In short
Animal Spirits Podcast Episode 324: The Market Cap of Taylor Swift
Overview In episode 324 of the Animal Spirits Podcast, hosts Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson delve into various topics related to investing, market trends, economic data, and social aspects of life. They address the impressive performance of the Nasdaq 100, current housing market dynamics, sentiments around the financial system, and even a fun discussion about pop star Taylor Swift’s market cap.
Episode Topics
- Performance of the Nasdaq 100
- Economic trends and data
- Housing market comparisons: Canada vs. Miami
- Happiness in marriage
- Public sentiment on the financial system
- Taylor Swift's financial impact
---
Key Discussions
- Nasdaq 100 Performance
- The Nasdaq 100 has seen a 42.2% increase year-to-date, marking one of its best years historically.
- Comparison with previous years: 2019, 2020, and 2021 were also strong years but followed by a downturn in 2022 (-33%).
- Discussion on the resilience of tech stocks amidst high inflation and rising interest rates.
- Economic Trends
- Bond Market Insights: The hosts highlight a correlation between starting yields on bonds and their future returns.
- Investment Sentiment: Notable swings in investor sentiment, with indicators showing some bullish trends despite recent declines.
- August’s historical performance is highlighted, as it’s known for being a poor month in the market.
- Housing Market Dynamics
- Comparison of housing prices in Canada and Miami, revealing significant increases in Miami’s market despite a broader downturn in 2022.
- Analysis of affordability challenges in housing, particularly focusing on rising mortgage rates and their impact on buyers.
- Happiness and Marriage
- Discussion on a study indicating married individuals report higher levels of happiness.
- Statistically, there has been a substantial increase in the number of 40-year-olds who have never been married, impacting overall happiness ratings.
- Public Sentiment on the Financial System
- The hosts reflect on how public sentiment has shifted from blaming the Fed in the 2010s to blaming fiscal policy in the 2020s for perceived failures in the financial system.
- They suggest that many policymakers are not inclined to let the financial system fail.
- Taylor Swift's Market Cap
- A fun discussion on Taylor Swift’s concert earnings, suggesting that if she were a stock, she might outperform tech giants.
- The conversation touches on the broader implications of celebrity influence on economics and market valuations.
---
Key Takeaways
- Market Resilience: The Nasdaq's performance amidst economic challenges is noteworthy, suggesting a potential continued upward trend despite inflation.
- Housing Market Complexity: Current housing prices remain a pressing issue, with geographical disparities influencing affordability.
- Social Dynamics: The effects of marriage on happiness reflect broader societal trends, highlighting the importance of companionship.
- Cultural Impact: Celebrities like Taylor Swift can significantly influence economic sentiments and market valuations.
---
Recommendations
- Michael and Ben share personal recommendations for movies and shows, with mentions of:
- Curb Your Enthusiasm - A return to the classic comedy series.
- National Lampoon's Vacation - Highlighting the humor and nostalgia of classic films.
- Justified City Primeval - A continuation of an acclaimed series with a compelling narrative.
---
Conclusion This episode of Animal Spirits Podcast blends insightful market analysis with light-hearted discussions on cultural phenomena, offering listeners a comprehensive view of current investing climates and social dynamics. The hosts invite feedback and encourage listener engagement through their email.
---
For more insights and future updates, tune in to the Animal Spirits Podcast every Wednesday.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today's Animal Spirits is brought to you by the Compound Network. That's us. You're listening to us. right here, right now. I don't know if you know this, but we've got five shows a week. It's almost too much, but we're just getting started. Monday, Animal Spirits Talk Your Book. Tuesday night, live on YouTube with a podcast the next morning or maybe even the next night. That's what are your thoughts? Wednesday, us, you're listening to it, Animal Spirits Proper. Thursday, that is Ask the Compound with you, Ben Carlson and producer Duncan Hill and actually creative director at Duncan Hill, excuse me.
0:35And then on Friday, the compound on Friends. The good thing is there's something for everyone there, right? I think probably some people have their own favorite shows. Some people only listen to one. Some people listen to all. There's diversification and variety here. So Josh actually, so all kidding aside, we are ramping up. We're doing the thing. Josh wrote a post about it. I think we're up to like 900 ,000 downloads a month or thereabouts on a 10 million, I was about to say dollar annual run rate, download. So thank you to the audience for making this possible, for tuning in to one or several of your favorite shows here.
1:08It means a lot to us. We're so lucky that we get to do this for you every week and more to come. We love doing it too. And the feedback from people who watch and listen is half the fun too. So we always love to hear from people.
1:24Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions. Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.
1:54Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. Speaking of loving to hear from people, actually put a pin in that. Is this not the best time of the year? How so? Football season? Well, just back to school, back to life, back to reality. As much as I love the summer, I'm done. It's enough. I'm ready for the kids to be back at school, although I still got Logan for another week, which is annoying. Don't get me started. We've got football around in the corner. Pretty excited about that. It's just this is this is my type of year. The 90 degrees is fading. I'm not into that. I love it. I won't give you best time of the year because I do love the summer.
2:28But I was taught, like, we had our Labor Day fill from, like, Friday to Monday, being outside all the time, being on the water. And we kind of said, all right, we've squeezed this drive for the summer. We need, like, I hate winter with, I just hate it. Besides Christmas, I just hate winter. But I think sometimes you need the seasons to give yourself a break and then something to look forward to. I love seasons. I'm a big season guy. I just like that there's always something to look forward to, right? I look forward to the fall for football. I look forward to the winter for various reasons. And then once you're done with the winter, oh, we got spring thawing out and then boom, you're into summer.
2:59And then you start it all over again. All right. And then when you reach middle age, you talk about the seasons more. And can you believe how fast summer went? But I really feel like that's an obligatory thing at this time of the year. But has this not been the fastest summer? How do we quantify that? Was this literally the shortest summer? No, they're all the same amount of days. I don't get it. It seems to be speeding up. All right. Last week, mea culpa here, hand up. last week I was talking, uh, about, uh, an order went that went awry that I was one of my favorite stories of the year. When you, when you set the follow-up to this, can I just kind of set the picture here and then you can give the, sure.
3:34Go ahead. You complained because your hex clad pot pant, pots and pans got sent to some Brian guy in California and you were saying, Hey, just back up, just setting the stage. So I am, I'm still rolling with the pants for my wedding. which coming up on 10 years. And then I decided to like cheap out and go the Amazon basics route. And sometimes you get what you pay for. So I said, you know what? Time to step up, put my big boy pants on and get some real pans. Back to you, Ben. And then you were like, what's going on here? They sent it to the wrong address. I don't know. I don't know what, I'm talking to customer service.
4:13No one, and then you send an email after the show last week and fill us in on what the email's. I, I, this, it's kind of unbelievable that the person who got the pans is a listener of the show. Yeah. Well, it's not just a coincidence. Uh, so the person, Brian, who got the pans, I'm thinking like, how did this happen? So Brian got the pans, guys, a man, she told me to send the return label. He'll, he'll take care of it. He'll mail it back. Then on Friday, I get a call. No, no, no, wait. Say why Brian got the pans. I'm going to. Okay. On Friday, I get a call from Hexclad customer service. And I said, did you happen to hear about us on the podcast?
