Nvidia earnings boom to 70% despite tariffs

29 May 2025 · 49 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Nvidia Earnings Boom to 70% Despite Tariffs

Podcast Information

  • Title: Big Boss Interview
  • Hosts: Sean Farrington, Felicity Hannah, Will Bain
  • Description: High-profile chief executives and entrepreneurs share insights on managing large organizations, presented by BBC Radio 4 and BBC 5 Live hosts.

Episode Overview

  • Main Topic: Nvidia's remarkable quarterly earnings report despite ongoing tariff issues.
  • Key Guests: Michael Malone (Silicon Valley journalist) and Zyma Islam (senior reporter, The Daily Star, Dhaka).

Key Discussions & Insights

Nvidia's Earnings Report

  • Earnings Performance:
  • Nvidia reported a profit of $18.8 billion on revenues of $44.1 billion.
  • A significant earnings increase of 70% year-over-year, beating market expectations.
  • Despite challenges from US tariffs and export controls, Nvidia's stock rose nearly 4% in aftermarket trading.
  • Impact of Tariffs:
  • Nvidia faced a $4.5 billion hit from US tariffs, which was less severe than anticipated.
  • Concerns persist over potential future losses, especially regarding chip sales to China amidst evolving US policies.
  • CEO's Concerns:
  • Jensen Huang (Nvidia CEO) highlighted fears of losing market position if US policies lead to reduced sales in China, stressing the importance of maintaining competitiveness in global AI advancements.

Tariff Wars and Political Landscape

  • Elon Musk's Critique of Trump:
  • Elon Musk expressed disappointment with President Trump's new finance bill, marking a shift from his previous support.
  • Discussion on the GOP's internal divides regarding government spending and fiscal policy.

Climate Change and Corporate Liability

  • German Court Case Precedent:
  • A recent decision in Germany allowed for potential climate change liability claims against companies like RWE.
  • The court acknowledged that while the plaintiff in this case could not claim damages, the ruling opens doors for future litigation.
  • Implications for Businesses:
  • This sets a significant precedent for potential climate damages claims against corporations, sparking a conversation about corporate accountability in the face of climate change.

Controversial Developments

Bear Meat in Slovakia

  • Government Policy:
  • Slovakia plans to sell meat from culled brown bears, a protected species, following government-sanctioned hunting due to rising human-animal conflicts.
  • Discussion on public perception and market viability of bear meat, with local food guide expressing skepticism about its popularity.

Conclusion The podcast episode encapsulates the challenges and triumphs of large corporations like Nvidia amid political and economic turbulence. It also touches on broader societal issues, including corporate responsibility for climate change and cultural attitudes towards wildlife conservation and consumption.

Key Takeaways

  • Nvidia's strong performance against tariffs signals resilience in tech despite political pressures.
  • Musk’s shift indicates potential fractures within the Republican establishment.
  • Emerging legal precedents in climate liability could reshape corporate accountability.
  • Cultural and ethical discussions surrounding the consumption of wildlife highlight broader issues of conservation and environmental stewardship.

For further inquiries or to get in touch with the team, email: bigboss@bbc.co.uk.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04Hello and welcome to Business Matters. I'm Roger Hearing. Coming up on the programme, one of the world's richest companies, NVIDIA, beats expectations on its earnings despite the tariff wars. But could there be a bigger hit to its profits on the way? Also a bit of a rift in Trump world. Elon Musk isn't happy with the president's big, beautiful finance bill. A German court case sets a precedent for climate change impact to be laid at the door of fossil fuel companies. and fancy a slice of bear. La Slovakia is legalising the selling of meat from the endangered brown bear, but is anyone actually going to eat it?

0:43And I'll be joined throughout the programme by two guests on opposite sides of the world, Michael Malone, journalist and host of the Silicon Insider podcast, who's joining us from Silicon Valley. Michael, good evening and welcome to the programme. Good to be here again. Good to have you there. Across the other side of the world, we're also joined by Zima Islam, Sam, senior reporter for The Daily Star, who's joining us on the line from Dhaka. So, Zama, a very good morning to you. Hi, hi. Good morning, Roger. Are we really going to be talking about best, though? We might towards the end, but I have to tell you there's loads of stuff happening, even as we speak, which I shall bring you up to speed with almost immediately.

1:20But first of all, Zama, just give me a sense of what's going on in Dhaka today. I mean, you know, what are the things that are catching your attention this morning? Oh, Dhaka is bursting with protests every single day. The country seems to be at a standstill. People are trying, they have a lot to demand and they want all of their demands to be met right away. I don't know if you know, but this is an interim government. We had a student that revolution last year. And so this is not a democratically placed government. And so they are really struggling to keep the economy going. They're really struggling to keep political stability.

2:04Things really seem to be spiraling out of, a little spiraling out of control at the moment. Difficult times there, clearly. And yes, we'll talk maybe a little bit later in the program about some of that and the implications. But Michael, let me come to you. Well, I mean, there's a lot happening in your neck of the woods. and we'll talk about obviously what's going on in Trump world in various ways but there's actually been a story breaking over the last hour or so which is that a US federal court has ruled that President Trump overstepped his authority by imposing global tariffs in a significant blow to a key part of his economic policies.

