Who Owns the Stock Market? (EP.366)

26 Jun 2024 · 53 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Animal Spirits Podcast Episode 366: Who Owns the Stock Market?

Episode Overview In episode 366 of the Animal Spirits Podcast, hosts Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson delve into a variety of topics related to the stock market, economic trends, and societal behaviors. Key discussions include the differences between bull and bear markets, generational attitudes towards investing, and significant shifts in consumer spending patterns.

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Market Trends
  2. Bull vs. Bear Markets:
  3. Bull markets tend to be "boring" with slow, methodical gains.
  4. Bear markets create headlines and invoke heightened emotions.
  5. Current Market Statistics:
  6. Only one daily gain of over 2% in the S&P 500 for the year.
  7. Notable stocks like NVIDIA have seen fluctuations but do not significantly affect overall market stability.
  1. Generational Investing
  2. Gen Z's Interest in Stock Market:
  3. A surprising trend where Gen Z is actively engaging in stock investments, sometimes influenced by unconventional methods such as astrology and tarot.
  4. Over 70% of Gen Z reportedly own stock, suggesting a more positive outlook towards investing compared to previous generations (e.g., Millennials) who were skeptical.
  1. Economic Observations
  2. Consumer Spending Shifts:
  3. A notable increase in consumer spending on concerts and experiences, particularly among younger demographics.
  4. Discussion on the rising costs of concert tickets and the cultural importance of such experiences.
  • Housing Market Insights:
  • Concerns regarding high-interest rates and their impact on housing affordability.
  • A case for the Federal Reserve to consider rate cuts to stimulate the housing market.
  1. Global Economic Insights
  2. Europe's Economic Challenges:
  3. Comparisons between U.S. and European markets, highlighting Europe’s declining market cap and GDP.
  4. Observations about productivity divergences and the role of tourism as a critical economic driver for certain European countries.
  1. Passive Investing Trends
  2. Statistics on market ownership:
  3. Notable changes in stock market ownership dynamics, with passive investment vehicles gaining prominence.
  4. Discussion on how passive index funds don’t constitute a large percentage of total market ownership yet dominate flows.
  1. Investor Sentiment
  2. Mixed messages regarding investor appetite for equities:
  3. Some surveys indicate a lack of risk appetite, while others show bullish sentiment.
  4. The paradox of increasing interest in private credit despite concerns regarding the credit cycle.

Key Takeaways

  • Historical Context: Predictions about market returns often fall short; historical data shows that long periods of above-average returns can occur despite prevailing pessimism.
  • Diversity in Spending: Cultural shifts, particularly among younger generations, indicate a strong emphasis on experiences over material goods.
  • Market Predictions: The unpredictability of market cycles makes it challenging to forecast future returns—historical trends suggest the difficulty in timing market entry and exit points.
  • Global Perspectives: Economic performance varies widely across regions, with significant implications for investors and policymakers.

Conclusion The episode ends on a humorous note with various anecdotes and personal opinions from the hosts, highlighting how cultural and economic trends intertwine. Michael and Ben emphasize the importance of understanding these dynamics in the context of broader market behaviors and investor sentiment.

---

*For more insights and detailed discussion, check out the Animal Spirits Podcast or visit the hosts' blogs, A Wealth of Common Sense and The Irrelevant Investor.*

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Black Friday savings are here at the Home Depot, which means it's time to add new cordless power to your collection. Right now, when you buy a select battery kit from one of our top brands like Ryobi or Milwaukee, you'll get a select tool from that same brand for free. Click into one of our best deals of the season and stock up on tools for all your upcoming projects. Get Black Friday savings happening now at The Home Depot. Limit one per transaction. Exclusion supply. Full eligible tool list in-store and online. Close your eyes, exhale, feel your body relax, and let go of whatever you're carrying today.

0:37Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-CONTACTS. Oh my gosh, they're so fast. And breathe. Oh, sorry. I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order. Oh, sorry. Namaste. Visit 1-800-CONTACTS.com today to save on your first order. 1-800-CONTACTS.

1:28positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.

1:34Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. Doing a little research this morning, Michael. Through Friday, give us a timestamp. What are we recording right now? Oh yeah, that's right. It's Monday morning, 1030 Eastern Standard Time. We're recording a day early because the production team needed some extra help. And listen, we're willing to work with them. Right? Yeah. This is for you, Duncan. 31 new all-time highs for the S &P 500 through Friday's close. And I was looking at some of the stats today because it just, I mean, there's some NVIDIA stuff that you could point to that's kind of exciting.

2:10But in general, bull markets are kind of boring. So we've had one daily gain of 2 % or more this year. Just one time. 14 days of 1 % or more out of like 120 trading days. No 2 % down days for the whole year. And just seven days of minus 1 % or worse. So it just got me thinking, the bear markets are the headlines, right? Like bear markets just beat you over the face and beat you over the head, like with constant pain. This is, look at what's happening. And bull markets are just, for lack of a better word, boring. There's just not much to a bull. It's like slowly and methodically moves up and there's not a lot of exciting stuff that happens during a bull market.

2:48So interestingly, Nvidia is down 10 % from its highs, which is not much when you double and double and double again. But still, it's 10 % off its highs and the market is right near it all. The market's not budging. Does this get back to the theory that Bitcoin really is like an AI proxy or a risk on proxy because isn't Bitcoin down double digits as well? Is Bitcoin just tracking NVIDIA? NVIDIA is bringing Bitcoin down? I don't know if I buy that, but. Okay. John Reckon Taylor from Morningstar did this thing where he looked at the last 10 years of returns And he went back in time to 2014 and looked at what people were saying then about the prospects for returns.

3:29Because remember, we'd hit new all-time highs again. The market had already been up a lot since then. Remember, 2013 was kind of the switch was flipped. And it was like, OK, we're back on. And then people started getting worried again. So he looked at the mainstream estimates of people for what are returns going to be, some expert estimates, and then pessimist estimates, which obviously we know who those people probably are. Where did he grab these? Basically, the research from Wall Street. He said it was Bogle and Schiller and all the people you know, probably. So he went back and what did people say at the time versus what it actually was?

