In short
Animal Spirits Podcast: Talk Your Book - Emerging Market Fundamentals
Episode Overview In this episode, Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson host Rahul Sharma, Portfolio Manager and Executive Director at Schaefer Cullen Capital Management, to explore various aspects of investing in emerging markets (EM). Key topics discussed include:
- The impact of China on emerging markets
- Identifying value traps in EM
- Macro trends in India
- Passive vs. active management in EM investing
Key Discussion Points
The Current State of Emerging Markets
- Performance Comparison: Emerging market stocks have underperformed significantly compared to the S&P 500, yielding only a 3.6% per annum return over the last decade compared to 13% for the S&P 500.
- Focus on China: China’s large weight in the EM index has predominantly influenced the overall performance of emerging markets. Despite challenges, specific markets like India, Mexico, and Taiwan are performing well.
Factors Influencing Emerging Market Performance
- Currency Impact: A strong dollar negatively impacts emerging markets, especially those with dollar-denominated debt. A weaker dollar historically correlates with better performance in EM stocks.
- Diverse Opportunities: While China faces difficulties, other regions in EM are capitalizing on trends such as technology, energy (especially renewables), and demographic advantages.
The Case for India
- Potential for Growth: India, with a young demographic and a growing middle class, is seen as a strong investment opportunity.
- Key Sectors: The utilities sector and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) show promise due to government support and a push towards renewable energy.
Active vs. Passive Management in EM
- Active Management Advantage: The podcast highlights the potential for active management to outperform passive strategies in the emerging market space due to greater inefficiencies, allowing skilled managers to capitalize on opportunities.
- Focus on Governance: Corporate governance is a significant concern in emerging markets, making the selection of dividend-paying stocks vital for ensuring quality investments.
Investment Strategies and Considerations
Avoiding Value Traps
- Country Research: Employing a rigorous framework for country selection helps avoid weak economies and potential value traps, focusing on countries with strong economic indicators and stability.
- Corporate Governance: Investing in companies with strong governance practices to mitigate risks associated with emerging market investments.
Portfolio Construction
- Bottom-Up Approach: Emphasis on fundamental analysis and sector trends rather than strict adherence to benchmarks.
- Diversification: Identifying opportunities across various sectors and countries to construct a balanced portfolio.
Themes and Trends
- Demographic Trends: Favorable demographic trends in places like India and Mexico provide a strong foundation for growth, especially in consumer and healthcare sectors.
- Investment Opportunities: Engaging with sectors aligned with long-term trends such as technology, renewable energy, and climate change solutions.
Conclusion The episode emphasizes the complexities of investing in emerging markets and the importance of active management, nuanced understanding of individual markets, and the potential for growth in regions beyond China, particularly India. As markets evolve, investors are encouraged to focus on specific opportunities while being mindful of inherent risks.
---
Further Learning
- Rahul Sharma’s Strategies: For additional information on investment strategies, visit [Schaefer Cullen Capital Management](https://www.cullenfunds.com).
- Listener Engagement: For questions or feedback, reach out via email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com.
Disclaimer The content discussed in this podcast episode is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as personalized investment advice. Always conduct thorough research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today's Animal Spirits Talk Your Book is brought to you by Schaefer Cullen Capital Management. Go to CullenFunds.com to learn more about their Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund. That's CullenFunds.com. Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions.
0:34Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.
0:42Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. On today's show, we are covering emerging markets. A lot of people are looking at like investing now, and they're saying, I can't invest now with the market at all time highs. And I guess I say a lot of people, who's the source? You know the meme, I made it up? Me. Many people are saying this. The stock market is overvalued and where am I supposed to put my money? Yeah, yeah. Well, there are other areas of the world that have not had nearly the same success over the last five to 10 years as the mega cap stocks in the S &P 500. Emerging markets is certainly near the top of the list.
1:25So we've been talking about emerging markets being relatively cheap for a while. And they always kind of trade at a discount to the US. but they've just sucked wind in terms of performance for well over a decade now. And I think I've come around to the idea. We've been talking about what's the catalyst for this, right? What would cause foreign stocks or emerging markets outperform? And I think it's just the dollar, which we get into this. I think if the dollar were weak for a prolonged period of time, you would see emerging market stocks do really well. Is that fair? Well, have you seen the deficit?
