In short
U.S. labor market data and Fed-rate expectations after weaker-than-forecast July payrolls; how demographics and AI may affect jobs, participation, wages, and Fed policy. It also briefly touches airline AI pricing and FIFA/streaming sports media deals.
Guests (and backgrounds)
- Michael McKee, Bloomberg TV/radio international economics and policy correspondent.
- Matt Lizetti, chief economist at Deutsche Bank.
- Kevin Hassett, White House Director of the National Economic Council (interviewed earlier).
- Laura Ulrich, Director of Economic Research in North America at Indeed Hiring Lab; former Fed Richmond economist; Winthrop University economics professor/associate dean.
Key claims
- Payrolls were weaker and prior months revised down, implying labor market “weaker than it appeared,” but not a Fed emergency.
- Labor force participation fell to 61.4% (lowest since 1970s); “break-even” jobs needed to stabilize unemployment may be near zero to ~40k.
- Demographics: 55+ participation collapsing is largely expected; immigration/new entrants have “dried up.”
- Fed focus shifts toward inflation data; unemployment slack is tighter, but PCE inflation remains high.
- AI: economists are split (about 57% expect net job losses), yet Indeed sees growth in “AI touch” roles (e.g., software development, data/analytics).
Notable examples
- Indeed job posting index around 101–102 since Sept; software development jobs up ~15% since early 2025.
- Employers recruiting AI-native talent (45%) vs workers identifying as AI-native (14%).
- Possible wage pressure: 57% of surveyed economists expect downward pressure for college-educated workers.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOLabor Market Report Analysis
0:30 to 1:00
Analyzing the unexpected job cuts in July and their implications.
“When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track.”
Labor Market Report Analysis
1:05 to 1:44
Analyzing the unexpected job cuts in July and their implications.
“Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut.”
Labor Market Report Analysis
2:10 to 3:50
Analyzing the unexpected job cuts in July and their implications.
“The Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio.”
Insights from Kevin Hassett
3:50 to 5:00
Discussing Kevin Hassett's insights on labor force participation and unemployment.
“That, of course, is White House Director of the National Economic Council, Kevin Hassett, earlier on Bloomberg.”
Demographic Trends in Labor Participation
5:00 to 8:00
Examining the impact of retiring boomers and younger entrants in the labor market.
“Do you agree with Mike's assessment here that, yeah, on the surface, it looks weaker, but it's not as bad as sort of the headline number?”
Immigration and Economic Growth
8:00 to 10:00
Discussing the role of immigration in supporting economic growth and labor force.
“as Matt was saying, that's been going on for quite a while as baby boomers from 1946 started retiring.”
Federal Reserve's Interest Rate Decisions
10:00 to 12:00
Exploring the implications of recent labor data on Fed's interest rate decisions.
“Mike, I want to get to the conversation with Kevin Hassett this morning.”
Fed’s Dual Mandate Discussion
12:00 to 14:00
Debating whether the Fed should prioritize inflation or employment in policy.
“And that's a very normal thing for him to do.”
Fed's Rate Hike Decisions and Labor Market Insights
14:00 to 16:45
Discussion on the Fed's stance on inflation and the labor market dynamics.
“And they have backed off the idea of a September rate hike.”
Legal Challenges Facing Fed Governor Lisa Cook
16:45 to 17:42
Overview of President Trump's threat to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
“And we don't know how this will all play out, because even if she's found not guilty, the president could come back and say, well, yeah, but she was implicated or something.”
Show all 24 chapters
Legal Challenges Facing Fed Governor Lisa Cook
18:53 to 19:22
Overview of President Trump's threat to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Shifts in the Labor Market: Job Cuts and Trends
19:22 to 21:04
Analysis of unexpected job cuts in the labor market and the impact of AI.
“had to make a decision because I caught myself getting that frog in my throat and starting to get teary as I'm narrating some of these sections.”
Insights from Laura Ulrich on Job Trends
21:04 to 28:00
Laura Ulrich discusses job trends, the impact of AI, and labor market data.
“How would you describe today's payrolls report and how it changes your view of the labor market, if at all?”
The Demand for AI Native Talent
28:00 to 30:08
Learn about the importance of AI skills in the current job market.
“Indeed, where we asked employers if they were seeking what we defined as AI native or AI fluent talent.”
Wage Trends Among College Graduates
30:08 to 31:02
Discover insights on expected wage pressures for college graduates.
“I have stressed that to my sons and I've stressed it to myself too, as someone who is older, only 11 % of Gen Xers in our survey even define themselves as AI fluent.”
Interview with Laura Ulrich
31:02 to 32:02
Hear from Laura Ulrich about economic research and job market dynamics.
“Yeah, I think that the sectors that are most likely to be impacted, especially in the short run are many white collar sectors that college educated people flow into.”
Cal Penn's Earsay Podcast
33:10 to 34:44
An introduction to Cal Penn's podcast discussing emotional storytelling.
“I'm the host of Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.”
High Costs for Streaming Sports
34:48 to 35:55
Explore the challenges sports fans face with streaming costs.
“You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.”
FIFA's Financial Strategies and Tensions
35:55 to 42:00
Insight into FIFA's business strategies and tensions with UEFA.
“I feel like we have to go to FIFA, though.”
Soccer Media Rights Discussion
42:00 to 42:54
Exploring the potential viewership and media rights for future soccer events in the U.S.
“I could see$2 billion, but that depends on who shows up and wants it.”
Soccer Media Rights Discussion
44:13 to 45:47
Exploring the potential viewership and media rights for future soccer events in the U.S.
“I'm the host of Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.”
AI Debt and Market Dynamics
45:51 to 55:56
Analyzing the surge in AI-related debt and its implications for major tech firms.
“You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.”
Analyzing Company Demand and Financials
56:02 to 57:02
Discussion on the financial implications and demands of companies.
“But it was like, you need to upgrade in order to ask this question.”
Analyzing Company Demand and Financials
57:43 to 58:10
Discussion on the financial implications and demands of companies.
“If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00What if data didn't sit still? What if intelligence moved with us? Not buried in reports, but activated in real time, where lives are being shaped, where decisions are being made. It all starts with a question. Where is the potential? Cotality turns data into clarity, intelligence into insight, insight into action. Because when intelligence moves, we all move forward. Cotality. Intelligence beyond bounds. When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges.
0:43At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation. Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut. This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem? Running a business is hard enough. Don't make it harder with a dozen apps that don't talk to each other.
1:18One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. That's software overload. Odoo is the all-in-one platform that replaces them all. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR, fully integrated, easy to use, and built to grow with your business. Thousands have already made the switch. Why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's odoo.com.
