Eric Porres is Rewiring Logitech’s Org for the AI Age. First; he trained 800 people himself.

3 Apr 2025 · 56 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Beyond The Prompt - Eric Porres is Rewiring Logitech’s Org for the AI Age

Episode Description: In this episode, Eric Porres, Global Head of AI at Logitech, discusses his efforts to transform a 7,000-person company into an AI-fluent organization. From personally training over 800 colleagues in his first 100 days to building a culture of "augmented intelligence," Eric lays out a human-centered AI strategy. He emphasizes the importance of interaction with AI, the rise of agentic AI, and how to measure its impact effectively.

---

Key Takeaways

  1. AI Fluency Starts with Behavior:
  2. Emphasizes teaching employees to think differently about AI instead of just using tools.
  3. Focus on measuring conversation depth and rewriting prompt habits for behavioral change.
  1. Grassroots Training:
  2. Eric trained over 800 colleagues, which built internal momentum for company-wide transformation.
  3. Identifying “quiet champions” within teams helped drive broader AI adoption.
  1. User Experience over Model Selection:
  2. Success with AI depends more on how employees interact with the AI rather than the specific model used.
  3. Logitech focuses on creating intuitive, user-friendly AI experiences.
  1. From Individual Fluency to Agentic Teams:
  2. Envisions a future where employees work alongside custom AI agents, focusing on what tasks to delegate to AI.
  3. The need for a shift from mere prompt mastery to managing AI-augmented teams.

---

Detailed Discussion Points

Intro to Eric Porres

  • Eric's background and how he became the Global Head of AI at Logitech.
  • Overview of his goals for the first 100 days.

First 100 Days of AI Leadership

  • Focused on instrumentation (measuring usage) and orchestration (aligning AI efforts across teams).
  • Conducted a GenAI survey to understand AI usage and establish a benchmark for future improvements.

Measuring AI Adoption

  • Eric discusses the need to measure not just quantity but quality of AI usage.
  • Importance of surveying employees about their AI experiences and how they are using it.

Training and Empowerment

  • Details on how Eric trained colleagues and the approach he took to educate them on AI.
  • Emphasis on the need for ongoing, evolving training programs.

Scaling AI Across Teams

  • Discussion of the need for equitable AI access across diverse teams.
  • Importance of selecting the right tools to facilitate AI integration into various workflows.

Measuring Success

  • Success metrics include Net Promoter Score (NPS), feedback, usage data, and the development of AI champions.
  • Approach to understanding the effectiveness of AI tools being used within the company.

The Rise of AI Champions

  • Eric describes identifying and nurturing champions who can teach others about AI.
  • The criteria for maintaining champion status includes providing value through teaching and sharing knowledge.

Future of Work and Agentic AI

  • Conversations about the potential for employees to work with AI agents.
  • How this shift could redefine roles within the organization and the importance of managing AI relationships effectively.

Building the Right Interface

  • The need for AI tools to be user-friendly and meet employees where they are.
  • Importance of creating a supportive interface and library of prompts tailored to different workflows.

Personal Knowledge Management

  • Eric shares how he manages his knowledge using tools like NotebookLM for research and prompt development.
  • Encourages individuals to develop their personal knowledge bases to leverage in future AI interactions.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

  • Emphasizes the collaborative nature of AI learning and the importance of continuous improvement and adaptation.
  • Encourages listeners to experiment with AI and refine their approaches based on real-time feedback.

---

Key Quotes

  • "AI fluency starts with behavior, not just tools."
  • "It’s not about which model you use; it’s about how you interact with it."
  • "Teaching is the best teacher. If you can teach it, you understand it."

---

Additional Resources

  • Eric Porres LinkedIn: [Eric Porres | LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/eporres/)
  • Logitech Official Site: [logitech.com](https://www.logitech.com/)
  • NotebookLM Dashboard Example: [NotebookLM Dashboard](https://drive.google.com/file/d/14EZrWNmvVUscZkWLLldAOGgw10fWxT1Y/view?usp=sharing)

---

Listen to the full episode: [Beyond The Prompt Episode](https://podcast.beyondtheprompt.ai/episodes/eric-porres-trained-800-people-himself-now-hes-rewiring-logitechs-brain-for-the-ai-age/transcript)

This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in practical strategies for AI adoption at scale.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00And the first tip I use in that is say, okay, how can you use AI to improve itself? And this is an example of, you know, I can't tell you both internally and externally how many times if I do, okay, hey, everybody here, show of hands, before you submit the prompt, submit the prompt to AI to make it better. Like AI knows better than you do how it's going to interact with these words you are about to give it. Hi, I'm Eric Kores, the head of global AI for Logitech. I'm super excited to be here today with Jeremy and with Heinrich to talk about what is it like to be head of global AI for the first 100 days at Logitech and how I hope to enable my knowledge working colleagues to become augmented intelligence superstars.

0:46So you're appointed head of AI. Imagine one is appointed head of AI at Logitech. Imagine that. What do you do? What do the first 100 days look like, Eric? Ah, Jeremy, so, you know, great question. So first, you know, of course, thanks for having me on with you guys. It's great to see both of you. So what do you do in the first hundred days? You hold on to your ejection seat and you say, all right, I'm going to ride this thing out as far as I can. No, I'm kidding, of course. First 100 days is, I would say, a lot about instrumentation and then orchestration. And what I mean by that is, you know, like the old adage is true.

1:25You can't manage what you don't measure. And so, you know, AI has existed in its in various guises and iterations at Logitech for a very, very long time. It's existed in hardware. It's existed in software. It's even existed internally with what we do with how we interrogate our own data. But I would say it's also been, Jeremy, somewhat of a disaggregated set of individuals that work within specific capacities. And so at a certain point, we said, you know what? Rather than it be perhaps 1 % of 100 people's time to think holistically and horizontally around the organization, maybe it makes sense.

2:06It probably does make sense to provide some kind of center of excellence, some gravity, a gravity well around bringing all of what we do and thinking about AI together. So within those first hundred days, really within the first 30 days, I said, OK, great. What do I need to do? I need to figure out for the individual, so of this roughly 7 ,000 of us that work around the globe, how are individuals like myself, knowledge workers, using or not AI within their own capacity to be augmented intelligent people, right? So I think a lot about AI, right? You can have, I think, and even Jeremy, maybe you said in one of your recent articles, right?

