Fed Minutes Show Several Officials Nod to Rate-Hike Scenario

18 Feb 2026 · 41 min · 21 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Bloomberg Businessweek

Episode Title

Fed Minutes Show Several Officials Nod to Rate-Hike Scenario

Episode Overview In this episode of Bloomberg Businessweek, hosts Carol Massar and Tim Stenovec cover the implications of recent Federal Reserve (Fed) minutes, highlighting concerns regarding inflation and the potential for interest rate hikes. The discussion features insights from various experts, focusing on the Fed's decision-making process and its impact on the U.S. economy, alongside analyses of the housing market and the effects of technology on business.

Key Takeaways

Federal Reserve Insights

  • Inflation Concerns: The Fed minutes from the January meeting indicate a growing concern over persistent inflation levels. Several officials suggested that if inflation remains above target, a rate hike may be necessary.
  • Rate Decision: The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted 10-2 to maintain the federal funds rate between 3.5% and 3.75%. Dissenters called for a quarter-point rate reduction.
  • Employment vs. Inflation: The focus of the Fed is shifting from employment concerns to inflation, reflecting a broader economic sentiment.

Economic Outlook

  • Market Reactions: Despite the discussion of potential rate hikes, market reactions were muted, indicating that investors may not be overly concerned about immediate financial implications.
  • Earnings Growth: Experts like Mike Wilson from Morgan Stanley discuss a potential new economic cycle, marked by increasing earnings growth across various sectors, particularly in technology and consumer goods.
  • Equity Market Predictions: Wilson predicts a 16% growth in the S&P 500 for the year, contingent on several factors including earnings performance and the impact of AI on productivity.

Housing Market Dynamics

  • Kamini Lane's Perspective: The CEO of Coldwell Banker Realty discusses the current state of the U.S. housing market, emphasizing:
  • The need for increased inventory to meet demand.
  • The influence of mortgage rates on seller behavior.
  • Regional variations in inventory and pricing dynamics across the country.

Technology and Social Media

  • Kurt Wagner's Report: The episode features insights on the ongoing legal issues faced by Meta (formerly Facebook) regarding social media addiction, especially among youth. Key points include:
  • The potential for significant legal repercussions from lawsuits alleging that platforms knowingly facilitated addiction.
  • The need for greater oversight and regulation in the tech industry to protect younger users.

Expert Contributions

  • Michael McKee: Bloomberg TV and Radio International Economics & Policy Correspondent discusses the implications of the Fed minutes on market behavior and inflation expectations.
  • Mike Wilson: Chief U.S. Equity Strategist at Morgan Stanley, provides forecasts for the equity market and insights on sector performance.
  • Kamini Lane: President and CEO of Coldwell Banker Realty, shares the latest trends in the U.S. housing market.
  • Kurt Wagner: Senior Technology Reporter at Bloomberg News, covers the ongoing social media addiction trial and its broader implications.

Conclusion The episode highlights the complexities and dynamics currently shaping the U.S. economy, including the Fed's balancing act between managing inflation and supporting employment, the evolving housing market, and the challenges posed by technology and social media regulation. The insights from experts provide a comprehensive view of the economic landscape, preparing listeners for possible future developments.

Listening Information

  • Live Broadcast: The Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast airs live on weekdays from 2 PM to 5 PM ET.
  • Watch Live: Available on [YouTube](http://bit.ly/3vTiACF).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Analyzing the Fed Minutes

2:26 to 5:54

Discussion of the recent Fed meeting and interest rate decisions.

“Business Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio.”

Market Reactions to Fed Updates

6:02 to 7:04

Exploring how the markets are responding to the Fed's comments on inflation.

“Having said that, just taking a look at equity markets firming up a little bit on the S &P and the Dow, but pretty much NASDAQ 100 staying where it was prior to the Fed minutes coming out.”

Tariff Burdens and Economic Impact

7:10 to 9:20

Discussion on the economic burden of tariffs on U.S. companies and consumers.

“Hey, Mike, a couple of the headlines that are worth repeating.”

Job Market Concerns

9:40 to 10:34

Concerns about the job market's growth and its risks to economic stability.

“Hey, good to have that on the program, Mike.”

Upcoming Guest Insights

13:18 to 14:00

Introduction to guest Mike Wilson and discussion on market forecasts.

“Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m.”

Analyzing the Current Market Cycle

14:22 to 16:09

Discussion on whether we are in a new bull market and earnings cycle.

“And someone who has followed Mike's call and writes calls, I should say, and writes about him a lot is our own Alex Seminova.”

Market Volatility and Future Predictions

16:09 to 19:23

Insights on market volatility and what could change current predictions.

“Hey, Meg, it's been pretty remarkable to see that we've gotten this tremendous stock volatility at the single stock level, also at the sector level.”

Tech vs. Broader Market Performance

19:23 to 20:56

Exploring the performance of big tech versus other sectors in the market.

“And anyone who said that for the last few years has been wrong on that.”

Economic Rebalancing and Fed Independence

20:56 to 22:41

Discussion on government economic strategies and Fed independence.

“That was one of our lead calls in the November outlook.”

U.S. Housing Market Insights

23:49 to 24:55

Transition to discussing the current state of the U.S. housing market.

“This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.”
Show all 21 chapters

Navigating Inventory Challenges in Real Estate

24:55 to 28:00

Exploration of inventory issues and their impact on the real estate market.

“The spring buying season is about to get underway.”

Real Estate Market Dynamics Across the U.S.

28:00 to 29:10

Explore the current trends in the real estate market across different U.S. states.

“And folks are really loosening the fact, loosening to the idea that that low interest rate is the only thing holding them in their home.”

Impact of Environmental Factors on Housing Demand

29:10 to 30:50

Discuss how environmental events, like fires, affect housing demand in Los Angeles.

