In short
The episode covers two threads: (1) the Fed’s March 18, 2026 minutes and how officials weighed Iran-war and tariff risks for inflation and jobs; (2) live market and geopolitical headlines, plus a separate interview on Levi Strauss results.
Guests
- Tim Stenevek and Carol Masser are hosts (Bloomberg Businessweek Daily).
- Mike McKee (Bloomberg) reports from the Fed.
- Matt Lizetti, Deutsche Bank Chief U.S. Economist/Head of U.S. Economic Research.
- Dr. Ed Hussain, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations; Georgetown professor (Middle East/global security).
- Michelle Goss, President and CEO of Levi Strauss & Co. (also former Kohl’s CEO; ~17 years at Starbucks).
Key claims/examples
- Fed minutes: Iran war/tariffs create “two-sided” risks—higher inflation vs. protracted war weakening labor markets; no rate move at the meeting.
- “Protracted” implies months+; officials cited vulnerable labor markets and slower progress toward 2% inflation.
- Lizetti: more officials favor two-sided language; tariffs caused firms to “stand aside” and war-driven price increases could reduce hiring.
- Hussain: Iran’s Lebanon/Strait of Hormuz actions reflect regional ambitions via proxies; ceasefire violations are “fragile”; suggests a decentralized/federalized Iran as a long-term solution.
- Levi Strauss: CEO says 9% organic growth; strong DTC and brand execution; examples include Beyonce/Blackpink/Rosie collaborations and Super Bowl campaign; diversified supply chain; no U.S. production shift despite tariffs.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOEpisode Discussion
0:00 to 14:00
“Is your multi-entity management creating more confusion than clarity?”
Impact of the Iran War on Consumer Spending
14:00 to 15:10
Learn how the ongoing conflict affects U.S. consumer spending and economic outlook.
“fuel spending rose 25 % over the last month as a result of the war with Iran.”
Long-Term Economic Implications of the War
15:10 to 17:00
Understand the potential long-term economic effects and inflation pressures caused by geopolitical tensions.
“But on average, in the aggregate, things look very resilient.”
AI's Role in Inflation Dynamics
17:00 to 18:50
Explore the evolving discussion around AI's impact on inflation and the labor market.
“We'll overall raise interest rates, keep interest rates higher and inflation higher.”
Iran's Negotiation Dynamics
21:10 to 23:18
Analyze Iran's approach to negotiations and its implications for regional stability.
“You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast.”
The Fragile Nature of Iran-Israel Relations
23:18 to 28:00
Delve into the complexities of Iran's ambitions and their impact on Israel's security stance.
“foreign policy toward the Middle East generally.”
Understanding the Iran-Israel Conflict
28:00 to 29:30
Explore the dynamics of the Iran-Israel conflict and its historical context.
“So there's a lot to play with in terms of enhancing U.S.”
Future of Iran: Federalization Possibilities
29:30 to 31:10
Discuss the potential for a federalized Iran and its implications for governance.
“Could that actually happen after 47 years of rule from, you know, under the Ayatollah, an Islamic Republic and an IRGC that is so powerful?”
Cultural Underpinnings of Iranian Society
31:10 to 32:50
Delve into the cultural factors influencing Iran's political landscape.
“to support forces against Arabia as well as against America and Israel.”
Levi Strauss: Business Success Amidst Challenges
32:50 to 34:05
Learn about Levi Strauss's recent business performance and strategies.
“But the point that you made is fundamentally true that Iran has this long willpower to fight.”
Show all 18 chapters
Innovative Strategies at Levi Strauss
34:25 to 36:20
Examine Levi Strauss's strategies for growth and market engagement.
“Company reporting revenues of$1.7 billion in the fiscal quarter that exceeded the average of analyst estimates.”
Celebrity Partnerships and Brand Growth
36:20 to 37:45
Discuss how collaborations with celebrities enhance Levi's brand.
“I mean, the brand has been strong for a long time.”
Economic Environment's Impact on Business
37:45 to 40:05
Analyze the macroeconomic factors affecting Levi Strauss and similar brands.
“Just at the Brits, we had Harry Styles dancers all wearing 501s.”
Navigating Supply Chain Challenges
40:05 to 42:00
Learn how Levi Strauss adapts its supply chain amid global challenges.
“We're speaking with Michelle Goss, the CEO of Levi Strauss.”
Navigating Tariffs and Supply Chain Relationships
42:00 to 43:11
Learn how established supplier relationships help manage tariff challenges.
“We have a robust, very diversified supply chain across many, many countries.”
Growth Projections and Company Momentum
43:11 to 44:28
Understand the company's growth goals and recent performance highlights.
“And like I said, because we have these enduring long lasting relationships, I know we'll be able to navigate whatever's ahead on that front.”
Adapting to Trends in the Fashion Industry
44:28 to 45:54
Discover how Levi's is evolving its product offerings and market strategies.
“We've sold the Dockers brand so that we could really focus on the Levi's brand.”
Opportunities for Future Growth
45:54 to 46:54
Explore the untapped markets and categories for Levi's potential expansion.
“that are not yet tapped that could be big for you guys?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Carol Massar:Is your multi-entity management creating more confusion than clarity? You need the Intuit ERP. Intuit Enterprise Suite. It's the AI-native ERP solution that's powerful, painless, and proven. Learn more at intuit.com slash ERP. When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For mid-size and large companies, that isn't always easy. Risk can touch multiple parts of an organization at the same time, often in ways that aren't immediately obvious. It might involve property, liability, or cyber. It could stem from regulatory requirements or challenges tied to a specific industry or the scale of an operation.
