US pauses student visas

28 May 2025 · 49 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: Big Boss Interview - US Pauses Student Visas

Episode Overview In this episode, the hosts discuss significant developments in the U.S. regarding the suspension of new applications for student and exchange visitor visas under the Trump administration. The discussion includes insights from former U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan, as well as a look into a merger involving Japan's Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel, and challenges faced by consumers trying to buy American-made products.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Suspension of Student Visas
  2. Context: The Trump administration has halted new student visa applications as part of a broader policy, introducing social media vetting for foreign students.
  3. Impact:
  4. Over a million foreign students study in the U.S., contributing over $40 billion to the economy.
  5. Arne Duncan argues this move harms U.S. innovation and attracts the "best and brightest" students.
  6. Concerns about the chilling effect on international students considering U.S. education.

Guest Insights

  • Arne Duncan:
  • Emphasizes that attacking foreign students undermines U.S. innovation and competitiveness.
  • Suggests that the timing of these changes could disrupt students' plans for the upcoming academic year.
  • Critiques the administration's broader attack on higher education.
  1. The Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel Merger
  2. Details of the Deal:
  3. Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel at $55 per share has been approved, with claims of significant investment and job security.
  4. The merger includes strict conditions to ensure U.S. government oversight and control.

Local Perspectives

  • Chris Kelly, Mayor of West Mifflin:
  • Expresses optimism about job security and the potential investments from Nippon Steel.
  • Addresses community concerns about foreign ownership and historical issues of steel dumping.
  1. Challenges of Buying American-Made Goods
  2. Consumer Experience:
  3. Diana Huff shares her journey to buy American products, revealing the complexities of identifying truly American-made goods.
  4. The difficulty of finding electronics and other consumer goods made in the U.S. is highlighted.

Key Insights

  • Huff notes the potential higher costs associated with buying American but emphasizes saving money by avoiding impulse purchases.
  • The conversation touches on the moral implications of manufacturing overseas versus supporting local economies.
  1. Digital Safety Laws in Texas
  2. Legislation:
  3. Texas has passed a law requiring parental approval for minors to download apps or make in-app purchases, a move supported by some social media platforms.

Discussion Points

  • Concerns about privacy and the implications for children in the LGBTQ+ community were raised, emphasizing the challenges of parental control in the digital age.
  1. Broader Economic Insights
  2. Erin McLaughlin, Senior Economist:
  3. Discusses consumer sentiment and the impacts of tariffs on various industries beyond steel manufacturing.
  • Simon Littlewood:
  • Offers a perspective on the effects of U.S. tariffs on international relations and manufacturing dynamics.

---

Key Takeaways

  • The suspension of student visas may lead to a significant decline in international students in the U.S. and impact innovation and global competitiveness.
  • The merger between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel exemplifies ongoing challenges and transformations in the American manufacturing landscape.
  • Consumers face difficulties in supporting local businesses due to the prevalence of imported goods and the complexities of supply chains.
  • Recent legislation in Texas showcases the ongoing debate around digital safety and the responsibilities of tech companies in protecting minors online.
  • Economic discussions reveal a shift towards service-oriented employment and the need for targeted strategies in U.S. manufacturing.

---

Conclusion This episode provides a comprehensive look at the intersection of education, manufacturing, consumerism, and digital safety in today's economy, reflecting both the challenges and opportunities present within these sectors.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:05Hello and welcome to Business Matters. I'm Rahul Tandon on the programme today. A partnership between Japan's Nippon Steel and US Steel gets the green light. The mayor of one steel town, Wes Mifflin in Pennsylvania, has been telling me why he thinks that is good news. Texas brings in online child safety laws. Apple's boss, Tim Cook, isn't happy. We'll find out why. And how easy is it to be patriotic and only buy goods made in your country? Quite difficult, it seems. And I said, well, if I'm going to be working with manufacturers, the least I can do is support them by buying things made in USA.

0:38So I said, I'm going to buy everything made in the US. And I had to quickly backtrack on that one. More on that to come. It is another particularly busy few hours, lots of different news stories coming in. To guide us through it all, we have Erin McLaughlin, Senior Economist at the Conference Board in New York. How are you, Erin? I'm good. Thank you for having me. Well, we are delighted you're with us. And while you're with us, let's start a consumer sentiment, something I know you guys look at. We've had some figures out in the US. What's that telling us? How are people feeling? Well, it's very interesting.

1:11So today the conference board released its consumer confidence index, which we're very well known for. And this was the first time in after five months of declines that consumer confidence went up. And it's very interesting because evidently it was because the administration struck a deal with China. So it's kind of like after all of the dismal sort of talk of tariffs, even though we still have these tariffs in place globally, coming down from 145 % and just having some advancement made the index go up for this reading. Well, there we go. People feeling a bit better about life. Somebody's always pretty positive about life.

1:56Simon Littlewood, founder of the Raffles Crew of Singapore-based business network, joins us. How are you, Simon? In good spirits? Yeah, I'm in good spirits. It's a lovely, lovely sunny morning in Singapore. I'm delighted to be talking to you. Both blessings. Well, there we go. Indeed. You know, we talked about what was happening there in the U.S. with consumer sentiment. Quite a lot going on in Asia. ASEAN, you know, that group of countries have been meeting. And once again, I suppose they look at China and the U.S. and wonder, do they have to choose? Do they, Simon? Well, I think that, you know, it's very difficult for the smaller countries in Southeast Asia who clearly have to kind of balance the tightrope between China and the U.S.

