The Cost of the American Dream (EP.384)

30 Oct 2024 · 1 h 3 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Animal Spirits Podcast Episode 384: The Cost of the American Dream

Overview In this episode of the Animal Spirits Podcast, hosts Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson engage in a comprehensive discussion that touches on various topics related to the markets, economic conditions, investing, and societal narratives. The episode is titled “The Cost of the American Dream” and covers changing market narratives, rising interest rates, inflation, and living expenses in the context of the American dream.

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Changing Market Narratives
  2. Narratives and Market Movements: Michael expresses skepticism towards the quick attribution of market movements to narratives. He believes that often the true reasons behind market fluctuations are more complex than what is often assumed or communicated.
  3. Macro Advice from Hedge Funds: Both hosts argue against taking macroeconomic advice from hedge fund managers, citing their track record of inaccuracies.
  1. Interest Rates and Economic Observations
  2. Rising Interest Rates: The episode discusses the reasons behind increasing interest rates, emphasizing that the economic strength is a substantial factor rather than merely the Fed's actions.
  3. Bond Vigilantes: They critique the idea of "bond vigilantes" as an explanation for rising rates, suggesting that it is more about the unwinding of recession fears and the resilience of the economy.
  1. Inflation and Cost of Living
  2. Inflation Pain: Michael and Ben delve into the economic realities of inflation during the 2020s and how rising costs have impacted the average American’s financial situation.
  3. Living Paycheck-to-Paycheck: They highlight a statistic indicating that 20% of households making $150K or more live paycheck-to-paycheck, raising questions about spending habits rather than income levels.
  1. Critique of Housing Market and Mortgage Rates
  2. S&P 500 and Mortgage Rates: The hosts discuss the S&P 500's resilience despite rising mortgage rates and the implications for ordinary consumers.
  3. Housing Affordability: The segment addresses the struggles of homeownership in light of rising mortgage rates and the consequences of increased housing costs.
  1. The American Dream's Financial Burden
  2. Cost of the American Dream: A breakdown provided by Visual Capitalist suggests that achieving the American dream could cost as much as $4.4 million when factoring in retirement, education, and homeownership costs.
  3. Discussion on Financial Planning: The hosts reflect on personal finance, investment strategies, and making meaningful choices regarding education and home affordability.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Complexity: Simplistic narratives often fail to capture the multifaceted nature of market dynamics.
  • Economic Resilience: Rising interest rates and inflation are part of a complex economic picture that reflects both consumer behavior and broader economic trends.
  • Personal Finance Awareness: Understanding the true costs of living, especially under the guise of achieving the American dream, is crucial for financial planning.
  • Caution with Macro Predictions: Historical inaccuracies from renowned hedge fund managers highlight the importance of independent thinking in investing.

Listener Engagement

  • The hosts encourage listeners to share their thoughts and questions via email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com. They also promote the upcoming discussion around the election's impact on markets.

Conclusion This episode of the Animal Spirits Podcast offers a rich dialogue on the implications of economic conditions on personal finance and investing, urging listeners to think critically about market narratives and their own financial decisions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Today's show is brought to you by GlobalX. Since 2008, GlobalX ETFs have been committed to empowering investors with unexplored intelligent solutions. GlobalX specializes in exchange-traded funds that offer exposure to the artificial intelligence ecosystem, including themes like data centers, robotics, semiconductors, and cloud computing. To learn more about GlobalX's entire suite of ETFs from covered calls, fixed income, emerging markets, and more, visit GlobalXETFs.com.

0:31you know your choices matter. You're the expert because you know what fits your life. And getting it right starts with good information. That's why America's beverage companies are sharing more information about our ingredients at goodtoknowfacts.org. No spin, no judgments, just the facts straight from the experts for more than 140 beverage ingredients. Visit goodtoknowfacts.org.

1:03Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions. Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.

1:33Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. Ben, hello, how are you? Hi. Hi. So you and I had a conversation with Jared Dillian on his concerns about private equity, private credit, and all the activity going on in there. That dropped on Monday on the feed. I thought we were pretty clear that there was not an endorsement and that we were pretty verbal about the fact that we disagreed with a lot of what he was saying. Podcasts are not endorsements. I personally don't think this is the biggest short ever. That's my disclaimer. Fair? Fair. All right. I am a shooter down of narratives. That's my stance in the market usually.

2:07Like, I think that there are, I think we're far too quick. You're like the Shaq gift thing. Duncan and Daniel, make that for Ben. I think people are far too quick to describe narratives because it makes you feel good. It makes you feel like you have your hands on the steering wheel if you go, well, this market is going this way because of this. And this is moving down or up because of this. And I think that just makes people feel better. Ben is such a narrative swatter that if the markets move decisively one day after the election, he's going to say, who knows? Who knows what's driving them? It could be noise.

2:36Who knows? Yes, I will be saying that. So this is a tweet from Bill, a guy I follow on Twitter who has SpongeBob SquarePants as his avatar. So must know what he's talking about. Pretty good follow, actually. He shows a picture of the 10-year Treasury yield, and it goes up and down and up and down. And every time it peaks, he kind of says, uh-oh, watch out, it's Bond Vigilantes. And I feel like we see this all the time. I remember when rates got to 5 % last year and everyone said, all right, here it goes. It's, it's fiscally responsibility by the U S government. That's what's causing the rates to go up.

3:07Then rates come down and it's like, okay, there was a recession. Then rates go back up. I was like, no, no bond vigilantes again. And I just think people spend way too much time trying to shoehorn their own personal narratives on markets that are moving for reasons that probably have more to do with where people are putting their money than anything else. Yeah. I don't disagree, but just for the sake of argument, uh, sometimes the market is wrong and sometimes the narratives are wrong. So just because the market might move, and I don't think we're saying anything different, sometimes people are just wrong.

3:35And that leads into like the positioning part of it is that the narratives were wrong and then the narratives need to get unwound. So it – Right. There was something there. You agree? Yes. Like the bear market got unwound because everyone thought there was going to be a recession. Yeah. Exactly. Sometimes – yeah. So what we're talking about here specifically is the fact that the narrative now is the Fed cut rates and interest rates are rising. What gives? Why is this happening? So Jim Bianco has a great tweet showing all the previous instances after the Fed first cut rates of the 10-year treasury yield.

4:12And unlike any other time, going out 25 – now 30 days outside of that, interest rates are – the 10-year is significantly higher. and that's never happened before. So again, why? It is interesting though that some of those other times rates did rise a little bit. There's not nearly as much as they are now. Yeah. So anyway, Warren Pies I think has the correct take here and he said, Warren tweeted, many are misinterpreting recent price action. The move from 3.6 to 4.25 in the 10 year does not signal a policy mistake. Instead, it is the unwind of recession insurance buyers. And when I saw this, I was like, yes, of course.

4:50Same thing with me. I saw this and I go, oh, duh. Yeah, so it's a few things. So on TV, we have a lot of people talking about the deficit and the bond vigilance. So we'll get to that in a second. But Warren's point is it's a combination of, number one, economic strength, a justified higher treasury yield. But more importantly and most importantly, and this is why narratives do matter, is because there was a lot of people buying protection in case a recession happened that would send rates lower. We didn't get a recession. We got actually economic – I don't know if it's strengthening or accelerating, but we got decent economic news.

5:28And now that trade is being unwound, pushing rates back to where they probably should have been in the first place. Right. The idea was you're getting a double whammy. The Fed's lowering rates and the economy and labor market are weakening. so that could be in a recession. That means bonds are going down. And that didn't happen. So now people are selling bonds and that pushes rates back up. And that, to your point, it makes sense. It makes sense. That makes way more sense than bond vigilantes. It makes way more sense than all of a sudden the deficit matters all of a sudden. Although, why do you think gold is rallying?

