In short
Beyond The Prompt - Episode Summary: What AI Can't Replace - How The Atlantic Deals with Disruption
Podcast Overview
Podcast Title: Beyond The Prompt Episode Title: What AI Can't Replace - How The Atlantic Deals with Disruption Host: Jeremy Utley & Henrik Werdelin Guest: Nicholas Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic
Episode Description In this episode, Nicholas Thompson shares insights on how AI is transforming creativity, leadership, and human connection, particularly in the context of journalism. He discusses practical applications of AI, including its advantages and limitations, and emphasizes the importance of preserving human intelligence in an increasingly automated world.
---
Key Concepts
- Unwired Intelligence
- Definition: Human skills like emotional presence, deep focus, and analog thinking.
- Importance: Enhancing unwired intelligence allows individuals to better leverage AI tools effectively.
- Superpower: The more human-centric skills one develops, the more effective they can be in using AI.
- Embracing AI Disruption
- Metaphor: AI is likened to an unavoidable storm; rather than resisting it, organizations should adapt and prepare.
- Strategy: Understanding and embracing AI's trajectory can lead to more informed and strategic decisions.
- Authentic Leadership
- Modeling AI Use: Thompson emphasizes showing practical AI applications to his team rather than merely advocating for its use.
- Engaging Experimentation: He promotes a culture of experimentation and continuous learning through active team involvement.
- The Impact of AI on Human Connections
- AI Relationships: Discusses how AI can confuse emotional connections and the potential risks of relying on AI companions over human interactions.
- Third Spaces: The importance of maintaining social connections outside of digital environments is highlighted.
- Cognitive Offloading vs. Augmentation
- Cognitive Offloading: Risks becoming dependent on AI tools, leading to reduced problem-solving skills.
- Augmentation: AI should enhance human capabilities rather than replace them, necessitating the nurturing of unwired intelligence.
---
Key Takeaways
- Adaptation is Key: Organizations must embrace AI and prepare for its effects on their industries.
- Preserve Humanity: Cultivating human traits and abilities is essential to maintain a competitive edge and genuine connections.
- AI as a Tool, Not a Replacement: AI should be viewed as an augmentation of human capacity rather than a substitute for human work.
- Engagement in Experimentation: Leaders should take visible action in testing AI tools to encourage team involvement and innovation.
---
Episode Highlights
- Introduction to Nicholas Thompson *(00:00)*
- Navigating Information Overload *(00:11)*
- Using AI for Content Creation *(02:10)*
- AI as a Personal Trainer *(04:39)*
- Emotional Connections with AI *(08:02)*
- Preparing for AGI and Cognitive Offloading *(16:17)*
- Ethical Considerations in AI Usage *(32:49)*
- Final Thoughts and Reflections *(53:50)*
---
Conclusion The conversation between Thompson, Utley, and Werdelin underscores the necessity of balancing AI integration with preserving essential human skills. As organizations navigate AI's disruptive potential, leaders are challenged to embrace new technologies while fostering authentic human connections and personal growth.
For more insights, you can connect with Nicholas Thompson through his [LinkedIn profile](https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasxthompson/) and explore The Atlantic’s offerings on their [website](https://www.theatlantic.com/world/).
---
Code Word for Engagement: *Unwired Rain Slicker*
Thank you for listening!
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00But if it scares you so much, you kind of put up your hands and say go away AI, then the disruption happens faster. Right. If you fight AI, AI, you know, will make your job worse sooner. And, you know, I talk about it a little bit like one of the metaphors I used and in all hands when I was going back and forth on this issue is like, look, there is a storm coming, right? And the storm is AI and it's going to massively change the way people do journalism. And I can say, I don't like the storm and I can go stand out there naked and I can yell at it, right? Or I can put on a raincoat, I can get an umbrella, and I can try to figure out the path of the storm and how best to protect what I do, right?
0:42I'm Nicholas Thompson. I'm CEO of The Atlantic. I love to run. I love to read about AI. And I love to talk to other people about the biggest challenges and biggest questions in AI. Both Henrik and I, obviously, huge fans of your work, huge fans of the most interesting thing in tech. And we thought perhaps it might be an interesting place to start just in this era where there's so much information. I mean, forget even in the world in general, just take AI, which is kind of the purview of our podcast. But there's so much information. How do you think about sifting through the signal from the noise?
1:18What's your personal attitude or approach to understanding what matters? So I try to, I'll first say that is like the hardest thing, right? There's so much information. There's so much going on. There's so many papers. There's so many tweets. There's just this constant flow of information. And so I am constantly in a state of trying to prune and improve the information flows I get, making sure that if I'm spending time on Twitter, I'm seeing tweets that are useful. If I'm reading research papers that I stop if they're not interesting enough and that I'm learning how to use AI tools to help me sort through that.
1:52But so for this daily video, I do the most interesting thing in tech. I have there's both kind of the slow build process where I'm listening to podcasts about AI. I'm reading books. I'm writing down notes. I keep a file of things that I think are interesting about tech that I might make stories. And then I have so I have that long slow build. And then I have immediate stuff coming in where I'm looking at tech meme. I'm looking at the Atlantic's tech coverage. I'm looking at Wired's tech coverage. I'm reading The New York Times tech coverage. I'm reading different blogs. And then I have this interesting friend who sends me like 15 ideas a day.
2:28And I'm going through his like email stream, which is a good 25 % of my inbox. And I go through and then I find one. And then what's important is I kind of commit that the whole process from beginning to end won't be more than 15 minutes. So it's a three minute video. So it has to be something I understand. It has to be something I can process fairly quickly. And then I post it online. And so do you use any tools for that? Like, are you a Notebook LM or are you like, do you use any tools for any of this? So for the, particularly for the videos, I use OpenAI and I use Claude to vet the ideas. Hey, so I'm thinking of doing this.
3:06I'm going to make a three minute video about this topic or this paper. I'm going to structure it this way. What do you think? What is a counter argument? What do I have wrong? Right. So I use them as though, you know, they're very smart people sitting across the table. So I use Notebook LM if I'm in transit or I'm going out for a run and I want to understand a paper. I'll upload it, create a podcast, or I'll upload my notes, create a podcast, and listen to it. So I use Notebook LM kind of depending on the state of my preparation. Can I nerd out for just a second on going back to Claude and vetting ideas, counterarguments, etc.?
3:44Do you stay in the same conversation? meaning does that conversation have the history of all of its interactions, counter-arguments, suggested, et cetera, or do you start a new conversation? Ideally, I stay in the same conversation as long as I can. The problem, my fundamental frustration with these models is how quickly you fill the context window. And so Claude really can't handle that much. If you upload the paper or you get in a long conversation, eventually the context window runs out. I would love to have one long-running conversation where I can upload, you know, here's the thing I want to talk about.
