In short
The episode is about prediction markets: online platforms (notably Kalshi and Polymarket) where people buy contracts tied to outcomes (politics, weather, geopolitics, even “mention”/word markets). It argues prediction markets can aggregate information and create “homework” advantages, but also raises concerns about insider trading and moral backlash as markets expand and “financialize everything.” Key examples include a Jerome Powell press-conference market where “renovation” was unexpectedly mentioned; a Polymarket trader (“Domer”) profiting from a Taylor Swift album-sales bet; and “insider” sports-betting allegations involving NBA player Jontay Porter. It also traces prediction markets back ~500 years to 1500s Italy’s “Scommese a fare il papa” (betting on the next pope) and notes U.S. backlash, including DARPA’s 2001–2003 “Policy Analysis Market” for terrorism, which was canceled after senators criticized it.
Guests
Jacob Goldstein and Robert Smith (hosts of Business History) and Stacey Vanek-Smith and Max Chavkin (Everybody’s Business).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding Prediction Markets
2:25 to 3:49
An overview of prediction markets, their growth, and examples of bets.
“So actually, this is a podcast mashup between everybody's business and business history.”
The Role of Prediction Markets in Economics
3:49 to 5:32
Exploration of the economic implications and the value of prediction markets.
“People are starting to laugh as they see the official name of the market.”
The Concept of Financializing Everything
5:32 to 7:37
Discussion on the idea of creating tradable assets from opinions and predictions.
“as the press conference goes on, the odds change.”
Hedge Risk with Prediction Markets
7:37 to 8:45
Explaining how prediction markets could serve as alternatives to traditional insurance.
“So one example that Cal Street founders give is flood insurance.”
Domer's Journey in Prediction Markets
8:45 to 10:37
A look into Domer's experiences and significant bets in prediction markets.
“And we should say for people listening, it's a 3 % chance, which seems pretty high, right?”
Caden Booth's Super Bowl Bet
10:37 to 14:03
The story of Caden Booth's unique strategy to bet on the Super Bowl national anthem.
“On Polymarket and CalShe, if you do your homework, you can get the edge.”
The Bet on Charlie Puth's Performance
14:03 to 15:24
Learn about a unique bet placed on Charlie Puth's Super Bowl performance.
“Is he going to hold the high note for like a minute and a half?”
Insider Trading in Prediction Markets
15:25 to 18:07
Explore the issues of insider trading in sports betting and prediction markets.
“One is this is not heartwarming to me because if I'm going to bet on this, I have to bet against this guy with the parabolic mic and the plane ticket and the stopwatch.”
The Historical Roots of Prediction Markets
21:40 to 27:42
Trace the history of prediction markets from the 1500s to modern times.
“Visit auraring.com forward slash decoding to get 10 % off the new Aura Ring 4.”
Betting on U.S. Presidents: A Cultural Shift
27:43 to 28:00
Learn about the cultural context of betting on U.S. presidential elections.
“Well, we've done this sort of history of the opportunities of betting, but there's also a history of the backlash to betting on real events.”
Show all 16 chapters
The Early Days of Prediction Markets in Elections
28:00 to 28:56
Learn how early methods tried to predict presidential elections without polling.
“The big question, of course, was similar to the Pope one, which is who is going to be the next president of the United States.”
DARPA and the Bet on Terrorism
28:56 to 29:58
Explore DARPA's controversial prediction market initiative post-9/11.
“government decides they're going to see if people can bet on terrorism.”
Public Backlash Against Betting on Terrorism
29:58 to 33:07
Discover the public and political backlash that led to the demise of terror betting.
“you that on September 11th, 2001, the World Trade Center is attacked.”
The Papal Bull Against Betting
33:07 to 34:16
Understand the historical papal prohibition on betting for the next pope and its implications.
“the deputy secretary of defense says, I have never heard of that program until I read about it in the paper today.”
The Evolution of Prediction Markets
34:16 to 37:00
Examine how prediction markets have evolved and their current relevance.
“Pope Gregory IV issued a papal bull banning scomese a fare il papa, banning, betting on who was going to be the next pope.”
The Role of Prediction Markets in Journalism
37:00 to 40:48
Learn how journalists are utilizing prediction markets for insights.
“It does feel like there's just, it's hard to say that this isn't going to go away because this stuff just feels like it's everywhere right now.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:28Women deserve tools that support their health at every stage of life. off the new Aura Ring 4. When you buy business software from lots of vendors, the costs add up and it gets complicated and confusing. Odoo solves this. It's a single company that sells a suite of enterprise apps that handles everything from accounting to inventory to sales. Odoo is all connected on a single platform in a simple and affordable way. You can save money without missing out on the features you need. Check out Odoo at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com.
