In short
Podcast Summary: Bloomberg Businessweek
Episode Title
EU Warns That Trump’s New Tariff Policy Breaks Trade Agreement
Episode Description This episode discusses the implications of President Trump's new tariff policy, which is seen as a violation of the trade agreement between the U.S. and the European Union (EU). The episode features insights from various experts on legal ramifications, trade projections, and economic impacts.
---
Key Takeaways
- Tariff Policy Overview
- Changes in Tariff Structure: The episode highlights Trump's new 10% global tariff and potential rise to 15%, which the EU claims exceeds agreed limits from their trade deal.
- Impact on EU Exports: Increased tariffs will affect EU exports like cheese and agricultural products, breaching previously established agreements.
- Legal Insights
- Supreme Court Ruling: The recent Supreme Court decision (6-3) against Trump's use of emergency powers for tariff imposition is discussed.
- Shift of Authority: The ruling suggests a shift back to Congress regarding trade authority, emphasizing limitations on presidential powers to impose tariffs without legislative approval.
- Economic Implications
- Impact on Trade: Experts predict that the new tariffs will create uncertainty in trade and could lead to a reduction in investment and hiring by businesses.
- GDP Growth Projections: Economic forecasts highlight that the new tariffs could drag down GDP growth by about 1%.
---
Featured Guests and Their Insights
Kathryn Judge (Law Professor, Columbia Law School)
- Legal Ramifications Post-Ruling:
- Emphasized the significance of the Supreme Court decision, indicating it creates more uncertainty and questions regarding presidential authority over tariffs and trade.
- Discussed the potential for future legal actions and challenges in enforcing new tariffs.
Greg Daco (Chief Economist, EY)
- Economic Outlook:
- Discussed the overall resilience of the U.S. economy despite uncertainties brought on by the tariff announcements.
- Noted that businesses are likely to face more restraint in investment due to this uncertainty, which could impact GDP and consumer spending.
Madison Muller (Health Reporter, Bloomberg News)
- Related Health News:
- Briefly covered insights on weight loss drugs and competition in pharmaceutical markets, specifically mentioning Novo Nordisk's challenges.
Ryan Vlastelica (Equities Reporter, Bloomberg News)
- Market Reactions:
- Discussed the market’s nervousness surrounding AI and tech stocks, linking broader economic fears to specific sectors experiencing sell-offs.
Lauren Rosenthal (Weather Reporter, Bloomberg News)
- Weather Update:
- Provided an overview of the recent blizzard impacting the Northeast, detailing snowfall statistics and potential upcoming weather events.
---
Discussion Points
Impact of Tariffs on International Relations
- EU officials expressed concerns regarding the lopsided nature of the trade deal and the potential for escalating trade tensions.
Future of Trade Agreements
- The conversation also touched on the need for clarity from the White House regarding future trade policies to prevent further legislative gridlock within Congress.
---
Conclusion This episode of Bloomberg Businessweek highlights the complex interplay between economic policy, legal authority, and international trade dynamics, while also touching on broader economic implications and the ongoing challenges in various sectors, including health and technology. The discussions reflect a cautious outlook on the U.S. economy amid tariff turbulence and evolving global trade relationships.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMarket Overview
0:30 to 1:55
Discussion on market trends, including AI's impact and tariffs.
“So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises.”
Supreme Court Tariff Decision Discussion
1:55 to 3:03
Exploration of the recent Supreme Court decision regarding Trump's tariffs.
“with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio.”
Legal Challenges and Presidential Authority
3:03 to 6:08
Analysis of the implications for presidential authority and future legal challenges.
“Cold Schmid, professor of law at Columbia Law School, joining us right here in New York City.”
Future of Emergency Powers and Tariffs
6:08 to 8:06
Discussion on how the ruling may affect the usage of emergency powers.
“open the door wide for this president and perhaps future presidents to do almost just about anything.”
Reimbursement and Future Legal Issues
8:06 to 12:45
Consideration of potential reimbursements and new legal cases stemming from the tariff ruling.
“But as you're pointing out, it's part of a much broader conversation where we've seen a very significant shift in both the court's jurisprudence and also presidential actions.”
Closing Thoughts with Professor Judge
12:45 to 13:58
Final thoughts on the implications of the Supreme Court decision and upcoming challenges.
“And then if new tariffs come down from the president, which he's already talked about, like Emily, that just, you know, you have to layer that on top of it all.”
AI in Business: Scaling Effectively
14:52 to 15:43
Explore how companies can effectively scale AI for better productivity.
“My one advice to them, pick areas you can scale.”
Economic Uncertainty Post-Supreme Court Ruling
15:43 to 18:23
Discuss the implications of recent tariff changes on the U.S. economy.
“Learn more at adobe.com slash do that with Acrobat.”
Impact of Tariff Changes on Growth
18:23 to 21:23
Understand how new tariffs affect GDP growth projections.
“What does it mean for growth prospects in the U.S.?”
Consumer Spending and Disposable Income Trends
21:23 to 24:02
Analyze the relationship between disposable income and consumer spending.
“Yeah, I think that's a very important component of economic activity, and we tend to forget it.”
Show all 24 chapters
Conclusion of Greg Dacco's Insights
24:02 to 24:12
Wrap-up of economic insights from Greg Dacco at the NABE conference.
“Greg Dacco, he's chief economist at EY Parthenon there at the NABE event in Washington.”
GLP-1 Drugs Market Update
26:40 to 28:00
Get the latest news on the GLP-1 drugs market and its key players.
“Listen live each weekday starting at 2 p.m.”
Novo Nordisk's Challenges in Drug Development
28:00 to 29:10
Explore the hurdles faced by Novo Nordisk in bringing new drugs to market.
“Cagrosemma, which is not yet on the market, it's sort of supposed to be Novo's answer to Lilly's ZepBound, which has been extremely popular.”
Market Dynamics in Weight Loss Drugs
29:10 to 30:52
Understand the competitive landscape of weight loss drugs and market expectations.
“So this next generation drug, Cagrocema, also has semaglutide in it.”
Innovations in Drug Delivery Systems
30:52 to 32:56
Learn about the latest advancements in drug delivery systems for weight loss treatments.
“But Eli Lilly's version is really good for a lot of people.”
Regulatory Challenges for Copycat Drugs
32:56 to 34:28
Examine the regulatory landscape affecting copycat weight loss drugs and company strategies.
“I mean, Lily's used this for insulin or for their diabetes drugs.”
Market Sentiment in Weight Loss Drug Stocks
34:28 to 35:15
Dissect the current investor sentiment surrounding weight loss drug companies.
