CompoSecure: Heavy Metal - [Business Breakdowns, EP.232]

24 Oct 2025 · 56 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: CompoSecure: Heavy Metal - [Business Breakdowns, EP.232]

Hosts

  • Matt Reustle
  • Zack Fuss

Guest

  • Parsa Kiai - Managing Partner at Steamboat Capital

Episode Overview In this episode of Business Breakdowns, Matt Reustle discusses CompoSecure, a company specializing in premium metal credit and payment cards. The episode dives into the company's history, market position, innovations, and the impact of new leadership under Dave Cote.

---

Key Discussions

  1. The Niche of Premium Metal Credit Cards
  2. Market Overview: CompoSecure manufactures metal credit cards for major issuers like American Express and Chase.
  3. Customer Base: Services high-end customers who contribute significantly to consumer spending.
  1. Dave Cote's Impact
  2. Involvement: Cote became the controlling shareholder in August 2024, a pivotal moment for the company.
  3. Expertise: Known for operational excellence and a strong M&A track record.
  1. Origin Story of CompoSecure
  2. Founding: Established in 2000 by John Herzlo and daughter Michelle Logan from a family-run plastic business.
  3. Firsts in Innovation:
  4. Introduced the first metal card with American Express.
  5. Developed industry-leading security features like EMV chips and NFC technology.
  1. SPAC Era and New Growth Engines
  2. SPAC Merger: Went public via SPAC in 2021, initially trading at a $1 billion valuation.
  3. Arculus Business: Focuses on digital cold storage for crypto and security/authentication applications. Despite setbacks, it remains a promising growth area.
  1. Future of Digital Wallets and Security
  2. Market Dynamics: Discussion on the transition to digital wallets and potential risks to the physical card market.
  3. Resilience of Physical Cards: Consumer preferences indicate continued demand for premium metal cards.
  1. Financial Performance and Market Position
  2. Revenue Growth: CompoSecure's premium metal card business shows strong organic growth potential.
  3. Market Share: Holds approximately 80% share in the premium metal card sector, with continued opportunities for expansion.
  1. M&A Strategy and Resolute Holdings
  2. Cote’s Approach: Emphasis on strategic acquisitions to enhance growth.
  3. Resolute Holdings: Capital allocation business spun out to focus on M&A, with a goal of significantly boosting CompoSecure's EBITDA.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Mission-Critical Businesses: The podcast emphasizes the value of identifying overlooked companies that provide essential services at low costs relative to their ROI for clients.
  • Long-Term Strategy: Under Cote, CompoSecure aims to leverage its established market position to compete effectively against emerging threats and innovate in the space.
  • Consumer Insights: Even with the rise of digital solutions, there is a strong preference for physical premium cards, indicating a long tail of demand.

Conclusion The episode provides an in-depth look at CompoSecure’s business model, historical context, and its strategic direction under new leadership. It highlights the importance of understanding niche markets and the critical role of innovation and relationships in sustaining competitive advantage.

For further insights, you can explore more episodes of Business Breakdowns at [joincolossus.com](http://www.joincolossus.com).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This episode is brought to you by Portrait. It's the AI research system that I used to prepare for today's episode and for all Business Breakdowns episodes. Portrait was built by former buy-side investors, and they understand great investing isn't just about having more information from low-quality sources. It's about having the right information organized the right way. And if you listen to the show, you appreciate diligence consists of many things. Diving into the history of a business, framing the nuanced competitive dynamics, tracking key signposts around your thesis. And historically, that would take up material time that you do not have.

0:42But Portrait is basically like adding an army of analysts to your team. It's powered by an AI system specifically designed for investment research workflows. So you get nuanced idea generation. Portrait assesses the same types of qualitative attributes that we discuss on this show. And that can help identify businesses which fit your frameworks. Portrait also customizes research report generation. And I use Portrait to generate a primer and lay out bold bear cases ahead of today's episode to help frame the conversation. And third, there's intelligent thesis monitoring. And that's where Portrait assesses thousands of data points across value chains each day, extracting the insights, driving the business.

1:32Again, all this work would typically take hours and hours and hours. It's at your fingertips now. Visit portraitresearch.com to start your free trial today.

1:45This is Business Breakdowns. Business Breakdowns is a series of conversations with investors and operators diving deep into a single business. For each business, we explore its history, its business model, its competitive advantages, and what makes it tick. We believe every business has lessons and secrets that investors and operators can learn from, and we are here to bring them to you. To find more episodes of Breakdowns, check out JoinColossus.com. All opinions expressed by hosts and podcast guests are solely their own opinions. Hosts, podcast guests, their employers or affiliates may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.

2:27This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. This is Matt Russell, and today we are breaking down Composecure. If you have a premium metal credit card in your pocket, Composecure likely manufactured it. And my guest for this episode is Parsa Kiai, founder and CIO of Steamboat Capital. Now, in the spirit of integrity and full disclosure, this is my first time breaking down a company where I actually own the stock. And while we get into the risks in this discussion, and you'll hear the disclaimers, to be very clear, this is not investment advice.

3:11I was first introduced to Parsa by Andrew Peters of Revalere Partners. I saw Andrew posting some notes from an investor about Compo, and I was curious to hear more. And what really made him the ideal guest is that he has history in Compo Secure before the Dave Cody era, which started sometime in 2024. We get into all of this, the niche market of premium metal credit cards, how Compo has such a dominant position in that industry, whether there's an opportunity in digital storage, and then perhaps most importantly, what Dave Cody's involvement, his M &A track record that he brings, and the unique corporate structure that they've created all mean for Compo.