1:28Wasabi.com. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage, proud partner of iHeart Podcast Network.
1:39Pushkit. Too quick? No, it was perfect. Pushkit. Stop. You got it. Hey, it's Jacob. Robert and I recently did a live show with our friends from the Bloomberg podcast, Everybody's Business. The show is about prediction markets, and the hosts of Everybody's Business talked about what's been happening in prediction markets in the last few years, while Robert and I talked about what's been happening in prediction markets for the last 500 years. It was a fun show. I learned a lot making it. And we're going to play it for you now. I hope you like it. This is Everybody's Business from Bloomberg Businessweek.
2:18I'm Stacey Mannix-Smith. I'm Max Chavkin. And this is Business History, a show about the history of business. I'm Jacob Goldstein. And I'm Robert Smith. So actually, this is a podcast mashup between everybody's business and business history. We are calling it Everybody's Business History. Clever. See what you did there? Do you see what I did there? And today we are going to be talking about the world of prediction markets. This is Polymarket and Kalshi. These are places where you can bet on how many inches it is going to snow in Brooklyn today or whether we are going to attack Iran. Everything and anything we can bet on.
2:56These markets are now worth more than$100 billion a year. They're growing all the time. Yeah, I figured just for those people who have been following this in the pages of the Wall Street Journal or Bloomberg, just want to lay it out quickly. Prediction markets, you've probably seen them most with politics. There are two big companies. Stacey just mentioned them. Kalshi. Polymarket. You go on a prediction market, and you'll see essentially a price, like, say, 10 cents for AOC to be the Dem nominee. And what that means is that if you put 10 cents down and AOC becomes the Dem nominee, then you get a dollar.
3:32And if she doesn't, you get zero dollars. And you can bet on everything, pretty much anything under the sun. And we wanted to kind of give people a visceral sense of this via our own sort of prediction market. So this is a financial opportunity for everyone in the room. It's going to require you to look around the room and ask yourself, how's this talk going to go? People are starting to laugh as they see the official name of the market. Okay, let me read the terms. The terms of this market are, will at least 10 % of the audience leave the room before the end of the show? So just to be clear, betting yes is betting, I think, you guys, on a dud, right?
4:14If they bet yes, they're betting that more than 10 % are going to leave. I don't think it's necessarily a dud because they're also overlapping segments. So there could be another panel that people feel like they really want to see. An even stronger panel. Also bathroom, right? Oh, yes. All factors are possible. There's also the prospect of insider trading, which we will get to. I mean, you could bet yes and then walk out. We could all leave. Okay, I'm going to get us back on track. And I just want to give people a sense of how crazy this gets. So Stacey mentioned a couple of markets, weather, there's politics.
4:46There are also these things called mention markets. And Stacey, you are a big fan of the Federal Reserve. I do love the Federal Reserve. People who listen to the show know this. It's kind of endearing, strange. I don't think it's that strange. It's a very important and powerful issue. Monetary policy is exciting, and there is a prediction market. There are prediction markets, as you know, Stacey, every time Jerome Powell gives a speech. and we wrote about one of these in the latest issue of Business Week. This is the lead of the story. So basically, this is Jerome Powell's last press conference.
5:18You could bet on 44 words. So is he going to say the phrase, good afternoon? That's a gimme, by the way. He always says good afternoon. Always. Easiest one cent you'll ever make. But the thing that was kind of crazy about this market is, as the press conference goes on, the odds change. You just saw that with our own market, right? as people are entering the odd shift. And so during the last press conference, there was a question of the word renovation. Would Jerome Powell mention renovation? Remember, people who've been following this probably remember that there's a big controversy over the renovation of the Fed building.
5:53Donald Trump's very mad about it. And let me just play what happened. You know, technological developments that raise potential output, some kind of technological revolution. Did he say renovation? Insane, am I right? It's like the equivalent of a Hail Mary when the game is almost over. We need a replay. Traders on Discord and on Twitter went absolutely berserk over this. The quotes, and you can read these in the Businessweek story, the most insane market I've ever traded. Somebody else wrote, investigate Powell in all caps, suggesting that perhaps Jerome Powell had done this on purpose. He has a Polly market bet.
6:32But I do think, Stacey, this kind of raises a question, which is like, is this valuable? Like, what is the point of these things? Yes, like what is the economic value of these? Obviously, if you are betting on Jerome Powell saying renovation, you have personal value, but what about for the economy? Okay, so let me give you the perspective of the founder of Calci, who's, this is one of the two big companies. Let's just listen to Tariq Mansour try to explain why this matters, like why this is important beyond just an exciting opportunity for gamblers. The long-term vision is to financialize everything and create a tradable asset out of any difference in opinion.
