Talk Your Book: The Next Catalyst for Crypto Assets

30 Sep 2024 · 39 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Animal Spirits Podcast: Episode Summary

Episode Title

Talk Your Book: The Next Catalyst for Crypto Assets

Hosts

  • Michael Batnick
  • Ben Carlson

Guests

  • Chris Kuiper, Director of Research at Fidelity Digital Assets
  • Matt Horne, Head of Digital Asset Strategists at Fidelity Digital Assets

Episode Overview In this episode, the hosts converse with Chris Kuiper and Matt Horne from Fidelity Digital Assets about the current narratives surrounding Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), their use cases, decreasing volatility in crypto markets, and how financial advisors can integrate digital assets into client portfolios.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Use Cases for Bitcoin and Ethereum
  2. Bitcoin (BTC): Often considered "digital gold," Bitcoin's main narrative revolves around its scarcity and security.
  3. Ethereum (ETH): Described as a more complex and dynamic asset, Ethereum supports decentralized applications (dApps) through smart contracts, which require the native token (Ether) for transactions.
  1. Market Dynamics and Trends
  2. Price Dynamics: The hosts note that discussions about use cases for crypto assets tend to diminish when prices are high, contrasting with a heightened focus on utility when prices drop.
  3. ETF Launches: The episode discusses the successful launches of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, noting that Bitcoin has seen substantial inflows, albeit with muted price growth.
  1. Stablecoins
  2. Defined as digital representations of fiat currency on blockchain, stablecoins serve as a bridge between traditional finance and the crypto world.
  3. A significant portion of stablecoin use is seen in developing nations, providing new financial access where traditional banking is limited.
  1. Institutional Adoption
  2. The podcast highlights a trend where institutional investors are beginning to embrace Bitcoin and Ethereum through ETFs, with observations on how hedge funds utilize these products for arbitrage opportunities.
  3. The conversation acknowledges that while Bitcoin may represent a larger allocation in portfolios, Ethereum is gaining traction among investors.
  1. The Role of Advisors
  2. Advisors are seen as crucial in integrating crypto into client portfolios. Fidelity aims to support advisors by offering extensive research and strategic resources.
  3. There is discussion on how financial advisors can manage crypto volatility through position sizing and the importance of rebalancing in portfolios.
  1. Future Catalysts for Crypto Assets
  2. Bitcoin Halving: This event, which reduces the rate at which new bitcoins are created, is anticipated to drive prices higher due to reduced supply.
  3. Technological Innovations: The ongoing evolution of blockchain technologies and applications may unlock new use cases and financial products.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Understanding Digital Assets: Bitcoin is viewed as a store of value, while Ethereum is considered a network for building applications, contributing to its different investment case.
  • Market Behavior: Price movements and market dynamics can drastically affect investor interest and perceptions of utility.
  • Institutional Interest: Increased institutional participation through ETFs is shaping the landscape of digital assets.
  • Future Outlook: Key events like the Bitcoin halving and the evolution of crypto technologies may serve as significant market catalysts.

---

Conclusion

This episode offers insightful perspectives on the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency, its adoption by institutions, and the integral role advisory services play in helping clients navigate this burgeoning market. The discussion emphasizes the need for continuous education and strategic integration of digital assets into traditional investment frameworks.

For further details, listeners are encouraged to check out Fidelity Digital Assets' research and offerings.

---

Contact Information

  • Email: animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com
  • Fidelity Digital Assets: [fidelitydigitalassets.com](https://fidelitydigitalassets.com)

Disclaimers

  • The content discussed in this episode is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as personalized investment advice.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Today's Animal Spirits Talk Your Book is brought to you by Fidelity Digital Assets. Go to FidelityDigitalAssets.com to learn more about their research pieces on all things crypto. And check out their crypto ETFs for Bitcoin, FBTC, and Ethereum, FETH. It's FidelityDigitalAssets.com. Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions.

0:40Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.

0:48Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. Michael, I feel like every time we've talked about crypto for the past few years, you try to come up with a good use case, like title insurance or registration for something. I feel like you're a good salesman for the blockchain. You're trying. What if the real thing is just, it ends up slowly integrating with the rails of the financial system and there is never any consumer use case and it was just meant to be for financialization and that's it. Is that enough for you? Well, it could be. I think long-term, long-term. Listen, if it's good enough that the banks integrated into what they're doing, I would assume that at some point there's going to be some sort of consumer application, but maybe we don't need it.

1:33When I say we, I don't know why I'm saying we. I'm not necessarily from the community, although I support the community. I am a Bitcoin ETH holder. Chris said about the four-year cycle, us holding for four years, we've held for more than four years. I bought my first Bitcoin in June of 2020, I believe. I mean, mine was probably 2017 or so. I did a very small amount. But the thing is, people would be more concerned about use cases if the price was lower. If the price is high, no one cares about use. Very true. Price being in the 60, whatever thousands now, people would be way more concerned and up in arms if prices were much lower.

