Former president of Brazil sentenced to 27 years in prison

12 Sep 2025 · 49 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Big Boss Interview - Episode Summary

Episode Title

Former President of Brazil Sentenced to 27 Years in Prison

Podcast Overview The "Big Boss Interview" podcast features high-profile chief executives and entrepreneurs sharing insights on running large organizations. Hosted by Sean Farrington, Felicity Hannah, and Will Bain, it explores the challenges and opportunities in managing significant businesses.

Episode Description In this episode, the hosts discuss the sentencing of Brazil's former president, Jair Bolsonaro, who received over 27 years in prison for attempting a coup after losing the 2022 election. The episode also covers international worker detentions, London Tube strikes, and the use of artificial intelligence in political and business speechwriting.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Jair Bolsonaro's Sentencing
  2. Overview: Jair Bolsonaro, former president of Brazil, was sentenced to 27 years for attempting a coup.
  3. Supreme Court Verdict: The Supreme Court found him guilty, with 4 out of 5 judges voting for conviction.
  4. International Reactions:
  5. Donald Trump called the verdict surprising, suggesting it was a political witch hunt.
  6. Concerns in Brazil about potential repercussions from Washington, including increased tariffs.
  1. Arrest of South Korean Workers
  2. Incident: Over 300 South Korean workers were detained in Georgia during a raid at a Hyundai plant.
  3. Impact on U.S.-Korea Relations: The incident raised concerns about future investments in U.S. battery factories.
  4. Economic Implications: The situation may deter South Korean companies from investing in the U.S. market.
  1. London Tube Strikes
  2. Duration: The Tube has been closed for five days due to strikes over pay and working conditions.
  3. Economic Impact: Estimated costs of up to $312 million for London’s economy, affecting local businesses, commuters, and productivity.
  4. Public Sentiment: The strikes highlight ongoing issues related to worker rights and conditions in a post-COVID economy.
  1. AI in Speechwriting
  2. Emerging Trend: Increasing use of AI to write speeches for politicians and business leaders.
  3. Concerns Raised: Discussions about the quality and impact of AI-generated speeches on public discourse.
  4. Expert Opinions: Speechwriters express concern that reliance on AI undermines the art of oratory and audience engagement.

---

Guest Insights

Nha Pham - Journalist and Filmmaker

  • Provides a perspective from Vietnam and discusses the significance of the National Day celebrations.
  • Comments on regional political climates and reactions to international events.

Stephanie Hare - Researcher on Technology and Ethics

  • Offers insights into the implications of strikes on London’s economy.
  • Discusses the shift towards digital payments and changing attitudes towards credit and debit usage among younger generations.

---

Key Takeaways

  • The political landscape in Brazil is significantly affected by Bolsonaro's sentencing, raising concerns over U.S.-Brazil relations and economic repercussions.
  • Arrests of foreign workers in the U.S. can create diplomatic tensions and impact investment decisions by international companies.
  • Strikes in London demonstrate the fragility of the post-pandemic economy and the importance of addressing worker rights.
  • The increasing use of AI for speechwriting raises questions about authenticity and the quality of public communication.

---

Conclusion This episode of "Big Boss Interview" provides a rich analysis of current political and economic events affecting Brazil, the U.S., and the UK, while also exploring the evolving landscape of communication in business and politics. The conversation reflects the interconnectedness of global affairs and highlights the importance of understanding worker rights in today’s economy.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04Hello and welcome to Business Matters. I'm Roger Hearing. On the programme today, Jair Bolsonaro, Morrow, the former Brazilian president, is jailed for 27 years for attempting a coup. Washington is not happy, but what will it do about it? Also, hundreds of Korean workers flying home after their arrest by American immigration officials in Georgia. What's going to be the effect now on plans for new battery factories in the US? London counts the cost to business from a strike on the capital's underground trains. and why are AI bots now writing the speeches of business leaders and politicians? You will find somebody who leaves school at 16 or 18 who's a smart sort of tradesman will be able to write a better speech than an Oxford PPE graduate.

0:50And I'll be joined throughout the programme by two guests on opposite sides of the world, Na Pham, journalist and filmmaker, normally based in Taipei, although she's joining us today from Hanoi. So, Na, a very good morning to you. Good morning, Roger. I'm indeed in Hanoi. I've just been attending the celebration of Vietnam's National Day, very big, big event. Indeed. Well, we'll talk about that in a moment. But let me first bring in and welcome Stephanie Hare, a researcher on technology and ethics, who's actually joining us where I am, in London. So, I don't know, good middle of the night to you, Stephanie.

1:25Welcome to the programme. Good evening. You're both very welcome to the programme. OK, well, let's kick off then with Nha. You were talking there about the celebrations going on. Just tell us what is going on in Hanoi right now. Well, apart from the National Day, not much really, because that celebration actually took months and months and months to prepare. Vietnamese were all geared up for that. It's the 80th anniversary of the National Day, very big celebration indeed. I heard that they spent billions of dollars to organise it, and there was a procession of like 10 days, lots and lots of activities across the country, and people for a moment forgot about the tariffs, but now they're back to normal and have to deal with that.

2:08Well, indeed. And, of course, the other thing we should mention there is it is 50 years, I think I'm right, since the end of the Vietnam War and the reunification of the country. So a lot of reasons for kind of marking a national day. All right, Stephanie, what's been catching your eye in the way of news right now? Well, we've been living a news story here in London with the strikes that have affected so much of public transport. And I think bikes are the winner. Yes, I have to say, well, we'll talk about this a little bit later in the program because I can talk about the tube strike anyway. But I have to say it's been a bit dangerous.

