In short
Animal Spirits Podcast Episode 360: When Will Houses Be Affordable Again?
Episode Overview In this episode of the Animal Spirits Podcast, hosts Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson delve into various themes surrounding the market, life, and investing. Key topics include market pullbacks, insights on Jim Simons, the potential pitfalls of 401(k) plans, and reflections on how personal possessions, such as cars, reflect an individual's character. The episode also addresses the pressing question of housing affordability.
Key Themes and Discussions
Market Trends
- Market Pullbacks:
- Discussion on the nature of bull markets and the frequency of pullbacks.
- Historical performance of the S&P 500, noting that it has experienced multiple significant gains in recent years.
- Jim Simons:
- Considered a legendary figure in investing, Jim Simons is known for utilizing mathematical insights to achieve market success.
- His approach involved leveraging complex algorithms and was less focused on traditional investment strategies.
401(k) Plans and Wealth Inequality
- Debate on 401(k) Plans:
- The episode questions whether 401(k) plans were a mistake, citing that they have contributed to wealth inequality due to their limited access for lower-income individuals.
- Michael argues that the 401(k) has provided a means for many to accumulate wealth, despite not being universally accessible.
Housing Affordability
- Current Housing Market Analysis:
- JP Morgan's analysis suggests that restoring housing affordability may take approximately three and a half years assuming steady income growth and stagnant home prices.
- A regional breakdown highlights major cities such as Miami and Boston facing longer timelines for affordability restoration.
- Home Equity Trends:
- Discussion around the current state of home equity in the U.S., with a significant amount of tappable equity available, highlighting opportunities for renovation and investments.
Personal Reflections and Societal Observations
- Cars as Status Symbols:
- Michael reflects on societal perceptions regarding car ownership and how it can reflect personal identity.
- The discussion also touches on how societal feedback and judgment affect individuals’ choices, particularly regarding material possessions.
- Consumer Sentiment:
- There’s a recognition of the disconnect between general consumer sentiment and individual satisfaction with personal circumstances.
- An exploration of how social media influences perceptions of lifestyle and personal achievement.
Key Takeaways
- Expectations of Market Behavior:
- Historical patterns of market performance suggest that investors should not always expect continued gains, but rather prepare for volatility and pullbacks.
- Housing Market Challenges:
- The ongoing housing crisis is complex, affected by income growth, housing stock, and broader economic conditions. Potential solutions may take time to materialize.
- Personal Choices and Perception:
- The decisions individuals make regarding possessions can often reveal underlying societal pressures and expectations, which are amplified through social media.
Conclusion Episode 360 of the Animal Spirits Podcast provides a multifaceted discussion on investing, personal finance, and societal expectations. The insightful conversations and data-driven analysis offer listeners a deeper understanding of current market dynamics and personal finance implications.
Additional Resources
- Sponsors:
- YCharts: Offers financial insights and tools for market analysis.
- Fabric by Gerber Life: Provides term life insurance and financial protection resources.
- Newsletter Subscription:
- The Compound newsletter for updates on investment insights.
- Contact Information:
- Email: animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com for feedback, questions, or topic suggestions.
Related Links
- [YCharts Election Guide](https://ycharts.com)
- [The Compound Newsletter](https://www.thecompoundnews.com/subscribe)
- [Ben Carlson's A Wealth of Common Sense](https://awealthofcommonsense.com)
- [Michael Batnick's The Irrelevant Investor](https://theirrelevantinvestor.com)
This episode encapsulates not only financial wisdom but also reflects on broader societal trends, making it relevant for both seasoned investors and casual listeners alike.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today's Animal Spirits is brought to you by YCharts. Ben, do you know what's coming in the fall? College football? Yes. Also, an election. And YCharts has an election guide that you can use to know and share with your clients what happened around previous elections, what happens before, what happens after, should you really be making any moves based on that, and all that sort of good stuff. Also want to mention that our chief operating officer, Nick Majuli, is doing a webinar with them on May 22nd. So sign up for that. But remember, if you're a listener and a new YCharts user, you can get 20 % off your initial subscription.
0:41Go to YCharts.com, link in show notes for the visuals that I've mentioned. I'm a fan of the election stuff because every two years or four years, however often people pay attention to elections, we have to remind people the same stuff because those same questions pop up. If this person gets elected, what does it mean? If this party is in control, what does it mean? And I think that context is very helpful because there's always people who have those questions. So, electionguide, whitecharts.com, check it out. Today's Animal Spirits is brought to you by Fabric by Gerber Life. It's the term life insurance.
1:17You can get done right here, right now. You could be covered from your couch in under 10 minutes with no health exam required. That's pretty good. Join the thousands of parents who trust Fabric to protect their family and apply today in just minutes at meatfabric.com slash spirits at meatfabric.com slash spirits. It's the easiest rule of thumb in all of financial planning, right? Term life insurance, especially for a parent. We had a lot of young parents who follow us. This is easy. Cost effective. Yes. Easy. Manage that risk. Policy is issued by Western Southern Life Assurance Company, not available in certain states.
1:49Prices subject to underwriting and health questions. Remember, check it out. Meatfabric.com slash spirits.
1:57Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions. Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.
2:27Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. I'm trying to think of a joke to describe the shirt you're wearing. It's very fashionable. What is that? Is that like a grease? Is it a 1970s era? Is it? I'm trying to be retro, but I'm not quite sure what era it's calling back to. It's just a lightweight coat. It's just a, almost like a members only, but modernized, I guess. You know. You look like TC in that. You look good. Thank you. I didn't know where - It's like a TC type. Is that a cardigan? It's just a lightweight coat. I wasn't planning on fashion talk to start the pod, but I think I'm one of the last 10 remaining people who uses Stitch Fix.
3:03And I like it because they send me stuff that I wouldn't normally buy on my own. I get a box every two months with five items in it. And I pick those items I want. Thank you. So they send me stuff like this that I actually like, you know, I probably wouldn't have bought that on my own, but I'm going to give it a try since they send it to me. So what do you do for the stuff you send back? you have to go to the post office? That sounds like a pain in the butt. They send you a pre-stamped bag that you just drop in the mail. Stuff you don't want. You go through and you check out. And if you get everything on the list, they give you a 20 % discount, which is pretty good.
3:32When you say drop in the mail, do you mean that your madman will come pick it up or do you have to physically go somewhere? Well, you're going to, yeah, in the mail drop. I have one in my office. Oh, I got it. I got it. I got it. Yeah. Well, I'm not one to critique fashion because I'm wearing the Knicks shirt that they give away at the games. I think you've been wearing a Knicks shirt for 33 straight days. This is like a pajama. This is actually making me feel good about my recent weight gain. And this says a lot about the state of the average American. This is a dress. This thing is huge. Based on your mentions of weight gain on the podcast over the years and months, you have more volatility than the S &P.
4:07Is that fair? No, it's not fair. I have a range, and I've got strong support and maybe even stronger resistance. credit to me. I don't go above, I don't go above like 182. That's where I'm hovering. So you're like a buffer ETF. I don't think I've ever gotten below. My absolute bottom, my absolute bottom is 169. All right. Upside volatility in the stock market this year. This is, I don't know if, I don't know how many people find it surprising. The S &P is basically up 10 % on the year, which I don't know, halfway through the year seems kind of insane. So here's the last five years because I want to talk about what, if this means anything for the next rest of the year.