4:58And he said, yes, our CEO did actually catch wind of that. So I said, let me ask you a question. What merchant do you use to send this out? Is it like, I don't know, Plaid or Square? Who processes this payment? Shopify. And immediately, ah, light bulb. So Brian, in December 2021, I sent Brian something from the store. I don't know if it was a mug, a shirt, whatever. Yeah. Okay. Whatever we gave Brian. So I guess that was the last time that I used something on Shopify, maybe last and only. So Brian's address was, I guess, like stored as the default. And so that explains how Brian has my pants. Now, the fine people at Hexclad were such mensches, which I don't know if you could use the plural.
5:50I feel like you can't pluralize mensch. But anyhow, they said, you know what? Tell Brian to keep the pans and we're going to send you new ones. So all's well that ends well. Hexclad, hand up. I'm sorry. I was not hacked. There's no nefarious activity. Although I do think that if your billing address does not match your shipping address, there should be a pop-up. Not on Hexaclan. I'm like Google or whoever. There should be a pop-up. Are you sure? Maybe AI can help here. But that is pretty funny that that was your default address from that long ago. So not only does Brian get a free t-shirt, he gets a free couple of Hexaclan pants.
6:37So I'll be back with the proper review because I'm excited to use, I'm excited to get some new pans up in here. Yeah. I just think it's hilarious, the people that reached out to you for this. All right. I want to talk about the year-to-date returns of the NASDAQ 100. All right. So tech has been on fire, obviously, since like, I don't know, 20, like early to mid 2010s. Technology has been the thing, right? The sector. The NASDAQ 100 has been like the best way to, I think, have that idea of tech. What was the, maybe it was you who gave this stat that like there were zero growth managers that beat the NASDAQ over the whatever period.
7:17I think that was Jeffrey Patak. Okay, whatever. The NASDAQ 100 has been hard to beat because it's market cap waiting on steroids. This year through, this is through, I guess, Friday or Monday. We're taping this Tuesday morning, September 5th. market just opened. Great to be back. Great to be back. The NASDAQ is up 42.2 % coming into the day today. Jeez and rice. I look back on Y charts at the pre, they show the previous 10 years returns, right? So this goes back to 2013. This is the second best calendar year. If the year were to stop now and the best one was actually 2020, which is hilarious because the NASDAQ felt like 35 % that year.
7:56It was up almost 50%. Read the returns from 2019. But all those great years. So 2019 was up 39%. 2020 was up 49%. 2021 was up 27%. Last year, down 33%. And then now up 42%. And obviously, part of the reason it's up so much this year is because it was down so much last year. But it's for as good as the returns have been in the NASDAQ 100 over the last decade or so, this is the second best year. And it's a year, I keep kind of harping on this point, but it's a year when the Fed has continued to raise rates. Rates are above 5%. Inflation is high, falling, but high. And I just don't think anyone had this like pegged as like, oh, this is going to happen.
8:37The Nasdaq is going to go bonkers again in a year with such high rates. Can this continue? I mean, we're going to be talking about this for the next five years. Oh, in 2024, the Nasdaq was up 30 % and then down 10 % and then up 25%. Yeah. Anyway, just kind of a crazy one. Good one from the Carson group here. We've talked are looking up for bond investors and diversified 60-40 investors more because of the bond side of the portfolio than the stock side, right? And we've talked about this in the past, but I like this chart that they use. They use the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, which I think is now called the Barclays one, or do they go back and forth?
9:15Which one is it? Bloomberg Barclays? It's the Bloomberg Barclays. I don't know. Is it? I don't know. So they show the eight-year rolling returns, and then they yield to worst at the start of the period. And you can see the correlation here is about as close as you can get for basically the starting yield is your best predictor of eight-year returns going out. And so I think obviously the yields are not as high as they were in the 70s and 80s or even 90s, but starting at, you're looking at, I think almost like 5 % now for the ag or something. It's not bad. Check this out. I'm dropping this in the doc.
9:49Look at the scatter plot. Starting yield on bonds. I think this is a 10-year. and forward 10-year returns. It's not quite one for one, but it's about as close as a mathematical relationship in the entire investing universe than you get, as you get. We've been talking in recent weeks about how a simple diversified portfolio, 60-40, is in a much better place today, not so much because of the stock side of things, but because of bonds and bond yields being much higher. I think I looked last week, the average yield of maturity on the Barclays ag is like 5 % now, which is higher than it's been in a long, long time.
10:27And Carson Group has a really good chart here showing eight-year rolling returns with the starting yield to worst at the start of the period. So starting eight years prior. And you see the correlation here. I've done this historically. It's like 0.9, 0.95, something like that. It's really, really close. Basically, your starting yield will give you, if we're talking, I don't know, seven to 10 years in the future, 95 % of the return. It's the starting yield is the thing that matters most. Corey Hofstein did this a while ago. I wrote a piece about it saying, what was the, how do you do the return attribution from the bonds in the 1980s?
10:58You remember this one? He wrote it like 2017 in like 75 % of the return came from the starting yield. 25 % was from lower. Like a lot of people assume bonds did so well because rates fell and that did help a lot. Yeah. But it was mostly because the yields, starting yields were so high. I made a scatterplot showing the starting yield on 10-year bonds and the forward 10-year return. And this is about as tight a relationship as you get in all of investing is bonds and the starting yield. It tells you more than all that you need to know. So that's the point for a diversified investor. Like you don't need stocks to carry the day anymore.
11:38You can have much lower returns on stocks if you have a diversified portfolio. if bonds are bringing up the rear and helping out with a much higher yield. This is a good thing for investors. It's a great thing. Right? Should be. Ryan Dietrich tweeted, it really is amazing how this works. N-A-I-M, Official Exposure Index. What does that stand for? North America Association of Investment Managers? That's pretty good, actually. You pulled it right out of your rear end, and I think you might be right. Sounds good. was above 100 in late July, the highest level since late 22. Now, after a 5 % minor pullback, it is at the lowest level this year.
12:18And I guess what this is showing is just how quickly the pendulum of sentiment swings. The vibes change faster than the allocations, though, is always the case. Yeah. Right? Vibes move way before anything else. I'm sure if you looked at a sentiment indicator versus actual asset allocations, that relationship is way, way worse than what bonds would show, right? People become more bearish or bullish than their portfolios would show. Totally. Most portfolios don't change all that much for most investors. Yeah. So we had that garden variety correction. We had a nice little rally. I don't know. Someone did tell us what garden variety means.
13:02It was basically like in a garden, there are certain things that you, okay. When a gardener plants a garden, there are basic plants that always get planted. Tomatoes, peppers, beans, et cetera. That's why it's called garden variety. Right? Isn't that what you have in your garden? Simple stuff like that? Keep it simple. My tomatoes have bloomed, not to brag. Okay. Last week on the show, we spoke about September. And here we are. It's been historically the worst month of the year for the stock market. And in fact, it's like a big outlier. So Bespoke has this chart showing the average monthly change for the Dow going back 100 years.
