In short
The episode is Bloomberg Businessweek Daily covering three main beats: (1) U.S.-Iran talks: the White House has a reported “15-point” demand plan for Iran, but Iran has rejected Trump outreach. Guest Michelle Jembrisco says U.S. and Iranian statements conflict; the U.S. cautions against negotiating via the press; Iran’s counter-demands include a no-further-attacks guarantee, war reparations, and retaining sovereign control of the Strait of Hormuz. She also notes a reported 4–6 week timeline for the Iran operation. (2) Logistics/data centers: Prologis CEO Dan Litterman discusses resilience despite higher oil prices, saying customers aren’t pulling back; he cites 5.7 GW of power in advanced negotiations and build-to-suit data center strategy. (3) AI and tech/legal: Rachel Metz on why OpenAI’s Sora didn’t “stick” (compute limits, unclear business model), plus June Grosso on a Meta/Google jury verdict in a social-media addiction mental-health case, with punitive damages pending.
Guests
Michelle Jembrisco (Bloomberg News national security editor), Dan Litterman (Prologis CEO), Rachel Metz (Bloomberg AI reporter), June Grosso (Bloomberg Law host).
Notable examples
Sora, Microsoft renting a Texas data center, Meta/Google litigation “bellwether” trial.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding the Iran-U.S. Standoff
0:30 to 2:20
Discussion on U.S. demands from Iran and Iran's rejection of those terms.
“So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises.”
Details on U.S. and Iran's Demands
2:20 to 4:24
Insights into the specific demands from both the U.S. and Iran regarding negotiations.
“She's White House and a national security editor for Bloomberg News.”
Iran Operation Timeline and Diplomatic Developments
4:24 to 6:25
Analysis of the timelines for U.S. operations in Iran and upcoming diplomatic meetings.
“We haven't really moved forward, it seems, in any way to end the conflict.”
Prologis CEO Insights on Market Conditions
10:34 to 14:01
Prologis CEO discusses the macroeconomic impact of geopolitical events on logistics and real estate.
“Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern.”
Data Center Business Growth and Strategy
14:01 to 17:12
Learn about the current state and future plans of the data center business amidst changing energy landscapes.
“Are you seeing any signs of weakness or slowdown or changing trends when it comes to the data center business?”
E-commerce Demand and Economic Impact
17:13 to 19:11
Explore how e-commerce growth is reshaping logistics and real estate, regardless of economic slowdowns.
“So we have leases in place before we put a shovel in the ground, and we have so much opportunity in front of us, we don't need to be thinking about another vector to grow this data center business.”
Joint Ventures and Development Potential
19:12 to 20:36
Understand the strategic significance of a joint venture to expand logistics capabilities and development.
“On that, I'm interested in the joint venture that you guys announced last week.”
OpenAI's Video Generation and Computational Challenges
20:51 to 22:30
Learn about OpenAI's approach to video generation and the challenges surrounding compute power.
“let's head to Bloomberg News at San Francisco Bureau and to Bloomberg AI reporter Rachel Metz.”
AI in Hollywood: Consumer Perception and Impact
22:31 to 24:24
Discuss the implications of AI in the film industry and its acceptance among consumers.
“I mean, ultimately, these companies have to make money, right?”
Navigating the Future of AI Investment
24:25 to 28:00
Explore the ongoing evolution in AI investments and the challenges of profitability in the sector.
“But I mean, that was a potential billion dollar investment in open AI and to license the license IP from from Disney to open AI to then create, you know, these characters for AI shorts.”
Show all 12 chapters
Questions on Current Events
28:00 to 28:24
Explore the ongoing uncertainties surrounding current discussions.
“I think there's still a lot of questions there.”
Legal Implications of Social Media Case
31:09 to 35:54
Discuss the significance of the recent ruling against Meta and Google.
“Meta and Alphabet's Google found liable for a 20-year-old woman who alleged that her addiction to the company's social media platforms caused her to suffer a mental health crisis.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00They told us to expect change. They warned us about the transition. But honestly, they forgot the best part. This is the chapter where we finally focus on us. LifeMD delivers expert menopause and midlife care right from your home. From hormone health to holistic wellness, LifeMD helps you feel your best for the best years of your life. LifeMD, it's just getting good. Visit LifeMD.com slash goodlife. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need.
