In short
Financing and strategic stakes in the Warner Bros. Discovery takeover fight, focusing on Larry Ellison’s $40B equity pledge to Paramount Skydance; compares Paramount vs Netflix bids, including credit risk, debt structure, and what each deal would mean for media assets (studios, streaming, and cable networks like CNN/TNT).
Guests (backgrounds)
- Molly Schutz, Bloomberg News Media editor.
- Stephen Flynn, Bloomberg Intelligence senior credit analyst.
- (Other segments in the transcript include Bloomberg guests on markets/commodities and baby bonds, but the episode title and main discussion center on the Warner Bros. bid.)
Key claims
- Ellison is personally backing $40B in equity financing for David Ellison’s Paramount Skydance bid.
- Credit risk is mitigated by a $54B secured credit agreement and bank commitments.
- Netflix is viewed as stronger credit (single-A, low leverage) and is ahead with the board’s recommendation.
Notable examples
Netflix’s offer structure includes a spin-off of global networks; Paramount argues the networks stub is only ~$1 versus Netflix’s higher implied value.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOWarner Brothers Discovery: Ongoing Battle
2:40 to 4:55
Discussion of the competitive landscape for Warner Brothers and current offers.
“The fight for Warner Brothers Discovery, guess what?”
Larry Ellison's Financial Backing
4:55 to 9:20
Exploration of Ellison's guarantee and its implications for Paramount's bid.
“as having a better solid financial footing.”
The Merger Landscape
9:20 to 12:30
Analysis of potential mergers and the impact of debt financing.
“But I guess a big difference between these two offers is Paramount Skydance wants the whole thing, including CNN, right, TNT, where Netflix doesn't want that.”
Future Implications for Paramount
12:30 to 14:03
Speculation on Paramount's direction and strategies if the deal fails.
“I think a lot of folks thought that, well, maybe we can wrap this thing up.”
Market Overview and Insights
16:57 to 17:45
Discussing the current state of U.S. markets and upcoming trends.
“So, Alexis, it's been really a stellar year for markets in the U.S.”
The Durability of the Current Bull Market
17:45 to 19:25
Analyzing the breadth of the current bull market and sector performances.
“We're seeing a bull market right now, and it's a bull market that's broadening beyond mega cap tech into mid caps and small cap stocks.”
The Future of AI Investments
19:25 to 21:45
Exploring the potential risks and opportunities in AI investments.
“that it might not be paying back at least in the short term horizon.”
Emerging Markets and Investment Opportunities
21:45 to 24:01
Identifying promising opportunities in emerging markets, particularly China.
“I'm really glad you brought up EM, because emerging markets have sort of been the sleeper story, I think, of the year.”
Precious Metals Performance and Market Impacts
24:01 to 28:00
Examining the performance of precious metals and their correlation with stocks.
“Kwe Wynn, Chief Investment Officer, Equity Strategies with Research Affiliates.”
Gold's Implications for the Market
28:00 to 29:00
Discussing the potential implications of rising gold prices and their effect on the S&P 500.
“I've been bullish forever, but there's never wrong where you can say take profits when it goes parabolic.”
Show all 17 chapters
Geopolitical Tensions and Precious Metals
29:00 to 30:20
Exploring the relationship between geopolitical tensions and the performance of precious metals like gold.
“You're describing the current bull market, things we talked about five years ago, things that were happening.”
Bitcoin's Future and Market Dynamics
30:20 to 31:40
Examining the outlook for Bitcoin amidst market trends and comparing it to precious metals.
“I don't think it gets much above$100 ,000.”
Gold vs. Bitcoin: Ratios and Predictions
31:40 to 33:00
Analyzing the changing ratio between gold and Bitcoin and its implications for investors.
“It's everybody's assumes it's going to be up 11 percent, which means it better be or we got issues.”
Understanding Baby Bonds vs. Trump Accounts
40:00 to 41:00
Discussing the key differences between baby bonds and Trump's youth investment accounts.
“And in the other context, about 80 % of children between the ages of zero and 10 will have some access to this donation, this lagresse.”
Philanthropy vs. Government Responsibility
41:00 to 42:00
Debating the role of philanthropy in youth wealth-building initiatives versus government action.
“It's still in the infancy there, but how are things going?”
Wealth Creation and Government Responsibility
42:00 to 45:44
Explore the role of government in wealth creation and the debate over private vs. public investment.
“or do you think they create risking a system that just really hinges on, to your point, philanthropy of maybe rich individuals or big corporations?”
The Future of Baby Bonds
45:44 to 46:19
Discuss the potential impact and future of baby bonds in various states.
“We'll see if they come into other states.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00They told us to expect change. They warned us about the transition. But honestly, they forgot the best part. This is the chapter where we finally focus on us. LifeMD delivers expert menopause and midlife care right from your home. From hormone health to holistic wellness, LifeMD helps you feel your best for the best years of your life. LifeMD, it's just getting good. Visit LifeMD.com slash goodlife. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need.
0:40Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM. For many men, mental health challenges aren't recognized until they've already taken a toll. Work pressure, financial stress, changing relationships, and traditional expectations around masculinity can quietly wear men down, often without clear warning signs. In season three of The Visibility Gap, Dr. Guy Winch and his guests explore how these pressures show up, how to spot them earlier, and how men can access meaningful support.
