Challenge the category, not the consumer- Fred Hart's branding principles

15 Oct 2025 · 41 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: Building the Brands of Tomorrow - Episode with Fred Hart

Episode Title

Challenge the Category, Not the Consumer - Fred Hart's Branding Principles

Host

Ruth Fittock

Guest

Fred Hart, Brand Strategist

---

Episode Overview In this episode, Ruth Fittock interviews Fred Hart, a branding expert based in Colorado. They explore the intricacies of brand building in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector and discuss the principles that guide effective branding. Fred shares his insights on design, consumer behavior, and the dynamics of influencer-led brands.

---

Key Themes & Discussions

  1. The Essence of Branding
  2. Recognition Over Reading: Fred emphasizes that branding is about recognition rather than reading, asserting the power of distinctive visual identity.
  3. Design as Strategy: Branding should be strategic, not merely decorative.
  1. Challenges in Challenger Branding
  2. Common Missteps: Fred discusses common design errors that can hinder brand growth and the importance of understanding consumer perceptions.
  3. When to Refresh: He outlines indicators that suggest a brand needs a refresh, such as persistent negative feedback or shifts in target audience.
  1. Consumer Trends and the Future
  2. Emerging Trends: Fred shares insights on trends anticipated for 2025, focusing on protein incorporation in various products and the rise of influencer-led brands.
  3. Influencer vs. Celebrity Brands: He distinguishes between influencer-led brands, which often have more authentic connections with their audiences, and celebrity brands, which can lack authenticity.
  1. Fred's Five Branding Principles
  2. 1. People Don’t Read, They Recognize: Brands should focus on creating recognizable symbols that convey their identity without needing words.
  3. 2. The Opposite of Bravery Isn’t Cowardice, It’s Conformity: Brands must avoid mimicking category leaders and instead find their unique voice.
  4. 3. Challenge the Category, Not the Consumer: Brands should disrupt traditional category norms rather than altering consumer behavior.
  5. 4. Research Informs, Strategy Decides: While data is essential, it shouldn’t dictate every decision; the creative vision must be preserved.
  6. 5. Test to Learn, Not to Win: Testing should be used as a learning tool, not simply for validation; it helps guide creative decisions.
  1. The Role of AI in Branding
  2. Fred cautions that while AI can assist in branding, human discernment remains crucial. Individuals must critically evaluate AI-generated insights.
  1. Navigating Subjectivity in Design
  2. The podcast discusses how subjectivity can complicate design processes, emphasizing the need for consumer feedback to guide decisions rather than personal preferences.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Brand Distinctiveness: Successful brands create easily recognizable elements that consumers recall.
  • Consumer-Centric Innovation: Brands that listen to their target audience and adapt accordingly foster loyalty and growth.
  • Caution with Trends: Brands should prioritize genuine innovation over simply following trends to avoid becoming generic.
  • Long-Term Thinking: Brands must consider future expansion and audience shifts when designing their identity and offerings.

---

Conclusion Fred Hart's insights provide valuable guidance for entrepreneurs and marketers looking to build enduring brands. By focusing on consumer recognition, embracing uniqueness, and leveraging research appropriately, brands can navigate the complexities of the FMCG landscape successfully.

Listen to the full episode for more insights.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:16Hello and welcome to the Tomorrow Brands Podcast, where we explore what it takes to build a brand of tomorrow. I'm your host, Ruth Vitock, and today's guest is Fred Hart, brand strategist and CPG obsessive. In this episode, we dig into what makes a good brand refresh, how founders can avoid costly design mistakes, why influencers are rewriting the brand building playbook, and Fred's five principles of better branding. Let's get into it. We're very excited to have you. I think you've actually already been on the podcast. You got mentioned in an episode. It's a great track record, and nothing makes my mom happier than hearing that.

0:50So before we get into it, I'd love to hear a bit more about your background and how you got to where you are now. Yeah, I started as a designer and cut my teeth in the Bay Area, working for some great firms there, a small boutique and then a slightly larger one. And 10 years ago, moved to Boulder, Colorado, where I currently live, and started a branding and design agency with a former business partner called Interact. That nine-year period we were together, we went from three people to 30 offices in multiple locations. It was a great ride. A year and a half ago, I exited the business and have just been independently consulting since.

1:26And while I started my career as a designer, I don't do any designing today. I really focus on the strategy of design and really working to understand the future of CPG. I attend probably 12 trade shows a year, some international. I am obsessive about going to stores and just understanding like where's culture going, where consumers going, what's innovation looking like, what is happening from a design and packaging perspective and just nerding out on all things CPG. Yeah, and you share some great updates from all of these shows. And I know you've been to some quite weird and wonderful ones, right?

