In short
Whether election prediction markets (Kalshi and Polymarket) can be trusted, and how they can be manipulated or used to sow doubt.
Guests/backgrounds
Liam Vaughn, Bloomberg investigations reporter/editor in London, covers prediction markets. Sarah Holder hosts “The Big Take” from Bloomberg News.
Key claims
Regulatory changes (CFTC review; judge ruling) enabled large-scale political betting; after a Trump-era CFTC shift, trading surged (Kalshi volume from $226M Dec 2024 to $6.4B a year later). Markets can be vulnerable to manipulation, especially when liquidity is low, and media incentives can amplify them without context.
Notable examples
Polymarket’s $44,000 bet briefly pushed Matt Mahan’s CA governor odds to ~96% (then fell to ~36%); Spencer Pratt’s LA mayor odds (59% for 2nd) didn’t match results; allegations of disinformation-linked manipulation in Romania and claims about influencer-paid posts. Proposed safeguards: KYC (Kalshi), higher trading volume, and media “size/robustness” checks (e.g., average over time, not single prices).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Evolution of Political Gambling in the U.S.
0:38 to 1:27
Learn about the history and regulation changes surrounding political gambling.
“Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business.”
The Evolution of Political Gambling in the U.S.
5:24 to 7:37
Learn about the history and regulation changes surrounding political gambling.
“Today on the show, the dangers of mixing prediction markets with politics.”
Impact of Prediction Markets on Political Outcomes
7:37 to 9:29
Understand how prediction markets like Polymarket and Calci influence political narratives.
“That by harnessing the wisdom of the crowds, crowds with real money on the line, these markets can predict the future more accurately than traditional polling can.”
The Risks of Market Manipulation in Politics
9:29 to 14:01
Examine the vulnerabilities of prediction markets and their potential for manipulation.
“Yeah, so I would describe it as a kind of feeding frenzy of deal making between Calci and Polymarket and the mainstream media companies.”
Introduction to Election Prediction Markets
14:01 to 14:47
Learn how prediction markets can spread misinformation in elections.
“Coming up, how prediction markets can be used to help spread misinformation and sow doubt in election results.”
Introduction to Election Prediction Markets
15:01 to 15:52
Learn how prediction markets can spread misinformation in elections.
“Support for the show comes from public.com.”
Case Study: Spencer Pratt's Prediction Market Surge
16:31 to 16:46
Explore the hype around Spencer Pratt's candidacy and prediction market implications.
“Around the time Matt Mahan was surging on polymarket in the California governor's race, another candidate was riding his own wave of prediction market hype in the Los Angeles mayoral primary.”
The Impact of Misinformation on Election Results
16:46 to 18:00
Examine how misinformation influences public perception of election outcomes.
“Kalshi prediction markets are showing a 59 % chance that Spencer Pratt finishes second place in the first round of the L.A.”
Manipulation of Prediction Markets
18:00 to 19:09
Understand the potential for manipulation in prediction markets through disinformation.
“And one election in Romania showed they can also be vulnerable to potential influence from bad actors.”
Risks and Solutions for Prediction Markets
19:10 to 20:56
Discuss the risks of prediction market manipulation and potential solutions.
“But for supporters of the right-wing candidate, George Simeon, the bets helped create the expectation that he'd win.”
Show all 14 chapters
Media Responsibility in Reporting Predictions
20:56 to 21:46
Learn how media should responsibly report on election prediction market data.
“but more heavily traded markets are harder and more expensive to manipulate.”
Improving Prediction Market Accuracy
21:46 to 22:14
Discover methods to enhance the reliability of prediction market odds reported by media.
“they just do some basic interrogation of like, is this price being determined by one or two wallets?”
Improving Prediction Market Accuracy
22:59 to 23:48
Discover methods to enhance the reliability of prediction market odds reported by media.
“With thousands of options, from apparel and drinkware to tech and totes, it's easy to find the right fit for your brand and budget, with standout choices at every price point.”
Improving Prediction Market Accuracy
23:52 to 24:37
Discover methods to enhance the reliability of prediction market odds reported by media.