2:47Like there's average intelligence, there's aspirational intelligence, and then there's augmented intelligence. I would like to be in a place in which the mark I leave at Logitech a year from now or two years from now is in which all 7 ,000 of us are operating at this augmented intelligence basis, but we need to benchmark. We need to get there somewhere at the beginning. So the first benchmark was let's do a state of Gen.AI, as an example, state of Gen.AI survey across the entire company to understand where our strengths and weaknesses are and then how we can get better. And also for me personally, professionally to say, OK, Jeremy, six months from now, a year from now, have we moved those markers?

3:27What is the NPS on our use of generated AI? Right. And so what was that? Was that a questionnaire or was that like, you know, you looking into Enterprise ChatGPT and see how many sessions? Well, what was kind of like some of the things that you were measuring? So it started with a survey and the survey look at in previous lives and iterations. I have built research and insights practices at the four different companies in which I was a CMO. oh, so the practice of research is not foreign to me. And so it started with a survey, but it was enhanced with, we also have usage information of our own instances of AI.

4:11So in that case, to your point, we have something that we call internally Logi AI, in which we have built similar to, I think, early Moderna days when they had their MCHAT prior to moving to OpenAI or GPT Enterprise. they built their own way in which they could bring in different models. I love that for a variety of reasons, but that also gave me an ability to look, of course, on an anonymous basis, what is the usage of our own systems? Are we using it in that way? Go ahead, Jeremy. Can we talk, I'm just digging into that idea of survey usage. One thing that's always curious me, and this is somewhat ironic, I know coming from the IdeaFlow guy, and most of the time I'm talking about more is better.

4:58When it comes to AI, I don't think more is better. I think better is better. And what I mean by that is more usage doesn't necessarily mean better usage, right? It could be more average use, which is probably actually not better than just humans without augmentation. Can you talk for a second about how you evaluate quality? Are you able to evaluate quality? Because I imagine like self-reported survey and certainly usage data would give you kind of a quantity measure, but probably wouldn't tell you much about the quality of folks' interactions with LLMs. Yep. So it reminds me. So my high school band teacher, Ken Pollitt, if he's out there, I'll send this podcast to him still alive.

5:37And he used to say, you know, practice makes perfect, but it also makes permanent. And so, you know, to your point, it's like you could be doing the same thing over and over again. But if you're starting from the wrong seed knowledge or kernel, it can be completely off. So give you one example of that. And let me take a step back. Prior to doing that survey, I also had over the last year prior to taking this role, an opportunity to teach, which something hopefully shifts. Jeremy, you'd appreciate, teach about 800 of my fellow colleagues how to master generative AI. And the first tip I use in that is say, OK, how can you use AI to improve itself?

6:20And this is an example of, you know, I can't tell you both internally and externally how many times if I do. OK, hey, everybody here, show of hands before you submit the prompt, submit the prompt to AI to make it better. Like AI knows better than you do how it's going to interact with these words you are about to give it. Do you mean like, hey, hey, chat GPT, I'm trying to do this. And here's the prompt that I wrote. Can you give me feedback on the prompt before I asked chat GPT what I was going to ask chat GPT? That's exactly right. And whether it be GPT or Claude or Gemini, it doesn't matter what model you work with in that way.

6:54They all work or they all will give you that kind of feedback. And that's also the other thing I do where I have a, I don't have it on my computer anymore. But the other thing I encourage people to do is I always say, put a sticky, put a post-it note on your computer and saying, ask AI. And ask AI really applies to everything. So, Jeremy, back to your question. So from teaching and training 800 people, I could understand qualitatively where some of the gaps were based on those conversations and Q &As in Zoom sessions and in-person sessions, number one. Number two, if we looked at some of the prompt history, we could say, OK, are people using some concept of context, task and output?

7:37Right. If we think about the basics of role, context, task, output, depending on which framework you use around prompts or a light prompt engineering to understand whether are people doing that. And also, are we looking at it in terms of depth of prompt? So I'm not looking at anybody other than my own, the kinds of prompts that I'm able to look at. And I have a full spectrum analysis into my prompts. But what we can look at on a history basis saying, okay, what is the average depth of prompt? Okay. And if the average person is prompting, you know, 2.7 chats per conversation or so, that's saying to me, that's giving me some qualitative, that's quantitative and qualitative estimate to say, okay, the conversations aren't that deep.

8:18And then I look at the survey and I say, okay, hey, we're doing a lot of the survey comes back and say, hey, love AI, generative AI for content writing, summarization, drafting emails or whatnot. Okay, that's good. That's like AI curious. And now I want you to get AI fluent. So that's the transition. I think part of the transition for us is going from curiosity to fluency. I love the, even the simple heuristic of how many interactions are in the conversation. Cause I think anybody could acknowledge in a human conversation, if folks looked at our transcript and there's only one person talking the whole time, say what you will about what a good production is.

8:55It would not be a good conversation, right? There's a back and forth. And I think even that simple heuristic, Eric, I just wanted to call that out of just look at how many interactions are you having? If you're not having a vibrant back and forth, it's not a conversation. And we know by now, of course, that the more people know about using AI, the more they use it as a conversation instead of just as a prompt. And so I think that's a good point. I was just going to say to that point, look, and it's nobody's fault in the sense that for the last 20 plus years, we have been taught by Google and to a lesser extent Bing and those of us who are old enough with enough gray hair, you know, Altavista, Lycos, others, to we have a search.

9:34We ask one question. we get back a sea of blue links and then we get our answer or we get our answer maybe we go into one deeper inquiry then we go back to that same one question we don't go that heuristic of going from one question to two to three it's not something as a human behavior species we have necessarily been trained to do so it's not necessarily a surprise that prompts tend to be short and they tend to be not a mile, you know, a mile wide and an inch deep in that way. So that's behavior change. Before we go back to, because I would obviously love to learn more about like how to master AI, the training stuff, and then kind of what you did after that you measured kind of like the state of the union.

10:19Were there anything that you're surprised by when you got the survey back? And the reason why I ask is because some of the companies I'm involved in, I'm always kind of like a little bit puzzled why suddenly, for example, at BarkBox, the logistics team is just incredibly deep in AI. And there's no real reason why they should be more into it than another team. Did you see any kind of like patents that kind of stood up as you were reviewing the surveys? Well, yeah. So it's funny you mentioned that. So I looked at the survey ahead of this call to say, okay, what were some of the challenges? And so from the survey, we saw that 96 % of employees or my colleagues have engaged with AI in some way.