“that boundary and been comfortable in the gray regulatory area.”
AI's Impact on Future Economies
35:15 to 36:18
Analyze the hypothetical economic predictions surrounding AI and its effects on the job market.
“More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.”
Tech Sector Reactions to AI Disruption
36:18 to 37:29
Investigate how tech stocks are responding to concerns about AI disruption in the market.
“and a labor market that has just been completely upended by AI, Carol.”
Future of AI and Software Companies
37:29 to 39:24
Consider the long-term challenges software companies face in the evolving AI landscape.
“We had on Friday, Anthropic came out with a new security tool that sent cybersecurity stocks lower.”
NVIDIA's Prospects Amid AI Investments
39:24 to 42:01
Explore NVIDIA's position as a key player in the AI-driven tech investments landscape.
“and different sectors of the market or segments of the market.”
AI Spending and Market Reactions
42:01 to 42:44
Discussion on the impact of AI investments on stock performance, particularly NVIDIA.
“We've seen more interest going into, say, memory and storage names, for example.”
Northeast Blizzard Update
45:30 to 48:51
Current updates on a significant blizzard affecting New York City and its aftermath.
“here in our Bloomberg studio in New York City, a snowy New York City.”
Snow Accumulation and Future Weather
48:51 to 50:02
Discussion on the snowfall measurements and predictions for future winter weather events.
“Somebody, we were sitting in their makeup room this morning and people are like, yeah, there's more snow coming this week.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Carol Massar:They told us to expect change. They warned us about the transition.
0:04Tim Stenovec:But honestly, they forgot the best part. This is the chapter where we finally focus on us. LifeMD delivers expert menopause and midlife care right from your home. From hormone health to holistic wellness, LifeMD helps you feel your best for the best years of your life. LifeMD, it's just getting good. Visit LifeMD.com slash goodlife. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need. Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions.
0:48Tim Stenovec:Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM.
1:32Tim Stenovec:Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily, reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus, global business, finance, and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio.
2:02Carol Massar:Stocks lower, bonds higher as renewed anxiety over the impact of artificial intelligence. Uncompany profits joined lingering tariff uncertainty in squelching risk appetites. And you've been talking about the risk tradeoff, Bitcoin tumbling below, what,$65 ,000, gold rallying. We've definitely been seeing that play out in the markets.
2:20Tim Stenovec:And the tariff story, which felt like it was baked into the trade, is now coming front and center again. We were talking just on Friday, right, about how low volatility was. And like the VIX wasn't moving, but the VIX has arisen from its slumber. It's much higher today. Are we above 20? We're above 20. We're at almost 22 right now on that fear gauge.
2:41Carol Massar:So investors are nervous. So we're focusing on all of this. We wanted to get a little bit more on kind of the legal decision of the Supreme Court decision, we should say, that we got on Friday and kind of what happens next and what legal challenges could be coming or legal actions coming off of that. So we're delighted to have back with us Catherine Judge. She is Harvey J. Cold Schmid, professor of law at Columbia Law School, joining us right here in New York City. Catherine, nice to have you here with us. Before we move forward about what might be coming in terms of legal action, I would love to get your thoughts on what we got on the Friday Supreme Court decision on President Trump's tariffs.
3:22Carol Massar:What's kind of top of mind or you think should be top of mind for the Bloomberg audience? A couple of things. First, it was a blockbuster decision. Six three, the president loses. That in itself was incredibly significant, given that the president has made this his signature economic program of a second term. Beyond that, however, what we really got was much more uncertainty and more questions than answers. We saw a fractured court, six of them getting to the same outcome, but by very different paths, a heated dissent that felt that the president really did have the authority under the claim statutory scheme to proceed as he wanted to.
3:59Carol Massar:And so part of the challenge going forward, as we've seen, the White House still wants to impose tariffs, is having to use other sources of authority that have a bunch of limitations. and the spillover effects and the full ramifications of Friday's decision are really going to take some time to work out. Right.
4:16Tim Stenovec:So when you think about the decision, does it rebalance the trade authority back to Congress? Or does it just now challenge President Trump to figure out other tools that he has to impose new forms of tariffs?
4:32Carol Massar:A little bit both, but really the core is the court recognized and the majority of court recognize tariffs are a variation of the power to tax. The power to tax is one that the Constitution clearly vests in Congress. It is such an impressive and important power that you need congressional authorization. And it really was an aggressive reading by this administration to try to use the International Economic Emergency's authority for a power act for this purpose. Again, it doesn't even mention tariffs anywhere in the act. And they like that in the sense that most of the situations, and there are many that give the president authority to impose tariffs, have a bunch of limitations.
5:17Carol Massar:They have limitations regarding how high those tariffs can be. They oftentimes also have limitations for the duration, for how long those limitations can be in place. And what President Trump most wanted was a capacity to engage in dealmaking and to say, look, I have a huge amount of discretion here. And one of the things the court did say quite clearly on Friday is that type of discretion, that type of just handing over of the power to determine what the rate should be against him and to make constant adjustments for any reasons. Congress didn't, and Congress can't hand that type of authority over to the president.
5:51Carol Massar:Professor Judge, though, it still sounds like from what you're saying, there are still some questions about how this Supreme Court views presidential authority. So other issues may come up where they may say, yeah, he has the right to do. I mean, go back to that decision about immunity from presidential actions, which seemed to just open the door wide for this president and perhaps future presidents to do almost just about anything. Now, it's a great case to invoke, in part because the majority opinion in the immunity case was written by Chief Justice Roberts, who also authored the majority opinion in Friday's case.
6:29Carol Massar:And what we saw in the immunity opinion was not just a very broad understanding of presidential immunity, but we really saw Chief Justice Roberts opining on his core understanding of how to think about the three branches of government and the incredible authority vested in Article 2 in the presidency, in the president himself. And so the opinion on Friday was in some ways a welcome reprieve. We've seen a number of decisions also this term, oftentimes not full decisions, but shadow docket and other abbreviated opinions, typically giving the president a great deal of discretion. I don't think the court is going to abandon that.
7:10Carol Massar:We have a court that is very committed, strong and broad executive power, but that doesn't mean it's going to be limitless. And the power to impose these types of tariffs, really the power to tax is one of the core powers vested in Congress. And so we do see that there's at least limitations that this court is going to be willing to impose on the degree of discretion that can be exercised by the White House, by this president. But it's something interesting to keep in mind, whether it's still on immigration issues, whether it's on upcoming elections, be it midterm or anything, you know, state issues.
