Trump Says Iran Reached Out on Deal, US Begins Hormuz Blockade

13 Apr 2026 · 39 min · 23 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

This Bloomberg Business Week Daily episode focuses on U.S.-Iran tensions and spillover into markets and tech policy. Topic: President Trump says Iran reached out for a deal as the U.S. begins a Hormuz blockade; the U.S. warns it will intercept/divert/capture neutral ships and “eliminate” Iranian fast-attack vessels near the blockade. Iran calls the restrictions illegal and piracy, warning of threats to regional ports.

Key claims

talks are advancing but details are unclear; main sticking points include uranium enrichment and control/reopening of the Strait of Hormuz; investors are reacting cautiously while watching for kinetic escalation.

Notable examples

Trump’s Oval Office remarks naming Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, and J.D. Vance; Bolton arguing peace requires regime change; Bolton citing earlier easing of sanctions on Iranian oil shipments.

Guests

Michelle Jamrisco (Bloomberg White House/National Security Editor); John Bolton (former U.S. National Security Advisor); Mark Champion (Bloomberg Opinion columnist); Michael Ventura (RBC co-head U.S. equity capital markets); Jamil Jaffar (George Mason Univ. Antonin Scalia Law School; former Bush White House associate counsel; Paladin Capital advisor).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

U.S. Naval Blockade of Iran

1:44 to 2:30

Discussion on the U.S. naval blockade and its implications.

“Plus, global business, finance and tech news as it happens.”

Trump's Remarks on Peace Talks

2:30 to 3:37

Analysis of President Trump's comments on recent peace talks with Iran.

“restrictions are illegal and constitute an act of piracy and threaten the ports in the region if its own facilities are targeted.”

Deciphering Diplomatic Messages

3:37 to 4:54

Understanding the mixed messages surrounding U.S.-Iran negotiations.

“as we continue to hear a momentum, a flow of commentary out of the White House or out of social media.”

Key Issues in U.S.-Iran Relations

4:54 to 7:21

Exploration of the main sticking points in U.S.-Iran negotiations.

“But at the same time, we're trying to decipher what to make of the president's remarks on where the diplomatic talks are going after the failure in Islamabad over the weekend.”

Political Implications Ahead of Midterms

7:21 to 10:03

Analysis of how the blockade and negotiations may affect upcoming elections.

“Michelle, does it come down to one or two main points?”

Trump's Threats Against Iranian Ships

12:34 to 14:00

Discussion on President Trump's threats regarding Iranian naval actions.

“You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.”

Analysis of U.S. Sanctions and Iran's Oil Strategy

14:00 to 14:32

Explore the impact of U.S. sanctions on Iranian oil and pricing strategies.

“And I think the failure of the Islamabad negotiations just makes the point as clearly as one can.”

U.S. vs Iran: The Game of Chicken in Hormuz

14:32 to 18:45

Discuss the strategic standoff between the U.S. and Iran in the Strait of Hormuz.

“An interesting column out today about how the Hormuz blockade is a, quote, throw down the U.S.”

The Challenge of Regime Change in Iran

18:45 to 21:00

Understand the complexities and historical context of regime change in Iran.

“Otherwise, you're simply trying to massage through force, you know, the behavior of the Islamic Republic.”

The Fallout of Viktor Orban's Political Defeat

21:00 to 23:29

Analyze the implications of Viktor Orban's electoral loss for Hungary and beyond.

“And we always appreciate you staying up late there in London.”
Show all 23 chapters

Equity Capital Markets: Current Trends and Challenges

23:29 to 26:31

Dive into the current state of equity capital markets and their challenges ahead.

“We're living in a market that moves on every headline and every potential attack or conversations around a ceasefire with DC and Iran at the front of everyone's mind going into earnings season.”

The Impact of Defense Spending on Market Dynamics

26:31 to 28:00

Examine the influence of defense spending on market opportunities and investor behavior.

“evaluation that you're doing in the private market in your final stages of IPO prep that I think will really separate winners and losers in this next open window.”

Market Dynamics and Upcoming Deals

28:00 to 28:58

Discusses the significance of new deals and the shift from macro to micro-driven market focus.

“Half of the 10 largest deals this year, a lot of numbers, down more than 25%.”

IPO Landscape and Market Resilience

28:58 to 30:01

Explores the current climate for IPOs and the resilience of the market amidst challenges.

“It's the most exciting part about my job.”

Current State of Middle East Stability

34:10 to 35:28

Analyzes the stability in the Middle East amid ongoing conflicts and market reactions.

“We've been focusing a lot out of headlines out of the White House, watching the war.”

U.S.-Iran Negotiations Outlook

35:28 to 36:30

Explores the complexities of U.S.-Iran negotiations in the context of current tensions.

“that raises the question whether the ceasefire will remain in place and whether there's a long-term solution here.”

Advice to President Trump on Iran

36:30 to 37:53

Jamil shares insights on what advice he would have given President Trump regarding Iran.

“I want to ask you, since you were a former associate counsel to President George W.”

Assessing U.S. Security After Conflict

37:53 to 39:08

Discusses the implications for U.S. security following military actions against Iran.

“It's hard for us to determine what victory looks like.”

Anthropic's Position in Ongoing Negotiations

39:08 to 40:10

Analyzes Anthropic's negotiations with the U.S. government and its implications.

“Just looking at our reporting today that Anthropic hired a Trump linked lobbying firm, Ballard Partners.”

Legal Challenges Surrounding Anthropic

40:10 to 41:40

Discusses the legal challenges Anthropic faces regarding its designation as a supply chain risk.