1:23Listen to the new season of The Visibility Gap, a podcast presented by Cigna Healthcare. This podcast is brought to you by Wise, the smarter way to manage your money internationally. If you're getting a headache from juggling different currencies and different bank accounts in different countries, there's a better way to receive money in the currency you need without the slow transfer times or hidden fees. Meet Wise, the savvy way to handle your money internationally. Hold balances in up to 40 currencies with the mid-market exchange rate on every conversion, whether you're receiving payments from tenants abroad, earning as a digital nomad, or converting dividends from your international investments, the Wise Multicurrency Account is for you.
2:02Be smart. Get wise. Download the Wise app today or visit wise.com. Terms and conditions apply. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily. Reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business, finance, and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio. The fight for Warner Brothers Discovery, guess what? It's not over yet, not by a long shot. Both Netflix and Paramount Skydance are now strengthening their financial backing for their respective offers.
2:51So where do things stand right now? Let's get a check in with Bloomberg News Media editor Molly Schutz and Bloomberg Intelligence senior credit analyst Stephen Flynn. They join us here in studio. Thanks so much for being with us. So Molly, I'm just going to start with you. Just bring us up to speed on what Larry Ellison is saying here. I guess he's throwing his own personal fortune behind this deal to say, hey, listen, we're good for the money. That's right. He's putting his name on the line. He's saying, I'm personally backing this$40 billion in equity financing to help his son, David Ellison, who's the CEO of Paramount Skydance, succeed in their takeover offer for Warner Brothers.
3:32But, okay, so I want to bring in Stephen here. Larry Ellison is the fifth richest person in the world with a fortune of around$246 billion. Are there any credit risk implications of his personal guarantee? or like this having a billionaire really backstop meaningfully and extend the runway for deals like these? Yeah, sure. So it's important. You have the backstopping of Larry Ellison. You also have a lot of other funds involved. And importantly, they also have a$54 billion secured credit agreement in place. So there's plenty of financing to support the$30 per share cash offer for the tender offer for Warner Brothers shares.
4:06So Netflix, though, was talking about a bridge loan, right, of nearly$60 billion. If you had to stack it up, because I'm sure the board at Warner Brothers is going through this whole pros and cons list. How do these two, Molly, I'll ask you first. I'd like both your thoughts on this, but how do these two deals stack up next to each other when you're talking about, I'm just talking about the financing of the debt. Is there one that just seems more plausible or more attractive than the other? I think the latest offer by Paramount today shows that that was their effort to say, look, we've got the solid footing here.
4:44This will help with credit investment grade, help our investment grade, and show that we're serious and that this bid is solid, which Netflix already has an investment grade rating and was seen originally as having a better solid financial footing. What are your thoughts? Listen, Netflix is a much, much stronger credit than Paramount Skydance. Netflix has a single A rated balance sheet. They have a large market cap. They have growing EBITDA, growing free cash flow, and very, very low net leverage. So Netflix has plenty of capacity to borrow in the investment grade corporate bond market. Now the company has single A credit ratings.
5:24I believe Moody's has already affirmed their single A rating. I expect S &P to do the same. So they have plenty of capacity. On the flip side, Paramount Skydance, they have a bridge commitment in place. So the commitment is there from a number of large banks. Now, that is secure debt, and they will probably strive for investment-grade ratings on that secure debt, saying, hey, this comes ahead of the other debt that the company has. And if you use charter as a comparison, you could have a split-rated capital structure where you have secure debt that's rated investment-grade and certain other debt, whether it's unsecured or security that's inferior to the security provided to the other debt with high yield ratings.
6:04So you can get creative with the way you sort of stack the debt, if you will. Yeah, plenty of companies get very creative. I bet. So that structure aside, talk to us about a media tech standpoint. What will it look like if the company merges with Netflix or with Paramount, which makes more sense? Well, both Netflix and Paramount think their deal makes more sense. For Netflix, obviously, it gives them direct access to the library, one of Hollywood's most iconic libraries for film and TV content with Warner Brothers. And that's also what Paramount technically is trying to do. Paramount Plus is a much smaller streaming service right now than Netflix.
6:46So they're really seeing this deal as a way to bulk them up and allow them to compete better with the likes of Netflix and Amazon and Disney. Is this Larry Ellison offer now a last-ditch effort, do you think, by Paramount Skydance? Because we know that Warner Brothers is already saying, listen to the shareholders, we want you. We believe that Netflix is a stronger deal. We want you to vote that way. Do you think we're going to hear yet again from Paramount? And what might that be? Might it be a sweetened offer if this doesn't work? Yeah, well, so mid last week, the Warner Brothers Discovery Board recommended shareholders do not participate in the tender offer.
7:23And they listed reasons why. Now, what Paramount this morning has done is kind of address many of those reasons, particularly given the Larry Ellison guarantee. So I believe Paramount's going to see how many shares they get to participate in the tender offer. And if they need to, you know, conversations with shareholders, if they need to raise it to a certain level that they're still comfortable with, I imagine that's what they would do. Talk to us about the size of this deal, because our Bloomberg story said something like it's the biggest in a decade. It's definitely one of the biggest media deals in a long time.
7:54I mean, it harkens back to the days of Disney and Fox, those kinds of deals. I mean, this is definitely a big deal, both financially and also in terms of what it means for Hollywood and for content production and the creative industries at large. Is the debt financing now, you think, the deciding factor here for the board of Warner Brothers? Is this what it's going to come down to for them, do you think, Stephen? No, because I don't think if you have a commitment in place, that's why companies get bridge loans to say that, hey, we're good on the debt part. Look at the financing here. It's provided by a slew of banks.