7:40Carol Massar:I mean, these are things to keep in mind that might come before the Supreme Court again, when it comes to presidential authority or presidential overreach, somewhat, some might call overreach, but they could come before the Supreme Court. Certainly. And I think that's the right way of understanding this opinion. So part of the opinion was just a question of statutory interpretation. How do we understand the extent of discretion vested in this particular statute that's passed in 1977? But as you're pointing out, it's part of a much broader conversation where we've seen a very significant shift in both the court's jurisprudence and also presidential actions.
8:17Carol Massar:I mean, President Senator Reagan have taken a more expansive approach to executive authority. And during the second Trump presidency, we've seen that go to a whole new scale, right? And so we're really working out these core legal questions of what is the nature of the authority that the Constitution vests in the three different branches? And what are the nature of the limitations? What is the role of the judiciary and Supreme Court in particular in both allowing but also limiting presidential action? And so there's this broader conversation that really is at stake in the decision that we saw on Friday.
8:51Tim Stenovec:Yeah, and you talk about limiting. I'm wondering how you're thinking about this decision affecting other uses of emergency powers beyond just tariffs, because of course the act, the IEPA, did have to do with emergency uses of, I guess, presidential authority.
9:09Carol Massar:Yeah, and that's actually one of the things that's really interesting that we thought might be resolved here. One of the ways President Trump on numerous fronts has expanded the effective authority that he's been able to exercise is by invoking different states of emergency. There's a whole variety of statutory schemes that say, well, here's the normal rules of the game. But in real emergencies, we want the president to have more authority, more discretion. And so he's widely invoked a variety of emergencies. We actually learned less about that than we might have in Friday's case because it was largely resolved on other grounds.
9:43Carol Massar:So we had three justices just saying straightforward matter of statutory interpretation. You know, the statutory scheme here doesn't allow for tariffs. IEPA does not allow for tariffs. It doesn't say tariffs, so it doesn't mean tariffs. And then we had three justices, an opinion largely written by the chief justice, focusing on major questions and saying, well, look, there's a particular constitutional value that's at play here, and that is the Congress's power to tax. And so we're not going to read into what we see as otherwise ambiguous language, this broad authority that the president has invoked to impose tariffs in such a discretionary and ad hoc way.
10:24Carol Massar:And so we didn't get the type of traction we might otherwise have hoped to see regarding the use of trying to invoke emergencies, because there are a whole variety of emergencies that had been invoked because they were able to dispose of the case on other grounds. So that's one of the legal issues that in some ways remains open. I will say Friday's case does say, look, we as courts are going to play a role policing how the president uses authority that he claims is granted to him under different types of statutes. And that also would seem to potentially be an invitation for at least some policing of the ways that he has invoked emergencies.
11:04Carol Massar:Professor Judge, one of the things, though, that the nation's highest court left open is refunds. They kind of push that back. I don't know. So we're now beginning to think, what are the next legal things and issues to come when it involves presidential tariff action? So how should we be thinking about that and how that might play out? We keep hearing two, three years that this is going to take to maybe resolve. And it potentially could. I mean, this is part of what's so interesting about this is so far the government and we see different estimates, but some estimates suggest about one hundred and sixty billion dollars that the government has collected.
11:45Carol Massar:And not only that, but it's money that has come in during a time when the deficit has been growing and there have been real concerns about the deficit. And so this was kind of a way that a president who doesn't want to be a high tax president was de facto imposing taxes on the American public. And again, that's part of the reason we got the outcome we did. But it does create this real challenge now in terms of how, if at all, the money is going to get paid back. And so the Supreme Court, one joys of being the Supreme Court is they can often avoid these messy issues, right? So the dissent calls it out and the dissent says, look, this is going to be a big mess.
12:20Carol Massar:But for the majority, that doesn't resolve the legal issue. I mean, just because something's going to be messy to make right doesn't mean the president should be given authority that the president wasn't actually given by the underlying statute. Right. So they again, it's sent down to lower courts. We do have a specialized court for federal claims, and that court is now going to be charged with trying to figure out what to do in this particular case. And there's also the open question of, you know, how many others are going to come forward now that we have this opinion and demand reimbursement of money that they were paid for in a lawfully invoked basis for imposing these tariffs.
12:58Carol Massar:And then if new tariffs come down from the president, which he's already talked about, like Emily, that just, you know, you have to layer that on top of it all.
13:04Tim Stenovec:Yeah, I'm curious, Professor Judge, if that's what you're watching next year, is it more important to pay attention to what's going to be happening in the lower courts or paying attention to, you know, the headlines about all of these other new forms of tariffs that could be coming out?
13:17Carol Massar:And we only have about 40 seconds. Sorry. The answer is both, right? I mean, we know the president is not giving up on tariffs, but there are a lot of additional checks. And I think there's also just a broad appreciation now of legal uncertainty. And that's going to reduce things like this dealmaking capacity in really meaningful ways. Yeah, no, we've already seen some pushback from the European Union. So you've already started to see some actions around that. Catherine Judge, Professor Judge, thank you so much. She's Harvey J. Goldschmidt, professor of law over at Columbia University Uptown from where we are, joining us with the latest, the legal actions around that Supreme Court decision and President Trump's tariffs.
13:58Carol Massar:Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
14:05Carol Massar:They told us to expect change. They warned us about the transition. But honestly, they forgot the best part.
14:13Tim Stenovec:This is the chapter where we finally focus on us. LifeMD delivers expert menopause and midlife care right from your home. From hormone health to holistic wellness, LifeMD helps you feel your best for the best years of your life. LifeMD, it's just getting good. Visit LifeMD.com slash goodlife. Hello, hello. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, host of the podcast Smart Talks with IBM. I recently sat down with IBM's chairman and CEO, Arvind Krishna, and I asked him, how can companies use AI to its fullest potential to create smarter business? My one advice to them, pick areas you can scale. Don't pick the shiny little toys on the side.
14:58Tim Stenovec:For example? If anybody has more than 10 % of what they had for customer service 10 years ago, they're already five years behind. If anybody is not using AI to make their developers who write software 30 % more productive today, with the goal of being 70 % more productive.
15:23Carol Massar:Yeah.
15:24Tim Stenovec:Wow. So we are not asking our clients to be the first experiment on it. We say, you can leverage what we did. We are happy to bring out all our learnings, including what needs to change in the process, because the biggest change is not technology. It's getting people to accept that there's a different way to do things. To listen to the full conversation, visit ibm.com slash smarttalks.
16:14Tim Stenovec:We'll see you next time. with Acrobat. Learn more at adobe.com slash do that with Acrobat. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app or watch us live on YouTube.