“I live in Los Angeles and we're actually seeing sort of a steadying of the market in Los Angeles.”

Navigating Seller and Buyer Market Dynamics

30:50 to 32:30

Understand the variations between seller's and buyer's markets based on inventory.

“It did keep its full-year guidance when it comes to deliveries.”

Real Estate Commissions and Agent Compensation

32:30 to 34:10

Learn how commissions are changing and the value agents provide in transactions.

“And, you know, if we think about the industry, this is one where they're essentially private contractors, right?”

The Role of AI in Real Estate Transactions

34:10 to 35:25

Discover how AI is transforming the home buying process and the role of real estate agents.

“Fortune has a story out from Zillow, citing Zillow's CTO, chief technology officer.”

Meta's Response to Social Media Addiction Allegations

38:00 to 40:00

Analyze the ongoing trial concerning Meta's responsibility regarding youth addiction.

“You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.”

The Broader Implications of Social Media Trials

40:00 to 42:00

Understand the potential legal implications for Meta and similar companies from ongoing trials.

“There's thousands of lawsuits in the same vein.”

The Importance of Legal Cases Against Meta

42:00 to 43:59

Explore the significance of ongoing legal cases against Meta and their implications.

“But I mean, just the rules and oversight.”

Global Responses to Social Media Risks for Youth

44:00 to 46:25

Discuss the international measures being taken to address social media's impact on children.

“And I'm looking at a story that was on the Bloomberg yesterday into discuss India discussing age based social media curbs, according to one of its ministers.”

The Future of Social Media Regulation

46:26 to 46:59

Delve into the potential future regulations for social media platforms affecting youth.

“Yeah, I can say I can tell you that it's a massive theme that we're following on our sort of social media pod here at Bloomberg.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Carol Massar:They told us to expect change. They warned us about the transition. But honestly, they forgot the best part. This is the chapter where we finally focus on us. LifeMD delivers expert menopause and midlife care right from your home. From hormone health to holistic wellness, LifeMD helps you feel your best for the best years of your life. LifeMD, it's just getting good. Visit LifeMD.com slash goodlife. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need.

0:40Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business.

0:58Carol Massar:If you follow markets, you know the value of long-term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But in life, even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. A fire, a loss, a disruption that demands immediate attention. When that happens, what matters isn't just what you planned, it's who shows up. That's where Cincinnati Insurance comes in. For more than 75 years, they've helped individuals and businesses navigate life's toughest moments with care, expertise, and personal attention. Together with independent agents, Cincinnati Insurance focuses on relationships, not transactions.

1:37Carol Massar:Their approach is grounded in experience, follow-through, and trust built over time. Bad days happen, and when they do, you deserve an insurance partner who understands risk, respects what you've built, and is ready to help you move forward. The Cincinnati Insurance Companies. Let them make your bad day better. Find an independent agent at c-i-n-f-i-n dot com.

2:26Business Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio.

2:32Carol Massar:It is a Fed Wednesday. Not a decision, but we're getting the Fed minutes from that first meeting of 2026. Happened on January 28th. You know, that's the meeting when the Fed kept rates steady. And you had two Fed governors, Chris Waller and Stephen Myron, voting against the decision in favor of lowering rates by a quarter of a point. So we are waiting for them to cross. They will cross any moment from now. Chair Powell also back then talked up a, quote, clear improvement in the U.S. outlook and said the job market shows sign of steadying, signaling a cautious optimism. All right, let's head to D.C.

3:04Carol Massar:and outside the Federal Reserve is our own Michael McKee. Mike. OK, here's the headline in a very newsy set of minutes. Several participants indicated that they would have supported a two-sided description of the committee's future interest rate decisions, reflecting the possibility that upward adjustments could be appropriate. The focus of the January meeting on inflation largely, rather than jobs, and concern that bringing it down had stalled. Officials anticipated inflation would move down this year, but the pace and timing remained uncertain. The continuing rise in prices driven by tariffs, the Minutes say.

3:44The effects would likely start to diminish this year, and ongoing moderation in housing prices would also help. High productivity growth from technology might also put downward pressure on inflation. And a few participants mentioned that companies were telling them they are automating more operations to try to offset some price increase needs. Most participants, however, cautioned that progress toward the 2 % objective might be slower and more uneven than generally expected, and judged that the risk of inflation running persistently above the committee's objective was meaningful. Some cited reports from business contacts expecting to raise prices this year.

4:25The labor market, the committee's big concern last year, was less of a concern this year. The vast majority of participants judged the minutes say that labor market conditions had been showing some signs of stabilization and that downside risks to the labor market had diminished. Still, most agreed downside risks to the labor market remained in place, particularly as the labor supply diminished. Overall, the economy appeared to be expanding at a solid pace with resilient consumer spending and robust business investment, particularly in technology. Several, though, suggested a lot of that was due to spending by higher income consumers.

5:05Lower income spending was soft. There was a long discussion of markets with several commenting on high asset valuations and historically low credit spreads. Some saw vulnerabilities in AI, including elevated equity valuations and gains concentrated in a small number of companies. Several highlighted concern about the private credit sector, and others commented on risks associated with hedge funds and rising leverage. Finally, the January meeting is when the Open Market Committee elects its officers for the year. Jay Powell, again, named chair of the committee, but the minutes say until the selection of their successors at the first meeting of 2027.

5:49Carol Massar:Got to say, Mike, it sounds like they all had their Wheaties that morning. It was a busy meeting, right? It sounds like they covered a lot of stuff. Hang on for a second, because I want to see what you think is of most importance to the Bloomberg audience. Having said that, just taking a look at equity markets firming up a little bit on the S &P and the Dow, but pretty much NASDAQ 100 staying where it was prior to the Fed minutes coming out. If I look at the Treasury curve, you are looking at pretty much the 10 and 5, where they were prior to the release of the minutes. Looking at the shorter end of the yield curve, slight uptick, the two-year yield moving from like 345 to 346, kind of back there.