4:46So for the last five years, here's the returns for the S &P. Up 31%, up 18%, up 29%, down 18%, up 26%. So call it four out of five years, we're up basically 20 % or more if we round up the 18. I would sign up for that coming forward. I'm just saying. If we're going to do that, I would sign up for that. So if we, because we always say that a given year is not the average year. Like you rarely get the average, that it would fall on 10. Obviously, it could happen. but it would be more likely that we're down 5 or 10 percent or up 20 percent than ending where we are today so if we're just i mean this is almost like a gambler's fallacy kind of thing that if i just keep heading on black it just looking at the last five years of returns it would be shocking to me if we had another 20 up here ever no no just just in this string it's not impossible but it would seem improbable, that would be quite a run of gains.
5:40Although, again, I always say the 20 % up year is one of the most dominant years that there is. We've been on a pretty good run, even with the bear market, is what I'm saying. Doesn't feel that way. I mean, I guess it does and it doesn't. But if you polled 100 people in the street, even investment professionals, I don't think they would say, what is this annualized to over the last five years? What is that? What is that? It's a lot, no? Yes, I don't know. I can look up the annualized returns, but I don't have it in front of me. But to your point, there have been plenty of bumps along the way. I pulled this from Sam Rose, ticker, sub stack.
6:16I always, TKR, I can never, I never know the difference. It's just ticker. Okay. So this is from, he did this whole thing, like 18 things that's going on in the stock market. So he said, this is from Truist Keith Lerner. Since March 9th, 2009, which is the bottom, which I think we're up, I don't know, like 900 % from, which is crazy. Uh, we've count 28 previous pullbacks, at least 5 % for the S and P 500. So tons of setbacks along the way there. Hmm. It's a great chart. Yes, I agree. I, I usually look more like the 10%, but that that's pretty good. Uh, okay. Another cool chart. So I think Callum Thomas does his chart review book, you know, and he put this one in there looking at when the big gains were comes from some of these, especially big tech companies.
7:03So Airbnb, Shopify, Tesla, Facebook, Google, Amazon, Netflix. And they say out of all these huge, huge winners, 4 % of the value is created between years 0 and 10. 96 % of the value is created after year 10. I don't know that I like this chart. Okay, explain. I'm not, you know, never do math on a show. Never do math in front of the audience. I learned that this week. Oh, you have a math problem. No, no, no. I don't want to incriminate myself. Did you see the, who's that podcast guy? Huberman. Okay. Who did like - The probabilities. Yeah, you saw that? Yes. So he taught all content creators a valuable lesson.
7:44Never math in front of a camera. So I'm not going to attempt, I'm not going to fall into that same trap. Fool me once. Okay. Can't get fooled again. But I just, I don't like what's going on here. I feel like there's some number shenanigans happening. I mean, is this just compound interest? Yes. Okay, fine. How about this? 96 % of Warren Buffett's wealth was created after his 85th birthday. Does that mean that he wasn't rich when he was 84? That's where I'm going with this. Okay, that's fair. I get what you're saying, that it's kind of fun with numbers. I guess one of the things is people always say, like there's no runway anymore for some of these companies when they come public.
8:22And maybe some of these are older stocks that went public earlier, but I think that was my whole point of looking at it is like, oh, for a lot of these companies, actually, there is a decent runway. right where they still have room to go even after you think like oh oh that's okay all right that's a fair takeaway is that fair okay okay so since 2018 the s &p 500 17 well since the end of 2017 13 no i'm gonna i'm sorry i apologize my guess was 17 oh oh it's 13 per year okay so it's not yeah it's not knocking the cover off the ball but pretty good all right Like Jim Simons passed away this past week.
9:02And a lot of thoughts from people. I feel like he's - Wait, Ben, Ben, Ben. Not all of our listeners know who Jim Simons is. Okay, true. So that's true. He's not really, he's in like Warren Buffett's class as an investor, but not well-known because he doesn't have the folksy kind of quotes and he never really shared exactly what he did. Greg Zuckerman tried to get there. And he never had tens of thousands of shareholders. True. And so kind of an enigma, but he was a code breaker, mathematician, professor who decided to take the math insights and turn them into market beating results. And I actually had someone email me this week saying, I've never heard of this Jim Simons before.
9:40I read a story. Ben, please tell me that this is fake. There's no way his track record could be real. And I said, no, it is real. But here's the difference between, you mentioned like compounded returns versus not compounded. And so his formulas for beating the market were so good, but there was a limit to the capacity. So after a while, they shut clients out and they just managed money for people who worked at Renaissance Technologies, right? But then the other thing is, because I saw some people say, if you would have put$1 ,000 into Renaissance Technologies when it started, you'd have, you know, whatever,$8 billion by the end of it.
10:17He returned the profits every year, too. So they not only put a cap on how much money could go in, at the end of each year, you couldn't like compound that capital because it would be returned to you. So it was, whatever, 60 % per year for however long he did it. But they also returned the money. So I think the point is, even the man who solved the markets, there was an upper bound on, because anytime they tried to, they tried to release some more public facing funds in later years and they didn't do nearly as well, obviously. No, they didn't do well at all. Right. Another interesting thing of that book that you mentioned, The Man Who Solved the Market by Greg Zuckerman, one of my biggest takeaways was that Jim Simons was like the architect and the business person.
11:03It was really, and I hope I'm not misstating this, it was really Robert Mercer and Peter Brown. It wasn't until they hired those two guys that the returns really, really took office. Do I remember that right? It did seem, I mean, yeah, he was the head man there and pulling all the strings, but he was almost like an investment CEO. He was a CEO. He wasn't the coder. He wasn't the guy or the girl doing the algos. And there was, I don't know how many employees he had, 50, whatever, 100. But it was all people outside of the market. It was all computer scientists and engineers and coders. He hired a lot of smart people.
11:37And he was moving things around and putting the teams together. He found anomalies, short-term anomalies in the market. They were not doing fundamental research, unless to the extent that the fundamentals would drive some sort of short-term mean variance something or the other. Who the hell is this? And even after reading that book, I still am not quite sure how they did it all. It's easy to say, like, oh, there's all these little momentums, but I still don't quite get it. He was effectively just raking money, just combing the cream off the top or the foam off the top of the drink. Yeah, the winning percentage was, what did it say in the book?
12:14A little over 50 %? 51. and it was just leveraged. And my other thoughts on Simon's were a lot of people made jokes about the fact that the guy smoked two packs of cigarettes a day. And it's almost like a badge of honor. But how much of your life is determined by DNA? You hear these stories all the time of this person lived to be 100. What's their secret? And it's like, you know, I ate bacon every day or whatever. And it's like, ah, see? But it literally is. It's baked into the cake when you're born in most cases, I think. A lot of these. Yeah, I don't think Jim Simons, the mathematician, would tell you that smoking two packs of cigarettes was the key to his longevity.
12:50Right. You hear about Buffett. Well, he drinks – he eats McDonald's all the time and Dairy Queen and he drinks Cherry Coke or whatever. It is – yeah, anyway. Maybe I'm thinking about this stuff because I'm middle-aged now. Well, rest in peace, Jim Simons, an absolute giant – Yeah, if you haven't read that book, we did a – I think we did a podcast with Zuckerman. You guys did a video with him. It's a really fascinating book because it's unlike any other investor. We started off this podcast talking about politics. And the more I think about it, the consumer sentiment data. Speaking of that, Ben, who are you voting for?
13:27I told you a couple of years ago, I was at a party and someone said, all right, this is kind of boring. Let's talk politics. And I was like, OK, I'm out. Thank you. It's been fun. See you later. That's my time. So consumer sentiment data came out last week and I clicked through to the actual data. And so let's take a look at this stuff. and they have all these different ways they slice and dice it over time and they've only been doing this since 2017 so it doesn't go back that far but they break it out by republican democrat and independent man that's depressing huh and yeah so you look when trump was president the republican consumer senate was way higher democrat was way lower biden becomes president democrat goes up republican goes down i guess you could say well just follow the independent line that's the you Take the average of them or something, but it just makes me feel like consumer sentiment data is more and more useless the further we go along with this kind of stuff.