8:30So that typically provides companies with some comfort that the debt component is going to come through. I think what Warner Brothers was asking for more comfort on the equity side, right? Because there's over$40 billion of equity capital as part of their acquisition proposal for the Warner Brothers shares. How does Ellison's bet change Paramount's position relative to Netflix, YouTube, and Amazon? Does it enable a different operating model, or is it just really scale at this point?
9:00I think it's mostly scale. Yeah, Paramount's argument is that we will be a good steward of this content, and this will allow us to... Because Paramount Skydance is a pretty small operator in terms of if you're looking at compared with Disney, Netflix, even Amazon. And so really having a studio like Warner Brothers behind them and to be able to tap into that library of content would really be a step up for them. But I guess a big difference between these two offers is Paramount Skydance wants the whole thing, including CNN, right, TNT, where Netflix doesn't want that. They want the studios and the streaming service.
9:40So what if Netflix does win this bidding war, what happens to CNN and those cable properties? So the way the Netflix deal is set up is that they're going to have Warner Brothers Discovery spin off their global networks business. That includes many of the channels that you described here. And what will be left behind is the studios, which is very valuable, and the streaming business, which is very valuable. And then Netflix will acquire that remaining company. And that's what makes it a little bit tough to compare the valuations here, right? Because Netflix was offering$27.75 per share, mostly cash, but some Netflix stock for the remaining company.
10:16So investors had to figure out, okay, what's the per share value in the global linear networks that's being spun off? Paramount Skydance is saying, hey, that's only worth a dollar. Some people are saying, well, that's worth several dollars. And so that$27.75 plus the value of that stub piece is your total value compared to$30 a share in cash from Paramount Skydance for the whole company. Which one is the front runner here so far in your opinion? Well, clearly from the board of Warner Brothers, Netflix is, right? They accepted Netflix's offer. They put out a letter last week saying that why investors should reject the Paramount Skydance offer.
10:55So it's hard to break a deal. It can happen, but it's hard. So it seems that Netflix, given what's going on so far, is ahead. But something tells you that this is going to last quite some time, right? Paramount Skydance has significant financial backers. They really want this. You could argue that they really need this. They need to gain scale. And so they're motivated. So I think we still have a ways to go in this. So if this thing drags into 2026, which it looks like it very well might, we know the media landscape's continuing to change. Let's just say, you know what, Paramount doesn't get Warner Brothers.
11:30What does Paramount do? Or do they eye another company? And if so, who might that be? I mean, I think that's the big question now. Where will they go from here? David Ellison has said, I mean, despite the fact that, yeah, he really, really does want this company, he says, well, okay, if we don't get it, we'll be able to proceed and we'll still continue to produce great movies and great content and we'll find other ways to grow and to compete. Yeah, let's remember, Paramount Skydance was recently formed, right? You merged, you had David Ellison Skydance merge with Paramount, and then they took out the national amusements on the Paramount side.
12:08So that company was just formed. They had a plan. They were going to cut costs, grow certain areas, and so improve the overall business. And now Warner Brothers would give them a certain amount of scale. If this doesn't work out, I'm sure they could look for other assets for additional scale. All right, we're going to have to leave it there. But certainly, we're going to see how this all plays out. as I guess the board continues to look at these deals through the holiday. I think a lot of folks thought that, well, maybe we can wrap this thing up. Netflix might have thought we can wrap this thing up and I'll celebrate the new year.
12:36But there are still lots and lots of question marks. Our thanks to Bloomberg News Media Editor Molly Schutz and Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Credit Analyst Stephen Flynn for being here in our studio to help break down what really has become a quite complicated scenario for all of these companies. Lots of tangled webs. So thanks a lot for being with us. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
13:23for the best years of your life. LifeMD, it's just getting good. Visit LifeMD.com slash goodlife. Support for the show comes from Public. Public is an investing platform that offers access to stocks, options, bonds, and crypto. And they've also integrated AI with tools that can assist investors in building customized portfolios. One of these tools is called Generated Assets. It allows you to turn your ideas into investable indexes. So let's say you're interested in something specific. like biotech companies with high R &D spend, small cap stocks with improving operating margins, or the S &P 500 minus high debt companies.
14:03Chances are there isn't an ETF that fits your exact criteria. But on public, you just type in a prompt and their AI screens thousands of stocks and build a one-of-a-kind index. You can even backtest it against the S &P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Add paid for by public holdings. Brokered services by public investing member FINRA SIPC. Advisory services by public advisors, SEC registered advisor. Crypto services by zero hash. Sample prompts are for illustrative purposes only, not investment advice.
14:39All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities and drive growth. With a widespread presence in communities across the country, Chase for Business supports small business owners at a local level. That makes it possible for you to connect, learn from each other, and grow together. There's a real commitment to seeing small businesses succeed. The Chase for Business team has knowledge and expertise that span a wide range of financial areas. They can help you make more informed decisions as you navigate the complexities of running your business.
15:16They'll help your business grow with individual guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. Deadlines move, plans change, and sometimes opportunities pop up out of nowhere. When you need branded gear fast, 4imprint is ready to deliver.