2:38It was the Court of International Trade ruling that an emergency law which the White House used did not in fact provide the unilateral authority to impose tariffs on nearly every country. People may remember that was what Donald Trump called his Liberation Day. And I should say within the last few minutes, we've been told that the White House is in fact going to appeal that. Michael, a lot happening, but a lot to do with tariffs. And interestingly, all this up and down, on and off of tariffs. But there's a funny and rather interesting phrase that's being used at the moment in relation to that, which you know about.

3:14So tell me about that. Yeah, I think I'm going to celebrate by having a taco tonight. Go on, explain, explain. The new term on Wall Street is taco, which is Trump always chickens out, which is considered an investing strategy in which you believe that no matter what Trump says, President Trump says about a particular tariff rate on another country, he will give up on it. he will back off and he will come up with something lower right now he responded he responded today uh in a press conference well indeed let me pause you there because you've actually got a bit of that uh press conference and how he did react to it have a listen mr president wall street analysts have coined a new term called the taco trade they're saying trump always chickens out on your tariff threats and that's why markets are higher this week what's your response to that i kick out Chicken out.

4:13Oh, chicken out. I've never heard that. You mean because I reduced China from 145 percent that I set down to 100 and then down to another number? Well, Mr. Trump did quite a long answer to all that, but he finished his answer with this. I can promise you, and I have great respect for the people at the European Union, they wouldn't be over here today negotiating if I didn't put a 50 percent tariff on. The sad thing is now when I make a deal with them, it's something much more reasonable. They'll say, oh, he was chicken. He was chicken. That's so unbelievable. Well, there we are. Michael, is this going to vastly undermine, do you think, the Trump plan of sort of re-throwing everyone into chaos on tariffs?

4:56If everyone says, well, it doesn't really matter, he'll chicken out in the end. Well, the markets seem to think that he will today. I'm not so sure. I've been around some negotiators in my life. And it's a scary process watching them at work because I've seen fights in the parking lot, then they'll agree on something, you know, shouting at each other like they're going to attack each other and kill each other. And then all of a sudden they hit a number they like. All I can say is I have no idea how this is going to end up. I mean, he's a great negotiator, but great negotiators often fail too. And they don't always get what they want.

5:42In fact, usually they end up in the middle somewhere. So let's see. Okay. Okay. Well, it is an interesting moment. And of course, the tariffs are affecting an awful lot, not least, of course, companies very much in your wheelhouse, Michael, which is tech areas. Now, let's talk about NVIDIA. It's a company that's a huge success in the tech world. The chip maker has been vying with Apple for the position of the world's richest company, in fact. So the latest quarterly earnings which came out today have been weighty with some interest, especially in this period of tariff chaos. In fact, the company beat expectations despite export controls.

6:18$4.5 billion hit, however, from US tariffs, a bit less than feared. NVIDIA said it made a profit of$18.8 billion on revenue of$44.1 billion. and that actually caused the shares to rise nearly 4 % in aftermarket trading. But it does seem the biggest hit is yet to come, as I heard from our New York business correspondent, Michelle Fleury. It confirmed that there is this massive demand for their product and that they are able to meet it for the most part. But one area where they're struggling is the sale of H20 chips to China. These are specially designed to try and meet Biden-era restrictions on chip sales to China.

6:59But within the last few weeks, the Trump administration imposed curbs on that. And so as a result, that has affected both their revenue projections for this quarter and also going forward. And I think that was sort of the area that investors have been very concerned about. And in fact, it was something that Jensen Huang was asked about during the call just now with investors. So was he giving any kind of assurance? assurance? Was he kind of suggesting that there is a way through this? Because the big hit is very big if it does come. They say it's going to hurt revenue by about 8 billion, which is substantial when you think that they're talking about a revenue for the next quarter of around 45 billion.

7:43It's not nothing, but it's not everything either. But here's the thing. Jensen Huang said to investors that the platform that wins China is positioned to win globally, that China's AI moves will carry on with or without US chips. And so he, as the CEO of NVIDIA, is worried about kind of being left behind and worried that foreign competitors will move in. The problem is he's got to deal with Donald Trump, who feels quite strongly on this issue. And so it's unclear whether or not, you know, there will be any change in this policy. And at the same time, NVIDIA is looking in other areas. It's not just China.

8:18The Middle East, it seems to be quite fruitful at the moment for them. As we're talking, this call is going on with investors, And I'm sure there will be questions about how much will some of the losses from the China market be offset by some of the gains you're making in other parts of the world. Obviously, we saw that splashy announcement when he was with the president the other week on that Middle East trip and talking about, you know, the role they're playing in helping the Middle East build their AI infrastructure and AI infrastructure of the future. So those are the positives. The question is kind of the big long term.

8:50And I think that's what Jensen Huang was trying to get at with that comment about being left out of China. Clearly, it's something the company is concerned about, but it's not necessarily within their control. And so at the moment, the key thing we're seeing is they're still doing very well in the markets they have. And importantly, in data centers, that business continues to grow 73 % growth. And that was Michelle Fleury. I also got the view of Dylan Patel, chief analyst at Semi Analysis, a semiconductor research firm in the San Francisco Bay Area. The question was how much of that sold out business was now kneecapped because the new round of China restrictions that have been happening sort of on an annual cadence almost in both the past and current administrations would impact this.

