OpenAI's GPT-5 Looms, Apple's Antitrust Problem, Sports Betting's Big Scandal

22 Mar 2024 · 57 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Big Technology Podcast - Episode Summary

Episode Title

OpenAI's GPT-5 Looms, Apple's Antitrust Problem, Sports Betting's Big Scandal

Episode Description In this episode, host Alex Kantrowitz is joined by Jessica Lessin, CEO and founder of The Information, and Steve Kovach, technology correspondent at CNBC, to discuss recent developments in AI, Apple’s antitrust challenges, and a significant scandal in sports betting.

---

Discussion Topics

  1. Rumors Surrounding GPT-5
  2. Release Timeline: Expected mid-year, possibly during summer.
  3. Capabilities: Reports indicate it will feature new abilities, including autonomous task execution via AI agents.
  4. Vulnerability of OpenAI: OpenAI faces increased competition as model quality converges among major AI players (Google’s Gemini, Meta’s LLaMA, Anthropic, etc.).
  5. Marketing Strategies: Speculation on how OpenAI categorizes its model updates for talent and enterprise customer engagement.
  1. Microsoft's Position in AI
  2. Satya Nadella's Statements: Claimed Microsoft’s extensive integration with OpenAI gives them control over valuable data and models, indicating a unique position in the market.
  3. Inflection's Leadership Shift: Mustafa Suleiman’s shift from Inflection to Microsoft raises questions about investor trust and corporate ethics in the tech industry.
  1. Apple’s Antitrust Issues
  2. Department of Justice Suit: The DOJ has filed an antitrust case against Apple, citing practices designed to maintain monopoly power over the iPhone ecosystem.
  3. Key Points of the Case:
  4. App Store fees and restrictions
  5. Compatibility issues with third-party accessories and software
  6. iMessage as a lock-in tool for users
  7. Apple's Defense: Apple argues that their practices are focused on user experience and security.
  1. Inflection's Downfall
  2. Funding and Management Issues: Inflection raised significant funding but ultimately failed to compete with larger players, leading to questions about venture capital strategies in AI.
  3. Investor Reactions: Investors expressed dissatisfaction with the loss of capital and the abrupt leadership turnover.
  1. The Apple-Google AI Partnership
  2. Potential AI Collaboration: Apple reportedly in talks with Google to leverage the Gemini model for iPhone features, highlighting Apple's necessity to catch up in the AI race.
  3. Regulatory Concerns: The partnership raises questions amidst ongoing antitrust probes.
  1. Sports Betting Scandal Involving Shohei Ohtani
  2. Details of the Scandal: Ohtani's interpreter allegedly misappropriated funds for gambling, leading to a broader conversation about gambling regulations and player integrity in sports.
  3. Impact on Major League Baseball: The scandal poses a dilemma for MLB regarding how to handle its biggest stars amidst growing gambling scrutiny.

---

Key Takeaways

  • AI Competition: The competition in AI is intensifying, with major players working to stay ahead while grappling with vulnerabilities.
  • Regulatory Landscape: Apple is facing significant scrutiny regarding its business practices, which could reshape its operational framework in the coming years.
  • Investor Sentiment: The AI startup landscape is fraught with risk, as seen with Inflection's failure and the implications for venture capitalists.
  • Gambling Culture in Sports: The increasing normalization of sports betting is leading to potential ethical challenges that may require stricter regulations.

---

Conclusion This episode of the Big Technology Podcast provided deep insights into the current state of AI technology, regulatory challenges facing major tech companies, and the ethical dilemmas emerging in the sports betting world. The discussions highlighted the competitive dynamics in the tech industry and the implications for consumers, investors, and regulators alike.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00OpenAI's GPT5 is coming. How exactly did Microsoft hire a key AI CEO to run its co-pilot division? Is Apple so far behind in AI that it needs Google's Gemini to power its AI search? We'll also talk about Apple's big antitrust case, Shohei Ohtani's betting problems, and plenty more, all coming up right after this.

0:24You're used to hearing my voice on the world bringing you interviews from around the globe. And you hear me reporting environment and climate news. I'm Carolyn Beeler. And I'm Marco Werman. We're now with you hosting The World Together. More global journalism with a fresh new sound. Listen to The World on your local public radio station and wherever you find your podcasts.

0:51Welcome to Big Technology Podcast Friday edition, where we break down the news in our traditional cool-headed and nuanced format. Rajon Roy is out this week. He's in France, but he'll be back on Wednesday, this upcoming Wednesday, to talk with me and Yahoo CEO Jim Lenzone. Yes, the Yahoo episode is coming on Wednesday, but we have a great show for you today because we have two great guests. Jessica Lesson, the founder and CEO of The Information, is here to talk about all things AI. And then after the break, Steve Kobach, a CNBC technology correspondent, is going to be on to talk about the Apple case.

1:24Jessica, so great to have you here. Thanks so much for coming on the show. How's it going? Thanks for having me, Alex. I love listening to the pod and man, what a week. So excited to dig in. Yeah, we got you out of a great week. You're our first byline on a big story at the information. And by the way, kudos to you and the information. Your publication has just been scooping like crazy on the AI beat. We reference it every week here. So we'll get into that in a moment. Let's start with this report that GPT-5 might be on the way. So Business Insider has this story that says OpenAI is expected to release a materially better GPT-5 for its chatbot mid-year.

2:02And they basically talk with CEOs that have been briefed by OpenAI about this new model that's coming. It says sometime mid-year, likely during the summer. And a CEO says it's really good, like materially better. and they're actually demonstrating new capabilities, including what Business Insider says is the ability to call AI agents being developed by OpenAI to perform tasks autonomously. I mean, this could be the big one. So I'm curious what you think about this report and what we should be looking out for. So make no mistake, I think OpenAI is actively, constantly working on a new model. And my personal opinion is it's sort of arbitrary where they kind of slice it and say, okay, this isn't four, it's 4.5, or this isn't 4.5, it's five.

