Kalshi's Court Fights, Regulating Prediction Markets

5 Aug 2026 · 45 min · 16 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Episode topic: Legal and regulatory fight over prediction markets (Kalshi) plus related market/finance segments (secondary markets; micro-mobility IPO; non-lethal defense tech).

Guests and backgrounds

Robert Dinald, head of enforcement and legal counsel at Kalshi; Larry Ashbrook, founder/managing partner of G-Squared (secondary/private-company investing); Wayne Ting, CEO of Lime; Conn Davis, CEO of Burnett Technologies (CO2-powered non-lethal “launchers”).

Key claims

New York AG Letitia James alleges Kalshi runs illegal gambling; Dinald argues Kalshi is a federally licensed exchange under the Commodity Exchange Act, with no “house,” and that CFTC oversight (including product self-certification and a 267-page prediction-market rulemaking) governs trades. Dinald says Kalshi detected George Santos market manipulation and referred evidence to the CFTC; Kalshi runs 24/7 surveillance and makes 150–250 “material” investigations per quarter, with 40–50 CFTC referrals year-to-date. Ashbrook argues secondaries are supported by macro (yields/risk premium) and expects a 2023-like slowdown; Ting emphasizes Lime’s competition and Uber partnership; Davis says devices are legal nationwide and non-lethal via projectile velocity/type.

Notable examples

New York lawsuit filed Friday in Manhattan; Santos wager about attending the 2026 State of the Union; Uber app access; Lime’s payback under 12 months; Burnett’s 60-foot range and 6-foot gas cloud.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Kalshi's Legal Challenges

1:41 to 3:01

Discussion on New York's lawsuit against Kalshi for illegal gambling.

“Reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead.”

Response to Allegations

3:01 to 5:39

Bobby Dinald's defense of Kalshi against claims of illegal operations.

“What is your response to this claim that Calci is running an illegal gambling operation?”

Federal vs. State Regulation

5:39 to 7:17

Debate over federal regulation of exchanges and state authority.

“We are not on the other side of individuals trading.”

Market Composition Concerns

7:17 to 8:23

Discussion on the oversight of bets and market manipulation risks.

“There were some like, why do you think Kalshi was singled out in this this typical or this this iteration of the lawsuit?”

Surveillance and Enforcement

8:23 to 11:23

Kalshi's measures for policing trades and preventing insider trading.

“It's just two parties figuring out something.”

Investigation Processes

11:23 to 12:20

Overview of how Kalshi conducts investigations and enforcement actions.

“And we police these markets both in real time and in retrospect.”

Future of Prediction Markets

12:20 to 14:00

Exploration of the impact of prediction markets on financial analysis.

“I think year to date, we've probably made about 40 or 50 referrals to the CFTC.”

Understanding Kalshi's Role in Financial Analytics

14:00 to 14:41

Learn how Kalshi serves as an informational resource in financial markets.

“I think the first goal is what we find is so many people are using Kalshi as a resource just to obtain information.”

Larry Ashbrook on the Growth of G-Squared

16:42 to 21:47

Explore G-Squared's investment strategy and successes in the private market.

“Larry Ashbrook predicts a coming reset in valuations, which is something we want to dig into.”

Navigating Market Trends and Valuations

21:47 to 25:02

Understand current market conditions and the implications for investment.

“But Larry, walk us through how you're thinking about this current market.”
Show all 16 chapters

Capital Deployment and Exit Strategies

25:02 to 27:09

Learn how G-Squared approaches capital deployment and exit strategies.

“Being in Chicago, we're able to be a little bit immune to that.”

Interview with Wayne Ting, CEO of Lime

28:55 to 36:50

Wayne Ting discusses Lime's growth, market strategies, and competition in micro-mobility.

“Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern.”

Insights on Non-Lethal Defense Technology

36:50 to 42:00

Discussion with Conn Davis on non-lethal defense technology and market challenges.

“Wayne Tang, CEO of Lime, joining us from San Francisco.”

Supply Chain Challenges for Small Businesses

42:01 to 45:50

Explore the difficulties and strategies small businesses face in today's supply chain environment.

“I am curious, what are some of your pain points right now in terms of supply chains, tariffs?”

Consumer Trends and Market Insights

45:51 to 47:25

Understand how consumer behavior is shifting and its impact on sales in specific markets.

“Based on that, who is your consumer typically?”

Policy Impact on Small Businesses

47:26 to 48:53

Learn about the influence of government policies on small businesses and their operational challenges.

“So I will tell you, we have a great R &D organization based just outside of Boston, Massachusetts.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00What if data didn't sit still? What if intelligence moved with us? Not buried in reports, but activated in real time, where lives are being shaped, where decisions are being made. It all starts with a question. Where is the potential? Cotality turns data into clarity, intelligence into insight, insight into action. Because when intelligence moves, we all move forward. Cotality. Intelligence beyond bounds. This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem. Running a business is hard enough. Don't make it harder with a dozen apps that don't talk to each other. One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting.

0:42That's software overload. Odoo is the all-in-one platform that replaces them all. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR. Fully integrated, easy to use, and built to grow with your business. Thousands have already made the switch. Why not you? Try Odoo for free at O-D-O-O dot com. That's Odoo dot com.

1:29Super Troopers 3. Only in theaters. Friday. Rated R. Under 17. Not admitted without payment. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily. Reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead. With insight on the people, companies and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus, global business, finance, and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio. Well, last week, New York state authorities sued the prediction markets company, Calci, for allegedly running an illegal unlicensed gambling operation in the state, marking another legal hurdle for an industry that's won support from the Trump administration.