13:42It's the only month that's been down on average over the last 100 years. And it's been down on average over the last 100 years, over the last 50 years, and over the last 20 years. Now, Ben, you just mentioned people's emotions may be changing facts on their portfolio. I would say that this should be a data point that has no correlation. Please do not do anything with your portfolio based on this. And in fact, in fact, why does it sell in May and go away and not sell in August? And because it doesn't rhyme. Yeah, I mean, you only only investing. I only invest in things that rhyme. In America, half of every dollar spent on brand medicines goes to entities who don't make them.
14:18While middlemen like PBMs and 340B hospitals drive up costs, Biopharma is investing$500 billion in new infrastructure and manufacturing here at home and helping patients buy medicines directly at lower prices. Tell Washington to end middlemen markups and put American patients first. Visit phrma.org slash middlemen. Close your eyes, exhale, feel your body relax, and let go of whatever you're carrying today. Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-CONTACTS. Oh my gosh, they're so fast. And breathe. Oh, sorry.
15:00I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order. Oh, sorry. Namaste. Visit 1-800-CONTACTS.com today to save on your first order. 1-800-CONTACTS. So Ed Klisold from Ned Davis Research has a great, like, au contraire type of thing going on. All right, so the S &P 500 fell in August, as we know, 1.8 % garden variety, after surging 19.5 % year-to-date through July. The 13 previous times that the S &P 500 was up 10 % through July and then down in August, it rose every time September through December. So every time through the rest of the year by an average of 9.9%. Now, Ben, I see you smirking.
15:44And I love these sort of stats because it's repeatable and it's not complete nonsense. Like there's data here. And all that it's saying is, listen, when the stock market is up more than 10 % January through July and falls in August, 13 times the market's been higher through the rest of the year. Every time. I'm smirking because this is the kind of stuff where every rule of thumb can be disproven. I feel like everything in the markets can be disproven if you want to find something. That's one of the best and worst parts about the markets is you can torture the data any way you want. And I'm not saying this is data torturing, but I'm saying if you look hard enough and have enough rules, you can change the way that these data points look.
16:25And I think that's one of the maddening things about the markets for some people. Totally. Because people want there to be ironclad rules that if this happens, then this happens. Don't take everything at face value. Take everything with a grain of. Sand. No, but this data point is not like when the S &P is up this and the sky is green and there's wildfires in Canada. No, this is basic shit. When the market's up a lot in the first half of the year, falls, it continues to rise at the end of the year historically. Those are just the facts. I'm sticking with my 20 % gain is way more likely than finishing the year down, which I did a while ago, just because 20 % gains happen a lot.
17:03Yeah. Good call. All right. Here's a face blower for you. Retail, this chart comes courtesy of Daily Chartbook, which again, worth subscribing to if you're a chart lover. Okay. Retail investor flows have reached new record highs over the last month. So this chart shows retail investor flows, like a three-week average. And then there was a huge breakout during the pandemic. The pandemic changed investor behavior, maybe not forever, but maybe forever. And then there was a huge jump. Then it went sideways for a couple of years, and now it's re-accelerating. So you would think, wait, didn't all the people, all the Robinhood-type people, all the Reddit-type people, Didn't they all get washed out in the bear market from 21 to 22?
17:48Actually, no. So can we say that the speculative excess and behavior that happened in late 2020 and early 2021 was a good thing for the markets because a lot of people stuck around and continued to pour money into the markets? Is that fair? Is it a good thing? I think it's complicated. What I said at the time was people don't get unaddicted to gambling. Now, I'm not saying that all of these people are like junkies. I don't mean to say it like that. but the market can be an addictive substance but you're right that all of these crypto fell 80 and all of these speculative stocks fell 80 or 90 in some cases they moved on and if that stuff didn't get people completely out of the market and people are still putting money in and i think it's a net positive all right uh i'm gonna quote myself on a tweet here and i got a bunch of feedback on this one uh i said in 2010s people who wanted this system to fail right the financial system should fail.
18:42They blame the Fed. If it wasn't for the Fed, the financial system would have failed. Now in the 2020s, people are saying, well, I blame fiscal policy for not allowing the system to fail. The system would have failed if it wasn't for fiscal policy. And I said, call me crazy, but most elected officials and Fed people and Treasury people, they don't want the financial system to fail. So if you keep looking for reasons for this whole system to fail, I'm sorry, most of the time it's probably not going to happen. That someone's just going to, oh, system's going down, Let's let it happen. Right? You would think that's fairly intuitive.
19:13And of course I got a lot of the crazies in my mentions about this, but I got a few people who, who are like, uh, not all the way perma bear, but close, close enough. And they, and some people said, well, listen, I just want to see lower housing prices and starting valuations. Like there were in the eighties for my kids. I want my kids to have a, have better access to lower stock prices and lower housing prices, which sounds great in theory, right? It's that sounds amazing, but guess what you have to have for really lower housing prices. in really lower valuations, like an awful economic period where your kid probably doesn't have a job and people are out of work and their wages aren't rising.
19:47And that's unfortunately the rub here is that like the thing you want to bring things back in balance. And I think that there's more to the housing price thing than the stock. Like you can't just create more stocks. Like we could, there's stuff we could do policy-wise to make it housing more affordable. We could make it way easier to build houses. And I don't think that would necessarily have to mean housing prices crash, but they just don't go up as much anymore. You can't do that for the stock market, obviously. You need 20 % interest rates to see eight times price to earnings ratios. And I don't know what situation makes it happen, but anyway, I just think that that whole mindset of the financial system collapsing is I don't know.
20:26Good luck. And then there's a piece... Wait, hang on, hang on, hang on. That mindset that you're describing is a pretty fringe group. Like that's not, I mean, those people are loud maybe on Twitter, but the people that want to see the world burn is such a small group of people that it's probably not even worth giving them the time of day. Maybe it is just like the Twitter thing, but the number of people who are Fed haters and financial system haters that are constantly just spamming my messages on Twitter, anytime I have something that goes a little bit outside of my usual FinTwit group, it's amazing to me.
21:01a case of Twitter is not the real world. They're definitely over-indexed on Twitter. The tweets in the last couple of weeks about people saying that if you index for inflation, things were better in the Great Depression than they are now. And I know a lot of this is just outrage bait and stuff like that, but I think there's enough... It's enough of a non-fringe that people believe this kind of stuff and think, if the financial system just fails, everything would look better. I mean, that's true. That's true, but yeah. So this, this Ethan Mollick tweeted this, this cynical genius illusion. We've talked about this in the past, how like pessimism just seems more, just more intelligent than optimism.
21:39And it's a worldwide survey of 200 ,000 people finds that cynical people are thought of as smarter, but that in reality, cynics test lower on cognitive and competency tests. Stephen Colbert said cynicism masks masquerades as wisdom, but it is the furthest thing from it. That's really true. If you want to sound smart, you can by being pessimistic and cynical. If you're bullish, you just sound naive. It's like, well, you don't see the risks? What, are you an idiot? Don't you see how things can go wrong? But this is the whole thing about like, listen, I would have been right if not for A, B, and C.
