In short
Podcast Summary: Beyond The Prompt - How to use AI in your company
Episode Title
How IBM Used AI to Cut 40% of HR Operating Costs and Reinvest in the Company
Podcast Overview
- Hosts: Jeremy Utley (Stanford d.school) and Henrik Werdelin (Entrepreneur)
- Guest: Mohamad Ali, Head of IBM Consulting
- Focus: The episode discusses IBM's transformation using AI, emphasizing their internal application of AI solutions to achieve significant cost reductions and improve efficiency across the company.
Key Discussion Points
- IBM as "Client Zero"
- IBM utilized its own operations as a testing ground for AI solutions before offering them to clients.
- The transformation involved 150,000 employees participating in hackathons, creating a culture of innovation and engagement.
- Key Components of Successful AI Implementation
- Leadership Alignment: Technical expertise in leadership was essential for driving the transformation.
- Process Redesign: AI was not merely added on but was embedded into existing workflows.
- Employee Engagement: Broad participation helped in building trust and belief in the new systems.
- Impact of AI on HR Operations
- Automation of transactional HR tasks through tools like Ask HR led to a 40% reduction in HR operating costs.
- $3.5 billion in savings was noted, which was tracked and communicated to stakeholders for accountability.
- Digital Labor and Its Implications
- The use of AI in automating tasks reshaped business models by allowing for more efficient allocation of human resources.
- Employees previously dedicated to HR tasks were redeployed to consulting roles, improving overall organizational capability.
- Measuring Success and Effectivity
- The transformation's impact was tied directly to business metrics, ensuring that AI adoption was tangible and visible.
- Transparency in reporting results to investors was crucial in demonstrating the benefits of AI initiatives.
Key Takeaways
- Start with Yourself: Using internal operations as a model for testing AI solutions builds credibility.
- More than Technology: Successful transformation requires a blend of technology, process redesign, and cultural buy-in.
- Digital Labor Reshapes Models: AI technologies can significantly reduce costs while enhancing service delivery.
- Accountability and Measurement: Connecting AI outcomes to quantitative metrics is essential for demonstrating value.
Notable Quotes
- "Client Zero works" – Mohamad Ali emphasizes IBM's strategy of testing AI internally.
- "Transformation became real when IBM tied outcomes to business metrics." – Importance of measurable results.
Key Elements in the Transformation Process
- Hackathons: Massive employee engagement events that foster innovation and excitement around AI.
- Technical Leadership: The necessity for leaders to have a technical background to navigate AI complexities.
- Cultural Shifts: Creating a culture that embraces AI as a tool for enhancement rather than a threat.
Future Implications
- AI is anticipated to lower operational costs for companies, making them more competitive and allowing for reinvestment in growth and development opportunities.
- The conversation highlighted the potential for companies to create AI-driven products and innovations as their capabilities evolve.
Conclusion The episode serves as a case study of IBM's ambitious transformation through AI, illustrating the blend of technology, process innovation, and cultural change necessary to achieve substantial operational benefits. Mohamad Ali's insights provide valuable lessons for organizations looking to leverage AI for their own transformation journeys.
For more insights and resources, visit [Beyond The Prompt](https://www.beyondtheprompt.ai). Follow the hosts on LinkedIn for updates on future episodes and discussions on AI in business.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00our hr is one where we apply this like at massive scale and um we were able to lower our hr budget by 40 percent because we basically automated all what's called transactional HR. So if you needed to transfer an employee, you can't figure out how to do it in your HR system. So you call somebody, right? Now we have this thing called Ask HR. You go and you chat with it and it helps you out. And so 94 % of all transactional HR has really been automated. And we've taken some of those people and we've repurposed them. We've taken them out of HR and put them in consulting so that Those consultants can now go into companies and help them with their kind of HR optimization.
0:41I'm Mohamed Ali. I'm the head of IBM Consulting. We're a small team of 150 ,000 colleagues helping to solve hard problems with human and digital labor, which we call the science of consulting. And before we could help our clients, we had to transform ourselves with AI. Again, thank you so much for coming on. We actually thought when we originally got in touch with you, we thought we were going to have a conversation about the future of consulting, which maybe we will. That's great. Congrats on being on the Forbes list. But when your team sent the information about the enterprise transformation at IBM, I mean, our eyes popped out of our heads.
1:21These numbers are staggering. And so before we get to the future of consulting, we got to talk about the wins that you've led at IBM. We'd love to hear how that transformation up to this point has unfolded. If you think about the strategy and tactics that you've employed, we'd love to start there. Yeah. So, so Jeremy, even before I talk about the, you know, productivity gains we've seen at IBM using AI, I think I need to provide a little bit of context, a little backdrop. Please, please. So, you know, many years ago when I graduated from Stanford, I helped start a company called Neural Applications Corporation.
2:04And it's exactly what it sounds like. It's a company that a bunch of guys from Stanford decided we were going to build neural networks, right? And this was like in the 90s. And we built a bunch of software to do neural networks and we put them on these disks. And we tried to sell them for$2 ,500. and a few people bought them and didn't really know what to do with it. Then somebody came along and said, hey, why don't you try this on a real problem? And somehow this guy was connected to a steel mill. We didn't know anything about steel mills. But a steel mill is a giant pot and you throw all kinds of metal into it and you pump it with electricity and it just melts.
2:44And so the guy said, hey, listen, if you can come up with a better model for what happens in this giant pot, which is like the size of a house, then maybe we can control the electricity better and save some power. And so we built a neural network that modeled what was happening inside this pot. And at the end of it, we were able to save like a million dollars a year in power, right? At which point we turned it into an appliance. We started charging$250 ,000 for one of these things and we sold 10 of them. And, you know, at that point, just with the small amount of data, compute and algorithms that we had, we could solve these like incredible problems.
