In short
The episode discusses President Trump’s threat to revoke or scrutinize broadcast licenses of TV stations that criticize him, and how that could pressure private media companies into self-censorship. It centers on Jimmy Kimmel’s indefinite removal from ABC affiliates after backlash to Kimmel’s remarks about the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. FCC Chair Brendan Carr is cited saying broadcasters could lose licenses if they don’t serve the public interest, and that Kimmel’s comments “misled” the public.
Guest
Katie Fallow, Deputy Litigation Director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, who focuses on threats to free speech and previously litigated Trump’s social-media blocking case.
Key claims
the First Amendment constrains government action; private companies can choose content, but government threats of regulatory oversight can coerce them. Fallow argues courts could enjoin such pressure, potentially reaching the Supreme Court, citing an NRA-related Supreme Court precedent about regulators pressuring third parties.
Notable examples
Trump suing the New York Times; Disney/ABC actions; FCC actions against CBS/60 Minutes.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOTrump's Comments on Kimmel
1:30 to 2:17
Discussion on Trump's criticism of Jimmy Kimmel and its implications.
“If you're actively involved in your portfolio, you probably catch yourself repeating the same actions.”
Trump's Comments on Kimmel
2:21 to 2:36
Discussion on Trump's criticism of Jimmy Kimmel and its implications.
“Brokerage services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC.”
Trump's Comments on Kimmel
3:04 to 4:23
Discussion on Trump's criticism of Jimmy Kimmel and its implications.
“The Bloomberg Businessweek Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.”
FCC Chair's Perspective
4:23 to 6:01
FCC Chair Brendan Carr discusses the implications of Kimmel's remarks.
“FCC Chair Brendan Carr was on CNBC this morning.”
Interview with Katie Fallow
6:01 to 8:15
Katie Fallow discusses free speech and government influence on media.
“and things like that to essentially coerce private companies into censoring speech that the administration doesn't like.”
Implications of Censorship
8:15 to 14:00
Exploring the implications of censorship and the balance of rights.
“over remarks that were, quote, offensive and insensitive.”
Implications of Targeting the Press
14:00 to 17:38
Explore the implications of a government targeting critical media and its effects on free speech.
“I mean, that is sort of what I was thinking and that I think he would have a good claim.”
Implications of Targeting the Press
18:10 to 19:04
Explore the implications of a government targeting critical media and its effects on free speech.
“Fidelity, Fidelity advisor shares and Fidelity ETFs as of 6-15-2026.”
NVIDIA and Intel's Historic Investment
20:23 to 28:00
Discuss the significance of NVIDIA's $5 billion investment in Intel and its implications for the semiconductor industry.
“This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.”
Intel's Position in the Chip Market
28:00 to 29:03
Explore Intel's current state and the implications of the chip war.
“I think there's no doubt that Intel is going to be an important chip designer in the future, perhaps smaller than it used to be.”
Show all 21 chapters
U.S. Government Support for Intel
29:03 to 30:58
Discuss the U.S. government's involvement in Intel's success and national security.
“Well, I think we're in the thick of the chip war right now.”
Taiwan's Critical Role in Global Supply Chains
30:58 to 32:06
Examine the implications of Taiwan's chip production on global supply chains.
“But what do we need to see to say, okay, this company, this U.S.”
Potential Conflicts and Economic Impact
32:06 to 33:59
Analyze the risks of conflict involving Taiwan and its effects on the tech sector.
“There was a story I was reading this morning by our Javier Blas, an opinion piece.”
TSMC's Strategies and Future
33:59 to 35:18
Investigate TSMC's plans for U.S. expansion and the challenges ahead.
“What do you think of the politics of this and the fact that TSMC has this facility in Arizona and is working to increase its presence here in the United States.”
Trump's Policies on China and Semiconductors
35:18 to 35:54
Discuss the effects of Trump's administration on U.S.-China semiconductor relations.
“I mean, was President Trump right in his increasing tensions on China?”
Trump's Policies on China and Semiconductors
36:04 to 36:55
Discuss the effects of Trump's administration on U.S.-China semiconductor relations.
“More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.”
Trump's Policies on China and Semiconductors
37:57 to 38:31
Discuss the effects of Trump's administration on U.S.-China semiconductor relations.
“I can clear my search history, but I can never unsee that.”
Market Overview with Clear Harbor
38:56 to 42:00
Get insights into the current market environment from Aaron Kennan.
“We're talking about S &P 500, Dow, NASDAQ 100, and Russell 2000.”
Market Strategies and Consumer Insights
42:00 to 45:20
Explore how market conditions affect investment strategies and consumer behavior.
“And of course, that's never set in stone.”
Wealth Distribution and Economic Impact
45:20 to 46:45
Discuss the implications of wealth distribution on the economy and quality of life.
“And I don't know, something that ultimately is going to be playing out, like in our economy, in our markets.”
Wealth Distribution and Economic Impact
47:21 to 47:48
Discuss the implications of wealth distribution on the economy and quality of life.
“If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00As a top-performing advisor, you demand top-performing funds. That's why Fidelity's 1 ,000 experienced research professionals combine deep insights and advanced analytics to deliver consistent outcomes for clients across market cycles. Explore 300-plus Morningstar-rated 4 - and 5-star funds at i.fidelity.com slash top funds. Across all fund share classes of Fidelity, Fidelity Advisor Shares, and Fidelity ETFs as of 6-15-2026, past performance is no guarantee of future results. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need.