4:06And I guess the mainstream estimates would be more like the Wall Street strategists. And that was the highest at 11%. The expert estimates was 7.5%. And then the pessimists said 2.5 % per year. I have to be honest. I was probably between experts and pessimists. I remember my first post on preparing for low returns was probably 2015. Probably because we were reading a lot of those same articles, right? That like, look at the dividend discount model or something. But the S &P blew - That's the last time I listened to Bogle. Thanks a lot, Jack. The S &P blew away even the mainstream, the high end of the estimates.

4:42Wait, what did the S &P 500 do over the 10-year period? Nearly 13 % per year. What was the exact number? I'm just curious. 12.7%. What was the exact number on the chart? 12.69%. Nice. Just had to go out two decimal places, didn't he? But I just think it's worth remembering how no one thought this was possible. There was no one saying, we're going to get like 13%, 14 % returns. I looked the other day. Since the start of 2009, the S &P has compounded at 14.5 % annually. Damn. Just an amazing run. So I had our chart kid, Matt, put this together. I looked at these various cycles of really bad returns, really good returns, and you can see it goes back and forth.

5:24These things are cyclical. I did real returns here because the 70s, it actually wasn't as terrible on a nominal basis. It was like 6%, but with inflation, it was negative 1%. So you have these cycles where you basically go nowhere for a decade or so, sometimes more than a decade. And then you have these two to three decade periods sometimes where you have way above average returns. My first instinct is I don't like this chart because if history holds, it means we've got low returns going forward. But I will say, look how long these periods can last. 1942 to 1965, that's 23 years. 82 to 99, that's 17 years.

6:01We're only at 14 years. So it doesn't mean it has to stop right now. The point of my blog post about this was that in real time, you can never tell how long this is going to go. Because in 1987, I've read all the stories, all the books. people thought we were going into a depression when the stock market crashed. Like no one would have ever thought we have 12 or 13 more years to go of this bull market at that point. I'm sure everyone thought this is it. And the same thing in that 42 to 65 period, there was four bear markets. There was like 10 regular everyday 10 % crashes or whatever. So that's the whole point of it is trying to predict the end of these secular cycles is nearly impossible.

6:41That's all. Yeah, that's all I'm saying is the linear version thing. It's not like trees don't grow to the sky. You have above average returns and you have below average returns, but good luck predicting when it's going to happen. Right. That's the point. Just wanted to contrast here. I'm talking about the 60-40 portfolio. You and I are kind of a 60-40 today. We're very diversified. I'm very colorful. You are the more black. So we're good contrast today. It's a great looking shirt. Tropical bros. I have way too many. My wife is kind of, you got another shirt? She's always asking me. We got, what do Do you need another pair of shoes?

7:13Need another shirt? You know, I got a text message this morning because I wore my Tropical Bros shirt to the beach as I normally do. It's a beach shirt. I got a text message this morning. Hey, what was the brand of that Hawaiian shirt? The gentlemen love them, don't they? John Authors at Bloomberg did this, and he did a global 60-40 portfolio. So this is taking everything into account. The headline of this chart is really funny. It says, somehow the classic asset mix has set a new all-time high. Like, I can't believe it. But this is almost more impressive than the stock bull market just because of how bad bonds were or have been.

7:49So it's a new all-time highs in the 60-40 portfolio because the bond piece was so, so bad and obviously hasn't made up for the losses yet. Stocks have been pulling their weight. But this was surprising to me. Which part? That we hit an all-time high? Yeah, just because bonds are still in a pretty deep drawdown depending on what you're looking at. Yeah. The Bears lose again. As always. Maybe not. Maybe they win in Europe. One of these days, one of these soundbites is going to age extremely poorly. I'm prepared for that. Yeah. I don't know, though. Is it, though? Well, eventually. It could be in 2036, but yeah, eventually.

8:34No, because the thing is, we're always open to the possibility of bear markets. The thing is, the people who constantly predict them every single day or every single year, just by sheer logic and averages, they're going to be wrong more than they're right. But if you're someone who says most of the time the market goes up and sometimes it goes down. Can never be wrong. Because it's true. That's the ultimate Grand Rapids hedge. Most of the time stock go up, sometimes they go down. It's true. It is true. That's a fact. Those are words to live by as an investor. Maybe unless you're in Europe. Okay, so I got a bunch of charts about Europe.

9:09And it's funny, people always try to predict the downfall of the American empire. Like, this is Rome 2.0. Why don't they talk about Europe like this? Why don't they say, like— Well, because Europe's not on top. That's why. But I guess no one ever talks about the fact that the European empire is crumbling before our eyes, or has crumbled. So look at this. The market cap of NVIDIA, and we've done this before, is now bigger than UK, Germany, and France. This is Deutsche Bank chart. And it's funny how quickly it caught up to those. I wonder like a good companion chart would be, what are the total earnings and revenue of those markets versus NVIDIA?

9:46I'm sure they dwarf it. I don't know. Is it 10 to 1, 15 to 1? That's true. Number of employees for all those companies versus the number of employees at NVIDIA. Here's another chart from The Economist. GDP and market capitalization as a percentage of the world total for Europe. Since 2000, market cap has gone from one third to a little more than 15%. GDP has gone from nearly 40 % to 25%. Not good, as you would say. Here's another one. This is from the FT. Productivity in the US versus Eurozone in the UK. Look at how much that productivity has diverged since the great financial crisis. What were some of the explanations and the replies?

10:26A lot of people said, well, we can fire workers here and capital. There wasn't great examples. Is it just capitalism? I think so. How that works? Hand up. I've never really gotten a good explanation of how to calculate productivity. It's like what's all lower. It's a residual. It's a filler, right? Yeah. Finally, here's one more. Market capitalization of venture-backed companies valued at over a billion dollars. And it shows China and the U.S. China's actually pretty close to the U.S. here, which is surprising. And then Europe is just way, way down at the bottom. So maybe part of it is, so again, the point of the Roman Empire falling, how long were they kings for?