2:50I think a lot of that decision is frankly kind of marketing and messaging to the talent out there, how they sort of benchmark their progress. But absolutely, they're working on new capabilities. We first broke the news at the information about the agents a month or so ago. This would be, you know, AI not just being able to answer a question for you, but actually do a task, book you a reservation, something like that. So that's the agent concept. We know they're working on it. And yeah, they're trying to push the envelope. I mean, it is a full on race between Gemini, OpenAI, MetasLama, Anthropic, and And I think when I see a story like what Insider did, it just says to me also that OpenAI wants the ecosystem to start talking about their next capabilities, which I think makes sense.

3:51We're in this war for talent, war for enterprise customers. And while Gemini has kind of had mixed results in some way, there's no question that it is a hugely powerful model with incredible capabilities and open AI feels like they need to respond. It's just interesting to hear that perspective because it means open AI is vulnerable. And that's kind of like the theory that I've had this whole time is that these models are going to commodify or commoditize, and then you're going to basically be left with these seemingly impenetrable research houses now with products on par with the others. So as your understanding of this is sort of the beginning of that and this rush to differentiate is kind of what we're seeing here?

4:35OpenAI is absolutely vulnerable, Alex. And that doesn't mean that they haven't done incredible work and are incredibly well positioned in terms of talent. But think of their distribution relative to Google. And just the fact that Google can embed Gemini in products that billions of people use every day. Open AI can't do that. And as we move into other phases of this AI war, I think that they face a lot of challenges, as well as opportunities because of their sort of research and technical know-how. So we are absolutely entering a phase. I completely agree that these models are converging. And when you secretly talk to the people who are building these models inside the big companies and you say, oh, look at that benchmark or whoop-de-doo, this thing's a little bit better at that, even they roll their eyes and kind of admit, you know, that's all the sort of pre-work before these models are in the wild.

5:41They're all converging. And so it's a very exciting time. But it's also, I think these companies internally face a lot of major challenges. On one hand, they have to keep that research going, right? They have to keep pushing the capabilities. But at the same time, they really need the business models, the distribution models. You know, that's critical. Yeah. And you did get that agent scoop. How critical do you think this agent factor is going to be? Because there's risk there, right? If you trust agents to do things for you, they make mistakes. And then who's responsible? Personally, I'm not like an agent hype person.

6:22I mean, I think it is a step in a capability that can be used, but I don't think it means that, you know, these models are kind of fully autonomous and that we can use them in new ways. But I also am struck by how early it is. You know, we recently wrote a story at The Information where we asked early adopters and people building tech, you know, people at OpenAI and so forth, how they were using AI. and I read the piece and I was like, shoot, I'm doing it all wrong. Like I'm, I'm sort of querying these chatbots a little like search and, and, you know, meanwhile, there are all these use cases such as like teaching yourself French and then quizzing yourself.

7:08And, and so I, you know, it's hard to say any one feature is or isn't important at this point. But it would be silly to think, you know, that this next model is the cat's meow and is, you know, a big leap towards AGI. I mean, we're so far away from that. Right. And so we're talking about all these different research organizations and the distribution that they might get, right? Google has, obviously, Gemini, they can throw it into any Google product. OpenAI has Microsoft. There's a couple of interesting developments with the OpenAI-Microsoft partnership this week. First of all, we're going to talk about the inflection deal.

7:48But first of all, did you see this quote from Satya Nadella? I think it was from like the Elon Musk lawsuit, where he was like, describing how Microsoft is so insulated from open AI's, you know, ups and downs. He's like, we're above them, we're below them, we're beside them. We own their data, we own their models. Like, what do you think that was all about? I love that quote, Alex. And I quoted in a column I wrote in our briefing column last night. So I thought a lot about it yesterday. I mean, what now this is a quote that Elon is using in his lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI from an interview Satya gave.

8:23And this was when OpenAI was imploding and Satya was trying to assure people that Microsoft could progress in AI without them. But to your point, he was saying, we don't even need them. We have their IP. We know how to train it. We've got all the talent and so forth. And I think we're at this very interesting moment also in the relationship between all these startups and emerging companies. I mean, open AI at almost$100 billion, it's hard to call it a startup. But the reality is we don't know a lot about the relationships between the big platforms that are investing in the next generation. If in the olden days, aka five years ago, Microsoft would acquire a hot new technology or Google would acquire it, Amazon would acquire it.

9:17for a host of reasons, including the fact that regulators are breathing down their neck and scrutinizing every acquisition. Microsoft and others are taking a different tack and structuring these investments where they, you know, put some money in, but they also are getting equity in exchange for credits on their own services, you know, so-called round tripping or potentially. and it's crazy. So when we saw that Satya quote, it was like, aha, this deal is quite complicated between the two. And, you know, I think this is where you're getting to, but we broke some news this week with the terms of Microsoft's hiring the talent from a struggling AI company inflection.

10:03And I actually think the terms of those deals, that deal, which we can talk about, were very similar to the list of things that Satya said they have in OpenAI. And so I think that's a clue that there is a playbook at work here for how Microsoft is trying to consume as much talent in tech in the industry without acquiring it. Yeah, because I mean, we're obviously like, we're in the week where the DOJ has brought this case against Apple. We already know the FTC is like trying to shut down almost all M &A in tech when it comes to big tech, at least. And that brings us, you're right, right to this inflection story.

10:44This is like a fascinating story. So this guy, Mustafa Suleiman, he was a co-founder of DeepMind. I think he got pushed out or like sidelined because of bad behavior. Like even this week, there were former or current DeepMind employees who were like, you know, look at this guy. So basically he got hired into Microsoft to be the CEO of Copilot. It's a pretty big deal. And after he was the CEO of Inflection, which raised like$1.5 billion. So like, of course, there's like concerns about what's the deal with this guy, right? Like even for a CEO to leave a company like this in a lurch, really, and say, I'm going to go be the CEO at Microsoft.