9:34And so there was a lot of fears that it would be really big, right? They wrote down four and a half billion dollars worth of products that they were making for China. And so the fears were, you know, given NVIDIA's margins are so high, hey, that's 15, 20 billion dollars of revenue that could go away over the course of this year. But it's still a pretty big deal, right? Two and a half billion dollar hit this quarter, another eight billion dollars next quarter. Right. That's over 10 billion dollars of revenue hit, but not nearly as bad as sort of the expectations were. Well, yeah, but I mean, the eight billion, the eight billion, you know, isn't obviously massively in advance of what they've just gone through.

10:09I mean, does it keep going like that? Do we see more of that in the next quarter and the next quarter? Is there any way back from this? Yes. I mean, when you think about the natural state of chip sales to China, right, before the tit for tat and this global trade war, China would have been 30 to 40 percent of chip sales. And the U.S. would have been 30 to 40 percent of chip sales. And then the rest of the world is what's left. Even when NVIDIA was making these China-specific chips, they were only getting to the 20 percent range, right, if they had no restrictions, right? So it's kind of regardless, they were already pretty badly hit by prior restrictions.

10:44And now these new restrictions further clamp them down. So how large would the impact be if there were no restrictions? Well, maybe NVIDIA's numbers would be 30 percent higher. And that was Dylan Patel speaking to me earlier. Zima, let me bring you on this because, I mean, you know, we're very close up with this. But this is interesting signal really about how difficult it is in many parts of business, particularly the tech world, in dealing with this tariff war that's going on via Donald Trump. Yeah, I mean, for example, right, just I think five minutes ago, the producer told me that the courts overruled on Donald Trump's Liberation Day tariffs.

11:22And I was internally cheering because Bangladesh was going to be facing more than 50 percent tariffs on its garment sector, which is really the backbone of the country. And I hope that this stays. I hope that, you know, something else doesn't happen that brings these tariffs back on. I mean, things are clearly changing at the rate of things are changing weekly almost. So tariffs in Trump's world might absolutely upend the RMG, the redimit garment sector in Bangladesh. But it might just be a taco, mightn't it? It might be a Trump chicken's out again, I suppose. One can only hope. I will celebrate the tacos if it does.

12:08Well, Michael, let me come to you. I mean, this is very much your area, the whole tech development. Companies like NVIDIA really matter, and they seem, well, they're doing all right, but there is certainly a big, big downside that seems to be coming at them because of all that's happening in the trade wars. yeah well you know 70 growth in a quarter is not something to sneeze at i mean nvidia seems to be kind of getting by all these obstacles without much trouble and part of it is the introduction of that new blackwell chip which is apparently a monster and some of the servers that are being going to be created for ai with those chips are going to be a another quantum leap really so So that's the Blackwell chip is a big thing.

12:55Yeah, the servers are going to build with it, are going to be even closer to natural language and indistinguishable. They'll pass the Turing test. I mean, they will be, you won't know if you're talking to a human being or a machine. That's how powerful these things are. And we're already seeing some of the impact of the latest chips. so can can nvidia get through this without being too seriously impacted by china they're going to be impacted they already are but i think these new products are going to swamp the story of the company's success it's going to do better and better in despite of china well it'll be interesting to see how it does all play and we are just seeing this sort of real-time evidence in a way of the impact.

13:45But yeah, we've been talking about how the news is changing almost as we speak here at the moment through events in the US to do with tariffs. But there's been more happening as well in the area of a certain Mr. Elon Musk. Now, he's the billionaire, of course, and co-founder and CEO of Tesla. And he has been a strong backer of President Donald Trump. In fact, he'd actually been very much involved in the administration, cutting back on government staff and expenditure through his Doge Group, Department of Government Efficiency. Now, several interesting things have happened. I'll bring you the very latest one, which is in within the last hour.

14:21He has suggested on a social media post that his scheduled time as a special government employee is coming to an end. So it's kind of him saying goodbye to his role in the Trump administration. We've had indications of that, but that has now come out on his own social media on X. But also, he has, well, been a little bit critical of the man who will now be his former boss. And it's been something of a surprise because he's been expressing doubts about the president's new finance bill. Now, this includes multi-trillion dollar tax breaks and the pledge to increase defence spending. Elon Musk told CBS News he was disappointed by what the president called his big, beautiful bill.

15:01You know, I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the Doge team is doing. Well, the bill has still to get through the Senate. Earlier, I asked Julia Manchester, national political reporter with The Hill magazine, was Mr. Musk's reaction something of a shock? It is certainly emblematic of a major division we saw not only in the House of Representatives when they were looking to pass this bill. We saw a number of what we would call fiscal conservative hawks who were against the bill originally because they thought, like you said it, like Elon Musk says, I should say, added too much to the deficit.

15:39And now in the Senate, you have a number of Republicans who feel the same way. Senators like Ron Johnson from Wisconsin, Rick Scott from Florida, they are very much pushing back against this. The problem, though, is that you have another group of Republicans and you saw a group of Republicans like this in the House and you see a group of Republicans like this in the Senate who think the bill cut too much from government programs like Medicaid, for example. So I think what you heard Elon Musk saying is a reflection of the division we've seen within the Republican Party. And it's interesting to see how Donald Trump's responded at the moment, saying he plans to negotiate aspects of the bill, like some bits of it doesn't like others, which is a bit of a change of tune, isn't it?