16:38Carol Massar:In the meantime, a lot to coming from our Bloomberg Economics team. In fact, they put in 2026 with a bullish outlook, but not even two months into the year, many of our assumptions are being challenged. And they say, they talk about things like the Supreme Court ruling, concerns about the AI boom and all the spending around that. So we wanted to see what our next guest has to say. He's actually where Michael McKee is, surrounded by Fed officials and economists. Great to have back with us, Greg Dacco. He is chief economist at EY Parthenon, And he joins us from the 2026 National Association of Business Economics Policy Conference in Washington, D.C.
17:18Carol Massar:Greg, so glad you could catch up with us. I'm here with Emily Grafeo. Has the game changed in terms of the U.S. economy, starting with the Friday Supreme Court decision? Are all bets off?
17:35Tim Stenovec:I mean, I think in general, what we're seeing in terms of the U.S. economy is still ongoing resilience. but a lot of uncertainty as a result of the Supreme Court ruling, as well as a result of the subsequent announcements by the administration to impose the Section 122 15 % tariff, which have a maximum duration of 150 days. From a business standpoint, this is a highly uncertain environment. It's one where it's very difficult to plan how much you're going to invest, how much you're going to be hiring, and it makes it very difficult to plan in the long run. So in terms of the momentum for the overall U.S.
18:11Tim Stenovec:economy, the paradigm has not shifted that much. But we are going to be in an environment where there is likely to be more restraint in terms of investment because of this latent uncertainty when it comes to trade. What does it mean for growth prospects in the U.S.? Talk about kind of how you guys are calculating the outlook for growth now that, you know, some tariffs are being taken away, but now more are being proposed. Yeah, so if you put it simply and you think about the IEPA tariffs that were imposed, with the IEPA tariff you had an average cost of doing trade with the US that was around 17%, 16.9%.
18:52Tim Stenovec:That was the average tariff rate. With the Supreme Court ruling that the imposition of these tariffs was not legal, that brought down the average tariff rate to about 9%. Now with the subsequent re-announcement of Section 122, 15 % global tariff, you're back up to around 13.5%. So a big share of essentially this potential easing in tariff restrictions has been offset by the new announcement of these new tariffs. In terms of GDP growth, we were anticipating a drag from the IEPA tariffs of about 1.2 % of GDP, without them only about 0.6 % of GDP. Now with the new Section 122 tariffs, we're back to a drag of about 1 % on GDP growth.
19:34Tim Stenovec:So a lot of the relief has actually potentially been offset by this new announcement of new tariffs being imposed.
Read the full transcript
19:41Carol Massar:All right. One step forward, two steps back, it feels like. Greg, I do want to get to what your note you wrote and you put out specifically on this. And you do, and this is some of what you just covered. You say the Supreme Court's decision materially reduces the economic drag associated with IEPA-based tariffs. Effective tariff rates have fallen. Fiscal revenues will decline. Growth headwinds have eased. and inflation pressures moderate at the margin. However, tariff risk has not been eliminated and policy uncertainty remains elevated. You just talked about all of this and I just go to this idea of uncertainty, whether it's over AI spend, whether it's over tariffs, you know, what have you, this is never good for an economy.
20:26Tim Stenovec:Yeah, that's right. In general, business leaders across various sectors always want to know what's going to happen next. even if that means there is a tax increase on the horizon or a tariff increase on the horizon, as long as they know that there is going to be stability in the environment they're going to evolve in, they are able to plan. Without that stability, they're much less able to plan. And you were just talking, Carol, about inflation. And I think it's important to remind everyone that even if there is an easing in the average tariff rate, it's an open question as to how much of that easing in input cost will be passed on to consumers because we know a lot of businesses have been compressing their margin as a result of these tariffs to avoid passing on the cost to consumers.
21:11Tim Stenovec:So it's very realistic that even with some easing of the tariff rate, there's not going to be much relief on the price front because businesses are not necessarily going to pass on these reduced costs onto consumers. Yeah, let's talk about the consumer and what this all means for household incomes.
21:30Tim Stenovec:Yeah, I think that's a very important component of economic activity, and we tend to forget it. If you think about how the Fed is conducting monetary policy, it has two mandates. It has an inflation mandate. It has an employment mandate. But the reality is that we're forgetting about the income component of economic activity. And when you look at developments in terms of the labor market, there has been fewer job growth, less job growth. We're talking about a jobless expansion. And wage growth is under pressure. You combine the two and you have a trajectory for real disposable income growth that is gradually cooling.
22:04Tim Stenovec:And adjusted for inflation, real disposable income is below 1%. What does that mean for the average person? It means that they're less able to spend freely. And so we're seeing this deceleration in consumer spending activity as a result of this slower trajectory for income. And I think that's a key risk that we have to be increasingly focused on in a jobless environment.
22:25Carol Massar:It makes me a little nervous. It makes me think of something Emily talked about on Friday about for a while we were talking, was it last year, the year before, a lot about stagflation of slower growth, but higher prices, inflationary pressures. And, you know, even Fed's Chris Waller says the March rate call depends on the labor market. He's watching the weakness in the labor market. Should we be talking or even thinking about stagflation at this point, Greg?
22:54Tim Stenovec:I don't think it's the right time to be talking about stagflation in the sense that if you look at growth numbers, they're actually quite strong. And inflation, yes, is slightly above 2%, but it's not alarmingly so. We're not in a stagflationary environment in the purest definition of the sense where inflation would be at 5 % and growth would be zero. We are seeing an economy that's growing at 2.5%, and we are seeing inflation slightly above the 2 % target. One thing that I'm increasingly concerned, though, is this notion that not everybody is benefiting from this economy. We have an environment where a lot of the growth is productivity-driven, and we have an environment where a lot of the growth is driven by AI investment.
23:32Tim Stenovec:Not everybody benefits from these gains, and that means that the income for some may be really strong, but the income for a majority is under pressure. And that, in turn, is a key constraint in terms of economic activity. So I'm not as concerned about stagflation as I am potentially about downside risk to growth because of this slowdown in real disposable income growth.
23:53Carol Massar:Right. And I do think about the gaps. Right. And if some don't feel the benefits of that growth, their income not growing for them, it maybe doesn't feel so good. Greg, thank you so much. I know it's a busy event. So glad we could check in with you. Greg Dacco, he's chief economist at EY Parthenon there at the NABE event in Washington. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
24:20Tim Stenovec:Hello, hello. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, host of the podcast Smart Talks with IBM. I recently sat down with IBM's chairman and CEO, Arvind Krishna. and I asked him, how can companies use AI to its fullest potential to create smarter business? My one advice to them, pick areas you can scale. Don't pick the shiny little toys on the side. For example? If anybody has more than 10 % of what they had for customer service 10 years ago, they're already five years behind. if anybody is not using AI to make their developers who write software 30 % more productive today with the goal of being 70 % more productive.