3:22And so that made me a believer, right? And so about two years ago, I rejoined IBM. I worked for IBM in the beginning in my early career, and then I left and I was CEO of a couple of companies. And then I came back. And part of that is because, you know, as Gen AI sort of hit scale, I realized that you could go solve like a lot of really interesting business problems with this technology. you know, not only do you have to believe, but you also have to like know where the pitfalls are and then how to apply it. And that's sort of what brought us to, okay, well, let's take IBM as that petri dish and see what we could do with this company itself.
4:01Well, so that's actually a really fantastic starting point. And I thank you for rolling back the clock a little bit, because one thing that'd be fascinating to learn is what did you see as, as an outsider with a prospect of rejoining the company, what did you see about the company that in terms of leadership, in terms of capabilities, in terms of readiness, so to speak, that led you to believe you could affect a meaningful change at this company? Because I'm sure you actually could have undertaken a transformation effort in many different places. Why did you decide to rejoin IBM? Right. So as we started doing this, we realized that there were sort of three big components of applying a technology like AI to yourself.
4:44One is yet have leadership that actually believes in this stuff and are technical enough to go pull it off. Second is you have to be willing to go redesign all these processes, which is not an easy thing. And then third is you have to actually have buy-in from, you know, the 270 ,000 employees we have, that this is actually a good thing for all of us. And putting those three things together is really hard for most companies. Now, I knew we could get the leadership because is the current CEO, Arvin and I were peers for four years. We helped build the software business back in the early days. And we're both very technical.
5:26He was head of research. I also had a very technical background and I knew he got it. And after we sold the last company and I was sort of just without a job and trying to figure out which index, Arvin called me. And he said, hey, listen, I think there's a huge opportunity here at IBM, in particular in the consulting part of the business where, you know, we have 150 ,000 people delivering 100 % with human labor. What if we could deliver with human plus digital labor? We should be able to clean up the market. And I said, hey, you know, I think it's even bigger than that. Right. And he had already started this process of trying to apply almost like pre-Gen AI technologies to transform the company.
6:13So there was a real buy-in at the very top of the company that we could use technology to transform the business. And then the processes, decomposing those, you can actually do that when you have that kind of sponsorship. And then the last piece is we work for a technology company. Well, actually, so before you go to the last piece, you said the second piece is a willingness to redesign. And you said you can do that if you have that kind of leadership. I would respectfully beg to differ. I've actually seen a lot of times where there's leadership in place, but the willingness to redesign among, you know, as some refer to middle management as the mushy middle, the willingness to redesign is actually where a ton of friction is encountered.
6:55Right. So I don't think we can just take that for granted. Can you talk for a second about how did you assess the middle's willingness to redesign work processes? Yeah, actually. So maybe it's a combination of the leadership, right? And the last part of it, which is like, how do you get 270 ,000 people excited about redesigning what they do? Right. And so if we actually started with these, we're not going to, you know, it's not about redesigning your work yet. Right. But we just wanted to get people educated. And so we ran these massive hackathons with like 150 ,000 people participating using Gen.AI to do cool stuff for themselves and their teams.
7:40And they got really, really invested in it. And there were contests. And so as people got invested in it, we said, hey, you know, how can you apply this to make your area better? And in some ways, we started harvesting those, like there was a bottoms up, a tops down. We have people in the tax department. So in the tax department, we've applied Gen AI, we have reduced 100 ,000 hours. Now, you figure the people in the tax department would say, hey, this is bad for us. In fact, they were so proud of what they did because they were competing against the FP &A people. The supposedly creative individuals, right?
8:19Yeah, exactly. Yeah. And then it started building on itself. We were able to start reinvesting some of that money into more engineering, more products, more sales. And, you know, our business has, the growth has flipped by eight points from minus three to plus five, right? It's eight points of growth. And, you know, the stock price has doubled, right? So I think people are seeing the benefit of it. And they're actually like loving being part of it, which is really hard. I think a lot of companies, it's hard for people to, you know, really participate. I mean, I think a lot of companies, it's like, here's some AI and we're going to just give it to you and tell you to use it.
8:56And this was both tops down and bottom belts. And could you talk a little bit on the, you said you gave the background of you and your colleague, the CEO, being technical. A lot of CEOs that we talked to are excited about AI. Where does it make a difference that the leadership is technical? And if they're not, what would you advise kind of companies that do not have technical CEOs to kind of do in order to understand it at a level that is technical? I mean, you guys know this better than anybody. You're in the industry, you help drive startups, etc. There's a lot of hype. And I think a big part of being technical is being able to figure out what's hype and what's real.
9:43And I think we were able to quickly narrow down. After we did all that hackathon stuff, we ended up with 200 processes in the company that we wanted to redesign. And then we narrowed that down to 70. And we picked 70 where we knew the data, we could get to the data, right? You guys know, in AI, it's really about the data, the compute, and the algorithms, right? And so we needed to make sure we could get quality data for these problems. These problems could be decomposed. these problems. There's like low-hanging fruit. It's like very much document-oriented, which is really a good use case for certain things.
10:25And so we're able to pick out the applications very quickly that were actually the workflows where we're going to see benefits, like the tax processing, for example, right? Can you talk just to the tax thing? Just curious, like what's the actual use case there? You mentioned it a few times. Oh, sure. You know, we're a global company. We operate in a hundred plus countries. We have to file taxes everywhere. There's a ton, a ton, a ton of paperwork, right? And so parsing through all of that, being able to prepare these documents, being able to like optimize a variety of things, you could actually like decompose that workflow and say, you know, at this stage, it would be really great if I had something that parsed through these documents and highlighted the things that matter to me so I can actually do this thing faster, right?