“You wouldn't expect Lockheed Martin, of course, to prohibit the U.S.”

Precedents in Government-Company Relations

41:40 to 42:00

Explores historical precedents regarding government interactions with tech companies.

“And do you agree that it's a supply chain risk to national security or is this just playing angry?”

Legal Implications of AI Regulation

42:00 to 43:50

Exploration of the legal frameworks affecting AI companies like Anthropic.

“It's hard to imagine how under the current Texas statute, an American like Anthropoc would.”

Concerns Over Government Intervention

43:50 to 44:32

Discussion on the tensions between AI companies and government regulation.

“There's actually two of them, two different federal laws that apply in supply chain risk here.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Is your multi-entity management creating more confusion than clarity? You need the Intuit ERP. Intuit Enterprise Suite. It's the AI-native ERP solution that's powerful, painless, and proven. Learn more at intuit.com slash ERP. For many men, mental health challenges aren't recognized until they've already taken a toll. Work pressure, financial stress, changing relationships, and traditional expectations around masculinity can quietly wear men down. often without clear warning signs. In Season 3 of The Visibility Gap, Dr. Guy Winch and his guests explore how these pressures show up, how to spot them earlier, and how men can access meaningful support.

0:40Listen to the new season of The Visibility Gap, a podcast presented by Cigna Healthcare. Being a small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. Manage all your business finances, from banking to payments to credit cards, all in one place with Chase's digital tools. Plus, access online resources designed to help your business thrive. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply.

1:17JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily, reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus, global business, finance and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio. We've got the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports and coastal areas. It has gone into effect. It could further inflame some tensions amid the global energy crisis.

2:05Meantime, the U.S. has said neutral ships will be subject to interception, diversion, and capture. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, slumping back down again today, reversing some move-up, a jump that we actually saw yesterday. And then we've heard from Iran, too. Yeah, it seems like talks are advancing. The ceasefire are mostly holding in. And at least that's what the market is buying with the S &P rallying after Trump spoke and then oil pulling back like we've been talking about. Yeah, markets seem to be taking this all in stride. Meantime, Iran did say the U.S. restrictions are illegal and constitute an act of piracy and threaten the ports in the region if its own facilities are targeted.

2:39So it's like, yeah, peace. But hey, watch out. That is our world. just around 1240 p.m. ET from just outside the Oval Office. President Trump spoke on the weekend peace talks in Islamabad and how it went and how his team there on the ground, which included U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Woodcoff, and also his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as well as his vice president, J.D. Vance, how they did. Well, he's done a good job. It's Steve and Jared. They've all done a very good job. And I can tell you that we've been called by the other side. They'd like to make a deal very badly. We've been called this morning by the right people, the appropriate people, and they want to work a deal.

3:21They would like to work a deal. All right, again, that was President Trump earlier outside the Oval Office. And, of course, talking about U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Whitcoff, his son-in-law, Jared Cushion, of course, his vice president, J.D. Vance. We knew we had to check in once again with our team in Washington, D.C. as we continue to hear a momentum, a flow of commentary out of the White House or out of social media. With us once again is Michelle Jamrisco. She's Bloomberg News White House and National Security Editor, again, joining us from the nation's capital. Michelle, good to have you here with Bailey and myself.

3:54Good to be here. So let's recap. What did we get from the president? What's new? What's significant in your view? markets just seem to be taking all of this in stride today. Well, we're in this position again, Carol, where we're trying to decipher what each side is saying and what to believe from what each side is saying and whether that matches what's happening behind the scenes. Well, at the same time, we're watching basically for any sort of kinetic action, not that we're hoping for it, but with the threat of a U.S. naval blockade that has come into effect hours ago and is now also paired with the president's threats to interdite any vessels of any country transiting from Iranian ports or to Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz and coastal areas, as well as any attacks on Iranian small boats that might approach the U.S.

4:45naval blockade. All that taking into account, we have not seen any sort of action yet that would be a flashpoint and perhaps scare markets even further. But at the same time, we're trying to decipher what to make of the president's remarks on where the diplomatic talks are going after the failure in Islamabad over the weekend. Now, I will just point out in the clip that you play just now, President Trump is referring to a call that has happened this morning. To my knowledge, we have not gotten any confirmation from the Iranian side as to whether that, in fact, was the case. And of course, again, the question of who participated from the Iranian side.

5:20We know who went to the direct talks in Pakistan. We don't know if those are the people really kind of pulling the levers on what the regime might act on in the end. Well, Michelle, how much, I'll call it static, is there in terms of who's actually participating in these conversations? And to your point, mixed messaging, whether these calls are actually taking place, whether the right people are involved in these conversations, and what that really means. Because if the question at the end of the day is, when does this conflict end? Presumably, it's pretty important who's in those meetings. Yeah, well, Bailey, a very fair question and one that we've had for many weeks now in some form.

5:56But what came out of the weekend, at least, was this assurance that we knew who from the Iranian side participated, the Iranian Speaker of Parliament, as well as the foreign minister getting involved. And we know, obviously, who on the U.S. side was involved in those direct talks. So at least there was some transparency over the weekend on these, you know, unprecedented, really, for many decades, direct talks between the two countries. But now what we see in the aftermath is kind of similar rhetoric that we've heard from both sides, really, U.S. and Iran, on where these talks are headed and what the disagreements are.