3:58Please enjoy my conversation with Parsa on Compo Secure. Parsa, I am excited to have you here to talk Compo Secure. You were a very specific guest that I had interest in in talking about this name, and we'll get to that. But I don't think it's in any way a well-known name, and it's been coming on the radar. But I think just starting us off with a simple introduction to the underlying company and what they do will be the perfect place to start, and then we can get rolling from there. Composecure is interesting in the sense that it's certainly not a household name, but I would say probably almost all of your listeners have it in their wallet.

4:41It is a fascinating little company that manufactures the premium heavy metal credit cards that most of us have in our wallets. So if you look at the back of your American Express or Chase Sapphire card, and you look in the bottom right corner underneath the little NFC beam logo, you'll see a serial number and in between it with the letters CS for Composecure. So a very niche business, but in a very interesting industry and market where they manufacture, design and distribute these cards for most of the large premium credit card companies that we think about. American Express Black, Platinum, Gold, Chase Sapphire, Capital One Venture, and a lot of these new fintech cards like the Coinbase card or the Robinhood gold card or even crypto cards.

5:39Very fascinating and really interesting history that goes beyond just the breakdown of the business and the journey along the way from humble family origin to a SPAC becoming a broken IPO, and then all the way along with its evolution. I still have one of those old plastic credit cards, a Capital One that sits in my wallet and has to come out every now and then. It drives me nuts. The rest of my cards, which I prefer to use, are those premium metal cards. They happen to be Compost Secure cards. It is this interesting niche business. The reason I wanted to have you on was because it came on my radar after Dave Cote He was involved in the business sometime in 2024, sometime last year.

6:22And that added a unique dynamic. You have some experience with this business well before that. Maybe we could just start with Cody and what he represents to the story and how it's changed. And we'll get into the backstory to the business after that. But I do think it's important to bring him into the conversation quite early. He's probably the main figure in the story right now. You're right. It was August 2024 that he came in. It was a watershed moment for the company. He became the controlling shareholder by buying out the private equity sponsors and the co-founder, a lady named Michelle Logan.

6:57And for many of your listeners, Dave Cody needs no introduction. He, along with another industrial CEO who's been talked about on your podcast a lot, Brad Jacobs, are probably the two best known industrial CEO entrepreneurs that we have in our market right now. And their track records are both incredible. Dave Cody was the star CEO of Honeywell for many years and then became the chairman of Vertiv and has led the growth in that company. he's written two books on the operating system. It was the Honeywell operating system at first. It is a focus on operational excellence. It is a focus on capital allocation.

7:38And a large part of that is exceptionally astute M &A, which comes from deal origination, integration, and paying the right price for the right business. His involvement is critical. And we honestly look at our investment in the company in kind of two parts. There's Composecure 1.0, which was before Mr. Cody's involvement when it was a broken IPO with a hidden gem of a business that was trading at a fraction of its core value. And then Composecure 2.0, which is a more respected business with really attractive near-term tailwinds and a much longer-term potential under the Composecure operating system.

8:22Let's get back in time to some of that Compo 1.0 era. It's not quite the 100 plus year old business like we just covered with an Amphenol. It has a little bit of a shorter history though. It's still decades old. Bring us back in time in terms of the origin story and how they got to this position in the marketplace where they are so prominent. Very fascinating story. Does not have the length of history of some other companies, but it was a family started business. And there was a gentleman named John Herzlo and his daughter, Michelle Logan. They worked for their family's plastic business that the grandparents had started in the fifties.

9:01And through that business, they eventually founded Composecure in 2000. By happenstance, they worked with American Express in 2003 in introducing the first ever metal credit card. And up until then, credit cards were always plastic. And they worked with American Express to make the first metal credit card. And I think there's a real rich history of innovation and growth that we'll get through. And it's important that American Express today, 22 years later, is still a key partner and customer. And I think it just shows you a lot about the innovation and organic growth that the company has. Throughout the years, they really pioneered a lot of what we see in a physical premium credit card today.

9:49After working with Amex, they helped Chase launch their first metal card, which was the predecessor to the Chase Sapphire card. It was called Chase Palladium in 2009. And again, Chase today, many, many years later, is still a premier customer. And you've seen that that relationship has grown. And throughout the years, so much of the innovation that we see in a card today was really helped and pioneered by them. They were the first ones to put a ENV chip in a credit card. And your listeners will know, the guys that listen to the Visa and MasterCard podcast will know EMV is Europay, MasterCard, and Visa, which is the security protocol for payment cards that puts a microprocessor embedded into a chip so that it works with an EMV enabled payment terminal to authenticate transactions with much higher security.

10:42So they were the first ones to do that. They were also the first ones to put large scale NFC or near field communications integrated dual interface metal cards. This is really a protocol in a card that allows for radio frequency identification between the payment card and the terminal. So a lot of this innovation was done by then. And even up until now, including biometric security, dynamic CVV codes, and a lot of other things. Really rich history. And then along the way, a private equity company called LLR invested in the company. They paid $100 million for a 60 % stake in the business. And one key aspect was they brought on board a senior payments executive named John Wilk.

11:28John Wilk has a deep history in the business at Bank of America first and then at Chase. And John was in the room when they were making that first Chase Sapphire card. And he had the vision and the experience being on the issuer side, saying, what does an issuer need? What do our premium clients want, our cardholders? And John has been instrumental in growing the business, strengthening and growing the American Express and Chase relationships and expanding to all these new customers like Capital One and the Delta co-branded card, Amazon co-branded cards, and now with all these neobanks and fintechs.

