Senator Mark Warner: Nobody’s Ready for What AI Could Do To Us

25 Mar 2026 · 48 min · 22 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Senator Mark Warner warns that government and society aren’t ready for rapid, possibly exponential AI-driven disruption over the next 3–5 years, citing lack of data on job losses and risks in defense and elections. He argues for faster, bipartisan policy: measuring AI job displacement via BLS, guardrails for military AI, and economic transition funding (including data-center impacts).

Guest

U.S. Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), former governor; Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee; long-time technology policy advocate.

Key claims

CEOs and major firms are privately cutting hiring (e.g., fewer interns/first-year associates; back-office staff reductions) while the government lacks measurement. Warner predicts college graduate unemployment could rise from ~9% to ~30%. He calls the Pentagon’s move to label Anthropic a “supply chain risk” a “death warrant” precedent without due process. He fears AI surveillance without guardrails and AI weapons without human-in-the-loop.

Notable examples

Anthropic/Claude disrupting software and HR; Amazon announcing 11,000 job losses; data-center community opposition (Pew poll); Palantir/Maven target selection; Iran “girl school” targeting controversy; social media regulation failures as a cautionary parallel.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introduction to Senator Warner

0:41 to 1:30

Senator Mark Warner discusses the government’s preparedness for AI advancements.

“Welcome to Big Technology Podcast, a show for cool-headed and nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond.”

Concerns About AI Readiness

1:30 to 2:16

Senator Warner expresses doubts about government's readiness for AI progress.

“But now there's at least a percentage chance that that's real.”

Economic Disruption from AI

2:16 to 3:30

Discussion on the economic impacts of AI on job markets and industries.

“The markets don't respond that way that quickly if people aren't saying there's going to be fundamentally dramatic change in kind of industry fundamentals.”

Legislation for AI Data Collection

3:30 to 5:40

Senator Warner talks about bipartisan efforts to gather AI impact data.

“So I've heard you say this a couple of times that the CEOs may be downplaying the impact.”

Anthropic and AI in Defense

5:40 to 7:40

Discussion about Anthropic's role in AI and its implications for the Defense Department.

“And to say government's not ready would be an understatement.”

The Role of Awareness in Legislation

7:40 to 8:00

Senator Warner discusses the need for increased awareness in government regarding AI.

“to write a death sentence to major American tech companies.”

Comparative Challenges of AI and Social Media

8:00 to 9:30

A conversation about the difference in challenges posed by AI compared to social media.

“Defense, Department of War, whatever you want to call it.”

Prioritizing AI Legislation

9:30 to 11:34

Senator Warner expresses concerns about the prioritization of AI issues in Congress.

“When we think about, you know, the stories already we're hearing about AI, you know, leading kids potentially to suicide.”

Future of AI and Job Security

11:34 to 14:01

Discussion on the future implications of AI on jobs and workforce reskilling.

“I think most members – and this is a human reaction.”

The Impending AI Transformation

14:01 to 18:10

Discussion on the rapid transformation AI might bring and legislative responses.

Show all 22 chapters

AI's Impact on Relationships and Society

18:11 to 21:30

Examination of AI's effects on human relationships and societal norms.

“The biggest – in most kind of mid-tier public universities, the number one major for most young people is business or business administration.”

Political and Economic Implications of AI

21:31 to 25:14

Insights into the political ramifications and economic challenges posed by AI.

“So you're running for a fourth term, three-term senator at this point.”

Data Centers: Community Concerns and Future

25:15 to 28:00

Discussion on public perception of data centers and their environmental impact.

“China clearly is investing at an amazing rate.”

Virginia's Data Center Economic Battle

28:00 to 30:50

Senator Warner discusses the challenges and opportunities facing Virginia's data centers amidst economic negotiations.

“But to go into a community and sell that when the only image you have is of, say, data centers in northern Virginia that are still old school, last generation, that's a hard sell.”

AI and Government Oversight

32:53 to 36:26

Discussion on government agency decisions regarding Anthropic and the implications for AI oversight.

“And we're back here on Big Technology Podcast with Senator Mark Warner.”

AI in Warfare and Surveillance

36:26 to 42:01

Senator Warner addresses the role of AI technologies like Palantir in military operations and the ethical considerations involved.

“you know maybe it's better to go with the chinese model okay so you're the vice chair of the senate Intelligence Committee was or is the Pentagon making a AI-based surveillance program of American?”

America's Global Image and Leadership

42:01 to 42:30

Discussing the importance of America's reputation and its impact on safety.

Bipartisanship in Addressing AI Job Disruption

42:31 to 43:12

Exploring bipartisan efforts regarding the impact of AI on jobs.

“All right, I have a couple more for you before we leave.”

Insider Trading Legislation in Congress

43:13 to 44:11

Examining the challenges Congress faces in regulating insider trading.

“And you are great in your statement saying we shouldn't see this anymore.”

Complexities of Stock Trading for Congress Members

44:12 to 45:58

Insights into stock trading rules and personal experiences of a senator.

“And I think we've kind of completely gotten out of all trading.”

