Is Apple Winning the ‘AI Scare Trade’?

25 Feb 2026 · 17 min · 10 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Big Take Podcast Episode Summary

Episode Title

Is Apple Winning the ‘AI Scare Trade’?

Episode Description In this episode, host Sarah Holder discusses how Apple has managed to "decouple" from the broader tech market's reactions to fears surrounding AI disruption. The discussion features insights from Bloomberg's equities reporter Ryan Vlastelica and Chief Apple Correspondent Mark Gurman, exploring the implications of Apple's current standing amidst the "AI scare trade."

---

Key Themes and Insights

  1. The Current Market Landscape
  2. AI Scare Trade: The term refers to the market reactions driven by fears about AI’s potential to disrupt various industries.
  3. Recent sell-offs were triggered by speculative research indicating AI might significantly alter the economy by 2028, affecting companies like American Express and Capital One.
  1. Apple’s Unique Position
  2. Market Decoupling:
  3. Apple shares have increasingly diverged from the Nasdaq 100's performance, with a reported correlation of just 0.21, the lowest since 2006.
  4. Unlike its tech peers, Apple has not been significantly impacted by AI-related market fluctuations.
  • Insulation from AI Disruption:
  • Apple is perceived as having less exposure to AI risks compared to software companies, leading to its status as a "hedge" against AI fears.
  1. Investor Sentiment
  2. Safe Bet:
  3. Investors are viewing Apple as a safer investment amidst AI volatility, despite the company lagging in AI advancements.
  4. The perception is that Apple’s hardware-focused business model offers stability compared to others heavily investing in AI.
  1. Apple’s AI Position and Strategy
  2. Lagging Behind Competitors: Apple is recognized for being behind in AI technology development, despite its significant cash reserves.
  3. Strategic Shift:
  4. There is a consensus that Apple’s current strategy is reactive rather than proactive, as it navigates the AI landscape more cautiously than other tech giants.
  1. Future Prospects
  2. Concerns Over Long-Term Viability: While Apple is performing well now, its failure to lead in AI could limit future growth and investment appeal.
  3. Upcoming AI Investments:
  4. Apple is working on integrating AI into its hardware, including innovative products with visual intelligence capabilities.
  5. A revised version of Siri using AI is expected later this year, alongside new AI-driven hardware products.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Decoupling Dynamics:
  • Apple’s divergence from market trends highlights a unique investor perception, protecting it from AI-driven market fears.
  • Challenges Ahead:
  • Apple's delayed investments in AI may hinder its competitive edge, leading to skepticism about its long-term growth potential.
  • AI Hardware Focus:
  • Emphasizing hardware innovation may be Apple's strategy to leverage AI's potential without fully diving into the software side, where it currently lags.

---

Conclusion This episode of *Big Take* provides a compelling look into Apple's current market position amidst the swirling fears of AI disruption. While Apple appears insulated now, whether this strategy will pay off in the future remains an open question as the tech landscape continues to evolve rapidly.

---

*For more insights, listen to the full episode of The Big Take on Bloomberg.*

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Market Reactions to AI Panic

1:29 to 2:16

Discussion on how AI fears are impacting market dynamics.

“The social media trend is landing some Gen Zers in jail.”

Apple's Unique Position Amid AI Fears

2:16 to 5:28

Exploration of Apple's resilience against AI disruption in the market.

“The market is just taking a look around at any possible sector that could be disrupted by AI.”

Understanding Apple's Market Correlation

5:28 to 7:34

Analysis of Apple's correlation with Nasdaq and investor behavior.

“This level of decoupling, we're at a nearly two-decade low.”

Apple's Role in the AI Ecosystem

7:34 to 9:35

Discussion on how Apple is seen as a hedge against AI disruption.

“If you want to put a number on it, it fell to a correlation of, I think, 0.21.”

Apple's Strategy Moving Forward

9:35 to 11:38

Insights on Apple's future plans in AI and technology.

“So you can use these things on the most advanced hardware that you can get.”

The AI Race and Historical Parallels

11:40 to 14:00

Analogy between AI competition and past sporting events, emphasizing insights on market dynamics.

“The social media trend that's landing some Gen Zers in jail.”