5:56It's weird. I looked at this and over the last year, the S &P 500 and gold are both up roughly 40%. And I couldn't find another time in history when that's happened before. Ever. It was close in the early 80s. But it's a bizarre thing. And a lot of people said, well, it's because of the fiscal deficits. And I don't know, that almost sounds too cute to me. It's bizarre because most people assume gold does better when real interest rates are lower. But rates have been going higher. Well, even this is semantics. Let me ask you this while we're on the topic of narratives. Is it fair to say that gold is going higher because more gold buyers are, in fact, worried about the deficit?

6:38And it could also be true that in actuality, the worries about the deficit will prove to be unfounded. Both things could be true, no? Fair. That's certainly possible. It's bizarre to see the stock market and gold go up like this. It would have been hard to come up with a narrative ahead of time for that being the case. What if just risk assets are going up? I know gold is not traditionally a risk asset, but it is a risk asset. Look at this chart. This is from Bank of America. It shows the biggest inflow to gold funds since July 2020. Now, is that because investors are worried about the deficit?

7:17Is it momentum and that's just it? But why does momentum exist? So it's really hard to know. Also, look at Bitcoin. Is Bitcoin a deficit story or is it a momentum, a risk on story? I have no idea, but it does not matter. This is what you want for your diversified assets, though. You want them all to go up at the same time, right? You don't want them to go down at the same time, but you want them to go up at the same time. That's what you want. Risk on for the win. Yeah, risk on. So Colin Roche at Discipline Funds had a post called, we need to talk about bond vigilantes. And he's saying, like, listen, the government spending as a percent of GDP was really high during the pandemic.

7:51Now it has normalized. It's basically, he's not that worried about it anymore. And he had some good points basically saying, because Elon Musk has this thing where he says we're going bankrupt. I don't know how people do. And there was a Paul Tudor Jones hit on CNBC where he talked about this. The headline was, Paul Tudor Jones says, market reckoning on spending is coming after election. We are going to be broke. And Cullen went through the history of this and showed that there was a piece in 2013 where Stanley Druckenmiller made the same exact claim. And my whole point on the fiscal deficit government spending thing is, sound the alarm all you want, but give me a line in the sand.

8:24You can't just scream from the hills every two or three years, government spending is out of control, we're going broke. Just wait, it's going to happen. And that's the thing that makes me mad. And Paul Tudor Jones has been on this beat for a while now, no? So, yeah. So, he, Tay Kim shared a post from CNBC in 2018 where he says this. I want to own, this is Paul Tudor Jones in 2018. I want to own commodities, hard assets, and cash. When would I want to buy stocks? When the deficit is 2%, not 5%. Now the deficit is, I don't know, 7%. So, he was saying, you know, he's worried about it back then. So, again, this is a guy who is very smart and he's a good investor.

9:01but here's my good rule of thumb. Wait, he's a trader. He's probably - Yes. Dude, in 20, so I wrote about this in 2015. In 2015, he said on CNBC, we are going to be broke really quickly unless we get serious about dealing with our spending issues. That's 2015. And guess what? He's a trader. I'm sure he's done fine. You know what I mean? Like, it's not like he's - His investment account is - He's not married to his views. If the market proves him wrong, like Druckenmiller, I'm sure he's like, listen, this is what I think, but I trust the market over me and I'm going to get long or short based on where the market is going, not where I think the market's going to go.

9:37But again, it's a mentality. Here's my rule of thumb that people are probably going to get mad at this because I'm talking about their heroes, but you never, ever, ever listen to hedge fund guys talk about macro. They are terrible at spouting macro. Think about it. Paul Tudor Jones, Stanley Druckenmiller, Ray Dalio. These guys have been wrong on macro in the Fed for 15 years. Yeah. And these are some of the smartest, best, and guess what? Their portfolios have done fine. Yeah. But if you took their macro takes at face value, No, their macro takes in public. Their macro takes in public. Yes, in public.

10:11It's not like you're speaking with them for 10 hours, right? They're on TV for a couple of minutes. Yes, but the stuff they say sounds very intelligent. I got a ton of people asking me about Paul Tudor Jones, and I went back and I found all the times he's been talking about the Fed and the deficit and spending, and my whole thing is like, listen, if you're going to talk about this, then you either put your money where your mouth is. And he said he's shorting bonds. So he is. But guess, like you said, he could change his mind very quickly. Don't listen to these people. Short bonds has been a good trade.

10:40I wouldn't be shocked if he's taking profits here. It's possible. Right. Yeah. That's the thing. The timeframes that these guys manage in the deficit and the government debt, if it's going to be a problem, like everyone keeps saying it is, that's a very long time horizon bet. I actually saw somebody tweeted about Druckenreller yesterday. I don't remember who it was. That 25 % of his portfolio was short bonds. And guess what? He made money. And he said, I wish it was bigger. George would be mad at me right now or something like that. Speaking about George Soros who always said go for the jugular.

11:08Yeah. So I just don't listen to these people on macro. That's my whole thing. It's not worth it because it'll change their mind or they'll change their portfolio. All right. Torsten's Lock chart of the week. The S &P 500 doesn't care about rates. So this is corporate business net interest payments are near record lows. And this says as a percentage of, let's see, net interest payments. Yeah, this is one of the craziest charts from the rising rate period. So he shows where the Fed started hiking rates. Since then, interest payments have gone down. The net interest payment have gone down. This is not a chart crime, but it's not really showing the full picture.

11:45Because if you take out the 100 biggest stocks that have these gigantic cash piles, you know what I mean? Here's the thing, though, that gets me. Remember, for years during ZRT, people were saying, there's zombie companies all around us, and the Fed is propping up zombie companies. And we've turned the stat about 40 % of Russell 2000 companies don't have a profit. Yeah. Where are all the failures of companies now that rates have been 5 % for two years? We had higher bankruptcies in 22 and 23, and it's moderating a bit. It probably wasn't the wave that we should have expected, given, to your point, the years and years of the zombie company talk.

12:21That's my point is that these high rates should have been more onerous on these companies. And if there really were zombie companies, they would have been failing left and right. So maybe, just maybe, they weren't being propped up by the Fed. Eh, I think a lot of these shitty companies were being propped up by the Fed. The scooter company that raised$3 billion, whatever. Like, come on, all those free money companies. No, that wasn't being propped up by venture capitalists, though. Because of free money. It all went to zero. All those companies went to zero. We're never going to agree about this, but venture capital does not borrow money.

12:50They don't operate on leverage. It's not, dude. It's a mindset. It's a mindset of free money. Come on. I'm sorry. Just agree. To use the Charlie Munger, you'll agree with me because you're smart and I'm right. Like, come on. I don't think venture capital is propped up by cash flows, not debt. Where do you think the cash comes from, dude? The money was free. It was a party. It didn't matter. Cost nothing. Have at it. let's move on. All right. Torsten Slok, another chart shows NVIDIA is bigger than, NVIDIA market cap is bigger than Canada, UK, France, Germany, and Italy. Almost as big as Japan. Which is just insane that in 1989, Japan was 45 % of the global stock market.

13:36Now, NVIDIA's half as big as they are. These are the kind of charts that it's easy to like, ah, whatever. This is insane. And also not actionable. And I feel like market cap comparisons have cost investors a lot of money, myself included. Like, oh my God, it's, remember when Apple had a trillion dollars? That was going to be the top? Yeah, but don't you think this is more of a saying how bad things have gotten in Europe as opposed to how good things are in the United States? It is wild. Don't get me wrong. But like, all right, cool. Yeah, we know. Now what? Someone sent me this letter from Gibberney Capital Asset Management.