15:554imprint offers hundreds of promotional products in their 24-hour category. Everything from custom apparel, bags, and drinkware to writing tools, trade show staples, and high-tech gear. At 4imprint, they're focused on getting the details right, printing your logo with precision, packing your order with care, and shipping it out fast. And it's backed by their 360-degree guarantee. That's 4imprint's promise your order will show up right on time, just the way you planned it. That's what it means to be 4imprint certain. So, if you're prepping for a last-minute event or jumping on a big opportunity, you don't have to settle or scramble.
16:30With 4imprint, fast, reliable service and peace of mind are built right in. Check out their full 24-hour selection at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. 4certain. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. So, Alexis, it's been really a stellar year for markets in the U.S. and across the globe. And we've talked about how the S &P is on track to see its eighth winning streak, its longest winning streak since 2018. And already next year is looking quite optimistic.
17:09We have sell-side strategists really putting their price targets for the S &P out there. and the range is around 7 ,000 to 8 ,100. That's quite the range. It's quite the range, but it's high. For context, we're around 6 ,800 to 6 ,900 at this point. And it's really hard to make sense of the markets next year because we have a lot of optimism, but we do have a lot of uncertainties as well. And joining us to make sense of all of that and to give us a look ahead is Khoeng Wen. She's the Chief Investment Officer of Equity Strategies at the Research Affiliates. She's with us in the Interactive Broker Studio.
17:41So thank you so much for joining us on this Monday to help us make sense of all of this. We're seeing a bull market right now, and it's a bull market that's broadening beyond mega cap tech into mid caps and small cap stocks. Absolutely. Why does that matter to make this rally durable? I mean, I think that when you have very, very narrow leadership, the danger is always that there's a hiccup in something or whatever it is that's driving that narrow leadership. And we saw that recently with the whole AI story, people wondering whether or not these stocks are overvalued. But I think one of the things that you're seeing is that a lot of other stocks are benefiting as well.
18:14So as long as people have a lot of options to choose from that continue to do well, people will stay invested. Do you have reason to believe we're going to branch out from the sort of narrow stocks we've been looking at driving the rally this year? And by that, I mean, are we going to break out of AI and start to see some opportunity elsewhere? I think we're already beginning to see that. I mean, if you take a look at what's happened in the markets this year, everybody is focusing on the Mag7, right? Everybody's focusing on NVIDIA, on Alphabet. But if you really think about it, NVIDIA was not the top performing chip stock this year.
18:54NVIDIA is up something like 36%. And you have Intel. Remember that stock from long ago? That's up 82%. So I think you're already beginning to see broadening out within technology itself. but you're also seeing broadening out to other sectors. Financials are doing well. Healthcare stocks are seeing signs of life now. So there's massive capital flowing into AI and short term we're seeing who are the winners but not everyone will be a winner longer term. So how real is the risk of overinvestment in AI? Because already we have investors kind of feeling jittery that it might not be paying back at least in the short term horizon.
19:31Sure, I mean I think that one of the things that we see is that the companies that are investing in AI are really strong cash-flowing companies. They're very, very strong. There is some debt behind this, but it's not an overwhelming amount of debt. So I do think that there is the risk of overinvestment. I don't necessarily see a real risk quite yet, but also I think it's really hard to pick who the winner is. So the best way to invest in this is to stay diversified. We're most likely going to be in an environment of lower interest rates. I mean, it looks like the market is banking on two interest rate cuts.
20:06As long as we don't get an interest rate hike anytime soon, we might very well see these financials do well, these smaller and mid-cap stocks do well. But is there an area of this market you wish was seeing a little more love that isn't, that maybe should be and that people are just overlooking? So one of the areas that I do think is highly overlooked is really the consumer sector, right? So you see a lot of the large names, consumer discretionary doing poorly. I mean, Walmart's done well this year, but you see a lot of companies not doing so well. You see Target, for example, a beloved American brand.
20:44And again, there the issues are changing consumer taste of whether or not they can keep up. I love that you're in your talking points. The very first one is short term. Interest rates are coming down. Everything else is commentary. Is that really the story right now? Are investors already looking past beyond the rate cuts? No, I think that if you take a look at what drives markets, markets just tend to go up. They stay with whatever momentum it is unless something happens to change that. And what usually happens, what's usually necessary to change the upward trajectory that we're in right now is a tightening of financial conditions.
21:20If you take a look at bear markets, meaning they go down 20 % over a certain period of time, they're always preceded by some sort of tightening financial conditions. And we're not seeing that right now. I do think that lower interest rates are benefiting U.S. equities, but they're also benefiting non-U.S. equities, namely emerging markets as well. So I think investors are going to have a variety of opportunities to choose from next year. I'm really glad you brought up EM, because emerging markets have sort of been the sleeper story, I think, of the year. They've really done quite well. And even Europe has sort of come along for the ride.
21:56So if you're looking for opportunities to diversify outside of U.S. equities, where in particular might you be looking next year? Oh, I definitely think emerging markets are exciting, particularly China. I mean, China got so cheap. And what you're seeing there is, yes, there are difficulties with growth, but I think you have a lot of world-class companies there. A lot of money was flowing out of it. Now money's flowing back in because of the valuation opportunities. We're also seeing more of a stabilization of the trade situation. All of these things really do help emerging markets a lot. And I want to go back quickly.