25:08Carol Massar:Yeah, wow.
25:09Tim Stenovec:So we are not asking our clients to be the first experiment on it. We say, you can leverage what we did. We are happy to bring out all our learnings, including what needs to change in the process, because the biggest change is not technology. It's getting people to accept that there's a different way to do things. To listen to the full conversation, visit ibm.com slash smarttalks.
26:03Tim Stenovec:Learn more at adobe.com slash do that with Acrobat.
26:12Tim Stenovec:With Bali from iShares, you get access to both monthly income and growth potential in one simple ETF. It's the best of both worlds. Discover Bali, iShares large cap premium income active ETF. iShares, the market is yours. Visit www.iShares.com to view perspectives for investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses, and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing. Risks include principal loss and the use of derivatives, which could increase risks and volatility. Monthly income is not guaranteed. Prepare by BlackRock Investments, LLC. This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.
26:43Tim Stenovec:Listen live each weekday starting at 2 p.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say, Alexa, play Bloomberg 1130.
26:57Carol Massar:Hey, speaking of a lot of stuff going on, there's a batch of items we're watching in the GLP-1 space on this Monday. We've got hims and hers reporting after the closing bell today. And then earlier today, Nova Nordisk ADR is dropping around 17 % intraday, lowest since 2021. Some disappointing data. We're going to get into that. The news sent shares of Eli Lilly rallying, which we'll get into. They also got some news from the FDA. So let's get to a roundup on the space. Back with us as someone who tracks us, the ins and outs constantly. Bloomberg News Health reporter Madison Muller. She's here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.
27:31Carol Massar:There is a lot of stuff. But let's start with Novo, what their news was. And again, kind of another disappointing batch of news for them.
27:39Tim Stenovec:Exactly. It was another rough start to the day here for Novo, which we've seen over the last couple of weeks. You can't help but feel bad for them. I just feel like the bad news doesn't stop coming right now for Novo, a company that created the weight loss drug market over a decade ago and really pioneered this field is now really falling behind Eli Lilly. So what we saw this morning was that Novo's next generation drug, Cagrosemma, which is not yet on the market, it's sort of supposed to be Novo's answer to Lilly's ZepBound, which has been extremely popular. It's extremely effective, more effective than Novo's drugs, Ozempic and Wegovi.
28:15Tim Stenovec:So Cagrosemma was supposed to be the next thing for Novo to help but compete with ZepBound. And so they ran this head-to-head trial between ZepBound and Cagrosemma. And Cagrosemma, the expectations were that they would maybe be on par with each other. But what we saw was that Cagrosemma actually wasn't as effective as ZepBound, which sort of dashes Novo's hopes for this next generation drug.
28:35Carol Massar:Can I just ask you, why is Novo stumble after stumble? As you said, they created this category. So why do they continue to have problems? Or is that just the way drug development goes?
28:45Tim Stenovec:I mean, it's not supposed to go like this. I mean, drug makers are aware that these patent cliffs come, that more effective medicines are developed, and they're supposed to be always investing in R &D to sort of get ahead of this problem. One of the issues was that Novo has really relied on Ozempic and Wegovi, which the molecule, the active ingredient is called semaglutide. And they sort of were like, nothing's going to get better than this, and pinned their hopes on that. So this next generation drug, Cagrocema, also has semaglutide in it. And instead of really branching out and exploring other types of molecules and drugs, they've really focused their efforts and their investments on this molecule over the last few years.
29:23Tim Stenovec:And that's, you know, blinded them to kind of what else is out there. I mean, there are other dynamics at play for Novo just in terms of the U.S. health care market, some of the pressures now that they're seeing with President Donald Trump. So there's a lot of issues that are going on for them. But what we're seeing here in terms of R &D and investment and falling behind on the science is something that sort of has been brewing for a few years. So Morgan Stanley said that the data readout for Novo is a worst case scenario. Now, I know you guys talk about health and GLP-1 drugs a lot. So forgive me if this is kind of like a basic question, but people treated with the dose of this drug achieved a 20.2 % weight loss.
30:03Tim Stenovec:Like, that's not terrible, right? It's really good, actually. It's not nothing, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, it's great. It's better than Wagovi and Ozempic. The problem is that the expectations for this weight loss market have gotten so high. I mean, in order to compete with a company like Lilly that has a drug, you know, that Zetbound is so effective, so popular, you need to come up with something better. And if it's not better, it has to be really different. Maybe a pill, maybe a less frequent injection. The problem is that Kegrocema is the same weekly injection as the shots that are currently available.
30:36Tim Stenovec:and it's not much better in terms of efficacy. So why would you put all of your investments, all of your eggs in this basket for a drug that isn't any better than one that's already on the market?
30:45Carol Massar:I kept thinking that there were going to be different classes of patients who were going to have to take one drug over another just because everybody's a little bit different in how they deal with drugs. Is that really not the case? No, that is what's happening. That's totally it. Yes. Okay. Yeah. But Eli Lilly's version is really good for a lot of people.
31:00Tim Stenovec:Exactly. So there's different buckets. There are the people that maybe don't need to lose 20 % of their weight. Maybe they need to lose 15 % or less, or they want to. And those are the people for whom pills will be really good, the people that are in maintenance that have already lost their weight and just need to keep taking something to keep that weight off, pills. That's sort of the market where pills will come into play. Then you have these really effective injectable drugs like ZepBound that you can lose up to 20 % of your body, you know, more than 20 % of your body weight on. That's good for a broad swath of the population.
31:30Tim Stenovec:I mean, I think it's like 90 % of people respond well to these drugs. And then you have people on the higher end of the obesity spectrum, people who are more sick, who might have other comorbidities like liver disease or heart disease. And even though Zepan and Wagovi do address some of those other comorbidities, there are drugs that these companies are trying to develop that are even more effective. So that will help people lose 25 % plus of their weight. And that's sort of another segment of this market. And then there's a bunch of in-betweens of people that don't want to take an injection every week.