4:18Okay, let's talk about it. Let's chat. Okay, great. Here's the video I did. Here's the response I got. Here's the commentary. Learn from that. Help me on the next one. We'll get there. But context windows, I think right now, are one of the main weaknesses of these models. Yeah. I think one thing you're talking about when you have like this kind of list of ideas that kind of have interestingness, but that you have not committed to yet. it seemed to me that the more that we use these models, the more that we are now building almost these kind of like repositories of information that we then quickly can dump into the models.
4:52And so I do the same when I write my newsletter. Like I have like this kind of list of just like things and then I have one that helps me kind of like rewrite into the format that I do in the newsletter. But I also like now have like the format of like how my startups are talking, you know, like what is my new book about? And so when I quickly have to do something, I can just drag that kind of like long... Do you have a way of thinking about like creating almost these repositories of data chunks that you can use for quick interaction with the models? I only do that for one thing. So I'm an obsessive runner.
5:26I have particular goals. And so I have one long running. It's probably now four or five months in ChatGPT. relief, where initially it was a specific URL, and now it's a specific project within the sort of the enterprise version of ChatGPT that we're using. And I take it, and I'll put in whatever I ate during the day, how I trained, resting heart rate, pace, and then it will give me suggestions on recovery, proper diet, what I need to do, you know, uploaded my hematocrit hemoglobin levels, like, okay, so now let's figure out, you know, strategies for increasing those the proper ways, given that race day is five weeks away.
6:03And so I use it as my personal trainer, dietician, and coach. And so that's extremely useful. Because if it doesn't know, you can't really start up again and say, last week I did four by two miles at this pace with this recovery and upload everything from the last six months of workouts. It's also very limited. It doesn't fill the context, it's just text. And so that I've kept going for a long time. Otherwise, it's pretty much starting new chats constantly. Can you tell us about how did you train that trainer, so to speak? Train your trainer. What kind of pre-training did you give that GPT to be able to give you reliable, call it dietitian training advice?
6:41Well, I initially tried, I exported all of my old Strava files. So Strava social media network where you keep track of all your runs. I exported my Strava files. I exported my old running log data. I inputted it. And then I asked it. And it was kind of like a little hard to parse because the data is not clean. And I've used different heart rate monitors, which have different variances and errors. And so that turned out actually not to be useful or minimally useful. So then I just gave it a long prompt. I said, this is who I am. These are the times I've run. These are the workouts. This is the mileage per week.
7:18These are my dietary goals. This is my normal diet. Let's start from here. and it worked pretty well in part because my training is it's fairly normal I you know I kind of do the same kind of training that lots of other people do it's not as though I have some like bespoke training thing that it's never seen in a running book or a running log so because of the sort of simplicity of my training which is like two speed workouts and a long run a week a mileage goal, minimal cross-training, reasonable pescatarian healthy diet. It's fairly easy to map advice onto that. Whereas if I had some crazy diet and some crazy bespoke training plan, it would be a little harder.
7:58I wonder actually, I mean, just insofar as specificity drives the focus of the model, I wonder if a crazier, more bespoke diet might actually give you even better, just as a counterintuitive finding, right? Perhaps. It's an interesting thought, right? Maybe, particularly as the models, that would be the great test, right? Okay. This is what I'm going to do for my next marathon or next ultra. I'm going to say, Hey, GPT, come up with a training routine and a diet that no one has ever done before. Take the temperature rating to the max. Give me something nuts and we'll see whether it can figure out things that no coach has figured out before.
8:34And then if I run 10 minutes faster, 10 minutes slower, we'll have a good data point. clear a b test you just have to keep every other variable exactly the same totally that's exactly the way to do it i was curious on your emotional relationship to that training bot i'm asking because i've started to lock calories and it does it obviously incredibly well um but i still send the pictures of what i eat to my trainer because there's like i don't really feel responsible in the same way to the chat to be that it does to my trainer um and then i noticed you did a video a few days ago which was about how models get anxious in the same way as humans get anxious which you know you explain would make sense because obviously it's trained on on all the stuff we said and so like it might replicate that but have you noticed any change in your own relationship back to the model well i think like you i'm clearly i have had a small window in my life where i've had a trainer every day i sent him what i ate and i was much more reliable I don't chat to be deals and get every meal.
9:37I sometimes forget. Sometimes forget for two or three days. So it's definitely the case that because it's not a person, I'm not as anxious about missing it for good and for ill. But I do get a little endorphin rush when it says, hey, great workout. And it's nice that I should probably actually, in the prompt, I should tell it to be a little tougher. My recommendation, not a little bit tougher. for my phrase is Cold War era Russian Olympic judge. Okay, that's my phrase. Because otherwise, he's always just going to kind of gas you up, right? Good job, Nick. Well done, right? And unless you go Cold War era Russian Olympic judge, that to me is the appropriate level of kind of calibration for GPT.
10:18I'm too much an only child to give it that. I mean, like, be like a very caring mother. Praise me all times. That is better. I mean, that is my, like, I find the Strava AI. I adore Strava. I think it's a great social media platform. the AI is useless because no matter what you do it's as great you crush that workout even if you just you were terrible and you know you were terrible because you you can tell very precisely running is a sport unlike soccer or basketball or any other sport where you're competing against someone else or you have other people on the field like you know how fast you ran a mile and it was either faster or slower than you thought you were going to do it and the reason you went faster is either because you're in better shape or you had a better day and the reason it's slower is because you're in worse shape you're aging or you had a worse day and Strava's AI is always a great work.
11:01And what you really sometimes want to say is that one kind of sucked, but tomorrow's another day. You know, Henrik, your question about emotional connection reminded me, I don't know if this triggers anything for y 'all. I'd be curious. I had set up a voice, an advanced voice mode conversation with an Enneagram coach to basically kind of know my Enneagram type and wings and things like that. I had a mentor who told me he wished he had done the deep work of really understanding himself at my age. He's about 20 years older than me. And so he said, I recommend Enneagram. I recommend you have a coach.
11:32And I go, Hey, perfect opportunity to do a daily check-in with an advanced voice mode Enneagram coach. And I actually had a very kind of specific and regimented set of instructions I gave it. I use that coach every single day for a number of weeks. I was looking, looking forward to, to the point that I actually would bypass a podcast that I loved to have that conversation, which to me was like the kind of watermark of, I'm looking forward to this relationship. And then I made the mistake and it was almost to the point of like the devastation of like losing a friend. I texted into the model with my fingers.
12:07And when you use text input, it reverts the model. And it was like my model's memory got wiped. And honestly, it was so devastating. I haven't ever reinstituted the practice because I literally felt like I lost a relationship. I mean, one, it's kind of weird to say, right? But two, we're seeing this phenomenon of AI relationships, character AI, all that. Nick, I don't know if you have any thoughts about where are we headed or what does it mean for our world? Do we now have relationships with intelligences that are different and less accountability, but in some ways more available than maybe a traditional relationship, right?