The Unlikely Victory of Stephen Bradbury

14:00 to 14:48

Learn about the surprising story of Stephen Bradbury's gold medal win in speed skating.

“This is a nine-lap race, and now it's only one man across the line for gold.”

Apple's AI Strategy: A Failed Approach?

14:48 to 16:42

Explore whether Apple's current position in AI is a strategic choice or a failure.

“into the conversation and ask him, with Apple getting investor love for effectively being behind in AI, is the company doing a Bradbury?”

Assessing Apple's AI Potential and Hardware Innovations

16:42 to 18:34

Understand Apple's hardware plans and how they fit into their AI ambitions.

“For that, can you talk more about how you're viewing this decoupling dynamic?”

The Future of AI at Apple: Investment Perspectives

18:34 to 20:18

Investigate the implications of Apple's AI stance on investor sentiment and company value.

“Well, Apple does have several AI hardware products on the way.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Sarah Holder:Hey, everyone, it's Emily Simpson and Shane Simpson from the Legally Brunette podcast. Each week, we're bringing you true crime through a legal lens. Whether you want all the facts on the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie or you still need to wrap your head around the ditty verdict, we're breaking it all down step by step. And we're not just lawyers. We're also husband and wife. It makes for some pretty entertaining episodes. Listen to Legally Brunette on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. The news doesn't stop on the weekends. Context changes constantly. And now Bloomberg is the place to stay on top of it all.

0:39Sarah Holder:Hi, I'm David Gurra. Join us every Saturday and Sunday for the new Bloomberg This Weekend. I'm Christina Ruffini. We'll bring you the latest headlines, in-depth analysis, and big interviews. All the stories that hit home on your days off. And I'm Lisa Matteo. Watch and listen to Bloomberg This Weekend for thoughtful, enlightening conversations about business, lifestyle, people, and culture. On Saturday mornings, we put the past week's events into context, examining what happened in the markets and the world. Then on Sundays, we speak with journalists, columnists, and key political figures to prepare you for the week ahead.

1:11Sarah Holder:Join us as soon as you wake up and bring us with you wherever your weekend plans take you. Watch us on Bloomberg Television, listen on Bloomberg Radio, stream the show live on the Bloomberg Business app, or listen to the podcast. That's Bloomberg this weekend, Saturdays and Sundays starting at 7 a.m. Eastern on February 28th. Make us part of your weekend routine on Bloomberg Television, radio, and wherever you get your podcasts. The social media trend is landing some Gen Zers in jail. The progressive media darling whose public meltdown got her fired. And the massive TikTok boycott against Target that actually makes no sense.

1:48Sarah Holder:You won't hear about these online stories in the mainstream media. You can keep up with them and all the other entertaining and outrageous things happening online, in media, and in politics with the Bread vs. Everyone podcast. Listen to the Bread vs. Everyone podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News.

2:15Mark Gurman:Another week, another AI-induced panic in the markets.

2:20Sarah Holder:An AI scare trade right now. We saw that sell-off over in the U.S. Another AI scare grips the market. The market is just taking a look around at any possible sector that could be disrupted by AI. Selling first, asking questions later.

2:33Mark Gurman:Part of the reason for this week's sell-off was a thought experiment posted by a research group called Citrini, playing out some of the ways artificial intelligence could disrupt the economy by 2028.

2:45Sarah Holder:Zitrini Research publishing a hypothetical scenario where the agentic AI commerce routing of retail payments upends, apparently, the fee and merchant subsidy businesses of names like American Express, Synchrony, and Capital One. Those names plunging.

2:59Mark Gurman:The hypothetical scenario played into fears that have been rippling through the market for a while. Fears that AI could make entire lines of business obsolete, with consequences for consumer spending, real estate, and financial markets. One of the AI tools getting attention right now is Anthropic's Claude Chatbot, which promises to write code that businesses have traditionally paid programmers or other companies to make. Claude has even caught the eye of the Pentagon, which is pressing Anthropic to give it full access to the technology. On Tuesday, the company released new features that had investors fearing further disruption.

3:37Sarah Holder:We added onto that Anthropic out with an update on Claude that talked about modernizing the COBOL programming language, a dated programming language that IBM uses. And that sent the IBM share price down by 13 percent. And so it prompts lots of questions about where you can hide, if anywhere.