1:51It's coming. That's true. If you're an anti-deficit government spending, government debt kind of thing, emerging markets are, that's where you put your money, right? What if gold and emerging markets are the big one for the next decade? That would throw people for a loop. That was the last decade of the first decade of the century. But anyway, we got into a lot of really good stuff on India and China and the opportunity set in emerging markets and the crazy high dividend yields that you can get there too, which are way higher than the United States. So we talked to Raul Sharma, who is a portfolio manager, and he's been doing this apparently for about as long as anyone in emerging markets.
2:25He's been doing it for over 20 years. He's a really, really sharp guy. So we learned a lot from him. Yeah, this was a good one. Excellent conversation. Here is our talk with Rahul.
2:36We're joined today by Rahul Sharma. Rahul is a portfolio manager and an executive director at Schaefer Cullen Capital Management. Welcome to the show. Thanks for having me, Michael. All right. Today, we're going to be talking about emerging market equities. And maybe let's start here. So from the perspective of a US-based investor, things have not been great over the last decade. Emerging market stocks have done 3.6 % a year. That's a 43 % total return versus the S &P 500, which has obviously crushed it, doing 13 % a year for a total return of 235%. The reasons for how we got to where we are now are very well documented, the tech trade.
3:17We get it. So if you had to put your crystal ball on, that doesn't make sense. If you had a crystal ball, what would you guess would be the reason why emerging markets could outperform US stocks over the next decade? Well, I think emerging markets are so diverse. So there have been several emerging markets that have been doing very, very well. But everyone is just so focused on China. And China is such a large weight in the emerging market index. And China has been really underperforming. And that more than anything has caused the emerging markets to underperform. But if you look at other markets like say Mexico or India or Indonesia or Taiwan, those markets have actually done very, very well.
4:00And in some cases, they've actually outperformed the S &P 500. And a lot of the same drivers that are driving the US market, namely tech, there's a lot of that in emerging markets. in places like Taiwan and South Korea, you can get very good exposure on things like AI and semiconductors and that sort of thing that are also doing very, very well. One of the other problems has probably been the dollar. I mean, typically there's a very strong correlation for when the dollar weakens. That's usually a very good thing for emerging market stocks. And seeing that the dollar has outperformed for the last decade or so, we definitely think we're getting into a period where you might start to see a reversal of that trend.
4:38And I would expect that to be a big catalyst for all emerging markets. In the meantime, I expect those certain emerging markets to continue to do very well. And you got to watch China. You never know if China is going to improve. It's a very sizable economy. They're pretty much the biggest consumer of most products globally. So while we're quite underway, China, I wouldn't say that China is, say, uninvestable. I was going to ask you actually about the currency side of things here. Maybe you could explain for the audience just why it matters when the dollar is strong that emerging market stocks tend to do poorly.
5:11Well, a lot of the, some of certain emerging market countries and companies might have a lot of US dollar denominated debt. So, you know, as the dollar strengthens, that debt gets more expensive, the interest expense, you know, starts to rise. So that's, you know, a big reason for it, I would say. You know, usually when the dollar is strengthening, you're generally talking about kind of a risk, or oftentimes you're talking about a risk-off environment, which is usually not a good thing for emerging market stocks as well. So with China as such a large percentage of just passive indices these days, there's a lot of – well, first of all, there's a lot of money coming out of China, right?
5:51Foreign investment is just going the wrong direction. But when I see calls for EMX China or China is uninvestable and their stock market already in a 70 plus percent drawdown. I don't know. I tend to think that like, it's not to say that things have to get a lot better, but what if they're not catastrophic? What if they're just really bad? Like that in and of itself could potentially spark a nice rally. What I guess what I'm saying is, uh, maybe this is wishful thinking is not all, is there, is anybody pessimistic? I'm sorry, optimistic on China. Like, Isn't all of the bad news baked into the pie already or a lot of it?
6:29I think sentiment is pretty terrible on China. I mean, I've been doing this for almost 25 years and I've never seen it as bad as it is in terms of either the sentiment or the overall economic activity. But I do think it's kind of bottomed out and I think it's just going to generally improve. And then there's areas of the Chinese economy that are doing a lot better than other areas. So if you look at things like say travel and tourism, that's an area that's doing quite well. I mean, domestic travel is well beyond pre-COVID levels and now outbound travel is really, really picking up. So we own a few kind of travel and tourism related stocks that are doing pretty well.
