The Dumbest Trade War (EP.398)

5 Feb 2025 · 1 h

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Animal Spirits Podcast - Episode 398: The Dumbest Trade War

Overview In episode 398 of the Animal Spirits Podcast, hosts Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson dive into a variety of topics concerning markets and investing, with a particular focus on the implications of tariffs, AI's potential influence on the stock market, and several investing myths. The episode also touches on personal anecdotes related to life experiences, from skiing to home renovations.

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Tariffs and Their Economic Impact
  2. Definition of Tariffs: Tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods, which are ultimately passed on to consumers.
  3. Destructive Nature of Tariffs: Both hosts argue that tariffs are counterproductive to free-market capitalism and can harm the economy.
  4. Historical Context:
  5. Cullen Roche's perspective that the U.S. is now a technology and service-based economy, making a return to heavy manufacturing unrealistic.
  6. Discussion of the Wall Street Journal's characterization of the current trade situation as "the dumbest trade war in history."
  1. Market Reactions and Economic Implications
  2. Market’s Reaction to Tariffs: Despite initial fears, the market showed a more muted response than anticipated, signaling investor confidence.
  3. Potential Economic Consequences: Exploration of how tariffs could negatively affect various sectors, such as agriculture, beer, and consumer goods, due to reliance on imports.
  4. Regional Effects: Discussion on the potential repercussions for both the U.S. and its trading partners, particularly Canada and Mexico.
  1. AI’s Role in Future Markets
  2. AI as a Market Stabilizer: The hosts speculate on AI's ability to support market recovery over the next decade.
  3. Shifts in Market Narratives: The conversation indicates how quickly market narratives can change, especially with AI developments and corporate earnings.
  1. Vanguard’s Market Assumptions
  2. Vanguard’s Predictions: Vanguard’s projections for the next decade suggest lower returns from stocks and bonds.
  3. Historical Perspective on Predictions: The hosts note that predictions from financial firms are often inaccurate, highlighting the difficulty of forecasting long-term returns.
  1. Leveraged ETFs and Investment Strategies
  2. Leveraged ETFs: Discussion around the popularity and risks associated with leveraged ETFs in the current market environment.
  3. Investor Behavior: The conversation highlights the difference between informed and uninformed investors in utilizing these financial instruments.
  1. Personal Anecdotes and Lifestyle Insights
  2. Skiing and Family Dynamics: Both hosts share personal stories about skiing, peer pressure related to social events, and family vacations.
  3. Home Renovation Trends: Discussion on the remodeling boom, particularly in older homes, and the rising costs associated with renovations.
  1. Cryptocurrency Insights
  2. Bitcoin as a Risk Asset: The hosts clarify that Bitcoin should not be seen as a hedge against tariffs; rather, it is a high-risk asset that behaves according to market sentiment.
  1. Financial Planning and Education
  2. 529 Plans vs. Bitcoin for College Savings: Debate over the controversial choice some parents are making to invest their children's education funds in Bitcoin instead of traditional savings plans.

Conclusion The episode encapsulates a wide range of topics, from serious discussions about economic policy and market behavior to lighter personal stories about family life and hobbies. The hosts emphasize the importance of maintaining a balanced perspective on market volatility and the complexities of investing, while also reflecting on personal life experiences that shape their views on finance.

Additional Resources

  • Debunking Investing Myths Deck - YCharts: [Link](https://go.ycharts.com/debunking-investing-myths)
  • Subscribe to The Compound Newsletter: [thecompoundnews.com/subscribe](https://thecompoundnews.com/subscribe)
  • Blogs for Complete Show Notes:
  • Ben Carlson’s [A Wealth of Common Sense](https://awealthofcommonsense.com)
  • Michael Batnick’s [The Irrelevant Investor](https://theirrelevantinvestor.com)

Feedback Listeners can reach out with any feedback, questions, or topic suggestions via email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Today's Animal Spirits is brought to you by our friends at YCharts. Whitecharts created a brand new deck helpful for advisors called Debunking Investing Myths. And I've got some favorite charts in here that they use. They have one that says fallen stocks will always bounce back. This is a thing where you - Not true. No, it's not. So they show AIG, 96 % below all-time highs. Citigroup, 88 % below all-time highs. This one surprised me. Walgreens is 90 % below all-time highs. So while sometimes it seems like, oh, I'll just wait till a stock crashes and I'll buy it and it'll obviously come back. because that's happened to a lot of stocks in recent years.

0:35Not all the time. Most of the time, in fact, these stocks never come back. If there was an ETF of stocks making new 52-week lows, it would be the worst performer eight out of 10 years. Yes. You'd have maybe one winner in there or something, but you wouldn't have a lot of them. So we're big fans of myth-busting here. Click the link in the show notes. Download a copy of YCharts' latest deck. Get 20 % off your initial YCharts professional subscription when you start your first free YCharts trial through Animal Spirits, new customers only. ByTrust.com to learn more. Tell me anything else we just sent you.

1:11Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions. Clients of Britholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.

1:40Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. We're going to start the show with one more plug for Future Proof. Signups are going bananas, Ben. Gangbusters, if you will. So if you are an emerging manager, again, no offense, not like a pajama day trader, but a real financial professional, and you want to showcase to the world what you're up to, sign up, link in show notes. One other thing that we've mentioned in the past, but not for this particular event. Again, it's March 16th to March 19th in Miami, Miami beach, literally on the beach. If you are an advisor, you are eligible for a 700 up to a $750 reimbursement for travel and hotels.

2:26So what that means is you're going to, you're going to pay, you're going to sign up, you're going to pay. But if you sign up for, uh, I think it's eight breakthrough meetings. And again, we'll link in the show notes. It's all there. You have to pay, but afterwards you submit for reimbursement and up to$750, uh, with, with a free ticket, I should add. So come on, no brainer. Yes. And those breakthrough meetings are helpful too. Yeah. That's not homework. You opt in, you can meet with who you want to meet with. I think for one of these future proofs, we need to do a roulette roll the dice and all of a sudden Ben or Michael is there for one of these breakthrough meetings.

2:58A mystery guest, if you will. Right? I don't hate it. I don't hate it. So, okay, this has been a year. The Deep Seek stuff feels like it was 14 years ago. I don't love a lot of what's happening, but especially the fact that we have to be glued to our phones on a Sunday night. Not a big fan of that. Or the weekend. Did you just say or the weekend? Well, just the whole weekend. Yeah. Because it's kind of started on Friday. So most weekends, I'm busy with kid stuff, right? It's sports and practices and birthday parties. and now we're going to go skiing or whatever. And so one of the great things about that is a lot of parents complain, I'm so busy, but I love being able to focus on my kids and not have to focus on the outside world, right?

3:55I think it's actually like one of the benefits of being so busy is like I don't have time to be glued to my screen. But this weekend, kids settle down, and I'm looking at all this tariff stuff. So I have the analogy. Well, you're a big tariff guy. Let's just get that on the record. Ben's a big tariff guy. I don't like the fact – first of all, we're going to get into all the tariff stuff and luckily it seems like that's on hold for 30 days. We're going to talk about what it means. Yeah, I don't like that we have to talk about this because I don't think that Ben and I are overly political people.