7:10And I think if you do build a general purpose exchange that can resolve differences of opinions on anything, like the time is quite massive. I think that might be the least relatable sentiment I've ever heard. We're going to financialize everything. Do you like finance? What if everything was finance? That's essentially what they're saying. And it sounds kind of crazy, but the argument is basically that this would be a way to sort of hedge your risk in areas where it might be hard to. So one example that Cal Street founders give is flood insurance. Like maybe instead of buying flood insurance, or if the flood insurance were too expensive, you could buy a contract on the weather.
7:47You could buy a contract on rainstorms. And it sort of is, it's the way that like Wall Street hedge funds, you know, use futures and stuff like that. But it would be for all of us. And I want to say, as crazy as this sounds, anyone who bets on sports knows this phenomenon because there's this concept of emotional hedging where you bet against the team you're rooting for. Sort of as a way to soften the blow. Like, my team loses, but, you know, but I make a little money. If I lose, I win. It feels kind of wrong, though. Like, here, let me just give you one last prediction market that's on Polymarket right now.
8:23Will Jesus Christ return before 2027? It's gone up sharply since February. Well, it's also gone down. What has happened in the last month or so? And who is betting on this? Anyway, there's a lot. If he, with a capital H, returns, do we think that Polymarket's going to pay? Oh, that's a good question. There might be bigger problems at that point. Or opportunities, depending on how you've lived your life. And we should say for people listening, it's a 3 % chance, which seems pretty high, right? It does seem high. I mean, it's been 2 ,000 years. We'll talk about this more, Stacey. but to me, like, this just kind of feels wrong.
9:00I'm not specifically talking about the Jesus market, although this does feel wrong to me. But the whole thing, the whole idea of financializing everything. I mean, yes, these markets are incredibly problematic. But I kind of like them. Okay. Here's why I like them. So I really hate gambling. I don't like taking risks, and I don't like trying my luck. I like homework. I like, you know, you do the work and you get the payoff. That makes sense to me. That feels fair to me. These are the markets. This is what I like. I like things where I like homework-oriented things. I mean, and homework does not help you in gambling.
9:40This all tracks. Like, if you go to a roulette table and you know more about roulette and the history of roulette and the roulette wheel than anybody in history, it's not going to help you win at roulette, right? In those cases, like, the casino, it's got an edge. Yeah, if you understand gambling, you don't go into the casino. Exactly. And I would argue in investing, there's kind of similar things going on. Because these big investment houses and hedge funds, they have all this money and they have access to all this information that you and I have no access to. Like they will look at satellite photos of Walmart's parking lot and they will see how many trucks are going in and out.
10:15And they will estimate Walmart's sales and they will figure out Walmart's profits. And then they will place a bet on Walmart's share price. You and I don't have access to that information. It feels very unfair to me. And I don't like it. It just feels like in these cases, the house has the edge and homework is for suckers. And I don't like that. But this is not true on Polymarket and CalShe. On Polymarket and CalShe, if you do your homework, you can get the edge. Yeah, we, a couple months ago on the show, interviewed this big Polymarket trader. I think we called him the Polymarket whale. His name, his pseudonym is Domer.
10:54We know his name, but he likes to be anonymous because I think partly because these markets are in sort of a legal gray area. But anyway, Domer had bet Stacey something like$400 million on Polymarket. When we talked to him, he had a big money bet on Taylor Swift album sales. He had$1 million riding on the question of how many albums Taylor Swift would sell. Yes. And we asked Domer, like, was there a bet that did it? How did you get on these markets? Because this is his job now. He had been a professional poker player, but he had left the world of professional poker for this market. And he said, yeah, there was this bet that did it.
11:31It was back in 2008. So it was John McCain versus Barack Obama. We knew that, but they hadn't picked their running mates yet. And everyone was wondering, especially who's John McCain going to pick? People thought maybe Mitt Romney, but they weren't sure. And there was this old betting market. This old version of a betting market was not Polymarket or CalSheet that went up. And Domer thought, I'm going to bet on this. And I wonder if I can get an edge. And here's what he told us. The date for John McCain picking had been announced. And also the location was a small town in Ohio, which is obviously a swing state.
12:04And then it's like, OK, like, what are the logistics of it? And so we looked at the map and we're like, OK, where's the nearest airport? And so we found the nearest airport and we were looking at the flights that were coming in. And, you know, most flights are, you know, little podunk things. But there was this one random flight from Alaska that was coming in. And it's like, what is going on here? Like, why is that? Why is a flight from Alaska coming into this random town in Ohio? And we're like, OK, I think it might be Sarah Palin. And she was 25 to 1 odds. And, you know, I put a thousand dollars on it, which is a huge bet.