0:40Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business.
1:27Carol Massar:IBM. dot com. Support for the show comes from public.com. If you're actively involved in your portfolio, you probably catch yourself repeating the same actions. Buying the dip, manually sweeping idle cash, putting on a hedge. On public, you can now create AI agents that handle all these tasks on your behalf. Just describe what you want to do in plain English. Like, if the VIX hits 25, buy a put option on the S &P 500. Or, if my cash balance goes above$20 ,000, move the excess into my direct index. You approve the workflow and your agent handles the rest. Monitoring the market, watching for your conditions, and executing your strategies exactly as defined.
2:08An investing platform driven by your intent, not just your clicks. You can also get full read and write access to your account via the public API. Go to public.com slash market and fund your account in five minutes or less. That's public.com slash market. Paid for by public investing. Brokerage services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily, reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the People, companies and trends shaping today's complex economy.
3:00Plus, global business, finance and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Businessweek Daily podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio. Now on to one of the most read stories on the Bloomberg terminal. Jimmy Kimmel is off air indefinitely amid a backlash to remarks the late night host made about the killing of Republican activist Charlie Kirk. President Trump weighing in on this. he had this to say about the late night host earlier from the UK. Well, Jimmy Kimmel was fired because he had bad ratings more than anything else. And he said a horrible thing about a great gentleman known as Charlie Kirk.
3:36And Jimmy Kimmel is not a talented person. He had very bad ratings and they should have fired him a long time ago. So, you know, you can call that free speech or not. He was fired for lack of talent. So that was the president earlier today. Later, Carol, on his way back, he's still on his way back from the UK. He made comments on Air Force One that got a lot of attention. He said that U.S. broadcast networks should face scrutiny over their licenses if they're too critical of him. The president also backed ABC's decision to remove Jimmy Kimmel amid pressure from network affiliates who had said they were pulling the show over Kimmel's comments about conservative activist Charlie Cook.
4:16The president's comments represent a break with the nation's longstanding traditions of freedom of speech and the press that are enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. FCC Chair Brendan Carr was on CNBC this morning. He weighed in on ABC's decision. Jimmy Kimmel is no Johnny Carson. And the issue that arose here where lots and lots of people were upset was not a joke. It was not making fun or pilloring me or the administration or the president. It was appearing to directly mislead the American public about a significant fact of probably one of the most significant political events we've had in a long time, certainly the most significant political assassination we've seen in a long time.
4:58All right.
4:59Carol Massar:That again, of course, was FCC Chair Brendan Carr earlier on CNBC. Hey, we wanted to turn more, kind of dig into this and kind of get a feel of what's really here at threat and what's at issue. Katie Fallow is Deputy Litigation Director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, where she focuses on threats to free speech at a free press in the digital age. She joins us right here in New York City. Katie, is free speech under threat? Is the First Amendment under threat? Absolutely. I think since the beginning of this second Trump administration, the president and his advisors have taken a number of steps to use sort of every lever of power at their disposal to control the speech of private individuals, private companies, and private institutions.
5:51And I think the Brendan Carr's statements on Wednesday is just the latest example of this administration using threats of regulatory oversight, denial of mergers, and things like that to essentially coerce private companies into censoring speech that the administration doesn't like. So what is the recourse here? You have a long history of working in this field. You were one of the litigators, the lead litigator on that landmark case back in the first Trump administration where the president blocked people on his social media account, the real Donald Trump Twitter account. So you have a lot of experience with this.
6:33What is the recourse here? Well, the recourse typically and certainly over many decades of our history is to sue in the courts under the First Amendment and to challenge government action that violates the First Amendment. And that is important both for the speakers that are affected by government censorship, but also important for everybody else to for the courts to confirm that the First Amendment protects all kinds of speech, including speech that many people or even most people find very offensive. And it also protects speech on broadcast stations, on cable news, on social media, et cetera.
7:17And so what the main step to get relief here, other than public opinion and political change, obviously, is to get courts to rule that this is unconstitutional. And it plainly is. The problem is that, at least we've seen in the Trump administration, a number of private institutions and companies, even if they have a very strong First Amendment claim, essentially folding and caving before actually litigating or vindicating their rights.
7:48Carol Massar:So wait, so then when you look at this and let's let's roll on top of this, I mean, you know, Walt Disney taking Jimmy Kimmel live off the air indefinitely. It was said amid a backlash to remarks that he made about the killing of Republican activist Charlie Kirk. So amid a backlash. And then the move was really brought about by Nextstar Media Group, which owns dozens of ABC TV affiliates, saying it would pull the show from its stations over remarks that were, quote, offensive and insensitive. So when we think about free speech, does Jimmy Kimmel have the right to say what he was doing, that it was within the parameters of what free speech is?