14:19Is that fair? I wouldn't throw it all out. I would say it's flawed and it's... But, I don't know, what is it useful for? Let's put it that way. I guess we've talked about how it's more useful at extremes. When it gets really, really low, it's probably a good sign. when it's really, real high, it's probably flashing warning signals. You know what it's useful for? Content. It's useful for podcasts. That's about it. Okay. Charts, too. I was on the road this weekend. We went to a soccer game on the other side of the state for my daughter. I got some thoughts on that later. Got some good feedback for sports parents.
14:55And we drove by one of those Carvana things. Remember they did the Carvana? It was like a big glass thing and you could pick your own car. and I thought, yeah, we used to talk about that stock a lot because it was down 98 % or something from the highs and I pulled it up and from the start of 2023, Carvana's stock is up like 2 ,400%. It's got a huge, huge bounce. So I compared that to Peloton in the same time because when you're bottom fishing, Carvana, that's the thing. So that's why people still bottom fish, right? So I compared it to Peloton just because that seems like it was two stocks that were both down darn near 100%, right?
15:32As close as you could get. And Peloton was already down 98%, and then it fell another 50%. But if you look at Carvana, it's got this huge, again, like 2 ,400 % return. But look at the last chart I put in here. Look at how far it's still off the highs. It's still way, way below those 2021, 2020 highs. But this is the hard, these stocks prove how both the allure and the problem with bottom fishing like this in stocks that have gotten absolutely massacred. Yeah. This also highlights a problem with the Bessenbender study that we've mentioned in the past. Right. Depends on when you get into these stocks.
16:09Yeah. Like, sure, Carvana is a net loser. And not even Carvana specifically, but a lot of these companies, you have an opportunity to make or lose a fortune. So yeah, net-net, if you buy the IPO and you sell forever, most of these are probably not worth holding forever, but who doesn't? He was on Meb's podcast a couple weeks ago. Oh, really? It was actually very, yeah. He talked about his research, and I found it very interesting. He's, yeah. So the New York Times had this big profile. Someone emailed this to us. Was a 401k a mistake? And they go through this whole thing about how it was just this obscure law that happened in the late 70s, early 80s.
16:45Remember some guy kind of, Ted Bennett found it. And they talked about how in the past it was all pension funds and people were taken care of by their employer. And now people are on their own. And most people, you know, I think 50 to 60 % of workers have access to a 401k. and the people who don't are just, sorry, you're on your own. You have to save on your own. And then they also talk about how it's kind of driven wealth inequality because they say there's$7 trillion in 401k assets, but most of that goes to the top 10%, right? And the whole - This is bunk. So that was my feeling too, because my whole thought process is regardless of the 401k coming along or not, those corporations were not going to keep offering pensions.
17:31Do you think corporations with people living longer were going to look at what happened at GM and Ford and all these auto makers and go, yeah, sign us up for that forever. There's no way these companies were going to continue to give pensions. First of all, this notion that everyone used to have a pension is false. We've spoken about this in the past, right? Yes, it is. I forget what the data exactly is, but. It got as high as like 40 some percent, but at that, it was more or less giving you social security income. It wasn't like it was offering like this lavish retirement that you'd think about.
17:56Nobody was taking a vacation on their pension. Not nobody. Don't come on. You know what I mean? But that was like, that was more of like a one-time deal. Right. So how many people have generated, created hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars in wealth in their 401k over the last 40 years? I mean, hundreds of thousands, no millions, right? It's a lot of money. So the 401k, I don't want to, I will, I will reject this claim outright. I don't need to hear the details. Come on. It's a net benefit. it. And the bad, my whole thing is, is the, what's even the bad? Tell me the bad. The bad is just that not everyone has access to one.
18:32That's the bad part. So my plan has always been the government needs to offer. If your employer doesn't offer you a 401k, you have access to our thrift savings plan, which is the government run plan. It's all index funds. They cost like three basis points. BlackRock runs it. There should be an, a retirement plan available for people who don't have them through their employer. That's the thing that I would want to fix is that just not enough people have access to one. But yes, the 401k, I think has been a net positive for sure, even though would it be a better world if everyone could have a pension or an annuity like stream of income in retirement?
19:07Of course, because most people don't know how to manage the money themselves and have a hard time asking for or finding help. But that doesn't mean the 401k has been was the problem. 401k stepped in and was a solution for a large number of people. All right. Moving on to some passive stuff from Balchunas and his team. Passive fund ownership of the S &P 500 is about 24 % today, up from 7 % 10 years ago, meaning that on average, an S &P 500 stock has 24 % of its shares out owned by index funds. Tom Serafagus and James Seifert did some incredible work on this topic. I had never seen this before. Let's get to the data.
19:49All right, here's Tom and James. And by this, I'm talking about what impact does passive ownership have on stock prices and price discovery and all that sort of stuff. Because there's a notion out there that is not super controversial, or just this idea that stocks with a higher ownership, stocks that are heavily owned in the index, perform better, right? Because there's natural buyer of flows. Makes sense. Like, intuitively, that seems reasonable. However, S &P 500 stocks with lower passive ownership have outperformed peers on average across varying time horizons. The least-owned quintile has beaten the other four over one, three, and five years, while passive's most-owned stocks have generated the lowest returns.
20:34Wait, this isn't just like a market cap ranking? This is something else? This appears to belie the notion that the prices of stocks heavily owned by passive funds are being inflated by strong inflows. Isn't that interesting? I don't get how they decide this, though. They're breaking down. So these quintiles, these 20 % buckets, so 1 through 5, are based on highest passive ownership in quintile 1 to lowest passive ownership in quintile 5. And the least owned stocks, the least owned stocks by index funds actually are outperforming. Interesting, right? I wouldn't have thought that. The other thing I was thinking about, I think we talked like a month ago about how there's so much more ownership of S &P 500 funds now, and it makes it a bigger section of the fund world or whatever.
21:27The S &P, when this whole bull market started, made up something like 50 % of world market cap. Now it's 60 because the US has outperformed so much. Now, this is a chicken and egg thing, but couldn't you say because the US is such a bigger part of the global market cap now, that it makes sense that the ownership continues to rise and get higher? Does that make sense? The ownership of what? US index funds. Yes. Just because it's a bigger portion. Yeah, yeah. Another great chart that I had never seen. So they break it down again by quintiles, but this time based on average PE ratio by passive ownership.
22:01So the stocks that have the highest passive ownership actually have a lower PE at 27 on average versus the lowest quintile, which is an average PE of 34. Why is this interesting? Because oftentimes you hear people say, well, by owning the S &P 500 index, you're de facto overweighting the most expensive names. And I've always said that's not true. And it's not true. It's just not true. Apple was the biggest stock in 2014 when, remember the back out the cash phase of Apple? It was a value stock, remember? Yeah. So that's just nonsense. So credit to them. Great stuff. That is interesting. Okay. Whenever we talk about anything related to inflation, most of the time it comes like standard of living and where you live.
22:45Is this income good or not, right? What are we talking about? A$400 ,000 income,$250 ,000, whatever it is. People always come back with, yeah, but it depends where you live. You live in California or New York. It matters. So I saw this. I think Nick Majulie posted this on his website. It's U.S. cost of living. They break it out by different segments. And, I mean, it's obvious once you look at the data that, of course, it's way more expensive to live in the northeast and then the west, right, on the coast. That's where all the coastal elitists are. That makes sense, right? Coast elitists. But I think that it's surprising how many places have a standard of living that is relatively inexpensive, I guess, by these standards.