0:40At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline, not a one-time decision. At The Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. That means working with companies to identify where they're exposed, decide what matters most, and put practical standards in place so risk is managed as part of day-to-day operations. And when losses do happen, the Hartford can pair that risk-control work with insurance coverage grounded in underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience developed over time. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation.
1:15Carol Massar:Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth. Chase for Business helps business owners like you with personalized guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., member FDIC. Copyright 2026, JPMorgan Chase and Company.
2:15and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio.
2:27Carol Massar:We are just seconds away from the minutes from the second Fed decision of 2026, Tim. That was back on March 18th. We had a rally underway though and yields have pulled back ahead of this. Oh, that's ahead of this. Think back to when that meeting happened though. U.S. Treasury slumped short-term yields soared to their highest in about five months. And we're getting Fed minutes in just a second. And with that, off to Mike McKee. He's at the Fed in D.C. Mike. Well, no surprise, the Iran war and tariffs were central to the discussion among Fed officials at their March meeting. The full effect of tariffs had not yet moved through the economy, officials said.
3:04A resilient economy, they called it. And the war, then only a few weeks old, raised the threat of inflation increasing and hiring slowing. Some participants judged there was a strong case for a two-sided description of the committee's future interest rate decisions in their post-meeting statement, reflecting the possibility that higher inflation might call for rates to be increased, although no member called for a rate move at that meeting. Most participants raised the concern that a protracted war could lead to further softening of labor markets, which would warrant additional rate cuts. But many participants pointed to the risk of inflation remaining elevated for longer than expected, which, quote, could call for rate increases.
3:49The vast majority of participants noted that progress toward the committee's 2 % objective could be slower than previously expected, the Minutes say. Labor market conditions appeared vulnerable to adverse shock. They say most participants, highlighting the risk that a protracted conflict in the Middle East could weigh on business sentiment and further reduce hiring. As for policy, most participants felt it was too early to judge how the war would affect the economy. Many participants judging that in time, it would likely become appropriate to lower the target range for the federal funds rate if inflation were to decline in line with their expectations.
4:29A couple highlighted, though, that they had pushed their assessment of the most likely timing of rate cuts further into the future. Stephen Myron, though not named, was the only dissenter. The minutes do note that one participant argued rates were still restrictive, and that was increasing risks to the labor market. Guys? Mike, this is the moment where we sort of parse language here, and we ask you to translate what different words means when it comes to these minutes. The word protracted, you know, that has to do with a period of time, a longer period of time. I go to that word because the Fed said most said that protracted war could hit jobs, warrant cuts.
5:07How long is protracted? You know, they they do have a guide to Federal Reserve terminology in terms of some, many, few, etc. But they don't have a definition of what protracted means. Obviously, it would have suggested that the war could last for several months or longer. We're kind of in a middle period now. Hard to know whether this fits that model or not.
5:31Carol Massar:All right, Mike, we're going to come back to you in just a moment. Our Mike McKee there at the Federal Reserve. We're going to continue with Mike in just a moment. Do you want to check on the markets in terms of what we've seen in terms of reaction? Because, listen, folks, we saw a reset happening late last night into this morning because of what is going on, easing tensions or so it seems when it comes to the U.S. war in Iran. Having said that, as for the S &P 500, pretty much where we were prior to the release of these Fed minutes. Same story for the NASDAQ 100. Just a little bit of a move to the upside.
6:04Carol Massar:Probably more importantly is what's going on in the Treasury market. And I'm just taking a look all along the curve in terms of what we're seeing. And we're pretty much where we were prior to the release of those Fed minutes. So, you know, maybe investors, of course, a little bit of, I don't know, I think they're just focusing on the war at this point. And maybe just kind of happy in terms of that happening at this point. Although there are a lot of questions about that. Mike, I want to go back to you. I mean, can we will the Fed start to look through the war based on what we got? Or, you know, we still have a lot of questions about what happens next.
6:43Too early to reach a judgment on that yet because the war has maybe not ended. We don't know for sure. We've had conflicting headlines all day. Most Fed officials who've spoken in the run-up to their next meetings since the last meeting so far have basically said the same thing that the minutes suggest, that there are increased risks to inflation that could come starting with oil prices and then working their way through the economy. They also note that tariffs had still yet to work their way through the economy and we might get more. So there's a lot they don't know at this point. And I think the minutes really don't give us any more clarity since they were three weeks ago.
7:21And nothing has happened that gives us more clarity into the future direction of interest rates and oil prices and everything else at the moment. The next move from the Fed, Mike, not whether it's going to, you know, the Fed's going to just not change rates, but are people still thinking the next move could actually be higher rather than lower? No, it doesn't appear that way. Right now, we don't have a good measure of inflation since the war started. Friday, we get CPI. That'll be our first real clue. And then we'll watch PPI the following week. We do get PCE inflation tomorrow, but that's for February, so it's not going to tell us anything.
8:03But the other two inflation measures will give us an idea of what the initial shock is. Now, we're already into April at the highs of gasoline prices. So we'll have to see if they stay elevated throughout the month, what that's going to mean for inflation. The word we get from oil companies and shipping companies is that this is going to take a while. to work its way out of the economy, even if the war ended today. So they're likely going to be faced with uncertainty for quite some time. And I would imagine that we'll get a very similar meeting and minutes when they meet on the 29th of this month, because they're basically going to have to say the same things.
8:48Inflation could rise. It could become longer lasting. The labor market could weaken. But we just don't know yet. Yeah.