11:08How many years? Hundreds and hundreds of years? Thousands. Didn't you watch House of the Dragon? That's true. Since House of the Dragon in the 1300s. What a show. Unbelievable, right? I think it's better than Game of Thrones. At least to the outset. Game of Thrones, I think people forget. At the very beginning of the show, it was very slow and boring. I think coming out of the gate, the dragon one is better. It's excellent. So here's what Europe does have. Tourism. This is from the Wall Street Journal. They say Europe has a new economic model, basically. And tourism, they use Portugal as an example here.

11:46Tourism generates one-fifth of economic output in Lisbon and supports one in four jobs. Portugal's gross domestic product grew nearly 8 % between 2019 and 2024 compared to 1 % for Germany. So it's saying all these places in Europe are just packed with American tourists because their dollar takes them stronger. And I don't know, everyone looks on social media for the best places to go now. And it's more or less saying all these like Greece and Portugal have grown faster and Spain has grown faster than Germany. More or less because of tourism. Well, I've done a trip to Europe since 2015. It's probably going to be another couple of years.

12:22Mine was a work one. I mean, can you imagine taking little kids to Europe? I know some people do it. I can't imagine doing that. Doesn't sound fun. No, the time change and the, I don't know. Do you think your kids would really care about seeing all the castles and churches and ruins and such? My kids would be over it very fast. I know people do it. And so anyway, it's the article is also saying what happens if the dollar weakens and people stop traveling there because of it. but it seems like American tourism spending is kind of propping up the European economy. Without that, that's like the biggest thing they have going for them.

13:02You know, you're just taking flamethrowers to all sorts of people. Now it's people who take their kids to Europe. No, I'm saying good for them. I couldn't do it personally. Ben's nice, but also mean. Here's my mean of the week. I was just asking the question. Here's my mean of the week. Like I had an email exchange with somebody to set up a meeting. And they gave me two dates but warned me that their calendar fills up very fast. It was like a buy now before it's too late for an email. That's a turnoff now. Yes. Boy, your meeting etiquette on emails is – like you should have a list of rules. Like how to set up a meeting with Michael Batnick.

13:42I just behave like a proper gentleman. I don't tell people sign up now or else. I agree. That's very aggressive. Yeah, come on. I mean. Yes. So the point is, though, what needs to happen in Europe to change this? Is that a real question? Do you expect me to have an answer to that? I live on Long Island. I haven't been to Europe in 10 years. I don't know. I don't know what goes on there. All right. Yeah. They need to pivot to capitalism. Is that the answer? I guess maybe my whole point here is that I'm surprised by all of these figures more than anything. That it's happened this quickly. Since the 2008 crash, basically, since then, we've just gone on two divergent paths.

14:27Yeah. Okay, Howard Silverblatt. I think he's at the S &P. This surprised me. He is at the S &P. Okay, he said, today, NVIDIA became the 12th company to become the largest in the S &P 500 since 1926. More or less companies than you would expect? It's way less for me. Yeah, only 12. So like not even one, just barely more than one a decade. Yeah. So it's like one every eight or nine years, I guess. So he listed them. AT &T, Apple, Cisco, DuPont, Exxon, GE, GM, IBM. That's a lot of letters. Microsoft, NVIDIA, Philip Morris, and Walmart. I would have expected there to have been more turnover. When was DuPont at the top?

15:07In the 60s? It had to be like 60s or 70s probably. Yeah. So I guess because we've talked. So do you think that these stocks, when they become the biggest, do they just kind of become the market? No. When they - What do you mean? Oh, in terms of returns? No, they underperform. No, no, no. They underperform dramatically. Ned Davis used to have a great chart about this. Or was it the Lutol group? I can't remember. And then, but Mobison did a piece recently that I highlighted showing that like Apple bucked a trend. If you had just invested in the largest stock when it became the largest stock on a go forward basis, your returns were horrible.

15:39Like really bad. I guess GE. Yeah, GE. Really, really, really bad. And Apple broke this. Microsoft, too. They've been phenomenal investments since they became the biggest over the last 10 years. The theme of the show so far, Ben is surprised. I'm surprised there's not more names that have made it just for a little bit, you know? Yeah. This was a good tweet from Ben Lang. If you joined NVIDIA five years ago as a mid-level product manager with an annual$70 ,000 stock grant over four years, just that initial grant would be worth$10.6 million today. I don't know if these numbers are right, but I guess back of the envelope, would have to be pretty close.

16:13How many deca-millionaires has NVIDIA created? Yeah. Probably a lot, right? Yeah. Yeah, it's wild. Reach out to Ritholtz Wealth Management if you're one of these people. I'm just going to put it out there. Hey, that's a good plug. No, but just life-changing amounts of money in a short period of time for these people. Yeah.

16:33What is this headline? Okay, read it. stock obsessed gen z are using astrology and tarot to invest and swearing by the results to the tune of over four hundred thousand dollars okay so i can't believe you fell for that i can't believe you fell for this so a lot of people i'm looking deeper than the headline here so they talk about some woman who quit her job as a tarot reader to day trade and she says she's earning five thousand dollars you ever go to a tarot reader i don't peg you as a tarot reader guy No. I think I would just giggle if I went to see one of those people. Yeah, I don't think so.

17:07Kind of point. They say something that surprises me, and I just immediately melt and start crying. That's true. That's true. How did you know that? Yes. Yeah, it's always very generic. I did lose somebody. Yeah. You're a genius. So they talk about driven by the fear of missing out and determination to escape the corporate rat race. Over 70 % of the generation owns stock according to NASDAQ. That number seems high to me. I don't know if that's a survey or what, but my whole point here, a lot of people will look at this story and say, this is ridiculous. These Gen Z people don't know what they're doing.

17:38They're day trading. They think this is easy. I think this is a good thing, that Gen Z is obsessed with the stock market, if that's a real thing. I don't know what the actual numbers of Gen Z people in the stock market are, but it's got to be way more than millennials at their age. I looked at this. This is how long I've been blogging for. I wrote a piece in 2014 called Millennials and the New Death of Equities. and it was a UBS survey that talked about how millennials are totally skeptical about long-term investing. They don't want anything to do with the stock market. And yeah, this is better.