4:25But inevitably, there are people that feel very strongly about this that are going to email us and strong opinions. I don't know how to be nonpolitical about this, but my feelings on tariffs have nothing to do with the president, okay? So tariffs, I just – what are we doing? I don't get it. Now, again, fine, you could say he won because it was all a negotiating tactic. But he actually does like tariffs. Like this was not a bluff. And I guess credit to him because there were some deals that were made. But tariffs are not good. And what are tariffs? They are a tax that the importer pays for bringing goods into the country that ultimately gets passed along to everyone.

5:03It is destructive economic behavior. It is like the opposite of free market capitalism. So Cullen Roche, I thought, had really the best idea because a lot of people were saying, hey, listen, I would rather buy my products that are manufactured in the States and have to pay more. Fine. People were saying this. And Cullen Roche said, listen, the genie is not going back in the bottle. We're a technology and service-based economy now. You can't go back to the way things were when everything was manufactured here. That's just not going to happen. I agree with the political thing because just because you have a financial analysis of something like this, it doesn't matter.

5:40I don't care if it's Republican, Democrat, Independent, a Green Party, whatever. The facts are the facts. And the Wall Street Journal had the headline saying this is the dumbest trade war. Well, the notoriously liberal Wall Street Journal. Yeah, the dumbest trade war in history. And my explanation of this, I watched the movie Saturday night at Netflix this weekend, which was very good. Ben movie, not a Michael movie. I'll put it out there for that. So it was the very first night of the very first show of Saturday Night Live back in the 70s. And I guess they took like six months of stories and put them into one night.

6:08So it was very chaotic. And Jason Reitman did it. I thought it was very well done. And the guy who played Chevy Chase, because it was Chevy Chase and Jim Belushi and Gilda Radner and Dan Aykroyd and Billy Crystal and all these people. And I thought all the actors did a very good job. But the guy who played Chevy Chase just nailed Chevy Chase. He looked like him. The mannerisms were the same. And at the beginning of the movie - You're a big Chevy Chase guy, right? Oh, love. Chevy Chase is a one-on-one. What movie says he's been in? I'm just kidding. So Chevy Chase is, and apparently this is a gag he did.

6:36He's walking down the hallway, and he does a theatrical trip, and he falls over. And he gets up, and he jumps up, and he goes, oh, sorry, I tripped over my penis. In a very arrogant way. And that's the way I view these tariffs, is that it's just more of an ego-arrogant thing. Like, why are we doing them? Because we can. And that, because the U.S. is in such a good position, It's like, well, why wouldn't we do this? Because we can. And I think that's the biggest mistake of puffing our chest out and be like, well, of course we can do these. Because you don't know what the downfield effects are of that.

7:10And that's my worry. All right. So let's get into some of the facts. Again, on hold, but who knows if they're going to be put on. So let's get into like if tariffs were to go into effect on our two biggest trade partners, what would that mean for us, Ben? Before we get into this, the one thing I want to say is I would actually be okay with tariff, like targeted tariffs on China. Like China is a huge competitor of ours. If we wanted to put targeted tariffs on China and not let them completely take over the world, I'd be fine with that. But on Canada and Mexico, that's where it doesn't make sense.

7:41Because guess what? I like drinking Modelo. I like Pacifico. I like avocados. So this is from Torsten Slock. Goods imported from, good imports make up 11 % of US GDP. 43 % of imports come from Canada, Mexico, and China. That means 5 % of US GDP is directly impacted by higher tariffs. And so it's a lot. And Callie Cox breaks it down for us. She did a great job on her site looking at all this. It's 90 % of our fresh vegetables come from Canada or Mexico. 84 % of beer, because the Modelo is like the biggest beer company in the world now. These are really high numbers. Berries and poultry and baked goods and lumber products like pork.

8:21Toys, game, and sports equipment. 73 % of it is from China. All above 50 % of our consumption of these comes from these three trade partners. It's a big deal. Bloomberg did another one where they looked at it. And again, it's beer and fruit and vegetables and distilled spirits and poultry. 67 % of our berries come from Mexico. Ben, I think I speak for all parents out there. Kids eat a lot of berries. We go through a ton of fruit in our household. Yeah. So again, this is, and the funny thing to me about the tariff talk is no one ever even assumes that the businesses are going to pay for these. Right.

8:59It's no one ever assumes like that tariffs are a tax on businesses. No. Right. Well, they're not. Well, right. But because they immediately get taken by the consumer. Right. But you wouldn't even consider that they'd be. Again, they, Mexico, Bento, Canada, the next. I don't say that as a good thing. I still don't think this was great on balance. But there were concessions. And again, I don't know enough about the border stuff. That's outside the scope of our shtick. So this is from a Canadian listener. And a lot of people in Canada were rightly scared because it could have a real impact on their economy.

9:37We heard from a lot of our Canadian friends. Yeah, and this one was probably pretty, you know, exemplifies this. So we're scared, we're angry, we fear vulnerable and betrayed. I live in a small province that relies heavily on non-energy US trade. We're going to be decimated. There was booing at the Raptors game for the national anthem over the weekend. Like, this is not good. So the social media world freaked out. All the people in my financial sphere that I follow spent all weekend completely freaking out. And I made the joke that, like, if social media sentiment from finance people translated into market moves, we would have had a 1987 moment on Monday.

10:10Like, that's how much people were freaking out about this. Because I think the people on Wall Street had initially thought, like, he's never actually going to go through this. These are a negotiating ploy, and I guess it turned out to be a negotiating ploy. But Ben, you did a meme that was funny. What was your meme? Oh, I did a clown meme saying Wall Street analysis on tariffs, and it was basically like he's never going to go through with it. These are a negotiating ploy. Okay, they're going to be targeted tariffs, but no, actually, if the trade war will actually be short, if it short-lived, if it happens.

10:38But the truth is, again, not knowing his exact motivation, but it was. Was it not a negotiating tactic? I guess. But it sounds like the tariffs on China are going through. So I don't think anyone, I think that's the hard part for people is we don't know. So I think people spent the weekend freaking out because it's like, oh gosh, maybe this is going to go through. And people thought like the financial implications of this are just not good. I was an unforced error. Like we're, we're so, we're so far on the other side of, of inflation. And like, we're in a pretty good economic environment and like, why shoot ourselves in the foot now counterpoint?

11:12It's like, well, he ran on this. And now I wonder if like the market's reaction. So we'll talk about this maybe a little bit later, but the market, the S &P opened down 2%. Right now, crypto was crashing. We'll talk about that later. S &P futures opened down 2%. NASDAQ opened down 3%. The VIX only, I hesitate to even say spike, but it went up to 20. There was, it was a pretty muted reaction on Wall Street. And there was people saying like, even last week on Friday, like, why is the market looking past this? It feels complacent. And I think the market was right in looking past this and saying, listen, it's not going to happen.

11:48It's your boy who cried wolf analogy from a few weeks ago. The downside of that is let's say you take the chance of the economy breaking from 5 % to 15%. So Jake at Economic did this thing. He said, if I wanted to crash the economy, I think I'd put on indiscriminate tariffs, push cheap labor out of the country, slash public jobs, cut public spending, promote an alternative to the dollar, and incentivize every global ally to look to partner with China. Maybe that's getting too cute, but let's say you just took the percentage from 5 to 15. I don't know how you reprice that. And I also think if we get out of a boy who cried wolf situation where like, okay, finally he does say, screw it, I'm going to do it.