14:12I don't know who they are. Apologize. But they had some good stats. So he says, the return on equity today, so this is for the S &P 500, is around 20%, while pre-tax operating margins exceeds 16%. I think sometimes investors, or maybe just this investor, forgot how exceptional these figures are. A generation ago, an ROE of 14 % and profit margins of 10 % were considered good. Then he goes to compare that to European stock markets. German DAX trades for a PE of 13 times, earns a 12 % ROE, and should grow earning 7%. UK, 4 PE of roughly 11.7 times. ROE of 15%, earnings growth of 5%. Just saying how it is all these big companies, but they've completely changed the dynamics of the S &P 500.

14:56It's the fundamental, stupid. You can't talk about the market. You can't talk about the top line without talking about the bottom line. Yeah. Right? So our thing last week where we talked about the US being the envy of the world, economically speaking, which was from The Economist, I got some pushback from some Europeans. I got a really nasty comment on LinkedIn, which you don't get a lot of nasty comments there. What did? All right. What was the comment? Well, the one I heard from most people is, yeah, but Europe has a bigger safety net, which is fair. Yeah, yeah. And they list all the other ways the U.S.

15:24has screwed up. The guns and the school shootings, fair. We have our set of problems. I agree. And there was a piece in Fortune where they talked about this guy from Norway who runs, what does this guy do? He runs Norway's$1.6 trillion oil fund. And he says... 1.6 trillion. He says, America's attitude towards failure is helping propel the nation ahead of its European counterparts. He says, America's attitude... Where is it? Oh. Workers have a better work-life balance in Europe, but they aren't as ambitious as people are in the US. So that's like the... He's saying, listen, people probably actually live better in Europe, but the ambition in America is why we're pulling so far ahead economically and market speaking.

16:11And that's the kind of trade-off where you stop and think and you go, is it worth it? Like, which one's better? Where you take eight weeks off a year and you take a nap every day at 3 p.m. and you kind of work 30 hours a week? Or there's not a right answer. Well, yeah, there's no right answer. That's a personal preference thing. And then the other piece of pushback was inequality, which we mentioned. But I want to remind people that researchers, this was also the economist, has showed that two-fifths of the rise in wage inequality over the past four decades has been undone in the past four years.

16:45So this actually has gotten better. Anyway, that was pushback from Animal Spirits. All right, Goldman Sachs via Sam Rowe again. He's our Goldman Sachs go-to, isn't he? Is Sam Rowe the king of the via-via? Yes, he's the Michael Scott of podcasting. This is interesting. It shows the 10-year turnover of S &P 500 constituents. The average going back to 1980 is 36%, Over the past 10 years, it's roughly a third of all companies that have chained turnover over a 10-year period. This supports a higher multiple, no? More stability, less turnover. There's less turnover because there's less junky companies that are getting thrown out.

17:22Yeah, but it's still not that far below. My point here is that this is actually why being indexed fund is so hard because the losing companies, you're out of here. We're bringing some new ones in. I think this is actually a good diversification selling point it's not just static the S &P let me do the flip side so investors hold on to their losers right so does an index fund until the company gets kicked out we hold on to our losers until it's a$2 billion company down from 47 I'm making that up whatever the company is and then you're gone. Investors also tend to sell their winners too soon. Oh, me as an example.

18:12I sold Facebook when I was up 100%. It's probably up 200 % since I sold it. I sold Netflix, by the way, last week. Sold Netflix, bought Disney. Credit to me. I don't know. We'll see. But the point that I'm making, Ben, is investors are too quick to sell their best performers. Guilty as charged. An index fund doesn't sell its winners. And that's why it's so hard to beat. That is why it's so hard to beat an index fund didn't sell nvidia at 1.7 trillion for better and for worse yes never gonna sell those winners too early that's a good point uh this was a good one from the daily shot it shows rolling year-to-date performance in the sap so it shows from the start of the year and so far going back to 1999 through where we are at at i don't know 300 days into the year this is the one of the best this is the best year of this century basically up to this point.

19:00Wow. And let me ask you another question about this year. Is this the fastest year on record? How is it November already? Because you're middle-aged and you're a father. This is what happens. Life speeds up as you get older. And you're going to say, oh my gosh, it's Christmas already. It's like, oh my gosh, summer's already here. You know what? I don't care. I'm never, I'm always going to be that guy that can't believe how fast time is going. I'm not too cool for the, yeah, it's always, You know what? I'm sorry. You know what it is though? When you, this is the reason I think as being a parent, when you first have your kid and the child is a baby, you are, I talked about this.

19:37Does time slow down? Time slows down and you're constantly, because you don't do anything when your child is a baby and you sit there and you're like, geez, it's only 10 in the morning. Can we have lunch yet? Because you've been up for so long and it feels like you're just, you're waiting for time to go and then you like wait for time to put the kid to bed and then as the kids get older and there's more to do, you're constantly doing stuff. And now we've got to go here. Now we've got to drop off here. Now we've got to do this game, that game. And you're doing more stuff and it changes with your perception of time.

20:04Yeah, you know, it's so true. I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but this weekend was wild. We had Kobe's flag football at eight. Then we got breakfast real quick. Logan had soccer at 10. Kobe had a birthday party at 11. Then Logan had football at one and Kobe had baseball at 130. And then we went to dinner and I was just like, my head was spinning. And, you know, more of the same on Sunday. It's crazy. It's a lot. I'm not complaining. I love it, but it's just, it is, it just goes to the time thing. It is, when you get to this stage of life, I often talk to my wife, like, what did we used to do before kids?

20:43I have no idea what we did with our time. All that free time. Well, I read a lot of books. You know, here's one thing about kids today that definitely did not exist when we were growing up. but I'm not sure it's bad or good or whatever. It just is. It's the after school activities. Oh, yeah. When I, back in the 90s, I came home. I watched Spider-Man and X-Men, which was awesome. Ate some cereal, maybe Frosted Flakes, had some Oreos, and then played Xbox for four hours. Like, is that better than having an activity after school every day? Probably not. Definitely not. You want kids that are doing stuff, right?

21:18Yeah, I would think so. But right, every day after school? It's something. Yeah. For us, it's like it feels like a surprise when we don't have something. Like, oh, there's nothing going on today? Wow. This is bizarre. Oh, where were we? Okay. Ben, you had a conversation with Sean O 'Brien, the director of retirement at Cerule for The Unlock, which by the way, we are going to be talking more to our advisor audience. We're ramping it up there. What's that? Yeah, we're ramping things up. We're ramping things up there. So link in show notes for the Visor Unlock, the newsletter on YouTube. I also spoke with Meb Faber about his new 351 ETF.

22:02I think the ticker is tax. Very interesting. Very, very, very interesting. So that will be dropping sometime next week. The biggest thing that stood out to me is Sean O 'Brien from Cerule told me, last year alone, there was$765 billion in rollover assets from 401ks to IRAs. there's just going to be a ton, a ton of money in the years ahead that needs financial advice. Ben, I put this chart from your post in the deck, and I don't remember. Is this going to be one of those things where we spoke about this like three weeks ago? Have we spoken about this chart? Last week we did, yes. Last week. Okay.