8:57Carol Massar:Mike, sit tight for a sec. We want to bring into the conversation because here in studio with us, back with us is Matt Lizetti. He's Deutsche Bank, Chief U.S. Economist, Head of U.S. Economic Research, as we said, right here in our studio, listening to Mike break it down. Good to have you back. Good to be back. What jumps out for you? Yeah, I think Mike kind of highlighted things. And actually, the note that he was talking about where the Fed goes through their account numbers, I had it up in front of me. And I think the one thing that sticks out back in January, several Fed officials were pushing for this two sided language.
9:26They wanted to open up to the possibility that the next move could be a hike in addition to being a cut. At the March meeting, it looks like this group grew a little bit. So now some rather than several officials are in that group. Some in the Fed's lexicon is actually more than several. So you do see that group as growing. Now, Chair Powell at the meeting in March didn't actually note this. He didn't push that. He was asked about it specifically. So I think you've seen that group grow. Now, the minutes always can be stale, right? They're several weeks ago, especially in an environment where things are evolving so quickly.
9:57Carol Massar:But sometimes I love it because it kind of just reminds us, okay, here's where we were before some of the craziness. And then, like, do we get back to that? Or does that craziness, Matt, affect us longer term? Stay with us. And it gives you a sense of, you know, how hawkish were they, for example, before we got a much stronger jobs report, which could have alleviated some of the concerns about downside risk to the labor market. And so that context matters a lot. Do you want to ask Mike a question? So, Mike, from the minutes perspective, do you see a sense that the Fed could be opening up more to rate hikes as we look ahead.
10:35I like the question about protracted nature. I thought that that was really giving the Fed optimal flexibility and optionality to respond however they might want. But your overall read of the minutes, is the Fed inching closer to potentially this two-sided language? Do you think they adopt that at the April meeting? I don't think they will. It'll really depend on what happens with the inflation numbers. they could. And you're right, we have seen more people talking in that area. I think the sentence that you highlighted, the other part of it was in the January meeting, some members said they could support the idea of a two-sided explanation.
11:11And this time they said there was a strong case for it. So what that tells me is that probably the case is going to be stronger for no move. And the people who wanted to cut are going to be fewer at the next meeting because they still don't know. And the risk is a little more two sided. But I can't say that it really sets them up to raise rates at this point, because in theory, things might get better by then.
11:42Carol Massar:It's like, honey, I said some. No, I meant more. Like, I don't know that the nuances. Hey, Mike, before you go, last thing on your mind, when you think about the U.S. economy, so much coming at folks. I can't wait for earnings. I want to see what CEOs and the C-suite has to say about the outlook if they're willing to commit. But what's top of mind for you here? Well, you make an important point about earnings and what CEOs say because they do note in the minutes that tariffs had caused companies to stand aside and not make decisions and that continued price increases from the war could cause companies to cut back on hiring.
12:19So those are the kind of outlooks we'd like to see from the CEOs that will give us a better idea of where the economy is going. But overall, what I take away is that the Fed officials are just like the rest of us and the folks on Wall Street. They don't know what's going to happen, but they stand ready to respond in whatever direction with whatever they can do to help.
12:39Carol Massar:Which is kind of what you want in a central bank. All right, Mike, you can come back home. So we'll be welcoming you back. Of course, our Michael McKee, Bloomberg TV and Radio International Economics and Policy Correspondent, But still with us, Matt Lizetti. Matt, fundamentally, how is the U.S. doing? Like, what do you think about it? I think if you take a step back and you look at the incoming data, we have an economy where growth has been very resilient. You know, the economy has experienced abnormal and historic shocks over the past 12 to 18 months. And despite that, the economy has been continuing to grow at 2 % or above.
13:16The labor market, extreme volatility in the month-to-month readings. But if you look at the unemployment rate today, it's about where it was last summer. It's still at historically low levels, almost 4.2%. Most measures of labor market slack are very stable. The hiring rate has been stable. The quits rate's been stable. And so despite all the worries, despite the fact that we are experiencing the significant adverse shocks that are putting attention to the Fed's dual mandate, the economy is actually performing quite well. The economy is not monolithic, and there are different parts of the economy.
13:45And the way that different people feel this energy shock is a lot different. We spoke to Chris Britt, the CEO of Chime last week, this neobank or fintech, whatever you want to call it, where the average income of the user is about$75 ,000. He said his consumers fuel spending rose 25 % over the last month as a result of the war with Iran. What does it do when that consumer is hit so hard to your outlook of the US economy? Yeah, you know, you've had an economy and part of this is always the state for the US economy, which is that it is heavily skewed in terms of the impact of consumer spending towards higher income households that drive a disproportionate share of consumer spending.
14:23Now, the shocks that we are seeing tend to be regressive. So they're hitting the middle and lower part of the income distribution more. So they're raising fuel prices. They will be raising food prices, most likely. The tariffs that we've seen impact goods more than they do services. So all those are negatively impacting the lower part of the income distribution. That part of the income distribution is generally always more fragile, but has been shown to be more fragile in an environment of higher interest rates, higher inflation that we've seen. But if you take a step back, all of the aggregate spending data still looks quite good.
14:57Consumer spending looks relatively solid. From a business CapEx perspective yesterday, we got durable goods orders and shipments, which remain pretty solid. So there's still these kind of distributional concerns about the consumer and the broader economy. But on average, in the aggregate, things look very resilient.
15:13Carol Massar:So we keep talking about a lot around this table about the longer impact of the war. And I can't remember. Protracted. Protracted. In the words of the Federal Reserve. Yes, exactly. But I just think about, and I can't remember if we've talked about this yet with you, is that this idea that you have nations thinking about what they need to protect domestically for their national security. And so producing more at home, making sure they have access to raw materials. I don't know. I'm obsessed with this about the rethink. And I do wonder if that's factoring into your models longer term. And with that, I think about labor costs in here, that would make things probably more expensive here.