12:25Is there a potential for an air pocket in the stock market? And I think that there is. And I'm really glad that stock market does not trade 24-7 because I think you would have seen a much bigger move this weekend because crypto was a pretty good risk off barometer, right? So that's why I'm glad that the stock market has the weekend to kind of chill through this stuff. Through the lens of the stock market alone, there is so much strength underneath the surface. There is so much buying. Oh, yeah. This easily, would you have been surprised if this was a down 6 % date? Now, I guess, again, given that there was a deal made, it's not surprising the way things ended up.

13:01But even prior to that, the market was really not down a lot, especially given that we were 2 % from all-time highs. It's like it could have been way worse, but the market strength is –

13:36The only thing that matters to the stock market is going to be AI for the rest of the decade. And the economy actually gets hurt more than the stock market in this case. Well, it's so funny how quickly the narratives shift because last week it was all about earnings. It was all about Mag 7. It was all about Deep Six, right? It was Deep Six. And then how did Mag 7 look? And they look good. And numbers look good. Deep Six sounds better than Deep Seek, but it is Deep Seek. Deep Seek, my bad. What's Deep Six? I don't know. Deep Six is a better name. It sounds like some sort of spaceship in an alien movie.

14:01But the narrative shifts are wild. Nick Kolas, so in terms of thinking about the next four years, Nick Kolas was on with Jessica and Josh yesterday. And he said, for as much as we talk about Trump's erratic policies, 80 of the 100 or something like that, of the 100 lowest VIX closes ever were during Trump's administration when there were tariffs. So it might not translate one for one. Now, it seems like these are more aggressive than the first go around. These are way bigger. So that's the potential difference. But I just think where we are, I think the AI stuff last week and NVIDIA dropping 20 % or so in a day almost, I think that just shows that the margin of safety for this, to keep harping on that term, is much lower because stock prices are higher, valuations are higher.

14:51Yes and no. Investors have way bigger gains. So I just think the potential for a VIX spike is way higher now than it was back then. I think that ultimately, the tariffs are like, to use the dog on the leash analogy, the tariffs are the dog and AI earnings are the person walking the dog. And I think that ultimately, Mag7, the AI mega story, which is what it is, will trump, pun intended, Trump's policies. Not in the short run, not like overnight, there's going to be wiggles and stuff, but ultimately that is the arrow pointing up. And the big downside risk is you have these tariffs and you have presidential volatility and you have AI that comes up short for whatever reason.

15:35That would be bad. But as investors, as you know, this is unsettling and whatever you might, you might like it, you might not, but you gotta look, you gotta look through the volatility. My whole thing is, I just think there's going to be a lot of reasons to freak out. I tweeted this on Sunday night, like it's easy to freak out, but like there's a high likelihood any tariff related sell-off would be a buying opportunity. Yeah. It's because we have the ability to walk them back. Because to your point, saying this is an unforced error, it does seem like it is, but it also seems like the Fed raising rates is that if the Fed raised rates too high, they could just take them down.

16:12And if Trump puts tariffs on too high and it causes a freak out, he can take them off. And I think that's the way Wall Street is looking at this. Yeah. Like, we don't know what happened in conversations with Trump and the leaders of Mexico and China yesterday. What if Trump was the one that caved due to the market's reaction and he was just looking for – like, I'm not saying that happened, but the point is this is not – like, separate this from your portfolio. You have to. Yes. You have to. You can't freak out about this stuff all the time. Even if you don't like the policies or whatever, you don't like what it's doing, you can't make investment decisions based on that.

16:46All right. Here's another one. Again, we have to cover because I think it's a huge story. I am, my bias is I don't like this. I read this article and say, I don't like this. It makes me uncomfortable. I don't like it. On the one hand, I also don't necessarily love how much bloat is in the federal government. Like there's no doubt that the federal government, the systems, the processes, the technology is built on a layer that was, that's from the 1970s, right? Like there's got to be a way to modernize the infrastructure, streamline it, bring it into the 21st century. I'm for that. Like I am. I think that's probably unbalanced a good thing.

17:22And I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt to see where this goes. But this, this scares me. Can we start with the convenience fee every time I pay my property taxes? Sure. Can we get rid of that? Absolutely. So what am I talking about? There was an article in the Wall Street Journal, Doge gains access to payment systems doling out trillions to Americans. So let me read the article. The Treasury Department has agreed to give Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency access to a payment system that distributes trillions of dollars in entitlement benefits, grants and tax funds to Americans each year.

17:51Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, who was confirmed by the Senate this past week, greenlighted the move to grant Doge representatives access to the system, which is typically run by career civil servants. Treasury's payment systems is one of the main financial arteries of the U.S. government operating as an account payable department that disperses money to contractors and millions of Americans who get Social Security payments. Any interruption in its operations could result in far-reaching economic disruptions. The payment system handles nearly 88 % of all federal payments, including some 81 million payments every month for Social Security, Medicare, and veterans benefits.

18:23This is like the most sensitive thing that we have. And the richest person in the world with all sorts of potential conflicts of interest is in charge. Again, do I think that this needs modernization? Yes. is Elon the person to do it? I don't know. Maybe. Like, is this idea a little bit worrisome? Yeah, it is. So I guess for years, they've always said like, why doesn't the government run like a business? Or why don't we have a business person running the government? And I guess this is going to be the grand experiment to see how those two things can coexist. Yeah. So I'm not going to make any decisions on ultimately how I feel before this pans out.

19:07Like I said, I'm open-minded. I I like parts of this, but we'll see. Interesting time. Was that a Grand Rapids hedge? Not quite. Okay. That was like a 70-30 hedge. Okay. All right. Vanguard produced their look ahead for the 10 years for what their capital market assumptions are. That's a very high-level sounding thing, but it just means what do they expect returns to be? Now, Vanguard is, again, they tend to lean bearish. They're bonds for the long run, right? Yeah, right. Well, for the next 10 years, they might be. So they look at the median is kind of like that's their base case, I guess. And they think over the next decade, bonds are going to beat U.S.

19:50stocks. They said roughly 5 % for bonds and 4 % for U.S. stocks. That would in no way surprise me. I don't think the scenario is easy to lay out. Yeah, we know what bonds are going to do, right? The bonds are only 5%. Okay, that's about what you're going to get. can I see stocks doing 4 % given that we've just done 15 for 15 years? Yeah. Here is a Grand Rapids hedge. I could also see the AI train continuing and lifting as much higher, but it is credit to Vanguard. Like this is sticking their neck out. I'm sure valuation-based and mean reversion-based and yeah, we could do 10 % a year for the next 10 years.

20:30Counterpoint, literally not specific to Vanguard, on every single one of these capital market forecasts has been wrong for the last decade. Oh, yeah. They're almost never right, right? Aswath DeModeran, the professor at NYU, who's probably one of the better podcast guests. If he's on a podcast, I'm going to listen. He's always very good. He does this annual thing where he updates the calendar year returns for stocks, bonds, cash, and he added small caps and real estate and gold and all this. And I reference it all the time. I use it for my blog. And I was looking at it, And every year I update it once a year.