2:20Carol Massar:That's right. That suit filed Friday in state court in Manhattan alleges that Calci's prediction market exposes state residents, including those under the legal gambling age of 21, to, quote, serious personal and financial risk. This is coming from the New York Attorney General Letitia James, putting that out in a statement. We've got with us Robert Dinald, head of enforcement and legal counsel at Calci. He joins us here in the Bloomberg Business Week studio. Bobby, welcome. I want to jump right into this suit because Letitia James, the attorney general, says, quote, no matter what they call themselves, prediction markets like Calci are gambling platforms, plain and simple.

2:55By ignoring our laws, Calci is running an illegal operation and harming New Yorkers in the process. What is your response to this claim that Calci is running an illegal gambling operation? I mean, as both a New Yorker and a lawyer, I'm alarmed by the overreaching sentiment that's coming from the attorney general's office. So Calci is a licensed federally regulated exchange. By her logic, any federally regulated exchange that's operating with a federal license and overseen by a federal regulator can suddenly be subject to the whims of state criminal enforcement if the attorney general of a particular state wakes up and decides one day that these contracts actually come within New York state gambling law.

3:39That's not how any exchange in U.S. history has ever operated, right? So we have, we're here at Bloomberg, you guys talk about the New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ, other exchanges, all of them could be potentially affected by the breadth and scope of the New York Attorney General's approach and legal theory in terms of how she believes she can regulate and bring to heel federally licensed exchanges here in New York State.

4:02Carol Massar:Bobby, are you saying you're the exact same thing as the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq markets? Are you saying you're the exact same thing apples to apples then? What I am saying is that federal law dictates that that is the case. when a federal law like the Commodity Exchange Act exists and provides for a way for an entity to get licensed by something like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the Securities Exchange Commission, that licensure and that federal regulation is what governs that marketplace. Now, if states want to litigate with that regulator on a case-by-case basis about what types of contracts might implicate some state laws, that's one question.

4:38And that's some of the lawsuits we've seen over the last year on sports. But this is much more far-reaching. This is claiming that that license means nothing. And if you don't hold a New York license, you're running a criminal operation and you need to be run out of the state. And I think it's important to ground this sort of in history of disruptive sort of new players in marketplaces. Right. Call she's new. But this this sort of licensed regime has existed for many decades. We've seen similar playbooks used against companies like Uber and Airbnb, where states try to throw their weight around and bring crazy cases to block what customers want as a reasonable alternative.

5:14We think that that's a pretty similar playbook to what the attorney general is following here. So why shouldn't Kalshi seek a license from the New York State Gaming Commission? Why wouldn't you do that? So it really goes to the way that the business operates. We are a federally licensed exchange that requires us to run open markets that are available nationwide. wide. Our users set the price. Traders set the price. We match traders in an open marketplace with one another. We are not on the other side of individuals trading. We don't run a casino where people can come in and drink and play card games.

5:45We don't run a sports book where we profit when people lose. What we do is run open marketplaces where users define the price point. And that type of financial product, even if it touches on topics that is similar to a topic touched on by a sports book, the way that that product operates is typically what governs what regulations apply.

6:04Carol Massar:So even though people keep coming at you and say, gambling, gambling, gambling, that's why you're not gambling? So I think it's important to define exactly what they mean when they say gambling. To me, gambling is when you go up against the house, when you go to a place that controls whether you're going to win or lose, they're going to chase losers, they're going to maximize their ability to limit winners. they're not going to run like a true business. But where an exchange exists and individuals are setting price with one another, I think that it operates under a different regulatory framework.

6:35And it's not to say that a whole panoply of different topics can be touched on by different regulated products. So we see concerns in options trading or leverage trading, retail traders moving into markets that are traditionally regulated markets at the federal level. I think some of the same concerns exist for those markets. And if you read the lawsuit closely, A ton of the definitions and the language and the descriptions that Attorney General James's office uses could easily be transposed onto Robinhood, crypto trading, derivatives trading, any sort of trading activity that the Attorney General suddenly decides poses a customer threat to individuals who want to participate in.

7:12I mean, there is in April, she did sue Coinbase and Gemini for running illegal gambling platforms. There were some like, why do you think Kalshi was singled out in this this typical or this this iteration of the lawsuit? You'd have to ask the governor's office why, you know, Kalshies was signaled out. I think the truth is there are a number of prediction markets that would be affected by this approach. There's a number of other exchanges that would be affected. There are a number of exchanges, like Robinhood's based in New York, right? Novig, Polymarket, they're all based in New York, none of whom have been subject to the attorney general's focus.

7:45So I don't know if that's coming. I don't know if you'd have to ask her office. But certainly, you know, we're a bit alarmed that the attorney general is seeing the scope of New York gambling law applying to potentially federal derivatives exchanges.

7:58Carol Massar:But I do think about exchanges, do you think about the composition of the bets that are on? Like if we're going to use the gambling analogy that keeps getting kind of lobbied at you. I mean, if I think about exchange, there is incredible oversight, you know, and there's rules. And so that there isn't, you know, trades that are happening that are not legit or fair or right. You know, if if gambling is, as you say, there is no house. Right. It's just two parties figuring out something. Where is the oversight and concern about the composition of the bets being made and making sure that they are true?

