In short
Veolia CEO Estelle Brachlianoff discusses “environmental security” as national security, arguing the UK should act now to prevent water shortages, and that Veolia can help whether water assets are privately run or nationalised. She also covers data-centre water/energy demands, hazardous-waste treatment (including PFAS), recycling, and energy-from-waste with carbon-capture plans.
Guest backgrounds
Estelle Brachlianoff is CEO of Veolia, a 45-country environmental services firm (~€44bn turnover; ~215,000 employees). She has worked at Veolia for 21+ years, including leading UK operations; trained as an engineer with a quantum physics major. Justin Rowlett is BBC Climate Editor and interviews her.
Key claims
droughts will recur more intensely; technology exists to avoid UK water restrictions (leak detection via AI, wastewater reuse, possible desalination). Veolia would support public or private water models. Data centres need “security of supply” and can be made circular via recycled cooling water and waste-heat reuse. Veolia can destroy PFAS up to 99.9999% using concentration plus high-temperature incineration.
Notable examples
desalination units in the Middle East reportedly surrounded by Patriot missiles; Thames Hestory desalination; Jordan where 75% of irrigation uses treated wastewater; Veolia projects with Amazon Web Services (Mississippi) and “Energy One” (Ohio); PFAS destruction plant near Liverpool; data-centre water use estimate by 2030 equals Birmingham+Glasgow combined.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding Veolia's Role
2:25 to 3:57
Estelle explains the evolution and global presence of Veolia.
“Here is Justin's interview with Estelle, CEO of Veolia.”
Estelle's Journey to CEO
3:57 to 5:54
Estelle shares her career path and the challenges she faced as a woman in leadership.
“Actually, I've been in the company for more than 21 years.”
Challenges of Being a Female Leader
5:54 to 7:40
Discussion on the barriers Estelle faced as a female CEO in a male-dominated industry.
“Never thought about, you know, what the next steps will be.”
Environmental Security as National Security
7:40 to 10:54
Exploration of how environmental security relates to national security.
“And I hope it brought something to the party.”
Addressing Water Scarcity
10:54 to 14:00
Estelle discusses how Veolia can tackle global water scarcity issues.
“It's a phrase the UN also uses, the idea that we're kind of effectively using up running out of water faster than nature can provide it.”
Veolia's Wastewater Innovations
14:00 to 17:30
Learn how Veolia plans to use technology for wastewater treatment in the UK.
“And what do we mean by what I mean by everything we have?”
Addressing Thames Water Challenges
17:30 to 20:50
Explore Veolia's perspective on Thames Water's operational issues and investment needs.
“Okay, well, we're very glad to hear that.”
Data Centres: Balancing Energy and Water
20:50 to 24:00
Understand the environmental impact of data centres and how Veolia can help.
“I get asked about data centres practically every day.”
Tackling Hazardous Waste
24:00 to 27:10
Discover how Veolia addresses hazardous waste and the technologies involved.
“Another one would be to do the same with water.”
Cost and Responsibility in Pollution Management
27:10 to 28:00
Examine the financial responsibilities for managing pollutants and Veolia's role.
“So now we can tell you we can destroy those PFAS up to 99.9999%.”
Show all 16 chapters
Who Will Pay for Pollution Cleanup?
28:00 to 30:09
The discussion revolves around identifying responsibility for pollution cleanup costs and the implications for society.
“Because often the companies that created the pollution have gone or been absorbed by another company and the responsibility is not clear.”
The Cost of Living Crisis and Environmental Solutions
30:09 to 33:54
A comparison of immediate action versus delayed responses to environmental issues in the context of financial strain on citizens.
“If we wait for the next crisis, if we don't use all the innovation we have, then I couldn't certify that.”
Recycling Challenges and Opportunities
33:54 to 35:50
An examination of the stagnation in recycling rates in the UK and the need for innovative solutions to improve them.
“will end up, you know, increasing just, you know, local bills.”
Mining Waste for Valuable Resources
35:50 to 40:00
An exploration of the potential for extracting valuable minerals from waste to ensure resource security and reduce dependency on imports.
“In the meantime, how do we do to promote recycling?”
Investing in Environmental Services Amid Political Challenges
40:00 to 41:53
A discussion on the paradox of investing in environmental services in the US despite a lack of federal support for climate policies.
“Minerals are very critical to our lives and a question of geopolitics.”
Reflecting on Career Choices and Advice
42:01 to 43:34
Learn about personal reflections on career paths and advice for aspiring businesswomen.
“I'm always curious, you know, what would the 16-year-old Estelle think of you now looking back on the career you've had?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
0:30up at Whole Foods Market. Update your home with pre-finished siding from Menards. Choose between 13 timeless Sherwin-Williams colors, an LP SmartSide, or Allura fiber cement siding. Durable siding that includes a Sherwin-Williams paint warranty. That means peace of mind with no painting for years to come. Right now, LP SmartSide pre-finished siding is on sale through September 7th. Plus, check out our weekly flyer on Menards.com for all the great deals happening now. Save big money at Menards.