3:51Mark Gurman:And there's a second concern in the market that some of the biggest tech companies that place some of the biggest bets on AI may not have enough to show for it.

4:01Sarah Holder:Most notably, you've seen all of the major hyperscalers, so the companies that are really spending aggressively on AI. This is your Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, Amazon. The market has become a lot more impatient looking at this spending, wondering when are we going to start seeing this money paying off?

4:20Mark Gurman:Ryan Vlastilica covers tech stocks for Bloomberg. And he says that as the AI scare trade grips the market, there's one company that's been remarkably insulated.

4:31Sarah Holder:Now, Apple manages to be nowhere near either of these central narratives. Right now, if you look at the two major themes in the technology sector, it is concerns about AI CapEx, which Apple isn't doing, and it's concerns about AI-related disruption. And it doesn't really seem like Apple is really in the path of AI disruption in the same way that you would say software companies are or just growing list of companies and sectors are.

4:59Mark Gurman:As most of the Nasdaq has trended down in recent weeks, Apple stock has often moved in the opposite direction.

5:05Sarah Holder:The overall moves of the major indexes aren't dictating the way Apple moves. This has really been visible in days when there has been a lot of AI related angst in the market. things are down pretty broadly, except for Apple, which is up pretty solidly. So we've been describing this as Apple decoupling itself from the broader market.

5:27Mark Gurman:That's something Ryan says hasn't happened to this degree since the days of the iPod.

5:33Sarah Holder:This level of decoupling, we're at a nearly two-decade low.

5:37Mark Gurman:So far, AI jitters don't seem to be hitting Apple as hard as its competitors. And Bloomberg's Apple reporter, Mark Gurman, says, That's a mixed blessing.

5:48Ryan Vlastelica:If you asked Apple six months ago, would you like to be an AI company at the forefront or not, they would say yes. But they're extremely behind, not on purpose, but by accident.

6:03Mark Gurman:I'm Sarah Holder, and this is The Big Take from Bloomberg News. Today on the show, Apple and the AI scare trade. Is Apple a safe haven for investors freaking out over AI? And is that a good thing for the company long term?

6:25Mark Gurman:Bloomberg's Ryan Vlastilica says that Apple's decoupling from the Nasdaq is notable because, if anything, Apple has been a longtime market bellwether.

6:35Sarah Holder:I think in a normal kind of environment, when you don't have this sort of AI wildcard, it's pretty common to see Apple moving somewhat more or less in line with the overall market because it has sort of traditional drivers like consumer spending, consumer sentiment, overall growth rates. How, you know, what is GDP doing right now? All those other factors. Now, Apple stock has been a pretty strong performer. That's why it's one of the biggest companies in the world.

7:00Mark Gurman:To understand just how far Apple has diverged from its peers in the Nasdaq, Ryan looks at correlation.

7:07Sarah Holder:Basically, you measure it on a range of positive one to negative one. So positive one would be complete correlation. Two different securities moving in complete synchronicity with each other. And of course, negative one would be complete inverse correlation. Say oil prices and airline stocks. So if oil prices are going up, airline stocks are probably going down. So that would be inverse correlation.

7:29Mark Gurman:And he applied that analysis to Apple.

7:32Sarah Holder:So we charted out a correlation between Apple and the Nasdaq 100, which is primarily composed of these big tech companies. If you want to put a number on it, it fell to a correlation of, I think, 0.21.

7:44Mark Gurman:That's a 40-day average. And that 0.21 from earlier in February was the lowest level since 2006. Ryan says it's bounced up a little since then.

7:55Sarah Holder:Apple is basically no correlation at all, which means it's not really moving on the major themes that are driving the overall index.

8:04Mark Gurman:The big themes like the AI hype cycles and sell-offs. Over the past month, at least, Apple hasn't really been getting caught up in the drama. While the Mag 7 is down about four and a half percent so far in February, Apple is up. That's after underperforming the Mag 7 in the longer term. Ryan says there's a number of reasons for this.

8:26Sarah Holder:It's not a major spender, and it doesn't seem like it's really at risk of AI disruption in the way that some of these other stocks are.

