In short
The “first AI election” in the 2026 midterms—how AI is being used in campaign ads and financing, how voters connect AI to jobs, affordability (electricity/data centers), and distrust, and how AI regulation is unfolding via conflicts involving Anthropic.
Guests
Michael Shepard, Bloomberg senior editor for technology and strategic industries, based in Washington, covering AI’s political and industry influence.
Key claims
AI is changing ad production (rapid image creation and deepfakes) and political research (younger voters using AI). The AI industry has pledged about $275M for U.S. races. Regulation is not “hands-off” but ad hoc, including government pressure on Anthropic.
Notable examples
New York 12th Congressional primary (Alex Boras vs. Michael Lasher) with an estimated $29M spent; AI money backed both sides (Leading the Future opposing Boras; Public First Action supporting him). Anthropic model “jailbreak” dispute: Fable 5 and Mythos 5 access changes after export-control concerns. Anthropic alleges Alibaba data extraction via tens of thousands of accounts (~30M Claude queries) for distillation.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroduction to AI in Elections
0:30 to 0:59
Explore how AI is influencing the 2026 midterm election cycle.
“Now own the card that rewards you for it.”
Introduction to AI in Elections
1:48 to 3:23
Explore how AI is influencing the 2026 midterm election cycle.
“Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut.”
AI's Role in Campaign Advertising
3:23 to 3:41
Understand how AI is changing campaign advertising strategies.
“On today's episode, the first AI elections.”
Voter Research and AI
3:41 to 4:32
Discover the impact of AI on how voters research candidates.
“because this is one of the most visible areas for voters in the public to see AI shaping the elections.”
Campaign Financing and AI Influence
4:32 to 5:38
Learn about the financial influence of AI companies in campaigns.
“And there's some research by a progressive aligned group called Data for Progress that indicates that, you know, voters under the age of 45 are more likely to use AI as a tool to find out about candidates.”
The New York 12th Primary Race
5:38 to 7:30
Examine the dynamics of the New York 12th primary and AI's involvement.
“And the AI industry is certainly trying to repeat that same playbook to its advantage.”
Divided Opinions in Silicon Valley
7:30 to 8:25
Explore the differing opinions within Silicon Valley regarding AI regulation.
“Of course, he ultimately lost to the candidate who was favored to win, but it still drew a significant attention to the issue and made New York 12 kind of a proxy battle for the industry.”
Public Sentiment on AI and Regulation
8:25 to 11:43
Understand public concerns about AI's impact on jobs and regulation.
“There are a lot of people in the industry who also favor some restraint on the technology.”
Public Sentiment on AI and Regulation
12:37 to 12:49
Understand public concerns about AI's impact on jobs and regulation.
“Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC.”
Anthropic and Government Tensions
13:16 to 14:00
Explore the conflict between Anthropic and the Trump administration.
Show all 12 chapters
AI Regulation and Government Concerns
14:00 to 18:04
Discussion on Anthropic's AI models and government regulations affecting their use.
“Well, David, there was another conflict that erupted in early June between the company and the Trump administration, and it's centered on Anthropic's top two models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5.”
The Future of AI and Its Political Impact
18:04 to 20:46
Exploration of AI's influence on future elections and economic factors.
“That is when a line is crossed in AnthropicsU and also in the view of companies like OpenAI.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM. When you own your own business, you own every decision. Now own the card that rewards you for it. Chase Sapphire Reserve for Business is a pay-in-full card that elevates your travel experience and offers premium benefits that will take your business to the next level.
0:45Sapphire Reserve for Business offers 8x points on all purchases through Chase Travel, 3x points on social media and search engine advertising, airport lounge access, and more. Chase Sapphire Reserve for Business. It's the card that gives back all you put in. Learn more at chase.com forward slash reserve business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. Accounts subject to credit approval. Restrictions and limitations apply. Cards are issued by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., member FDIC. When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges.
1:26At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation. Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut. it. Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news. It's really coming at us all at once this year in this election cycle.
2:08Artificial intelligence is on the ballot in many 2026 midterm elections. How to regulate it, what it means for jobs and for energy prices. And hundreds of millions of dollars are pouring into election races from competing super PACs, vying to steer the AI conversation. Voters are getting more and more election information from AI, and they're seeing campaign ads made with it. As one former U.S. official recently told Bloomberg, this is the first AI election. We're seeing it in the campaign financing. We're seeing it in AI as an issue itself in the way that people are now becoming truly and acutely aware of its impact on the economy, and it's also becoming a campaign tool.