Crypto Regulations and Ethical Standards

45:59 to 46:59

Delving into the need for ethical regulations around cryptocurrency.

“It's, you know, we ought to be passing these ethics restrictions, but boy, oh, boy, there ought to not be a carve out for them.”

Engaging Public Ideas on AI Policy

47:00 to 47:40

Encouraging public participation in shaping AI policy and regulations.

“I appreciate you spending the time here again.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Big Technology Podcast Host:If AI progress is actually moving on an exponential, are we ready? Let's talk about it with U.S. Senator Mark Warner right after this. Fiscally responsible, financial geniuses, monetary magicians. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds. Because Progressive offers discounts for paying in full, owning a home, and more. Plus, you can count on their great customer service to help when you need it, so your dollar goes a long way. Visit progressive.com to see if you could save on car insurance. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, potential savings will vary, not available in all states or situations.

0:41Big Technology Podcast Host:Welcome to Big Technology Podcast, a show for cool-headed and nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond. We have a great show for you today. U.S. Senator Mark Warner is here with us. We're going to talk about whether the government is ready for fast AI progress, us what government data says about AI-driven job loss so far, and the latest on that small anthropic situation with the Pentagon. Senator Warner, great to see you again. Welcome to the show. Alex, thanks so much for having me. So it's been four years since we last spoke, and I reached out because I had been getting freaked out, I'll be honest.

1:16Big Technology Podcast Host:I'd been speaking with some folks in and around these AI labs, and there's a belief among them that AI technology is moving on an exponential and could have real disruptions. And I think for me and many others who've been watching this, that was marketing language a couple of months ago. But now there's at least a percentage chance that that's real. And I'm freaked out because I'm not sure if the government is ready for an exponential. Silicon Valley might do exponentials. Washington does linear or backwards sometimes. I wanted to just get your take on, I know you're right into this. Everybody says, you know, go to speak to Senator Warner.

1:54Big Technology Podcast Host:He's the one that knows what's going on. But I want to get your take on the general vibe in Washington today. Do you think there's awareness among rank and file members of Congress and the Senate that something might be brewing, that there will have to be drastic action to head off the negative consequences if it happens? Well, Alex, I don't think government's ready. i don't think society's ready and i know the same you know ai optimists who are talking about this i actually think they have changed their pitch and are now holding back because they're freaked out about freaking out people and i've seen like you know the um and i am still long ai in terms of value but boy short term next three to five years the economic disruption is gonna be i i just think we are not ready at all we don't have good data we don't know what's happening and you know an example i like to give is if you just look at anthropics clod products this year how clod has already kind of disrupted the whole software business now the market recovered a little bit But then it hit the same thing on the HR business.

3:14The markets don't respond that way that quickly if people aren't saying there's going to be fundamentally dramatic change in kind of industry fundamentals. And that's just two areas. And I think there's much, much more to come.

3:30Big Technology Podcast Host:So I've heard you say this a couple of times that the CEOs may be downplaying the impact. I know they speak with you privately. Are they telling you things like saying, hey, Senator Warner, don't say this to other people, but here's what we think. Or what brings you to that assessment? What brings me is the CEOs who are saying this in the AI space. and what I'm hearing privately from big brand name firms who are saying they're cutting off or cutting in half the number of interns or first year hires. I even heard from a nationally known law firm that has decided to hire no first year associates.

4:11They're going to take a pause and see how this works out before they even hire. All these kids, after they've done everything to get through law school and they got a job offer they thought with a big brand firm and then it's just going away nothing they did and because of ai and yeah because ai and i hear and i hear like so many companies that are mid-sized who say you know i had one guy the other day saying you know i had 23 people do this back office function now i got three isn't that amazing and the thing is we are not even collecting data on this yet. That's why I've got a bill with Josh Hotley, very bipartisan, that says to BLS, Bureau of Labor Statistics, we need to start measuring this.

4:56And not just in terms of firms like a Jack Dorsey saying he's cutting 40 % of his staff on because of AI and whether that's true or not, you know, we won't know for sure, but, you know, that kind, but also try to measure, you know, jobs that would traditionally have been created, because my view is that this is going to particularly hit kids coming out of college, coming out of graduate school. We're at about 9 % recent college graduate unemployment. I think that number will actually go to 30%. And the economic disruption that will have not only on those young people that don't get jobs, but their parents who help finance their college education and the level of kind of fear that is amongst everybody I know that's in college at this point, I don't think people are factoring that in.

5:40And to say government's not ready would be an understatement. Right.

5:45Big Technology Podcast Host:And we're going to talk about some legislation that you have brewing and, and, you know, but it takes more than one or two senators here. And, you know, you've already passed the Claude test, Senator Lorne, which is you're a senator that knows what Claude is. 100 U.S. senators. How many of them do you think know what Claude is? Well, I hope, I hope more than you and I think. But, you know, and again, I don't if you want to go now into the whole you know clad's part of anthropic um whether we want to go down that path now but you know i would argue that anthropic you know pick your anthropic open ai obviously google is doing doing well we've got a half dozen llms that are making major advances but you know what what's happening to anthropic at this point as they were doing business with the Defense Department and being very well used.

