In short
Podcast Episode Notes: What it’s like on the frontlines of Trump’s tariffs war
Podcast Overview Podcast Title: Azeem Azhar's Exponential View Episode Title: What it’s like on the frontlines of Trump’s tariffs war Guest: Ryan Petersen, CEO and Founder of Flexport Episode Focus: Current state of global trade amid escalating tariffs, geopolitical tensions, and technological disruptions.
Key Discussion Points
Introduction
- Global Trade Pressure: The episode begins with the context of immense pressure on global trade due to tariffs, geopolitical tensions, and technological change.
- Ryan Petersen's Background: He shares insights from his position at Flexport, a logistics platform navigating the complexities of the US-China trade war.
The Current Landscape of Global Trade
- Tariffs on Chinese Goods:
- US tariffs on Chinese imports are as high as 145%.
- China has responded with tariffs of 125%.
- Impact on Businesses:
- Businesses are facing bankruptcy due to unanticipated tariff increases.
- Conversations are ongoing about whether to ship goods or cancel orders, leading to significant distress among importers.
Shipping Dynamics
- Importance of Shipping: Shipping is crucial for everyday life and the economy; it is not limited to high-value items like electronics.
- Potential Increase in Global Shipping: Despite tariffs, the demand for global shipping might increase as businesses reconfigure supply chains.
- Manufacturing Shift: Many companies are moving final assembly to countries like Vietnam while still relying on components from China, creating a complex web of logistics.
The Future of Globalization
- End of Globalization Debate: Discussion on whether tariffs signify the end of globalization; Ryan argues it is more a temporary blip.
- Historical Context:
- Trade has historically grown at a rate of 4%-5% annually since the Mongol invasions.
- Past disruptions (e.g., wars, pandemics) have shown temporary impacts on trade volumes.
Resilience vs. Fragility of Trade
- Resilience of Trade:
- The decentralized nature of global trade systems has allowed for adaptation and recovery post-COVID.
- Fragility Exposed:
- Geopolitical tensions (like the Houthi rebel actions) expose vulnerabilities in maritime routes and logistics.
Technological Changes in Trade
- Rise of Technology in Logistics: Flexport has leveraged technology to enhance visibility and efficiency in trade.
- Historical Lack of Technology: The logistics industry has been slow to adopt modern technology, relying heavily on manual processes.
Agility in Business
- Need for Adaptability: Companies must become agile to navigate the unpredictable nature of modern global trade.
- OODA Loop: Emphasis on the OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) loop as a strategic approach for businesses to thrive amidst trade uncertainties.
Predictions and Future Outlook
- Trade Deal Expectations: Ryan predicts that a trade deal between the US and China is likely, though complex negotiations will take time.
- Future Trade Dynamics:
- Potential shifts toward regional sourcing and trade blocks to minimize vulnerability from geopolitical tensions.
Conclusion
- Final Thoughts: Ryan emphasizes the need for businesses to adapt to new realities while underscoring the enduring nature of globalization despite current challenges.
Key Takeaways
- Business Impact: The episode reveals the significant distress and challenges that businesses face due to tariffs.
- Technological Integration: The push for tech adoption in logistics is crucial for future resilience.
- Adaptability: Companies that remain agile and responsive to changes will likely survive and thrive.
- Historical Context: The growth of trade has historically been resilient to disruptions, suggesting a return to growth despite current geopolitical tensions.
Links and Resources
- Ryan Petersen's Links:
- [Flexport Website](https://www.flexport.com/)
- [Twitter/X](https://x.com/typesfast)
- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/rpetersen/)
- Azeem Azhar's Links:
- [Substack](https://www.exponentialview.co/)
- [Website](https://www.azeemazhar.com/)
- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/azhar)
- [Twitter/X](https://x.com/azeem)
Additional Notes
- This episode is a part of Azeem Azhar's new show "Friday with Azeem Azhar," focusing on discussions related to exponential changes in technology and society.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Global trade is under immense pressure from many angles. What's the mindset that you've seen in your customers, these American businesses who are ordering from China? It's very ugly. There will be bankruptcies from this. People are pretty pissed off realizing, hey, you know, you built your whole life, built your whole career around this. And now all of a sudden, you know, maybe your business model doesn't work. They're sitting there thinking, okay, we still have to set up our customers. They're trying to figure out where they can reconfigure and how quickly they can do that. Ironically, like some of this stuff might increase the demand for global shipping.
0:32A lot of what's happened is manufacturing has moved. Final assembly manufacturing has moved to places like Vietnam. But a lot of the components are still made in China. If you're like, oh, trade's going to go down. You're like, actually, trade might go up. We have seen a tremendous growth in global trade really since year dot. When you look at this, you see anything that changes that path. Human beings have an innate desire to find a customer or a supplier that helps them make their life better. And if a certain government tries to rein it in, guess what? The main line of trade will move elsewhere.