6:28There is a clear divergence of opinion and view on what broke down those talks over the weekend. We've heard, and we heard it again today from President Trump, that Iran's nuclear ambitions were the main reason that the talks broke down, that they would not concede on that point. And that's a deal breaker for the U.S. However, on the Iranian side, they have said that, you know, the distrust of U.S. negotiators, U.S. coming to the table to dictate rather than negotiate. And of course, some differences of opinion on things like war reparations and actually seizing the fighting and seizing attacks on Iran were among other disagreements that have remained for some time.

7:07So we don't know where talks are going. And I think you're seeing investors and others act on these kind of incremental developments, but not with the sort of confidence that, you know, action will follow in line with what they've said. Michelle, does it come down to one or two main points? Is it about the enriched uranium? Is it about, like, I don't know, I've kind of lost track of, and maybe this gets to the mission of what this war really is about. And so what is the main sticking point? Does it come down to one or two things here? Well, I think in broad strokes, Carol, you can say it comes down to nuclear ambitions and control of the Strait of Hormuz.

7:46But there are many things that the two countries have openly disagreed on, including the list of demands that the Iranians have released some weeks ago, maybe a week and a half or two ago, that did not match what the 10 and 15 point plans that the U.S. side has put forward. So there are a lot of smaller points that I think would not be agreed. But the big idea being the nuclear ambitions, there has not been a way forward on exactly how to play that. And, of course, a long time distrust on either side about whether or not Iran would be pursuing purely for scientific purposes and whether or not that would put the U.S.

8:26at ease, which it won't. So that is one big thing. But obviously caught up in all of this and what is really feeding the global energy crisis is the control of the Strait of Hormuz, which at times the U.S. has said would be something that could be worked out for the profit of everyone. Trump has kind of alluded to a sort of toll system that both the U.S. and Iran could benefit from. But at times he has said that is unacceptable, full stop. And so now we're at a blockade of a blockade, essentially, that really has the markets in this whirlwind trying to decipher what comes next and whether things will escalate before they de-escalate again.

9:05And Michelle, we only have about 30 seconds here. One of the touch points we've talked about on the markets desk is kind of this notion of a Trump put. At some point, he will walk back what he's pushing for with midterms on the horizon and with energy still far higher and more expensive than many people would have expected. Is there a time crunch or a limit where the White House is going to have to consider potential weakness going into the midterms just given rates are not lower and the cost of living has only gone up in the last few weeks? Michelle, we've only got about 25 seconds. Yeah. It's a great question, Bailey, and I think a lot of the political actors within the administration are looking toward the midterm deadline as a hard stop, but really would like things resolved much sooner than that to kind of alleviate Americans' concerns.

9:46But we've seen gas prices get worse, and the Iranians try to exploit that as well, warning that they would get much worse before the critical midterms if the Strait of Hormuz blockade continues. Yeah, right. It just makes you ask so many questions if you think about the midterms coming up. Michelle, thank you so much, as always. Michelle Jamrisco, Bloomberg News White House and National Security Editor. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

10:31That's powerful, painless, and proven. Learn more at Intuit.com slash ERP. Support for the show comes from Public. Lately, it feels like there are two types of investing platforms. Some are traditional brokerages that haven't changed much in decades, and others feel less like investing and more like a game. Public is positioned differently. It's an investing platform for people who are serious about building their wealth. On Public, you can build a portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto, without all the bugs or the confetti. Retirement accounts, yep. High yield cash, yes again. They even have direct indexing.

11:07Public has modern design, powerful tools, and customer support that actually helps. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Add paid for by Public Holdings. Brokered services by Public Investing, member FINRA SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, SEC Registered Advisor, crypto services by ZeroHash. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth.

11:42With a widespread presence in communities across the country, Chase for Business supports small business owners at a local level. That makes it possible for you to connect, learn from each other, and grow together. There's a real commitment to seeing small businesses succeed. The Chase for Business team has knowledge and expertise that span a wide range of financial areas. They can help you make more informed decisions as you navigate the complexities of running your business. They'll help your business grow with individual guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community.

12:20Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. President Trump did say that the U.S. would attack any Iranian vessels that approach U.S. ships in the Strait of Hormuz as that new naval blockade of the Vital Waterway took effect today.

13:01Here's what the president posted on social. And there's a lot here, but I'm going to get to what I think is the big warning. And that is, he talks about Iran's Navy laying at the bottom of the sea, completely obliterated 158 ships. What we have not hit are their small number of what they call fast attack ships because we did not consider them much of a threat. warning. If any of these ships come anywhere close to our blockade, they will be immediately eliminated using the same system of kill that we used against the drug dealers on boats at sea. So yeah, here's that warning from the president.

13:33Meantime, we also heard from John Bolton over the weekend, Bailey. Yeah, really interesting conversation with your normal co-host. Nothing's normal right now. He did. He talked about President Trump's blockade making sense. He did join the weekend team of Tim Stenevec and Christina Ruffini. He talked about the U.S. war in Iran. The only way to get true peace and security in the Middle East is to have regime change in Iran. You can negotiate all you want with these people. It's not going to change anything. And I think the failure of the Islamabad negotiations just makes the point as clearly as one can.

14:08I think the ceasefire was a mistake. Part of the problem here was caused by Donald Trump a few weeks ago lifting American sanctions on the shipment of Iranian oil. And I think he was motivated by fear of rising international oil prices. And he thought a few tankers might get the price down. I don't think that's correct. And he should he should reimpose the sanctions. That was former National Security Advisor John Bolton with Bloomberg's Tim Stenevec and Christina Ruffini on Bloomberg this weekend. And, Carol, obviously a lot going on. An interesting column out today about how the Hormuz blockade is a, quote, throw down the U.S.