2:36But, you know, generally, when you tune out all the noise, we're expecting growth of between 4 % and 5 % this year across most of Asia, including north of 4 % in Singapore. So there's every reason to be positive. Yep, that's always good. You know, I saw a headline. It made me think of you, Simon. It said, rich and naive. I know you're one of those. Why Singapore is engulfed in a scandemic. I hope you've been safe. Yeah. Yeah, I have. I mean, Singaporeans, bless them, who grow up in a rather protected environment where the government, you know, the government, for example, controls the Internet by proxy servers.

3:09So nothing can get through that they don't approve of. It means that if you're overprotected, you're very, very vulnerable when you go somewhere else where you're meeting, you know, crooks and fraudsters. So Singaporeans are famously vulnerable to all that kind of stuff. And indeed, I know a couple of quite smart Singaporeans who've lost a bundle. Oh, dear. Oh, dear. Well, there we go. We started with positivity and now we're moving into some negativity. Well, we're glad to know that nobody has managed to scam us, Simon. Right. The Trump administration has told American embassies all over the world to stop interviewing foreign students who want to study in the U.S.

3:43New rules are being prepared, which will mean the social media accounts of all international students will be vetted to make sure they don't support terror groups. Here's the U.S. Department of State spokesperson, Tammy Bruce. Whoever you are, we're going to be looking at you. It seems to be such a controversial thing that's going on, but it shouldn't be. And every nation should take seriously and does who's coming in. So if you're going to be applying for a visa, follow the normal process, expect to be looked at, and we go on from there. Now, let's give you some numbers. More than a million foreigners study at American universities, and the Association of International Educators say they contribute more than$40 billion to that U.S.

4:23economy. Arne Duncan is a former U.S. Education Secretary who served under President Obama. He's now a senior fellow at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy. If you attack foreign students, it deprives our country, the best and brightest, people who can help us innovate, people who can help us find a cure for cancer, people can build new businesses and create jobs. This only hurts us. As a former education secretary, can I just talk to you about timing here? A lot of students from abroad would have places for next year. Would they be in the middle of that visa process now? I assume so.

4:57My strong hope is that there'll be some court injunction coming very quickly behind this because it is so illegal. But yes, people, whether they're new students, whether they're returning students. It's obviously for us, you know, people just leaving schools now, summer holidays. My son just came home from college about a week ago. And, you know, people be making their plans to return in the fall. And we've never seen anything like this in the history of our country. So it's deeply unsettling, troubling. But it might only be something very temporary. You know, he's talked about expanding social media vetting of people who are coming into the country.

5:34That may not take a long period of time. that may not be a bad idea either. I actually think it's all a terrible idea and we've always been the nation of opportunity. But you have to check who's coming in. I mean, that is something that's always happened. That's not what his agenda is. His agenda is much more insidious than that. You always have to look at, you know, not lose the force for the trees. And what we're seeing is like an unprecedented series of attacks on the rule of law, on journalism, on freedom of speech, and now on universities. and the goal is to create maximum fear. Well, there will be those in the Trump administration and Republicans who would disagree with that.

6:11Can I talk to you about the damage that this could do to the U.S. education system? Because it has, as you said, brought in the brightest from all over the world. Do you think many students across the world will now look at the U.S. and wonder whether it's worth coming? Well, it's not only a chilling effect for students coming from overseas. You're seeing more and more American, you know, born and bred students It's choosing to go to college overseas, go to Canada, go to Europe, go to Australia, go to the UK, wherever it might be. And so it just leads to a brain drain. But Trump and his administration is just very threatened by higher education in general.

6:46They see places of higher education, places where people can think critically and think for themselves and think independently. So this is part of a broader attack at higher education in general. What they've done with Harvard University in particular recently is, you know, just again, beyond mind boggling. It's completely illegal. And so this is, again, I want people to understand, your listeners to understand the context in which this is happening and what his real end goal is. And it will have a serious financial impact if this continues on universities, because almost 6 % of U.S. students come from abroad.

7:23It's an important sense of revenue as well for universities. It is an important sense of revenue. That's real. But for me, that's I don't say it's minor, but for me, that's much less important than the brain drain. And our system of higher education is far from perfect and you're always trying to get better. But I think I can say honestly that it is the best system of higher education in the world. And it has attracted talent from all over the world, you know, for centuries, not for decades, for centuries. And that talent coming here benefits the world, benefits us globally, but it absolutely disproportionately helps us here in the United States.

8:01We have that kind of talent coming in who can create, who can innovate, who can drive medical breakthroughs and technological breakthroughs. That's what makes America strong. And his slogan, Make America Great Again, he's doing exactly the opposite, exactly the opposite. But a final point to you. Even Harvard has said, look, they've had problems on campus that needs to be addressed. Those problems you would accept need to be addressed, but not in this way. No, absolutely. Harvard is an amazing institution. It has never been perfect and it never will be perfect. And every institution needs to, every university, everyone's trying to get better.

8:38Every high school, every elementary school, perfection is not the goal. It's getting better. But what he's done to challenge Harvard, he is scared of a place like Harvard. And so, yes, every university, including Harvard, has many areas in which they need to get better, 100 percent. But to take away hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars in medical research, try and go after individual foreign students, no president in America's history has ever done this. Harvard's been around much longer than the presidency here in the United States. and it's a real challenge. Fascinating to hear the views there of the former U.S.