2:50Michael Shepard is a Bloomberg senior editor for technology and strategic industries who focuses on artificial intelligence. It's rewriting the playbook for how candidates seek office and the strategies that they can use to gain an edge in competitive races. Mike says the concerns about AI that are coming out this election season mirror the ones across our society at a moment when AI can tell us just about anything. short of where the AI revolution will take us.
3:21This is The Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm David Gurra. On today's episode, the first AI elections. What's at stake and who's working on the answers?
3:34Mike, let's start with campaign advertising. How has AI changed the kind of ads that people see? This is actually, David, a great place to start because this is one of the most visible areas for voters in the public to see AI shaping the elections. Candidates are deploying it effectively on the campaign trail. And in the past, to get an advertisement or a message out, you would have to get a radio spot, a newspaper ad, very expensive television advertising. And, you know, for candidates that were on a shoestring budget or just starting out or didn't have a name, that was tough. But AI is enabling them to create images and curate them very quickly.
4:15It's also allowing candidates to develop deepfake ads. You know, some that portray candidates in unfavorable lights to gain an edge in a race. I got to imagine it's changing the way that voters research candidates, learn about candidates as well. It sure is, David, because what we see is the same thing with politics that we see elsewhere in the economy. And there's some research by a progressive aligned group called Data for Progress that indicates that, you know, voters under the age of 45 are more likely to use AI as a tool to find out about candidates. And what that suggests also is that AI as a tool for political research is here to stay.
4:59Mike, in your role helping to lead Bloomberg's coverage of AI, you have a special vantage. You're based in Washington, so you're looking at the way these companies are trying to influence politics and the political conversation. This is an election in which a lot of these companies and their affiliates are pouring a lot of money into these races. What does that look like in broad terms? Well, in broad terms, it looks like a lot of cash. And, you know, to give you an idea, the pledges so far that we've gathered from across the industry amount to 275 million across the U.S. And, you know, that, if fulfilled, would dwarf the amount that the crypto industry spent during the 2024 election when the digital currency industry was able to topple a number of Democratic incumbents.
5:51And the AI industry is certainly trying to repeat that same playbook to its advantage. Mike, I want to ask you about one race in particular, a primary race that took place here in New York City involving Alex Boris. He was one of the candidates running in this primary, running to be the Democratic candidate in the 12th Congressional District, which includes a big part of Manhattan. Alex Boris lost that primary, but there was so much money in this one race. And I should say Michael Bloomberg, the owner of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News, endorsed and contributed to the winning candidate Michael Lasher's campaign.
6:26But there was a lot of AI money in this race as well. What about it attracted so many big backers? Well, it was Alex Boras really who drew all of that attention. And that was because as a New York state assemblyman, he had sponsored a number of bills that sought to rein in the industry. Governor Hochul just signed my Raze Act. New York has the strongest AI safety law in the country. He pushed safety legislation. He also pushed a data center moratorium that ultimately passed. And so he came into this race with kind of a target on his back for a number in the industry who see the kinds of bills that he was proposing and the kinds of policies that he was advocating as a threat to their attempt to build out the industry at a breakneck pace.
7:16I mean, if people think I've been too friendly to tech, someone should tell the executives at Palantir that are funding the super PAC against me. And so as a result, Alex Boris ended up drawing a lot of attention, but also a lot of money into this race. We estimate that$29 million were spent by all sides in industry in the competition. Of course, he ultimately lost to the candidate who was favored to win, but it still drew a significant attention to the issue and made New York 12 kind of a proxy battle for the industry. What's so fascinating to me is there was AI money on both sides of this race.
7:53Your team just reported that a super PAC called Leading the Future spent about$8 million opposing Boris. That super PAC supports softer regulation on AI, and it's funded by an OpenAI co-founder, among others. Then on the other side,$15 million came in to support Boris from Public First Action, whose funders include Anthropic. Why were Anthropic's interests kind of aligned with Boris's interests? And what have you seen from other companies in that regard? Well, I'm glad you brought that up, David, because it really does highlight that Silicon Valley is not of one mind when it comes to AI. There are a lot of people in the industry who also favor some restraint on the technology.
8:32And Anthropic is one of the leading voices. In fact, part of its branding is that it professes itself as a more responsible AI developer, one that places a higher priority perhaps in its competitors when it comes to safety. So they naturally leaned toward a candidate who would favor more regulation, and that was Alex Boras. That race, the New York 12th primary, might have been an outlier in terms of how much money was poured into it. But stepping back, I wonder sort of how much of an outlier it is in terms of just the way that AI is a campaign issue going forward here. I think about the kind of broader zeitgeist, how people feel about AI, its prospects, its potential perils.
