Fed Minutes Show Many Officials Said Rate Hikes May Be Needed

19 Aug 2026 · 47 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Fed minutes from the July meeting show a divided FOMC: many officials said rate tightening may be needed if inflation doesn’t fall, but most agreed to hold rates while waiting for more CPI/PPI/PCE data. The episode also links the minutes to Treasury actions (longer-dated bond buyback plans) and broader bond-market strategy amid AI-driven debt issuance and shifting interest-rate regime.

Guests

Michael McKee (Bloomberg international economics and policy correspondent at the Fed); Karen Vera Perry (Head of US iShares fixed income strategy, BlackRock); Jim Caron (Chief Investment Officer, Portfolio Solutions, Morgan Stanley Investment Management).

Key claims

Inflation outlook is “highly uncertain” with upside risks; Middle East conflict clouds inflation; some officials see AI as inflationary short-term, others see productivity offset. Treasury buybacks are framed as a signal to “put a lid” on long-term yields. BlackRock: investors add duration via ETFs (e.g., TLT, GOVZ) and consider TIPS; intermediate bonds under 10 years (GovM) to reduce volatility. Caron: the big story is a changed interest-rate cycle and higher nominal GDP; 10-year yields around ~4.6% need not derail growth.

Notable examples

IBM AI HR chatbot resolving 94% of common questions; S&P up ~32 points after minutes; 2-year yield ~4.18%, 10-year ~4.65%; BlackRock cites long muni up ~4% YTD vs long Treasuries down ~3% YTD; hyperscalers doubling debt run rate; Caron cites nominal GDP ~6.5% (Q2) and 30-year JGB yields ~4.1%.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

AI Integration in Business

0:00 to 0:30

Learn how AI is being integrated into businesses to enhance efficiency.

“So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises.”

Overview of Fed Minutes

1:57 to 3:19

An analysis of the recent Fed minutes and their implications for rates.

“The Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.”

Inflation Debate Among Fed Officials

3:19 to 4:49

Explore the differing views among Fed officials on inflation and policy.

“Inflation was first and foremost in the debate, and the committee's counting words show a lot of division.”

Market Reactions Post-Fed Meeting

4:49 to 6:00

Discuss market reactions to the Fed minutes and upcoming expectations.

“and provide policymakers and staff with more time to consider what he called strategic policy issues.”

Clarifying Fed's Future Direction

6:00 to 8:02

Insights on the Fed's future direction regarding inflation and interest rates.

“Look, sounds like basically there were people who had opinions on a whole range of things that were expressed, which Warsh said he wants to see.”

Treasury Buyback Strategy

8:02 to 9:25

Analysis of Treasury buybacks and their impact on interest rates.

“But I don't think the markets are going to have a takeaway that the Fed is going to do this or that in the way that they have after some chairman's address is there.”

Discussion with BlackRock's Karen Vera Perry

9:25 to 14:01

Karen Vera Perry shares insights on Fed minutes and market implications.

“and they might try to convince markets not to push up rates so aggressively.”

Market Reactions to Treasury and Yield Changes

14:01 to 21:33

Learn about the current market dynamics regarding treasury yields and their implications.

“And then, of course, the long end moving down quite a bit today, but still elevated levels.”

Treasury Debt Management and Market Trends

23:01 to 28:00

Discuss the implications of treasury debt management and rising yields globally.

“We like to touch in with him every quarter with everything that's coming at us.”

Rising Debt and Its Impact on Treasury Bonds

28:00 to 29:41

Learn how increased government debt issuance is affecting long-term bond yields and competition with the private sector.

“So it's somewhere, if you just look over the last 12 months, they have doubled their run rate, right?”
Show all 17 chapters

AI Investments and Market Opportunities

29:41 to 31:01

Discover how AI is unlocking cash flow and productivity across various market segments, particularly in healthcare.

“That doesn't worry you, that it gets too crowded, certainly for treasuries.”

The Productivity Gap in AI Utilization

31:01 to 33:11

Explore the disparity between increased productivity from AI and the challenges companies face in translating that into profits.

“So, you know, if it's a demand question, because demand right now is outstripping supply and this, that's what keeps the positive momentum going.”

Risks of Rising Capital Costs and Debt Markets

33:11 to 35:57

Understand the implications of rising capital costs on equity valuations and debt market strategies for companies.

“So what you're seeing is this broadening in markets that's taking place, which I think is super healthy.”

Political Risks and the Future of AI

35:57 to 38:57

Learn about how regulatory and political uncertainties affect the valuation and investment in AI technologies.

“and hyperscalers or anything, is a sudden sharp stop in economic activity.”

Market Dynamics and the AI Trade

38:57 to 41:34

Examine the concentration risks in AI investments and how companies balance their exposure amid changing market conditions.

“Aside from policy pushback, what are the other kind of key risks with just the AI trade?”

Market Insights and Economic Changes

42:53 to 49:54

Discussion on current market trends, nominal GDP, and interest rates.

“You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.”

Wall Street vs. Main Street

49:54 to 50:46

Exploration of economic impacts on consumer sentiment and job markets.

“I tend to read a lot of research that I can just get caught up on, you know, most of its economic theory, just because I think that we are in a very big changing point right now.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need. Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem? Running a business is hard enough. Don't make it harder with a dozen apps that don't talk to each other.

0:38One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. That's software overload. Odoo is the all-in-one platform that replaces them all. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR. Fully integrated, easy to use, and built to grow with your business. Thousands have already made the switch. Why not you? Try Odoo for free at O-D-O-O dot com. That's Odoo dot com.