7:05You know, there's also been this, you know, general change in the way people think about travel. A lot of younger people, you know, are really more after experience rather than materialistic things. So that's helping travel a lot. And then also having these kind of hybrid work environments now makes it a lot easier to maybe get a three day weekend or a four day weekend in another place. and you could still maybe work a day. And so that's one example. There's other areas where certain Chinese companies are just extremely dominant. I would say electric vehicles would be one example of that. If you look at companies like DYD, they're now selling more electric vehicles than even Tesla and their cars are quite competitive.
7:44If you look at battery technology, if you look at companies like CATL, they are by far the leaders in battery technology, be way, way ahead of everyone else and really dominant in that area where they have something like 40 % global market share. And like I said, that big lead. So those, to the extent we have exposure to China, those are kind of the areas that we like to be involved in. But I still think there's better ideas outside of China. Because again, just like you said, there's money coming out of China. Either people aren't investing in emerging markets or they're reinvesting from China into other emerging markets.
8:18So markets like India, Mexico, Indonesia, and other markets are seeing very, very strong fund flows. And if it was just that, I'd say that's a problem, but it's also coinciding with a lot of huge long-term opportunities, things like nearshoring and reshoring where people are trying to relocate their supply chains to places like Mexico or India, first because of the problems that supply chains had during COVID, but now because of the geopolitical tensions between China and the US. We have AI, everyone's talking about AI. So there's a lot of stocks in Taiwan and like I mentioned, South Korea that are really benefiting from that.
8:51Climate change is another big thing. I mentioned the EVs, finding the companies that are providing the products and solutions to address climate change concerns. And so those same markets where the fund flows are going into are also benefiting from these trends, and that's creating excellent opportunities in those markets. So Michael mentioned the fact that the pessimistic side of things for EM is pretty well documented. It's funny because it was the opposite heading into the 2010s where everyone said, well, the only place you can find growth is in emerging markets. and they have billions of consumers.
9:20So that's the place that you want to be. And it turned out to be the opposite. And I think one of the things a lot of US-based investors have figured out is that, well, you don't get to hold a lot of your returns from the corporations in some of those countries. So how do you ensure that you actually do get those returns? And it's not something that the government regulation is taking away and making sure that they're not getting those same returns from their companies. Yeah, I mean, we're just really focused on kind of, we're really kind of simple stories that are, you know, we're very, very focused on earnings growth.
9:53So, you know, even though we're value investors, you know, we're very focused on the earnings growth. We tend to be quite thematic in nature. I mentioned some of those themes that we're exposed to, whether it be something like AI or we have a lot of exposure to this nearshoring, reshoring. And also to the consumer, like you mentioned, that still is a very good long-term story, particularly in Asia. And so if you just focused on companies that are kind of selling into those areas, you can get very good growth. And we also pay a lot of attention to things like corporate governance. That's much more of a problem in emerging markets.
10:24So it's just a lot more kind of value traps potentially in emerging markets. And so you need a lot of tools to be able to avoid those. And we're quite experienced and quite focused on doing that. Are there certain countries that you avoid altogether? How do you think about that side of things? Well, these days, obviously, Russia, we can't invest in there. We typically, we do a lot of country research. So that's one of the things when we first started these strategies really back, or really started investing in EM really back in 2001. We noticed it was a little bit different than what we were doing in the US.
10:53And usually it was because of country factors. And if you look at empirical research, you'll see that country selection matters just a lot more when you invest in emerging markets. So we had to kind of come up with a framework to analyze countries. And we started publishing a country report that we do every year where we basically rank and assess countries on a broad array of metrics. We go beyond the stocks. We're looking at bond markets. We're looking at economic statistics. We look at a lot of surveys on the ease of doing business. We look at their past experience in certain crises. Doing all this helps us identify the strengths of certain countries.
11:30That helps us identify certain types of companies within countries because we always love to leverage the strength of a country through a company. But then it also points out some of the vulnerabilities that countries have. And probably the biggest problem, this gets back to that dollar issue we were talking about, is when an emerging market country has a weak external position. When they have a lot of debt, when they don't have a lot of reserves, when they have twin deficits, that tends to lead to big currency depreciations, which then could lead to blowups in certain emerging markets. So we tend to be a lot more selective or really not even invest in those sorts of countries.