6:35And, you know, the anthropic leadership crosswise with Hegseth at DOD, and obviously any company, if they're going to do business with DOD, has to make some accommodation. But the idea that we're going to turn over to Pete Hegseth, the ability to completely decide that these AI tools can be used totally for surveillance without any guardrails, or even potentially worse, creating AI weapons without a human in the loop. That's big freaking deal. And we ought to have, if we were not in this war with Iran at this point, I think that would have been a major focus. And what is even happening with this, I'm trying to rally the tech community to say, regardless of what you feel about Trump and Hegsef, if you're having these decisions and then Hegsef is going to declare, is trying to declare Anthropic a supply chain risk, that would mean that not only Anthropic couldn't do business with DoD, but any company and virtually every major company in America does some level of business with DoD, they couldn't do business with Anthropic as well.

7:39This would be the ability for a single individual to write a death sentence to major American tech companies. And people need to realize this stuff is happening real time.

7:50Big Technology Podcast Host:Okay, so I guess like the reason why I'm asking the awareness. And I take your point. We're going to talk a little bit more about this in the second half, about the Anthropic DOD or the war, the dispute they're having with the Department of Defense, Department of War, whatever you want to call it. We'll talk about that a bit more. The reason why I asked is because, and maybe this dispute is giving more awareness to Anthropic. I just want to see if you could reassure me, or maybe you're saying that there is little reassurance that when it comes to the list of priorities that your your colleagues have that this at least ranks because i i remember reporting on the social media stuff uh five ten years ago it was clear that there was no there was and you know what i guess we sort of came out of it okay well alex but we did this is my worry is this say there's the same lack of awareness in the government for something that could happen faster.

8:48Well, amen. Amen. Like social media was a challenge. And I had bipartisan bills on data portability, interoperability, delegability, which is now basically called agentic AI. We had things about dark patterns. There was lots of bipartisan action. And all the social media companies, they all said, yeah, we want some meaningful regulation until you put words on the page. And we batted zero. We still haven't even done the freaking kids' online safety bills. So social media is a challenge. It has, I think, effects, you know, psychic effects, psychological effects, I'm sorry, on young people. But it is tiny compared to AI.

9:30When we think about, you know, the stories already we're hearing about AI, you know, leading kids potentially to suicide. And we're seeing what was kind of a spot story just six months ago of people becoming romantically involved with um ai agents now this is actually a statistical thing you can look at um and that's just on the kind of psychological societal effects but on the job effects we just don't have we don't have good data we have people i think shifting blame i've you know i saw amazon you know they've announced 11 000 job losses they say none of that's due to AI. But I got to just tell you, you wouldn't have literally not billions, but trillions of dollars of private capital coming in if these enterprises don't, the investors don't think they're going to return.

10:21Now, some of this may be because we're going to have great healthcare breakthroughs or have AI created jobs, which I believe we will. But in the short term, the amount of AI job dislocation is going to be jaw dropping. And I don't think the majority of senators understand and i think they can be convinced um and i just fear that we what we've got now is you know the overriding uh agenda coming out of the trump administration is they are kind of ai accelerators you know peddled in the metal because we got to beat china and we do have to beat china but the idea that we are not going to think about any guardrails or about the short-term economic consequences i think is really frightening and and as somebody who still believes the power of by the way there's no way we're putting the genie back in the bottle anyway is could have positive effects we could actually have populism on the left and the right coming together to try to you know snuff out the innovation and do it ham-handedly so boy boy this is you know it is i'm trying to get hired one last time in this job and probably the major reason is if i can help navigate um you know some of these ai solutions and i don't pretend to have by any means all the answers matter of fact if we i think alex we may have talked about this at one point we go way back in time like three years ago the i think well at least at that point thought through well guarantee of a job was let's at least make sure everybody has basic coding skills that was well intentioned but was obviously not the right answer since those are the first jobs being eliminated

12:04Big Technology Podcast Host:and so when you think about the way that your colleagues view this uh is it high priority medium priority or low priority for them wasn't this stuff is hard i i don't you know i i joke but it's kind of true there is no real linear relationship between me spending more time I'm on AI and actually thinking I have a better understanding. I get – it is evolving so quickly. I think most members – and this is a human reaction. If you don't get it and it seems too complicated, you want to try to punt on that. And that allows for simple-minded solutions like let's just shut it down or let's just have a moratorium all data centers for a year.

12:52That's not going to answer the question. So we do have to navigate it. And what small value I hope I can add is not turning this into a partisan issue and trying to find folks on both sides of the aisle that says, hey, we've got to grapple with this. China and the rest of the world is moving ahead. There is no way we can reverse this. But we are not powerless, both to put guardrails in effect and also say in terms of the economic dislocation. And my challenge to the AI community is you guys are right. If government defines us all, we'll probably screw it up. So you guys help us define what this transition looks like, what the training or reskilling, whatever tool we want to call it.

13:35But you also got to help pay for it because the cost of this are going to be amazing.