2:01I've just went to a pet food show. I've been to private label manufacturer show. I've been to supplement supplier shows. I'm about to go to Toronto in two days, actually, to my first natural product show in Canada. And we'll be speaking at that conference, which I'm pretty excited about. You've mentioned you've had a long history of design. What was the first project that made you fall in love with branding? It was before I even knew what branding was. I fell in love with design because of basketball. I still play a lot of basketball personally. And it was always the shoes that my favorite players were wearing that I learned to love.

2:34And you dive into the world of Jordan and Tinker Hatfield and the massive brand that has been built around athletes and performance and style and all this stuff. And that, I think, was my first entry point into this world. But I fell in love with, I think, CPG when I was a junior in college. I had an internship at a small design firm in the Bay Area called McLean Design. And their claim to fame was they created Monster Energy Drink, the billion-dollar energy drink brand that disrupted what Red Bull had created and Rockstar. And it was then that I learned the power of brands, particularly outside of the home, things you carry around with you, and how they act as status symbols and forms of identity.

3:18And I also loved that packaging was like what I saw as the only form of competitive design. You can design a book or a website or a billboard, beautiful corporate identities. But in packaging, everything is fighting for the same occasion, share of stomach, share of wallet. And I love the chess match that ensued. And that's where I think I found my love of design. So let's talk about trends. Obviously, as you just said, you go to a lot of shows. So what are your headlines for trends in 2025? Or maybe we should look ahead to 2026 because we're almost done with 2025 now. Yeah, it really depends on the industry.

3:56I've been to candy trade shows and the trends there are completely different than with the natural product trends versus, of course, pet food. And then I was lucky right after Expo West earlier this year to go to London for the International Food Expo and to see the two very similar sort of markets be vastly different in terms of what was trending in products is fascinating. It's hard to say here are the top line trends, but I think that protein is undeniable. It's being pushed into everything from pasta sauce to sprinkles to ice cream pints to soda. It's getting wild out there. And it begs the question of when will the protein bubble burst?

4:37But also, who's actually building around protein with consumers in mind? Just because you can put it into something doesn't mean you should. And I thought the Kardashian brand, Khloe Kardashian's brand, Cloud, that came out earlier this year, that I think was designed by Turner Duckworth, was a pretty fascinating and interesting one bringing popcorn and protein together in a unique way that actually felt appropriate. I think the rise of influencer-led brands is undeniable, and it is disrupting Big Food in a lot of ways because they figured out how to build massive audiences first and then leverage that.

5:11But I had the luxury of working with Jimmy, a.k.a. Mr. Beast, on his Feastables chocolate brand several years ago. You get a front row view of just the kind of demand that they can create. And you're seeing it everywhere pop up now. Unwell and Nestle with what Alex Cooper is doing. Name a big name celebrity. And they have some sort of products at this point. I did see that J-Lo had brought out a range of RTD cocktails, but she's the famous teetotaler. Yeah, she doesn't drink. Things like that just feel so forced. And I think the large problem with celebrity-backed brands versus influencer brands, there's some nuances.

5:51Celebrities don't need these products to sell. They've already made their money. And so there's just a lack of authenticity oftentimes or misalignment. And for every one celebrity brand that's successful, I'd say there's probably 10 that failed that no one mentions. It's like all the PR comes out when they launch it and then it's all quiet when it goes away. But influencers, they focus on building audiences first. And I think they have a little bit more longevity. But how long do they have is the big question. I feel like for a lot of the influencers, they're so tuned into their communities in a way that celebrities perhaps aren't.

6:24And they're getting those sort of, we just actually had a call with a creator who's created a range of sources. And you get to spend a lot of time testing and learning with the audience, getting feedback, doing little drops and listening and creating feedback loops. and because that's how they're used to working with creating content anyway. They're applying it to product development and they're directly speaking to their consumers, which anyone who works in CPG would say to do. That's as a celebrity. I don't know why I haven't thought of this sooner. They're like the genius founders. Yeah, imagine that, a feedback loop.

6:58Wow. Yeah, that's what makes so many entrepreneurs so special is they find a white space or a problem that they have that hasn't been addressed. And that's also why the large strategics, the Nestles, the Canagoras, the Mondelezas of the world end up acquiring brands because they've lost that ability to stay rooted to real world problems and such. And so it'll be interesting to see how can influencers over time continue to scale and do they hold on to that because of their unique platforms? Or at some point, do people sour on influencers the way they have with celebrities or sometimes athletes too?