21:03I go through an update and I say, what are the, and he goes back to 1928. So I update, what are the returns from 1928 to 2024? And so I updated it from 2023 to 2024. And I saw like the very long-term return ticked up. And I looked at this and I thought, oh, you know, a few years ago, it was, the long-term return was 9.5%. And now it's closer to 10 % because we've had such a good run. And I wanted to look at how much this has changed. So since in 1999, the long-term return for US stocks was 10.8%. This is the S &P. By 2008, after that lost decade, it was down to 9%. So we lost almost two percentage points of long-term returns from the lost decade.

21:43Obviously, that's at the bottom almost. Now, since then, since 2008, we've added a percent back. So we're back to 10%. That's like how much this run has added and how hurtful that lost decade was for long-term. This is obviously very, very long-term returns. This is now we're closing in on 100 years of returns. But I think it is interesting how a 10 or 15-year cycle can really impact even the long, long term. Remember in 2019? When was Fang coined? Was it 2017 or 2015? I think 2017. I'd say 17 sounds about right. Okay. So, of course, there was many people who were like alarm bells, like this is the top.

22:20There's a name for these groups. Apple's a trillion top, right? So Demodron did a blog post where he showed the contribution in overall market cap from the MAG-7. And this is from 2020 to 2024 by year. 44%, 30%, 43%, 55%, 50%. So from 2019 to 2024, 45 % of the gains in the market are from the MAG-7. So we are the world that's resting on the shoulders of these giants. Wow. Not bad shoulders to be resting on, but nevertheless. less. And I still feel like the 2030s, there's going to be like two or three other companies that are robotics companies or AI companies that are trillion dollar companies that - I think they're going to be inside the Mach 7, like Optimus for Tesla, for example.

23:06These are the biggest venture companies in the world. All right. I just think there's going to be a new company that we don't know about, or that's good that nvidia was one of them nvidia was not in the top 10 as recently as 2019 true so i just think there's going to be another company that comes up i mean another sure but if you're going to say that like there's going to be a new crop that like takes the throne or the crown i would take the other side of that nvidia just did that though no i'm saying like a new group of companies that like oh a group of companies okay the idea that the mag 7 is going a turnover.

23:44I don't buy it. Yeah, the whole MAG7, I agree. A few of them, I still think it's possible. All right. Eric Belchunis tweeted about the Vanguard effect. We've seen a$5 trillion swing from high-cost active to low-cost passive over the past decade. And you can see this, it's, I mean, we've seen this chart before where one of them's going straight down, the other one's going straight up. Now, Vanguard just announced this week, they're slashing expense ratios on hundreds of mutual funds and ETFs, amounting to what the firm said is the largest cost cut in history at over at over 350 million investor savings per year like taking what it is now they on an average that drops the fees from 11 basis points to nine basis points and someone will go oh geez thanks two basis points but that's 20 20 savings and on trillions of dollars that's uh now you're talking real numbers black rock was down five percent yesterday why it was a problem this hello earth to ben Oh, yeah, well, so just because Vanguard took their fees from 11 to 9, BlackRock's down 5 %?

Read the full transcript

24:45Yeah. Just because they know they're going to have to match? Yeah. Jack Bogle really is a saint. Like, because if Vanguard didn't do this, BlackRock wouldn't have done this either. Is that fair to say? It would have happened. Somebody would have done it. It would have taken a lot longer. Not taken anything away from Bogle. All credit to him, but somebody would have done this. Vanguard is quite possibly the best thing that's ever happened to individual investors. Is that fair to say? No, that and triple levered ETFs. Speaking of which, all the way on the other side. Okay, so Bloomberg had an article about levered ETFs.

25:20And they say traders have been diving into leveraged exchange trading funds. Someone asked us, is it levered or leveraged? Which one is it? Either way. Either way. Dealers choice. Okay. I feel like— I say both. Okay. Yeah, I probably do too. Yeah. Traders have been diving into leveraged exchange traded products, funds, excuse me, a subset of a derivative is enhanced products offering to amp up. All right. Why am I reading this? They netted around$940 million in revenue in 2024. That's a record 37 % jump. $940 million in revenue. So like, that's the headline, right? Like, holy shit. And my credit to me, my initial thought is, well, I need to know more.

25:58Like, all right. But what value were they providing? And again, we've spoken a bazillion times about these products because we get emails all the time. And we get another email from a very sophisticated listener who's like, listen, if you are using these levered or leveraged ETFs inside of a portfolio, it can actually have diversification benefits. You can get intelligent leverage. I'm like, listen, dude, I'm not talking to you. You know exactly what you're doing. And there are absolutely ways to use this responsibly, even though they're not meant to be held to the long term, whatever. Like there are ways inside of a portfolio.

26:32I'm talking to the kids that are just getting started that email us like, hey, why wouldn't I just put all my money into a triple lever ETF? Like that's who I'm talking to. But anyway, be that as it may, Jeffrey Patek did Yeoman's work. I don't know what that means, but I know it's something people say. To like look further beyond just the fees, like what sort of value did they provide to investors? And look at this chart. It shows the fees versus the income and the gains. And the fees as noted are a billion, but the income and the gains are like, $16 billion. So Jeffrey said, if you're like me, and Jeffrey is an analyst at Morningstar, if you're like me, you look at this and say, sure, they paid a lot in fees, but they also made real money, $16.5 billion in income gains.

27:12To put those numbers in context, the ETFs held$38 billion in average net assets that year in all. So it means investors paid 0.65 % of average net in asset and management fees and earned a 43 % return on those assets. Not bad. Not bad at all. The funny thing is, is that no one has ever invested in a levered ETF before and gone, I wonder what the fee is on this thing. Yeah, nobody cares. It's besides the point. But what really stands out is the extent to which investors' dollar gains in these ETFs lagged the ETF's reported total returns. So that's like the behavior gap stuff. We know that. That has nothing to do with the product issuer.

27:49And then Jeffrey goes further to say that the actual gains lagged what the issuer said they might expect to gain. But either way, credit to Jeffrey, great analysis. Yes. But every time we talk about these products, we do get an email from someone who has an intelligent way of thinking about these. And I agree. If you have a highly volatile strategy within your portfolio and you use it to rebalance, it actually can provide benefits in your portfolio. But a lot of people that ask us these questions are not doing that. Well, listen, also, there are gazillions of dollars in these things. It's not all people that have no idea what they're doing, right?

28:22Like, there's obviously a lot of institutional investors and hedge funds that are using this. We're offering a PSA here. Just keep your eyes open. Yes, the fees are completely besides the point because they're getting access to an area of the market that's liquidated and quick and whatever, whatever. Okay, AI Ben. This was good. Somebody uploaded a bunch of Ben Carlson posts into one of the LLMs. I don't know which one. And they said, like, let's see what Ben Carlson would say about DeepSeek, okay? Pretty good. It's pretty good. Okay. Here we go. It's hard to keep up with the AI arm. You know what?

29:00Why don't you read this? I mean, this is your writing. I looked at this. Read it. Really? I'd say, no, I just want to get my - I'll read it. No, no, no. I'll read it and then you can respond if you don't feel comfortable reading your computer voice. It's hard to keep up with the AI arms race these days. One day, everyone's talking about OpenAI and NVIDIA. The next, a Chinese startup comes out of nowhere and wipes out half a trillion dollars in market value for the biggest AI players in the world. Welcome to the stock market in 2025. And then it goes on. I don't know, man. This sounds pretty good.