1:16Welcome to Big Boss Interview. I'm Liana Byrne. We have BBC Climate Editor Justin Rowlett with us today. Justin, you've been speaking to the CEO of one of the biggest water companies in the world. I'm joined by Estelle Brachlianoff, the chief executive of Veolia, the world's largest environmental services company. It's a 44 billion euro business. It employed 215 ,000 people around the world. It supplies water, deals with waste and produces energy. the basic services that keep modern societies running. And the company's size and reach makes Brachlionov one of the most powerful women in world business.
1:59Veolia is the biggest waste company here in the UK. Its lorries may well collect the rubbish and recycling from your homes. I'll be exploring what Brachlionov's plans are for Veolia in the UK. Could it help improve this country's woeful water industry? Maybe even take over troubled Emswater. And what about data centres? Can their voracious appetite for energy and water be tamed? Let's hear it then. Here is Justin's interview with Estelle, CEO of Veolia.
2:33Estelle, welcome to Big Boss Interview. First of all, briefly, what is Veolia?
2:39Estelle Brachlianoff:Oh, Veolia is a multi-local company present in 45 countries, leader of environmental services, which is what we do is offer environmental security to cities and to industries alike. This is about water, this is about waste and recycling, this is about local energy. So originally it was a French water company, wasn't it? And how did it evolve into what you're describing as this kind of environmental security company? You're right. Originally means more than 170 years ago, you're right. We were born in France in water, but it developed into now, you know, a company which is 80 % outside France and actually 40 % outside Europe even.
3:18Estelle Brachlianoff:We are number one in the US. We are number one in Australia. This is for water. The US is for hazardous waste and for water. And in Australia, it's about waste as well. So we are really present in many, many different countries. And how did it evolve from this originally French company to a worldwide one? actually has the customer's need has evolved from, you know, providing essential service, such as water at your tap, developed into developing technologies and innovation to treat various pollutants. And then, you know, recycling as a social service as well. And we've acquired as well a few companies over the years.
3:56And that's how we became this, you know, 45 billion turnover to 120 ,000 employees worldwide now. So this is a big, big, big company. How, Estelle, did you get to the top? Actually, I've been in the company for more than 21 years. So I kind of know it inside out, moved through the ranks, started as, you know, having being the head of a small business unit somewhere, and then progressively a larger one. And then I moved for a few years, actually, in the UK, heading our activities there, and so on and so forth. So what degree did you study? What did you study? Yes, I graduated as an engineer as well as I majored in quantum physics, which is not exactly very useful for Veolia, but still makes you think in like innovation terms.
4:48And when there is a problem, there is a solution. We just have to find it out. So you're in quantum physics, but you end up running a business. That seems like quite a big journey you've made. Yes. A lady which is driven by curiosity. I love to learn things, discover people, discover countries. I've lived six years in the UK. And that's how I came from, you know, like an engineer to progressively run businesses. So probably the second driver for me is like the never give up. So I said, you know, like I was always attracted to from challenges as in, you know, like, OK, I'm not so sure I'm going to be able to do it.
5:27But let's give it a try. and as long as I have an appetite for it and even a passion for it, okay, let's give it a go and try. But you rose all the way to the top. So what's the point at which you said, I'm going to give it a go, I'm going to go to be CEO of this huge company? Oh, I never had this moment. Actually, I was always, you know, from one job to the next and as long as I have a value and have a little bit of fun as well, let's give it a try and give it a go. Never thought about, you know, what the next steps will be. You know, I'm not at all like this is my plan for the next few years in the organization was never the way I thought about it.
6:04You are one of the most senior or run one of the biggest companies, one of the women running one of the biggest companies in the world. If that captures what I'm trying to communicate. How has being a woman changed your pathway through a big and frankly quite male dominated business like the earlier? Yes, it's a male-dominated business, although things are moving fast, you know, and now we have more than 30 % female, you know, throughout the organization. It was basically twice less just five years ago, roughly. So it's moving fast, but still is male-dominated. I guess I'm a great believer that difference creates innovation.
6:44And difference can be, you know, like male and female, you know, around the table, but can be nationality, can be, you know, even if I'm a social partner. You have to mix people to be able to create something different from just reproducing exactly the same answers to new problems. That's why I don't know if I was only a female, but it's fair to say very different from other people around the table. Let me give you an example. When I was appointed in the UK that was more than 10 years ago to run the business here, I was the only woman around the executive committee of the UK business. I was French and I was something like 40 years old at that time.
7:25And I remember asking some of the team, what was the, after a few years, what was the most shocking of the three? I said, oh, you're right. Female, French or 40? Yes. And the reality was all three, you know. So I guess difference is not only about gender. It's wider than that. And I hope it brought something to the party. But it gave me back something as well. I learned a lot by working with people who were, you know, like in the UK, very different from my initial way of running businesses. I've got to ask you the obvious question. Do you think the fact that you were a woman created barriers along the way?