“When Kohler, global design leader in luxurious kitchen and bath products, asked me to be their ambassador for timeless, elegant, durable cast iron, I said, I'm in.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Whatever your goal, trade show giveaways, client gifts, or team gear, 4imprint has the promo products to match. With thousands of options, from apparel and drinkware to tech and totes, it's easy to find the right fit for your brand and budget, with standout choices at every price point. And with their 360-degree guarantee, you can be 4imprint certain your order will show up just right, right on time. Explore more at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. 4certain. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need.
0:37Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM. When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive.
1:19And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation. Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. When Matt Mahan officially entered the race for governor of California in late January, he wasn't exactly a household name. Mahan was the mayor of San Jose, a centrist with ties to Silicon Valley. He was polling around 4%. But on the morning Mahan announced his candidacy, he got a boost from an unexpected place.
2:07On Polymarket, which is the preeminent political prediction market in the world, There's suddenly a trade for$44 ,000 that comes into that market to back Matt Mahan's candidacy. That's Liam Vaughn, a reporter and editor on Bloomberg's investigations team based in London. He's been covering prediction markets, which allow users to bet on the outcomes of real-world events. Suddenly his odds go from the low teens all the way up to 96%. You see this huge spike. If you bet 96 cents that Mahan would win, you'd get paid out a dollar if he did. But before that big bet, you only needed to bet about 12 cents for the same payout.
2:52And essentially, the price fluctuates between zero and 100. And that reflects the apparent odds, you know, according to that market of an event happening. So when Matt Mahan's odds go from like 12 % to 96%, at least for a few moments, what that market's saying is there's a 96 % chance that he's going to be the governor of America's largest state. Quickly, other traders on Polymarket saw an opportunity to make money. They started taking the other side of the bet, wagering that Mahan would lose. That started pushing his odds back down. But the interesting thing about this market is it doesn't bring it back anywhere close to where it started.
3:37It goes to 36%, which is still very high for this guy who hasn't got much name recognition in a market full of like, you know, very big, big names. And so immediately you start to see press coverage. For example, in the New York Post, there's a piece that runs that afternoon that says the smart money is backing Matt Mahan for California governor. Mahan did not respond to requests for comment. Ultimately, his polymarket bump wasn't enough to win him the primary. But eventually, kind of gravity caught up. Other candidates with more money and more name recognition prevailed. And ultimately, Mahan kind of quietly exited stage left.
4:20But the$44 ,000 question remained. Who had made the bet? We don't know very much. And I think that that's telling in and of itself because Polymarket is crypto-based, so the authorities don't know who it is. And unless this individual comes forward, nobody else knows who it is. Whoever it was had shaped the conversation around a major primary race with one big Polymarket bet. And with the U.S. midterms fast approaching, it's just one example of how prediction markets could be gamed in elections. What's fascinating to me about this incident is that it highlights the inherent vulnerability of some of these markets to manipulation.
5:01And so the questions that I was keen to explore were like, well, how is that able to happen? What safeguards are in place to stop it happening? And as we go into the midterms and elections globally, is this something that we're going to see much more of?
5:22I'm Sarah Holder, and this is The Big Take from Bloomberg News. Today on the show, the dangers of mixing prediction markets with politics.
5:35Until relatively recently, gambling on politics wasn't allowed in the U.S. Previously, there was only a couple of forums that were allowing political gambling, and they were associated with universities. And so it was, you know, studied, like, can these things reveal good information and are they useful forecasting tools? For years, that restriction on political betting was enforced by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the federal agency responsible for regulating derivatives markets in the U.S. But in 2023, Calci, the largest prediction market platform in the U.S. and Polymarket's chief competitor, pushed for those restrictions to be loosened.
6:15The CFTC undertakes a review and ultimately it concludes, as its predecessors had, that this is a bad idea, that it's against the public interest, that it's going to potentially encourage people to either try and make money from democracy or try and influence the outcome of elections. and therefore it should be banned. That then goes before a judge, but ultimately the judge decided betting on politics is not gambling or it's not gaming as it's written in the statute. So it's a kind of nuanced argument, but ultimately it means that Kaoshi and its competitors are allowed, for the time being at least, to allow mass-scale gambling on US politics.