14:47can't win. That's written by none other than Mark Champion. He is Bloomberg opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. Joining us from London, Mark, President Trump saying the U.S. will eliminate Iranian fast attack ships if they come close to our blockade in the Strait of Hormuz. Why do you believe this is a game of chicken between the U.S. and Iran when it comes to the blockades of the Strait or Hormuz? And how is that one that the U.S. can't win? Well, in essence, what you have is the U.S. saying, OK, we're going to block in order to get you back to the table. And we're going to block in order to force you to reopen the strait.

15:33And you get into a question there where the Iranians have said clearly, you know, we are not going to respond to that, except that we will start hitting, you know, Gulf ally ports, you know, the ports of the Gulf allies and in response if we need to. And the question then becomes, OK, so the U.S. has has cut off, you know, that the Iranians are stopping the supply from the Gulf states. The Americans are stopping the supply of oil from Iran. What happens? Well, you know, it's not so much today, you know, because the markets are listening to Trump saying that, you know, the American, the Iranians have already come to us and are asking for a deal.

16:22We'll see if that's true. I have my suspicions that it's not. But, you know, what happens then is that at some point the oil, reprice oil will go up because supply is shrinking. And then it's a question of who can last longer. You know, the Iranians will be suffering, but they've had a windfall for the last month or so through their ability to sell oil. And, you know, sanctions, as John Bolton said, were lifted. They were eased so that they were able to sell. They didn't have to sell at a discount anymore. So they've been earning a big windfall, and they have a cushion now. So they can sit on that cushion for several weeks, you know, or more.

17:09And even then, after that cushion expires, you know, it's a question of, you know, are they willing to endure more economic pain, to inflict more economic pain on their own people than is, you know, the U.S. and other countries around the world that will be suffering inflation and potential recessions as a result of, you know, U.S. actions in the Gulf? And I just, you know, can't really see knowing that, you know, who the Islamic Republic are and, you know, how their leaders kind of have almost been looking for this kind of showdown with the U.S. for, you know, decades, that they will fold. And you write in your column, Mark, make no mistake, the Iranian regime is monstrous and should not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.

17:57And you're not alone in folks that have come in and say, you know, this is not this has not been a friend at all of the United States in particular for many decades here. Having said that, we keep saying that for Iran, this is existential, and their willingness to fight kind of to the bitter end. Regime change is not easy. We keep hearing that over and over. And that is kind of different from where the U.S. is coming from. I mean, they could back off. The president reminds us, we don't need the Strait of Hormuz. So I'm just, you know, wondering, is that part of, too, why the U.S. can't really win using this tactic?

18:32I think it's tough. I mean, I don't, there's a lot that I don't agree with John Bolton on. But one thing that he said, which is correct, is that this war only made sense to begin if it was going to end with regime change. Otherwise, you're simply trying to massage through force, you know, the behavior of the Islamic Republic. And that's an incredibly difficult thing to do. It's hard enough through negotiation, but to do it by force, to kind of calibrate that and to get the right kind of reactions, it's almost impossible to do. So what you really want to happen is regime change so that you just have a different bunch of people in charge of whatever nuclear stuff that they have, in charge of their ballistic missiles.

19:17This is a nation of 92 million. They are not going to completely disarm. What you want is to have a regime there that has an army and it has an armed force, it has whatever, an air force, whatever it has, and it simply isn't going to threaten its neighbors in the way that Iran had. You know, regime change so far has failed. Hey, one last question before we go. And this is something else that I know you've written. You understand Europe so well. The Viktor Orban election outcome. We're hearing his daughter and son-in-law have left. Allies have disappeared from airwaves and social media pages. There's unconfirmed reports of the movement of assets abroad and made calls for the Orban-connected elite to be brought to justice.

20:02Just got about 30, 40 seconds here. What's the significance of this loss to the region, to Russian President Vladimir Putin, to even a President Trump? It's really big. I mean, essentially, you know, here was the model conservative, you know, from sort of MAGA-type conservative in Europe. He was in power for 16 years this time, four years on a previous term. And he completely changed the fabric of Hungary, primarily because of a kind of quirk in the sort of institutional makeup that allowed him to change the constitution at will and to change laws at will. That is now reversed. It's not just that he lost.

20:43He lost the opposition, one with a constitutional majority. So they are now able to undo a lot of that stuff. And, you know, I think that's why you see, you know, a lot of his allies, you know, fleeing because they know that the boot's now on the other foot. All right. Great stuff, as always. And we always appreciate you staying up late there in London. Mark Champion, Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. Highly recommend you check out his columns on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg.com. This is the Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast. Listen live each weekday starting at 2 p.m.

21:18Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg 1130. Investment bankers are talking about it, hitting the road to raise more than$15 billion potentially over the next few weeks, though all eyes are on the fragile ceasefire in Iran. Though this week alone, Carol, we could have five companies raise as much as$4.6 billion by Friday and a critical test for the spring window of deals. I think it's interesting. And I think, you know, you don't bring a company to market if you don't feel good about the environment or the macro.

21:55So I think it's really telling. I think it's another indicator that's an important read on where we are. An important read on where we are. And no one better to break that down than Michael Ventura. He is the co-head of U.S. equity capital markets at RBC here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio. Michael, thanks so much for joining us. Thanks for having me. Great seeing you. All right. So big week. A lot of companies looking to price billions potentially on the line. How important is it that these handful of deals price well and trade well, given, as Carol mentioned it, all the uncertainty from a macro perspective?