2:10Well, we've said this in the past. What if for Bitcoin specifically, I think ETH, there's got to be something. There's got to be a there there. For Bitcoin, though, it just works, right? It is what it is. It's never been hacked. The blockchain has never been down to the best of my knowledge. It just works. It does what it does. So on this episode, we get into the history of it, the adoption, what are advisors using it for? How are they thinking about it? What sort of questions are they asking? ETFs. The ETF, of course. So on today's show, we're joined by Matt Horn. Matt is the head of Digital Asset Strategies at Fidelity Digital asset management.

2:44We're also joined by Chris Kuyper, Director of Research at Fidelity Digital Assets. Stick around. Hope you enjoy the show.

2:52Chris and Matt, welcome back. Thanks for coming on today. Thanks for having us, guys. Pleasure to be back. Yeah, thank you. Okay, I'm going to start the show today with a little story, something that I experienced over the weekend. I took my family to the post office because we needed to get them passports. We're going out of the the country in December. And we get there. We're all prepared. We've got our forms. We've got the pictures. And he says, how long do you want to like expedited shipping or processing? And I said, well, give me, what are the options? Six to eight weeks or my six to eight weeks for, okay.

3:32You know, six to eight weeks, that's fine. December's further than that. So no big deal. How would you like to pay? Money order or check? Money order. What is a money order? I have no idea. I didn't have a check. So I said, yeah, let's go with the money order. Okay. So he punches me up$237. I take out my credit card, go to tap. Oh, sorry. We only take debit cards. You only take debit cards for a money order? What even year is this? So I don't know. He printed the money card, the debit card, the this, the that. Okay. Okay. Obviously, there's inefficiencies here. This is the government. We understand how that works.

4:10Is blockchain not a solution for these sort of financial transactions? And if so, what are we talking here? What would fix the money order nonsense? Well, I mean, I don't think you need a blockchain to fix that instance. But I think there are a lot of unique use cases for blockchain technology, and they're becoming more apparent over time. In your instance there, Michael, obviously, just the ability to accept traditional payment rails in the modern era would have worked. But really with blockchain, we're quite a ways into this now, right? Bitcoin came around 2009, Ethereum 2014, 2015. And you've seen a lot of different use cases being built more recently on top of these protocols.

4:53And it does get pretty interesting as to what you can predict a future state to be using this technology. people generally say, you know, what is the killer app for crypto at this point? And I'd argue there's many, but, you know, I think the most common one you would hear is around stable coins, right? The ability to take a fiat currency, US dollar, put it on blockchain, digitize it, make it instantly transferable globally as a digital bear instrument, right? It's like handing a dollar to a person globally instantly, right? The issue there, of course, is, you know, the inability of a stable coin to generate a yield.

5:30So there's sort of an opportunity cost by keeping your money in stable coins in a higher rate environment. So now we're seeing the proliferation of things like tokenized money market funds that are trying to solve that use case. I saw Circle made, somebody tweeted, Circle made more money last year than Goldman Sachs or last quarter or something. I believe it was Tethered on Circle. Oh, Tethered, that's right. Because to your point, there's a 5 % available and they're not paying it out. But it is kind of funny that we're however many years in. The white paper was, I don't know, 2009 or something.

6:00And Bitcoin and Ether, which we're going to spend the majority of the conversation today talking about, have become legitimate asset classes. But Matt, as you mentioned, really the killer use case today are stable coins, which I don't know if it's ironic or what the right word is, but it's kind of funny. Well, I want to talk about stable coins a little bit because I made the corollary a few years ago that stable, it's kind of like a money market, but also a currency Hedrick, how would you explain it to people who are unaware of how they work? You're getting the benefit of a currency you want, like the US dollar, but you're getting it on the blockchain rail.

6:33So you can do all the stuff you can do on blockchain, but you're using a US dollar rather than something else that you might not want to be exposed to, like the volatility of Bitcoin or Ether or something like that. And so, of course, there's that aspect of it. You've opened up anyone with an internet connection, especially to your point, Ben, I was a little surprised at the rise of stablecoin, but that's probably my myopic view as a citizen of a developed world. But you get into this and you start to see how important these things are in developing worlds for people to have access to them. It's like an instant bank account access or a way to get dollars where they might be banned or very hard to get.