12:40and it ended up being Sarah Palin and I made$25 ,000. Game change, baby. Yeah, heartwarming story, right, Stacey? I think so. Homework for the win. To me, it is a heartwarming story. Domer, by the way, he made$60 ,000 on that Taylor Swift bet, which that was like a couple of days work for him. So this guy is pretty successful. Yes, and at this point, Domer is kind of a pro, but anybody can do this. So our wonderful producer, Jasmine J.T. Green, say hi, Jasmine, told me about this story that I loved and have not been able to stop thinking about. This guy, Caden Booth, he was 21, and he decided he wanted to bet on the Super Bowl.
13:18And he didn't want to bet on the game or the halftime show. He wanted to bet on the national anthem, which seems like a weird thing to bet on. He was betting on the length of the national anthem specifically, which doesn't seem like there should be that big of a range because the song is the song is the song. But there's actually a huge range. So back in 1998, this is Jewel singing the national anthem. It's one of the shortest national anthems in Super Bowl history, clocked in at 1 minute and 27 seconds. Now, in 2013, it was one of the longest national anthems in Super Bowl history. It clocked in at 2 minutes and 36 seconds from the lovely Ms.
13:55Alicia Keys. So now, Caden had to call this year's Super Bowl national anthem. Charlie Puth was singing and he had to figure out where Charlie Puth's national anthem was going to fall on the like star spangled spectrum. Yes. Do the vibrato. Is he going to hold the high note for like a minute and a half? Yes, exactly. Is he going to be on the jewel side or is he going to be on the Alicia Keys side? Yes. So he was kind of poking around and he came across there was this moment and he saw it and he was like, this is my moment. And what happened was he just saw a social media post from Charlie Puth being like, hey, headed to San Francisco.
14:30It's like a week before the Super Bowl. And he thought, this is my moment. He bought three things. He bought a stopwatch. He bought this weird listening equipment that really serious bird watchers use. Like a parabolic mic. Yeah, exactly. To listen to distant bird calls. And he bought a plane ticket to San Francisco. He went to San Francisco. He stood outside of the stadium. There he is. There's the weird bird watching. He stood outside of the stadium. And he was like, at some point, Charlie Puth is going to come. And he is going to rehearse on site. and I'm going to catch the sound with my bird watching listening equipment.
15:06I'm going to time it. I'm going to place my bet. And he waited and he waited and he waited. And then he heard the swell of the music. He hit the timer and clocked it in. I think you can see it there. At a minute 51, he placed his bet. He won thousands of dollars. Homework for the win. Okay, two things, Stacey. One is this is not heartwarming to me because if I'm going to bet on this, I have to bet against this guy with the parabolic mic and the plane ticket and the stopwatch. He did his homework. Okay. This feels fair to me. Problem number two is, what happens, Stacey, if Charlie Puth deliberately, you know, swayed the, you know, he held the high notes for longer than he intended to during the Super Bowl, placed a bet, and took$5 million from this guy?
15:51Yes. So these markets, it is true, have always had an insider trading problem. But now that they're getting bigger and more money is going into them, the insider trading problem is getting much larger. This is especially true in sports. Of course, everyone loves sports betting. Sports betting, you can bet on everything from like the color of socks that some athlete is going to wear to how many fouls there's going to be to how many free throws. So you can bet on every aspect of every sports game. And some people have really taken this kind of insider trading to almost an art form. So there's an athlete, John Taye Porter.
16:30He was with the Toronto Raptors. And he would basically, he was accused of basically making bets on the sidelines, saying I'm about to go in and fake an injury and place a bet. and he would go in and fake an injury and win all of a sudden. These aren't necessarily prediction markets, right, that you're talking about. This is traditional sports betting with Jonte Porter. These were on calling market. Right. And the other thing is this could happen in all sorts of other domains. And that, to me, is what's kind of so distressing about this. Well, it is distressing. And these kinds of issues. So Jonte was banned for life from the NBA.
17:11But these issues have happened on professional sports leagues and college sports leagues. And here's the thing that shocks me and makes me think that maybe this is all going in the direction of casinos and hedge funds. You'd think that sports leagues would be horrified by this, right? It's terrible for sportsmanship. Who wants to watch a game where people are throwing the game or wearing socks or missing free throws because they can get some side money? But no, the biggest thing the sports leagues are worried about is getting a cut of the action. National Hockey League, Major League Soccer have signed deals with Polymarket, basically exclusivity deals so Polymarket can offer bets on them.
