In short
Consumer VC Podcast Episode Summary
Episode Title
Kiva Dickinson & Madeline Kaplan (Selva Ventures) - Raising $34 Million Fund 2, Opportunities in Beauty & Personal Care, And The Value of $1 in Revenue Online vs. In Retail
Episode Overview
In this episode of Consumer VC, host Mike Gelb interviews Kiva Dickinson and Madeline Kaplan from Selva Ventures. They discuss the recent raising of their second fund, which totals $34 million, and explore the differences between clean and clinically backed beauty brands. The conversation also addresses the relative value of online versus retail revenue, emerging trends in the beauty and personal care sectors, and the overarching landscape of consumer brands.
Key Points Discussed
Introduction to Selva Ventures
- Selva Ventures focuses on partnering with consumer brands promoting healthier living.
- Fund 2 differs from Fund 1 in scale and strategy, with increased capital and focus on early-stage investments.
The State of Consumer Brands
- Fragmentation of Consumer Preferences:
- The varied tastes of consumers allow indie brands to address problems that large conglomerates cannot.
- Importance of celebrating differences and the unique solutions brands provide to consumers.
Fundraising Insights
- Fundraising strategies are evolving, with Selva Ventures recognizing the need for more involvement and larger check sizes in their investment approach.
- Kiva shares his journey of building Selva Ventures, highlighting the challenges and learnings since the initial establishment.
Beauty & Personal Care Sector
- Shift towards Clinical Beauty:
- This trend emphasizes product efficacy over merely "clean" ingredients.
- Brands must demonstrate tangible benefits and resonate emotionally with consumers.
- Emerging focus on the beauty and personal care category is driven by high margins and profitable business models.
Online vs. Retail Revenue
- Discussion on the relative value of a dollar earned online versus in retail settings.
- Factors influencing revenue evaluation:
- Online metrics focus on customer retention rates and subscription models.
- Retail metrics prioritize product turnover and market presence.
DTC and Omni-Channel Strategies
- The emergence of omni-channel approaches as a necessity for brands.
- Concerns over the sustainability of direct-to-consumer (DTC) models amidst rising customer acquisition costs.
- Brands need a solid plan for retail distribution to ensure scalable success.
Themes in Beauty and Personal Care
- Clinical Beauty vs. Clean Beauty:
- Clean beauty lacks a standardized definition, leading to consumer confusion.
- Importance of understanding both the ingredient efficacy and consumer experience.
- Sun Care:
- Growing interest in sun protection products due to increased awareness of skin health.
Investor Perspectives
- Kiva and Madeline emphasize the importance of strategic thinking for brands in today’s tightened capital markets.
- The necessity for startups to focus on profitability while maintaining growth momentum.
Non-Alcoholic Beverages
- Kiva shares insights on the non-alcoholic trend as both a response to cultural shifts and consumer health consciousness.
- Non-alcoholic options serve as a solution for those wanting to reduce alcohol consumption without sacrificing social experiences.
Conclusion The episode concludes with reflections on the fragmentation of consumer preferences and the innovative spirit that drives the beauty and personal care industry. Both Kiva and Madeline express excitement for the opportunities in their sector and the potential for growth and investment.
Additional Resources
- For more insights and past episodes, visit [The Consumer VC](http://www.theconsumervc.com).
- Follow Mike Gelb on Twitter for updates: [@mikegelb](https://twitter.com/MikeGelb).
Sponsors
- This episode is sponsored by Vauban from Carta, which provides tools for launching and running venture investments, including SPVs and fund vehicles.
Key Takeaways
- Emphasize the importance of emotional connection and product efficacy in consumer brands.
- Recognize the necessity of adapting business models to embrace omni-channel strategies.
- Understand the evolving landscape of fundraising and how consumer preferences are shaping investment opportunities.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This episode is brought to you by Vobin from Carta. Vobin from Carta is the easiest way to launch and run your venture investing. They offer SPVs and fund vehicles for GPs at all stages of the journey, from your first syndicate to operating a multi-million dollar venture fund. If you're interested in investing in startups, stick around after the episode where I chat with Gabriel Shin from the Vobin from Carta team, who shares his perspective and tips about how to start investing and how Vobin from Carta can get you set up. The link to Vobin from Carta's website is in the show notes. One person loving or hating a product is so non-indicative of whether a brand will succeed or whether a movement or category will succeed.