1:49Carol Massar:Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily, reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business, finance, and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio. So let's get to it and let's get to the labor market and that report we got this morning at 8.30 a.m. Eastern. Here's just kind of some of the details. U.S. employers unexpectedly cut jobs in the month of July and hiring the prior two months was revised lower, suggesting that the labor market here in the U.S.
2:34Carol Massar:is weaker than previously thought after surprising strength, Tim, earlier this year. The decline in jobs driven by cuts in government, leisure and hospitality, also retail. Private sector payrolls rose by$30 ,000 for a second month that was led by healthcare and social assistance. Manufacturing and construction payrolls, those continue to climb. And then there was the participation rate. The share of the population working or looking for work fell to 61.4%, which, excluding the pandemic, was the lowest since the 1970s. Among those between the ages of 25 and 54, known as prime age workers, participation edged higher but remained near the lowest levels of the last few years.
3:13Carol Massar:White House Director of the National Economic Council, we're talking about Kevin Hassett. He spoke earlier on Bloomberg TV and radio on open interest with Danny Berger and Michael McKee. And labor force participation is kind of on a downward trajectory, which means that the break even jobs number, that is that the jobs number you need so that unemployment rate doesn't go up, is has gone from maybe one hundred twenty hundred thirty thousand a few years ago to maybe about forty thousand now. And so what it means is that what the market is used to look at, oh, it's like a normal tread the water kind of jobs number if it's around one hundred is no longer true.
3:49All right.
3:50Carol Massar:That, of course, is White House Director of the National Economic Council, Kevin Hassett, earlier on Bloomberg. Joining us with more is our own Michael McKee, who was talking to Mr. Hassett earlier on Bloomberg. He is, of course, Bloomberg TV and radio international economics and policy correspondent. Joining us here in studio, along with and back with us, Matt Lizetti. He's chief economist at Deutsche Bank. Guys, thank you so much. I do want to kick it off with you, though, Mike. We've had a few hours for the dust to settle. Is this a report that was weaker? What's the assessment here? I think the bottom line, to just skip to the end of the book, is that the labor market is weaker than it had appeared.
4:27But it's not weak. It's not a problem for the Fed to have to deal with. And there were, as you mentioned, some quirks in the data this time. And everything Kevin said was true about with the labor force declining. You need fewer jobs to employ people so the unemployment rate can go down. And that is something that the Fed's going to have to think about in terms of what is the level of interest rates that keeps the unemployment rate steady. We'll dig into all of this and more in just a minute. First, I want to bring in Matt Lazzetti, chief economist over at Deutsche Bank. Do you agree with Mike's assessment here that, yeah, on the surface, it looks weaker, but it's not as bad as sort of the headline number?
5:10Yeah, I think absolutely. You got a downside surprise on payrolls. You had the$100 ,000 of downward revisions to prior months. But I think what it does is it confirms that that break-even number is just lower. So there's various Fed estimates out there suggesting that the break-even number could be as low as zero per month. Over the past three or six months, we're running at 20 ,000 to 45 ,000 on headline payroll numbers. With that backdrop, we've seen the unemployment rate decline to the lowest level in 18 months. We've seen other measures of labor market slack actually tighten on the margins as well.
5:38And so I think it actually fits more with a story where the break-even number is quite low. We see payroll gains trending kind of around those levels, maybe a little bit above. Labor market slack tightening at the margins. But it takes away some of the upside risks to the labor market that the Fed might have been contemplating.
5:53Carol Massar:All right. So when it comes to – we've got actually a question I want to bring in from a viewer and listener. It's Mark in Toronto. And he says, what impact do boomers retiring have on the labor participation rate and unemployment make? And if we could address that. I have to say, I have some boomers in my family who've retired recently. or in the last few years, and they have at least three or four of them that have left the labor market. Matt, is that something that is certainly at play here? Absolutely. So if you look at the labor force participation of recent months, in June, there was a big decline in prime age, which I think you alluded to, and specifically the 25 to 34 age group.
6:30That partially reversed. I think the bigger structural trend is labor force participation for 55 plus continues to collapse. There's a question about whether or not that's worrying or not. I would actually argue that that it's really in line with what you would expect from demographics. So if you look at different age groups with 55 plus, their participation rates are actually not moving around all that much. So what's happening is people are just aging into buckets where they work a lot less, where their participation rates are much lower. And we're, in fact, much closer to what I would expect from a demographics implied trend from the labor market.
7:04Mike, what about the other end of the demographic spectrum? And that would traditionally be new entrants to this country entering the labor force. and younger immigrants. We've seen that dry up significantly over the past few months, and certainly by design with this administration. You addressed that with Kevin Hassett a little bit in one of the questions that he answered. Does that work in our economy when we're not having enough kids? It isn't good news for the overall economy, as we were talking about with Kevin Hassett. The size of the labor force is one input into what potential growth is.
7:38And if the labor force isn't growing. You've got to get more out of productivity. Kevin and Warsh thinks you will eventually, not yet. So it is a problem for the economy overall. And you can see that in the overall participation numbers as well. Although prime age has ticked up a little bit, things have loosened up a little bit compared to where they were. But the demographics at the other end, as Matt was saying, that's been going on for quite a while as baby boomers from 1946 started retiring. And now we're past the peak of baby boomers being 65. So that'll be less and less of an issue going forward.
8:16But it still takes a lot of people out of the labor force.
8:19Carol Massar:Is it too soon? Well, I feel like there's a million things I want to talk about because demographics is things I know we've talked with you about it. But I do think about longer term, if we don't allow immigration into the country and we have an older workforce, you know how much the economy here in the U.S. is at risk in terms of growth. Matt, is that something you guys are thinking about a lot or studying? Sure. I mean, I think if you look at projections for population growth and the size of the U.S. population, as you look out five or 10 years, without positive net immigration flows, you have a declining labor force.
8:49You have a declining population. The U.S. is not the only economy, global economy, that is dealing with these issues. We've seen this movie, right? We see these issues in various parts of Asia, Europe. Many of these economies are actually worse placed than the U.S. is from that perspective. But no doubt, we rely on positive net immigration flows as we look ahead. I think, as Mike mentioned, the hope is that productivity growth can pick up. It has been pretty robust over these past two to three years, and that that can be the supporting mechanism for overall growth. So far, it's working out okay.
9:21Yeah. But it's a bigger question as you look at it. Okay, I promise we—oh, go ahead, Mike. I was just going to add on to this. There is one aspect of this that the productivity can't really solve. And that is the fewer people that are working, the lower the dependency ratio is. And so Social Security gets less funding. Medicare gets less funding. Tax-based, right? That is an ongoing issue, and nobody has any idea when Congress is going to address this.