7:33yeah prime has been talked about to death here but it was an amazing example of creating a bubble and then the bubble popping and not necessarily related to it being a creator-led brand necessarily or just that hype like what like the hype everybody wants but can easily become your undoing because it's too faddy yeah i mean how long can you keep a hype train going can it always grow that's a big challenge. Interesting. And how can we go a podcast without mentioning liquid death? I had this realization talking with some friends the other day that the genius of liquid death is they're basically an influencer brand, but the brand is the influencer, not an individual.

8:14It's massively more scalable as a result, right? They have the characters and then they have the funny ads. And it's just like really smart that they've managed to figure out that influencer playbook without having the influencer involved. That is smart. We also had Nick, one of the founders of Midday Squares on the pod a while ago, and he talked about making, celebritizing themselves as founders rather than using celebrity. That is absolutely true. If you hop on LinkedIn today, everyone is building out in the open. And they are trying to build audiences at the same time they build their brands and have the two sort of connect one another.

8:51Because if your retailers and brokers and all of the people that are gatekeepers within the industry are online watching you do this, then there's already greater familiarity and they feel like, oh, you've already done something. It's quite smart. sometimes it can be a little noisy on the platform as a result sometimes it's more beating their chest than it is providing insight or knowledge but look there's an audience for everything i think it works when people are genuinely authentic we have a few founders in the uk who do it really well as well but they share the highs and the lows but like genuine lows not the sort of like humble braggy lows or the kind of glossy lows and i think that's what people will then feel emotionally invested in it doesn't work if you just yes yeah yeah yeah posture posture and don't show the roller coaster that is the entrepreneurial lifestyle let's talk about refreshers interested to get you the other thing that we talk about is good founders seem to know the difference of when to stick and when to twist and like when to pivot and when not to pivot and sometimes these things are only clear in hindsight as we know anyway and it's all very easy to say down the line when do you think is a good time to brand refresh and when is absolutely not i think a good time for brand refresh is you're getting a lot of feedback from either your customers or your retailers that there are issues with the perceptions of the brand or that there's a lot of questions that consistently swirl around it other times though because it's all about where are you at in your brand's life cycle.

10:27Sometimes it might be you're going to launch a new product line of innovation and you didn't set up the original brand identity or packaging to encapsulate something beyond. Oftentimes, I think entrepreneurs make the most straightforward decisions possible in the early days, not thinking super big and they can put themselves in a little box. I find this happens a lot with brand naming, actually. They put the product name in the brand name and what happens if they want to move away from an ingredient that's in their brand name or I actually just posted a little case study today on a company called Hodo that we'd worked with that just got some big investing from a large Asian snacking brand called Calbee and Hodo is a tofu company they used to be called Hodo Soy and when we worked with them to do a significant brand refresh for them we said you need to drop soy from the name it doesn't do anything what if you want to use ingredients other than soy at some part Hodo is the narrative so drop that and then You know, the other parts were like, they had won in kind of the natural channel, but they were looking to win over more.

11:27So there was an audience shift and they wanted to win over more mass consumers or start to play in convention a little bit more. So I think anytime there's a lot of questions that swirl around the brand that are misconceived perceptions, anytime there's a shift in audience or who you're going after, maybe you've won the first stepping stone and now you need to get the second. Sometimes maybe it's moving out of natural and into conventional or moving from convenience into grocery. So there's a whole lot of things. I try to ask as many questions early because I think, Ruth, you're leading me a little bit with like, how do you know when to tell them no?

11:58And I think telling people no is a very powerful thing that earns you a lot of trust if you earnestly believe it. And it's in the best interest of their brand not to do anything. Larger companies, they get a new CMO and they want to put their thumbprint on it and they want to change things. And that can be really dangerous too. Yeah. It's the brands I've worked on. We've done some pretty big refreshes and they've always been so nerve-wracking because the one I see doing a dozen on LinkedIn, and I've never been behind anything like this, but the Tropicana rebrand just gets real bad. Cracker buying?

12:34Yeah, saw that one too. And I feel for the people behind that because it's so public as well, isn't it? Yes. yeah and it it it creates incites fear for those that do need to make change which is tough i'm a big believer in testing to learn and using research early on in the creative phase i think where the issue comes in a lot of times is especially with these larger companies they do validation testing at the end maybe you've got one concept and it doesn't hit all the metrics and now you're frankensteining things at the last minute because you have print deadlines and all this stuff and things just like you lose the perspective of what you're trying to do in the first place, or you simply never tested early concepts just to see what you could learn from consumers and bring them into the creative process.