8:02Was it a challenge sometimes because you were female to get that job, as you say, French, female and 40? Yes, of course. But I never thought about it when I was experimenting, if you want. I was just, OK, if there is if there is something I believe into, I'm going to fight for it. And that's it. So it's more after years than what I reflect back. I can see, you know, the barrier. But when they were, you know, in front of me, I never thought about them. The question is really the question is really to be given the chance. And I was very lucky that I was given the chance of friend diverse businesses I just told you about.
8:39And that was by my boss at that time. Let's move to Veolia itself. So you've talked about kind of environmental security as a kind of organizing principle to how you see the company developing. You've also talked about Veolia as a defense company. Now, you supply water, you deal with waste. How is that national defense?
9:01Estelle Brachlianoff:Actually, I think environmental security is part of national security. And probably we haven't realized it yet, but some other countries have. When I say some other countries have, if you were to come with me in the Middle East now, probably you wouldn't understand very much what I mean by that. Desalination units in the Middle East are targeted, as we speak, because they are a critical infrastructure to provide water, not only to cities, but to industries, to refineries and to pretty much everything, and of course agriculture. So they are considered an essential service, a critical need. When you say targeted, you mean literally targeted by Iran in the conflict around the Straits of Hormuzh?
9:44Actually, desalination units are in the list of the targets, and actually some of them have been bombarded, as we speak. So we have therefore Veolia facilities in the Middle East surrounded by Patriot missiles. So literally, we're talking about, you know, security as in national security. Of course, you know, this is an extreme example that you can see in the Middle East. But when you look at the summer that we've had through Europe and including in this country, in the UK, you can think of, you know, when water becomes scarce, when you have droughts, And you have to think of water as something as critical as many other national securities, you know, items.
10:29Water irrigates pretty much everything. Without water, you don't have, you cannot have food. You cannot produce anything. Of course, you know, you cannot, you know, drink. So it's critical resource.
10:43Estelle Brachlianoff:And this is one of the first consequence of global warming and climate change is on water. So it's one of the first victim of climate change is water. And you've talked about water bankruptcy. It's a phrase the UN also uses, the idea that we're kind of effectively using up running out of water faster than nature can provide it. How can, you know, this is, you know, you're a commercial company. How can you step in and kind of address this, these kind of really big national and environmental issues? So Veolia is the largest water company in the world. We operate on the five continents, including in very water-scarce areas, such as Jordan, Chile, Australia, just to name a few.
11:24Estelle Brachlianoff:And we've, over the years, developed technologies and know-how to be able to ensure you have safe water, resilient water at the tap every single day. Water is a key critical infrastructure that we have to think of as we should protect it. That's why I call it security as much as any other critical infrastructure. What does kind of water failure in the UK look like, do you think? I mean, you've had water companies here in the UK, you're experts in water supply. Are we at the point now where we could see a situation where there is enough water to flush toilets in the UK? There is enough water supply, water in the taps.
12:08People are going to stand pipes out in the street. Can you imagine that happening?
12:12Estelle Brachlianoff:I would put it another way around. We have to do everything it takes so that it doesn't happen in the UK. And we have everything it takes. So we have the technology. I hope we will have the will, the political will, to understand that it's a geopolitical and national security interest for the country to act quick and to act fast. Why do I say that? We have all the technology to be able to avoid, you know, water restriction at the tap in the UK. And acting now will always be less expensive than active in a few years time in the middle of a big crisis. It's economically efficient to do it that way.
12:53You're saying that the technology is there. That implies that the technology is available, but that it's not there, which implies that we do have a problem. and parts of Britain were close to rationing water supplies this summer. So, I mean, just give me a sense of your perspective, running one of the biggest water companies in the world. How close is the UK to having a really serious issue with water supply?
13:16Estelle Brachlianoff:I hope that this summer, where we were very close in the UK of having water restriction, as you mentioned, will be a wake-up call for everybody to say we have to act now as opposed to wait for the next crisis because climate change is happening. The first victim of climate change is on water. So you know what? The type of summer we've seen this year will happen again. And they will happen again more frequently and even more intensely. That's a fact. That's what science tells us. We already had two-thirds of the country facing drought this summer. And you know what? Again, this is going to happen again.
13:51Estelle Brachlianoff:So we have two choices. One is turn a blind eye and wait for the next crisis. And at one point then, yes, there may be water restriction in the UK. Or we have a plan, we act now and we use everything we have. And what do we mean by what I mean by everything we have? Use the technology and the know-how of companies like Veolia has developed over the years in five continents. We are ready to import it in this country to be able to treat wastewater, to treat the pollutant in water and to avoid water restriction. And how do we do that? you know, like manage leakage in a better way, using AI, for instance, so smart investments, reuse of wastewater, and maybe developing a few desalination units at one point.
14:39Estelle Brachlianoff:Do you think it's come to that? Desalination units in the UK? Do you know, this is a question for you, that you already have a few desalination units in the UK? It's usually something the general public doesn't know, but you already have a big one. I'm ashamed to say I did not know that, Estelle. You already have a quite large one in the Thames Hestory. And, you know, we are regularly selling a smaller unit in the western part of this country. Why is that so? Because as opposed to what a lot of people think, all the south of the UK is actually commonly known for water scarce and quite a dry part of the world.