9:48Carol Massar:I keep saying if robots are going to replace us or AI makes us more productive, but robots don't buy lunch or robots don't need their shoes shined or robots don't need to go shopping for shoes. They need to be oiled, though. It depends. It may be rebooted sometimes. It depends. It depends. Mike, I want to get to the conversation with Kevin Hassett this morning. at one point talking about hourly earnings, and he then brought up weekly earnings. You said something like, I don't know if the president's watching the Oval Office saying you got your point, though. And Kevin, good job, good job. And Kevin said, I don't know if he's watching, but I'll find out.
10:21Carol Massar:And I want to get both of your perspectives. But let's, Mike, speak to the president who watches a lot of TV. We know that and responds. Is that typical of a president? Is it shows his involvement in what the message is that's getting out? I think it's just unique to this president that he likes to do that and he likes to hear people talking about him. And he spends a lot from all the reports we get from the White House. He spends a lot of time watching television and watching the various news programs. I don't know that he was watching Kevin Hassett today. But putting pressure on then his members of his team when they're on air.
10:53Well, yes, but every White House does that in a sense that you're sending out a spokesman for the White House. So that person is not going to say, yeah, we blew it. this was a bad policy or something like that. They're always going to try to present the best numbers. And I was thinking when Kevin and I were having that conversation, you know, the old saying about you can torture the statistics any way you want to get the numbers that you want. Right. The bottom line for the White House, though, is that we are average hourly earnings are falling behind inflation. And whether you use one measure or another doesn't really matter because the public thinks that's happening and that's their political problem.
11:31Well, speaking of communications, you and Danny Berger asked Kevin Hassett about the communications between the president and Kevin Warsh. Let's listen to what he had to say. There have been some news stories that the president is talking to Kevin Warsh. And of course he is, you know, and he talked to Jay Powell, too. But the other thing is that Kevin Warsh and the president have a very close long term relationship from New York City, from Florida. And they talk about the economy all the time. It's very, very natural for the president to do something like say, hey, you know, Chairman Warsh, what do you think about today's job number?
12:05And that's a very normal thing for him to do. But I think that's the way you should think about the bounds of the conversations. Earlier on Bloomberg TV with Danny Berger and Mike McKee. Matt, I want to toss this over to you because Kevin has had also said that the president respects the independence of the Federal Reserve. And I'm curious, based on the reporting that we've seen around the conversations happening between the Fed chair and the president and what the president said publicly and on social media throughout this term and his previous term, is the view now, is the market viewing that the president respects the independence of the Fed?
12:37Look, I think we don't really know the context of the conversations that are happening. It seems like it might be more frequent than what has the interactions between the president and the Fed chair than in the past. If you look at market measures, I think what we like to look at are inflation expectations showing anything that is worrying. Are they suggesting that the Fed's credibility is at risk? I think last week you did see a notable rise in inflation expectations. I don't know that that was anything kind of tied to the president, but I think it was tied to Chair Walsh's specific comments around willingness to potentially raise rates, unwillingness to say that they were targeting 2 % PCE price inflation, and just the overall conversation, I think, and the language that he used, I think, raised some risks from a market perspective about whether or not the Fed would do what's necessary to keep inflation in check.
13:24Carol Massar:President Trump did an interview with Punchbowl today, and he reiterated his preference for lower interest rates, but acknowledged it is not the central bank chief's decision alone. So kind of making or taking a little bit of a softer tone in some of the criticism. I mean, when it comes down to it, I know we are already thinking, OK, what does the Fed do next? We've got inflation prints to get through, right, Mike? We've got more economic data. Who knows where the Fed will be and Kevin Warsh and everybody on the FOMC at the next meeting? Clearly, you don't trade Fed funds futures. You're right.
13:57We don't know. But the people who do trade these things have to decide on a minute-to-minute basis what they're going to do. And they have backed off the idea of a September rate hike. But the important thing is we're going to have two more inflation reports, two more, well, one more after this jobs report. And so there's going to be a lot of data for them to hang a decision on. We don't know what that data is going to say. And so at this point, it's too early to speculate. I mean, it's been going into this, everybody was saying, well, if we get a bad number, then the Fed might have to back off.
14:33And we got a bad number. So they're saying the Fed's going to back off. Now we're all on to, well let's see what we get on Wednesday with CPI and we'll make a decision.
14:41Carol Massar:It's our favorite part of the day. Well Matt, what is, what should, you know the Fed has a dual mandate but and I think for a lot of people the last few months have said okay, the labor market is strong so the focus should be on getting inflation down. After today's print, does that view change? Should the Fed still be squarely focused on that part of the dual mandate? I don't think it changes. Clearly you had a downside surprise in payrolls but if you think the break even number is close to zero, you're actually running at or near those levels. The unemployment rate's at 4.1%. It is well below what the Fed thought it was going to be at the end of this year.
15:14It remains our best measure of labor market slack. I think you have a shift of risk distribution on the labor market. Now, there's not as much upside risk. But September will be about the inflation data that we get over the next two months, especially if you get it bounced back in payrolls next month.
15:28Carol Massar:I mean, inflation's still a problem, right? So, in our view, it is. I mean, if you look at PCE inflation, which is what the Fed targets, It is the highest that it's been since 1992 if you strip out COVID. And we agree with an evolving Fed assessment from many officials that it is more broad-based, it is more demand-driven, AI-related investment is a source of inflationary pressures, underlying inflation is stuck closer to 3%. None of that changed today. We'll get an update on that next week from the CPI. Okay, I want to just throw this last one at you, even though we don't have enough time, Mike.
16:02Lisa Cook. Because in the conversation about independence of the Fed, since we heard from Kevin Hassett this morning, our Bloomberg News team reporting that President Trump has revived his threat to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over those unproven allegations. Update us here on this. Well, they apparently sent Lisa Cook a letter that said the president is considering firing you because of the allegations of mortgage fraud. And you have three weeks to respond to this letter. Remember, the Supreme Court said that the president couldn't fire her, but because she didn't get due process, they didn't decide the legality of her particular case.
16:38And so now the White House is coming back and trying to follow the dictate of the court and give her the opportunity to respond. And we don't know how this will all play out, because even if she's found not guilty, the president could come back and say, well, yeah, but she was implicated or something. So this is just it's Friday. Put it that way. And this is the kind of thing you get on Fridays.
16:59Carol Massar:Yay for the lawyers. That's all I'm going to say. Matt Lizetti, Chief U.S. Economist at Deutsche Bank. Thank you so much. And, of course, our own Mike McKee, Bloomberg TV and Radio International Economics and Policy Correspondent. Do more on the labor market. What if data didn't sit still? What if intelligence moved with us? Not buried in reports, but activated in real time. Where lives are being shaped. Where decisions are being made. It all starts with a question. Where is the potential? Cotality turns data into clarity. Intelligence into insight. Insight into action. Because when intelligence moves, we all move forward.
17:38Cotality.