22:35All right. See? No. Give me – what do you got? What's your take? I knew it felt familiar. I'm like, no, no, no. No need to rehash it. No need to rehash it. All right. Here's my thoughts. So we're looking at two charts, 1989 to 2019 on one side, and then 1989 to 2022 on the other side. And it's showing the median net worth by age adjusted for inflation. Yep. And look at us. Look at us millennials. I mean, that's a big takeaway, right? Yes. It's crazy. The last four years have been very kind to millennials. To everyone. Millennials, Gen X, everyone. But yes, but Gen X and millennials are both ahead of the game.

23:12The relative catch-up of millennials and Gen X is pretty wild. By the way, Silent Generation does not mean what you think it means? No, we missed that when we flubbed that. Silent Generation is the Gen X of then. So the greatest generation, then the silent generation, then the boomers. Okay. So Silent Generation is like the Gen X that no one ever thinks or talks about. Yeah, yeah. What we also got a lot of comments on last week was CY equals calendar year. Duh. Duh. Yes, we didn't know it. It felt a lot obvious. It is weird to think, though, that the greatest generation, like our grandparents' generation is just not...

Read the full transcript

23:44So you know when you go to parade in the summer and you see the old... The guys walking with their hats that served in the military? Like they're... Is that the silent generation? The white... No, but here's the thing. You used to think that, oh, those are World War II veterans. No, it's Vietnam. They're Vietnam veterans. It's kind of hard to laugh here. There are no more World War II veterans. I mean, I know there's probably a handful, but they're in their 90s. Oh, I know. I mean, think about how old Matt Damon was in Saving Private Ryan and that came out in 1999 or something, right? Remember when he flashes forward and he's old?

24:14Or is that Tom Hanks? That was Matt Damon. Matt Damon. Okay. All right. Paycheck to paycheck. This is from Axios. They did a look at Bank of America card data, and they said, among households making$150K a year or more, nearly double the median household income, 20 % live paycheck to paycheck, using their definition of paycheck to paycheck. And then they say, this is a study, and they say, how can that be? And then this is the answer from their senior economists. One reason is that higher income households may have bought larger, more expensive homes and consequently have bigger mortgages. And often along with bigger homes come bigger insurance costs, property taxes, and utility bills.

24:51So it's not like people who make six figures living paycheck to paycheck are like in the poor house. They still have this financial asset. They have more bills. Yes, they bought bigger houses and technically they're still saving in that house and building equity. It's just that they probably spent more than they should have because their income rose. Yeah, I don't know what the line is, and it's person to person, but at some point, like your spending will rise faster than your income. Yes, for a lot of people, that's the reason. And they make the point, too, that a lot of the paycheck to paycheck stuff doesn't take into account the fact that people are already saving in 401ks, and it's just coming off automatically.

25:26I don't think it. Okay, this is a question that I hate. Are you better off than you were four years ago? Gallup asked this, and they say the majority of Americans feel worse off than four years ago, so they have this economic confidence indicator. and they say 52 % of people feel worse off, 39 % say better, and 9 % say we're the same. And now if you took objective data, housing prices are up 40%, stock market is up 80%, net worth is up 50 % over the past four years. And if you remember four years ago, guess what we were living through, the pandemic. People were still wearing masks. We had all these weird rules about going inside places.

26:00Schools were opening and closing. If you objectively look at, you're better off than you were four years ago. And it has nothing to do with the president, right? So this is not a question that people answer honestly. When they answer this question, they're really answering, who am I going to vote for, right? Like this is another sentiment question that you can just throw out the window. It doesn't mean anything. Well, yes and no. I think that you're right that objectively, if you were to just look at people's bank accounts, their real estate, their brokerage accounts, their retirement accounts, if they have one, objectively, most of the country is better.

26:35If you put a number on it, I'd say 80 % of the population is doing better than they were four years ago. Yeah, I would agree with that. But it does matter in the sense that, like, there is definitely a mood in the country. But, like, look at this up. But don't you agree with that? There is definitely a mood in the country. Yes, but again, I think this is the kind of question I think you can now throw out. It might have made sense in the past, but now you can throw it out the window because of how polarized everything is. Like, look at this next one from the Federal Reserve. Assessment of your own financial well-being.

27:03going back to 2017 it's basically flat right it's about 75 percent of people 70 to 70 to 80 percent somewhere in that range say my financial well-being i'm doing good i'm doing fine but the national assessment keeps going down yeah so this so my point is that like how you ask the question if you say are you better off than you were four years ago everyone instinctively goes ah this political question i know it i'm gonna but if you ask how are you doing on your own and don't put the politics in it, you say, oh, I'm doing great. I don't even know if I should hesitate to even share these thoughts.

27:35But whatever. I feel like if you're offended by this... Are we living in a post-political world? Or maybe I'm projecting that I was talking to Josh about this yesterday. I feel like sort of people are less on edge and more over it than they were in 2016 and 2020. But perhaps I'm just over it. That's me too. I'm totally over it. I want this to be over. I think the, I wish we had like a week long election cycle. Like I don't need to be 18 months or whatever, however long it is. It's way too long. So I'm like, I do kind of feel like a lot of the country would agree with that. But I also don't know if I'm like literally just making that up.

28:15If I'm just projecting my thoughts into the rest of the country. Yeah. Some people obviously love it. Some people are really into this and they go into the battle every day. And I don't know. I do have some thoughts on the election polls and betting markets because I thought that the lesson we took from 2016 and from 2020 and pretty much all of the in-between elections there is that you can't really trust the polls anymore. Like you can't trust, it's not like saying the pollsters are putting their finger on the scale and they're leading us astray, but it's like, what percentage of people actually, what percentage of people in your life would answer a phone call from a pollster and answer honestly?

28:501 % of people you don't? Like how many people do they have to go through to get the people that they actually get for the polls? I know they're doing the best they can, but I guess I'm surprised. I got a call the other day and I don't even know why I answered. I thought of somebody else and I hung up. I mean, I said, sorry, good luck with the election. Now's not a good time. So yeah, who answers? I don't know. I'm surprised that the amount of people who live and die by these polls and the election betting markets saying like, look at the polls, look at the betting markets. They take it every day, the movement as fact.

29:20And I thought the whole lesson was supposed to be, whoa, whoa, whoa, let's pump the brakes. And like we, maybe we, the whole, the way to do it now is like, we don't know. So just be careful. I don't know how anyone can have certainty either way at this point with the election. That's my stance. So everyone has an opinion, whether, whether or not like you really are watching the news and like are really personally invested in the outcome. Everybody's an opinion. I just think like for me, it's, it's been eight years. You know what I mean? It's just like you can't, it's hard to keep up the same level of anxiety because it's just exhausting.

29:56Yes, but I don't know that that's going to go away. It seems like this might be the new world. I don't know. So what, Nick Kolas had some thoughts on the betting markets. It's funny to me because it was 50-50, then 45-55 and 60-40. And to me, that's a toss-up regardless. But some people, again, take that as like, no, that's, this is gospel. I take the betting markets as gospel. I don't, I can't believe anyone in the markets thinks that way. So now we have liquid betting markets. Robinhood just rolled this out. I guess it's been legalized. Kelsey has it, Polymarket, Robinhood. So there's a lot of volume on Polymarket, and people are saying, like, listen, it's a wrap.

30:33Like actual bettors, like actual dollars, not just opinions, are putting their money where their mouth is, and they're saying it's – I don't even want to throw out a number, but it's skewed to Trump. I don't know what the actual number is. Nick Kolas says – Yeah, it's like 60-40. Okay, so Nick Kolas says it doesn't – it's really noise until you get to 70 % in a betting market. I guess it's like the analogy that I gave is like it's like the weather. Like if this is 65 % chance of rain, it's probably not going to rain. But the funny thing, Hillary was at 70%. She lost. So even then. Okay. So anyway, but there's a whale coming in from France that's been reported on and Polymarker that's betting 30,$40 million.