22:26Incredibly important that we have a constructive pricing backdrop. We've had an incredibly robust issuance backdrop this year, but with very binary outcomes. Deals that are up 30 % countered with deals that are down 30%. And so I think to keep this window open through the spring and summer pricing season, some constructive outcomes are sort of must-have. That binary outcome, is it just because some are really smart deals in price 12, some weren't price 12? Is there anything that you can say as to why you've seen those two different pathways? So many of the outcomes are deal-specific. I think what has been instructive and what will be interesting to watch in this next cohort of deals is obviously aftermarket support for each of these transactions.

23:07We have a number of transactions that are for, as you mentioned, sort of multi-billion dollar assets that are coming to market, a lot of them private equity backed. There will be more to come in terms of supply on a lot of these transactions. And I think what's been very encouraging on top of the resilience of the market, given the volatility that we're seeing, is the resilience of risk appetite from the buy side. Which, again, as we look for green shoots to keep this window open longer, those are all sort of very positive barometers for us as equity capital markets professionals. Well, take us behind the scenes.

23:38We're living in a market that moves on every headline and every potential attack or conversations around a ceasefire with DC and Iran at the front of everyone's mind going into earnings season. What are the conversations like among your banking peers when you're talking to a management team about, OK, now is the time for us to look to make a deal? Yeah, look, sometimes you don't know that the IPO window is open until you look down and it's definitively closed. And so for the folks who have done diligent preparation, they've tested the waters, they've engaged with institutional investors as part of their IPO prep, these valuations are generally quite well underwritten by the buy side prior to launch.

24:18You see a number of transactions that are coming to market this week that have cornerstone institutional investors or sponsors who are already sopping up some of that liquidity that will come to market. Making sure it goes well. Exactly. And so these deals are structured to be successful at the outset. Go. Well, no, I was just going to ask. This is your world. But we've been talking, right? So industrials, aerospace and defense, healthcare, are they active because of the calendar? Are they active because investors are saying to you and your colleagues and your peers across the street, hey, we want more of these types of companies?

24:51Yeah, not to get asset specific, but certainly some of the subsectors that you talked about are very much of the moment. Defense tech, space tech, other parts of the market that are obviously becoming very quickly sort of part of the zeitgeist, which you guys are covering quite well. Well done. Those are obviously very of the moment. Outside of that, again, you mentioned industrials, multi-billion dollar EBITDA companies that have been around for decades. I think these are assets where institutional investors feel very, very comfortable. Again, there's a lot of capital rotation that's going on.

25:22The set it and forget it software market of the last 10 years, a lot of that capital has been freed up and is looking to be redeployed into these new stories, new IPO entrants that are coming to market. When you talk about Michael, we're talking about Michael Ventura over at RBC Capital. And is it companies that have been private, private equity owned for a long time? So they've got a nice duration in terms of the business. You can look at a bunch of, you know, the balance sheets over a period of time. That's what you're talking about. They're finally coming to market. Exactly. Durability through cycles.

Read the full transcript

25:51These are investments that our private equity clients have made, have held them probably a little bit longer than the normal private equity cycle, scaled them a little more significantly than normal and are looking out at a market backdrop where valuations are, you know, frankly, exceeding expectations. So it's a perfect time, volatility aside, to be entering the market again. Well, you mentioned you don't really know an IPO window is open until it's closed. I feel like talking to some of your peers over the last few weeks, the sense was almost, if you talk to issuers who are on file, we wish we went a few weeks ago.

26:21Is that kind of your read of where we're at? Timing this market, we've talked about this before, timing this market is as much a function of luck as anything else, luck favors the prepared. And so again, it's that underwriting evaluation that you're doing in the private market in your final stages of IPO prep that I think will really separate winners and losers in this next open window. So something like SpaceX, I mean, is it just a whole other category you throw that into and that's the anomaly? A whole other category. Obviously, can't comment on any specific transactions that may or may not be preparing for market.

26:51But I think thematically, you will see a number of very significant sort of seminal capital markets events potentially over the next number of months. And those will sit in a category by themselves. When you mentioned defense, though, and you like opportunistic, I mean, does that mean that that it's not a good company going forward? You know, that if they're looking at the market saying with the war on and so on and so forth, the defense spending that's going on, not only in the US, but also overseas, it's a good time. Does that mean they're just being opportunistic and it's not necessarily a longer term good play or no?

27:23No, I think, look, I don't think you can ever fault a private company for sort of timing the market when the subsector in which they operate is as front and center in the day-to-day news flow as some of these assets that are coming to market right now are. I certainly don't think that's a barometer or a telltale sign of future market performance. Because you know when things are hot and you take advantage of a certain situation and you get sometimes some things that shouldn't be public. Well, we see that play out with some of the themes, I think, back even to last summer with some of the crypto deals that we saw getting done.

27:55And obviously, the aftermarket performance has been pretty lackluster. But Michael, I just want to come back to kind of the point you made about aftermarket performance. Half of the 10 largest deals this year, a lot of numbers, down more than 25%. When we look at a horizon that has two notable deals this week in Madison Air and R6, I know you can't talk specifics, but how important is it that the deals that get executed in price this week and next week that kicked off earlier today, that they perform well ahead of what is going to be presumably a pretty busy stretch? It's table stakes. That is what will set the stage for the health of this next open window.