17:39Carol Massar:Intelligence beyond bounds. This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Now with ChatGPT Work. I'm Carol Masser. Globetrotters hunting for airfare bargains are in for a rude awakening. as the days of stumbling across a cheap seat on a popular flight could soon disappear. Bloomberg's Wan Ha reports that airlines from Delta to Virgin Atlantic are adopting artificial intelligence to change seat prices more quickly by weighing dozens of variables in real time, helping capture more revenue while shrinking pricing gaps that once allowed travelers to find bargain fares. Machine learning models can more accurately forecast demand by analyzing historical booking patterns, seat inventory, and seasonal trends, while also continuously tracking competitors' fares and capacity changes to update prices in near real time.
18:29Carol Massar:The technology could lead to higher fares on busy routes as airlines pack flights closer to capacity, but may also result in lower fares on off-peak and lower-demand routes. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at ChatGPT.com today by selecting Work Mode. Available on Plus and Pro Plans.
19:22had to make a decision because I caught myself getting that frog in my throat and starting to get teary as I'm narrating some of these sections. And it's like, okay, yo, yo, yo, is this indulgent? And I really thought about it. I was like, no, at this point, it would kind of be betraying the trust the author and the listener have in telling this story if I don't go through it. But there's places in this book that deeply emotionally affected me. And I left it on the mic. That's great. Because it served the story. People will say like, oh my God, I cried at the end. It's like, yeah, dude, me too.
19:54Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
20:02Carol Massar:You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. We have been reporting U.S. employers unexpectedly cut jobs in the month of July and hiring in the prior two months was revised lower, suggesting the labor market is weaker than previously thought. Man, do I need a weekend? This is after some surprising strength earlier this year. We're going to stay on the labor market. We've been trying to look at this from different vantage points, and that's where our next guest comes in.
Read the full transcript
20:39We've got Laura Ulrich with us, Director of Economic Research in North America at Indeed Hiring Lab. She's also a former senior regional economist and senior manager at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, primarily focused on research related to higher education and workforce dynamics, which, by the way, we got some great questions from our audience coming in just about this. She was also an economics professor and associate dean for undergraduate programs at Winthrop University. She joins us from North Carolina. Welcome, welcome, welcome. How would you describe today's payrolls report and how it changes your view of the labor market, if at all?
21:12I wouldn't say it necessarily changes my view of the labor market. We at The Hiring Lab and Indeed have been kind of describing the market as a market that is cooled, not necessarily that is cooling. We're kind of bouncing along the bottom. And I see that as the same today as I really did yesterday. However, I do think it is important to acknowledge that the payroll employment report came in about 100 ,000 jobs below consensus today. And so that's notable, right? It was much softer than what people were expecting.
21:43Carol Massar:So I am curious, too, and tell us a little bit more, if you would, Laura, about the activity you are seeing on the platform. What are the job listings? What are the jobs people are looking for? Give us an idea and give some context about data today versus maybe six months ago or just trends, because you guys see a lot. We do. We do. We have access to a lot of data, both on labor supply and labor demand. And I would tell you that we've been in kind of a, I wouldn't call it a steady state because there has been a bit of turbulence, right? We've been bouncing a bit, but we've been at about a job posting index of 102-ish, between about 101 and 102 since about September of last year.
22:30So that's kind of what leads partially to our viewpoint in that this is kind of a cold market that's bumping along the bottom. One interesting point, though, and you did see this reflected potentially in today's payroll employment report, we have seen some strength in some sectors where we were seeing considerable weakness before. So software development jobs, for example, are up 15 percent since early 2025. And we had seen considerable cooling in tech jobs and in the payroll employment report, jobs in both information and professional business services were up today. So we are starting to see some of those, I would say, sectors that maybe are more AI exposed that where we had seen a lot of softness to turn the corner of it.
23:16OK, you know, Brendan down in Maryland sent us a question during our last segment that would be great for you to weigh in on. It's about sort of these different areas of the of the economy and what you're seeing in terms of different sectors. He writes that it seems many jobs were lost in education. To what extent do you think these are permanent job losses as many municipal school districts have exhausted and no longer can use the massive federal funding they received during the pandemic era? Here's a great question. I did take note of that data point this morning. I think that the loss of those local education government jobs, that could be a bit of an anomaly with some issues with the seasonal adjustments.
24:00I think it'll be interesting to see what the number looks like next month. I will say, though, much of my background is in education, as you mentioned. And there is considerable pressure, both on higher ed, but also K through 12, partially because of the federal funding cuts, but also because there have just been fewer and fewer and fewer students enrolled in public schools. And so if you look at enrollment for many of those districts, it's been declining. And so there there's less need for staff and teachers at some of those districts as well.
24:30Carol Massar:Hey, I want to get to, because one of the things we talk about, Laura, when it comes to the labor market is the impact of AI, right? We're still trying to figure all of that out. And we thought, both Tim and I, when you talked about strength and software development jobs, we kind of were surprised at that. Yeah, I thought the bots were going to do it. Yeah. So that was interesting to us. You have done a new survey, the Indeed Hiring Lab Labor Market Outlook Survey. You talked to more than 100 U.S. economists and labor market experts. Tell us about the findings and what you heard? Absolutely. So we're really excited.
25:01This is a brand new product for us. We released it earlier this week. So we'll be doing this on a quarterly basis where we ask over 100 very well respected labor economists to predict what they think is going to happen, both to unemployment rates, but also our own job postings and Indeed. And along with that, we're going to be asking them some special questions. This time we had a lot of questions on AI. It was really interesting for us to see the results because from a macro point of view, there wasn't a lot of disagreement amongst economists. Many of them did see that there would be a slight decline in job postings and a slight increase in unemployment rates over the next year, but not a lot of movement.
25:39But the AI question got a much broader array of answers, I will say. A little over 50 percent of the economists that were surveyed, I think it's 57 percent, believed that AI would lead to job losses on net. About in the 30 percent thought it would lead to job gains on net. And then some are unsure. And I think that that wide array of responses from, like I said, this group of very well-respected labor economists really shows how much uncertainty there is in what path this might go in. But I will say at Indeed, we're starting to see, I mentioned that growth in software development, those jobs where we are seeing growth do tend to be what we're calling AI touch jobs.
26:24These are jobs that either have AI in the title. So think like AI engineer or machine learning specialist, something like that. A data center technician is another one that's growing a lot. Or they mention AI as being a skill or a characteristic of the job and the job description. So those jobs are on the rise on our platform for sure. They're also on the rise in terms of what people are seeking. And so really from our vantage point right now, I would say today, from my perspective, it's much easier for me to point to some growth that we're seeing from AI in the labor market to actual destruction from AI doing people's jobs.