16:23It is a change of tune, but it's something he has to do to sort of get it through Capitol Hill. Remember, we saw the first version of the bill pass through the House of Representatives. Now it has to pass through the Senate. And then an identical piece of legislation needs to pass through the House again before it ends up at Donald Trump's desk. So right now, he and Republican leadership, Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Leader in the Senate, John Thune, have to walk a very, very fine line between these different factions within their party. This is really interesting that what we'd seen as a pretty united front of the of the GOP, the Republican Party behind Donald Trump now seems to be splitting on some pretty major financial issues.

17:06Absolutely. And I think, you know, part of the reason why we'd seen such a united front the first 100, 150 days of President Trump's presidency so far was because, you know, he was able to get a lot of his agenda through by executive order. He could just do it with the stroke of a pen, his signature. Now comes the hard part with getting that legislation through Capitol Hill. And you are seeing that, you know, even though Trump and Republican leaders have been very good about whipping their members into place when it comes to supporting President Trump and getting behind him politically, when it comes to this legislation, it's difficult.

17:44And I think, you know, a lot of this also plays into next year's midterms. Like I said, you already see Democrats targeting a lot of these vulnerable senators, vulnerable House members on this issue of potential Medicaid cuts. Now, there's part of Trump world in his supporters who are quite keen on taxing the richest, taxing the billionaires. I suppose people like Elon Musk. Is that part of what's going on, a fear that that might be the way this is going, that although he has the support of billionaires, they won't like it if it does move towards taxing them? I think that's part of it. And we've seen from President Trump's language in the past that he would be open to something like that.

18:24But the Republican language you're seeing on the bill and the talking points you saw coming out of the House of Representatives when it was passed last week was, you know, this talking point that this legislation represents a tax cut for Americans across the board. And what they mean by that is the extension of the Trump's 2017 tax cuts. So that's how they're using this to promote this bill. And that language you would think would be palatable to most voters. However, if there ends up being taxes on certain income brackets or higher taxes on certain income brackets, there's going to be some backlash there.

19:02Julia Manchester there of The Hill magazine. So, Michael, I say we've been hearing in just the last half hour or so that Elon Musk is actually on the way out of the Trump administration. But this slight knifing he's given to his boss on the way out, disappointing the bill, I mean, how do you read it? Do you see big splits appearing in the MAGA world? Not yet. I think if you know Elon, you understand that he's a very empirical guy. And if the equation says that something is correct, that's something that he is going to do no matter what. And I think he's been sort of surprised and disappointed.

19:45He called himself being a whipping boy of D.C., of politics, of the wheeling and dealing and the compromise and the negotiating and all of that. I think he thought that that Doge was an efficiency measure and it had every reason to be accepted by everybody. And he's been surprised. And I think when he realized that this the beautiful new bill was going to add to the deficit, he was astonished by that, too. And finally, there's other factors as well. Tesla wants him to get back to, you know, business and put in a 40 hour week. Yeah, because Tesla's in a bit of trouble, isn't it? Yeah. And he's feeling that pressure, too.

20:31I think he'll at a certain point, he's going to be real happy to wash his hands of inside the beltway. Yeah. So you think this but you don't think he disagrees fundamentally with the Trump administration. It's more just not wanting to be in the politics. Yeah, I think he doesn't want to compromise on this stuff. He thinks he's right and he thinks he's doing, you know, God's work on cutting out corruption and spending. And now he's being told, well, we're not going to exactly do that. Yeah, it's the frustration. Zyma, it's an interesting one because it happens in so many societies, you know, politics and business meeting head on, really.

21:11Yeah. In fact, we recently... Yeah, go ahead, Sam. We recently... Yeah, sorry. So Bangladesh recently got Starlink. And this happened... Starlink is, of course, the internet service provided by Elon Musk through little satellites. Exactly, exactly. And then this meeting, as we've learned, had actually taken place in the White House where Bangladeshi government officials met with Elon Musk. So this just does not seem like he was able to keep business and politics out of, you know, each other's business. Yeah, it's interesting. It does seem to be a bit of a conflict of interest, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah.

21:50But Bangladesh has got the Starlink now, has it? Or is it just being promised it? I don't know. We've got Starlink. The deal worked out very, very fast. I think they made that visit a couple of months back. And we've already worked out the deal. We have Starlink. And it will make a difference in Bangladesh? Yes, it will make a huge difference, not only just in speed, but Bangladesh has been completely reliant on submarine cables, which I think Michael will be able to tell us that's technology of the last century. Which means that governments have effectively been able to close the Internet, turn off the Internet, shut it out.

22:29So this is actually an advance of crisis. Yeah, this is an advance of freedom because you can keep it on, at least as long as I suppose Elon Musk wants them to. Anyway, well, we'll leave that subject for the moment. And in the second half of the program, we're going to come back. We're going to probably talk a bit more about what's been going on with tariff legislation. But we'll also be talking about what's going on with efforts to sell bear meat in Slovakia. Stay with us.