32:02Tim Stenovec:But you're right that the market is segmenting and that what we're seeing is there's just more options for patients that are better targeted to their specific needs. Shares of Eli Lilly, Madison, up about 4 % right now. That's not just because of Novo's setbacks today, though, right? Eli Lilly also has some other new drug developments coming in the future. Exactly. And on this same topic of options, what Lilly did this morning was they launched a new formulation of their drug set bound. So right now, if you have ZetBound, you can get it in a vial form, which is, you know, you take a syringe and you inject the drug yourself.
32:37Tim Stenovec:Or you have a shot, an auto-injector pen that you do a weekly shot. You have four pens and, you know, you change them out each week. What they launched today is a single pen that has a month's worth of the drug in it. And so each week you just turn a dial and you sort of control the amount of medication that you give yourself. It's not revolutionary. I mean, Lily's used this for insulin or for their diabetes drugs. So they already had this technology. But what it does do is it gives patients another option. If they prefer to use one pen instead of four, if they're conscious about waste, or it also gives them a little bit of flexibility with controlling the dose, which is something that Lilly doesn't necessarily promote, but that a lot of patients and doctors have sort of been doing themselves.
33:21Tim Stenovec:And they launched it at a$2.99 cash pay price, which is the same as what they offer their vials for in terms of cash pay. So it's an option for people that don't have insurance coverage for weight loss drugs or that just want this option and are willing to pay for it out of pocket.
33:38Carol Massar:All right. So we've got hims and hers after the closing bell. Anything that you're watching out when they report? Yeah.
33:43Tim Stenovec:I mean, this is a big day for hims, just given all of the recent news with the lawsuit with Novo Nordisk, the FDA saying that they're going to crack down more on this copycat weight loss drug market. Which they could do when there were shortages, correct? Exactly. But now they can't because there aren't shortages. Exactly. And HIMSS hasn't stopped. I mean, they launched a copycat version of Novo's new weight loss pill just a few weeks after Novo launched it. Novo came back and sued them, even though HIMSS took it off the market. So there's a lot of drama around this company and investors haven't really heard yet what the path forward looks like for their weight loss drug business.
34:16Carol Massar:Is there a path? I mean, the stock's down 52 % year to date, 37 % of the float is short. Investors are super negative. Is there a way forward when it comes to these drugs? I mean, it depends on the level of a
34:27Tim Stenovec:regulatory risk that HIMSS is comfortable with, which they've always sort of skirted or pushed that boundary and been comfortable in the gray regulatory area. But this is a little bit different. The FDA is signaling that they're serious about this. This is the most that we've seen from the FDA in terms of signaling that they're interested in taking enforcement actions. So the risk scenario has changed and we'll have to see what HIMSS thinks about that. I love this space.
34:55Carol Massar:Are we three years in? I was trying to remember. Yeah, I think three years in. This is our third, right? The third year. And so much has happened even in the last one year. It's hard to keep track. Winners, losers.
35:03Tim Stenovec:But him's really getting crushed. Yeah. He's down 70 % over the last 12 months.
35:08Carol Massar:Yeah. I mean, unbelievable. All right. Madison, thank you. Thank you. Always getting us up to speed on this. Bloomberg News, health reporter. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.
35:22Tim Stenovec:You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. So as delivery payments and software stocks right now are sliding, there was a report out this morning that has been picked up by Bloomberg News and pretty much every other media outlet. It's from Centrini Research. So they're a macro research shop. And they walk through, essentially what it is, is a hypothetical report that is coming in 2028. And so it takes place in 2028. And it's all about the, quote, weird economy that's going to come.
36:07Carol Massar:Hence the 2028 global intelligence crisis. They're saying, if this was coming out in 2028, here's what we'd be talking about. Here's what we would be talking about.
36:14Tim Stenovec:and they mention 10 % unemployment rate and a labor market that has just been completely upended by AI, Carol. It's quite bearish.
36:26Carol Massar:I do recommend it. So here we are in 2026. So now what the trick is for all of us and all of investors is to figure out how much might they be right about in terms of predictions. It's definitely playing out in the trade though. We've seen shares of DoorDash, American Express, Blackstone all slumping more than 7 % during the day. You've seen names like Uber, MasterCard, Visa, Capital One, Financial, Apollo Global, and KK are also taking some hits. Let's bring in our own Ryan Vestelica. He is Bloomberg News Equities reporter, and he's out there in our Chicago bureau. This report, Ryan, definitely having an impact on the trade today.
37:02Carol Massar:And is it just because there's nervousness in the market or because investors, you know, we've been thinking about this, this AI scare trade a lot over the last few weeks?
37:12Tim Stenovec:Hey, thanks for having me. So what I would say is that investors haven't really needed any excuse to sell stocks broadly, especially in the tech sector over the past several weeks. It seems like this report is just sort of the latest example of people being concerned about AI disruption and using really any catalyst like this, any negative headline, as an opportunity to really just sell things broadly. We had on Friday, Anthropic came out with a new security tool that sent cybersecurity stocks lower. They came out with another report today talking about ways to modernize the COBOL programming language.
37:46Tim Stenovec:You see IBM is down quite sharply today. So there's all kinds of concerns related to AI disruption, and people are just selling things en masse, very cautious, a lot of concern. What is this going to mean for growth, for profit margins, for pricing power going forward? This is a real long-term issue that people are starting to grapple with in a very more pronounced way. What do you make of the fact that investors are basically just looking for a reason to sell, though? Because that just seems like an excuse, right? Right. It must be backed by some fundamental reason that investors are finally sniffing out, right?
38:25Tim Stenovec:Well, I'm going to be watching out. We get some pretty major earnings reports this week from a lot of software companies, including Salesforce, Workday, Intuit, Snowflake, Autodesk. A lot of companies that have been sort of in the crosshairs of AI, it's going to be very interesting to see what these companies say, what the management teams say about not only what they're expecting for the rest of the year, but if they have any sort of longer term thoughts about what AI could mean for their businesses. You know, are they going to be able to introduce AI services that get their own demand? Or are they really facing this kind of existential competition from these AI labs like Anthropic, like OpenAI, like Alphabet?
39:02Tim Stenovec:that companies are just very hard to compete with is the fear.
39:07Carol Massar:So how do you take a research report like this that is looking into the future, right? Two years from now, as we know, if you just think about the last year or last two years, a lot has happened in our universe, even in the first couple of months here of 2026. Especially, you know, Ryan, you, Emily, you guys are constantly reporting on the markets and different sectors of the market or segments of the market. Everybody, when it comes to AI, I feel like there is one, though, common denominator or narrative, and that is we're early in on this. We don't really know ultimately how this impacts our world and who are ultimately the winners and losers.