15:14I did see a statistic that said Rome gets more rain than London, which is quite extraordinary. Now, listen, Veolia used to run a regulated water company in the UK, and there's a wonderful commercial opportunity available for you. You could take over Thames Water, which has been having some trouble. How about Veolia takes over Thames Water, puts in place some of those new technologies that are going to protect us from droughts in the future?
15:36Estelle Brachlianoff:I would think in a different way. You know, I will let, of course, the government decide what they want to do with Thames Water. What I can say, we have a lot of things we can offer. We have the technologies and know-how to be able to operate large network, large wastewater treatment units, for instance, in a very efficient way. Very efficient means, of course, Thames Water and other water companies need more investment. But I guess it's smarter investment, which I think Veolia contributes to. I mentioned leakage. You know, when you are facing potential water restriction and you still have a big leakage, you might wonder, OK, what is this absurd?
16:16Estelle Brachlianoff:You know, you have the traditional way of reducing leakage, which is just to replace pipes. It costs you a fortune. You know, it's quite a lot of disturbance in the streets and that's it. You have a more modern way, if I may, which is to use AI to detect the leak exactly where they are happening. So you're targeting a specific section of the pipe to be replaced. This is typically the way I, what I call smart investments. So, of course, we can help water companies, Thameswaters, whatever its future is, as well as the other, to be smarter in their investments, to operate in a more efficient way.
16:51Estelle Brachlianoff:Thanks to the innovation with the, we are the larger water company in the world. We can bring those innovation to the UK. And why do I talk about being more efficient in running, for instance, wastewater? water it's because you know it's one of my obsession is that people have value for money so innovation for the sake of it is no interest for me innovation has to serve a purpose it can be solve a problem pollutant in water water restriction that you can avoid it can be as well just by being more efficient you have the bills right which can stay where they are as opposed to go up. Bielia is ready to help.
17:30Okay, well, we're very glad to hear that. But I'm wondering why, you know, there is this commercial opportunity in Thameswater. I mean, you know, and you've kind of stepped back, you're clearly saying Bielia doesn't want to buy Thameswater, certainly at the moment. Does that mean that you think Thameswater isn't fit for purpose? Isn't a business that you think that you could successfully turn around?
17:51Estelle Brachlianoff:No, I would put it another way around. I think, you know, you have a, it's not for me, it's for really the government to decide what type of model they want for running the water companies in the UK. The actual model is, you know, the assets are owned by the private sector, as well as the assets are run, if you want, by the private sector. There are a lot of models where the assets are actually owned by the public. It's public ownership and the public, whether it be the government or a specific dedicated regional body of some sort. But the private sector brings innovation as well as know-how to run them.
18:31Estelle Brachlianoff:So in a way, you can have the best of both worlds, in my opinion, when you have, you know, like private sector do what they do well, which is bring innovation. But Veolia is not here specifically to bring money. In a way, we're here to help save money. So, Ernie Burnham, the new UK Prime Minister, has said he doesn't think the water industry in the UK is working. And I have to say, I think a lot of the UK public would agree with that. So, are you saying, you know, listen, Andy, if you nationalise the assets, if you make the physical assets of the companies a public good, then we, Viola, would be happy to come in and use our expertise to manage them better.
19:10Is that what you're offering?
19:11Estelle Brachlianoff:It could be an option, yes. You know, by running some specific plants, why not? So plants, I mean, you know, drinking water units or wastewater treatment plants or network management. That's what we do in some different countries. I am not at all opposing public and private sector. I think the public, as in the government or, you know, public bodies, are exactly where they should be in deciding what to do. Then we're here to provide our expertise and innovation so that we deliver at the best cost possible. And I think, you know, we need both in other terms. And I think that if the water sector is giving this direction, we'll be very happy to support, again, running in a very efficient way using the innovation we've developed everywhere.
20:00Estelle Brachlianoff:Just to give you an idea, in Jordan, I've talked earlier on about reusing wastewater. Basically, it's recycling wastewater, as opposed to ask the farmers to stop irrigation for a few weeks because we don't have water in the middle of the summer. What about using wastewater, treated wastewater, of course, being recycled to help the agriculture sector? That's what we do in Jordan. 75 % of irrigation of water in Jordan is provided by wastewater. water. That's something we can develop in some part of the UK as well. Let's move on to another business area that I know is something you think is a potential opportunity for Veolia.
20:40Data centres, and you're talking about supplying water, naturally grows out of your core business, but also energy to data centres. Now, data centres, as you know, are very controversial. I'm the climate editor of the BBC. I get asked about data centres practically every day. What do you think you can bring to these issues about the incredible appetite for both energy and water that data centres have?
21:03Estelle Brachlianoff:So data centre and micro E and everything to do with AI, I call it the AI industries because it's really a supply chain. It's two sides of a coin. One is exactly what you said, they're consuming enormous amount of water and energy. And we have the way in Veolia, again, the know-how and technologies to be able to make it more sustainable. And we'll explain that in a minute. The other side of the coin is that we can use and we are using AI as well to reduce water consumption, to detect leak, just as I mentioned, or to be more efficient in what we do. So I guess AI can be a force for good, as long as it's used in a very practical way, where each time we check the balance between the environmental impact and the positive effect it can have.