9:14How is that manifest in other races across the country? Well, it's manifesting itself not so much as like the headline issue, like people are not voting up and down on AI per se. But they are wrapping AI into all sorts of other questions, principally affordability. Because when you think about affordability, all you have to do is look at your electricity bill if you live in certain parts of the country and see that, yes, it has gone up. We had a big take recently that looked at how electricity prices had more than tripled in some areas, up 267 percent as a result of all the AI data centers that are being built with all the investment from Silicon Valley.
9:55So people are looking at that and thinking, hey, you know, this is hitting my pocketbook. I feel it for real. They're also worried about their jobs. Will artificial intelligence come in somehow and change the way I do my job on a daily basis? Or perhaps eliminate it altogether? Or maybe eliminate that entry-level opportunity that might be awaiting my son or daughter? Because that kind of lower-level, maybe grunt work that was good for us when we were starting out could now be done by a machine. And then there is also just the distrust of Silicon Valley, because policymakers here in the U.S. have never really gotten around to resolving some of the key questions surrounding social media and how it should be overseen.
10:38And AI is an extension of that in a way in many voters' eyes. And they are concerned that the government is not going to be ready to step up here. And polls are showing, and we identified this in our big take, that they think that the government needs to do more.
10:59Regulation isn't keeping up with advancements in AI. And in the breach, the U.S. government and companies like Anthropic are laying down rules as they go. That's next.
11:13The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM. Support for this show comes from public.com. If you're actively involved in your portfolio, you probably catch yourself repeating the same actions, buying the dip, manually sweeping idle cash, putting on a hedge.
11:55On public, you can now create AI agents that handle all these tasks on your behalf. Just describe what you want to do in plain English. Like, if the VIX hits 25, buy a put option on the S &P 500. Or, if my cash balance goes above$20 ,000, move the excess into my direct index. You approve of the workflow, and your agent handles the rest. Monitoring the market, watching for your conditions, and executing your strategies exactly as defined. An investing platform driven by your intent, not just your clicks. You can also get full read and write access to your account via the public API. Go to public.com slash market and fund your account in five minutes or less.
12:36That's public.com slash market. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building.
13:15That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.
13:47when Anthropic effectively set guardrails on how the Defense Department, the Pentagon, could use its technology, and the Trump administration hit back, saying it would designate Anthropic a national security risk and effectively blacklist that company from being a government supplier. What's the latest on this fight? Well, David, there was another conflict that erupted in early June between the company and the Trump administration, and it's centered on Anthropic's top two models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5. In essence, the government was warning the company that it needed to contain what officials saw as a so-called jailbreak.
14:23And that refers to an ability to get around the safety and security guardrails. And if those concerns weren't addressed, the company would need export licenses from the Commerce Department to be able to share that technology with any foreign national. And that included any foreign person on U.S. soil. In effect, that forced Anthropics' hand. The company had to immediately disable access to those two models starting on June 12th until the security concerns of the government were addressed. Now, at the end of June, if we fast forward a bit, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick goes back to the company to say, look, you have now taken steps to address our concerns.
15:02And in effect, we will no longer require export controls on those models. The move, in effect, has allowed Anthropic to begin releasing Fable 5, as originally intended, to a broad group of users globally without any limits. Mythos 5, however, has been restricted still to just U.S. users and on a more limited basis. And you'll remember Mythos is that cyber-capable model that everybody had really wanted to be able to use to test their own networks for possible vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers. And, you know, David, this whole episode does raise some broader questions, too. And in essence, they boil down to where the government is heading when it comes to AI regulation.
15:48The Trump administration really from the start has insisted it would take a hands-off approach to AI, especially in the area of regulation. However, it is unfolding on a bit of an ad hoc basis as we are seeing with its handling of Anthropic and those two models. And what's unclear is what the roadmap is ahead for Anthropic and its rivals, OpenAI and Google's DeepMind, as they start to roll out equally sophisticated models. Will they have to go through the same sorts of checks before the government gives their clearance for release? It is the very kind of thing that Silicon Valley companies have been worried about and warning against.
16:31Your team at Bloomberg just had an exclusive report that Anthropic raised an alarm of its own about Chinese users. Walk us through what happened. We were privy to a letter and were told about a letter that the company had sent to several U.S. senators and White House officials warning that Alibaba, which is one of the biggest tech companies in China, have been improperly extracting data from the company's Claude model. And, you know, Claude is really the centerpiece of Anthropik's product line. It is something that we have seen adopted across the economy by businesses and even consumers are using it widely.