7:14And then, of course, you have all the technological benefits of it. It removes so many frictions. You can verify stuff much easier. To Michael's point, it's not going to take days and weeks for this stuff to clear. It's almost instantaneous. Do we know? So that makes a lot of sense. Listen, we're US citizens. We have the strongest currency in the world. We don't necessarily need stable coins. What we have works pretty fine. Yeah, it could be better, I suppose, but it works pretty fine. Do we know how much of the stable coins outstanding are held overseas? Because if you tell me that 92 % of stable coins are held by Americans, well, then what are we doing here?

7:52It's definitely the majority is offshore, without a doubt. Because again, to Chris's point, we're the most developed nation, we don't need it, right? But if you think about the emerging world, the emerging world was sort of able, because they weren't the leading edge of technology adoption for the last 50 years here, They were able to kind of skip some of the things we went through here in the US, the landline phone, right, the dial-up internet. It kind of went right to cellular. So technology is now global in the palm of one's hand. And this technology now makes the ability to transfer value instantaneously with finite settlements, settlement assurances, the inability to easily counterfeit this currency.

8:35so it is attractive in many ways because for better or worse, the dollar still is the global currency for most nations, right? That's sort of what you go to, you travel anywhere, Michael, right? With your fresh new passport, you're going to have anywhere you go, they will likely take the dollar, right? Even if you don't have the local currency. And a stable coin is just a manifestation of this, of a tech, you know, just a current technology version of the dollar, essentially, right? Now, why is it interesting, right? You know, in a world of low interest rates five, six years ago, stable coins proliferated.

9:07But as rates rose, there was an opportunity cost then, right? Because if you were a crypto native firm or stable coin user storing your value in a stable coin and having to sit there, you are missing out on anywhere from three to 5 % yield. And I think that's why we've seen such a move here to find yield generating instruments that one can now hold in a similar vein. And that's your point earlier, that's why these stablecoin issuers for years have been making a very fat margin because they've been able to not pay a yield on the stablecoin while investing the collateral, the dollars, right, in US treasuries at, you know, 3 % to 5%.

9:41Unless you live outside the United States and your currency is weakened significantly against the dollar, then who cares about the 5 % yield? Fair enough. Yeah, there obviously is the purchasing power parity type narrative there for sure. But, you know, ceteris, peribus, whatever, all is equal, right? You know, I think the the opportunity cost of yield is where I see a lot of institutional players, right, that are operating on chain trading firms, crypto native hedge funds, crypto native firms that just keep a lot of their reserves or balance sheet on chain. They saw a massive opportunity cost there.

10:11And there was demand for yield on chain. And hence the developments we're seeing with yield generating instruments. All right. So let's get back to Bitcoin and Ether. It's been an exciting year for the two asset classes. The Bitcoin ETF, did it launch in January? January 11th. Okay. And Ether was June? When was it? Late July, July 23rd, I think it was. Okay. And it's been a raging success. At least Bitcoin has. We'll get to Ether in a minute. Are you guys surprised at A, the amount of flows into the Bitcoin ETFs? And are you also surprised that it hasn't led to substantially higher prices? Bitcoin has been acting well, better in the past week or a couple of weeks.

10:52But overall, yes, there was a huge run-up, but there's been a lot of sideways action for the last couple of months. For sure. Yeah. So to answer your first question, the flows were definitely a pleasant surprise, I would say, generally. I think it was very hard to handicap this category coming out as to what the demand would be because you had existing assets tied up in legacy products that were converting into the ETP structure. You had, I think it was 10 or 11 issuers launching all on the same day. So there was, again, a lot going on. But all in all, I would say this was a smash hit home run success for a new ETF category being Bitcoin.

11:29Very strong adoption across all client segments. You know, I see a retail still leading the way for the most part. Advisors coming in strong over time here, right, as they make their assessments and do the due diligence. And last but not least, we're seeing, you know, early adopters via, you know, the institutional channel using these ETPs. On the Bitcoin side, the one, I'd say, interesting development that really caught me by surprise was just the traditional hedge fund usage of these products. You look at some of the top products in the category, including Fidelity's, FBTC products, and a decent amount of hedge fund ownership.

12:06And they're using the exposure in a variety of different ways. Because they're in the ETP structure, they play easier in the traditional financial system, meaning they're marginable. there's an arbitrage trade going on for some of these hedge funds where they're buying the spot Bitcoin, ETP, selling forward the CME futures and locking in an arbitrage trade there. So I would say the institutionalization of these ETPs was one of the more shocking things to me this early. How does it impact when we see options and some other activity on top of these ETFs? Does that make a difference at all? It could.

12:40And it's hard to say exactly how options on the Bitcoin ETPs will play out over time. I think it's great because it just gives participants another instrument to hedge or do various trades in the long run. They just got approved, right? The Bitcoin ETF options? There's a process here. They're not approved. It was one leg in the process, but we're optimistic for hopefully working with regulators and the exchanges for sometime next year. But again, it'll be another tool in the tool chest here for market participants to use to put on either positive or negative exposures toward the asset class. Ethereum, I'd say a little bit earlier on the adoption curve.