6:29Carol Massar:So I would say not much market reaction, which is kind of interesting. Mike, what is most notable? Because investors seem to be taking this in stride. Well, this is the first commentary from anybody at the Fed about the possibility of rate increases. Several refers to only two or three members, and we kind of know who those members might be. But the idea that they did put the idea out there is something that we haven't seen in years. And so it does become a significant talking point as we go forward and watch to see what inflation does. The emphasis clearly shifting to inflation at this meeting from last year's focus on jobs.

7:10Hey, Mike, a couple of the headlines that are worth repeating. Several saw more cuts of inflation declines as expected, yet most cautioned disinflation could be slower than expected. What could lead to slower disinflation? Well, they're concerned about tariff price increases and maybe they don't fade out as fast. And then additional demand in the economy, because we're going to get some stimulus from tax refunds and because of all the spending on AI, might also push prices higher. So there's concerns that inflation, while it may not rise significantly, could stabilize at a higher than desired level.

7:47And that might lead the Fed to have to do something about it.

7:50Carol Massar:Hey, Mike, a lot going on. Obviously, there's Fed minutes. We had some economic news today as well. We also had Kevin Hassett out there on a New York Fed tariff study, and I got to ask you about that. He's, of course, President Trump's NEC director, and he says that a New York Fed study showed that the U.S. companies bearing most of the tariff burden is an embarrassment, and the people associated with it should be disciplined. He spoke about this earlier on CNBC. Here's exactly what he had to say. He said what they've done is they put out a conclusion which has created a lot of news that's highly partisan based on an analysis that wouldn't be accepted in a first semester econ class.

8:31Carol Massar:I've been in that first semester econ class. So, Mike, Fed researchers found nearly 90 percent of the economic burden from tariffs last year were borne by U.S. companies and consumers. Let's say you, Mike McKee, and the folks that you talk to, the economic community, who really bears the cost of those tariffs? companies and consumers in the United States. Mr. Hassett's comments seem to have adopted the attack dog language of the Trump administration much more than even Kevin had done before, maybe because he's not a candidate for Fed chair at this point. But you got to point out that the New York Fed, by saying 90 percent is picked up by Americans, is the outlier here because a study by the University of Chicago found 99 percent.

9:15Study by the CBO found 95 percent. The Kiel Institute in Germany found 94 percent. So all of these people found that Americans are buying 90 percent or more or paying 90 percent or more of the tariffs. So I think Mr. Hassett has looked at it the wrong way. And obviously, the Trump administration doesn't like criticism. Okay, Hey, good to have that on the program, Mike. Just before we let you go, the jobless boom, a most read story on the Bloomberg Terminal about the unprecedented jobless boom in the U.S., how economists are warning that the U.S. economy is vulnerable to shocks because the labor market is not growing.

9:55Some are predicting that economic growth will slow due to stagnant labor markets. Can't productivity increase as a result? Well, productivity can increase. Of technology, excuse me, as a result of technology. Well, that can happen. And the question is, how fast does the technology get adopted and how quickly and how deeply does it get adopted to drive productivity significantly higher? The concern about the labor market and the jobless recovery is reflected in these minutes. And members of the Open Market Committee did talk about that as a possibility, a possible risk to the economy. Although, as I said, inflation was sort of their number one concern this time.

10:33Carol Massar:All right. So appreciate it, as always. Our own Michael McKee down there outside the Federal Reserve or actually inside the Federal Reserve because it's kind of still cold outside, I think. Mike, thank you so much. Safe travels back. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.

10:53Carol Massar:They told us to expect change. They warned us about the transition. But honestly, they forgot the best part. This is the chapter where we finally focus on us. Life MD delivers expert menopause and midlife care right from your home. From hormone health to holistic wellness, Life MD helps you feel your best for the best years of your life. Life MD, it's just getting good. Visit LifeMD.com slash goodlife. Hello, hello. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, host of the podcast Smart Talks with IBM. I recently sat down with IBM's chairman and CEO, Arvind Krishna. and I asked him, how can companies use AI to its fullest potential to create smarter business?

11:39My one advice to them, pick areas you can scale. Don't pick the shiny little toys on the side. For example? If anybody has more than 10 % of what they had for customer service 10 years ago, they're already five years behind. If anybody is not using AI to make their developers who write software 30 % more productive today, with the goal of being 70 % more productive.

12:11Carol Massar:Yeah. Wow. So we are not asking our clients to be the first experiment on it. We say, you can leverage what we did. We are happy to bring out all our learnings, including what needs to change in the process. Because the biggest change is not technology. It's getting people to accept that there's a different way to do things. To listen to the full conversation, visit ibm.com slash smarttalks.

12:59staying at Sonesta ES and Simply Suites means earning points toward free nights, upgrades, and more with every eligible stay. Go to Sonesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass. Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sonesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app or watch us live on YouTube.

13:32Carol Massar:Hey, listen, investors definitely keeping a watch on economic data, Fed expectations. For what else is a top of mind is someone who's been looking at the recent volatility in the markets. He says it's typical of a major investment cycle, and that's some dynamics around the fear of AI disruption or contradictory. It is the view of our next guest. He is Mike Mike Wilson of Morgan Stanley. He was among the rare forecasters who held on to a bullish view last April, even as stocks sank in the aftermath of sweeping U.S. tariffs. His conviction proved correct, with the S &P, as you know, rebounding to a record as President Trump dialed down his trade war.