8:29Carol Massar:Does Nextstar Media, if there's a backlash of people who also have free speech right to say, we didn't like this, have the ability to say that? Does Nextar Media have the right to say, we run a business and we want to change what we carry or maybe not? Like, help me understand free speech in all its, you know, wonderment, if you will, but in also maybe how it's a little tough to kind of figure out what it exactly is. Yeah, I mean, it's absolutely complex. I mean, the First Amendment only applies to actions by the government, meaning the government cannot censor speech. But, you know, private companies, private institutions, private individuals can suppress speech or, you know, decide that they don't want to speak in certain ways if they don't want to.
9:22That's absolutely fine. But I also think it's important to see the context here, which is that, yes, this affiliate or these local broadcast stations said they weren't going to carry the Jimmy Kimmel show. But they also said that after the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission made a statement that said, called on Disney and ABC to take action against Kimmel or else the FCC was going to look into whether these broadcast licensees were broadcasting in the public interest. So that's a direct threat of government censorship. So while, you know, ABC could make its own decision, but I think there is a real concern here and direct evidence that the government is using the threat of regulatory investigations and possibly, you know, by the way, these local broadcasters are seeking approval by the FCC of a potential merger.
10:21And so, you know, I think you can connect the dots and see that the FCC chairman's statements played a significant role here. Even if we don't know for sure, it certainly raises the troubling specter that the government is using threats to coerce private speech. And that is unconstitutional.
10:43Carol Massar:So what about like a news organization or an entity like Disney, ABC, who also has a fiduciary responsibility? I know that this may not be your area, but a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders that if if there are deals that don't happen and things don't happen, it changes their financial picture. And I guess I'm just trying to understand that. Do they have a right to to say, well, this isn't in the best interests of the company? And so even if it's kind of, you know, dampen somebody's free speech or removes it, do they have a right? Yeah, that's right. But is it? No, they might have a right.
11:26But is that the long term best way to go? Is that in the long term best interest of the company? I mean, if you're going to have companies constantly bowing to pressures from the government, censorship pressures, including, I mean, you just saw the president or you played the clip of the president saying on Air Force One, I think you should revoke the licenses anytime a broadcaster carries a show that criticizes me, you know, is essentially what he's saying. Long term, I think that is not in the best interest of broadcasters that want to air programs that the entire country watches. And, you know, presumably these broadcasters and certainly Disney and ABC have many viewers that are upset about Jimmy Kimmel being suspended based on, you know, a pushback from the Trump administration.
12:21So how do you view this as going through the courts? Like, does Jimmy Kimmel have a case here? Does does somebody have a case here that they could bring to the court that could ultimately go to the Supreme Court and be a test for the First Amendment of the Constitution? I think it could be. Just last year in a case involving the National Rifle Association, so certainly not an entity on the left, brought a lawsuit against a New York regulator saying that the regulator had brought pressure onto insurance companies not to cover the NRA. And the NRA brought a lawsuit and the Supreme Court said if that regulator uses its authority to pressure other banks or insurers not to do business with the NRA, that violates the first based on viewpoint that violates the First Amendment.
13:16So under that case, I think Jimmy Kimmel could bring a lawsuit against the government saying Brendan Carr and the Trump administration sought to exert pressure and through threats of coercion. And then the result was that ABC canceled or suspended the show. There are some complexities in terms of the remedy that he could seek. But I think at the very least, you know, you could ask for a declaration and an injunction saying the government can't do this. So it wouldn't be a lawsuit against ABC. It would be a lawsuit against the government.
13:49Carol Massar:That's what I'm thinking, right, Tim? This would be his own lawsuit, though, without the backing of his network. I'm just wondering if somebody else brings it on. Yeah, exactly. Well, yeah. OK, we could get into it. Yeah. I mean, that is sort of what I was thinking and that I think he would have a good claim. But of course, it's complex. There are questions about remedy. And I think, you know, overhanging this as of whether it would eventually reach the Supreme Court is all the sort of other financial considerations that are motivating the various actors that are involved in this issue. I'm curious about the non-legal implications of this.
14:26And just in your view, as somebody who focuses on the freedom of the press, what the implications are of an administration that seems to target negative news about him, news that's critical. For example, the president this week sued the New York Times for$15 billion, claiming it has an agenda against him. Last year, Disney paid$15 million to settle a defamation lawsuit that was brought on by President Donald Trump over comments made by host George Stephanopoulos. What is the effect of that? Not the legal ramifications, not the legal ramifications, but the effect of that, Justin, in your view, on a free press?
15:02I think it's deeply scary. And adding to the examples you gave, also the FCC's actions against CBS and the ultimate settlement over 60 minutes airing, you know, a particular edited version of its interview with Kamala Harris. So I think the message that it sends to journalists and to media companies is if you criticize the president or his administration, you do so at great risk. And that should be frightening to all of us and including should be frightening to people on the left, because if we accept that that's how these things should proceed, then if there's a Democratic president in power, that person could use, you know, the same kinds of threats and coercion against, you know, Fox News or right wing media entities.
15:56And we would all be the poorer for it. And from a free speech perspective. Last question.
16:03Carol Massar:All right. So everybody in media is listening. And paying attention. But what about American citizens more broadly? I mean, free speech is just something we take for granted. Right. And gold standard, if you will, I think around the world. Like what could be, you know, should we be worried that it's not just about media? It's just it's about everybody in terms of what they say. Absolutely. I do think we are the gold standard and for good reason or we have been. But, you know, I've been practicing First Amendment law for a long time, and I've never seen such a frontal assault on basic First Amendment principles, things that I thought were well-established and things that we all benefit from.