23:03Welcome back to Business Matters with me, Roger Hearing, and my guest today, Michael Malone and Zyma Islam. It's been a pretty busy hour or so leading up to the programme. We've got some various breaking developments. Let's pursue one of them, which is the fact that a panel of federal judges in the US have blocked President Trump from imposing some of his Liberation Day tariffs on China and other countries. In fact, the judges said the president had vastly overstepped his powers. Let's get an update on this from our North America correspondent, Jake Kwan, who's in Washington. Jake, thanks for being with us.

23:34First of all, just tell us about this case and what the court decided. So I think we need to go back to April when Mr. Trump revealed this bombastic Liberation Day. He said that, you know, the Americans has been ripped off for decades with this great trade deficit. And this is why he's going to impose taxes on imported goods from around the world, really. That ranges anywhere between 10 to 50 percent, which is an astounding number of taxes to put on imported goods. Now, in the first major legal challenge to this, the Manhattan Court of International Trade have ruled that Mr. Trump really overstepped his authority in putting this tariff on goods around the world.

24:18Because, you know, putting tariffs is really given to it's a power that is given by the Constitution to the U.S. Congress. And what Mr. Trump did was arguing that there is a national emergency of this trade deficit, and he's given this emergency power to put these taxes on goods around the world. So now the court is saying that he has really no authority to do it, and the Liberation Day tariffs needs to be suspended. And, I mean, this is something that he has said he has already suspended. It was going to be in effect in July, but now that is very murky whether that will come back. So they said he can't do it anyway, even if he didn't suspend it, only can't bring it back.

24:58Yes, it's a very complicated situation. So what's the Trump administration said in response to this judgment? So they immediately filed an appeal, and this is very much expected. I mean, this trade deal, the tariffs, these are very cornerstone of Mr. Trump's second term in the office, and he was very much expected to fight tooth and nail. And we also heard from Stephen Miller, who is the deputy chief of staff of the White House and a very key policy advisor to Mr. Trump, tweeting immediately, judicial coup is out of control. So they're really using this as another opportunity to point out that Mr.

25:33Trump's policies are failing, not because they're flawed, but because they're being undermined by these what they call political judges. Yeah. And there are other cases in the in the works, aren't there? This isn't the only one coming through. Exactly. This is actually only one of many. There are cases pending across America in five different courts. And we'll likely see many of these crop up. And this is only first. So this is not done deal, right? These cases have to go up and down. And Mr. Trump is, of course, going to appeal over and over again. His lawyers have been arguing that this case never should even be heard because, you know, we're talking about whether it should be Congress or the White House that should have this authority.

26:15So it should be really the Congress arguing this, not a group of small business owners who brought this case to the court. So Mr. Trump is expected to pull out every stop in arguing against this case. We'll see where it goes. Jake, thank you so much for updating us and all that. Jake Kwon on the line there from Washington. Ah, gosh. Well, Zyma, it does seem very confusing, doesn't it? I mean, as a business, you don't know whether you've got to deal with tariffs. And as a country, you saying Bangladesh was cheering a bit, maybe because these were suspended. Maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place.

Read the full transcript

26:50I mean, that's exactly how I would be feeling is that these tariffs were so arbitrary. Did Trump even mean them? I mean, was it just all a bluff? Could he have known that the courts would have eventually stopped him from implementing these tariffs? And was it simply, you know, a move to get people to come to the table and renegotiate some of the, you know, the trade relationships? Maybe that's all he wanted. Maybe he actually didn't want, you know, 60 percent tariffs from Bangladesh. And that, I mean, the language that's being used, a judicial coup, that's very strong language, isn't it? Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it?

27:32The Supreme Court. Yeah. Michael, let me bring you on this because, I mean, just that term that Zimer highlighted there, the judicial coup, because a lot of people said the challenge to Donald Trump is only really going to come from the courts because Congress is effectively dominated by one party and they're not going to challenge him. And that this is where the real confrontation is going to come and no one really knows how it'll work out. What do you think? Well, I think we're coming up on a constitutional crisis here in the United States. The question is, can a federal judge or a group of judges in this case decide, make rulings and impose their will on the entire country, which is well beyond their jurisdiction?

28:13So ultimately, these things are all going to the Supreme Court. But the Supreme Court seems very wary of tamping down this this lawfare being used by these judges. Well, you call it loud lawfare. They're just interpreting the Constitution, aren't they? Well, yeah, kind of. I mean, some of these things are pretty radical. And, you know, you get a certain group of judges in certain different districts that keep pushing these things while other judges aren't doing anything of the sort. I mean, if every judge in America or a majority of judges in America agreed with this, that'd be one thing. But this is one man or one woman coming up with a judgment.

29:00So ultimately, this is going to have to go to the Supreme Court. Well, I was going to say, in the end, that is the final arbiter. But if the Supreme Court decides against Donald Trump, against the administration, would you still say that's lawfare? Or is it just the way the Constitution works? The judges, the Supreme Court, the final ruling, if that's what they decide, that's the law of the land. But at some point, the constitutional crisis is the Supreme Court has to decide who actually makes decisions for this country. And is it 200-something federal judges or is it the duly elected president of the United States?