2:43A lot of people using these bikes that you can get from the side of the road. And I think many of them have never cycled in their lives before. And heaven help pedestrians is all I can say. Anyway, we're going to move on to a story that's been breaking in the last hour or so, which is the news that Brazil's former president, Jair Bolsonaro, has been sentenced to more than 27 years in prison after the Supreme Court in Brazil found him guilty of attempting a coup when he lost the 2022 election. Now, four out of five judges voted to convict Mr Bolsonaro. His friend, President Trump, called this verdict surprising.

3:21Well, I watched that trial. I know him pretty well. a foreign leader. I thought he was a good president of Brazil, and it's very surprising that that could happen. That's very much like they tried to do with me, but they didn't get away with it at all. But I can only say this. I knew him as president of Brazil. He was a good man, and I don't see that happening. Donald Trump. Well, Donald Trump's Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, said in Washington that the country would respond accordingly to what he called this witch hunt. Now, Brazil is already dealing with 50 % tariffs on its goods imported into the US, so how much worse could it get?

4:02Well, I'm joined now by Gustavo Ribeiro, who is the founder and editor-in-chief of the Brazilian Report in Brasilia. Gustavo, thank you for being with us here on Business Matters. Is there concern in Brazil about the result this will have? Because obviously it won't go down well in Washington. Thanks for having me. And yes, there's a lot of concern in Brasilia because the Brazilian government believes that something will come from Washington. Now, the$1 billion question is what? The more probable alternative that the Brazilian government is preparing for is if Trump extends sanctions against more Supreme Court justices.

4:47So the justice that has overseen this case against Bolsonaro, he has been targeted with the Magnitsky Act, which is pretty much a sort of financial death sentence. You can no longer hold assets in dollars. You can no longer have any business whatsoever with U.S. companies or persons. For instance, this justice can no longer have a MasterCard or a visa. And so the Brazilian government believes that the other justices who voted to convict Bolsonaro may face similar punishment. But there's also the concern that, for instance, military deals could be in jeopardy. And Brazil has the U.S. as its main military partner.

5:31Yeah. And I mean, we already know there are 50 percent tariffs on almost all Brazilian goods. I mean, I suppose potentially those tariffs could go up even higher. Well, yes, but I mean, 50 % is already a de facto embargo for many industries. Now, it's important to say that the list of exceptions extends to, give or take, 700 products, some products that are really important for U.S. consumers, such as orange juice. But for instance, coffee is not exempt, so maybe that list of exceptions will shrink further. And, I mean, 50 % is already almost an embargo. So at one point, it doesn't make a difference of how high these tariffs go, right?

6:18Well, I suppose that's right. But on the other hand, I also suppose that given it does effectively amount to an embargo, that's not going to make this verdict popular in Brazil, surely, because people say, well, the process against Bolsonaro is making it impossible for certain businesses to do business. So do people in Brazil think, well, we shouldn't be doing it? Or do they think, well, we'll carry on. We don't care what America thinks. So this Trump election has created a sort of rally around the flag effect here in Brazil. And also because the Bolsonaro family has pretty willingly tied itself to the tariffs.

6:58They have said time and again that Trump is only doing this because we convinced Trump to do that. So many people in Brazil are blaming Bolsonaro for the tariffs, not the Supreme Court. A recent poll showed that about 39 percent of Brazilians are against the conviction of Bolsonaro, but 50 percent are for it. So that's very interesting. I think I also noticed that President Lula's favorable ratings have gone up quite a lot as well. He's sort of surrounding himself in a kind of nationalist flag, maybe. Yes, exactly. I mean, the approval ratings, according to a poll that was published today, went from 29 to 33 percent.

7:41And the thing is, it's hard to know how much of that is this rally around the flag effect and how much is the fact that inflation is going down. And that affects a lot voters mood in Brazil because we have a poor country, a low income country. And I mean, the cost of the basic food basket really affects voter moods. So, I mean, it's hard to to separate, to quantify how much of this is Trump and how much of this is just inflation. Yeah, and I suppose what you're saying is in the end, it's kind of rally around the flag and say to Washington, do your worst. We're not going to succumb to your pressure.

8:25Is that essentially what the feeling is? That is almost verbating what the Brazilian government has said no further than this week. So the Brazilian government is willing to stand its ground and to do whatever it can to protect the Supreme Court. However, there is a growing feeling of uneasiness around investors because many Brazilian companies, and especially the big banks in Brazil, have operations in the US. So they are really worried about how that can affect their bottom line and their operations. Yeah, well, it's an interesting moment. We'll see how it proceeds. We don't, of course, know what, if anything more, the US government is going to do.

9:11But Gustavo, thank you for being with us. Gustavo Ribeiro, they're live on the line from Brasilia. Stephanie, it is an interesting time, I suppose, in global politics and economics because it seems to do anything that offends the man in Washington can bring all sorts of terrible things on your head at the moment, doesn't it? Yes, I mean, I think we can't really discuss what's just happened in Brazil with this verdict without reflecting on what has happened in the United States with regards to the storming of the capital on the 6th of January in 2021 and attempts to overturn an election and, you know, threaten elected officials' lives.