15:51Carol Massar:Even if you take out the moving stuff around costs, I just think about what that does to inflation longer term. Yeah. So I think there's probably two aspects of this. One is supply chain resiliency. And it was a key topic coming out of the pandemic. And maybe we've forgotten a little bit about it over the past several years, even though you had this historic tariff shock. Yeah. But what's happening over the past month certainly intensifies those concerns. Now, it might mean that you have to invest more across multiple supply chains. You incur more costs because of that. And therefore, yes, you're more resilient.
16:24But at the same time, your average cost is higher. And so that could feed into inflationary pressures. The other part of this is how are people thinking about their own defense? And so can European economies rely less on the U.S. for defense? I think certainly we've seen Germany take a strong stance on that position. Significant investments in their own defense industries and infrastructure. And that will mean globally fiscal policy is more proactive than it has been in the past. And because of that, inflation will be higher as well.
16:54Carol Massar:Guns versus butter. Like thinking about the impact on what that does for society. Correct. I think ultimately it will squeeze out and push out some of the private sector. We'll overall raise interest rates, keep interest rates higher and inflation higher. You know, when we when we talk about a duration of a conflict like this, I think there's this idea that, OK, we're in a period where a ceasefire has been announced, but it's clear that things aren't going back to what they were before February 28th. Oil's not there. Maybe the excitement about what could it could go back to is there. But there's still skirmishes happening and there's still negotiations to be had.
17:27Is there a chance that the war may not look like it did in the first five weeks, but there is still a heavy presence by the United States and Israel in the region for a long time to come and that affects the economy? Yeah, I think we have to think that there's still uncertainty here, right? We're in day one of what is still an uncertain truce at this point. And so, you know, how the world looks two, three, four, five, six months down the road remains highly uncertain. I think it is very likely that energy prices are just higher than they were before the recent events. In part, that's because even if the Strait of Hormuz picks back, reopens fully, and we're clearly not there yet.
18:08No, oil transit remains halted now. Correct. So we're clearly not there yet. But you've had some damage to energy infrastructure in the region, which is absolutely critical. And that's going to take longer to get on track. So I think regardless, you are likely in a world where energy prices overall and therefore inflation for this year is going to be higher as a result. Now, I think the U.S. economy can absorb that. And I think that it can be resilient in response to that. I think if oil prices were to move up to$150 a barrel, that's the period where we became really worried that it could wipe out the benefits of tax cuts to U.S.
18:43consumers. You might get into nonlinear effects on the economy where growth begins to be more damaged. So, you know, yes, I think it has lingering effects on inflation. I think that impacts the Fed in a hawkish direction, but it doesn't necessarily overturn a relatively resilient view for the economy.
18:57Carol Massar:Matt, I want to throw one more thing. And, you know, before the war, I mean, every conversation either started or somehow worked its way to artificial intelligence. And you guys have done a lot of work. Certainly, we've talked a lot about the impact, potential impact on the labor market. But you guys also did a recent note on AI's maybe impact on inflation. What did you look at? And what did you guys find out? Yeah, so I think if you think back six, seven weeks ago, the entire conversation in markets was about how AI was going to be disinflationary and was going to displace labor, both of which was going to put downward pressure on inflation and on interest rates.
19:32Now, obviously, that's completely gone away from the discussions at the moment. But I think there's just this very strong conviction in markets that AI is this massive disinflationary force. One thing that we did is we actually just went out and asked various AI tools whether or not they think it is going to be disinflationary. Did the tools explode? They did not explode. Okay, that's a good sign. And, you know, people, they joke, yeah, of course, if you ask how, whether or not it's going to take your job, it's going to tell you no. I'm sorry, Matt. I cannot answer that for you.
19:59Carol Massar:Just got about 40 seconds. But from the inflation perspective, I thought you found really interesting results. So AI is not at all convinced that over the near term it's going to be a disinflationary force. And it highlights, I think, key factors. There's a big investment boom that's taking place. It can add upward pressure on energy prices. But even if you look over the next five years, it puts about an equal probability that AI is a significant disciplinary force to it lifting inflation. And again, it's kind of highlighting a lot of these supply chain issues and the investment demand part. By the way, one of our favorite things, maybe it's just mine, like, do you know who Tim Stenevek is?
20:33Carol Massar:Do you know who Carol Messer is? We get all kinds of crazy answers. Matt Luzetti. We know who Matt Luzetti is. We certainly do. Deutsche Bank Chief U.S. Economist, Head of U.S. Economic Research. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
21:09Carol Massar:Learn more at Intuit.com slash ERP. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. All right, folks, watching markets, watching the headlines as we continue to see reports about the Iranian parliament speaker, Galboff, who would lead the country's negotiating team in talks with the U.S. in Islamabad on Friday, according to the semi-official Iranian Students News Agencies. But he is talking about some different concerns about the ceasefire.
21:52Carol Massar:And again, we had some headlines about the ceasefire being violated. We did see a little bit of the Treasury rally fading, the equity rally fading, but just a So I just want to put it in perspective. But again, the Iranian parliament speaker also posting a violation statement. So the talk's unreasonable. So again, we're trying to make some sense out of all. Yeah, I'm just going to this statement right now. Quote, the deep historical distrust we hold toward the United States stems from its repeated violations of all forms of commitments, a pattern that has regrettably been repeated once again. The speaker is saying noncompliance with the first clause of the 10-point proposal regarding the ceasefire in Lebanon, a commitment that the prime minister has also explicitly referred to and declared as an immediate ceasefire everywhere, including Lebanon and other regions effective immediately.