23:29right? Like the 80 % of the country, it looks like. Well, not to nitpick. It's not a standard of living. It's a cost of living. Those are different things. You could have a low cost of living and a high standard. Well, sorry. A lot of people use those terms interchangeably. Okay. You're splitting hairs here, sir. But I'm just saying, look at, but look at, look at the, I'm just saying it's, I guess it's when you look at it this way, however they broke this down, there is way more affordable space here. And a lot of people would say, well, of course, it's affordable for a reason. There's nothing else to do there.
24:03That's what coastal leaders like to say. That's not what I would say. Don't put words in my mouth. Anyway, this is kind of obvious data, but when you look at it presented this way, I think it's very interesting. And if you look at how many areas where there are lower cost of living, I guess if you're a young person who's out of the housing market, move to the blue. You know, that's interesting. Which state do you think, now I pride myself on geography. I know all these states just by the outline, not to brag. Which state, although the state that I'm thinking of, this is a tough test, which state has the least amount of high cost areas?
24:43Looks like it's the one above Louisiana, Arkansas, man. you just talked about your geographic prowess then you say the one above louisiana sir it's a joke arkansas that is arkansas right yeah i'd say that you're not so sure you're not so sure no i'm looking at it i'm saying the arkansas missouri yeah that corridor probably what's about missouri is that iowa yes that's iowa so i was pretty i mean michael's pretty darn affordable too. It's just Grand Rapids and Detroit. Not bad. Uh, yeah. What's, what's the, what's the elitist flyover state? Looks gotta be Illinois now. No, Colorado. Oh, I don't consider that flyover.
Read the full transcript
25:30I guess I'm talking, I guess I'm talking Midwest. Okay. Yeah. I guess it would be Illinois. Minnesota too. Although I gotta be honest. I gotta be honest. Credit to me. Very transparent. The two states that are back to back in between Louisiana and Florida. Hold on. Oh, I know what it is, but I don't know which one is which. One's Mississippi, one's Alabama. Mississippi's to the left. Yes. It goes Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia. I only know that because I watch SEC football. Okay. All right, moving on. We got an email. Last week, we spoke about lumber prices. You said you didn't want to get dunked on for math, and you're just going to get dunked on for geography now.
26:06I held my ground. I said I was good at geography and I proved it. All right. Regarding lumber prices, returning to pre-pandemic levels, That's been the case for most lumber items since the first quarter of 2023. We track wholesale material costs to build a 2 ,200 square foot house in Central Florida. And as you can see below, we're only 15 % off the peak in January. All right, whatever. Anyway, the point of this email is look at this chart that this person included. This is the Romack Whole House Commodity Index. Like how much it costs to build a house, essentially? Yeah, that's a hell of a chart.
26:38Great chart. So what's that peak? I can't say,$59 ,000? 58 ,000? Yeah, 60 ,000 basically. All right, and now it's 51. So even including other factors, it's still well off the highs. Yeah. Counterpoint, it's still way above pre-pandemic levels though, right? That's also true too. So it's way above trend. So I guess we can give the home builders a little bit of a pass for not completely lowering their prices. Ben, one unfortunate reality of the internet and especially social media is that bullshit travels very fast. And unfortunately, deleting a tweet, dunking on a tweet, well, maybe dunking a tweet sometimes works, but correcting a tweet, you can't undo it because people are so desperate for bad news, especially if the bad news is at the government level.
27:34The outrage always causes way more of a problem than the rebuttal. Yeah. So the, how do you pronounce this? Kobayashi? Kobayashi? What is this? The Kobayashi letter. What's that? I always say Kobayashi, just from usual suspects. Oh, is that what this is? Is that how you spell that? No. Okay. Anyhow, they tweeted, and this went spread like a wildfire. This is unusual. The US BLS has announced that coffee prices will no longer be factored into CPI inflation data. In fact, all right, whatever. So people got really mad at that. Oh my God. Coffee prices are up 38 % over the last two years. And now the government is not showing them to you anymore.
28:15Have you been to Starbucks lately? Right, right. Yes. And this tweet, which was deleted, in fairness, I don't know if they issued an apology. So maybe they did. Maybe they did. Maybe they didn't. I don't know. But they did delete the tweet, which is good because a lot of people don't even do that. It's not true. It's literally not true. Coffee is still very much in the CPI calculation. If my understanding of this is correct, what they did was they removed the price level for whatever reason. But coffee is still very much a basket in the CPI calculation. Kyla Scanlon came in here and said, no, you're wrong.
28:56It's still in there. Yeah. And a lot of other people did too, but it doesn't matter. It's just the, see, do you see what they're doing?
29:08that that plays well these days so i was gonna say this for my recommendations but on the my flight here i'm in a hotel room in a flyover state and i watched american fiction on the way down here uh jeffrey wright is in it and very good movie i'm not sure it's a michael movie it's it's like part satire but also part family drama and comedy i really liked it yeah probably not a Michael movie. I do like Jeffrey Wright. I sat by him on an airplane once. Nice guy. I think I might have caught a photo and sent it to either of my wife. Can't remember who. What do you mean nice guy? You didn't talk to him.
29:43I seemed like a nice guy on the plane. But the whole point of the movie is like he's this intellectual professor and all his intellectual stuff just has no traction whatsoever, trying to be an author. And then he writes this thing that is more or less a satire because he thinks that it's dumbed down for the masses and it takes off like wildfire. And he's saying, no, no, no, I don't want this thing to take off. I wrote it as a joke. And the whole thing is interesting in terms of like the lowest common denominator and what actually sells these days versus what doesn't. Very good movie. I give it a two thumbs up from Ben's movie rankings.
30:20Yeah, so should I see that movie? Maybe it's an airplane movie for me. It was a very good airplane movie. I enjoyed it. I was thinking, eh, probably not a Michael movie. It was nominated for Best Picture. It was that kind of movie. It was just very, the screenplay, I think it's by a new writer, too, who wrote the movie and directed it. You know, I got to be honest. You have postal elitist taste in movies. I'm a flyover state guy. That is true. You have definite flyover state. But like flyover states where they bury bodies in a basement kind of movie taste. But yeah, I do have a coastal elitist movie.
30:56That's a fair take. American fiction. Very good. All right. JP Morgan has a great post out on real estate. And they asked, when will homes be affordable again? So they say, how long might it take to restore average levels of affordability based on historical ratios of home prices to income and factoring in mortgage rates if incomes were to keep growing at their recent pace and mortgage rates didn't decline and home values stayed at all-time highs? So assuming what I just said, they say about three and a half years. I bet a lot of people would not believe you. I don't believe you, Ron Burgundy.
31:32Yeah, it'd take a lot longer. So this is just, so let's say home prices stagnate for a couple of years. Incomes keep growing. That three and a half years, and I bet for most times in history, that would be a long time frame to wait, right? Yes. Yeah. So the point is, and this is the whole point of real estate in the first place for a lot of people. And this is not financial advice, but one of the things that someone told me when I was buying a house was we were very unhappy with the houses we were looking at. And he said, go up from price and just stay there longer. You'll grow into the payment.
32:08And this is, I'm like, we're reaching a little bit here though. And they don't reach for housing costs because that's your highest cost, right? And we did reach a little bit. And guess what? Your income grows and you grow into that payment. So this is - Is this the barn house, the modern farm house, or the previous one? This is our first house, not a modern farmhouse. But that's terrible personal finance advice to people who can't handle reaching for a payment. But that is true for most people. They grow into their fixed payment over time. You just win somebody's life, congratulations. Probably, but that's how these things work, though.