27:02Carol Massar:But as you pointed out in the press release, you guys said when a group like this converges on something like AI as they did, right? In terms of the impact, it's worth paying attention. When it splits, that tells us something too. In this quarter, it did both. Is that fair in terms of how I'm reading it? It did. We asked one really interesting thing was we asked the economists exactly what sectors do you think there'll be the largest decline in jobs and what sector do you think there'll be the largest increase? And there were two occupational sectors from our data that ended up on both lists. That was software development and data and analytics.
27:33So some of the economists thought this is where we're actually going to see the most loss and others thought this is where we're going to see the most gain. That was a surprise to me. I didn't expect to see the same sectors end up on both lists.
27:45Carol Massar:It's just, it's a reminder that we're figuring our way. People say we're early in on this, right? And understanding really the impact. I mean, we're trying to figure this out and we don't really know, right? Longer term, exactly how it plays out. I totally agree. I think one thing that we do know, and we did another survey internally at Indeed, where we asked employers if they were seeking what we defined as AI native or AI fluent talent. AI native talent has nothing to do with age. You can be a Gen Xer like me and be AI native, but it basically means that you default to AI technology to help you across multiple workflows.
28:21AI fluent is you still feel comfortable across workflows, but you don't necessarily default to it. And 45 % of employers said they were actively recruiting AI native talent, but only 14 % of workers in the survey considered themselves AI natives. So I think one thing we do know right now is people who do have AI related skills and talent are being hotly demanded in the labor market. Well, let's make this a little personal because our team told us that you have a couple of kids. I guess they're not kids anymore, but they're young men entering the labor market right now. And this is, I think it's fair to say, a really interesting time to enter the labor market.
29:04You're talking about this AI fluency and being AI native. What do you tell them about the skills that they need to succeed in this market? It's a great question. And yes, I have three sons, 16, 19, and 22. I'm sorry for the third one that I did not mention. You don't know who you are. He won't mind. But the oldest just finished graduate school in data science, which in R &D data has been one of our softest areas. So you can imagine for me and the work that I do, doing the research that I do, but also living life as a mom trying to help this young adult. He has landed his first full time job, which is excellent news for our household.
29:43But it was very tough. And what I kept stressing to him was that, in my opinion, it's really important for young job seekers to prove to companies that they are better off, the company is better off with AI plus them than AI without them. And that's a tough road to navigate right now, but I do think it's extremely important. So I think being an AI native is very important. I have stressed that to my sons and I've stressed it to myself too, as someone who is older, only 11 % of Gen Xers in our survey even define themselves as AI fluent. And I've had to work hard as an older worker myself to become an AI native and to really dig into it.
30:28So I think it's something that in my view is extraordinarily important. As we do go into this period, that is going to be so uncertain because I believe that for my children's generation, one of the most important skills they can have is adaptability.
30:43Carol Massar:I got to ask you about one more data point from your survey finding. We've only got about a minute or so left, but you guys found a larger majority, 57 % of panelists said they expect downward pressure on the wages of college-educated workers over the next year versus 34 % who said the same for workers without a degree. Forgive me, but just about 40 seconds. Why do you think that is? Yeah, I think that the sectors that are most likely to be impacted, especially in the short run are many white collar sectors that college educated people flow into. I'll say too, we've done some work at Indeed looking at how that collides with the demographic shifts that you guys were talking about before.
31:21And what we've kind of predicted through this is that we might have an excess of workers moving into these white collar roles with a combination of demographic shifts and AI. And so if that happens and supply exceeds demand, seeing downward pressure on wages would be pretty rational to expect.
31:40Carol Massar:All right, great stuff. Please, please come back and join us again. We would love to have you. Thanks for having me. Have a good weekend. Laura Ulrich, she's Director of Economic Research in North America at Indeed Hiring Lab. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
32:00Carol Massar:This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Now with ChatGPT work. I'm Carol Masser. Globetrotters hunting for airfare bargains are in for a rude awakening, as the days of stumbling across a cheap seat on a popular flight could soon disappear. Bloomberg's Juan Ha reports that airlines from Delta to Virgin Atlantic are adopting artificial intelligence to change seat prices more quickly by weighing dozens of variables in real time, helping capture more revenue while shrinking pricing gaps that once allowed travelers to find bargain fares. Machine learning models can more accurately forecast demand by analyzing historical booking patterns, seed inventory, and seasonal trends, while also continuously tracking competitors' fares and capacity changes to update prices in near real time.
32:47Carol Massar:The technology could lead to higher fares on busy routes as airlines pack flights closer to capacity, but may also result in lower fares on off-peak and lower-demand routes. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute, brought to you by ChatGPT. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at ChachiPT.com today by selecting Work Mode. Available on Plus and Pro plans.
33:15Hey everyone, it's Cal Penn. I'm the host of Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club. This week on the podcast, I am sitting down with Ray Porter, the narrator of Andy Weir's audiobook Project Hail Mary, massive sci-fi adventure about survival and science and what happens when you wake up alone very far from earth. I really had to make a decision because I caught myself getting that frog in my throat and starting to get teary as I'm narrating some of these sections and it's like, okay, yo, yo, yo, is this indulgent? And I really thought about it. I was like, no, at this point it would kind of be betraying the trust the author and the listener have in telling this story if I don't go through it.
33:59But there's places in this book that deeply emotionally affected me, and I left it on the mic. That's great. Because it served the story. People will say like, oh my God, I cried at the end. It's like, yeah, dude, me too. Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Wait, I came in for two things. How is this$47? All right, we're going to need a plan here. Just start simple with Bank of America Advantage Safe Balance Banking. No overdraft item fees, no monthly maintenance fee if you're under 25. Plus, as a new checking customer, you can earn$100 when you open an account and make qualifying Zelle or debit transactions.
34:39Oh, that's actually really simple. Safe Balance Banking, one less thing to figure out. Learn more at bfa.com slash earn100. Terms and conditions apply Bank of America and a member FDIC. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.
34:54Carol Massar:Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. This story definitely caught our attention. Tim set it up so well. It's about one sports fan and what he's paying to watch all of the streaming channels and sports that he loves on streaming channels. And it turns out to be more than$2 ,000 a year. He's got to share some passwords. Like, what is he doing? We know what goes on at the Stenevek Castle. Okay, why so much? As our team reports out, the rise of streaming services has made it difficult for U.S.
35:28sports fans to follow their favorite teams without special subscriptions, with pro leagues signing deals with multiple services and creating a bewildering schedule and some steep costs. We've got Randall Williams, Bloomberg News senior reporter and the co-host of the Bloomberg Business of Sports podcast. That podcast is available at Bloomberg.com, Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
35:48Carol Massar:Also means it's the weekend because it's dropped. Hey, good to have you here. Lots to talk about. Thank you for having me. Well, it's great to have you. We're going to get into the streaming costs. I feel like we have to go to FIFA, though. Okay, we can start there. Right, because last week we talked about, and it looked like they were trying to get outside investors and all this stuff. That's done, right? It's dead. They died after we talked to you. No, literally, shortly after it died, and I think I ended up reporting on it, like maybe three hours after, which is nuts. The thing that remains to be seen is if Gianni Infantino, the FIFA president, is going to win his re-election next year.