9:20Education Secretary Arne Duncan. Aaron, we're still sort of getting more details on how long this pause may be. Could be a long time, could be a short time, but we know that there's been a lot of debate around the U.S. education system. Do you think people outside may look at this now and, you know, we started that discussion there. Wonder about whether the U.S. is the place to come to? I do think folks will wonder that. I think that if the whole conversation is around freedom of expression and freedom of speech, and when one is a student, whether undergraduate or graduate, that is a time for thoughts to be tested and debated with peers, with professors, and with academia.

10:05And so those are the tenets that have made U.S. universities so impressive and so attractive globally. And certainly, you know, anecdotally, I've heard from some of my colleagues who are associate professors that some of the students are very that are international are also very cautious to even return home or to not have jobs over this summer period if they're already in the U.S. And so sort of like the business environment, it's just creating another level of uncertainty that's affecting all sorts of different stakeholders. Simon, I saw something interesting. You know, Asian universities are moving quickly.

10:46The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology has offered unconditional admission to displaced Harvard students. University of Tokyo has said they were considering displaced students as well. Singapore's got a great education system, haven't you? One of the best universities in Asia there. Do you think they could benefit? Singapore has two of the world's top 20 universities. So Singapore has done really very well. I mean, let's just, because I really disagree profoundly with what you're interlocute. I had to say that you won't be surprised here. But if we just take a step back a bit and take the politics out of it, if you wanted to get into a Singapore university, you can expect to be subject to the kind of scrutiny which the Trump administration is trying to ensure occurs in the US as a matter of routine.

11:32You know, there is concern about your political affiliations. There's concern about your finances and a whole range of other things. And it's done in a quiet, gentle, loving way. And it's not proclaimed, but that's the reality. Because Singapore, like many nations in Southeast Asia, are, you know, they don't, it's not long since there was chaos in Southeast Asia. And they, it's in living memory, you know, race riots and so on and so forth. So people here are quite happy to accept a level of security. You know, I think what's going on in the US is that the universities do not anymore. They're no longer the custodians of free speech.

12:07They're no longer the custodians of open debate. I certainly don't accept that. Well, I think they should. I mean, I enjoyed going to, you know, I've got to balance this a little bit because, you know, when I was at a well-known UK university, we occupied the university administration, a whole bunch of us. Which one was it? Come on, tell us. It was Oxford to protest the Vietnam War. and we were all ejected by a combination of the police force and college proctors. You know, I mean, it was good fun. So, I mean, if we didn't have social media, I don't know. I'm just trying to think as you serve this article up, how they would have found out that we had insidious left-wing views and there wasn't any way unless they'd opened our mail or tapped our phones, they wouldn't have known what we were up to.

12:49I mean, it's all a bit out in the open now. Well, it is, yeah, but I'd like to go back to some of those people because those views have changed over time a little bit, haven't they, Simon? To be frank, as most people have, Aaron, it is part of the world that we live in now we leave a trail don't we with social media so is it unfair for government to say hey well hang on a minute if you're going to come in let me have a quick look and see some of the things that you've been posting well i think that goes back to are we discussing freedom of expression and freedom of political thought or are we really in fear of sort of acts of terrorism right and so and also who is sort of evaluating this.

13:26It's a little, the reports are a little bit light on details. You know, how are folks that are trained within our embassies and within our Department of State, how are they going to evaluate a student's Facebook page or Instagram or, you know, Twitter X tweets? And how do they make these judgment calls that will impact one individual's life so profoundly, especially if that individual has already started studies in the US. And so, you know, I think that's where we really have to be careful between, you know, what is a hazard and what is, you know, freedom of thought and freedom of political speech.

14:07Yep. Let us see how this story continues to develop. And lots of students all over the world, I know people I know in India whose kids heading off to the US because they're in that period where they've had offers. Many of them would be within the visa process at this point of time. We'll be looking for clarification, which, of course, when it comes, we will bring it to you here on the BBC World Service. We're going to stay on that sort of theme of social media now because Texas has passed a new law requiring Apple and Google to verify the age of their users on the app stores. Starting next year, anyone under 18 will need a parent's approval to download apps or make in-app purchases.

14:43Apple and Google have opposed the bill, but social media platforms such as Meta, X and Snap have welcomed it alongside child online safety groups. Let's bring in a familiar voice on the program, our tech correspondent, Lily Jamali. So firstly, I mean, is this the first state in the U.S. to sort of pass this sort of law? Have others done it or others considering it? The second state in the U.S. to do this, but it is definitely the largest one. The first to kind of pioneer this is Utah, which is another conservative state. But Texas has the largest, the second largest population of any state in the nation.

15:19So we expect more impact from this law and could also ratchet up pressure on federal lawmakers to make sure that they get federal legislation of this ilk passed in Washington. Now, there have been reports, haven't there, that Tim Cook, who runs Apple, called up the governor of Texas to say, look, don't do this. Why are companies like Apple and Google so opposed to this? Well, it's bad for their business model for one thing, but the reporting that you just mentioned, I'll mention, it was reported by the Wall Street Journal and we have asked Apple about it. They are not commenting on that at this time.