17:12But what Anthropic is saying is that Alibaba and operators affiliated with it used tens of thousands of accounts to make nearly 30 million queries to Claude in a bid to take those results and then build its own model, one that would compete with Anthropics, but one that would also not carry the same degree of safety guardrails. This is a process called distillation, and I don't know how wonky we want to get here, David, but you're going to start hearing more about this word because Anthropic and other top USAI labs have been warning about distillation all year long. Now, distillation itself is not illegal, and a lot of companies even allow it and encourage it to a certain level.
18:03But the issue is when they are extracting data at an industrial and systemic scale and then using it to develop a rival frontier model. That is when a line is crossed in AnthropicsU and also in the view of companies like OpenAI. I want to pull back, and clearly there's a lot at stake here in terms of what kind of role AI plays in our lives, in our national security, in our economy. Also, just a ton of money riding on AI in global markets with big IPOs coming down the pike pretty soon here. What is that funding going to allow them to do? Well, the funding is really everything. They need that money to keep building.
18:43AI is, I don't want to call it the perpetual machine, but they really are investing in the infrastructure that they need to keep running those models. And it's expensive. Those chips from NVIDIA can be tens of thousands of dollars apiece from AMD. They're expensive, and they need those on a scale that it's really hard to describe in a podcast or radio format. You really have to see the pictures of these data centers just to get an idea of the footprint that they occupy and also the amount of computing power that they deliver. And if you think about all the businesses across the economy and as they try to adopt AI and employ it, well, think of how much more computing power would be needed to make that happen.
19:31Mike, let me close by asking you, just when we think about where we go from here, who or what has the most power to kind of influence the conversation about how we're going to steer our adoption of AI. What are the odds that in two years' time, if you and I were to sit down, the general election of 2028 would also be the AI election? David, I am going to mark the calendar for two years from now because, yes, we will have this conversation again. And the stakes are only going to grow bigger because, you know, whoever is to succeed Donald Trump as the candidate for the Republican nomination, whoever is vying for the Democratic nomination, they will have to address these issues.
20:14And if there is, for example, a market correction or a pullback or some other negative externality related to artificial intelligence, that too will be on the ballot. And if lawmakers and the administration really can't get it together when it comes to regulation, the conversation will only intensify. So you can count on it. 2028 AI will once again be on the ballot. It'll be part of the conversation politically and really for the foreseeable future.
20:47This is The Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm David Gurra. To get more from The Big Take and unlimited access to all of Bloomberg.com, subscribe today at Bloomberg.com slash podcast offer. If you like this episode, make sure to follow and review The Big Take wherever you listen to podcasts. It helps people find the show. Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.
21:15Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.
21:44Healthcare doesn't always work great. If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like? Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get and care that looks at the whole person. How you need it. Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Learn more at business.optum.com. As industries evolve faster than ever, companies need an environment that accelerates strategic growth, and Michigan delivers on that promise.
22:21From emerging startups to global enterprises, Michigan offers what executives value most, a resilient, innovative ecosystem, diverse communities that attract top talent, and a quality of life that supports work-life balance. With our unified Team Michigan approach, businesses scale faster and compete at the highest level. Michigan, pure opportunity. Seize your opportunity at michiganbusiness.org.
From the publisher
In the 2026 elections, artificial intelligence is the backdrop for just about everything.
The US and Anthropic reached a truce in recent days that lets the company roll out its powerful models to some users, the sort of on-the-fly decision-making that has candidates jockeying to shape how AI is regulated. Big AI companies are pouring money into 2026 state and federal races, dwarfing the cryptocurrency industry’s spending in 2024. And even as AI is fueling Americans’ anxiety about jobs and energy prices, it’s feeding them the ads and information that will shape their votes: According to one survey, 55% of US voters under the age of 45 are likely to use chatbots to learn about candidates and elections.
On today’s Big Take podcast, Bloomberg’s Michael Shepard, a senior editor focusing on AI, joins David Gura to discuss what the first AI election means for our current moment.
We have a special Bloomberg subscription offer for podcast listeners at Bloomberg.com/podcastoffer.
Hosted by David Gura; Produced by Rachael Lewis-Krisky; Reported by Michael Shepard; Edited by Jeffrey Grocott.
Fact-checking by Victor Swezey, Julia Press and David Fox; Engineering by Emma Munger.
Senior Producer: Naomi Shavin; Deputy Executive Producer: Julia Weaver. Executive Producer: Nicole Beemsterboer.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