11:26And you know, somebody will pick up the pieces when I'm on. I think he took 70 employees or something like that. It is, it's a fascinating story. It just like kind of leaves me scratching my head on a number of fronts. So we'd love to hear a little bit about, yeah, you're reporting on, on what happened here, why it was structured this way. Are like the original investors and inflection going to be pissed that they put all this money in and then he just jumped ship. So yeah, why don't you break it down for us? Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it's a fascinating story and I think there are a couple of ways to look at it, but the facts are that Microsoft announced earlier this week that Mustafa and his co-founder were joining Microsoft to run their AI and that they would also offer Inflection 70 employees the chance to work at Microsoft.

12:15And instantly, I mean, my phone was ringing from the investors being like WTF, you know, you don't invest, you know, also the investors that invested in Inflection, which had an early product called Pi chatbot that people liked, but really was not in the same league in terms of being able to compete. But Mustafa, off his name, relationships, co-founder of DeepMind, raised all this money. But make me want to say, the investors backed him. And then after two years, Microsoft was one of the largest. Then after two years, to find out that he had jumped ship with taking the employees is not what you expect as a venture capitalist.

13:07Now, the deal is it is so interesting because it's so complicated and you can kind of see the threading of the needle. But what changed hands is Microsoft paid Inflection, I think,$620 million to license its IP. But what that is essentially doing is putting some cash in Inflection's pocket. And then Inflection says, OK, shareholders, you'll get your money back and a little bit more. So if you were in the first tranche of investors, you got your money back in 50%. If you were in the second tranche, you got your money back in 10%. Um, so they, they threw that bone there, but, but none of these investors invested to get their money back in 10 % after two years, right?

13:54That is not the kind of return you expect. Um, and these investors now still hold some equity in inflection now, which is going to be a little more of a design steward AI studio and who knows, but it, but it's really, you know, a shell of, what it was. And I think it is, you know, Microsoft is taking pains to say to shareholders, this is not an acquisition. But, you know, you get access to the tech, which I don't think they really need, but was a way to structure some payment back for shareholders to recoup something. And then you get access to the talent, which I think, you know, all these companies are hoarding.

14:36So I think there are a couple of lessons from it, too. I mean, to me, it's just very clear that if you're a traditional venture capitalist, I don't think you should be investing in AI. Like how, at least in the sort of LLM kind of models where the strategics are putting billions of dollars in, and there are these complicated relationships that are, you know, really have the risk of like restructuring the deal on a moment's notice without the shareholders knowing, which also happened in a different way with OpenAI. and so I think it's just it's a different kind of investment it's a different kind of game I think it shows you know the leverage that these big tech companies have there there there's a flight to them from from the world of startups because they have so many advantages and can compete in in ways that the smaller guys can't and Tim O 'Reilly wrote an excellent op-ed for us about this where he basically said you're seeing really like the amassing of concentration with the big tech companies around AI is going to be very anti-competitive and squeeze all investors out.

15:53So I think it supports that. Now, I will say on the other side, if you talk to entrepreneurs about this deal, they'll say, look, companies fail sometimes. And the best thing to do when companies fail is to acknowledge it for the founders to be honest with the team, not drag them along for years and years, because you can get dragged for a long time on a billion and a half dollars and just kind of say, guys, it didn't work. We're moving on. And by the way, come with us. And we found you a kind of soft landing. So I think that is a very reasonable way to kind of look at it a bit from the point of the founders, I also think, you know, it's understandable why investors are pissed.

16:38And so we'll see how it plays out. And I'm absolutely sure that Washington and Brussels are going to look at this. They've already said they're looking at these deals. So. I mean, this is definitely a dodge in terms of like having to get an acquisition approved. But before we talk about that, I definitely want to talk about why inflection failed. This is a tweet from Gavin Baker, an investor. He says, inflection will likely be the first of many VC-backed foundation model companies to fail. Foundation models without proprietary real-time data and massive distribution for ROHF are the fastest depreciating assets in history.

17:17I mean, it goes right to what we were talking about in the beginning, right? Which is that these models, like you mentioned, coming together. And unless you have an edge, you can literally light a billion and a half dollars on fire overnight because you can't compete is that what's happening here i think so i also think there's the current reality and then everyone is preparing for the next phase of training and the next phase of compute and i think we actually don't spend enough attention on on that in the press sometimes because um you know from again the people working on these, that's top of mind for them.

17:54Just, you know, even the architectures that got the training to this point, aren't going to be the architectures that get it to the next point. And so the costs just compound. So absolutely, I think we saw this over exuberance, as we often see in private technology, for anything with AI, whether it's a foundation model or an app and so forth. I guess the only thing I'd add to Gavin's statement is, well, I completely agree with it in terms of the pace of erasing value. But I think all AI startups are vulnerable. I mean, we've seen companies that were trying to build features using open AIs, APIs that have, you know, basically been obliterated because now you can do it in a model like open AI.

18:43So I think in the startup land, few areas are safe right now in this category. Right. And then going back to this, I don't know, antitrust or anticompetitive angle or merge, whatever, regulatory side, this was an acquisition. So how is it possible? Is it just going to be the new way that companies try to do acquihires without, I mean, it screws the investors. It doesn't have to go through regulatory approval. It's great if you're Microsoft. It's great if you're Mustafa Suleiman. But otherwise, it seems like you're right and any regulator would be like a red flag city right now yeah it i mean it's absolutely going to get scrutiny as it absolutely should i think you know again it is it's not unreasonable if if this was a tiny company that was failing you know this kind of structure is logical, right?