13:40Big Technology Podcast Host:Yeah, and I'll explain a little bit about my line of questioning here. I just wanted to see if you think the government would be able to move fast if we end up seeing this exponential. I'll even take your words. You said recently in a great YouTube video about the AI challenge, this is as dramatic as it changes anything I've seen in my lifetime. You said, think about the transformation brought by the Internet. this AI transformation at the rate we're seeing it could be over in the next two to three years and again I know you have legislation you have three bills at least three bills in action right now on AI gathering data trying to understand the implications here trying to head off the issue and it's different you can attack it in a way that it's not stop it it's like maybe help people who are being who are who are in at risk of job dislocation but i'm not very reassured hearing the way that you describe the way that this issue is being uh handled in the senate that that that speed is going to be met well i'm not sure i can point to a policy makers anywhere in the world that's figured this out i mean i got good bipartisan legislation let's put a commission together similar to the cyber salarium that actually put some points on the board you know commission of the economy of the future we've got you know bills to get bls to start reporting on ai job disruption i've got a bipartisan bill about how ai is going to affect the financial markets and how we ought to think through this they are i think thoughtful but they are self-acknowledging here small incremental steps when it very much could be the holy shit moment and can we think big and you know if if donald trump the disruptor if he had an ounce of either empathy or collaborative spirit somebody that is a disruptor could actually help us through this but i i i want to be more optimistic um but but i'm i am terrified i mean i had somebody come in the other day and it was like i thought it was a very uh interesting thing saying you get you know you get three couples of parents together who are talking about their kids yeah 10 years ago would have been you know this globalization i don't know if my kid's gonna get a job five years ago it'd be oh my gosh i'm really concerned about whether my kid is getting addicted to social media now the conversation and this is happening at such a level that our policymakers get it they are terrified that their kids have done everything right.

16:20They're going through college and there may not be a job there.

16:23Big Technology Podcast Host:Right. And can I just say, so I brought up social media as an example of our U.S. legislative body's ability to deal with technology effectively, but it's different than social media. I think we both agree here that with social media, the big disagreement was, are you going to tell Facebook how to handle its newsfeed, what to do? This isn't necessarily uh legislation that needs to be or policy that needs to be can we tell the ai companies to stop making their models to be able to handle the negative effects here it's more like how do you stimulate job growth retraining and even that's probably not proven but um that's what gives me hope is that there's a chance that that that can be and the fact that you have these bipartisan bills let's but let's look for a second solution you know i've talked to some of the my friends in the industry who say like let's at least deal with things like non-consensual nudes do you want your young daughter or son to be portrayed with a deep fake out there and everybody says yes but then you get you know elon at grok saying no we you know we're going to be an outlier and you know we default to the lowest common denominator on some of this you The idea of these horrific stories of people being guided to suicide.

17:43We can say, well, we're going to try to correct the model a little bit, but we're always lagging. I mean, I do think I'm kind of freaked out about this. The idea of who you turn your romantic interest to. I think we all remember that movie a few years back called, I think it was called Her, where the main character fell in love with a kind of a chatbot. But that stuff is happening now, not in tiny numbers, but is actually starting to appear statistically. And then we come to the job dislocation. The biggest – in most kind of mid-tier public universities, the number one major for most young people is business or business administration.

18:26Those are the jobs that you come out and you go work for a firm for a couple of years as a young analyst or whatever. Those jobs are gone. I mean, somebody suggested the other day, I'm not sure this is right, but maybe some of these companies ought to pay an incentive to get more people into nursing as opposed to business administration. We ought to at least disclose to people that the job prospects in some of these fields are going to dramatically change. And I'm just not sure whether we're ready. And one of the scary things that I've found, and again, I want to be more optimistic, is like you talk to the leading AI companies, the leading AI thinkers, and they'll give you a partial answer.

19:10Well, gosh, we're going to build a lot of data centers so that the traditional trades will have an increase. And that will be a short-term increase in terms of building those facilities. And there's going to be obviously huge needs for more electrons. So I'm a big advocate that we'll never be able to power this without a small modular nuclear or other kind of decentralized power generation. But that's still going to be a relatively small number. And then you say, well, how do we make sure that whatever you're going to do, you can use AI to become better skilled at it? And everybody's kind of got soft terms because they're making up right now.

19:49But gosh, we got to have that stuff ready yesterday. and it'll be very interesting to see even this hiring cycle as we get close to graduation in May in colleges. It's going to be very telling. Yeah, it's going to be very telling.

20:05Big Technology Podcast Host:New grads get jobs. We're going to learn very quickly. I'll say a couple of things. First of all, as someone who's married to a nurse, I agree with you. It's a good career path and I always tell her at least one of us will be employed in the long term. On AI romantic relationships, I mean, you can't possibly believe that adults should not be able to enter into these relationships with AI chatbots. Is that more of a minor thing that you would – in terms of legislation, right? I don't know. I mean, obviously on minors and, you know, you – and trust me, I'm not, you know, big brother here in saying we can prohibit behavior of adults.