29:26It sounds like you. So they did like the takeaways at the end. And then at the end, it says, if you're investing in AI. Read the takeaways, because that's bad. Okay. Disruptions happen fast. The AI race is still in its early innings. Diversification is your friend. Market reactions are often overblown. Okay, that's, but the ending here. The takeaway, go ahead. If you're investing in AI, buckle up. It's going to be a wild ride. I'd say it's like 60 % there. No, this is you, dude. The takeaway isn't that. This is you. The takeaway isn't that NVIDIA is doomed or that DeepSeek is the future. It's that innovation is unpredictable and markets will always struggle to price it correctly.

30:02That's the Ben Carlson Grand Rapids hedge. I'm sorry, dude. They got you pegged. You will be obsolete. I don't think I'm ready to lose my job yet. But it's not bad. So I was playing around with – my kids ask questions all the time. And I finally put JetGPT on their iPad and said, why don't you play around with this a little bit? And it's funny. The one thing my daughter wanted to do, she's like, well, what do I ask it? And she asked us some questions and she was kind of bored immediately. And I said, why don't we do a Taylor Swift thing? So she said, all right, because she's big into basketball right now.

30:31I want to write me a song about Taylor Swift and basketball. And ChatGPT did a Taylor Swift song about basketball that, honestly, my daughter and her friend were singing it. And they were like, it was actually pretty good. The way that they were rhyming stuff, I was actually kind of impressed. All right, let's talk about crypto. You know what's funny about the crypto stuff? I think that people say that one of the good things, and they usually say it sarcastically about crypto, is that it's a risk gauge for sentiment over the weekend. Yeah. And I think that if crypto wasn't behaving the way it was behaving, people would probably have been a little bit less freaked out.

31:07Right? Yeah. Oh, yeah. ETH nuked like 20%. It was down 30 % at one point over the weekend. It was down 20 % in a day. So my first take is crypto is not a tariff hedge. I think we can rule that out. Take that off of the hedge list of crypto. But I do think that it does serve a purpose on the weekend. I think one of the reasons that the stock market didn't freak out so much is because crypto did it for them. Maybe. Crypto already did it. What, Bitcoin was down 15 % or whatever? By the way, nobody's saying crypto is a tariff hedge. I know. I know no one said that. But I feel like the crypto people are secretly hoping it's going to hedge one of these things eventually and not just be completely risk on, risk off.

31:47But that's what it is. It's a risk asset. Why would it not behave this way? Exactly. It's a risk asset on steroids. And with leverage. There was$2 billion of leverage wiped out. It was the biggest wipeout ever. But don't you remember the whole narrative of Bitcoin when it first came out was this thing's going to be an inflation hedge? The narrative changed. It's not. Someone plotted TQQQ, which is the two or three times leveraged Nasdaq on Bitcoin. And it basically follows it exactly. Yeah. Right? So yes, it is risk on, risk off. I did want to plug our talker book with Calmos this week. We talked to Matt Kaufman from Calamos.

32:19And when these downside protection ETFs from Calamos came out, there was a story on Bloomberg and a story on CNBC. And I saw people on social media dunking on them and saying like, why would you ever want to protect Bitcoin? And there's one where you can have zero losses, but your upside is capped to like 11%. There's one, they come out today actually, like downside is capped at 10%, but upside is 30%. I thought it was zero and 9%. Is it 11? Either way. And then there's another one that you're capped at 20 % downside, but your upside is 55. And all these people are going, Bitcoin is this huge volatile asset.

32:51Why would you want this? Yeah, the volatility is the point. And our, you and I both, we talked about this before we talked to Matt and we said like, I don't understand this. Let's push him kind of hard on this. And his explanation - You folded like a cheap suit. His explanation, like, so I just, if you've heard of these products, listen to our podcast with him because I think your mind will be changed or at least will give you a different perspective about the reason for strategies like this. And it made way more sense to me than it did just from reading the headlines. Yeah. So it's worth a listen.

33:21All right. There was an article over the weekend or last week that got a little bit of attention. It was the headline is parents ditch 529 plans and embrace Bitcoin for college savings. And of course, you see this and you're like, what the fuck? Come on. No, don't stop. Like, no, college savings, Bitcoin. No. And some quotes from the article. Take Jim Crider, a 35-year-old father of four from San Antonio, Texas, who wants each of his kids to have one whole Bitcoin saved by the time they turn 18. As a certified financial planner, he knows some consider putting all his children's savings in Bitcoin that's risky, but he believes the asset will reach$1 million in a decade.

33:56The opportunity is too good to pass up, he says. And then he said, I think it's incredibly risky to have 0 % exposure to Bitcoin. And I think people see this and understandably their knee-jerk reaction is top. Oh my God, blah, blah, blah. This makes no sense. It's outrage. But like, I still think that Bitcoin is still so, I don't want to say under-owned, like it should be owned by everyone, but it's still like, it's still a fringe asset despite the tens of billions of dollars in Bitcoin ETFs. Most people still don't own Bitcoin. And I think if you're looking at stories like this that are like, you know, admittedly sound like poppy and stuff, I just think it's like, it's not, that's not it.

34:37This also happened, I had a friend's parent from college tell me that saving for college in the 90s was easy because we didn't even bother with 529 plans. We put it in the stock market in our brokerage account, and the stock market went up 20 % every year or whatever. And so I think that's also why these stories happen, because people see the huge gains that you've gotten, and then they think, okay, sure. Do you think this guy is a financial advisor? do you think that does that? I don't know. As a financial advisor, that seems a little risky to me. And a five is in issuing the 529 plan to put your kids college fund into Bitcoin, putting all his children's savings in Bitcoin.

35:14Yeah, it's risky. I'd say I understand like I want to I want my kids doing Bitcoin forever. And I'm gonna start them early. That I can see. But for college savings, to me, I think that that is a leap to do all of it. Yeah, what I would say is not what I would recommend, but to each their own. This is a... I would not have expected that coming from a financial advisor. I guess a young financial advisor, that makes sense, but that's all I'm saying. Okay, Lawrence Hamptill, friend of the program, wrote a great story at Fortune Financial about the implications of an aging household stock. And he looks at the...

35:47Census data provides this. When were the houses in the U.S. built that people live in? And more than 60 % of houses in the U.S. are at least 35 years old. So 1989 or earlier, which is crazy. And look at the number of houses that are still 1939 or earlier. It's almost 12 % of houses were built that long ago. Obviously, there's been remodeling, all this stuff. I do think this is going to be a massive story because I just don't think young people are going to put up with an aging housing stock. Okay, so Ben, I am a shareholder in Home Depot and Sherwin-Williams. It sounds like you want to jump in while the water's warm.

36:24I've been talking about home renovations forever, and I don't know why I don't own these stocks. I'm an idiot. I don't follow my own advice. Guess what? The market's open right now. It's not too late. So I mentioned before, my daughter has been watching Full House lately. She's on like season four. The original? She started with Fuller House, then she's going back and watching the original. So every once in a while, I'll watch an episode with her before she goes to bed. And one of the things I can't believe, well, funny enough, I'm thinking about the fashion at the time, like Uncle Jesse and Uncle Joey have mullets, which are apparently back in style today.