21:49Estelle Brachlianoff:When it comes to data centres being implemented in the UK, you're right, if we're not careful, we can have a fight for water, in a way, or for energy between a local community and the data centres, which is, of course, not at all what anybody wants. By the way, it's happening already in the US when you look at it. And it is becoming data centres a very big part of the next election in November in the US is around data centres, you know. So it's becoming a political agenda as well. And it's becoming a political agenda pretty much everywhere. As in, do we have to choose between supplying farmers and city or cooling down data centres?
22:30And the issue, just to be clear for the audience, the issue is if you stop supplying water or energy to a data centre, if it goes off, you lose all the data. And that's a huge kind of loss. So data centres demand unbelievable security of supply of both water and energy.
Read the full transcript
22:48Estelle Brachlianoff:And the volume is huge. Just to give you an idea, in the UK alone, by 2030, we estimate that data centres will be using the equivalent of the water consumption of both Birmingham and Glasgow combined. So it gives you an idea, and it's only 2030, so it's really short term. So it's potentially very, very consuming. In a way, you have two choices. Either you say, I don't want data centers at all, but then you will be dependent from all the AI industries, which still is creating jobs and potential innovation somewhere else. And you will be dependent from, you know, like other countries. It's not necessarily what we want.
23:26Estelle Brachlianoff:The other choice is to make them more sustainable. And that's exactly what Veolia is helping there. By recycling water and recycling energy. What do I mean by that? Data centers, they consume a lot of energy and they produce heat because you have to cool them down. So the wasted heat, when you cool them down, can be used to provide heat for quite a low price to, say, a local district heating scheme. So you can imagine to almost have free heat for your home in the local community, thanks to the Dessent Territors, which is nearby. This is quite a circular approach, which is very important. Another one would be to do the same with water.
24:05Estelle Brachlianoff:They absolutely need a lot of water to be cooled down, those data centers, you can, instead of taking water from the underground or from the rivers, water being scarcer, as we just explained earlier, you can recycle water. So you can take water from a wastewater treatment plant to be used to cool down the data center. But it has to be very, very clean, doesn't it? Otherwise it leaves a residue in the system and then needs to be cleaned up. You're exactly right. That's why I said technology and know-how, because it's not exactly as easy as what it sounds. But we are ready. We have everything it takes.
24:40Estelle Brachlianoff:And actually, we've already developed such project with Amazon Web Service in Mississippi, the Energy One in Ohio in the US. And we have a lot of projects exactly alongside what I said in the UK, none of them which we've announced yet, but we are progressing very well. But this is not something that's uniquely a vision of Veolia. Other people have noticed, for example, you know, that the water isn't actually lost, you know, it's a circular process for the water. And as you say, there's a heat resource there that could be used if you can find an innovative way to use it. Yes, but Veolia being number one worldwide in terms of patent in water, you know, we are uniquely placed, we have unique technologies and unique know-how.
25:18Estelle Brachlianoff:Plus, we have experience. You know, as I said, the fact that we're present on five continents means we've already developed such projects in other geographies, and we have the know-how to be able to deliver them. Let's move on to another area that Veolia has been focusing on you made a big purchase in america of a company that focuses on hazardous waste um and you clearly again think this is a a big business opportunity what is it what can you bring to hazardous waste what is the problem that you're trying to address so hazardous waste in a few words these are all the effluents which industries do produce like you know solvent use solvent or chemical products just to give you an idea so it's a i would say nasty stuff you don't want to end up finding in the river nearby where they live or whatever you want to treat them or to destroy them for a better word so that they are not released in nature when i talked about environmental security earlier on here we're talking about health protection so it's a way of ensuring security of the supply but with regards protecting your health because you don't want those pollutants again to end up anywhere.
26:29Estelle Brachlianoff:PFAS is one of them. These are the so-called forever chemicals. PFAS, yes, are the forever chemicals which you know are pretty much everywhere in our daily lives and science discovered. But in absolutely minute quantities these are you know kind of one molecule in a million. Exactly. So you know science has evolved and we've discovered I mean, science has discovered that some of them, not all of them, could be harmful for your health. And they are progressively banned or, you know, there are things imposed on the companies producing them. And alongside science evolving, Veolia has innovated. We've put all our R &D team to try and say, OK, can we destroy those PFAS?
27:14Estelle Brachlianoff:At first they say, no, not yet. And then they found a way. So now we can tell you we can destroy those PFAS up to 99.9999%. That's quite a lot. That's quite a lot. But how do you do it? How do you do it? And then I've got another question. How do we do it? You know, it depends if those pollutants are within soil, within water or within the air. But basically, you concentrate them thanks to, say, membranes or iron resins. and then once you have a concentration of them, you destroy them by burning them at a very high temperature. It's more than 1 ,100 degrees Celsius in very specific units, which we have a few around the world and we've demonstrated.
27:58You've got one in the UK, haven't you?