20:49but you know at at some point you know as a functioning society that needs to procreate that needs to have human relations i just think we ought to have a at least a discussion about this and i i just think that my friends in the community need to either not blow it off and say oh we can't well there's nothing we can do or you know at least we put a bigger warning sign you know adults are going to do what they're going to do but the the full fully informed before you go down some of these rabbit holes um you know and and the ability to have any kind of shared common truth as we think about how ai could affect you know political debate i am terrified right now of of um you know disruptions in our 26th election from foreign sources or frankly even you know the president's willingness to try to say he wants to have the feds take over our elections and we have not seen deep fakes used in a massive way so far but as we know that technology is evolving on a monthly basis and it only takes one major screw-up in a election cycle for example for people who already are losing faith to lose faith in our basic democratic processes.

22:09Big Technology Podcast Host:Right. So you're running for a fourth term, three-term senator at this point. And one of the things that I love when I speak with politicians is we can talk about polling and no one reads polls better than people like yourself. So I want to read to you a couple polls about AI's popularity or lack thereof and sort of get your read on what it could mean politically. This is from the NBC News poll. You might've seen it. A majority of registered voters, 57 % said they believe that the risks of AI outweigh the benefits and a plurality of voters view AI negatively and don't believe either Democrats or Republicans are doing a good job handling policy related to the rapidly advancing technology.

22:51Big Technology Podcast Host:I guess let's leave the reaction to Democrats and Republicans aside for a moment. What are the consequences? And we've tried to figure this out on the show, but no one better to speak about it than with you. What are the consequences for this ai industry if it continues to pull so low uh is there are they opening themselves up to put a go they're opening themselves up i think the first line will be the war against data centers you know and they are big they use a lot of power you know and that becomes almost a proxy for the overall concerns about ai at large and you know they're gonna have to go ahead and make sure that people's electric bills don't go up that the water supplies don't go up that they are better that they are better screened you know i got a county in in virginia that took their ai revenues and put it all into affordable housing so people see a tangible benefit and in virginia we're on the front line we're data center you know uh heaven in terms of the biggest state biggest data centers in the u.s we're having a major debate right now at the state level about trying to extract you know somewhere between 500 million and a billion dollars a year from the industry i would hope the industry would lean into some of these things and say we're going to yes we will voluntarily help and we will dedicate that to this economic transition you know it's happening so quickly i'm not sure we're going to get that together and i'm no longer the governor or the state official but the industry the the tech industry writ large has basically said and i say this is a pro-tech guy i'm you know and my back business background was tech i'm a big believer but the tech industry so far has generally said you know and likely so policymakers don't get us we can blow them off you know that was clearly the success of the social media platforms to never have any regulatory basis at all and then when you do have over regulation say from the eu and they'll point to the eu and say listen we don't want to be like europeans they have no innovation at all so getting it right is hard but on this one um you know when i this one if they kind of ignore and say we can blow off any regulatory or any framework we have no obligation um i think it could bite them now it's not going to disappear ai these models are out there and the fact that you know you know in China clearly is investing at an amazing rate.

25:23But even if America closed down, the models can transfer to another entity that has the compute power. So this is not going away in a certain way, not to sound old school wistful. But if there was ever a time where the world as a whole ought to be thinking through this rather than nation state competition, it is on this issue. And I absolutely do believe that we are now, whether it's full AGI or full process, we're getting close to where the magic that happens inside these models. I don't think, at least I've heard from many of – and most of the guys have said, like, we don't really understand how this is – what all is happening.

26:09This is way beyond just predictive of the next word, which was kind of the AI 101 model that people got educated on a long, long time ago, like two years ago.

26:20Big Technology Podcast Host:Okay, let me run this by you before we end this segment because you mentioned the data centers. I was stunned. So there was a series of negative polls about AI that came out recently, and I was stunned at the way people feel about data centers. So this is from Pew. I'm sure you've seen this poll. Far more Americans say data centers are mostly bad than good for the environment at 39 % to 4%, for home energy costs at 38 % to 6%, and the quality of life for those that live nearby, 30 % to 6%. I mean, goodness, that is a terrible, terrible polling numbers for these data centers. Does that mean that they're going to be places where they are just not going to be built because the opposition is so high?

27:03Big Technology Podcast Host:I saw there was an Axios report that said something like half of the data centers that are expected to be built this year are delayed. Now, some of that is part shortages. But I think community opposition is going to be a big part of it. Well, the interesting thing, too, and rightfully some of the tech companies will say, well, you actually look at the electric rates for states that have done a lot of this. They've not seen a dramatic rise. But I think they have to do more than just say, hey, we're going to cover your no increase in utility and electric rates. I think they got to put that in statute.

27:36I think they got to move more towards self-generation that is adjacent to the AI facility so it doesn't go into the full grid. And I think we have to document that. I think they have to do more on the water usage. I think they need to do a much better job on just visual screening. These are big, ugly buildings. And the thing a little bit is they are making progress. But to go into a community and sell that when the only image you have is of, say, data centers in northern Virginia that are still old school, last generation, that's a hard sell. Now, there always will be a jurisdiction that needs that additional revenue to get by.