19:38There's not, so you can kind of see why they go this route. I mean, it totally benefits Microsoft in so many ways. So I think it's also, you could look at it as they structured it this way to get around antitrust. You could also look at it, they structured it this way because it's better for Microsoft. You don't have to get all the complicated stuff you don't want. You just get exactly the pieces you do want. So I think it's a win-win for them in terms of economics and structure as well as regulation. But we'll see. You know, I think it's so early in this industry, but at the same time, you know, regulators have their eye on it.

20:24At the same time, you know, you referenced DOJ and Apple. We've got, you know, a DOJ and Google search trial going on from, you know, a deal struck. I don't know, like when I was in high school, no, probably not. But like you can also, I mean, these big tech companies are right to kind of keep moving with their strategy. You can't wait forever. But it's going to be very interesting. And I think the piece I believe strongly is that we just need to know more about these arrangements. It may turn out that like they're not anti-competitive because there's enough competition in the space. And but we just don't know.

21:08And that's why Satya's quote was so jarring, because it sort of said, oh, wait, this isn't it reminded us this isn't a traditional investment. You know, it's something it's something much bigger. Exactly. So this has been one of those weeks where like every every day a bit of news is broken and it's like, are they is Microsoft trying to distract from NVIDIA and is NVIDIA trying to distract from Microsoft? And what about Apple and Google? Like, are they trying to steal their fire? And actually, it just seems like this is just the pace of change right now and the pace of the way that this stuff is moving.

21:43So it brings me right to this Apple and Google deal because it was like at the beginning of the week and now almost forgotten. But it is a huge deal. And this is a Bloomberg story that Apple's in talks to let Google Gemini power iPhones, the iPhone AI features. It just strikes me as a kind of a red flag around Apple that they just shut down their self-driving car program. They put everybody toward AI. They've been teasing this AI announcement coming at WWDC. To have to rely on Google to do your AI infrastructure and put Gemini in the iPhone, similar to the way that you couldn't do search and you have Google doing search in the iPhone, And just it seems to indicate that Apple is so far behind on this front that they they are bringing in the cavalry.

22:31Right. Which I think there was this picture of it looked like Sundar and Tim Cook having dinner together. It's just like, man. Yeah, I think it was maybe Tamarind in Palo Alto, one of Tim's favorite restaurants. Right. It's a fascinating and also great reporting by Bloomberg on this topic. I think what's going on here is Apple has way more AI strategies than meet the eye. And some of those are hedges against their own efforts. But I do think they're doing a lot of other things. And within AI, we've got this big, large language model race where it appears that Apple is behind, you know, working to do their own thing.

23:15But as we know, I mean, Google, DeepMind, right, the roots there in talent go back a very long time. OpenAI has been a pioneer as well. So I think Apple's looking at their position and saying, OK, when it comes to like these small AI models, you know, doing cool things on your iPhone, we got that covered. And I think, you know, we'll hear a lot more, but I expect that will be an area, you know, where they could, you know, you could open your eyes and your photos or, you know, those kinds of on device kind of features. And then they're saying, look, we need, you know, kind of why not try partner with Google to jumpstart our efforts in larger models and while continue on their own thing.

24:08I mean, I was at the Wall Street Journal covering Apple when it was doing this playbook with search and maps and YouTube and all the other services that they knew needed to be on iPhones and well integrated into iPhones to make them popular, but they weren't experts in themselves. And so I think that's probably the thinking inside of Apple. It's complicated, though. I mean, this court case I mentioned, where I guess we'll find out later this year what was decided in the DOJ suing over the Apple search partnership, where Google powers Apple search or search on iPhones and their devices. You know, a Gemini deal could look a lot like that deal.

24:58You know, that would be ballsy to announce that amid that probe. At the same time, it's also, it's so early, like, what are the economics around partnering? I think there are just a lot of questions. But it makes sense to me, given the history between those companies, that they would be attempting a partnership on this front. And I think it does show Apple being behind in a lot of ways. But I also feel like we need to look broadly across what AI is and why it's important to the next generation of these companies. And I suspect Apple has a lot up its sleeve that we don't know about. Right. OK, do I have time for one last question?

25:42Sure. OK, so I wrote about Google's AI, generative AI for newsroom product today. So basically, this is the way that it's going to work. A newsroom would take a primary source, maybe two. It could be a press release from a city council or a 500-page report or even a tweet. And then Google will build a draft of that story for them and then would indicate places where they should fact check or make sure that there's no plagiarism there and then potentially add their own information. You run a pretty successful newsroom. Is this something you would ever think about using? I wouldn't use this tool, Alex.

26:24I think, you know, the information, we're all about original reporting from our own sources. And you can't piece together stuff that's out there in the world and get an information story by definition. I think there are a lot of potentially interesting ways AI can be used as a tool for reporting. Going through transcripts, searching transcripts, highlighting interesting parts of transcripts, document research, data research, basically taking all the tools we try to use today and putting them on steroids. I think that's incredibly exciting for the news industry. I also think AI will be used, you know, aggregating, summarizing, that sort of thing.

27:17And overall, I think that's probably fine. But make no mistake, it's not reporting. All right. I definitely agree. All right. We'll be back in the second half with Steve Kovac to talk about Apple. Jessica, thank you so much for being here. And thanks again for all the great reporting that you and the information are doing. We're regular ciders and readers of the work and keep it coming. Thanks so much. All right. Thanks for being here. We'll be back right after this. Did you know your credit card points and miles can lose value to inflation? Credit card companies often reduce the redemption value of your points and miles.

27:52Now, imagine a credit card with rewards that can grow in value. With the Gemini credit card, you can earn Bitcoin or one of over 50 other cryptos instantly with no annual fee. Every swipe at the store or gas pump earns you instant rewards deposited straight to your account. Plus, sign up now for a$200 Bitcoin bonus to kickstart your rewards. Visit Gemini.com slash card today. Check out the link in the description for more information on rates. Again, if you're looking to invest in Bitcoin but don't know where to start, the Gemini credit card makes it easy. The Gemini credit card is issued by WebBank.