14:09Carol Massar:He does see the S &P rallying, I think, about 16 percent this year, but that was his call in mid-November. We'll see if he has an update. We welcome Mike Wilson. He's chief U.S. equity strategist, chief investment officer for Morgan Stanley. He's in New York City. Mike, good to have you here. And someone who has followed Mike's call and writes calls, I should say, and writes about him a lot is our own Alex Seminova. She's Bloomberg News equities reporter. She's here in studio. We want to talk about the markets, Mike. Are we in the midst of a new bull market and earnings cycle, especially for many of the lagging areas of the index?

14:43Carol Massar:That was your call in mid-November. Is that a call you still stick to? Yeah. Well, good afternoon. First of Well, I would say yes. I mean, you know, the story we actually started writing about in May of last year, which is a mid-year update, was exactly that. I think I think our view still remains out of consensus around this idea that Liberation Day marked the end of what we call a rolling recession. So we're actually not only in a new earnings cycle, we're in a new economic cycle. And that's why we're seeing the broadening out now, because there have been many parts of the economy that have been sort of mired in a recession for the last three years or so.

15:21Carol Massar:And they're just now starting to emerge. Areas like consumer goods, some of the financial sector, industrials, obviously, which is getting a boost from AI CapEx, but also getting a boost from, you know, basically underspending for the last several years. Parts of technology are still doing quite well. And so that broadening out is the real story. And we doubled down on that in November because the evidence was coming through. And, you know, in May, we didn't know. But now we know. I mean, the earnings growth for the median stock in the Russell 3000 is now running double-digit growth year over year.

15:53Carol Massar:That's the first time we've seen that in four years. So it's happening. The question now is, how long can it last? You know, what could derail that? And, you know, what do you pay for? I mean, those are always the questions. But the first part of your question is a resounding yes. We are in a new earnings and economic cycle, and the market has figured it out. Hey, Meg, it's been pretty remarkable to see that we've gotten this tremendous stock volatility at the single stock level, also at the sector level. But when you look at the S &P 500, it actually hasn't really done much this year. What is it going to take to break us out of this range, and what could be the catalyst to get us past that elusive 7 ,000 level that everyone's waiting for?

16:34Carol Massar:Yeah, that seems to be the question. I mean, obviously, stock investors don't mean if you can make money in other areas, that's fine. I think that's the real main message is that the market is not going anywhere at the S &P level, but there are many sectors that are doing well. And that's the name of the game. Now, to your question, I think what's going to break us out ultimately are two things. Number one, there is some uncertainty around the AI CapEx cycle and the disruption that perhaps it could cause in the labor market and other areas. So I think we're in one of those testing periods now.

17:04Carol Massar:We heard about that this week. We think that ultimately it's a little bit premature to kind of throw a cold blanket on the AI cycle. It's just getting going from our standpoint. And then secondarily, I think we have a new Fed chair nominee with Kevin Warsh. And the market always tests the new Fed chair, whoever it is, when they come into power or office. And so first we have to go through the confirmation hearings. And then we got to learn a little bit more about what he really intends to do. So that could lead to this, you know, the market kind of struggling for another month or two. And then ultimately, we think once he takes office, we think that'll be another catalyst for why the market can have a really good second half.

17:47Carol Massar:And we stand by our$7 ,800 price target for the S &P by the end of this year. OK, so those are all the reasons and more that you think we could see a 16 percent increase in the S &P 500 this year. What changes your mind, Mike? Like what could happen between now and the end of the year that could cause you to go back and sharpen the pencils, break out the Excel and say, wait a second, we've got to recalculate this. Yeah, well, we do that every week anyways, because we have to. But I would say, you know, what would change our view is probably the things that are going right now. So, for example, if we would see that earnings cycle start to deteriorate, that could happen.

18:24Carol Massar:It's not our forecast. But if the earnings revisions were to start to narrow again or start to really break down, that would be clearly something that would change our view. The second would be that, you know, the fear around Kevin Worsh being kind of a balance sheet hawk where, you know, he's going to maybe strike the balance sheet. And we're going to have a little bit of a liquidity problem, potentially, that would cause multiples to come down. We don't think that's going to be the case this year. That might be a story for 2027. We'll think about it then. But but maybe we're wrong on that. The other one, of course, is you get another exogenous shock of some kind.

18:59Carol Massar:And I think, you know, the one I mentioned earlier is starting to weigh on stocks here in the short term, which is this concern that, you know, AI is happening so fast and it's, you know, it's migrating now into the corporate world that we're going to see a big labor cycle. That's not our view, but it could happen. And so there are those would be the top three, I would say, that could derail our positive view for this year. We've heard time and time again that big tech's profits are going to slow, that it's time to rotate. And anyone who said that for the last few years has been wrong on that.

19:31Do you think that this year is different? And when you think about the end of 2026, when we close out, who are going to be the new winners?

19:37Carol Massar:And I love that you went there because, Mike, it feels like the last three years people have said, get away from big tech, diversify. And yet that's where we've seen so much of the gains. It's a great it's a great. I think a lot of people also made the other side of the call, which is to kind of upgrade small caps or the equal weighted S &P. We didn't do that. We don't get everything right. But we waited until November to make that call because our view is not that tech earnings are going to collapse. It's that the rest of the market's earnings are going to improve. And that's what usually drives relative performance.

20:09Carol Massar:So it's really the spread between sort of the MAG-7 or large cap growth stock earnings growth and the other 493 stocks or the other equal weighted index, whatever you want to call it. And that spread is narrowing now. And so the areas that we have been recommending is based on where that earnings growth is accelerating the most. That would be things like consumer goods or financials, some of the industrial segments, some of the small mid cap areas. And we stand by that. That's what we're seeing and that's what we think is going to continue for the rest of this year. And that's really the story.