11:03Now we could talk about, okay, the level of depth and whatnot. So it's not like it hasn't, again, going from this curiosity to fluency. But what I would say is that there was uncertainty in terms of how AI may fit into specific job functions. And that is a function of maturity of AI going beyond this very podcast, beyond the prompt, going beyond this curiosity into, okay, can I take an op variance report, for instance, if I'm part of the finance team, can I interrogate my data in a way that historically I've done using human grunt work, grudge work, and a bunch of macros in Excel. And so bridging that gap between AI and theory should be as simple as search, as simple as these tools that we've used for decades.

11:55That's where I think there is that maturity curve. It still needs work. So the biggest surprise is, again, going from curiosity to fluency. But Henrik, to your point, I would bet that that team that you described, there was at least one person in that team who was an AI champion. Someone who was curious early on, started to go deep and then said, hey, it is my responsibility as a good colleague to start bringing my team into the mix and into the conversation. And that's what I found, again, from training and talking to over 800 people, almost on a one-to-one basis in the last year, there are absolutely champions in every part of the organization.

12:34But sometimes those champions are quiet champions because of either personality or workflow, or they work in a different office. And so the more we're able to expose those champions, the more we're able to matriculate the, or have the information trickle down as well as trickle up. Does that make sense? A ton of sense. And obviously it raises a lot of questions. Should we just, before we go down that track, stay a little bit with the how to master? And obviously, I think everybody who is involved with trying to figure out how to upgrade their company's abilities to speak AI is kind of like trying to grapple with that specific question, right?

13:16Let's just start with kind of just what you were teaching people. Did you simply set up like, you know, webinars and kind of like saying, hey, you know, next week, Eric is going to teach how we prompt better and do like kind of like the basics? Or could you tell a bit more about? No, absolutely. Absolutely. So the journey inward, you know, my journey toward AI started really 13 years ago when I got to work with the founder of Rocket Fuel, which was a martech company back in the day. He was a classmate of Sergey and Larry. He was an AI PhD, turned down the job to be employee number four at Google, but like he did okay in the end.

13:57His name is George John. George, if you're out there, George Shunt, PhD, and had one of the most cited research papers in the world around AI. So if you fast forward from 2012 to now 2024, now we have folks like Section, I know what you were part of, you know, Sections now created their AI mini MBA course. So I took the AI mini MBA course a year ago, and I said, or over a year ago, and I said, wow, this information is incredible. and the capstone course of sections mini MBA is one in which they ask you, okay, how would you apply basically, you know, what's your thesis? How would you apply what you just learned to something that you're doing at work?

14:38And so my original thought to do that was, okay, I'm going to do this for product management. How do I, like very tactical, how do I prioritize product and program management for the function that I was part of at the time. But then I slept on it. And then overnight, I had this epiphany, which was, hey, wait a second. If the goal is to bring, if I've just been brought into the AI class or have refined my techniques as being part of the AI class, people are literate in terms of have a faculty and fealty with AI, maybe what I can do is take this thousand slides worth of content and great, great teachers of which I would include.

15:21Hi, Rick, what you're doing and Jeremy, what you're doing in terms of this podcast and boil that down into something that would be digestible for the knowledge workers that I get to work with. And so it totally shifted my approach. And I said, Hey, I want to take on the role of AI conciliary within the organization because I'm one of the few people that have had both the history in terms of making AI explainable and also the practical applications of AI to be able to do that. So then that created for me a way in which I could say, yeah, you know what, I'm just going to start presenting to teams because I know they have the need for this.

15:59I've been asked about it through the tea leaves. People are asking me about, hey, can you help me with this? Hey, I've heard that you just did this course. Hey, I've done X, Y, Z. So that's really where the journey began in terms of journeying inward organizationally. And then over that time, over the course of eight months and 800 people and, I don't know, 24 different courses taught, I came up with my presentation now is one slide. And it's one slide with 10 tips. And those 10 tips are something that I can spend two hours chatting with different teams about. And the first tip, as I described, was use AI to improve itself.

16:37Before submitting a prompt, ask AI to improve the prompt with you as part of your first effort to collaborate with AI. That's fascinating. I think everybody who have had the role of kind of like inspiring an organization or get them going, you can have done some of that. My 10 wasn't 10 tips. It was 20 things that I used AI for the last two weeks. And it just was like this kind of rapid fire of just use cases. you know, anything from kind of like writing a investor report to talking through a difficult meeting to writing a good night story for my kids. But also like it just prompts kind of like people's brain to go, hey, wait a minute, can you use it for that?

17:15And I also really like, just want to point that out. I think there's something very interesting in this idea of using, wouldn't call it almost like SWAC to try to get into people's daily habit. Obviously, you're an expert in habit building. So maybe you could talk a little bit more about that. But I was just thinking, everybody should simply go around and put those posters on people's laptops, right? You know, all confused. Oh, no, 100%. When I visit an office, that's what I do. And one of the nicest ways that people have ever sort of thanked me for the training was I've had people send me pictures of their computer with an Ask AI next to their Logitech camera.

17:57But to your point, Henrik, that I should bring up that, yes, it is 10 tips, but the 10 tips are me working side by side with one of the multiple generative AI models that we have available to us. Okay, now let's take this tip. Let's, hey, Henrik, what's something you're thinking about today? Okay, I'm thinking about my kids in a story. Okay, great. Let's do that in real time. Let's write that prompt. And now before we submit it, let's use AI to improve itself. What is one of the other tips, just so we get a little bit of flavor? Oh, sure. So prompts can be preposterously long and that's okay. So I think, again, this mindset of how do I transition from search to JetAI and what I'll do with the prompts can be preposterously long.

18:43The first thing I'll share is Anthropic posts their system prompt, right? They will make an update to their system prompt. And the system prompt is about 4 ,500 words long. And when you think about like, it's a parenthetical expression, You have system prompt, then you may have your custom instructions, then you have your actual prompt itself. And you're looking at like, wow, that is a super long prompt. No wonder it feels so human, where I'd say it's kind of like, you know, anthropic to your Claude feels like they've got a PhD in cultural anthropology. GPT is more like, you know, the MBA student.