12:11That business was growing. When COVID comes around, everything payments related went crazy. And it believed they were trying to shop the company in 2020. I think that sale didn't materialize. the company came public via a SPAC. They merged with a special purpose acquisition company called Roman DBDR, and it debuted in the market in 2021 at a$1 billion enterprise value. SPACs didn't have a great reputation at the time. We hit a little bit of a bear market, and it provided an opportunity for our involvement in Compo 1.0. But it's a really rich history of innovation and growth for an interesting niche little company.

12:54It's easy for me to look at the metal card and think about the vanity play of the noise it makes when it drops on the table. But there's obviously a lot of actual innovation going into the chip and what would attract them to the banks on the other side of this. I want to get into that SPAC era now because they have this premium metal card business, but I know they introduced another growth engine, very much a sign of the times. And we'll see where it goes. But can you talk a little bit about beyond just being baby thrown out with the bathwater in terms of SPAC up and SPAC down, what was fueling some of the excitement over Compo that was another piece of the business that we can introduce now?

13:38The SPAC era was interesting because there was just some real unrealistic expectations about everything, digital asset, and a lot of other things. But they actually do have a business called Arculus, which focuses on two things. One is a digital cold wallet for storing, transacting, and trading digital assets. But its larger use case, in my view, is really on the security and authentication side. And it's here where I think there's potentially a lot of value and it really shows the next step in the innovation and growth of the company. When they came public via the SPAC, you had this very good core payments business and it was almost overlooked as an afterthought because they're like, all right, we have this business, it's profitable and it's growing, but really look at this Arculus business.

14:34And the expectations there initially were too high. If you think about what Arculus does from security and authentication, it has a lot of incredible use cases that we have not yet seen monetized. So their services can be combined between the payments and the authentication. It makes your premium metal card into a security token, into an authentication token, and it can be combined to have a lot of different use cases for different banks, fintechs, and a whole sorts of payment transactions. For example, you can use this for passwordless login on a variety of different financial apps or banking apps.

15:16So you can combine it with your biometric fingerprint or face recognition. You can tap your Arculus-enabled metal card on your phone, and this reduces the need for passwords, reduces fraud risk, and it simplifies your access while maintaining a lot of high security. I think it also can be used in certain high value false declines in online purchases. So if you make a potential transaction that needs verification from your bank without having to call in or text to confirm, you can tap your Arculus card and it minimizes friction, It boosts the approval rate, cuts down on fraud. So it's really a win for the cardholder and the issuer.

15:59There are a lot of other use cases, including high value transactions in gaming, in-store approvals in more unusual locations, call center efficiency, customer verification. Beyond just saying it's a crypto cold wallet, it has a lot of applications. And it was a big portion of the excitement of the company. A couple of years after the SPAC, it almost became a bit of a liability because its revenues had not materialized. It was generating about a$20 million operating loss, and it went from being the shiny toy to a liability. And that was our involvement in the company saying, we've got this incredible niche core payments business that is growing organically, has a long runway for growth, is valued at a fraction of what it's worth.

16:50And we have this incredible nascent technology that is not yet generating a lot of revenues, but it has incredible use cases, an incredible team, and is the next leg of innovation and growth for this company. As a consumer, I've heard of your credit card with a Bloomberg B unit, for those that use Bloomberg, attached in and being a one-stop shop to reduce a lot of the frictions. But then you can obviously understand from the opposite side of the equations, whether it's banks or whoever, who have to deal with all of the costs associated with the challenges of security, and it's only getting more and more intense.

17:25So that's an interesting one where the expectations were so high. And at times you could see these dislocations, but it will be interesting to see how that evolves. I wanted to tap into a little bit about those relationships they have. They seem so core. Can you just talk about what drives that beyond some of what you just mentioned and what the competitive set looks like in terms of others that might be trying to do the same thing and where Compo really ranks against the rest of the peer group. When you think about the relationships that they have with their issuers, the two biggest customers are American Express and Chase.

18:03And if you're in the premium metal car business, it's only natural that those are going to be your two biggest clients given their size and scale in the industry. If you focus on those two first, you see how long and valuable that partnership has been. And even though it's a contractual business, one, two, three-year contracts, the number of times that those contracts have been renewed and have been increased in 10-year really speaks to how important that relationship is. Initially, when we looked at the business, we had some concerns about customer concentration, but the more we learned about how symbiotic this relationship is, we became a lot more comfortable with that.

18:45So if you think about what they provide, this is really all about the pursuit of the high-end credit card customer. Research shows that 10 % of cardholders are responsible for nearly 50 % of all consumer spending. So if you are a Chase, American Express, now Citibank, Capital One, you really want to go after that high-end customer because they spend, on average, customers, cardholders with credit cards that have an annual fee greater than $500, they spend something like$3 ,000 per month on their credit cards. Those with cards with below that as an annual fee spend only$1 ,000. The difference between that$2 ,000 a month is$24 ,000 in annual spend.

19:31And that is a huge prize for credit card issuers, not only because of the interchange revenue that it brings, but all the ancillary service fees and cross-selling opportunities to this high-end cohort. These are also a much more loyal customer base with lower churn. And given their higher income stature, they generally don't carry balances. So you have lower credit loss provisions. And you're seeing this now with the increase in annual fees and the increase in rewards for the new American Express Platinum cards, the new Chase Sapphire cards. It really is a battle to win the top of wallet status.