6:59That opened the floodgates right before the U.S. presidential election. And so in the presidential election of 2024, I think it's like$4 billion is traded. And when both Cauchy and Polymarket predict that Trump is going to get in, and the polls again are sort of prevaricating in some sense a tie, and the prediction markets perform much better in that question, That kind of adds to this sense that this is a good thing and this is something that should be embraced. To prediction markets and their boosters, this outcome seemed to confirm something important. That by harnessing the wisdom of the crowds, crowds with real money on the line, these markets can predict the future more accurately than traditional polling can.
7:47What happens next when the Trump administration takes office? How does the regulatory approach to these markets change? I mean, it's a complete 180. Essentially, the Trump administration comes in, they put their own people in charge of the various regulators. And at the CFTC, they get rid of all the Democrats and essentially put in some conservative commissioners who are predisposed to and are supporters of prediction markets. You know, essentially you see a real kind of shift in the administration's attitude towards these markets. And as a result, they explode. In December 2024, the monthly trading volume on Calci was$226 million.
8:30A year later, it was$6.4 billion. At this point, how do Calci and Polymarket's approaches to political wagering differ? Yeah, they're kind of the yin and yang of approaches. Kaoshi has spent a huge amount of time and energy trying to position itself as the official market. It does KYC, know your customer. So anyone that signs up has to provide details of who they are, where they live. And so anything that goes wrong or any sort of attempts at manipulation, Kaoshi should, in theory, know who's behind that. Polymarket is crypto first, and you don't need to provide your bank details. And essentially, you could do it all anonymously.
9:17You could see via sort of a numerical or a kind of username what that account is up to on a kind of rolling basis. But you just don't know who it is. So, Liam, there was another moment that really marked the entrance of prediction markets into sort of the polling mainstream after the election, after the shifted regulatory approach, Polymarket and Calci made a string of deals with major news outlets. Yeah, so I would describe it as a kind of feeding frenzy of deal making between Calci and Polymarket and the mainstream media companies. So Calci have done deals with CNN, with CNBC, with Fox, and several others.
10:01Polymarket have done deals with the Wall Street Journal, with Dow Jones, X, Substack. So there was a real strong financial incentive for some of these media companies to be citing these prediction market odds. And that's a kind of contrast with polls because even though they carry polls, they're not getting paid by the polls to carry them. We don't know the details of all of these deals, but in the agreement between CNBC and Kalshi, CNBC can earn a fee every time someone signs up for Kalshi from its website. The other criticism, which we get into in the piece, is that quite often, because these markets aren't very big, outside of the major political events, they're easy to manipulate, and yet they're still cited regularly.
10:49Just to give one example, but they're far from alone, but CNN has got this show called The Odds, and they will regularly use Kalshi Odds as a sort of frame to talk about current political events. but often they cite markets that are very small so you know there's a discussion around who's going to be the next speaker of the house and we looked and at the time it had like a total of 16 ,000 betting across its lifetime so you're sort of talking about a market where every day there's like you know a couple of hundred or few hundred people amounts being traded so the question is like is that a market that's robust enough to really be cited by mainstream media organizations And there's some people that argue, no, absolutely not.
11:35Yeah, I mean, it's like the Matt Mahan example. The Matt Mahan market was vulnerable to being moved by this one big bet. Some major outlets ran that story about Mahan's polymarket odds and the governor's race without additional context. Does that happen a lot? I mean, it happens more than you'd think, definitely. And it's not helped by the fact that because they've done these deals, they're sort of obliged to consistently refer to these polls. CNN says that, quote, prediction markets offer just one source of data that journalists can use in telling a story, unquote, and that CNN staff are prohibited from trading.
12:11A Calci spokesperson says that its media partners have, quote, full control over what and how they report, and we don't tell them which markets to cite, unquote. CNN and Calci both declined to comment on how much Calci pays CNN to cite its data. Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, provides Polymarket and Calci data as part of its broader data offering for clients. What do prediction markets themselves say about their utility as forecasters of election results and these risks that they pose? So in terms of their ability to forecast events, Calci and Polymarket point to research that suggests that they are consistently very good.