28:33Now, keep in mind what's going on in the background. We're moving from a macro-driven environment, you guys have been talking about it over the last few segments, a micro-driven environment with respect to earnings. And so I do think that's actually going to be quite a grounding mechanism for institutional investors to get back to company-specific earnings reports and more of a micro focus of the market versus this macro environment that we've been living in. And obviously, I enjoy talking about IPOs. It's the most exciting part about my job. But certainly keeping an eye on the selldowns from some of the companies that have recently gone public as we get through earnings blackouts, are we expecting to see a big rush with the floodgates opening?

29:11Yeah. Again, market resilience has been I thought we retired the word unprecedented in 2021. Not at all. I would not be surprised to see our private equity clients access capital. They are by definition not hedge funds. They are not built to hold publicly traded positions. And so expect with this window opening, we'll see a flood of follow-on activity as well. And just getting back to the IPOs, we only have about 30 seconds. Tech seems challenged. Do we see tech companies come public? Do we see software companies dipping their toe in the water from an IPO perspective, just given all of the headwinds that are going on?

29:45I don't know that the window opens up for software, again, in the near term, though my crystal ball is in the shop. I do think a lot of that capital, though, will be happily deployed into some of the high-quality assets that are coming to market from other sectors, some of which have tech as an adjacency to what they do day-to-day. Did the crystal ball break because of software? Great stuff. Thank you so much. What a treat. Michael Ventura, co-head of U.S. Equity Capital Markets over at RBC. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.

30:20Support for the show comes from Public. Public is an investing platform that offers access to stocks, options, bonds, and crypto. And they've also integrated AI with tools that can assist investors in building customized portfolios. One of these tools is called Generated Assets. It allows you to turn your ideas into investable indexes. So let's say you're interested in something specific like biotech companies with high R &D spend, small cap stocks with improving operating margins, or the S &P 500 minus high debt companies. Chances are there isn't an ETF that fits your exact criteria. But on public, you just type in a prompt and their AI screens thousands of stocks and builds a one-of-a-kind index.

31:00You can even backtest it against the S &P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market.

31:22by zero hash. Sample prompts are for illustrative purposes only, not investment advice. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Being a small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. That's why they make business growth their priority. The Chase team takes the time to understand your mission, where you are now, and where you want to go. Their broad range of solutions is designed with you in mind, so you can bring your ideas to life. From banking to payment acceptance to credit cards, you can conveniently manage all your business finances all in one place with their digital tools.

32:02Looking for tips and advice? Their online resources are always available to give you the solutions you need to help your business thrive. See how your business can get stronger and go farther with Chase for Business. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase Mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. We buy insurance for peace of mind, but every year millions of claims are denied. Not because people did anything wrong, but because their policies quietly excluded what happened.

32:40Insurers know every detail. Policyholders rarely do. That's why My Policy Advocate exists. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and explains where you are vulnerable. They don't sell insurance, they deliver transparency. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Go to MyPolicyAdvocate.com. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Or watch us live on YouTube. Hey, our next guest understands the world from public and private perspectives and more.

33:21Let's bring in Jamil Jaffar, National Security Institute founder and executive director at George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School. His relationship with D.C. in particular, very wide in scope, including during the George W. Bush administration, where he served in the White House as an associate counsel to the president, handling Defense Department, State Department, and Intelligence Community matters, and served as one of the White House Council's primary representatives to the National Security Council Deputies Committee. He is also Paladin Capital Group Venture Partner and Strategic Advisor.

33:52That's a global investment company that is, according to the company's website, investing in technologies, products, and services focused on dual use in both commercial and government markets with a strong value-ed culture. As we said, he comes at things from so many deep perspectives. He is with us from Washington, D.C. Jamil, nice to have you here with Bailey and myself. Let's start macro. We've been focusing a lot out of headlines out of the White House, watching the war. When you look at this environment, does it feel like a stable one? Well, Carol, obviously, with with a war ongoing or a ceasefire temporarily in place, there's obviously some amount of instability.

34:30At the same time, we've seen markets respond positively to the idea that there might be a ceasefire or that the ceasefire is in place. We saw a positive reaction over the over the over Friday, over the weekend. So we're in a market where things are changing, obviously, day to day, not just on this conflict in the Middle East, but obviously with the advent of generative AI and its impact on markets as well. So we're in a fluid environment and there are stability issues, but they relate to a number of macro conditions, not just, obviously, the conflict going on in the Middle East. And we had a conversation with Max Wasserman from Miramar Capital earlier, and he kind of made the point that when you look at the Middle East, it only takes a little bit to reignite the situation and cause volatility to spike again.

35:12What's your current read on kind of the outlook for the ongoing conflict in Iran? And because when I talk to investors, everyone's even if we're putting on a happy face, we're still on tensor hooks at the end of the day. No, there's no doubt, Bailey, with the vice president having left Pakistan without a deal, that raises the question whether the ceasefire will remain in place and whether there's a long-term solution here. But what's clear is the president himself and the Iranian leadership are both committed to trying to find a deal. The question is, is there deal space to be had here? As you know, when you're trying to make a deal, there has to be a meeting of the minds as to the agreement.

35:45And on the ceasefire, at a minimum, we know there wasn't yet a meeting of the minds and certainly not to date. Now, look, it's going to take time to find a path forward to get to a final agreement between the United States and Iran. It's no surprise, frankly, that the Pakistan talks didn't end fruitfully. But the conversations are ongoing. We'll see what happens going forward. But the two sides remain far apart on key issues like uranium enrichment, like Iran's support for terrorism, like the closure and reopening and nature of the reopening of the Straits of Hormuz. So the parties are far apart.