19:18Both are good and they have different reasons. They have different ways in which they communicate with you. So that the fact that prompts can be that long and you can provide that much context is what I use for that's tip number two. And maybe by the end of this, we'll get through all we can get through all 10 tips if you like. So then I use an example, Henrik, of, OK, now if I want to do something that is deep research oriented, I have created a one shot prompt that is seven steps long, about two pages worth of content to share with people and say, wow, that starts to get everybody's cylinders.

19:52as far as like, oh, I need to think about this. I need to treat this differently. I need to treat this way of interacting differently than perhaps I was doing initially. So you've done, you conducted these 24 sessions, 800 colleagues, and then one, how does transition to head of AI happen? And two, given that you've had those experiences, how do they inform this new transition? So, well, let me go back to the first question. And I would say to a certain degree, and you and I both have our mutual friend, Philippe de Pollins at Logitech, who really gave me the opportunity not only to take on my day job of managing our personal workspace, our services portfolio as part of the knowledge worker and how do we help ourselves with software and services, but then also take on the secondary role of AI educator.

20:46And as we started to mature, I'll call it our own AI maturity curve internally, it goes back to what I said before, which was rather than have AI as part of each individual's, multiple individual's responsibilities, does it now make sense really to bring that role into at least one person? I'm not saying I'm not the only person at Logitech that has an AI remit. I happen to have a remit that is really responsible at the moment, I'd say the first six months. So instead of first hundred days, the first 300 days of upskilling, upleveling ourselves related to, again, this notion of augmented intelligence where everybody can feel very comfortable that they can ask AI and they can have a conversation with AI and they can get the most out of their experience.

21:39experience of AI. So it was a natural transition for me, Jeremy, to go from educator plus my experience over 12 years of thinking, doing, learning, understanding AI, plus my personal experience. I did this again, just before the session, I downloaded my GPT history and which is hopefully everybody knows you can do that and go to your personalization settings and you can download the entire archive of your entire history with chat GPT as an example. So I did that. And it turned out that I had done over the last two years, 9 ,736. There were 9 ,736 conversations. It was about 2 ,000 pages of written work that I've co-collaborated with and by 1.7 million words worth of conversations with AI.

22:29And then if you go back to the habit book, and then I said, okay, Atomic Habits is about 80 ,000 words long. So I've done about, you know, 20, I've written about 20 books worth of generative AI and had that experience over the course of two years. So there's a certain faculty there that is maybe a higher than, you know, higher than average in that way. Is it accurate then to just to kind of recap back to what you said that the way your training, call it 800 people at Logitech, informs your go forward as head of AI is I know this is the first step. and now I'm scaling up my upscaling efforts and they are anointed or they're knighted efforts now instead of being a covert operation or like a secondary job.

23:16Now my actual full-time job is to scale up this thing that I already started doing on a part-time moonlighting basis. Yeah, I think that's a good way to describe it. And what I would say there too is, right? Like we have Logi AI, our own internal instance where we're calling in an API way the different models. So one great thing about working at Logitech is that we haven't standardized on one model. So everybody right now has a model playground to work with. They can work with Gemini. They can work with ChatGPT. They can work with Claude and any other model we may choose to introduce. And so that was a real, a great light bulb moment for everyone to say like, wow, like many companies, as you know, I've standardized on one.

24:03It doesn't mean you don't do it on your own personally. On your own time, you might work with others. Glog, perplexity, take your pick of Storm, Consensus, Poe, some of the other micro models that exist or micro ways in which you work. But what did that tell me, Jeremy? It told me that when I looked at our own instance of Loggi AI, it was behind VPN. And for, at the time, a good set of reasons. B, it was stood up by our engineering team that didn't have any real, not a strong UI UX component to it. So I said, okay, in order for us to flourish, one of the first things I need to do is figure out the right structurally and working with our product security team, et cetera, to bring AI to where people are, as opposed to trying to create too many gates to get there.

24:54Because otherwise what you wind up with, as you know, is like a shadow IT organization or shadow AI, where people are doing it on their own, which is not good. We have to be responsible individuals in terms of our own data and proprietary data that we have. You have to read people. Is that working all the way into Slack or Teams or whatever kind of software are they already using or completely passive agents that kind of roams? How do you think about the interface between your organization and AI? Yeah, great question, Heinrich. So step one is meeting people where they are in terms of their, how they operate with Gen AI.

25:35And so that means how do we create an interface that really looks and feels more like the best of GPT, Claude, and Gemini? Because each one of them, right? It's like you can have the greatest tool in the world, but if it's in a cave, you know, maybe we would have discovered Fire sooner. It was stuck in a cave somewhere, you know, out of the Peking Man 500 ,000 years ago, maybe it was a million years ago. And so to that extent, it almost doesn't matter what the model is. It's about creating a beautiful and intuitive user experience that in which people can feel as comfortable as they are using our version of AI as they are with any of the other models, number one.

26:16Um, number two is then how do we create an environment in which people have a prompt library or a style library, right? Depending on the team that you're part of, you may need to speak in using Logitech's authentic brand voice. What are the ways in which we can help you, uh, adapt your voice into that brand voice and forgive you templates. So that was another key learning by based on speaking with lots of people is okay. how a marketing team in our business group converses or creates content will be different than that person that I described before in operations or finance, who will be different than that person in product management.

26:59And who will also be different than developers who typically will use or are very often over-indexed in terms of their use for a code review. So each one of them has their own modality. And then we've created the ability for them to instantiate those personas within how they interact with AI automatically. I'm just thinking about the breadth there. I mean, you just described so many different roles, so many different functions as you, and it sounds like, correct me if I'm wrong, it sounds like you were kind of near term. You said one or two, your goal is 100 % of people proficient. So 7 ,000 employees, fluent, you're, you know, from, from average to aspirational.

27:38So how do you measure that? How do you know if you achieve your goal? Like, what are you actually looking at in terms of the outcome variable to know in two years? Has Eric Perez been successful in achieving the goal? Like, what are you even measuring to know? Sure. So, so I'll measure it in across three or four different ways. One, I'll measure it based on NPS as it relates to how likely are you to recommend Slogi AI or whatever it might be called in the future to, to a friend or colleague. because that tells me, and I have a baseline now, and I know whether the tooling and the instrumentation that we've developed for, on behalf of our colleagues, has been successful by measuring that.