28:29In order to qualify for the$200 crypto intro bonus, you must spend$3 ,000 in your first 90 days. Some exclusions apply to instant rewards in which rewards are deposited when the transaction posts. This content is not investment advice and trading crypto involves risk. The Gemini credit card cannot be used to make gambling-related purchases.

28:51You're used to hearing my voice on the world bringing you interviews from around the globe. And you hear me reporting environment and climate news. I'm Carolyn Buehler. And I'm Marco Werman. We're now with you hosting The World Together. More global journalism with a fresh new sound. Listen to The World on your local public radio station and wherever you find your podcasts.

Read the full transcript

29:18and we're back here on big technology podcast friday edition in this segment we're going to talk about or the really next half hour we're going to talk a lot about this apple case huge antitrust case that the department of justice brought against apple and then we're also going to touch upon the shohei otani betting scandal in baseball which to me is such an amazing story Before I bring in our guests, I just want to say I definitely noticed a lot of reviews come in after last week. And I can't thank you all enough. It's so great to see such an awesome outpouring of support. So many five-star reviews.

29:52That's going to help us a lot. Again, it's the only publicly available metric that people can really see about podcasts. And that helps us show that we actually have listeners and it's worth coming on. So thank you all for that. All right. Joining us for the second half is Steve Kovac. He is the CNBC technology correspondent, someone that I love watching on air. I appear with on air every now and again. Every once in a while, yeah. Steve, you are the guy on Apple and Microsoft at CNBC. So major week for you. I'm sure there hasn't been a lot of sleep. And I'm thrilled that you're here with us. Thanks.

30:24I am quite exhausted. I don't think I've slept much in the last 36 hours, but we're good. Let's see if I can make it through a podcast. Oh, yeah. You're going to be great. The big thing, of course, is that the Department of Justice suing Apple. What exactly is going on in this case? Oh, boy. Let me try to boil down 88 pages. I know you can summarize this well. And antitrust. I've done it on air many times. So high level, the argument here is that the DOJ is making against Apple is, first of all, they establish or try to establish that the iPhone is a monopoly. and therefore the ecosystem around the iPhone is designed such that it keeps you stuck in that ecosystem in that Apple ecosystem so when you're ready to buy a new smartphone they make sure that new smartphone is an iPhone and oh by the way not only do they make sure that happens they've been steadily increasing prices on iPhone over the years Merrick Garland the attorney general of the United States in the announcement of this this week basically said you know he held up an iPhone and said these things cost as much as 1600 bucks now and Apple is going through all these different practices to make sure that happens so part of the argument is the same App Store argument we've been hearing a bazillion times over the last several years it's the only way to download software to the iPhone we've seen this play out in Europe the the complaints from Spotify and so many other app makers about the fees that Apple collects and how that keeps Apple in control over what happens on the platform.

32:05But then some other stuff that we don't hear quite as often, such as accessories, like hardware accessories, smartwatches, Bluetooth headsets, basically saying things like if you buy a third-party smartwatch, maybe a Garmin or one of Google's Fitbits, it doesn't have the full capabilities or features that you might enjoy on Apple Watch, like getting rich notifications, sending iMessages, and things like that. It's kind of like a watered-down version. Same with AirPods. If you're used to having AirPods, you know that really cool feature where you hold it next to the phone, you flip open the case, it automatically pairs.

32:42You put it automatically pairs between your Apple devices. You can't do that on a third-party set of headphones. So they kind of point to instances like that as demonstrations of how Apple is keeping people locked in unfairly and keeping third-party competitors off the platform. And the other thing I'll mention is, and this is like probably the most accessible one, is iMessage. They say that is just a huge lock-in. It keeps people, you know, upset about the good old-fashioned green bubbles and it keeps people either convincing their friends to buy an iPhone or shaming people to buy an iPhone maybe.

33:19And they even referred back to Tim Cook's famous comment, I think it was about two years ago, when someone complained about this issue to him at, I think it was the code conference. And he basically said, well, tell your mom to buy an iPhone if they don't like the green bubbles, if you're messed up with that. So yeah, whoops. And then they also, you know, pointed to some emails, which we've seen before between executives privately saying, if we opened up some of these services, messaging and whatnot, that would just encourage people to buy an Android phone. And that's bad for Apple. So lots of things going on here.

33:51Apple, of course, denies everything. They are going to fight this till the very end. And like we've heard so many times from them, they say so many of their decisions are about privacy, about security, and providing the best experience for their customers on their own products. And that's why they do what they do. Partly true, but there's some holes in that argument too. Yeah. Now, Steve, before we get into the specifics of the case, I need to ask you about the vibe within Apple, because so often, like right now we have Apple, Facebook, not Microsoft, actually Google and Amazon, they all have caught cases from U.S.

34:27regulators, big antitrust cases. But the vibe within these companies never is all too concerned about what's going on. And maybe that's just because like it's the frog boiling thing where like it's actually a problem, but they don't feel it because it's in the background. But I also think it's an indication that they're dealing with relatively feeble US regulatory bodies who aren't well funded, who don't have, you know, senior staff working on these cases, who they can afford to kind of outlast. And so I'm curious, from your perspective, you know, the vibe within Apple, you talked to Tim Cook, like every quarter after the earnings report.

35:04Are they how is Apple responding to this? Like, are they feeling within the company that this is a problem? Or that this is going to blow over this is a category five hurricane or it's a drizzle the impression i get is they know it's a problem they know this is likely to be a distraction over the next several years um but publicly they're trying to make it seem like everything's hunky-dory and business as usual you'll you'll note for example um at least it didn't leak out if there was one a memo from tim cook to employees they sort of rally the troops type of messaging he didn't even do that he spent And by the way, the day this lawsuit dropped, he was in China just opening up a new Apple store in Shanghai.