31:05And Nicole has made a point that I was like, oh, yeah, of course. Like now we can't prove this, but it, you know, it's, it sounds reasonable that if you're betting that sort of money, this is like real money. And perhaps, just perhaps, it's to influence other markets. So if there is a perceived outcome, likely outcome for one winner over the other, in this case, Trump, it has geopolitical impacts on currencies, sure, certain commodities. So they're using this 30 – Oh, rates and oil and – So they're using this$30 million to push the narrative here and then investing like$200 million or whatever it is here.

31:47So this is sort of – I don't really care about this$30 because I'm really going to make money on the peso or the whatever. I like that take. I'm just surprised at the amount of markets people who've seen this stuff that like the markets are – we've talked about it already. They're not always right in the fact that people are taking it as gospel. That's the thing that's surprising to me. But I guess people are, again, looking for certainty. It is interesting though. The market seems not, I mean, there's, there's no volatility and it's like people, you talk about like all this anxiety about the political outcome and all that sort of stuff.

32:17Not that the market's end all be all, but it's just, it is interesting that the market seems to not be bothered. So would it be more surprising to you or less surprising if we had like, let's say we have the election night and whatever, I don't know how long it takes to figure out who the winner is. We have the winner and there's just not much movement in the markets at all. Would that surprise you more than seeing a big move in the morning? No. Okay. I think that would be shocking to a lot of market people if we just had kind of a, eh, stock market's up 50 basis points or down 50 basis points, but not really a big move in either direction.

32:47No, I wouldn't be surprised with anything. If you tell me that somebody wins and the market's down 2.5%, I mean, I don't know. I wouldn't be surprised. All right. Let's talk about the American dream. So visual capitalist, somebody sent this to us. The American dream costs$4.4 million. and they broke it down by the lifetime cost. So retirement, owning a new car, a wedding, raising two children, owning a home, pets, yearly vacation, and a funeral. Hey, I can't afford a funeral if I'm going to be paying$4.4 million for this stuff here. Sorry, dump me out back. So what do we think? I think anytime you add these cumulative totals like this, it's going to look weird.

33:30Yeah. and not, because if you ask someone how much money you're going to make over your whole career, like, I don't think people would have, people would understand the, I saw something, I saw a doctor post this on Twitter a couple months ago saying, I'm in my, I'm like 40 years old. And by the time I retire, my lifetime earnings will be like$10 million. And I felt like $10 million. That's crazy. And I looked up, I think the number is probably for a doctor, like 250 a year or something to get that. I, the numbers, you know, I'm not, it's direction right. It's not accurate. But the cumulative total probably makes things seem worse than it actually is for most people.

34:07Is that fair? When you say worse, oh, you mean the cost? Yeah, it makes the cost look way higher than… Here's the question. How many people actually get to these levels? Of what? Spending? Yeah. $800 ,000 for car. By the way, speaking of cars, Dude, Audi still has my car. And they're not, I haven't heard anything from them. Like, I'm just, I think Robbins put 5 ,000 miles on the loaner. Driving to the ground, man. I don't care. Good. I'm not putting my, like, but it's just, what sort of customer service is this? They've had my car since August. I heard from them once. That is crazy. Parts supply problem?

34:49I have no idea. I don't care. Keep it. Okay, back at the envelope from American Dream. So if you make an average of 150K for 30 years, that's the average. That's like$4.5 million. So that's the number. So does that square a little better? Yeah, when you put it that way. When you put it that way. All right, Ben, where are we going next? All right, the Wall Street Journal had a piece on how inflation has cooled, but Americans are still seething over prices. Seething. That's not just mad. They're seething. They interview this woman, and she says, it's hard to adjust. A 54-year-old engineer from Doylestown, Pennsylvania, you lived with these stable prices all your life.

35:29Mentally, it's hard. And she's saying, like, we've had to make some changes. And the thing is, like, prices haven't been stable your whole life. There has been inflation. And I looked at this. I had ChartKid Mac. You're never going to win this, Ben. No, no. I'm just, I'm making a point here. Just go with me. Okay? So, inflation in the 2010s, which included a period of deflation, obviously, in, you know, coming out of the crisis, was 19%, roughly 20 % in total for the whole decade, right? So we had, I think it was like 1.7 % inflation, very low, but we still had 20 % rise in overall cumulative prices.

36:02We've now roughly had that same cumulative rise in the first five years of this century, right? It's been 22 % cumulative inflation. So my whole thing is that we could have 0 % for the rest of the decade and people for a long time would still, obviously the cumulative for this decade is probably gonna be what, 30 % now? it's going to be higher, maybe even more, 35 % after all is said and done, depending on what it comes in at. But the fact that we pulled forward and compressed it, that's the thing people can't handle. They need the slow but sure rise. And it's kind of like early success. If you look at all the stats of the people who go bankrupt from winning the lottery, it's way higher than people who just have a regular stable income.

36:38So the people who slowly but surely build their wealth and their 401k and their IRA from age 25 to 65, they're far less likely to go broke than the person who wins the lottery at age 25 and pulls it all forward. That same thing applies to inflation. It's the earliness or the pull forward or the volatility. That's the thing that affects you psychologically. Does that make sense? Yeah. So that's the problem. It could be the same cumulative price rise, but if you compress the time horizon, it totally screws with your perception of everything. Yeah, well, have you mentally adjusted to the price of everything?

37:13I'm still like$24 for a salad with chicken. Like that will, I don't know at what point will that not boggle my mind. It might take me four years to digest that. I don't know. I guess the new normal thing is just kind of, I don't know if there's anything that I've looked at and I'm like, oh my gosh, it's probably housing prices for me. Like when I first bought my house for what it, they just sold the house that we, so we bought our first house. We lived there for 10 years. We bought it in the 2008 crisis. So we brought it at a fire sale price. And we sold it for a hefty gain. And the people that just sold it again that we sold it to, because we get the Zillow alerts, you know?

37:55It's like, they sold it for how much? It's that, the housing prices thing to me is probably the most shocking. Yeah, that's going to take a longer time. All right, last comment on politics. Just to get ahead of the comments or whatever. Oh, you're going back. All right. The last thing. I understand that like us not having to really worry about who's in the White House is a position of privilege. I understand that. So for everybody that's going to email us and say, well, it's easy for you to say, I get it. I understand. Okay. We are privileged. I get it. Okay. Moving on. There's nothing you can say about politics right now that won't get someone angry.

38:28That's the problem. Should we just delete that whole thing? I know. No, it's probably best. But no, I don't think we said anything that's too up. I know. But you know we're getting emails. Whatever we say. From Bloomberg. Back to normal. Food inflation. Americans are now spending the same percentage of expenditures on food as they did before the pandemic. So food makes up 7.4 % of consumer spending, the lowest since before the pandemic in February of 2020. And they, I don't know who wrote this one for Bloomberg, but they're saying like, what if it was transitory? They look at the average, the CPI back to average.

38:57I know. But the question is, what happens to make it come back? That's, I think that's the thing that people are. When you say it come back, are we talking about price levels? No, no, no, not, that's never going back. Higher, higher prices. What's the thing that makes inflation get back to 5 %? What would it take? I have no idea. You see what happened to oil yesterday? Down 6 % on the day? Oil just goes into— Oil's in a lost two decades, are we, almost? It's crazy. It's funny. There was, like, concerns about, like, the end of oil, like, that we would run out or something. Yes. It's under$70 again.