0:40Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business.
1:27IBM. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily. Reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead. With insight on the people, companies and trends shaping today's complex economy. plus global business, finance, and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Businessweek Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio. Let's go now to Washington, D.C., to what we're hearing from the White House. As we've reported, the Trump administration has compiled a list of a dozen demands along three points that Iran would get in return.
2:19We also know Iran has said thanks, but no thanks. I want to bring in Michelle Jembrisco. She's White House and a national security editor for Bloomberg News. She joins us from our Washington, D.C. Bureau. Michelle, I just want to bring everybody up to speed on what we heard from Caroline Levitt just now. Some some other headlines too soon to say if the U.S. is satisfied with the Iran regime change. Control of uranium is a point of conversation. Still, how did her statements that we that she just made to the press in the last hour or so gel with what we heard in that 15 point plan and what we've heard from the president?
2:54Well, there's a lot of work here, Tim. And I think, you know, the first off, what we heard from Caroline Levitt today is not consistent with what we heard from Iran earlier today, which should come as no surprise. I mean, the two sides have been trying to jawbone each other definitely at odds, and especially because we don't know exactly who the U.S. is purporting to be negotiating with on the Iranian side. It's hard to kind of parse who's saying what from the regime's angle of events. And now on that 15-point plan that Bloomberg reported on earlier, Caroline Levitt referred to that and cautioned against speculating via such a proposal.
3:34Of course, she doesn't want to, you know, she uses the tried and true line of not wanting to negotiate through the press. She did acknowledge that there are some elements of truth, as she said, to that plan, but that, you know, no one should take that as sort of the final negotiating end piece that the U.S. is operating with. Now, at the same time as we have that U.S. proposal, of course, we have Iran's own counter demands today earlier, you know, demanding. And we've been through this before, especially with Dan just before me, but demanding that, you know, the U.S. issue, U.S. and Israel issue a guarantee of no further attacks, that they issue war reparations, among other things.
4:15And then key, especially for our Bloomberg audiences, is that, you know, Iran is stipulating that they want to retain sovereign control over the Strait of Hormuz. So there's a lot at play here. We haven't really moved forward, it seems, in any way to end the conflict. And as we approach the fourth week, we're kind of nearing that time frame where the U.S. has said that they would like to be concluding and winding down this war. Hey, Michelle, you know, we've been talking in the newsroom before we went on air about this 20 point plan that President Trump and the White House has come up to end the war between Israel and Gaza, like going back to that, that really is yet to be delivered on.
4:54And so we're thinking about this 15-point plan, which we know Iran has already pushed back on. I mean, what is it that, is it just some kind of offeramp, just getting something out there to kind of save face perhaps for both sides? And they can say we agree to this, and yet nothing's really signed officially, and it just lets everybody to put down the weapons. Is that kind of what we're expecting? Well, one thing I think is key to remember here, Carol, is that the White House hasn't publicly issued this 15-point plan. It's something that we've reported on, that we heard through other sources, and they have since said, you know, like nothing is official until Trump says it is so, which, you know, Caroline Levitt herself often jokes about, you know, she could be overturned in five minutes by a true social post.
5:36So, you know, we could hear differently from the president himself on what is sort of on the negotiating table at this point. But I think what that proposal and the reports of it do show is just kind of the breadth of the issues at hand and what the U.S. is trying to put forward as the negotiating points with Iran.
6:07but also what they're trying to kind of work toward in a resolution to this conflict, which, as we've been saying, are two very starkly different sides to this conflict. Well, as Carol has mentioned, Caroline Levitt reiterated a four to six weeks timeline for the Iran operation. Also today, we learned details on the president meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. he's just out on social media saying that it was originally postponed due to our military operation in Iran. It's been rescheduled. It will take place in Beijing on May 14th and 15th, and that the First Lady and the President will also host President Xi and Madam Pang for a reciprocal visit in Washington, D.C.