11:13So that's a great example. and we're not just applying it to ourselves, right? So we now have built this playbook and we're applying it to clients. So there's a government client and you guys have probably used this service. It's one of these things where you go and you submit your documents and then you wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, right? I'm sure you've had that experience with some government service, right? And so this is the first full year in production where we've augmented the process with AI. It's very paper-based, I should say paper-based, document-based, right? So it's a good application for this.
11:49And so far, we've processed 2.5 million of these things, and it is 12 % faster than last year. And the backlog is finally coming down after years of the backlog growing, right? So, you know, we're doing it to ourselves, but we're also figuring out how to do it in client scenarios. and in the client scenarios, Henrik, I see you're looking at me quizzically. A big part of it is, I don't think it's technical anymore. We're figuring out the technical part. It's all those people things around. How do you get people? That's funny. That was exactly actually the question because where you obviously have a very unique insight is you guys are technical by design, I'm sure, and culture, but obviously also a consultancy.
12:37And so by now, if people are trying to get benefits out of AI, how much is that actually new technology and how much is this is just atomizing workflows, understanding where the technology is at this state and then applying in many ways pretty off the shelf technology in many cases? Yeah, I think you're hitting on something really important. It's not just, hey, listen, I've got this giant anthropic model and I'm going to throw it at these documents and magic's going to happen. Like that's actually a small part of the problem. Actually being able to understand the workflows and decompose the workflows.
13:16And yeah, I mean, that's something we've been doing for years for all kinds of clients. Right. And so that's helpful. Sometimes we use AI models that aren't like a giant anthropic. Like there's a time series model that we use. It's actually an LLM. But if we didn't have that, we use a traditional time series model to solve a bigger. And so we're actually, one of the things that we built in the consulting organization, so we have 150 ,000 people, right? And so everybody's going to go sort of do their own thing, but we needed to organize that somehow. So we built this thin layer of software. And, you know, as a software designer myself, like I helped architect it, which you can think of it as an AI virtualization layer.
13:58And so then on top of that, we built like these things called digital workers, right? They use specific tasks, like the tax thing and so forth. And then below that, like all the models you could possibly want, the AI models, but also non-AI models, right? So now we can sort of, it can choose from Llama and from Granite and from OpenAI and from Entropic and from, you know, some non-AI models and then build these things that are smart. And those smart things, then we could bolt it into the workflow. So it's way more than just a big model. So you're right about that. It does take all these pieces to make it work.
14:36You know, one thing that I'm thinking about is you have to think systemically, right? To break down, to atomize, understand and decompose a workflow. You actually have to take a step back in order to be able to do that. Take a step back from the work to think about the work. And one challenge that we've observed in organizations is nobody's got bandwidth to actually think about their work. They're too busy working in the business to work on the business, so to speak. And so it's kind of uniquely well suited to a consultancy because you actually already have the objectivity when you're working with a client, right?
15:10How did you get the teams inside of the organization space to have that kind of objectivity on their own work? Because it would strike me that it was actually probably much more difficult to do it inside of IBM than for a client. Yeah. And in some ways, we treated IBM as a client. We actually call it client zero. That's the term we use at IBM. And there are really two organizations that supported this. And organization number one is the internal CIO organization. And organizational number two was IBM Consulting, which is about 150 ,000 people of the 270 ,000. So now you have these two services organizations that are guiding this process.
15:52But inside the core of the company, you have the leadership, all the leadership structure. The CEO actually met once a week with the leadership team, all the business unit owner, the functional owners, etc. To drive this. There was a team that specifically, there were four teams. The second team was, okay, here are all the workflows that we need to go decompose. And then the fourth team actually was how you engage the employee population, right? So these hackathons and that type of thing. But we sort of treated IBM as a client and we called it client zero because part of what - I love that. Yeah.
16:35Part of what we're trying to do is, is, you know, IBM has been in the AI space since like 1957 or whenever that conference was in New Hampshire, right? IBM was one of the four, you know, scientists who were there. And so we've been around the space a lot. And I mean, some ways is why I came back. And, you know, when Gen AI came into existence, it was a bit of shock to like the whole, you know, AI world, right? But it was so good and so pervasive and so quickly. So, you know, from our CEO's perspective, who's very much a technologist, he's like personally like leading our quantum charge. Right.
17:11And, you know, he could tell you exactly how the qubits behave. Can he explain entanglement to somebody like me? Because I'm still trying to get.
17:23But look, if we're not going to be the ones that bring, you know, Gen. AI in that burst that happened two years ago, then we should be the one that shows how Gen. AI could be used productively at scale beyond anything else. And I think with the 3.4 billion of costs that we've removed from our$20 billion spend, which is only a part of the company, which is 16 and a half percent, which is actually pretty amazing. This is probably the largest scale application of this technology in existence. And so I think this was really important to him. This was really important to the leadership. So you're right.
18:00I mean, this is a little bit different than what we see at clients, but we have to create a playbook out of it. I love, I love, love, love the humility and ambition, interestingly entangled there, to use Henrik's word, of that statement. And if we can't lead the, call it technology development, let's be the first case study of organizational transformation. That's a wonderful kind of balance of humility and ambition. I do want to qualify that, right? Because there are certain aspects of this technology where we actually think we're leading. Like governance, for example. Like we have a product for governance that is probably the best in the plant.