8:37Carol Massar:Because I think that's where you get into gambling. If anybody can kind of put up a bet and another person can take the side, and who knows if those two sides didn't get together to figure out this bet. Like, you know what I'm saying? So that, to me, is where you get into the gambling. It's a little, it feels a little loose. Sure. I don't think it's loose at all. So I think that when you're, so just to sort of zero in on some of the nuance that you just said, gambling is when there is the house. What you do on an exchange is where there is no house. There are two counterparties in a particular market agreeing on a price together and executing what we characterize as a swap, what the CEA qualifies as a swap.

9:14Those types of trades are heavily regulated under CFTC regulation. There are hundreds of regulations that apply.

9:20Carol Massar:All the trades that are happening on Cal State will be heavily regulated and oversight. We understand the two sides. They are currently heavily regulated and being overseen. I meet with the CFTC's enforcement division. That's my line of work at Kalshi. I lead our exchange enforcement. I meet with their enforcement division multiple times a week. But separately, they have other divisions, division market oversight, other divisions that oversee the implementation of markets so that they are structurally fair for the participants operating in them. And that oversight requires Kalshi as an exchange, but all prediction market exchanges to work very closely with the CFTC on the products that they offer.

9:53They have to self-certify them to the CFTC who can revoke approval for those products. And the CFTC recently came out with a 267-page rulemaking that was specific toward prediction market contracts. So I think it isn't correct to say these aren't currently heavily regulated. We're speaking with Bobby Dinald. He's head of enforcement and legal counsel at Kalshi. He joins us here in the Bloomberg Businessweek studio. I want to shift gears and talk about some other recent news. It seems like you're really playing whack-a-mole at this point with these lawsuits. It's like, obviously, it's keeping you busy.

10:23Also keeping you busy as enforcement. And former Congressman George Santos agreed to pay more than$35 ,000 to settle allegations that he manipulated a wager on your platform about whether he'd attend the 2026 State of the Union. Is it your responsibility to police that? Are you the one who recognized that and flagged it? Yes, it is our responsibility to police that. Do you have the resources? Like, this is one example, but do you have the resources to find every single one of them that allegedly has insider information? So I paused there and say that's not our standard at the New York Stock Exchange, and that's not our standard in the securities and equities markets.

10:57What we expect our federally regulated exchanges to do is to have reasonable procedures to detect insider trading, market manipulation, etc. Kalshi has very robust and, in fact, more robust than stock exchanges policing measures to prevent and detect insider trading. We do have 24-7 market surveillance. We use a surveillance vendor, but also in the coming days are going to announce an expansion of our surveillance systems. And we police these markets both in real time and in retrospect. And we work with the CFTC to investigate specific markets and detect anomalous activity in those markets. We did detect the trading activity by Mr.

11:34Santos. We conducted an investigation that involved an interview with Mr. Santos. And we referred the entire matter and the evidence that we collected to the CFTC, which allowed them to pursue enforcement. But separately, in the derivatives and commodities space, these exchanges, like ours, have a responsibility to also bring enforcement actions directly against the users who participate on them. And so we pursue direct exchange enforcement in areas where individuals come on and violate our CFTC-approved exchange rules. How often is that happening?

12:03Carol Massar:And how many investigations are you triggering on a daily basis or a weekly basis? So we sort of estimate quarterly. And volumes upticked quite a bit. So the investigations have upticked quite a bit. But somewhere between 150 and 250 a quarter become material investigations. We make a number of referrals. I think year to date, we've probably made about 40 or 50 referrals to the CFTC. These matters take time, though. The legal process, everybody deserves due process rights. So we afford people due process. We've settled or brought disciplinary actions in a number of cases. We're going to continue to do so.

12:34And by the end of the year, you know, I'm sure you'll see a meaningful number of actions. I put for context, the SEC in the last year of the Biden administration bought 35 insider trading actions. So, you know, I think the expectation would be somewhere in the ballpark of that number. Do you think that there are some markets that are listed on Kalshi that are more susceptible to manipulation than others? I think much like insider trading in the traditional securities and equities markets, there are certain paradigms that exist that create more likelihood for insider or manipulation risk. Like mentioned markets, perhaps?

13:06You know, I think mentioned markets are a unique category. I don't know that they're necessarily more susceptible to insider risk, but I can see the context or argument for saying they maybe are more susceptible to manipulation where one person controls what word they say. On the counter of that, there's a small pool of people who could possibly be capable of manipulating that market. And because we're an exchange that collects user information, we follow KYC, know your customer rules for every single individual trading on the exchange. We have a pretty good idea of who's taking positions in certain markets that allows us to police mention markets just like we police all markets.

13:40Carol Massar:You're talking about CalShane public companies, right? I just, what are no? I mean, yeah, that's part of it. I mean, that's the new. Just 60 seconds. I know we've got to run. It's interesting. earnings updates, KPI forecasts, earnings call mentions. You loved this when you saw this. I do. And I'm thinking, God, does this replace ultimately the earnings estimates that we follow? Is that the goal? Just quickly. I think there's two goals. I think the first goal is what we find is so many people are using Kalshi as a resource just to obtain information. 75 % of people who visit the platform are there just to look, to learn.

14:10They're not there to trade. And so this is a resource for people who might be on a trading desk, people who might be in a financial position where they want to analyze these really subtopic financial questions about a particular KPI. But, you know, of course, we are seeing academic research that shows these are somehow and sometimes more accurate than our traditional metrics in financial markets. And so it's exciting to develop further in that space.