13:20I'm also a big believer that people don't read, they recognize. And if you're going to evolve a brand that has product market fit and has scale to it, you need to inherently understand what consumers recognize about the brand and figure out how to maintain that. And sometimes you can move too far, as we've seen. Sometimes it's on the structural design side of things. Sometimes it's on the imagery and visual equities, or it's just politicized, which doesn't help either. I think it's such a good point about what consumers actually associate with your brand. Remember at Popchips, we did quite a dramatic change.

13:50It went from being like the dark to white and the swoosh. And it was being driven by the US and we had to roll it out in the UK anyway. And I remember we tested it with some consumers and lots of people didn't even notice it had changed because they just recognized the logo. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Completely different. it's quite humble once you understand what is the thing that they recognize then you know oh i can pull all these other levers and it's like a counter-balancing situation like the one you're just talking about we move from back to white as long as the logo is there it's a fixed asset yeah don't touch the logo red flags when you're speaking to brands when you know a project's in trouble when subjectivity is just leading everything we all bring ourselves to the table our past experiences.

14:39As designers, we have certain tastes and acumen. That is why I do getting early qualitative feedback from consumers early in the process to hold everyone accountable to what we're seeing and hearing. Other issues, there's always the budget part of food photography. I think sometimes first-time entrepreneurs who are investing in food photography are shocked by the price tag. But at the end of the day, taste is king. And the best way to communicate flavor and appetite appeal is through world-class photography. And there's a cost of velocities and adoption and trial if you hold back on that side of the equation.

15:15And then I think just maybe sometimes not thinking big largely or broadly enough about what the brand could be can sometimes be limiting. But what we do is brand therapy. You know that as much. We did it with a prominent jerky brand here in the United States called, now it's just called Archer. At the time when we worked with them, I think in 2019 to do a refresh, they were Country Archer Jerky. And we said, okay, first off, you make more than jerky. Let's take that out of the brand name and place in provisions, but provisions will be small. And then Country Archer, most people knew, like most people wanted more of a shorthand.

15:51So we're going to make Country super small and Archer big. And we'd sold them in that presentation in 2019 of like, hey, what if you just did Archer? They weren't ready for it, but it planted that seed. And then they just did that in their big refresh. and it's just awesome to see brands getting smart and thinking about the future and setting themselves up for success. Long-term thinking is what we'd like to see. What do you think the fastest way for a small brand to stand out is? We should pick a category really, shouldn't we? Because like you said, they're all so different. Why don't we choose soda because it's just such a tough category?

16:23Ooh, soda. Yeah, soda's exploding. And what soda means, the lines are being blurred now with the rise of olipop and poppy and all these other companies one of my mantras is challenge the category not the consumer it is easy to be different for different sake so i could take a soda brand today and i could say hey we're going to own one brand color across all flavors it's going to be bright magenta it's going to brand block you're going to see it's going to disrupt itself but it may alienate male drinkers or it might have navigability issues with flavors etc so i think ultimately you have to look at the semiotics and the design codes with the categories and spaces and ask yourself, what's taken for granted and what can we flip?

17:02I had seen actually a point to a brand that's been around for a long time, Jones Soda, if you know it at all. It's always a black and white label with a piece of black and white photography on it and then a big kind of colorful hit. I think if someone were to take the aesthetic vibe and ethos and bring it into Soda, it could be really different because everything today is now, every can's a different color and it's all this rainbow Skittles effect on the shelf. I think we're going to see the return of brand blocking within Soda. Xevia, interestingly enough, in the United States, has rolled out two limited edition flavors now.

17:36And they're vastly different in design than the core portfolio. And I think it's going to be the long-term strategy. And it's always green up at the top. They've cut the can in half architecturally, always green up top for the brand, and then flavor down at the bottom. And I think what it's going to do is help them accrue a visual billboard at shelf that'll help them get consideration because what isn't seen isn't sold in retail and you can't afford to get lost. So I think that's a big thing for entrepreneurial entrants into the space is to find a way to be different and disrupt. This is also making me think that for a while now, I think that this food water or vitamin water, let's call it the launch of, and this was years ago and you can't find it in market here anymore.

18:20I just think it was ahead of its time because A, it was a functional beverage, which has now come back in again but also it had that amazing rainbow but then with the massive black and white label yep i think it's time to bring it back yeah it's they just did a refresh here in the states they got rid of that half and half architecture it probably got way too complicated with the amount of skews that they had and now black is just full sugar white is zero calorie where i think in the beginning the core product was white on the top for full for full calories so for sugar they had so much success but they had some baggage and the category language started to change and then they got out of it yeah you're totally right vitamin water was ahead of its time there's a brand called soylent here in the u.s that was also highly functional and very differentiated visually i think the issue there is like it changed hands and then they tried to bring it to mass consumers and it just lost its vision unfortunately yeah if you were launching a challenger brand today and he had 100k in your pocket where would you spend the first 20?