1:28investment, and international relations. That's the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe today on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere you listen. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily, reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping today's complex economy. plus global business, finance, and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio. It is Fed Wednesday, a Fed Wednesday, August 19th, 2026. We do get the Fed minutes in just a moment, just a few seconds.

2:17This has Wall Street staged a rebound after the Treasury said it plans to boost buybacks of longer-dated bonds, a signal that the U.S. wants to lower borrowing costs after yields hit multi-decade highs. Let's head to the Federal Reserve and those latest minutes and Michael McKee. Mike. Well, Kevin Warsh was right. The minutes do suggest there was a bit of an old-fashioned family fight at the July meeting as participants argued over the outlook for inflation and monetary policy. Two lines of general agreement stand out. Many participants assessed that policy tightening would likely be necessary if inflation did not decline.

2:53Now, Now, remember, this meeting took place after the June CPI report that showed inflation had declined more than anticipated. And participants judged that their inflation outlooks were highly uncertain and that inflation risks were skewed to the upside. Many participants noted that the recent re-escalation of the conflict in the Middle East significantly clouded the inflation outlook. Inflation was first and foremost in the debate, and the committee's counting words show a lot of division. Several participants noted that price increases over the past year were broad-based, and some said underlying inflation appeared to be elevated.

3:34AI spending had also been subject to price pressures. But inflation expectations remained contained, and most participants anticipated inflation would step down over the rest of the year, as the effects of tariffs and earlier energy price increases wane. But again, what? Many participants noted the possibility that inflation might be more persistently elevated. Several noted companies had accommodated price increases by compressing margins, but they suggested if the Middle East conflict went on, they might have to raise prices, while a couple noted that business contacts judged consumers would resist those price increases.

4:17They also disagreed on the impact of AI at the moment, with some noting its inflation risks in the short run, while some also said AI productivity increases would cancel that out. In the end, most members agreed to hold rates at that meeting under the assumption that additional data before September would offer more clarity. And speaking of additional meetings, Chairman Worst suggested six scheduled meetings per year to the committee, held roughly every two months, saying that would allow more information to accumulate between meetings and provide policymakers and staff with more time to consider what he called strategic policy issues.

4:59Warsh asked for input from the committee, and no decision was reached at the meeting other than there would be no changes made this year. All right, Michael McKee there at the Federal Reserve. Mike, you're going to stay with us. I'm just looking quickly here in terms of market reaction, a little bit of a lift to the equity trade. I did see the S &P up about 22 points ahead of these Fed minutes. They're now up about 32. The NASDAQ 100 was just down a fraction of a point. Now it's up about two and a half points. And let's go on over to what we are seeing in terms of U.S. Treasury yields. And we have seen a little bit of a dip lower.

5:37So where's that two-year note right now? $4.18, five-year note with a yield of$4.35, and you've got that 10-year note with a yield of$4.65. Mike, interesting. First of all, six meetings by the FOMC would be two less than what's on the calendar currently. What's sticking out here for you following the latest Fed meeting? You were there in the room, put a question to Kevin Warsh, Fed chair, that many thought was really smart in terms of like what are you watching to figure out kind of where we go next but tell us based off of these minutes if you got any more clarity about what the fomc is thinking i think what the minute show is that the committee was much more divided than people had anticipated the counting words that they use the adjectives for how many people were on one side or another are much more in evidence in this set of minutes than I think I've ever seen, especially the words some and several.

6:39Look, sounds like basically there were people who had opinions on a whole range of things that were expressed, which Warsh said he wants to see. But it didn't suggest at this point that they have any kind of unified view about what's going to happen in the future with inflation. They did say it's very uncertain at this time. My thought was that three weeks ago, when this meeting took place, they might have still been leaning towards the idea of a September rate cut. Now we've seen some changes to that view since then in the markets. But this was a somewhat hawkish group of people who were concerned about inflation and the fact that they didn't know what was going to happen.

7:20So, Mike, we're likely to hear from the Fed again in just a week from now at Jackson Hole. Now that we've looked through the minutes and we have maybe a little bit more of an understanding of how they're thinking about inflationary pressures and the health of the economy, does it inform us at all about what we're going to hear next week? I don't really think so because of the stance that Kevin Warsh has taken about not giving any kind of forward guidance. I suspect that he might offer a little bit more in terms of what their framework for monetary policy is, what's their reaction function. And he may outline more about what he's trying to do with his task forces and reforms at the Fed.

8:01And then finally, maybe some more comment on how many meetings they might have. But I don't think the markets are going to have a takeaway that the Fed is going to do this or that in the way that they have after some chairman's address is there. What's not answered for you, Mike, in these minutes? Like we always get more detail, right, of what was going on at the meeting. But what is really missing here for you still? Well, I don't think we get a real clear view of what's going to happen ahead. There was general agreement that if inflation doesn't come down, they might have to raise rates. But there was also general agreement that the inflation picture was extremely cloudy.

8:38They said in the minutes that they were hoping the fact that they would have two CPI reports, two PPI reports, two PCE reports before the next meeting would give them more clarity. And I think that's still where we are today. And, Mike, just your reaction today, pivoting away from the FOMC minutes, but on this news of the Treasury and debt buybacks. It's all kind of related. But I'm just curious, Mike, you know, the Treasury does this. But the size and the timing of it is super interesting. Yeah, the size is very small compared to the size of the overall Treasury market, and it isn't going to have much of an impact in and of itself.