9:52And obviously you get sort of challenges to power in two countries and very different outcomes about holding those people to account and what that means. Yeah, there's an interesting parallel that you're drawing there. Now, Fahm, what's your take on this? I mean, do you see this? Is it being seen that Washington is perhaps, you know, I suppose, supporting its ally? I mean, in a quite an honourable way, really. Or is it a bit of a bully in the north taking on a slightly smaller economy in the south? Well, I think it's both really, you know, both supporting its allies and also a bit of a bullying effort.

10:30But, you know, I'm Asian and coming from where I live, you know, things like that are not actually surprising. In South Korea, in Taiwan, in Vietnam, in China, we all see presidents and former top officials being prosecuted and even jailed. So it's also something to do with the culture of top politicians across the world. And, yeah, I mean, we in Asia are actually watching it with kind of curiosity, but not surprised. No, you're right. That is interesting because you're drawing that point that a number of leaders, I mean, a former leader of Korea, of course, South Korea, is in trouble with the law.

11:15It does seem to be something that happens a lot. But then you could also say the same has been true of France in recent years. So there's a lot of precedent for this. But let's talk about something else that matters a lot to people in all these places, I suppose, at least places where people have money, because they can use credit cards. Now, credit cards have an interesting and somewhat tangled history. They've been around, in fact, since the 1950s. Some of you might even remember this advert from the 1980s. You've got a few minutes. Welcomed around the world and just around the corner. Hello, American Express.

11:49Oh, Mr. Lewis, to your front store. Thank you. The American Express card. Don't leave home without it. Oh, I remember that advert. But it does seem that many people are leaving home without their credit cards now because debit cards, where the money is deducted immediately from your account, are increasingly a bit of a substitute, especially, it seems, among younger Americans, where credit cards, in fact, may be on their way out. I heard about all this from Michael Waters, a freelance journalist who writes for The Atlantic magazine. In 2004, debit cards represented about 33 % of all card transaction volume.

12:26And last year in 2024, so 20 years later, they were 47%. And essentially what is happening is that for a host of different reasons, more Americans are spending more money with their debit cards than with their credit cards. I suppose the obvious point is that with a debit card, it comes out of your account straight away. There's no hidden burden of debt that's building up. I mean, that must be the attraction. And the thing is that people kind of use these two cards dynamically, right? You know, you make different kinds of purchases with a debit card than with a credit card. You do have people who, you know, like an emergency or something, kind of have no choice but to put it on a credit card if they don't have that kind of money in their bank account.

13:04You see debit cards used a lot for, you know, like smaller transactions like groceries, etc. So, you know, people have a dynamic relationship to it. But in general, I mean, part of the appeal is that with debit, you are spending money that you actually have, which when there is money in your account can be sort of a smart financial choice. And then there are moments when some sort of like emergency crops up. And that's when people start to dip into credit more often. And you say there's a kind of generational effect in all this. It's interesting who is actually moving away from credit cards. So you see in a lot of different surveys that young people in particular are expressing skepticism of credit cards.

13:43And I think that's for a lot of different reasons. It's also just a generation that has grown up around so much debt, whether that's from student loans or from credit cards, and just have this sort of skepticism of spending too much on credit cards. And that's not to say that young people are not using credit cards often as well. there is a lot of appeal in credit card points and getting different kinds of like cash back for spending on credit. But especially for this generation that grew up in the shadow of the Great Recession, there is a lot of skepticism of over-investing in that kind of debt.

14:19And this is going to be a problem for the credit card industry, isn't it? If the youngest generation, the one that's coming up, doesn't really want to use them as much because it's a It's a big money spinner for some of the big banks. Yeah, I mean, and it remains to be seen, right, how long this holds. I do think that part of what has kept credit cards so omnipresent, especially in the U.S., is the use of credit card points, right? This idea that in exchange for spending on certain items, you get back airline points, you get cash back of different kinds. And there really is like a strong relationship between the kinds of rewards that you get for spending on cards and people's willingness to use those cards.

14:59And I actually think that one reason why we see debit gaining a little bit more popularity in recent years is that a lot of debit cards now have cashback features, right? And I suppose part of the encouragement or part of the willingness, as you say, to use debit cards is you're spending money you have. And then, I mean, it goes beyond that. I suppose people who aren't in a bank, don't have any bank, are using cash. And that is exactly the money you have and nothing else. So it's maybe part of the same thing, the unbanked. I also think part of the explanation for why debit cards are gaining in popularity now is that we're seeing this just like technological shift away from cash, like across more cohorts.

15:38Right. So there are a lot of stores that no longer accept cash. I think that is probably contributing a little bit to people who maybe spent things with cash are now just switching over to debit. We've seen how well Klarna, the big Swedish buy now, pay later company, is doing, just launched on the New York Stock Exchange. Is that another pattern that kind of shows you that the people like still have this appetite for credit, but perhaps in different areas? Yeah, I think when you look at young people in particular, there is a lot of, I would say, experimentation with buy now, pay later. And so that is a way of making a big purchase with money that you maybe don't have up front that, you know, there's some segment of young people who maybe would have once put that on a credit card and are now opting for a buy now, pay later.

16:28And when it comes to Klarna specifically, I mean, you also see that they are trying to break into the debit card market, too. And so they see that, right, there is this interest among young people in debit cards specifically. And Klarna recently launched their own debit card in the US as a part of sort of their expansion. Michael Waters there talking about debit cards and credit cards. Now, OK, I'm going to ask both of you. You don't have to answer. Nah, do you have a debit card? Do you have a credit card? I'm intrigued. I have a debit card and I have a few credit cards. But, you know, in Taiwan or, you know, in Japan, cash is still king.