0:42And it is actually the fragmentation of taste preferences and consumer preferences in general that allow this industry to flourish. It's what allows indie brands to go solve problems that big, large, established, well-resourced CPG conglomerates can't solve. And so that fragmentation, I think, is the magic of this industry. It's something that I think we should just be celebrating more. The differences between us and how these brands can solve our problems and how when we solve our problems, we can share those solutions with friends. That to me is the most special part of the industry that we work in.
1:19Hello, I'm your host, Mike Gelb, and this is the Consumer VC Podcast, where we discuss the intersection of venture capital and consumer innovation. If you're enjoying this podcast, I highly recommend subscribing to my newsletter at theconsumervc.com, where you'll receive all new episodes straight to your inbox and a weekly recap of all the consumer deals that are happening. All content and episodes are for informational and entertainment purposes only and is not investment advice. This episode is brought to you by Vauban from Carta. Vauban from Carta is the easiest way to launch and run your venture investing.
1:52They offer SPVs and fund vehicles for GPs at all stages of the journey, from your first syndicate to operating a multi-million dollar venture fund. If you're interested in investing in startups, stick around after the episode where I chat with Gabriel Shin from the Vobin from Carta team, who shares his perspective and tips about how to start investing and how Vobin from Carta can get you set up. The link to Vobin from Carta's website is in the show notes. So we're here. I I can't believe we're here. We're at episode 300. And I couldn't be more excited to have these two amazing investors on the show who just came off of raising their second$34 million fund.
2:30We have Kiva Dickinson, our first non-named Mike second time guest and Madeline Kaplan from Selva Ventures. Selva Ventures is an early stage venture capital firm dedicated to partnering with consumer brands that promote healthier living. We discussed their recent close of their$34 million fund too. how it's different from Fund One, the differences between clean and clinically backed beauty and personal care brands. Do they value$1 of online revenue more than$1 earned in retail? And much, much, much more. This is a really, really great conversation about consumer brands and as well as health and wellness.
3:08Without further ado, here's Kiva and Madeline.
3:21Kiva and Madeline, Team Selva. Thank you both so much for coming on the podcast. How are you both? We're doing great. Excited to be here. Excited to be back. Doing well. Thanks for having us, Mike. No, thank you so much for coming on. Kiva, you are the first second time podcast guest who is not named Mike. So congratulations. That's an honor. And I very much look up to the first one. So big shoes to fill. So Kiva, you came back, you were first on the pod back in 2020. A lot of things have changed, obviously, in the state of consumer. I know the state of Selva has also changed. Now you've gone from a team of one to a team of two.
4:00What have been some of your learnings over the past couple of years since we started speaking back in 2020? Yeah, I mean, probably at the highest level, building a firm is hard. I think we spoke probably like February of 2020. It was so close to the world shutting down that I remember we had to get back on the phone to record a little a little addendum. Went into working from my kitchen table and then a small home office for a long time without without a teammate for quite some time until Madeline joined the fold. And so I think probably just gratitude that I was naive enough to take a shot at this on my own at the beginning and very much aware of like how many battle scars came along the way to build something that more investors would want to be a part of and more companies would want to be a part of.
4:53and more importantly, that Madeline would want to join. Because ever since the team has expanded, it's been a game changer. I feel like we've grown up and really expanded our vision and ambition quite a bit while keeping the mission the same. So what led to Madeline joining the team? How did you first, both of you first meet? And Madeline, I guess, what got you excited to join Selva? Yeah, so Kiva and I met in the summer of 2021. At the time, I was working at a later stage consumer investment firm, kind of doing Series B all the way to pre-IPO and was looking to go earlier stage with my investing as well as focus on kind of more of a niche part of the market.