13:20And I'd say that's not expected. Now, as an ETF category, the Ethereum, by all means, again, a smash hit. You're seeing, I think, well over 2 billion in gross flows into the new products in the category. Obviously, there was one existing product that has outflow, So it's sort of a muted kind of net flow. But overall, for a new ETP category,$2 billion in a month and a half, whatever it's been, is a smash hit home run. Now, Ether, I've been in crypto personally since 2016, 2017, and professionally for five years now. And in my opinion, it always starts with Bitcoin. So it's no surprise Bitcoin has the majority of the focus of the ETP flow.

14:03And Ethereum is coming on now. Ethereum, we can get into this a bit more. It's a much different use case. There's a lot more going on. There's different narratives playing out around Ethereum. It's definitely a bit more dynamic, I'd say, as a protocol than Bitcoin. And it just takes time to understand. And I think, frankly, advisors and institutional participants have enough time, have enough on their hands to figure out, how do I deal with Bitcoin, never mind Ethereum, right? So it sort of is an adoption curve of not just digital assets, but even within the digital asset system. Bitcoin generally goes first, Ethereum comes second.

14:39So I'm not shocked to see this lagging. Michael and I have talked a lot about the narrative and right or wrong that drives flows and interest for a lot of people. And we always said Bitcoin, the selling points for Bitcoin ETF are pretty simple. It's digital gold ETF, basically, right? Whether you believe that or not, that was a good selling point. It's a lot harder to pin down the Ethereum. So, Chris, how do you explain the Ethereum use case or investment case or whatever it is if you wanted to make it simple for someone who doesn't understand how all this blockchain stuff actually works? Yeah, like you said, we view them very differently.

15:11Bitcoin's kind of its own asset class, either if you want to talk about it like a commodity or like a non-sovereign currency that people are adopting. And the investment thesis is very clear there. It's something that's non-sovereign, has a finite amount, and it's the most decentralized one out there, market, shared, leading, all of those things. And then Ethereum, people used to lump them together. And now I think they're beginning to see that they're very different. And to be fair, they started a lot more similar. They were both proof of work consensus mechanisms, and we can talk about that.

15:45But Ethereum has undergone all of these changes and all of these upgrades. And so it's a very different asset class. And so the way I would think about it is you have Ethereum, the network, just like you have Bitcoin, the network. And it's all the computers running the Ethereum code. They're following the rules. They're processing these transactions, these things called smart contracts, which are little snippets of code that have to be run to make these decentralized applications built on it work. And then you have Ether, which is the native token to the Ethereum network. So this term gets thrown around a lot.

16:18We say Ethereum's trading at$2 ,600. whatever. What we actually mean is the Ether token. And the important thing to note is it's a purely digital token. You can hold it, you can send it to others, just like Bitcoin. It's not controlled by government. It's got its own issuance rule set. But the key difference is you need that Ether token to pay for computation on this network. So all these applications built on the Ethereum network, they have to run on the network that takes computational resources. And so you have to pay your way with the native Ether token. So from an investment thesis perspective, if you're going to invest in Ether, the token, and especially if you're just going to hold it, what you're betting on or investing in is this network getting bigger, more stuff getting built on it, more users coming to it.

17:05And therefore, people need to buy the token and hold it to do all these transactions on it and to run these computations and these decentralized applications on it. And fundamentally, every blockchain is trade-offs, right? It's sort of like trade-off between security and throughput. And how you want to optimize on that is sort of up to the community that's supporting that blockchain. And back to Ben's point, the Bitcoin blockchain is pretty straightforward. It doesn't change very often. It's slow to move. It's sort of ossified at this level for its use case, and it's doing exactly what it's designed to do very well.

17:44Ethereum has had a lot of changes over time and is very different and aspirational in what it's trying to do. So right now, and Chris, I love your thoughts on this too. This sort of is a battle for how to best optimize the block space, right? There's a finite amount of block space on Ethereum. There's layer twos that try to optimize some of that real estate on the block space. And how do they as a community to come together and optimize that for the best outcome for Ethereum. And I think it does get complicated for the average person to approach and try to understand what's going on. I'm in this space and it's a lot to follow, frankly, right?

18:19So nevermind a financial advisor or someone who's trying to understand how will value accrue to Ether over time. And to Chris's point, fundamentally, as there's more demand to use the Ethereum blockchain for whatever purpose it is, right? There's many purposes and use cases you can use it for. As there's demand to use it and spend Ethereum, right? Then the value of Ether should go up over time. So that's sort of the general North Star is that this is a very useful blockchain. There's a lot of useful actions and activities being done on this chain. And people want to hold and use Ether in this ecosystem.