19:26Bitcoin. If I had where would I spend it? I would spend it on the product. I tell clients all the time the fastest way to kill a brand is to have a great design and horrible product because you'll get trial and no repeat purchase and they have to make sure that what's inside of the can the box the bag gives itself the best chance to win with consumers tastes you can have horrible packaging and slowly grow as a brand because you have a great product because people will share it via word of mouth and you'll be skeptical and it creates hurdles because they won't have organic trial to it but there's trust if someone tells you to try this thing and it exceeds expectations the worst thing is undermining expectations great packaging you're like this was horrible i'm never spending my money on that again.

20:15I did experience quite a lot of that last time I was in the US actually. I feel like there's, I was in like a narrow one and I bought some like collagen protein and I was really excited about it. And I was like, this is disgusting. I had to keep it on shelf because it tastes so bad. It feels like the kind of barrier, taste barrier to entry is a little bit lower there than it is here. I don't know how brands get away with it. Yeah, fortunately, Erwin is not most people's reality. I love it for seeing what innovation looks like and things. But I think there's so many bleeding edge entrepreneurs that sometimes the story of what's not in the product or who's bringing it to market or what trendy no seed oil things they've got going on trump the product itself.

21:04And I think you also have people in Air One that are shopping more for lifestyle. And so there's a bit of posturing of, oh, yeah, I love this product. And you love it because maybe it's trendy and it's influencer lad and this and that. But I think try to go to the middle of America with something like that. It's your point. No, no one's buying it. Yeah, I did. I did also go to North Carolina recently and stopped at a gas station. And I was like, I can't find any of the brands that I see on LinkedIn in here. Yes. I love the flyover states. I went to the Iowa State Fair. It's like a big event here in the United States.

21:39It's all fried food on sticks. And it's just a healthy dose of reality of what the majority of the U.S. looks like and also what innovation looks like there. So I guess you did early on ask me about innovation. Innovation in the middle of the states is like pickle lemonade, pickle pizza, spam burgers, fried bacon on a stick. it's more about flavor and like a mix of novelty and comfort simultaneously that tends to win formats that people are familiar with and interesting flavors on top pickle flavors there was a lot i love pickles there was a lot of pickle going on i bought a bag it was like that was the snack it was just a giant pickle in a bag it's great i'm not sure it wouldn't work here speaking of which you've said before that you have a lot of love and respect for uk CPG in the design world here?

22:28Why is that? I think there's just such a cleverness and sophistication to branding and design that comes from the UK. And if you think about a lot of the agencies that are most admired in the States, it's Pearl Fisher, it's Turner Duckworth, it's JKR, it's Bulletproof. Where did all of their founders come from or where did their first shop start in the UK? I think that the US just provides much more scale for work. There's cultural differences so those things have to adapt but as a young designer growing up and being in san francisco some of my favorite agencies also had london offices and i would look at the work coming out of london offices and just be so impressed and also felt like so refreshing because there's a lot of use of like character both in the literal sense of characters but also just personality through design and command of typography and color palettes i've been fortunate to go to the ife show twice now every time i go it's just it encourages me to try to continue to learn as much as I can from the UK and try to practice that in the States.

23:26Obviously, we all love to hear that. As you guys should be the best at it. Reputation on the world stage is so strong in one area.

23:39You've mentioned a couple of them already, but you have five branding principles, which I love. I think they're on your LinkedIn header, aren't they? And I've seen you talk about them as well. Yeah. So I'm going to go through them. And for each, I'd love for you to build it out a little bit, give us a bit of definition, and then also a real world example of where you've seen it play out and it can be good or bad. So the first one, which you have already mentioned, is people don't read, they recognize. Yep, all the time. I'm just a big believer in this because people don't slow down and a picture is literally worth a thousand words.

24:12As human beings, we've evolved to look at symbols. It's why you can drive down a highway in the US and if you see a golden arch, you know exactly what it is. Or a sports commercial can end with just a swoosh and no name. Or I can walk around holding a green cup and you know that I went to Starbucks. That's the ultimate power of branding. Coca-Cola does it the best. If I tell the audience now I've got a small box in my hand that's teal with a little ribbon on it, most people know that's Tiffany. The fact that you can do that just based on the general description is remarkable and a testament to, I think, what we all ultimately want to build, which is distinctiveness and recall.