5:39And I'd always been super passionate about health and wellness in my own personal life. I was a student athlete all the way through college. I grew up in LA where me and my friends were always trying the latest health and wellness trends. And so it was an area that I was already pretty personally passionate about. And so every person that I spoke on the phone with, I was telling them about what I was interested in. And one of our mutual friends, Chloe Steinberg, suggested that I connect with Kiva and learn more about what he was doing at Selva, just in the context of learning more about what it would be like to actually do that day to day.
6:17And so we hopped on the phone and had a nice call and then really spent like the next eight or nine months getting to know each other, getting to kind of figure out how we operate. We looked at a deal together and felt super aligned both in terms of our core values and the kind of firm that we wanted to build as well as the strategy that Selva is pursuing. So I feel very fortunate to have joined the team and to be where we are today. Can we talk a little bit about the strategy that Selva is pursuing? And Kiva, how has that evolved from maybe where we were back in 2019, 2020, when you were first starting this firm?
6:56The strategy originally stemmed from a problem that I saw in the market, a hole in the market of value add high resource capital, supporting early stage wellness brands at Seed and Series A. it felt like there were a ton of really amazing supportive firms in later stages. And there were some amazing early stage firms that provided not just capital, but great resources across technology and healthcare, but really not a lot in consumer products. And so we came to market with a$10 million fund, really trying to more than anything, prove that this type of investing would work, that not only could there be a really interesting return profile at the earliest stage of consumer products, but also that what we brought to bear would resonate with the best brands and that they would want to work with us.
7:53I think what we found is a number of proof points that this does work, a number of proof points that this really is an exceptional opportunity in terms of risk reward and opportunity for partnership with these types of brands. these types of brands, I think, liked working with us and often were asking for us to be more involved. You know, we led three of the 14 investments we made in fund one. And I think, you know, there are at least twice as many that we probably could have led if we had the greater capital to do so. And so I think as we started thinking about this second fund, we started thinking like, essentially, how do we avoid changing our strategy as much as possible?
8:45Because the strategy is very much working. And it certainly seemed like the appetite from these companies that we like to focus on for us to say, right, a$1.5 million check instead of a$500 ,000 check was really there. And so that gave us the confidence really to run the same strategy back to maybe talk about some other categories, which we can spend more time on in this session, but to really not change the type of company we're looking for, which is, again, just that seed in Series A, really high potential, ambitious brand that's helping their consumers live healthier lives. In terms of the evolution, I guess partly it's writing bigger checks, being able to lead more rounds and become more and more involved in companies.
9:29Maybe we can talk a little bit as well as how you think about being involved and actually helping companies from that standpoint, too. But would love to first maybe dive into what are maybe some of the new categories that you're maybe interested in that previously maybe in Fund 1 that you weren't exploring? Yeah, I think the first one to start with is something that was a more minor focus in Fund 1 that is becoming a really major focus in Fund 2, which is beauty and personal care. you know we had invested in kinship and cake prior to madeline joining uh it wasn't until madeline joined that we were able to um to really dive headfirst into that space and try to become a leader uh it was a category that i always knew was was really interesting but it would have required much greater expertise than i had in order to play a force and so it was madeline's passion, which you should talk about, that really allowed us to make that a big strategic focus.
10:30I would just add to that, that beauty and personal care are categories that I personally love and spend a lot of time learning about and exploring in my own life. And then I think from the business perspective, can be very high margin, profitable businesses. And when you're truly solving a problem for the consumer, having that repeat purchase and people kind of coming back for more and really a sticky customer makes it a great business model when it works. So I think the combination of both being super interested in the category and then having a pretty compelling business model, as well as some strategic buyers who rely on these kind of early high growth companies to acquire them to continue to bolster their growth.
11:17It was just like a great, great category for us to get more exposure in. And so far in the second fund, two out of three of our investments are in the beauty and personal care space. So I can understand why beauty and personal care, broadly speaking, as a category is pretty interesting for a VC, right? You have high margin profile. If a consumer loves your product, then you hopefully have high retention, which those are two great things to have in a business that you can scale with. But how do you dissect within beauty and personal care of what kind of makes a company more interesting or different kind of sub trends or that you find quite interesting in today's market?