9:21It's more of a signal from the Treasury that they don't like the direction interest rates have been going in, and they might try to convince markets not to push up rates so aggressively. Whether that works or not, we'll have to see. A lot of short covering today, according to the bond strategists I've talked to. But what we're seeing is the Treasury using one of its tools, and that is the maturity curve, to try to control what might happen. Buying more at the short end and buying back fewer at the long end gives some more, buying back more at the long end, gives more money into the system so that people can buy more bonds.

10:00But the maturity shift does put some risk into what they're doing. What's interesting is also Scott Bessent was very critical of Janet Yellen for doing the same thing when she was Treasury Secretary, and now he finds himself doing it. And I guess the kind of the bottom line here for the Fed is that if you want to bring down lower rates, one good way to do that would be to raise short rates, because then that gives the markets more credibility for the Fed on inflation, and that could bring down the long end. So do as I do, not as I say? Is that what that is? I don't know. I'm not sure. Well, you can imagine Kevin Warsh going to the White House and saying, look, I raised rates, but mortgage rates are coming down because the 10 years lower.

10:44So I gave you what you wanted in a different way. Yeah, let's be happy about this. Hey, Mike McKee, thank you so much. All over this, obviously, the Fed Minutes and then headed off to Jackson Hole soon. Mike, thank you so much. Michael McKee, he's Bloomberg TV and radio international economics and policy correspondent. He's there at the Federal Reserve in D.C. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.

11:33to answer and code to roll out quicker. Join over 10 million business and enterprise users worldwide already using ChatGPT for work. Download the ChatGPT desktop app or contact sales to learn more. At Radiolab, we love nothing more than nerding out about science, neuroscience, chemistry. But we do also like to get into other kinds of stories, stories about policing or politics, country music, hockey, sex, of bugs. Regardless of whether we're looking at science or not science, we bring a rigorous curiosity to get you the answers. And hopefully make you see the world anew. Radiolab, adventures on the edge of what we think we know.

12:15Wherever you get your podcasts.

12:32say, we want to stay on this, and we're going to even dig deeper into the entire macro. We're going to do that in the four o 'clock hour with Jim Caron. He's CIO at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, again, in our 4 p.m. hour. But we want to know more right now. Mike's setting us up so well. Joining us once again is Karen Vera Perry. She's head of US iShares fixed income strategy over at BlackRock. Joining us from San Francisco, massive firm. You know it so well. They've got $15.3 trillion in assets under management. That's as of the end of the second quarter. World's largest asset manager.

13:04Hey, good to have you here with us. Excuse me, the FOMC minutes. Anything of note for you? I think it was really interesting that the whole market is looking at the minutes today, and they're trying to decide. We had three dissenters last meeting. What was the discussion actually like? What is the Fed really thinking? So for me, when I looked at the summary real quick, I was just thinking we're probably they're probably leaning closer to actually hiking rates. And there was a lot of uncertainty to note in the minutes. And so I think that really opens up the path of rates in different directions.

13:39And I think that's why we're seeing so much scrutiny of every little little piece of language is we're just seeing how the Fed's going to react to the cycle. And Karen, what do you make of the Treasury moves today? Because it's interesting, you know, the minutes suggesting maybe more hawkish Fed than we had previously thought. But the two-year yield actually moved down a little bit. And then, of course, the long end moving down quite a bit today, but still elevated levels. What's really driving the yield curve right now? I think your point on the two-year is quite interesting because I saw the Fed funds futures and they didn't really move much after the minutes.

14:16I know we've only had a few minutes to digest. But that two-year point is really driven on where we think the Fed's going to go. So if we're on hold for a little while, we could see some more steadiness there. But then if it backs off a little bit, we could see it go down. And then I think the actions today with the Treasury Buyback Program are really a signal to the market that we're trying to put a lid on long-term interest rates. And then we saw the 20-year Treasury auction came out earlier today,$16 billion printed. and I think that we saw some strong metrics there on that 20-year auction, keeping it around 5.2 on the coupon.

14:52So I think that was their signal to the market saying that we're not going to just let this run. We're going to put a cap on rates and we're going to do that with our buyback. Well, have they talked to the hyperscalers who keep issuing and tapping the credit markets? We had a great story on Monday, Karen, that just got into this whole idea of the constant issuance from all of these big tech firms, tapping the debt markets and how that might be crowding out potentially some of the treasury trade. What is your position on that? We've just seen a lot of, to your point, crowding out where there's a lot of people looking for yield, looking to turn out some duration.

15:27They could do it with some of these hyperscaler, long-duration corporate bonds as opposed to going with treasuries. We've actually seen this quarter $6 billion coming into TLT. That's our 20-plus treasury ETF. So when we've seen levels hit over 5 % in the long bonds, we do see some people coming in and buying them via the ETFs. We've seen a couple other trades in our STRIPS ETF, GOVZ, and even one of our 2056 I bonds, some pretty big trades coming in when it hits that levels. And then more broadly with adding duration of portfolios, we think long-term munis is another interesting way to do it.

16:05and that's really performed well this year with long munis up 4 % year-to-date, where we've seen long treasuries are down 3 % year-to-date on a total return. So I think there's some ways to add duration of portfolios very thoughtfully in this market as we're seeing yields come back up. Go back to flows, because we always love talking with you about this. You said, I mean, you guys have had a pretty active month, right, so far in August in terms of money going into, in particular, longer-term bond funds? Yeah, usually it's pretty sleepy in August sometimes with people on vacation. But I think this month, people are paying attention.