8:33Mark Gurman:But that doesn't mean investors see a bet on Apple as a bet against AI.

8:38Sarah Holder:The fact that you can get all of these AI services on the iPhone, the fact that people will be accessing AI through the iPhone or other Apple products, means that if you are still optimistic about the potential of AI, Apple isn't a terrible way to play that thesis because it is something that could see, as AI proliferates, increased growth, more adoption. People aren't going to start abandoning their phones on account of this issue. As somebody told me, no one is out there vibe coding a new iPhone for themselves.

9:09Mark Gurman:So it's clear that investors are treating Apple as a bit of an outlier right now, but it's not as simple as Apple going up while others are going down. Apple shares have had their own ups and downs even over the past two weeks. They're just out of sync in this way that you're describing. Can this be explained by investors seeing Apple as this kind of hedge against AI bets? Or are they also responding to other kinds of news coming out of the company?

9:32Sarah Holder:I do think a lot of it is Apple's sort of insulation from some of these AI cross currents. Now, I was speaking to someone who basically said the fact that correlation is so low with the broader market does kind of increase its value as sort of diversification within the overall market, especially since you do have this sort of AI upside optionality from the fact that if AI really proliferates and everyone is using it, maybe that means more demand for, you know, the next generation of iPhone or other Apple products like that. So you can use these things on the most advanced hardware that you can get.

10:05Yes.

10:05Mark Gurman:And we'll talk to Mark about some of the ways that Apple is investing in AI moving forward and how its AI bets have gone so far, But I'm wondering why this decoupling matters right now. What does it reveal about how investors are viewing the AI race more broadly? Because these two fears that you laid out, that companies are spending too much on AI or that AI is going to disrupt all these software companies, they feel a little bit in intention.

10:31Sarah Holder:Yes, I think you're right about that. I think there is a lot of concern right now about when are we going to see this pay off? And at the same time, is this going to destroy everything? So those two narratives have been very much present in the market. And you're right that there might be some tension. But I think people, if you're looking around and you're trying to find something that feels like a safe bet right now, Apple is sort of a kind of obvious place, especially within big tech, to look for something like that.

10:57Mark Gurman:Coming up, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman on how a series of missteps and missed opportunities put Apple in this position in the first place. And what the company is doing to catch up on AI.

11:38Sarah Holder:or wherever you get your podcasts. The social media trend that's landing some Gen Zers in jail.

Read the full transcript

11:46Sarah Holder:The progressive media darling whose public meltdown got her fired. I'm going to take Francesco off the network entirely. The massive TikTok boycott against Target that makes no actual sense. I will continue getting stuff from Target and I will continue to not pay for it. And the MAGA influencers whose trip to the White House ended in embarrassment. So refreshing to have a press secretary after the last few years who's both intelligent and articulate. You won't hear about these online stories in the mainstream media, but you can keep up with them and all the other entertaining and outrageous things happening online, in media, and in politics with the Brad vs.

12:20Sarah Holder:Everyone podcast, hosted by me, Brad Palumbo. Every day of the week, I bring you on a wild ride through the most Delulu takes on the internet, criticizing the extremes of both sides from an independent perspective. Join in on the insanity and listen to the Bread vs. Everyone podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

13:02Sarah Holder:From Brussels, I'm following the politics, policy and the people shaping the European Union right now. And from London, I'm looking at what all that means for markets, money and the wider economy. We've got reporters across Europe and around the globe feeding in as stories break. So whether it's geopolitics, energy, tech or markets, you're hearing it while it happens. It's smart, calm and to the point. And it fits into your morning. You can find new episodes of the Bloomberg Daybreak Europe podcast by 7am in Dublin or 8am in Brussels, Berlin and Paris. On Apple, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.

13:46Mark Gurman:This Winter Olympics, there was a video going around from the 2002 Winter Games in Salt Lake City. It was that year's thousand metre short track speed skating final. And it's relevant to today's AI race. I promise.

14:00Sarah Holder:This is a nine-lap race, and now it's only one man across the line for gold. It'll be over in 97.