14:32Carol Massar:Please come back and talk more about this, because I am fascinated about kind of where this goes and who will all be on it. Bobby, thank you so much. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up After this.

15:14All move forward. Kotality. Intelligence beyond bounds. Sophistication. Class. Restraint. Dignity. None of these words have anything to do with Super Troopers 3. One, two, three, go! Woo-hoo-hoo-hoo! Barbara in the house! Hope you guys aren't too drunk already! This Friday, no new info on the guy who did it. Oh, so it couldn't have been a woman? Sexist! You ever see Ocean's 8? Enough! Super Troopers 3. Only in theaters Friday. Rated R. Under 17. Not admitted without fair. At Radiolab, we love nothing more than nerding out about science. Neuroscience. Chemistry.

15:55Carol Massar:But, but, we do also like to get into other kinds of stories. Stories about policing. Or politics. Country music. Hockey. Sex. Of bugs. Regardless of whether we're looking at science or not science, we bring a rigorous curiosity to get you the answers. And hopefully make you see the world anew. Radiolab, adventures on the edge of what we think we know. Wherever you get your podcasts.

16:42Carol Massar:Larry Ashbrook predicts a coming reset in valuations, which is something we want to dig into. Yeah, the firm has started building out the fund with stakes and companies that we talk about all the time. Anthropic, Polymarket, N-Scale, and more. Yeah, let's get to it. We welcome Larry Ashbrook. He's founder and managing partner of G-Squared. He is out there in our Bloomberg News Chicago Bureau. Welcome, welcome. Also, excuse me, with us is our Bloomberg News senior IPO reporter, Bailey Lipschelz. He's here in studio. Hey, Larry, we want to kick it off with you. First of all, welcome. So great to have you here on Bloomberg.

17:14Carol Massar:Tell us about this fund, the companies you are targeting, the strategy. And I'm also curious, are there more new names to come, or do you just want to double down on some of the investments you've already made? Well, first of all, thanks for having me. It's an honor to be here. On behalf of our 50 employees around the world, we're humbled that you included us today in your broadcast. Thank you. Yeah, it's exciting for us. It's exciting for us to be here. The fund,$2.3 billion, it's the latest of our flagship vehicles, really to do the same thing we've been doing for the past 15 years, which is support great companies in their growth stage, mostly through secondary transactions and saving some capital to help with primary in their growth phase and really helping them manage their cap tables as they stay private longer.

18:05and we're excited about the companies we have in the portfolio and the opportunities set in front of us. Yeah, Larry, just walk us through, if you can quickly, kind of the notion of this growth in the secondary market and what that actually means when G Squared can partner with a company like an Anthropic. And are you providing access to, you know, employees to see some liquidity or is it early stage investors? Who's selling what you're buying? Yeah, it's all the above, really. And that's changed over 15 years. Early days, it was heavy focused on employee shares. I think as the market has evolved and the secondaries have become a global asset class with the company staying private longer, more and more of what we're doing is helping other managers and other GPs manage their liquidity by taking stakes in their portfolio companies to help them return capital to investors and help the company stay private longer.

18:59And so it's a combination of those things. It's everything from one-off individual secondaries when the companies have a need to change a life scenario to keep that employee engaged and involved so they don't leave to go to another business, all the way through broad employee tenders where you're making a bona fide offer at one time and a lot of capital up front, and the shares are bought in that way, all the way through to preferred managers buying the stakes that they invested early. And what we've seen as a trend since 2020 is actually about 70 % of the deployment on the secondary market has been in preferred shares.

19:35So that's been a fundamental shift in the marketplace as companies stay private longer. And the stress on the GPLP relationship is amplified with funds getting to late in life with little capital returned. Other managers need to return capital. So we've been there to support their portfolio companies and to support what they need to do as GPs. and we're lucky to be where we're at and excited about what's to come. Well, before the deployment of money comes, the fundraising comes, and you just closed your seventh round, 2.3, or seventh fund rather, $2.3 billion in that fund, Larry. Compared to the other funds that you've raised, what was it like raising money in this environment?

20:17Was it easy? Was it hard? I know people say it's never easy to raise money, but there is a lot of money out there right now. I think broadly in secondaries, the broader market has woken up a bit. It's now a bona fide asset class that's covered. Companies see the validity of it. Other managers, primary focus managers see the validity of it. And LPs around the world have a desire to be involved in secondaries because it provides a bit of a margin of safety in growth investments by the way the capital is deployed. And this fundraise for us, anytime you set out to raise capital, it's hard. I like to tell our team all the time, raising money's hard, deploying it's easy, and selling it's hard.

21:02A year in, it's the quickest we've raised capital. Our target was just, you know, for us in the scale and size of the concentrated portfolio, we need about a billion dollars per fund plus our SMAs and co-investments to be meaningful to a certain set of companies, getting very large stakes. Here, we were able to kind of get twice the size in half the time it took us in the prior vintages. And I think it's a lot of things, but mostly a testament to our portfolio management team that did a fantastic job coming out of the COVID environment we were in and the pullback. And when everybody was running out the front door, we were running in, so to speak, and deploying money at really, really great prices.

21:40And those historical funds have done well and raising capital at scale has gotten easier for us. But Larry, walk us through how you're thinking about this current market. Already deploying in the seventh fund, you have Anthropic, Polymarket, and Scale, three companies that when I talk to folks in the private ecosystem are quite pricey and there's a lot of competition for access to that. How are you thinking about whether or not this is a market that's maybe run too far too fast and how you're thinking about deploying capital now and what that means through the end of this year and into next? Yeah, I like to tell our LPs our job is to get involved in the stars of tomorrow, today, and do that before their household names.