6:50at a later date. Should we look at that May 14 to 15 date as maybe a bookend for this conflict? Well, that was precisely the question that our own Mario Parker put forward to Caroline in the briefing. And I think what we saw is Caroline herself and others in the administration continue to be at pains to kind of separate the two. They don't want the Iran war issue to be clouding the eventual Trump-Xi summit, even as they publicly acknowledge that this was the reason for the delayed trip that was supposed to take place at the end of this month. So I think, you know, that remains to be seen how it might, how the Iran's Iran wars conflict timeline might play into the eventual trip.
7:37And if it might be delayed further or if it will color it in some way or change location, that's still up for grabs. I mean, it's a long way till till May. But as for now, I think the White House is at least trying to keep those two issues separate. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
7:59They told us to expect change. They warned us about the transition. But honestly, they forgot the best part. This is the chapter where we finally focus on us. Life MD delivers expert menopause and midlife care right from your home. From hormone health to holistic wellness, Life MD helps you feel your best for the best years of your life. Life MD, it's just getting good. Visit lifemd.com slash goodlife. Support for the show comes from Public. Lately, it feels like there are two types of investing platforms. Some are traditional brokerages that haven't changed much in decades, and others feel less like investing and more like a game.
8:41Public is positioned differently. It's an investing platform for people who are serious about building their wealth. On Public, you can build a portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto without all the bugs or the confetti. Retirement accounts? Yep. High-yield cash? Yes, again. They even have direct indexing. Public has modern design, powerful tools, and customer support that actually helps. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Ad paid for by Public Holdings. Brokered services by Public Investing. member FINRA SIPC.
9:18Advisory services by public advisors, SEC registered advisor, crypto services by zero hash. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Here's a paradox. We buy insurance for peace of mind, yet the very policies we trust can deliver the biggest financial shocks. Across America, millions of claims are denied every year, not because people did anything wrong, but because policies quietly excluded the things that happened. The psychology of trust tells us we assume the contract is fair. But in insurance, the information gap is massive. The insurer knows every detail of what's covered.
9:53The policyholder rarely does. That's where my policy advocate comes in. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and shows you in plain language where you're vulnerable. They're not selling insurance. They don't do that. It's about transparency, giving ordinary people the same understanding insurance companies have had for decades because when you know what's really in your policy, you can plan, protect, and avoid surprises. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Visit MyPolicyAdvocate.com today. Peace of mind starts with knowing the truth.
10:29MyPolicyAdvocate.com. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Or watch us live on YouTube. Well, we like to remind everybody that Amazon, Home Depot, FedEx, UPS, also Giga Cloud Technology are just some of our next guest big customers. We're talking about the$125 billion market cap company. It is a warehouse logistical read. It is Prologis that is massive. And it owns, develops, and manages logistical warehouses for the biggest companies like we just mentioned.
11:05and they've got more than 1.3 billion square feet in 20 countries. So what a great person to get a view in terms of the macro of what's going on around the world, considering, Tim, our backdrop. Shares up about 3 % so far this year. We've got Dan Letter with us, CEO of Prologis. He joins us here in the studio. Dan, good to see you again. You just took over as CEO, though we've spoken just a few months before that. I want to start with what Carol mentioned in the macro, because we are just squarely focused on an increase in oil prices as a result of the war in Iran, what that means for consumers, what it means for business leaders.
11:39How are you looking at the macro environment? Yeah, well, first, thanks for having me. Great to be here with you, too. I look at the macro environment right now, and I think about all the chaos and turbulence our customers have been through going back to COVID. Six years ago, the world was shut down, right? Over the course of these six years, think of all the geopolitical events, post-COVID, the rate hikes and how that impacted our customers. And I actually look at these customers and I realize they've built a lot of endurance. They actually, this turbulence is more of a feature of the environment that we're living in today.
12:21And I look back to a conference where we were talking to investors a couple weeks ago, actually right after the weekend of the original Iran bombing. And we were telling our customers, 2026 started really strong. 2025 was our second largest leasing year ever. And we were seeing that go into 2026. Does that continue? There's a lot that's happened. It's just, I think, kind of shocking. And we talk about this so much. No one expected some of the things that have come at us, Dan, in 2026. So since that, that was just a few weeks ago or a month ago or so, that update, and that you were talking with, like, is that optimism still there?