1:01and civilization will advance. And there's many cases where cities that were once great got left behind. My personal prediction, you didn't ask me my prediction, but I'll go ahead and say it. I'm here with a man who is really at the center of this tariff storm and the impact of these trade wars, Ryan Peterson, the CEO of the very, very fast-growing logistics platform Flexport. And we're going to talk about geoeconomics and trade, but also software and AI and the future of globalization. So Ryan, praise your time for you. So thank you very much for being here. Yeah, that's great. Now, let's start with the biggest headline.
1:40Global trade is under immense pressure from many angles, every angle potentially. The US tariffs on Chinese goods are currently 145%, I think, and China has responded with 125 % saying they won't go any higher. you are seeing the fallout in real time across your platform what's breaking first well the uh importers from china people shipping from china the u.s are basically a state of distress right now um because that 125 remember is added to the previous tariff and trump in his first term put in 25 tariffs on most chinese goods not most but a lot of chinese goods and then by the continued those and increased them in some places so that's 170 and then you know there was already tariffs before Trump ever took office of a few percent on average.
2:27So that breaks most business models. I think you're going to see trade. And people are in a really difficult... I talked to a customer yesterday at 103 containers worth of furniture shipping from China. So 170 % duty, I think, is their duty rate. And that is 145 of which they didn't know when they placed these orders. So when the containers arrive in one of the big ports in the US, they're slapped with an additional unplanned... Yeah. And when they're deciding right now whether to even ship them or call the factory and tell them sorry and ruin their reputation with their factory or do they import them and just take a huge loss.
3:05And I think that kind of conversation is happening in businesses all across the United States today. And so it's very ugly. There will be bankruptcies from this. And so my personal prediction, you didn't ask me my prediction, but I'll go ahead and say it, is I just think there's going to be a trade deal between the U.S. and China. That's my prediction. I have no firm evidence for this, but I can't imagine that Donald Trump wants his legacy to be in his first quarter in office, bankrupting thousands and thousands of businesses and jacking up the unemployment rate. Consumers are one thing. They'll be upset they can't get their stuff, but they can buy other stuff instead of that.
3:40Let's dig into that a little bit because for many of us, what we see of globalization is that we can buy a billion things on Amazon. on. So if we go a layer at a time, you know, we talk about containers, we talk about containers on ships. You know, it's been 60 years, I guess, nearly 66 years, I think, since the Ideal X and the first containers were put together. But just help somebody who hasn't been inside one of these 20 foot long things understand what goes in there, because it's not all iPhones, is it? But the iPhone probably ships by air most of the time. It's a very valuable product. So it's, yeah, but most of the things that you see are shipped by ocean freight, anything really.
4:23I mean, that's the beauty of the container. It's standardized and you can just put anything that fits inside a rectangle can go in there. But from China specifically, a lot of consumer electronics, although also, yeah, some of that flies by air, furniture, apparel, you name it. Now, a lot of it, it's low complexity goods. So things like apparel that are relatively easy to produce and it's just about an intensive labor operation. A lot of that work has already left China over the last decade for cheaper countries with cheaper labor. China's done a great job of increasing its standard of living.
4:59And with that, the labor value, the dollars per hour have gone way up. And so if it's just cheap labor between the tariffs that Trump put in in his first term and just the rising inflation of labor costs in China, a lot of that moved to Southeast Asia, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, many other countries around the world over the last decade. So it tends to be higher complexity things where there's an ecosystem of subcomponents. That's why electronics is the hardest thing to move out because you've got, you know, no one company makes all of the things. You're like buying little components from other companies.
5:32And so therefore you have an ecosystem and that basically is in Southern China. Yeah. And that ecosystem, of course, has all of its codes and clues, how they pass information, how you understand, how you have the vibes of what people want, what people need, who's good, who's not good, which is why it's not a simple case of lifting and shifting. And we'll talk about that a little bit later in our conversation. But if we just come back to the container and the ship, I mean, the scale is staggering, right? Some of the biggest ships have, what, 24 ,000 containers on them. So give us a sense of what's in a container and therefore what's in a ship, like in dollar terms.
6:11Well, by the way, this is the first opportunity we have to just say how dumb the industry can be sometimes. There's 24 ,000 TEUs, but that's only 12 ,000 containers. A TEU is a half container, which I think just frustrates me to no end because at least once a week, I hear somebody get a metric completely off by 50%. Right, because you've got the 40-foot, but the TEU... There's seven TEUs, but they may have the EUs. He's like, yeah, we can't keep doing this. Okay, so let's just clarify that. The TEU is the standard packet size of a container, but actually containers are 40... TEU is 20 containers are 40 foot long so a teu is half of the container we see on on the back it's like measuring your revenue in 50 set pieces it's pretty crazy uh anyways um yeah the ships are enormous the ships uh however those mega mega ships the 24 000 teu ones basically there's not that many ports in the world that can handle a ship of that size they're they're in china they're in singapore and they're in rotterdam maybe felix still i have to check the european um networks But the U.S.
7:11ports are not capable of handling a ship that large. I think the largest ship that's full, when they're more full, they weigh more. They go deeper. They need a deeper draft. I think the largest one that can come to the U.S. is more like 16 ,000. The U.S. is not invested in our port infrastructure, and it's very dilapidated. And that is a sad fact here in the United States is that we have a pretty antiquated port. Nonetheless, yeah, the ships are enormous. You put that next to it, they're bigger than like a U.S. limits class super carrier, aircraft carrier. They dwarf their size. Yeah. So they're moving around at the 16 ,000 TEU equivalent coming to the US.