20:12When you open your wallet, you want to be that heavy metal card that you fill on the dinner table at a restaurant and it clanks. It really is trying to find those. What Composecure does is it really helps facilitate that because when you think about the unit economics of this business, you can think about it on a per card basis and then you could think about it in aggregate. If we take an American Express cardholder or a Chase Sapphire cardholder, these cardholders will spend anywhere between$30 ,000 to$60 ,000 per year. On some of that spend, that interchange is as high as 2.5%. So the card issuer can get$750 or$1 ,500 annually in interchange revenue.

21:00On top of that, they provide these rewards to the customers. So they have to give something about half of the interchange back to these customers. And they're happy to do that because it makes and retains and grows these customer relationships. So you spend about$375 or$750 on your rewards costs. These cards typically have very, very low credit losses. And then you add on top your annual fee for this. And you're looking at something like a$1 ,200 or$1 ,600 annual profit. And the cost to the issuers for this Composecure card is$12 per card. So you're looking at something like 100 times return on your investment.

21:47This is really the only physical cogs that an American Express or Chase has. There's a lot of other things are variable costs. And if that metal card, that premium feel is that important, we think it's very important to have that quality card so that you're not going to switch to go to a new upstart competitor to save a dollar per card when you're making something like$1 ,000 or$1 ,500 in annual profit. And now you compare that to your generic plastic card, even that one that has no fee, it costs less than a tenth of a premium metal card. It costs$1.25 per card. But given how much less a customer spends and generally the higher cost for credit provisions and churn, we estimate that the return on investment on a generic plastic card is less than a fifth of what it is on a premium metal card.

22:40That is why we think that this symbiotic relationship exists. And that is why even as the company has become public and its high gross margins, its high EBITDA margins, and its average selling price has become public disclosure, you have not seen customer attrition. You've not seen market share losses because it is such an incredibly valuable tool for their issuers to go after those high-end credit cards. If you look at a business like American Express, American Express does something like$75 billion of annual revenues. And the largest component of that, about$40 billion, is interchange fees. Another$18 billion is net interest income, about$10 billion is your card fees, and$8 billion is service fees.

23:37So on this$75 billion, American Express makes about$20 billion of pre-tax and pre-provision profits. The biggest cost structure is about$18,$19 billion in card member rewards. This $20 billion of pre-tax, pre-provision profit is really facilitated by providing that valuable customer experience and a$10 card. That cost of goods sold is 0.2 % of their cost space. And we think this is a really interesting business that you provide such an experience to such a big company facilitating such a large scale, and you are such a small part of that cost. And that's really why we think these relationships exist, grow, and why other people want to get into the game.

24:29You mentioned they have this market share. Do you have any sense in terms of numbers of what that market share looks like in this segment? There's about 18 billion payment cards in circulation. And that number, despite all the movements towards mobile wallets and Apple Pay and everything, that number is still growing at about 4 % per year. The fascinating thing about cards is it's actually a rather stable recurring revenue business because the number of new cards issued, most of them actually come because of card expiration or lost and stolen cards. And these happen with regular frequency. About 4 billion new cards are issued annually.

25:12If you look at net new accounts, it's actually a fraction of the cards issued. So there's a solid core of recurring card issuance per year, and then an interesting nice little amount of new accounts. When you look at the premium metal card business that Compose Secure operates, it's a very, very small share, but a very fast growing share. Of the 4 billion cards issued annually, less than 1 % of that are premium metal credit cards. But those premium metal cards are growing three or four times faster than the aggregate cards in circulation. One thing that we think is really fascinating is Composture has something like an 80 % market share in these premium metal cards.

25:59So that market share, that penetration of premium metal cards goes from 1 % to 2 % or 3%. Even if you lose a little bit of market share, you're still getting so much growth in terms of units and dollars that there's a long runway for organic growth. Even as your market share goes from basically being virtually the only player in a 90 % market share to 80 and 75 or something. So we think that if you look to where the puck is going on the issuer side and the focus on premium metal cards, Compost Secura is in the pole position to maintain a very large market share and to have outsized organic growth.

26:38I can speak to having a card expire recently and then getting my new card and it was upgraded to of metal. That's just a perfect example of a mixed shift moving in their direction and how that can continue to happen over time. But you did mention Apple Pay. There's this natural question of once that was released, will we ever need wallets ever again? Will we ever need to carry credit cards? How do you frame that risk of Apple Pay? This is probably the most important question in breaking down this business and thinking about it long-term. And it really was the biggest concern we had when we first invested in Composecure before David Cody's involvement, as I mentioned.

27:22It is a real important and interesting topic, and it's worth thinking about the disintermediation risk by mobile wallets and Apple Pay, but I'll address it in two ways. The first is back when we first invested in the company, the company was valued as if no one was going to use a credit card in three or four years. The company was trading at five times normalized free cash flow. When we did our work then, we came away with the conclusion that cards were going to be around for at least five years and we were going to make good money on this investment because it was priced as if you were disintermediated in the near term.

28:01While cards were still growing, double digits and all of these new fintechs and neobanks were all looking to get into the premium card business. That was a different story then. Fast forward a few years to now, it's still an important question, but the data shows that the premium metal card has become increasingly important, not the other way around, even as Apple Pay, mobile wallets, and other things have taken off. You're seeing that that customer response is getting stronger, not weaker. Take a look at American Express. When they did one of their first big product refreshes back in 2016, and they introduced the brand new shiny American Express card with a higher annual fee, net new accounts acquired went up by 50 % over the pre-refresh period.