22:11True. It's the same thing. By the way, Michael Burry, how much did he spend on his puts? $1.6 trillion? Or is it$10 trillion? I can't remember. His puts are under water. What's that? Oh, so it's not working? I mean, are you looking at the market? I don't know when they expire, but they're taking a bath. Does Michael Burry count as retail inflows or does he still have a hedge fund? Maybe he's propping up retail inflows. It's all Michael Burry. All right. U.S. personal consumption expenditures. Look at this. Right back on trend. This is real. Consumption races higher, even with higher inflation.
22:48I think the higher inflation piece is impressive, but I think even more impressive is just the drop in the pandemic and then the, this, just the reacceleration to trend. Again, this is a, this is consumption adjusted for inflation. It's still on trend. Basically since like, look at if you did your R2 on that one or whatever, R2D2 thing. R squared. I'm taking away your CFA designation. By the way, I got an email this morning. Hi, CFA. You know those dumb ass emails that just, it's like high first name. And then it's just sometimes just not even trying. All right. Joey Politano, rapidly rising interest rates have sent direct costs to service the national debt up dramatically.
23:27Look at this chart here. Federal interest payments are soaring. And this is one of the reasons that I thought that rates just couldn't get too high. Because I thought politically, someone eventually is going to jump on this and go, hey, listen, the Fed is jacking up the national debt because we're having to pay so much for interest costs. I'm waiting for a politician to jump on this and make this a political issue. Don't you think? I think if rates were to say higher and say Jerome Powell is adding to the national debt. Yeah, I'm surprised we have. Well, the election is coming up, so just wait.
23:57So there's a chart from – where did I grab this? I think this is Apollo. U.S. net interest payments as a percentage of the federal government receipts. When does this – and obviously it's breaking out. When does this start to matter? And if so, what are the implications for this? I mean, it depends who's in the leadership role of the government, obviously. But is it possible that 2020 just kind of broke the, it's like the Stephanie Kelton thing of the debt doesn't really matter if some people think that. And then it doesn't matter until you say it does, I guess. I don't know. It's like, we'll just keep spending money.
24:34We'll be fine. Has anything bad happened from us spending so much money yet? No. Okay. I know. I'm not asking rhetorically. I have no idea. I'm not, I don't know. I'm saying that's – but I'm saying if that's – I think it's all political will until there's a really big crisis. And obviously, the inflation was like our first dealing with this. So I don't know. Maybe if we have this soft landing from such high inflation, it's a bad thing because people just kind of go, no, we made it through that. Not too bad. It was pretty quick. Let's just keep spending. Yeah, I don't look at this chart and think we're all going to die.
Read the full transcript
25:07But I don't know. Doesn't this – can't this lead to a really bad outcome? like the end of the financial system no i don't know just like i don't know something bad i know the government is not a household and it shouldn't be treated as such but i don't know but don't you think that that the only i mean the the bad thing would be if if higher debt costs just push like if it's a pie that's not growing and higher debt costs make it so other stuff is not being spent on right that's a bad thing other government services are being left by the wayside but it's just isn't inflation the biggest risk always from something like this what do you mean it's like substantially higher like government spending being so high just means that the i think the biggest risk is always going to be higher than average inflation but i don't think this is government spending it's it's just like what it costs to borrow what it costs to service all of our debt government debt that's what i mean but then we just print more money to pay off the debt.
26:07It's like a, some people would call it a Ponzi scheme. It's not, but that's what all right. Something else back to trend. Uh, Jason Furman was tweeting about how real average hourly earnings are kind of coming back down. And he, he did the trend through like 2018 and it was below trend. But then he said, well, let's look at 20, go through 2007. So you have a more cycles, you have a couple of recessions and it's 0.6 % below trend. This is real average hourly earnings, but basically kind of back on trend. We had a huge spike, then we had the below, and now we're back. And so the whole people falling behind thing has happened for the last 18 months or whatever.
26:44But it was short-lived, and we're just kind of back on trend. And if you look here, this is kind of the way things go. Above trend, below trend, this is how cycles happen. It's not bad. Like, look at this next one. I did inflation rate, U.S. quits, and U.S. job openings. Okay? So they all kind of follow the same track. And I did it on different, you can do it on different panes here in Y charts. I didn't want to be accused of doing an axis chart crime. Right? I'm very aware of the chart crime. So inflation is coming down. So they all kind of rose at the same time. They're all falling at the same.
27:22So is it possible for things to just go back to normal? Like Matthew Bosler tweeted that. Well, the quits thing was insane during the pandemic. Right? That was the fastest way to get a raise was to quit. your job and get a new one. Yes. But I guess the hard part is like, how do you distinguish between things getting back to normal and things overshooting and leading to bad outcomes? You just, I mean, obviously you just don't know. Well, you just wait and see. Yes. All right. Let's talk about crypto a little bit. So Grayscale won their case against the SEC. Now the ball's in the SEC's court. They still did delay the decisions on the ETFs for another, I think it was 45 days, more days, kicking the can.
28:12The grayscale, the GBTC discount shrank rapidly. Last reading was, it was at a 19 % discount to NAV. And this is like the whole crux of the issue is that the GBTC closed end fund does not have the arbitrage mechanism that ETFs do. So it could trade at a wide premium as it did in the first couple of years of its life, which led to a lot of the nonsense. Now it's at a severe discount. And if and when they're able to convert to an ETF, that will shrink ostensibly overnight. And so GBTC is up 123 % in the year as this discount has narrowed more than twice as much as the 55 % year-to-date return on Bitcoin.
28:56It's still way underperforming over the last five years. Bitcoin is up 285 % over the last five years. Grayscale is up 94%. Oof. Big oof. I don't want to steal a take here, but I think it was yours. Was it you who said, I don't think Grayscale wants this to convert to an ETF because they're just earning 2 % per year on this or something. They're not going to be able to charge the same amount of fees on this as they would if it didn't convert to an ETF. So I think when they were doing all the hand-wringing a couple of years ago that – I have no evidence of this. I'm just speculating. That it was sort of a charade.
29:32Like let us convert, you know? But I think now they need to. Well, yeah. There's no other choice because they need to have us coming one way or another. Right. When this thing converts, how much money is just immediately going to leave? That was just waiting for this discount premium to – or this discount to close. You mean people that came in late and are just waiting for the power? Using it as like a arbitrage opportunity. So, well, I don't know. You think people are going to pay taxes just to get into a cheaper vehicle? Money that's just been stuck there for years. People saying, why would I sell this asset that is trading at a discount?
30:06And then once that discount closes, it's back to where it was. I don't think so. I think so because there's going to be a price war. All right. So let's say there's$16 billion in the thing. I mean, how much leaves? A billion? I think like a third of it could leave. No way. I would hardcore take the under and I'll, I'll bet you a sushi dinner. I don't eat sushi, but you know what I'm talking about. All right. So they get an ETF within six months. They're down a third in assets. No way. Timestamp it. Okay. That money's going, that money's going to iShares or something else that has a lower fee. Nah, nah.