36:52They're back. Yeah, the hairstyle is back. But the, remember when Uncle Jesse starts dating Becky, who, she's the mom who went to jail. I think Becky was everybody's first crush. Yeah, she's the mom who went to jail because of the college scandal a few years ago. Yeah. But she has her own apartment before they get married. And they try to dress it up as like this stylish, because she's like a news reporter, you know, on like the San Francisco Today show or whatever. Oh, and she worked with Danny. Yeah, she was Danny's co-host. But her apartment is just so, They try to make it look like in the 90s it's chic, but it's like pink carpet and green furniture and gold, whatever.

37:29It's just that kind of stuff just would never fly today. And I just think the tastes of young people these days, blame it on HGTV or whatever, are so much – there's going to be a massive remodeling boom if they're buying these older homes. That's my point. Ben, that bobblehead behind you, is that you? It looks like Jack Bogle. It is me. It looks like a young Jack Bogle. The Motley Fool did something and used one of my articles for something and sent me a, I'm even holding my own little book here. Yeah, that's me. Yeah, Full House, what a show. What else are we doing with houses? So I looked at like the equity.

38:09It's just, it keeps going up. It was, I looked at an old piece I did in like 2021 and I was saying like, gosh, home equity is at like$20 trillion. This is crazy. It's at$35 trillion now, home equity. And it's just, look at this. This is the higher, this is like a chart of Nvidia, home equity in the United States. So I wanted to talk about my strategy for renovations because the Axios did this piece where they looked at the median price of home renovations and it's gone from$15 ,000 to almost$25 ,000 pre-pandemic to now. So obviously wages have gone up, materials have gone up and the demand for this stuff has gone up.

38:45So I feel like these people can do it now. So they say the high-end kitchen remodel can run up to$200 ,000, which is just insane, obviously. I have a friend of mine who's doing something like that, and it's wild. But he's like, dude, my mortgage is under 3%. Where am I going? So here's my strategy. So we have some stuff we want to do. I'm thinking about maybe adding an office space for myself at home. Extra mudroom, extra mudroom. We need a bigger mudroom, we do. That's maybe something eventually. My wife is talking about how she wants more storage in the kitchen. Actually, she said, you know what?

39:15I don't need the kitchen stuff yet because I just want to keep taking vacations. That's where I want the budget to go. So kudos to her for not wanting it to have her cake and eat it too. But I think my strategy for renovations is I think the cost of this stuff is just going to keep going up. And if I'm just borrowing from my home equity line of credit to do it, I think I would rather do it sooner than later. Because I think every year you wait, the cost is just going to rise. And yeah, you pay - Did Ben just discover inflation? No, but I think the cost is going to rise more than the rate of inflation is what I'm saying.

39:45I think the increase in this stuff, because I think that the home renovators are going to have so much leverage because they're going to be so busy that they can offer you obscene estimates. And it's going to be like, I don't care. I've got so much work. It doesn't matter. Supply and demand. Is that fair, though? You've done some renovations in recent years. What's your strategy? My strategy is to invest in the home renovation stocks, use the gains. How do you source these things? Because that's something I've never known for. No, but I haven't done any large projects that require like a big chunk of money.

40:26Okay, but you added stairs and like a play space for your kids or whatever in the attic. Like that's a pretty decent sized project. Like we bought our house brand new. And so we've never had to do any full scale renovations. Like how do you even go about finding a person to do these things? I sound like such a noob, but that's where I'm at these days. I guess you ask around. But do you have a contract broker that you use for a general contractor? There should be a contract broker. I know that's how it is. You ask people, like, who do you use? But just specifically, if you're asking me, like, what would I do if I needed to do my kitchen or something?

40:58Yeah. I would take it, I would do a HELOC, no? Yeah, no, I'm not saying how would you pay for it. Yeah, that's what I'm going to do too. I'm saying, like, how do you find the right place to do it? Okay, this is crazy. I would call a friend and say, hey, who did your kitchen? Were you happy with the work that he did? Yeah. The way that I'm going to do it is I'm going to get three or four bids and see where they come in. I'm going to shop around. Yeah, obviously. Yeah. Okay. Well, come on. No offense, but I can see you just taking the first one and be like, eh, fine. That's good enough. You got me pegged.

41:34What, you did your shop around? No, no, no, no, no. The first Mudroom. Didn't we talk about this? I went nuts on the show. The first Mudroom quote tried to give me$40 ,000. Oh no, was it the Mudroom? It couldn't have been$40 ,000. That's insane. It was a quote that pissed me off so much because I'm like, and then I spent 10 grand on the Mudroom, I think. And even that pissed me off when I saw what the actual scope of the project was. Beams, this, that, come on. So I feel like it's like a car relationship. So I'm having a guy do a quote for us from an office. And he said, think about what you want to spend for your budget, but I don't want to give them a number.

42:10I want them to give me a number first. Well, no, I think you have the number in your head. Yeah, so that's the thing. I want to tell them what I want. I want to tell them what I, I don't want to give them a number because I feel like whatever number I have, they'll anchor to it and add 20 % or something. Yeah. Right? So I don't want to, the guys are like, just give us what budget you want. I'm like, no, no, no, no. You tell me what it's going to cost. What's your budget? You tell me how much does it cost. Yes, exactly. Listen, as somebody who climbed out of the passenger door, I think that you're going to get steamrolled.

42:38Okay. No offense. Hey, I'm good at negotiating for my cable bill. And how's it? You know, I ran into somebody recently. This week, actually. Where was it? I was talking to somebody, maybe on the phone. I can't remember. And they're like, was Ben kidding? Or did he really climb out the passenger door? Sadly to say, I actually did climb out the passenger because my kids got in a car and said, why is your door? Why is your seat all dirty? in hindsight i did it make the wrong move yeah yeah okay everyone agrees live and learn i got a good survey for the week okay this is from the national bureau of economic research how much do employees value remote work did you look at this already if not don't look i didn't i didn't okay okay on average what arm this is a big giant survey they did where they said they kind of they had these numbers before they they wanted to look at it in a deeper way what pay cut would Would employees be willing to accept for partly or fully remote roles?

43:34Like versus going into the office all the time. What kind of pay cut would people be willing to accept? 8 % to 12%. 25%. All right, that's not true. I believe that's what the survey answered, but no, that's not actually. When the rubber meets the road, no way. They also said 11.8 % of full-time workers work fully remote. 29 % are partly remote. Does the 12 % number surprise you? Is it higher or lower than you would have thought? That seems pretty high for all full-time employees. That's not just saying white-collar work. I don't know. It feels right-ish. I do think people that have lived through the remote work, I think part of it is if you are already working remotely and you said you have to go back full-time, I think that's when the pay cut thing comes in because if you already tasted that sweet, sweet, sweet remote work, right?

44:26I think it'd be really hard to give it up. And I think you could say like, yeah, I'd take a lower wage to do it. Yeah. Anyway. All right. The Bonaparte's, Doug and Heather, have this subset called the joint account where they talk about money and relationship issues. And they did this thing a couple weeks ago, said, no, we will not ski with you. And they were saying that they've got a lot of peer pressure from friends every ski season. And they said they're not big skiers and it's expensive and it's time consuming. And there's kids have all their stuff going on and they just, they feel the pressure, but they just don't want to be pushed into the skiing thing.

45:00And I DMed with Doug a little bit and I said, I've felt this exact same thing. We have friends who ski. I've never asked you, but are you a skier? Have you ever skied? What do you think? I bet you've tried it before. There's got to be some mountains in upstate New York, right? I've tried it. but I feel like you either grow up skiing and then you're a skier or you're not. So here's the thing. I, I actually Grand Rapids hedge this in the middle. So we moved up to Northern Michigan when I was in fifth grade and there was three ski hills within five or 10 miles of us. And so just for something to do, because we got so much more snow up there, we kind of taught ourselves how to ski, but I was not a skier.