39:32And obviously, I don't know shit about energy, but, like, obviously alternative energy, clean energy, just there's a lot of supply, which is a good thing. So oil is now at$67 a barrel. That first happened in the spring of 2007. All right, so on a real basis. So even on a nominal basis, oil has gone nowhere for almost two decades. That's insane. Yeah. This is not great. It's about things going up. Bill McBride tweeted, the 30-year mortgage is now 7%. That sucks. It's unbelievable because the conventional wisdom was always, okay, rates go up much higher. You have the same level of activity. Prices have to fall.

40:15Instead, the housing market has gone, no, no, no, no, no. Rates go up. Activity falls. Prices go up a little bit. And that's what's going to happen again. I think, I was listening to Joe and Tracy. They had somebody on talking about the spread between mortgage rates and the 10-year. And like, why is it so high? It's like, investors demand a premium because it's, the term is like, there's negative convexity in the mortgage bond market. Yeah, that was a very good episode. Yeah, because if rates go down, people prepay and that's it. Like you just, you get your money back and now you have to invest in lower interest rates.

40:51And we know, we don't know, we think that rates are probably gonna go down and people are probably gonna refinance. And so mortgage buyers, mortgage bond buyers are demanding a premium as well they should. Yeah, that was a very good episode. Tom Graff, I think is the guy's name. All right, the Wall Street Journal is coming around to the Ben Carlson way of thinking. America's primed for home renovation resurgence. And they show the amount of spending has gone up considerably. They talk about the amount of $35 trillion in home equity. They did this poll where they say, they recently polled almost 500 households and they broke down into two groups of people with renovations.

41:2430-somethings planning work in the$60 ,000 range and then older homeowners eyeing updates that will cost$30 ,000. And they say the former are motivated by marriages, babies, and career changes. They are less sensitive to interest rates and prone to remodel sooner. And I think you and I fall into this category. And here's what I'm going to make the pitch for. People ask us a lot about home equity line of credit questions and stuff and renovating. If you locked into 3 % mortgage, your capacity to borrow is way, way higher than you think. Because if you had to buy a new home right now, you were forced to, and you had to take on that 7 % mortgage and a higher home price, you'd be borrowing more money.

41:56So that's why I'm okay taking out a home equity line of credit and borrowing a little bit. Because if I was in the market for a new house, I'd be borrowing more anyway. Now the opposite, the frugal person would say, no, no, no, you just save it. Save the difference. That's the thing and that makes sense to me too. To each their own. You know, there should be, not that I would read it, but there should be like a new homeowner manual, a handbook, if you will, for some of the things that you need to know. Like for example, oh, your boiler has filters that need to be changed and if it's leaking, don't just put a bucket underneath it for four years.

42:32Actually look into it. And I say this because... 40 years? Three. I don't know. When did I move in here? Yeah, five years. How often do you have to change the bucket? We change the bucket. It's cold in my house. There's a big difference between 60 degrees inside and 60 degrees outside, I learned. Yesterday, I took a warm shower because my hands were starting to freeze. My fingers were starting to freeze as I was typing. So you have no heat in your house right now? I have no heat in my house. So I called my HVAC guy. Shout out to Raphael. Why don't you just sell your Peloton if that's going to, if you need to.

43:07That guy's the best. He's showing me the boiler and the filter. And he's like, Michael, dude, you got to stay on top of this stuff. And I was like, nobody ever told me. So we were going to get a new dishwasher. Our dishwasher finally kicked the bucket because we just use it all the time, at least once a day. And I'm going to show you a picture of it because it's got a nice new rack for putting things in nice and orderly. And they're like, if you buy this lower end model, you have to change the filter once a year. And if you buy this higher end model, you don't have to change the filter. And I'm looking at the lower end model, which we currently have.

43:36And I go to my wife. I'm like, I've never changed a filter in a dishwasher. What? I didn't know that dishwashers had a filter. Yeah. Did you? No. Obviously, you don't. The way that you load your dishwasher. Of course not. Actually, Raphael came from my house. So I was laughing with him last night when my hot water went out last night. It'll be fixed today. But credit to me. What a husband I am. You have Raphael and Tito. You basically have the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. running a house over there. So I filled the bathtub for the boys and I didn't realize that the hot water had conked out. So I said, all right, they could skip one that it's fine.

44:08She goes, but I need to think about it. So I filled the bathtub and I boiled like eight pots of water did nothing, did absolutely nothing. The water was still freezing. So living in medieval times. Yeah. How did people do it back then? But anyway, so I called, I was joking that I called Rafael probably four years ago when my air condition conked out and all that I needed to do was replace the filters. You know, like there's like, you have like vents up top in the ceiling and there's just that little tiny filter that you get from Home Depot for four bucks. Do you know about that? Yes. Yeah, of course you do because you're a homeowner.

44:42I didn't know about that. My father-in-law tells me when to do these things. I don't know them. Here's my one pitch on renovation project. To your point, to each their own. Here's what I will say. If you want to do, if you really want to do a home renovation project, you want to redo that kitchen or bath, like, I don't think you wait. I don't, I don't think you wait and say, I'm going to wait for, I don't think prices are going any lower. If that's your thinking, I think if you, if you have the means, you do it. I don't think you wait because I think if you wait a year, price is going to be higher.

45:12If we had another year, the price is going to be even higher. I don't think the demand for this stuff is going down. Insert the Jennifer Love Hewitt, uh, meme. What are you waiting for. There you go. By the way, I think they're bringing it back. I don't know if they're making a show. We spoke about it. It's a show or another movie. A reboot of what I know you did last summer. Terrible movie that scared me in the 90s. Not a good movie. Great cast, though. Right? Sarah Michelle Gellar. See, that's my kind of horror movie. Oh, Ryan Felipe. You definitely love that guy in the 90s. Oh, Freddie Prince.

45:42You were definitely a big Freddie Prince guy. Freddie Prince Jr.? Were you not? Come clean. I mean, She's All That is... Listen, She had glasses on and her hair in a ponytail. And they took the glasses off, put the pony down, and she's beautiful. I was not another teen movie guy. That was hilarious. That introduced us to Chris Evans. That was a funny one. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Oh, actually, speaking of movies and scary stuff, somebody emailed us. It is Halloween after all. By the way, we have a Halloween party on Saturday night, which I'm not a Halloween party guy. That might shock you. So what are you going to wear for your costume?

46:15So I wasn't – I'm, like, not involved in this. So Robin like picked out, like she got, I'm going to be like coach stable and she's going to be a ref. So coach, that's a coach of the giants. So she got me like a, a head piece and a, I don't know. I don't even know what she got me, but I woke up this morning. I'm like, wait, I don't want to do that. I hate the giants. I can't stand, I can't take it anymore. You should wear your, you should wear your headset. You're wearing right now. I should be a podcaster. No, I'm saying wear the headset. Cause the coach was a headset. No, she got me a headset.

46:41Oh, okay. Uh, I just, I don't want to be him because I hate us. But anyway. Oh, I'm sorry. So here's – I distracted myself twice. So somebody emailed us asking about horror movies like slasher movies from the 80s. Jason Voorhees, Michael Myers, Freddie, et cetera. And he was wondering if those movies are like so dated that if somebody was to wear a hockey mask on Halloween, would kids today just think that they were being a goalie? That's a good question. I think – I don't – We went to a... There's this house... 10 minutes from our house that the people do a crazy Halloween... Like, their house is on a trail and they do these crazy Halloween decorations.