17:06And we don't actually use credit cards very much, not debit cards. So cash is still the currency that we use. That's really interesting because you'd imagine somewhere like Taiwan, very tech, they would have it. Because my son has just come back from mainland China. He says almost nobody uses cash there at all. No, mainland China is actually different. they do promote digital payment. The same happens in Vietnam. So people use QR code and, you know, pay directly from their banks. But Japan and Taiwan are different. I don't know why, but I mean, they do prefer cash. And also IC card, which is like prepaid cards, the smart cards that they use in the metro and, you know, in convenience stores.

17:50Yeah, it's very peculiar. But I personally like cash. You know, something about Chris's bank notes that really remind me of my childhood where we received red envelopes on holidays. Oh, lucky you, yes. I love it, yeah. Well, I suppose if you received a red envelope and there was a card inside it, if you were a child, you might think, well, what's that about? It wouldn't be as exciting as I'm having, as you say, bank notes. No, not exciting at all. Yeah, that's the thing. Okay, Stephanie, fair dues, I'll ask you, do you have a debit card, do you have a bank, do you have a credit card? I have a debit card because here in London, As you know, in the UK, digital payments, contact payments are in many ways preferred more than cash.

18:33But I also go to Berlin a lot for research. And there, it's the complete opposite. And they want everything in cash. So I've got cash in euros. Isn't that strange? Certain economies, you know, as you say, Germany, Taiwan, Japan, they don't like that electronic form of payment. It's strange, isn't it? Well, is it, though? I mean, I've wondered about that and thought, is this a tax avoidance issue? Oh, right. Because you can track everything digitally. I mean, there's a big argument for cash also as resilience. Yeah. And is that maybe why the Chinese are so keen on it? Because they can keep a complete eye on what everyone's spending, I suppose, if they get hold of the data.

19:13Yes. It is interesting. So, Stephanie, you don't have credit cards? Is that right? No. And is that a personal choice? You just don't want to go there, don't want to do that stuff? I think – I mean I should have a credit card because you're supposed to always have one for emergencies and also you have to get them to build up your credit score if you want to do things like buy property, et cetera, which I've always sort of hated as a model that, oh, you have to use this debt-inducing model. I guess you're supposed to just be very clever with them and put everything in your credit card and pay it off at the end of the month.

19:46So you just have to have this discipline. But I hate that because, again, it's all about who has my data. what's it for? And you're stuck, basically, you're locked into a monopoly of certain big companies or banks. So, there you go. It is interesting, what you said about credit score because, I don't know again if this happens where you are now, but it is, if you don't have a credit card, often, it's actually quite, if you've not borrowed money, you don't have a credit score. It's a kind of, it seems to be not rewarding prudence in some ways if you can't get something because you haven't got a record of having borrowed money before.

20:21It's almost as though the entire financial system is rigged. Yes, imagine. I mean, who would have thought? Gosh. Yep. And so it's an interesting thing in terms of the trend because what Michael was saying there is that young people don't seem to like credit cards in the same way. They are wary of debt. Again, now, would you say that where you are, that there is any kind of generational issue on that? Because, you know, people do, particularly when they're young, I suppose, and aren't earning that much, could build up a lot of debt. Sure, yes. But I think young people these days also prefer credit cards and types of cards.

20:58And first, you know, it looks more sophisticated, more tech savvy. But also, yeah, they don't want to get into debt. And also, even though lots of debts actually occurred with their own families, like, you know, parents give away money and give them some credit, then they pay back later. So it's not to do with the banking system, really, but with the spending habit that is more developed, should I say, these days with young people. Yeah. Do you notice, Stephanie, that kind of difference between generations in that sort of way, that younger people are more debt averse, I suppose, is what we're saying?

21:35I think that particularly this generation of young people that grew up in the shadow of the financial crisis and with job insecurity, etc., I think they've had to be so careful. They don't have the being able to take it for grantedness that somebody who's Generation X, such as myself, had that I think those attitudes towards money are really formed in your youth and security. so I completely sympathize and understand there's a whole thing of going back to cash and even putting budgets for certain things in envelopes so you have your rent in one envelope and your groceries in one because it's so easy and the research shows this if you're paying in cash you really feel it whereas if you're paying in card it's very easy to just keep paying and going over your budget that's the secret isn't it that's why they have these things because it doesn't feel like you're spending money at all I think we've uncovered a few things there anyway stay with us Much more coming up here on Business Matters in just a moment.

22:31We're going to talk about that issue about Korea and those guys who were arrested in the US, apparently for not having the right visa when they were working on a battery plant. But we're also going to talk about those tube strikes, which Stephanie, I know, has suffered from, as have I. And we're going to talk about speech writing. Who's doing it? Is it all being done now by robots? Stay with us. This is Business Matters.

23:03Welcome back to Business Matters with me, Roger Hearing, and my guests today, Nar Pham and Stephanie Hare. Now, just before we go forward, a repeat of an announcement that's a little sad. In January, the BBC announced that Business Matters will be closing here on the World Service. And we're now in the final week of the programme. The whole team of producers, presenters and editors wanted to say thank you for being with us. Whether you've tuned in regularly over the last 12 years or just now and then, it's meant a lot to have you listening. Next week at this time, you will hear our colleagues from the newsroom, bringing you trusted global news and analysis seven days a week.