16:47And so right now it's being waged against members of the media. But we also see the Trump administration essentially taking all these steps to decide for the American people what their colleges can teach, what their media, you know, what their comedians, their favorite comedians can say. And, you know, I think that that can be used just increasingly to crack down on free speech. And we should all be very concerned about that.
17:19Carol Massar:Katie, yes or no? Does this potentially the issue of free speech, First Amendment go all the way up to the Supreme Court at some point? Yes or know. I think it will at some point. Okay. Katie, thank you so much. Super, super appreciative. Katie Fallow, Deputy Litigation Director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.
17:47Advisors, the best way to outperform client expectations is to choose funds and ETFs that outperform the market. Fidelity helps power long-term growth in client portfolios with 300 plus Morningstar rated four and five star funds, including active ETFs. Discover what sets Fidelity apart when it comes to performance at i.fidelity.com slash top funds. Across all fund share classes of Fidelity, Fidelity advisor shares and Fidelity ETFs as of 6-15-2026. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Support for the show comes from public.com. If you're actively involved in your portfolio, you probably catch yourself repeating the same actions.
18:24Buying the dip, manually sweeping idle cash, putting on a hedge. On public, you can now create AI agents that handle all these tasks on your behalf. Just describe what you want to do in plain English, like if the VIX hits 25, buy a put option on the S &P 500. Or if my cash balance goes above$20 ,000, move the excess into my direct index. You approve the workflow and your agent handles the rest. Monitoring the market, watching for your conditions, and executing your strategies exactly as defined. An investing platform driven by your intent, not just your clicks. You can also get full read and write access to your account via the public API.
19:04Go to public.com slash market and fund your account in five minutes or less. That's public.com slash market. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., Member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. Ask yourself, what are your best people spending their time on right now? Expense reports, receipt chasing, month-end close that takes weeks. You become what you spend on, and that's not what you're building toward. Brex is the intelligent finance platform that eliminates that work before it starts.
19:44AI agents that handle the manual stuff automatically. so your team can spend their time on what actually compounds. It's time to get Brex AF. Learn more at brex.com slash AF. Aging is real, and so are the benefits of adding vital proteins, collagen, peptides to your daily routine. Because around the age of 30, your body needs backup to keep your collagen up to help support healthy hair, skin, nails, bones, and joints. Available in the classic collagen peptides, collagen and protein shakes, and new vital proteins, collagen, sparkling waters, So you can stay vital, stay you. Visit VitalProteins.com to learn more and where to buy.
20:22These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
20:28Carol Massar:You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Or watch us live on YouTube. It's exactly where we start that agreement or deal for NVIDIA to invest$5 billion in Intel. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Wang called it a historic collaboration that together they will lay the foundation for the next era of computing. President Trump also weighing in from the UK, where he and the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer unveiled a new technology partnership to deepen ties on AI and digital assets.
21:05So we're taking the next logical step with a historic agreement on science and technology partnerships. And this will create new government, academic and private sector cooperation in areas such as AI, which is taking over the world. I mean, I'm looking at you guys. You're taking over the world, Jensen. I don't know what you're doing here. I hope you're right. All I can say is we both hope you're right. But it's pretty amazing. That was President Trump earlier from the UK with more on the global backdrop when it comes to the industry. Ed has a role in with making so much of our world tick. We are talking semiconductors, of course.
21:45I want to bring in Bloomberg TV, BTEC co-host Ed Ludlow, joining us from San Francisco. Ed, just off the phone with Jensen Wong and Lit Bhutan, CEO of Intel, and of course, Jensen, the CEO of NVIDIA. Ed, what did they tell you? What did you find? Yeah, I mean, the main takeaway is that the president and the administration were not involved in the brokering of this partnership and deal. It predates more recent events with both companies in the Trump administration. The way that they both explained it is that. Really?
22:16Carol Massar:Do you believe that? Well, well, I'm so I'm so glad that you did that. So let's get into it. You know, that was what they said. And what I find interesting is that they claim that 12 months ago or more, engineering teams started meeting and working together now. That would not only predate the sort of more recent relationship between Jensen Wang and the president and Lit Boutin's relationship with the president, but I also point out that Lit Boutin was not CEO of Intel 12 months ago. He was on the board. So this is a kind of legacy thing, if there to be believed. Now, to your point, the equity stake and the investment of$5 billion of NVIDIA into Intel, How do we interpret that?
22:56The way that Jensen Huang answered it is, why wouldn't we invest if we believe in the success of the products that we're working on together? Because they'll realize an excellent return. But nobody in this briefing that I participated in asked Jensen if the investment itself was catalyzed or proposed by the administration. Yeah, I mean, just the cynic in me would say this looks really good for NVIDIA to make this investment in a company that is partially owned by the U.S. taxpayer, partially owned by the U.S. government, and show his support, show NVIDIA's support for this company. I want to think about this in the broader context.