35:46He was not focused or did it at least publicly appear to be focused on this. So they're trying to play it both ways. At the same time, and I'm sure you've covered this already, but, you know, in the last couple of weeks in the European Union, very similar allegations and rules and so forth being brought up over there. They have anger on their face. They really had a PR blunder with the Epic Games reversal. You know, they're kind of being, I don't know, humbled in a lot of ways, thanks to these tough regulations in the EU. And I really think they're seeing that as a template for how things could end up here.

36:18But like you said, kind of a toothless regulatory body here in so many ways. We have yet to see Congress pass any meaningful tech legislation. For some reason, they're more interested in banning TikTok than they are potentially, you know, doing some, you know, protecting little kids online. So it really falls to the DOJ and the FTC to do this work, to make any changes if there is an idea that there should be a change. That's what the focus is, I guess. But yeah, they're just trying to pretend this is nothing, even though it's something. And Tim Wu was on CNBC earlier this week talking about how regulatory bodies, was it win or not?

37:01Basically, what he was saying was that they just want to let these companies know that they can't trample on other companies' ability to do business. Do you think that they're fine? The regulatory agencies would be fine just kind of giving Apple like a real headache and letting this drag out for a couple of years? Like, is that a win for them? Potentially. So if you ask Jonathan Cantor, who's the antitrust official who spearheaded this case, or Lena Khan, the chair of the FTC, who is very much in line and of the same thinking with Cantor on this kind of stuff, they would say, even though we haven't been successful in so many of the cases we've brought, even though we failed to do things like block the Activision merger and stuff, they say thematically it's kind of put this chilling effect on some of what they view as you know monopolistic activity so they consider even their losses a win um so that's kind of how it's being viewed on that side side of it too so even if this just causes a headache they can also kind of claim victory and victory at the end of this let's just say we gained this out for four or five years, DOJ loses this case, they can still try to claim victory by saying, well, you know, we made Apple think long and hard about some of these things.

38:18Maybe they grab a concession or two and they still they still consider that a sort of win. I will also note that we have an election this year and there could be a very easily be a Trump administration again next year, a Trump Department of Justice. Now, of course, this Apple case and the Google case started under the Trump administration. A lot of people forget this investigation started back in 2019 and was carried on by this new Department of Justice under the Biden administration. And then, you know, what we saw this week. So there's also a possibility, though, that because Biden did it, Trump won't want to do it.

38:52And he might try to unwind or weaken this kind of stuff. Tim Cook, you know, in the first Trump administration, did a really good job cozying up to Donald Trump, got some relief on China tariffs and things like that. Tim Apple, famous Tim Apple. It works, though. So, yeah, it's going to be really interesting to see how the election plays out to see what the next beat of that looks like, for sure. exactly and so that's from the regulatory side from the apple side is the big problem here this like you mentioned the europe thing they had that big you know two billion dollar fine they also haven't grown very much they've had um i think declines in revenue for the last five quarters and it's going to be five of six right so is this just like the real risk here is that this just kind of adds to a malaise around the company like it doesn't have a good narrative right nvidia has the best narrative in the tech world on the market right now.

39:48I mean, I would say Microsoft has the second best. We're not used to a world where Apple is like third place. We're losing the narrative. And when you talk about the narrative, it's artificial intelligence. What is the AI narrative? And I've even noticed a shift. You mentioned that I talked to Tim Cook every quarter on earnings. When I talked to him last quarter, he was almost defensive almost about, well, we have tons of AI in our stuff, you know, and he just started rattling off features like, you know, the fitness detection and the Apple Watch and Vision Pro wouldn't even exist without artificial intelligence.

40:24All this stuff is happening under the hood, though. That's nothing new. In fact, it's just they're calling it something different. I also noticed there's new MacBooks that came out a couple weeks ago. They called it like something to the effect of the best AI PC ever, you know, consumer AI PC you can buy. Val does protest too much situation. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. And so but what they're also doing is really putting enormous pressure on themselves by teasing some sort of AI announcement later this year to really deliver. They call it, you know, Tim Cook is calling it. We're going to say we're going to break new ground in AI.

40:59That's a hefty promise. And so the stakes are quite large. Presumably, it's going to happen at WWDC in June for them to deliver some kind of mind-blowing AI announcement to kind of ease these investor fears amid slumping sales. China looks bad and all these regulatory headwinds. Yeah, and it better not just be we're going to run Gemini on the iPhone. You know, it's got to be more than that. Now let's talk about the actual case, right? Right. Because the DOJ has these weird definitions of monopoly, right? It says that Apple is 65 % of the iPhone market in the US, but 70 % of the performance smartphone market in the US.

41:40Like, dude, did you just make up a new category to add 5 % to the market share? Like, what's going on there? And from what I understand, I mean, 70 % is not a monopoly to me. It's a dominant position, but not monopolistic. Yeah. And then on the other hand, and just to be fair, you have Apple trying to say, oh, we're just a teeny tiny little company here. We only, and they talk about their global market share, which is true. It's, you know, 20%, maybe less. Android is by far the dominant platform, but this is a, this is a United States case. And so therefore we're looking at United States market share.

42:13Let's get that out of the way. This reminds me of the FTC lawsuit against Activision, where they tried to make this case of there are different kinds of video game consoles and there's the high performance video game consoles playstation and xbox and then the i guess lower end consoles like switch and they try to make this argument they're two completely different markets that didn't fly in the courts at the time i don't see how this could fly either if you're using a phone you're using a phone it doesn't matter if it's a phone with a super duper fast chip or if it's a phone that you got for free from at &t for signing up with the contract.