22:30You've pointed out that AI is already changing the investing landscape, especially in the startup world. How does AI lower the barrier to entry compared to other tech super cycles? So I think AI is just the most recent tech super cycle. I mean, if you really think about the tech bubble, you know, the late 90s, if you wanted to throw up an e-commerce company, Pets.com, for example, you had to go out and invest a lot in computers and servers and bandwidth. It was very, very expensive to have a startup. The cloud came along, and essentially you could just license a lot of this stuff out, right? It became much, much more cost effective or less capital intensive to have a startup.
23:12And I think now what you're really seeing is on the software side, you're getting a lot of benefit from AI. What I'm hearing from people is that if you wanted to start up a company like Uber or Lyft, you need a lot of coders, right, to create that entire code base for you. But now with AI, all coders are becoming, or at least the coders that know how to use it, are becoming much more productive. You need to hire far fewer people. That said, it's most beneficial when you have a new code base, right? So if you have an existing code base, it's not nearly as productivity enhancing. And so in some ways, I think one of the things that we're seeing is that I wouldn't be surprised if there was a lot more new ideas being put into play in the venture world, a lot more disruption that happens in technology.
24:01All right. We're going to leave it there. Kwe Wynn, Chief Investment Officer, Equity Strategies with Research Affiliates. Thanks for coming by and giving us your thoughts on where the market is now and headed into the new year. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
24:22This is the Bloomberg Businessweek Daily podcast. Listen live each weekday starting at 2 p.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa. Play Bloomberg 1130. Things are shaping up to be sort of a festive end, if you will, Isabel, to the year for the markets and a solid start to the new year. We have the stops now. U.S. equities erasing those December losses. The S &P set for its eighth straight month of gains. It seems like the Santa Claus rally is really shaping up. And Santa Claus rally is, of course, the last trading days of December, the five last and the first two in January.
Read the full transcript
25:05And we have Mark Hackett of Nationwide saying that the Santa Claus rally is typically the best two weeks of any trading year since 1950. So as you said, it's great water cooler chat, and I will definitely use it on December 24th. Even if the trading volume is thin, because we know lots of folks are not participating. Also, I just want to throw in there, fund managers are maintaining record low levels of cash right now. So they're really putting money to work in this market. Markets are still banking on two rate cuts next year. And we had Fed Governor Stephen Myron on Bloomberg Television earlier today.
25:34And he said the central bank actually risks sparking a recession unless it continues lowering rates next year. Though we know he has a bias right now to lowering rates in a more aggressive way. So the bullishness is really there, but inflation remains above the Fed's target. Unemployment has ticked higher and the heavy AI spending has yet to be realized. So I feel like there's also uncertainty, even if all the bulls here are like, rah, rah, rah, 2026 is going to be great. There's not a lot of clarity still going into the new year. Precious metals, by the way, have been on a tear this year. Gold and silver on course for their strongest annual performance since 1979.
26:10Gold up more than 65 % and silver up better than 100 % so far this year with still a few more trading days left. How much further can they go? Mike McGlone covers commodities for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us from the Bloomberg Miami Bureau. So, Mike, first of all, I've got to ask, because we have seen all year long stocks rising in tandem with precious metals. This normally doesn't happen. Explain to us why that phenomenon is happening this year, if you can. That's the harder question. Why? It's a key thing. Gold is basically grabbing alpha in a significant way. So it's up almost 70 % on the year.
26:49S &P 500 is maybe 20%. So it's way outperforming. I think part of it, the main thing was the main trigger was 2022, Russians invasion of Ukraine and some of the issues with the dollar. But gold just absolutely loves our new president, Mr. Trump. He's pushing back on the Fed, potentially creating more inflation, running it hot. It's all good. And his volatility is all good for gold. The significance I look for in gold and I was looking forward is you mentioned how extended is, how stretched it is. History does not really bode well for new longs at these levels. One good example is silver. Its peak, its close in 1979 was 32, and this year's low was 28.
27:31So we have Goldman Sachs among the several banks who predict that prices will keep rising in 2026. They're issuing a base case scenario of$4 ,900 an ounce with risks to the upside. Do you see more runway for growth for gold here? Or are we going to see maybe a correction soon because we have kept on rising higher and higher up around 60 % this year? There's an old saying in markets, you're supposed to be selling when they're yelling. That's the inklings I got in cryptos last year and that kicked in this year. And I'm getting those inklings in gold and silver now. I've been bullish forever, but there's never wrong where you can say take profits when it goes parabolic.
28:04So momentum could easily carry it to 5 ,000, but a normal correction from such stretched levels, maybe it's almost 100 % above its 60-month moving average, this is the most since 1979, because you easily get gold back to 3 ,500. That's just how it works and has worked in history. So I look at gold here as just absolutely frightening for what it means. To me, the implications of gold going up at this high velocity and crude oil going down at this high velocity is potentially global deflationary inklings and potentially signaling a down year for the S &P 500 next year. But wouldn't, I mean, I'm looking at sort of everything around the precious metals, like geopolitical tensions, the things that would make people sort of run to the quote-unquote safety of these precious metals.
28:49I feel like 2026 has a lot of geopolitical tension, Mike, I got to tell you. And I think that maybe that could be a tailwind for these metals, don't you think? Well, absolutely. You're describing the current bull market, things we talked about five years ago, things that were happening. But the bottom line is, as Kamani's strategy now, is just look at the lessons of history. Once you get to these levels, everybody points out the fundamentals. There's always good reasons. But you have to flip over to your risk management hat and say, do you realistically think the relative value is good for getting overweight long at these levels?