28:24And they do generate revenue and they don't bring a lot of kids because they don't have a lot of jobs adjacent. But there needs to be a rethinking on this. And I do think the state battle that's going on in Virginia right now, I've said to the industry, you guys got to watch this because we are the mother load of data centers. And if there is some adjustment of the kind of economic deal that's going to happen in Virginia, that is going to be copied by every other state around the country. And my pitch to the AI industry is, you know, don't just fight it like mad. Be proactive and say, yes, we're going to chip in more.

29:06and we're going to chip in more and not only make sure your electric rates don't go up and they are appropriately shielded but we're going to actually put money on the table to help through this economic transition and i you know i get a lot of head nods but you know the the lack of of specific policy ideas alex is i've talked to everybody i i i can and most you know policy experts and others are observing the problem or want to do things like, I'm trying to collect data, but what the actual reskilling, retraining program looks like, we don't have a lot of good examples so far.

29:46Big Technology Podcast Host:Yeah, I'm sensing some frustration with tech companies. Yeah. I mean, I kind of get it. If you think about the big guys, they've been pounded on for years. Since most of the big guys act, the hyperscalers, Most of them actually started as either social media or you got Amazon and Microsoft and some of those. But they've kind of gotten through with kind of good lip service but no rules or regulations in place. And it's kind of like this time, I think the seriousness and back to your numbers on data centers, the fear is real and palatable. and I don't want this innovation to stop, but I do think sitting down and figuring this out in a more forward-leaning way is really essential.

30:42And that's what I'm desperately trying to do here. And this job, at least, is not allow this to be kind of divided Ds versus Rs.

30:49Big Technology Podcast Host:All right, let's take a quick break and then come back and talk a little bit more about Anthropic and the Pentagon and the state of AI in warfare. Back right after this. I've interviewed a lot of great tech founders on this show. And one surprisingly universal challenge comes up again and again, finding the right domain name. It's something I ran into myself when launching big technology. The names you want are often taken, and it's tempting just to settle and move on. But the founders I respect most don't settle on fundamentals, and your name is one of them. It should immediately signal what you actually built.

Read the full transcript

31:24Big Technology Podcast Host:That's what I appreciate about.tech domains. It just makes sense. It tells the world, your customers, your investors, and anyone Googling you that you're building technology, clean, direct, and no qualifiers. And I'm seeing more serious startups leading into it. Nothing.tech, 1x.tech, Aurora.tech, CES.tech, Pi.tech, and so many more. If you're building something tech first, don't settle. Secure your.tech domain from any registrar of your choice and make your positioning obvious from day one. Starting something new isn't just hard. It's terrifying. So much work goes into this thing that you're not entirely sure will work out.

32:05Big Technology Podcast Host:And it can be hard to make that leap of faith. When I started this podcast, I wasn't sure if anyone would listen. Now I know it was the right choice. It also helps when you have a partner like Shopify on your side to help. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10 % of all e-commerce in the U.S. From household names like Allbirds and Cotopaxi to brands just getting started. With hundreds of ready-to-use templates, Shopify helps you build a beautiful online store that matches your brand's style. Get the word out like you have a marketing team behind you.

32:36Big Technology Podcast Host:Easily create email and social campaigns wherever your customers are scrolling or strolling. It's time to turn those what-ifs into with Shopify today. Sign up for your$1 per month trial today at shopify.com slash big tech. Go to shopify.com slash big tech. That's shopify.com slash big tech. And we're back here on Big Technology Podcast with Senator Mark Warner. Senator, it's always great to speak with you. I was looking at the date of our last conversation. I can't believe it's been four years. Alex, that's my blowing. We got to make this more frequent. I didn't believe that either. So let's just pick up on the anthropic thing.

33:18Big Technology Podcast Host:The U.S. government, right? So you've definitely stated your opposition to them being labeled as a supply chain risk in the first half. The U.S. government right now is in the middle of removing Anthropic from federal agencies. There's actually a six-month phase-out that the president has ordered. So can you talk about, because you know government agencies very well, can you talk about, like, is this something that Anthropic is already being removed and you can't really see them being put back? Or is this six-month deadline something like we've seen in the past with TikTok, which could just be a six-month deadline?

33:56Big Technology Podcast Host:because we know they need anthropic that just gets pushed back again and again which is it oh alex great question you know again i go back to like you know the tiktok issue president trump in his first term and his treasury secretary was good friends with steve minister literally convinced me you know about the the national security risk around tiktok because of um you know particularly the ability to alter the message uh and more the propaganda than the data collection and then obviously president trump completely flipped on that issue and tiktok's here to stay and i still like to get more of the details on the the controls the new american owners have so i don't know the answer to that whether this is talk or they're actually being disconnected and and you know to take out what is at least at this moment in time probably the market leader and when there are actually benefits happening from the usage.