16:40And whenever we see yields tick up, flows coming in, as I mentioned to TLT, overall government bond ETFs have seen almost$90 billion year to date. So I think a lot of people are using ETFs to tap those part of the treasury market. Other interesting things that people are doing across the curve, we're just seeing a lot of interest in inflation-linked bonds. That's been a big topic this month. You can get real yields of 3 % plus some inflation protection. So we've had probably an uptick in inquiries about tips this month because of that. So you mentioned, you know, the 5 % level. Do you think that that level holds?

17:19That there is a moment, you know, where treasuries do become attractive and buyers step in? Because a lot of people this morning were talking about bond vigilantes, you know, and the push and pull there with the government. But do you think that there is, you know, demand here for yields at this level? I think so. I think a lot of liability driven accounts, this helps them immunize some of their liabilities. I think there's a group of people who do, who do think rates are going to come back down or tick back down. But I think we're in an environment where there's a lot of uncertainty with inflation, and that's going to call for at least the term premium being positive around these levels for a little while.

18:00So, huh, what's the risk here? I just feel like, Karen, there's just still a fair amount of uncertainty. And I just feel like in terms of indications of what the Fed does, you know, whether it hikes rates, cuts rates, you know, now we're having part of the narrative, an expectation that maybe it's later next year that we're going to see rates cut. But there's still so much that comes out of the White House in terms of tariffs, more tariffs, less tariffs, backing off, going forward, a war that sends energy prices higher. Help me understand what matters you think most to what we see in terms of yields, whether it, you know, and I'm curious what the tops are that you're watching for something like the 10-year.

18:41Yeah, I think for a lot of people, don't get deterred by a lot of the geopolitical headlines and even specialized events like today with the buyback program announcement. I think right now in this market, yield is your best friend that buys you as we see price volatility and rates and treasuries look to add income to your portfolio. So we're helping people look, you know, beyond government bonds and a corporate's even going global. And if you can add five to 6 % income to portfolios, you can buffer some of these treasury movements that are happening, or you can just not play this game. We're seeing a lot of interest in intermediate bonds, people sticking to under 10 years.

19:19We We actually launched a one to 10 year treasury ETF earlier this year. The ticker is GovM, so G-O-V-M. And we're seeing people just cutting out the long end of their portfolios. I don't want all the volatility. I can still get 90 % of the yield pickup by going to more intermediate bonds. And so that's really what we would coach people on. Think about the long term strategy. There's going to be some volatility and fixed income. But add some yield. That's going to buffer out some of these price movements we're seeing. Hey, what about in credit? because a lot of these hyperscalers are issuing super long dated debt.

19:50We're talking 50, even I've seen a hundred year debt. Is that attractive to clients right now? I think there's definitely some clients who are willing to buy out that far because they do want to lock in yields for a certain amount of time. And plus some of them want access to the names, They feel very comfortable with the underlying issuers in the market. But we would just say stay diversified. Don't put all your eggs in one basket. And we have seen credit spreads historically are still at very tight levels on IG credit. So we're seeing people move away from IG credit to some securitized sectors to add income.

20:31And so that's been a trend that we're seeing is people aren't just going to credit. They're looking for maybe other sources of income outside. All right, just 30 seconds. So, you know, we've all been coming in on Monday and concerned about the move up that we've seen in global bond yields. And there's concerns, whether it's the war, higher oil prices, governments spending more than they're bringing in. You're not concerned about that, that that overall pushes rates higher, and in particular in the U.S. And again, just got about 25 seconds here. Yeah, I think it's definitely something we're watching.

21:01We don't want to be overexposed to any single risk factor. And so I think that there's definitely an argument for staying really short. And if that's what you want to do, we've definitely seen a lot of money coming into ultra short exposures, like our ESCO ETF just hit$100 billion, as people are just hiding in cash and avoiding all the volatility. Perfect guest to have on what we call a Fed Day, Fed Minutes Day. Karen, thanks so much. Be well, be well. Karen Farrah Perry, she's head of USI Shares Fixed Income Strategy over at BlackRock, joining us from San Francisco. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.

22:04Join over 10 million business and enterprise users worldwide already using ChatGPT for work. Download the ChatGPT desktop app or contact sales to learn more. Hi, I'm Tom Keen, inviting you to join me for the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. It's about making you smarter every business day. I'm Paul Sweeney. We bring you complete coverage of stocks, bonds, commodities, even crypto. All the information you need to excel in the markets. And I'm Alexis Christophorus. Stofferis, listen to us for essential conversations with the smartest names in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

22:39That's the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe today on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere you listen. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Or watch us live on YouTube. Let's get to it. Jim Caron, perfect voice. We like to touch in with him every quarter with everything that's coming at us. We're a little bit, we look at what's happened, but we also look ahead in a big way. Jim, of course, is Chief Investment Officer of Portfolio Solutions at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, joining us here for the four o 'clock hour.

23:18So thank you, thank you. Good afternoon. Thank you for having me on your show. It's been a little crazy of a day, so you are going to save us. We kicked off with the news this morning coming out of the Treasury. Significant in your view? Yeah, look, it's significant. But the first thing we have to do is take a step back and breathe a little bit and really put this into context. So the Treasury has a long tradition of managing the refinancing risk and the rollover risk of government bonds. That's their job. They do that by managing the average duration of the overall debt. That debt has ranged between, call it five and six years, plus or minus, maybe a month or so.

24:01We measure this in terms of months. So I'm going to talk in terms of months, not years here. So right now, today, the current level, duration level, the average maturity, let's call that, the duration, is 71 months. The high in that was about 75 months back in 2023. The 20-year average of the duration of treasury debt is 65 months. So this is high. So today we are at a high level of duration of treasury debt in markets. Does it make sense to bring it down to say maybe the average over time? Sure. This is just debt management 101. So this isn't something that I would say is extraordinary. We are still in that five to six year duration range of treasury debt.