22:20And when they become household names, we know we've done our job right. And I think in those three examples, we took contrarian views, got involved early. They have grown to fantastic levels in valuation. I think the way we're thinking about the next chapter of deployment in our seventh fund is we expect some macro headwinds in the fall and into the winter months and maybe early spring, going through some midterm election cycles in the U.S. and some volatility. And we're watching the macro indicators very closely. And we think that there's a higher likelihood than not that we see some interest rate hikes, which on the secondary market, the fundamental drivers are the 10-year yield and the federal funds rate, along with equity risk premiums in the public market.

23:08So as you have an elevated interest rate environment and a low equity risk premium, secondaries tend to do well. And we think we're going to enter a market that's more similar to the 2023 time period than what we've experienced in the past year or so. And we're going to be prepared to do the best work we can for our LPs.

Read the full transcript

23:28Carol Massar:You speak of stars and I feel like with AI, there's lots of shiny new things out there, to say the least, Larry. In the story that Bailey wrote, and I highly recommend everybody check it out on the terminal. It's all about you guys. He quotes you or he points out how you argue that the market has become overheated. His competitors are chasing every hot AI name, which has driven valuations to become expensive. Just really briefly, I mean, what kind of correction are you looking for and what names do you think are going to be maybe taken down just quickly? Yeah, well, I think the specific names of inflated valuations that we view internally, we'll leave out of it.

24:07What I would say broadly in the market is when everyone's hopping on, it tends to not end well. And there was a period of time where it was very difficult for AI companies to raise money. We were a large investor. And if you look at the cybersecurity AI business whiz, it raised capital at a point in time post-COVID. It was very difficult to put together their money at a$10 billion valuation that goes on to sell to Google a couple years later at$32 billion. The time to make the 2, 3, 4, 5 Xs in these businesses, in our opinion, for the most part of the names that you're all reporting on, have kind of, were there.

24:43And we're looking for the next chapter and the next businesses for what we think will be coming over the next few years to get involved with today. And so I think it's natural, it's cyclical. Valuations rise and fall. And deploying capital. You need to be very careful right now, just given the multiples that deals are getting done at and the FOMO picking up. Being in Chicago, we're able to be a little bit immune to that. I think that's one of the benefits.

25:07Carol Massar:There's a Midwestern sensibility. We feel it. We feel it and appreciate it. You don't even have a New York office. Come on. Having said that. Yeah. I do wonder about SpaceX because that was one of your investments. What is the status of that investment now? Do you still own SpaceX? Yeah, we don't comment on our dispositions. But what I would say about SpaceX is, first of all, betting against Elon is a good way to lose money, typically. And I think they'll go on to even greater things than today. I think fundamentally there's an issue with the IPO market that's being played out right now, real time, with how you see SpaceX trading.

25:42I think there needs to be some change on how and when options are allowed to come in. You have a massive business that's a fantastic business and shareholder creation event that's taken place. But you have a very small float, indices forced buying, options coming online. You have a high push on the stock price on the upside. And then you have a massive amount of float coming to market. And so it's just a supply and demand situation where you're going to see these companies be stressed, even with positive results like you saw come out of the business today. So I think it takes some time to work that out.

26:19You need to get the float working properly globally in a massive business that raised a small amount of money compared to its private market cap. And I think SpaceX is an illustration of what's likely to come with many companies that will seek IPOs in the near term. We need to address the way that IPOs are done. It's going to continue to be an issue for the world's best, fastest growing, most dynamic, largest businesses. Larry, we have about 20 seconds here, 30 seconds here. Just walk us through how you're thinking, though, about deploying capital and how you're thinking about the exit environment.

26:49I mean, are you looking for some of the bigger positions to go public later this year and into next? And would you try to sell before that IPO or immediately after?

26:56Carol Massar:Really quickly, if you could, please. Yeah, really quickly. Look, we have a job to do for our LPs. We look at harvesting our positions as they meet our return profile, and we'll continue to do that work, which has allowed us to raise the capital in which we've been able to. I think that the next group of companies we work on are going to be from the same fundamental kind of thought process, which is we want to partner with businesses, help them manage their cap table, help them work through the difficult issues, and stay private as long as they'd like so they don't have to live their day in 90-day increments and have you all talking about the pros and cons of their public report.

27:34Carol Massar:Listen, when we leave and a guest and we have a million more questions means you've got to come back. So please come back. I would love to. Thanks for having me and I look forward to it. All right, Larry, thank you so much. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

27:55Sophistication, class, restraint, dignity. None of these words have anything to do with Super Troopers 3. One, two, three, go. Barbara in the house. Hope you guys aren't too drunk already. This Friday, no new info on the guy who did it. Oh, so it couldn't have been a woman? Sexist. You ever see Ocean's 8? Enough. Super Troopers 3. Only in theatres. Friday. Rated R. Under 17. Not admitted without payment.

28:25Carol Massar:AI is entering its most consequential phase where scale, safety and sovereignty will determine who leads and who lags. Join Bloomberg Tech in London on November 2nd and 3rd as global leaders across business, finance and policy examine the defining tradeoffs shaping the future of AI. Thank you to our presenting sponsor, Salesforce and supporting sponsors, IDA Ireland and Schneider Electric. Learn more at BloombergLive.com slash Tech London.