20:43Carol Massar:It's not an anti-tech or anti-large cap growth call. It's more of just a bullish call on all these parts of the economy and the market that have been under-earning because of this rolling recession. So is it fair, Mike, to say that you like the equal-weighted version of the S &P 500 more than the main index? Absolutely. That was one of our lead calls in the November outlook. And that has worked so far. So knock on wood, hopefully that continues. And based on what we've seen so far this year in the earnings and what we see kind of in this, you know, the economy itself, which I think, quite frankly, is booming at the moment because you have capital spending increasing and consumer spending holding up.

21:23Carol Massar:That's a much better environment for the average company. Hey, Mike, two things I just real quickly I'm curious about. Do you think the White House is still a risk to financial markets or with midterms looming? Do you think that the president and his team are going to be very careful about unsettling things in the financial markets? Many have said he certainly keeps an eye on it. Maybe that's the checks and balances on the White House. And secondly, Kevin Warsh, if indeed he does become Fed chair, will he be an independent Fed? Yeah, no, I think I mean, look, I think that this administration and the president, you know, specifically has shown that, you know, they're going to he's going to kind of operate in his speed.

22:05Carol Massar:And so I don't anticipate that we're going to see, for example, you know, this administration trying to lose momentum in what they're trying to achieve, which which means more of the same. Quite frankly, it's going to be, you know, it's going to be active and that creates, you know, periods of volatility, uncertainty, whatever you want to call it. But I mean, I think the mission and what they're trying to accomplish is now crystal clear. They're trying to rebalance the economy on three different planes at the same time. And I think they're having some success with that. That's why we're seeing productivity increase already.

22:32Carol Massar:We're seeing GDP increase. We're seeing earnings broaden out. And so as long as they're seeing results like that, I think they're going to stay the course. With respect to the Fed independence, I mean, I have probably had a bit different view here. I mean, as far as I can tell, I mean, the Fed independence has been sort of fading for the better part of 20 years, really, since the financial crisis. And when I say independent, I don't mean they're under the thumb of the White House. What I mean is that they have to play ball in terms of their role to help the government fund itself. OK, and we saw that after the financial crisis.

Read the full transcript

23:07Carol Massar:We saw that in 2012. We saw that, you know, when we had a regional banking stress in 2023. So the Fed is obligated to, you know, help financial markets operate. I mean, it's their third mandate. They even call it that. So that to me is where the Fed independence has been challenged for the better part of two decades. And I think that's going to continue. I think the Fed and Treasury are going to work closer together, similar to the World War II period. And that's a good thing because that means they're going to figure it out. All right. Well, we all want you back here. So feel free to stop by our studio anytime.

23:44Carol Massar:Mike Wilson, Chief U.S. Equity Strategist, Chief Investment Officer over at Morgan Stanley, and of course, our Alex Seminova. This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live each weekday starting at 2 p.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say, Alexa, play Bloomberg 1130. So U.S. Treasury yields, we did see move up today earlier on some strong economic data, including reports on housing. New residential construction in the U.S. rose to a five-month high in the month of December.

24:21Carol Massar:That, as home builders boosted production to take advantage of lower borrowing costs that were out there. The advance, we should point out, was broad-based, both single-family home starts and apartment projects rising at years. And the number of one-family homes started was, Tim, the highest since the month of February. The stronger construction numbers suggest that builders were growing more confident at year's end, even as they continue to sell off a bloated inventory of new houses. For the full year, though, starts notched a fourth straight annual decline. For more on the U.S. housing market, we're joined by Kamini Lane, president and CEO of Coldwell Bank or Realty.

24:54It's got nearly 49 ,000 affiliated real estate agents doing business in more than 55 markets across the United States. She joins us from Los Angeles. It's good to have you on the program. The spring buying season is about to get underway. You have agents all over the country who are giving you real-time feedback about what things are looking. This is not a monolithic market. I hear that location, location, location is everything. What can you tell us about the state of the real estate industry in the U.S.? Yeah, you know, we have seen some really good indicators at the end of last year, both in terms of housing starts and in terms of new construction.

25:30And, you know, inventory really is sort of the issue to tackle in the housing market right now. We know that, you know, more than 85 percent of people believe that home ownership is central to the American dream. So that aspiration has not gone away. However, we need inventory. We need inventory to get people into those homes. So, you know, it is location, location, location, but it really is inventory, inventory, inventory. And we see sort of mixed inventory across the country. And if you look at sort of the Midwest and the Northeast, we still have really tight inventory. whereas in other markets, we do see loosening of inventory, which is causing more price stability.

26:10Is there anything that gets inventory to increase without actually just building more homes? Would lower mortgage rates increase inventory? Absolutely. I think, you know, we've talked a lot about that lock-in effect that started occurring because of the historically low interest rates, you know, around post-COVID era, where we saw sellers that were really locked into their homes because they didn't want to give up that three or four percent interest rates. So with the loosening of that lock in lock in effect, we're going to see sellers who are more willing to put their homes on the market, who are a little bit more realistic about prices.

26:43Right. Because we're not seeing the double digit year over year price increases that we saw kind of four or five years ago. And so when we get more sellers to release that lock in effect, when we get sellers to get realistic about pricing, that's really going to be the other factor in addition, obviously, to new building that gets more inventory on the market.

27:03Carol Massar:Company that lock in effect where people, you know, have a low rate and they don't want to move. Is it is it everybody or is it largely an older population who maybe retired around COVID or made some decisions? And, you know, it's just more to do with demographics than people who locked in lower rates. Or is it a little bit of both? It's you know, it's everybody. I mean, who doesn't love, you know, a three percent interest rate. Right. But I think that what folks are starting to realize is that those were historical lows for a reason and now now we are you know mortgage rates are about six percent hundred basis points lower than last year and very much in line with u.s historical averages so i think this idea of just holding on to an interest rate is starting to loosen across all demographics and people are realizing that there are other reasons to move now you couple that with the increase in home equity and the increase in wage earning over the last couple of years.