24:54We're at the high end of that right now, five years and 11 months, right? Maybe we bring it down to five years and eight months or five years and nine months or something like that. I don't know if they have a target in mind, but I don't see this as overly historically significant. Hmm. It's interesting because just as you're talking, we got a headline out of the Bloomberg Terminal, which is, I mean, very relevant. U.S. total public debt outstanding exceeds a record 40 trillion. I mean, this is like, it's something that I feel like traders kind of forget about. And the debt pile in the U.S., it kind of lingers in the background.

25:37But it's come front and center this week and kind of this whole summer as these yields have been really moving up. Yeah. So let's put that into context on a global scale as well, right? Because you're right. You're absolutely right. Yields are moving higher. I think that's the trend. So if I look at, let's just look at the 30-year long bond because that's what everybody's talking about today. If I think about 30-year Japan, 30-year JGB yields, those have risen 62 basis points year to date. If I think about Germany, German bund yields have risen about 45 basis points year to date. Treasury 30-year bonds have risen 40 basis points year to date.

26:15So very much in line with Germany, less than Japan. The significance here is that we are at a secular shift in the interest rate cycle, where we had gone down in rates for 40 years from 1981 to 2021. We started to move higher in yields, right, from 2022 onwards. And now what the world has lost is the bond yield anchor, which is Japan. Japanese yields were typically very low and very stable for a very long time. Now those yields are moving up. 30-year JGB yields are about 4.1%. That's higher than 30-year German yields. You have to kind of go back in time for this. So the market is losing some of its anchor towards lower yields.

Read the full transcript

27:00So the question now for treasuries, not just the U.S. treasury, but treasuries and treasury departments, the equivalents thereof in the U.K., in Germany, in Japan, and everywhere else, is to try their best to try to manage that movement higher in yields so that it's not overly destructive. So this is just the start. You're going to see more of this. What about one of the things that really we came back over the weekend on Monday and just the impact of the AI spend and build and your hyperscalers, your big tech companies, you know, continuing to, and they're still going in terms of tapping the debt markets and how that's crowding out treasuries.

27:41I think, I can't remember who we spoke to said, We're not necessarily seeing a lot of selling, certainly here in the U.S. by institutional investors, but they're not buying. Yeah, Carol, that's a fantastic question, and I'm glad you brought that up. And you mentioned the magic word, which is crowding out, right? We have to think about that concept. So what we know about the hyperscalers right now is that they are tapping the debt markets in massive size, right? They are issuing a lot of debt. So it's somewhere, if you just look over the last 12 months, they have doubled their run rate, right? There's projections that the debt is going to be like$1.7 trillion overall in the next 12.

28:18I mean, these are insane amounts of debt being raised. Does that put pressure on long-term bond yields moving higher? You betcha it does. And that's what's going on. So if you're the Treasury, right? And this is the way the Treasury thinks about this. It's a zero-sum game. If the duration of Treasury bonds are longer, they're going to compete for capital raises with the private sector, with the more productive private sector, which is AI, CapEx, data centers, and all that other stuff. So that crowding out effect is what exactly what you brought up, which is exactly what the Treasury and I think the government, the Trump administration is trying to figure out and say, look, the government, which tends to issue a lot of debt, is less productive than the private sector.

29:04So why should we compete with the, you know, AI hyperscale arrays? Why don't we pull back a little bit? Right. Let these companies go out there and issue debt and raise the GDP and employ people and do all kinds of things on the private sector side. So more of a supply side push, then have the government do this, right, and compete for those, you know, compete for those long term bond yields. So I think this is a really important nuanced point that I haven't really heard spoken about enough in terms of how this is a positive, I think, for the markets. Ah, a positive for the markets. I find that really fascinating.

29:40And even as we continue to see issuance, we've got 30 seconds, we're going to come back. That doesn't worry you, that it gets too crowded, certainly for treasuries. The thing, you know, it doesn't worry me in terms of the debt markets. What worries me is if there's a sharp slowdown and all that debt becomes somewhat burdensome going forward, but we're not there yet. We're not there yet. We were talking about AI, and it does seem like everyone, we talk with our Mandeep Singh of Bloomberg Intelligence, the investments, looking at the balance sheets, looking at the fundamentals, the spend is still there, the backlog is still there, Jim.

30:15How do you guys, what do you think is the smart conversation to have around AI right now? So the way that we parse this out is we try to find areas in the markets where technology, technological innovation, potentially use of AI is actually unlocking a lot of free cash flow and a lot of operating leverage. And that's what we screen for. And we end up creating baskets of equities to express these views. So, look, today you went through a run rate of some health care sector related companies that are doing super well. Right. So it's no surprise that in the earnings reports for many of these companies this past quarter, that they're using a lot of AI to unlock a lot of operating leverage in their companies.

31:01So we think that there is so much of that, whether it's from the small caps and the mid-cap sectors, where many of these segments of the markets can get a significant advantage just from adding higher levels of productivity very cheaply just by using AI. So, you know, if it's a demand question, because demand right now is outstripping supply and this, that's what keeps the positive momentum going. I don't see this demand falling away anytime soon. We talk a lot. So don't fight the trade. Don't fight it. Okay. No, I mean, that's kind of what I wanted to ask because I feel like all earnings season, the big question was like, when are we going to see the revenue?