7:47And there is this powerful relationship between, you can use TEU as a sort of leading indicator of where GDP is going to go, right? There's this multiplier effect of if GDP goes up 1%, TEU volumes go up 2 % to 2.5 % because this trade has been such an important anchor in how countries have got rid. Yeah, you've seen global trade's percent of GDP go up and up and up. I think it's around 50 % now. The only interesting fact of all of this is as the tariffs have hit China, a lot of what's happened is vinyl assembly manufacturing has moved to places like Vietnam and other parts of Southeast Asia. But a lot of the components are still made in China.
8:26So you have to, if you want to declare something that's made in Vietnam, you have to undergo what's called a substantial transformation. And there's specific customs rules about that. We got teams that people have exported total experts on this, but I don't want to try to oversimplify it. But there are rules for what has to happen. And it's really about the value add, both in materials and labor costs that has to take place to then say that, yeah, this is our product of Vietnam. But a lot of the components, a lot of the parts of the products are still made in China. And so you end up actually from a logistics standpoint, moving the same goods twice.
8:58You move it once from China to Vietnam and then once from Vietnam to the US. So ironically, like some of this stuff might increase the demand for global shipping. I saw it like fully got my head around it and modeled it in the right way. But that's something that didn't occur to me at first. You're like, oh, trade's going to go down. You're like, actually, trade might go up. Yeah, I mean, actually, you're bringing to the fore the complexity of these global value chains that we now have. You know, they're not really supply chains. And the reality of the complexity, so is that what's happening amongst your customers and your teams?
9:30That they're sitting there thinking, okay, we still have to serve our customers. what are the parameters that were allowed by global trade rules to now declare that this has been manufactured in Vietnam or Mexico? And they're trying to figure out where they can reconfigure and how quickly they can do that. Absolutely. And as you mentioned at the outset of your audience, and you guys cover AI a fair amount. And so one of the interesting things here is the GPU, the semiconductors are duty free under Trump's new trade. Now, with the reciprocal tariffs, this was all pods, but when reciprocal tariffs were coming down the pipe a week ago, this was one of the hot topics, and it may come back in 90 days when this thing comes back around, is that semiconductors are duty-free, but graphics cards are not.
10:14And so if you take a GPU, and the GPU is obviously the most expensive part of the graphics card, and you transform it into a graphics card by adding it, you know, I don't know. Well, I stick it on the PCB, and you put the edge bolts and all that stuff. You do a couple more things. Now you've got a very high-duty product you import. So it might actually lead to some American manufacturing because we're going to import the semiconductor separately from the PCB and the other components, assemble it in the U.S., and then send it back to wherever in the world to turn it into a computer and send it back over.
10:48And you've now said, hey, the portion of this product that's made in America I get to deduct from the final value. I mean, you're going to generate all kinds of stupid inefficiencies at the end of the day. I mean, by the way, like you're flying these things around the world, generating carbon and costs and all this idiocy just to save some kind of regulatory hack. But that will happen for sure. That already happens on all kinds of cases where people are trying to save money on duties. Right. I want to dig into that later in our conversation when we talk about what comes next. But I'm curious about Flexport because Flexport sees a large number of customers, right?
11:24I think you see 3 % to 5 % of U.S. trade across your platform. Is that right? Just 1 % of global trade, roughly, that you see across the platform? No, it's more like 1 % of U.S. trade, a little bit smaller on some other markets. But yeah, we're still pretty significant. What have you sort of numerically seen? How many of your customers have said, we're just going to pause what's coming out of China right now until we understand what's going on. Yeah, we're still taking survey of it all. A week ago, when the reciprocal terrorists were still live, or proposed rather, and pending for all of the world effectively, we did a kind of a call down last Friday.
12:08A week ago, we called all of our customers, as many customers we get a hold of. And that time, 28 % of them told us they were going to pause their bookings after this hit. and we're still kind of recalibrating what does that mean for the ones who are just china oriented and uh presumably the other ones with the 10 duty aren't aren't changing a lot of business plans although part of what that story is there it's not just that these companies are totally screwed and and going you know to pause all operations a lot of what happened is this date was known liberation day has been known since trump took office effectively or maybe since he got elected you know this date until i think on january 21st or something so you've had two months to prepare And so people front-loaded and imported a lot of inventory and are pretty well-stared.
12:48But it has to get here, of course, right? I mean, it doesn't matter if you ordered the only... Actually, the way they made it was it just has to depart. The vessel has to depart at origin. Right. Had to depart. Now it's in the past. By the 9th of April, it had to depart to avoid the higher duties. So there was a mad scramble last week to get everything loaded. And then now people have said they were going to take a pause. our bookings are down for sure this week as people go through this math and figure out what they want to do and realize they have stock. A lot of people believed like I did. And I told all our customers, Hey, I think a deal is going to get done on these countries.