30:44So anyway, the pop, poof, evaporated. There was a big fat pop. I think Bitcoin traded from like 25 to 28 or something. Now it's back down to wherever it was pre-announcement. So even despite the 55 % year-to-date return on Bitcoin, it just seems nobody cares. Nobody's interested. Tom Dunleavy tweeted almost$300 million in digital asset outflows over the past seven weeks. centralized exchange volumes at 2020 levels, reaching peak bearishness apathy slash apathy. Of course, we don't know where the peak is, or peak in apathy, bottom in price. But yeah, nobody cares. It's hard to see the ETF being this savior to the industry.
31:24Why? I'm saying it's not like the ETF has raised interest in it so far. Do you think the ETF is going to be a savior to the crypto industry? No, probably not. I mean, remember when they launched, futures were going to be traded at the CMA? Matter of fact, I think that was the top in 20, whatever it was, 19? I don't remember. This morning, though, so we always talk about the use case. The use case, where's the use case? This morning, somebody from Visa, actually, the head of crypto at Visa, tweeted, Visa expands stablecoin settlement capabilities to merchant inquirers. Now, I read the tweet that I'm going to be honest.
32:00I don't understand most of this, but I mean, Visa, blockchain. Say no more. Hello, Visa, blockchain. So I don't know. Maybe, I mean, this has been a speculation all along is that TradFi uses blockchains to bring efficiencies to their ways of doing business. It's behind the scenes for the financial system. We spoke to Fidelity last week. When's the podcast dropping on that? Next Monday. Next Monday. Okay. Right. All about Fidelity Digital Assets and what they're doing over there. So that's coming on Monday. All right. I want to talk about idiosyncratic risk in real estate, which, man, that's just a word I love saying, idiosyncratic.
32:43It is a good word. That's a word that makes you, in the finance world, that makes you sound a lot smarter. Yeah. Right? Yeah, I like it. That's a good call. Yeah. Okay. So I got an email last week on, I think, Wednesday morning. I'm in kind of an old school WeWork building where my office is. it's just a bunch of little small businesses, doctor's offices and insurance companies. And I just have a single office for me. It's just me here. I'm holding down Ritholtz Wealth, Grand Rapids by myself. I have an office. I've had it for seven or eight years. I get an email from the building manager and they just bought this building like 18 months ago probably.
33:19And so whoever sold made a good timing on getting out of commercial real estate. But said, hey, a pipe burst on the third floor. there's three floors and water is rushing down and it happened at four in the morning. So the fire, I don't know how they got alerted to it. Fire station, the fire trucks came over at like six or seven AM to shut it off. And so water is running for three hours for a burst pipe. And so I come to the office to check, to make sure all my computer podcast gear is okay. And I was, there's three inches of water in the hallway. I took, I had to take my shoes off to walk through the hallway, just broken stuff everywhere.
33:56And office on the left side of me, office on the right side of me are flooded, just total flood. Again, three inches of water. My office is completely fine. I don't know how it happened. I got lucky, but they had to have like this crew come in this restoration crew. It was like seven trucks and they're ripping stuff up and they're putting these huge industrial fans down and they're turning stuff off and spraying for mold. And it just got me thinking about like, that's like the, the thing you don't hear about in investing in real estate is like the one-off things that can just screw you. Obviously, I'm sure there's some insurance or they'll probably be okay, but I can't imagine owning a building like that and have something like this happen and having to deal with the ramifications.
34:42Your index fund is not going to call you in the middle of the night and say a pipe burst. right i'm not saying like don't invest in real estate but it's just it just made me think of that right that it's there's a lot of there's a lot more stuff that can go wrong if you're not diversified more stuff can you know can go right too but the the range of outcomes is just wider i was at the dinner with a friend of mine the other night and he had a phone call and it was probably 10 o 'clock and now he's not, he's not a, a real estate investor. He's a general contractor. And one of his clients like had, had three inches of water in their apartment because I don't know, whatever, something thought a pipe or whatever, whatever, but yeah, this shit happens.
35:26And, uh, not phone calls you want to get, but it's phone calls that you will get. Right. That's a problem. Uh, all right. Is this a chart crime? All right. I want to talk about this. A bunch of people tagged me on this. Someone posted on Twitter. I mean, it certainly is. Believe it or not, housing affordability hasn't changed in the last 40 years. The median new house today is almost a thousand square foot bigger than 40 years ago. Price per square foot inflation adjusted basically is unchanged since the late 1970s. Could we rewind to the believe it or not part? Because I'm going to go with the or not.
35:55So here's the problem with this. So I looked at the actual source of this article, but my first problem with it is it stops in 2020. right so i think you could have made the argument through 2019 2020 that and i did like adjusted for inflation and interest rates you wrote a post on that yeah and it yeah it was like basically two years ago yeah that that that held water but it said in 2017 the price per square foot of a new home was only four percent more than 1979 this is adjusted for inflation but it stops in 2020. Luckily, our resident actually guy on Twitter, Jake Economic, took the data through 2023.
36:37Now you can see it just takes off. Come on. Don't tell me that buying a house is not expensive. Adjust it for anything. Affordability right now is the worst I'd say that it's ever been. And that's especially when you mix in the fact that the supply is so low. But that's the crazy thing is through the 2010s, housing was still very affordable. And then in the blink of an eye, it became unaffordable. That's the hard part. Here's one for you. Good luck buying a house in Miami. Median home sales in Miami rose 17 % from a year earlier in the four weeks ending August 27th, the biggest increase the metro area seen since October 2022.
37:19Biggest increase of all 50 most populous u.s metro areas they said the funny thing is unlike most big places that had a huge influx of housing miami never saw housing prices drop so housing prices never dropped and then now they're increasing almost 20 again which is just kind of crazy they also said two out of every five buyers in miami are paying all cash so it's just rich people coming in and buying up Miami. Median home sale price was up to$380 ,000, up 4.8 % from a year earlier. That's the biggest increase since October. I'm still waiting for these monetary policy lags to hit the housing market because that should be the one that gets hit right away, right?
38:00I know people keep saying, just wait, the lags are happening. They're coming. They're coming. Credit to Goldman. I was reading one of their notes this morning, and apparently they've been saying that they don't buy the notion that the policy impact lag thing. That doesn't make sense. That's not English. But you know what I'm saying. They don't buy it. They're not buying it. They say not only is the impact not going to show up on a lag, it's not going to show up at all. My retort would be things happen so much faster now that you'd think that policy would get priced in, that the financial system moves way quicker than it did before.
38:36The other thing would be, it would just, if rates stayed at this level, then eventually there has to be something that happens. Like it can't, but if inflation is falling and the Fed cuts rates over the next 18 months or so, then I don't know. How can you call it lags at that point? I don't know. It does seem unsustainable, but you know, the hell do we know? So they also had the housing payments are up 17, 28 % year over year. You know, we've shown this chart before, but it's at an all-time high again, almost$2 ,700. There was a story in Fortune about this couple that asked on their registry for a down payment fund.