28:55When American Express just introduced the new product refresh earlier this year, you saw that net new account acquisition went up by 2x. So the customer response was double in 2025 what it was in 2016, even though mobile wallets, Apple Pay and everything is more prevalent today. So customers are still showing that they want a top of wallet physical card and the status and prestige that that brings among your friends. The second point is when you look at even digitally native companies that have some aversion to physical assets like Coinbase, Robinhood, Gemini, all of them are coming out with brand new premium cards that are physical metal cards as a customer acquisition tool.

Read the full transcript

29:46And they are all Composecure customers. So even these companies that are at the leading edge of everything digital, they are manufacturing and distributing cards to their customers. And instead of giving you 4 % cash back, they'll give you 4 % in Bitcoin back. It shows that this tool is still incredibly important. Third, when you look at Apple itself, Apple was one of the first ones to try a card that did not have a physical card and it was only digital. And the Apple card program did not take off the way people anticipated that it would. It really did not resonate with the high-end consumer. And the reports have been that Goldman Sachs has lost quite a bit of money on it and now trying to transfer that over to maybe JP Morgan.

30:33So the experiment that you've had with a purely digital card has not taken off yet. And then lastly, while I do think that in 20 years or some long time period, this does become a bit of a risk, you have to also consider that the third most frequently used form of payment, even today, is cash, not mobile wallets or anything. So credit cards are number one at 35%, debit cards are at 30%, and 17 % of transactions are still done with cash. And it's incredible to people who live in New York or San Francisco, but there's plenty of places that forget about accepting metal or plastic. They don't accept anything but cash.

31:17So the tail for physical credit cards is going to be longer than expected rather than shorter. This is a risk and you've got David Cody and his team here to address that and to put the company, whether it's with the security and authentication at Arculus, whether it's with M &A, whether it's with other things, really get ahead of this risk in the long term. It's a really interesting theme. I would have put myself on the camp of expecting physical cards to shrink near term, medium term. But as you dig deeper, and you look at the actual data and the precedent, and then consider cash or checks, the amount of checks that I still have to write and the amount of checkbooks that I still have to receive, it's still a piece of the payments infrastructure system.

32:01And that does a lot. So interesting to hear about how you frame that risk is being real over 20-25 years, but near term, the signals are pointing in the other direction. I wanted to transition a little bit to the margin side of the equation. Now that they're public, it's out there for the world to see. We see some companies who maybe fear going public because then that would release those margin numbers to their customer base. Talk about what those actually look like. How good of a business is this in terms of what they're driving inside the financial statements? Our first fear was when the company came public, we're like, oh my God, everyone's going to see that you have 50 % gross margins, 40 % EBITDA margins, American Express and Chase are going to see this and all of this is going to go down.

32:46And I think when you really dig into their competitive position and the advantages that they have from the technology, the manufacturing, and the customer relationships, they've been able to maintain those margins, even as all the competitors see it, even as the customers see it and renew contracts. You got a nice glimpse into the business when they published their 2024 10K is they broke out the segment financials for the first time and they separated Arculus from the core metal card business. And you could see that the metal card business has 53 % gross margins and core EBIT margins of 40%, very little in the way of capex and depreciation with EBITDA margins of 42%.

33:31One of the fascinating things is that there's virtually no marketing spend at the core metal business because you're really the dominant player in the industry and you're so well known to the largest and most important issuers that you don't need to convince them to use you and others come to you as well. So if you think about the business in 2024, did a little over$400 million of revenues and they sold about 31 million cards. So the average was about a$13 ASP for your card business. Gross margins are a little over 50%. Each card costs you about$6.20 per card. That's six times more expensive than what your general plastic card looks like.

34:16And that's because of all of the technology and the raw materials and all the quality that goes into that card. So you've got your EMV chip that could cost a dollar a card. You've got incredibly sophisticated materials, stainless steel. They make certain cards for different co-branded partnerships. They've used recycled aluminum from a Boeing 737 fuselage to make a Delta co-branded card. They've used Corning Gorilla Glass to make a glass card. It really is a sophisticated manufacturing process. So between the manufacturing, the EMV chip, and the technology, you get around a$6 unit cost for the card, and that gets you your 50 % gross margins.

34:59It's a pretty efficient business thereafter. You have 40 % EBITDA margins and a really, really attractive business on a unit basis. They also showed the unit economics on the Arculus side. This was a real interesting thing because up until then, you really didn't know. they would tell you a little bit Arculus was a double digit net investment or what it was, but you saw that Arculus has 80 % gross margins and that its revenues had grown from less than $2 million in 2023 to almost$11 million in 2024. When we think about the use cases, how big that TAM can be and a business that could be cross sold and have all this integration into your existing high-end issuer base.

35:49We think 80 % gross margins, long runway for growth, security and authentication being so much more valuable in the future. We think Arculus has a lot of potential as well, even though it is not providing a ton in terms of segment EBIT or anything like that. But it's a really fascinating business and that glimpse of the unit economics was very important. It's amazing to hear about the usage of some of those unique metals and then being able to keep the margin because I would imagine it's a pretty efficient manufacturing process to do what they're doing and then to introduce some of those unique products like the gold and the glass that you mentioned is quite interesting, probably speaks to something on the manufacturing side of things.

36:32When you put it all together, just from a top line perspective, I had that number of net new cards, but also just card growth in my head. But when you put everything, including Arculus and the legacy business together, what does a reasonable top line growth look like, whether it's traditional GDP environment or anything along those lines? How do you think about the revenue growth in some term of trajectory? If you think about the drivers of the revenue growth, you're going to have the units on the premium metal card side. You're going to have ASP on the card side, and then you're going to have Arculus.