39:45Tim Stenovec:Yeah, I'd absolutely agree with that. It does seem like adoption is still pretty low relative to what people are expecting for the coming years. It seems like AI technology itself, it seems like it's advancing at a pretty rapid clip. So the idea of, you know, there's certain things that it doesn't seem like AI can replace right now. Who knows what the next model is going to bring? Who knows what we can expect, you know, a couple of quarters from now, a couple of years from now, you know, and even extend out to even longer. Which is why you have these companies, really you have sort of the worst case scenario out there, is pretty bleak for them.
40:15Tim Stenovec:Just the idea that they could be completely usurped and replaced by these newer services from these AI labs. It's something that is very hard for people to grapple with. And so far, we haven't really seen estimates moving too much for the rest of 2026 or even 27 for a lot of these kinds of companies. People are still expecting growth in software revenue and earnings. But when you get further on past that, it becomes a lot harder to model. And that makes it a lot harder to determine, have these stocks come down too much? Do they still have more room to go? What does fair value look like? What is growth going to look like?
40:48Tim Stenovec:These are major questions that right now it seems like you have a huge, wide range of potential outcomes. So when you have a wide range of outcomes like that, it makes it very difficult to value stocks. And I think in the presence of that kind of uncertainty, people are just selling.
41:04Carol Massar:Yeah, and I mean, safe to say that whether it's Salesforce or Snowflake or Workday or whatever, these software companies, Emily, can come out with a good report, can be upbeat. But it doesn't mean that in a year or two years or three years from now that they could be disrupted. Like this is kind of this Netherlands we're in right now.
41:20Tim Stenovec:Well, Ryan, I feel like you've set us up really nicely to talk about NVIDIA earnings. Is there one key metric that you and your sources are watching? For NVIDIA? Yes. Yeah, that's a great question. It's sort of an interesting company to be reporting right now because on one hand, we just had all the hyperscalers. So Microsoft and Meta and Alphabet and Amazon, they really affirmed pretty aggressive CapEx spending. They continue to invest very aggressively in AI. And that really should read down to NVIDIA's benefit in a pretty pronounced way. It has obviously been really the main beneficiary of AI spending over the past several years.
41:59Tim Stenovec:Now, that trade has started to evolve a little bit. We've seen more interest going into, say, memory and storage names, for example. especially this year, companies like SanDisk and Micron and Western Digital have done extremely well. So I don't think there's a ton of concern about NVIDIA's near-term results just because we've already had these pretty aggressive spending targets laid out. But further on, there's a lot of questions now about when is all this AI spending going to start paying off for these companies? You have all this AI disruption. Just so many questions out there and where that leaves NVIDIA I think right now remains to be seen.
42:31Carol Massar:Yeah, and it's interesting to see that this stock is little changed on the year, just up about 2%, and it's down, I think, about 7 % from kind of a late October high. So we'll see what happens, right? Ryan Vlastelikov, thank you so much. Really appreciate it. Equities reporter at Bloomberg News.
42:48Tim Stenovec:Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
42:57Tim Stenovec:Hello, hello. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, host of the podcast Smart Talks with IBM. I recently sat down with IBM's chairman and CEO, Arvind Krishna, and I asked him, how can companies use AI to its fullest potential to create smarter business? My one advice to them, pick areas you can scale. Don't pick the shiny little toys on the side. For example, if anybody has more than 10 % of what they had for customer service 10 years ago, they're already five years behind. If anybody is not using AI to make their developers who write software 30 % more productive today with the goal of being 70 % more productive.
43:44Carol Massar:Yeah, wow.
43:45Tim Stenovec:So we are not asking our clients to be the first experiment on it. We say, you can leverage what we did. We are happy to bring out all our learnings, including what needs to change in the process, because the biggest change is not technology. is getting people to accept that there's a different way to do things. To listen to the full conversation, visit ibm.com slash smarttalks.
44:14Tim Stenovec:Adobe Acrobat Studio, your team's home base. Collaborate within a shared PDF space. You've got your docs, your plans, your specs. And then invite the crew to build what's next. They talk off the teamwork. Here's an update render. They think that this design Be a contender.
44:28Carol Massar:When somebody wonders. What's the next step? AI helps you finish the rest.
44:34Tim Stenovec:Bolts are tight. Now your plans are fine. Run a smoother business when you're all aligned. Do that with Acrobat. Learn more at adobe.com slash do that with Acrobat.
44:48Tim Stenovec:With Volley from iShares, you get access to both monthly income and growth potential in one simple ETF. It's the best of both worlds. discover bali iShares large cap premium income active etf iShares the market is yours visit www.iShares.com to view perspectives for investment objectives risks fees expenses and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing risks include principal loss and the use of derivatives which could increase risks and volatility monthly income is not guaranteed prepared by blackrock investments llc you're listening to the bloomberg business week daily podcast catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m eastern listen on apple carplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.
45:26Tim Stenovec:Or watch us live on YouTube.
45:29Carol Massar:Carol Masser, along with Emily Grafeo, here in our Bloomberg studio in New York City, a snowy New York City. On that, it is actually one of the most read stories on the Bloomberg. It has to do with this Northeast blizzard.
45:42Tim Stenovec:It's a powerful winter storm, buried New York City in one of its 10 snowiest days on record, Carol, and poised to rank among one of the worst blizzards in almost 50 years, over 600 ,000 or almost 600 ,000 homes and businesses lost power and more than 10 ,000 flights canceled through Tuesday.
46:01Carol Massar:I am grateful not to have lost power, but we feel for those that are. And it's not over yet. And we know the streets have to be cleaned up, certainly in this area. We want to start there because kind of want to know when this is all over, the tallies and dare we even ask, might there be more snow coming this week? Because it sounds like there might be. Let's get to it with Bloomberg News weather reporter Lauren Rosenthal joining us here in New York City. Lauren, good to have you here. So where are we right now in the storm? Because if we look outside, it does look like I'm looking out the windows.
46:30Carol Massar:It looks like things are calming down here in New York City slowly.
46:34Tim Stenovec:Yes, we could still see another few inches through early evening hours. We are definitely through the worst of it. So don't be surprised if you see some light snowflakes if you're in the northeast, but you don't need to fear another two feet dumping on you in the middle of the night like we had overnight Sunday. And how has New York City's response been so far? I did see some buses running, a couple folks saying they're taking the subways. The transit system seems to be working smoothly. Yeah, we've had reports of, you know, subways operating on local schedules. And I've seen buses where I'm based in Brooklyn with chains attached.