12:07The good news is that they're not a big part of EM. They're just much smaller countries like, say, Turkey or Argentina that don't have large weights. But that's one of the tools we use to kind of avoid those pitfalls. And sometimes you also get very, very good opportunities. Greece was a very good example of a country that you really wanted to avoid after it had a huge crisis many years ago. But when you looked kind of five or 10 years later, all of a and things had really turned around a lot, the government really changed. It went to a more business-friendly government. They put in a lot of sound economic development policies.
12:42They refinanced their debt at low rates, and they benefited from a lot of the kind of changes that have happened during COVID and because of the wars too. And so all of a sudden, Greece went from being a pretty weak market to one of the best performing markets in the world. And that's the market that we're actually overweight. Greece was up 43 % last year. I would not have guessed that. Yeah, it's still cheap. If you look at the valuation, it's still one standard deviation below its long-term average on either a PE basis or a price-to-book basis. So we still like that market a lot. You said you're a value investor and you mentioned that Greece is still attractively priced.
13:15How do these companies or countries get re-rated? Does there need to be a catalyst or can it generally just be, I don't know, value finds a way? I think it's both. I think certain companies within a country that might not be performing well will still perform well because they have very good company factors and they're kind of firing on all cylinders. And so there's examples of Chinese companies that are doing quite well over the last couple of years, even though that market hasn't. And then, yeah, you get these huge re-ratings of a country, like we mentioned, Greece, or probably the best example of a re-rating would be India over the last 10 years.
13:45And usually it's when governments change. And like I said, you get a combination of a less corrupt government that's more business friendly, that puts in sound economic development policies, and then in a country that just has a lot of potential. So if you look at India with 1.5 billion people, yet per capita income, it's still only 2 ,000 US dollars. There's just huge opportunities for growth. There's a lot of management talent in India. There's just a labor advantage with 450 million young people that often speak English. So that allows a country to kind of start firing on all cylinders and that could create great long-term opportunities.
14:19And that's basically what's happening in India and to a lesser extent Greece. And there's other markets too, like Mexico, like Indonesia, like Vietnam, that I think you could say a similar thing. India is one of the hottest markets right now. I'm curious, what are the leading companies, maybe not companies specifically, but what are some of the sectors that are driving those returns higher? Yeah, the whole market has been doing well. Certainly the big conglomerates, which are probably the companies people know best, the Adonis and Reliance Industries of the world, they've been performing reasonably well.
14:49But it's actually been the SOEs more recently and some of the kind of SMID caps have been doing well. And by SOEs, I mean state-owned enterprises because usually we don't like state-owned enterprises in emerging markets. That's usually where you do see a lot of governance problems and you see a lot of value traps in markets like China or Russia. And that's usually because these companies are not really acting in the interest of shareholders, but rather they're acting in the interest of the state and that becomes a problem. But when you get a really technically sound government that is making just frankly brilliant economic development plans really over the last decade, all of a sudden those SOEs become a big beneficiary about it.
15:23And they're often the means to which these development plans are kind of implemented. And so you've seen a lot of the utility stocks do really well in India. That's an area that we own because that was still an area where you could find cheap stocks to pay dividends. They're doing well because India is growing and so there's a lot of demand for electricity, but probably even more so. They all have some exposure to renewables. And if India has one problem, well, one of the problems India has is pollution, certainly. So they're making a huge push into renewables, and there's just a ton of money coming into the sector.
15:54And so a lot of these utilities have really benefited from that. So that's an area where we've really been able to do well in our fund and still more or less like the exposures. Some of the banks, I mean, anytime you have an economy doing well, like whether it be Indonesia or Mexico or India, and you're seeing strong macro trends, banks tend to do well. So that's another area where we've had some exposure that's also done very well in India. How do you think about some sort of valuation discount there? Because a lot of people have been saying for years that the US deserves to have a valuation premium to the rest of the world, and then places like some emerging markets and maybe even Europe actually deserve to have a discounted valuation multiple.
16:31How do you think about that when building a framework for thinking about what the right valuations should be? Yeah, I mean, I think that's true. I think it's hard to argue that the US shouldn't have a premium. I mean, there's just things about the US, the ease of doing business, the rule of law, the dominance of the technology companies that probably weren't that premium. But the question is how much of a premium? So if you look at valuations now, emerging market stocks, if you look at the MSCI EM index, it's trading about 12 and a half times earnings versus the S &P 500 trading at 21 and a half times earnings.