23:37Also, I wanted to tell you about our new show, World Business Express, which you can hear Monday to Friday at 14.50 GMT here on the BBC World Service, bringing you the stories that matter and the essentials on the fast-changing global economy. But now, well, let's talk about part of that economy. What's going on between North Korea and the US? Because last week, a raid by US ICE, Immigration Control Enforcement, ICE, on a Hyundai and LG battery plant in Georgia resulted in the arrest of over 400 Korean workers. The officials claimed were working illegally. The raid caused something of a diplomatic row between Seoul and Washington, and it means the plant is now facing a minimum start-up delay of two to three months.

24:22That's according to the Hyundai CEO, Jose Munoz. The plant, part of a$7.6 billion factory complex intended to make battery-powered models, was due to come online later this year. Now, the fallout of the raid has been widespread. Workers at other LG plants, including those co-owned by GM in the US, were asked to return home. And South Korean companies will be very hesitant about investing in the US, according to President Lee Jae-myung. From the perspective of companies, setting up local factories in the US inevitably raises concerns like, will we face all sorts of disadvantages or difficulties in the future?

25:04Is this really something we should do? Such concerns could significantly affect future direct investment in the United States. Korea's president. Well, the plane carrying the detained workers from the Georgia plant left a little bit earlier for South Korea. Although there are talks about a new sort of visa for Korean employees going to the US, the plans to expand battery making in the US through joint Korean-US ventures seems to be in some trouble. I asked Tim Shorrock, a Washington-based journalist who's been writing about the Korean economy and US-Korea trade, if this was putting that relationship under strain.

25:43Well, absolutely. I thought it was extraordinary to see the South Korean president openly criticize the U.S. president of calling this an unjust infringement on their rights and also to say him saying that this could deter Korean companies from investing, which, of course, it will, because, you know, this was a very cruel treatment to make to a country that's been invited to invest or asked to invest up to$350 billion in the US economy as a way to build up, make America great again. And so it means depriving Korea of lots of capital investment and its own industrial process and shipping that to the United States.

26:26And I think that itself is problematic for many Koreans in Korea. Yeah, and Tim, I mean, some people would say, well, OK, but these people, they were in there working at a Hyundai, joint Hyundai and LG plant, shouldn't those companies have made sure that all the people there had a right to work there? I mean, you know, just follow the law. Well, absolutely. I mean, there is some blame to be put on the big companies. I mean, none of the people arrested or detained were from either Hyundai or LG. It was all of their subcontractors. And of course, you know, if South Korea is going to ship their industrial facilities and the way they operate in Korea to the United States, of course, it's going to come along with subcontractors, which is, you know, a big part of the occurring economy anyway.

Read the full transcript

27:11It's a way that, you know, large companies, you know, of course, you know, save money by subcontracting certain services. But, you know, all these workers were from these subcontracting companies. And I think that it's clear that sometimes they were not told all the rules under which their visas were given. And so, you know, some workers that were not supposed to be doing sort of dangerous work were and there has been you know some casualties some you know workers have been killed or injured on the job there at that specific plant so that is a problem you know with the companies okay so tim i suppose then the question is who has the strength in this is it the u.s saying well we you know we just got to enforce our laws i'm sorry if you don't want to come here don't or is it south korea saying well actually you invited us because you want to build these things.

28:00You want to have big plants that are going to use U.S. workers in the future. I mean, who has the strength in all this? Korean companies, they don't have to invest. I mean, if the government makes some agreement, in broad agreement, and they run into difficulties like this, I mean, I think the strength is with the Korean companies. They can withhold their investment. If Trump wants to, you know, make manufacturing the centerpiece of his economy and wants to bring them all in from Japan and Korea and other places, then, you know, it's up to the companies, those Korean companies, to make the decision to do that.

28:36And if they're treated badly, they're not going to. I mean, I think they have the leverage. They have the leverage here. The U.S. can't force them to invest. But where else are they going to do it, Tim? Because, I mean, the South Korea isn't likely to have a similar arrangement, for example, with China, probably not with Japan either, I imagine, for historical reasons. Historically, this is how the Korean economy was built in the 1960s and 70s and 80s by Japanese companies building factories in South Korea and shipping technology there and technicians and financial capital. And the steel industry in South Korea was built largely from Japanese investment that was opened up after they normalized relations in 1965.

29:22The whole you know, Korean so-called, you know, economic miracle in the early days was financed and built with Japanese technology. And so, and Japan shifted much of its, you know, manufacturing, low level manufacturing to Korea, and they moved up in the chain and high tech. And I think that's what's happening now with the South Korea and the United States is, you know, they're shifting their, you know, this kind of manufacturing facilities to the United States, because the The United States has basically forgotten how to manufacture things. Our industrial economy is in deep trouble. Tim Shorrock there speaking to me earlier.

30:03Now, what's your take? I mean, do you think that places like South Korea are beginning to wonder about the welcome that they're getting in the U.S.? Definitely. And I think people in Taiwan actually are watching it very, very closely because Taiwan actually has the same problem with Taiwanese workers in the U.S. You know, the biggest semiconductors manufacturer in Taiwan, the TSMC, is building five factories in Arizona. And they also are facing the same accusations from the U.S., not only authorities, but also population about mistreatment of their local workers and preferential treatment to Taiwanese workers there.