29:22And it typically is not. So I'm very concerned. One thing that's never happened in history is we've never had gold rally at this velocity, almost a 100 % difference versus 60-month moving average with stock market volatility staying this low. That's never happened. That to me is, I fear for what I think it's going to indicate next year. Is that stock market volatility, 120-day volatility, 11%, which will be the lowest since 2017, it's just going to pick up and get to its average next year, which is closer to 20%. Not a big deal, but that might seem a big deal when the market corrects. So that's the signals I'm getting.
29:54It's just purely frightening. We've seen gold-backed ETFs, seeing inflows rise week over week in the past, I think, one month. But you know what has seen outflows? Bitcoin ETFs. And I know you also write about Bitcoin and crypto. Can you talk to us about your outlook briefly for next year? What are we expecting in that asset class? So I think Bitcoin's more likely to revert back to its enduring mean around$50 ,000, which has been the case on the annual charts since 2021. I don't think it gets much above$100 ,000. It has the curse of the best backtest in history and the biggest ETF launch in history.
30:31And now we're finding out the realization of what happens with the great backtest. Usually that means the best is over. The thing about Bitcoin, it was one cryptocurrency in 2009, and now there's 28 million. So it's basically the whole cryptocurrency space is a bunch of pigeons versus four doves, which is gold, silver, platinum, palladium, and precious metals. So that to me is what's happening. The bottom line, I think, for cryptos next year is the stock market absolutely has to go up. Or that Bloomberg Galaxy crypto index, which is down about 20 % on the year, which is the same price since 2021, will probably continue to drop next year.
31:04I think the whole space is just getting overhyped, got a little bit too bullish. And I'm fearful that precious metals are getting a little bit overhyped and a little too bullish now. So, Mike, as you look into your crystal ball for 2026, which precious metal has more runway in your opinion? Well, I think gold's going to continue outperforming virtually all commodities and virtually its own stock market, but this time potentially with the stock market going down rather than going up. So the key thing to remember about gold is almost always outperforms almost everything except maybe treasury bonds when the stock market's going down.
31:37And to me, that's the biggest risk for next year. It's not in anybody's model. It's everybody's assumes it's going to be up 11 percent, which means it better be or we got issues. And the gold, the ratio between Bitcoin and gold has been a key indicator this year. It's dropped down about 19 ounces of gold per one Bitcoin. That's the lowest level in almost two years. That's a good leading indicator. It's pointing lower. I think that ratio is more likely to go to 10 than anywhere get above 30. All right. Good stuff. Something tells me we're going to be talking to you a lot, Mike McGlone, in the new year.
32:06We always appreciate your insights. Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Commodity Strategist Mike McGlone there joining us in sunny, warm Miami as we are here in cold. Chile, please. New York City. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this. Support for the show comes from Public. Lately, it feels like there are two types of investing platforms. Some are traditional brokerages that haven't changed much in decades, and others feel less like investing and more like a game. Public is positioned differently. It's an investing platform for people who are serious about building their wealth.
32:43On Public, you can build a portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto without all the bugs or the confetti. Retirement accounts, yep. High yield cash, yes again. They even have direct indexing. Public has modern design, powerful tools, and customer support that actually helps. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Add paid for by Public Holdings. Brokered services by Public Investing, member FINRA SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, SEC Registered Advisor, crypto services by ZeroHash. All investing involves risk of loss.
33:21See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth. With a widespread presence in communities across the country, Chase for Business supports small business owners at a local level. That makes it possible for you to connect, learn from each other, and grow together. There's a real commitment to seeing small businesses succeed. The Chase for Business team has knowledge and expertise that span a wide range of financial areas. They can help you make more informed decisions as you navigate the complexities of running your business.
33:55They'll help your business grow with individual guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. Deadlines move. Plans change. And sometimes opportunities pop up out of nowhere. When you need branded gear fast, 4imprint is ready to deliver.
34:344imprint offers hundreds of promotional products in their 24-hour category. Everything from custom apparel, bags, and drinkware to writing tools, trade show staples, and high-tech gear. At 4imprint, they're focused on getting the details right, printing your logo with precision, packing your order with care, and shipping it out fast. And it's backed by their 360-degree guarantee. That's 4imprint's promise your order will show up right on time, just the way you planned it. That's what it means to be 4imprint certain. So if you're prepping for a last-minute event or jumping on a big opportunity, you don't have to settle or scramble.
35:10With 4imprint, fast, reliable service and peace of mind are built right in. Check out their full 24-hour selection at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. For certain. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need. Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business.
35:49Let's create smarter business. IBM. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. I want to switch gears and talk about these Trump accounts, right? They're part of the president's one big, beautiful bill. They're designed to create these investment nest egg for kids. And here's how it would work, Isabel, right? So children born now through 2028, they're going to be given$1 ,000 from the federal government into an account that would act sort of like a hybrid IRA or 529 plan, because there are some tax consequences here.