12:55They are at pains to say that they should be viewed as additive to existing forms of forecasting, whether that's polls or reporting or whatever else. In terms of the issues that we raise in the piece around the vulnerability of these markets to manipulation, Cauchy would say we are not the same as Polymarket. And, you know, we take our responsibilities to identify our customers and monitor what they're doing very carefully. And if there is anything untoward going on, then we will find it. Polymarket would say a couple of things. One is that in terms of market manipulation, these markets have a sort of degree of ability to self-correct, which is demonstrated.
13:45And so even if there are attempts at manipulation, they'll be quickly remedied. And so they would say, I think, that the Mahan example is testament to that, because ultimately, whilst his odds did move, they did also come back as the market kind of responded to that. Coming up, how prediction markets can be used to help spread misinformation and sow doubt in election results.
14:46Thank you.
15:01at 4imprint.com. 4imprint, 4certain. Support for the show comes from public.com. If you're actively involved in your portfolio, you probably catch yourself repeating the same actions, buying the dip, manually sweeping idle cash, putting on a hedge. On public, you can now create AI agents that handle all these tasks on your behalf. Just describe what you want to do in plain English, like if the VIX hits 25, buy a put option on the S &P 500. Or if my cash balance goes above$20 ,000, move the excess into my direct index. You approve the workflow and your agent handles the rest. Monitoring the market, watching for your conditions, and executing your strategies exactly as defined.
15:44An investing platform driven by your intent, not just your clicks. You can also get full read and write access to your account via the public API. Go to public.com slash market and fund your account in five minutes or less. That's public.com slash market. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., Member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. If your best finance people are doing expense reports, chasing receipts, or spending time on month-end close, it's time to get Brex AF, A gentic finance that eliminates that work before it starts.
16:27Learn more at brecks.com slash AF.
16:34Around the time Matt Mahan was surging on polymarket in the California governor's race, another candidate was riding his own wave of prediction market hype in the Los Angeles mayoral primary. Republican former reality TV star Spencer Pratt. Kalshi prediction markets are showing a 59 % chance that Spencer Pratt finishes second place in the first round of the L.A. mayoral election. What if he clears 51 % tonight? Kalshi's saying he's going to go. When the votes finally rolled in, Pratt came in third, failing to qualify for the November runoff. But not everyone was willing to accept that the prediction markets had been wrong.
17:11You saw lots of right-wing supporters of Pratt coming forward and saying, this is ridiculous, the race was rigged, like there must be an issue here. Some of the posts came from influencers who were being paid by Calci and Polymarket to cite their odds. According to Semaphore, after paid influencers for Calci questioned the integrity of the LA mayoral election on X, Calci asked them to take the post down. So Trump wrote on Truth Social, this is an outrage. Essentially, Spencer was robbed. And he's kind of citing how well he was doing in the race up until that point. And so the concern is that ultimately, these markets kind of present themselves as truth machines, but they can also be utilized by people that are looking to spread mistruths.
17:59In the past year, the platforms have missed the mark in high-profile races like in Argentina, India and New York City. And one election in Romania showed they can also be vulnerable to potential influence from bad actors. There was an election in 2024 that was actually annulled because there was found to have been Russian disinformation campaign that was enacted on TikTok and YouTube. It was so bad that they ended up cancelling the election. They held another election, and that election was subject to a lot of speculation around whether the polymarket numbers for the kind of nationalist candidate who was supported by the Kremlin were being manipulated because there was such a big divergence between what the polls said and what the odds were on this political candidate.
18:49And there were lots of people that kind of suggested that this was like Russia cottoning on to the potential opportunity to mess with people's perceptions of reality by targeting prediction markets alongside TikTok or YouTube or other forms of disinformation. An active disinformation campaign. Yeah. A firm Bloomberg asked to view the trades found that a few recently created accounts were driving a lot of the trading. Liam says maybe that was a coincidence. But for supporters of the right-wing candidate, George Simeon, the bets helped create the expectation that he'd win. When this guy Simeon lost, again, you had all these people coming forward and saying, look, this is ridiculous.
19:33On Polymarket, he was, you know, a dead sir. And now you expect us to believe that he lost. So it's almost like there's damage either way, even if ultimately it doesn't succeed, or even if ultimately it's not manipulation. If everyone is suggesting it, then it kind of degrades the sanctity and faith in the democratic process. I'm wondering, given all this potential for manipulation and just the rise of these prediction markets, importance and reach, do you see the risks of this becoming more severe moving forward? Are we at an inflection point? I think so. I think that essentially, you can have a situation where something that's quite cheap to move can have a huge amount of traction, both in social media and in the media.