28:54You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. Shares of Neutron Holdings, better known as LIME, ticker LIME, hit a new high today. This after the company reported its first financials since going public earlier this summer. Revenue for the$1.7 billion market cap company increased to$304 million. That was up 24 % year over year. And the guidance, too, has investors excited.

29:27Carol Massar:Yeah, for the third quarter guidance, revenue in the range of$340 million to$360 million, adjusted EBITDA in the range of$120 to$130 million. And we should point out that after the report, KeyBank Capital Markets analyst Justin Patterson raised the target on the company to 37 from 33 a share. So the stock right now, just below$36 a share. We've got with us Wayne Ting, the CEO of Lime. He joins us from San Francisco. Wayne, good to have you on the program. We went through some of the numbers here. As I mentioned, the company's first report since going public. I'm just wondering, before we get to sort of the nitty gritty, what is the strategy or the difference between communicating with a group of private investors ahead of the IPO and now communicating with this wider audience of public market investors?

30:15I would say, I mean, I think the heart of the strategy doesn't change. Like we want to continue to deliver great growth on top line and bottom line, which is what you saw. in our Q2 results. I do think the immediate reaction that we can get on a day like this, right after earnings, that's certainly new to me as a CEO who's managed a private company historically. But I think what investors are looking for is strong growth, strong growth in top line, strong growth in profits, continue momentum in the business, which is, if you look at our Q2 results, exactly what we delivered. Go ahead. Oh, so I want to talk a little bit, But here in New York, I don't have access to Lime bikes.

30:58There are some Lime scooters in parts of the city, right? You're correct. We do operate in the eastern Bronx and western Queens, but we're not in Manhattan. So city bike dominates on the bike side here. I'm just wondering, are markets big enough for more than one micro-mobility provider?

31:23Definitely. And in fact, most of the markets we're in, Lime is in 230 cities around the world, 29 countries. In the vast majority of our markets, there are multiple operators. In fact, I would say competition improves all of us. And I know in New York, oftentimes I hear New Yorkers talk about the fact that CityBike isn't super, there could be improvements to price, to reliability, to quality. And I think introducing more competition helps the consumers. It helps the city. It helps improve service. So absolutely, I think New York can, there could be multiple operators. In fact, I think the people who will benefit will be the consumers and the citizens of the New York.

32:07Yeah, I think the comments you made about City Bike, anyone who has used City Bike here in New York can relate to those. Does that mean you have plans to launch the bike service in New York City? so um we are at tim as you point out we're already in new york city and uh the department will expand i guess expand it has been so we have to work with the city to scale the operations to more boroughs and we're certainly very interested to bring lime service to more boroughs across greater new york and lime is the global leader in shared micro mobility by far and we are the global leader because we have the best hardware.

32:45We're vertically integrated in software, hardware operations and government relations. And I would love to bring that level of service and quality to more New Yorkers and more neighborhoods.

32:56Carol Massar:Hey, I want to ask you specifically, Wayne, about the Uber partnership and the Uber relationship. You were backed by Uber. They were expected to control, I have to look, I meant to look at holdings, more than 20 % of the outstanding shares following the IPO. And then at 2025, 14.5 % of Lime's revenue came through the Uber partnership, the remainder generated directly on the Lime app. Tell me about the Uber partnership and relationship today. Sure. So Uber is an incredibly important and strategic partner for us. Anywhere Lime and Uber both operate, you can access a Lime bike and scooter directly in the Uber app.

33:37And as everyone knows, Uber is the biggest transportation platform out there. and it's a great new user discovery partnership for us. And when we launch a new city, Uber also allows us to scale faster and get to reliability faster because day one with Lime launches, millions of users will be able to access Lime directly in the Uber app. So that partnership remains very strong and it's a long-term partnership. In fact, our two-way exclusive contract lasts for several more years and our expectation is we're going to continue to invest and scale up that partnership over time.

34:16Carol Massar:So remain on their app as well? Yes. Okay. Okay. For the long term or for at least a few more years or maybe even longer. Hopefully even longer. Okay. Yeah. And at least here in New York, again, Lyft has the City Bike Partnership. So, you know, to actually, and Lyft owns City Bike. So that's one thing to keep in mind from the competitive landscape. In terms of the actual modes of transportation you offer, the e-scooter, the e-bike, the seated e-scooter, which form are you most bullish on? Which form has quicker adoption, higher adoption? Which form would you rather somebody take when they're faced with a choice?

34:57I would say I'm agnostic to the various. We are the biggest operator of e-scooters and e-bikes and we recently introduced a new sit-down form factor called lime glider and actually one time magazine's best invention of 2025. what i want people to do is to drive less help us solve some of the transportation challenges that we see in cities all over the world congestion is a problem parking is always there's not never enough parking sustainability is a problem all over the world and the number one source of carbon pollution in the united states and in europe is from transportation and any mode online you're being offered a reliable more affordable and far more green alternative to driving and so i would say any mode i would be great and it's better than the congestion affordability challenge from cars that we see as a problem urban transportation everywhere.

35:58What's the break even on an e-bike when you make that initial investment in e-bike? How long does somebody have to ride it hours-wise for that to make sense from an investment perspective? So we have a really good payback and return on invested capital. So the average e-bike e-scooter that we buy is roughly$1 ,300 in terms of a fully landed cost. And we typically pay back that initial investment in less than 12 months. And these vehicles last five years plus. So our total cash on cash return is four to five times our initial investment. And we continue to improve our cost to serve and improve the utilization of our vehicles.