18:41We actually use that in our organization. You can't go into a government and say, I'm just going to put AI in here. You have to have a whole governance framework on it, right? Small models, like the Granite models, the time series models, those are things that we develop on our product side. And the time series model is actually the best on the planet, most downloaded, et cetera, right? And the small models, when we started this internally, we were using a small number of tokens. Now it's like billions of tokens that we're consuming all the time. And if you run that in a giant model, it's super expensive.
19:13So 38 % of all of our calls as of right now, I can watch it and see goes to a small granite model, right? And that costs like way less. And so there are pieces of this technology that we're building, we're really good at. But I think the big thing here is when we show that it actually works. Yeah. And just, I think we had an overlap there. Did you say you've removed$3.5 billion of cost? Did I get that right? 16 % of the total cost? How do you start to quantify that? Right. So, and I think this is part of why the stock price has done so well, because we actually quantified it, not just ourselves, but to our investors.
19:58And every quarter, we actually report on it. And we would actually show how it adds up, right? So, so if you take in 2024, the number is$3.5 billion out of a$20 billion spend that we targeted, right? And what we would show is the improvement in the profitability. And then we would also show we're investing it. So, for example, our R &D as a percentage of revenues used to be 9%. Now it's 12%. So if you take that three points and the additional profitability, and then, you know, you can actually add it up and get to the$3.5 billion. And so once the analysts can see this, then they know it's real, right?
20:36Because you guys know, like people say they've saved a lot, but you can't actually see it. it dropped to the bottom line, or you can't figure it out on the incremental investments. And once they're able to see it, they give you credit for it. How do we do that? One of the people on that weekly call that the CEO had was the IBM controller himself, a guy named Nick. And Nick's job was to get all these numbers so we could file it in our 10 case and 10 Qs. And Nick was not going to get this wrong, right? Or you couldn't come in and say, you saved this money and it's not really true. So Nick had to keep us on this.
21:17I think that's incredibly important. And I think it's not what you see a lot of places. I had an interesting conversation a few months back with this guy who basically pitched that the future of HR would not be human resources, but chief resource officer. And then, and since you have this now, framework where you think about people and agents models, whatever the terminology is in you. How do you increasingly think about both kind of like, how do you sell it to customers? Like, do you charge a, you know, like a hour spent on an agent in the same way? Or like, how do you, what's your kind of mental model of all that?
22:00Yeah. So this is a very, very interesting question. Because I actually think that In the future, I mean, just like you have millions of iPhone apps, you guys remember it in the old days, we used to build giant apps and they still exist. I mean, some really good ones like Oracle and SAP and so forth, right? Heavy duty stuff. Then the iPhone, you know, the mobile came along and we started building instead of hundreds of apps, like millions of small, tiny apps. And then tomorrow, we're going to be building trillions of what I'm calling digital workers, for lack of better term. These are like little bits of software that call an LLM, right?
22:42And they do something very specific. And so these things are going to exist out there. And how do you monetize it? As a consulting company, how do you monetize? We know how to monetize human labor, but we don't know how to monetize digital labor, right? And I think where you're going with this is what we're trying to figure out. So today, when a client comes to us, like, for example, we have this chemical company that came to us. And so we have, you know, this is our procurement organization today. Procurement is very paper-based, right? Great application for AI. If you were to apply AI, like, what could you do with this?
23:19And in this particular case, we've signed a deal where we're going to reduce the labor costs by one half, right? It is actually remarkable what we're committing to doing here. Wow. Offer can be done. And like us, they'll be able to reinvest that money in R &D and sales, whatever they want to reinvest it in. So how do we charge for that? So today, the charging model is very simple. It's a fixed price project. We can now do it much more cost efficiently. So we'll charge you less to do it. And actually, your margins go up by doing that. because a bunch of what you're putting in there is software, digital labor software, and that adds higher margins.
23:58So that's good for the client. It's good for us. But I do actually envision a world, maybe five years from now, where there'll be millions of digital workers out there, and Jeremy, you need to do something, and you would just go buy a bunch of them, and there'll be an Amazon-like place where you're going to get them, and there'll be a different monetization scheme for that. So I think over the next five years, like how this stuff gets monetized will be fast at hitting. One thing, I don't know if it's at all interesting, but one of the projects I'm involved in is basically this kind of, think of it as Shopify for the agentic web, like where people can come in and they can do something.
24:35And I think when we started it, everybody just assumed that the business model of yesterday would kind of just continue, right? So for consultancy, it's our rendered and for software, it's SaaS, right? It's like X dollars per month. And what we see is that that is increasingly difficult, both because people have subscription fatigue, but also because that obviously these models are basically human wrapped on top of an LL model. And so the business model that is emerging, you know, aging is free, but you pay for human in the loop or purely success based or the specific output have a prize and new interesting models.
25:12You know, I saw one the other day where somebody, they will pay you money if you complete the course that they've done, and then they will take much more money if you do not. And so there's kind of like, you know, it's so. Alignment. Yeah, it's just really fascinating. Brand new gym. Exactly, right? Totally. So it's just really fascinating, you know, how, what are the business models that we have not quite predicted yet will kind of emerge on the back of all these digital workers. Are there, just on that point, are there experiments that are in flight now in terms of business modeling? How do you think about experimenting your way towards the future when it comes to something like business model pricing, et cetera?
25:55Yeah, actually, we have one client where we're trying something creative like this. So it's called the pod model. And so this pod is a, a pod can do a task, right? So let's say it can migrate a cluster of applications to the cloud, this particular pod of people. We do a lot of that. We do a lot of cloud migration or VMware migration and that sort of thing. And these pods historically has been human pods. There are 10 people. These are the skills of the people. You can containerize so many applications to that one particular pod. And that's what we saw. And now those pods are a combination of human plus digital labor.