17:50And they're cashing in. And the New York Stock Exchange bought a huge chunk of Polymarket. They, too, are cashing in. Which makes me think that Polymarket and Kalshi and all the glories of homework are now going in the direction of casinos and hedge funds. and that these big, rich players can buy an edge or make an edge in this case, and that homework, once again, is for suckers. Okay. It's so sad. I also just worry, Stacey, that we're trivializing important stuff. Like, let's look at this ad that Kalshi has been running. I think I saw this during the Olympics, but it's been out there for a couple of months.
18:30This is how Kalshi is promoting itself. History has taught us anything. It's not to root against the underdog. The British are coming! All right, so you see David with a slingshot, Paul Revere, the midnight ride. People are betting on whether the Wright brothers' plane will crash, I guess. Against impossible odds. Will prisoners escape Alcatraz? Will Sparta win the war? It's like a 300 scene here. And I guess the point is like, hey, all these historical events, you may think of them as historical events, but they're just betting opportunities. I will say they were betting opportunities. Like, we know, in fact, that there were prediction markets on the Revolutionary War.
19:11And we think that we've invented something new, as we always do on the Internet. But, as we found in business history, people want to gamble, and they want to know the future. And that has always been the case. So, can we check in on the market? Yeah, let's just see how it's going. Ooh. Okay, we're doing okay. It's at 56 cents. Oh, no, no, no. Oh, what? Oh, it just dropped. It is at 44%. The whale. Now, remember. The on-air fest whale just went against us. Because we're partway through this session, people have looked around. They have determined that not a lot of people have left so far. And so they are reevaluating what they think of this question, whether 10 % of the audience is going to leave the room or not.
19:58Do you feel like there's also pressure to not leave? 100%. Okay. We will close our eyes for 10 seconds. If anyone wants to make a bad leave, anybody, anybody, we will call you out. Okay. So in theory, those of you keeping count, this will change as we approach the end of the show. I'll try and pick it up a little bit. Yeah. I'll see if we can get at least back to 50%. We're going to take a break and then we're going to come back and Robert and I will talk about the centuries-long history of prediction markets in just a minute.
20:35Thank you.
21:05Oura Ring gives you over 50 metrics that help you understand your body better so you can be your own health advocate. With its accurate heart rate tracking and stylish, comfortable design, Oura Ring is made to be worn 24-7 and actually looks good. It's even FSA and HSA eligible. Oura doesn't just show you the data. It helps you turn insight into action so you can show up as your best self every day. This is personalized health powered by data designed for women. Be the expert in you. Visit auraring.com forward slash decoding to get 10 % off the new Aura Ring 4.
21:51Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. Before you know it, you are drowning in software instead of growing your business. This is where Odoo comes in. Odoo is the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that handles everything. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR, and more. No more app overload. No more juggling logins. Just one seamless system that makes work easier. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost.
22:29It's built to grow with your business, whether you are just starting out or already scaling up. Plus, it's easy to use, customizable, and designed to streamline every process, so you can focus on what really matters, running your business. Thousands of businesses have made the switch, so why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. Innovation is what gets your business to market, And Wasabi is designed to give every business a shot at competition. How? Break free from skyrocketing storage costs and unpredictable egress fees from old and top-heavy legacy providers. You know, the big guys.
23:09Wasabi is the world's hottest cloud storage company and the go-to provider for professional and collegiate sports teams and leagues around the world. And here's why. Innovation. From Wasabi's AI-enabled intelligent media storage, Wasabi Air, to the industry's only cloud storage service with triple protection against cyber criminals, data deletion, and ransomware, the world's top companies trust Wasabi. Remember, Wasabi is up to 80 % less than market competition and doesn't charge a cent for businesses to access their own data. Wasabi, another championship story. Check them out for free at wasabi.com.
23:47Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage, proud partner of iHeart Podcast Network.
24:02so yeah in fact i meant it when i said that people might have been betting on paul revere's ride we know that prediction markets not just gambling but real prediction markets go back at least 500 years they go back to italy in the 1500s and the big market there the big prediction market in italy scomese a fare il papa, betting on who's going to be the pope. The papa! Il papa. And, I mean, it makes sense both that it's in Italy, and that's what they were betting on. It makes sense that it was in Italy because this was the time, Italy in the 1500s, when modern finance is emerging in Europe. The first banks are being established.