Read the full transcript

28:17And not only measuring that, Jeremy, as you know, but it's also, what was the reason for your answer? So that's super important, right? For instance, when we think about our teams in China and in the Far East, they do need access to different, I'll call it non-Western standard models. And so that's something we're exploring right now. How do we safely, in a privacy and security friendly way, enable, whether it be Quinn from Alibab or DeepSeek or any of the other models that exist, how do we give them the right kind of model playground such that they can work more effectively, collaborate more effectively, specifically in those markets?

28:59It's what you're saying there that that you can't, if you're measuring NPS as one outcome variable, and you said, what's the reason for the answer? You can't expect folks who don't have access to the best tools to have a great experience. And so part of your job is to make sure that everyone has access to the best tools so that you know that your NPS is a reliable measure. Yeah, but also the best tools for them, it sounds like, which I think is actually an interesting observation that, right. Well, no, yeah, that's absolutely right, right? Like what might be right for you may not be right for some, depending again on the use case.

29:31So in the case of even now, when you use as an individual, personally, in your own personal time, right? Like there are different file formats as a simple example, right? There are different file formats that GPT does a great job of that Claude doesn't yet need. And similarly, there are certain files that Claude does, I would say, a better job of either OCR recognition or image interpretation or code that it will do well, that others don't. So that's like the point of meeting people where they are based on that need state and providing the right model for associated with the goal, number one. I would just suggest there, Eric, insofar as you're measuring NPS, I think another great measure and perhaps even better if I, my understanding of kind of product market fit measures and things like that is instead of asking for an NPS, ask how disappointed would you be if you no longer had access to this tool?

30:24Yeah, that's a great question. That's something we ask as the other part of the software portfolio that I have in Smart Habits is we ask the exact question and we say, okay, you know, we know that 96 % of people in that particular example, 96 % of people would be super disappointed if it didn't exist anymore. So that is a great question. Jeremy, it's a great reminder. Thank you, because that's something we'll do. I want to do this tracking study every six months. People can give us feedback whenever they want. And something we will introduce, Heinrich, to your question and Jeremy to yours as well, the thumbs up, thumbs down in terms of conversation response, that will be measuring us.

31:05And then that is to say, okay, if I have a conversation in Logi AI, was it thumbs up? Was it net effective? Did it give me some kind of value or was it meh or was it really great? Again, that's not something else we're measuring now. You can get thumbs up and thumbs down in your commercial versions of GPT, for instance, but that's going back to them. That's not going back to us saying, okay, can we get that? And that's available to us at any time. So I would say you have a set, there's a combination of quantitative metrics as well as qualitative. So what I described before in terms of qualitative, now let's look at conversation depth.

31:46Let's look at conversation, the average prompt. Let's look at how many assistants have been created today and how many assistants will be created six months from now versus a year from now. Let's look at the usage of those assistants. Let's look at the champions in which every time I now now I know who my champions are because they had given me permission from the survey to say, yes, I'm an advanced user. Yes, these are the things I'd like to see better. Yes, this is why I love or hate Logi AI or G Suite. Yes, I'm proud to be, or I'm actually ready to be an AI champion within Logitech. Can you talk a little bit more about the champions?

32:28Because Bryce from Moderna mentioned that he had 100 champions and that it's kind of a fixed group. And basically, if you don't do the job of an ambassador, you're going to like, you fall out of the group, which I thought was interesting. And that's something that we've adopted a BarkBox and I've heard other people have success with. could talk a little bit more about like, how do you serve your ambassadors so they can serve the rest of the thousands of Logitech employees? Right. So it's the teach, tailor, take control. So right now, to be fair, in terms of our journey, I think I have a pretty good sense of who those ambassadors are in terms of the actual rolling out of the champions program.

33:07It's still very much in development, which is great because yes, I am speaking with Bryce about, okay, what did you learn about that experience. Henrik, as a separate conversation, love to interview you about what worked as well. But I find that in my case, I studied martial art for over 20 years, ninjutsu, and I got to be pretty good at it. I got my fifth dan license in 2004. And that said, okay, Eric, you are now knighted, as Jeremy said, by the grandmaster of the art to be someone who can then pass on the art to others. And what I found in that experience is that, right, teaching is the best teacher.

33:46And so from like, do you really understand your stuff? Can you actually effectively teach something to me that either I didn't know before or I had to unlearn and relearn? And that's so like prompting as an example is a skill that people often have to unlearn and relearn because of the sort of going from search degenerative AI. And so one of my markers in terms of ambassadors will be, okay, I want you to be able to teach to me and to a cohort of other people I've identified as super users and to help us understand how comfortable you are with the material you have, how you're teaching people, and then what are the key takeaways that they can then use as part of their every day.

34:25And that's one of the metrics by which we will keep or move ambassadors in and out. Because look, people are busy, right? Like you get assigned a new project, you have a new child at home, you have other responsibilities. So I don't think the expectation is that ambassadors necessarily need to be there all the time and that they should be able to have the right to rotate. Assume the tips, you know, get 100 % penetration, right? You get 100 % adoption, fluency throughout the organization. Have you thought about what's beyond fluency? No, to go from from fluency to mastery. So so what I would say, you know, beyond fluency, right?

35:03Like we know that the agentic future is upon us. Now, how people define agents like Mark Benioff has a definition of the agentic future. He is pivoted wholesale pivoted Salesforce toward like whether he was meditating in Hawaii or something like he has made a super commitment. And I've talked to some other people at Salesforce who've been there for a long time. And they said, look, we've never seen a company pivot this fast and as focused toward the agentic future as they have with Mark making that mandate. And so likewise, we have to think about, you know, to your point, Jeremy, where I will no longer a year from now or two years from now, if we do this right, I will no longer be working solely as a human knowledge worker.

35:50I will have a agent or set of agents that I will be responsible for. And my AI fluency will be one in which I can, as the human, right, human as the instigator, human as the judge, I will understand what tasks and what projects I can safely and effectively delegate to my agent workforce and which ones require the full scale of my intellectual attention. So I think that is one of the markers that go beyond, beyond Cluency. How do I work with Gen AI myself on a day-to-day basis? The next generation of that is how do I work with agents on a day-to-day basis and manage the team effectively? Can I just ask you to double click a little bit of that?