32:43That's the beauty of a fixed-rate mortgage, right? The hope is that that payment stays exactly, it's the Matthew McConaughey meme. That payment stays the same, right? That's good. Anyway, it's – So three and a half years. If you would have said, Ben, guess when it'll be – So I see they have their chart in here. I would have never guessed that. Well, we talk housing as if it's like not very much a local thing. So they show – they break this down by city. And who's the most screwed? Oof, Miami. All right. So Miami, this is never happening. 2034. You got to go to a decade. Oh, okay. So based on now, when is it going to be, when is that going to be back into, and it's going to be a long time?
33:25For my neighbors to the north, Boston. All right. By the third quarter of 2027, set your watch for it. Minneapolis is another one. So it says Cleveland to Detroit already restored. Back in line with historical norms. Just kidding. I kid the Midwesterners. All right. They show new construction. This, I didn't know the stat. that new housing unit completions make up just 1 % of the nation's housing stock annually. Again, we know we're not building enough houses, right? We know. But they showed that new construction is happening mainly in cities with lower costs. So that's a good thing, right? That makes sense.
34:01And I'm sure a lot of that has to do with some of these places that it's hard to build and the regulations and rules make it harder. Those are the costs that are part of it as well. But that's the building where they can, right? Lastly, J.P. Morgan's takeaway is if you are looking to buy a house in the United States, don't wait for or expect a home price crash. And we've been saying that for a while. Yes. Before prices really took off, we were saying that. Like if you're – because remember, prices initially took off in late 2020. People are already then asking us, do you think we should wait? We had a lot of those.
34:34Right? Those prices look darn good right now in comparison. speaking of Axios had a piece on home equity and so they say a record 11 trillion is tappable so that's not the total so they say meaning you can borrow against it but still maintaining 20 % equity in the house which is kind of what the banks want you to do they want you to have a loan to value ratio of 80 % or whatever so you keep that 20 % buffer they say 48 million folks have access to tappable equity with an average of 206 ,000 per mortgage holder so they say it's almost 17 trillion the total value of home equity in this country is$32 trillion which means there's$15 trillion in equity for people who have no mortgage.
35:14Because they're talking about people who still have a mortgage. This is just people who have mortgage properties that have$17 trillion. It means people without a mortgage have$15 trillion in equity sitting there. That is a ton of money. That's a lot of cash. If I was a skilled person, I would be starting as many home renovation businesses as I can right now. We got a quote a couple weeks ago for, Or, like, hey, what if we wanted to take our white deck railing and make it the wire stuff, you know? So it's like it makes the view a little better, right? Just an ungodly quote. And the guy's like, we're like 14 weeks out.
35:49And I think the quote was like, we're basically going to charge you whatever we can. And if you say no, so what? We have other business coming in. It was that kind of quote where I kind of said, all right, I'm good. You know, don't need it. It was way too high. Wow. Yeah. And I kind of did the channel check. And I said, well, how was business? And he said, oh, it's crazy. We're crazy, crazy busy. The holidays mean more travel, more shopping, more time online, and more personal info in more places that could expose you more to identity theft. But LifeLock monitors millions of data points per second.
36:23If your identity is stolen, our US-based restoration specialists will fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Don't face drained accounts, fraudulent loans, or financial losses alone. Get more holiday fun and less holiday worry with LifeLock. Save up to 40 % your first year. Visit lifelock.com slash podcast. Terms apply. When you walk into a Burlington, you're walking into amazing prices and great gifts. That's main character energy. Because at Burlington, the holiday savings aren't the only things turning heads. Discover quality finds and perfect presents for everyone on your list. Even those who are hard to shop for.
36:59Toys and jewelry to new beauty brands and styles. these gifts go seamlessly from our stores to under your tree. Seriously, with these savings, why shop anywhere else? Burlington Deals Brands Wow. Okay, you talked about the outrage thing. Here's another one I saw going around. Seriously underwater homes, mortgages tick up across the U.S. And a lot of people shared this headline. It was from Bloomberg. Oh, yeah? Oh, yeah? Sorry. What does seriously other water mean? So they say one in 37 homes are now considered seriously underwater in the U.S. and that share is much higher across southern states.
37:33And that means that they have loan balances that are 25 % more than their market value, which sounds bad on the surface, right? That was the headline, right? 1.37. And then you read the story a little more and you say, okay, that's actually 2.7 % of homes, which stinks for those people. I don't know, it's people who bought a house in Austin, maybe, and prices fell there. I'd be guessing that would be part of it, those kind of places. And while the share is ticking up, it remains much lower than before the pandemic when the rate was twice as high boom so kind of the headline was oh geez this is scary the meat of the article if you read past the headline was actually it yeah it's going up a little for these and it that stinks for people who are in that situation but it's way below average and it's still not did you see that did you say that it's half what it was pre-pandemic yes okay and then i mean i guess the the the reason for that article is.
38:25Well, we all know. I mean, you know, don't hate the player, hate the game. And then we're going to have another home crash 2.0, right? It's the GFC all over again. The way that numbers are presented can make it, because 1 out of 37 sounds way worse than 2.7%, doesn't it? Exact same thing. Yeah. Fair? All right. One more email. Oh, this is interesting. On subsidizing purchases, Ben has been discussing rate buy-downs by homebuilders recently, and I wanted to add some commentary about potential downsides. I believe Ben thinks these are solely a subsidy. I didn't write this, Ben. I didn't write this.
39:07I believe Ben thinks these are solely a subsidy to the homebuyer that makes ownership more affordable. This may be partially true, but they are also a marketing scam to some extent as well. Oh, you had my curiosity. I can see that. If you read the fine print in any of these ads, it says something important that you have to finance through the builder's preferred lender, which happens to be owned 49 % by the builder. These lenders can tack on five figures plus of extra closing costs on a mortgage relative to lenders that are not affiliated with the builder. It is essentially as if you are buying down your own rate, not getting a great deal.
39:36If someone doesn't look at the fine print closely or comparison shop their mortgage, they probably won't understand this. All right. Credit to this person for helping out. So you're paying more in fees because of it. I get that. Yeah. That makes sense. Put a few words in my mouth, but I'm a... Okay. That's a fair assessment. Um, Biden tweeted something that got ratioed all the way into the stone age. My dad always used to say that the way you build wealth is by building equity in your home. My housing plan would help Americans achieve home ownership by giving households$400 a month for two years when they buy their first home.
40:14The reason why he got destroyed is not necessarily a political thing, but like, I mean, we know what happens when you subsidize areas of the market. Prices go up. I bet it wouldn't have got as much ridicule if he would have said, we're giving first-time homebuyers a 3 % mortgage. Maybe he would have. I still think that's kind of fair for young people. But here's the thing. I think the thing that makes most people so mad about the housing situation is it literally doesn't matter what we do right now. There's nothing that could be done to fix the housing market in the short term. There's nothing that can be done.
40:48And I think that's like, no matter what this, obviously you're right. It's if you just subsidize the demand part of it, we know what's going to happen. The prices are going to go up probably, but there are no short-term fixes for this. None. That's like putting on a, like spraying oil to like protect yourself from the sun. Right. But that's the thing is the problem is there are very angry people with the housing market right now, and there's no good fixes for them or that, the housing market, right? Even if they said, we're going to subsidize homebuilders and the government's going to cover their loans, right?
41:23So if homebuilders want to build more homes, have at it, we'll cover the loans. That's what they did in the 50s, right? That's why we got this big boom time in the 50s and the middle class and people coming from the war. If they did that, it would still take years to filter through and for the homebuilders to get it up enough capacity to do that and get enough construction workers and find enough land. Yeah, there's no overnight fix. No. Redfin has a chart showing the percentage of homes with a price drop. And this looks different. So there's a seasonality to this. But in 2024, as of May 5th, 6.2 % of listings had a price drop.