36:22He was, I would say, reaffirmed as president this week in Morocco, where I believe he said the final is probably going to be played there. But UEFA has not, they have not said anything different. They still are not supporting him. Many people who are just sort of joining the conversation right now about FIFA and post-World Cup might not understand. I certainly don't. I can paint the picture. The tension between UEFA and FIFA, was this just the straw that broke the camel's back? Or have there been tensions for a while? There have been tensions for a while. I think that when Gianni Infantino, of course, is looking at FIFA as a business, as most executives do.
37:01But there's also a purest mentality in all sports, in golf and tennis and football and basketball and everything else. And so you think about the innovations that Gianni Infantino, that's what he would call it and say, like such as hydration breaks, commercial breaks that are used to sell ads. That's not typical in football. UEFA is very strongly opposed to that. And he's even said in the Euros that they won't be doing it. But that is something that if UEFA was trying to maximize TV dollars that they could sell. But they're talking about the purity of the game of soccer and they're saying, no, absolutely not.
37:33So then you, you, you know, relay that into what's happened recently. FIFA made$15 billion from the World Cup. And then after that, they're going to be like, you know, we're going to sell stakes. We're going to do this with Thrive Capitals, Joshua Kushner. And UEFA is like, listen, no, we've had enough of you and we're going to be trying to probably get rid of you come next year.
37:54Carol Massar:Yeah. Do they have the power to do that? I think it's going to take some rallying and they need they need there has to be another potential candidate. I have not seen any reports that someone has been trying to rally against them. It's just that they do not support him. I also don't anticipate that Gianni Infantino in four months is going to be able to change UEFA's mind. So who can UEFA find to really go up against Gianni Infantino? And the reality is Infantino, as much as he has done with the Trump administration and for the World Cup, it's hard to argue that he hasn't done a good job. You make$15 billion the most ever, it's going to be hard to get rid of anybody who's just made record-setting profit.
38:34Carol Massar:And won't there always be that tension between FIFA and kind of the regionals? Of course, because FIFA owns the World Cup, which is the, you know, it's over the entire world. Whereas, you know, you have your CONCACAF, you have your soccer federation in South America, you have UEFA, and each of them have their own tournaments. You have the Euro, you have Copa America, but the World Cup is when everybody competes. So there's always going to be some tension there. They've got to be a little jealous that this went so well. Just a little bit. But so listen, there was a story on the Bloomberg, too, the next World Cup and the money deals, Randall.
39:07Carol Massar:FIFA exploring selling U.S. media rights for the next two World Cups together, which would keep the hydration breaks that boosted it. They're not going away, are they? I don't think so. I mean, once you get a taste of advertiser money in 30 seconds and all, and you got to think about it. This is exclusivity. At the Super Bowl and at other events, those 30-second ads sell for$8 million apiece, but they never really rerun. And when you're watching the World Cup, you see the same ads over and over and over and over again. Well, yeah, my son's like talking to me about Bank of America, Home Depot. And like he's seven years old and never watches other commercials.
39:39And he knows. And by the way, David Beckham's in all of these. Of course. So this is great news for David Beckham, I guess. It's great news for all of FIFA's partners is because it really is one of the most exclusive, you know, advertisements that you can possibly have. because it's going to run in every single match across various continents and regions. So they are going to take this to market. They're probably going to shop around to whoever's willing to pay the most. But of course, you want the reach angle of this. There's not one inch of that screen that is not taken up by an ad, even when the game is going.
40:10Absolutely not. Everything is an ad in there. So much so that even the stadiums. Think about the stadiums. We're not calling MetLife Stadium MetLife. We're calling it New York, New Jersey Stadium.
40:20Carol Massar:That blew my mind. How the heck did they get that done? I mean, they obviously have an insurance partner. And, you know, SoFi Stadium became Los Angeles State and so on and so forth. I just could not believe that they're willing to go that far to protect sponsors. But if sponsors are paying a premium and that's what they're asking for. So that's why they did it. I think it's part of it. Because those, those, but the naming rights that, you know, you get naming rights for a stadium. You expect that, that those, that name to be used when the stadium is mentioned. It's twofold. The stadiums and their owners were willing.
40:55They wanted the World Cup, and they wanted those matches and that revenue that came from FIFA. And so they were willing to cover up the names. At the same time, FIFA is like, we don't want anybody profiting off the World Cup except for us and our partners. And so even if it's Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, Hard Rock Stadium in Miami, there were banners that were hung up that said New York, New Jersey Stadium. And it's hard for me to say New York, New Jersey Stadium when the stadium is in New Jersey.
41:22Carol Massar:We saw it. We were like, is that a mistake? It came down to the fact that the host committee is called New York, New Jersey host committee. And so that's why the stadium was named that. But nonetheless, it is a bit far-fetched. I'm like, that's too far. But anyways. We mentioned streaming costs coming into this. Meteorites. What were they for the past World Cup? What might they be for the future World Cup? I believe the media rights are around$485 million, around that half a billion dollar mark. I believe they will probably go for double that. I mean, this was probably one of the most successful World Cups.
41:57Carol Massar:So if they sell them for two, you're talking about a$2 billion deal? I'm saying at minimum a billion. I could see$2 billion, but that depends on who shows up and wants it. Because it's U.S. media rights? Yes. But the challenge with that is going to be the time zone for the next one. Time zone. It's five hours ahead. We really worked in our favor. Yeah, it's five hours, six hours ahead, I believe, in Spain, Portugal, and Morocco. I think it's doable. They have to figure out the schedule and when the players are going to be playing. We're not going to see it. I would be shocked, unless the U.S. somehow ends up in the final in 2030, I would be shocked that if the number surpasses what it was this year, which was, I believe, 64 million viewers, which is probably the most watched soccer ever here in the U.S.
42:38I think you're going to go. I probably will. Yeah. Bloomberg grants me permission. You got four years to make it.
42:46Carol Massar:Are you listening, anybody? No. Randall Williams, Bloomberg News senior reporter, co-host of the Bloomberg Business of Sports podcast. Check it out. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
43:03Carol Massar:This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Now with ChatGPT work. I'm Carol Masser. Globe trotters hunting for airfare bargains are in for a rude awakening, as the days of stumbling across a cheap seat on a popular flight could soon disappear. Bloomberg's Juan Ha reports that airlines from Delta to Virgin Atlantic are adopting artificial intelligence to change seat prices more quickly by weighing dozens of variables in real time, helping capture more revenue while shrinking pricing gaps that once allowed travelers to find bargain fares. Machine learning models can more accurately forecast demand by analyzing historical booking patterns, seat inventory, and seasonal trends, while also continuously tracking competitors' fares and capacity changes to update prices in near real time.