34:55And I got no particular beef for Anthropic or I'm not carrying their water here, but I am saying when you can get thrown out, what happens to Anthropic could happen to OpenAI and could happen to Amazon, it could happen to Google. You name the entity and you're going to have to go through a political litmus test. Now, I think Anthropic probably screwed up their negotiations with Department of Defense. But to put up, you know, the supply chain designation, which I don't believe has ever been designated against an American company. This is a death warrant. And I don't think any company, technology driven or not, wants to have a single individual.

35:36This is not even the president. This is Secretary Hags that making that determination without some due process. this is a big freaking deal and i just hope and this will be the you know we're and i think the jury's out on this i've been trying to to talk to all of the other tech companies to say even if you are anthropics biggest competitor you don't want this precedent set um particularly because at least with this administration as we've seen time and again you know they may love you today but that doesn't mean they're going to love you tomorrow and you know take them you know in the political figure think the marjorie taylor green if that kind of you know up and down approach is applied to all of our leading tech companies you know who's gonna you know we're gonna see where we've always had advantages in terms of our international take-up people are gonna say heck you know maybe it's better to go with the chinese model okay so you're the vice chair of the senate

36:37Big Technology Podcast Host:Intelligence Committee was or is the Pentagon making a AI-based surveillance program of American? That was one of the central contentions. I do not know the answer to that, and I should. This administration has not been forthcoming, and unless we have bipartisan oversight, we're not going to get those answers. And I think there have been concerns raised, And this is not just around the Intelligence Committee. It ought to be also the Armed Services Committee and others. And I think I've had conversations with a lot of my Republican friends. I think I'm making the case that this is a big deal, that we've got to know some of this.

37:21we might decide that that is the right choice we may even decide although i can't imagine this to be the case that we're ready to move to ai weapons without a human in the loop and it's easier to make the decision for example on an ai weapon without a human in the loop on defense you know having a missile system that would fire based upon an incoming that's the adversary you know to protect an aircraft carrier makes you know there's an argument there without a human in the loop you know on the offensive side it's it's a much more challenging argument but we ought to have those arguments rather than you know a single person in terms of pete hexath making that

38:00Big Technology Podcast Host:determination palantir recently demoed maven smart system at a conference and showed how it's selected targets um seems like palantir is actually far more consequential uh in war fighting than than claude although maybe there have been updates where claude was embedded uh that we don't know about uh i'm curious from your position because you know this better than than most uh or almost everyone how important is palantir there and uh when you think about the war on iran right now are is just is it palantir selecting the target i think a little bit about that i think palantir has been a very successful company i think andrel has been a very successful i i think the idea that you know that these new entrants are shaking up the primes in many ways you know make sense i also actually think that um you know alex carp is is thoughtful on a number of these issues i know i know i was i raised um real concerns about palantir and the six other technology companies that have taken contracts with department of homeland security and i've been extraordinarily concerned that you know dhs or ice as we saw people targeted in minnesota i I mean, literally a lady who was up for the global entry pass got denied because they had evidence that she'd shown up at a protest.

39:20Do we really want DHS or ICE making those determinations? And I've, you know, Palantir and some of the companies are saying they are not doing that. But how do we independently validate that? This is where we're entering into this realm where at some point you still need third-party objective, whether they be academic or other experts, trying to help keep both sides honest in terms of both sides, both being government and the tech companies. and i find where some of these companies are willing to participate and at least they've told me they're willing to participate through through that kind of review and oversight but it really is going to take um you know both political parties in dc to you know realize this is not a democrat republican issue this is like we're setting the ground the ground rules for stuff that that if we don't put ground rules in place could lead to a pretty spooky spooky place there's a reason why I think the overwhelming majority of science fiction movies about the future have this kind of dystopian future, because that default is actually easier than thinking this through in a rational way.

40:32Big Technology Podcast Host:On the Palantir side of the Iran war, obviously, it seems like the United States did target and hit that girl school in Iran. And it was presumably bad targeting. are you because again as the vice chair of the senate intelligence committee do you have any idea of whether well a u.s technology layer like palantir was involved there you know i think we need a full investigation and what i'm i'm a little old school that i think we ought to you know restrain making a conclusion before you get all the facts um this girl school was literally right adjacent to you know an iranian military base you know was this dia was it sent common i mean i think we need to get the facts out on on this um but we all know you know technology makes mistakes and that's where you know the rub comes with this kind of horrific um event let's get the facts before we draw conclusions but what is what is problematic is that when the president united states i can't believe he was briefed with his initial reaction that this came from the intelligence community oh this was the iranians bombing their own school and then they kind of said well like here's the material that showed it was an american you know a missile and then he said well maybe they got them as when that kind of absurdist response comes from the commander-in-chief that undermines i think not only the confidence of the american people that we're going to get the truth and it also doesn't help us in terms of how the world views us you know for all our flaws we have been generally viewed as the good guys and when we lose that designation you know that doesn't make america safer i'll just leave it at that at this point.