24:51And I think the food and beverage industry is rife with very conventional design that's mostly typographically led. Most entrepreneurs, it's just, okay, write out my logo and then big photography and then lots of claims. And it's all just like alphabet soup. and I try to tell people, what are we building that people are going to recognize, not have to read? Because if I have to say I'm cool, I'm not cool. But if you look at me and you think I'm cool, then that's the ultimate sort of litmus test for things like that. I think the other thing people don't understand about that is that you built those brands, have built those distinctive assets over many years and years of consistent, smart investment in the brand, in brand building, not just like performance marketing that has this like one-to-one row.

25:42That is not, that is not, you know, they've earned like - They've earned it, yeah. They've earned it. Commitment to assets and elements. But depending on the category you enter, you can create a lot of disruption. Bonds is a perfect example in the States. That orange box completely broke up all of the blue, white, red, and green Italian kind of colors of the category. Or I remember when Hippies launched at Expo West, which was done by JKR and I think the London office, that yellow bag was so just powerful that every time you saw it afterwards, you're like, oh yeah, the yellow bag, the yellow bag.

26:20And so it's just also, you create such great shorthand for the brands. And to your point, it only gets more powerful the more you invest in it. Hippies did a really good job. when they launched in the uk we all thought they were a californian brand and then when i think they launched yeah i thought they were a british brand and i'm still not entirely sure it was like california and give peace a chance aesthetic now they're and now they're not really here anymore and they're really big in the us that's that's another story okay so number two the opposite of bravery isn't cowardice it's conformity so this is something i tell a lot of entrepreneurs in part because their strength is the ability to take risk.

27:01It's why they're starting their businesses in the first place. But oftentimes, young entrepreneurs look at whoever the category leader is and wants to replicate that playbook. And what I have to remind them is you will turn yourself into a two-bit player, a fast follower, a commodity, a generic version of something if you try to do that. What you need to do is find your own voice, be your best self. And that's where I think it's reminding Clarence, like look it's not easy it's not comfortable for everyone but there's there is a formula to most epg brands and the ones that can figure out how to break it we already talked about liquid death we just talked about bonds and we talked about hippies they all had their own unique formula and that's what i try to get entrepreneurs to do and understand at the outset of their creative journey i guess it's learning which rules to follow which is yes they work and then which ones to break.

Read the full transcript

27:58And that's the tricky part. Maybe we should write a book. That is the tricky part. Yeah, we should write a book. And that's why we were hired, right? Because we helped navigate some of those pitfalls that a first time entrepreneur couldn't see themselves. You've mentioned this one as well, challenge the category, not the consumer. Yeah, it's a little bit tied to the previous principle that we just talked through. But this one is really about understanding the codes of a category and deciding which one are you going to purposely break? And how are you going to do it to make sure that it actually resonates with an intended audience, not alienates.

28:26Bonza is a great brand to talk about. I don't know if it's in the UK yet. The squeeze plastic bottle for olive oil. That was novel and now everyone is fast following. That was disruptive in terms of the physical shape and the glass bottles that people were used to. It also made the notion of olive oil in the kitchen for most people at home much more accessible. I always looked at it as, God, I don't even, of extra virgin or this or that or expeller press. I'm like, I don't know these things. And they took what was natural behavior in the back of restaurants and they just brought it forward to consumers.

28:59And that to me is a great example of saying, no, we're not going to go in glass. No, we're not going to go in the square bottle. No, we're not going to be stuffy and focus on the premium qualities. We're going to bring illustration and character to the category for the first time. The Gander in New York City did that work. I'm friends with those founders. they're great at figuring out how to disrupt and live to this notion of challenge the category not the consumer i heard though that grazer are now going into a glass bottle yeah and i just saw it at a store it's actually quite genius the reason why they're doing that is so that you can just fill your plastic bottles back up or attach a head to it it's so funny how like old becomes new and new becomes old and they've come full circle with that they also have cans of olive oil in aluminum for the sustainability element there's still sustainability to the glass component too but they're finding like different touch points and needs for the consumer can change that structural presentation but their hallmark will always be the plastic bottle i think it's a good sign is when you look at something like that and you're like but of course why has no one done this before and that's when you know you're in the right level of innovation that it's it's acceptable but it's different it's like pushing something when you're like this feels obvious now it exists but no one thought about it beforehand yep so number four research informs strategy decides this is when i talk with more sophisticated clients the bigger the business tends to get the more conservative they are with change ruth you and i were just talking about tropicana and like the hesitation and the intimidation around some of that stuff when you start to be able to afford research, what can sometimes happen is you just let the numbers lead you.