47:11Tim Stenovec:I think the system's operating slowly, but it is still up and running in places. Amtrak, On the other hand, canceled all service between Boston and New York's Moynihan train hall today. And there are cancellations that have cascaded into New England. So air travel has become impossible over the last day or so. We've seen thousands of flights canceled.
47:32Carol Massar:Lauren, I want to go back to what you said. The two feet, we're probably not going to get the two feet that's already dumped on us. Is that the official tally? And I know from shoveling, and I live just across from lower Manhattan, I would shovel. And then within the next hour, they're like four inches back. You know, it was unbelievable how fast it was coming down. So is it official that we're close to two feet here in and around the New York City area? Yeah, in Central Park, we're at 19.7 inches as of just about an hour ago.
48:01Tim Stenovec:If you're on Long Island, yes, totals have inched up above two feet. There are reports of up to 30 inches, you know, in some parts of the Northeast. So I'm not quite sure that we'll reach two feet in New York City proper, but it may come close. And so this is one of the 10 snowiest days on record, or have we passed that tally so far? I'm just looking at what your colleague Brian Sullivan had put out on Bloomberg News earlier this morning with some superlatives. Yeah, it's a 24-hour measurement, and when all is said and done and the measurements are verified, we'll have a better idea. We're far short of the snowiest day on record for Central Park.
48:37Tim Stenovec:But this morning we did crack the top 10 24-hour snowfalls observed in Central Park, And those records go back to the 1800s.
48:45Carol Massar:All right. It's been a pretty snowy start to 2026. Are we done yet? Somebody, we were sitting in their makeup room this morning and people are like, yeah, there's more snow coming this week. Is there more snow coming this week?
48:58Tim Stenovec:Unfortunately, it is a possibility, depending on how you feel about winter. There are chances of some sort of slippery winter mix later in the week. And some forecast models have hinted at the possibility of another nor 'easter next week. However, this far out, it's difficult to say with certainty whether we will see another significant snowstorm.
49:18Carol Massar:Well, and I guess it all depends on the weather. We know that first one that hit us, it was so cold, stayed so cold for so long, which is why that snow, which just disappeared in my neighborhood on Saturday, and is now we're full of snow once again. But we'll see whether or not the temperatures start to kick up a little bit so that maybe it doesn't stick around as much. Having said that, is it too early to say 2026 in terms of how it stacks up in terms of snowfall?
49:43Tim Stenovec:Yeah, we have a ways to go before winter is over. I think, you know, a lot of the forecasters we talk to on a regular basis have cautioned us. We may not be out of the woods until April. So we have a ways to go before we know exactly how bad it was this winter. All right, we're going to leave it there.
50:00Carol Massar:Hey, Lauren, thank you so much. Appreciate the update. Lauren Rosenthal, Bloomberg News weather reporter.
50:04Tim Stenovec:This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.
50:35Carol Massar:If you follow markets, you know the value of long-term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But in life, even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. A fire, a loss, a disruption that demands immediate attention. When that happens, what matters isn't just what you planned, it's who shows up. That's where Cincinnati Insurance comes in. For more than 75 years, they've helped individuals and businesses navigate life's toughest moments with care, expertise, and personal attention. Together with independent agents, Cincinnati Insurance focuses on relationships, not transactions.
51:13Carol Massar:Their approach is grounded in experience, follow-through, and trust built over time. Bad days happen, and when they do, you deserve an insurance partner who understands risk, respects what you've built, and is ready to help you move forward. The Cincinnati Insurance Companies. Let them make your bad day better. Find an independent agent at c-i-n-f-i-n dot com.
51:36Tim Stenovec:Deadlines shift, plans change, and sometimes you just need promo products fast. Turn to 4imprint. 4imprint has hundreds of promotional items available with 24-hour turnaround, from custom apparel and drinkware to trade show gear, writing tools, and more. And their 360-degree guarantee promises your logo will be printed with care. Your order ships fast, and it'll show up right and on time. That's the certainty of 4imprint. Check out the full 24-hour selection at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. 4certain. From coast to coast, unlock adventure at Red Lion Hotels by Sinesta, where restful sleep, friendly service, and trusted local knowledge are part of every stay.
52:17Tim Stenovec:Red Lion makes it easy to feel welcomed, comfortable, and connected wherever the road takes you. Whether you're traveling for business or pleasure, you can spend less and make more of every trip. When you sign up for Sinesta Travel Pass, you'll get their best rates instantly. Go to Sinesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sinesta Travel Pass. Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sinesta.com. Terms and conditions apply.
From the publisher
The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy.
Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.
A European Union assessment found that President Donald Trump’s new tariff policy will increase levies on some of the bloc’s exports, including cheese and some agricultural products, above the level permitted in their trade agreement.
After the US Supreme Court struck down Trump’s use of an emergency-powers law to impose his so-called reciprocal tariffs around the world, he announced a new 10% global levy, which he then threatened to increase to 15%.
The European Commission, which handles trade matters for the bloc, told lawmakers Monday that the new global tariff will be added to levies that are already in place, according to Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s trade committee. The new cumulative rate means some goods would be above the 15% ceiling the EU and US agreed to in their trade deal.
Under Trump’s new tariff program, some products including butter, plastics, textiles and chemicals would have levies above that 15% ceiling, according to people familiar with the commission’s assessment. The new global tariffs can stay in place for as many as 150 days.Commission spokesman Olof Gill declined to comment on the assessment.
The EU-US trade deal — struck last summer between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen — would impose a 15% tariff rate on most EU exports to the US while removing tariffs on many American goods heading into the bloc. The US would also continue to impose a 50% tariff on European steel and aluminum imports.
The bloc agreed to the lopsided deal in the hopes of avoiding a full-blown trade war with Washington and retaining US security backing, particularly with regards to Ukraine. European Parliament suspended legislative work on approving the EU-US accord on Monday, requesting clarity on Trump’s new trade policy.
Today's show features:
- Kathryn Judge, Harvey J. Goldschmid Professor of Law at Columbia Law School, on the next steps in the legal process following Friday’s Supreme Court ruling on President Donald Trump’s tariffs
- Greg Daco, Chief Economist at EY, on the latest global trade rumblings from the 2026 National Association of Business Economics (NABE) Policy conference
- Bloomberg News Health Reporter Madison Muller on Novo Nordisk’s next-generation obesity shot delivering less weight loss than Eli Lilly’s rival drug
- Ryan Vlastelica, discussing the week ahead for tech stock traders ahead of Nvidia’s earnings
- Bloomberg News Weather Reporter Lauren Rosenthal on the latest blizzard to hit New York City and the Northeastern US
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
