In short
The episode is a multi-topic Bloomberg Businessweek Daily segment centered on (1) U.S.-Iran nuclear and Hormuz developments, (2) Netflix’s earnings/leadership transition and AI in media, (3) whether U.S. policy is becoming a “war economy” via defense spending, and (4) market implications of Hormuz reopening and energy/inflation outlook.
Guest
Spencer Faragasso, senior fellow at the Institute for Science and International Security (nonprofit, nonpartisan), focuses on North Korea, Iran, Russia, and advanced drones in Ukraine.
Key claims
Iran may suspend enrichment indefinitely but still retains capability to enrich and potentially reach weapon-grade over time; verification requires IAEA unfettered access to facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan), which Iran has not allowed since a June 2025 war; past concealment (Ahmad Plan; hidden Fordow after Natanz admission) shows “anything is possible.”
Notable examples
20-year vs 5-year enrichment bans; IRGC-coordinated Hormuz commercial traffic; IAEA inspection limits; Fordow/ Natanz history.
Other guests
Felix Gillette (Bloomberg media entertainment editor; author of “It’s Not TV”) and Nick Wadhams (Bloomberg national security team leader) and David Bush (Trajan Wealth co-CIO).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIran's Nuclear Program Update
2:21 to 3:31
Discussion on Iran's nuclear program and recent developments.
“to suspend its nuclear program indefinitely and will not receive any frozen funds from the U.S.”
Expert Insights on Iran's Uranium Plans
3:31 to 6:05
Expert discusses Iran's nuclear ambitions and the geopolitical implications.
“We last spoke a couple of weeks ago when the situation was actually quite different.”
Challenges of Verifying Iran's Nuclear Compliance
6:05 to 7:21
Examines the difficulties in verifying Iran's nuclear program actions.
“And this is something it continues to deny to this day.”
Future of Iran's Nuclear Ambitions
7:21 to 9:44
Speculation on Iran's future actions regarding its nuclear program.
“Well, but if you were a betting man, are you going to say that you said Iran can come back in terms of uranium, you know, that they can come back?”
Netflix's Leadership Change and Market Challenges
12:11 to 14:01
Analysis of Netflix's recent performance and leadership transition.
“The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices.”
Netflix's Crossroads: Leadership and M&A Decisions
14:01 to 16:33
Explore the current state of Netflix amidst leadership changes and strategic decisions.
“And he handed that off to people who I think investors would describe and analysts would describe as very capable people.”
The Future of Netflix: Content and Competition
16:34 to 19:04
Discuss the challenges Netflix faces in content engagement and competitive strategy.
“Netflix is the streaming company to beat, right?”
Adapting to Change: Netflix's Innovative Strategies
19:05 to 23:08
Learn how Netflix is diversifying its offerings and adapting to new technologies.
“You know, they're serving advertisements in there.”
U.S. Budget Proposal and Defense Spending
27:26 to 28:00
Discuss the implications of Trump's proposed budget increase for defense spending.
“Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern.”
Defense Spending Cuts and Priorities
28:00 to 29:10
Discussing the implications of increased defense spending while cutting domestic programs.
“in defense spending while also renewing, Tim, his push for steep cuts to domestic agencies.”
Show all 18 chapters
Congress and Defense Budget Dynamics
29:10 to 31:30
Analyzing Congress's role in defense spending and fiscal responsibility amidst rising deficits.
“Again, asking this of the director of the OMB, Russell Vogt.”
The Concept of a War Economy
31:30 to 34:10
Exploring whether the U.S. is transitioning into a war economy and its implications.
“You know, when do you have to sort of reckon with the massive overhang and the debt that will be faced by the U.S.?”
Transition to Advertising
34:10 to 34:40
Introduction to a sponsorship message about Public, an investing platform.
“There is just so much money here, as you indicated in the top of the segment, how much the president is willing to spend.”
Market Reactions to Iran's Statements
37:30 to 39:50
Discussion on market reactions following Iran's declaration regarding the Strait of Hormuz.
“I want to bring in David Bush, the co-CIO of Trajan Wealth.”
Energy Prices and Market Forecasts
39:50 to 42:04
Examining the long-term implications of higher energy prices post-conflict in the Middle East.
“that was taken offline due to the bombings there in the Middle East.”
Energy Independence and Portfolio Diversification
42:04 to 44:30
Explore the need for energy independence and a diverse energy portfolio in light of geopolitical tensions.
“There are supply chain disruptions that have happened because of these geopolitical conflicts.”
Nuclear Energy: Long-Term Investment Challenges
44:30 to 45:56
Discuss the long-term prospects and investor considerations for nuclear energy amidst regulatory challenges.
“If you've got clients who are saying, what's my play here when it comes to nuclear?”
Federal Reserve's Rates and Economic Signals
45:56 to 47:11
Analyze the implications of rate changes and inflation signals from the Federal Reserve.
“How are you thinking about today's developments and the way that rates are going to look?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Carol Massar:Is your multi-entity management creating more confusion than clarity? You need the Intuit ERP. Intuit Enterprise Suite. It's the AI-native ERP solution that's powerful, painless, and proven. Learn more at intuit.com slash ERP. If you follow markets, you know the value of long-term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But in life, even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. A fire, a loss, a disruption that demands immediate attention. When that happens, what matters isn't just what you planned, it's who shows up. That's where Cincinnati Insurance comes in. For more than 75 years, they've helped individuals and businesses navigate life's toughest moments with care, expertise, and personal attention.