29:42And ultimately, the Supreme Court may punt and decide to throw it to Congress to make the decision. If the Constitution says it's either the president or it's the Congress of the United States and the president can't do it, then the Supreme Court may have to give it to Congress to decide. Gosh, it's moving into a very interesting area, I have to say. We will see what happens. Anyway, let's now move away. We've been talking about America basically from the beginning of the programme. Let's talk to some other cases and situations. In fact, let's focus on a case of a Peruvian farmer and a giant German energy company.

30:23Now, the case has just come to an end, legal case, after over a decade in a courtroom in the German town of Ham. On the surface, the farmer seems to have lost the case. The judge, in fact, found against Saul Luciano Uyers' claim that the RWE company should help pay for his flood defences at his home in Peru because the global carbon emissions that the company was contributing to had made flooding near that home in Peru more likely. The court, in fact, has issued a judgment, didn't find his favour, but it did establish an important precedent. And I heard about this from Noah Walker Crawford of the London School of Economics, an advisor to German Watch, which has been helping Mr Yuya.

31:07The judgment today is a victory. It's a real legal milestone. What the court did today is establish a precedent. They established the legal principle that companies can be held liable for climate damages. The court concluded that in this specific case, the risk to the person bringing the claim wasn't quite high enough, the risk of flooding caused by glacier retreat. But they said that in principle, these kinds of claims are possible, which means a lot of other people who face even higher climate risks, who face even more damaging impacts of climate change around the world now have a tool in their hands that they can use to make claims against polluting companies.

31:45Yeah, so just to clarify, they said that the risk to the plaintiff's house was about 1 % and it wasn't enough to take the case further. So he's not going to get whatever it was,$17 ,000 or so that he claimed. The case establishes the principle of corporate climate liability. But in this case, there's not going to be a payout. But of course, the payout that the plaintiff was demanding, the 17 ,000 euros, was just a very small symbolic amount, which is it's just small change to a big company like this. And so what this case was really about from the very beginning was establishing the precedent.

32:20And that's exactly what's been achieved. And so what we can expect is that there are going to be many other cases building on this. And of course, the potential payouts aren't going to be around 17 ,000 euros, but we could imagine in the billions or even the trillions because there are potentially infinite amount of climate damages around the world. Well, RWE in this case obviously wasn't held responsible in this particular case. They say they operate in accordance with applicable laws and climate policy and that any changes in that should be resolved at a political, not a legal level. The court addressed this question very clearly because they said that even if climate change is a political issue that needs political solutions, that doesn't exclude companies like RWE from liability.

33:08The court also said that even if RWE was operating its power plans in line with regulations, if they had all the permissions, that also does not exclude them from liability. So even if they're following all the rules, they still have a responsibility to address climate change. And what the court said very clearly is that we've known about climate change for a long time. They said there is a responsibility since the 1960s, even since 1958, when we have had the first scientific insights on global warming. And so they said that since then, a reasonably informed company like RWE should have known that they were contributing to climate harms in the long run.

33:48So what happens next? I mean, the farmer, Mr. Luya, he can't take his case any further, I guess. Are other companies going to be prosecuted? How is it going to work? There are many more people around the world facing climate harms, facing risks even higher than Mr. Luciano Juia, the plaintiff in this case. He essentially lost this case because he lives 20 meters too far away from the river and up the hill where a flood would come down. And because of this, the court found that the risk wasn't high enough to him. But even in the city of Huaraz, where he lives, there are many thousands of people who live right by the river who are affected by a much higher risk of flooding.

34:27So even there, according to the court appointed experts, people are affected by illegally relevant risk. Noah Walker-Crawford there on that case in Germany. Now, Zyma, you're in a country that has been affected, is being affected quite clearly by climate change. Do you think there are farmers in near Dhaka who might say, well, let's prosecute, let's try and take legal action against some of the big energy companies in other parts of the world? Yeah, I was just trying to figure out how that's going to work out. I mean, you were at the absolute frontier of, you know, the climate change crisis. And Bangladesh has really been suffering from adverse climate events.

35:14For example, right now, it's about to I think I think there's a storm coming. I'm looking at the sky and we shouldn't be having a storm at this time of the year. The rains, the monsoon season has really come, you know, it's come up in the year. And I'm trying to figure out if like, you know, one million, say, farmers in Bangladesh got together and they decided to prosecute all of the big polluting energy companies. How would that work out? How do you, where does it stop? How big does the company need to be for you to prosecute the company? Could you perhaps prosecute a smaller company? Would the amount of liability, the scale of liability still be the same?

35:56I'm not sure that, you know, the courts are exactly where we should be solving this crisis. Understandably, there has been no political solution to this yet. We've been at a sale rate for years and cops have failed year after year. But I think that's the point, isn't it? If you can't take action through something like COP, I mean, the argument would run, I suppose, is that you could say, you could point, I mean, by this legal precedent, you could point to a company in Germany and say, well, look, you contributed partly to this, you've got to pay. But then again, it's like how big or how small can that company be?

36:32Could I perhaps prosecute a much, much smaller company, you know, and simply say that there's reasonable, you come from a country that's reasonably developed, you should have known about this, you should have known about, you know, climate change, which is an established scientific fact. But is there perhaps scope for that to be misused, for that to be abused? I mean, I don't know. This is a very, I think, new arena for all of us. I think it is a very new area, indeed. Michael, let me bring you in on this. What do you think? I mean, do you think there is a, is it reasonable to take a company that has, you know, almost by its own admission, been, been, you know, putting out carbon emissions and say, well, you have to pay the cost.