36:16Doesn't mean they can't come together, but we'll have to see what happens over the next days and weeks as these negotiations continue in various settings. Jamil, before we get into military and technology, which we want to talk about with you, certainly Anthropic was something we were talking about a lot over the last month or so. I want to ask you, since you were a former associate counsel to President George W. Bush and pulling together defense state intelligence aspects, what would have been your counsel to President Trump before this war if he had reached out to you? Would you have advised to do this in what has been a very tortured relationship between the U.S.

36:55and Iran, to be fair? Well, look, Iran has been coming after Americans for the better part of 40, 50 years, right? We've seen a long, ongoing fight with Iran, at least since the revolution in 1979, I should say. We've seen a tense relationship with that country and its leadership, not really with its people, but its leadership. And the challenge there is that they support terrorist groups like Lebanese, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hamas and the like. They've been an inveterate opponent to American policy in the Middle East. whatever you might think of that, they're opposed to it. And that's been a challenge to the United States going back to the days of Ronald Reagan, if you remember the tanker wars and the like, and obviously the number of terrorist attacks conducted against Americans.

37:34Well, those have continued. Even during the Iraq war, we know that Iran was supporting proxy groups in Iraq to kill Americans, providing them with explosive foreign penetrators and the like, killing American soldiers on the battlefield. So that's always been a challenge. And so the question becomes, how can you find a path forward? And what I would have said to President Trump is, look, if you're going to get into this conflict, you have to have a plan for getting out. a plan for what victory looks like. And I think that's the challenge today. It's hard for us to determine what victory looks like.

37:59Have we won already, as the president said a number of times? Or is there something more to be done? And at the end of the day, what does a post-conflict Iran and a post-conflict U.S. role in the region look like? I love that. One last question. I mean, is it still up in the air whether or not we are more secure, that the United States is more secure after this war? Or we just don't know yet? Well, look, I think from a perspective of Iran being a threat to the United States. It's certainly a reduced threat because we've taken out a significant portion of their navy, a significant portion of their ability to launch.

38:27But you can rebuild. You know, anger is a funny thing, right? No, you're exactly right. And of course, Iran's reaction to this may be, well, this exactly demonstrates why we need a nuclear weapon. And so what you have to do now is get to a point where either there's a new government in Iran that's more friendly to the United States, or they commit in a way that's verifiable and insurable that they're not going to get a nuclear program. And That probably means not having a domestic enrichment, which was the key challenge of the prior nuclear deal that President Trump got rid of in his first term.

38:54And so that's the real challenge here. How do you get to that committed goal without resolving these big picture issues? And not to mention Iran's support for terrorism in the Middle East, which has been a longstanding problem for the United States. All right. So to pivot just a little bit, Jamil, one of the things that obviously Carol had mentioned has been in the headlines for quite some time has been the back and forth between the administration and Ananthropic. Just looking at our reporting today that Anthropic hired a Trump linked lobbying firm, Ballard Partners. Obviously, this dates back to the back and forth negotiations around the Pentagon and those conversations collapsing after the agency demanded unfettered access to the startup's tools for lawful purposes.

39:32What's your read of the current backdrop? Because it does feel like this is at least skewing towards Anthropic and away from the administration. Well, Bailey, I think one of the challenges here is that you've got two very committed views on both sides. On Anthropics' side, they want their tool being used in the only ways they permit. And they're concerned about things like mass surveillance or what they call mass surveillance. And they're concerned about the autonomous use of weapons. The Department of Defense for its part says, well, look, we're buying this tool we want to be able to use for any lawful purpose.

40:01If the law needs to be changed and restrict us, that's fine. We'll take that. But that's a negotiation between us and between the executive branch, the legislative branch and how you make laws, not between us and a company. You wouldn't expect Lockheed Martin, of course, to prohibit the U.S. from using F-35s in a certain way. And the U.S. government saying the same thing on the Anthropics side. Anthropics position, however, in the current ongoing fight and the litigation is about what the U.S. government did after this thing developed, which is to name it a supply chain risk under federal law.

40:28and thereby prohibiting it from being used by certain federal government agencies and certain federal government contractors that do business with the Department of War. And so that, I think, is the big challenge now, how that's going to play out. There are two pieces of litigation ongoing, one in D.C., one in California. In California, there's an injunction in place so the government can enforce its current procedure, the executive branch. And in the D.C. Circuit, they refused the injunction but did recognize the importance of the case and now set the case for expedited briefing. So these proceedings appear to be moving pretty quickly to some sort of conclusion.

40:57Jamil, you say this is a challenge, challenge or mistake by the government, the U.S. government, the Trump administration, to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk to national security. Well, I think the challenge, Carol, is that the U.S. government really wants to use Anthropic. When Secretary Hemsworth was talking about its value, he referred to its capabilities as exquisite. And we all know, as we've seen its performance out in the markets, we've seen it do well and make huge gains in the technology market and the like. That being said, now calling the supply chain risk makes it hard not just for the Department of War to use it, but for other federal agencies and for federal government contractors who want to supply the department.

41:37And of course, the real question is, is it a supply chain risk? Does it qualify under the statute? But that's what I'm asking you. Do you agree with their designation? And do you agree that it's a supply chain risk to national security or is this just playing angry? Look, I think on the text of the statute and the definitions there about adversary and supply chain risk, it's going to be a very difficult case for the government to make. That statute was designed to go after Russian companies, after Chinese companies like Huawei and ZTE, Russian companies like Hespersky. It's hard to imagine how under the current Texas statute, an American like Anthropoc would.