24:45The Medici are running Florence. And so you see these laws being passed to give brokers in Rome and Florence a monopoly on these prediction markets. And then the Il Papa part also makes sense because predicting the next pope in the 1500s was like the Super Bowl and the presidential election rolled into one. And a lottery. And a lottery, sure. You know, the pope had a tremendous amount of political power. It mattered if you were a wool merchant in England or if you were the king of France or whatever. It mattered who was going to be the next pope. And so you see ambassadors, you know, writing back home every time there's a conclave, like, who is papabile?
Read the full transcript
25:28Who's popable, they would ask. These brokers who have the monopoly, they print up cedule, that's like a voucher today, like tickets, with each cardinal's or all the possible guy's names on them. And they pay off for 100, 100 scudi, and you buy it for whatever fractional probability the guy is selling it, exactly like prediction markets work today. and so like for example in 1549 there was a conclave and at one moment Cardinal Pole of England was at 80 % in the voting heavy favorite and interestingly we know now from the historical record that at that moment he did in fact have 26 of the 28 votes he needed right we knew that that market was reflecting reality how could they possibly know that the people who are betting on it.
26:23Could the cardinals have been insider trading? Oh, Muldoo. No. I mean, look, if you saw the movie Conclave, you know, right, that the conclave is supposed to be sealed. Like, literally, the word conclave is like conclave, cum clavis, right, with a key. It's a room that's closed with a key. But yes, obviously, the cardinals were insider trading, right? Of course they were. This is how it got out. And now there is this question, right? Like, Stacey and Max, you guys just talked for 20 minutes about why prediction markets are so bad, and fair enough, but put yourself in the shoes of the British wool merchant or of the ambassador or whatever.
27:03These people who really need to know who's going to be the Pope, lives depend on it, livelihoods depend on it. And so this insider trading by the cardinals, yes, it's unfair. Sure, it's gross, but it is useful information, right? It's good to know what's going on inside the locked room. Although I should say that Cardinal Pohl, that guy who was trading at 80%, he did not win. A French cardinal showed up at the last minute and accused Pohl of being a crypto-Lutheran, not a Bitcoin trader, but a secret Protestant, and the papacy went to an Italian cardinal instead. Your bet on Pohl was now worth zero, weeping in the street.
27:41It's basically the Jerome Powell renovation of the 16th century Italy. Yes, exactly right, exactly right. Well, we've done this sort of history of the opportunities of betting, but there's also a history of the backlash to betting on real events. We're going to forget Europe for a second and move to America in the 1800s and the early 1900s. The big question, of course, was similar to the Pope one, which is who is going to be the next president of the United States. There was not polling at the time, and so they tried unique things to figure out who the next president would be. Reporters would go to bars and count the number of toasts to the various candidates.
28:18They would be like, huzzah, William Harrison, and they'd mark that down. This was a terrible way to predict the presidency. Only drinking. But the most fun. But the most fun. Huzzah! And there were actual prediction markets in presidential elections. They tried that. But then states thought, this is a terrible idea. And in the 1920s, they decide that they are going to basically outlaw this kind of betting in the United States. America. Now it does come back and it comes back prediction markets from an unlikely source at the beginning of the 21st century. The source of prediction markets is the U.S.
28:55government. The U.S. government decides they're going to see if people can bet on terrorism. Let me explain. May of 2001, DARPA. Now I know it sounds like a James Bond bad guy, but DARPA is the research arm of the Pentagon. They're the people who helped bring us the internet. And they put out this call for proposals for, quote, electronic market-based decision support. The proposal is basically asking, can prediction markets help the U.S. government predict what's going to happen around the world? Like, maybe in the coming year, what's the probability of a revolution in Tunisia? What will the economic growth in Mexico be?
29:39These are things the US government wants to know. And the smart guys there are playing around with prediction markets because the internet has just come in. People are obviously using the internet for betting already. And so DARPA thinks, well, we should give this a try and see what's going to happen. Now, they put out the call for this in May of 2001. I don't need to tell you that on September 11th, 2001, the World Trade Center is attacked. And it's the worst attack on America since Pearl Harbor. And this should affect the market. But DARPA thinks, actually, this is a case for having prediction markets for terrorism.
30:18There is all of this stuff happening in the world. We need better ways to predict the future. And for those of you who read the 9-11 report, there were people who knew parts of the story. It just was in different agencies, different people. It was hard to tell the signal from the noise. If there's one thing a betting market does is it aggregates all this information in one place. So DARPA decides they're going to go forward with this. They pay a million dollars and they start a market called PAM, the Policy Analysis Market. I don't know if that's their actual logo, but I hope so. It is. That's actually such a, that's how the web used to look.