12:07Yeah, so I think it goes back to what we focus pretty broadly on at Selva is brands that are making products that are, you know, making consumers lives better in some way. And we think about that in three ways. Products that offer better function, better ingredients, and a better emotional connection with the consumer. And I think that last piece is pretty critical in the beauty category. I would say, like, in terms of what's interesting in the space, there has to be some sort of, you know, need for this product, some sort of innovation or reason that the product exists, and that the consumers are coming back for more and more.
12:50And then I would say on the brand side of things, that emotional resonance is really, really important. And having something that's either speaking to the consumer, making them feel seen in a way that they haven't before, you know, more so reflecting the modern world that we live in. There's such a need for those new brands that are able to kind of attract and reach consumers that have oftentimes not felt like, you know, the beauty standard or kind of what the traditional incumbents have reflected kind of reflects who they are. So I think that that's kind of another piece of the puzzle and definitely is kind of the Selva way of thinking about these brands is how is this making a consumer's life better?
13:33And that's kind of woven throughout both the brands that we've invested in today, as well as the ones that we continue to look at. And then the other piece of it is we do thematic mapping. So we kind of identify the trends in the space that we're really most excited about and try to talk to any and all companies that are building products in that category. So what are some of the thematic mapping side? What are maybe some of the different themes within beauty and personal care that you find particularly interesting and why? Yeah, so I think first is kind of this movement more towards clinical beauty over clean, which is just this idea of kind of the gold standard being product efficacy.
14:21And I think that as consumers become more and more inundated with so many new products, they just really, at the end of the day, want something that works. And so showing, you know, whether it's before and afters or clinical results or kind of a deeper level of exploration in terms of why does this product need to exist? And then being able to articulate that well through marketing to the consumer, I think, is one area across all of, you know, everything from beauty to personal care. We see this in supplements as well, but something that we're pretty excited about. And, you know, I think our investment in a company called One Skin is part of this theme.
15:04They're a longevity skincare company that creates topical products that help combat signs of aging. But what really the customer understands and keeps coming back for is this is like this is a skin health product. So it's not just improving the way your skin looks, but it's improving the performance of your skin, your resilience. you know, your skin is the largest organ in your body and it's making it stronger and more defensible to, you know, I think external factors. So that's one category that we're pretty excited about. I think one skin is a start and we're not done exploring that space. And then more recently, I've been going deep on sun care.
15:48I think that, you know, for a number of reasons, everyone should be wearing sunscreen every day. There's, you know, increasing education, there's increasing understanding of UVA and UVB rays and how essential, essentially, sunscreen is the best anti-aging product you can ever put on your body. But also that, you know, the education of all skin tones, all skin types need to be wearing sunscreen, need to be protecting their skin and finding the brands that are really at the forefront and creating formulations that work for different skin types is another category that we've been excited about and exploring.
16:30I really appreciate you sharing both those different categories, clinical beauty and also sun care. You mentioned in the beginning how you take how you're right now more focused on, for example, clinical beauty over clean beauty. What do you actually mean by that? How do you define clean beauty in your mind? Yeah, I mean, I think that's a great question. I would say it's a term that is interpreted in different ways by almost everyone. And so you've got a different clean standard from all of the big retailers that we look at. Credo has a different clean standard from Sephora, who has a different standard from Ulta.
17:06And I would say, ultimately, like what clean and kind of the dialogue around it has done is created more awareness of the ingredients we're putting on our body. So I think it's generally been a positive thing. But I do think that in some instances, it has almost steered us in this direction of going to the extreme of we need no chemicals in our in our products. Well, everything's a chemical, water is a chemical. So I think that this narrative, like while it started in a really positive place of, hey, let's be more conscious about the ingredients that we're putting on our skin has been now, to answer your question, I don't have a clear answer of what is quote unquote clean because there is different clean definitions.