31:40Like there's just been so much spending. I mean, I'm really focused on credit, but even on the equity side, like, Like, where are we in that cycle? Are you demanding as an investor that we see that profit? Yeah, so we are at the infancy, right? So if we record this conversation, come back and look at it a year from now, two years from now, three years from now, we'll be going like, oh my gosh, what did we miss, right? So right now, I think there's what we call a productivity gap. So if you ask individual people working at a company, do you use AI? Absolutely. Are you more productive? Yes, I'm 25 % more productive.

32:16Just put a number on it. The CEO says, but I'm not 25 % more profitable. So how do we convert this new technology? And by new, I mean like this year, like several months ago, into higher margins. And companies, corporations are figuring this out, but they have a lot of legacy systems, right? So you just can't like unplug one thing and plug something else in and expect it to work. But I can tell you that every day, every week, every month, we're incorporating more and more of this technology. And it is becoming a large source of higher productivity for us. So where does it end? How far does it go?

32:55When do we start to see the return on investment? It's going to be lumpy. And I think some of the bigger spenders that are out there that are really investing, their whole goal is just fear of missing out. They don't want to miss the wave. But the beneficiaries of that is the broader economy. So what you're seeing is this broadening in markets that's taking place, which I think is super healthy. You know, one of the things on this, you know, and I was thinking about Alphabet did an issuance, the Australian, its first Australian bond offering. And it resulted in the company's highest ever yield on a note.

33:30I think they paid just under 7%. It just continues. But we had a great story on the Bloomberg buyer, Sebastian Boyd. And he said the rising cost of capital to fund the AI race is making U.S. equity valuations increasingly untenable. The biggest risk, though, isn't higher borrowing costs. The industry's relatively low debt means companies are more vulnerable to equity funding costs that are set to rise along with financing needs. How does that factor in? It's debt capital markets, right? So this is the issue. Is your equity cost of capital more expensive than your debt cost of capital? If it is, then you issue bonds, right?

34:03So if many of these companies have strong balance sheets, and they can issue a lot more without risking a credit downgrade, this is your space, this is what we look at with these strong balance sheets, which means that their debt cost of capital raise is a lot more cost effective for them. So guess what? That's exactly what they're doing. This is what you're supposed to be doing. At some point, it balances out. We're just, again, we just started this. This debt surge has just started in the last several months. And I don't think we're at the tipping point. These balance sheets are big and there's lots of cash on them.

34:40But people talk about exposure limits, particularly when it's not just Alphabet coming and issuing corporate bonds. It's like them doing that and then Alphabet also maybe backstopping some other private credit deal with AI. There's a lot of exposure in a portfolio to a single name. when do you hit those limits? I mean, is that something that does exist at Morgan Stanley, where eventually you do have to say, hey, we already have this much exposure to this company. They want to issue more. We can't participate. Exactly. So how you count the debt really matters. And I think, Emily, you're bringing up a really good point in terms of there's a lot of other debt outside of just the traditional public markets.

35:23There's private market debt. There's a lot of things that are out there that are, you know, weighing on this. And, you know, this is what we do as investment managers. We look at this and we try to understand, is the, you know, is the level of debt relative to the return, is the risk right? Do we want, am I getting paid enough to take this risk? So, you know, it's a market like anything else, but, you know, what's the point, like, what's the level? That's really hard to say. I'd say that the biggest risk for in any cycle, it's not just particular, it's not specific to this particular thing with AI and hyperscalers or anything, is a sudden sharp stop in economic activity.

36:03That's usually what brings these things down. It could be an oil event. It could be a geopolitical event. It could be, you know. But we've had that oil event. Yes. We've had those, you know, but, you know, it could be, it could be a currency, you know, who knows what it is. I mean, is there's always something lurking that's out there that can create this sudden stop and can make people revalue this debt. One of the things that always seems to come up, and we've had this with various CEOs and folks who talk with the C-suite pretty regularly, is that they need certainty from the White House and the continued involvement.

36:40Even today, the president, of course, meeting with folks in the crypto industry, but he said, next week, we're going to meet with the AI people. The AI industry's top people will attend the meeting. We want to regulate, but we want to have regulation where they can continue to lead. It's early. We'll see what happens. But we've seen a global pushback when it comes to social media and the platforms. We've seen it in France. We've seen it in Europe. We've got Meta on trial. We'll see how this one plays out. And people think that there's going to be more to come. And even the possibility that these types of companies, the way they do business, is what's being now at risk.

37:17Yeah. So let's combine the last question with this right here, because this is critically important. So let's think about data centers. Let's think about energy. Let's think about all of these various things, all of the policy factors. And we know that there's some pushback against data centers and everything else. If we just think mathematically through a textbook and say linearly, okay, look, this is a really good technology. We should use it. We should invest in it. And it's great. The real world answer is like, but my utility costs are going higher. Voters are getting mad. Politicians are reacting to that.

37:50They're responding. So when we start to think about the valuation of debt, whether it's in the private markets or it's in the public markets, we always have to put in a factor for what's the political risk. What if somebody else gets elected or what if there's a new policy change? How do we factor that in? And it's almost impossible to do that because you can't anticipate policy changes very easily. But you could put something in and say, well, how much of a cushion do I have if that were to happen? Let me look at the longer-term contracts. How do the cash flows get negotiated over time? If it's utilities, it could be utility raises.

38:28Is that scheduled over a period of time? And those are things that we have to incorporate. So to the extent that there's volatility around policy on this, I think that's going to stay with us. but we have to build it into the price and it just means that it's a higher risk premium for us to factor in. There's no real really other way to answer that because there's no specific numbers around it. Right. But we have to build that in. You have to say this could happen and things could be changing. Aside from policy pushback, what are the other kind of key risks with just the AI trade? Is it that there's too many names and like, Or is it like the technology might not prove to be as reliable as we expect right now?