18:55And that's fundamentally the driving force here. Yeah, I'll throw two - Are stable coins - Sorry, Chris. I'll just throw two analogies and I'll get to your question there because one is you could think of Ethereum like an app store. It's just this platform and then people build apps on top of it. And so if you think people are going to build more apps and more people are going to come to this app store and use these apps, the tokenomics say, or that's the idea that the value of Ether should go up. So that's one way to think about it. It's this blank canvas. Anyone can build all this stuff, but you got to pay your way with this Ether token.

19:29What about stable coins? Are they primarily built on top of the Ethereum blockchain? Yes, Ethereum has a majority of the stable coin market. There are other competing networks that are taking some as well, you know, a stable coin. And one stable coin can operate on multiple blockchains as well. I'm not even going to dig deeper into that because that sounds like a worm. All right, go ahead. So what is ETH being used for? We just released a report, Max Waddington on my team, very sharp guy when it comes to Ethereum. It talks more about the investment use case and he goes through the stats on what is ETH used for.

20:03The number one, 34 % of all ETH activities is just ETH transfers. So just like the Bitcoin network, transferring Ether from one wallet to another. Stablecoins is at 12%. Decentralized finance applications are 13%. ERC-20 tokens. So these are different tokens. Non-native tokens are 14%. And then the rest of the bucket is 27 % of all other things. It seems to me that a lot of this tokenization stuff, and maybe this is just the point, it's just there's a lot of, it's all financialization. It's a lot of swapping. It's a lot of back and forth. I don't know if this is a criticism, but I think that a lot of people outside the crypto ecosystem would say, well, what the hell, what is it for?

20:46Like when is it going to ever do anything other than just be a financial instrument? Is there going to be a consumer application? Does it does there need to be a consumer application? Well, I think there's two ways to think about it. Number one is, yes, I agree with you. Most of the activity, the things I just ran through are financial nature. So ETH transfers, if you're transferring value, I would say that's financial. Decentralized finance, that's obviously financial. Stablecoins, that's financial too. So that other category, 27%, you've got things in there like gaming, collectibles, NFTs, social apps, that is there, but it's smaller.

21:21So you bring up a great question of, does Ethereum move beyond just financial applications, or is this going to be its continued use case? But I would say there are, and there will continue to be consumer applications on these things. You've already seen it. There's obviously a need for consumers to do financial things in a much more frictionless or efficient way. And especially if you're not in the US where you already have a lot of great apps and companies and things like that. One potential use case that I haven't seen proliferate yet, maybe I'm just making this up, so check me if I'm wrong.

22:01Michael's an ideas guy when it comes to crypto. Yeah, I'm just throwing some shit against the wall to see what sticks. Like live events. I've been to a million Nick games and guess how many, guess if you asked me to pull up a record of, was I at that game? Have I seen this player? I don't know. I have no idea. Like what about just NFTs for concerts, for sport, for sporting events, for reservations, things like that? I think it's funny you said that. I heard someone talking about this the other day, where they said the good old days of concerts where you had the concert stub, you'd say, I was at that concert, you know, whatever, Grateful Dead and whatever, right?

22:35I think that's interesting. Why not, right? I do think, absolutely, these blockchains are ledgers. They record data and keep it in a decentralized location for history, right? And so I absolutely think you could do something like that, where you had an NFT that shows you were at some event, right? I think that's interesting, right? You had the game six of the Knicks playoff game or whatever, right? I think that would be an interesting use case. So the current use cases for investors now, if they're in the ETF, I'm curious how you see people using, if they're using both ETFs? Because I'm not sure the latest breakdown, what is it?

23:07Maybe if you broke down Bitcoin and Ether market caps, it's 80-20. Is that right? Close or not really? The market cap of Bitcoin and ETH? Yeah, Bitcoin versus ETH. I'm saying it's just the two of them. It's like 70-30, roughly, give or take. Okay, 70-30. So I'm curious if you see anyone, if you see a lot of investors that hold both ETFs doing that, do you see a lot of people trying to get those similar? Or is Bitcoin still just a much bigger piece in most people's portfolios if they're using ETFs? Yeah, without a doubt, it is Bitcoin is the majority of that position, right? I would argue 90 % of the digital asset ETPs that are held out there, they're just holding mostly just Bitcoin.

Read the full transcript

23:46Now, there is an early curve of adoption, I'd say, especially in retail side, but some advisors we're seeing now to come in to get the Ethereum exposure. And generally speaking, they're not doing either or. They're holding both. They're not going to sell Bitcoin to buy Ethereum. They're just going to hold both generally in the market cap proportions. Like I said, if you look at the total market cap of Bitcoin and Ethereum together, right, roughly 70 % of that market cap is made up by Bitcoin, 30 % Ethereum, give or take. And you're seeing some similar pro-rata allocation to portfolios that way.