27:59Estelle Brachlianoff:We've got one in the UK near Liverpool. Who is going to pay for that? Because often the companies that created the pollution have gone or been absorbed by another company and the responsibility is not clear. I mean, who's going to pay? governments, local people, the companies, Veolia? So it's, we're here to serve and to ensure that, you know, the cost is the lower possible. That's what I said by, you know, having a value for money and innovation is helping us to be more efficient every single day. It will be, it will be for society to decide in a way who's going to pay for that. It's going to be probably a bit of the three you mentioned.
28:35Estelle Brachlianoff:And Veolia's role is to make it so that, you know, it's a less possible cost for the population. That's why it's value for money is at the forefront of everything we do with regard to innovation. But you're sort of building a business without a guaranteed revenue stream yet. You're exactly right. So you're right when you will launch an offer, we don't have any guaranteed revenue. But I think, you know, this summer for any other things demonstrated that we are probably at the right place as in having unique proprietary solutions for critical needs on water, waste and energy. I think some people listening to this will say, you know, brilliant, obviously we want to clean the environment up.
29:16That sounds great. But if I end up paying the cost, my bills are going to rise at a time when I'm already worried about the cost of living. We talk a lot here in the UK. I'm sure it's the same in France. The same everywhere. Everywhere that people feel as if the cost of living is bearing more heavily on them than it ever has before.
29:32Estelle Brachlianoff:A few things on that one. Acting now will always be less expensive than waiting. So let's not waste a good crisis, as you say. Just this summer, droughts, you know, and water scarcity cost the UK more than one billion pounds. So we have to anticipate the solution. We have everything it takes, if you call us, with using our innovation and know-how, so that we can ensure that the water bills doesn't go up in terms of percentage of, you know, income in the UK. If we wait for the next crisis, if we don't use all the innovation we have, then I couldn't certify that. But if we use all the solution we have, plus we act now, I can certify, I can stay very, very…
30:22Estelle Brachlianoff:That's a very forceful argument. But there are some constraints here. Interest rates have gone up dramatically. The cost of borrowing is higher. Governments are struggling to find money for defence, for fundamental things, for funding the NHS here in the UK. They don't have money to invest in things that, yes, would be great to kind of solve now, but things like clearing up chemical residues from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. I would see it a little bit differently. You were implying in your question that there are serious things, say, defence, and things which are more, OK, to be good for the environment or for the planet, and maybe we can wait.
31:09Estelle Brachlianoff:I would debate that. But as I said earlier on, environmental security is a question of national security. Ensuring that there is no water restriction in the UK is a matter of national security. Ensuring that you don't have a health crisis because we let pollutants end up, you know, being drinking by your fellow citizens is a question of, in a way, national security. So it's not a question of being good for the planet. It's a question of the human being. it's a question of competitiveness for this country it's a question of economy and by the way it creates job and good local well-paid jobs you talk a lot about you know protecting the environment you're building the the you know the core principles of the company around that idea that's the vision um but at the same time one of your businesses is waste to energy so it's taking you know for example plastic waste burning it to create energy which sounds like a kind of recycling process.
32:08But of course, Estelle, it produces carbon dioxide emissions. And Veolia has quite ferociously been fighting the proposal that you should pay a carbon price. Now, all other energy generators who burn fossil fuels and plastic is effectively in this instance of fossil fuel pay a carbon price. Why shouldn't Veolia pay a carbon price as well?
32:28Estelle Brachlianoff:So a few things on that one. You know, priority is to recycle more. And then energy from waste is when it's only to produce energy of the non-recyclable waste. So it's in this order and in this priority, just to be very clear. So, yes, there are progress we should make in this country to recycle more plastic. And actually, we are investing massively. We've invested, we are investing one billion pound until 2030 in solar economy in the UK. OK, we've just opened a new plant in Shrewsbury and so on and so forth. So, yes, you're right. It should be the priority. But once you have a part which is not recyclable, I'd better produce energy than landfill it.
33:12Estelle Brachlianoff:Produce energy means it's a local source of energy, which means you don't have to be dependent from importing fuel and so on and so forth. So, but you're right. It should be the priority or first increase the recycling rate. And it is exactly what the intention of the government is. In the end, when you produce, you're right, you know, energy from waste are checked with regards to all the emission and everything, and rightly so. It still produces CO2. It's not vellus CO2. It's your household waste, which produces CO2. So we're only, you know, operating it for you. So in the end, the CO2 tax, if it were to happen, and it's not for me to decide, will end up, you know, increasing just, you know, local bills.
34:00Estelle Brachlianoff:That's it. But you could say the same thing about a gas turbine plant, an electricity generator that uses gas. You could say, well, it's local bills and, you know, charging a carbon price is going to push up local bills. At the end of the day, if we're going to tackle climate change, which you said is a core issue for Veolia, we have to drive down emissions. You know that, Miss. Exactly. That's why the third part of my answer is, at the same time, we're investing massively in trying to see how we could capture the CO2, which will be remaining, into energy from waste. And we've invested in, where was it, Sheffield, for instance, to test a new technology of carbon capture for the remaining bit, because there will always be a remaining bit of CO2 emission from energy from waste.