43:50Carol Massar:The technology could lead to higher fares on busy routes as airlines pack flights closer to capacity, but may also result in lower fares on off-peak and lower-demand routes. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at ChachiPT.com today by selecting Work Mode. Available on Plus and Pro plans.
44:18Hey, everyone. It's Cal Penn. I'm the host of Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club. This week on the podcast, I am sitting down with Ray Porter, the narrator of Andy Weir's audiobook Project Hail Mary, massive sci-fi adventure about survival and science and what happens when you wake up alone very far from earth. I really had to make a decision because I caught myself getting that frog in my throat and starting to get teary as I'm narrating some of these sections and it's like, okay, yo, yo, yo, is this indulgent? And I really thought about it. I was like, no, at this point it would kind of be betraying the trust the author and the listener have in telling this story if I don't go through it.
45:02But there's places in this book that deeply emotionally affected me, and I left it on the mic. That's great. Because it served the story. People will say, like, oh, my God, I cried at the end. It's like, yeah, dude, me too. Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Wait, I came in for two things. How is this$47? All right, we're going to need a plan here. Just start simple with Bank of America Advantage Safe Balance Banking. No overdraft item fees, no monthly maintenance fee if you're under 25. Plus, as a new checking customer, you can earn$100 when you open an account and make qualifying Zeller debit transactions.
45:42Oh, that's actually really simple. Safe Balance Banking. One less thing to figure out. Learn more at bofa.com slash earn100. Terms and conditions apply Bank of America and a member FDIC.
45:53Carol Massar:You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.
46:06We are trying to figure out what's going on with AI debt. So far this year, Amazon Alphabet, NVIDIA, Meta, Oracle, and SpaceX. Check this out.
46:13Carol Massar:I know. Together, they raised more than$200 billion from dollar bond sales that dwarfs the$13 billion from high-grade tech companies in the same period last year. Think about the Alphabet offering yesterday. day, 10 tranches over, you know, so much investor interest and they're not done. That's at least all the analysis that we've been seeing. But there's a little bit of a chill. I don't get it. I don't know. It's a chill engulfing AI linked debt as tech borrowing surges. Buyers have grown weary that massive AI spending will not pay off. We've got Davide Barbusha with us, Bloomberg News corporate finance reporter.
46:49He joins us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Can you just settle for us the distinction between what Carol mentioned, that Thursday offering from Alphabet attracting roughly$115 billion of peak demand. That's according to people with knowledge of the better. And they raised only? 25. Yeah, 25. You were on this byline, by the way, so you know about this. Then today you have this story out that talks about the chill that's engulfing. As
47:13Carol Massar:we talked about this on our editorial call this morning, each of these companies is different and has different offerings. What did you find? So it's kind of interesting. So the Google deal comes after a string of, well, there were three deals between June and July, essentially, where we had SpaceX, we had NVIDIA, we had Amazon raising$25 billion each. And these deals did not do particularly well in the secondary market, which, you know, traders and investors care very much about. Because if a bond doesn't do well in the secondary market, then it becomes sort of difficult to pull sales off going forward.
47:50Carol Massar:Well, explain that, right? It's important to see kind of the movement of these investments. No, explain that. That's what I'm saying. Well, essentially, when a bond is issued, there is a primary market where it gets absorbed, and there are books or orders for that bond sale, and then the bonds just start changing hands in the secondary market. And if it loses value, then the narrative around the asset in question becomes problematic, right? And harder for that entity, right, to come back and do another issuance. Exactly. OK, so enter the banks and sort of the narrative or like the narrative that's emerging around the attempt to sort of rekindle demand for at least part of this debt.
48:31So what happened after these three deals? There was a different deal by BlackRock. It was for a data center. So it was by BlackRock, but not just a corporate deal. It was still AI, essentially. And with this deal, which was smaller in size, about half of those,$12.5 billion, the banks on the deal essentially kept the orders limited to so-called buy and hold investors. So institutional investors that are, let's say, strategically invested in these assets or like these assets don't plan to essentially make a quick profit by selling these assets the moment they start trading.
49:10Carol Massar:Wasn't like relying on the secondary market, right? Well, the idea of this was essentially to make sure that it wouldn't be like an offloading in the secondary market immediately. And so what happens is that they created what in sort of banker lingo is called scarcity value. So the bonds were not easily available and that made them more valuable. As somebody who watches this market, are they creating an environment and so it's not reflecting the real trade and demand that's out there? Like it's kind of, I don't want to say covering it up, right? You're allowed to do this. There's nothing illegal.
49:46Carol Massar:But I mean, it speaks to the difficulty with some of these issues. Definitely. It definitely does. Because the fact that, I mean, everyone knows that there's going to be, there has been already a ton of debt issuance to finance the AI build out. There's going to be even more. So there's no doubt that the market is aware of that. There are still questions as to the pace and the cadence, like the frequency of these bonds. And so those three deals, one after the other, as I said, between the end of June and July, kind of spooked the market a little bit. And so there was a need in the market for a deal that did well, essentially.
50:22And so the Black Record deal happened. And then after that, we saw the Google deal yesterday, which did particularly well. Where do, I mean, should we think about this from a yields perspective, too, on what these investors are being paid for taking on this risk? Like, how does it vary from one company to another? Well, that's the thing. So, yes, there was an order book or, you know, let's say the quality of investors participating in the Black Record deal was, as I said, more buy and hold. But let's not forget that what these bonds were offering in terms of yields was particularly high. So we're looking at, in the case of BlackRock, it was like 7.5%.
51:02Carol Massar:Not too shabby, right? Yeah, which makes it closer to a high-yield credit rather than an investment-grade, blue-chip type of credit. What did Alphabet offer? I don't remember, but it was something like, if I'm not mistaken, 15 basis points above their existing curve. Okay. So that is a premium that makes the new bonds essentially attractive. Davide, is it important to like what BlackRock did? This was a data center deal. So was this real estate? Was this like what versus what we're getting from Alphabet or, you know, or what SpaceX or Amazon was doing? I mean, like where do we think about, okay, these buckets are similar versus this?
51:45Carol Massar:I'm trying to figure out, too, what this means in terms of the AI spend and trade and how investors are getting much more discriminatory. Yeah. I mean, data center debt, particularly in the investment-grade market, is a new thing. Yeah. It started, I think, this year, actually. And it's essentially project bonds. So it's bonds to finance the actual project, as opposed to, for instance, a corporate, straightforward corporate deal, senior unsecured bonds issued by a company, where the use of proceeds can include, for instance, AI investment, but it can also be refinancing of debt or any other thing.