23:33I mean, Pat Gelsinger, Ed, was the CEO at the time, and I think it was notable back in, gosh, January of this year, I think it was, when NVIDIA had that big decline as a result of the DeepSeek news. Pat Gelsinger essentially coming out and saying that he was going to buy some of the NVIDIA stock. On LinkedIn, he said that. That was a really big deal because these two companies were seen as rivals even then. Are they still seen as rivals right now? Guys, if I jump in my car right now and I go 25 miles down the 101 and I park up at Intel and climb onto the roof and I look back across the freeway, I'll see NVIDIA's headquarters.
24:09And funnily enough, if I look the other way, I'll see AMD's headquarters. In the context of technology history, we've not seen something like this since way back when Microsoft kind of bailed out Apple. which is a moment in history long forgotten. The way they explain it, and you tell me if you want to get into the nitty-gritty of it, is that it's a simple technology story. The architecture that Intel CPUs are based on still dominate the data center market. So all the CPUs that go into data centers, Intel has a good hold on that market, and NVIDIA sees an opportunity to leverage that to their advantage.
24:47Carol Massar:I'm trying to understand. So NVIDIA invests$5 billion. The U.S. took a roughly 10 % stake in Intel in August, and that investment so far paying off pretty nicely. Japan's SoftBank Group committed to investing a lot in U.S. chip making. They made a surprise$2 billion investment last month in Intel. It's a rather notable group of investors. How should one read that? What is Intel becoming? Is this a step toward NVIDIA buying Intel? Is there a grand takeaway here? uh the way to interpret it is that intel still needs cash so lit butan was very honest that he's still focusing on shoring up intel's balance sheet you know um the difference between microsoft investing in apple way way way back when is that apple was facing bankruptcy intel's not but its profit has been eroded or obliterated and gelsinger's kind of thing was uh to try and get back on a product roadmap.
Read the full transcript
25:45Litboutin is like, I'm going to cut back. I'm going to cut down to profit, get the balance sheet strong. But on paper, Intel also represents everything that this administration wants. A US company with heavy footprint in the United States that on paper can do more manufacturing. The problem is this NVIDIA agreement has nothing to do with manufacturing really.
26:05Carol Massar:Well, our next guest was giving us hints and cues several years ago about the chip wars. And so we're going to talk a bit more about it with Chris Miller. But you set us up so well, as you always do. Ed Ludlow, Bloomberg TV B-Tech co-host joining us there from San Francisco. All right. So let's get to Chris Miller. He wrote Chip War, the fight for world's most critical technology. It was written in 2022. That book made us all sit up and take notice of the importance of semiconductors to the world, to the most developed nations when it comes to economic growth, national security, and so much more.
26:38Chris is professor of international history at the Fletcher School at Tufts University. He does consulting, but he has not consulted for Intel or for NVIDIA. He joins us from Palo Alto, California. Chris, the book laying it out for us three years ago, America's Edge is slipping, undermined by competitors in Taiwan, Korea, Europe and above all China. Should we be shocked by a partnership such as this? Strange bedfellows in a previous life, no? Well, I think from the perspective of 10 years ago, this would have been a pretty surprising pair up. But today there's a real logic for it. NVIDIA is a leader in AI chips.
27:14Intel has been trying to catch up when it comes to AI. But also Intel's got a lot of unique know-how when it comes to building processor chips, which AI servers still require. So certainly on the chip design side, there's differing areas of expertise that both of these companies can bring together. All right.
27:32Carol Massar:But just all of it together, the U.S. taking that 10%, approximately 10 % stake in Intel over the summer. You've got SoftBank, their$2 billion investment now in NVIDIA. What is this? I mean, is this what you thought would happen, need to happen to ensure U.S. remain a dominant player in the semi-space? Well, I think we're going to need to wait and see what implication this announcement has, if any, for Intel's manufacturing business. I think there's no doubt that Intel is going to be an important chip designer in the future, perhaps smaller than it used to be. But they've got a unique position in the market on the chip design side.
28:12But from a national perspective, what really matters is Intel's manufacturing arm. And that's where Intel has really struggled the last couple of years to stay at the cutting edge technologically and also to win customers away from TSMC, the Taiwanese market rival. And today, NVIDIA produces almost all of its most advanced chips with TSMC. There's been a big push from Washington to get companies like NVIDIA to diversify their supply and to try to help Intel become a more successful manufacturer of chips for other companies. The announcement today doesn't really say anything about that, but I think a lot of people will ask whether this is a stepping stone for other U.S.
28:51companies, NVIDIA or some of its peers, to bring more of their manufacturing business to Intel's manufacturing arm.
28:56Carol Massar:So chip war, it is on or where are we? Is it the beginning of the chip war? And I'm just curious, are you starting to think about, I don't know, another book and where it goes from here? Give us give us your thought here. Well, I think we're in the thick of the chip war right now. Next to this news about NVIDIA and Intel, there's a big debate going on in Beijing and in Washington about which companies should be allowed to buy which type of the AI accelerators that NVIDIA specializes in designing that are almost exclusively today produced in Taiwan. on. And so you've got these competitive commercial dynamics intersecting with high geopolitics.
29:37And today you can't really separate the chip industry from the decisions of President Trump or from Chairman Xi. Well, that's a really good point and kind of brings me to that question about Intel specifically and the U.S. taking this unprecedented stake in this chip maker earlier this year. What did you think of that, Chris? Well, I think the U.S. has been pretty clear in its desire, going all the way back to the first Trump administration, through the Biden administration, as well as both houses of Congress, both parties, that it sees Intel's success in manufacturing as important for U.S. national security.