36:34It would be managed by parents until the child turns 18. And we know they have the backing of some deep pocketed investors like Ray Dalio, Michael Dell, and his wife are donating six and a quarter billion dollars to help this fund, to help fund the Trump accounts. And Michael Dell spoke earlier this month with Bloomberg's Caroline Hyde about his donation. We do think that this will be catalytic and that more philanthropists and companies will join us over time. And again, this is a platform for the future of these children. Long term, we think, you know, investing these accounts in the S &P 500 is a very good way to compound over time for these children.
37:24Well, our next guest says Trump accounts, they're not the answer when it comes to closing the wealth gap for the next generation. Derek Hamilton is a Henry Cohen professor of economics and urban policy at the New School. He's also the brainchild behind baby bonds. Connecticut was the first state to implement this concept just a couple of years ago. And since then, we've had more states come on board, including California, I also believe Washington, D.C. And Derek Hamilton joins us here in studio Derek, thanks so much for being here. Thank you. Glad to be on the show. Yeah, especially ahead of the holiday.
37:54I guess there's a lot to dig into, but let me just start with what is, I guess, the main difference between baby bonds and the Trump accounts? Because on their face, there seem to be a lot of similarities. Well, conceptually, the goal is to provide access to asset building by way of having some financial capital so that you can get into asset building. The problem with the Trump accounts versus baby bonds is baby bonds focus on what actually is the problem. It's one of endowment. Essentially, the way wealth is created is wealth begets more wealth. It's having a large enough nest egg so that you can get into a home or get into an education without debt or to be able to have some capital to start a business.
38:38The Trump Trump accounts essentially emphasize savings by way of the tax code. So in an ironic way, it's structured in a way that's potentially going to subsidize those that have the wherewithal to raise capital in the first place. What does it signal to you when billionaires step in to fund youth wealth building programs? Are we seeing it as innovation that government couldn't achieve on its own? Or is it just a quiet shift away from maybe public responsibility? I mean, I applaud philanthropy, the desires to be vanguards and trying to create pathways to democratize wealth. However, the mechanism in this case is only feeding into a bad system.
39:20The federal government should not be ultimately subsidized for their duty. We shouldn't be reliant on the charitable contributions of a billionaire for our salvation. But what a billionaire can do is provide demonstration, be a catalyst, seed some momentum so that we ultimately can have them invested. And, you know, I'll make one other quick point, which is when you think about the$6.4 billion, which is a huge number, it requires context. So two context points. One is it's contextual to that$4 trillion big, beautiful bill that was referenced at the beginning of the segment. So if we're thinking about the ways in which the federal government is spending wealth towards advancing access to asset building for the population, that$6.4 billion deserves context to that$4 trillion, which is from our public legress.
40:17And in the other context, about 80 % of children between the ages of zero and 10 will have some access to this donation, this lagresse. But if you were to disaggregate that, that amounts to about$250 per child. Right. So essentially, that's not going to be the catalyst. So it's distracting a little bit. You know, some countries have done this pretty successfully, right? I know, I believe Germany is among them. They'll give an allowance, a monthly allowance to parents for kids of a certain age. Some countries use it as an incentive to get people to have more children. It's now these baby bonds have been implemented in, let's say, Connecticut since 2023.
41:01I believe they were the first state. How are things going? It's still in the infancy there, but how are things going? I mean, Connecticut is a really great model, and it's a state, so it doesn't have the capacities of the federal government. But here you have a scenario where every Medicaid birth will receive$3 ,200 automatically at birth, and the treasurer is managing that money in a collective fund in an astute way with responsible investing where the projections are that the children, you know, low-income children born as part of a Medicaid birth from rural to urban areas throughout the state will have about$12 ,000 to$18 ,000 as some seed capital to begin wealth building.
41:40And then, you know, other examples would be the UK did it. They didn't fund it to the extent that we would call for in the U.S. And then here's perhaps even the best counterfactual. The United States has done similar programs with the GI Bill. That's right. We have a history of doing this. Do you think that programs like these have an influence to affect economic policy long term? or do you think they create risking a system that just really hinges on, to your point, philanthropy of maybe rich individuals or big corporations? And that's exactly why it should be a government responsibility. And here's the point.
42:16This is not charity. This is an investment. So if you believe in the market, if you don't believe in the market, regardless, again, it's pretty simple the way wealth is created. It is that down payment that puts you in an asset that passively appreciates over your life. So if you are authentically somebody who believes in transaction in the market, then you should support people having some seed capital to get into that asset. So, again, it's a question of endowment, not savings behavior. Is there anything about the Trump accounts that you actually like? I mean, I think we can agree that, you know, the concept, I mean, the heart's in the right place.
42:54Well, I mean, that's just it. the attention on trying to make sure that we democratize access to wealth, that's a good thing. But the structure, the 529 structure, we have lessons from that where, you know, 529 saving, tax provision savings so that we can provide access to college for our children. The bottom half percent of earners essentially don't participate. Only about 2.5 percent of Americans participate. So there are really good ways we can do it. My fear is that we co-opt a good idea. It's a really good idea. We have pathways to really facilitate a good value for our American economy, which is inclusion.
43:34We just got to work on the delivery. To Alexis' point, there's the idea of corporation match welfare embedded here. Are there any upsides to that? What should policymakers be cautious about? I apologize for laughing, but the phrasing of corporate welfare, again, I take the Dells as being not disingenuous, but really trying to be supportive. I think there's better ways, there's more catalytic ways they could spend that$6.4 billion. But at the end of the day, the American people don't want to be at the whim of billionaires. And then there are other aspects as well that we should be leery about, which is state-private partnerships for which we have to be concerned about the potential for grift when we're relying on billionaires to provide economic security for the American people.