12:59And is your outlook on 2026 still the same? So what we see at this time is customers don't necessarily pull back. I look back to last year at this time. We had expressed a little caution that led into what was Liberation Day, right? And you see customers just look around and see what's going on and then lean in. they make long-term decisions, five, seven, ten-year decisions when they're working with us. And so they're really kind of seeing through that noise. And when you look at these decisions they're making, it's really only three to five percent of the overall cost of the supply chain. So no people who were maybe going to sign a contract that backed out or anything like that?
13:36Well, we hadn't seen that. And it's really just a matter of they digest it. And then they, it comes in different forms. Maybe you end up seeing some short-term leasing or, But certainly no pullback. What about when it comes specifically to data centers? Because last time we talked with you about the data center activity you're seeing. And in that time, a lot has happened. We've heard from different companies. Microsoft is renting a Texas data center that was dropped by Oracle and OpenAI. Are you seeing any signs of weakness or slowdown or changing trends when it comes to the data center business?
14:07So our data center business was really born from our higher and better use business. When you have 6 ,000 buildings, 14 ,000 acres of land, close to 78 % of the world GDP, that is where the next wave of the economy is. That's where data centers need to be. And we have deep relationships with these hyperscalers. We have a fortress of a balance sheet. And every megawatt we can deliver over the next three years is in some sort of lease discussion right now. And we have 5.7 gigawatts of power that we control or are in its advanced stages. Meaning you're at full capacity in terms of negotiations right now.
14:39We're at full capacity. So nobody else could come to you right now and say we're interested in the next few years and you have an option for them. No, that's not not the case. Just the next three years of power that we can deliver. Right. These hyperscalers, these major data center users are heavily focused on near term power and we're focused on delivering power much longer beyond that. And so we're certainly in discussions beyond that for the next three years. And that's where this 5.7 gigawatts of power will come in. So that's the power you've secured. Right. So we've secured 1.8 gigawatts.
15:11And then we have 3.9 gigawatts that we call in the advanced stages, which means it's a year or two behind. But again, think of the universe of opportunities we have behind that 5.7. You have the opportunity. Which is just the size of our platform. All right. So then I'm going to say, are you looking to secure even more power? Absolutely. Yeah. We are working. And remember, we're a global company. As you said, we're in 20 countries. And so we're working around the tier one, tier two markets in the United States. We work around the flap D markets in Europe. And we're starting to see it actually in Latin America and Japan as well.
15:45So has anything changed because of the war? Or is really everybody kind of looking through this? Because we talk about an energy environment. You know, we've talked a lot about LNG specifically because Qatar has lost about 30 % of their capacity. And that's going to take three to five years to build. There's going to be a floor where energy prices are higher. And so I'm just curious, has any of that impacted you guys in terms of how you think about outlook, build, spend, costs? Well, as it relates to logistics real estate, again, it's 3 % to 5 % of the overall costs. And our customers need to make these decisions long term, and they want to be close to those population centers.
16:21So can't necessarily sit back and wait. Can I just throw one thing out there? This could be a little wacky, but it's Elon. And so that's kind of wacky. But we've talked this week, right, about data centers in space. Is that something you are thinking about and how that might impact you guys? Because you obviously are doing this on Mother Earth. And I'm just wondering, is that just something that... We're going to stick to these 20 countries that we're focused on. No Mars, Pluto, Earth. I think there's plenty of opportunity for us for the foreseeable future, but maybe ask me in 10 years. Okay. Yeah, but to Carol's point, with that getting so much discussion right now, why are you just focused on terrestrial?
17:02I mean, I know it would have sounded crazy a year ago to be talking about this, but this is something that a lot of people think is the future of these data centers. Well, we do this business 100 % on a build-to-suit basis. So we have leases in place before we put a shovel in the ground, and we have so much opportunity in front of us, we don't need to be thinking about another vector to grow this data center business. Yeah, that's pretty fascinating. What would change your mind, though, in terms, would it have to be an economic slowdown, which some have talked about, depending on when this war ends, or even if we start, if we see inflationary pressures continue and whether there's demand destruction that slows down essentially the global economy, a lot has to fall into place, as you know.