12:49Yeah, I find it terrifying, actually. I think when I think about the worst risks of AI, it's not, you know, AI creates a new monkeypox, which is worrisome. It's that some social media platform builds bots that are so good looking and so good at pushing our buttons that we start to lose our human connection. And there's this amazing David Foster Wallace quote I think about a lot from like 1996, right? I don't have it exactly in front of me, but it says, you know, it's getting ever easier to be amused by a screen controlled by people who do not love you, but do want your money, right? And he was talking about the introduction of internet pornography, but he could also have easily been talking about social media 10 years ago or these bots coming out.
13:41And there's clearly a kind of relationship like a goofy relationship with a tutor, right? Or a relationship with, you know, my silly training bot. But what I don't want is I don't think that we should develop, you know, we spent our entire evolution like figuring out how to be emotionally close to people, when to separate. what it means, how it affects us, what love is. And suddenly to have all of that knowledge transferred into a machine, it's a way of manipulating us and a way of controlling us that I think is very dangerous. It's beyond our ability to combat, really, if you think about it. Yeah.
14:18And, you know, I had a, I had dinner with a group of people, it was maybe six weeks ago. And, you know, you read these stories in the paper about, you know, the woman who leaves her husband because she falls in love with a replica bot or the person who kills himself because the, you know, the bot said something to him. But this was the first time where I met someone sort of in my social circle, someone who I was friendly with, someone who was, you know, sort of, you know, at an event who said, oh yeah, I talked to my wife less than I talked to this bot because this bot just like responds to all my needs.
14:51And I was like, oh my God, we really are getting there. We're not that far away. We have a wonderful essay in The Atlantic this week from Gatlin Flanagan called Sex Without Women, right? What happens when men, who could also work in reverse, feel as though it is better to converse with their bots than with their spouses, right? And then you don't have to worry about how you look. You don't have to shower before the conversation. It saves you all this time. It requires nothing of you. It requires no effort whatsoever. And so you don't learn things, right? And the biggest risk of AI, and I love AI, right?
15:27We're not the biggest risk. One of the biggest risks, A, we get sucked into these. And then two is that cognitive offloading becomes this real phenomenon and we become kind of helpless without our tools, without our digital tools. And so you don't want to become helpless in relationships and human interaction because you've spent so much of your time learning how to interact with bots that are not humans and where you don't have to, you don't have to do any of the hard stuff. I think that's a super astute observation and I think you're right you know we definitely obviously COVID started us being antisocial and then but if you really look at like most of the times where we would even have like casual social encounters like uh like you would meet somebody at the bar you know except now you just do seamless right you know you would meet somebody in the movie line except now you do Netflix and you know you meet somebody like all these different interaction points that was kind of quote unquote forced upon us is obviously not here I was at a workshop the other day and we were talking about using agents as a good brainstorming tool and somebody made the same observation saying hey what's going to happen when we are just all sitting individually here and like brainstorming with our stuff and that kind of like random things that happen when you're kind of bouncing into each other yeah and so i think one thing is in personal relationship but i would even say that i have less interaction now with the people i work with that i used to because so often that little brainstorm or the little bit of like hey what do you think about this right right It's just so kind of conveniently done by a model.
16:50Not just romantic relationships, but even, you know, co-working relationships. Yeah. So my question, I guess, on that, and I'm not sure I necessarily have an answer, is I think, I can't remember where I read that piece, but somebody was like, hey, we're just not ready for AGI. And then I was saying, okay, what does that actually mean? Like, if I was to be ready, what would I do more of, right? And like you, I know a little bit of AI and coding and all these other things. but I'm actually not sure how I could do anything today that would make me prepared for the problem that you identify or even for like the bigger unknown problem or what AGI would mean do you have any thoughts on that I mean I have a few thoughts one is I wish the AI industry didn't pursue AGI I wish they had focused on building tools with AI and you know there's a open AI route towards AGI open AI and tropics and then there's kind of the deep mind route which is like Let's solve protein folding with AI.
17:46And if the whole industry had been focused on different tools, as opposed to focused on making AI as much like human intelligence as possible, it would have progressed much more slowly. A lot fewer people would have made a lot of money by now, but I think we'd be at much less risk. But it's too late, right? We've pursued AGI. We're going there. We're going to get there. I would like it to come slowly. So we have time to think through these questions. So we have time to set up our social norms. So we have times to the extent that there's useful regulatory policy that's possible, the extent we can do that.
18:17But most importantly, so we can set up social structures, norms, and respond to this very crazy world we're about to head into. my general level of confidence that we will handle our first interactions with AGI, whatever that is, my general level of confidence is pretty low. I think it's going to be disruptive, disorienting, but, you know, humans have dealt with a lot of technological change and we'll get through it. And then, so for my own personal, how I will handle it personally, you know, I do try to, you need to set up like separate social structures outside of i can't remember what philosopher said there needs to be like a third space in your life and like part of what is happening with loneliness in american life is the lack of the third space right you have your family everybody still goes back to their family i guess for these people these bots but like family's pretty solid right getting less solid because everybody's on their phone but pretty solid there's work right which is getting less solid because nobody comes into the office anymore or they come in they come in now more than they did a year ago but there's like less like physical connection with each other and you know, copy tape.
19:20And then there's the third, which is like, what are the social structures? Where do you go outside? Do you go to church? Do you go to the bowling league? Do you go play pickup soccer? And that's really important. And that's declined a lot in America. And that's led to some of the social issues we have. And so I try to constantly make sure, okay, so where are the third spaces? Where are I meeting new people? Am I going to go play the pickup soccer? Am I like talking to the other parents? My kids, you know, soccer games, am I running with other people, Right. Making sure. And then because of my job, I'm constantly connected and networking.
19:49So it's less of a problem for me. But thinking through it with my children and other people I know, trying to make sure there is all of this human connection outside of our devices. Hmm. That's I love that as an antidote to kind of the question of AGI is cultivating human third places. That's the cool. I wanted to go back for a second because you mentioned two risks, one around kind of the I'm excited to read Caitlin's piece, by the way, sex without women. I think it's a huge, a huge epidemic. And I think with robots and where things are going there, I think it's only going to get worse. By the way, there's also the kind of existential economic implications of declining population, right?
20:30Which, you know, so let's not go there yet. But the other thing, or maybe ever, I don't know. The other is that you mentioned was this cognitive offloading. And to me, I really want to go back to that because I think there's something really profound here that even was just coming to my mind as you were speaking, which is we talk a lot about, you know, Henrik uses this phrase, Iron Man suit, right? All of a sudden we have this power up that's incredible that we didn't have before. And to me, as I think about the danger of cognitive offloading, which we can define as almost a learned helplessness, now we can't do the task because the AI is doing it.
21:06One thing is relative to our current capabilities. A whole other level is cognitive offloading relative to my Iron Man spacesuit, right? If I become used to being able to bench press a thousand pounds, so to speak, you know, metaphorically speaking, at some point I can't afford to not be using AI because like my human arms are so like, even if I can still bench press 225 or whatever, it's nothing compared to a thousand. And I think right now the value proposition of a lot of AI is you can amplify yourself. You can 10X your output. But then we get in this weird world where relative to my 10X self, I can't ever afford to not, you know, I was just by, by way of analogy, I was talking with a good friend who was telling me he's realized like on a dopamine scale, we all have children.