14:07Mark Gurman:Five skaters were confused, including Apollo Ono, the American speed skating icon. By the final lap, Ono is at the head of a tight path. And an Australian skater, Stephen Bradbury, is dead last. But then something remarkable happens. They bump! They bump! Ono and the other three leading skaters topple onto the ice.

14:29Ryan Vlastelica:And Bradbury wins! Steven Bradbury of Australia across the line!

14:33Mark Gurman:And Bradbury glides past them for the gold. Australia's first in the Winter Games. To this day, when somebody wins because the rest of the field has flamed out, Australians call it doing a Bradbury. I wanted to bring Bloomberg's chief Apple correspondent, Mark Gurman, into the conversation and ask him, with Apple getting investor love for effectively being behind in AI, is the company doing a Bradbury?

15:01Ryan Vlastelica:Well, if they're doing a Bradbury, I think they fell backwards into it because the plan certainly wasn't for them to do a Bradbury. The reality is that Apple was caught flat-footed. And so, yes, they're getting the benefit on the stock right now because of that. But that's not a good thing for the long term business being so behind in a core technology. And we're talking about the core technology of all core technologies here.

15:28Mark Gurman:So, right. Apple has trailed its magnificent seven peers pretty significantly, at least when it comes to spending on AI, even though the company famously is sitting on a lot of cash. So when you think about Apple's position right now, how much of the separation from the pack is due to a strategy or is it a result of a failed strategy?

15:50Ryan Vlastelica:Oh, I absolutely think it's the result of failed strategy. And then they've seen how these other companies are having their own financial issues and their own problems. And they said, you know, maybe it's kind of a good thing that we failed. So maybe let's turn the failed strategy into our strategy.

16:04Mark Gurman:Is that what's happening?

16:05Ryan Vlastelica:I think to some extent. Yeah.

16:07Mark Gurman:Is that what you're hearing from people at Apple that they want to lean into this now?

16:11Ryan Vlastelica:Well, no, I haven't heard specifically they want to lean into it. But they're, you know, very careful when it comes to investing. They've had opportunities to buy, you know, major AI companies like Mistral out of France and Perplexity, that search engine AI app. And they've chosen not to make those major investments. They're partnering with Google to help them build their own new Apple Foundation model using Gemini. So they're going at it very slow after trying to race into it and it blowing up in their faces. I mean, Apple intelligence lags behind the competition significantly. significantly they've been trying to release this new version of siri now for two years that uses ai to let you tap into your personal data and on-screen content and control applications in a more precise way it's going to take them another you know three to six months maybe even longer to get those features out they're not going to launch their first chatbot until the tail end of this year so they're definitely behind but by any metric and trust me it wasn't supposed to be this way

17:06Mark Gurman:In some ways, Apple is being rewarded by investors. For that, can you talk more about how you're viewing this decoupling dynamic?

17:14Ryan Vlastelica:I think investors have realized that Apple is failing in AI and they're seeing Apple as a company that's very focused on the hardware. And if you look at, you know, investments and portfolio diversification, you know, Apple really is not an AI company. It's a hardware company, whereas all these other companies have become AI companies. And it's not the way it was supposed to be. Apple was supposed to become an AI company by now, but it's diversified because it's simply not.

17:43Mark Gurman:How does the company think about its place in the AI race?

17:47Ryan Vlastelica:It depends who you're asking. It depends when you're asking them. If you ask them in an official setting, they'll probably tell you that they think they're doing a great job in AI. The reality is, is that they're trailing all their competitors in AI. Their LLMs are subpar. Their models, for all intents and purposes, are subpar. Their integration of AI across the software stack is subpar. They're only really getting religion now on using AI to run the company. So they are very much far behind.

18:15Mark Gurman:Apple has declined to comment on Bloomberg's reporting about these AI efforts.

18:20Ryan Vlastelica:Will they turn things around? Absolutely. But will they be pushed to the forefront? No. But I think with the right combination of models and the combination of their hardware, I think from an AI hardware perspective, they could definitely be a leader.

18:34Mark Gurman:Well, Apple does have several AI hardware products on the way. Tell me a little bit more about those.