28:00And folks are really loosening the fact, loosening to the idea that that low interest rate is the only thing holding them in their home. They're starting to realize that if they do put their home on the market, they can take advantage of some of those equity gains from price increases, you know, and just be more realistic about what rates are in line with historical averages.

28:20Carol Massar:You mentioned earlier that I think there's tighter inventory in the Northeast, other areas are looser. Walk us around the country and what you're seeing and be more specific in terms of markets. Yeah, sure. So, you know, Texas is one market, Austin in particular, where we are seeing year over year price decreases because we've got a lot of inventory there. Florida actually has more inventory this time this year than it did last year, which is sort of an interesting and unexpected dynamic. And, you know, one market that I think is fascinating right now is the city of San Francisco. We saw year over year price declines around the COVID era in the city of San Francisco.

28:57And now because of the AI boom, we're seeing really strong price increases in the city of San Francisco, both in terms of rent and in terms of single family homes. And I think that that's going to continue to increase. So price increases in that city, but not a lot of inventory. I live in Los Angeles and we're actually seeing sort of a steadying of the market in Los Angeles. We had historical highs in terms of year-over-year price increases a few years ago. Now we see prices are really studying out in Los Angeles and supply and demand are starting to even out a little bit. In Los Angeles, did the devastating fires last year affect the way that people think about living in an environment such as that?

29:38Los Angeles is always going to be a really attractive city. Just the combination of the weather, the proximity to the beach, the ocean, you know, mountains, the entertainment industry, the fires certainly had a devastating effect on specific communities. But we actually saw particularly in the high end, that that demand that was in the Palisades and Malibu communities that were devastated by the fires transferred almost one to one into neighboring communities like Beverly Hills, Bel Air, Santa Monica, Brentwood. And so I don't think that the demand to live in Los Angeles has changed at all because of the fires.

30:16We're just seeing a sort of a rebalancing in where folks have moved. You know, I'm curious to what sellers are having to do.

30:27Carol Massar:So is it more of a seller's market or buyer's market? Or again, depends on the market. And I am curious about when it's new versus previously owned homes, what you're seeing. And I bring that up because Toll Brothers reported after the close yesterday, our own in-house intelligence team writing the post-first quarter earnings outlook. First quarter orders were flat, 5 % below consensus. It did keep its full-year guidance when it comes to deliveries. Management saying January's gotten off to a promising start with most customer metrics modestly higher than last year. They'll caution that it's still early in the spring season.

31:04Carol Massar:I mean, the spring season is an important one, and I am curious if sellers, particularly new homes, are having to incent buyers throwing in different things to get sales going? Or is that not the case? You know, so, you know, for new constructions, for new construction, incentives have not actually changed. And so we're not seeing, you know, major shift in the sort of buyer's market or seller's market dynamic with regards to new construction. But to your point, you know, whether it's a buyer's market or seller's market really does differ around the country. And it really is just dictated by inventory, because the macroeconomic factors around the country are steady, right, in terms of wage increases, in terms of mortgage rates.

31:44And so it really is dependent on inventory. So when you look at a market like New England, for example, where we still have very, very tight inventory, you know, that's going to dictate that sellers have a little bit more power than buyers do. However, in a market like Texas, and, you know, Texas is very broad, but I'll talk to Austin in particular, we've got a lot of inventory in Austin. And so prices are down year over year, about 6%. So that indicates that it's more of a buyer's market where buyers have a little bit more power at that negotiating table. So, you know, again, inventory really is the thing that's dictating market dynamics across the country.

32:21And it very much is region specific. You know, I'm wondering about compensation for the agents that you have, that you oversee. And, you know, if we think about the industry, this is one where they're essentially private contractors, right? They're not employed by you. They work for themselves. They eat what they kill. The commissions have been under scrutiny for quite a bit of time. There was the big settlement in recent years. What are commissions looking like in different markets? And is there pressure on commissions as a result of that? Yeah, great question. So at Coldwell Banker Realty, we have about 49 ,000 affiliated agents, all independent contractors.

33:01And what we're actually seeing is that on the list side, commissions have gone up a little bit. And I think that is because after the massive conversation and the news cycle around commissions, our agents got better at talking about the value that they provide. So at that kitchen table, when you're negotiating with an agent to decide who is going to list your home, which, you know, by the way, the vast majority of Americans have the vast majority of their wealth tied up in the equity of their home. So that is an incredibly important decision, who is going to help you with the most important financial transaction of your life, those agents are better able to articulate their value.

33:43And consumers are recognizing that, and they're willing to pay for it. And that is what the commission is. It's compensation for the incredible value that the real estate professional is providing. So contrary to what a lot of people assume, we actually have not seen commissions decline in the last year or so. They're actually going up. And I think it really is because of that value that the real estate professional is providing, particularly at a firm like Coldwell Bank or Realty.

34:09Carol Massar:Kamini, one thing we have to ask you about is AI, the impact. Fortune has a story out from Zillow, citing Zillow's CTO, chief technology officer. And he is saying that AI is reinventing every step of the home buying process, making it easier for shoppers to search for a home and complete a transaction. And we've recently seen the AI scare trade impact some of the residential or not residential, but real estate servicing companies. AI in your world just got about 40 seconds left here. How is it impacting it so far? And how might it? Yeah, I think artificial intelligence is an amazing tool to help our real estate professionals use their time more effectively and efficiently.

34:48At the end of the day, real estate really is about relationships. It's the most personal transaction that most people are ever going to encounter in their lives. And so that really does require a human at the center. However, AI can make that human more powerful, use their time more efficiently, use data more efficiently and be more effective in that transaction.