18:10So this is better, right? Than that. In 2014, were you still using your pen name or were you out of the closet? With this wealth common sense, I never used a pseudonym. I wish I would have. Oh, oh, you were always Ben Carlson. That's me. Yes. Duncan just slacked. I'm convinced that Mike's email pet peeves are part of a sci-up to prevent people from ever emailing him. No, quite the opposite. Quite the opposite. You should see my inbox. It's loaded, loaded. And 98 % of the time, people do the right thing, say the right thing. So I wish I could drop a Seinfeld reference here, but you are not a Seinfeld person, but you are the soup Nazi of email.

18:51Like you have to stand in. It's all these rules to order the soup. That's you for email. I'm really not that particular, but don't buy now me in an email. Duncan and John, I'm going to need you to superimpose Michael's head on the soup Nazi with the little white getup just for the video, please. I did make it four seasons through Seinfeld. Okay. All right. That was one of those shows for me that every night we get home from classes. It was on TBS for four hours after college. Can I give a good plug for a good background show? I'm really into the golden collectibles things on Netflix. Great background show.

19:26I don't know what that is. It's collectibles. It's like Pawn Stars, but more fun. Reality show? Okay. Does Pawn Stars still make new episodes? It can't be, right? I used to be a big reality TV show person. The only one I watch now is Welcome to Wrexham. All the reality TV shows for me have kind of gone by the wayside, unfortunately. I was a big dating show person back in the day. So Robin shares a Netflix profile with me. So I'm a barbell. I've got horror movies and reality TV. That's what the algorithm recommends for me. Okay. For me, it's all just shark movies because my son watches so many.

19:58But now he's scared to go in Lake Michigan because of the shark, because of the 10 days under Paris or whatever it's called. There's no sharks there, are there? No, there's no sharks in fresh water. I have to try to explain this to him. But he said, how did the shark make it into Paris, though? Oh, he does have you there. You know? So this is a funny chart for me from Taurus and Slack. Households turned bullish on equities when the Fed started talking about rate cuts. It's a survey of consumer expectations. the average that U.S. stock prices would be higher one year from now. And the average of this is probably 45%.

20:29Now it's at 40%. Why are people so bearish? The average is 45 %? Yes, this is just sort of watch what they do, not what they say, I guess. Because we've talked about this. The stock market is up 75 % of the time on a one-year basis. So if people are saying 40 % of the time think it's going to be higher one year from now, either people are always bearish sure they have no idea what they're talking about. One or the other. Yeah. Yeah. 75 % of the time it works every time. Friend of the show, Sam Rowe, uh, is always sharing these really good golden sacks nuggets. And, uh, this is my, one of my favorite charts.

21:07Who holds, who owns the stock market? I wanted to show me what, tell me what pops out at you from this, because I have something I want to see on this. I want to see if we're seeing through the same lens. Okay. So you see this chart here? I'm looking. It's ownership breakdown by households and ETFs and passive mutual funds and pensions and all these different. All right. So I'm not going to say the obvious one because it used to be, it used to be owned entirely by, by households more or less, right? It was 95 % was owned by households in 1940s. I'm not going to do that. Uh, so two things jump out at me.

21:36Number one, business holdings used to be a much bigger piece of the market. Was that pensions? Oh, no, it says there's a place for pensions. Okay, so whoops, never mind. So what is that? Okay, I don't know what that one is. That's a good question. All right, throw that one out. Foreign investors. Okay, foreign investors is big. Here's the one that stood out to me. Passive mutual funds and ETFs make up combined 14 % of the market. Oh, that is a good one. That's a tiny percentage for people who think that that's driving a bubble in the stock market. Okay. That's not a very big percentage, right?

22:10it's big in terms of the mutual fund industry. Well, no, no, no, no. But if you look at flows, it's everything. True. But active mutual funds are 12%. Passive and ETFs are 14%. Okay, active mutual funds are only 12%. See, there really are no price setters. That's the interesting thing. Foreign investors are bigger than both of those cohorts. Huh. My whole point is just that the whole passive indexing is leading the bubble. it makes up a very small percentage of the overall stock market. Right. Again, I counter with it, but it's every dollar flows, more or less. True. But it's on the margin. That's what I'm saying.

22:49All right. But I'm just saying flows. All right. So we look at the market every different way we can, right? Earnings and these companies, and we look at it all. This is just, this is what we do. Vanguard had this piece that kind of puts this stuff into context a little bit, into perspective. they showed a 4 % rule starting in 1973, 1983, 1993. What would happen if you took 4 % per year, adjusted for inflation? Where do you end up in 30 years? And starting in 1973, because inflation was so much higher, you're adjusting for that. You didn't do very well. No. 1983, perfect. You did awesome. 1993, you did pretty darn good too.

23:32What's with these starting points? Oh, they just started every 10 years? Yeah, they're just kind of trying to show, and I think wanting to use 2023. All right, takeaway is what? What are you trying to say? For as much analysis and breaking down that we do of the markets, a lot of it is really just driven by luck, unfortunately. And sometimes the timing component is the most important thing you can do. Yeah. Nick Majulia had an incredible stat that I'm going to butcher. But it was like from, call it 1970 or 19 whatever. However, if you outperformed the market by 10 % a year, you didn't do as well as somebody who underperformed the market by 5 % a year from 1990 to whatever.

Read the full transcript

24:15The 80s and 90s. Yeah. Right. Yeah. Saying the 80s and 90s, just being in that time. Just really showing that when you get started, it's everything. I also want to say that no one actually uses the 4 % rule. Bloggers do. That's not true. Bloggers do. Don't you think though? If you're talking actual clients who use the 4%, even if you started as a baseline, people's spending fluctuates so much in retirement. It probably is very high at the beginning of retirement. It slows down at the end. Healthcare costs, one-off costs. I'm just pretty sure no one actually uses the 4 % rule. I suspect that you have a spreadsheet with the 4 % rule built in.

24:52I will not be a 4 % rule guy. Five? Thanks to your savings? Maybe push it to six? I'll be a die with zero guy. I'll push it way up. I don't know. I don't know what my spending rule is going to be. All right. Let's talk about the economy. Money market funds are currently paying$500 billion in interest. That's 2.5 % of annual consumer spending. See, I like it when you – this is another Torsten Slott one. He puts a denominator in here for us. Put these numbers in perspective. So I think it's great perspective. I'll pick a nit here in that I still believe that money market income does not influence spending.