17:42Is that what would maybe change your outlook? Or again, because everything's locked in place, if the economy slows down, what kind of impact might that have on you guys? Or does it matter, because you've already kind of signed things and are moving ahead, because it's longer term? When I think about our core business, the building blocks for our core business is 70 % of the U.S. GDP is consumption. Our buildings are close to the major population centers in the United States. So on top of that, there's the e-commerce secular demand driver. We've been talking about e-commerce for a long time. Pre-COVID, e-commerce penetration as a percentage retail sales was in the 17-ish percent rate.
18:23Now it's like mid-20s. We see that growing another 75 to 100 basis points a year through the end of the decade. That alone is additional demand on top of that. So there's a big tailwind for our growth. But if there was an economic slowdown, that could be a problem. Or would that not even impact? That's what I'm trying to think. One thing I forgot to mention is e-commerce, for every dollar retail sales, it needs 3x the warehouse space. because think of all the activities that happen in the brick and mortar and the returns happen there. There's the stock in the back. And then with e-commerce, there's been that proliferation of SKUs.
19:00And all of us, we're looking for speed and we're looking for choice, right? And so that's been a big driver. And you may see flat retail sales, but you'll see e-commerce penetration. That e-commerce penetration is great news for logistics real estate. On that, I'm interested in the joint venture that you guys announced last week. $1.6 billion JV with GIC to build to suit warehouse development. Why partner with GIC? Why not do this solo? Well, we've long been developing on our balance sheet, but now look at our development business. We can build$43 billion more of logistics space in our land bank alone, not buying any more land.
19:37On top of that, we have this data center business. Wait, say that one more time. That's tremendous. We have$230 billion worth of AUM today at the end of last quarter. We can build another 43 billion of logistics buildings on our 14 ,000 acres of land. That's 240 million square feet. We can grow the company 18 % without buying another piece of land. Then we have this data center business. Think about it from a megawatt perspective. If you build a powered shell that's on the continuum, powered shell over here, that's about$2.5 to$3 million a megawatt. You go out this side of the continuum, and that's a turnkey.
20:13That's everything soup to nuts built out. that's 15 million a megawatt. So think about how big that data center development could be. So we're looking at diversifying our capital stack there and our partners, great to have a new partner with GIC here. They want a piece of this development business. And we're doing that to help build bigger relationships globally. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Or watch us live on YouTube. For more on OpenAI and what they are up to ahead of a potential IPO, let's head to Bloomberg News at San Francisco Bureau and to Bloomberg AI reporter Rachel Metz.
20:58Rachel, when Sora first came out, I mean, even before it came out, when we just saw the capabilities of it, when nobody could use it except for OpenAI employees, we were all like, this is crazy that this type of video that looks so real can be generated by AI When we tried it, people thought it was, I think, really, really novel. What ended up happening? Why did it not stick? I mean, I think that an overarching theme here is OpenAI is trying to simplify what has become a pretty vast portfolio of different kinds of AI products. And I mean, the fact of the matter is that generating video is extremely computationally intensive.
21:38And if there is one thing that OpenAI has not quite enough of, it's compute. I mean, the company is very, very, very hungry for more compute. So this is an easy thing, I think, to say, hey, you know what, like, this is interesting, and it looks cool, but it is not our core product. And if we need compute, let's put it toward other things. so that in my mind that may be part of it as the company and the company is trying to sort of like unify slim down some of its product line a little bit which has gone in a lot of different directions the codex for coding is really important to them chat gpt is really important to them and i think trying to figure out how people are going to pay and pay over time for these products and keep using them.
22:29Are they just trying to be like Anthropic? I don't know if they're trying to be like Anthropic, but I think they have realized that coding, using AI as a coding assistant is a really good application for them, and it's something that people may be willing to pay for over time. And also, it seems like a number of these companies are realizing that once they make their models good at completing coding tasks, they're also able to expand that out into some other things, such as different kinds of office work. I mean, ultimately, these companies have to make money, right? And what they're doing is very expensive to build and to run.
23:07So they have to figure out ways that they can up the revenue. Yeah, that's what that's about, right? Right. We're how old now into kind of this process, Rachel, what, three years and counting. And right now you got to think about, okay, a lot of money's come in, a lot of investors excited, a lot of hype, a lot of activity and actions. And then you got to think about return on investment. What's the long-term viable business model, right, as the landscape continues to evolve and get more competitive? Absolutely. And I'm not sure that anybody has really cracked the code for that with AI imagery, whether it's still images or videos.