24:18Now, those that are buying both, I would say generally understand there are distinct narratives here between the Bitcoin story and then the Ethereum story, which we kind of hit on a few minutes ago. Bitcoin comes first, right? That's the non-sovereign digital store value. In the narrative, honestly, we're hearing in the field talking to advisors and different institutional investors is they're looking at just the central bank largesque globally, the Fed's back to cutting rates again. We're paying trillions on a year on interest payments now. So I do think there is a cohort of advisors and investors who just generally want to potentially hedge some of that a little bit, right?

24:57And they look at things like gold, which is at an all-time high in Bitcoin as a way to do that. So I think that's sort of where they start out. Ethereum, this is where I think firms like Fidelity can help out our clients really well, because we have the resources to spend time focused on doing research in this space on Bitcoin and Ethereum, writing papers, having the availability of client strategists to do calls with and understand this because it is complicated. And for an advisor with limited time and resources to sit there and try and navigate this new asset class, it's so hard. When you guys are talking to advisors, at least let's start with Bitcoin, are they asking questions like, hey, get me up to speed on Bitcoin?

25:41How do I talk to clients about it? Or do they mostly understand it's not super complicated and they're like, all right, well, why Fidelity versus some of your competitors? So some of the conversations are right there, Michael, right? They're at the finish line. They want to allocate to just trying to figure out which firm to use, right? Which partner to partner with. All right. So what's the pitch? Well, Fidelity has been in the space well over a decade. We have a long history of participating in the digital asset ecosystem. We began with mining Bitcoin as far back as 2014. And as a result of those mining activities, we had to build our own custody.

26:16So we We built our own custody solution, which we now offer to advisors and institutional clients. It also powers our retail digital asset offering. So point being is we understand this technology really better than any firm would argue in the space because we've had to participate in it for much longer. And we built out numerous different technology platforms to support our business in the space. We now offer two commercial offerings. We have direct custody with Fidelity Digital Asset Services. So if you're an institution or an advisor, you can come directly to us with your Bitcoin or Ethereum in custody at safely with us.

26:53As an advisor, that could be a potential option that could work well because you can integrate these digital assets alongside traditional assets. So if a client has their Bitcoin at, say Coinbase, for example, but the advisor, the rest of their money is at Fidelity, and they want to see Bitcoin within the context of their whole portfolio, they can move it and custody it with you guys. Correct. Yeah. And it's going to depend on, again, how it's held and what state they're in. But generally speaking, there is a solution there that it's worth engaging us with because that's the biggest pain point.

27:27You can be an advisor sitting wherever, and you know you have a client who might have millions of dollars at Coinbase because they bought Bitcoin or Ethereum back in 2015. And the client had never been able to bring it over. They don't want to sell because of tax basis. And the advisor just knows it exists out there and they can't see it. So now at least the advisor can holistically bring it under the umbrella on platform and advise on it in a more cohesive manner versus just kind of ignoring it. Right. And the second commercial offering we have, obviously, is a Fidelity Digital Asset Management, where I work.

27:58And we have the Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange rate products. So FBTC is the Fidelity Bitcoin products and FETH is our Ethereum ETP. Both 25 basis points. Ethereum is waived for zero fee till end of year. but great liquid options to access these asset classes in a holistic manner for any account type, any registration type on or off Fidelity's platform. So we try to bring the best of Fidelity to our clients, give them actual solutions here where we can meet them where they are, whether they want to go direct to our custody platform, like I mentioned before, or enter the space with us in a very familiar vehicle like these ETPs.

28:36So many ways to access these assets with us. In one of your recent research pieces, your team lays out the compound annual growth rates for Bitcoin and Ethereum for the last four years. And it goes from, I think, May 2020 to May 2024. And the numbers are insane, higher than I would have thought. I guess caveat is that was coming from a low base because of the pandemic and such. But Bitcoin is up 65 % per year. Ethereum is up over 100 % per year. And you show the previous four years as well, which are both 100 % per year. I'm curious how you go about setting expectations for these asset classes and these funds.

29:12Do you kind of say, listen, returns should be lower, but volatility should be lower too over time as they mature? How do you position these from an expectations perspective? Yeah, there's a few schools of thought here. One is, and you'll see these in our research reports, we note how volatility for both have gone down. So the numbers you just mentioned are from that most recent report. We just released it. a week or two ago called How Ether May Add Value to a Portfolio. And in that report, we also show volatility, just draw a regression line through them. They're both declining. So as these assets get bigger, volatility has gone down.