13:23And we were right. And they were right. The ones who thought that was going to happen. China, I do believe a deal is going to get done. I just think it's a lot harder to negotiate. Both sides need to save face. Both sides have made this a big part of what they're all about. They end up showing that they're strong. They have very different negotiating styles. The Chinese don't want to ever risk their leader. This isn't specific to Xi. This is about Chinese culture. You don't want to risk the leader ever looking bad. That's not uncommon, to be fair. Yeah, totally fine. Maybe it's not just the Chinese thing, but they want to negotiate this at the lower level, make sure it's really done.
14:01The two leaders meeting is a formality. Trump doesn't care, he looks bad. He wants to make, you know, he's going to go in there and yell at some people and try to, you know, try to work out a deal man to man. So there's very different negotiating styles that'll be hard to overcome. American interests and Chinese interests have obviously many points of divergence and there's real substantive issues here that have nothing to do with tariffs. But I just think it's, you can't go through with this and just devastate the American small business, especially. That's probably something that parties all around the world understand.
14:32But what you've just described is the number of moving parts, complexities, bits that are completely inscrutable to us because we sit and even in your case, we are close to the customers. You're reading what's coming and learning things through the news. But just give us a sense of what's the mindset that you've seen in your customers, these American businesses who are ordering a lot of merchandise from China, whose mindset is working well at this moment? i mean they're pretty pissed off they're um people have built businesses over a decade playing under the rules of the game as it was defined and you know that's the job of the government define the rules and then the business people got to find a way to make money um whatever those rules might be but having those rules changed out from one of you with no notice overnight i mean you had some notice people knew that some things were going to happen here but yeah it takes time to shift the supply chain to make decisions etc and so um yeah people are pretty pissed off uh some despair some realizing hey you know you built your whole life built your whole career around this company and now all of a sudden you know maybe your business model doesn't work and what are you gonna do it's pretty pretty terrible yeah i mean i i think it is pretty terrible i think we'll hear more than individual stories over the coming weeks right as the the reality bites and people are able to sort of try to take stock of where they are because Yeah, people are not running with 200 % profit margins by and large.
15:58So, you know, you have a 100 % import tariff. It's pretty tough. But what I'd like to do maybe is just step back a little bit to this whole overarching question of globalization. So, you know, we have seen a tremendous growth in global trade really since year dot. I mean, it is something that humans like to do. You know, you find Viking coins in parts of Central Asia, right? And they date from 1000 AD. and people like to travel, they like to trade, and trade is very, very helpful to improving the quality of life. It's actually an exponential, right, in a sense. I mean, it's not a Moore's Law exponential of 60 % a year, but it's 4 % to 5 % a year over centuries.
16:41That really, really does compound. I'm just curious about whether when you look at this, you see anything that changes that path, Or is this a blip of the type that we say saw in the 1920s or the 1890s when there was a period of retrenchment? I look at it that way as a blip. You know, you look at that long run of trade. It has grown 4 % annually since the Mongol invasions, at least. So you've got 800 years of this compounding. And that 4 % doesn't sound like much. But when you do it for that long, it looks like a Silicon Valley straight line vertical at that point. And on that graph, World War II barely shows up.
17:24You know, the black death doesn't show up. There's some terrible things that happen that don't compare to this. Right. What does show up is the 1890s process of deglobalization that took place and also the 1920s or late 1920s. Those were very real events. But the growth has been so much that, you know, it just looks really tiny now. Because what shows up actually is COVID hit, the great financial crisis, because we're so big that all of a sudden the drop of 20 % on this huge number looks like a real thing. Whereas even if you drop 30%, the numbers were so small back then that it looks like a little tiny thing.
18:04Because 4 % of what we're doing now is way bigger than a drop of 30 % in the Great Depression. So that's just the nature of exponential math. So yeah, I think you'll see trade Be bigger 10 years from now than it is now There's too much benefit to both parties That's why you're doing it Governments will try to rein it in Many reasons why people in power Want to preserve their power, exercise their power But human beings have an innate desire To find a customer or a supplier That helps them make their life better And make them make more money So generally those forces tend to overcome and if a certain government tries to rein it in, guess what?
18:44The main line of trade will move elsewhere and civilization will advance and there's many cases where cities that were once great and once hubs of global trade got left behind because of policies that they enacted or the geography shifted. New trade routes were discovered. You can think of places like Venice or even Brune. many other places around the world that were at one point thriving hubs of civilization and then just got left behind because of sometimes policy, sometimes geography, sometimes new technologies. There are many reasons, but trade moved on. So you have to be careful as a government trying to regulate too much on these things and essentially plan your economy.
19:30I mean, they can do some stuff that might lead to some more American jobs, but at the cost of making every American worse off. It's a really, it's a complex picture. I mean, what you've painted, of course, is this consistent element of the world over the past thousand years that we, a bit like the internet, but it's much more important in a sense, don't see, right? We don't notice that there is this whirling ecosystem of infrastructure, of 40-foot containers, of automated ports, of automated loading. We live with the benefits, but they've had quite a tough 10 years, logistics professionals, haven't they?