23:42I mean, AI video is still very early days and it's there's no getting around the fact that it takes a lot of computing power to build and to run these kinds of models. So and you need people then to pay for that. And right now the companies are heavily subsidizing that stuff. And there's just you know, you can only do that for so long and you need to find like a market fit at some point. And you'll notice people have not been talking about it that much. You haven't seen anything really splashy that obviously uses Sora or other competing companies' products either. It's just a very tricky market.
24:20But it's still really early days for that type of technology. And it does seem really promising, especially when it comes to, and we're going to talk with Chris Palmieri in a few minutes about the Disney side of things. But I mean, that was a potential billion dollar investment in open AI and to license the license IP from from Disney to open AI to then create, you know, these characters for AI shorts. Does that do is I guess my question is, are consumers not interested in this? Do we know a difference at this point between what is AI generated and what isn't? Does that matter for consumer tastes?
25:00I mean, I'm not sure if it's really at this point in like the cycle of this technology, if it matters that much how the consumers feel about it. I mean, it does. Obviously, it does matter. And we are consumers. And I think people do care about knowing whether something is a generated or not. I mean, ultimately, they probably care how it looks and how how how it feels to watch something that's that's either AI generated or animated. But really, I think there's a lot of mixed feelings at the studio level about whether or not they want to use this kind of software, how they want to use this kind of software.
Read the full transcript
25:35If it's just one more tool in the toolbox that they have to produce like an animated movie or an action movie, or if it's going to be taking over large swaths of their production pipeline, in which case some people might have really big issues with that. And we know that in Hollywood in general, this is a very contentious issue, the idea of using AI either to augment or instead of people's work for certain things. So, you know, there's a couple of stories. I just want to roll into this. I mean, we did a story about OpenAI set to raise$10 billion from MGX, Code 2, and Thrive. So we're talking about a major funding round.
26:15We also still have Microsoft. Is it a 27 % stake in open AI? And I wonder too, Rachel, are investors, people investing Microsoft saying, all right, guys, it's time to grow up a little bit and like figure this out. Is that part of this or we don't know exactly? I think at this point, we don't really know what's behind it. But this idea that you would spread your technology out into a bunch of different directions and then like rein it in somewhat, that seems to make sense to me as part of the process. as you move toward an IPO. Did we talk about Spud? Can we talk about Spud? What is this new AI model?
26:54What do we need to know about this? I mean, this is a forthcoming model that we have heard about, but it's still TBD. What exactly is going to be coming out about that one? Is it a model for, like, that ChatGPT uses? What is the iteration of it? I am not sure, to be honest. So, okay. Okay. To be determined when it comes to Spud. I like the name. I don't know. Just to wrap up here, Rachel, I mean, you cover this stuff. This seems logical. Like, you know, it's so funny. I feel like we're still so much in the exploratory process. But it does feel like the conversation has shifted more to agentic AI and some different things.
27:39I know at Bloomberg Invest, I had conversations about the importance of vertical AI data and how that's going to be important. It's still an evolution, right? Or is there anything that you think is a stronger narrative and just got about 30, 40 seconds? Yeah, I mean, I think for all of this stuff, it's still very early days, still early stages. There are so many questions about how much information you should give over to any of these models or any sort of agentic AI that's going to carry out any actions on your behalf. I think there's still a lot of questions there. It's also not clear to me how people are actually using this stuff and then finding it really useful.
28:19So there's a lot of things that we still need to figure out. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Businessweek Daily coming up after this.
28:31Support for the show comes from Public. Lately, it feels like there are two types of investing platforms. Some are traditional brokerages that haven't changed much in decades, and others feel less like investing and more like a game. Public is positioned differently. It's an investing platform for people who are serious about building their wealth. On Public, you can build a portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto, without all the bugs or the confetti. Retirement accounts? Yep. High-yield cash? Yes, again. They even have direct indexing. Public has modern design, powerful tools, and customer support that actually helps.
29:06Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market.