39:14I have to say, the enthusiasm and the coziness, and we talk about the circular finance, it just makes me a little nervous, right? Yeah. So I'd say the concentration risk is something that we hear quite a bit, right? There's a lot of money funneling into a very, very narrow sector, and that usually doesn't end well, right, historically. But part of this, too, is that there are going to be winners and losers in this, right? So there are companies that are making a massive spend, and they might not get the return on investment, the ROI, that they were hoping to get. Now, the question is, is this a small company that's very narrowly focused, and if they lose this, they lose everything?

39:54Or is this like a very large, multi-franchise company that says, well, if I lose that, I can write that off. It's not going to be a great year for my stocks, but I can recover from it. Right. So the answer to a lot of this is how these companies are diversifying their risk. But as time goes on, what history would suggest is that people get more and more and more concentrated. And then there's a sudden break. There's a sudden stop. And something changes. And, yeah, there's going to be fallout from this. There's no question, right? Timing that is going to be really hard. Is that 10 % from now? Is that 20 % from now?

40:29Is that tomorrow? We don't know what that is. So, you know, as investors, we just have to make sure that we understand the risk and that we're being compensated for the risk as best we can. And that's where the investment selection, you know, the quantitative analysis, the optimization of portfolios, the correlation risk, all these things matter quite a bit in terms of how you construct your portfolio. Yeah, and time will tell. I mean, I think it's hard not to feel sometimes it's a little bit of a FOMO feel, right, of just chasing this as the build continues. I do feel like earnings are getting a little bit more discerning when it comes to that.

41:07And certainly when we have some really big-name IPOs, whether it's Anthropic or OpenAI, we are increasingly getting a window into their financials. So we're not going to let you go yet. And I want to kind of look forward. We still have a few months left in the year. I feel like there's going to potentially be a lot coming at us. whether it's politics, whether it's more out of the White House, others earning cycles. And I am really curious about kind of what the Fed's going to do. So we're going to continue. Jim Caron's going to stay with us, chief investment officer of Portfolio Solutions at Morgan Stanley Investment Management.

41:40Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.

41:47Quick one before you jump back in. You're listening for ways to help teams move faster, make sharper decisions, and turn scattered context into work they can use. ChatGPT for Business can help. ChatGPT for Business gives teams a shared workspace with admin controls, permissions, and access to work and codecs in ChatGPT. This means your business can move from question to answer and code to rollout quicker. Join over 10 million business and enterprise users worldwide already using ChatGPT for Work. Download the ChatGPT desktop app or contact sales to learn more. Hi, I'm Tom Keen, inviting you to join me for the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

42:27It's about making you smarter every business day. I'm Paul Sweeney. We bring you complete coverage of stocks, bonds, commodities, even crypto. All the information you need to excel in the markets. And I'm Alexis Christophorus. Listen to us for essential conversations with the smartest names in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. That's the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe today on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere you listen. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

43:04Or watch us live on YouTube. I want to get back to Jim Caron, Chief Investment Officer of Portfolio Solutions at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. We were just saying that we like when we can just kind of slow down and talk about some bigger stories. Jim, I am curious, like, what you find interesting in this market cycle. Like, I'll take a look at the most read stories in the Bloomberg right now. And you have SpaceX attempting to acquire an AI coding startup. And there's a story about that. There's the Besson story about the dead buybacks, FedMinutes, Moderna. You have stuff about what's going on in the Middle East.

43:40I do wonder when you look at this, there's a lot that we always say is coming at everybody. What do you find interesting, though, right now? The most interesting thing going on right now is a change in the interest rate cycle. So we are leaving a regime where we've gone down steadily in rates. I highlight the period 1981 to 2021. To now, it's pretty much ingrained that we're probably not going to resume that. What that catalyzes is higher nominal growth. We are in a higher nominal GDP world, right? So nominal GDP is real GDP plus inflation, right? And where we were for many, many years, we had about 1.8 % growth and about 1.8 % inflation.

44:23We can never get above two. So nominal GDP was like 3.5 % to 4%. Nominal GDP right now as of second quarter is 6.5%. That's a whopping number. What that does, when you have higher nominal growth, it's good for cash flows, it's good for earnings, and it's good for earnings growth rates. So what are we seeing this year? We're seeing an earnings boom that's taking place. It's not an accident. You have higher nominal GDP. That's what you're going to get. So what we're effectively doing now is when we think about balancing a portfolio is we're thinking about what role, how do I manage my fixed income risk relative to my equity risk?

45:04Equities in a higher nominal growth world, that's a tailwind. In a higher nominal growth world for bonds, it's a headwind, right? Because inflation and interest rates are going up in that environment. So if we think about the level of yields today in 10-year treasuries, it's about 4.64 % right now as we speak. Typically, historically, nominal GDP is the speed limit for 10-year yields, meaning that 10-year yields and nominal GDP historically tend to sit right on top of each other. Now, I'm not suggesting that 10-year treasury yields are going to 6.5%. What I am suggesting is that a 4.6%, 4.7 % 10-year yield is not something that's going to contract the economy.