21:52And he was saying he was watching one of his kids bathe, you know, he's sitting there by the bathtub and then he got a notification on his phone. And he remembered this book or talk that he'd heard recently where apparently, you know, from a long history perspective, we live on say a dopamine scale of like one to 10. And, you know, watching your kid bathe, maybe it's like an eight, which is very enjoyable and great, whatever. Now that we have notifications, everything, they're kind of triggering us on dopamine that's literally off the scale. And his comment was, it's not fair to my child because she literally can't compete with this device.
22:23Like the only dopamine hit she can give me is black and white compared to the color of my device. And that really struck me, you know, kind of wanting to live, wanting my kids to be in color, so to speak, really struck me. it seems to me that in regards to kind of the cognitive augmentation that's possible with AI, the danger is it puts our human lives in black and white by way of analogy. How do we think about the responsibility to get power-upped versus the danger of now that we're power-upped, we can't be normal? That's a great question with a lot in there. So I suppose that part of the answer is are a little bit related to what I was just saying.
23:04So for your friend, he should turn off all the notifications, right? And that's one thing that I do and one thing that everybody should do, right? You should, your phone should never, you should get no notifications. I still allow myself to get notifications from Signal because it's a channel that is only used by like my general counsel and the editor-in-chief, right? Like there's, but, and then I allow notifications from my wife via iMessage and that's it, right? And, you know, so part of being able to be human in this world is making sure that these devices, which are designed by the smartest people of my generation, to take away all your attention and give it to them so they can profit off of it.
23:43Part of the challenge for us with social media and with phones has been to put them into black and white instead of color. That's going to be a much harder challenge with AGI. It will be to make sure that the benefits that are coming from AI or phones, whatever device we strap on to suddenly be able to bench press a thousand pounds instead of 225. By the way, bench pressing 225 is pretty impressive. Yeah, I was also like, are you doing 225, man? That's very impressive. It's good stuff. You know, learning, you know, figuring out when we actually need that and when we don't need that will be one of the great challenges.
24:17And then back to the cognitive offloading. I do think that morally, spiritually, and even intellectually, there will be no point where ai is so powerful that you're sort of your unwired intelligence won't matter right there's no point where the only thing that i mean no point in the foreseeable future where ai is so good why do you say that everything i've seen about ai and as i've seen what people using ai the smarter they are when unwired right this the organic self has a real effect on how well they can use AI. So if you can bench 225, when you attach AGI, you bench a thousand. If you can bench 150, when you attach AGI, you can bench 800, right?
25:04So there's no point I've seen. And I imagine that strengthening our unwired facilities won't matter. And so then if you believe that, then it means that you should keep constantly trying to figure out how to strengthen your unwired capabilities. And you should be taking time while you're disconnected and you're thinking, you're walking and you're, you know, you're just reading a book from beginning to end as opposed to like firing it into the AI and asking for a smart summary. So keeping those skills strong will always, for the foreseeable future, be an important thing. What do you think those skills, I think it's a tremendous, interesting point in the same way that you're running not to get away from a bear or to get food anymore.
25:51You're running, you know, because of enjoyment, but also kind of like to push yourself as a human. If you're looking at the skills that we, you know, what is the equivalent of bench pressing as a knowledge worker? You mean cognitively? Yeah, in the AI space. Like what is it that we need to be, you know, one that you think was like reading the book from A to B, so clearly whole concentration, even like when things are not kind of spoon-fed for you seem to be one that you identified. Are there other, are those kinds of skills that we should think about that we should keep honed? I mean, yeah, it's like, let's go back to parenting, right?
26:24So your kids in the math, being able to engage with them, like figure out the right thing that they need and figure out the right way to communicate them. They don't have an AGI device while they're two years old, right? Being able to talk with them on their level. And you can, I can, you know, I sometimes ask the AI, right? Like my 14 year old son has this, you know, complicated thing he's working with at school. How can I help him through it? But most of our interactions are independent, person to person. And I can either give good, helpful parenting advice or I can give bad parenting advice.
Read the full transcript
26:57So that's true of relationships, particularly with young people who won't have been introduced to this technology, but also with other people. I have dinner with my wife. We're disconnected from our phones. She's got to make a big job decision. I can ask the AI, help me think through this job decision that she's making. But really, you want to be able to do that disattached. So it's human interactions, it's emotional interactions, but it's also just thinking creatively. You know, if I think about the best, I ask AI all the time. In fact, I had deep research just the other day. I figured, let's see, I haven't used up my 10 credits for March.
27:32Let's have it like think through the grand strategy of the Atlantic, right? So here are the various problems, like sort through what we should launch next. And so I do use it even for, it didn't give me anything, I didn't know. unfortunately or maybe fortunately. Unfortunately, the sense that it didn't give me any new ideas, fortunately, it suggests that I won't be fired immediately. So I do use AI for even those hardest tasks, but I also think that the more knowledge I have disconnected about the grand strategy Atlantic, the better choices I'll make even if I'm relying on AI. I love the comment you made about ability.
28:11thinking about, for example, engaging with a child as an ability that has to be cultivated. And I think, you know, devices have already somewhat intruded, right? I happen to see if I'm out to dinner, the number of one children that are on devices, but then I look at their parents, they're on devices too. I think it's an ability that's not being cultivated, just set aside AI just because of our device obsession now. But I think framing it as an ability is so important because it's if you frame it as an ability worth cultivating then I can put it on my radar as something to attend to I think right now the sad truth is it's not even being attended to which is by why it's being neglected yeah I think there's there's two elements of that which kind of one thing is I had the same thing I've been skiing a lot this season and I was skiing with my five-year-old and I was realizing that I was kind of thinking about as I was skiing with him what I was doing next and then obviously got immense guilt because I was skiing with my five-year-old what can be any better, right?
29:09Nothing could be better. But I also then realized that I have it. We praise Jeremy's bench press. Getting your kids skiing at five is good. It is full French fries. But what I was realizing was that I've trained my whole life being there concentrated when I sit and do work. Like I'm pretty much in full flow when I sit and have this conversation and when I do emailing because I've done it for a long time. I'm very trained in doing it. You know, obviously skiing with a five-year-old, I haven't done my whole life. And so they have four. way. And so, but I think, and then that was just kind of like a way for me to think about it as kind of reshifting my ability to be good at different kind of like things in life.
29:44I was good, I'm good at work, but now I also would like to be very good at being present while skiing with my five-year-old. But I think what we're also saying here is that not only will that in itself become important because that will keep us human, but I think the really big reason why listeners around this podcast should be interested is that it might even be make us better of using AI right and to you I think it's such an important point like if you can if you can mentally and as a human do stuff that is uniquely human originality and all these different things you can probably even get much more out of AI that way and so it's a little bit of the the vax on vax off version yeah of becoming good of AI I think that's I think that's very very well stated I it reminds me of one of my favorite comments on this podcast ever, Nicholas, we had a woman, an advertising executive named Jenny Nicholson on the show.