44:26So if we're thinking, you know, look, a lot of folks are not going to take advantage of a 529 plan. Is that because they don't have the money to do it? Is that because they don't know they exist? Is that because a lot of Americans cannot be left to their own devices to save for themselves? I mean, think about how, you know, some of our programs like Social Security came to be. It's because it was supposed to be some sort of a safety net. So is it a good idea for the government to put aside some money for folks who might not otherwise do it? I mean, that actually is a great idea, but just how and the mechanisms by which we do it, that's the problem.
45:02So it is the case that clearly we have an affordability crisis in this country. So people don't have the wherewithal to save en masse. And that's a big reason why people don't participate in the 529 Council, not as if they don't love and adore their children and desire for them to have savings. It's wherewithal. And then the other big point is, for those that have amassed wealth in America, it's not active savings that's driving that. And by active savings, income that we actively save is passive savings. It's that down payment. It is critical for young adults to really have some capital so that they can get into that automatic vehicle to save.
45:42All right. We're going to have to leave it there. But it's not the last we've heard of baby bonds. We'll see if they come into other states. Are they coming to other states soon? Do we know? Is this in the pipeline? Lots of momentum at the state level. There are demonstrations. I have to give a quick plug, which is at the Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy. That's racepowerpolicy.org. We have a whole list of where they are flourishing, the various states, the demonstrations where this idea is incubating across the United States. Derek Hamilton, University Professor Henry Cohen, Professor of Economics and Urban Policy at the New School.
46:15Thanks so much for coming in, especially ahead of the holiday. Talk baby bonds. This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.
46:49Here's a paradox. We buy insurance for peace of mind, yet the very policies we trust can deliver the biggest financial shocks. Across America, millions of claims are denied every year, not because people did anything wrong, but because policies quietly excluded the things that happened. The psychology of trust tells us we assume the contract is fair, but in insurance, the information gap is massive. The insurer knows every detail of what's covered. The policyholder rarely does. That's where My Policy Advocate comes in. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and shows you in plain language where you're vulnerable.
47:25They're not selling insurance. They don't do that. It's about transparency, giving ordinary people the same understanding insurance companies have had for decades. Because when you know what's really in your policy, you can plan, protect, and avoid surprises. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Visit MyPolicyAdvocate.com today. Peace of mind starts with knowing the truth. MyPolicyAdvocate.com Sonesta Travel Pass makes traveling more rewarding. Designed to help you get more out of every stay. Sign up at Sonesta.com to enjoy instant savings, bonus points, and valuable perks like early check-in, late checkout, room upgrades, and free stays over time.
48:07With Sonesta Travel Pass, every stay brings you closer to your next reward. Choose from more than 1 ,100 hotels across 13 distinctive brands and unlock the best available rates when you book direct with Sonesta Travel Pass. Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sonesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. These days, it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agent's identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust.
48:46So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta, you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. Okta secures AI. For many men, mental health challenges aren't recognized until they've already taken a toll. Work pressure, financial stress, changing relationships, and traditional expectations around masculinity can quietly wear men down, often without clear warning signs. In Season 3 of The Visibility Gap, Dr. Guy Winch and his guests explore how these pressures show up, how to spot them earlier, and how men can access meaningful support.
49:21Listen to the new season of The Visibility Gap, a podcast presented by Cigna Healthcare.
From the publisher
Watch Bloomberg Businessweek Daily every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.
Larry Ellison is throwing his personal fortune behind Paramount Skydance Corp.’s bid for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., aiming to give his son’s company an advantage in a fiercely contested takeover battle with Netflix Inc.
Both suitors moved on Monday to strengthen the financial backing for their offers, though they stopped short of increasing their bids. Netflix refinanced a portion of its planned $59 billion of debt as a way to ensure a lasting investment-grade rating — a key advantage it holds over the lower-rated Paramount.
But it’s the personal guarantee of Ellison, the world’s fifth-richest person with a $246 billion fortune, that could force a rethink by Warner Bros. The board previously urged shareholders to reject Paramount’s offer in part because the billionaire father of its Chief Executive Officer David Ellison had backed the $40.4 billion of equity financing with a revocable trust that could, as the name implies, be withdrawn or amended at any time.
Paramount has been aggressively pursuing Warner Bros. for months and Ellison was taken by surprise when the board agreed to a deal with Netflix for $82.7 billion for the streaming and studio assets. The strength of the financing for each bid has emerged as a decisive issue in the takeover battle, which unleashed two massive debt-fueled offers that rank among the largest in the past decade. Paramount took its offer of $30 a share, or $108.4 billion including debt, for the entire company directly to shareholders.
Today's show features:
- Bloomberg News Media Editor Molly Schuetz and Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Credit Analyst Stephen Flynn on the latest developments in the Warner Bros. Discovery bidding war
- Que Nguyen, Chief Investment Officer, Equity Strategies with Research Affiliates on whether small- and mid-cap stocks are contributing to the bull market and how much more growth we can expect from the AI trade
- Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Commodity Strategist Mike McGlone on trading trends in gold and crypto
- Darrick Hamilton, University Professor, the Henry Cohen Professor of Economics and Urban Policy at the New School, on whether Trump accounts can help close the racial wealth gap in America
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