29:47As we get more financial products around it, like exchange traded products, like options, you would expect volatility to be mitigated as well. Of course, the big question is, do you get decreasing returns as well? Now, of course, these things, you know, trees don't grow to the heavens or whatever the saying is, these things can't overtake everything in the world, at some point you are going to hit that law of large numbers. So it would be foolish to think you'd get those absolutely fantastical gains like we have before. But that doesn't mean if you just do some simple total addressable market analysis of what markets you think these things could capture, they're still very high, right?

30:26If you think it could take X percent of gold or other commodities, X percent of other things that contain monetary premiums or other technologies out there, you could still get some pretty juicy numbers. And of course, the thing we try to drive home is, yes, they're volatile, but they have these high returns. So just looking at simple historical stuff, when we do this in that same table, you're well compensated for that risk. Your Sharpe ratio is higher, your Certino ratio, which only looks at the downside deviations, which is what most investors care about. They don't care if something's volatile to the upside.

30:57They care if it's volatile to the downside. Those are all higher than your traditional asset classes. And then we go through why and how this could make sense as part of your portfolio. The way I approach it, Ben, is a non-zero position could make sense if you think it makes sense for your client's portfolio. You manage the volatility through position sizing. So most advisors, I generally say, are probably allocating 1 % to 3%, somewhere in that range at most for some of these digital asset exposures. And you can manage volatility around that. You can set client expectations around that just knowing everyone knows it's going to be volatile at this point, I would argue.

31:33And you have to have a long-term time horizon. And there's going to be years where those gains aren't there. And we know that. But if you have a consistent exposure to it, you allocate it to it consistently, you rebalance at some point, it should prove out over time, assuming those returns carry forward. I would argue that the rebalancing piece is probably the biggest one. Even if, let's say the returns are way lower going forward, but the volatility is still really high. I would argue, I think Cliff Hasnard said, AQR had a recent piece about this. He talked about the benefits of adding a high volatility asset to a portfolio.

32:08And I would argue that the rebalancing piece is even more important going forward for that if the volatility is so much higher. So here's my big question as a target date fund guy. How far away are we from these being in target date funds? Because that would make a lot of sense to me with an automatic rebalance that takes sort of the decision out of people's hands. Yeah, I'd say we're still a ways away. And I think there's challenges there in general. And this isn't just like a fidelity issue. I think it's just a general institutional investor issue where it's limited history. It's hard to model capital market assumptions going forward in a thoughtful manner.

32:41I think the Department of Labor would have something to say about that. Like putting that in like 401k plans. There's that consideration too, right? as far as oversight. You're saying like a 2 % Bitcoin or ETH, I say 2 % crypto piece in a target date fund. You think people would have a problem with that? I don't think, I think the government would. Yeah, I can't really comment on that. But I just think just from a portfolio kind of intellect standpoint, Ben, just even alts, I'd say, you know, we're just at the point now where alts are proliferating, right? And I think the indexes most people use for benchmarks in the general alts category go back to like 2002.

33:14I think people are just getting comfortable kind of using those as reference benchmarks. So again, limited history. Bitcoin was first. And most would argue 2015 is the year you want to look at trading data for Bitcoin, just given the volume. And pre that year, there wasn't enough liquidity. So you're really not even 10 years into a price history for Bitcoin that's acceptable for most institutional allocators. Now, some get over that quickly, right? They understand the thesis and they understand you just don't have it. You got to just make an assumption based off that. And that's where Chris was sitting on with, what do we think this could be, right?

33:49You look at other modeling techniques there. So I do think the lack of history is sort of an impediment to some of these bigger mandates that we're talking about, whether it's target date or just institutional adoption here. As we think about the next catalyst, I think the obvious one that crypto folks would say is the halving. Chris, can you talk about, just remind people what that is and why that might be a positive catalyst for the asset class? So the halving is what occurs in the Bitcoin network approximately every four years, where new Bitcoin are issued every 10 minutes. And they go to these people called miners who are helping to secure the network.

34:25That's their reward for spending all this electricity and computing power. And that reward gets cut in half approximately every four years. So the issuance schedule of Bitcoin, it increases a lot. And then every four years, that slope is getting shallower and shallower. So this is why we've got 19.6 million Bitcoin out there already. We're not going to hit that near 21 million limit of Bitcoin until the year 2140. That is what is embedded in the code. So from one perspective, people look at the supply side of this and they say, every time there's a halving, there's fewer and fewer new Bitcoins being minted.

35:04And so all else equal, if demand stays the same, then that has to be expressed, that change has to be expressed in a higher price because there's fewer new Bitcoins coming onto the market. There's, of course, a lot of debate around this. Maybe some people think that having had a lot of weight or influence early on because you went from 50 Bitcoin every 10 minutes to 25 to 12.5. And now, of course, if you just look at the numbers, it's a lot fewer and fewer Bitcoin every time you get a halving. So I'm not exactly sure. These four-year cycles also align with other things like Fed liquidity cycles or election cycles.