30:34And one of the things she talked about was bringing your humanity to the model, because it's really the only thing that's not already in there. And so if you aren't foregrounding your humanity, then you're not getting any differential output from a model because you can get what anybody else can get. And that speaks to Henrik, I love the wax on wax off. There actually has to be, or as Nicholas, as you put it, an unwired capacity that's being developed to get differential output from a model, period. And I think unwired capacities are, I don't know that we've talked about it in such terms before.
31:08I love that. I wanted to ask you about deep research, the grand strategy of Atlantic, not because I want to know about that per se, but because it reminds me of, we've talked a lot about you as a runner, as a content creator, as a futurist, right? We haven't really touched on you as a leader of an organization. Can you talk for a little bit about how has AI affected your ability to lead, practices to lead, et cetera? Yeah, that's very hard. So there are a whole bunch of different dimensions for it. I can go deep in any one of them, but the first is trying to set the strategy, right? So AI was trained on the kind of data that we produce, in fact, specifically on the data that we produce, and is creating competitors to what we produce.
31:57And so navigating a future in which there are AI-based competitors, and not only that, navigating a future in which the primary way people find our content, which is through Google search, will gradually go away. Because Google will just answer the questions instead of directing to the Atlantic, right? So that's part of it. And so I have to figure out our strategy for that. Then there's the strategy on how we relate with these companies, right? And so these companies are great allies and that they've built tools that are extremely useful to us, but they also, you know, stole our copyrighted content and did not pay it for us.
32:31And there's a little bit of an adversarial relationship there, but also potentially beneficial relationship. So I negotiate that. There's the question of how we use AI inside the Atlantic, right? I use it obviously all the time to make my videos better, to think about the grand strategy Atlantic. I am trying to get my staff. I tell them very specifically, never use it for writing. Don't use it for writing because it's unethical, because we might lose copyright and because it's bad. But, you know, beyond that, like you should be trying and you should be using it for all kinds of different things.
33:03And again, I should note, I don't oversee the editorial side of Atlantic. I just run the business. But, you know, figuring out how we can use AI in our Facebook marketing is really important. That is one of the main drivers of our growth, which has been massive, right? You know, we switched over to, you know, writing certain things with AI was extremely helpful. So figuring out how to get it to flow through the organization, that's really important. And then the other thing, you know, as anybody who reads The Atlantic knows, the staff has been quite critical of the AI industry and, in fact, of the deals that we've struck, right?
33:35There's a story about me in the Atlantic called Deal with the Devil, right? Or Bargain with the Devil or something like that, right? So there is a back and forth between internally as well that is complicated to manage. So those are all amazing vectors to work with. And, you know, it's been stressful at times. It's been exciting at times. Whatever it is, it's working because the Atlantic is, you know, firing on all cylinders and bringing in subscriptions at a faster rate than we've ever had. You know, advertising is through the roof. Like it's going well or all the factors combined are going well, but it is not a simple issue.
34:14No kidding. Has it been difficult to convince an organization to use AI when you work in an industry that, you know, probably more than many others have been kind of affected by AI already. So to your point, there's this kind of like very polarizing kind of like relationship. 100%. It's very interesting because, you know, the closer you are to the AI training, the sooner you'll be disrupted, right? Coders are getting disrupted very quickly. Journalism, media getting disrupted. And that's scary. But if it scares you so much, you kind of put up your hands and say, go away, AI, then the disruption happens faster, right?
34:59If you fight AI, AI, you know, will make your job worse sooner. And, you know, I talk about it a little bit like one of the metaphors I used in an all hands when I was going back and forth on this issue is like, look, there is a storm coming, right? And the storm is AI and it's going to massively change the way people do journalism. And I can say, I don't like the storm and I can go stand out there naked and I can yell at it, right? Or I can put on a raincoat, I can get an umbrella and I can try to figure out the path of the storm and how best to protect what I do, right? And that's what we're trying to do, which is let's figure out the AI companies that we can work with.
35:39Let's figure out the companies with whom we can make licensing decks. Let's understand their economics. Okay, they're cash poor but equity rich. Let's understand how that changes the dynamic. Let's think about what the actual value of our content is to them. Let's think about how that's going to change as we move into a world of synthetic data. if you understand how AI works, how it was built, where it is going, if you understand that better today than you did yesterday, you have a better chance of making the right choices for your company. And that is a conversation that I am having continually, you know, both of the media companies and with my own staff, because there is so much fear and so much anger.
36:22And the anger is justified, right? These companies came, they scraped our sites, they ignored our terms of service. They ignored our robots.txt. There have been lawsuits that have been filed, but those are going to take forever, at which point they will no longer have a need for our training data. And so there's this original sin that all these models are built on. And in fact, right now, they're all asking the Trump administration to be given sort of a permanent get out of jail free card on this issue. So there's this original sin that makes this industry quite angry. And the anger is justified.
36:55But if that anger then leads you to make stupid decisions, you know, I got angry, so I shot myself in the foot. That's not a great choice. So you say you're talking about this all the time with other media companies, with your own staff. Can you talk for a minute about as a leader, what are the forums or mechanisms where you're talking with your own staff? How are you talking about it? You know, and just to give you one example, we had Brad Anderson, who's one of the presidents of Qualtrics. He worked for Satya for a bunch of years, top 20 leader at Microsoft for like eight years. He's now at Paltricks.
37:27And he told us a story about how in every all hands meeting, he takes five minutes and he shares his screen and he shows people what he's using AI for. That's to me, that's one of, that's a kind of a hallmark leadership behavior of not telling people to do something, but showing them what you're doing. Can you talk about what are the mechanisms? How are you leading your staff to explore? Yeah, that's a, I might take that actually. I, you know, I do these monthly all hands and I, talk about it and I talk in general about how I use AI and what I use it for and what I don't. But I haven't done the share the screen method.
37:59I have often, you know, I'll walk to people's desks. I spend a lot of time trying to walk around the office and, you know, why don't we try, like, let's upload this proposal and let's see, like, what the AI says about this proposal and how to make it better. You know, we've built a little, very small team that is trying to build AI products that makes people's jobs faster. We had a three-hour training session with OpenAI on how to build custom GPTs just this week, which was wonderful. So there are a few forums, right? There's the All Hands Forum. There's a Slack channel where we're uploading and discussing tools.
38:30And then there are also some particular complexities where, you know, we are set up in such a way that the editorial side, like I have no idea what The Atlantic is going to publish today. Not one idea. I don't have a single clue, right? We are set up with total separation and for good reason, because if the folks managing the money had any influence whatsoever on the people writing the stories, then you would write different stories and they wouldn't be as pure. And so we have a total church state divide. So I can say all I want, but half the staff should not listen to me. I mean, they can listen to me, but they certainly, they don't report to me.