Read the full transcript
22:42Carol Massar:They also say the entree of an intruding drone into Iran airspace, which was destroyed in the city of Lar in Fars province in a clear violation of the clause prohibiting any further violation of Iran airspace. Denial of Iran's right to enrichment, which was included in the sixth clause of the framework. They say now the very workable basis on which to negotiate has been openly and clearly violated even before the negotiations began. In such a situation, a bilateral ceasefire negotiation is unreasonable. We have said many times the devil is in the details, but curious to see what our next guest has to say.
23:17Dr. Ed Hussain is senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations focused on U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East generally. He's a professor at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, where he teaches classes on global security, Arab-Israeli peace and the shared intellectual roots of the West and Islam. Dr. Hussain joins us from Abu Dhabi. Dr. Hussain, just your reaction to the latest headlines and the fragile nature of this ceasefire. Fragile nature is exactly the right phrase. I woke up this morning here in Abu Dhabi with signal alerts going off on my phone and then throughout the day we've had attacks from Iran on Dubai.
23:54As late as 45 minutes ago there were attacks or drone attacks, interceptions from Iran into Dubai. So here in the region especially on this side of the Strait of Hormuz it didn't feel like a day in which there haven't been violations, but there's been not much coverage of that. Now, Al-Ibaaf, the Speaker of the Parliament, calling this unreasonable, it doesn't seem like an outright rejection. My question to the audience and for all of us thinking people is, why does Iran care about Lebanon? And that's part of the problem, that Iran hasn't given up its imperial ambitions, that violation in Lebanon, which means Israel's counterterrorism measures, that wasn't a violation of Iranian sovereign space.
24:43And yet it still harbors these ambitions that it's trying to exert pressure on Lebanon and Israel's efforts there. So I think that's something for us to think about, that it's not just Iran's concerns about Iran. Iran still has these ambitions around the region, which was one of the reasons why October 7th happened three years ago. And this is downstream from that terror attack that Hamas instigated with Iranian government support that continues to ricochet around the region and the world.
25:09Carol Massar:I'm glad you went there, Dr. Hussain, because I think one of the things we're trying to figure out too, because Israel has continued its ambitions, right? It seems like, and its attacks on Lebanon. So are you saying that Iran still has bigger ambitions by being concerned about that. And so I guess I think we were trying to say, well, Israel has to stop. So help us understand, you understand this region, the dynamics between all of these players and what their missions are, and how it might not coincide with what the US ambitions are. Because I thought this was about, you know, the nuclear ambitions of Iran.
25:51Yes, I mean, you're absolutely right. The nuclear ambitions are linked to having an Iran that is surrounding Israel with proxies, which was previously the Syrian government, the Lebanese government led by Hezbollah. And in Yemen, there are Houthi attacks that are anti-Israeli and supporting movements inside Saudi Arabia, inside Bahrain. So these are all movements outside of Iran. And now we have a situation that Iran is trying to negotiate control of the Straits of Hormuz, which it didn't have previously. Now, all of that, and you're right to ask the question about Israel, plays to Israel's existential angst.
26:36Israel and Jewish people writ large, as we know, are traumatized people coming out of the Holocaust, And October 7th pressed that wound, which means we survived since the rise of the Iranian regime, the mullahs in Iran since 1979, by more or less trying to accept that the Iranians will have forces parked all around our borders and will try and do a peace deal. October 7th made the Israelis realize we can't have that world again, and we don't trust Iranian intentions, and they will support Hamas and Hezbollah attack our people again. Therefore, we'll go after them everywhere, including Iranian nuclear ambitions.
27:19And I'm afraid to say this, but it's the truth, and we can't shy away from the truth. For as long as Israel feels it's not safe, it will continue to attack Iran and its allies. And the biggest mistake Iran makes in response to this is rather than fight with Israel, it begins to attack countries such as where I'm sat here in the Arabian Peninsula, in Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Jordan. And I think that's the danger of the Iranian regime, that it wants to more or less draw in the rest of the world in its war with Israel. And in that, and I think the good news is countries here now feel closer to America than they've done in the last 15 to 20 years.
28:03So there's a lot to play with in terms of enhancing U.S. influence and relationships with countries here in the Aragon Peninsula.
28:10Carol Massar:Just quickly to get your thoughts, though, isn't this about Israel's existentialist or existential angst versus Iran's existential angst? I'm just, I mean, is that what's kind of, like, how do you, if you've got that going on? Come on, you tell me how you end that. You know, it's a battle of different willpowers, different wills. And the Israelis will have stronger willpower for all kinds of reasons. They have 3 ,000 years to back that. And the Iranians also have strong willpower and have 3 ,000 years to back that. The rest of us are caught up in that. And the way you end that is by making sure that Iran and the Iranian government, as it stands now, focuses on normalizing Iran's economy as the Japanese did and the South Koreans did, rather than Iran's ambitions being regional and global and shouting every Friday, death to America, death to Israel, and attacking Arab neighbors and allies who have not attacked Iran.
29:06Even to this day, they, we here are in a defensive posture. And the way you end that is by ensuring that Iran's government is not centralized, that Iran's government is decentralized, that there is an Iran that's an Iran of federations, that minorities inside Iran, the Azeris, the Baluchis, the Arabs, the Haziris, the Persians, have greater rights. Dr. Hussein, is that realistic? Is that realistic in your view? Could that actually happen after 47 years of rule from, you know, under the Ayatollah, an Islamic Republic and an IRGC that is so powerful? It may not happen next month. It may not happen the month after the US and Israeli attacks on Iran have consolidated the government's nationalist appeal for unity.