15:58But, you know, without a doubt, this Apple will say, and they actually did say in a statement today that they share the goal of wanting to protect these younger users and the way that they use this technology. But they don't agree with the method. So I think all of us generally want kids online safety, but they are concerned about how this might affect the privacy of those younger users. You know, sometimes I hear the example of kids, for example, in the LGBT community where the social media platforms that they have access to online, especially if they live in perhaps a more conservative place, can create community for them.

16:39And so we often hear that privacy argument. If they, for example, have to share that with parents or other relatives who don't agree with that lifestyle, that can put them in danger. A question that many people will probably want answered is, OK, so you're in Texas and this has now come into place. How does your phone know you're in Texas? Yeah, that is a really good question. And we should actually do some reporting on the mechanics of this. This, you know, when you look at legislation in the U.S., Texas has done things that are passed in their territory, but do affect people across the country.

17:19And another great example of this is abortion. So that's not a tech story, but they have very stringent abortion laws there now. And as we have watched that story unfold over the last two to three years where they passed this very specific law that restricts how people can access abortion care in Texas, there have been ramifications for doctors in other states. There have been ramifications certainly for the women who seek that treatment. And I think what we'll see here is a lot of those questions will be unanswered when this actually takes effect January 1st. And then we also are going to get some answers as Utah's law comes into effect.

17:56It's actually, I believe, in effect now. It's kind of on a quicker timeline. So we will have some answers there. It'll be interesting to look at how that's working. I'm sure that'll be something that you'll be looking at. Lily, stay with us. I want to bring in our guests here. I mean, it seems eminently sensible, doesn't it? That, you know, there should be some sort of limits put in place on what kids can download, and the companies should be responsible for that. The ills of excessive use of devices, including social media, are really very well known. There's no question. Young and impressionable minds can clearly be affected.

18:34Plus, it's not healthy to spend hours and hours and hours every day with your face buried in a device. And it's very important that the role of the parent is front and centre when it comes to managing what devices kids have and what access they have to them. Yeah, that's true, but it's not – I mean, we all know as parents, it's not easy to do that, is it? I mean, so the companies have to have some responsibility, don't they? I think it's – well, I think the companies do, but at the end of the day, you know, as was quite accurately said a minute ago, the companies just want to make money. So they might make the right noises.

19:08But at the end of the day, kids spend a fortune, particularly kids who are spending their parents' dollar and don't really mind what they spend. They are very lucrative markets. So parents have to take responsibility. They have to have the ability to get involved in what their kids consume, whether it's at school, whether it's on their devices. These are just common sense ideas. On this very program, I've talked about how when my kids were younger and they had their devices, I would make them put their devices away for family occasions. they'd be given to a monitor, everybody had to talk. And initially there was resentment, then there was engagement.

19:41It's possible to be an effective parent. It's not that hard. I wonder about it. Honestly, as a parent myself, I'm a pretty ineffective parent. I think if you speak to my children, it's probably what they'd say to you. But it is, I think, on a personal level, probably, what do you think about this, Erin? I don't know if you have kids. I hope you don't mind me asking you that question. But it does. It's not as easy as it used to be, I think. So this idea that, yeah, we should all do better when it comes to social media as parents. We need some help sometimes, don't we, from the companies, from regulation?

20:16Yes. I mean, I do not have children. I have lots of friends with children. And it's very interesting. But, you know, I can barely figure out my iPhone some days. I just got a new iPhone. I have to authenticate every single step. But it was in the news here in the U.S., I don't know if it made it around the world, that a second grader in Kentucky accidentally ordered 70 ,000 lollipops that Amazon delivered to his mom's doorstep. And it cost thousands of dollars. And it became a sensation because there's so many ways. You know, forget when you sort of just put the content discussion aside. There is so many ways to, I guess, order from basically just speaking into the air, which is what he did.

21:02And Alexa brought, you know, thousands of dollars worth of lollipops to the door. So I, you know, there's got to be some responsibility, you know, on all sides for sort of making sure that that doesn't happen. Well, listen, you know what we're going to do to help with your eyes? We'll give you Lily's number. If you have any problems, you know, as our tech correspondent, Lily will be, I'm sure, able to help you with all of them. But it comes and this discussion has been fascinating because it comes to that crunch issue, doesn't it, Lily, about, you know, whose responsibility is it? And does that mean you need the federal authorities, like in the case of Texas, to say, look, we're going to have to put in regulation, which is something the tech companies and, you know, Donald Trump doesn't like?

21:43Yeah. And the tech companies, make no mistake, are battling among themselves about whose responsibility this is. And that's why you're seeing certain companies, Snapchat among them, supporting this kind of legislation, because it puts that onus of checking age on the people who run the app store, not the people who run the app itself. And I think that's really important. Just a few quick comments. The lollipop story, absolutely delightful. I know it's not exactly what most parents would want. But the other thing I'll quickly mention is just when you talk to lawmakers and regulators about this issue, you almost always will hear them invoke their own children and how hard it is to keep track of the lives that they lead online.

22:27You know, it's one thing to know physically where they are, but they are having this experience online that is totally sometimes in the dark for these parents. And that's why they want to do something about it. Lily, it's always a pleasure having you on the programme. I have to say if thousands of lollipops appeared at my door, I would be angry at the cost. But, you know, I would eventually get through most of them. Right, we will be back with the second half of Business Matters very shortly.