42:51I don't think that seems tough. And that's also the crux of it too, right? You know, they have to prove that they have, you got to have your monopoly position. And, you know, so many comparisons have already been made to the Microsoft case several years ago where they did have a monopoly. It was very hard to find a computer that was not powered by Windows, period. globally, not just in the United States, but globally. That is a monopoly. And it's harder and more difficult to make that argument here, but they're going to try and we'll see what happens and if they buy that. And then another novel thing they could try is, well, most of the money is spent on the iPhone.

43:36Those are the wealthiest customers, so therefore there's more money at stake. I don't know. It's a novel theory. And if they can't even pass that bar, this whole thing's dead. Right. So let's quickly get into a little bit of the harm as we round out this conversation. So the Department of Justice made some interesting accusations and some weird ones. I'll just run by like the most interesting and the most weird one for you. Most interesting to me is this pairing, like you mentioned of smartwatches, how the smartwatches don't pair well to, uh, to the iPhone. And like, that actually is like real harm.

44:13Like it does harm. If you're a smartwatch company, you can't pair well because Apple has the Apple watch that sucks. Um, and it is like real exclusionary conduct. So that is one area where I'm like, ah, okay, I really agree with the DOJ here. Uh, on the other hand, it's like, that is kind of the Apple strategy, right? Is like locking you into their products. Like there was a line, I wrote it down because I was on air super early this morning, like worldwide exchange early. And I was like, we got to talk about this, that Apple locked, they say Apple locked in users and developers while protecting its profits.

44:46And it's like, yep, that's the Apple strategy, right? So I'm curious, like, you know, let's do the most interesting, then I'll do the other part. But, you know, as far as the smart watches and wearables go, do you think the DOJ has a point here? And do you think Apple's defense will hold up? yeah it's true that it is exclusionary i mean yes if you've ever tried to attach a fitbit or a garmin which by the way garmin's super popular especially among runners yeah it just doesn't have that full feature set you can get on the iphone um does that cause people to stay locked into the ecosystem i don't know um that's that's that's hard to quantify or say but if they bring out evidence showing we were disabling these features because we built you know to do that then we get then it becomes harder to defend so right that is very interesting i think they talk about smart watches i really think even more popular than the apple watch are these things i'm wearing right now the airpods and that is such a mass market product more so they there are more airpods in the world than there are uh apple watches for sure and so you know if you take all that together just the accessories in general maybe there's an argument to make there um and maybe that's a concession apple would have to make um making pairing easier which would be great for notifications yeah it'd be awesome which would be great for consumers and you know maybe not that bad for apple if you think about it uh the apple watch is by far and away the most popular watch in the world um there are plenty of watches that work with android phones well um but i really want to know the weirdest thing that you thought or the okay how'd you frame it because i have i have one the most ridiculous thing was the bringing up of i message like merrick garland seemed like he seemed seized on this idea that you become a green bubble in android uh or an android becomes a green bubble in the iphone and everyone's like yeah yeah no that's proof of the apple lock-in and for i for a while was on that side as well and was like look look how you know what they're trying to do to make people switch to prevent people from switching to Android.

46:58However, because Apple has been so insistent on this Apple iMessage lock-in and they don't make it interoperable, people have been moving to WhatsApp in the U.S. WhatsApp has really been on the rise in a real way in the U.S. I've reported the data and you could argue that Apple's actually hurt themselves by doing this and it shows there's real competition because people are going to another compatible messaging app and effectively destroying value for Apple because, and that's how a market should work, right? Bad product, you lose your audience. And that's the Apple market or Apple argument, rather, almost verbatim.

47:35They say, I mean, go in the app store, look at the messaging app tab. I mean, there are billions of them, right? And WhatsApp is a perfect one. I personally use WhatsApp when SMS freaks me out, not because it's, it just does. It's also just a worse experience. forget the encryption it's just not good um and so i i whenever i have to text i use iphone for the most part and whenever i have to text someone who has an android phone i just use whatsapp and it's fine and it's great um but all that said i think a couple things are happening here one merrick garland brings it up because it's such an easy to understand accessible thing so many people have experienced that right your group chat gets messed up because someone green bubbles in there whatever we all understand that what they also do though is they show evidence like there are literally emails from apple executives saying we can't put we shouldn't put iMessage on android or we shouldn't open it up or make it more compatible because it's they know it's such a good lock-in and we don't want people going to android phones so that's kind of a smoking gun there that's the apple kind of ignores that part that they said that as well everything's true that they said about messaging apps and you know good experience and so forth the other true part that they don't talk about is that internally they kept it that way in part uh to keep people locked in right now can i share my favorite thing the weirdest thing and the funniest thing the apple tv argument and saying they there's a line in this lawsuit i'm gonna i'm just gonna paraphrase it but basically saying uh apple tv you know because of apple tv plus the service not the box um because of the monopoly power apple has it now has power over the flow of free speech because of apple tv plus which just is a bananas thing to say yeah that's like saying hbo has the control over the flow flow of free speech or cnbc has too much control over the flow right which it does uh i don't think ted lasso really gives a shit um about free speech i think they're just trying to entertain you with Apple TV plus.

49:41And oh, by the way, Apple TV plus is available on Roku. It's available on Android. It's available on Samsung TVs. It's not an Apple only product. I think that just little things like that in this case, uh, just makes me scratch my head. It's like, have these guys ever used an Apple product before? Yeah. This is what I was saying about the junior developer, the junior lawyers. That's probably one of theirs. Yes. Yeah, exactly. yeah so okay before we head out i definitely want to talk about um this shohei otani story have you been following it it's definitely like one of the i have all the stories so uh for folks and also i'm a mets fan i think you are a little disappointed we don't have show and this was not a uh mets scandal but you wanted this to be a mets scandal i i if we had show on our team absolutely dude but he might he might not play so uh i mean there's I think there's a chance he gets suspended from this because there's definitely been a cover-up.