29:27complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. We buy insurance for peace of mind, but every year millions of claims are denied. Not because people did anything wrong, but because their policies quietly excluded what happened. Insurers know every detail. Policyholders rarely do. That's why My Policy Advocate exists. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and explains where you are vulnerable. They don't sell insurance, they deliver transparency. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Go to MyPolicyAdvocate.com.
30:00Deadlines move, plans change, and sometimes opportunities pop up out of nowhere. When you need branded gear fast, 4imprint is ready to deliver. 4imprint offers hundreds of promotional products in their 24-hour category. Everything from custom apparel, bags, and drinkware to writing tools, trade show staples, and high-tech gear. At 4imprint, they're focused on getting the details right, printing your logo with precision, packing your order with care, and shipping it out fast. And it's backed by their 360-degree guarantee. That's 4imprint's promise your order will show up right on time, just the way you planned it.
30:37That's what it means to be 4imprint certain. So, if you're prepping for a last-minute event or jumping on a big opportunity, you don't have to settle or scramble. With 4imprint, fast, reliable service and peace of mind are built right in. Check out their full 24-hour selection at 4imprint.com. 4imprint, for certain. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Or watch us live on YouTube. Meta and Alphabet's Google found liable for a 20-year-old woman who alleged that her addiction to the company's social media platforms caused her to suffer a mental health crisis.
31:22This is according to a jury. It was out on the West Coast. It's the beginning of a lot of litigation against these companies and about their responsibility. But we want to dig into kind of legally, what does this mean for the two companies? Because it's not like the share prices have fallen apart. Yeah, that's certainly notable. And that's why we have June Grosso with us. She's the host of Bloomberg Law on Bloomberg Radio. She joins us here in the Bloomberg Business this week studio, a significant ruling. I'm pretty surprised by the investor reaction, which is meh, but perhaps there's some overhang that's gone.
31:51Well, it's significant. And perhaps the reaction isn't so bad right now because this is only the compensatory damages. So there were$3 million for compensatory damages. That's for pain and suffering to reimburse a person for what they went through. But the jury decided that there could be punitive damages. So there's going to be another proceeding to determine punitive damages. And that's where the big money comes in in a lot of these cases where they want to punish the company. So things might change if there's a big punitive damages award. When we talk punitive, like how much are we talking?
32:29And then my understanding, I was listening to you, I think on with the team over at Balance of Power, that this is the first of many cases to come to trial against these companies. Right. There's another case. I believe trial is scheduled for July in Los Angeles, but there are thousands, I think three thousands of these cases. There's also a case by state attorneys general against these companies. So what's really important is they call this a bellwether trial. So it's the first one to go to trial. So that does make this verdict very important because down the road, that might mean that Meta might be more pliable as far as settlements.
33:06But also, you know, I think that it's hard to read into just the one verdict, like people comparing it to the tobacco cases. Well, the tobacco cases, it took a while before a pattern was established. So here, I think you have to go through more than one trial, a couple of trials before you see which way the juries are coming back. Also, you know, I was surprised by the verdict because there was a lot of evidence that this young woman had a lot of other mental health struggles, that she had problems at home. She had a learning disability. She had bullying problems, I believe, in school. So there was evidence that there were other sort of, you know, influences on her, not just meta.
33:49And so another thing that strikes me as a parent is that, you know, she was on the social media platforms like 16 hours a day or whatever. And, you know, where are her parents at that point? You know, I don't think, you know, I don't know what would happen if my daughter be on, you know, all those different hours. You raise a lot of good points, June, and I'm wondering from a compensation standpoint, is there a chance, you know, not just from the perspective of, okay, punitive versus compensatory. Compensatory. Compensatory. Thank you. But does it create some sort of precedent, you know, that moving forward, this is how, and not necessarily a legal precedent, but this is how people are thinking about this technology.
34:33Well, I mean, yeah, this is how people are thinking about this technology. And perhaps when they choose the next jury, they'll try to eliminate people who are thinking this way about this technology. But it is a trend. I mean, there are states that are passing laws. As I said, the social— Countries that are ahead of this compared to the United States. Right. In terms of pushing back. I don't know about pushing the blame on one company. But, you know, the problem was that in this trial, there were a lot of internal documents that were showed to the jury that, you know, revealed a sort of ignorance on Metta's part or on the executives at Metta about what this was doing or, you know, we don't care about it.