17:01So EM is over 40 % cheaper on a PE basis and it has double the dividend yield just on an index level. And then value managers like ourselves are even cheaper than the EM index. So to me, that's way too much. Maybe you should get on average a 10 % or 15 % discount, but I don't think it should be that much. And so that allows it for the opportunity for a re-rating. And then within certain markets, you probably shouldn't have much of a discount at all. India probably does deserve to trade at a similar multiple as the US because like I said, things are going just so well in that economy. And then you have other markets like Mexico and Greece, which are also doing very, very well, but they're still really quite cheap when you really look at them.
17:41So there's a lot of opportunities there too. And it's just not on a P base. It's even probably more dramatic on a price to book basis. So that's how we think about it. How much should the discount be both overall and then on a company-specific basis as well. How important are demographic trends in your process? They're important. We definitely like favorable demographics. That's another thing we love about places like India or even that's one of the advantages that Mexico has always had. And it's a reason why people are outsourcing so often to Mexico because they have a pretty good skilled labor force.
18:15It's definitely a problem for places like China in terms of a shrinking labor pool and also in places like Eastern Europe where you have quite an older kind of demographics. We also think about it just in terms of, you know, opportunities. I mean, things like kind of like healthcare are kind of interesting when you see demographic trends, you know, because unfortunately, as you get older, you do then to use more, you know, kind of healthcare services. And then we mentioned like the consumer in emerging markets in places like India, that that's, you know, something we want to be exposed to. or you look at how changes in behaviors among certain demographic groups, like we were mentioning, travel and tourism, that also can create opportunities.
18:55So it's definitely something we look into and we do think it's important. Your strategy is called the emerging markets high dividend strategy, which is kind of funny because in the US, it seems like most investors have kind of just let go of the dividend thing from the overall market perspective. The NASDAQ 100, I don't know, it's a 1 % dividend. S &P is probably what, 1.7 % or something, 1.6%. So what are the differences there in terms of the kind of dividend yields you can find in companies in the emerging markets? Yeah, I mean, you wouldn't believe. And I always say that emerging market dividend paying stocks are the best kept secret for income seeking investors.
19:28We do have a bit of flexibility with the mandate too. The mandate is that 90 % of the companies will have a dividend yield of 2 % or more at cost when we invest in them. But the other 10 % might have lower yields and there might be other things we like about them, like just their peer valuations or whatever it might be. But like I said, there's such a diverse set of companies. Who would have ever thought that the biggest driver of our relative performance last year would have been AI? I mean, no one would have thought a value dividend manager would be able to get that exposure. But you can just load up on companies that are basically supplying the Magnificent Seven that pay dividends and that are cheap, like I said, in places like Taiwan.
20:06So it's quite a diverse opportunity set. And I think it's just almost kind of more important in emerging markets because it gets to that governance factor that usually companies that pay dividends do have better corporate governance and corporate governance is so important in emerging markets. So it's kind of a good way to start, you know, to kind of get to where you want to be in terms of getting into higher quality companies, you know, in EM. And I think that's more important in emerging markets than say in the US. So that's kind of how the dividend opportunities look outside. You know, we're usually, our dividend yield is usually about 60 to 100 % higher than the index.
20:40So we're currently and over a 5 % dividend yield. Wow. Yeah. So there's a lot of opportunities out there. I'm curious how you think about portfolio construction. Do you view it through the lens of, okay, these are like our sector constraints or we're bullish on this country, we want to be underweight that country? How does the portfolio management process work? Yeah. I mean, we are officially benchmark agnostic, but we do have certain concentration limits on position size, country size, and exposure to any industry. But that doesn't mean that we can't have big conviction in certain markets and have huge overweight.
21:14So we've been 10 times the index in places like Greece, four times it in places like Mexico. So obviously, those are markets that we like. But we're really looking – we're very rarely are we saying, all right, we want to get overweight this market. It's more of a bottoms-up process. We're looking for companies in markets. And then maybe we can get to an overweighted position if we like the companies enough. But like I said, oftentimes that works out pretty well because a lot of the things that make you like the country are the things that the company is capitalizing on. And so it leads to good growth opportunities.
21:51So that's how we think about portfolio construction. We also like price momentum a lot, believe it or not, as a value investor. So a lot of times you'll see the bigger positions in our portfolio, they've become that way because they are benefiting from positive price momentum trends. And we love to let our winners run. We do not just keep doubling down on our losers. As long as the thesis is intact and the stock has positive price momentum and the valuations are reasonable, we're going to keep holding on to it. So you use Momentum as more of a way to like entry and exit signals? Yeah. I mean, what we do is when we're doing fundamental research on companies, we have bull bear base case scenarios for each company we invest in, where we kind of stress certain macro factors and obviously company factors to come up with a bull price target.