23:03Welcome back to Business Matters here on the BBC World Service. Simon Littlewood, founder of the Raffles Crew, a Singapore-based business network, is with us, as is Erin McLaughlin, senior economist at the conference board in New York. Erin told us the fascinating story of the eight-year-old boy who ordered 70 ,000 dum-dum lollipops by mistake. Or maybe not, Erin, because I'm just reading here that eight-year-old Liam said that he wanted to host a carnival for his friends and distribute the candy as prizes. Well, I think, Erin, he's got a lot of friends there, to be honest with you. He must, he must, or he certainly does now.

23:39He certainly does. Now, interesting conversation that probably took place between him and his mother. Right, let us kick off the second half of the programme by talking about steel. And before we go into this story, just a quick question to both of you, Simon first and then Erin, if you want to pick up. Steel is very important, isn't it? I think just for countries' national identity, you know, even those often countries may have this industry struggling, I mean, they still want to have their own steel industry, a lot of them, don't they, Simon? Historians have measured the economic importance of countries going back centuries by their steel production on the premise that you have to produce steel to have a modern world.

24:19And, for example, they'll commonly say Chinese steel production was the world's largest until the 1820s. And then the UK took over, and that was the moment at which Western culture sort of lent over Chinese culture. And now China has reasserted itself. So, yeah, there is an importance to the manufacture of steel. Whether that's still quite as true in the digital age, I don't know. And Erin, when you talk about consumer sentiment in parts of the US, in that rust spell in particular, this is a really important issue in terms of how people feel when they look at whether that industry is there or not anymore.

24:53It has. I mean, the capital of steel in America is Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. And Pennsylvania is a critical, large swing state that Donald Trump won. So that's important to sort of keep in mind. But Pittsburgh itself has diversified, you know, even though their football, our football team is called the Steelers. So, you know, steel is important because it really is a physical embodiment of the built environment, of bridges, of railway, of skyscrapers, you know, and both infrastructure is also critical for national security. So it certainly is a material that is top of mind. It's also been one of the sectoral tariffs, steel and aluminum, that have a 25 % tariff and have gotten a lot of attention.

Read the full transcript

25:41I like the way you use the word are. Is this part of the world you know very well? Yes. I don't know Pittsburgh very well, but I know infrastructure very well. So I'm an urban economist and an urban planner by early education. Yeah, let us continue this conversation because the reason we're focusing on steel so much is we're talking about a possible merger that looks like it's going to go ahead. That is Japan's largest dealmaker, Nippon Steel, and its$15 billion plans to take over US steel. It's been going on for a couple of years. They were put on hold by President Biden. But, you know, in the last few days, President Trump has now given the plan to greenlight.

26:20It'll be controlled by the United States. Otherwise, I wouldn't make the deal. I went to the unions, to all of the local unions. They all wanted it. And I'm doing it because all of the congressmen came in, about five of them. And the others, I understand, are in concurrence. And they asked that I do it. Everybody seems to want it. And we'll see. I mean, we'll see what the final is. But they're going to invest millions of dollars in steel. and it's a good company. And a few hours ago, the Republican Senator Dave McCormack from Pennsylvania gave more details of the deal to the U.S. network CNBC.

26:58Nippon has agreed to invest $14 billion into a new investment into U.S. steel. And then the control structure is going to be somewhat unique. It's a national security agreement that will be signed with U.S. government. It'll be a U.S. CEO, a U.S. majority board. And then there'll be a golden share, which will essentially require US government approval of a number of the board members. And that will allow the United States to ensure production levels aren't cut and things like that. And Erin, that's important, isn't it? The structure of the deal, because US Steel has been such a central part, you know, the first billion dollar company in the US, a really important part of the economy.

27:38So the idea, even for some people, that it will be controlled by the Japanese totally is difficult. Yes, I think it would be difficult. Obviously, Japan is an ally of the US. And so it's not a nothing political or, you know, it's not. But steel itself and US steel not being held by an American company would definitely get a lot of backlash. And that's why it was blocked by the prior administration in part. and in part because, you know, for national security reasons, it is important to have domestically owned steel companies. Let's hear from Chris Kelly. He's the mayor of West Milflin, a steel town in Pennsylvania.

28:23It has been a roller coaster for the last two years. You feel good and then all of a sudden something else has happened. But when President Trump ordered another CFIUS review, and that is the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, We thought, wow, that's the best way to go because the first CFIUS report indicated there is no national security threat. So we were confident that the second CFIUS report would be exactly the same. So we are elated. I have met numerous times with the individuals from Nippon Steel, Mr. Mori, Mr. Ono, wonderful people. They have a track record of helping communities and doing exactly what they said.

29:04But, you know, there's going to be 10 years of guaranteed work. Nobody does that in the corporate world right now. No plant closings, 10 years of guaranteed work. And when they do this – go ahead. Sorry. No, no, no. What I was going to say is that is what – you know, that's what people say. But, you know, the union, the Steelworkers Union, they don't believe that, do they? And also many people – well, one minute. And you'll remember this. If you go back to the 70s when all that Japanese steel was dumped in the US, that caused problems in towns like yours. Some worry that could happen again. Well, it won't be Japanese steel.

29:41It's going to be mined in America, made in America by American workers. So it's not going to be dumping of the steel. The actual union people that are the local unions were overwhelmingly in favor of this. That is true. That is true. But listen, here's a statement from the Steelworkers Union. Okay, we spoke to them. U.S. Steel is a critical producer in a critical domestic industry. And our concerns about Nippon, a foreign corporation with a long track record of violating U.S. trade laws, remain undiminished. And a lot of your steel workers initially were against this, even the local ones. They've changed their minds, haven't they?