35:16So I think that those internal documents probably played a big part in the way the jury came back. But remember, they were out for nine days, 40 hours. So they didn't come to this conclusion right away. It wasn't like, oh, wait, here, we saw what happened, we heard it, and we're ready to rain down on Meta and Google. Just real cookie. I'm a little hungry, perhaps. June, just real quickly, 30 seconds here. Can these two companies appeal or is there any pushback? They'll wait until they get the punitive damages verdict in. And then, yes, they're already saying they're going to appeal. There's no doubt that there'll be appeals in this case.
35:57This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5 p.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app. tune in and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.
36:28Here's a paradox. We buy insurance for peace of mind, yet the very policies we trust can deliver the biggest financial shocks. Across America, millions of claims are denied every year, not because people did anything wrong, but because policies quietly excluded the things that happened. The psychology of trust tells us we assume the contract is fair, but in insurance, the information gap is massive. The insurer knows every detail of what's covered. The policyholder rarely does. That's where My Policy Advocate comes in. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and shows you in plain language where you're vulnerable.
37:04They're not selling insurance. They don't do that. It's about transparency. giving ordinary people the same understanding insurance companies have had for decades. Because when you know what's really in your policy, you can plan, protect, and avoid surprises. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Visit MyPolicyAdvocate.com today. Peace of mind starts with knowing the truth. MyPolicyAdvocate.com
37:34With Bali from iShares, you get access to both monthly income and growth potential in one simple ETF. It's the best of both worlds. Discover Bali, iShares large cap premium income active ETF. iShares, the market is yours. Visit www.iShares.com to view perspectives for investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses, and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing. Risks include principal loss in the use of derivatives, which could increase risks and volatility. Monthly income is not guaranteed. prepared by BlackRock Investments, LLC. Deadlines shift, plans change, and sometimes you just need promo products fast.
38:05Turn to 4imprint. 4imprint has hundreds of promotional items available with 24-hour turnaround. From custom apparel and drinkware to trade show gear, writing tools, and more. And their 360-degree guarantee promises your logo will be printed with care. Your order ships fast, and it'll show up right and on time. That's the certainty of 4imprint. Check out the full 24-hour selection at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. For certain.
From the publisher
The people, companies and trends shaping the global economy.
Watch Carol and Tim LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF.
The White House insisted that peace talks with Iran are ongoing, even as Tehran publicly rejected US overtures and issued fresh conditions of its own to end the conflict that’s wreaked havoc across the Middle East and global markets.
“The United States has been engaged over the last three days in productive conversations,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Wednesday. “You’re beginning to see the regime look for an exit ramp.”
“If Iran fails to accept the reality of the current moment,” Leavitt added, “Trump will ensure they are hit harder than they have ever been hit before. President Trump does not bluff and he is prepared to unleash hell.”
Her comments ran counter to Iran’s earlier statements through state-run media publicly rejecting Trump’s push for talks. Tehran is also seeking its own guarantees, including that the US and Israel won’t resume their attacks, reparations for war damages and recognition of its authority over the Strait of Hormuz, state-owned Press TV said.
Trump on Monday set a five-day deadline for Iran to negotiate a deal to end the war. Halfway through that period, there are lingering questions over the status of negotiations and the likelihood for a deal.
The US has compiled a 15-point peace proposal that Pakistan delivered to the Islamic Republic, according to people familiar with the matter, highlighting the urgency within Trump’s administration to resolve a conflict it started alongside Israel almost a month ago. Leavitt on Wednesday said there were “elements of truth” to the reported US proposal, but cautioned against speculating on anonymously provided plans.
Vice President JD Vance may travel to Pakistan for Iran talks this weekend, CNN reported. Asked for comment on that report, Leavitt said “this is a fluid situation, and speculation about meetings should not be deemed as final until they are formally announced by the White House.”
Today's show features:
- Michelle Jamrisko, Bloomberg News White House and National Security Editor
- Dan Letter, CEO of Prologis
- Rachel Metz, Bloomberg News AI Reporter on OpenAI Discontinues Support for Sora, Winds Down Disney Deal
- June Grasso, Bloomberg Law host, on Meta, Google Found Liable in Social Media Addiction Case
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