39:11So they said, give us money for a down payment as a wedding gift, which I actually applaud them for. It's kind of sad. It has to be that way. So then it says they couldn't find anything, couldn't find anything. They found, I think they were in Florida. They found a 900-square-foot, one-bedroom condo listed for$300K, also$600 extra HOA fees. They had a 7 % mortgage,$2 ,300. I don't know. That seems expensive to me. It's just crazy to me how much that 7 % mortgage just kills you. Also, our HOA fee is the biggest scam in the world. Like you hear about some of the condo fees people have to pay. What is it?
39:48I don't know what that stands for. Homeowners Association? Yeah. Well, New York is the most egregious example, but some of the fees you have to pay to live in a condo building, there's no way it costs that much for upkeep for these places. So where does it go? Just to the coffer? I don't know. That's what I'm wondering. You know, we spoke earlier on the podcast about Brian, who happened to be listening to the podcast last week and got my pants. The craziest story, and I'm sure I told this at the time. This was years ago. You know, we've been doing this podcast for a long time. We have, over five years, right?
40:22Coming up, we started in November 2017, I believe. That's right. So I bought an apartment, a co-op in Park Slope in 2015. And there was - It will never not sound like a ski city to me. Why Brooklyn is called Park Slope, I don't get it. It sounds like it should be a ski city in Utah. Well, there's a park. Got a little - Prospect Park. And the city slopes downward, I guess. Anywho, there was no money in the bank for this building. There's only like five or six units. And in the bylaws, there is a flip tax because there's only, you know, it's a very small building. They don't want anybody buying and selling.
41:09And the flip tax was in place for four years, which is a long time, right? Four years is not a flip. And so I sold my unit with like three years, six months, three years, eight months, whatever it was. And these jerks in my building wouldn't let it go. I had to pay like a 2 % tax or whatever it was, 2 % of the purchase price. Why do they care if people buy and sell? Well, because it's a family. It's families there and they don't want a lot of turnover. Okay. But four years, that's excessive. So anyway, so they said no. they hit me with the flip tax. And then, sorry, I probably complained about it on the podcast.
41:48And some, I got an email, the person who sold me the apartment. So the person that I bought from, the person that they bought from is a listener. So basically my grandparents, my grandpa of the apartment. He was the one who put the flip tax in place.
42:13so he apologized for me but what a small world what if you get someone who buys into the building that you don't want to be there you want them to get out that's a great point now you're holding him in there that's a great point all right we've looked at this before uh this is from the economist real housing prices since 2000 it shows canada britain italy u.s france germany japan Canada is just off the charts. I wrote a piece in, I think, 2017. This makes no sense. I wrote a piece in 2017 saying the Canadian housing market is a crazy, crazy bubble. It didn't really matter. Yeah, should have. That's the Stanley Druckenmiller, George Searle.
42:49When you see a bubble forming, you go in to write a blog post. Britain is way higher. France is way higher. The U.S. still doesn't look. Italy is falling. I guess if you want to place on Lake Como with George Clooney, that's the place to buy. I keep coming back to the idea of I don't know. Just what if U.S. housing prices are, if we don't ever, if we don't like have some government policy that forces builders or incentivizes builders to build more homes, I think U.S. housing prices are still going to be undervalued for like a long, long term. Hey, maybe the guy who did that tweet was right. Maybe it's not a chart card.
43:25Maybe U.S. home prices are cheap. Certainly not cheap. But I mean, are we really going to look back in 30 years and see like housing prices not go up most of the time, even if it's not as, I don't know. We got an email. Hi, guys. As you know, housing in Canada is bonkers. Now three of the big five banks have disclosed that 20 % of their mortgages are negative amortization, which means the monthly payments aren't enough to pay the interest. What? And the remaining interest is getting added back to the principal. Oh, boy. Okay. I just learned about this. Do you know how Canadian mortgages work? I know they're very short-term, right?
44:02They're floating. Let me explain this to you real quick. I learned about this. Someone sent a story about this. So they're fixed payments, but the interest rates are variable. So all it does is if rates go from 3 % to 7%, it extends the life of your mortgage or less money goes to your principal and more goes to interest. So the payment stays the same. It's not like they're jacking up payments, but the amortization thing they're talking about here, basically instead of whatever, 60 % of your payment going to principal, Now 20 % is or something. Wait, let me ask you a dumb question. You're paying more interest.
44:35Is that a better system than what we have? No, because eventually if you're underwater, like they're saying, they're going to have to either extend the loan, you're paying more, or it's certainly not a better system. It's not a good thing. We're lucky that we have things the way they are. Well, actually, you know what? Because, yeah, because how many people are actually impacted by rising interest rates. What is it? Two thirds of people. How many people have a fixed rate mortgage below 5%, like 90 % on their six? Anyway. The other thing is they, people in Canada, they benefited when rates were falling.
45:17They did amazing when rates were falling, having a variable rate mortgage. So everyone benefited on the way down and everyone's getting hurt on the way out. So better for inequality maybe. All right. Anyway, this is possible because in Canada, Okay, we already discussed this. Yeah, pretty wild. But wait, it says, and their new amortizations get reset to a maximum of 25 years. What if you've got like five years left and then all of a sudden rates go up and then you get, you're like, sorry, you've got another seven years. So that's what I don't know. Maybe people can, in Canada can let us know. I don't know if that means you have to make like a big principal pay down to get it more in line.
45:51Like if that's the 25 year thing, like they can't give you a 50 year loan. The banks aren't going to do that. Do you have to like just do a principal pay down? All right. Another email. Random bank in Dallas bought my mortgage 3.07 % with 17 years left. How is this a good move on their part? What am I missing? I couldn't care less, but for them, isn't that like buying a 17-year bond at 3.07 %? Maybe they'll package it with other mortgages to sell. Okay. No, this is not like buying a 17-year bond at 3.07 % because even though that's your mortgage rate, the prices on these bonds have adjusted so that instead of them, they're not getting a 3 % coupon.
46:31They're probably getting closer to, I don't know, whatever, 6%, 7%, 8%. Well, no. Yeah, they're buying the bond at a discount. Yeah, they're buying the bond at a discount, which raises a good point. It's trading for 80 cents in the dollar or whatever it is because of the change. We were asking about, we were wondering why are spreads so wide on mortgage rates versus the 10-year? And I think we got, actually, we got a long email about this. is because of prepayment risk. Bond buyers are like, no, sorry. I know that as soon as rates go down, all of these bonds are going to get refinanced. And so I'm buying them at 8%, but they're not really going to give me 8 % of maturity.
47:11So whatever the number actually ends up being, obviously nobody knows the path of interest rates, but that's a big reason why the spread between mortgage rates and the 10-year is where it is because everybody knows that there's a ton of refinance risk embedded in these bonds. And prepayment has been extended now too, because a lot of the bonds that are at 3 % are not getting prepaid. And so they know the duration is even longer. In the past, you would assume a mortgage bond is going to pay off in like, I don't know, an average of seven or eight years. If that duration gets extended to 12 to 15 years, that's a whole different kind of bond.