17:53It's not standardized by anyone. And so that's why I think instead of just investing in companies that claim to be clean, because I don't think any business is going to say, hey, my product's toxic and terrible to put on your skin. I just don't know why you would ever come up with a product you don't view as clean. We are focused on how do we understand these ingredients? How do we understand these formulations? And what is the efficacy? What is the driver that's going to make people say, oh my gosh, this is improving my self-confidence, making me feel better about myself, making it easier for me to take care of myself.
18:30That's really kind of the North Star that we're going for. So when I think about this, and tell me if I'm wrong, Clinical Beauty, it's, you know, this is how the product can actually help and better your skin. Whereas clean ingredients, like let's focus on the source of the actual ingredients itself, where you're kind of saying, let's not as much focus on like the actual source of where the, and kind of nitpick over what is, you know, clean versus not. Let's just focus on how it can actually help your skin. Is that, is that roughly correct? Yeah, I think that's right. And I think it's also understanding that in the world of consumer, there's going to be different products that work for different people.
19:08So I think there's, you know, there are some ingredients that are not considered clean that work for some people and others where, you know, fragrance is a great example of this. Clean generally states that the products are fragrance free. And for people who have sensitized skin or different skin conditions, fragrance can really irritate their skin. But if you have normal skin, you might want the experience of fragrance on your skin. So I think it's also understanding that there's different consumer preferences. And so these different ways of shopping and ways of thinking about things work for different people.
19:48No, that's really helpful. I also wanted to focus as well about distribution channels. I know there's a lot of talk around, you know, maybe in 2022 is said that, you know, DTC is dead or what have you. And, you know, there's maybe more of an emphasis to go omni-channel or go retail maybe earlier for brands than previously. How do you think about, you know, DTC, retail, if you see a brand that kind of comes to you with their value prop, what kind of is the right answer or how do you think about as a brand maybe could grow in 2023 and beyond? Maybe Kiva, we'll start with you. Yeah, I think for a long time, people believed that direct-to-consumer was in and of itself an innovation would be how consumers would want to shop across a lot of different categories, across a lot of different parts of their lifestyle.
20:55And that trend really had picked up steam prior to the pandemic, which forced all of us into our houses and accelerated our adoption of shopping online and buying products directly from the source. I think we probably, as an industry, overestimated how much appetite there was for consumers to buy product this way. And in doing so, we collectively overcapitalized a large chunk of companies that had not actually proven their ability to scale profitably and create really interesting equity value appreciation for the investors along the way. Right. We like this industry of consumer products and consumer wellness, not only because there are really powerful tailwinds that we think are largely immune to cycles.
22:00We also like it because there are tens of thousands of points of distribution across the United States and Canada that allow consumers to pick up a product that they're familiar with without you having to spend money on an Instagram ad or a Facebook ad or AdWords to get them to transact in that moment. And as these businesses scale, it's those points of distribution that can be very profitable where you share a small portion of a sale with a retailer instead of spending$30 to$75 every time a consumer transacts, that is ultimately the unlock that we see to these consumer brands having attractive EBITDA margins over time and attractive P &L that an acquirer would want to buy.
22:59So as we have evolved in our thinking, we've probably put greater pressure on a young brand to prove to us how they plan to build that bridge between being a digital first brand that has gotten a lot of early consumers excited and being an omni-channel brand that really fits with a number of different retailers that can scale. And that means potentially seeing interest from retailers. It means having velocity from some early retailers. It means explaining why you won't hit a ceiling when you get beyond a certain type of niche retailer that's willing to take risks and hit the big time, which we think of as Walmart, Target, Costco.
23:48I don't think it makes sense to assume that a young brand with under$5 million in sales will have thought of all of that. But we pretty much dismiss at this point, the brands who have not thought of it at all, who simply think that direct to consumer will continue and that the next million dollars will be easier than the last million dollars, because I've yet to see the next million dollars of direct to consumer revenue be easier than the last million dollars. I would just add to that. We have a Selva book club every quarter where we read a business book and discuss how it relates to our business and the companies that we work with.