20:09Yeah, it's been nothing but chaos, really, for the last decade between tariffs, between terrorists, all sorts of obstacles to trade. War in Ukraine has been pretty, I mean, obviously, humanitarian crisis on the ground, but it also has had a big impact on all the air cargo can't fly over Russia anymore. pretty inconvenient and costly. And yet the world finds a way. I mean, the world finds a way to do more trade. Trade has grown. Trade with China has grown even since the tariffs started. Even since tariffs, right, in 2016 to 18. But there is something that's going on that is about, and I'm not sure whether this is a story of fragility or it's a story of resilience, right?
20:52I think it's really a mix of both. So going around the Red Sea and through the Suez Canal has been a thing that's been important. It's been really important since the Suez Canal was there. It's been important for the last 30 or 40 years. So much so that, you know, you think of those Nimitz supercarriers that you talked about and they existed in that area to keep those sea lanes open. And yet they've not been able to keep them open, right? They've not been able to keep them open by what is barely a fully-fledged nation in terms of the Houthi rebels. So there's a point of fragility. And a point of resilience is how we bounced back from COVID.
21:36And then we get to the point of fragility, which was a single tanker, the ever-green, ever-given, ever-given gets stuck and billions of dollars of damage are done. So how do we understand that? Is this a fragile system? Is it a resilient system? Is it one that will ultimately reconfigure if there's enough of an impetus on it? It's quite resilient because it's decentralized and lots of actors who are making decisions on their own part. And there's not really, there are definitely some choke points and we see that with the Red Sea, Panama Canal, Straits of Malacca, you know, South China Sea. There are some choke points in the world that create some fragility, but in general, it's a relatively robust system.
22:22And it has been, the global order has been of free trade and globalization. It's something we've basically taken for granted, but it's a post-World War II phenomenon. Before World War II, the countries basically did trade with their colonies. Right. And a lot of the ships were, you know, you had to put cannons on your ship if you wanted to do trade. And it's sort of a newer concept that the United States Navy is going to be out here. I mean, the British Navy did a lot of this before, but the United States Navy since World War II has been the guarantor of freedom of navigation and free trade. And now anybody can go anywhere as long as you play by the rules.
22:58And the WTO really accelerated that. But it is a big challenge to the global order. The Houthis is the story that I think is the biggest story in the world, the most underrated story in the world, that this small rebel group can cut off global trade and all the ships are having to rout around it. route around Africa and take a much longer journey. And the United States Navy, who's supposed to be the guarantor of freedom of navigation, hasn't been able to stop it. Trump is up to attacks. And so maybe there's some progress to be had. But if that's the case, and we go back to a prior world, it's, yeah, a lot of the prosperity the modern world's built off of that freedom of navigation that we do take for granted.
23:39And the United States doesn't care that much, it seems. And not just under Trump, right? Biden didn't do much about it in general. The United States trades the least of any major country as a percentage of the economy. I mean, we're the biggest, us and China are the two biggest countries in terms of trade. But as a percentage of our economy, it's pretty small. The U.S. is a big country with so much great natural resources and we're independent on food and energy. And so we're just less inclined. We need it less than other people. Do you think it was a reasonable deal for the U.S. Navy to, I mean, it cost a lot.
24:14It cost a lot to run those supercarriers, right? They used to cost$5 billion. They probably cost$10 billion now. They've got 70, used to have 90 aircraft on them. They used to have 6 ,000 sailors and airmen. They now have 3 ,000. Things are more efficient. Was the U.S. getting a good deal out of that? We got to become the reserve currency of the world. And I think that's a big part of why we're the reserve currency because we're seen as the security guarantor. And being the reserve currency kind of makes you rich without doing that much. Everybody wants your currency. You can use that to buy whatever you want around the world.
24:43And so in general, it's created a set of problems. The problems are easy to see. The benefits are less obvious. You take them for granted more. But the fact that, you know, you can just, when I, as an American, you travel abroad, you're like, man, this place is cheap. Wherever you go, it means you're rich. Right, of course. Yeah, when I travel to the US, I really do notice that American GDP growth has been, you know, 2 % or 3 % higher than the UK's for the last 20 years. And, you know, you notice that when you go into the local coffee shop, right, America is rich and it's connected to the reserve currency.
25:21It's connected to the infrastructure that has enabled this, you know, this globalization. I want to come to the Houthis because they are underrated in all of this. How damaging has it really been for cost, right? I mean, it's clearly more expensive to go around the Cape than to whip through the Suez Canal. and takes a lot more time. Is it really significant or is it, again, one of those blips on the graph? I think it'll turn into a blip because last year, it was very expensive last year. It raised, especially for Europeans, it raised the price of shipping a container from Asia to Europe by three to four times, depending on the exact route.
26:00But let's put some numbers on that. That's like a few thousand dollars. That's from like a couple of thousand to maybe$8 ,000 a container. Yeah, something like that. And it raised the price of freight on all lanes, even Trans-Pacific. Like that has nothing to do with the Red Sea. The price went up two to three times. So we're kind of calling from long run average of$2 ,000 to ship a container to more like$5 ,000,$6 ,000 almost to ship a container. But it does look like that'll be temporary. Even though the Hootie's, it's unclear if it'll be hopefully temporary in the long run of history. But I'm not making any prediction that that's going to open up anytime soon.