45:35Like if you saw me on the ski hill, you wouldn't go, Oh, that guy's a skier. Like, you know, people have the look that was not me. You know, the, the, the, I did not have the ski jacket and I didn't look like I I had the used skis. They were probably gray, right? They weren't the nice brand. So I skied because it was something to do, but I still remember that, so I started in fifth grade. I retired from skiing in college, and I still remember exactly why it happened. Freshman year of college and Christmas break, four or five friends said, hey, let's drive up to Canada and go skiing for the weekend.

46:05And so we all piled into my friend's suburban and went up to Canada, and we got there and we realized that, oh, the drinking age here is 19. and two of the friends who are huge skiers and had been skiing all the way. They went from ski families, went skiing and the rest of us stayed in the ski lodge and drank beer. And I didn't go skiing all weekend. We just stayed in the lodge and drank beer. And that's the last time I went skiing. I retired then. That was anticlimactic. Sorry. I just, it ran its course, okay? That's all I'm saying. And I just, I didn't, I didn't miss skiing. Like I had a fun time doing it because there's something to do, but I didn't, I wasn't a skier.

46:38So now - So when you say you're getting pressure to ski, like literal or people just asking yourself, saying no. Or they're like, come on, ski. Have some. You know you want it. I want to tell you what… So we just have friends who like go on trips and yeah, why don't you guys ski? It's so much fun. And so my twins are seven going on eight and they got invited to a ski party for someone's birthday and they've never skied before. A ski party? Yeah, like the girl was having… How rich is it where you live? They have a really cheapo ski mountain here. uh so they've never gone and my wife's like what do we do i'm like i don't know tell them they don't ski of course we don't they don't ski we got other stuff going on and so she said no no we're gonna try it so she got them lessons they did an hour lesson and she said oh i guess they're good to go so they tried it and they went last night and so they did the lesson for an hour then they went skiing with a friend and now they love it all right long story short you're you're gonna be ski dad so my wife said why don't we get into skiing again i said i don't want to get into skiing again.

47:36You're going to get skiing. But now that my kids want to do it, I feel like I'm going to be, I'm going to have to, but am I the crank for saying like, eh, I've already, I've, that's already kind of passed me by. I don't need to. No, I wouldn't want to, I wouldn't want to learn skiing in my mid forties either. Okay. Thank you. I, I stand with Ben. If my kids want me to do it, I'm sure I probably will, but I, I didn't, I didn't have the desire to do it again. I feel like I've, that's part of my life that I've moved on from and not caring. Okay. Anyway. Okay, read this one from The Private Chef. Because we got, I think one of the most proud things I am of this podcast is the fact that we have such a diverse listening audience.

48:14Like every time we write about an obscure topic or a different profession or something, we get an email from someone that says, hey, that's me, or I know about this. Well, it is funny because last week, guys, after concluding the email, I was like, I don't think we've ever read an email that had so little connection with our audience. And we got a bunch of emails from people in the private chef world. So here's one. I would agree with your assessment that this playing field is generally for the 1 % of the 1%. However, I have noticed that my field has grown in demand. I have colleagues that have generally not gravitated towards being a mercenary for hire and have become jet chefs or travel with these clients and their families, including travel with them for extended periods of time to different parts of the country where they have homes.

48:54Having a private chef is more of a flex for new money and a basic normality for people who have had existing wealth. Generally, the old money knows how to work with us, while newer money is often more demanding or particular and treats us almost as any regular service worker. Shout out, Michael. What does that mean? Are they saying that I respect workers or that I would treat them poorly? No, I think that you respect service workers. I absolutely respect service workers. So this is interesting. So it's like the old money probably treats the private chef as more of like a member of the family or friend, whereas the new money is like maybe not as nice or not as accommodating is what they're saying.

49:35Okay. I would assume that old money is just like – they don't even like look at them. They just sort of – they're just like invisible. No, I don't think that's what – they're saying the opposite though. They might be just wrong. Okay. Anyway, they conclude none of us will ever go back to work in restaurants or starting a business with a physical location. And owning a brick and mortar mom and pop shop or even a restaurant or something only 1 % of us even consider doing. And that's because they are either, whatever. So yeah, I guess for chefs, this is like a new line of business because being an entrepreneur is not for most of them.

50:06I think this is the new normal as the wealth gap intensifies. And I agree with that. The other thing is I can totally see being a private chef and not having to worry about the overhead of running a restaurant. Your profit margins are through the roof. I'm sure the, who's on the hook for buying the food, do you think? The chef or the family? Who knows? I don't know. So what's your strategy for getting a private chef? Is this a HELOC too or asset back loan or what? I can't imagine bringing a private chef on a trip with you. That is a serious flex. But those are the families that probably have a nanny and a private chef and a live-in person who cleans the house.

50:45I don't know. that's a world that we'll never be part of, I guess. Oh, okay. Let's do some random thoughts here real quick. So I thought about this because I was reading Howard Marks last week and he calls his updates to clients, he calls them memos, okay? So I thought, oh, that's such a boomer thing to say, memo. I like memo. For millennials, it's called a blog. For Gen X, it's called an update. And for Gen Z, it's called a newsletter. They're all the same thing, but they call them different things. Right? Howard Marks would never say, this is my blog or this is my newsletter. For him, it's a memo.

51:23It depends what generation you're in. Okay, well, this is a good one. On your podcast, you said that we still don't know what to call the aughts. The Brits are calling them the naughties. We got a few people who said this. I don't like it. Yeah, but it sounds way cooler with a British accent. They can pull it off, we can't. Yeah, yeah, yeah. All right, this one tickled my funny bone. Our friend group has been debating this all day. Would you rather hiccup every minute for the rest of your life or sneeze every minute for the rest of your life. Thanks, guys. Love the show. I'd rather die than have either of these, but I think it's an easy answer.

51:51What do you think? Sneeze. Hiccuping is the most annoying thing ever. Okay, I was going to go the other way. You'd rather sneeze? I think hiccuping is just so uncomfortable. Again, both of these are bad. Okay. All right, Ben, you tweeted. Actually, you skyed. How do you differentiate between what you're going to sky and what you're going to tweet? I feel like, you know how comedians sometimes go into the comedy cellar and work out 10 minutes of their show? Oh, I got you. Blue Sky is where I'm working out my new material. Okay. Did this make it to Twitter? I don't think so. Okay. I think the true sign of middle-aged wisdom is realizing how useless all the self-help quote books were in your 20s and 30s, but understanding there will always be a market for that crap.

52:33Spot on, and I want to talk about middle-aged for a moment, specifically mental middle-aged, because I think I'm getting into mental middle-aged, Ben. We got an email. Hey, Michael and Ben. Your brief conversation about filling tires with air caught my attention. And I have a recommendation not long ago. I bought a compact air compressor on Amazon. And it is so convenient. Plug it into your car, set this PSI, and boom. And I said to myself, oh, my god. I have this. I bought this. I forgot I had it. It's only$30? That's a great deal. It's a great machine. Why have I been going to the gas station for two years?