50:37So this is from ESPN. Dodgers fire Shohei Ohtani's interpreter amid allegation of a massive theft. So basically, they found out that he made$4.5 million in wire transfers from Ohtani's bank account to a bookmaking operation. And his translator, a longtime friend and interpreter, they say that he incurred debts. Now, the amazing thing about this story is he sat down with ESPN and gave this entire basically deposition talking about how, yes, I incurred all the debts and Shohei was good enough to pay them. And I'm thankful, but he had nothing to do with it. And then they basically had to go back and say, actually, Shohei had no idea that this was happening and he stole all this money.

51:23And it was a massive theft. and there's like a video of him and the interpreter hanging out in the dugout like 90 minutes before this news breaks and everything is fine. So like did that all happen within that moment? So for those, by the way, Shohei is a$700 million batter and pitcher for the Los Angeles Dodgers. He's the biggest star in baseball. I think this is interesting for a number. In sports, arguably, in a lot of ways. Yeah, and so I think this is interesting for a number of reasons. A, the crime is fascinating. but really it's just like we've seen all these tech companies FanDuel and DraftKings bring betting into the mainstream right next to the broadcasts and sports leagues and stuff like that and maybe it's become so commonplace that now it's starting to have that negative effect where it's kind of starting to blend into the leagues.

52:17I'm curious what you think about this story and what the takeaway is from your end. Yeah, it's also, So it's gliding into the leagues. I mean, we've seen this at the NFL, you know, players getting in trouble for betting and so forth. And this is something that's kind of concerned me basically since the beginning of gambling apps. And, you know, I know it's state by state. Was it North Carolina that just approved it? I forget. Anyway, my point being just seeing how, you know, the companies that you and I cover every day use their apps, you know, to get you sticky, to get you to stay in. Yeah. That's one thing.

52:52you know scrolling through tiktok every day i'm sure they're but at least tiktok's not sucking money out of your bank account and like i understand vanduul and all these guys they have you know you could set your own limits and and things like that but just the ease of use i mean this is just right for stricter regulation uh just gambling apps in general um the showy thing the showy atani and his interpreter thing is an extreme example um and whether or not you know And those are also league rules, too. But, you know, a lot of bet on yourself or your own games and your own league. But, I mean, this is this just is the kind of thing it's I'm almost shocked like regulators haven't taken such a deeper look at gambling apps because it is so easy to lose money.

53:35And, you know, what kind of gamemanship are they using to kind of encourage betting and, you know, sign up now and get$100 free and so forth? That's that's really my takeaway. way. I feel like the shoe is yet to drop on gambling apps. And that could be coming. It is interesting because it is sort of the product of a recent Supreme Court case that legalized sports betting across, well, allowed states to make their decisions about whether they would legalize it or not and not prohibit it on a federal level. We'll definitely have more on that. It's a really fascinating backstory. But last question for you.

54:10Do you think Shohei was participating in this gambling. Oh, man. Because I think I... It's hard to tell. Yeah. This is just my own guess. I think he was. Yeah, he must have. I mean, even my closest friends, I don't give them access to my bank account. Right. Story makes no sense. Yeah. I mean, the only people you give access to your bank account are maybe your accountant or, like, if you're married, maybe your partner. That's it. Right. so so he knew he had to have known which is bad I mean he's such an amazing guy like otherwise such an incredible athlete what a what a guy to watch I mean he just he's like not even human to watch him on the field everything he can do and oh poor Dodgers right and now the question becomes will Major League Baseball their loss is my game well Major League Baseball has been is in this moment where it's losing audience and losing fans it needs to do anything it can to make it exciting and now they're faced with like, do we suspend our biggest star and stand on principle or do we allow this to slide and let the games go on?

55:19And it reminds me of this amazing moment in The Simpsons where Mark McGuire is caught doing some terrible things and he goes up to the town and he goes, you want to know the deep, dark truth about Major League Baseball or do you want to see me hit some dingers? And the whole town is like, dingers. I remember that one, yeah. Right, right. Right. Yeah. So that could be it too. But anyway, anything that's bad for the Dodgers is potentially good for the Mets. Yeah. I'm cheering it. Let's go to a game this year. It'll be fun. Hell yeah. Citi Field. As soon as it warms up. Yeah. I'm there. Okay. Sounds good.

55:52Steve, I know you got to go on air. Thanks so much for joining us. Yes. All right. Thanks, Ox. Take care. All right, everybody. Thanks for listening. And we'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast.

From the publisher

The Information's Jessica Lessin and CNBC's Steve Kovach join us for a star studded Friday episode breaking down the week's news. Lessin is the CEO and founder of The Information and co-host of the More or Less podcast. Kovach is a technology correspondant at CNBC. We cover (with Lessin): 1) Rumors of GPT-5 being shown to founders, and what it might look like 2) Whether OpenAI is vulnerable now that model quality is converging 3) Satya Nadella's claims that Microsoft effectively controls all the value of OpenAI 4) Inflection leadership heads to Microsoft 5) Inflection investors are pissed 6) Why Inflection failed 7) Google and Apple's potential AI agreement 8) Would The Information use Google's new tool for newsrooms. And with Kovach: 9) Outline of the DOJ's case against Apple 10) How Apple is feeling about the case 11) Merits of the case 12) Shohei Ohtani's betting problems.
Enjoying Big Technology Podcast? Please rate us five stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ in your podcast app of choice.
For weekly updates on the show, sign up for the pod newsletter on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6901970121829801984/
Questions? Feedback? Write to: bigtechnologypodcast@gmail.com

More from Big Technology Podcast

All 399 episodes
OpenAI's GPT-5 Looms, Apple's Antitrust Problem, Sports Betting's Big ScandalBig Technology Podcast · 57 min
Listen in VO