45:45Ten-year yields can gradually move higher as long as it's slow and as long as it's managed. They can move higher without hurting the markets. The number one question we get is, at what level in the 10-year yield does it derail everything? You can't answer that question. You have to know where nominal growth is. In a 6.5 % nominal world, it's a higher number. In a 4 % nominal world, it's a lower number. So then the question is, though, what is out there to derail growth? And I think that's what we have to ask. And I think this is some of what we're trying to figure out. I understand AI making us more productive, but if it puts people out of work, what's the economic impact of that?

46:23So what do you see as the risks to growth that are out there? So whenever we get to these points where there becomes a lot of overinvestment in certain areas, and if there's a lot of hiring in certain segments of the markets, that could cause the unemployment rate to spike quite a bit. That to me is something, because consumption is 70 % of GDP. If you lose the consumer, if you lose consumption. So could that happen if there's an inflation shock, if there's an energy shock, people save their money instead of spending their money? Those things are much more geopolitical at this point. From an economic fundamental standpoint, there's not much out there.

47:02It's not very high risk at this point. What's the recession call right now. It's a very, very low probability. But could something be triggered with, say, higher energy prices, geopolitical tensions? Could that change things? Absolutely, that could change things. I mean, Russia, Ukraine, all of these various components to me, inflation and potentially the Fed having to hike interest rates in order to combat that, that by design is supposed to slow the cycle down, right? So those things are what I worry about. But these are very big macro macro events but you know sentiment is down and i i think we we do kind of think a lot about like wall street here at bloomberg because this is you know we're talking about wall street here but you do look at social media and people are complaining about higher inflation since covet that now their grocery bill is higher k-shaped economy just not not everybody's feeling great down.

48:01Like how does Wall Street kind of square that in? Yeah, square that with Main Street, right? So I use the hamburger analogy, right? So pre-COVID, I could go to a diner and I can get a great hamburger for 14 bucks. Now it's 20 bucks, right? So how do I make that hamburger, that$20 hamburger,$14 again, right? You're not going to. It's not going to happen. The way that you solve that is by making that$20 hamburger more affordable for everybody. And that means that you have to have higher wages, higher jobs, better jobs. So, you know, President Trump was speaking today about manufacturing, the reindustrialization cycle in the U.S.

48:38These manufacturing jobs are really strong. So when you talk about Wall Street versus Main Street, the strongest part of the jobs market is the trades market, is skilled tradesmen, right, you know, that are coming through. electricians, plumbers, pipe fitters, all of these areas, if there's a data center that's being built in some rural area in the U.S. or something like that, you get a lot of jobs. And if you get manufacturing jobs, the ratio of manufacturing jobs is six to one in terms of services jobs, meaning that for every one manufacturing job you create, you get six service sector jobs that come to support that.

49:16So that broadening, whether it's coming from the one big beautiful bill or the deregulation or the CapEx spend, we're just getting started in this whole thing. So we're going to make that$20 hamburger more affordable and that should change sentiment. But it takes time. As long as those jobs stick around. Yeah. Right. You can build a data center and then you move on. Or if you don't need, right, like those workers have to have a place to go. We were talking about summer vacations when you came in. You're getting ready. Just got about a minute left. Is there a book you take with you? Is it research or do you just say, I'm done?

49:49You know, I'm not taking a book with me for this trip. I think what I tend to do is I tend to read a lot of financial news. I tend to read a lot of research that I can just get caught up on, you know, most of its economic theory, just because I think that we are in a very big changing point right now. And I think that relying too much on historical data today is going to be a mistake. and we have to think about a higher nominal growth world and more of a supply-side dominated world as opposed to a demand-side dominated world. We need to do more of that with you, maybe bring Mike McKee on too, because I think that would be a fun, fun discussion.

50:26I'm just picturing like Aperol spritz with a side of our star and term premium. Yes, exactly. We do do wine segments sometimes on Friday. Maybe we can couple them together. I've said it before, but I really mean it. You're a gem. Thank you for giving us all this time. We love having this opportunity to do this. Jim Caron is Chief Investment Officer, Portfolio Solutions at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app.

51:09You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

51:22Before you sign off, you tuned in for ways to help teams move faster, make sharper decisions, and turn scattered context into work they can use. ChatGPT for Business can help. Chat GPT for Business gives teams a shared workspace with admin controls, permissions, and access to work and codecs in Chat GPT. This means your business can move from question to answer and code to rollout quicker. Join over 10 million business and enterprise users worldwide already using Chat GPT for Work. Download the Chat GPT desktop app or contact sales to learn more. Hi, I'm Tom Keen, inviting you to join me for the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

52:01It's about making you smarter every business day. I'm Paul Sweeney. We bring you complete coverage of stocks, bonds, commodities, even crypto. All the information you need to excel in the markets. And I'm Alexis Christophorus. Listen to us for essential conversations with the smartest names in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. That's the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe today on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere you listen.

From the publisher

The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy. Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF

Several Federal Reserve officials favored an interest-rate hike last month and many indicated that policy tightening would be necessary if inflation didn’t decline. The FOMC voted 9-3 in July to hold the benchmark federal funds rate in a range of 3.5% to 3.75%, with some officials dissenting in favor of raising rates. The release of minutes comes as the total US public debt has surpassed $40 trillion for the first time, with a surge of a third in less than five years.

On today's episode:

  • Michael McKee, Bloomberg TV and Radio International Economics & Policy Correspondent
  • Karen Veraa-Perry, Head of U.S. iShares Fixed Income Strategy, BlackRock
  • Jim Caron, CIO, Portfolio Solutions, Morgan Stanley Investment Management

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Businessweek

All 738 episodes
Fed Minutes Show Many Officials Said Rate Hikes May Be NeededBloomberg Businessweek · 47 min
Listen in VO