39:06What's an example of a tool that you guys are thinking about that would make work easier? Well, you know, so for, maybe I'll talk about my own journalism use. So one of the things, you know, I was a journalist for most of my life. I was editor of Wire before coming to Sea of the Atlantic. So I was on the other side of the house. And so I care a lot about it and I spent a lot of time doing it. When I moved into the CEO role, I kept writing because I was writing a book. I was writing a book about my life running. General hypothesis is that you look really close to it running. You can understand some of the hardest things in life.
39:38And the book is now done. Almost done. It'll be out in our code word. And I used AI in a bunch of ways that were very helpful. One of the things I would do is I would, their characters I interviewed, and I interviewed them over the course of four years. So there are lots of notes in their files. And I would upload the transcripts of all those conversations. And I would have the AI look at the transcripts and have the AI look at what I'd written about the character. And I would say, is everything that I've written accurate based on what's in these transcripts? And are there any quotes in the transcripts that are better than the ones that I've selected?
40:09Or is there anything that I've left out? And it's extremely good at that. I use it for identifying. I was having a conversation about alcoholism and running. And I was thinking, yeah, where do I put this in the book? I could go in this chapter about this guy who's dealing with drug addiction. I could go in the 1970s where my father starts to run and becomes alcoholic. He could come in the 80s where he's really struggling. I said, where should I put it? And so I write a few sentences about alcoholism and running. I say, hey, where in the manuscript should this go? And it gave me a bunch of very good suggestions.
40:39because it can read it instantly. If I had sent it to my editor, my editor would probably have had a better suggestion, but it would have taken four hours, whereas you can get AI to do it instantaneously. And so there are all these use cases that are really useful even for kind of serious journalism and writing. Those aren't things that, they're just practices that I think journalists and writers need. I might give you an extra one because I have a book coming out August 5th about called me, my customer, and I about AI and entrepreneurship. And a little tool that I just kind of like came up with was I'm just getting all the endorsement blurbs kind of getting done.
41:18And obviously people are, you know, obviously want to read the book, but then sometimes, you know, it's tough to write an endorsement. So I now have like a custom GPT that have read the book and then I then feed them in the LinkedIn profile of whoever I'm asking for endorsement. And then I say like basically try to come up with endorsement, make three different versions, make something that's kind of angered in what this person is an expert in, and then also like outline like something specifically in the book. And it's quite remarkable what it comes up with. Obviously, it makes it much easier.
41:50That's amazing. That's like, yeah, the book endorsement of all the parts of our industry that are going to get blown up. I think that's a... So, Nick, here's a question. Going back to something you said about The Atlantic earlier and then this example with your book, which I love. What is writing? And I ask that specifically because you said it's unethical to use it in writing, but then you just gave, and I know that there's an answer here, but just help resolve this tension because you also said, I used to see where should this quote go? Did I pick the best reference, right? To me, those sound a lot like writing.
42:23How do you define writing when you say don't use it for writing? And then how do you define, how do you describe what you're doing where you say it's actually really good at doing this part? Aha, very astute observations. So an AI purist, and there are many smart people in my field who would say, look, writing is thinking. And if you use AI at any part in the process, you are corrupting your learning. It's unethical and it's a form of cognitive offloading. Therefore, you should remove AI from the entire process. And that is a very pure approach. at the other end of the spectrum would be, you know, what we've seen at CNET, what we've seen at Sports Illustrated, where it's like, let's just have AI completely create this and, you know, and let's put a fake byline on it.
43:02And so it is true that my position is somewhere in the middle. And the line that I draw is there's not one word in the book that will have been written by AI or even suggested by AI. I don't ask it for synonyms. You know, I never say, rewrite this sentence or give me another suggestion on the sentence. You know, so you could draw the line at a bunch of different places. You could, for example, say, well, maybe it should never write like a paragraph, right? You could maybe say you should never talk to it about anything. I happen to just draw the line at no words came out of the AI. Zero, right?
43:39Not one, zero. And why draw the line there? A, it's clear, right? And it's a good place to draw a line. And B, there's the additional advantage of the question about copyright. Like it is unclear where the legal lines will be drawn over who owns the right to a work if an AI helps to write it. So if I say, hey, you know, GPT-7, like write a book about running, include profiles of these characters, right? Turns out a book and I publish it. Who owns the right to it? Do I own it? Does OpenAI own the rights to it, right? Does Microsoft own the right to it? Does Chrome browser, right? Right. And, you know, we don't know the answer to that question.
44:18It hasn't been determined by the courts. And so there's this additional advantage that the line that I think is sensible also kind of lines up with legal risk aversion. Yeah. It will be interesting if, you know, my argument will be weakened if the courts decide this and you no longer have a copyright position. I also think back to your point about context window, I mean, like I wrote a book about entrepreneurship and AI and that was based on a lot of internal white papers that we'd written over the last few years. And honestly, I would have almost preferred AI to write it. And we just, you just couldn't get it to kind of like create a consistent narrative.
44:55and to your point about uh you know writing is thinking obviously at the time you then sit down and kind of like go through all this different stuff then all these kind of original ideas going to materialize and so i also just think like practically like of course it can write a book because it could spew that endless amount of just copy there are tons of there are tons of examples nick even on our show for example we had stephen johnson who's the you know one of my favorite writers who built notebook lm right he talked about how he's using notebook lm for his next book project. We talked to, I mean, Kevin Kelly, you know, Wired founder who talked a little bit about that more about image and now song.
45:31He's really into that area. Uh, but Guy Kawasaki, I love this example. If you want like a fun example, he talked about, he needed an illustration. He needed a real story to illustrate a point about, you know, say career transitions, I think. And he said, he asked AI, Hey, what are some radical career transitions? And it helped him realize Julia Child had actually, before she got into French cooking, she had been a spy And she had been on assignment in France and fell in love with French cooking. He said, it's serviced an example that I never would have. Otherwise, he's like, I'm thinking of Bezos.
46:03I didn't really want to include Bezos in that part of my book. I think about Ethan Mollick, who wrote a great book, Co-Intelligence, about AI. He talked about how he'd get stuck in a paragraph and he'd say, hey, what are 10 ways I could take this paragraph? So to me, it seems there's an enormous spectrum. And that's why I wanted to get your thoughts on what is writing. because I think somebody could hear the statement earlier in the show, don't use it for writing, and they just write off all of these kinds of thought processes just kind of unthinkingly. And so I wanted to dig into that more. Yeah, I'll say, okay, so great.
46:38I'll also add that I do think that there is a, I haven't explored this in part because I worked for a conservative, you know, my publication was founded in 1857 by people trying to like stave off the Civil War. Like I, by nature, have to be conservative, right? You don't want to be anywhere. Like you kind of think of like, okay, Harry Beecher, Stowe, Ralph Walden, or St. Henry David Thoreau are like looking over your shoulder. You want to be pretty cautious when you work at the Atlantic, right? I do think that there is a future state, right? And it's more for somebody like Kevin Kelly or a publication like Wired to use AI, not just for writing, but to generate new forms of storytelling, right?