30:16Over the last two years, it's because they've met with them. We've traveled to different plants that they have, and they've seen the commitment. When we went to a plant in Follensby, West Virginia, and they met with the union down there, He said, we've had one grievance in 12 years. We wouldn't be here if it wasn't for Nippon. They're just honourable people, and they put up the money, and they make a cleaner steel, a better product, and they have the money for modifications that we need. If Nippon Steel, if this deal didn't go through, wouldn't go through, what would that mean for your town? How many jobs would go in the steel industry?

30:56And it's not just the steel industry. That affects the whole economy, doesn't it? Oh, absolutely. For every steel worker's job, there's seven cursory jobs that are affected. Our community, we would have survived because we're much bigger, but some of the other communities, like Clareton, 70 % of their municipal budget relies on U.S. steel. And that's where the coke is produced. And that goes to Edgar Thompson, which is in Braddock. 80 % of their budget comes from that U.S. steel plant. They would have lost that. all those taxes to provide services, basic services, police, fire, ambulance, would have been passed on to the public.

31:33And that wasn't right. So we have a lifeline here, and we're ecstatic. Chris Kelly, you heard him talking about CFIUS. That is the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. that has been looking at this deal. Simon, this is a part of the world that you actually know quite well. And it is a part of the world, isn't it, that has suffered, hasn't it? I was looking at some figures. Some towns have seen huge drops in population. Well, as they have in the north of England, for example. So the steel industry, you know, during the Industrial Revolution employed millions of people. And now it doesn't.

32:08Yeah, well, I wouldn't say I know the product. I mean, I lived in Allentown, Pennsylvania, which was the headquarters of Bethlehem Steel, which was at one point one of the largest US steel companies for, what, 100 years. and it was an absolute desert when I was there in the, where would that have been, the 19, very early 1990s. And to some extent that's been rebuilt, but there's still no steel being manufactured in our town to my knowledge. So, I mean, this is very interesting because this is a combination of foreign policy impact because the way the Japanese are reading this, as the Germans are reading, in my estimation, is that America is undergoing a medium-term shift.

32:45They see not just a trump administration but probably another republican administration after that because they sense a sea change so rather than concentrate on uh on manufacturing abroad and being constantly subject to the whims of say a tariff uh they are hedging their bets moving manufacturing into the earth which is trump's objective so for example uh west germans or germany is moving elements of its motor manufacturing industry into america which it's never done before um they sell a lot of cars but in the face of tariffs they're going to start building them in the US and the same thing with steel.

33:17I think we'll see some other movements of that nature. So I think it's encouraging, you know, jobs are coming back to the US. Yeah. But I suppose the thing is, Erin, we talk a lot about manufacturing, but if we look at the US economy as a whole, it is really, really, we're talking about employment dominated by the service industry, isn't it? Absolutely. Yes. And our unemployment rate is sitting at 4.3%. So and we, you know, we do not have a replacement birth rate and we are tightening our borders and making immigration more difficult. So some of the for some of these industries, I thought it was very interesting when you use the word lifeline.

33:59Right. That's really like it's a dying. It has been seen as a dying industry. But when you're trying to bring back manufacturing, I think we have to be very selective about what kinds of manufacturing we want to bring back. because we don't have a large base of people that are unemployed and looking for opportunities. But steel certainly, you know, continues to be of interest within the U.S. manufacturing sector. Let us pick up on that point about what manufacturing will come back, because Donald Trump has talked a lot about bringing manufacturing back. So these comments from the president, to some, came as a bit of a surprise.

34:35You know, I'm not looking to make T-shirts, to be honest. I'm not looking to make socks. We can do that very well at other locations. We are looking to do chips and computers and lots of other things. I've been talking to Stephen Lamar, president of the American Apparel and Football Association. He told me he thinks the comments have been misconstrued. I think what they're saying, I think, frankly, what both of them are saying is that, you know, you're not going to be seeing tariffs used to bring about more manufacturing in this industry quite simply because it won't. tariff policy is not the way to do that.

35:10Is it because it won't or they don't see it as an important or as important an industry as some of the others where they are trying to bring jobs back? No, I think they see it as important. I just think they're beginning to realize that tariff policy isn't the right approach here. And that if you look at the different ways in which you want to create jobs in our industry, it may not be through the manufacturing lens. We employ 3.5 million workers. We support another 6, 7 million workers indirectly in a wide variety of jobs, high paying jobs in the United States. So this is an industry that does have a fairly hefty employment footprint, but it's not through the manufacturing lens.

35:58It's through design, compliance, retail, merchandising, a wide variety of other professions. It's no longer the manufacturing industry, per se, that it was. Doesn't mean we don't have manufacturing here. We do. We have quite a lot, but it doesn't have quite that same level that it did many, many years ago. But as you said there, tariffs have a huge impact, don't they? Because a lot of the materials that come in for the US textile industry are facing tariffs at the moment, and they could potentially be facing very high tariffs. I think a lot of People don't understand this, but we are already a very high tariffed industry as it is.