25:36I agree. I'm sure most people are not taking that income and then spending it immediately. Right. You think people are like, oh my God, I'm getting an extra$800 a month on my cash. I'm going to spend that. Right. I agree. Here's where people are spending. Concerts. I'm not a huge concert goer. I've mentioned this to you. I think I said it to you the other day, especially as a middle-aged person. I used to go to concerts when I was younger. I'm not ashamed to say I probably went to four or five Dave Matthews band concerts with my friends. That's okay. But that was an excuse to go somewhere and get drunk, right?

26:06It wasn't like I was the biggest fan of them and knew all their songs on their set list. So my wife and I went to see Zach Bryan in Detroit at Ford Field this week, last week. So we're talking, they must have had three quarters of the space open and behind the stage it was closed off, you know? So we're talking, I don't know, 40 ,000, 45 ,000 people because I think it could hold 60 ,000, 65 ,000 in there. So packed. Here's some observations. They have about four of those booths set up where you can buy the, you know, I went to Zach Bryan tour shirt, right? The shirt of the sweatshirt. Did you buy one?

26:40No. You don't buy the concert shirt, but everyone else did. Yeah. The lines to buy the merch were going around the whole stadium, every single line. I couldn't believe how long the lines were to buy this merch just to prove. Listen, I went to the concert. Damn it. I got my experience and I'm going to show her when I did it. I don't remember. Maybe this is just me being a hater again on young people. But I don't remember me or any of my friends ever being like, we need to buy the concert t-shirt. Right? True. Like you don't buy the, although I did have a friend who, whenever we traveled, he would buy a t-shirt of the city we went to.

27:10Let me ask you a question. Are you a singer? Are you a head nodder? Are you a dancer? None of the above? Do you just sit there? Do you just stand there awkwardly? Like I do? Well, I got a little tuned up for Zach Bryan. I had some of the tall Budweiser, so I might have been singing a little bit. Oh, yeah? Okay. But one of the best live shows I've ever been to. He was, the guy was, it was amazing. But here's my other thing, and maybe I shouldn't be surprised, but I assumed the crowd would be 30s, 40s-ish. And it was not that at all. I felt old. It was average age 18 to 22 probably. Young, young, young people.

27:48And how much were the tickets? Like get-in tickets. So this is the thing. This is my question. We got pretty good seats. And now not great seats, but pretty good seats. And we paid a decent amount of money for them. Say the number. I'm trying to think with the fees. Just say the number. Say the number. Don't be embarrassed. We're all friends here. Probably$600 or$700 per ticket. Wow. Wow. And pretty good seats. And all around me is these 18 to 22-year-olds. And I'm thinking, how the hell are these kids affording this? They're trading. Aren't you paying attention? I guess so. I'm going to a Billy Joel concert, the last concert actually, a month from tomorrow, July 25th.

28:26Yes, I use my ticket broker. Highly recommend. The cheapest tickets on Ticketmaster are$900. Now, it's his last one, but I've never spent that much money on a concert ticket in my entire life. But you have to go because you're from all I on. Got to do it. My one big East Coast question is always, who's more overrated, Billy Joel or Bruce Springsteen? See, you are such a hater. That's just how I get people from New York really angry with me. So the Wall Street Journal had this piece about - You also don't like bagels. I'm starting to think that you don't like a certain type of person around here.

28:56I'm not going to say, I'm not going to get more specific than that. No, my whole point is just bagels are fine. Donuts are better. They're not substitutes though. It is. Donuts complement bagels. It's a carb for breakfast and they're both round. So it's in a round food. So Wall Street Journal had this piece about concert tickets and they say they've nearly doubled over the past decade. and the average ticket for the top 100 tours in North America has increased more than 40 % over the last five years. And I can attest to this. It's expensive. But they were saying that these people are paying, shelling out for VIP.

29:27It's like sitting in the box and having these barbecue and tacos and high-end. And they're saying the demand is insatiable for this stuff, to have the VIP access at these tours. I did the VIP experience once. Or like not VIP, just a box, a suite at Madison Square Garden for a concert once. who did I go see Rage Against the Machine I don't like Rage Against the Machine now they dislike him but it's not like I wouldn't go otherwise but if somebody incites me to a suite I'm going I don't care who's playing I don't care if it's Blippi on state I don't care if it's Blippi I'm going great experience yeah I don't know if I could do Blippi I've heard enough of him over the years I've had enough but the point of this like VIP access so another one from I can't remember where I saw this one from but the highest income Quinto we talked about this accounts for like 40 % of consumer spending.

30:16And that cohort has so much money now. Oh, you know, this is a great chart. So we've spoken about this a lot. The reason why I keep saying that, like, I don't think that it's necessarily 401ks or money market funds driving spending. The second income quintile and the lowest account for 22 % of consumer spending. That's not nothing. And they're spending most of their income and their income is up a lot. Right. So that's the - That's a much bigger driver of everything, of everything. When you walk into a Burlington, you're walking into amazing prices and great gifts. That's main character energy.

31:03Because at Burlington, the holiday savings aren't the only things turning heads. Discover quality finds and perfect presents for everyone on your list. even those who are hard to shop for. Toys and jewelry to new beauty brands and styles, these gifts go seamlessly from our stores to under your tree. Seriously, with these savings, why shop anywhere else? Burlington Deals Brands, wow. This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Listening to this podcast, smart move. Being financially savvy, smart move. Another smart move? Having State Farm help you create a competitive price when you choose to bundle home and auto.

31:41Bundling, just another way to save with a personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state. Here's another one to show that people are still spending. United Airlines, Carl Cantania tweeted this, expect July 4th weekend to be the busiest on record. Is that a lot? Busiest on record? Is that a lot? Seems like it. It's a lot. You know, I've never been on a United flight that has the screens behind the seat. That always irks me.