42:00That is way higher than it was at this time either last year or, I mean, obviously over the last couple of years. Boy, that number still seems very low though, doesn't it? What's that? 6 % of houses have seen a price drop. It just still seems low. Well, it does seem low, especially when you adjust for the fact that the starting prices are outrageously high. You're right. Yes. Yeah, maybe this is not that great. I think a lot of this stuff is the trends are getting back there, but we're so far from normal that it's going to take a long, long time. All right, surveys are bullshit part 360. By the way, Animal Spirits, Daniel just mentioned to us, this is our 360th episode.
42:38Does it feel light? Or does it feel like a lot? Seems like a lot. Seems like a lot. That's a lot. We've been doing this for seven years almost? Don't do math on camera. Don't do math on camera. We started in November 2017, I believe. Okay. That's a long time. I'm sure I talk more with you than I talk with my wife during the week. And we live together. Oh, yeah. Of course. Of course. Of course. Eric Soda tweeted, a record 63 % of U.S. workers are satisfied with their jobs. That's the highest level ever for the survey, which goes back to 1987. Take a look at the spike upward after the pandemic. Yeah, how is this possible?
43:21How is this possible? I don't know. How could everything be bad, but everyone's satisfied with their job? Well, we have the, I'm fine, but everything else has gone to shit. That's the, also - Oh, you know what? You know what? That's exactly right. This is - That's what it is. This is the epitome of I'm fine, the world is going to hell. Like if they asked, if they did a survey, the percentage of US workers who you think are satisfied with their job, it would be 20%. I saw one a couple weeks ago that was, are you satisfied with the education system in this country? And everyone said, no, of course not.
43:58Are you satisfied with your own child's education? Yes, of course I am. It's the same thing with politicians, right? Congress is a bunch of corrupt idiots. And then it's like, do you like your congressman? Oh, yeah, of course I do. Also, if Eric lived in the Midwest, his name would not be Eric Soda. It'd be Eric Pop. Yeah, that was too easy. One more survey. This is from Axios. Felix Salmon tweeted this. Share of Americans who think they'll work past 62 was almost 60 % in 2016, and now it's down to 46%. How do you square this with the fact that people always say everyone's so ill-prepared for retirement?
44:31People are living longer. they're worried about their retirement, but they also want to retire early. I think part of this is, remember those other surveys where you said, how much do you need to retire? And people said, that's$1.5 million. And the amount of people who ever get that high is very low. Do you think most people, when they reach old age, just go, you know what, I don't need as much as I thought I did. I would rather retire early than let it compound for five more years and keep working and making more money. Screw it. I think that's going to happen to it. We've already seen it to a ton of baby boomers following COVID.
45:01Can you see millennials really want to work till they're 70? Do you think we're going to work until we're 70?
45:09I have no idea. We're going to be at 47 ,000 podcasts. I told this to Bill Sweet last week. Ask me something now, and my feelings in 20 years will be so different. Yeah. We'll have no idea. There'll be Michael and Ben holograms coming into everyone's living room for a podcast. Yeah. Right? We'll just be sitting there, you and your oversized Knicks shirt, me and my Stitch Fix. I wonder if we could de-age ourselves in the future so we don't look like a couple of old guys. Add some hair for you. Yeah, I like it. Give me like six more inches so I'm taller. All right, Ben. I wrote a post. I've been thinking about cars a lot lately.
45:40We've been talking about cars a lot. I like your title, what a car says about its driver. Yeah, so I remember in high school, one of my friends had a cool car. And this was a friend whose parents got him everything. And I remember them saying, you are what you drive. And I was offended is the wrong word. I was just like, really? Really? really like who do you think is more hated the you mentioned last week the old guy driving the nice car the convertible range rover or the young kid in high school who drives like a bmw who who do you think is more despised by their peers probably the high school kid right the young person god yeah oh because because at that point you have no emotional wherewithal to like control your jealousy i think yes true right okay um but just like you know what is the right age to buy a cool car.
46:33I don't know. A part of me thinks that like, I would really, really enjoy having like a really sweet ride right now. Another part of me is like, well, I don't want to be that person. Like, I don't want to be that person. So I read, I read, but what's wrong with driving a nice car? So I twisted myself into a pretzel. I read your post and I sent you a text message and I said, just buy a Range Rover, right? Because it sounds like you're having an internal dial argument with yourself here. Oh, I totally am. I totally am. But this is the thing about cars. They're so interesting because they're like a socially acceptable status symbol, but like in certain occasions, right?
47:11Like if a person's an asshole and they drive a nice car, you're like, what a f***ing asshole, right? But if you have a friend who's like a good, like a great dude, and he drives a nice car, are you judging that person? You're like, no, right? And you know that you're not overextending yourself because you save money and you invest and all these things. So I think one of the hard parts about living in the age we live in, it's never been easier to get feedback and opinions from everyone. People are constantly being judged. Like people are being recorded without their own knowledge of stuff that they do, right?
47:41And so I think the feedback and judgment, people probably worry about it more for themselves than anyone. Like it's so, isn't it so easy you find with little kids to judge other parents? I made some comment last week. My wife is like, you know what? every parent makes decisions based on their own thought process and how they want to raise kids. And I'm not going to judge anyone. Yeah. Yeah. It's very noble, but it is. And I'm like, well, I'm probably still going to judge people secretly. But, but I think with the car thing, maybe this is just me getting to middle age. I'm past the point of caring what other people think about me.
48:16I think that's what kids have really helped me get to that point is like, I just, I don't have any of that stuff that I had when I was younger where I really, really cared and I really wanted to be liked and I really cared what other people think. But you're mature. You're mature. I'm not. Even though I, well, no. Even though I always get on people for cars, like I know that your financial situation, you're in a good place. And if you want to buy a nice car, buy a nice car. Who cares what everyone thinks? I'm giving you permission as the car guy. That's part of the tip. You know what? Would I love to drive a Range Rover?
48:47Although I don't think I could. That's a lot. It's a lot of money. I looked how much it costs after you text me. that it's a lot of money. I told you to get a Rivian. I think a Rivian is the millennial Range Rover. How about this? Those are cool. Maybe I'm lying to myself and to the audience right now, but I'm just thinking out loud. Would I drive a Range Rover if everybody else somehow can magically see a Toyota Highlander? So like the shallow how? Yeah. Like I think I would really much, I think I would very much enjoy driving that car. Although after my experience with Audi, I feel like aren't Range Rovers known to break down too?
49:19That's true. Just get something that will never die on you. So I think it's complicated, but I do agree with the sentiment that do what you want, right? Life's short. Like I said, it's easier than ever to judge people, and people do probably judge more now than they ever – like there was never – I feel like there's a scoreboard for everything these days that didn't exist in the past. There was no review sites, right? Like this is – what stars is this? Where should I – all that stuff, nothing existed like that. And now we rank everything. everything's a judgment. All right. Good news in the car front.
49:56The Mannheim used car index drawdown is deep. 23%. Deepest ever on record. The funny thing is that your Audi situation is like counteracting this. Because you're the one with the drawdown. I am destroyed. I'm deep, deep underwater. But this is good news. Not bad. We'll take it. All right. getting back to like the bad news spreads like a wildfire and don't tell me good news no i don't want to hear that shit the world sucks uh so steven ratner tweeted the murder rate is down 19 in 2024 um some major cities like san francisco baltimore and philadelphia have seen much larger decreases chris hayes retweeted that quote tweeted that and said if these numbers were the opposite if homicides were up 19 so far this year it would be the number one or at least top three domestic story.