47:24People walk by it and look at them. And, like, you walk by stuff and it moves and jumps out at you or whatever. And there was a Michael Myers mask. And it freaked the kids out even though they'd never heard or seen of that movie. So I think it still plays. Oh, interesting. I'm not a big fan of, like, haunted jump-out people even though I like horror movies. I took Kobe to one a couple of years ago, and he wasn't scared because he had no idea, but it was like dark, and there was like... I did not enjoy it. That was too scary for me. You can't handle it? Even being a horror movie guy? Like spook walks, whatever they're called.

47:54Okay. Doesn't do it for me. Question from our listener. We are expecting our second child this month and are coming up on school decisions for our oldest. We're thinking through the public versus private K-12. Spreadsheet warrior perspective, the opportunity cost of private school is gargantuan, well under the seven figures over time. However, there are upsides to it that we value. We have access to highly rated public schools in my area. So this is an option as well. Since you have young ones, I'm sure you've thought through this at length. Curious your opinion. Disclaimer, this is obviously like, this is up to you.

48:24My thinking is, if you have a highly rated public school, I don't see the reason. I think private school, unless you have a kid that needs a certain specific area or something, I don't do you think the private versus public is really going to matter for your kid if you have a good public school that's my that's how I think about it and this is I went to a private school when I grew up oh you did well Catholic school does that count yeah okay I would have been just fine going to a public school that's my that's my line of thinking I don't want to I know nothing about private school I'm sure there's people who have very strong opinions on this but it depends on where you live I have great there's great public schools where I live so it wouldn't even occur to me to send.

49:07Your kids are going to public schools? Yeah. My kids getting out of daycare and going to public schools was like the biggest raise I've gotten in the past 10 years. That's just my line of thinking, especially if this person is a spreadsheet warrior. Oh, so let's be honest. I'm a man of the people. I'm a public school guy, okay? That's who I am. Or you could do a you could split your children up and send one to private, one to public and see which one ends up better. But it depends. Like if the option is sending them to like a crappy public school, like why would you do that if you if you could afford to not do that.

49:35So I don't know. It depends. But yeah, they have highly... Okay, this is a good feedback on Waymo. I was one of the earliest people to take an unsupervised ride in a Waymo here in Phoenix. They're fun and yes, like magic, for about five minutes. Then it gets oddly boring. They're one of my favorite things to do with visitors. However, given a chance, I will take Uber 10 times out of 10. Why? Because they're painfully slow and kind of annoying. They won't go a millisecond over the speed limit. They won't pass public buses. They take dumb routes. They often won't drop you at your exact location and will make you walk, et cetera.

50:02I've seen some videos where there's bumper to bumper traffic and the Waymo won't just nose out and get in line. So no one lets them in. So I can see the painfully slow part would really get to me because I've been in Ubers in New York before where they're weaving through five lanes of traffic and they're getting you there fast. Waymo sounds like socialism. I can see how that would be annoying. That actually makes sense to me. That sounds awful. All right. I got some stories. Okay. Kids puking in the middle of the night. We've been pretty darn lucky on kids puking in the middle of the night. But the other night, my daughter, my oldest, came in the room and said, hey, I threw up.

50:37And I walk in a room and there's a big pile of just sitting there. Smell does not go away. Oh, no, not at all. And she, for 36 hours, couldn't keep anything down. Couldn't keep water down. Couldn't keep food down. She threw up everything. And when that happens to your kid, it basically just puts a speed bump in your life. Like, your whole life has to stop when your kid is sick like that. Like, my wife had to take her to the hospital for IV fluids. we've always been lucky with that, but it's, it's tough. She's better now. All good. Kid puking in the middle of the night though. Like I was like, oh man, we've been so lucky.

51:10And then she threw up so many times. Awful. Awful. I've got a teen fashion take. Okay. Okay. This is coming from a guy who was Mr. GQ in his high school. Remember? Right. Voted on by my peers. Literally Mr. GQ. Like that, like that was a superlative that you won. Like in your senior year yearbook, you vote on like this person is most likely to be a CEO someday. This person, I got Mr. GQ, meaning I was best dressed in high school. So we've been going to some of the high school football games for my kids. Now they have friends. They're getting older. They want to go to the games and whatever, run around.

51:43They don't even watch the games. They just run around with their friends. I've got to take on teen fashion. It's time to step it up, teens, because I think the teens look like they work from home. They're wearing all pajama pants and joggers, and they're not, you know, where's the jeans with a flannel shirt and the vest that's what I wore in high school to the football games you did? I mean come on and that still plays today you know like I didn't see one pair of denim on a kid in high school they're all wearing joggers or even like pajama pants like step it up kids like have some respect on yourself that's my teen fashion take I was a slobby I was a slob of a looking kid in high school I definitely like stoned all the time just backwards hat dirty backwards hat I don't know.

52:31Not a teen fashion guy. Again, it might surprise you. Okay. I'm just saying, like, I think the pandemic probably changed things in them, but, like, I'm shocked at the amount of kids that are just way too laid back. Like, have some respect on yourself, teens. How about the mullet? There are a lot more mullets these days. The mullet is prominent. I don't mind it. I'm not going to lie. I forgot last week. Oh, no. No. I didn't forget. It was this week. I'm sorry. On the plane ride home, I was sitting next to a dude that was using a handkerchief, which is just so gross. Who uses a handkerchief? This dude was wiping his nose for four hours.

53:12Yeah, that's gross. I mean, throw it away. It's walking season up in the Northeast. Great walking weather. And I was walking around my town, which I do frequently, on phone calls, business phone calls, I might add. Not just walking. That's your thing. and every time you're on calls me, I see this. I'm always walking. I saw a delivery for like the big water jugs. I think the brand is Crystal Springs, like the big ones that go like, I guess, upside down into somebody's water tower. How is that still a thing? Those are good though. You have those? No. You mean like the water cooler? The water cooler for the house?

53:58You have that? Oh, no, no, not for the house. But those things, when I was in college, we lived in Philadelphia for a semester. And we had that. We had one of those in our house, in our apartment. And that was the greatest thing ever on the weekends. Just the cold water waiting for you after now. We had that in college too. But for homes, what's wrong with the Brita? Oh, okay. I don't know. Yeah, that's a good point. Most refrigerators come with a water filter too. But listen, I listen to the market. So obviously there's demand for there. so maybe I'm wrong. All right, I've noticed two bubbles, Ben.

54:31Bubble number one. Bubble number one. Water bottles? Not this one specifically. I don't know what this is. This is called Zulu. Gigantic water bottles. I walked into Target and there's a whole section of oversized water bottles. A whole section. This will not be a thing in five years. The thing is, it starts young. Did you ever water bottle when you were a kid? No. Oh, yeah, yeah, I know kids have water bottles these days. My kids have water bottles at all times. Like my kids have the big Stanley cups. They have a water bottle. They have a sports water bottle. They have a house water bottle, a school water bottle.

55:02But we don't need 47 different variations of water bottles. Here's another thing that we don't need 47 varieties of that I think is in a bubble. Greek yogurt. You know how much I love to grocery shop. I'm a big Greek yogurt guy. Who doesn't love Greek yogurt? Do we need 40 brands? I agree. There's too many of them. A lot of shelf space. Get the zero sugar ones. They taste just as good. I don't do that. You don't need all the fat and sugar. I need it. Okay. All right. Recommendations. Can I go first? Please. All right. You said you went to see the movie Trap in the theaters recently, a month or two ago.