30:45So I think that's a very big problem that the US government needs to look at and to resolve in order to attract not only investment, but also know-how from more developed economies like South Korea or Japan or Taiwan. Yeah, Stephanie, it's an odd situation, isn't it? Because the idea was that these big companies would put their factories in the US. They would give US workers jobs. But in the initial phase to actually build a factory, they seem to need to bring in their own workers. But then they don't seem to be either filling in the right forms for the visas or perhaps the visa situation is too complicated to work.

31:28Well, the South Koreans actually don't need visa to get into the US, the same as the Taiwanese. So I think there is some misunderstanding there in between the visa schemes for them. Yeah. And Stephanie, what do you think about this? Is it one bit of the US government not really thinking what the other one is doing or knowing about it? I mean, there's a conspiracy and then there's just incompetence. And it might be a mixture of both. so it's no secret that the United States has been really cracking down on all sorts of immigration legal and illegal and making things just very difficult for people so it could be overzealousness and it could also just be people not understanding what's going on it does seem very weird yeah and also if if those factories don't get built on time we now know that what this one at least is three months delayed maybe more um the benefits aren't going to be there are they Stephanie no and it's also going to be really bad for encouraging further investment into the United States.

32:26I mean, this is where politics starts to meet the hard road of economics. People don't have to invest in America. They can invest anywhere in the world. Yeah, you say that, but no, I mean, if South Korea doesn't deal with the US, who else is it going to deal with? I mean, I know Japan might be an option, and certainly Tim Shorrock thought that was the case, but they can't go into the hands of China, can they? No. Sorry, no answer, then I'll bring Stephanie in. No, I don't think China and South Korea are working very well together. But South Korea has huge markets in Southeast Asia. They've been building factories in Vietnam, in Cambodia, in other countries.

33:09So they do have outlets for their investments. And indeed, I mean, they are among top investors in Vietnam, where I am now. I don't think they really die. I need to invest in the United States. And that got to be looked at. Yeah, and Stephanie, I mean, that is a problem, isn't it? They could go elsewhere, maybe. I mean, there are other places they could go. I mean, I think this is something that we're seeing is that for a very long time, really since the Second World War, we've seen a sort of American world order. I mean, there was the Cold War. So certainly since the 1990s, it's very much been an American world order.

33:45That is no longer an assumption, I think, that the United States can rely on. And as we've just heard, the Asia-Pacific region is a target-rich environment for investment. And political stability is a big part of that now and being friendly to immigration also. Yes, yes. The Americans say, no, my way or the highway. They say, OK, we'll take the highway then. Talking of highways or little roads that are being rather overused in London today, where Stephanie and I are, it was pretty chaotic. We mentioned at the top of the programme. Getting into or across London the last few days was, let's say, difficult.

34:24The capital's underground rail system, the Tube, has been closed by a strike over pay and conditions for drivers. It's been very stressful for commuters, but more than that, it's been very damaging for businesses in London. It's thought the five-day strike could cost the economy around$312 million, with the burden falling not just on big companies in the city, but also on the support economy, including cafes and sandwich shops. Here's Prasanna Callaghan, owner of Crumpets Cafe in central London. Our revenue is down by 80%. Impact is going to be very severe. For a daily basis, we're losing about£600 or£700.

35:04and if you take it to five days, that's quite a lot of money. At the long run, it's impossible to survive. If we have the same impact on a few more occasions, you don't want to run a business that's losing money. Prasanna Callaghan there. Well, BBC London's work and money correspondent Megan Owen has been out speaking to businesses affected by the strikes and she told me about the financial impact. It's been pretty big. You know, the capital's economy really relies on people flowing through the city. And that really hasn't happened as much this week. We've got reduced productivity as staff struggle to get in and out of the office.

35:41We've got shops, restaurants and leisure venues experiencing weaker footfall and lower consumer spending. But also you've got, as you were mentioning, the congestion on London roads adding to delays and, of course, then lost output. So lots of things going on here to impact London and the UK economy. To put to that point, can we actually put a figure on how much this is costing? There have been some predictions. So the Centre for Economics and Business Research suggests that the strikes could have a direct economic cost of around£230 million. That's reflecting the loss of around 700 ,000 working days across both Transport for London and the wider commuter base in London.

36:23but it thinks that the true economic hit is likely to be much, much higher once the indirect effects are considered. So that lost productivity and lower retail spending. But also the UK's nighttime economy could lose£150 million through the strike this week, according to the Nighttime Industries Association. And that comes at a time when the sector has already been hit by previous strikes. But walk me through the ways in which this does have an effect. A lot of people say, well, hang on, a few years back we had COVID, everybody worked from home. People surely can just work from home, surely. Yeah, but I think the difference is that local businesses have told me that they just in the last year started to see people coming back to work in the office.

37:09And that was a real relief for them. And this is going to be another major blow. I spoke to one cafe in central London, Cafe Caffeine, which predicted that it would lose£10 ,000. pounds, another would lose£3 ,000. So pretty damaging. And also they've highlighted the impact on their suppliers as well, the sort of the knock on effect of these strikes. And as you said, sort of many have said they only just got back on their feet after COVID, the cost of living crisis that happened in the UK recently, and also taxes for employers have also been recently hiked up. So this is just the latest blow on top of a number of hurdles.