36:43So I feel like there's even upside to that payback that I just described over the long run. Wayne, thanks so much for joining us. Wayne Tang, CEO of Lime, joining us from San Francisco. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

37:24Sexist! You ever see Ocean's 8? Enough! Super Troopers 3. Only in theaters Friday. Rated R. Under 17. Not admitted without pimp. The Bloomberg This Weekend Podcast.

37:36Carol Massar:News, politics, and the lighter side of Bloomberg. The cutthroat competition to get a gig on a cruise ship. They get to enjoy all the amenities, and a one-week contract can pay like thousands of dollars for them. I know this is a good gig. Yes. Like you're booked through six months, and you can pay your bills for like a year and a half. And you may get norovirus. Keep going. The Bloomberg This Weekend Podcast. Subscribe today on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you listen. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

38:15Or watch us live on YouTube. I want to talk a little bit about defense technology, specifically personal defense. Burnett Technologies makes non-lethal alternatives to firearms, thanks to CO2-powered gun-like devices that shoot projectiles. We've got with us Conn Davis, the CEO of Burnett Technologies. The firm has a market cap of around$106 million. Conn joins us from Tampa, Florida. Conn, good to have you on the program. So you sell to law enforcement security. Can anyone buy one of these, what you call launchers? Absolutely. Our primary customer is actually the consumer, and they are legal in all 50 states.

38:54So anyone can purchase one of these devices. And they really are a great option for people looking for a personal protection device. How do you make sure they're non-lethal? So we do a lot of testing to make sure these products are non-lethal. It's really about the velocity and the type of round that we use. So there is a hard plastic round that's quite large. It hurts, but it does not penetrate the skin. The other option is a chemical irritant round made of powderized pepper and tear gas that can incapacitate someone for about 40 minutes.

39:27Carol Massar:Talk to us about the financials. The stock's been under a ton of pressure. And you did report earnings back in July. I think you talked about fiscal 2026 would not be a revenue growth year. But you did expect improvement in the second half of the year compared with the first half as retailers get ready for the holidays. and you're doing some other, I guess, internal marketing and so on and so forth. But why aren't people, why do you think it's so tough? You do direct to sell, you've got retailers, but why is it the numbers aren't better? Right. Well, right now where we are is we need to get the message out about the product.

40:07Everyone we talk to and understands what this product does gets really excited about it. And frankly, those turn into sales pretty quickly. Where we are today, though, is there have been historic advertising restrictions on things that look like a weapon. So we are in the middle of a marketing shift and a pivot in order to get the message out much broader into a wider audience. So that's what we're doing. We're expanding our SAM by about 10 times over the next six to nine months as we really reach that new consumer audience. Yeah, we're going to talk about supply chain in a second and sort of how you're dealing with tariffs and component costs and plastics as a result of oil volatility.

40:46I'm curious, though, about the market for law enforcement, because when we think about nonlethal devices for law enforcement, it really seems like Taser owns the mind share and owns much of the market. How do you compete with that? so really you compete with that in the law enforcement market by effectiveness and the differences between the taser product and ours so the taser product has a range of about 20 to 25 feet so it's a pretty close-in product additionally you have to be pretty accurate with it given the fact that you have to get two electrodes into an individual for us we have a range that's much further, about 60 feet.

41:25And when our projectiles hit, they create a six foot cloud of gas, which really will impact an individual, even if you don't directly strike them.

41:36Carol Massar:So interesting. And we may come back to talking a bit more about the business and the outlook. But one of the things that we like talking here at Bloomberg Businessweek Daily, smaller companies, companies with a different footprint, is what so much of our economy is small business, right? We know that. We talk about it all the time. It's the backbone of the U.S. economy. I am curious, what are some of your pain points right now in terms of supply chains, tariffs? We have a president who, you know, continues to make some comments about different types of tariffs right now. Earlier, we mentioned President Trump writing tariffs price floors to boost U.S.

42:16Carol Massar:polysilicon. There's a lot of different dynamics. What a large company can deal with in their massive supply chains, they often have leverage. Smaller companies, it could be trickier. Talk to us about your supply chain. It can be trickier. And frankly, businesses are looking for stability, especially smaller businesses, so that we can plan and grow going forward. Where Burna is uniquely positioned is several years ago, we made a pivot from pivoting from manufacturing overseas to producing all of our products domestically here in the us and you were in south africa before we were we were in south africa before from a manufacturing point of view we moved all of that to indiana uh over the past five years and even more than that we started moving our components and other pieces of our supply chain uh to domestic us sources which that has proved a real benefit for us as you've seen energy prices become volatile and shipping prices go up and down with that.

43:15Carol Massar:That's interesting. So financially, it was a smarter move. I'm just curious about labor costs. Or is it all automated? Like things we always talk about being so much more expensive to do in the U.S., but that has not been the case for you? That has not been the case for us. I will tell you that we pay a little bit higher of a labor cost, obviously, here in the U.S. than we would overseas. However, we make that up in quality. So the quality of the manufacturing that we can do and we control it ourselves. And when you're talking about a life-saving device, having a quality manufacturing process is really important.