37:13We'll try to tackle each one of those things. We actually think within the metal card business, units are probably going to go faster than the ASP as you've got so many more really incredible card issuers, neobanks and fintechs fighting for this customer acquisition tool. We think that the premium metal card business will grow at a high single digit to low double digit basis on a unit level. Now, within that, as that volume grows, we anticipate that the average selling price for high volume issuers like American Express and Chase will probably go down. You make 13 million cards for Chase and for American Express.

37:56If you start making 20 or 25 million, I anticipate that your ASP goes down. You flip it over to a Robinhood gold card and some of these cards that cost$50,$100, or$500 per card on smaller volume, that's going to be what I think will grow your ASP at a low single-digit rate. Interesting mix within that. And you see a glimpse of some of this in the customer agreements. But as you've had the ASP for American Express and Chase go down a little bit, the aggregate ASP has gone up because of these new customers. We anticipate that the premium metal card business can get you to the double-digit organic growth rate.

38:36And then the Arculus side, it's going to be a lot higher than that. It's tough to tell what it could be. But when you think about the cross-selling opportunities, for example, on the Chase Sapphire card, you're using the EMV technology, but you really have not incorporated all of the security and authentication tools yet. And given the long relationship between Composecure and Chase, that could be an opportunity for future growth. And you look at all the other use cases for an Arculus, we can look at a couple of companies. For example, there's a cold storage competitor called Ledger. They're not public, but there's some data that suggests they have maybe$70 million of revenue selling crypto cold wallets.

39:20Then you look at a company like Yubico, which is a security dongle company in Sweden. They have something like$250 million in revenues selling security devices for enterprise customers. Arculus could provide both of those and perhaps be a cleaner and more efficient tool. You're looking at$300 plus million of revenue right there. We're not sure when and how that evolves, but it's going to be additive to the overall growth rate. I would say as a baseline, we anticipate 10 % organic growth, and then you add Arculus, and then you add potential M &A from David Cody, and we could see this having a lot higher growth than that.

40:06The Arculus business is quite interesting because there's obviously numbers out there, but it's hard to appreciate how quickly it might be adopted or over what timeline that looks like. For any listeners, cold wallets are just moving something off of the internet. Most crypto wallets are connected to a bunch of digital things and that could increase security risk. This gives you something that's offline. Worth mentioning that part. But interesting to frame it in that regard. And particularly some of the pickup you could also see from some of the legacy customers. I know they split this business out on its own, but it does feel like there could be potential overlap in terms of how they're targeting customers in the future together with the legacy business.

40:48That's quite interesting. I did want to get some understanding. Are there competitive threats beyond Apple Pay? Are there other competitors in the metal card space? You mentioned some of the cold wallets, but what would you say that landscape looks like? There's definitely some competitors that are encroaching. A hodgepodge of competitors, mostly who have historically focused on the lower end general plastic card. But if you look at the growth and the margins that Composecure has and coming from virtually a monopoly position, it's only natural to think that there's going to be some capitalistic instincts and some competitive threats.

41:27There is a good list of competitors that are in the manufacturing business and are looking to get into this. And you can think about Idemia and Thalys in Europe. You could think about CPI Card Group, which is the largest card manufacturer in the general plastic card and a host of others. We anticipate that all of them have been and are going to continue to try to get into this business. It is conceivable that some of them with the right resources do start producing metal cards for some more marginal issuers. We would not anticipate that Chase or American Express takes their business over, partly because of what we talked about.

42:13This is such an important business for them. And the cost of a Compose Secure card at$12 or lower for these issuers is not enough to risk a lower quality or less experienced supplier. So we don't worry about that. But if you do think about less well-capitalized card issuers coming into the space, we do know that Idemia, Talis, as probably the most well-capitalized and technically proficient company, are probably going to start making some share. Idemia and Talis, interestingly, they're both competitors, but they're also actually resellers. Composecure manufactures some premium metal cards for them, for different issuers in international and other areas.

43:00It could be because those companies have much larger sales forces. They can go out and reach certain issuers internationally that Composecure can't, but they don't have the technological expertise and the manufacturing know-how that Composecure is. In a way, they are resellers for Composecure. But any company that comes off with this much of a head start in market share, it's natural to think that you're going to lose a couple of things. But I would be surprised if they did not continue to grow with Chase, American Express, and the premier fintechs and neobanks like Robinhood and Coinbase and so forth.

43:41But I would anticipate that Idemia, Talis, and some other producers like FCS and others will start to encroach the new entrance into this business. Natural to attract that competition over time. It'll be interesting to see how they compete. You've made a few references to Dave Cody's track record with M &A, and I think it's a perfect opportunity to introduce that, maybe introduce Resolute Holdings and that interesting dynamic into this business, maybe you can lay out the framing for how you think about Compos' potential to make acquisitions, how Dave's history plays into it, and then we can address Resolute in detail or follow up with questions that I might have around it.

44:30For anyone who doesn't know Dave Cody, I would suggest reading his books. It really is an incredible masterclass on focusing on the long-term and on the short-term. So he has a book called Winning Now, Winning Later, and another book called How to Be a Leader. And these are incredible books. And Dave took over as the CEO of Honeywell in 2003. If you go back then, 9-11 had just occurred. You had the dot-com bubble explode. Honeywell, they had the aborted merger with GE that was blocked by the EU. Honeywell was in a bit of a tough spot. I think the quarter before he took over, it had negative 4 % organic growth.