42:31Big Technology Podcast Host:Okay, that's a very telling answer. That's very interesting. All right, I have a couple more for you before we leave. First of all, on the AI job disruption question, you've mentioned bipartisanship a number of times. I want to put this to you. I'm going to be in DC in a couple weeks from now. And I'd love to interview one of your Republican colleagues. So I'd love to get somebody like Mike Rounds is very thoughtful on this. I got a lot of Republican friends that I think would love to sit down with you. And, you know, especially on some of the weapon issues, I think Mike Rounds is, you know, frankly, ahead of me on thinking through some of this stuff.

43:07Big Technology Podcast Host:Okay, so maybe we can, I can get in touch with your staffers after this, and we can find a way to connect with them. That'd be great. Okay, also, four years ago, we talked about an issue that's been, I think, really important to me, really important to many Americans, which is that we see, you know, whether it meets the legal definition or not, insider trading within Congress. And you are great in your statement saying we shouldn't see this anymore. But here we are four years later. This is just one example that came through my timeline this week. It looks like Josh Gottenheimer, sorry, yeah, Josh Gottenheimer, who's on the House Intelligence Committee, bought Exxon twice in early February.

43:46Big Technology Podcast Host:Now, Who knows if that's necessarily connected to the fact that the Iran war was brewing, but it doesn't look great. Why do you think it's been so difficult for the Congress to pass legislation around this? I can't answer that. I mean, I don't know. It seems like it should be a no-brainer.

44:08You know, and I'm lucky enough that I was able to put all of my stuff in a blind trust, independent – I don't know anything I own. And I think we've kind of completely gotten out of all trading. And I've moved from mostly stocks to, I think, mutual funds. But there are issues I've seen. Like I was a venture capitalist for many years before I got into this stuff. you know i've invested in companies that have have um you know took 10 to 15 years to go from startup to a public company and then you know i have a policy that if something becomes public we try to sell it but that still shows up as why is warner selling this stock right now i don't want to own the stock at this point but you know it is it is uh you should you have to disgorge even before you know in a company that you had long before you in public service there is some there is some complexity uh to this stuff and again i've been very very lucky i've got the freedom that that i was able to do very well in technology you know i'm gonna be fine regardless um i don't want to chase people out from even going in public service because if they're kind of somewhere along their career and you know they they were a founder of a single company what do they do i i don't know the full answer but all of those are are nits actually compared to we ought to have a rule that members of congress shouldn't trade stocks but here's the part alex that makes people more cynical i am right now in the middle of the final negotiations on trying to put in place certain rules around crypto you know i you know i crypto is here to stay there are some again real beneficial aspects of crypto but if we're going to have a market structure bill we've already paid past a stable coin bill you know one of the things that makes it difficult to get it finished is when the president united states says so grossly totally enriches himself through this industry and wants to say he wants to have ethics rules apply to Congress and members of the cabinet, but not to the first family.

46:30It's, you know, we ought to be passing these ethics restrictions, but boy, oh, boy, there ought to not be a carve out for them. You know, anybody whose name rhymes with grump.

46:45Big Technology Podcast Host:Okay, well, I'm with you on that. Look, Senator Ward, I can't say I'm more reassured that Congress has it under control on the the AI front, but I am really thankful that you're out there, you know, stirring it up, working across the aisle and trying to make some progress out there. I'm sure it's not easy and I appreciate you doing it. I appreciate you spending the time here again. No, Alex, we should do this more than a quadrennial basis because these issues are coming, you know, as you know, I know. And we really need, this is one of the things I would appeal, you've got a very sophisticated audience.

47:17You know, if part of your audience has got ideas or suggestions, please, you know, I'm wide open for business on what these policy notions ought to be. So you can get to me easily online. But it's going to take all of us in this, because getting it wrong, well, getting it wrong can be a major disaster. But thank you for having me on, Alex.

47:41Big Technology Podcast Host:Definitely. Yeah, it was great having you. And I'll tell you, social media, that beat took me about 10 years before I ended up in DC covering hearings and the speed at which I had to you know call and say we got to talk about AI is is much faster so thank you again and I'm sure the audience won't be shy in writing you let me know thank you Alex be well thank you all right everybody thanks for watching and we'll see you next time on big technology podcast

48:42We'll see you next time. All the newness is all on sale right now during the Livewell sale on The Drop by GNC.

From the publisher

U.S. Senator Mark Warner is a three-term Virginia senator and vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Senator Warner joins Big Technology to discuss whether Washington is prepared for the economic and societal disruptions of rapidly advancing AI. Tune in to hear why Warner believes recent college graduate unemployment could surge from 9% to 30% and why he's more frightened than reassured about Congress's ability to respond at speed. We also cover the Anthropic-Pentagon relationship, AI romantic relationships, data center opposition polling, and the ongoing battle over congressional stock trading. Hit play for a rare conversation with one of the few senators who actually understands what's at stake.

---

Enjoying Big Technology Podcast? Please rate us five stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ in your podcast app of choice.

Want a discount for Big Technology on Substack + Discord? Here’s 25% off for the first year: https://www.bigtechnology.com/subscribe?coupon=0843016b

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Big Technology Podcast

All 399 episodes
Senator Mark Warner: Nobody’s Ready for What AI Could Do To UsBig Technology Podcast · 48 min
Listen in VO