Read the full transcript
26:42And so we've actually sat down with this client and would say, okay, well, you know, you can have this pod and they'll do that. Or you can have this pod and it's going to do this. And so now they're buying these human plus digital labor pods to do these particular things. So Henrik, it's basically sort of your outcomes-based thing, but at a more granular level than a large project, right? Like this procurement project that I mentioned. And so I do think that the large projects are going to get atomized a little bit. And I think to the extent that these like units, I'm not quite sure how small the units could be, but the units have to be able to combine human plus digital, right?
27:22You can't have one unit human and one unit digitally. Like it doesn't work for this part concept. But I think there's something there, right? Do you ever worry that one of the kind of observations I've had with just my own use of Magentic systems is that I now code a lot of things that I would normally buy, but I would normally pay for a contact management system, but I only use like 10 % of it, 2 % of it probably, right? And so now I could just basically vibe code myself into that specific feature. And then I let go of the subscription of the system that could do the 100%. And so, quote unquote, a worry slash like kind of an observation that I'm not sure that I know what the consequence will be.
28:10Is if all this stuff is a little bit like the unbundling of the album. Like when suddenly we didn't buy albums, music albums anymore. We bought like all the single thing. if I now buy the features, it seems that a lot of the money that came out of the music industry didn't go anywhere. Like it just kind of evaporated. And so where are you on that we suddenly are creating all this technology and it's actually not kind of accreted to any specific business. It's kind of like, we'll just kind of evaporate out of the overall spend of software. Yeah. You know, another really good question, because in some ways it's sort of like the burning question of what's the economics of all of this in the end.
28:53And, you know, for me, I think they're kind of two things that I look at. One is that historically, like if you go back hundreds of years, like every time there has been a technological shift that lowers the cost of doing something, the GDP has expanded, right? Now, you know, it's been difficult at times because certain jobs go away and certain new jobs are created. And with this, there is a possibility that that's the case here too. And let me kind of explain why I think that might be the case. So in the services business, many decades ago, when offshoring became a thing, and so you could basically build the same application with cheaper labor, the market didn't shrink.
29:40The market actually expanded. And when cloud came into existence, and you guys know this well, your technologist right it's like with cloud you could build apps way faster because the hyperscaler had like all these pre-built things and you know you could load and get stuff right and it turned out that the market didn't shrink they were just like poor demand for more apps because like we're always solving more and more problems and i think what's going what's likely going to happen is that there's going to be more demand for like lots more of these sort of gen ai power thing having said that, you were right.
30:16And so from that, you could say, well, like a services company like us, there could be a lot more work, but if you don't lead in it, right, you're going to fall behind and you're getting a lot less work. So this is, this is a part of why I'm leaning hard in this, right? Now, now for the software side, right? It's like, what happens to SaaS companies? And you're starting to see a little bit of the multiples come down because people are kind of wondering, is it going to get disaggregated? Because you're right, you can vibe code a lot of good stuff now, right? And as you put these Gen.AI kind of user experiences on top of applications, like you almost don't even know the applications are there anymore.
30:58Like you're not using the native user experience. And so they become, you know, sort of glorified databases. Now, companies who provide the software are not just going to let that happen, right? So I don't actually know, Henrik. I'm a great fancier, but I see those dynamics. Another just anecdotal thing that I looked up the other day, when the ATMs kind of came into place, everybody was very worried about the people who worked in banks. Turned out more of them got hired over time. Same thing apparently happens with the self-serve kiosks in McDonald's. Yeah. Like also I have now, Frond. And so it is interesting that just if you look at all the data points of things that have been in the past that kind of like was similar-ish.
31:41Yeah. But I mean, like, obviously it's tough not to kind of go like, oh, I wonder how this kind of play out specifically with kind of like maybe even junior staff in a consultancy where you are like learning how to do something in a dance model might be able to do a lot of the same work. So now like a project manager will have to sit and go like, oh, you know, do I save the X amount of thousand a year for this specific one and throw a digital work at it instead? or do I just kind of roll with it with the benefit of having a human of the loop? Yeah, and you know, those are like a lot of what we've applied is what I call low-hanging fruit, like these document-centric things.
32:16But there's like a whole other class of work that is coming at us and coming at us like hard, right? So we're doing this project at L 'Oreal, the cosmetics company, and this one's public. I could talk about it. And what it is, is L 'Oreal makes 11 ,000 products, right? So you can think of a lipstick. And a lipstick is a little bit like that steel vat that I mentioned earlier here, right? You basically pour a bunch of ingredients and out comes something with physical characteristics, texture, taste, whatever. And L 'Oreal has decades of data of stuff you put into the pot and characteristics that come out in the product.
32:54And so we're working with them to actually build an LLM from scratch. There aren't too many projects where we build an LLM from scratch. But you can imagine like the engineers that, especially the junior engineers, you get to work on a product like this, because at the end of it, you know, if you could sort of predict what goes into the pot and what comes out, then you don't have to go build these things in the lab and test them. Right. Or at least you could. It's almost like it's an alpha fold for cosmetics. Yes. Right. And so your product cycle comes down and L 'Oreal has a goal of moving to 95 % bio source.
33:28Right. So, so they get two goals. They get like shorter R &D so they can outperform their competitors. And they have a model now that can help them get to more sustainable outcome, which is like still a big deal in Europe and, you know, many parts of the world. Right. So those are like, those are not projects that we would have naturally gotten before. But now with this technology, I think there's a whole class of projects like that coming. That actually gets to something that I was hoping you touch on. So I appreciate you kind of opening the door. broadly speaking, one way to think about the implications of Gen.AI are kind of efficiency gains or you call it value capture and then new things to do or value creation, right?