36:35Give us an example when you say that. How high are some of them? Say shoes. People talk a lot about shoes and tariffs. How high are those tariffs at the moment? Those tariffs can go up to 67%. And then when you add in the Section 301 tariffs, and then if you add in some of these reciprocal tariffs, then you're looking at numbers that kind of hit into three digits. You know, our industry, we represent about 5 % of the imports by value. but we pay about 26 % of the tariffs that the U.S. government collects. And you mentioned before, if I'm making something in the United States, the materials that I'm importing, they're going to be receiving these tariffs.

37:14And if there's more tariffs, they're going to be receiving those as well. So our manufacturing members have been among some of the loudest screaming for tariff relief. And then, of course, if there's retaliation on those products, then they find that their export markets are beginning to erode. Stephen Lamar there, president of the American Apparel and Footwear Association. Simon, it seems quite sensible what Stephen's saying there, and also what Donald Trump's saying about, look, we can't make everything in the US. And, you know, you're there in Asia, you look at countries like Vietnam, you know, China, India, Pakistan, and the textile industry.

37:49It'd be very hard for the US to compete against them. I think it's a mistake to think that when Trump says we need to bring manufacturing back, and the US has lost something like 5 million manufacturing jobs since 2000, that he's talking about bringing back the same kind of job. When I talk to people in supply chain roles in Asia, they point out to me that manufacturing everywhere has changed very significantly. And as your interlocutor said, it's about elements of the supply chain moving back to the US. You know, the high value added stuff, the planning stuff, the design stuff, and some elements of the manufacturing where technology provides an opportunity to make it much cheaper.

38:28So you'll see manufacturing coming back selectively. So I think it's a good strategy, but it is a mistake to imagine that this is an attempt to kind of recreate the world 50 years ago. I don't think Trump's that stupid. The thing is, though, Erin, if you work in those industries, you really probably don't want to see your president go, I want to bring manufacturing back, but not in your sector. it? Well, you know, I think one of the things that's sort of a mystery is that the tariffs have been countrywide, economy-wide, you know, ever since that conversation started. We do have some sectoral tariff conversations, such as for steel and aluminum, for lumber, for automotive parts, and for automobiles.

39:13But overall, the conversation has been about each country and sort of making trade equal. And so, you know, I think that that's sort of why there is some confusion. You know, if there is a real strategy and a real finer point about what kind of industrial manufacturing rebirth we want in America, maybe these blunt tariffs that are sort of economy-wide were not necessarily the right way to go about it from the start. But, you know, I don't think, There's some on social media, there's some ongoing jokes. I don't want to make sneakers, I want to wear them. And so I don't know that there is a big community in the US that is looking to get back into sort of your garden variety, consumer apparel and footwear.

40:07But certainly, when it comes to elements that are important for national security, for the technology industry, for pharmaceuticals, you know, that's quite different. And a lot of those industries will require advanced manufacturing in different, as Simon said, different kinds of jobs that are more attractive. Aaron makes a good point, Simon. Could we see more sectoral tariffs, do you think, as these policies can, you know, the policy is continuing to develop, isn't it? So good. Well, so as I said before in this program, Trump has very little time to make this very significant change to the balance of manufacturing and trade in the world.

40:48So initially, what he does is he creates alarm by going across the board with seemingly very high tariffs. And then when engagement occurs, he picks that apart. If you look at the temporary deal we've got going with China at the moment, it differentiates different parts of the economy. So it's not that he's intending to tariff everything. It's that he wants to get the attention of his interlocutor in order to have a detailed discussion, protect the things that he needs to be protected, allow the things that he doesn't think need to be protected to carry on. So that's where we are at the moment.

41:19And that's a negotiation. And it takes time. And he's not going to tell us at the beginning what his default objective is, because if he did that, that would be stupid, because everybody would know. So in a negotiation, you get the drama, you get the negotiation, and then you get a deal at the end of the day. And I think we're going to see some quite good deals. A lot of countries have already fallen into line. So, you know, I remain, as you know, pretty positive about this process. I think it's harder if you're a small country, say, like Singapore or Malaysia, to discern how you deal with this, because a lot of jobs and livelihoods are at stake.

41:54And there's a degree of uncertainty, which nobody likes. But, you know, all will be well. Let us see what happens. You know, we do know, don't we, that a lot of because of those global supply chains, that a lot of American companies have also had problems with the tariffs. Right. Let us. Move on to this. We've talked a lot lately about the global trade war and the new tariffs that are expected to drive up the cost of a lot of foreign-made goods. And it's leading some shoppers to lean local. Yeah, but how easy is that really to buy only American products? Yeah, how easy is that? That's something we thought, let's have a look into this.

42:27So we've been speaking to Diana Huff. She's the publisher of the Keep It Made USA blog. She interviews company bosses, does research about products and tries to buy products that are entirely made. in America. I read this book. It was a compilation of articles about how manufacturing in the United States had just been devastated by the offshoring. You know, we lost whole industries. You know, a lot of people were just clueless. I know I was. And so I read these books. I was horrified. And I said, well, if I'm going to be working with manufacturers, the least I can do is support them by buying things made in USA.

43:06So I said, I'm going to buy everything made in the US. And I had to quickly backtrack on that one. Okay, let's go through that process. How easy is it to find out if something is completely made in the US? Or do you say if it's 70 % made in the US, that's good enough for me? Basically, I just start reading labels. This was back in 2015. I hadn't changed my shopping habits. So I'd go to Home Depot, I have a house that I've been renovating and I'd read all these labels and oh my God, the whole rack of whatever I was looking at was made in China. And the more I read labels, the more I learned. So it could say made in USA of imported components or assembled in the USA or designed, you know, Apple's famous for this, designed in Cupertino, but made, you know, in China.