35:44So we don't have a good experiment to rerun on these things. And so there's a lot of debate whether or not that's actually driving the price or if it's other stuff. Last question for me. I'm sure you guys have done work on where the Bitcoin is coming from. how many Bitcoin are in the ETFs. I'd be curious, who do you think the sellers are? People in the Bitcoin community feel very passionately about their Bitcoin. They don't let it go very easily, but you can fill in the number, how many billions of net flows into the category, how many are held by ETFs. They got to be coming from somewhere. So what's your best guess into where these coins are coming from?

36:19So because of the on-chain nature of this, we can see some things. We have some visibility. And one of the things we have seen with the recent run-up in price and former run-ups in price, this is nothing new with each cycle, some of these very long-term holders start to liquidate their coins. So if you've got someone that's been holding it since 2012, 2013 or something, eventually, for whatever reason, they want to sell some of it. They want to buy something. They want to rebalance whatever the case may be. everyone reaches a point where at that marginal price, they're willing to let go of some of their Bitcoin.

36:57Whereas to what you allude to, there's still some very ardent people who say they're never going to sell it, or maybe they're newer to the space. And so they're planning on holding it many more decades yet. And so that's what makes a market, right? All these different time preferences, different liquidity preferences. But we can actually see some of that movement happen on chain, which is very interesting. Every time a bull market starts to take off, Michael and I have a discussion about what price we would be willing to sell some of our Bitcoin. And I think we just keep moving the goalposts, right?

37:26Well, you know what? I feel like I haven't sat through that 70 plus percent drawdown just to get back to even. You know what I mean? Yeah. Like just to get back to the ultimate cost. You got to do your four-year tour of duty yet, right? Exactly. But I think we had this, maybe this discussion last time, where what's interesting about Bitcoin, and I come from a traditional finance background and equity analysts. And I read, of course, a lot of value investor stuff. If you look at, say, something like a stock and you think the intrinsic value is here and it's trading at a 50 % discount, that's your thesis.

38:00And then, of course, you want to get in on that thesis before other people realize the intrinsic value. You get in, other people start to realize that the price goes up. So as the price goes up, Your thesis is getting validated, but then your risk is also going up because now you're closer to your intrinsic value, right? So you want to then close out the trade once you think it's reached its full potential. The weird thing about Bitcoin is as the price goes up, the more it's validating its thesis as this aspiring form of money, aspiring store of value. So your risk is getting lowered as it goes up.

38:36You know, people who bought Bitcoin at 10 cents were taking on way more risk than people buying it at 1 ,000 and 10 ,000 because it's validated its thesis more and more along the way. There's nothing else like that. There's nothing else like that. It's a totally different mindset. It's exactly right. Yeah. All right. I think that's a great place to leave it. Chris and Matt, this was great. Thank you for coming on. For people that want to learn more about Fidelity Digital Asset Management, where do we send them? Yeah. So for advisors, go to institutional.fidelity.com. You can check out FBTC and FETH there, as well as some of the direct solutions I talked about.

39:06And for Chris's research, fidelitydigitalassets.com. Thanks, guys. Thank you. Okay, thanks to Matt. Thanks to Chris. Thanks to Fidelity Digital Assets. Go to fidelitydigitalassets.com. For more, email us animalspirits at the compoundnews.com.

From the publisher

On today's show, we are joined by Chris Kuiper, Director of Research, and Matt Horne, Head of Digital Asset Strategists for Fidelity Digital Assets to discuss narratives surrounding ETH and BTC, use cases around ETH, how advisors can work with Fidelity utilizing digital assets, decreasing volatility in crypto, and much more!

Find complete show notes on our blogs...
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor
Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
 
Check out the latest in financial blogger fashion at The Compound shop: https://www.idontshop.com

Past performance is not indicative of future results. The material discussed has been provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal or investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security or strategy. The investment strategy and themes discussed herein may be unsuitable for investors depending on their specific investment objectives and financial situation. Information obtained from third-party sources is believed to be reliable though its accuracy is not guaranteed.
 
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.

The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.

Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/

The Fidelity® Wise Origin® Bitcoin Fund and Fidelity® Ethereum Fund (the “Funds”) have each filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for their respective offerings to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus included in that registration statement and other documents the Fund has filed with the SEC for more complete information about the Funds and their respective offerings. You may obtain these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, the Funds will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request it by calling (800) 343-3548. View prospectus here.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Animal Spirits Podcast

All 382 episodes
Talk Your Book: The Next Catalyst for Crypto AssetsAnimal Spirits Podcast · 39 min
Listen in VO