29:51But if we look at the Iranian population, since the Green Movement during President Obama's time to now, every two or three years, there's an uprising against this government. This government now is weaker than it's ever been before in terms of its air force, naval force, and ability to produce missiles. But one of the reasons why President Trump tried to support the popular uprising inside Iran was to diminish the government's outreach. But the mistake is now the government is stronger domestically. But there will inevitably be uprisings inside Iran. And I think this government at some time will fall.
30:29And we in the West with our Arabian allies need to have a perception of what a federalized Iran looks like, where there isn't a centralized control by the IRGC. And that's where I think all of us are failing. We just don't have an alternative vision for Iran without disrupting, without causing refugee flows, without causing further conflict, that all of these minorities inside Iran, I mean, Azeria is 25 % of the country, close to Azerbaijan, Turkic population, the Kurdish population, huge inside Iran. How do we decentralize power with these minorities that are actually pro-Israel, pro-Arabs, pro-America, rather than the Mullah regime trying to take us back to a messianic world order that continues to support forces against Arabia as well as against America and Israel.
31:16Carol Massar:You know, our Dan Williams, who's in Jerusalem, had sent us and shared with us a post he did earlier this morning. He said, when the all clear sound, when the all clear sounded after the last Iranian missile launch in the early hours of the morning and the ceasefire took call, my neighbors filed out of the communal bomb shelter, smiling wearily and wishing one other, well, quote, until we meet again in two weeks time. I mean, that's, that's, you know, I don't know the reality, like you talk about this federalized Iran, what that might look like and having the ability or having the trouble kind of figuring that out.
31:51Is that because it's, it's impossible.
31:53Carol Massar:I've had conversations with folks about the region, informed people and just saying, you know, this, it is existential. There's something in the, you know, in the culture of Iran, you know, that they are preparing for. And so you can't just get rid of that overnight. So it makes me wonder, can there be a federalized Iran? Well, we haven't made the argument. I've been thinking about a federalized Iran over the last two or three years. And you look at the history, you start to see that Iran was always a federalized entity. But as in ethnically composed, different ethnic compositions of the country now want to have greater rights.
32:32And we haven't recognized that. For example, Azerbaijan and Azeris have a strong relationship. We haven't focused on that. We have ability from Turkey and our NATO ally to project power into Iran that terrifies Iran because they have a long war with the Turks going back to the 1550s. It's another existential battle. But the point that you made is fundamentally true that Iran has this long willpower to fight. The Iranians or the Persians rather famously fought the Romans for 700 years, from 7 AD onwards. They have a long strategic vision. We on our side, our Arabian American and our Israeli allies, haven't really cast a long range vision back into Iran that we don't want to see an Islamist regime that threatens both Arabs and Jews and Americans both in the region and around the world.
33:23and I think that's the task for all of us to see in Iran that's different yeah that is decentralized and it's not about the Razashar Pahlavi coming into power or his family but genuinely bottom upwards representing the rights of the people.
33:38Carol Massar:Dr. Hussain thank you so much be well be safe um so appreciate your time take care this is Bloomberg. Stay with us more from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
33:53You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Or watch us live on YouTube.
34:06Carol Massar:Well, thank you, Harry. Thank you, Hulu. Thank you, FX. Thank you, Love Story and more. We want to talk about Levi, Strauss, and Gubbe. Company's latest results really knocking the socks off investors. The stock is up the most in one year as the company raised its projections for the year after reporting better than expected quarterly results. They cited strong demand in all regions as the denim brand steers shoppers to its own stores and website. We're going to talk about that a lot. Company reporting revenues of$1.7 billion in the fiscal quarter that exceeded the average of analyst estimates.
34:35Carol Massar:Earnings per share also, excluding some items, surpassing expectations. The stock now up about 7 % year to date and has gained nearly 80 % in the past 12 months. Yep, for those watching right now, it is up more than 11%, Tim, in today's session. With us is the president and CEO of Levi Strauss & Co. She's also a member of the company's board. She's former CEO of Kohl's. She spent close to 17 years, too, at Starbucks. We've got Michelle Goss here in the studio. Welcome. It's good to see you. The stock soaring. Investors are liking what they see. Where did the momentum come from, and what's really working right now?
35:08Carol Massar:First, thanks for having me, and I'm really excited to talk about how we started the year. We are seeing momentum across the board, which is around our strategies really picking up and accelerating. So we delivered 9 % organic growth, 14 % on a reported basis. We are seeing this across geographies. We're seeing this across categories. We're seeing it across genders. Why? We're seeing it across channels. Why is this happening? Well, you know, it's the brand, it's the product, and it's the execution. And all of those things are working. And I got to tell you, the team is doing a phenomenal job. We're coming off of a solid year last year, and it's accelerating right into 2026.
35:48Carol Massar:Michelle, denim, though, is such a crowded category. Like, I won't go to certain department stores because it's just too much for me. But I do go to Levi's. Well, thank you for that. You're welcome. You're welcome. And I said to you coming in, my 23-year-old, she's wearing them. That's where she wants to go. You talked about your wife. Like, you are hitting a lot of different demographics. How do you do that? How do you appeal to so many? Yeah. Well, I would say it does start with the brand. And we like to say that Levi's operates at the center of culture. and we're hitting a new stride with the brand.