37:17Well, I'm very interested in how this plays out. I mean, this is a very unusual precedent because RWE apparently didn't operate anywhere, you know, near Peru. That's right. They weren't in Peru at all. Absolutely. Yeah. And so do they have standing in this case? I mean, I think that's what they were arguing. Well, I think the line is that if they're putting stuff into the atmosphere, that affects global emissions, and it's the global emissions that are causing the problem in Peru and other places. Well, sure. But if that's the case, China's the world's largest polluter. What do we do about China?

37:55Do we sue the CCP? I mean, every company in China is essentially partly owned by the Chinese government. Are they culpable? And how do we measure what contribution different companies make? I mean, it's an interesting idea, but it's going to take probably the rest of the century to try to work out the threat of all this and set case and precedent. Yeah, because I mean, the president is in Germany at this stage. But I mean, you know, maybe we were talking about lawfare earlier. I mean, maybe, you know, US courts could perhaps get involved in this. Oh, I think they will. If this thing keeps going and extends around the world, I think every major country's courts will be involved in this.

38:42Do you think it's right? I mean, do you think, you know, is it it's clearly legally accepted in Germany and could be anywhere else? But is it right that companies are put in this position? I mean, we've said, you know, perhaps the restrictions that people try and put in through things like COP to try and release doesn't seem to have much effect. Perhaps, you know, going for the bottom line of companies is the most effective way of doing it. Oh, sure. That's the best way to get their attention. But the question is, do airline companies, do they they're obviously contributing to pollution? Do they get they get sued by individuals?

39:19How about the world's militaries? They're major pollutants. Are they held harmless or are they included? I mean, I'm just curious how this thing actually works out. Zyma, what do you think on that? I mean, in a way, exactly as Michael says, almost everyone's involved, aren't they? Yeah, exactly. You're essentially because, you know, this is what this is what companies are breeding out in a way. So and it's not just companies. Right. These are these are entities like a cattle farm somewhere in the middle of Midwestern America. How and some farmer in who has perhaps lost his home to soil erosion or river erosion or something in Bangladesh decides to sue that cattle farm, which he perhaps does not even know.

40:06He does not know that cattle farm. He does not know why cattle farms even emit methane or how they ruin the atmosphere. And, you know, someone just decides that this is a very ideal victim and this is an ideal polluter. And we put these two together in a lawsuit. There's a lot of work got to go on this, isn't it? Yes, it's going to be very difficult to make it work. Yeah, it's ringing alarm bells in my head. Yeah, well, there we are. Right. OK, well, let's end the programme by talking about something very different indeed. It's to do with the natural world, I suppose, in the same way. It's about meat, really, because the meat of brown bears, a protected species in the European Union, could soon be available to eat in Slovakia, after the populist government there approved plans for sale of it.

40:55Last month, the Cabinet there authorised a plan to shoot about a quarter of the country's 1 ,300 brown bears and that was in response to some recent fatal encounters between bears and humans. Now, the state-authorised slaughter has been criticised by conservationists and opposition politicians, including in the European Parliament. The brown bear is listed as near-threatened in the EU by the World Conservation Union. However, Slovakia's government is forging ahead with the plan and this week it announced that meat from culled bears will be sold to the public in order to prevent waste, they said.

41:32From next week, organisations under the Environment Ministry can offer the meat for sale, provided all legal and hygiene conditions are met. But is there even a market for bear meat? Well, I've been speaking to Linda Metisova, who's a food tour guide and founder of the Bratislava Food Tours Company. I ate the meat once, but it's not something that would be very common here. Maybe a monk hunter community, but not really as a, not even as a concert, as a delicacy or anything. You say you've eaten it. What does it taste like? Yeah, it's kind of the meat I've eaten. It was in a goulash, a stewed meat, so it was kind of sweet.

42:10I've heard the taste is based on what the beer actually eats, so it was rather sweet or sweeter than the traditional beef goulash. So the meat tastes like whatever the bear has been eating, so he's been eating something sweet, then the meat is sweet. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They say after the summer when the bear has been eating fruits and berries, then it's more sweet. So what I remember from the goulash, the only thing it was maybe eight years ago was the sweetness. The goulash was much more sweeter than usual. But it may be also on the process of preparation, the cooks on that specific event prepared it.

42:46Now you take tourists around in Slovakia. Do tourists like to eat bear meat or not? No, no, no, really we've never had it. The restaurants aren't even allowed to offer it. We had a thing last year, one restaurant in the mountains offered beer goulash and some beer spread from beer, but they got a fine, so it's not allowed to serve in restaurants at all. And we are, my company is situated in Bratislava, so not even something that would be on our other beer meat. But now the government has said it's approved, you can have it in a restaurant. Yeah. So do you expect in the future maybe the tourists will be offered bear meat?

43:30Yeah, yeah, bear meat. Maybe some restaurants will try to use it as their marketing advantage, but it was never considered as a traditional specialty in Slovakia. Something we would be striving for, like the grandmas dish or something you would be remembering from your childhood. I think it's more of a marketing thing. I don't think it's really that we would have some huge brown bear market or anything. So there's no tradition really in Slovakia of eating there? No, not really. No, no, not really. It's like among hunter community or in something like this, but nothing that we would ever, I've never even mentioned brown bear meat in our food tours.