45:08And by the time he left 15 years later, revenues were up 100%. EPS was up 400%. And the stock was up 500%, more than double what the S &P was. Then he became the chairman of a company called Vertiv, which provides liquid cooling systems for data centers. In the five years that he was chairman, that stock went up by close to 600%. And we've got a very good relationship with CEO John Wilkin. John has told us you've never met a guy that's more hard charging and focused and relentless as Dave Cody, not only on the operational improvement, but their approach to M &A is very similar. You guys have had Brad Jacobs on the Colossus podcast talking about the right approach to M &A.

45:53David Cody's approach is very, very similar. And it really comes with a few guiding principles. And one of the first would be to build a robust internal pipeline of potential deals. So you're not wedded or desperate on any single deal. So date a lot of people and have a lot of options out there. You really focus on good businesses with strong competitive positions that have not been run to their full potential, either because of underinvestment or lack of focus or something else. But you're not buying broken businesses. You're buying good businesses that should be better than they are and the willingness to pay a fair price, but not to overpay.

46:35And you begin the integration process before the deal closes. As soon as you have an agreement, you are working with the teams to integrate that business, take your best practices, what was the Honeywell operating system and is now the Composecure operating system, and integrate that. It's that M &A potential that people are excited about. And you mentioned Resolute Holdings. This is a fascinating case study because if you take something like QXO, which is the new building products endeavor by Brad Jacobs, it receives a bit of a halo valuation because of Brad's incredible track record of creating shareholder value.

47:16At Composecure, we've done something a little different in that we've spun out the asset management side. We've spun out the capital allocation business into something called Resolute Holdings. And Resolute's job is to allocate capital, do strategic M &A for Composecure and eventually on its own. But initial view is that it's going to be focusing on M &A for Composecure. And it's quite fascinating because Resolute was spun out to shareholders of Composecure. We've got an interest in both of these entities now, Resolute Holdings stock has done exceptionally well so that it is valued relatively richly today because you don't have much in the way of revenues.

48:03Resolute gets a 10 % share, a 10 % royalty, if you will, or management fee on Composecure's EBITDA. The stated goal is we are going to grow the EBITDA at Composecure by many, many fold. And the market believes that, look at Mr. Cody's track record, we're going to do this. So right now, the revenues at Resolute Holdings are something around$15 million. And that's basically the cost of looking for deals. We've got employees looking at the ground, doing due diligence. And that will grow as the Compo Secure EBITDA goes. So you have this symbiotic relationship where the team at Resolute Holdings is focused on growing the EBITDA Composecure by 50 % or double or triple.

48:52And the market is giving a halo valuation to Resolute Holdings. I don't think you really have priced that into Composecure yet. If you look at Resolute Holdings, it's valued at about a$700 million market cap. And if you look at a high growth asset manager multiple, it implies that Composecure's EBITDA should be double or more of what it is today. With Mr. Cody's controlling interest in both companies, you've got a strong alignment of interest. So really fascinating case study on what we're going to see in real time between capital allocation and M &A. It was an announcement made that was a little bit of a head-scratcher to me.

49:34And I can't say that I necessarily loved it at the time. But I also look at Dave Cody. He's brought Tom Knott, who was the Goldman banker who worked with him on Vertiv, and then came over with Composecure. We will see over time how it plays out. It's just a very interesting structure. You framed it perfectly well there in terms of it will act as a case study in terms of value unlock within businesses. On the M &A side, would you expect that acquisitions would be very overlapping and naturally tucking? It could be bigger in size, but fit the overall strategy? Could you see them diversifying away?

50:14Do you have any read on that in terms of, I would expect M &A, given Cody's track record. I think he's made 150, 200 plus deals in his career. So he's familiar with it in the same way that Brad is. What would you expect in terms of sticking with the core business lines versus extending outware? We have no knowledge of any transaction, but we would anticipate it is in the payments, hardware, technology, software, security and authentication verticals so that it will look like an adjacency to where Composecure is today. One of the biggest reasons we get comfortable with the long-term physical card disintermediation risk is that there's so many opportunities to grow this business from its pole position in physical card manufacturing to these different adjacencies, whether they're recurring software revenue lines, whether it's adjacencies on the hardware side, it'll initially be in the payments space.

51:15longer term, I could see diversification being implemented. And I think that would very much be positive because you would reduce some customer concentration. You would reduce some long-term industry disintermediation risks. It would morph into a much higher multiple business. One of the things that you will always expect is it will be done at an appropriate valuation, and it will be in the interest of shareholders. And when you get people like Dave Cody, we get questions like, well, how do you know he's going to do a good deal again? And you say, okay, well, last year, he bought a controlling interest in Composecure at$7.50 a share.

51:58And today you get a share of Composecure at$20 and Resolute Holdings at$80. So he did a great deal last year. He's going to continue to do good deals and he's showed you the playbook of how he's going to do it. It'll be interesting to see how all of this plays out, but initially payments, longer term, probably diversification, but with shareholder value as the primary North Star. It's going to be fascinating to watch. And I think with that resolute, I'll call it a dislocation in terms of how it's trading, which made me scratch my head a few times. You wonder what is being worked on and what's happening.

52:33I guess if we're to tie everything together, you mentioned the stock has had a nice run over the past year, year plus. What still stands out as the main catalyst for this business? There's several. If you look at the reaction to American Express's earnings last week and stock did great and they raised their guidance, the premium metal card is still the best customer acquisition tool for the high-end credit card holder. All of these companies are going to continue to invest resources. It's going to be driven by American Express, Chase, and a lot of other issuers, neobanks, and the market recognition of that durable growth and Composecure's pole position as the key supplier.