30:45And research can't tell you everything. It can tell you what certain parameters around what you tested for, but there's lots of decision-making moments. There's cool, you go to test your flagship product and it does well, but you've got this new pending innovation line. What about that? There's just a lot to consider. And so I think that some consumers also, if they come from the tech space, love to A, B test and get to the right solution that way. But you lose perspective of what you're trying to do in the first place. And that's where I come back to. What was the strategy of what we were trying to accomplish and what are we doing here?

31:21What is the data telling us, but also read between the lines of the data is just as important. And so it's just more of a caveat for brand managers, heads of marketing, CMOs, not to take everything at face value. and it's not always right i've tested things that have not performed well whether it be like a product or a flavor or like a flavor concept and then we've just done it anyway and then it's done really there are always rule breakers too on there and so you have to apply your own gut feel and strategy that you like you say but it's not yeah liquid death would never have tested it would have failed every single time it would have people hated it too polarizing etc but if you listen to Mike Cesare on the team at Liquid Def talk about even their advertising strategy they look for a 50 like dislike ratio because that means it it has made people feel a certain way and put people into camps and those that love it are the audiences they care about if you're shooting for a 98 % acceptance rate it's probably so bland and vanilla that sure everyone feels fine about it but has very low like recall or distinctiveness at the end of the day and I always that always sticks with me That scares the shit out of me to say, oh, yeah, let's make half of the audience hate this.

32:36But that is a different criteria and strategy that they have that validates the research that they're seeing and they're looking to be informed with. Which leads nicely on to number five, which is test to learn not to win. Yeah. And we already talked a little bit about this, but I'm just a big advocate of using design research, particularly with packaging early on in the face. There are some instances where I will be working with clients and I will actually pre-test my concept work before they've seen it and bring results to the table with me in the concept presentation. One, if I think I'm working with a really subjective founder, it'll help me combat some of that.

33:17But two, it'll help me cut off concepts that clearly are failing if I read through the qualitative data and there's nothing worth salvaging. But it also helped me learn not to do that in some other places or learn what is resonating. And even if I don't do it in advance of showing it to clients, I like to get clients even after just a round one concert presentation to take some of these things because you also want testable differences. If you wait too long and you just have iterative variations of things, you mitigate the ability to take real core learnings. And I think at the end of the day, all designers are problem solvers.

33:52The more sort of dots you give us to connect, the more dangerous we can be. I think consumer research has built up a bad reputation in our industry because it's mostly validation and it kills creativity at the end and forces us to make bad choices. If we front load it into the process and we let clients know we are not testing to win here, we are not looking for stars and stripes and go to print, and you calibrate that expectation, then I think everyone comes to the table with the open mind of, okay, maybe the brand didn't believe in all three, but we're going to learn something. And it might show you like hey actually this one is working really well but we otherwise would have said no not right for us so that's yeah that's why i believe in that principle i think you've mentioned subjectivity a few times and i think that is the big challenge with design that i've always come up against whether it's any sort of design work or creative is just so subjective and you need to bring consumers into the process if only just to cut through the two co-founders one who likes it one who doesn't and then one who's just shown their mom who hates it and then like oh great we've got to go back to the beginning now because of that it's a difficult it's difficult because it's subjective in a way that other disciplines and other areas of the business aren't absolutely and as designers like we've built our careers on taste but we're also not always the consumer that we're designing for and so i think a big part is regrounding us in the creative decisions that we're making and going, oh yeah, that's, I'm using a wrong design semiotic code here.

35:23That's not being picked up in the way that I intended to. So it holds us accountable too. Yeah, we haven't really talked about AI, but I think in a world of AI, subjectivity and our experiences of taste actually now become the differentiator on that side of the equation. Because if anyone can prompt something and it'll look at AI when you see it now, it does make the subjective elements of our careers actually more important, not less important. yeah and maybe it's a opening of a can of worms starting to talk about ai it's the same with brand strategy or like marketing strategies yes of course you can go to chat gbt and ask it to write your brand strategy you have to use discernment because it is still wrong sometimes and i think that's the other thing is people have stopped questioning it when often and i found you can say something it goes yeah and then you're like hang on really and it goes no good point and gives you a completely opposite perspective.