24:32And most recently, we read The Hard Thing About Hard Things by Ben Horwitz. And there's a quote in there about no silver bullets, only lead ones. And Kiva and I always kind of go back to that. And I think it's just remembering, you know, when the iOS 14 update came out and CACs rose for especially for these emerging brands, it just made the entire landscape hard. And so a lot of people turn to look to retail as kind of the silver bullet. And the reality is all these channels are really hard. It's really hard to scale a business. And so I think it's an important reminder as brands think about, you know, how do we scale?
25:16How do we continue to grow? You know, ultimately, at the end of the day, going back to, is this a great product? Is this a great brand? How do we find our customers that need and want this product and want to keep coming back for more? and then to Kiva's point, really having a strong and solid, well thought through plan for how you're going to go into retail and work with those partners, not only to be on shelf, but how are you solving something for the retailer? How are you tapping into a trend that they're excited about where you can come in and be on shelf and they're kind of helping to promote the brand and the trend that you're tapping into?
25:57So yeah, no silver bullets, but definitely we've been an omni-channel supporter since before it was cool, I think. When you're evaluating a brand, let's say the brand both is D2C and then also is in retail, how much is an online dollar worth to you compared to a dollar in retail? I don't think we can adjust with a lot of precision how we value one versus another. I've certainly heard the when you sell a beverage business, they mark your online revenue to zero. That anecdote has gotten thrown around a little bit. I understand why that's true in beverage, although I wouldn't consider myself an expert in beverage.
26:53I would say it's definitely not true in other categories. So we don't so much value online dollars as less than retail dollars. We do use a different set of metrics to evaluate them. So for an online business or a business's online channel, I care a lot about what percentage of their customers come back within 12 months, what percentage of their customers decide to subscribe, and what percentage of their subscribers are still around after 12, 18, 24 months. All of those things inform payback periods on customer acquisition costs. They inform what your return on invested capital is or LTV to cap.
27:54They also at their core just indicate signal as to whether you're actually solving problems for consumers, because if you've solved the problem for a consumer, they're going to buy it again. On the flip side in retail, what we're typically caring about is are you turning fast enough relative to your category benchmark and relative to your competition to one, stay on shelf, not get kicked out, to increase distribution in that door, meaning let's say you have two flavors on shelf and you want to get three and four on there, and three, attract other retailers to bring you on. Because if you're doing well in one retailer, retailer over here will look at your performance in that first retailer as a signal that you will work well in their retailer.
28:50So it's not so much that one is more valuable than the other between those two. But I think both tend to be powerful signals to us on how you stack up against your competition and whether you're ultimately an outlier. No, I think that those are some great points in terms of how to I actually think about it from a metric perspective as well. The DTC channel or different online channels versus as well retail channels. Walk me through a little bit about both of your due diligence process. I mean, I know that we talked a little bit about it, particularly within beauty and personal care. But overall, like when do you I know that because ultimately I know that you want to invest in brands that want to go mainstream or want to be, I'd imagine, on shelf at the big box retailers and be big consumer brands.
29:46But what kind of goes and tails into that on your due diligence process and maybe that you might have crumbles that this brand has potential to get to that level? We often ask ourselves in our process, once we have evaluated how a brand fits our framework, which I think we've talked about and written about in the past, the five M's, are you solving problems? Are you, are you the team to back? Does the brand have momentum? Is the market big enough to matter? Does it follow a mega trend? We often then at that point ask ourselves, what are we hanging our hat on? What is the thing that this brand or person or people or product really spikes in that when all is said and done and we look back years from now, whether it proves to be successful or not, is the shortest explanation of why did we invest in this company?
Read the full transcript
30:49We try to eliminate all of the noise in that. We try to focus on what really matters, but there's often that one piece that we've hung our hat on. And, you know, Madeline and I will smile as we think about different investments that we've made over time. We can probably explain like, you know, for each of our investments, what was that thing that ultimately put us over the limit? And sometimes that's analysis of the consumer and what they're looking for and what we've learned about the consumer from reading reviews and reading industry data. Sometimes it's time spent with the founder just being blown away at how many moves ahead they're thinking relative to the competition.