34:08And the, you know, the 3.5 figure you shared this earlier in terms of reduced cost, et cetera, clearly a great value capture play. Tell us a little bit more about value creation. And this is a great case, right? Building an LLM is probably something you've never done for a client before, right? So are other ways you're thinking about creating new value? And perhaps how are you organizing the organization, not just to do the same set of activities with less human labor, but to imagine fundamentally new set of activities, maybe with more, even more labor because it's worthwhile. How do you think about organizing organization to do that?
34:45Yeah, I think you're right. I mean, part of this is productivity benefits. And there's actually, I think a ton of opportunity for productivity benefits. And as I think about this, I actually think by the end of the decade, almost every large company will actually have to run at between 10 and 20 % lower costs at the same revenue to be competitive because their competitors are going to do that. And we can see that that is possible today, right? So that's one thing. The other part of this is that I think some of that productivity gives you flexibility to invest in new. Yes. And this is a great example right there, right?
35:28Which is faster R &D cycles. And, you know, I mean, for a lot of companies, like R &D cycles make or break the company, right? And if you could do something in 12 months that your competitor is going to take 24 months, like game over, right? You know, this government scenario that I talked about, yeah, sure, it's, you know, I guess you could say that that's productivity and that's lower cost. But the key metric there is actually the customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction has gone way up, right? Because you're not waiting for this thing forever. And when you get it back, it's actually higher quality in this particular case, right?
36:08And so what does that level of customer satisfaction mean? So if you apply that to a company, that company is going to win more business, right? And you're going to have a growth. wrote. Just last night, I was in Chicago with a client and the client said, hey, look, you know, we do this, they call trade marketing. You know, we have all this like doc, whatever. And then we put our product in Walmart. You know, there's one set of trade marketing and we put it in, you know, Costco is another set of trade marketing. I'm like, how do I go from this to that quicker? Because right now it takes me a long time.
36:40And if I can get stuff on the shelf quicker, then, you know, my revenues are going to go up. So I think there's going to be a whole bunch of like revenue opportunity as well for companies. Yeah. Are there mechanisms like a hackathon for value creation? Strikes me that the hackathon is a really elegant structure for value capture. Do you do the same kind of thing to imagine new possibilities or is it more just organic? Yeah. So we use it in two places, at least two places, like in our product. We have a whole product business, right? Like half the company's product, half the services. and in our product business, we're also using it to say, okay, well, what kind of products should we create?
37:22And I think that, you know, that's sort of a little bit of L 'Oreal example. It's less about building an LM from scratch and saying, hey, listen, if there's this big security problem, we all know like cybersecurity is just getting worse and worse and worse, right? Like the bad guys are, you know, getting better and better and better. And so there aren't enough human beings to actually keep up, right? So you're going to need a bunch of technologies to come to market that's going to be Gen AI inspired, right? And so that's a category of new products, right? And so, yeah, we have been applying the hackathons to also, like, how do we make our products better?
38:00I was wondering a little bit on the kind of like next wave of kind of like innovations you're going to do in this space. So you've done the low-hanging fruits. Yeah. When you look kind of 12 months out, what's the thing that, and you guys obviously are more advanced than most people. So like it is impressive just to hear kind of like how much impact the low hanging fruits have had. But what's kind of like the thing that you get excited about 12 months out? So, you know, if you guys, not that I think you do this, but if you listen to our earnings call from the last quarter, our CFO. I do that. I do that religiously, of course.
38:39IBM earnings calls on the calendar and never miss it. Just on his runs. He's always listening to him. On your runs. There you go. Podcast. So he actually committed to raise that$3.5 billion to$4.5 billion by the end of next year. So we actually see the runway is not over. And as I mentioned, we had taken 200 processes, of which only 70 we sort of apply this to. Of the 70 that we're applying it to, there's sort of incremental gains that we can have. And then we can apply it to new processes. You know, Jeremy, I think you mentioned HR. HR is one where we apply this at massive scale. And you might have caught in the document that we were able to lower our HR budget by 40 % because we basically automated all what's called transactional HR.
39:31So if you needed to transfer an employee to Henrik, you can't figure out how to do it in your HR system. So you call somebody, right? now we have this thing called ask hr you go and you chat with it and it helps you out and if you want to find your w2 form right you think about how hard that is right we all had to do it and you just go up this thing and you know chat with you make sure you are who you are whatever and you eventually get it and so 94 of all transactional hr has really been automated and we've taken some of those people and we've repurposed them we've taken them out of hr and put them in consulting so that those consultants can now go into companies and help them with their kind of HR optimization, right?
40:12So we've been able to - Wow, wait. So, okay, I've got to read that back to you because that's such an important point. I think when most people hear, we've reduced the cost of HR by 40%, what they think is we've fired 40 % of our HR staff, right? And I think what you just said is we've, and I don't mean to put words in your mouth, that's why I want to kind of put a fine point on it. We've redeployed 40 % of our HR staff from what was a cost center to revenue drivers of HR related consulting for our clients. Is that what you just said? So at a macro level, yes, that is what we are doing, right?
40:50So we are taking out costs in some areas and we are investing heavily in other areas. I mentioned R &D and sales, right? And in the HR example, we were able to redeploy some of those people into categories where they are now effectively going out and selling that playbook they created for HR, right? And so there's a large supermarket chain that you might've gone to. It's got 400 ,000 employees where this is one of the projects we put them on, right? Because they know how to do this, right? And so within our company, we have that flexibility. Not everybody's going to have that flexibility. I have one last question for you, at least for me.