0:49Carol Massar:Together with independent agents, Cincinnati Insurance focuses on relationships, not transactions. Their approach is grounded in experience, follow through and trust built over time. Bad days happen. And when they do, you deserve an insurance partner who understands risk, respects what you've built and is ready to help you move forward. The Cincinnati insurance companies, let them make your bad day better. Find an independent agent at CINFIN.com. The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work.
1:38Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter to business. IBM.
1:50Carol Massar:Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily. Reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead. With insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus, global business, finance, and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio. President Trump said Iran agreed to suspend its nuclear program indefinitely and will not receive any frozen funds from the U.S. The president saying a deal to end the war is mostly complete. Talks over a lasting agreement will probably be held, Tim, this weekend.
2:33Iran saying Hormuz is now open to commercial traffic, but transit must be coordinated with the IRGC. And President Trump said a U.S. naval blockade to persist for now. The claims, though, with Iran to remove the sea mines. He sent that out on social media earlier today.
2:48Carol Massar:And I feel like I keep hearing fragile ceasefire. There is still some questions out there about whether or not we can say that this is one and done. Especially with regard to the uranium. Yeah, exactly. And that's where we want to go. It's something we talked about on our morning planning call in a big way. Our question is, is Iran really ready to give up its uranium and chart a different path forward, a different regime, if you will? Spencer Faragasso is here, a senior fellow at the Institute for Science and International Security. It's a nonprofit, nonpartisan institution that's dedicated to informing the public about science and policy issues affecting international security.
3:22North Korea, Iran, Russia, and the use of advanced drones in the war in Ukraine is what he focuses on. He joins us once again from Washington, D.C. Spencer, good to have you back on the program. We last spoke a couple of weeks ago when the situation was actually quite different. Now the U.S. and Iran are talking via negotiators and perhaps in Pakistan again this weekend. Based on what you can tell from the open source intel, is Iran ready to give up its uranium and actually chart a different path? You know, first off, thank you for having me back on the program. Ultimately, it's hard to tell. We're getting mixed statements out from each side over the course of these negotiations.
3:58Trump says something. Iran says something. We're waiting for Iran to release their own statement on this. A few days ago, Trump was the administration. U.S. officials were floating a 20-year ban on enrichment. Iran came back with a five-year ban on enrichment. So we'll see how this actually goes. But I think the bottom line here is that getting rid of the highly enriched uranium, so the stockpile 60%, and ideally the 20%, doesn't end Iran's nuclear program. Iran still has the ability to produce centrifuges and build enrichment plants and enrich its low enriched uranium stocks of uranium. And hypothetically, given enough time, investment and commitment, it could produce weapon grade uranium from their stocks alone.
4:39Carol Massar:So what changes here? So is this really, you know, a ceasefire where Iran is different going forward? It sounds like that's not the case here. Well, I think only time will tell. It's hard to understand what the motives of the Iranian regime is at this moment. Um, uh, clearly their economy is being battered by the war. The, the blockade that's happening at, uh, at the Gulf of Oman, um, is preventing them from trading. Most of their trade comes from seaborne trade itself. So a payment, for example, of$20 billion would be a great boon for its economy. It's hard to tell ultimately what the ultimate goal here is.
5:14How do you, how, how would we know? Let's say we get to a point and look, I'm putting the cart before the horse here, but ultimately, this is the goal of the United States is to get Iran to stop enriching uranium and to abandon its plans for building some sort of weapon. How will we know that Iran is actually following along with those plans if the US indeed does get to that point in these negotiations? Yeah, ultimately, it would have to be verified through international inspections led by the IEA. The IEA will need unfettered access to Iran's nuclear facilities. Since the June 2025 war, They haven't been able to access the facilities that were destroyed, such as those in Natanz, Fordaou, and Esfahan.
5:54So without on-the-ground, unfettered access where Iran is providing a full and complete declaration of their activities, we won't truly know fully what is happening. And just to remind everyone, Iran has never come clean with the fact that it actually had an explicit nuclear weapon program in the early 2000s called the Ahmad Plan. And this is something it continues to deny to this day. But ultimately, these efforts need to be led by the IEA because they have the experts and the capabilities to conduct these investigations.
6:24Carol Massar:All right. So in investing and in the financial world, how many times do we say past performance does not guarantee future results? So we know how Iran has acted in the past for a long, long time. Is that what we should take away and say, that's not going to change? Or is there something here that says to you, Spencer, that it is going to be a different Iran going forward? Or we really don't know. I mean, based on the regime, it doesn't necessarily feel like there's going to be anything significantly different. You know, I remain pessimistic. Wild cards and crazy things do happen in foreign policy.
7:01But with this regime, knowing that it's led by hardliners, many of them who are fully in support of a nuclear program, maintaining an enrichment program, it's hard to see significant change without a breakthrough in negotiation. But, you know, I can't predict the future. And if I could, I wish, you know. Oh, go ahead, Carol.