30:54Drink it in. Oh, I love it with the rain. It's got a rainbow and a world and a supply and demand curve, I believe, over there on the market part of it. So one of the main proponents of this is an economist named Robin Hanson. He's still a proponent of prediction markets, former Silicon Valley guy. And the market is all set to open in the summer of 2003. Now, it's just going to be a sample market in terrorism. It's just going to be about the Middle East. And they are only going to give testers$100 to trade. So you can't make a million dollars on predicting what's going to happen in the Middle East.
31:25But they're just going to play around with this. And then in July of 2003, a few Democratic senators learn about the plan. And I believe get wind of is the official Washington term. They get wind of this plan, and the Democratic senators are not happy about this. They are Byron Dorgan of South Dakota and Ron Wyden of Oregon. Look at those guys. And on July 28th, they call a press conference. They call a press conference. We have a picture up of them smiling, sort of, but you're going to have to picture them being incredibly mad. This is what Dorgan says. The idea of a federal betting parlor on atrocities and terrorism is ridiculous and it's grotesque.
32:12Grotesque. Yeah, sounds bad when you put it that way, right? Wyden says, why wouldn't terrorists just hop online and start betting if they couldn't either mislead American authorities about their plans or make money to fund more Al-Qaeda operations? They say that it is morally wrong. And this, of course, was a huge story, boiled down, not the subtle economics of it, but really just like Pentagon kills terror futures market. Sounds terrible. But there is something really deep here and something that gets to the heart of our relationship with prediction markets. People love to gamble. There are real reasons to gamble.
32:53But people hate the idea of gambling. It's unseemly. And they find gambling on important things morally repugnant. Things like, will there be a terrorist attack? So literally the day the senators hold the press conference, the deputy secretary of defense says, I have never heard of that program until I read about it in the paper today. And yes, obviously, we're going to kill the program. The government will do without the electronic market-based decision support. There will be no betting on terrorism. And the prediction markets basically fade away until the rise of Calci and Pauli Market, who sort of took this lesson to heart because the one thing they do not call it is gambling.
33:34It's prediction. Sounds much better. Speaking of morally repugnant, I saw someone leave the room. Right on the edge here. That's going to affect the market. Also, somebody walked in. It was the count from the beginning. I think it may. Okay. All right. So we're going to wrap up the history section. but before we do that I want to go back to Italy in the 1500s I have money on that you win and the thing I want to point out is this tension between we want to gamble, we want information about the future but also we hate it when people do that, that has always been there that was there from the beginning in the 1500s and in fact in 1590 Pope Gregory IV issued a papal bull banning scomese a fare il papa, banning, betting on who was going to be the next pope.
34:25That is him. I don't know if that's his papal bull in his hand, but he is waving. Maybe he's waving goodbye. Arrivederci scomese a fare il papa. The penalty was excommunication, and kind of amazingly, it worked. Prediction markets on who was going to be the next pope seem to have gone away after this point. You don't see ambassadors writing home about it anymore. And so, you know, what has happened? Well, the church seems less gross and maybe less corrupt. You know, the Pope talked about how we shouldn't combine the most holy thing in the world with the corruption of the market, right? And emotionally, that is resonant.
35:04It's the counter-reformation, right? So it's also good for business at this moment. The Catholic church seems less corrupt. But on the other hand, the people who really needed that information about who was going to be the next pope don't have it anymore. They have less idea about this important thing that's going to happen. And so there is this trade-off. Last thought before we kind of talk it out is it's easy to think, oh, prediction markets, like the modern world is so gross, everything is just getting worse. That is clearly not true, right? This is not a line where things are getting more and more more gambly, more and more degenerate.
35:41This is a pendulum that has been swinging back and forth for literally hundreds of years. And so the question I would pose as we finish is, is there going to be a backlash? When is the pendulum going to swing back? And just to be clear, this papal bull is still in effect. So the current Pope cannot bet on Jesus Christ returning. I mean, he would have to do it through maybe a cardinal. But yeah, so what do you think? Is this, are we going to enter the era where everyone's betting on everything or will it swing back where it becomes morally repugnant in a way? Max and Stacey? I think this is different than the Papa voting because you can bet on everything and we are all so connected.
36:25I just think this betting is on another level and it's on everything. I don't know. To me, this is different. I feel like there are so many ways in which you take these kind of things that have happened through history and then you turbocharge them with the internet and you get something like say he's saying different and and I don't know I mean putting these papal markets for instance how did how did you have to bet Jacob you had to like fill out a piece of paper and like physically hand it to someone? It's so hard so much friction you have to actually have paper. Yeah I mean more Certainly more friction and you didn't have all this marketing behind it.