42:10The government's put its best foot forward and tried to make that argument. We'll see how the courts treat it, at least in the case of the D.C. Circuit. The D.C. Circuit did say at least the balance of equities on an injunction tilted in favor of the government. They didn't speak to this question of whether the U.S. government's likely to win. So we'll see how it plays out in court. It'll be an uphill battle for the government, no doubt. They have other tools, by the way. They could have used the Defense Production Act, which they didn't use. That may come next if, in fact, they lose this litigation.

42:36Just looking at some of our reporting, OpenAI, calling out the fact that OpenAI and Anthropic both have increased their federal lobbying spending. Last year, such a hot-button issue from an AI perspective. Is there any form of precedent for the ongoing battle between the government and Anthropic in terms of other kind of novel things like AI that have fundamentally reshaped where we are and how we live? Yeah, Bailey, great question. The most prominent example that we have from recent memory is actually the COVID situation where the Trump administration used the Defense Production Act to require contractors, federal government, sorry, pardon me, pharmaceutical companies to make the COVID vaccine.

43:13And so we do have a recent sort of what you would call a national security, economic security crisis, the COVID pandemic. And then the reaction by the government to use this tool in a unique way, the Defense Production Act, and actually to make somebody deliver a product they weren't otherwise going to make. So in theory, could they use that tool to force Anthropik to deliver its product to the government and to do it in a way the government prefers? They might. It's a hard question under the existing law. But that's a more likely a fruitful, a more fruitful approach than the current approach of using the supply chain risk.

43:42But again, we have litigation in California, litigation in D.C. We'll see how these courts come out. In this case, we'll eventually probably wind its way to the Supreme Court. And we'll see how it plays out on the specific statute that involves supply chain risk. There's actually two of them, two different federal laws that apply in supply chain risk here. Jamil, just got about 30 seconds here. You've worked on legal and policy frameworks on how the U.S. government procures and deploys sensitive technology, AI, generative AI. This is a whole other ballgame. Do you think that it's right for a company to be a little concerned about how the government uses all this?

44:14And forgive me, just about 25 seconds here. There's no doubt that a company has a right to be concerned about it. The question is, can they force the government to do it the way they want to? The government has its point of view. The company has its point of view. How to reconcile those two is the hard question at play here. It's going to be a question that will plague policymakers and courts for at least months, if not years to come. All right. Good stuff. Interesting. Thank you so much. Jamil Jaffar, National Security Institute founder and executive director at George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School.

44:40As we said, formerly served in the George W. Bush administration. he was in the White House as an associate counsel to the president. This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

45:17When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at the Hartford.com slash risk mitigation.

45:52Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut. What separates good leaders from transformational ones? I'm Jessica Chen, and in Season 2 of Leading by Example, we'll sit down with executives like Grace Chen of Birdie Gray to find out. It's important to understand where you spike, but also really acknowledge where you don't and find people who can fill those gaps. Listen to Leading by Example, executives making an impact, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

46:34The news doesn't stop on the weekends. Context changes constantly. And now Bloomberg is the place to stay on top of it all. Hi, I'm David Gurra. Join us every Saturday and Sunday for the new Bloomberg This Weekend. I'm Christina Ruffini. We'll bring you the latest headlines, in-depth analysis, and big interviews. All the stories that hit home on your days off. And I'm Lisa Mateo. Watch and listen to Bloomberg This Weekend for thoughtful, enlightening conversations about business, lifestyle, people, and culture. On Saturday mornings, we put the past week's events into context, examining what happened in the markets and the world.

47:08Then on Sundays, we speak with journalists, columnists, and key political figures to prepare you for the week ahead. Join us as soon as you wake up and bring us with you wherever your weekend plans take you. Watch us on Bloomberg Television, listen on Bloomberg Radio, stream the show live on the Bloomberg Business app, or listen to the podcast. That's Bloomberg this weekend, Saturdays and Sundays starting at 7 a.m. Eastern. Make us part of your weekend routine on Bloomberg Television, radio, and wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy.

Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.

President Donald Trump said Iran reached out to his administration over peace negotiations, as the US began a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the war’s seventh week.Even as Trump sought to jawbone negotiations back on track, there were few signs that was taking place after weekend negotiations failed in Islamabad. Iran blamed the collapse of talks on the US and Tehran has not confirmed further discussions on Monday.

“We’ve been called this morning by the right people, the appropriate people, and they want to work a deal,” Trump said at the White House, without elaborating on who participated in the conversation.
Trump spoke hours after the US moved to cut off vessels from transiting the vital waterway to and from Iranian ports and coastal areas, which could further inflame tensions amid the global energy crisis.

The US president once again claimed that negotiations had failed due to Iran’s insistence on maintaining a nuclear program. Trump said he was “sure” Iran will eventually agree to abandon nuclear ambitions, and reiterated there would be no deal without that concession.
This episode features:

  • Michelle Jamrisko, Bloomberg News White House & National Security Editor
  • Marc Champion, Bloomberg Opinion Columnist on Hormuz Blockade Is a Throwdown the US Can't Win: Marc Champion
  • Michael Ventura, Co-Head of US Equity Capital Markets at RBC on Wave of $15 Billion US IPOs Runs Headlong Into War’s New Phase
  • Jamil Jaffer, National Security Institute Founder & Executive Director

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Businessweek

All 738 episodes
Trump Says Iran Reached Out on Deal, US Begins Hormuz BlockadeBloomberg Businessweek · 39 min
Listen in VO