52:25In this case, it's essentially project bonds where, in the case for BlackRock, for instance, it was BlackRock funds taking an ownership stake in the project company that is going to develop this data center, meta at the other part of the ownership. And then the BlackRock funds raise the financing to essentially back their stake in the project. We're speaking with Davide Barbusha, Bloomberg News corporate finance reporter, joins us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio. Here we are. Oh, you wanted to say something? I just want to think.
52:56Carol Massar:Do you think it's interesting that Meta was part of this? Because people are questioning the Meta strategy. Well, this is, let's just put it this way. This is not the first data center of Meta. They actually sort of inaugurated the data center trend with a very large transaction late last year. It was like the Hyperion data center in Louisiana with Blue Hour, which was much larger than this one. So this is not the first time they do this. So I was going to say, here we are going into, we're done seven months of the year. So we're a little over halfway done with this year. And so far already, we've seen, what, 200 billion, more than$200 billion in bond sales.
53:38What do your sources tell you about what the rest of the year is going to look like? So like, as I said, everyone knows there's going to be a ton of debt coming up. Forecasts keep changing. But like 200 billion more? 150 billion more? There is a Barclays estimate which was total hyperscaler debt. So large tech companies at$280 billion for the total of this year. So we're looking potentially at another$80 billion. But if you look at the whole space, so including data centers, including the broader tech sector, there are estimates, I think, fresh JP Morgan assets that put it at about$500 billion.
54:16Carol Massar:dollars yeah so what do you watch in terms of you know the the big question that's out here david like we're just trying to figure out again going back to you know for here we are three years in right getting ready to i think enter our fourth year when it comes to the ai spend and build and just trying to figure out when is it overdone and i'm just curious the things that you watch or what you hear when you are reporting this stuff out what are you hearing from folks in the industry I mean, there is a concern, obviously, around that. It's mainly driven by the pace of issuance and the pace of the financing.
54:53There is a concern of capacity overbuilt. There is a concern that the technology may become obsolete relatively soon. Yeah. So that's another, yeah. What are we going to do? Let's say that, this is not to be answered right now, but let's say that happens. What do we do with all these data centers?
55:11Carol Massar:and you just turn them off? Leave them there? This is why you think about just other rushes, the energy market or two, and the overbuild and to drill, drill, drill. They have seen their cycles where - Booms and busts, if you will. Booms and busts in a big way. And anybody in the industry is just very cautious. And I feel like, are people being cautious? Well, I mean, it does have feelings. It does remind people of previous technology-driven boom and bust cycles. But we'll see. We've seen the tech earnings recently were relatively positive. So they were positive also for this Google bond, for instance.
55:50Okay, this just got me thinking. And, Carol, we've talked about this before. But if we think about this from the perspective of the LLMs that people use, just the chatbots. I woke up yesterday morning and asked Claude a question. But it was like, you need to upgrade in order to ask this question. so i just went to open ai and chat gpt and asked the same question there and when i run out of space there i just use you know the google one you've no loyalty to anything no loyalty i know
56:15Carol Massar:and this is where like this is what we're trying to figure out or where we think about companies and the spend are saying wait you don't really need to use this expensive tool to do what you you are like there's going to be a point where people are are not maybe necessarily offering it to everybody, right? Employees, like, we're trying to figure this out. Sorry, we're doing this to you. No, no, no, I understand, but like the scale of the finances suggests that there's a lot of demand. Yes. Like they wouldn't do it unless they thought, which is what we talk about with Mandeep Singh from Bloomberg Intelligence.
56:48Carol Massar:There's the demand, there's the backlog. The customers. The customers, right? So there's the sales and the revenue. You just wonder, can it all come to a quick start, stop at some point? I don't know. That's the big question. Davide, this is a great story. Thank you for stopping by. Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio. Davide Barbusha, he's corporate finance reporter for Bloomberg News. You can check out his reporting and the entire team's reporting on the Bloomberg Terminal and at Bloomberg.com. This is the Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast. Available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts.
57:20Carol Massar:Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.
57:43Carol Massar:Healthcare doesn't always work great. If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like? Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get and care that looks at the whole person how you need it. Optum is helping make health care work as one for everyone. Learn more at business.optum.com. This is Tony Ayo from The Real Report with Tony Ayo and Uncle Murda. You ever notice how everything keeps going up?
58:17Rent, streaming, even extra salsa at your favorite burrito spot? But with Boost Mobile, you don't have to play the will it's go up soon game. Boost Mobile offers an unlimited talk, text, and data plan at a price that'll never go up. It's the same price you'll pay for life. Switch now for unlimited wireless at a price that'll never go up, only at Boost Mobile. After 30 gigabytes, customers may experience slower speeds. Customers will pay$25 a month as long as they remain active on the Boost Unlimited plan. This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem? Running a business is hard enough. Don't make it harder with a dozen apps that don't talk to each other.
58:51One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. That's software overload. Odoo is the all-in-one platform that replaces them all. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR, fully integrated, easy to use, and built to grow with your business. Thousands have already made the switch. Why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's odoo.com.
From the publisher
The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy. Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.
US employers unexpectedly cut jobs in July and hiring in the prior two months was revised lower, suggesting the labor market is weaker than previously thought after surprising strength earlier this year.
Nonfarm payrolls decreased 23,000 last month following a combined 103,000 downward revision to the May and June figures, Bureau of Labor Statistics data showed Friday. The unemployment rate fell to 4.1% as labor force participation continued to slide, and wage growth slowed.
The report suggests the labor market may be starting to falter amid rising prices and uncertainty from the Iran war, despite recent data showing strength in consumer spending and business investment. The data could also prompt the Federal Reserve to delay interest-rate increases as officials weigh inflation against risks to employment.US stocks opened higher and Treasury yields fell as investors reduced bets on a Fed rate hike in September. Still, upcoming reports on consumer prices — including data for July next week — could ultimately decide the Fed’s course of action next month.
On this episode, Carol Massar and Tim Stenovec speak with:
- Mike McKee, Bloomberg TV and Radio International Economics & Policy Correspondent AND Matthew Luzzetti, Chief US Economist, Deutsche Bank
- Laura Ulrich, Director of Economic Research, Indeed on where the jobs are, hiring trends, AI in the jobs market
- Randall Williams, Bloomberg News Senior Reporter & Co-Host of ‘Business of Sports’ Podcast on latest podcast episode, sports streaming prices, FIFA latest
- Davide Barbuscia, Bloomberg News Corporate Finance Reporter on AI Debt Indigestion Forces Wall Street to Rethink Bond Sales
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