34:40Estelle Brachlianoff:So again, recycle first, and we're investing massively. For the past, which is not recyclable, I'd rather produce energy than anything. But at the same time, you're right, you know, the idea is not to keep it that way. The idea is progressively to evolve. But so far, it's not economically viable. So my duty, the duty of Eolia is to make it viable via innovating to try and find a way so that carbon capture becomes relevant for energy from waste. It's not yet the case, but I hope it will be. Okay. And just on the recycling, I was just looking at the statistics. The rate of recycling in the UK over the last decade has...
35:18Stalled. Fallen. Very slightly. Stalled. Roughly, it's stable. But why has it fall? I mean, that's a, you know, I remember looking at these issues 20 years ago, and it was like recycling was kind of, you know, something people did quite reluctantly. People have embraced recycling. We separate our stuff in all the different bins that you provide us. And yet we're still, it's less than 50 % of the rubbish is recycled. That's not great, is it?
35:41Estelle Brachlianoff:That's why, you know, I think, you know, again, a carbon tax wouldn't help recycling so far, because, you know, there is no alternative yet. So we have to find it. In the meantime, how do we do to promote recycling? Actually, a lot of things. You're right. You know, 20 years ago, the UK has progressed very quickly and very rapidly. And now in the last 10 years, basically, I stalled in 45 % of recycling overall. I guess it's the average of equivalent European countries. You probably want to be better than the average. Well, we should all raise our game. And all raise our game. And you're at the center of this.
36:18Estelle Brachlianoff:To have a look at what would be the ultimate target, which are more the northern European countries, say Scandinavia, which are leading the way in that respect. Many, many different things to be able to do that. One is to go on with increasing the recycling rate of plastic, which is not good enough. That's why we invested in this new plant in Shrewsbury, which I just alluded to earlier on. The second thing is to develop more food waste recycling, which is exactly what this country has launched a few months ago. I think it was in the spring. And we already have seen following this new legislation, we already have seen a peak in the recycling rate of various different items.
37:09Estelle Brachlianoff:So I'm quite confident we should go on or taking off again in the recycling rate in this country. But let's not give up. we can gain from 45 % to 65%, which is actually the government targets. I think we can get there. You know, I'm coming back to the comment I made earlier. Why is it important that we increase the recycling rate? It's not just for the CO2 emission, although it's important. It's as well because it's a source of materials which is in the UK as opposed to imported from elsewhere. So in a way, instead of mining the planet, What about mining our waste? Instead of importing paper and oil and plastic, because plastic, of course, is traditionally made out of oil and lithium to make batteries.
37:57Estelle Brachlianoff:What about mine our waste? Mine the waste. And then find those lithium and cobalt and whatever. Why do I mention lithium and cobalt? You know, they are absolutely critical for the energy transition. When you have a cell phone and you have a battery in it, when you have an electric car, an electric bicycle, those batteries, they need lithium, cobalt and nickel. But lithium, cobalt and nickel are basically today, the mines are in Congo, Chile, China. So instead of importing... Processing in China. China dominates... So that's the mining and you're right, the refining as well. So instead of, you know, importing from those countries, what about, you know, keeping those resources in the UK and mine our waste?
38:43Yeah. How realistically can we mine waste to meet these huge demands for these, you know, minerals that, as you say, are central to the renewable energy economy?
38:52Estelle Brachlianoff:So they are central. And it's a question of geopolitics, if I may. Do you want to depend on imports or do you want to be self-sufficient? But I'm asking you a different question. Is there really enough of those minerals in the waste stream to meet the kind of demands we can expect? Depends what type of minerals we're talking about. It's between 15, 20, 25 percent of the supply, which is realistically can come from waste mining. I said realistically because, you know, sometimes it costs more and it becomes realistic. But basically, a quarter of it you can count on. So it reduces your dependency again.
39:29Estelle Brachlianoff:Just why do I say geopolitics? You remember that when there was a big tariff discussion, to say not more, between Xi Jinping and Donald Trump earlier in the year, the first thing Xi Jinping has done is to basically cut the supplies of those exact same minerals I've just talked about. So it's not a theoretical debate. Instead of depending from imports, what about producing them more in the UK? And it's exactly what we've done. And the crucial point there was that Trump did back down on the tariffs after they restricted the critical minerals. Minerals are very critical to our lives and a question of geopolitics.
40:10Talking of America, talking of Donald Trump, you've put a huge investment in environmental services in America at exactly a time when the American president is rolling back.
40:24Estelle Brachlianoff:Are you wondering if I'm absolutely crazy? He's rolling back environmental regulations and making it less compelling for businesses to invest in the kind of services that you're providing. This is a real problem for the area. So it seems paradoxical that leading the largest environmental services company in the world, where the White House is not exactly inclined to climate policies, to invest massively in the US. It's not at all paradoxical when you think about it. The needs, they come from the population and from the industries, more so than from Washington's decision, if you want. When I'm in Arizona and you have a TSMC plant, so big microelectronic plants invest massively.