32:21I feel like Delta is the one that has them the most consistently. United and American rarely have the screens for you behind the seats. I'm surprised you're not a Delta card user. What do you mean? Why don't you always fly Delta? Is it because sometimes they just don't have the location? like we went to Charleston a few weeks ago. Maybe I did do Delta for that. I can't remember what I did. But remember when we were in Charleston and the woman was giving us the tour and she's talking about just people are flocking there, right? Everyone's flocking to the house. We've heard this. We have people who, for Riddle's Wealth, who work in Nashville.

32:55And they tell us that the difference between Nashville now and 10 years ago, it's like a, it's like a just, the city's just doubling in size almost. So I don't think necessarily people are flying more because flying is so easy. but I was listening to Kevin Costner do an interview with Howard. Are you going to see an American Horizon, by the way? Or Horizon? It's coming out this week. Probably when it's on a streamer, I guess. I'm not going to it. You're going to be one of the few people who goes to it, huh? I think I'm going. But he was talking about just the differences between traveling now and traveling in the 1700s.

33:27He's like, when you said goodbye to somebody, that was, you know, have a great life. I'll see you never, maybe in the afterlife. And he said, on a flight, I just flew to New York and you put your seat back. If you're one of those people, we don't judge. You get a cocktail, you watch a movie, close your eyes. Yeah, it's easy. And you're there. Yeah, and like the 1700s, the hardest part, like crossing a river was hard. Like you got all your stuff. How do we cross the river? There's no bridges. Yeah, what happens if you got a cold? Yeah, right. F*** them. So the Bloomberg had an article about how in the South, they call it the anti-growth fervor grips U.S.

34:05South after pandemic boom and someone says, I live in hell. Like all these Southern towns, which people decided I can work remotely. It's cheaper coming from California, New York. So they say that in Tennessee and the U.S. South, the region's population is increased by 2.7 million people, the size of Chicago. So they're saying like these towns are not big enough for all the traffic and their municipal systems are like, the water systems are under pressure and strained from all the demand. And they say from early 2020 to mid-2023, the Southeast, including Texas, counted for more than two-thirds of all U.S.

34:39job growth, almost double its pre-pandemic share. Tennessee's economy was the second fastest growing in the U.S. from that time. They picked out this one county in Tennessee that the number of apartments in the county doubled in the four years through 2022. And it's one of those double-edged swords of, I live in a place with good weather and it's highly desirable, but now other people want to come here and it's ruining the experience for me. And I don't know how you, how you stop that. So Lawrence Hamtel actually did a whole piece on this. He did a, like a white paper on the implications of business and population migration.

35:14And just look at the, look at the businesses moving to the South and leaving the Northeast and Midwest, that second chart there. Wow, that's a great chart. And the population going to the South, just, it's insane. And all the people who live there probably are saying, we don't want this. So both of our regions, the Midwest and the Northeast, are in secular decline. Yeah, that means less traffic, at least for me. But they also show the tax burden. So they look at the difference between California and Texas taxes or New York and Florida taxes in 1980 versus now. And look at how much that spread in taxes has jumped.

35:53Meaning it makes, so the people who live in California, New York, it makes so much more sense for them to move to these areas from a tax perspective. Got it. Good one. Yeah, that's a good one. Yeah. Ben, we got an email from a listener and the TLDR is, why are we in such a high-reliberate rates? Okay. Let me just read a quote from this email. It feels to me like we're addicted to historically low rates, much in the same way that patients begin abusing their once legitimate medications and frankly, I'm not eager to see the Fed feed into that addiction. In my mind, the case to cut rates should be a much higher hurdle than the case to raise rates.

36:31I would agree with you there. Given the natural inclination that lower borrowing costs feels better to the quick gratification sides of us, that I want everything to be cheap. Simply imagining that at some point rates will hypothetically be cut and saying, why not start now, does not meet that bar for me. I think this person's feelings are felt by a lot of people, not an entirely uncommon view. I don't know that the hurdle should be higher for lowering rates and raising rates. All right, well, we could debate that. But I guess one immediate, like my immediate reaction to this was, if nothing else, and I'm not suggesting that we need to cut from five and a quarter down to too or anything, but let's start to heal a really dysfunctional housing market.

37:20That's the biggest case for me is housing, which is a huge part of the economy. Right. So Michael McDonough tweeted a chart of existing home sales, and he breaks it down by, I'm going to click on this so it's less blurry. He breaks it down by region. And actually, surprisingly, the Midwest is hanging in there. But the point is, if you just look at the total, It's bad. It's really bad. People are stuck. You got to unlock some inventory. We had the blip in 2020, 2021, maybe 2022, when people started to build because the demand was there. And now it's falling off a cliff. So Bloomberg had a story saying the new home construction plunges to the slowest pace since June 2020.

38:01And I looked at - Sorry, but before we leave this topic, I just want to do one more thing on the why now thing. I am of the opinion, and this is mine. You might disagree with me. I'm of the opinion that at this point, the job is done. Inflation is mostly under control. And the longer you leave rates in a tighter than necessary posture, the more likely you are going to cause a recession. And so to me, the risks just seem asymmetric. I don't necessarily see the harm in taking rates from five to make up a number, four and a half, whatever it is. It doesn't have to go back to zero. Right. There's some middle ground there.

38:38I don't think anybody's saying that. So that's where I stand on this. All right, Ben. Back to the - Well, I think it ties into this. The stuff in the housing is, by them leaving rates higher like this and cutting out - So look at this U.S. building permits, which had a huge run-up in the first couple years of this decade and now has crashed again. And they're stopping building homes. This is going to make things worse in the future. So by the Fed constraining the U.S. housing market, they're just going to make things even that much worse in the future. They're putting it off when just having a little bit of a release valve there to open up some more construction and part of the economy that's 20 % of GDP, that makes sense to me as being a good reason to cut some rates a little bit.

39:18Now, I don't know enough about the mechanics of how this works, so I'm talking out of my ass here. But if you told me like, well, why doesn't the Fed just start buying mortgage bonds again? And maybe that will help to heal the housing market. If that's a legitimate option, and again, maybe it is, maybe it isn't, then that's fine too. But there's gotta be, the housing market does need some medicine. Right, that is one thing. If the Fed would say, listen, we wanna leave rates kind of restricted We're going to cut 25, 50 basis points, but we want to narrow that spread between the 10-year and mortgage rates because we're going to buy some mortgage bonds.