7:21Carol Massar:Well, but if you were a betting man, are you going to say that you said Iran can come back in terms of uranium, you know, that they can come back? Would you expect that they will ultimately? If there's a will, there's a way. if they're given the opportunity. Certainly, they've been extremely resistant on any guarantee that they would abandon the enrichment program. You can take the five-year moratorium as a sign of that. They want some sort of capability in the future. And essentially, any deal that provides a 20-year ban, which to be very clear, that's a very long time. And in that time, you can lose tacit knowledge that's required and that's built up over time to actually operate an enrichment plant, but it's essentially kicking the can down the road again.
8:10But it is a longer time period than anything that was guaranteed during the JCPOA, for example. Yeah, I want to go back to what you said about the inspectors and getting unfettered access, because it would be, I would imagine, I'm not a nuclear physicist, but I would imagine it could be probable that a country, regime could give access to inspectors to certain areas, but have an entirely different facility where something like enrichment could still take place. Again, I'm not a nuclear physicist, but wouldn't that be possible to do? And it's like a secret underground location. Iran's a very large country.
8:47For example, in the early 2000s, when they admitted to having the Natanz enrichment plant, they put that under safeguards. All the while they were still hiding and building the Fordow enrichment facility, which was eventually revealed by the international community in 2009. Anything is possible, but this is why the IEA and the United States need to negotiate an ironclad deal that enables them to conduct the investigations that they're capable of doing to fully verify the peaceful nature of any nuclear activities.
9:17Carol Massar:Is it safe to say 30 seconds here, Spencer, as we wrap up, that there's going to be pressure, obviously from the U.S. and from the developed world, but also from the region for Iran to do this and change its course going forward? No doubt. This nuclear program is a source of tremendous issues and problems for not only the Iranian people, first and foremost, but the region itself. It's a source of conflict. It's a source of instability. All right. Good stuff. As always, so glad that you were back here on Business Week Daily. Thank you so much. Spencer, of course, Farragasso, he's senior fellow at the Institute for Science and International Security.
9:54Carol Massar:It's a nonpartisan group. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
10:24Carol Massar:Learn more at intuit.com slash erp. Support for the show comes from Public. Lately, it feels like there are two types of investing platforms. Some are traditional brokerages that haven't changed much in decades, and others feel less like investing and more like a game. Public is positioned differently. It's an investing platform for people who are serious about building their wealth. On Public, you can build a portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto, without all the bugs or the confetti. Retirement accounts? Yep. High-yield cash? Yes, again. They even have direct indexing. Public has modern design, powerful tools, and customer support that actually helps.
11:02Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market.
11:23complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures.
11:26Carol Massar:Being a small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. That's why they make business growth their priority. The Chase team takes the time to understand your mission, where you are now, and where you want to go. Their broad range of solutions is designed with you in mind so you can bring your ideas to life. From banking to payment acceptance to credit cards, you can conveniently manage all your business finances all in one place with their digital tools. Looking for tips and advice? Their online resources are always available to give you the solutions you need to help your business thrive.
12:04Carol Massar:See how your business can get stronger and go farther with Chase for Business. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Or watch us live on YouTube. Carol Master along with Tim Stenevich live here at Bloomberg headquarters in New York City.
12:44Carol Massar:Yes, indeed. A stock on our radar. You know it is a top decliner in the NASDAQ 100, a top decliner in the S &P 500. We're talking about shares of Netflix. Stocks still down about 10%, tumbling the most in four years on an intraday basis after the company gave a forecast for the second quarter that fell short of expectations on Wall Street, underwhelming the street just months after it lost out on that bid for Warner Brothers Discovery, which, when they did finally lose out, investors kind of cheered it. They were really happy about that. The stock had been getting punished, and it's up quite a bit since then, even with today's decline.
13:17The Streaming Pioneer also announcing that chairman and co-founder Reed Hastings is stepping down after 29 years at the company to pursue philanthropy and personal interests. So we are extremely interested in the quarter and what Netflix looks like without Reed Hastings, the guy who really helped create and change the way that we consume TV now. Covering and guiding the media and entertainment coverage here at Bloomberg is Bloomberg News media entertainment editor Felix Gillette. He's the author of It's Not TV, The Spectacular Rise, Revolution, and Future of HBO. He joins us here in the Bloomberg Businessweek studio.
13:46We'll talk about the quarter a little bit in the guide. And I think that's a big part of the reason the stock is moving. But we're also really interested in Reed Hastings leaving officially. I think it's fair to say he's at a foot out the door for a couple of years since he hasn't been CEO. And he handed that off to people who I think investors would describe and analysts would describe as very capable people. Yeah. Maybe you would describe them that way, too. Yeah. I mean, I think compared to some of the competitors, this is an example of succession. It's worked very well. But at the same time, it does feel like Netflix is at this fascinating crossroads right now.
14:21Right. They just went out and tried to make this enormous M &A deal to buy Warner Brothers Discovery, then backed out of it. And, you know, just a couple of months after all of that goes down, now Reed Hastings is leaving the company for good. But so, yeah, it's a really interesting time to think and pause and be like, well, what is Netflix's future? What's their next move? And I think, you know, there's some question about where the growth is going to come from.