50:48And that is 100 % facts, right? Yeah. I wonder why it's down so much. Do you think people just got way more annoyed during the pandemic? It was like, ah, whatever. I'm going to kill someone. I don't know. Sorry, but I'm just wondering why, why did the numbers, because the numbers obviously shot up and then now they came back down. I'm sure there's all sorts of factors that are way beyond the scope of this. So I said, I said that I've been having nineties nostalgia lately and I've been seeing all these posts on Twitter showing like, here's a video of what high school was like for people in the late nineties.
51:22And I'm biased because I grew up then, but it really was like the last innocent time in this world. It was pre nine 11. It was pre great financial crisis. It was pre social media. Internet was just getting started. I graduated high school. It was pre, it was pre porn on demand. Remember you had to like wait like 37 hours to download anything. I still remember the first time my friend in college got a flip phone with a camera on it. And we would always go out to the bars and parties and such. And I'd say, why would I want photographic evidence of what we're going to do tonight? I don't want to remember this.
51:54Whatever we're doing, we're 21. Simpler times. Yes. And so the 90s were such a, and obviously people were still depressed then. And, but so this, this piece from a Gen Z person, I thought captured this really well. It's a little dramatic, but I think it's interesting. Wait, before you be there, can I just say one more thing about the 90s? If you look at the Limp Bizkit musics of the world, it didn't seem like teenagers were having a great time. I mean, that's like a, I don't know if I'm overplaying the relevance of Limp Bizkit, but there was definitely like a, that was big. Here's the thing that was so, and I look back at myself and I realize how naive I was about everything going on.
52:31Like, I just, I was so ill-informed when I was, especially in like high school and getting into college. I knew nothing. I didn't pay attention to anything. And honestly, it allowed me to just to be young and not care. You can't not pay attention today. It's impossible. So that aspect of what you just hit on, that's a better world. When kids could just be kids, that's a better world. You didn't have to have an opinion about what was going on in the world. And I favor this. I don't favor it. I'm against this. You didn't have to have any of that. So this piece, it comes from a subject called After Babel.
53:05Gen Z were given phones and tablets so early that we barely remember life before them. Most of us never knew falling in love without swiping in subscription models. We never knew having a first kiss without having watching Pornhub first. We never knew flirting and romance before it became sending DMs or reacting to Snapchat stories with flame emojis. We never knew friendship before it became keeping up on a snap streak or using each other like props to look popular on Instagram. And freedom. We never felt freedom to grow up clumsily, to be young and dumb, to make stupid mistakes without fear of being posted online, or the freedom to be unavailable, to disconnect for a while without the pressure of read receipts and last active statuses.
53:37we never knew a childhood spent chasing experiences and risks and independence instead of chasing stupid likes on a screen. Never knew life without documenting and marketing and obsessing, obsessively analyzing it as we went. So please, next time you cringe at Gen Z for not coping, for not feeling cut out for this world, remember how painful it is to think that the good times are over. Then imagine how much more painful it would be to realize you never knew them. Again, a little dramatic, but also kind of, it makes sense to me that they're just so much more self-aware. And it really, I just, I love the fact that I got to grow up in a time where I didn't have to be so worried about that all the time and being like in the know.
54:13Yeah. Yeah. It's hard enough being a kid. Yeah. So I am, a lot of people are like, what is wrong with these kids? It's like they, they didn't have a chance is the way that I look at it. All right. Oh, an update on my ticket broker. I don't know if we spoke about this last week, did we? You mentioned that you got a ticket broker. Okay. So the panic brokers in your life now, the panic buy, listen, I have an insurance broker. I have an insurance broker and I used a car broker. Okay. Okay. Insurance broker, car broker, ticket broker. Okay. Um, I paid six 80 in my panic for these four, for these four tickets, which means to get my money back on the website that I will not mention here, I would have had to listen for 800.
55:03And then they would have had to listen for 900 in order for me to get my money back. My ticket broker, 750. Boom. And guess what? No responsibility. No pricing, wondering, delivering. What do you think about that? Not bad. Worth the money. Whatever you paid. I paid nothing. He netted me$750. That's what I'm saying. He netted me$70 profit per ticket. They know what they're doing. Why would you not use a broker? I don't understand. I mean, most people don't get into this problem of buying and selling tickets all the time. Just in life. I'm using brokers in general. Services, service providers. You could call them a broker.
55:44I call them service providers. All right, Ben, we got it. This is a good email. From Andrew. He said, he has a new term, hydration, which he says is inflation plus the Hydra mythical creature. He calls it hydration. Hydration is this, replacing one purchase pattern due to inflation with another equally inflated purchase pattern. Michael experienced hydration after hiring a ticket broker to avoid high stub-up fees. That's pretty good. I've been an insurance agent for 26 years, started when I was 19. the auto insurance compensation is anywhere from eight to 10 % of the premium. Okay. Now, but the question of whether one pays more using a broker or doing direct, for example, our office represents, I won't say the name of the insurance company, and we usually are more competitive than direct.
56:35Oh, how about that? How about that? Wholesale versus retail. The main reason why we are usually more competitive as per my marketing rep, direct business pays for all the advertising. And number two, more fraud done online when insurance yourself compared to the office channel. So I'm not even paying more necessarily. You're selling yourself on a broker. I see. Okay. Scale, efficiencies. Okay. You know, you ever thought to yourself, like, I guess Netflix is a good example. Like when Netflix was doing streaming, you're like, oh, just wait until this company gets into it. Or why wouldn't Google just do it?
57:12Or why wouldn't Amazon just do that? You know what I mean? Yes. And I think when we do that, we're giving some of the other companies either too much credit or just not understanding that companies don't just do something because you think they should. If it's not their core business, and I'm generalizing here, they're probably not going to do it. And I thought about this. I thought about this when I was on the Maps app, Google Maps. And Google Maps, Google owns Waze too, right? We're a Waze family. Yeah. Why is there Google Maps and Waze? But anyway, be that as a matter. So I'm on Google Maps and the keyboard, you have to press the number to switch the keyboard from letters to numbers.
57:57And I'm like, well, that's annoying because I'm like, you know, I'm pulled over at a stop line. I probably shouldn't be texting anyway. It's annoying. With Waze, they've got the numbers up top and the letters down below. Now, both of these apps are owned by the same company. There's never a situation where you're putting in an address on Google Maps where you don't have to put in a number ever, right? You need a number. Why the F don't they have the same format as Waze, which is clearly a million times superior. So anytime you're thinking of investing in something, be it public or private, you're like, ah, well, Amazon should just do that.
58:30Yeah, Google should just do that. No, not necessarily. In fact, that's probably been a very bullish, in hindsight, that's been a bullish catalyst to invest in a company that, I'm not going to invest in them because why wouldn't that company just eat their lunch? It doesn't work that way. You should be entering the address through voice. That's your solution. Well, that is a good solution. Ben, I was in the airport last week, and I saw something that I hadn't seen in years. Okay. Perhaps decades. I don't even know what they're called anymore. The jeans with the loop for a hammer? Oh, like construction jeans, right?
59:08Yeah, I guess so. Speaking of the 90s, that was a late 90s, early 2000s trend. Yeah, if you could imagine that for younger listeners, that was a fad. That was a big, big - Plus you had like the pockets on the side with like the triangle pocket. Oh, that's right. They were called carpenter jeans. That's right. Carpenter jeans, that's it. Not construction. Yeah. Okay, I mentioned, so we talked about the housing shortage. There's a bigger shortage in America than the housing shortage. I'll tell you what it is. Go ahead. Parking spots for youth sports events. So we went to a soccer tournament in Detroit area for my daughter, travel soccer teams, and we go to this place in the middle of nowhere.