43:49Additionally, if you think about the shorter supply lines and supply chains that you have there, you can pull a lot of money out of your inventory when you are manufacturing domestically. How much did prices go up when you started manufacturing domestically? They went up$0. We did not increase prices at all. How much did you absorb? Understood. We understored, absorbed about 500 basis points on the cost line that we've now worked through from a manufacturing efficiency point of view. So at this point, I would call it neutral. When you hear about the on-shoring conversation that we've been having over the last, well, I mean, it really goes back to 2017.

44:30But I think at least in this term, since, you know, January of last year. do you think like like we talked to the former cfo of levi's for example and he says we're never going to make levi's jeans in the u.s i mean apple is not going to be making iphones here yeah they're going to make more and more in india but they're still making them in china like what takeaways do you have for other small businesses about the how realistic it is to onshore in in an environment where manufacturing is so specialized globally and where costs vary so much? So I think it really comes down to how much labor is in your cost stack.

45:14The more that you can drive an efficient manufacturing process and pull individual labor out, the more you're gonna be able to manufacture in the US. Additionally, when you're a small business, the ability to reduce the amount of money that you have in working capital from an overseas exposure point of view is massive. You know, we can ramp up and ramp down manufacturing much faster than we can if we had a large supply chain. That really gives us much more flexibility and allows us to be nimble to what the consumer demand actually is.

45:47Carol Massar:So again, you know, one of the things you certainly play into the consumer market, right? You're direct to consumer. You also sell to retailers, right? Who sell to consumers. Based on that, who is your consumer typically? And I'm curious, kind of where are the markets or the stores that you are selling the most? And what are you seeing about kind of the health of the consumer? Yeah, absolutely. I will tell you that, you know, our view is that the consumer is definitely under pressure and they're making trade-offs in what they're choosing to purchase and the events and things that they're trying to do in their lives.

46:20You know, we still see really strong sell-through in our channels that are, you know, sporting goods and outdoor stores. So think Bass Pro Cabela's, Sportsman's Warehouse, stores along those lines still definitely see strong sell through to that consumer. Again, more of that enthusiast outdoors oriented consumer. You know, where our opportunity is going forward is to expand beyond what has really been a pretty narrow early adopting audience to now reach that wider mass audience.

46:50Carol Massar:Yeah, it does sound like, you know, going back to the product itself, I mean, some of this stuff you have to kind of inform, right, in order to sell. There's an educational aspect to this. And I guess it sounds like that's what you guys are figuring out to some extent. That is. That's where we're focused right now. And we're doing a lot of partnerships both with, you know, people online, but also with local community organizers to help get the word out about the product and to train people. So what about the product pipeline and ways you can expand the products that are offered? When the people at your company who are in charge of that pipeline come to you with pitches, what are they pitching?

47:33So I will tell you, we have a great R &D organization based just outside of Boston, Massachusetts. And we're pitching in looking at a couple of different things. One, it's how do you reduce the complexity of the product category we have now so that we can lower those manufacturing costs, as I discussed. Second, beyond that, is starting to talk about how we develop more form factors so that people that aren't comfortable with something that looks like a firearm or looks like a gun, that they still have an option to protect themselves in an active way versus just a passive way.

48:06Carol Massar:Hey, one last thing. You know, we talk supply chains and I'm just thinking about policy. We mentioned the president, you know, different times coming out tariffs and different policies that impact large business, medium sized small. What else could this administration do as we get ready for midterms to help out smaller businesses and just got about 30 seconds? Yeah. So, again, it comes back down to really laying out a policy framework and just being consistent. The biggest thing for small businesses is the volatility. That volatility really creates uncertainty, both with the consumer and with investments that we're trying to make as an organization.

48:41Carol Massar:Are you saying this administration isn't consistent? I'm saying we need more consistency. OK. We've had a lot of back and forth and up and down in tariff policy and in oil and gas prices. The more we can be consistent there, the better. Yeah, that certainly is being felt in some days differently than others. Con Davis, thank you so much. Covered a lot of ground. CEO of Burner Technologies joining us there from Florida on this Wednesday. This is the Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast. Available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m.

49:19Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

49:38Now, Bloomberg.com subscribers can shape the conversation on Bloomberg Radio. We got a wicked smart question.

49:45Carol Massar:Can be part of the conversation. Submit questions for experts and guests you hear on air. Visit Bloomberg.com slash ask radio to send questions to our hosts. You may just hear them asked on the air. Exclusively for Bloomberg.com subscribers. Get answers on today's headlines, breaking earnings news, and big market moves. Visit Bloomberg.com slash ask radio to join the conversation right here on Bloomberg Radio.

From the publisher

The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy. Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.

Kalshi is being defended by a team of Milbank lawyers in court fights that could upend US predictions markets, including a new suit by New York Attorney General Letitia James claiming the company operates as an illegal gambling business. The New York suit poses the greatest potential threat to Kalshi because state law gives the AG wide powers, and could potentially bring the company to its knees, according to sports betting and gaming attorney Daniel Wallach. The cases, which have yielded mixed results, could eventually be headed to the US Supreme Court, testing a Milbank litigation practice boosted by the addition of lawyers such as Neal Katyal and Josh Sterling.

On this episode, Carol Massar and Tim Stenovec speak with:

  • Robert DeNault, Head of Enforcement and Legal Counsel at Kalshi
  • Larry Aschebrook, Founder & Managing Partner of G Squared and Bailey Lipschultz
  • Wayne Ting, CEO at Lime
  • Conn Davis, CEO of Byrna Technologies

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Businessweek

All 738 episodes
Kalshi's Court Fights, Regulating Prediction MarketsBloomberg Businessweek · 45 min
Listen in VO