30:12Right now, most of the world's advanced processor chips are produced by one company in one country, Taiwan. And the U.S. wants a more diversified base of manufacturing these ultra-critical chips that are key both for smartphones and computers, but especially for AI. high. And Intel is one of the three companies in the world alongside Samsung and TSMC that can produce these cutting edge chips. And it's the only U.S. company, the only company with a major U.S. footprint, at least right now. And so that's why the U.S. government has been trying to find ways to help Intel out. So what would it take for Intel to be able to compete with TSMC?
30:50I mean, it got money from the U.S. government. It got money. It's getting money from Intel here. As Carol always says, the devil's in the details. And you said, we need to see exactly where this money goes. But what do we need to see to say, okay, this company, this U.S. company is now competing with TSMC? So there's no doubt that Intel needs money, and it's raised some money from SoftBank and the U.S. government. But the key thing that it needs is customers for its advanced manufacturing processes. You'd only prove whether or not they work if you've got at least medium-sized, but ideally large-scale customers that are going to let you produce thousands, tens of thousands, eventually millions of chips on your manufacturing process.
31:28You can't scale up without customers. And right now, Intel's got a couple of smaller customers for its manufacturing business, but it's thus far failed to win a very large-scale customer. And NVIDIA is one example of a company. There are others that could provide a really large contract that would let Intel test out its cutting-edge manufacturing. And right now, I think the entire ecosystem is waiting to see, will it win some big customers that lets it complete that scale out and testing of its cutting edge manufacturing.
31:56Carol Massar:All right. So we're talking with Chris Miller, professor of international history at the Fletcher School at Tufts University, author of Chippewa, the fight for the world's most critical technology. Hey, Chris, one thing I want to ask you, and I want to go back to China. There was a story I was reading this morning by our Javier Blas, an opinion piece. And it was asking, why is China stockpiling so much surplus oil? And one of there were like five or six different reasons. And one of it was, does China fear an interruption in supply beyond U.S. and European sanctions? Oil traders who traffic and intrigue at our only one word, Taiwan.
32:28Carol Massar:Do you believe that there is a strong possibility that there will be a conflict involving Taiwan? And what does that mean for TSMC, who is so crucial in terms of the global chip supply chain? what could that potentially mean for the United States, the global economy? I mean, can you play that out and what the likelihood is? Well, there's no doubt it's a possibility. Nobody knows for certain what the likelihood is. But I think the magnitude of impact is so large that even if you think it's only 5 % or 10 % likely, you've got to take steps to prepare. All of the biggest, most valuable companies in the United States require silicon that today can in some cases only be sourced from Taiwan.
33:14That's true for NVIDIA, true for Apple, true for Google, true for Microsoft, true for Meta. The entire U.S. tech ecosystem relies on Taiwan's expertise. And that's why there's been this push for the last couple of years to find ways to diversify the U.S. from being so centrally exposed to China's decisions about war and peace in the Taiwan Straits.
33:35Carol Massar:And the reality is that the U.S. is still very, very exposed, correct, because of how much TSMC still produces. That's right. I think the U.S. has made a bit of progress, but there's still a long way to go. And it's a long way to go because TSMC is an extraordinarily capable company and the entire Taiwanese ecosystem is just so central to producing the semiconductor hardware that our tech firms and AI firms depend on. What do you think of the politics of this and the fact that TSMC has this facility in Arizona and is working to increase its presence here in the United States. Does it put that at risk?
34:13No, I don't think so. I think TSMC has got a strong signal from its customers that they want U.S. space production. It's got this uncertainty created by the tariffs that incentivizes more investment in the United States. And it's got a signal from the U.S. government, again, across multiple administrations, both parties, that they're going to keep pushing for a bigger U.S. footprint. But I think the challenge that TSMC faces is twofold. First, all of its key R &D remains in Taiwan and will be in Taiwan as far as we can see in the future. So Arizona is helpful in diversifying today's manufacturing, but it doesn't really get you diversification of the next generation.
34:52The second thing is that the ecosystem in Arizona is still less developed than it is in Taiwan. And so sourcing the gases and the materials and all the spare parts and specialized equipment you need for a cutting edge chip plant, it's still harder and more expensive in Arizona than in Taiwan. And that's going to be the case for some time until we keep building out the scale of Arizona. And all of that means that Taiwan is going to stay very, very important for our tech ecosystem for many years to come.
35:18Carol Massar:Chris, really quickly, 30 seconds here. I mean, was President Trump right in his increasing tensions on China? It started in his first term and ramped up in the second. Was he right, especially when you think about semiconductors? And just quickly, if you could. Well, I think the key driver of tensions in this sector is actually China's desire to become self-sufficient. We were in a pretty stable equilibrium in 2015 before the Made in China 2025 plan was released. That happened before any of the U.S. policies to support its own chip industry. And that was really the catalyst for introducing geopolitical tension as a central facet in the chip industry.
35:53All right.