Read the full transcript
26:37And nonetheless, the price is going to come back down. It has already come back down. largely because of it's a supply and demand thing. And the carriers, the ocean carriers who operate these container ships made a lot of money, sort of famously during COVID, the price went so expensive, they made a lot of money and they reinvested it in more ships. And it's how you know you have a functioning market. Some people allege that there's some kind of a cartel and they were taking advantage and jacking the price up. But they immediately went all and went crazy buying more ships, probably more ships than they need.
27:05And we're about to head into a world, especially with these tariffs of massive overcapacity where you have too many container ships relative to the volume of cargo that needs to get moved, and the price of freight is going to be cheap again. And if now the Red Sea were to open up, the price of freight is going to collapse. Collapse. Right. Yeah, because that might be a good strategy by the Houthis if they want to create some, you know, upset in the global economy. Let me ask you a question that I want us to think about this long run that you've talked about. And one of the things that's happened is that the cost of shipping has been on one of those inverted exponential curves, right?
27:40It's just fallen so far over 100 years just to move something across. This sounds a bit absurd, but does a temporary tripling of the cost to ship a container that's full of LCD TVs against the long run of where prices were five years ago or 10 years ago, So is that really an upward pricing pressure for the consumer? Or is that just something that we could actually manage and absorb, right? Because the curve is kind of doing that, right? It's just coming down year after year, decade after decade. Yeah, well, I just mentioned the price of ocean parade, but it's also taking a lot longer. So that's a lot more inventory on the water, a lot more working capital.
28:22So there's definitely economic impacts here. And then more so as a symbolic and potentially strategic change of the environment where if the Houthis can do it, then why not somebody in the Strait of Malacca? And, you know, Myanmar is an unstable regime. Maybe they decide to go a little crazy down there. And maybe somebody, you know, now Trump is going down and saying we're going to take back the Panama Canal. And but you never know. I mean, the world can become very unstable very quickly. It takes much longer to build things than to destroy them. And so it's more of a longer term, one of the longer term implications of the U.S.
28:58Navy no longer providing that security guarantee and what will happen then. And, you know, the world is, before the United States started doing that, we lived in a pretty crazy world. There are six different times when private American citizens conquered foreign countries and started their own country. Six different times that's happened. Wow. Without the government's involvement. Oh, let's have the six. Go on. Well, the United States itself. Number one. Number two, the kingdom of Hawaii. Now, the kingdom of Hawaii didn't exist. There was no kingdom of Hawaii. When James Cook got there, there were 40 different tribes.
29:36And an American guy and a Brit together, they met some Hawaiian princesses and decided that they would help their uncle conquer all the islands. They got 10 ,000 rifles and they went island hopping and conquered it all and created the kingdom of Hawaii. yeah okay we don't we don't want to be doing that you're right right there's that we live we take it for granted the u.s police uh the u.s global police that uh prevents some of this stuff from happening and by the way maybe they're raining in the u.s uh citizens ourselves we got 400 million guns over here and uh there are currently 21 countries without an army so that's a that's kind of an ugly ratio if you're just saying hey let's get the united states uh military to back off like you don't know what's going to happen next i mean i'm sort of are you saying in jest here but you don't really want a world of just pure chaos like no so so in in the case of of your business flexible right you see large amounts of trade you understand who wants to move what where you are working to i mean of course one of the costs of of trade is moving the goods in these efficient containers there's also all the paperwork which is another substantial cost and you've taken aim at that within Flexport.
30:49But what are the changes that you have seen in the dynamics and structure of how trade operates in the decade or so that you've been running this business? I think it's particularly interesting because I would guess that Flexport customers are quite forward-leaning, right? Because they're working with a young startup rather than paper ledgers. So what is that change? Is there a sort of structural theme that is common? Yeah, I mean, well, the biggest one, obviously, is the rise of technology. And when we started Flexport, the reason I started Flexport was I just was very frustrated by the freight forwarders.
31:25I used to run a business and e-commerce company and it was pre-Shopify. So we built all of our tech for online checkout, shopping, inventory management, invoicing customers, and logistics. And we had a lot of logistics tech and we tried to interact with the freight forwarding international side of things. And everybody treated me like I was an idiot and they made me call them and email them and there was no web portal. It was those two things. It was tech and the culture of customer obsession that was missing. On the tech front, in the last decade, we saw Flexport driving this, giving people visibility, control, where's my stuff, when is it going to arrive, accurate data connectivity between all the different parties in the chain.
32:06And now with AI, just doing incredible things. So we're proud to have said we take a leadership. I think anybody in the industry will say we've influenced the industry a lot. A lot of companies have started to invest because they have to. They may have made those investments anyway, but definitely it was a survival thing. If you don't invest in technology, it became very clear that Flexport was going to eat your lunch. And so, yeah, you've seen a big rise of technology. And I would argue no industry needs tech more. I mean, it was kind of crazy that 10 years ago in 2015, there was no software to manage this.