37:48And obviously, it's just the difficulty and the frustration of people trying to get in. Now, you got in today. How did you manage? I got in through cycling, and it was absolute chaos on the road. Because there are a lot of people who shouldn't be cycling at the moment. We're picking up these bikes you can get on the side of the road, and it's not really very safe, is it? It's not very safe, and there's lots of business people in their smart suits on electric vehicles. It was a bit hazardous, I think, this morning, but managed to get in. and here we are speaking. So both of us managed to get in.

38:20We did. We did. Now, you'll have to forgive Stephanie and I for a moment. We're going to exchange horror stories. So, Stephanie, you had to get somewhere today, I guess? Do you know what? I'm very lucky because the overground is still working. Yes. So if you are someone who's near an overground station and you can get to the Elizabeth line, you can almost still get around London. You have to be a little bit clever, and there's often a bit of walking at the end, but I have survived. That said, I got caught out last night and walked home for an hour and a half at some disgraceful hour because the Elizabeth line shut down and I was not the only one cursing.

39:00Yes. Oh, there was a lot of cursing going on today on lots of places. Me too, because I had to walk up from Waterloo and there was a thunderstorm. Of course, there's a thunderstorm when you're trying to walk through crowded London trying to avoid bicycles. So there we are. We've got our groaning and moaning out of the way. Now, you live in a, well, you're currently in Hanoi, which I think is a bicycle city almost entirely, but presumably none of these things matter. You don't get strikes on buses or anything like that, do you? No, it's actually not bicycle, but motorbikes. And yes, no strikes at all.

39:32But also, you know, in Taiwan, in Hong Kong where I live, I mean, I've never seen any strikes at all in the public transport system, not in the metro, not on the buses. So, yeah, I really feel sorry for you guys having to deal with this. that. We'll take that. Yes, we're happy with that, I think. But the other thing, Stephanie, is, you know, it is pretty obvious that it does have a huge economic impact. And there may be, you know, perfectly justifiable reasons for industrial action. But it has a huge effect on so many people who have no control over how much people are paid. I mean, this is it.

40:05I was thinking about this with all of the workers who are having to come into clean offices or provide food for the whole city, nurses who are trying to cross town. it's just it makes everything that little bit harder but you know that's also the purpose of a strike and what we haven't talked about also is why are these workers striking and what does it mean to have to work underground and be exhausted and not get fresh air and daylight for this long so i don't want to demonize the strikers either because i think that's kind of the whole point is we have to we have to have a discussion about jobs and fairness and distribution across one of the richest areas in the country.

40:42Indeed, indeed. And if the strike didn't make people uncomfortable, it wouldn't be worth having, because the whole point is it's a bit of muscle to try and get better conditions. Right, well, maybe some of those trade union leaders will be making speeches to some of their members. I don't know. And who will write them? Now, many people are called upon in modern life to give speeches, whether it's addressing an investors' conference or school prize-giving or fellow members of Parliament, perhaps. Now, of course, these speeches may not always be the words written by the people who actually speak them.

41:13Sometimes oratory for busy executives, of course, is supplied by professional speechwriters. But suspicion is growing at the moment. They may not even be written by human beings. The British opposition MP Tom Tugendhat has suggested some of his fellow parliamentarians are delivering words written for them by AI. I rise to speak. I rise to speak. I rise to speak. Chat GPT knows you're there, but that is an Americanism that we don't use. But still, keep using it because it makes it clear that this place has become absurd. Oh, dear. So is this a common practice in business as well as politics? I asked Brian Jenner of the European Speechwriter Network.

41:56It's a very disturbing trend. And I think it's also, you know, many years ago, PowerPoint appeared. and PowerPoint makes it easier in the minds of the speaker to construct a presentation. So AI is just the next level. And it's brilliant for solving the problem of the speaker. The problem is the poor audience, which is supposed to be the focus of the speech, is what gets neglected. Well, I'm taking from that, Brown, that you're not that impressed by what ChatGPT can do in the way of wonderful oratory. You know, one of the interesting things is that this does draw attention to the fact that for the past 50 years or so, We have not been training young people to write speeches.

42:36And one of my soapbox things is that you will find somebody who leaves school at 16 or 18, who's a smart sort of tradesman, will be able to write a better speech than an Oxford PPE graduate, just because graduates have been learned to write essays and use long words. So this is revealing the fact that not many people know how to write speech. And AI can often, you know, when you see the quality of stuff that is produced by many researchers and things like that, they're just continuing writing university essays. So if it's a toss-up between a university essay and ChatGPT, it's going to be probably ChatGPT, actually, because one of the complaints about ChatGPT is that it uses three-part lists.

43:16I don't know if you've got these ticks. You know these ticks? Well, Obama uses three-part lists. So, you know, it is, you know, our job is to translate a message into the language of public speaking and figures of speech like three-part lists and contrasts and rhetorical questions need to be used very much, you know, and not many people know that, but ChatGBT does. Well, you sound as if you're actually saying that ChatGBT can produce a decent speech. It's boilerplate. It's kind of going through the motions. You know, I was talking to a speechwriter for an assisted dying charity who were doing the lobbying for the debate a few weeks ago.

43:53And, you know, she was saying she just writes briefing notes for them. Well, I said, well, why can't you do the briefing notes on ChatGPT? Well, I can't, you know, a briefing note is not enough to write a good speech. So it's a new development, it's a new technology, and we have to adapt to it like everybody else does. Well, yeah, adapt, but also know that, you know, you're not going to get as much work out of it. I suppose the people we're talking about mainly perhaps are business leaders. I mean, they need to make stirring speeches sometimes to their board or their employees, I guess. and they need to have something that's going to inspire, I guess, as well as inform.