14:48Carol Massar:Step back. If they'd gotten Warner Brothers Discovery, do you think we'd be talking about Reed Hastings leaving the board? I think it's possible. I mean, he was never, you know, into the M &A deals. He was always very much about growing organically. He always had concerns about how these huge deals play out culturally inside of companies. I really do think this was driven by the current CEOs. But at the same time, yeah, there might be more interest to stick around and figure out how that transaction would have gone down. He's always been super interested in the cultural engineering. How do you put together a workplace culture?
15:25Yeah, the 2009 culture deck that got so much attention. This idea that you don't treat your colleagues as family. You treat them instead as teammates. And I think he said, you know, average employees will get generous severance. Like he doesn't want average people. He encouraged people to go out and actually get other job offers, come back with them so that Netflix could beat them. So that actually look, you know, at what they're worth in the marketplace like pro athletes. Did that shape the company? Yeah. I mean, from the beginning, it was always he always treated as this experiment. almost like a laboratory in how you make people work together.
16:02And I mean, what's fascinating when you look back at the history of it is like, you know, Reed Hastings had no initial ambition to even go into the entertainment business, right? They were like, we just are interested in online retail with the internet. And they were thinking about dog food or baseball bats or all these other surfboards. And then they're like, oh, you know, these new little things called DVDs would work perfectly in the mail. We could send them out. People could, you know, put in the request via the website. And, you know, you think of how much entertainment history has changed because of that decision.
16:33But yeah, I think that like the entertainment side was almost, you know, separate from his initial interest, which was like web-based retail and also that component of like the experimental workforce.
16:46Carol Massar:And yet here we are. Netflix is the streaming company to beat, right? Ahead by a long margin or wide margin based on everybody else. But having said that, investors are disappointed. And I guess one of the things we were trying to get after the company reported earnings yesterday, Felix, is is it because they didn't get the content from Warner Brothers or what's going on here? I think part of it is expectations. Yeah, I mean, it's expectations. It's also looking at the engagement with Netflix content, which has kind of, you know, flatlined a little bit over the last couple of years. And I think people are wondering, you know, where does the future growth come from?
17:24If it doesn't come from a Warner Brothers discovery acquisition, you know, they've tried to do things like video games that hasn't really proven to be a big hit yet. more recently they've started going into podcasting and more topical content sports but i think it is a question like where is that growth coming from what's the plan exactly you add in the charismatic founder leaving and yeah people have questions ted sarandos on the call yesterday said podcasts on the service are quote doing great and that the price hike greg peter is saying the price hike hasn't changed customer behavior um we're i want to talk with about ai with you we're going to get to that in a second because they made some comments about AI on the call yesterday.
18:06But before we do that, to Carol's point about diversifying away from the core product, if we were talking five years ago, six years ago, Netflix would never do live content. Netflix would never do games. Netflix would never do sports. Leave that to the traditional players. Now, the Netflix of today is, I think, almost maybe unrecognizable to people who knew this company five or 10 years ago. Yeah. Is that as a result of, of what it views as competition, which is what, whatever anyone is doing on their phone or on their screen when they're not watching Netflix? Yeah. I mean, I think that very early on they pivoted from being, you know, our competition is HBO to our competition is YouTube, Twitch, you know, sleep.
18:54They said that at one point, just anything that like takes people's time. Like we're in the time business. We're in like getting people and you know that's there's so much competition on all these different fronts um you know and they're trying to do this at a global scale which also is like part of the ambition and vision for that and you know i think that you know that's great except for the fact that like yeah the original programming has worked um and you know the advertising business is growing they've they've proven that they can do live sports which you know again 10 years ago you would say that they're never going to have an NFL football game.
19:31They have an NFL football game. You can watch it. It doesn't glitch. You know, they're serving advertisements in there. So like that is again, like, you know, it's, it's, it's, you know, adjacent to what they started off as, but it is different. You know, but like, yeah, the podcasting is a huge question mark. Like, is that actually, so they've struggled with topical content forever. They've tried all these different talk shows that like, you know, There's just a long roster of comedians that have come in there, done like a season of episodes and then just disappeared. And so I think that challenge of getting people to show up at a specific time to watch a specific thing, which you need to do in order to grow your advertising business, is really at the forefront of what they're doing.
20:16And I think that they're showing some real progress there.
20:19Carol Massar:You know, I'm looking at, you know, our story by Lucas Shaw that's out on the terminal, you know, It just talks about, you know, under Hastings, which he introduced the Netflix service ultimately in more than 190 territories, outmaneuvering Hollywood studios to build the most valuable entertainment company in the world. Like you really think about its place, right, when it comes to content creation. It really is a behemoth. I do wonder, though, getting back to that idea, at some point, is there just too much stuff out there? Is there an excess capacity in this industry where it just starts to kind of eat into some of these services?
20:56Carol Massar:It's just going to have to. Yeah. I mean, I think that that's been one of the challenges for everybody that's built a streaming service. I think Netflix has been more successful at building discovery options, creating an algorithm that serves up viewers, things that look interesting. But it's still a challenge. It's still like, as everyone knows, they jump on a streaming service. What do I want to watch? Oh, there's only 50 ,000 options sitting there. And there's a paralysis that's involved with that. And they continue to work on that and trying to figure out what is the best technology for surfacing things that will get people to watch and keep watching.
21:29But that never will end. I feel like that's the challenge that just goes on forever for Netflix and everybody else in this business.