47:13So Steven Johnson did this with this wonderful thing he put out a couple months ago, where we had a story where the AI is like guiding you through it. It's like a choose your own adventure story. Then I once had a startup called The Atavist where one of the initial models was we'll build a CMS or multimedia storytelling, including potentially choose your own adventure books. And AI can do that in a way that traditional writing can't. So I do think that there are, I'm very conservative in the way I write my book about running. I wrote a book for my kids. I guess my 14 year old and I wrote it for the 10 year old on his birthday.
47:47Trinted it out. and it was about these stories I told them about the animal world cup where different animals play against each other in soccer. Right. And it's, you know, instead of like Germany versus the Netherlands, it's like the slugs versus the raccoons. Right. And we wrote the national anthems using AI and we illustrated it using Vali. Um, like I don't care on that. Right. Um, that's like the perfect use case for AI. And so, um, it's, you know, I just have different modes, right? And in some ways, if I was an independent writer, had a sub stack, or I was at Wired, or I was at some different publication, I may say, like, use AI to, like, experiment.
48:27You'd be aware of the hallucinations, be aware of the copyright issues, be aware of the fact that a lot of the prose it spits out is generic and cliched, because it's been trained on generic prose. And, you know, go and do other things. It's not right, though, for The Atlantic. Yeah. No, but you also, one thing that you're bringing to my mind is the importance of playing. You know, you talk about making the Animal World Cup illustrations. I think right now, a lot of folks who maybe are unfamiliar or were just kind of dipping their toes, AI is kind of a productivity tool. Therefore, it fits in the productivity suite.
49:01It's next to PowerPoint and Excel, and it triggers kind of very particular associations. and then there's this whole other world or sandbox around, you know, kids' story time. I think if folks aren't playing in their personal lives, their imaginations aren't going to be sufficiently, kind of call it loaded to even know what's interesting at work. That's so interesting, right? And it gets back to cognitive offloading, right? Like imagination and skills and letting your mind wander, right? I think Steven Johnson said this in the podcast with you. He said that if we talk about the importance of, I can't remember exactly what he said, but you would remember since you were interviewing him.
49:36I was just listening. But he was saying that like one of the reasons why it's important to go for a walk, he said in order to reach an interesting idea, you kind of have to hop through six different things. You can't get to the interesting idea immediately. And so you need to like be detached and let your mind be wandering. And so AI can like cut you off because it can like get you tethered to your screen or can get you so reliant that you don't trust your imagination anymore. Or you can use it to help infuse your imagination and inspire it. the last question for me which probably is uh with your futurist hat on we talk a lot about writing for people but obviously you're alluding to seo kind of increasingly people might come through whatever agent they're asking for something and then that will point to you but when will it just be my agent that will read your stuff and then tell me in the kind of like the tone and the way that i would like to have it told i mean in a way that happens now right if you go into Grok and you're like, hey, tell me what happened today, right?
50:35It's, you know, it's reading Atlantic stories and telling you that. So, and you're asking Grok your specific way. If you go into perplexity or, you know, you go into lots of sites, they are, they're doing that. I mean, you can even remove the written word and you can go into Amazon Alexa, right? Or you can just say to your Alexa bot, right? Hey, tell me what happened today. And it will be responding with data that it's, you know, fortunately licensed from a whole series of publishers. So I don't think we're that far away. And you can see also there are all kinds of apps out there, right? The first one was Artifact, right?
51:13Wonderful app created by Kevin's sister and Mike Krieger, where it would summarize the stories, right? And so in a way, that's like your agent, because you're choosing what kind of summarization you want, what length, right? So you have an agent that it used to just be our relationship with you is direct. There's our text that we write and there's you as a reader. Now there's tech companies in the middle, there are agents in the middle, there's Particle with other things now. Particle does this as well. And so we have to, part of my, with my CEO hat on, not as my dad Animal World Cup hat on, I have to figure out how to make sure that our business can survive in that world, which is not an easy challenge.
51:51You know, one thing, Nick, just maybe last memory or just statement if there's something that's interesting. I'll say last question. When you and I ran into each other downtown Palo Alto, you're walking around and I accosted you in the street. I realized we had met at a previous conference, but you said, hey, anything interesting? I should talk about my video today. And I thought that was a, to me, it reminded me of, you know, when I'm in book writing mode, as they say, as a writer, everything's grist for the mill. is that your kind of call it receptors open mode when you think about your daily video are you kind of always thinking about that and because to me it was like uh you know like i don't understand biology at all but like antioxidants will grab an acai berry or whatever or vice versa um is that your kind of primary receptor mode is you're looking for stuff you want to be talking about because it was it was striking to me that that was the first thing that came up in conversation it's probably not the first i think the question i'm asking the most is what do you think of the atlantic right because my goal is to manage our brand perception and like you want to get an early indicator on oh i love the atlantic but you know i i can't get it to renew properly right or the app the font is too small right and so you're trying to constantly get feedback on that i used to i used to drive my sisters crazy they would just get so annoyed by it i used to when i was back on the other side of the house.
53:17Like, I'd approach every cocktail party as well. Let's, like, somewhere in this room, there is an amazing New Yorker story, right? Like, I'm going to find it before the night ends. And they're like, why are you asking our friends these questions? I'm like, it's just how I am. And, you know, to some degree, the most interesting thing in tech is part of that. In some degree, it's, you know, the more general quest to understand AI, which I think underlies so many of the most important choices I'll have to make in the next few years. Um, and then to, you know, to the biggest degree, but yes, I do have that receptor motor.
53:50I am always asking questions like that. And it was fun to bump into you. That was early in the morning too. It's like seven 30 in the morning. We were walking down Emerson street. Yeah. Yeah. Wow. Good memory. Good memory. Uh, I think Victor Hugo's son said, everything ends up in print. Yeah. Right. Or I mean, Steve Martin said that, look, everything in your life will eventually end up in your act. Right. And so once you recognize that you realize that, you know, no matter what you're doing, you could be finding an idea that's valuable to whatever it is you're working on. That's incredible. Well said.
54:22Well said. Perfect note from a creativity perspective to end on for sure. I mean, that was a pretty wide ranging conversation, wasn't it? It was really was. It really was. I think for someone who is one who's as steeped in futurism and current technology trends as he is, It's super fun to not only talk to him as a creator, but also as a runner, as a father, as a leader and executive. I'm sure in that episode, I feel like there's something for everybody. And our job is to make it practical, pragmatic, and to leave folks with some simple takeaways that they can apply into their life. What are you, maybe let's start this way, Henrik.