32:39I mean, how are you going to run a globally connected network for trade without the internet? It's insane. Well, I think of the container network a little bit like the internet. You know, you have internet packets and a container is of the box, right? Mark Levinson's phrase for it is like an internet packet that gets moved around and you don't know necessarily what's in your internet packet unless you inspect it and likewise with your container. And then you have things like the port of Shanghai, which is, I guess it's like three guys and a dog and it's like millions of containers going going through there in a kind of completely automated way it's it's a a world away from the steve doors of west side story yeah there's a lot of analogies from internet packet switching networks and but uh but it's not you know in the internet stuff just works or the electrical grid is another good analogy you flip the light switch over there and you're controlling a power plant in real time right when When you buy something on an online e-commerce site, there's not, that's what we're building towards our vision is that it'll kick off this replenishment chain that the order will get submitted to the factory.
33:45That's how we've built our system. You place orders through your factories, through our system. Those factories can become users, create bookings to go replenish and ship the cargo back with algorithms to optimize the loading of that container, route it correctly on the cheapest way that'll get there on time, determine where to ship it, all of those things. that's not how it's worked. It's a bunch of dudes on telephones. I call it freight, uh, it's freight forwarding. I often call it freight email forwarding. People just passing PDFs and attachments and it's all unstructured data. So, um, yeah, that's a big change.
34:19I think it's also, it's like, I don't really worry if there's more, I have a conviction that there will be more trade in 10 years. I'm not certain a bit, but I believe it. Um, if there's not, we do know that the world will want more technology to manage these things that will want lower transaction costs, better user experience, better data to make decisions about your supply chain. You're going to want AI to make more of those decisions and execute more of the transactions on their behalf. So we have conviction that one of our core values is to play the long game. It doesn't really matter if trade goes up or down for Flexport's health.
34:52We obviously want that for the world. Well, let's bring these two themes together, So we started talking about the trade war that is emerging, the volatility of the messaging that's coming from different places, the arrival of tariffs and the pause. And on the other hand, we've talked about the technology's role in enabling and affecting trade. In a sense, in the last few minutes, we'll talk about maybe what comes next. But there is a sense of once bitten, twice shy. So at a national level and amongst customers and manufacturers and retailers, they've been exposed to a vulnerability that they didn't know they had.
35:33And the last time probably that happened was with COVID and people moved to China plus one or China plus N and reshoring or friendshoring or close by shoring. How do you think they will respond? they will respond, right? Is it a sense of there will be more regional trade blocks, there will be more regional sourcing, people will not just, you know, gradient descent to the cheapest possible supply and say, we need to bake in some resilience into our business model. Is that the pattern of increasing interconnection and complexity that you think might happen? Or is there just a hysteresis effect? It was working really well apart from these things that are bigger than the trade disagreement between America and China.
36:17And that's a configuration that makes sense. Well, I think it was working well for a company. Whether it was working well for populations, for countries, is a debate that's largely not the thing that most business people are concerned about. Buying cheap stuff from other countries and selling it to the American consumer was working quite well if you're the CEO of a company. So the big change here is, yeah, now all of a sudden you realize, oh, wow, things can change in an instant. Politics is more important in your business than it ever was before. And you all of a sudden have to figure out how to be very agile to respond because government can be really unpredictable.
36:53And now we're learning government can move really fast. We're used to a world where government, they make an announcement and a year later, customs would implement that and you'd have some time. So to me, I think the biggest thing that businesses need to do, and the ones that we live in a Darwinian world, and so the ones that are good at this will be the ones that survive. they have to learn how to be incredibly adaptive and run what john boyd coined the oodagh loop of observe orient decide and act and figure out you know who's the best at running those loops of observing what's happening in the world figure out orienting means figure out what it means for you who needs to know uh go make some decisions and take action and so you're going to see nimble companies survive as always you're going to see the adaptable one that's darwin um and but darwin's going to be much meaner than he's been uh in the last decade it sounds like and right some some companies will thrive in this environment because it is a competition at the end of the day it's always competition and business and so there will be winners and losers and some people are going to figure out how to you see this with some of our customers in the first trade war it's too early in this new one to say what would the winners and losers look like but in the first time around you have a company that just set up their supply chain in china you the young company and they just When it happened, cool, yeah, we're just shifting to Korea.
38:11And the company's been around for 50 years buying from China. They don't know what to do. No one in the building remembers how they did this in the first place. So it's going to be that new competitive dynamic that's more important than ever. I guess the key word is agility. Yes, it is agility. And I love the OODA loop, right? The sense that that drives your agility. If you're able to get the data, read the room, make the decision, orient yourself, evaluate your decision more quickly than your competitor, you can adapt in the right kind of way. And I can imagine there are so many different classes of companies.