36:20Carol Massar:I mean, the brand has been strong for a long time. Last year, it went up a notch. We had this fantastic partnership with Beyonce. That moved into a partnership with Shibuzi. And this year, we launched our brand campaign at the Super Bowl. And it was the perfect time because Levi's Stadium was hosting the Super Bowl and we hadn't been on the Super Bowl in over 20 years. But it wasn't about launching an ad for the Super Bowl. It was about launching our campaign. We call it Behind Every Original, which is a global campaign and leans in to what Levi's does best across sports, across fashion and music.
36:57Carol Massar:And so if you've seen the ad, it really does bring that to life and has artists like Doshi or SGA. We're showing some of this. Great. And and Rosie. And I like to talk about Rosie because here is this. She was part of Blackpink. 90 million followers and growing. And we're rolling that right into a collaboration with her in Asia. So that is taking off as we speak. And so this is about launching, like I said, a campaign for the year. Looking ahead, we've got World Cup coming up that the stadium is, Levi's Stadium is hosting. We have collaborations. You know, we had our collaboration with Nike and Jordan a couple months ago.
37:35Carol Massar:We had people lining out the doors to get this special collab. Michelle, when you talk about these partnerships with celebrities, with the artists, I know each one of them is different. But in general, are they coming to you or are you identifying them and you're going to them? How organic is it? It's all of the above. Well, so and it happens organically. I mean, literally what? Just at the Brits, we had Harry Styles dancers all wearing 501s. I mean, this is about being at the center of culture. And the Beyonce partnership, that started because she wrote a song called Levi's Jeans. but we've been friends with Beyonce for decades back in back to the 90s or Carolyn Bessette were the 517s and you know in Love Story it's heavily featured and sales are up like 25 percent.
38:21Carol Massar:Did that surprise you like or when did you first all of a sudden notice like we've talked about this on air the impact of this. Yeah well the 90s we've known about the 90s trend for a long time and in fact when you go into our stores online go into our wholesale partners I mean that 90s trend is Levi's is all over it from top to bottom. I mean, one of the things we talk about when you ask about what's working, we talk about our two key strategies, which is about becoming a more DTC forward company and also evolving the brand from being about jeans to head to toe. We say denim lifestyle. What does that mean?
38:55Carol Massar:It means that we want to give you the whole wardrobe. It starts with the jeans, but tops, button downs, jackets, outerwear, dresses all through the lens of Levi's. but we're playing now in the total apparel space. Michelle, hang on for a second. Forgive us. This is the world we live in. You live in it too. We all do. We do have some headlines crossing the Bloomberg terminal. This is coming in involving the war, U.S. war with Iran. Iranian parliament speaker posting a violation statement saying that the ceasefire deal with the United States has been violated. So again, this is just crossing the Bloomberg terminal.
39:30Carol Massar:And let me just take a quick check on the market trade. We are seeing stocks just dip a little bit lower on that, but we're still seeing quite a rally across the board and a quick check on what we're seeing in terms of yields. They, too, are just taking up a little bit, just a hair. So we're going to need a little bit of clarification. But, folks, this is the world we live in, and this is what we said, that even with the headlines last night into this morning, that the details are going to be really, really crucial. Emerging market currencies index, trimming gains, as Iran says, the ceasefire violates.
40:05Carol Massar:So forgive us. That's our environment. We're speaking with Michelle Goss, the CEO of Levi Strauss. Michelle, perhaps that's a good segue to talk about the macroeconomic environment and potential disruptions or disruptions you've seen from higher transportation costs as a result of bringing these products from overseas into the U.S. and indeed around the world. What has this macroeconomic backdrop over the last five, six weeks done for your business? Yeah, well, I mean... Or the last year when I think about tariffs. It's been a really uncertain time. You know, I take a step back. You think about the company, Ellis & Co.
40:36Carol Massar:We've been around for 170 years. We've weathered lots of storms and navigated. And it goes back to who we are as a brand. During times like this, people do. We have to deliver. We have to execute. But they really do go to brands that they trust, that they love. We offer quality. We offer great value. We offer durability. To date, our consumer has proven resilient. I mean, you see that in our numbers. We are bringing them a lot of innovation. I think if pressures come on the consumer, when the wallets get tighter, we have to up our game, right? Wallets get tighter, we have to work harder. And that's what we're doing.
41:10Carol Massar:We offer great red tab right down the middle. We offer Signature by Levi Strauss, which is an awesome value. That business was up 16%. It's in the$20,$25 range. And then we offer blue tab, premium Japanese denim. And, you know, you can buy a pair of jeans from Levi's now at like$200. So we're serving every customer need. But know that we are constantly just making sure that we can address the needs of the consumer in the moment, whatever that moment might be. Love talking fashion. Love talking the collaborations. I also, though, do love the nitty gritty of like supply chains and what a company like you that has been around for so long and seen a lot of different market cycles.
41:48Carol Massar:What is your supply chain? And have you kind of spread it around based on what we've seen, not just in the last year, but even coming off the pandemic that reminded us that supply chains can be impacted dramatically when they're focused in one area? Yeah, that's right. We have a robust, very diversified supply chain across many, many countries. We have a really strong team that is agile and responsive. And so and these these relationships with our suppliers go back decades and decades. So we have tremendous partnerships. And as we've navigated things like tariffs, everybody has stepped up to help us, you know, determine what the next steps are there.
42:28Carol Massar:You know, just to just to put it out there on tariffs. I mean, everything that we've guided the street includes tariff assumptions on call it the original reciprocal tariffs at a higher rate at that 20 percent incremental rate. You know, there's been recent news of it going down back to 10 percent. We haven't baked that into our numbers yet. one could say that is upside there. It could mean up to$35 million in EBIT or seven cents of EPS. But we've held back just knowing that there still is uncertainty out there, as you were saying. One question we asked outgoing CFO Harmeet Singh in the last year in the wake of tariffs has been about moving production to the United States.