59:38There's 20 soccer fields. and on one side of the road is a soccer tournament. On the other side of the road is a baseball tournament. And there was so many cars going in and out that they had to have police there to shepherd people in. Right? You stop. Nope, you go. You stop. You go. And these soccer fields and baseball fields were made before there was large SUVs, the Suburbans and the Yukons of the world, and trucks. And they were made before so many people went to youth sporting events. Like growing up, you never had your grandparents go to sporting events, right? Now everyone has to go watch the kid play sports.
1:00:10there's none of parking spots anymore. We had to park like three miles away. It's so true. There's a bigger shortage of youth parking spots than there are houses. That's what I'll say. So true. Ben, did you know that wine is getting destroyed? How so? Look at this chart. The wine sold in the US in millions of cases. That is a pretty significant drawdown now. Look at how much it added though. That's a pretty good run up. Does this need to be a log chart for it to make sense? I don't know. I'm still keeping you going. We've talked about this. I still like drinking wine. I know the thing to do now for a lot of people is to talk about how you don't drink anymore.
1:00:54More power to you if that's you. I still enjoy drinking. I'm sorry. I love it. Sorry, not sorry. I know that's a thing people always say. Why would you drink in 2024? It makes you feel crappy. It is. That's the only thing. Drinking is still fun. It puts a smile on my face. I can't. And oh, I feel terrible the next day. Well, yeah, that's the price for feeling great the night before. Fair trade. Diversification. All right, recommendations. I already did. Okay, you do yours first. All right, Ben, it's fanny pack season. I saw this. You sent a picture of you and people from Chicago, and you were wearing a fanny pack.
1:01:31What's going on? I'll tell you what's going on. So when I am, well, I'm in sweatpants right now. When you're wearing sweatpants, as I do in the transition between spring and summer, right? If it's 65 degrees or in the 60, if it's 58 to 62, which is where we are today, I wear yoghurs, right? Yoghurs, yeah. Yeah. So if you find yourself in a situation where you're in another city, like I was in Chicago, great city, by the way, and you've got a portable phone charger, maybe a pack of gum, a cell phone, your wallet, and a sunglasses case, what are you supposed to do? You need a man purse. I will give it to you that having the big cell phone in your pocket when wearing joggers looks weird.
1:02:18It doesn't look right. Yeah. So I got a fanny pack and it's coming with me. I'm never going back. I'm bringing it everywhere I go. Middle-aged Michael. Okay. Somebody emailed us, how to know if Michael's horror movie recommendations is trash. I just assume they all are because last week I recommended Late Night with the Devil I didn't recommend it, I spoke about it, yeah hey guys, just a quick note on today's horror movie discussion a couple of the movies Michael mentioned today were produced by A24, Talk to Me and Hereditary A24 also released Midsommar and Green Room, Green Room is a great movie and The Witch, didn't care for The Witch and numerous others, I think a fair rule of thumb would be if A24 made it, it's probably good so if Michael recommends one of their movies, it's likely not one of his awful picks great email, definitely true A24 is the best in the biz.
1:03:08Ben, you slacked me and John, Ben, Duncan, Sean. This sounds like a movie Michael cooked up using AI. At the movie, it's a tweet from Variety. Bone Tomahawk director is set to reunite with his drag to cost concrete and brawl in Cell Block 99 star Vince Vaughn and Oscar winner Adrian Brody for new crime thriller. Quote, this is the coup de grace, the bookie and the bruiser. and I am in. Where do I sign up? It really does sound like you put Jet GPT. Here's my movie history. Make a movie I'm going to like. And it's going to gross like$60 ,000 at the box office. That's right. All right. I did see another bad horror movie that I forgot to mention because it was so bad that it was just completely not memorable at all.
1:03:56Night Swim. Remember the trailers past, I don't know, six months ago? It was as bad as it looked? It was worse. So I'll tell you this. If you see that on streaming, just avoid, keep moving. You're welcome. I watched, I mentioned this on TCAF, but on my three and a half hour delay to Chicago, I knocked out a movie, The Beekeeper. That's how you do airplane movies. It's 90 minutes of Statham kicking ass. It's completely ridiculous. And of course they're leaning into it. It's just good, clean, wholesome fun. The Beekeeper, next time you're on an airplane, do not watch it. Do not try this at home.
1:04:30This is not for the couch. It's for the, for the. You have to watch it ironically too, not unironically. Yes. I think you mentioned this. When I watched the Iron Claw, because it's on HBO now, most of the movies, high quality movie. But just not that great? Just okay, yes. I feel like the, how many steroids did Zac Efron eat for that movie? Because he grew another jaw. He was so right. That's another A24 movie. So you're right. It was super high quality. I just, I don't know. Everybody seemed to love that. But it looks like you and me are on this side of that. Great movie. I liked it. I didn't, I liked it, not loved.
1:05:04It was, it was high quality. For some reason, this is always kind of nice. When you find an old movie you've never seen before, and when I say old, I mean like 80s or 90s, because remember, I don't go, people keep trying to give me black and white movies. I appreciate it. I'm never going to watch them. Wait, hold on, hold on, hold on. So we had an email. You've never seen Memento? Oh, I have seen Memento, okay. But that goes back and forth, because that's a plot device. I'm okay with that. Oppenheimer? It's a plot, okay. Got me on Oppenheimer. But back and forth. That's a plot device. All right.
1:05:35So I watched The Edge with Alec Baldwin and Anthony Hopkins from the 90s. For some reason, I've never seen this movie. Really good. What an awesome movie. Both of those guys throwing their fastball. They're really good. I loved that movie. All right, here's one more thing. Wait, hold on. So I saw that movie. I re-watched part of it. Where was I? I think California, actually. It was on late at one of the hotels that I threw it on. Anthony Hopkins was old 40 years ago. Yes, he's one of those actors who's always been old. J.K. Simmons, Steve Martin, Anthony Hopkins. They were born 50 years old. Morgan Freeman, and they just always looked like that.
1:06:11Okay, I got nothing else. Okay. All right, Animal Spirits 360. Thank you to Daniel and the rest of the team for producing these videos and these audios. That's not great English. All right, Animal Spirits pod. Nope, nope, nope, nope, nope. Animal Spirits at the compound news. Thank you for listening. Thank you for the emails. Keep them coming. Ben, what's on your mind? You'll think you're about to say something. No, no. I'm appreciative of the audience for sticking with us this long. We have a lot of people who email and say, I've been listening since show one. And that's awesome. If you didn't come in, if you came in after that, that's cool too.
1:06:43But we always appreciate the audience. We love every email, but those are extra special. Personal emails, personal responses.
1:06:59Cool!
From the publisher
On episode 360 of Animal Spirits, Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson discuss: pullbacks in bull markets, the legend of Jim Simons, if 401(k)s were a mistake, what a car says about its driver, hotel movies vs airplane movies, and much more!
This episode is brought to you by YCharts and Fabric by Gerber Life.
YCharts is always one step ahead of the game with free resources and this time is no different. Check out their election guide and get 20% off your initial YCharts Professional subscription when you start your free YCharts trial and tell them we sent you (new customers only).
Join the thousands of parents who trust Fabric to protect their family. Apply today in just minutes at https://meetfabric.com/spirits.
Sign up for The Compound newsletter and never miss out: https://www.thecompoundnews.com/subscribe
Find complete show notes on our blogs...
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor
Check out the latest in financial blogger fashion at The Compound shop: https://www.idontshop.com
Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.
The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.
Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