39:46That actually kind of makes sense to me. Yeah. Saying like the housing piece is the one we want to target. I'm sure people would still freak out about that, but here's a good one from Judge Glock, which sounds like, I don't know, a bad guy in a movie, but good name. He says, I don't want to trigger anybody. The OECD housing ranking of total affordability, size and quality metrics has US at number one. So again, I don't know how much the quality piece fits in there, but affordability, size, and quality, the United States is ranked first in terms of affordability across the globe. I just don't think this makes anybody feel better.

40:22Nobody gives a shit about what it's like in Canada or France. I don't live there. I live here, and I can't buy a house. So just because the person in France has no AC and a smaller unit than me, and it was built on like$1 ,600, I don't care. I can't buy a house. Don't care. Okay. It could get worse. That's my thought. Here's an interesting survey. This is from Goldman Sachs. It's the GSAM Global Insurance Survey. They receive responses from 296 chief investment officers and senior investment professionals, 42 CFOs and senior finance managers, and 21 individuals who serve as both CIO and CFO, the insurance company surveyed, have over$13 trillion in balance sheet assets.

41:11So these are real people. Real people. And they were polled, which asset classes do you expect to have the highest total return in the next 12 months? And it's US equities, investment grade debt, cash, et cetera. The whole shebang bang.

41:3153 % said private credit. Even more than stocks. 53%. And here's an interesting quote that I don't know exactly how to square this circle, Ben. Insurers' appetite for credit is growing. 35 % of insurers look to increase credit risk in their portfolios over the next 12 months, despite 59 % of insurers expressing concern that the credit cycle is entering a later stage. So we think a recession might be coming, but we're still looking to increase exposure there. So to me, this is very, very simple. This is career risk and incentives, and it's the volatility laundry that Cliff always talks about. If we don't see the marks, we're better off.

42:15And look at the yield we're getting, right? Yeah. Do you think the thought process, too, for a lot of people is, well, it's whatever, 12 % or 14 % yields. And even if some of these default, we're still going to get 10 % or 12 % instead of 12 % to 14%. You think that's the thinking? I think it's that. I don't think they would say this out loud, but I think not seeing the volatility, not seeing the prices on a daily basis, even though we know that's not real alpha, it feels like it. Yes. The need or desire for liquidity is trumped by the fact that we don't see the marks every day. Now, global insurers, they do have a long-term time horizon.

42:55So if it makes sense for anyone to be using these instruments, maybe it's them. Right. But will these people be complaining if and when they can't get their money out on a fast enough basis when they want to? I mean, I would hope not. Yeah. But there's going to be stories in the years ahead if this stuff ever runs into trouble. Listen, they tried to get their money out and they couldn't. That's coming someday. There was a headline over the weekend that I didn't get to read yet. Pensions piled into private equity and now they can't get out. But again, I don't know if the reality matches the headline.

43:27Yeah, that's what private means. Okay, here's a great survey. A couple of surveys. Again, I'm just not sure how to square all of these round objects. Per the latest J.P. Morgan, Blake Merlot tweeted this, J.P. Morgan Institutional Weekly Survey, there's virtually no risk appetite to deploy fresh capital into equities. Investors continue to show no love for stocks in 2024. So they ask, are you more likely to increase or decrease equity exposure over the coming days and weeks? And this has plummeted to 17%. And then simultaneously, now these are institutional investors. They've got Bank of America Global Research.

44:10There's this Global Fund Manager Survey, again, institutional investors. Global Fund Manager Survey sentiment, most bullish since November 21. Ben, make it make sense. I think we have too many opinions out there today. Let me give you one more. Let me give you one more. Now, these are not necessarily institutional investors only, but Dot Shun has tweeted, VOO is a virtual lock to blow away the all-time annual flow record at$44.5 billion. It is only$5 billion away, and it's not even halftime. This is surprising to me that SPY is going to be dethroned potentially because that's... they had a big head start.

44:52Huge head start. Very big brand recognition. Like you never hear, I don't know, you don't hear people talk about VOO very much, but it's obviously just the expense ratio. What's SPY expense ratio? It used to be nine. Is it lower than that? VOO is three basis points. SPY is, did they, what is it? Okay, SPY is, yeah, nine. SPY is nine, VOO is three. Which is funny because that feels like splitting hairs a little bit, but if you're saying, listen, this thing is three times as expensive as this one. We're going to the cheaper one. That's surprising though. All right. Jeremy Horpital, I want to hear your explanation of this because I can't come up with one.

45:31I'm asking questions today. Americans spend on average 6.7 % of their income on groceries, the lowest in the world. Now he compared all this is from our world of data, compared all these different countries. And then my first thought was, oh, well that's simple because we spend more on restaurants than going out. And then he did a follow-up saying he included restaurant spending as a percentage of income and it's still the lowest in the world so is this just because we have higher incomes what would be an explanation for this i couldn't come up with a good one why would we spend the lowest percentage on food in the in the world compared to all these other countries that spend way more of their income as a percentage on food do you think it's just we have lower costs here because of uh bigger more resources lower energy you call it like lower taxes?

46:17What would the, I'm going to guess, I'm going to, yeah, I'm going to guess you're right with a denominator thing. It's got to be with higher incomes. That'd be my explanation. But again, I color me surprised on this one. Yeah. Color me as well. All right. Oh, it does the next one show the same thing. Yeah. Just with restaurants. So the first one is just groceries. And the second one is groceries plus, plus restaurant spending. Yeah. I don't know. That's a good one. Um, but we got an email. I'd like to remind Ben that car horns were invented to warn others of a vehicle's presence or to call attention to a hazard, not to show disapproval.

46:49I don't remember. What did you say about honking? Are you a frequent - I said it's okay to give - Are you a frequent - Okay, let me throw an example out at you. This happens all the time. You're waiting in like a left turn lane and it's a longer light and you know the person ahead of you has got their head straight down looking at their phone. Light turns green. Way to beat. Yep. Way to beat. Yep. Honk. Go, a-hole. What are you - you're on your phone like an idiot. what sort of, what sort of hunk do you give? You probably give a little to it, right? Like tap. If you're, if you're doing that and you're holding up a whole line of cars, you deserve to get a little honk to, Hey, wake up, buddy, get off your phone.