41:26we talk a lot about cost savings and optimizing. One of the areas that is always interesting is kind of like resourcefulness is when you don't just do something faster or you get somebody to kind of a digital worker to do it for you, but you actually become much better of what you do. Do you have examples of that? You get much better. Do you know what I mean? Like it's not like, it's almost like you can produce the work in higher fidelity, not just kind of like have somebody else kind of do it, it becomes a better thinking partner. It allows somebody who were not able to design in the past to then suddenly make graphics for the deck and stuff like that.
42:05You can suddenly do more than just doing faster. Yeah. I think that is true in a lot of our creative stuff. And you, I think, started an ad agency, if I'm not mistaken. One of you guys invested in one of them, right? Yeah. So I think a lot like a lot of the creatives i mean we do a lot of creative stuff right so there's a new airline being formed it's called riyadh air and it's not a startup that gets five million dollars it has 50 billion dollars of funding they've already placed enough orders for aircrafts to be the size of united so this is saudi arabia competing with emirates and so forth right and so we were hired to build the whole it stack and they didn't actually want us to start with traditional of airline software because airline software is like train ticketing software from 50 years ago it might be on mobile device but it's like it's rigid and whatever they wanted to start with e-commerce software like an amazon shopping cart right so so we built that and that's really cool but the creatives are just incredibly impressive because they also you know this is like this is the middle east everything has to be like incredibly like compelling right and so we've used like the best Adobe Flash and all of that.
43:18And what we've been able to do there is just iterate through things so fast that they can effectively come up with stuff that is better than anything else. Right. And, you know, your mobile app, for example, when you go to it and buy a ticket, you get to pick a seat. And it's like a pretty static thing with this mobile app. It'll be like a full immersive experience. You can be able to see stuff and it's going to be fast. Right. And we wouldn't have been able to iterate so many options on that and get it so well done if it wasn't for him. Okay, Muhammad, last question. And then I know we should wrap.
43:59Two years ago, you started this journey. Imagine another leader like you is seeking to undertake the journey starting today. What are your kind of two pieces of advice to help them succeed? this is not one of them this is like the zero right and the zero is you've got to get all the technical stuff straight right and you know like we we had to build that that sort of ai virtualization platform we had to build that we have 3 000 digital workers in different domains and all that so you got to get all the technical stuff but i would say probably the most important is actually around the people. Like, you have got to figure out how to get people excited about this journey.
44:47And for us, you know, we encouraged everyone to learn how to use Gen. AI, put it to work in their own, you know, areas. And the approach here is it's like Excel, right? It's like, you know, today, like we all use Excel. If you don't know how to use Excel, like you're not just not valuable to the company, but you're not valuable in the market. Learn how to use this. Be the best at it. that you'll be valuable with the company, you'll be valuable externally. And so, you know, people are invested in it. And I would say that if you can't get, I mean, I'm mostly focusing on businesses here, right? Because that's what we do to focus on.
45:23If you can get your employees excited that this is going to make their lives better, they're going to make the company a winning company, they're going to be working for a winning company, you know, they're going to be valuable out in the marketplace. If they don't believe that, they're just not going to come along, right? Even if you have technical pieces, right? That's incredible. Good place to end. Jeremy, that was a fascinating conversation. Thoroughly enjoyable. What a winsome human being. I really liked getting to know Mohamed. You know, one thing just right off the top, we talked about at the end, but it's so fascinating to think about a, perhaps a unique advantage of a consultancy, which I had never thought about before is if they have internal experts, they can turn them from a cost center into a revenue driver.
46:11Right. So unlike, say, you know, a football club, if their HR professionals become world-class at leveraging Gen.AI, it's unlikely that the football club is going to start advising other organizations and turn those HR professionals into revenue drivers. You know what? I've actually done a bit of research on this lately. It's really cool. And I think it happens more than people realize. So if you look at like Delta Airline, what do they make a lot of their money on? Their credit card. That's not about travel. Like obviously AWS is really a big revenue dryer from Amazon. And so if you start to actually dig into the numbers for a lot of these companies, a lot of them have really managed to find a way of taking a part of the system, a capability that they were incredibly good at and then monetizing that in order to serve their customers even better and it's obviously awkward because like when you create the narrative for the company like do you go out and say you know we are delta we're proud people of travel and credit cards right like you can't really and so right there i haven't really seen a good kind of catch all kind of descriptor of this um and i think you might see more of it with ai right to the point about hr If you become so good of using something internally, there should be no reason why you don't kind of spin that out and kind of sell it to other people.
47:32I couldn't agree with you more, my friend. I know you. Um, the other thing that jumped out at me too, was having the controller involved from the very beginning, um, to document and catalog the wins and put them on the board and to be rigorous about what they are advertising on earnings calls and things like that. Reporting their gains on a quarterly basis, I think is a really smart way to keep yourselves honest and also signal the transformation to the market? Why would the controller not be involved in the weekly updates when you're driving that kind of a cost reduction, for example? I think the only thing I would add to the points that you made was the importance and probably difficulties of seeing it as your senior manager's job to make the organization excited about AI.
48:27I think a lot of people are very worried about AI and, you know, obviously understandable why they might be that. But without creating the environment where people come to work and going like, I can now learn a skill that really will make me not much better in my current job, but basically much better at any job, is not an easy task. And they really seem to mention, obviously, Mohamed seemed to be such a charismatic person. you can see how we'd be able to kind of like get like the hoo-ha going. But that is probably something that we haven't really explored on these podcasts on how do you become better of basically promoting that internally.