18:38Ryan Vlastelica:So they're working on three main ones. One is a version of AirPods with cameras. One is smart glasses with cameras. And one is a necklace slash pendant that you can wear on your shirt or on your neck with cameras. And the idea is to use visual intelligence, the environment around you, to feed data into Siri for it to help you take action. One classic example is, you know, right now, if you're wearing AirPods or using an Apple device while on a walk and you have turn-by-turn directions on in Maps, it'll tell you, you know, make a turn in 450 feet or in one mile or whatever. Now it could tell you make a right turn past the gray three-story building because it can see what's around you, not only no distances.

19:19Mark Gurman:So it's not investing in chatbots to the same scale as some of its competitors, but it is investing in these hardware products. Can you talk about how that's a different strategy than some of the other Mag7 companies and why you think it's developed that way?

19:32Ryan Vlastelica:Well, they are building a chatbot. They are going to revamp Siri around this chatbot type of interface later this year and deeply integrate these Gemini models across iOS, iPadOS, and macOS with the next major versions that are going to be introduced in June and released in September.

19:47Mark Gurman:But they're late on that front.

19:48Ryan Vlastelica:Yeah, they're, you know, pretty late. And then in terms of hardware, you know, Apple makes 80 % of the revenue from products. They're a hardware business. They have not really shown a way that they're going to be able to monetize AI in the near future from a software stack standpoint. And so the only way they're going to be able to monetize AI to any considerable degree for the underlying business is going to be through hardware. So from that standpoint, AI hardware is the game in town for Apple to augment iPhone revenue.

20:17Mark Gurman:So if investors get past their jitters about AI and they decide in whatever way that the technology will be transformative, will support high company valuations and massive spending, what does it mean for Apple?

20:30Ryan Vlastelica:From an investment standpoint, I just don't see how Apple being so behind and not showing any ingenuity in terms of AI makes them an interesting company to invest in. They're an interesting company to invest in because everyone knows they're going to come out with great hardware. Everyone knows that they're forecasting solid results for the current quarter. Everyone knows they're going to continue making a ton of money on the devices. But in terms of future upside, it's just not exciting to investors right now, in my view.

21:25Mark Gurman:Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.

21:36Sarah Holder:Hey, everyone. It's Emily Simpson and Shane Simpson from the Legally Brunette podcast. Each week, we're bringing you true crime through a legal lens. Whether you want all the facts on the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, or you still need to wrap your head around the ditty verdict, we're breaking it all down step by step. And we're not just lawyers. were also husband and wife. It makes for some pretty entertaining episodes. Listen to Legally Brunette on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Evidence-wise, we had virtually no evidence.

22:11Mark Gurman:In 1995, Detective Tony Richardson was trying to figure out who killed a fellow officer. The case comes down to who is believed

22:20Sarah Holder:and who is ignored. Oh my goodness, we did convict an innocent man. I'm Beth Shelburne from Lava for Good Podcasts.

22:29Mark Gurman:This is Ear Witness. Listen to Ear Witness on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

22:38Sarah Holder:The social media trend is landing some Gen Zers in jail. The progressive media darling whose public meltdown got her fired. And the massive TikTok boycott against Target that actually makes no sense. You won't hear about these online stories in the mainstream media. You can keep up with them and all the other entertaining and outrageous things happening online, in media, and in politics with the Bread vs. Everyone podcast. Listen to the Bread vs. Everyone podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

As the “AI scare trade” jolts companies large and small, Apple shares keep doing their own thing. The company has “decoupled” to the greatest degree in 20 years from forces moving the rest of the Nasdaq 100.

Why — and how? On today’s Big Take podcast, host Sarah Holder talks to Bloomberg’s equities reporter Ryan Vlastelica and Chief Apple Correspondent Mark Gurman about how the company became a hedge against fears of AI disruption — and why that may not be a good thing. 

Hosted by Sarah Holder; Produced by David Fox; Reported by Ryan Vlastelica and Mark Gurman; Edited by Jeffrey Grocott.

Fact-checking by Eleanor Harrison-Dengate; Engineering by Alex Sugiura.

Senior Producer: Naomi Shavin; Deputy Executive Producer: Julia Weaver. Executive Producer: Nicole Beemsterboer.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Big Take

All 364 episodes
Is Apple Winning the ‘AI Scare Trade’?Big Take · 17 min
Listen in VO