37:04It does feel like there's just, it's hard to say that this isn't going to go away because this stuff just feels like it's everywhere right now. Just every part of life is being financialized, being turned into gambling essentially. Including journalism. Journalistic organizations have partnered with betting platforms because what they see is that people are using this as a way to get information. Why wait on what the news is going to tell you about that was on Twitter or on the Polly market when you can sign up yourself and see the moment the bet changes, the moment something pops? That's a news item.
37:41That may be considered in the future like a news alert on your phone, except you're watching it. Well, and then I think they're counting on insider traders to have a correct market. They're counting on people who have more knowledge than the rest of us weighing in on the market. Well, in this particular, I mean, in my heart, yes, it is bad because it devalues homework. But I do think that it does make those markets more valuable. I mean, Domer actually told us this really interesting case that took place here in New York around the mayoral election. And it was when... Wait, there was corruption around the New York mayor?
38:15I know. I know. Hold on to your seats. But Eric Adams was still in the race at this point, but it was clear he was dropping out. And so this question came up about when. And according to Domer, he told us there was this huge bet placed from a new user on Polymarket like right before Eric Adams dropped out of the race. Like second. That's true, actually. Look, I mean, I could imagine. Like what you guys are saying is true, but there could be some huge horrific event and two senators could stand up and say, people are profiting from this huge, horrific event. And I do feel like there's a way to put a little skin in this game.
38:56I think what we need is a market that says, will Calci or Polly Market be banned by 2030? You want to make a betting market about betting markets? I guess the problem is if you say, yes, they'll be banned, how do you collect? It's like the Jesus bet all over. It's the Jesus bet. Do you all use prediction markets in your journalism? Do you find yourself going to them? I use them as a citizen. I look at them for... Do you bet? No. I look at them for elections. When something happens, when there's some political news, I'll go and see how has the probabilities moved of which party is going to control the Senate after the midterms.
39:40Because I feel like if there is meaningful news, those markets are big enough that they should move. and I actually use it as entertainment. So I knew I was going to watch the State of the Union. And so I looked at the words people were betting on that President Trump would say, just so I had a reason to keep going. What were they? Oh, they were everything from, is he going to say Iran? Is he going to say 250, which is the 250th anniversary of the United States, which he did. And you could just see the list of them, and it just kept me watching. It's action. It turns it into action. It does action.
40:12Edge of my seat. All right. Should we check in one last time on our mic? Yeah. Let's see who might have won here. Oh, come on. Wow. Okay. So this implies that the audience believes that it's a lower than 50 % chance that people will leave the room. That's good for us. We should thank everybody. Thank you for staying here. Yes. This has been the very first mashup live show of everybody's business history. I'm Stacey Vanek-Smith. I'm Max Shafkin. I'm Robert Smith. And I'm Jacob Goldstein. Thanks for listening. Thanks, everybody.
41:02You ain't heard about Moto Casino? Moto has real Vegas slots. Any game you can find on the floor in Vegas, you can play it on Moto. I like my slots hot. Moto's free to play, like food stamps, in line at the grocery store, at a funeral, in traffic, keep your eyes on the road, hop on Moto Casino. Moto Casino got jackpots that are bigger than my belly. Moto, America's hottest free-to-play social casino. Download the Moto Casino app today. Moto Casino's the social casino board. We're prohibited. No purchase necessary. Visit Moto.us for more details. Moto Casino. America's social casino. When your schedule sounds like this.
41:39Are you kidding me? An oil change is the last thing you have time for. So drive into Take 5 and let our techs change your oil, check your tires, top off your fluids, and have you back on the road pit stop fast. All while you stay in your car. No putting your entire schedule on hold. No upsells, no problem. So you can get back to your to-do list. Or not. Find your nearest shop at Take5.com. Take 5. The stay in your car 10-minute oil change. It's tax season. And by now, we're all a bit tired of numbers. But here's an important one you need to hear. $16 billion. That's how much money in refunds the IRS flagged for possible identity fraud.
42:16But it's not all grim news. LifeLock monitors millions of data points per second and alerts you to threats you could easily miss on your own. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it. Guaranteed. Save up to 40 % your first year. Visit LifeLock.com slash iHeart. Terms apply.
From the publisher
A live mash-up between Business History and Bloomberg's Everybody's Business.
On platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket you can bet on just about anything - from Taylor Swift's album sales to whether President Trump will say a certain word in a speech. Many people worry about these new prediction markets, but the concept is far older than some critics might think.
We go back centuries to Papal conclaves; hear about how counting drinking toasts stood in for political polling; and learn how the US government tried using betting markets to predict terrorist attacks.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