41:06Estelle Brachlianoff:Arizona voted massively Trump in the last election. But nevertheless, basically, it's a red desert, Arizona. And when they talk to me about supply of water, securing the supply of water, and actually, in that case, even ultra pure water, I can tell you that there is no politics here. It's a critical need. Otherwise, there is not just the plants cannot operate. So it's a license to operate. Same applies for the population. Whatever you voted in the last election in the US, you don't want that when you open your tap, you drink PFAS in the midst of it. And I think, you know, that's the health concern is transpartisan.
41:46Estelle Brachlianoff:So environmental security is transpartisan. It's not a question of political decision at the center. Which brings us to the end. And there's just a couple of questions I'd like to ask you. But it's more coming back to you and coming back to your career. I'm always curious, you know, what would the 16-year-old Estelle think of you now looking back on the career you've had? Would she be surprised? Would she be impressed? You know, would she be asked, demanding anything of you? And also, what would you say to a 15-year-old woman listening to this about, you know, if they want to work in business, about, you know, what sort of things they should be thinking about, what sort of qualities they should be developing?
42:27Estelle Brachlianoff:So I will start with the last part of your question. If you're listening to this, male or female, you know, 16, 20, 25 years old, don't hesitate to give a call to Viola. We have lots of jobs open and offers now. This is a wonderful organization. You may find something of interest for you. and if you're passionate about you know solving real problems and making a difference which things which are absolutely essential for our fellow citizens and for industries alike and for the success of your country go and join Veolia. To my 16 self honestly I would have had no idea and the only thing I would the only tip I would give would be follow your instinct for your guts I never was, as I said earlier on to one of your questions, I never followed like a career path or a specific ambition.
43:24Estelle Brachlianoff:I never had that in mind. I always followed my gut about let's give it a try. As long as you have passion, as long as you believe into something, go for it. Estelle, thank you very much indeed. Thanks for joining us on the Big Boss interview. Thank you.
43:43Thanks to Justin and Estelle for that. Don't forget you can catch up with our whole back catalogue by searching for Big Boss Interview and you can contact the team who make it by emailing bigboss at bbc.co.uk and thank you for taking the time to listen. Bye.
44:08Evil Genius, Good Bad Billionaire and You're Dead to Me with a subscription to BBC Podcasts Premium on Apple Podcasts. You can also enjoy a range of our podcasts ad-free with an Amazon Music subscription.
From the publisher
The chief executive of the world's largest water company has said Veolia would consider running Britain's water infrastructure if it were taken into public ownership, opening the door to a model in which the state owns the assets but private companies operate them.
Asked whether that could mean "nationalise the assets, and Veolia comes in to manage them," Estelle Brachlianoff said: "It could be an option, yes."
She described what that could look like in practice: Veolia running drinking water facilities, wastewater treatment plants and network management under contract, as it already does in other countries. What she ruled out was buying Thames Water. Pressed on the commercial opportunity, she said the ownership model was for government to decide.
Brachlianoff leads a business with around €45 billion in turnover and 220,000 employees worldwide, including 15,000 in the UK. She says drought and water scarcity cost the British economy more than £1 billion this summer, with two-thirds of the country affected by drought and some areas coming close to rationing.
Her warning is that this is not an exceptional summer but the beginning of a pattern. Climate change means shortages will become more frequent and more severe, she argues, and waiting until the next crisis will ultimately cost households and government more.
That leads to the question she is repeatedly pressed on: who pays?
Britain needs to fix leaks, increase resilience, deal with contaminants including PFAS "forever chemicals" and prepare for rapidly growing demand, while households remain under pressure and the Treasury faces competing calls on public money. Brachlianoff accepts that investment is needed, but argues that the answer is not simply to spend more. It is to spend more intelligently.
Instead of digging up and replacing entire stretches of leaking pipe, for example, she advocates using AI to pinpoint the precise sections that are failing. She also points to greater reuse of wastewater, noting that treated wastewater already provides around 75% of irrigation water in Jordan, alongside the possible expansion of desalination.
Her claim is that technology and efficiency could allow Britain to make its water system more resilient without water bills increasing as a proportion of household income. But she acknowledges that guarantee becomes much harder if the country waits until the next shortage before acting.
For Brachlianoff, water is increasingly a national security issue as much as an environmental one. She points to the Middle East, where desalination plants have appeared on military target lists and some Veolia facilities are now protected by Patriot missile systems. Britain's risks are less dramatic, but the underlying principle is the same: without secure water supplies there is no food production, no industry and no functioning economy.
And demand is about to become more complicated.
According to Veolia, by 2030, UK data centres are forecast to consume the equivalent of the combined water use of Birmingham and Glasgow. Brachlianoff says tensions between communities and data centres over access to water are already becoming political issues in parts of the United States.
Elsewhere, the environmental case becomes more contested. Veolia says it can now destroy PFAS - or "forever chemicals" contaminants to 99.9999%, but the question of who should pay for cleaning up decades of pollution remains unresolved. Brachlianoff says the cost will probably have to be shared between government, industry and consumers.
Presenter: Justin Rowlatt Producer: Olie D'Albertanson