20:17And so I do think that the risks are increasing, that people will try and manipulate these markets for kind of political ends. Having said that, I do think there's fairly easy solutions to some of these issues. A lot of the issues around Polymarket could be fairly easily remedied if it kind of emulated its rival, Cauchy, and started getting the identification of its users. Another thing that could minimize the risk of manipulation would actually be to increase the number of people placing bets, boosting the trading volume on the platforms. More gambling carries its own downsides, but more heavily traded markets are harder and more expensive to manipulate.
21:00I think that if you talk to Calci and Polymarket, they kind of hope that one day everyone's going to be sitting there watching television betting on everything and everyone's going to want to bet on the local mayoral race in Sacramento. I'm not sure that that's going to happen. Liam, the midterms are coming up in the US. We're going to be seeing a lot more polls, a lot more prediction market election odds being reported. How should the public and the media be reading these results? What the media companies could do, and this is something that a professor at Stanford called Andy Hall, he's done a lot of work on.
21:39And essentially he sort of suggests a charter for the media where they only cite markets of a certain size. they just do some basic interrogation of like, is this price being determined by one or two wallets? Or is there a real diverse number of trades that have come to this price? He also suggests, rather than taking like a price at a set moment in time, which can be pushed around, that you actually take some kind of average over the course of a day. So it's different things that the media companies could do fairly easily that wouldn't really undermine their use of these things, but would make the odds that they're citing more robust.
22:43Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.
22:54Whatever your goal, trade show giveaways, client gifts, or team gear, 4imprint has the promo products to match. With thousands of options, from apparel and drinkware to tech and totes, it's easy to find the right fit for your brand and budget, with standout choices at every price point. And with their 360-degree guarantee, you can be 4imprint certain your order will show up just right, right on time. Explore more at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. 4certain. Ask yourself, what are your best people spending their time on right now? Expense reports? Receipt chasing? Month-end close that takes weeks? You become what you spend on, and that's not what you're building toward.
23:34Brex is the intelligent finance platform that eliminates that work before it starts. AI agents that handle the manual stuff automatically, so your team can spend their time on what actually compounds. It's time to get Brex AF. Learn more at brex.com slash AF. When Kohler, global design leader in luxurious kitchen and bath products, asked me to be their ambassador for timeless, elegant, durable cast iron, I said, I'm in. Soon after, I was in their Kohler, Wisconsin foundry, watching molten iron poured, enamel applied by hand, and the beautiful finished pieces ready to ship. Since 1883, Kohler cast iron has been crafted by incredible artisans, and seeing it firsthand gave me a whole new appreciation for their craftsmanship.
24:24Now, I am proud to lend my stamp of approval to my favorite Kohler cast iron products for their durability, beauty, and enduring style. Shop my curated picks at Kohler.com. As the Kohler Cast Iron Ambassador, I say, long live cast iron.
From the publisher
With the US midterms fast approaching, voters and the media are increasingly looking to a new forecasting tool: prediction markets.
The leading platforms, Kalshi and Polymarket, have been touted as a truth serum for political forecasting — arenas for mass betting that reveal what people really think when they’ve got money on the line. But a new Bloomberg investigation has found evidence that these markets are vulnerable to manipulation.
On today’s Big Take podcast, host Sarah Holder and Bloomberg investigative reporter Liam Vaughan dig into what can happen when prediction markets mix with politics — and how cheap and easy it can be to sway them.
Read more: How a Few Hundred Dollars Could Manipulate Election Prediction Markets
We have a special Bloomberg subscription offer for podcast listeners at Bloomberg.com/podcastoffer.
Hosted by Sarah Holder; Produced by Victor Swezey and David Fox; Reported by Liam Vaughan; Edited by Tracey Samuelson.
Fact-checking by Julia Press; Engineering by Alex Sugiura.
Senior Producer: Naomi Shavin; Deputy Executive Producer: Julia Weaver. Executive Producer: Nicole Beemsterboer.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