Read the full transcript
21:37Carol Massar:I always feel like I look and I'm like, nothing to watch. Which is crazy, right? And I don't know whether it's being overwhelmed. My friend has this notes doc with all the recommendations that he shares with us. I'll share it with you. Don't we talk about the makeup room? What are you watching? What are you watching? It's also fun to look at someone else's Netflix front page because it's just so totally different. You're like, wait, that's the same service as mine? Yeah. And that's the ideal for them, I mean, to surface stuff that it thinks will keep you engaged. Hey, speaking of technology, that Netflix acquisition of Ben Affleck's Interpositive for$600 million, as much as$600 million.
22:12You're obsessed with this. I am. I am because the AI story is so important in Hollywood. it. Ted Sarandos yesterday on the call said, AI will give great artists better tools. Netflix has to thread this needle where they don't alienate creators, but also make sure they adopt these technological tools that allow for, I guess, things to be more efficient. How do you see this? I mean, I think everyone is grappling with this in the industry. All the studios are trying to walk that tightrope between, yeah, you don't want to alienate the creators who are very worried about AI replacing them. But at the same time, the history of television and film and animation all of that has always been this incredible mix of storytelling with technological advances.
22:53And, you know, you don't at what point do you cut off and say, oh, we're not going to, you know, play around with any new technology. Like, that would be crazy. We still be watching, you know, silent black and white films. Claymation. Gumby's awesome.
23:07Carol Massar:Gumby and Pokey are cute. Very cool. So I think the question is, who is going to be able to use this technology in a way that, clearly you can do it to create low-grade, cheap content that doesn't really move the needle for anybody. But can you use it in a way that actually inspires and pushes things forward? Netflix, like everybody else, is proactively trying to get involved in that and figure it out. you know I think part of it is you know special effects part of it is you know CGI adjacent but I think yeah it's still that's going to be the huge question for the next year three years five years ten years for Netflix fortunately we got Felix to help us figure it out Felix Gillette he's Bloomberg News Media Entertainment Editor also check out his book It's Not TV The Spectacular Rise, Revolution, and Future of HBO.
24:05Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
24:12Support for the show comes from Public. Public is an investing platform that offers access to stocks, options, bonds, and crypto. And they've also integrated AI with tools that can assist investors in building customized portfolios. One of these tools is called Generated Assets. It allows you to turn your ideas into investable indexes. So let's say you're interested in something specific like biotech companies with high R &D spend, small cap stocks with improving operating margins, or the S &P 500 minus high debt companies. Chances are there isn't an ETF that fits your exact criteria. But on public, you just type in a prompt and their AI screens thousands of stocks and build a one-of-a-kind index.
24:52You can even backtest it against the S &P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Add paid for by public holdings. Brokered services by public investing member FINRA SIPC. Advisory services by public advisors. SEC registered advisor. Crypto services by zero hash. Sample prompts are for illustrative purposes only, not investment advice. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures.
25:24Carol Massar:Being a small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. That's why they make business growth their priority. The Chase team takes the time to understand your mission, where you are now, and where you want to go. Their broad range of solutions is designed with you in mind so you can bring your ideas to life. From banking to payment acceptance to credit cards, you can conveniently manage all your business finances all in one place with their digital tools. Looking for tips and advice? Their online resources are always available to give you the solutions you need to help your business thrive.
26:02Carol Massar:See how your business can get stronger and go farther with Chase for Business. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. Here's a paradox. We buy insurance for peace of mind, And yet the very policies we trust can deliver the biggest financial shocks. Across America, millions of claims are denied every year, not because people did anything wrong, but because policies quietly excluded the things that happened.
26:39The psychology of trust tells us we assume the contract is fair, but in insurance, the information gap is massive. The insurer knows every detail of what's covered. The policyholder rarely does. That's where My Policy Advocate comes in. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and shows you in plain language where you're vulnerable. They're not selling insurance. They don't do that. It's about transparency, giving ordinary people the same understanding insurance companies have had for decades. Because when you know what's really in your policy, you can plan, protect, and avoid surprises.
27:12Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Visit MyPolicyAdvocate.com today. Peace of mind starts with knowing the truth. mypolicyadvocate.com.
27:25Carol Massar:You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app or watch us live on YouTube. We had a question. It's something that we talk a lot about as we continue to watch wars around the world, even though it feels like we're making some progress, fingers crossed, when it comes to the war, the U.S. war in Iran. But we've been asking, are we becoming a war economy? And we ask this because President Trump has asked Congress to enact a$2.2 trillion budget for discretionary programs, seeking a massive increase in defense spending while also renewing, Tim, his push for steep cuts to domestic agencies.
28:08Carol Massar:Basically, big spend in defense, but a lot of other agencies, many of them, and the rest of the government getting cuts. The jump in defense spending is something that the director of the OMB, It's the Office of Management and Budget. Russell Vogt was grilled about by Democrats up on Capitol Hill this past week. Did you warn the president or administration officials that spending this much on defense would explode the deficit? Senator, I fully support this budget. The idea. That was that. Well, first, Senator Patty Murray, we apologize for that technical glitch there. That was also then where the glitch came in, represented Brendan Boyle, Democrat from Pennsylvania, just saying the idea that we're going to pay a 42 % increase in this military, in this Department of Defense, and at the same time cut Medicaid, Medicare, not pay for child care, all of these things that the American people need in the case of Medicare have paid into that is a reflection of priorities that are out of whack.