Read the full transcript
22:32and then also a bear kind of worst case scenario price target. And we like to compare the one to the other to develop kind of a risk reward ratio, the bull to the bear. And when we're getting kind of like two times the upside compared to the downside in the bear scenario, we tend to get more excited. And that's another thing that helps us develop more conviction in some names versus others. How big is your universe when you're picking stocks? How big is the opportunity set in emerging markets? And then how much do you winnow it down to the number of holdings you have? Yeah. I mean, it's a huge opportunity set, but I'm going to say there's something like 20 ,000 EM stocks, but then a lot of them are not very liquid or very, very small.
23:07So we do have, we do like investing in SMID caps, but we have a limit of about 15 % of the portfolio that will invest in SMID caps because we want to have proper liquidity. But we do like to leverage that. So when you start taking out the kind of minimum liquidity requirements and market caps, you're probably looking at about 4 ,000 stocks that you can invest in. And then we're doing the screens on those stocks, looking for low PE, above average dividend yield, and dividend and earnings growth. So these days, that's getting to us down to about 800 or so stocks that meet those screening parameters.
23:38It's a universe we know very well, because I believe I've been doing this in this space longer than anyone globally, going back to like 2001. So if you give our team the universe, we feel like we know it better than anyone. And so that's clearly an advantage. And not only that, there's only about maybe say 40 or 50 stocks that when we look at the screen that we might not be familiar with that we'd have to do the research on. So it's quite an efficient process. And we have very skilled analysts and we have a lot of research resources to do that. I'd say out of the 850 stocks that meet the screening parameters, we're then looking just at the stocks.
24:08It's kind of like classic stock picking with certain biases to some of the things that we've been talking about, exposures to growth thematics, good corporate governance, stable macro environments. I'd say we get about 80 to 90 stocks that kind of make it out of that stage. And then we construct the portfolio, owning the 50 to 60 best ones, and we're also monitoring those other ones. Those stocks make up our prospect list, and those might be the kind of companies we invest in in the future. You guys have been doing this for a while. The inception of the strategy goes back to 2006. At the end of 2023, there was$995 million in the strategy.
24:44There's different chassis for investing in this. There's a separate account. You have mutual funds. Who is your customer base? We primarily sell to the big advisory firms. So, you know, kind of the big six, the Morgan Stanley's, UBS's, you know, Jake and Morgan's are all, you know, big clients for ours. And we do have direct relationships, too. But I would say, you know, and we do have institutional businesses, too, our institutional relationships. We also have offshore businesses. We have just about over a billion in assets and offshore funds. So, you know, that's our primary client base. And so we're often selling through financial advisors who sell them to their clients.
25:20And oftentimes our products have gone through the due diligence of these firms. And sometimes we're often recommended as well. You said you've been doing this for over two decades. How did you get involved in this space in the first place? Yeah, it was kind of interesting. I started at Schaefer Collin. I started my career actually in education. I thought I wanted to be a teacher and I used to be a wrestler. And so I wanted to be a wrestling coach and do all these kinds of things. And a lot of my friends who are doing quite well on Wall Street told me, look, you should really be looking at this.
25:45You'd be good at this. And so I kind of switched over and I got an opportunity at Schaefer Cullen in 2000. And back then, we didn't have any non-U.S. strategies. We just had, you know, we were doing our high dividend strategy in the U.S. We had a value strategy, but nothing outside of the U.S. So based on client interest, you know, we had a client who asked us if we would take kind of more of a global approach, start doing more international investing. And Jim Cullen at that time, I was fortunate enough to sit in his office for about 40 years. And that was a very interesting time when value, of course, was out of favor, right?
26:16This is back in 2000 when the tech bubble was blown up back then. So it was kind of a very interesting time to enter the business. And we decided to take on the client's mandate of a global high dividend strategy. That's the first strategy that I started managing in 2001. We always thought that the emerging markets were kind of one of the more interesting parts of that universe. But then first in 2004, we launched an international high dividend strategy, which is more of a developed market dividend strategy, which I, by the way, also managed. And then after that, in 2005, we launched the emerging market strategy, first and a secondly managed account.