35:54Carol Massar:So glad we could get some time with you. So relevant as always. Chris Miller, author of Chip War and professor of international history at the Fletcher School at Tufts University. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this. Support for the show comes from public.com. If you're actively involved in your portfolio, you probably catch yourself repeating the same actions, buying the dip, manually sweeping idle cash, putting on a hedge. On public, you can now create AI agents that handle all these tasks on your behalf. Just describe what you want to do in plain English.
36:26Like, if the VIX hits 25, buy a put option on the S &P 500. Or, if my cash balance goes above$20 ,000, move the excess into my direct index. You approve of the workflow and your agent handles the rest. Monitoring the market, watching for your conditions, and executing your strategies exactly as defined. An investing platform driven by your intent, not just your clicks. You can also get full read and write access to your account via the public API. Go to public.com slash market and fund your account in five minutes or less. That's public.com slash market. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., Member FINRA, and SIPC.
37:09Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. If your best finance people are doing expense reports, chasing receipts, or spending time on month-end clothes, it's time to get Brex AF, a Gentic finance that eliminates that work before it starts. Learn more at brex.com slash AF. Aging doesn't stop, and neither should you, with Vital Proteins Collagen and Protein Shakes, because around the age of 30, your body needs more support for movement and recovery. On workout and rest days, reach for a 30-gram total protein shake or go with our classic collagen peptides help support healthy hair skin nails bones and joints so you can stay vital stay you visit vitalproteins.com to learn more and where to buy these statements have not been evaluated by the food and drug administration this product is not intended to diagnose treat cure or prevent any disease amazon health ai presents painful thoughts why did i search the internet for answers to my cold sore problem now i'm stuck Done a rabbit hole filled with images of alarmingly graphic sores in various stages of ooze.
38:20I can clear my search history, but I can never unsee that. Don't go down the rabbit hole. Amazon Health AI gets you the right care fast. Health care just got less painful.
38:34Carol Massar:This is the Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast. Listen live each weekday starting at 2 p.m. Eastern. on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg 1130. We're looking at a day where we could potentially see records across four major averages. We're talking about S &P 500, Dow, NASDAQ 100, and Russell 2000. If this happens, it would be the first time since 2021. But we'll see whether or not we get there. In the meantime, curious to see what our next guest has to say about the market environment.
39:13Carol Massar:He is Aaron Kennan, co-founder and chief executive officer of Clear Harbor Asset Management, about$2 billion in assets under management, joining us once again from Stanford, Connecticut. A lot, as always, Aaron, coming at us. We're more than 24 hours from that last Fed decision. I don't know, what do you think is the kind of constructive conversation right now to have about the equity markets in particular, valuations and what seems to be kind of continued moves to the upside? Yeah, we've had quite a run, Carol. And, you know, as you mentioned, the S &P's up historic levels today. And yet we look across the pond and emerging markets are up 28 percent versus the S &P's 14 and Europe's up 18 versus the S &P 14.
40:00So it hasn't just been a U.S. story. I think that's an important narrative for at least our clients to understand. And certainly valuations are not cheap. We're trading at sort of top quartile levels in most equity indices other than the small cap area, which is relatively cheap here. And yet we also know that elevated valuations do not always or never really augur bear markets. Usually there's some economic shock that ensues. And so we're mindful of the valuations, but it's not sort of putting up the cautionary flag too significantly for us here. So we remain reasonably constructive here, particularly now that the Fed is starting to cut rates and we think they'll continue to cut rates, even though they were quite cautious.
40:49OK, so let's talk about that. Why are you convinced that they'll continue to cut rates? Well, if you look at the Fed, they always want to be a little more optimistic, Tim, as it pertains to sort of the economic outlook. And this transcends this Fed chair, Yellen, Bernanke, Greenspan. have all done it. They don't want to sound gloom and doomy. But I would argue that there's still some normalization to occur as it relates to just sort of the Fed funds rate and its relationship to inflation. I also think, too, that we have a Fed that's going to be leaning more towards supporting employment than pulling down the last 50 basis points or 75 basis points of inflation.
41:35I think there's a sense that there's more of a prerogative to do that, to ensure that we have a healthy employment market. And then, of course, you look at the Fed Fund's futures, which is what the market thinks, and the market's calling for five to six rate cuts between now and year end. Maybe it will not be that aggressive. And we heard, of course, Chairman Powell yesterday say, well, we're on a meeting-to-meeting basis. So we don't have any insight. We're just going to look at the data.
42:02Carol Massar:Yeah, right? I mean, just that dot plot. And of course, that's never set in stone. It can change and it will change. But it's just a reminder that there are a lot of different views being discussed there at the central bank. So what do you do with new money in this market environment, Aaron? Well, I think we want to start with the foundational framework of what's the objective of the client? What is their risk tolerance, whether it's an individual, family or an institution? How much liquidity do they need? And then we look at where we're allocating capital around the world, where there are opportunities to maybe stick our necks out a bit.
42:38We still believe in the U.S. equity story for the long run. We still think the AI growth story is in the earlier innings that we're going to go from picks and shovels to a broader opportunity set within software, within AI. And we think, of course, the tariff picture in the U.S. is probably going to mean more reshoring, more investment in the United States going forward. But we also think there's opportunity in places like Europe and emerging markets. In fact, I think what's interesting right now is you have a country like China that is historically selling to the developed world, the United States and Europe.