36:37Because I obviously agree. And I think there is these two worlds emergence. There's the ones who's very advanced with AI and we kind of talk about agents and stuff like that, as in like, you know, that is about to happen. And we already have like a bunch of agents that we use on a daily basis and what have you. And then I think there's the realities of most organizations are still just having the conversation. Should we use AI or not? So there's like this huge gap. And then obviously there's like all the shades in the middle. I find it complicated to help people think about how to atomize the work that they do and then productize whatever it is, is the output of their now the current day to day job.

37:22And then even think about how to kind of like productize that as an agent. Now, you being somebody who understands product really well, I'm sure you kind of do that intuitively. but have you thought about how best to teach people how to kind of think about this kind of like journey that they as you say is kind of about to go on where they will see themselves like not working themselves out of a job to somebody else but working themselves out of their current job by having agents doing some of the more kind of like the laborious versions of what they do? Well, yeah, so good question. So, all right, so 10 years ago or 12 years ago, you know, at Rocket Fuel, we would say, you know, free yourself from the tyranny of the grunt work, grudge work, and guesswork associated with the manual optimization of advertising campaigns and liberate yourself to do the most inspiring and insightful work of your careers.

38:16So what do you do right now, which is grunt work, grudge work, and guesswork, and how do you get to a place in which you can be, you know, be inspired, you know, do things inspirational and insightful. And when I think about that, I then think about like, where is AI great and where can AI actually accelerate dysfunction? And I think about that across these three vectors. And this is, I have to thank Greg Shubb specifically for giving me this mental model, which is, and I wish I had my soda can here to do it, but it's do the do, which is Mountain Dew, DEW, data, expertise, and workflow. So is your data structured or unstructured?

38:56Is it garbage? Is your data polluted or not? Expertise is a combination of what is you, the human, what is the expertise that you are known for? What is the, like, why do you come to work every day? Why do you get paid to do what you do? And then workflow, you could substitute the word workflow for process as well. What are workflows that are part of your, and I think this partly gets to your question, what are the workflows that are part of your daily existence? Have you done the audit of your workflow? And therefore, can you atomize that workflow into digestible chunks that AI might be able to take over for you?

39:31For example, if I think about back in my day, when I had fewer gray hairs, I think about the SDR function as an example, right? So, you know, sales development represented inside sales for those it's referred to for the listeners, SDR, BDR. And I think about what an SDR has to do. And I think about whether some of the workflows that are part of correspondence with a prospect, right? So marketing, in theory, marketing has done their job to heat up a lead to in which a place in which it's qualified. There's some MQL, there's some way in which that lead has been qualified. They've downloaded a white paper, or they've read two reports, or they've configured, in our case, in Logitech's case, They've configured a room that they're interested in.

40:13Okay, great. The historical way in which SDRs operate is one of which, okay, there's a human being, there's a young person, right? Young graduate whose name could be Max. And Max goes in and says, hey, you know, I just saw you downloaded this thing. Would you be interested, like, to try to qualify that lead further? And whether that qualification is, right, band, budget, authority, need, timing, smart, take your pick of qualification, it doesn't really matter. Some of those qualification levers can now be offloaded, I believe, to agents that exist. Salesforce is one company that's offering this agentic model of SDR engagement, and there are others.

40:52So can I give that process? As a human being, do I necessarily need to be doing bank qualification in that way? Or is that a process that I can offload to an SDR agent? Absolutely. Do I still need the human in the loop to think about what is the way in which I can create this rad knowledge base, the right kind of knowledge base, and then structure those communications effectively and the workflow and periodically audit those conversations and the engagement rate of those leads before they go from leads to prospect to actual business? Sure. But I don't necessarily need to be that human that does every step of that qualification.

41:32And that's a great place where SDR agents could be very helpful. Similarly with customer service, like we've seen it, you know, everybody here. In fact, there was just that piece that was done that I saw on LinkedIn yesterday, which was two agents realized they were speaking with each other. And they switched how they started to communicate into a higher frequency language that the computers could understand faster than if humans were having that conversation together. I kind of like tracked that down. It was fascinating. but according to um you know like deep research done on reddit apparently it it was programmed to do that and so they didn't actually like self-discover that they didn't self-discover right no it wasn't self-discovered they did reverse they reverted yeah yeah but but it was fascinating and obviously the concept is is certainly something that that could and will happen and i think so like in in my case i would like to build an agent now right you can imagine as one becomes, you know, knighted head of AI, the influx of unsolicited requests for, hey, have you thought about this ML machine learning operations?

42:42Like the influx has increased exponentially, right? We're in the age of exponential growth. Because I'm still so new into the role, I cannot possibly answer these people. So what I would love to have is I would love to be able to build an agent for myself that says, that queries me periodically and say, okay, hey, Eric, what are you in market for? What are you not in market for? And then stand up an agent to be able to respond to those inquiries and say, look, not interested now, call me back in three months, six months, five months, et cetera, such that I have a curated experience and I can actually help those SDRs, whether they be agents or humans, do a better job of managing their pipeline.

43:25One question I have on, and this might be pretty nerdy, but as we are looking at atomizing and age-emphasizing ourselves and we use the do model, data for a company becomes clearer, right? We have different organizations have different kind of data and some of it can kind of become unique. And some of them, it is unique to them and some of them, it's not. But as an individual, let's say that you just work in the marketing team and you think about data for you as an individual. You mentioned one earlier, it was obviously the data source, which is like all your interactions that you had with ChatGPT over the last two years, which is now like a repository that you can make into a Rack model.

44:04Do you have other kind of like things that you started to gather as data repository for you as an individual that can be useful? And I'm asking because I saw somebody who is now using Readwise a lot as being the repository for all the highlights they've done in Kindle books. And that now becomes kind of a database of something that say something about their interest that they can use. Do you have other kind of things that you use that you started to kind of like keep because you know you're going to use it for an agent at a later point? Yes. So notebook is what I use in no small part because when, for purposes of research.

44:46So I try and stay up. I try and read three or four or five research reports that come out per week, of which there are another 15 behind it that I'm interested in, but just don't have the time to read. Like, I don't know how Ethan Mollick sleeps, but, you know, I follow him pretty relatively. I don't think he does. And I think everyone should follow Ethan. He is an agent. You know that, right? Correct. case. Well, right. Cause Reid Hoffman actually has his age and his younger self that he's created that three-dimensional facsimile in him, which is super interesting and interesting to watch himself interview himself from 30 years ago.