26:49And then later in 2012, we launched our US mutual fund. And then a few years later, our offshore fund. So that's kind of how I got my start. Basically, what we were trying to do is we were trying to get the same kind of profile we're getting in the U.S., but outside of the U.S. And by that, I mean, we wanted to have a lower volatility strategy that outperformed the market over the long term and generated a nice income stream that had good growth potential. And so it was just a matter of trying to replicate that. And like I said, there were definitely a few curveballs that I had to get up to speed with mainly due to the country factors.
27:21But over time, I think we've developed a pretty good process to handle those challenges. I'm curious to hear your take on if it's easier, obviously nothing's easy, if it's less difficult to generate alpha in emerging market stocks. Obviously, companies here like the big ones, Apple, have so much coverage. There's very little edge there. Do you think that the amount of analyst coverage and just general knowledge of these companies, does that actually matter? Are there greater inefficiencies when there's less people looking at these companies? Yeah, I think it's definitely fair to say that for me, it's easier to generate alpha in emerging markets than the US for the reasons you said that, yeah, the US stocks are just so well followed.
28:04There are just a wide variety of inefficiencies in emerging markets. There's those country factors that you have to really be aware of. So at the same time, it's still true that your average manager has underperformed the index over the last, say, 15 years. So it's not that the majority of managers are generating alpha, but a greater percentage I think are doing it. And the other interesting thing is I just think that in a world where people are so interested in kind of passive and ETFs and that sort of thing that in emerging markets, I think really mutual funds make a lot of sense. And I think active management makes a lot of sense.
28:36There's just a lot of things that we can do that passive strategies cannot do. I mean, I think it's very, very hard to analyze things like dividend yield and dividend growth consistently if you're trying to do that passively. When the Russia and the Ukraine broke out a few years ago, we were able to completely de-risk our exposure and get basically out of Russia completely, whereas passive approaches were stuck with those positions that generated big losses for them. So there are definitely advantages to being active. And I think that is one of the reasons why you can generate alpha probably a bit easier than compared to the S &P 500 or in the US.
29:09You mentioned the mutual fund. Is there a particular reason why you've stuck with this structure? Obviously, the exchange-traded fund chassis has gotten and very popular over the years. What are some of the differences? Why haven't you released that? I think we really haven't had to. I mean, we're getting decent demand. We're also not – I mean, obviously, we want to grow and do well, but it's not like my goal is just to manage$10 billion or something like that. We want to manage the money well. That's the biggest goal. We do have a separately managed account product too. The big difference is that you can't get the same access and a lot of the separately managed accounts as you can in a mutual fund where I can get into places like India or into China or even into frontier markets like Vietnam or Bangladesh, if you really wanted to.
29:55So that's the big advantage of a mutual fund. We've been asked a lot to run an EMSMA as like an ADR only strategy, but we've always said no to that just because we don't think it's really a viable product. So we probably would be managing a lot more if we had said yes to that. But again, we think it would ruin the integrity of the product. Getting back to one of Michael's first questions about there being the need for a catalyst, is low valuation alone a catalyst for emerging markets? Do you think there has to be something? Is it going to have to be the fact that U.S. stocks are too expensive and the dollar falls or whatever?
30:28What would it take for emerging markets to take off from here? Yeah. Do we need an agreement between China and the U.S.? Do we need that? Or can these stocks rally absent? Can there be a turnaround absent that? That would definitely help. Make no mistake. about. I mean, when you look at China, if China traded at 12 to 14 times earnings five to 10 years ago, they just shouldn't be trading at that level anymore because there should be a geopolitical discount in the stocks owning to the tensions and the fact that they're out there saying that they're going to invade Taiwan, which that makes me start thinking that they're a bit like Russian stocks.
31:00And I frankly think that if they did invade Taiwan, a lot of the sanctions and things that happened to Russian stocks would probably happen to Chinese stocks, which would then make them uninvestable. So it would help a ton if A, if China would say, hey, we're not going to invade Taiwan or B, they put more stimulus into their economy so things could start improving. But you don't need that. Like I said, there's too many other opportunities that are making a lot of money and generating very big returns in those other markets. And so people are just too focused on China and too worried. And so would it help if the dollar started weakening?