47:25But there agree. There's a world of difference between a respectful toot and an aggressive hunk. Oh yeah. I don't do it. I don't, I don't hold it. I give it. So I got, I got an aggressive hunk yesterday, actually. And so how I was, it depends. Now, listen, I guess the thing is that you don't know how long you're waiting for, right? If you, if you're staring at the light and it turns green and you get a hunk immediately, that's, that's the worst. So I was looking down guilty as charged. I don't know how long I was looking down. Oh, you were the guy I'm talking about. I deserve to be honked. I did.

47:55I did deserve it, but it was, it was a too long hunk. And when somebody too long hunks me, I don't move. I, I will roll away at five miles an hour. So you had a standoff. Yeah. Yeah. So, um, But then the person, so I'm driving slow, and the person is way far behind me. So eventually I drive, and they're driving, and it was a half a car. You know those half a cars? I got honked up. I got aggressively honked up by half a car. And then they were like a mile behind me. That really annoys me. If you're going to honk, at least speed around me. I don't mind. Just a little tap. There's probably two buttons, like one nice, one aggressive.

48:30You know how on the toilets in certain states or countries, they have the flush for one, flush for two? That's a great idea. There should be a tap hunk and a hunk hunk. Yeah. I don't use it much, but just when someone needs a little reminder, there you go. Yeah. Okay. Matt Bellany tweeted, Horizon, an American saga, chapter one, has dropped to a$10 million opening weekend. Not great. That's pretty bad, no? So how much money is he going to lose, Costner? They said he put 30 into it, So I don't know the economics of, you know, margins. I mean, I'm sure he loved this to be a resounding success. I don't know.

49:07The guy said he got to do what he wanted. I'm sure it was a fun experience. Why doesn't he just sell to a streamer? If Netflix bought this thing, way more people would see it than we'll see it at the theater. I'm sure he's probably a theater guy, though. Yeah, no, yeah. He seems like this has to be seen at a theater. You know what kind of bombed over the weekend? The Bike Riders. You'll see that when it comes out. Awesome bought by Tom Hardy. I'm a big Tom Hardy fan. Yeah,$10 million. That's not good, right? It's pretty bad. No, not great. I just think it's really hard to get people to go to the theater.

49:39But Inside Out is just blowing up. I think Inside Out has done$750 worldwide. $724. Yeah, it's incredible. Wow. I haven't seen it yet. Have you? No. I don't think I saw it first. We're waiting for a rainy day to bring the kids. Logan keeps asking me. I watched Monkey Man. It's on Peacock. Dev Patel. who does great work. Big fan. Okay. Looks like an action movie. Yeah. It's like a light John Wick. There was, I'd say, I don't know. It was okay. It was, there was parts of it that were really cool that I really liked and there was parts that just like dragged and weren't overall great. It was, I probably wouldn't recommend it.

50:18It was fine. Some good, some bad. Mixed bag. Is that, are we talking on our movie here or is it a little lighter for my son? Because he likes the action. Oh, no, no, no. Okay. No, it was violent. It was violent. Okay, good to know. I don't have much, but I rewatched, it was on Amazon, came up for like, you might like this, A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints. It was a movie that came out in the mid-2000s. And it's interesting to look back now. It's a biopic of this guy who grew up in Queens in the 1980s. But it was one of those flashback ones, you know, where it's like, here's the guy older and here's him younger with his friends.

50:55Holy shit, what a cast. Look at the cast. So Robert Downey Jr., before he took back off again, a young Shia LaBeouf, a young Channing Tatum. This is all them, like a young Rosario Dawson before they really took off. Chaz Palminteri is in it. Diane West. Pretty good movie. Eric Roberts. Yeah. Who directed this? I don't know who this is. The guy who directed it is the guy who wrote it. It's about his life. It's based on a true story. So not a great movie, but a pretty good flashback movie. I had nothing to watch and it came up as a recommendation for me on the Amazon Algo. They know I like coming-of-age movies.

51:30Yeah. Right? I want to rewatch, as I was listening to Kevin Costner, I haven't seen The Bodyguard since it came out, and I was seven. I saw it in 1992. Probably a little bit too young to watch that. Okay. One of my mom's favorites. That's a good movie. The only other recommendation I got since I haven't been consuming a lot of entertainment lately, I was thinking this. So Tadis at Normal Returns does all the daily links and just does it every single day. But then on Sundays, he puts out the top clicks of the week. And so sometimes if I miss some of his link fest during the day, he does the top 10 most clicked on.

52:05And I look at that every single week on Sunday to find the stuff that I missed. So subscribe to be on Normal Returns. Still the best in the business at putting stuff together that you need to read. Agreed. Animal Spirits at the compoundnews.com. If you're looking at the end of my calendar, do not rush me. I'm going to need the list of Michael Batnick email etiquette for how to get on your calendar. I'm a simple man. Just do the right thing. Okay. Have a great week. Thank you for listening. We'll see you next time.

From the publisher

On episode 366 of Animal Spirits, Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson discuss: the biggest difference between bull and bear markets, cyclical vs. secular bull markets, what's wrong with Europe, Gen Z is obsessed with the stock market, spending on concerts, everyone is moving to the south, how the Fed can help the housing market, when to honk your horn, spending on groceries, and much more!

This episode is sponsored by Global X and CME Group.
Visit https://www.globalxetfs.com/ to explore a lineup of more than 90 ETFs, along with insights to help you navigate a dynamic investing landscape.
Access CME Group's valuable educational materials and trading tools and learn more about what adding futures can do for you at cmegroup.com/animalspirits

Sign up for The Compound newsletter and never miss out: thecompoundnews.com/subscribe

Find complete show notes on our blogs...
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor

Check out the latest in financial blogger fashion at The Compound shop: https://www.idontshop.com

Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
 
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.
The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.
Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Animal Spirits Podcast

All 382 episodes
Who Owns the Stock Market? (EP.366)Animal Spirits Podcast · 53 min
Listen in VO