36:17It does still require a human with taste and knowledge to guide it, I think, for now. So we're safe for a little while longer, hopefully. You are totally right. And it's tough to be taught by AI. So if you're a first-time founder trying to build strategy or other things from it, it's mostly just going to reinforce your thoughts and tell you how brilliant you are, which is devastatingly dangerous because your ego loves it. And you start to drink the Kool-Aid and you're like, I can do no wrong now. And yeah, that's where I think it's interesting to be a young person in this day and age because you have so much tools, you have more information than ever.

37:00But if you don't learn from the previous generation and what they were able to do without those tools, then how will you know the difference between good or bad? if everything's being served to you on a silver platter of ease and convenience. And yeah, a thumbs up, like, yeah, smart thought, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Yeah, I don't know. Discernment, isn't it, is the new super... And discernment comes from experience a lot of the time. The past experience of what's good. Yeah, making mistakes.

37:29I feel like we're safe. We'll run it through chat, see if it gives us the thumbs up, tell us we're really clever and we can all feel really good about ourselves. Yep, yep, yep. so i'm gonna go into a little quick fire round now as we're nearing the end so brand redesign you wish you had done back to nature oh yeah i know that one which i came from a uk agency which i was so surprised when i found out that brand always sucked and was so sleepy and they just injected so much life and it's a great thing for the industry because people saw a huge drastic change and it was successful it's nice as a break from all the big changes that doesn't work like Crackle Barrel.

38:08We need more of that. Oh, brilliant. That's an agency called Love in the UK based off of Manchester. Just to give them their credit. What's your favorite brand in the US right now in CPG? Favorite brand? I'll give a shout out to a company called Alira. They make these incredible sort of ancient grained cookie sandwiches. And I've gotten to know the founders and the team there. They just did a great redesign and a great product, great packaging. That's all you can ask for. And favorite brand in the UK right now? Oh, man. And now you're asking me to put me on the spot. Favorite brand in the UK would be Feisty Soda.

38:42I got to meet Vi Cutting. She's doing cool things. It's a very interesting and provocative space. Yeah, I'm excited to see how she does. Yeah, nice choice. Best piece of advice you've ever been given and who gave it to you? My design teacher in college, he said, make your mistakes on someone else's dime. And that was a great piece of feedback, basically telling me, go get a job. I always knew I had aspirations to run my own agency or business. And I had a friend that did that right out of college. And I think his career had not accelerated as fast as mine did because I was able to make a bunch of mistakes, but I didn't have to pay for it firsthand.

39:20So you were probably a bit insulated by a team in that sort of environment. So you can make some mistakes and there's other people around there to fix them versus when you're on your own. Yep. Yep, exactly. If you weren't doing what you're doing now, what would you be doing? I'd be designing shoes and or just traveling in a van across the United States. I've been to all 50 states already, but I love flyover places and going to overlook cities like Des Moines and finding the cool things there. I was going to say, eating bacon on a stick somewhere in Iowa. Yeah, and going to convenience stores. and yeah cpg guilty pleasure brand that you're not actually guilty about oh this is a good one a true fruit comes to mind it's a brand of like frozen fruit enrobed in chocolate my wife and i housed down like a small little bag and then i realized there were eight servings in the bag at first i was like there's no fucking way that's eight servings it's just i feel good about it because it's whole fruit and then i get chocolate and so that to me is really delicious so final question that we ask every guest.

40:27In your opinion, what makes a brand of tomorrow? People. And we talked about AI. We talked about the need for strategy over data. We've talked about audiences. Everything comes back down to people. And I often get asked, what's my favorite brand or favorite project? And it's always correlated to my favorite clients. I think the best relationships build the best work. And so at the end of the day, everything comes back to people. Great answer. Thanks so much for coming on, Fred. Ruth, it was a pleasure. Thank you.

From the publisher

“People don’t read - they recognize. If I have to say I’m cool, I’m not cool. But if you look at me and know it, that’s the ultimate power of branding.”

What do challenger brands get wrong about design? Why do some refreshes fail while others build billion-dollar brands? And how do you know when to pivot - or just stay boring?

In this episode, we talk to Fred Hart - the Colarado based brand strategist and CPG trade show enthusiast - about what makes great brands stand out, scale smart, and avoid getting lost in alphabet soup.

We dig into 2025 trends, AI and subjectivity, the influencer brand bubble, and Fred’s five brand principles (including “People don’t read. They recognize.”)

We get into:

  • Design as strategy, not decoration
  • Building distinctiveness vs. chasing trends
  • How to test without killing creativity
  • The rise (and risks) of influencer brands
  • What makes a great refresh actually work

More from Building the Brands of Tomorrow

All 37 episodes
Challenge the category, not the consumer- Fred Hart's branding principlesBuilding the Brands of Tomorrow · 41 min
Listen in VO