31:33Definitely. I mean, And if you look at the past, I think in the last 10 periods when the dollar went down by 10%, emerging markets were up on average 45%. And the hit rate was nine out of 10 times. So that's kind of the mother of all catalysts. But you don't need that. You could just have company-specific catalysts, country-specific catalysts. You have these, I said, these huge trends. I think we're kind of living in an interesting world where we have a lot of problems like high rates, inflation. We have these terrible wars that are going on. But when you look at some of these long-term growth trends like nearshoring, reshoring, like AI, like addressing climate change, and unfortunately, these wars too, which create a lot of demand for industrial products, obviously defense munitions and other things, that's a lot of demand.
32:19And that's why I think we haven't really seen kind of a recession yet and why earnings growth has been very good. And a lot of these emerging market companies are exposed to those excellent kind of thematic growth catalyst. And those countries too are used to experiencing high inflation and high rates, right? They are. That's been the other big difference is that unlike in most emerging markets, rates never went down to zero like they did in developed markets. So they're not going to have to deal with that refinancing risk that is kind of looming. That's like kind of the elephant in the room if you ask me, if you look at developed markets either in the US or in Europe, that it's true that companies and corporations have done a very good, and individuals have done a very good job at refinancing their risk, refinancing their debt and locking in their debt at low rates.
33:11But at some point, they're going to have to refinance that. And when that goes up at a much higher interest expense, that's going to be a problem for a lot of companies. And in emerging markets, you have much less of that as a problem because rates never really went down that low. So there's several emerging markets where rates are actually lower than than pre-pandemic levels. And like I said, they've done a lot better. Inflation did not have nearly the negative impact that it had in the past in emerging markets, both because I think, A, they're so experienced either on a company level or country level in dealing with inflation.
33:43And then there are other things that happen, like for example, in Asia, a lot of Asian countries kept buying Russian oil. So all of a sudden, energy prices going through the roof didn't have that negative impact that it typically has. So from that perspective, I think most Most emerging markets, certainly not all of them, but most emerging markets are in a much better relative position compared to developed markets with regards to both inflation and refinancing risks. All right, Rahul, last question for me. You mentioned that they're in a much better position. But if you look at their economic footprint of EM countries versus the rest of the world, they are way underrepresented in the stock market in terms of they account for a lot of the GDP, the population, the growth.
34:23and yet they're whatever, 11 % of the global stock market or something like that. What do you think, again, I'm asking you to predict the future, which is not fair, but how does their stock market weighting grow relative to the rest of the world? Yeah, I mean, that's definitely a great long-term opportunity that if you look at, for example, market capitalization is about 20 % of the global market cap, but GDP is over 40%. and probably even more importantly, their contribution to global earnings is probably close to about 40 % too. So that is a disconnect that we think over time that you will definitely see convergence.
35:00And one of the things that should happen is that stock prices should go up. But there are certain markets where if you look at market cap to GDP, which is something we do look at, that it's already quite advanced. Like a place like Taiwan, I want to say has the largest market cap to GDP of any country in the world, even though it's an emerging market. So it's not just an opportunity necessarily for all emerging markets. And I guess that's the big point of what I'm trying to tell everyone is that you can't just call them emerging markets, right? They're all different. You want to look at each market.
35:27There's different opportunities, different risks, different valuations. And so you really kind of have to think of them one by one and getting together your collective EM exposure. Where do we send people to learn more about your strategies? Well, certainly our marketing team, our website has a lot of information. We love talking to clients and educating them about our strategies. We have a big marketing team that knows the product very well. So just inquiring with our firm is a great way to start. All right. Rahul, thank you very much for your time today. We appreciate it. Yeah. Thank you guys so much.
35:58Bye now. Okay. Thanks again to Rahul. Remember, Schaefer, Colin Capital Manager. That's colinfunds.com. To learn more, send us an email, annalspirits at a compoundnews.com.
From the publisher
On today's show, we are joined by Rahul Sharma, Portfolio Manager and Executive Director of Schafer Cullen Capital Management to discuss: China's effect on Emerging Markets, avoiding value-traps in EM, strong macro trends in India, passive vs. active management in Emerging Markets, and much more!
Find complete show notes on our blogs...
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor
Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
Check out the latest in financial blogger fashion at The Compound shop: https://www.idontshop.com
Past performance is not indicative of future results. The material discussed has been provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal or investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security or strategy. The investment strategy and themes discussed herein may be unsuitable for investors depending on their specific investment objectives and financial situation. Information obtained from third-party sources is believed to be reliable though its accuracy is not guaranteed.
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.
The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.
Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