45:21But anyway, so I use notebook as a repository of research information, both because again, I think I'm a reasonably curious person. So I'm curious about lots of things. I just don't have time to absorb all of them, but that curiosity, I would So that curiosity is the tip of the spear to say, okay, you know what, these five things I read and these 15 things I didn't read, that becomes part of a knowledge base for me. So what's the workflow there? Like, is there literally like, do you have a workflow built in your mind? Like if somebody sends you a research report, you tag it and immediately send it to Notebook.

45:56And then at the end of the week, you have like a time blocked on your calendar to ask Notebook, what are the five biggest learning? I'm making it up, right? You're not making it up. That is exactly what I do. Every week I get whatever, however many pieces of research I tag, flag, I open it in, I may be opening it on my phone in Safari, and I go through all of my open tabs from the last week and I say, okay, that piece of research, I download it, I then upload it to a notebook, and then I get my 15 to 20 minute audio summary of that notebook every week that I then listen to, add or read the briefing document with the notebook as well.

46:29And then what I may do, Jeremy, is I may use that research or some of that research in the future to create assistance. So, for instance, I've created a prompt building before. Yes, you can use AI to improve itself. And you can also go instead of a mile deep based on the type of work that you do. So I think Heinrich, you had asked the question about the marketer. Right. So every piece of content that a marketer reads to become a better marketer potentially is part of that knowledge base. And it's just like Jeremy, like, OK, I don't know how many books you read last year. And I think somebody on this podcast said it from a couple of months ago, which is like, you can't possibly remember what was on page five of the fourth book that you there were the fourth book ago that you read.

47:17And LLM can. And so having that access to access to that information in a bespoke way becomes very, very powerful. This is killer. OK, is there anything that you feel like folks need to hear that, you know, that you haven't shared with us yet? uh so probably i i am still surprised by the individuals i speak with professionally and personally who have not fine-tuned custom instructions to give the llm of choice knowledge about themselves whether it be their work their career uh and the types of outputs they expect and jeremy you asked about like what is that habit like a habit that you a listener can do right now, if you haven't done it already, is download your LinkedIn profile, assuming that it's up to date.

48:11And then you can upload that profile to your LLM of choice and say, hey, help me create, what do you think would be an appropriate set of custom instructions that would be right for me in 2000 characters or less, which is generally like the, that's the default character size for many of these models, in particular GPT. And I promise, right, it's like the output, the pre and post, right? The pre-exposure, pre-custom instructions, post-custom instructions is dramatically different. Run the experiment. I think that's a cool thing is like, tell everybody, take a prompt, you know, maybe like a burning question you've got, put it in LLM pre-custom instructions, then do what Eric just described, which just TLDR, download your LinkedIn, upload it to TITPT and say, what should my custom instructions be based on my LinkedIn profile?

48:59And then upload that as custom instructions, then rerun the same exact prompt in a new window with your custom instructions and just compare the difference. I think if folks want to dig deeper into custom instructions, Dan Schipper actually went really deep in one of our early episodes. He calls them the secret power-up to change LLM. So I totally agree. Any other kind of big piece of advice you think are no-brainers that folks just have to know before they stop listening to you at least today? Sure. So fact Checking, right? You know, AI, it's still an overeager intern or an overeager PhD, MBA, depending on who pick, right?

49:32You know, I do believe that the large, the frontier models, it is the jagged frontier as Ethan Malek described a year and a half ago. Like, you know, the future is here. It's just unevenly distributed. And so our LLMs are so eager to please that they will tell you, sometimes they will tell you the information that you want to hear. And so this is some of the work I've been doing recently. and I know Jeremy, I shared this with you and also with Bryce is creating neurodivergent assistance that give you the opportunity to really instruct the LLM to counter its narrative of always being, always being the people pleaser, right?

50:11Eric, should we post a link to your psychedelic GPT? Would that be cool? Yeah. In the show notes. So folks, folks who don't know. So Eric and I got into something on LinkedIn recently where we were talking about, you You know, psychedelics have influenced the kind of creative potential of humans for a while. And that's like introducing a chemical. What could we do with language to effectively introduce a psychedelic to an LLM? Eric worked hard on building that. And we'll post a link to that GPT in the show notes if you want a psychedelic kind of mind bending LLM experience. That's so cool. I hadn't seen that.

50:44That's amazing. Thank you so much, Eric, for getting on. Jeremy Motley, what stood out to you? you know what what stood out to me this phrase i can't remember where it came from i feel like it came from a recent episode but we've had so many amazing conversations folks check out the back catalog that i can't even remember which one it is maybe henric will but is this idea of commissioning yourself do you remember where that came from no but i remember somebody said it but you remember that that vibe right there's that's a vibe there and i just i really like how eric Eric is, I mean, he's an incredible leader.

51:19He's an incredible entrepreneur. He's an experienced CMO. And now he's stepping into this super cool, super huge role at Logitech. And if you ask how did it happen, basically he commissioned himself. You know, he didn't, oh, it was in our conversation with Blair, the rabbit hole. And he talks about the same thing, right? Commissioning himself to do the Adidas ad. I think in the same way, Eric effectively commissioned himself by, you know, on a moonlighting basis, taking the responsibility to train 800 of his colleagues, mostly because of his own personal curiosity. Then when the question comes, who should be head of AI at Logitech?

51:56I mean, it's, how about the guy who's already taken the initiative to train 800 people? You know, how about we start there? To me, that's a really cool, like - And you know, look, that's probably a good thing. You know, like this is kind of also what happened at BarkBox, you know, we have the guy who runs AI is called Mikkel and that kind of happened. He used to run design before, but then he, you know, got the AI block and kind of spend most of the time talking to everybody else about it. And you know what? I was talking to a part equity friend the other day who was kind of asking, hey, I just got involved in this big company and we need to kind of upgrade their ability to do AI.

52:26How should I do it? Like, who should I hire, basically? And there is something interesting in the thought of like, do you hire somebody from inside who have already the ear and is somebody who kind of like can talk the Logitech language as it is for them? or do you get kind of like the hot shot from outside? And then is it somebody who understands technology or is it somebody who understands humans, which obviously is somebody with an experience as CMO is. And even if you take Bryce, who is not a technologist, but is one of the ones that we've spoken to that seem to have the best handle on how do you really push this throughout an organization.