43:57So I started finding, you know, oh, there are all these companies that I didn't even know about that are selling direct to consumer. So that's a journey you go down. And you've had instances where you've bought something, haven't you? I was looking at a story about a weighing scale that you thought was made in America. But how did you find out it wasn't? Well, I went to Bed Bath & Beyond, which is now out of business, just to see what's available, just to get an idea. I need a bathroom scale. And they were all those smart scales, you know, you plug them into the internet. I'm like, oh, no, no, no, no.

44:32So then I went online and I'm like, oh, my God, you can't find an analog scale anymore. And I finally found this company that said, yep, we make analog scales. But now I've learned. I learned this the hard way. It didn't say made in USA. It just said our manufacturing facilities are in the U.S. And we also are, you know, different countries. And I thought, OK, all right, that sounds good. So I ordered it. It came. I opened the box and on the back, big fat label made in China. So back it went. When you've been through this process and you've been doing it for a significant period of time now, do you think you end up paying more because you're trying to find those made in the US products?

45:14Yes, some things do cost more. But I have found that because now I no longer do impulse shopping, I've actually saved money. Have you found over this period of time it's got easier or more difficult to buy made-in-the-U.S. products? It's become easier because now more companies are putting the labels on their products. You can usually find what you're looking for with the exception of electronics made in USA online through direct-to-consumer. Is that the hardest bit, electronics? I imagine much as you want to. You can't get a phone that's completely made in America, can you? Yeah, I don't think you can get any phone made in America.

45:55Diana Huff there, who has for many years been looking to buy products that are made in America, mainly made in the U.S., and telling us about what a journey that has been for her. Do you look at where things are made when you buy everything? I do, very much. And it's very interesting. It's very challenging to buy made in the U.S., absolutely. Absolutely. Some very large retailers like Walmart have, you know, really beefed up their procurement of American made consumer goods. But there's entire categories of things that are just not made here. Yeah. Electronics being a big part of that, Simon. But Simon, you know, the fact that so many products have come into the US, you know, many of them from from China has been good for American consumers, hasn't it?

46:44Because they've come in at a price that, you know, they're all very happy with. uh yeah i mean people will buy the cheapest item i mean you know that there is there is there is dare i say it a moral question here which is if you take the view that manufacturing and business is purely about making as much money as possible then making everything in china uh and letting five million manufacturing jobs in the u.s disappear you know it's fine if you take a slightly more nuanced view it says well could we make a little bit less money and actually employ some people where we live, then that becomes a slightly different discussion.

47:18And the iPhone, which is briefly mentioned there, is a very good example of that because the iPhone, which costs cents on the dollars for making China and sells for$1 ,000, has absolutely massive margins. Just one final thing. I am a big procurer of stuff from the US because if you happen to be a gentleman with a well-muscled abdomen and you want to buy a shirt, you can't get one in Asia because everyone here is too small. So I'm very grateful to the US for its supply of large items for big gentlemen like me. Well, you know, I've got a lot of sympathy on that because I spilled some stuff. I was in Madrid the other day and I managed to spill stuff all over myself.

47:54And then I had to go and buy some new clothes because I looked a bit like a clown more than I normally do. As I was wandering around this very sophisticated city. And as I went into many Spanish shops, I realized that their waist sizes were a little bit less than mine. So I have a lot of sympathy for you on this, really. Do you see a growth around you, Erin, of people saying, yeah, I want to buy a bit more? Other countries are doing it. Canada is doing it in particular, isn't it? Yes, I do see a growth around that. But I also see very strong growth around that Americans can consume less and that we can also consume vintage fashion, for example, sustainable items.

48:35So I do think that there is going to be a movement to consume less. And many, many acknowledge that, you know, Americans maybe consume too much and too low a quality of a lot of goods. And that would include sort of fast fashion and some other things that maybe don't need to don't need to be consumed at that same rate. There we go. There's one of the paradoxes of the world. Americans need to consume less. Simon, 20 seconds on this. The Chinese need to consume more, don't they? I need to consume less. Everyone I know tells me that. But at the end of the day, the world is full of wonderful things to eat, to wear and to look at.

49:13And I am determined to enjoy them while I can. Well, I'm with you on the food, Simon, which is why we have those body issues that we talked about. Right. Oh, not body issues, but, you know, we are who we are. That's it for Business Matters.

From the publisher

The US President, Donald Trump's administration, has ordered its embassies abroad to pause new applications for student and exchange visitor visas as it prepares to expand social media vetting of foreign students. We hear from former US Education Secretary Arne Duncan – who was in office during Obama’s presidency. Japanese-owned steelmaker Nippon Steel is expected to close its “partnership” with U.S. Steel at $55 per share, as the US media have reported. On Friday, last week, President Donald Trump said that he has cleared the deal. And Rahul Tandon hears how one woman’s quest to buy only US-made goods has been surprisingly difficult. Throughout the programme, we will be joined by two guests on opposite sides of the world: Erin McLaughlin, Senior Economist, The Conference Board in the US, and Simon Littlewood, President of ACG Global or a business consultant based in Singapore.

More from Big Boss Interview

All 93 episodes
US pauses student visasBig Boss Interview · 49 min
Listen in VO