43:16We've put up tariffs, and they can't flood our markets any longer with a good portion of their goods. And so they're looking at places where they can do that. And I think they're going to be selling more and more of their goods to emerging markets. It could push up emerging market currencies and actually boost capital markets further in those regions. So we're thinking, you know, about asset class level allocation as well as, you know, even within the equity asset class sector level and then geographic level. So there's a lot to talk about there. There is. I'm curious about your view on the U.S.
43:48consumer. We got news yesterday that the average FICO score slipped to 715 in April from 717 a year earlier. It's the second consecutive year over year drop. It's essentially the fastest rate that credit scores have fallen since 2009. We're also seeing some inflation in some places as a result of tariffs or other other things as well, like beef prices, beef prices moving higher, which certainly affects consumers. How is the consumer doing in your view? I think it's a tale of two stories, Tim. I think you just alluded to half the country, which doesn't own financial assets, unfortunately, haven't been able to sort of hedge this rising inflationary price that we've seen over the last five years or so.
44:35And you have retail sales recently that indicated relatively robust numbers. But then when you look beneath the hood to your question, where is the retail sales growth really happening at the unit level? It's happening at the upper quartile, upper decile of the economic stratum in the United States. The lower half, they have credit card debt. They have auto loans. If they're lucky, they have a mortgage. But that's all liability. That's not asset. And so we have this sort of bifurcation in the consumption pattern in the U.S. I think it's one reason why the Fed's leaning towards the dovish side, why they cut rates, and they'll continue to cut them.
45:14Carol Massar:so my sister had shared something with me a little while ago and i'm forgive me i'm trying to find out who the individual but it was essentially i think it was a european ceo or something who basically said i don't want to be a rich man in a poor country and i just think this kind of resonates with me and we've talked about this k-shaped recovery and economy so people who are in the market and have a good job and doing well and own a house so many who don't And you kind of laid it out for us. I mean, isn't that a problem? Isn't that a problem today? Continues to be a problem. And I don't know, something that ultimately is going to be playing out, like in our economy, in our markets.
45:53Carol Massar:And forgive me, it's a serious question, Aaron. I'm giving you about 40 seconds. Yeah. Well, we have a widening maldistribution of wealth. But if you look at where we were 50 years ago, where we were 100 years ago, and even where we were 30 years ago, you know, it's sometimes easy to think that, you know, we have it worse today among large cohorts than we did 50 years ago. But the rising wealth boat has lifted almost all tides. It's just that the maldistribution of existing wealth has widened. And so I think that the base level of sort of quality of life has improved dramatically for the lower quartile of Americans relative to 50, 75, 100 years ago.
46:40And I think, you know, it's good to keep that in mind.
46:43Carol Massar:Always good also to get some time with you. Aaron Kennan, co-founder, CEO of Clear Harbor Asset Management. This is the Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast. Available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.
47:21Carol Massar:Healthcare doesn't always work great. If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like? Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get and care that looks at the whole person. How you need it. Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Learn more at business.optum.com. Aging is real, and so are the benefits of new Vital Proteins Collagen Sparkling Water.
47:56because around the age of 30, your body needs backup to keep your collagen up. So get your daily glow up now in three fresh flavors, strawberry blossom, lemon lime, and blood orange. Improved skin health in as little as 30 days thanks to collagen peptides. Cheers to that. So you can stay vital, stay you. Visit vitalproteins.com to learn more and where to buy. These statements are not evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If your best finance people are doing expense reports, chasing receipts, or spending time on month-end close, it's time to get Brex AF, a gentic finance that eliminates that work before it starts.
48:34Learn more at brex.com slash AF. When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation.
49:12Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut.
From the publisher
Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.
President Donald Trump said US broadcast networks should face scrutiny over their licenses if they’re too critical of him, in what amounts to his furthest-reaching threat to media freedoms.
“When you have a network and you have evening shows, and all they do is hit Trump,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Thursday. “I would think maybe their license should be taken away.”
The president was defending ABC’s decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel’s show indefinitely over the late-night host’s remarks about the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Trump’s latest comments came days after he filed a $15 billion lawsuit against the New York Times. The president and his Republican allies have long complained that America’s mainstream media is biased against conservatives. Trump has repeatedly called for CBS, ABC and NBC to get rid of late night comedy hosts who are frequently critical of his administration.
On Wednesday, Walt Disney Co.’s ABC network said it is taking Jimmy Kimmel Live! off the air indefinitely following a backlash from conservatives over the late-night host’s comments about Kirk. Earlier Thursday, Trump backed ABC’s decision to remove Kimmel amid pressure from network affiliates who had said they were pulling the show.
Today's show features:
- Katie Fallow, Deputy Litigation Director for the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, on Walt Disney’s ABC network taking Jimmy Kimmel Live! off the air indefinitely following the comedian’s comments about Charlie Kirk
- Bloomberg Tech Co-Host Ed Ludlow on Nvidia’s $5 billion investment in Intel
- Chris Miller, Professor of International History at The Fletcher School at Tufts University, on the geopolitical forces shaping the global ecosystem for semiconductors
- Aaron Kennon, CEO of Clear Harbor Asset Management, on the outlook for the market and US monetary policy
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