44:13Yeah, it's just not really a thing. So we have different meals there. And traditional Slovak cuisine is based on flour, potatoes, and then those non-expensive meals that were easy to make in the past and meat would be reserved for special occasions such as holidays, Christmas and so on. So it's not really a thing. OK, so Linda, supposing I was there with you in Bratislava and I wanted to have some proper Slovakian meat, what would I, what should I have? You should definitely, like our national meal is considered to be brinzove haluski. So it's the dumplings with sheep cheese, with traditional sheep cheese on the outside.

44:53And then we also have sheep cheese pierogi. That's something that can be also found in Polish or Russian or Ukrainian cuisine. And then definitely we have lots of soups. And among our most popular meals is the sauerkraut soup that we usually eat for Christmas and New Year's Eve and so on. So this is what you should definitely have. Much better than bear then. Definitely. And from those maybe wild meats, what we have for a special occasion is roasted duck or roasted goose with potato pancakes called laksha and stewed cabbage. But there is no brown, brown beer is nowhere around. Linda Metasova there in Bratislava.

45:34Now, my researchers, Michael, have been investigating you and discovered you have in fact eaten bear. Is that right? Yes, I have. I'm almost ashamed to admit it after that report. but yeah i've had bear well tell us about it what did it taste like how did you come to be eating bear well i had it in alaska and uh i also had some at some hunters have shared some with me um it's what your your uh person just interviewed said is basically true if it's a salmon season if they're not that great it's not that great tasting but uh when they're eating berries oh yeah it's it's sweet it's a fairly dense meat it's it's denser than uh and it's stronger than um uh beef uh but it's not bad um you you if it was on the menu would you go out of my way to eat it but if somebody was served it you know at a dinner i'd i'd try it again yeah yeah it's interesting Zayma, I'm imagining you never have eaten bear, have you?

46:42No, no, I have not eaten bear. I know people who have, of course. I have eaten camel meat before. Ah, yes. That's the thing in Muslim countries. I'm vegetarian now, so the concept of eating meat is not very appealing. But no, it's interesting you mentioned camel. I've eaten camel as well in Somalia. and in fact I mean it's one of these things that's rather interesting about why certain animals we do eat I mean obviously I know in Islam of course you have halal restrictions on what you can eat but but also that just culturally people seem to think some things are meat and some things aren't um you know here in Britain I think people will be perhaps objecting to eating horse but in certain parts of central Asia it's very very normal part I mean Zyma is it just a just that we feel that some things shouldn't be eaten?

47:31Exactly. I mean, when you think about it, the way vegetarians would be seeing the world is that all animals are, the suffering is equal for all of them. A bear would suffer just as much as a cow. And I mean, I said that the concept of eating bear meat grosses me out, but then there are cattle farms, the ones we were talking about just in the last, I think, segment or something, where we said that they're releasing methane methane into the air, destroying the atmosphere. How is that any less disgusting, right? So I think this is all very arbitrary, what we want to put in our mouths and what we don't.

48:04Yeah, so Michael, I mean, is there any animal you wouldn't eat? Oh, I've eaten a lot of different African animals, antelope and that sort of thing. Yeah, I've eaten crocodile and zebra. I don't know if you thought they were any good. Yeah, I've had zebra and I've had crocodile and rattlesnake. Where did you all have zebra? Well, there was a place, I don't know if Michael did it the same way, there was a place in Kenya, several restaurants in fact, where they sell that as a thing. They serve it to you. I think the idea is you go and see it and then you eat it. I know a vegetarian would object to that, but that's the way it is.

48:38Was that where you got yours, Michael? Yeah, actually it was in Namibia, but the same kind of thing. Same idea, yes. at a farm but you know i had a park ranger say to me that one of the things that people don't account for is if an animal is hunted legally uh hunters will come in and begin to protect the animal yes in in order to have so it can actually have it can actually have a beneficial effect not for the animal itself but maybe for all the others there we are that's a strange aspect of all this. Perhaps it will help the bears. Who knows? Anyway, my thanks to Michael, my thanks to Zyma, my thanks to all of you for listening, and whether you're eating bear or not, have a good time, and we're back tomorrow.

49:20See you then. Bye!

From the publisher

Nvidia, a huge success in the tech world, reported its latest quarterly earnings. The chipmaker, vying with Apple for the position of the world's richest company, beat expectations despite export controls. Elon Musk, , the billionaire and co-founder and CEO of Tesla, has criticised one of the signature policies of President Donald Trump, marking a break from the US president who he helped to win re-election in 2024.

And the meat of brown bears, a protected species in the EU, could soon be available to eat in Slovakia after the populist government approved plans for sale. Roger hears from a food tour guide who tested the meat before.

Throughout the programme, we will be joined by two guests on opposite sides of the world: Michael Malone, a veteran Silicon Valley journalist and host of the Silicon Insider podcast in the US, and Zyma Islam, senior reporter for The Daily Star in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

More from Big Boss Interview

All 93 episodes
Nvidia earnings boom to 70% despite tariffsBig Boss Interview · 49 min
Listen in VO