35:09Carol Massar:So real quickly, it's an aid. It's not going to wipe out what you guys do or your agents do. No, it is an aid. It is an empowerment tool. But real estate is fundamentally human. All right. Going to leave it there. Kamen Elaine, thank you so much. President and CEO of Coldwell Banker Realty joining us. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.

35:35Hello, hello. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, host of the podcast Smart Talks with IBM. I recently sat down with IBM's chairman and CEO, Arvind Krishna, and I asked him, how can companies use AI to its fullest potential to create smarter business? My one advice to them, pick areas you can scale. Don't pick the shiny little toys on the side. For example? If anybody has more than 10 % of what they had for customer service 10 years ago, they're already five years behind. If anybody is not using AI to make their developers who write software 30 % more productive today with the goal of being 70 % more productive.

36:23Carol Massar:Yeah. So we are not asking our clients to be the first experiment on it. We say, you can leverage what we did. We are happy to bring out all our learnings, including what needs to change in the process, because the biggest change is not technology. It's getting people to accept that there's a different way to do things. To listen to the full conversation, visit ibm.com slash smarttalks. Thank you. and unlock the best available rates when you book direct with Sinesta Travel Pass. Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sinesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. If you follow markets, you know the value of long-term thinking.

37:32Carol Massar:You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. For more than 75 years, Cincinnati Insurance has helped individuals and businesses navigate tough moments with expertise, personal attention, and independent agents who focus on relationships, not transactions. The Cincinnati insurance companies. Let them make your bad day better. Find an agent at CINFIN.com. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App or watch us live on YouTube.

38:17Carol Massar:There's another thing we've been keeping track of. It happened out on the West Coast. It involved one of the largest market cap companies out there and a major player in social media. You're talking about Meta. Yeah, Mark Zuckerberg testifying that it's, quote, very difficult to enforce Instagram's age limits. He sought to defend the platform during a landmark trial over social media addiction. He was sharply questioned on the witness stand today about whether he and other leaders are aware of the volume of children under age 13 who use the photo sharing app. Kurt Wagner is senior technology reporter.

38:48He covers social media. He's also the author of Battle for the Bird, Jack Dorsey, Elon Musk and the$44 billion fight for Twitter. So he joins us from Denver. Kurt, there's so many directions we want to go here. I mean, there are some out there who are comparing this to what happened with tobacco company executives on the stand. And, you know, when we were kids and the way that that changed the public health view of cigarettes and the way that that has looked back on historically, what's at stake here? Yeah, I mean, this is, to your point, sort of in the same general vein as those cigarette tobacco industry trials, opioid industry trials.

39:29This is a question of whether these social networks specifically are built with the intention of addicting users, particularly addicting young people, teenagers, to their products. And so this is a real signature moment, I would say, for this industry to kind of be challenged with these allegations and, in Mark Zuckerberg's case, to defend himself and his company against these accusations. And so it's been highly watched, highly anticipated. And this is just really the first of more than a thousand potential trials that we could see. There's thousands of lawsuits in the same vein. And so we're paying particularly close attention to this one because the outcome of this could sort of signal what we might see from from a lot of these other lawsuits that have yet to be tried.

40:18How do you differentiate or how does a judge or how do lawyers differentiate on whether something is addictive, meant to be addictive to kids or just it's addictive in nature? So it doesn't matter if the person who's using it is 12 years old or 25 years old. Yeah, I mean, this is why it's such a challenging question. I don't know is the short answer to the answer to this, but I can tell you that what plaintiff's lawyers were doing this morning with Mark Zuckerberg on the stand was they were trying to show two things. The first was they were challenging him over Meta's enforcement of its age restrictions, basically saying, you know, are you actually enforcing this idea that that those under 13 should not be on the platform?

41:04And if so, are you doing everything possible to to actually do that? And I feel like that's really been maybe the main argument that's been happening is that they haven't really enforced their own policies on that. Mark Zuckerberg has admitted, hey, this is a difficult thing for us to do. And you may recall, this actually ties into a broader tech industry discussion we've had over the last couple of years where Meta has said, hey, this should be the job of the app stores. This should be an Apple and Google thing. And Apple and Google are saying, no, no, no, no, no. This is your responsibility, Meta.

41:34You know, you have to determine how old the users are on your platform. And so this sort of plays into a discussion we've really heard more broadly across the industry for the last couple of years.

41:44Carol Massar:What's so fascinating, Kurt, it's happening on a day when we've talked about CBS and what's happened on Stephen Colbert's show in terms of one specific Texas politician who is running for now a federal state, federal Senate seat. But I mean, just the rules and oversight. And it's just fascinating that when traditional airwaves came out, there was oversight. There was rules about what could be on air. And now most of us are getting information from social media. It's not your linear broadcast and so on. So you do wonder, like, when does the oversight come from all of this? And as you write in your story, I mean, this is one case.

42:30Carol Massar:You have 3 ,000 cases brought by children, adolescents, and young adults through their parents. You've got school districts. You've got, I mean, so much going on. It's not. So how important is this first case? Because it sounds like there's a lot more legal overhang from Metta and others. I think it's really important. I mean, we had some time with Meta's lawyers a few weeks ago, their legal team. And what they told us was, you know, each case is different. Each trial is different. Each jury is different. So getting a verdict in their favor one way or the other on this first case, you know, isn't a huge deal.

43:09But I think for those watching on the outside, I mean, this is going to signal, do these cases have merit? Do these cases have legs? Certainly it's going to be hard for lawyers in the other cases not to look here and say, OK, what worked and what didn't work in terms of arguments and lines of questioning. So I think it's very important. It could also be the kind of thing, you know, if Meta loses a case early on, you know, do they choose to start to settle some of these cases down the line to avoid having to go through the actual jury process every time? And so I think this is important. It certainly will signal or set sort of the expectation for things to come, even though it is true.