44:30Well, maybe you can tell me about this because as far as I'm aware, if we look at the FTSE 100, you know, 20, 30 years ago, we knew who the CEO of Marks and Spencers was. We knew who the CEO of Tesco. We knew who the CEO of Lloyd's of London was or whatever. I couldn't tell you the names of any of these people. They don't really take part in the public discourse. You know, I remember years ago we gave an award to the head of British Airways. He used to do fantastic jokes and all this kind of stuff. I'm very concerned because, you know, if you talk to some CEOs, they'll say, well, all the communications agencies say don't make speeches.

45:05You'll just get massacred on social media. And somebody else said to me, do you know what the caliber of CEOs these days is that they haven't got the literary or moral stature to make an intervention. And everybody works from home now. So the idea that they're doing town halls in HSBC and they're all 500 people gathering in a room and the chief executive is inspiring them to increase profits. Does it happen? I don't know. Well, it sounds to me like, Brian, that you're sort of doing yourself out of a job. You're saying you don't need me. You don't need AI. You don't need speeches. They definitely do.

45:38But the thing is, is that you can see that by the poverty of our talent in politics, that there is only one man in the show, Nigel Farage. Oh, well, maybe Jeremy Corbyn at a push. But these guys have been around town halls. They've been, you know, dark winter evenings. They go around giving speeches. Many of these Labour MPs have been elected. They've never given a speech in their lives before. So I think the problem is, is that in the political circles, people think that speech making is not important. and are you surprised that our democracy is is in serious trouble oh dear the downfall of democracy because no one's making a speech ah stephanie are you worried about this i just wonder if we're going to at a certain point touch bottom with all of this and get to a point where people start reading books again and want to learn how to write and want to learn the art of oratory and rhetoric you know like i just particularly young people i'm wondering too because they've just sort of grown up on all this.

46:36And wouldn't it be kind of exciting to actually have mastery of these skills again? And I completely agree with what was just said in terms of for CEOs, it's very risky now for them to give speeches and show any personality, show jokes or tell jokes, et cetera, because they will just get, everybody's so freaked out now on social media, so polarized because that's how algorithms are incentivized to work. It's just not worth it. So maybe this is what's happening. We're living in the algorithmic age. It's just flattening everyone's personality. Do you think we're all sounding a bit middle-aged? All these young people, they can't do this.

47:09No, I'm sure there's plenty of talent out there. No, I mean, does much speechifying go on in Taiwan or in Vietnam or not? Not really, but I think, you know, you guys are right. I mean, young people actually tend to use Chattrity PT a lot. I mean, I want to ask you, Roger, I mean, do you ever, you know, have you ever thought of using Chattrity PT in your scripts? No, no, no. No, not at all. The one that's just written for me says, if NAR says this, say absolutely not. No, it isn't. Ah, gosh. What are you suggesting? Generation gap, then. I don't use a script at all much, as you can probably tell by my incoherence.

47:52But, I mean, with NAR, the thing is, does it matter? Do people care if they hear a speech or they don't? Well, I do care. I mean, I do actually recognise if anyone used a CharterGPT or other AI-generated devices to write the scripts and text. But, I mean, young people probably don't care that much. You know, they just want to string everything together and, you know, put it out quickly. I guess that's probably true. Well, anyway, this is probably the point where I should make a speech because I'm afraid this is the last business matters that I shall present. There's not one tomorrow by someone else, but no, this is my final.

48:30So I will say, and here's a speech, thank you very much to NAR. Thank you very much to Stephanie. Thank you. Thank you to all of you out there, too, for listening to me on and off over the last 10 or 11 years. And I'm going to do a totally unworld service thing. I'm going to do a shout out. That's not done. I'm going to shout out to certain fervent listeners I'm aware of. Adil in Pakistan, Harsh in Pune in India, and Brenda in Warrington here in Britain. Thank you all for listening. Even though I haven't mentioned your name, it's been a pleasure and a privilege. I hope you've enjoyed it at least some of the time.

49:01I hope you've got some information that's useful for it some of the time and that it's been a decent ride. And I will finish by saying what one of my radio heroes said once. If you have been, thanks for listening.

49:25Thank you.

From the publisher

Brazil's former president, Jair Bolsonaro, has been sentenced to more than twenty-seven years in prison after the Supreme Court found him guilty of attempting a coup when he lost the 2022 election. More than 300 South Koreans who were arrested in the raid in the Hyundai plant in Georgia have now been released from detention and flown to their country. And how can this affect the economic relations between both countries? London's underground rail system – the Tube – has been closed for five days by a strike over pay and conditions for train drivers, and this has been very stressful for commuters, but more than that, it has been very damaging for businesses. And Roger Hearing hears about the use of artificial intelligence to write speeches for politics and business and how you can detect if it's written by AI or a human. Throughout the program, Roger will be joined by two guests on opposite sides of the world – Nga Pham, a journalist and filmmaker based in Taipei, although she will be joining us today from Hanoi in Vietnam - and Stephanie Hare, a researcher on technology and ethics in London.

More from Big Boss Interview

All 93 episodes
Former president of Brazil sentenced to 27 years in prisonBig Boss Interview · 49 min
Listen in VO