29:03Carol Massar:And then there was one other representative we wanted to bring to you, Veronica Escobar, Democrat from Texas. All of these are Democrats, so we do full transparency here, asking, what are you all asking for in order to fund the war in Iran? How much will you be asking? Again, asking this of the director of the OMB, Russell Vogt. He said, we're not ready to come to you with that request. We're still working on it. We're working through to figure out what's needed in the fiscal year versus next fiscal. Do you have a ballpark? He was asked. He said, well, don't have a ballpark. Would be more than 50 billion.
29:32Carol Massar:I don't have a ballpark for you. But we know the president's request is about one and a half trillion dollars. So Nick Wadhams watches this closely. He's Bloomberg News national security team leader. He joins us from Washington. Nick, I think we got to separate what the president kind of ran on in terms of where the budget is going right now. Also, because of I think it's fair to say there were a lot of people in his party who didn't want to see the Department of Defense enter into new conflicts separate from this. But what can we learn if we follow the president's budget and we follow the money?
30:07Well, I think you're seeing a couple of things here. One is that Trump feels that there really is essentially limitless appetite for increased defense spending. And he's getting very little pushback from that. I mean, obviously, the proof will be in the pudding because the president can make these requests. But it's ultimately Congress that has the power of the purse. So we'll see what happens when when the budget is actually put forward. But, I mean, the fascinating thing to me is that we really have sort of shoved aside any concept of balancing the budget or real fiscal restraint. And defense spending is a key indicator of that.
30:45Of course, the side element there is that, you know, some of these lawmakers may have dollar signs in their eyes as well. because if you boost defense spending by more than 50 percent and become such a massive part of the budget, of course, the way that that spending is done is it goes to defense contractors and bases and military installations that are spread pretty equally across all 50 states, which, of course, was intentionally done by lawmakers because they see defense spending in some ways as essentially massive subsidies to their own states. I mean, they all benefit from this. So, you know, in the short term, there's really no downside for a lot of lawmakers when it comes to a massive defense budget.
31:24Question is going to be in the longer term is the defense, you know, as the debt really starts to pile up and the deficit piles up as well. You know, when do you have to sort of reckon with the massive overhang and the debt that will be faced by the U.S.?
31:37Carol Massar:You know, but Nick, I do wonder when we ask, are we a war economy? Obviously, you know, World War Two, we were a war economy. right? And every effort was to make sure that we had what we needed to help in that fight, certainly from the U.S. perspective and, you know, with its allies. But are we becoming a war economy based on what the president is asking and, you know, where he is focusing on the spend versus where he is not? Well, I mean, what you're seeing is it's sort of exerting, I think, a war economy in some ways is exhibiting itself in more subtle ways. You're seeing the president exert a lot more pressure on defense contractors.
32:12The Defense Department is also exerting much more pressure. In fact, the Defense Department has become in some ways a sort of refuge for some of the China hawks in the administration, where they're looking to use loans and grants and other forms of financing via the Defense Department to try to rest supply chains for critical minerals and other things away from countries like China. Then you have the president obviously telling defense contractors, you know, no more money on dividends and stock buybacks. They want them to be more efficient. They want to use that money more wisely. So, you know, in terms of a broad war economy like you saw during World War Two, we're a long way off from that.
32:55But we have seen the president exert exhibit a much greater willingness to really exert his own influence on defense contractors and essentially tell them, you know, listen, if you want to do business with the government, you're going to have to do as I tell you. Well, perhaps not just defense contractors, Nick. There was a report in the Wall Street Journal earlier this week about the Pentagon approaching car companies and asking the CEOs of Ford and General Motors to potentially produce military supplies and weapons. It's like World War II. What happened during World War II in the U.S.? Right.
33:29I mean, we have seen some overlap. I think we are in some ways a little ways off from car companies producing munitions and things like that. But what you have seen, what's been documented by Bloomberg and many of our competitors, is this idea that there is some overlap and that you have car companies looking to partner with the Pentagon, with the administration on things that would be a little more, pardon the pun, in their wheelhouse. So, you know, tactical vehicles and things like that. You have seen that. But, I mean, it's also this broader element where you've really seen the walls come down between startups and the defense department, where the department is really looking to shake up the industry and rely on startups.
34:13There is just so much money here, as you indicated in the top of the segment, how much the president is willing to spend. And everybody is kind of jumping in looking for a piece of this. I mean, the Golden Dome Missile Defense Shield, very undefined. We're not clear what at all that's going to do, but just millions and millions of dollars in the pipeline to be spent there.
34:31Carol Massar:All right. Glad we could check in once again with you. Nick Wadams there on this Friday there in D.C. He's Bloomberg News National Security Team Leader. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
34:47Support for the show comes from Public. Lately, it feels like there are two types of investing platforms. Some are traditional brokerages that haven't changed much in decades, and others feel less like investing and more like a game. Public is positioned differently. It's an investing platform for people who are serious about building their wealth. On Public, you can build a portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto, without all the bugs or the confetti. Retirement accounts? Yep. High-yield cash? Yes, again. They even have direct indexing. Public has modern design, powerful tools, and customer support that actually helps.
35:22Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Add paid for by Public Holdings. Brokered services by Public Investing, member FINRA SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, SEC Registered Advisor. Crypto services by ZeroHash. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures.