49:09Feels like that could be a whole other conversation with Muhammad is just how do you get people excited? Yeah. I love the frame of IBM as the first customer, so to speak, or the first client, is it client zero? I think is what they call it. Yeah. Yeah. And really propping up, he didn't put it this way, but the way I took his comments was they created an internal AI consultancy. They treated themselves as the first client and they treated it like a consulting project, which is actually how they get bandwidth. And I couldn't help but wonder in a lot of organizations, if having a consulting engagement, even as a framework would be a really useful way to think about deploying experiments.
49:51Because right now, I think a lot of people are just moonlighting or it's bolted onto their existing job. What does it look like to be an internal AI consultant to actually look for opportunities and to create proof points? I thought there, again, it's maybe a unique competitive advantage of a consultancy that they can just deploy a consulting team towards the inside of the organization. But it feels like a model that anybody could leverage. Yeah. And then potentially sell to others. we recently had Adam Brockman and Andy Sachs on to talk about their book AI First right I was reading that on the flight this past week and in the conclusion they talked to Ethan Mollick former guest of our podcast as well and one thing Ethan says to them in the end is organizations need to build AI R &D labs and it strikes me that that is what IBM did without calling it that they'd be the internal team that was working on behalf of IBM as client zero was effectively an AI R &D lab.
50:55Yeah. And I mean, like maybe just to end on that when he talks about, and obviously he runs the consultant side. So obviously, and, and, and with reason is very proud of what they've done there. And so I think kind of like corrected us when we said, you know, like that it was humble and ambitious to say we didn't get there first with the foundational model so at least we should be there first with the applied ai um and then obviously card does because like they do technology too and so uh you know worth mentioning but it is very interesting two things one is being able to realize what game you cannot win and then kind of like find another game you can um i obviously very very inspiring and the second thing is to see applied ai as a discipline.
51:43I think a lot of us, when we hear about AI technology, we think about the core models and like the bits and bobs that goes into that. But really increasingly, like the difference between what is technology and what is systems design is kind of like blending, right? Because increasingly, as you were saying, you need to be able to understand the system design and how you re-architecture that in order to really use AI in a very effective manner. And so these disciplines are kind of like also kind of merging to the point where, you know, applied AI is kind of a technology in itself. Skill set in itself, for sure.
52:26Yeah. It's been another great episode of Beyond the Prompt. Thanks for listening with us today. If we may say ourself. Yeah. I mean, I loved it. Did you? I really enjoyed it. hashtag I loved it too that's the code word for today I loved it too just like Jeremy and Henrik did perfect love it hit like hit subscribe share with a friend share with a colleague and uh share with somebody who needs to get excited hopefully this might be a point of leverage to get them excited until next time take care no no no Henrik you always say bye-bye Bye-bye. Okay, bye-bye.
From the publisher
As Head of IBM Consulting, Mohamad Ali led one of the most ambitious enterprise AI transformations to date. By making IBM its own “Client Zero,” his team tested every AI solution internally before bringing it to market. The effort began with massive hackathons involving 150,000 employees, turning curiosity into capability and belief at scale.
Mohamad shares how leadership alignment, process redesign, and broad employee engagement drove $3.5 billion in cost savings and renewed growth. Jeremy and Henrik reflect on why IBM’s model may signal the next evolution of consulting — where organizations act as their own laboratories for change
Key Takeaways:
- Start with Yourself: “Client Zero” Works
IBM transformed internally before advising clients, using its own systems as a testing ground. This allowed the team to validate AI tools, workflows, and cultural shifts in real conditions, creating credibility and clarity before going to market. - Transformation Needs More Than Tech
Success came from a mix of technical leadership, process redesign, and cultural momentum. AI wasn’t just layered on; it was embedded into workflows, backed by leadership buy-in, and powered by 150,000 employees who participated in company-wide hackathons. - Digital Labor Is Reshaping Business Models
IBM automated most transactional HR tasks with AI tools like AskHR, driving a 40% reduction in HR operating costs — a look at how hybrid human–AI teams transform services.
Measure and Share the Impact
Transformation became real when IBM tied outcomes to business metrics. By reporting $3.5 billion dollars in savings and tracking results with the CFO, IBM showed how to make AI adoption tangible, accountable, and visible to both employees and investors.
LinkedIn: Mohamad Ali - IBM | LinkedIn
IBM: IBM
00:00 Intro: HR Automation
00:41 Introduction of Mohamed Ali and IBM's Transformation
01:14 IBM's Enterprise Transformation
01:41 The Role of AI in IBM's Success
03:25 Rejoining IBM: A Strategic Decision
04:33 Key Components of AI Implementation
07:21 Employee Engagement and Hackathons
08:59 Technical Leadership and AI
10:37 Global Tax Optimization with AI
11:17 Scaling AI Solutions for Clients
22:00 Monetizing Digital Labor
26:50 Digital Labor and Procurement Projects
27:29 Unbundling and Economic Implications
28:44 Technological Shifts and Market Expansion
30:04 AI-Powered Business Transformations
32:22 Case Study: L'Oreal's AI Integration
39:13 HR Automation and Cost Reduction
42:09 Creative Innovations in AI Applications
43:59 Advice for Leaders on AI Integration
45:43 Final thoughts
📜 Read the transcript for this episode: Transcript of How IBM Used AI to Cut 40% of HR Operating Costs and Reinvest in the Company |
For more prompts, tips, and AI tools. Check out our website: https://www.beyondtheprompt.ai/ or follow Jeremy or Henrik on Linkedin:
Henrik: https://www.linkedin.com/in/werdelin
Jeremy: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeremyutley
Show edited by Emma Cecilie Jensen.