53:02And so I think even like, who do you hire? How do you get hired? You know, like, is it inside and outside? It's kind of like an interesting conversation. Yeah, yeah, it's super cool. I love the shout outs to Bryce. I think if folks haven't listened to that episode, you really owe it to yourself to listen to our conversation with Bryce Shalomel, the head of AI at Moderna, who's just probably a little bit farther on this journey than Eric's on. Eric looks up to him as a hero and as a thought partner. And Bryce lays out a lot of his thinking in that conversation. You know, the other thing that I thought was just a really nice, simple takeaway is for anybody who's just getting started, using AI to improve your use of AI is kind of the meta trick that unlocks a lot of possibility.

53:40whether it's using AI to help you craft your customer instructions, like we heard from Dan, you know, now over a year ago, right? Eric mentioned that. Or whether it's even running a prompt through AI and saying, hey, I'm about to give this prompt. Could you seek to understand my intent and then give me feedback as to whether I framed this prompt well? How can I improve it? There's something about the kind of meta awareness that you, if you don't know how to use AI for something, you can actually ask AI and AI can teach you how to use itself or how to use it for your purposes in a better way. The final thing for me was like, we all feel that we are in a hurry to upgrade our own abilities and our company's abilities to use AI.

54:22And I think we hear these kind of success stories and see these videos and hear these anecdotes from other people. But it's nice even to hear from Eric that, you know, he's also in the beginning of this journey, right? And we are just figuring it out. And probably no organization has truly completely nailed this yet. And so what I actually like about the industry of AI, if you like right now, if you take it just like applied AI, not just building AI systems, is that there's kind of like a nice camaraderie in like everybody's just making shit up as they go along right now. And sharing, which is actually like a pretty nice kind of like, yeah, like nice space to be in.

55:05yeah i agree it's a privilege and i think the more that folks are sharing their experiences and um i love maybe the last thing i'll say and it's related to that point is thought that champions at loggy should be able to come back and teach him something new and teach the other champions something new as a criteria for their continued championness i thought was really great which one way of saying is there's an implicit humility there that he is not going to be the person who knows everything. And he's actually looking for people who are contributing to not only the group's collective knowledge, but his own understanding of the technology, I think is a really, really wonderful attitude to have for anybody who aspires to be their head of AI.

55:50And I think that's a good way to end it. So with that, thank you so much for listening to another episode of Beyond the Prompt. And obviously, if you enjoyed this episode, it will mean a lot to us if you can share it to somebody else on LinkedIn, or you could go in and like, subscribe, wherever you do. That's kind of like how this show gets exposed to more people. So that would mean a lot to us. So if you can do that, we'd much appreciate it. And then until next time, take care. Be good.

From the publisher

In this episode, Eric Porres, Global Head of AI at Logitech, shares how he’s working to turn a 7,000-person company into an AI-fluent organization. From running a GenAI survey to personally training 800+ colleagues in his first 100 days, Eric lays out the foundations of a practical, human-centered AI strategy.

He discusses building a culture of “augmented intelligence” through habits, champions, and clear frameworks—like prompt refinement, long-form instructions, and task-focused design. Looking ahead, Eric explores the rise of agentic AI, internal tools, and how to measure impact beyond usage metrics. A must-listen for anyone driving meaningful AI adoption at scale.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI Fluency Starts with Behaviour, Not Just Tools – Eric’s approach isn’t about pushing more AI - t’s about teaching people how to think differently. From measuring conversation depth to rewriting prompt habits, Logitech is focused on real behavioural change.
  • Train 800, Influence 7,000 – Before becoming Head of AI, Eric trained 800+ colleagues himself. That grassroots effort - combined with identifying “quiet champions” across teams- created the internal momentum for company-wide transformation.
  • Build the Right Interface, Not Just the Right Model – A powerful insight: it’s not which model you use, it’s how people interact with it. Logitech prioritized intuitive, user-friendly AI experiences to meet employees where they work.
  • From Individual Fluency to Agentic Teams –  Looking ahead, Eric envisions a world where employees work alongside custom AI agents. The future isn’t just prompt mastery - it’s knowing what to delegate, what to own, and how to manage an AI-augmented team.

LinkedIn: Eric Porres | LinkedIn
Logitech: logitech.com/
Eric's website: Porres
Psychedelic GPT: Trippin' The Chat Fantastic
These screenshots showcase how Eric Porres organizes AI research using NotebookLM, as discussed in the episode.
NotebookLM Dashboard: NotebookLM Dashboard - Eric Porres
NotebookLM Research: NotebookLM Research - March 9-15, 2025 

00:00 Intro to Eric Porres 
00:46 What the First 100 Days Look Like as Head of AI
01:51 Measuring AI Adoption: Surveys, Usage & Quality
05:34 Training 800 Colleagues: How Eric Taught AI Mastery
19:50 From Side Role to Head of AI: Eric’s Transition Story
23:02 Scaling AI Across Teams: Tools, Access & Equity
28:56 Choosing the Right Model for the Right Job
30:28 Measuring Success: NPS, Feedback, and Real Usage
32:05 The Rise of AI Champions and Teaching as Proof of Mastery
34:31 Beyond Fluency: Preparing for the Agentic Future
36:45 Atomizing Workflows: Making AI Work for You
39:10 AI in Sales & Customer Service: The Agent Use Case
43:26 Personal Knowledge Bases and AI-Augmented Thinking
50:49 Final Thoughts and Takeaways 

📜 Read the transcript for this episode: Transcript of Eric Porres is Rewiring Logitech’s Org for the AI Age. First; he trained 800 people himself.

 

For more prompts, tips, and AI tools. Check out our website: https://www.beyondtheprompt.ai/ or follow Jeremy or Henrik on Linkedin:

Henrik: https://www.linkedin.com/in/werdelin
Jeremy: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeremyutley

 

Show edited by Emma Cecilie Jensen. 

More from Beyond The Prompt - How to use AI in your company

All 48 episodes
Eric Porres is Rewiring Logitech’s Org for the AI Age. First; he trained 800 people himself.Beyond The Prompt - How to use AI in your company · 56 min
Listen in VO