47:44Yeah. Ben, you got a new car lease. Okay. I want to talk about this here, but we're talking to car dealership guy. later today actually for a podcast that's going to run I don't know next week we said we're running five days a week we're giving you an extra one for free on Saturday and so I got a new lease and I was just shocked at how I thought my car payment was going to go up to the moon because auto rates are like 9 % now to the health and I was pleasantly surprised I might have got lucky but I'm going to talk about the car dealership guy and save it for that also new car smell just on my kids the best my kids are like like run out of the house and go into the garage and open the door and smell my car and come back and i'm like hey hey hey quit open the door you're gonna you're gonna use it all my my new car smell in my jeep is just about gone so enjoy it while it lasts yeah because you have the top coming down all right we talked about this before i think a couple weeks ago we talked about how like if you're married it's the same as having 100k added to your salary if you're divorced it's like taking subtracting 90k something like that to which a bunch of people replied, if you just get married and divorced a bunch of times, that's like an arbitrage for 10K.
48:53You're just flipping the coupon. But the Atlantic had a piece and they looked at America's happiness ratings from 1972 to 2018. And there's this huge drop off in 2000. Now, my initial thought would have been, oh, internet. That's got to be it. It's internet. Social media, internet is making people more unhappy. This researcher, after slicing the demographic data it every which way, income, education level, race, location, and gender. Peltzman found that this happiness dip is mainly attributable to one thing. Married people are happier and Americans aren't getting married as much. This number shocked me.
49:27In 1980, 6 % of 40-year-olds had never been married. Today, it's 25 % of 40-year-olds. And so he's saying, and they even said in this article, like, listen, we haven't verified and dug through the data yet, but his whole thing is it's just fewer people getting married means more people are unhappy. And he didn't really come away with a reason though. Like why are married people happier than people who aren't married? Because you only have to do half the chores. Boom. Dual income households. I don't know. I couldn't, they didn't give a good answer. Maybe it's just that we need companionship. Is that the simple answer?
50:07Yeah, it's lonely being lonely. I was going to talk about this in recommendations. I watched National Lampoon's Vacation. It was on rewatchables recently. And I think it's one of my favorite rewatchables of all time. It was Van Lathan and Bill Simmons and Chris Ryan. And they were just dying the whole time. And you could tell that these guys had seen this movie like 20 or 30 times. And I told you, if you watch it once, you're probably not going to laugh that much. I do need to rewatch it. I did chuckle the first time a few times. But it's the kind of movie where you kind of go, oh, that's funny.
50:32But then if you watch that, I watched it. I watched half of it by myself and my wife the next time. I'm like, hey, why don't you watch the rest with me? And it's the kind of thing you'll go, oh, here comes the part with this. And it's just better to watch it with someone else than it is to watch it by yourself. All right, last week we talked about disaster insurance and how my hedge for climate change is living in the Midwest. This is from the Washington Post. At least five large U.S. property insurers, Allstate, American Family, Nationwide, Erie Insurance Group, Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffett's getting on this early.
51:01I've told regulators that extreme weather patterns caused by climate change have led them to stop rating coverages in some reasons. They say they will cut out damage caused by hurricanes, wind, and hail from policies underrating along the coastlines and in wildfire country. It's like people are just going to be kind of on their own for this kind of stuff, or they're just going to pay like exorbitant rates in the future. But people are still moving to Miami. Remember last week we were talking about homeowners insurance? Now, we did get some emails on that. A bank does require you when you're getting a mortgage to have homeowners insurance.
51:36That's what I thought. But is it two-thirds of people that own a home don't have a mortgage? What's the number? Is it one-third? I can't remember. It's close to 40 % of people do not have a mortgage anymore. House is completely paid off. Okay. So those people, they're playing with fire. Yes. I guess you rolled the dice. Although I do – that's a good point. So not only are they not raising prices, they're just backing out. They're just like, we just can't underwrite this. speaking of that underwrite that's hilarious when people uh say instead of instead of investing they say underwriting it's like bro you bought four shares what are you talking about yes you're not underwriting anything you're buying four shares that you're gonna probably sell in three weeks by the way i'm talking about myself okay it does make you sound smarter that's an idiosyncratic risk kind of thing you say it it sounds smarter all right um okay so r.i.p to jimmy buffett i don't know i can't imagine you're a big jimmy buffett fan maybe you are well i like what he's about he used to come to Long Beach, not Long Beach, Jones Beach every summer, most summers.
52:40I went to a Jimmy Buffett concert outside of Chicago right after I graduated college. And it was one of the best pregame concerts I've ever been to in my life. It was a huge open field, but it was all baby boomers in Hawaiian shirts. There were ice luges and tiki bars. And it was an amazing time. And my dad got me into Jimmy Buffett way back in the day. For me, it's the kind of music in the summer or like in the Caribbean, wherever you are in Mexico with like a Corona that and Bob Marley to me, that kind of music in a certain, it's yacht rock at a certain time. It's never going to go out of style.
53:14I listen to it. So there was a story in the New York times a few years ago, like three or four years ago, like how like Jimmy Buffett does not live the Jimmy Buffett lifestyle. And it talked about how like, he doesn't really drink margaritas anymore. Cause he doesn't have sugar and he doesn't really eat cheeseburgers cause he has no carbs and he doesn't really to smoke pot anymore. And it's like, and he, it says how he worked all the time. And he was working on like a Margaritaville Broadway show or something. And it was like, he did have like this laid back. I read his, his biography. He wrote a book at like age 50 and it was really good.
53:47And he really lived that lifestyle. He'd like sleep on the beach. He'd live on a boat. He'd drink until the sun came up, listening to music and learning how to play guitar. He really did like live that lifestyle. But then in his older years, he became like this entrepreneur and he's worth like half a billion dollars and he's just working all the time. So the whole point of the article was like, he's not really Jimmy Buffett anymore. He's like this businessman and he runs the show. And he said, well, I'm more like a sail captain. I want to have my hands in everything. And at first I thought like, it was like a practice what you preach thing.
54:13Like, is this like false advertising that he doesn't live in anymore? But then the more I thought about it, the more I thought like, well, of course he couldn't keep that lifestyle up his whole life. Like he wouldn't have made it, right? And I think my whole takeaway was like, your priorities change over time. You can't just live like you did when you were young forever. Right? Like you, you go to bed at like 10 o 'clock now, right? And we're staying out late for you, pretty much? That kind of thing? Yeah, more or less. I'm still hanging on to my youth. Okay, well, kind of. Anyway, it was like it made me just, the whole story pulled me in different directions.
54:52Like, wait a minute. He does not practice when he preaches, but it's like, well, so what? Your priorities change over time. but anyway, RIP to a legend. Still love his music. RIP to a legend. All right. I'm excited to read this email. Michael, I've gotten so much insight and entertainment out of listening to the pod for the last two years. This week's episode was enough to push me over the edge and realize that I need to give something back. Unlike Ben, I simply couldn't listen to the story of a hungry bald who just wants some spicy noodles sans fees and not do something about it. I know you're an Amazon prime member.