38:51And if it's lower value consumer electronics, perhaps those can come elsewhere. But if you're building something sophisticated like the iPhone, where it is an ecosystem of extremely complex capabilities that has evolved over two decades, it's quite hard to imagine that you can move any large portion of it in anything less than five to 10 years. I think the shift to India, which is less than 10 % of iPhone production, took three to four years and cost tens of billions, maybe more. So there is this quite a complex pattern that emerges, which I think also mirrors the complexity of the economy. It's very hard to imagine a world where there's any alternative to specialization as products get more complex, right?
39:37that the advanced productive capabilities, they enable more diverse exports, which feed back into advanced productive capabilities. And can you really break that cycle? And I'm not sure you can. I don't know what you think. Consumer behavior is going to shift. It always does. But it's not just though that it shifts to like, oh, now we're going to buy stuff that's made in America. Like we have customers that import pizza ovens and for your backyard. Oh yeah, I love those. I have one, yeah. Yeah, cool. They're great. Well, the price of those in the United States I think if they're made in China, it's like 100-something percent duty that just went on it.
40:11And you might now prefer to just go buy pizza in a restaurant, which is duty-free, made in America pizza. So it could shift to whole new categories of things. And that's kind of almost a perfect replacement, even though they're a different product. But it might shift to, hey, I'm going to go to Hawaii and take a vacation instead of buying the new iPhone. So there are going to be ugliness. There are going to be losers in these things. It's just like, you know, it's again, Darwin is a good analogy. You have some massive shift in the environment and the climate or something else. And it's not just that finches get replaced with another finch.
40:44It could be all of a sudden all the finches go extinct and there's now some, you know, swimming iguana on there. There's a million different ways that this can play out. And that's the nature of business. There's nothing new, but centrally planned economies have been proven to just be disastrous. And so I think that's the biggest fear that I have in all this. It's not like no business should ever go out of business. or that it's all sacrosanct and you can't touch an importer's business model or something. It's much more that like centrally planned economies, we just know that they throw out the poor results over the long arc of history.
41:15And this has been such an exogenous shock that has come, even if it was telegraphed a little bit. Thank you so much for spending this time with us. I'm going to come back to you with one final question. That question is, you said, well, you think there'll be an agreement and an agreement will emerge between the two key players here, China and Beijing and the U.S. through the White House. What do you think that will look like? And when do you think we could expect it? I do think that, but my confidence level is probably like 60 % or 70 % or something. So you're betting your company on it, maybe not a great deal.
41:51I think it has to involve currency. I think there's going to have to be something around the Chinese allowing their currency to appreciate. If you want to actually address the underlying structural issues that the administration says they want to address is you have to allow somehow that currency to appreciate, which also sounds like dollar devaluation. It looks like the market's taking care of that on our own. The U.S. dollar is down 9 % this year, year to date. So I don't know if that's by design or some people are looking at that and Trump's policy is a disaster, but kind of what he wants is to make it cheaper to buy U.S.
42:22exports so our manufacturers are more competitive. So there may be some element of that. They're not going to be able to get to the same page on Taiwan, So I don't think that that has to be on the table. I'm not saying these countries are just going to reconcile all the issues that they'll have between them. But I can't imagine that the duty rates stay at this level because you're effectively have got a trade embargo between the U.S. and China. And that's maybe less. You know, I mean, Trump's kind of a hardcore dude in some ways. But if this sticks, he's going to have a massive legacy of creating huge amounts of unemployment in the United States.
42:54And it doesn't seem like what he's actually trying to achieve. And he likes doing deals. With that, Ryan, thank you so much for being generous with your time today and joining me on my show. I will say to our viewers, there won't be an episode next week because it's a public holiday where I am, but we'll be back in a couple of weeks. Ryan, thank you very much. My pleasure. Thanks for having me on.
From the publisher
In this episode, Azeem Azhar speaks with Ryan Petersen, CEO and founder of logistics platform Flexport, about the current state of global trade amidst escalating tariffs, geopolitical tensions, and technological disruption. Ryan offers unique insights from the frontlines of the US-China trade war and explores how businesses are adapting to a rapidly changing landscape.
(00:00) Episode trailer
(01:12) Ryan's overall thoughts and predictions
(03:40) Why shipping is crucial to your everyday life
(08:07) Why tariffs may actually increase global shipping
(11:34) Who’s pausing their China shipments?
(14:29) The mindset of Flexport customers right now
(16:02) Is this the end of globalization?
(21:48) The fragility and resiliency of global trade
(25:27) The most underrated story in the world
(30:25) How tech has changed global trade
(36:31) Who will win in the new trade settings?
(41:20) What could a U.S-China trade deal look like?
Ryan's links:
Flexport https://www.flexport.com/
Twitter/X https://x.com/typesfast
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rpetersen/
Azeem's links:
Substack: https://www.exponentialview.co/
Website: https://www.azeemazhar.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/azhar
Twitter/X: https://x.com/azeem
Our new show
This was originally recorded for "Friday with Azeem Azhar", a new show that takes place every Friday at 9am PT and 12pm ET. You can tune in through my Substack linked below. The format is experimental and we'd love your feedback, so feel free to comment or email your thoughts to our team at live@exponentialview.co.
Produced by supermix.io and EPIIPLUS1 Ltd
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