35:45Carol Massar:Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth. With a widespread presence in communities across the country, Chase for Business supports small business owners at a local level. That makes it possible for you to connect, learn from each other, and grow together. There's a real commitment to seeing small businesses succeed. The Chase for Business team has knowledge and expertise that span a wide range of financial areas. They can help you make more informed decisions as you navigate the complexities of running your business.
36:17Carol Massar:They'll help your business grow with individual guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., member FDIC. Copyright 2026, JPMorgan Chase and Company. We buy insurance for peace of mind, but every year millions of claims are denied. Not because people did anything wrong, but because their policies quietly excluded what happened.
36:56Insurers know every detail. Policyholders rarely do. That's why My Policy Advocate exists. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and explains where you are vulnerable. They don't sell insurance. They deliver transparency. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Go to MyPolicyAdvocate.com.
37:18Carol Massar:You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Or watch us live on YouTube. A global risk on surge swept Wall Street after Iran declared the strait of Hormuz completely open for commercial traffic, erasing much of the fear that had gripped energy and equity markets through weeks of the Middle East conflict. I want to bring in David Bush, the co-CIO of Trajan Wealth. The firm has$2.6 billion in assets under management. Like all of us, he's been watching these developments very closely.
37:54He joins us from Scottsdale, Arizona on this Friday afternoon. David, the president is talking about this like it's the end of this conflict. Markets are seeming to at least price it like there's some good news on the horizon. Is this the end of the conflict in your view? Well, it's to be determined, honestly. What we've seen over the last several weeks since this conflict started is this headline risk where we get a sense that things are starting to calm down. but then another headline or an escalation will happen. And then we're right back to where we were. But I believe that this is a good step in the right direction.
38:35And really, I saw just a headline just a few moments ago that Iran is saying like the Strait of Hormuz is open, but they want the blockade to move out of the way. So it'll be interesting to see what happens over this weekend. But these are all good signs pointing to a ceasefire and hopefully peace talks, permanent peace talks.
38:56Carol Massar:Hey, David, signs that you trade off of? Signs that I trade off of? Yeah. I'm just saying, like, is this what you're getting now? Is this something that you feel comfortable enough that you have enough transparency that you make some trades off of it? Or you think about kind of a longer term trade from here? Yeah, I'm generally a long term investor. And that's sort of our stance. But I will say that the sectors that have performed well or that have been beneficiaries, and I hate to use that term, but beneficiaries of this war is like energy and defense contractors and so on. Now, we're seeing a pullback in some of those sectors and a rotation back into some consumer discretionary and so on.
39:37But having said that, given where price of oil has been and where it's at today, we have to remember that even if we have a ceasefire, what we're going to have is a period of 12 to 24 months to rebuild that infrastructure that was taken offline due to the bombings there in the Middle East. So the price of oil, I don't anticipate that it's going to drop back down to pre-war levels. I mean, we may ever come back into that$75 range, but I would just stay invested long term and diversified. Not drop back to$60 a barrel ever or in the near future? I just think in the near term, like over the next 12 to 24 months because of that infrastructure.
40:20Then what are the implications of that? Well, it means that we're going to have that continued inflation from higher energy prices, which we saw in the latest CPI and PPI numbers. And that inflation has to permeate the economy. And unfortunately, it touches every sector of the economy. So I would expect that inflation related to energy costs is going to stay elevated and consumers are going to continue to feel that pinch of the gas pump. But ultimately, I think we'll get some relief here.
40:55Carol Massar:Yeah. I mean, if you look at, we've talked about this a bunch. If you look at crude oil futures, WTI, I mean, we're still looking at oil in the$72 a barrel range. So we're not anywhere close back to where we were prior to this war. So you definitely see a bit of a floor here, And that's going to certainly feed into a lot and certainly as energy as a trade. How do you think about, like along those lines, David, and this is something we talk an awful lot about here, or I have been certainly focusing on, but I think the rethink of supply chains and when it comes to crucial things like energy or rare materials or just basic commodities, like the world kind of rethinking what happens in times of geopolitical strains or conflict or wars.
41:43Yeah, that's right. And this has been eye-opening, especially when we look at some of the headlines coming across from the European countries where jet fuel price or jet fuel supply is limited. And there was a headline earlier this week that talked about they have maybe six weeks left of jet fuel supply. So you're exactly right. There are supply chain disruptions that have happened because of these geopolitical conflicts. And what that means is that we as a country have to be energy independent and less reliant on foreign sources of energy. and what that means is likely a portfolio of energy sources, everything from the typical oil, coal, natural gas, but also those green energy sources like wind, solar, hydrothermic, and so on.
42:40And I think that we have to become more energy independent so that if in times like this when we have geopolitical risks and supply chain disruptions that we can continue on as a country and not feel the pinch like we've had over the last several weeks. Yeah, I mean, I think a lot of people would agree with you. I don't know if the policymakers would agree with you right now on the renewables part, though. Right. And it's kind of walking a fine line or a good balance. But I think that at this point, we almost have to consider several different sources of energy, including nuclear, when we not just in light of the supply chain disruptions, but also think about the AI infrastructure buildout in these data centers and the power that's going to be required to electrify them and provide this AI technology.