53:19I think that is one key catalyst. I also think getting Arculus to the point where it starts being a material contributor, starts having a positive cash flow contribution instead of a small negative. And the cross-selling opportunities in security and authentication is a big catalyst and could change the narrative on the company. And then, of course, the M &A debut, I think everyone's trying to see what they're up to, but it'll be an interesting one. On the other side of the spectrum, in terms of the risks and in theory, what would keep you up at night, for lack of a better cliche, what's most prominent?

53:56Right. Near term, you look at the response to the Chase and American Express refreshes. Near term, I feel pretty good about where the business is going. Long term and medium term, you got to keep an eye on competition. There are really sophisticated and well-capitalized competitors in Idemia and Thalys and others, and you're not going to have a monopoly forever and you have to innovate. You have to continue to grow with your customers. So competition is really always at the forefront of, I guess, any business. And then the mobile wallet issue, it's kind of the elephant in the room. And the next few years, it's not an issue, but that is something that you definitely have to keep an eye on in the long-term.

54:38We have full faith in the team at Resolute, but there's a structure in which they get paid on the EBITDA of Composecure. You do have to think about the long-term alignment of those, but given Mr. Cody's controlling interest and holdings in both. That's not a near-term concern, but those are the things I would think about long-term that we have to keep an eye on. Those all make sense. This has been absolutely fascinating. I am biased because of my particular interest in this name, but I appreciate you getting into some of the history and details in terms of their positioning in the market and what it looks like from your perspective, having the history.

55:18As we close out, we always try to cover lessons that you can pull away at maybe a broader level and apply elsewhere. What would stand out to you from Combo? The whole history and our involvement in the company has been a fascinating learning experience, but the biggest takeaways and what we've learned from it is finding overlooked and not well understood businesses that are actually mission critical to large, entrenched and growing customers with a cost that is minuscule compared to the ROI that the customer has and their core product, like selling a$12 premium metal card to Chase and American Express, that is an incredibly powerful tool.

56:01And you've had a bunch of businesses on the podcast in the past, whether it's a company like Transdime that will sell a proprietary$200 widget that goes on$100 million Boeing, or industrial gas businesses like air products that provide a small key input into a multi-billion dollar refinery or chemical plant. Finding these businesses in which you are mission critical, you are exceptionally high value, low cost, and entrenched, they're fascinating businesses. And then on the Composecure 2.0 with David Cody, and then it turns into what can he do here, watching that capital allocation unfold is going to be very interesting.

56:46Parsa, this has been a true pleasure. You hit on my favorite theme there at the end with those mission-critical businesses and representing a small cost to the end customer. That is one that I absolutely love. So thank you very much for joining us and sharing the knowledge here. Absolutely, Matt. Thank you very much for having me. To find more episodes of Breakdowns ranging from Costco to Visa to Moderna or to sign up for our weekly summary, Check out JoinColossus.com. That's J-O-I-N-C-O-L-O-S-S-U-S dot com.

From the publisher

This is Matt Reustle. Today we are breaking down CompoSecure, a company that manufactures premium metal credit cards and payment cards. My guest is Parsa Kiai, Managing Partner at Steamboat Capital. What really made Parsa the ideal guest is that he has a history with CompoSecure from before the Dave Cote era, which started sometime in 2024. 

We get into all of this: the niche market of premium metal credit cards, how CompoSecure has such a dominant position in that industry, the opportunity in digital storage, and perhaps most importantly, what Dave Cote's involvement means for the company—his M&A track record and the unique corporate structure they've created. I often get asked what you can do with the lessons you take from business breakdowns, and this is a perfect example of taking the lessons and lens from other companies and looking for pattern recognition in the market. Please enjoy this Breakdown on CompoSecure.

For the full show notes, transcript, and links to the best content to learn more, check out the episode page⁠⁠⁠⁠ here.⁠⁠⁠⁠

—-

This episode is brought to you by⁠ ⁠Portrait Analytics⁠⁠ - your centralized resource for AI-powered idea generation, thesis monitoring, and personalized report building. Built by buy-side investors, for investment professionals. We work in the background, helping surface stock ideas and thesis signposts to help you monetize every insight. In short, we help you understand the story behind the stock chart, and get to "go, or no-go" 10x faster than before.

Sign-up for a free trial today at⁠ ⁠portraitresearch.com⁠⁠

—

Business Breakdowns is a property of Colossus, LLC. For more episodes of Business Breakdowns, visit⁠⁠⁠⁠ joincolossus.com/episodes⁠⁠⁠⁠.

Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (⁠⁠⁠⁠https://thepodcastconsultant.com⁠⁠⁠⁠).

Show Notes

(00:00:00) Welcome to Business Breakdowns

(00:03:28) The Niche Business of Premium Metal Credit Cards

(00:05:35) Dave Cote's Impact on CompoSecure

(00:07:17) The Origin Story of CompoSecure

(00:09:11) Innovations and Growth in the Credit Card Industry

(00:11:19) The SPAC Era and New Growth Engines

(00:15:09) The Future of Digital Wallets and Security

(00:31:08) Financial Performance and Market Position

(00:42:55) Dave Cote's M&A Strategy and Resolute Holdings

(00:54:10) Lessons From CompoSecure

More from Business Breakdowns

All 153 episodes
CompoSecure: Heavy Metal - [Business Breakdowns, EP.232]Business Breakdowns · 56 min
Listen in VO