43:02He said, no way, that's not happening. Are you sticking by that?
43:05Carol Massar:We are sticking by that. Yeah, that is an industry that really has shifted overseas. And like I said, because we have these enduring long lasting relationships, I know we'll be able to navigate whatever's ahead on that front. All right. So I, you know, a company like you guys, our whole Bloomberg team is like, ask Michelle this, but we're curious about your prospects for reaching 10 billion in revenue, five years, seven years. How are you guys thinking about it? We have, we have not put a number out there or a date out there. But you've got some great momentum. Like, do you feel like you can take this momentum and how far can you carry it out?
43:37Carol Massar:Do you feel comfortable? Yeah, what I can say, and I think it's important to have bold goals, right? So we've put the 10 billion, we've put the 15 % EBIT. I think if you look at the progress over the last couple years, take revenue. We came off of 7 % growth last year. That was up from the prior year. This year, we're again guiding mid-single digits. We just had a blowout quarter at up 9%. So I think it's safe to say that you can count on consistent, sustainable growth. And then on EBIT, on profitability. We're making that March to 15%. Again, a few years ago, we were 9%, 10%. Last year, about 11 and a half.
44:11Carol Massar:We just said we're taking our guide up yesterday to 12%. So you see that sequential progress and keep doing that. We'll let you guys do the math, but we're confident. I mean, like I said, the exciting thing we are right now, the strategies are working. We've made some choices the last couple of years. We've sold the Dockers brand so that we could really focus on the Levi's brand. And there's so much opportunity. So certainly fashion is working in your favor right now, but we know the industry is fickle and consumers are fickle. What happens, or what do you do rather, to make sure that when the trends do change, you move with them?
44:48Carol Massar:Yeah, well, as the category leader in denim, let's start there. It's our responsibility to fuel the trends. You know, the denim category is growing. It's accelerating right now. I have more denim in my, no, seriously. But nowadays, I think a big part of it. that I haven't in a long, long time. And I keep buying more. But it's not always like that. But I would say though, but this evolution to denim lifestyle, or I'll say lifestyle, head to toe, that's not all denim, right? It is fine. If you're buying a rib cage, wide leg pair of jeans, what's the perfect top that goes with it? Which is going to be different than a low rise.
45:21Carol Massar:And so now that we're playing in this broader space, which basically increases our addressable market by 15X, We're playing in a 1 trillion market in apparel. That requires focus and discipline, but we've really up-leveled our capabilities to do that. And if you just take this last quarter, our Topps business was up 13%. It's only 20 % of our business. So when you think about all that upside, so we now, and 40 % of our business is non-denim. So it's not just denim anymore for Levi's. So what is the biggest opportunity or categories that are not yet tapped that could be big for you guys? Yeah, I would say a couple of things.
46:00Carol Massar:First, when we think about gender, women's is not quite 40 % of our business. Last I checked, women's has a big play in the apparel market. My closet's a lot bigger than my house. Just saying. But so there's still that should be at least half our business. So we're expecting tremendous growth there. I was just talking about head to toe. We always will be the leader in bottoms and denim bottoms, but tops. So in our business, we sell two bottoms to every top, which, by the way, that used to be like five bottoms to every top. That should be the other way around. Minimally one-to-one. That is all white space for us.
46:37Carol Massar:And then we have amazing growth ahead of us in expansion. There's still room to grow in the U.S., but you think about these international markets. In some cases, we're just getting started there. So as we look ahead and say, how are we going to go from six-point-something to$10 billion, we can chart that out. We feel very confident. Thank you. Thank you. forgive our distraction. We were dealing with some headlines on the Middle East, which is obviously so important to everybody's macro, but please come back soon. We would love it. Thank you. Well, thanks for having me. Yeah, we loved it. President and CEO of Levi Strauss and Company, of course, she is Michelle Goss joining us here in studio.
47:10This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.
From the publisher
The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy.
Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.
A growing number of Federal Reserve officials worried the Iran war could further stoke inflation and wanted to make clear following their March meeting that the central bank may have to consider raising interest rates.
Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s March 17-18 meeting, released Wednesday in Washington, showed policymakers wrestled with starkly differing scenarios for the US economy following the outbreak of the Iran war, and the policy reactions that might follow.
Most officials worried a protracted war could hurt the labor market and warrant lower interest rates. At the same time, many policymakers highlighted the risk to inflation that might ultimately warrant rate increases.
Officials in the latter camp appeared to become more strident, urging their colleagues to consider adding language to their post-meeting statement that raised the scenario of hiking rates under certain conditions.
“Some participants judged that there was a strong case for a two-sided description of the committee’s future interest-rate decisions in the post-meeting statement, reflecting the possibility that upward adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate could be appropriate if inflation were to remain at above-target levels,” the minutes said.
Echoing those concerns, the minutes noted the “vast majority” of officials thought it may take longer to return inflation to the Fed’s 2% goal.
At the meeting, officials held the Fed’s benchmark policy rate in a range of 3.5% to 3.75% at that gathering.
Today's show features:
- Michael McKee, Bloomberg International Economics and Policy Correspondent, breaks Fed Minutes
- Matthew Luzzetti, Deutsche Bank Chief US Economist and Head of US Economic Research
- Dr. Ed Husain, Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations
- Michelle Gass, Levi's President & CEO on Levi Boosts Outlook as Direct-to-Consumer Strategy Pays Off
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