53:09I have this. So I'm like, oh, my god. All right, so. Have you ever used it before? Yes, it's great. I use it all the time in the basketballs. It's wonderful. So I stopped working out with my trainer because my schedule was too busy and blah, blah, blah. This is probably four or five months ago, and I haven't touched the weight since. All right? Still got your Peloton back there? Still got my Peloton. All right, so that's the backstory for this. So last week, I said, you know what? Let me touch those weights. did some, some presses, did a few squats. And the next day I was really sore. And I'm like, wow, you're a real pathetic loser.

53:48Like I didn't do a lot and I really was sore. So I tell that story because I was walking and I felt soreness. And I wanted to call our friend Dan La Rosa, who also uses his trainer and say, hey, I finally worked out, right? So anyway, I call Dan, put the phone back in my pocket. He goes, yo, what's up, dude? And I had to take my phone out of my pocket because I forgot who I called. And I told Dan that and he's like, oh my God, dude. He's like, anyway, what's up? And then I go, oh no, I don't know why I called you. And so for like two hours, I was driving myself nuts. Like, why did I call him? Like, what were we talking about?

54:41Why did I call you? And then later during the podcast with Dan Ives, I like, I stretched, I felt sore. Boom. Remember why I called Dan La Rosa. But it's, that's pretty bad. Okay. So once you finally do lose it and go down the Alzheimer's dementia route, like what we're gonna have to do is record this podcast every week and pretend like it's still happening, but it's not going to be released into the world. because you're going to be so forgetful that we're just going to like me and you have a one-on-one session, like a podcast. Yeah, this was, this was like, uh, I did not feel good about this at all.

55:11It happens. All right. Recommendations. Uh, I mentioned Saturday night. This was a recommendation from Barry. So this was again, a bunch of early Saturday night live stories that they all condense into one. And the reason that I listened to this is because Neil Brennan has a podcast called blocks. I don't know if you've ever heard of it. And he, he, he, he's a big like therapy guy, like, like realized he made a bunch of money and success and he wasn't happy. So he's trying to like work on himself. And so he talks to celebrities about like their biggest blocks. And like, it's so funny because they're all just as messed up as we are more so.

55:43Yeah. More so. And there's a good one with like Ed Helms and Chris O'Donnell, not Chris O'Donnell, Jerry O 'Connell close enough. And so he had one with Jason Reitman, who's Ivan Reitman's son. Ivan Reitman did like some of the best comedies of the eighties. He did ghostbusters. And he talked about doing Saturday night, which is the Saturday night live movie. and the guy who's in Snack Shack plays Lauren Michaels on the show. And then again, they have all the, you know, Belushi and Aykroyd and Chevy Chase. And I don't think you would like it, but like the intensity of the show, like made you feel like how Saturday Night Live probably really does feel.

56:16And it was the very first episode and like how no one thought it was going to work. And I thought it was just very well done. One of the better movies I've seen in a while. People keep emailing us about Snack Shack. I got to watch it. Wait till the summer. Don't watch it now. Wait until it's summertime. time wait till you're going back to your pool then watch it it's a you got to be in the right state of mind to watch it all right that movie here with tom hanks and robin wright is on netflix as well who directed that it was a big director nekis okay that's right i give them credit for taking a swing it was ambitious you know the whole story of the movie is i forget i listened to a podcast but i forget what it was it's literally one camera angle it doesn't move and then it's one room of a house and all the things that happen in this one room of a house over time and it's different people living in this house.

56:59And so it goes back and forth between years, but it also does the de-aging thing on Tom Hanks and Robin Wright. Cause they're, they start out in like they're in high school and I appreciate the ambition of this movie. It wasn't very good. Okay. It, and I think the de-aging thing, it throws me off. It feels like I'm looking at some, it doesn't, it's like Tom Hanks, but they, he looks like a young Tom Hanks, but he looks like an AI version of a young Tom Hanks. It's, it takes you out of it. And so I think this was a cool idea. Not a very good movie. All right. Hard pass for me, right? Definitely.

57:31It just, I'm sure some people might like it. It just, yeah, didn't like it. Okay. I watched a Ben movie and I really enjoyed it. Okay. It's called Good Rich. It's on Max. Michael Keaton plays an older father of twins. He had Mila Kunis in his first marriage. And the premise of the movie is he wakes up, gets a phone call from his younger wife, who checked herself into rehab. And so he is scrambling to become a father of two nine-year-old twins and also repair the relationship with his daughter. It's like a very You movie. And I very much enjoyed it. I might have even cried. Oh, because it's almost like a coming-of-age movie.

58:16Yeah, it's like a coming-of-age movie for like a 70-year-old dad, I guess. It's very good. Don't you think that millennials are going to have more coming-of-age moments as they're older too? I feel like that's just going to be a thing. I don't know. It just seems like a thing that our generation is much more deep and introspective. Okay. I'm going to watch it. I love Michael Keaton. Yeah. Somebody emailed us. We spoke about American Pride and Evil a couple weeks ago. The first battle scene took like a year to film, which is not surprising considering how wild it was. Yes. It was epic. Yeah. Someone said their brother or something, her brother-in-law worked on the scene.

58:53It took forever. and that's a very gory show. Oh my God. I don't know. I have a weird feeling about the show. Maybe this was the intent. I didn't love watching it. It was a lot. I have one episode left. You almost feel bad watching it, even though you know it's probably pretty relatively accurate for how long it was. It was good, just not really a lot of fun. In fact, it was the opposite of fun. It was tough. No, really well done. But yes, you're right. You don't get great feelings coming out of it. All right, good. I'm going to add it to my list. Maybe you should watch Saturday Night then. Nah.

59:30Okay. All right. Animal Spirits at the Compound News. Could we get through one week without nutso stuff happening? Probably not. I think this is just life these days. The 2020s, this is what this whole decade has been. But think about all the crises that we've lived through. Remember the Silicon Valley Bank thing. Like, I feel like our crises these days now all last a weekend. AI is going to be over. Silicon Valley Bank tariffs. Eventually, we're going to have an actual crisis that stays. But most of the things people freak out about now, we move on in two days. It's like, I remember that thing.

1:00:08It didn't matter. Yeah, we freaked out about that. We moved on. Okay, that's depressing. All right. It is, but I think that's just where we are. Okay. Everybody enjoy the week. It's almost getting sun. It's sunny out here. Sunny today. 45 degrees. We turning in corner? Probably not. No, it's still early February. It's freezing in Michigan. This is why you have to come to Miami with us next month. Okay, that's right. All right. We'll see you next week. Thank you for listening.

From the publisher

On episode 398 of Animal Spirits, Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson discuss: the financial impact of tariffs, why AI could save the stock market, market return assumptions for the next decade, the Vanguard Effect, levered ETFs, AI Ben, crypto is not a tariff hedge, using Bitcoin instead of a 529 plan, the remodeling boom, peer pressure from friends to go skiing, and much more!

This episode is sponsored by YCharts. Check out the Debunking Investing Myths Deck at: https://go.ycharts.com/debunking-investing-myths

Sign up for The Compound newsletter and never miss out: thecompoundnews.com/subscribe

Find complete show notes on our blogs:
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor

Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
 
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.
The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.
Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Animal Spirits Podcast

All 382 episodes
The Dumbest Trade War (EP.398)Animal Spirits Podcast · 1 h
Listen in VO