43:33We're going to have to pull from several different sources. And I don't think anything should be off the table in terms of an energy source.
43:43Carol Massar:David, for something like nuclear, that is something I feel like, Tim, do you remember when we did, was it NJIT? And that's several years ago. Yeah, and Scarlett and Paul were there earlier this week. Right. And we were talking about different sources of energy. But when we did it a couple years ago, they were just, we were kind of shocked that, at least I was, that all of a sudden they were talking a lot about nuclear energy again. And this was, I feel like, even ahead of the AI build. Having said that, David, folks in the industry say it's a long time before you really start to see whether it's SMRs, the small modular reactors in terms of nuclear.
44:19Carol Massar:you really actually see them online and performing. So it's a little bit of a longer term play. Obviously, there's some old facilities that, you know, I guess can be rehabbed and up and running again. What's the advice to investors for you? If you've got clients who are saying, what's my play here when it comes to nuclear? Do you hold off a little bit because it's going to take a while for that to actually get online? Or is it something that is this too, you're long term, you said, and reminded us, is it too early, though, or too long term for investors right now? Well, I think that it's one of those sectors that we need to consider.
44:56And I think that right now, I think you're right. These small nuclear reactors, they're still years away from being put into production and online and usable. But at the same time, it's one of those that, from a diversification perspective and also So thinking about the future and the future energy needs of the country, I think that it's something that I'm considering for sure personally. But it's also one of those areas that if somebody gets into it, they have to think about that long-term horizon, that five, seven, seven to ten year time horizon before these actually come online. And so the payoff will be further out in time.
45:45Yeah, the regulatory environment and just the logistical challenges of where these will actually be built are still up in the air. We don't have any, as Carol mentioned, don't have any example of that. Hey, before we let you go, I just want to kind of push things ahead a little bit to the Federal Reserve and what the drop in rates and the drop in oil prices signals to you about not the Fed's next move, but the path for the remainder of the year. How are you thinking about today's developments and the way that rates are going to look? Yeah. So what I think is going to happen at the next federal FOMC meeting, Federal Open Market Committee, that's happening on April 28th and 29th is that they're going to hold rates steady.
46:27And we may get perhaps one rate cut this year. But really, when we think about their dual mandate, it's really the labor markets and inflation. So labor markets have at times softened, and then we've seen some bright spots. At the same time, inflation is still persistent, and we saw that increase in PPI and CPI. So there's really no catalyst for the Fed to cut rates in the near term. And as this inflation permeates the economy, and we think about what the Fed may say and what they may signal, is we're looking for words like transitory. That's not allowed anymore. Versus permanent inflation. Yeah.
47:08That word's not allowed. That's been banned, apparently. I know. That's almost a swear word at this point, transitory.
47:16Carol Massar:All right. Hey, listen, David, thanks so much. It was good to get some time with you. David Bush, he is the co-CEO of Trudgeon Wealth. He has his firm that is$2.6 billion in assets under management. Joining us from Scottsdale. This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.
48:01When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation.
48:36Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut. Find home wherever you roam at Sinesta ES and Simply Suites, where longer stays feel comfortable, flexible, and easy. Stretch out and enjoy spacious accommodations and home-like amenities designed to help you settle in and stay productive or relaxed for however long you need. And when you're a Sonesta Travel Pass member, staying at Sonesta ES and Simply Suites means earning points toward free nights, upgrades, and more with every eligible stay. Go to Sonesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass.
49:12Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sonesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. These days, it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agent's identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta, you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. Okta secures AI.
From the publisher
The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy.
Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.
President Donald Trump said Iran agreed to suspend its nuclear program indefinitely, and will not receive any frozen funds from the US.Trump said in a phone interview on Friday that a deal to end the war, which the US and Israel began with Iran in late February, is mostly complete. Talks over a lasting agreement will “probably” be held this weekend, the president said.
“Most of the main points are finalized. It’ll go pretty quickly,” Trump said.Iran has yet to comment on any deal beyond the Strait of Hormuz opening, nor on claims made by Trump on Thursday that Tehran had offered concessions — including over the key issue of its nuclear program.
Oil, fuel and natural gas prices plunged on hopes that the latest developments would mean more energy supplies can finally transit safely through the strait.
Brent crude fell more than 10% to trade below $89 a barrel by 12:41 p.m. in New York and wiped out most of its gains since the onset of the war. Diesel prices in Europe and the US led the move lower in the energy complex.
Trump said he hasn’t decided who would lead a US delegation for talks with Iranian officials to sign an agreement. Asked if he would travel to Pakistan, which hosted the last round of negotiations, the president said, “I may.”
JD Vance led discussions with Iranian officials last weekend, and Trump said the vice president, his son-in-law Jared Kushner, and envoy Steve Witkoff were candidates to attend additional talks.
Today's show features:
- Spencer Faragasso, Institute for Science and International Security Senior Fellow
on Trump Says Iran Agrees to Suspend Nuclear Program - Felix Gillette, Bloomberg News Media and Entertainment Editor on continued Netflix earnings reaction, Reed Hastings departure
- David Busch, Trajan Wealth CEO & CIO on the macro shift and oil shock
- Nick Wadhams, Bloomberg News National Security Team Leader on Trump’s $1.5 Trillion Pentagon Budget Raises Some GOP Eyebrows
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