43:47I think that each each case will have its own nuances and details to flush out. So this will kind of serve as a bellwether.

43:56Carol Massar:Listen, this is not a U.S. issue, as you well known, Kurt. It's a global issue. And I'm looking at a story that was on the Bloomberg yesterday into discuss India discussing age based social media curbs, according to one of its ministers. You've got countries, right, Tim, around the world that are taking steps to crack down on use. Australia, the first country to implement a legal ban, which included Meta, Meta's Instagram and Facebook, Snap, Elon Musk's ex TikTok and Google's YouTube, Ireland. Like, you know, it is going across Europe. So, like, we are seeing so many different things go on. Yeah.

44:34Kerr, what do public health officials, not just in the US, but in public health observers say about these platforms in general and kids? Well, I mean, there's been research for years that these platforms can be very divisive. You know, it's easy to for misinformation, for example, to run rampant on these platforms. We've all certainly witnessed that. I think it was in the U.S. where they wanted to apply sort of similar warnings that you would get on cigarettes, right? Like smoking labels, essentially, but for social media. And so there's been a lot of talk about this. I think what's interesting about these bans or these restrictions for teens is that they are, you know, everyone's watching Australia.

45:22you mentioned india there's other several other countries in europe that are considering similar restrictions but there's also states in the u.s that are trying to get this done as well to try and sort of limit social media use for teens and it'll be interesting to see if like there's a snowball effect at some point right because right now it's limited it's a lot of chatter but you know a year from now two years from now are we going to look up and say hey this is now the norm right that those under 16 just can't use social media and i think that's that's certainly possible

45:50Carol Massar:I mean, it's wild. I mean, Ireland, right home to kind of the EU tech hub, it's considering plans to introduce age restrictions on social media platforms as as part of a broader AI strategy. And they've talked about this. Do you feel like, Kurt, you follow this world that we are getting to a moment of reckoning when it comes to social media? There's a great story by Max Chafkin about dumb phones, dumb phones, you know, rather than every parent in the newsroom. We were talking about this today. We were all like, yeah, like, what is the solution for our kids? Like, like parents are stepping in because they just don't want this.

46:25Carol Massar:So are we at a at maybe a turning point or I don't know, like, what do you what do you think? We've just got about 30 seconds here. Yeah, I can say I can tell you that it's a massive theme that we're following on our sort of social media pod here at Bloomberg. Yeah, because it's not just this trial in L.A. We mentioned the thousands of others. There's state AGs that are suing, school districts that are suing. Like, this is not a storyline that's going to go away. And I think the ban or the restrictions, excuse me, in Australia and potentially in Europe are just adding to that. So certainly can't remember a time when it's been talked about this much before.

46:58Carol Massar:Great stuff, as always. Kurt Wagner, thank you so much. Senior technology reporter, cover social media. Check out his book, Battle for the Bird. This is the Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast. available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

47:39millions of claims are denied. Not because people did anything wrong, but because their policies quietly excluded what happened. Insurers know every detail. Policyholders rarely do. That's why My Policy Advocate exists. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and explains where you are vulnerable. They don't sell insurance, they deliver transparency. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Go to MyPolicyAdvocate.com.

48:11With Bali from iShares, you get access to both monthly income and growth potential in one simple ETF. It's the best of both worlds. Discover Bali, iShares large cap premium income active ETF. iShares, the market is yours. Visit www.iShares.com to view perspectives for investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses, and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing. Risks include principal loss and the use of derivatives, which could increase risks and volatility. Monthly income is not guaranteed. Prepare by BlackRock Investments, LLC. Deadlines shift, plans change, and sometimes you just need promo products fast.

48:42Turn to 4imprint. 4imprint has hundreds of promotional items available with 24-hour turnaround. From custom apparel and drinkware to trade show gear, writing tools, and more. And their 360-degree guarantee promises your logo will be printed with care. Your order ships fast, and it'll show up right and on time. That's the certainty of 4imprint. Check out the full 24-hour selection at 4imprint.com. For imprint. For certain.

From the publisher

The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy.
Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.
Federal Reserve officials signaled renewed worries over inflation with “several” policymakers suggesting the central bank may need to raise interest rates if inflation stays above their goal.
“Several participants indicated that they would have supported a two-sided description of the committee’s future interest-rate decisions, reflecting the possibility that upward adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate could be appropriate if inflation remains at above-target levels,” a record of the central bank’s January meeting showed.
Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s Jan. 27-28 meeting released Wednesday also revealed that a “vast majority of participants judged that downside risks to employment had moderated in recent months while the risk of more persistent inflation remained.”

The FOMC voted 10-2 at the meeting to hold the benchmark federal funds rate in a range of 3.5%-3.75%. Governors Christopher Waller and Stephen Miran dissented in favor of a quarter-point reduction. Officials dropped language pointing to increased downside risks to employment that had appeared in the three previous statements.
The minutes further signaled that one group of policymakers was embracing a view less open to additional rate cuts, at least in the near term.
Today's show features:

  • Michael McKee, Bloomberg TV and Radio International Economics & Policy Correspondent, on the latest FOMC minutes
  • Mike Wilson, Chief US Equity Strategist and Chief Investment Officer for Morgan Stanley, and Bloomberg News Equities Reporter Alexandra Semenova
  • Kamini Lane, President and CEO of Coldwell Banker Realty, on latest US Housing data
  • Bloomberg News Senior Technology Reporter Kurt Wagner on the Social Media Addiction trial

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Businessweek

All 738 episodes
Fed Minutes Show Several Officials Nod to Rate-Hike ScenarioBloomberg Businessweek · 41 min
Listen in VO