55:33And when you explained the plot to me, you said, hey, it's a serial killer who is brought to a concert with his daughter and they're trying to trap him in. I thought, wow, that actually, and you said the ending's kind of ridiculous, but the premise. No, no, no, no. Not kind of. Ludicrous. I will insert one more thing. I went with a friend. And so we had a great time literally chuckling at the absurdity of it. had I watched it by myself on my couch, I probably would have thought differently. This is one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. Oh my Lord, was it bad. But did you have fun? Not just bad, but bad because it took itself seriously.

56:09That's the problem. No. There's some movies that don't, you don't think it took itself too serious? No, not at all. I thought Josh Hartnett was very cringe and I'm a pretty big Josh Hartnett fan. Here's the other thing. There are no serial killers anymore. I don't think serial killers can exist anymore. And also, he's a parent who's a serial killer. There's no way you could have time to be a serial killer as a parent. Do not nitpick M. Night. Don't nitpick M. Night. Like, stop. Ugh. It was—I liked the Cabin in the Woods one. This movie was really, really bad. Like, in a cringey way. Yeah, yeah.

56:39No shit. But, okay, so you didn't even have fun? Like, I had fun watching it. I had to finish it just because I—but the—it just—it was off the—the plot itself, like, how he kept escaping, it didn't make any sense. Exactly. Okay. Speaking of serial killers, there's a movie on Netflix called Woman of the Hour where by Anna Kendrick, I think she directed it too. It was a true story in the 70s of a guy which is obviously got to be the height of serial killers in the 70s. I feel like all of them took place in the 70s. Yeah. That was like serial killer decade. And it was this woman who went on the dating game show.

57:10You know where you have one woman sit and then there's three guys on the other side and you can't see them and they answer questions? It was that show and there was a guy who was literally a serial killer who went on that show and she picked him as a date. And it's one of those stories where the true story of nature of it is better than the movie itself. But it was only like 90 minutes, so not bad. But it's one of those ones where I've never even heard of the serial killer. I think this guy killed anywhere between 10 and 130 people in the 70s. Speaking of dating shows, how great was Singled Out?

57:38Remember Jenny McCarthy and then Cameron Lutcher? I would watch that when I got home from school, for sure. Who hosted it? What was the dude's name? Chris something? Chris Hardwick. Yeah, great hair. Not bad. I started watching The Penguin. I'm two episodes in. So I'm guessing I'm going all Michael Batnick takes here. Here's my one nitpick with it. Good show. No, no, no. It doesn't even, it doesn't even, just wait till episode four before you, before you, but fine. No, but the only nitpick is not, not with the plot, but it's with just, I love Colin Farrell, but him in the fat suit in the makeup, like it's hard for me to take it seriously knowing that he's in all the makeup and stuff.

58:13Okay, I understand. Come back to us after episode four, okay? All right, I'm two episodes in. I like it, but that's my only nitpick. Okay. What do you got? All right. I saw Adam Neiman, a film critic who I very much enjoy, tweet something about a movie, like a horror movie that he will judge people's taste based on this movie. And I'm like, huh, this doesn't even look familiar to me. So I Googled it. The movie is Kill List, by the way. Kill List. So I Google it, and it shows – Ben, look at the doc. It says – it shows already watched. Check. And I'm thinking to myself, whoa, that's a cool feature.

58:50how does it know that I watch this? Wait a minute. I don't remember watching this. I've never seen this movie. So I fired it up on, I think it's on Prime. And it turns out I did watch this movie. And it is a very good movie. So who knew that you watched it? Google did. Look at this. I put it on the doc. It says already watched. Check. Interesting. And I had no memory of this movie until when I got in. I was like, oh yeah, yeah, yeah. Very good movie. I did forget I watched this. I feel like you could get in trouble with some other types of adult entertainment. Yeah. Yeah. I was talking to speak of horror Terrifier 3 crosses $50 million at the worldwide box office and officially becomes the highest grossing unrated film even surpassing the highest grossing NC-17 films Damian Leone the creator tweeted that I don't love the Terrifier movies it's just not necessarily for me but it is incredible that there's people love this shit horror is like really killing it at the box office I guess the indie horror is the one thing that can really break through.

59:50Those are like micro caps that go to like, right? Yeah, because they cost nothing to make. So one of those movies is a movie called Strange Darling, which I believe I've pounded the table on here before. I love this movie. And I, so here's what I do, Ben. I don't know about you. I don't watch trailers for these movies. So like, yeah, Gladiator 2, like, yeah, I'll see the trailer, I guess, if it's on. But I don't go seeking out trailers. Oh, because they give away too much in the trailers these days, right? So I just, I raw dog it. So like, I was talking to Arts and a couple of the guys that we work with about another movie called Mads that I saw Sean Fentasy tweet about.

1:00:23So I'm in. If I see Sean Fentasy tweet about a horror movie, I'm watching it. I had no idea what it was about. And Arts is like, oh, I could have already probably guessed a twist. I'm like, why are you watching the trailers? Just go watch the movie. Just go watch the movie. No expectations. So anyway, Strange Darling is one of these such movies. Like again, I could probably guess a twist. Like just go watch the movie. Strange Darling, Table Pounder. Great movie. I'm sorry. You're the opposite to me of Sean Fentasy. These movies just don't do it for me, so no offense to you, but I just won't watch it.

1:00:51No offense taken. We watched Mrs. Doubtfire with our kids the other day. So good. I don't think there's anyone past or present who could have played that part that Robin Williams played. I think he's the only person who could have played that. Did I call him the greatest comedic actor of all time? The thing is, I don't think he's, there's no comedic actors who could also pull off what he did in Good Will Hunting as well. No. He really was a one of one. So I saw that movie, that hit home because I saw the movie, I think I saw the movie like a year after my parents got divorced. I was like six years old.

1:01:20So that movie really f***ed up in a good way. I feel like the 90s had a lot of divorce movies. You don't see those as much anymore. It's true. I love that movie. Yeah, it really did. And my kids were into it too. How great was Pierce Brosnan? The whole cast, even the kids were great. What a movie. What a movie. All right, Ben. Happy election week. No, that's next week. Happy Halloween. Do we need to tease our election special we're doing? Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. So know what are your thoughts next Tuesday. It's election night. So on Wednesday, myself, Ben, Josh, and Callie, we are going to talk about the market's reaction to the election.

1:01:56And maybe there will be a big reaction and maybe there won't be. We'll record Animal Spirits as usual on Tuesday. So the Wednesday show will be – I'll share my thoughts about if this person wins, this will happen, if this person wins, that will happen. So I'll have those two forks made up, those two paths. But yeah, then we're going live on Wednesday. Tune in at the compound. Email us, animalspirits at compoundnews.com. See you next time.

From the publisher

On episode 384 of Animal Spirits, Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson discuss: changing narratives in the markets, why interest rates are rising, why you should never take macro advice from hedge fund managers, why the S&P 500 is so hard to beat, living paycheck-to-paycheck on $150k, why the 2020s inflation was so painful, 7% mortgage rates, the downside of Waymo, and much more!

This episode is sponsored by Global X and Kraneshares.
To learn more about Global X’s entire suite of ETFs from covered calls, fixed income, emerging markets, and more, visit: https://www.globalxetfs.com

Keep up on the latest out of China at China Last Night and learn more about the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF at: https://kraneshares.com/kweb/

Sign up for The Compound newsletter and never miss out: thecompoundnews.com/subscribe
Subscribe to The Unlock newsletter: https://www.advisorunlock.com/subscribe

Find complete show notes on our blogs:
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor

Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
 
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.
The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.
Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Animal Spirits Podcast

All 382 episodes
The Cost of the American Dream (EP.384)Animal Spirits Podcast · 1 h 3 min
Listen in VO