55:24so I went ahead and launched an offer with Grubhub to give you and any other Hungry Animal Spirits listeners a year of free Grubhub Plus. You'll get free delivery fees on orders over$12, exclusive deals and promotions, and for folks like Ben who are swimming in so much time luxury that they can leave the house for food, 5 % back on pickup orders. Head to the link for the offer and maybe give our Amazon basics pan another shot while you're out there. Sorry, I'm not going to do that, but thank you for the offer. Who is this from? Someone at Amazon? Yeah. Can't be ordering GrubUp every night in this economy.
56:02Well, this is a great email. What? Okay. What? Oh, with one of my credit cards gives me free DoorDash plus or whatever it is. It's the Sapphire Reserve. That's it. Yes. Yeah. Okay. So I have that. So we are going to link to this in the show notes. Again, free Grubhub for a year. Grubhub Plus for a year. So thank you to the gentleman at Amazon for the lovely email. All right, Ben, what do you think the market cap - No more complaints for you then about it, right? Oh, I'll still complain. What do you think the market cap of Taylor Swift is? I mean, if she was a stock, she'd be outperforming Nvidia this year.
56:40Like if somebody had the opportunity to buy all of Taylor Swift's future earnings potential at today's value. I don't know. Discount it all back. My oldest daughter is nine years old and is a self-described Swiftie, went to the concert they used to with my wife. We had to listen to it all summer long. And God bless her. Taylor Swift has a great catalog of music. I can't take it anymore. I just, I can't. It's too much. I need a break. But here's the thing. Her tour is making$1.5 billion or something. Maybe it'll be two at the time. But what's her price to sales ratio if she's making$2 billion on her concert?
57:25So the smallest stock in the S &P 500 is a company that I've never heard of. Shame on me. It's called Fortria. Although, you know what? Not shame on me. I don't know every stock in the S &P 500. Fortria Holdings. Fortria is a global contract research organization that provides services with the goal of advancing health. All right, whatever. That's$2.35 billion. If Taylor Swift were publicly traded, would she be in the S &P 500? Yes. I think so too. Right? She can't produce$2 billion every year like she is because she's going to die eventually if she has this many tours. But yes. Got to be. How many stocks in the S &P 500 would you buy instead of buying Taylor Swift from here?
58:09Not that many for me. I'd rather put my money in Taylor Swift than I would in most companies in the S &P right now. Yeah, for sure. All right, Ben, recommendations. What do you got? I already mentioned National Lampoon's Vacation. Justified City Primeval I finished, which I never realized. What is that? It's the Justified reboot on FX. Justified was a show. I mentioned it a few weeks ago. Oh, with Timothy Aldifant? Yes. I never saw it. Worth watching? The second season is amazing. I mean, it's five seasons, so it's probably too much for you to catch up now. But they had an amazing payoff from the original show in the last 10 minutes.
58:45So if you're an original Justified person, you have to watch this new one. And the ending was just amazing. They may be doing another one, I think. But I didn't realize, City Primeval is an Elmore Leonard novel from the 80s with a different character. And Quentin Tarantino and Timothy Olyphant on Once Upon a Time in Hollywood said, what if we took Raylan Gibbons from Justified and put him into this novel and updated it? And so it was Tarantino's idea to do this, which is kind of cool. I watched Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels last night. I think I found it on Starz. Now, this is the one where, back in the day, Guy Ritchie became really famous, besides marrying Madonna, when Snatch came out, right?
59:23Brad Pitt was in it. It was a bunch of – but if you were a real Guy Ritchie stan, you would say, no, no, no, no, Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels is actually better than Snatch. If you were a real Guy Ritchie stan, I believe you just referred to as Lock, Stock. Sorry. It's a great name. and I hadn't watched it in probably 15 years. And it's just the best word I could think of when I was finished was it's just a satisfying movie. It's like heists and all these storylines coming together at once. And when it all comes together, it's a little over the top, obviously, but it's just such a satisfying movie.
59:52I love movies like that. It was so good. Did you see Guy Ritchie's The Covenant? I did not yet. It's a very un-Guy Ritchie film, but very good. Okay, that's all I got. On to me. All right, I watched Friday the 13th. It's on HBO Max or now. I'm sorry. It's called Max. So I remember watching Friday the 13th. The only time I ever saw it, I was 13 years old at a sleepover on Halloween. And I was the only one. Me and my friends were sleeping in my friend's basement. And I was the only one awake. And I was in my sleeping bag. And I couldn't look over the sleeping bag because I was so petrified. Well, I got to say, this movie is not even borderline unwatchable.
1:00:34It's awful. Didn't age well. It was horrendous. Just horrendous. Your problem is you've probably seen too many horror movies in the meantime that built on that. Yeah, but so first of all, Jason's not even in the movie. His mom is a killer, which if you've seen Scream, you know that from Scream trivia. But just terrible. And Friday the 13th is like, you know, it's in like the Pantheon. It's awful. I never watched any of them. Awful. The horror stuff just awful. Okay. Okay, so I'm in a bit of a show drought, which I don't mind at all. Not even a little. I dialed up the season one, episode one of Curb.
1:01:16And it's from October 2000. So Robin comes by and she's like, why does this look so old? Cheryl especially looks like she's from a different era. Larry's still bald and everything. And I said to her, she's like, if it's from 2000, I'm like, yeah, guess what? That's 23 years ago. that is kind of crazy the show's been going on for that long and the first episode is hilarious it's exactly like it is today do you remember the pants tent? no oh yes okay I do he couldn't get the part in his pants to go down it's just classic LD and he's still doing it 23 years later you sent me a curb clip this weekend I forgot to respond but I didn't know the context did you remember you did that?
1:02:01oh that was hilarious You texted me a curb clip. Yes, it was pretty good. You were just kind of thinking of curb. Yes. Okay, that's it for us. We want to thank Big John Grayson for producing this episode. Stepping in for Duncan. If you are at Future Proof next week, right? Yes, next week. We take off Sunday. We will be doing live Animal Spirits on Monday. There may be Miami Vice is available. We'll see. It's going to be fun. Come say hi to us. Okay, indeed. Thank you for listening. As always, we appreciate the support. AnimalSpiritsPod at gmail.com. We'll see you next time.
1:03:02If they say you can't have it all, don't believe them. Your business demands more. Choose a payments provider that delivers more. Choose Marketa. Visit marketa.com slash Spotify to learn more.
From the publisher
On episode 324 of Animal Spirits, Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson discuss: one of the best years ever for the Nasdaq 100, people who want to see the financial system burn, getting back on trend with economic data, what if housing prices were just undervalued before the pandemic, Canada vs. Miami housing prices, why married people are happier, and much more!
Find complete show notes on our blogs...
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor
Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspiritspod@gmail.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
Check out the latest in financial blogger fashion at The Compound shop: https://www.idontshop.com
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.
Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.
Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