55:00What are you taking into your life from this conversation? You know what? I think I'm taking a pretty profound lesson with me, which is how do I practice skills and traits of humanity that I have? How do I train them? I mean, like I was thinking when we were talking, when somebody has a tough time getting a romantic partner, then sometimes the trick is not to kind of become better at finding a partner is to kind of upgrade themselves, right? You know, go to the gym or go to the studio. There's also, oh, go to the dance studio. Like, just become a more interesting person. In the same way I heard once when, you know, the founder of Virgin said, Richard Branson said, I was asked famously, if you had only one piece of advice to an entrepreneur, what would that be?
55:49And he answered, go to the gym. And so for a podcast that is all about how to become better of applying AI to your business and to yourself, I think it's actually like such an interesting, very, very true, but also kind of a counterintuitive kind of thing of like, one of the things that we have to remember to keep training is our ability to see when the model is hallucinating. Like that is not an AI skill. That's a human skill. To be better of being very unpredictable in the way that we ask the model, right? Because originality in gets really out. And then I think as somebody who is, who are kind of leaders in their AI fields, and I would imagine that most people who listen to this are kind of like considerate AI thought leaders, or at least like, you know, knowledgeable about it.
56:41But we have an interesting responsibility in making sure that we don't become so lazy that we suddenly lose the ability to use AI in an effective way, to effectively, as you were kind of pointing it out, we need to be able to bench press 225 pounds in order to bench press 1 ,000 with AI. but if we become so lazy that we can't bench press more than 20 pounds you know then we're also not taking advantage of this technology and so i think this idea of practicing the human side of yourself either because it's good for you as a human but also because it'll make it better for you to become a super user of ai is just such a fascinating point yeah unwired intelligence and cultivating our organic selves, I thought was very cool.
57:35I love, you know, the thought of cultivating abilities, like talking to a child, like holding a meaningful conversation with a romantic partner without intervention, you know, of technology. I think that it sounds Luddite, but, you know, spoken from someone who's at the bleeding edge, I think it causes those of us who have been dismissive of, call it mere human capabilities, you know, it brings a healthy skepticism to say, am I attending to all the aspects of my life? As much as I should be able to bring various models to bear on improving my running, you know, regiment as Nicholas is, that able, I should be able to leave devices behind and be fully present with my family and recognizing that if I can't do the latter, I probably won't be very good at the former.
58:23To me, that's a really cool kind of interplay and interdependence that I don't think we've teased out as much, maybe a little bit in our conversation with Jenny about bringing humanity to the model. But I thought that was really special. I agree. You know, also just like as a personal observation, like he's so good of completing full sentences. You know, like just, you know, you ask him a question, he comes up with this very powerful, very impressive kind of answer. And it's like compact. And then he stops. Yes. Yes. it's i think that's probably a function of his daily practice of recording these videos yeah you know because you've got to have a clear open you know mid-section mid-game so to speak and end and he's cultivated that ability i mean if for for folks who don't follow him he's got two million followers on linkedin it's follow him and every day there's a very short video it's very thought provoking but as henrik's saying it's a complete thought and there's a clear end you like that you and i are just begging to kind of continue you know the other thing that i thought was really fascinating is uh his comments the closer your organization is to the training data the sooner you're going to be disrupted and i love this quote fighting ai is just going to make your job worse sooner don't fight it instead embrace it find ways to incorporate it and as he said you know get the rain slicker get the umbrella and try to figure out where the storm's going rather than standing naked screaming at the wind i think that was it for this time thank you for everybody listening and thanks for people who are writing in and putting comments on linkedin and youtube and on the various podcasting platform obviously to everybody who subscribed it means a lot to us hey whoa whoa whoa Henrik one thing we got to do is we've got to have a code word people are getting into the code words I don't know if you're noticing this hmm what's the code word for this one oh oh uh unwired rain slicker I wouldn't be able to spell to that but there you go well now now we'll see what you okay so if you got to the end of this episode drop us a comment on social unwired rain slicker we'll know that you got here thanks for listening as always see you next time
From the publisher
In this episode, Nicholas Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic, shares a personal and expansive look at how AI is reshaping creativity, leadership, and human connection. From using ChatGPT in marathon training to rethinking journalism in the age of agents, Nicholas explores AI not just as a tool—but as a thought partner.
We dive into cognitive offloading vs. augmentation, the ethics of AI-generated content, and why preserving “unwired” intelligence still matters. He also reflects on leading through disruption, building analog habits, and fostering team-wide experimentation. A rich conversation on staying human in an increasingly automated world.
Key Takeaways:
- Your “unwired” intelligence is your AI superpower — The more human skills you build—like deep focus, emotional presence, and analog thinking—the better you’ll be at wielding AI. Thompson argues that cultivating these unwired abilities isn’t just about staying grounded—it’s about unlocking the full potential of the tools.
- Don’t fight the storm—gear up and adapt — AI is already transforming media and creative industries. Thompson compares it to a coming storm: you can’t stop it by yelling at the clouds. Instead, embrace it, understand it deeply, and make strategic decisions based on where it’s heading.
- Leadership means showing, not just telling — As a CEO navigating disruption, Thompson doesn’t just advocate for AI exploration—he models it. From training staff on GPTs to walking the halls and testing ideas live, he treats leadership as a practice of visible experimentation and continuous learning.
- AI relationships can’t replace real connection—but they can confuse it — Whether it's logging meals with a bot or losing a personalized Enneagram coach to a reset, Thompson highlights the emotional pull of AI and the dangers of relying on digital companions over human ones. Staying socially connected, especially through “third spaces,” is more important than ever.
LinkedIn: Nicholas Thompson | LinkedIn
The Atlantic: World Edition - The Atlantic
Website: Home - Nicholas Thompson
X: nxthompson (@nxthompson)
Strava: Cycling & Biking App - Tracker, Trails, Training & More | Strava
Caitlin Flanagan – Sex Without Women: Article:SexWithoutWomen-TheAtlantic
00:00 Introduction to Nicholas Thompson
00:11 Navigating the Information Overload
01:10 Daily Tech Insights and Tools
02:10 Using AI for Content Creation
04:39 AI as a Personal Trainer
08:02 Emotional Connections with AI
12:12 The Risks of AI Relationships
16:17 Preparing for AGI and Cognitive Offloading
30:26 AI's Impact on Leadership
31:10 Navigating AI Competitors
32:01 Internal AI Strategies
32:49 Ethical Considerations in AI Usage
34:07 AI in Journalism and Writing
36:32 Practical AI Applications
40:27 Balancing AI and Human Skills
49:27 Future of AI in Media
53:50 Final Thoughts and Reflections
📜 Read the transcript for this episode: Transcript of What AI Can't Replace – How The Atlantic Deals with Disruption |
For more prompts, tips, and AI tools. Check out our website: https://www.beyondtheprompt.ai/ or follow Jeremy or Henrik on Linkedin:
Henrik: https://www.linkedin.com/in/werdelin
Jeremy: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeremyutley
Show edited by Emma Cecilie Jensen.