31:29Sometimes it's a data point. Often the most exciting data point is just when you see a retention cohort curve that shows that consumers of a company are still a subscriber, like a certain percentage are still a subscriber after 12 months. I mean, sometimes you just see a wow number. You think like, gosh, if 50 % of people who subscribe to this are still subscribers after 12 months, how could this not be working? How could this not be solving problems for consumer? How could this not be a special product? Those are the things that at the end of the day, I think separate the exceptional brands from the good ones.
32:12And we're often trying in our diligence process to just hunt for that one thing that above all else, we can hang our hat on. I would just add that getting to know the team and spending time building relationships before we even get into our true due diligence process has been something that I think has been important for us in terms of understanding how the entrepreneurs that we're working with work through problems, solve tough questions, and think just kind of getting a better sense of the way that their brains work. And I think one of the things that we're looking forward to in that is self-awareness.
32:54So to Kiva's point, knowing where a company and where an entrepreneur spikes, but also them kind of being self-aware and knowing the areas where as they continue to scale the business, they're going to need more help and support. So I think that that's, you know, something that as we're building these relationships, and just kind of getting to know folks in the community is always something that we're, we're kind of thinking about. So I just add that. But yeah, in terms of our due diligence process, the two of us come from investment banking and later stage, you know, financial firms. And so having to kind of take a step back and realize we can't build giant models and hang our hat on deep numbers analysis is sometimes hard to do, but it's ultimately a good thing.
33:47After you've made the investment, I know we talked, Keeva, I think you brought up how in fund one, entrepreneurs were pushing for you all to be more involved or write maybe obviously larger checks, which now you're able to do with Fund2, which congratulations, that's incredible. But how also do you think about when it comes to it being involved with entrepreneurs and what they maybe might have a hard time or struggle with where both of you can truly add value? How do you think about that part when it comes to investing? Yeah, I think a lot of our companies have a very clear vision of what to do next and what to do in the long run.
34:36And it's that vision of those two things that got us excited to invest in them from the beginning. But that doesn't mean that when you pull back the curtain, they have all the answers. Most entrepreneurs that I know would describe their entrepreneurial identity as just a constant firefighting process of learning and solving new problems that they have absolutely no idea where to start. and trust their gut to do it and trust their long-term vision, their North Star that is attractive and has worked so far. I think if we can be helpful in those firefights and have them not start from the absolute beginning, anytime a challenge arises, but help them with a learning or an anecdote, another company that solved a similar problem or a good advisor that they can chat with who's maybe led businesses into this new retail frontier or solve this type of challenge where CPMs can balloon a little bit during a certain time of year or manage a product recall or manage a trademark dispute, whatever it may be that comes up along the way of building a successful brand story.
35:54It's our job to be constantly learning, making connections, building a network of people in our corner that we can put in front of these people and be thought of consistently as the first call when a new problem arises. We told founders for many years, we have probably like 1 % of the answers, but it's our job to have one degree of separation to 99 % of the answers. Basically have a group of people who we can connect them with who can help solve their problems and have enough context to be able to make those connections and inform. Over time, what that means, Mike, is that we're the ones that they call first, we're the ones that they text first.
36:39And between interactions like that, a lot of trust is built. The more trust that a founder has for you, the more they want you as a larger check writer in their round, as a more active role on their board, as a more active role in all parts of their business. And we felt pretty comfortable through that hard work and proof that Selva Ventures brings these tangible things to the table, stepping up and saying, hey, next time we're going to lead because we have the capital to do so. No, that's great. That's really helpful. And that also makes a lot of sense how you see it in terms of also how you think about value.
37:21I know, how are you thinking about as well, you know, today's market? And there's a lot of commentary about brands having to go profit, having to get profitable and maybe prioritizing profitability over growth. I think part of that is due to just the fundraising landscape has gotten tighter just due to the markets. But what are you advising your own companies when it comes to handling today's market outlook? I'd say we're advising our companies to control their own destiny, which is to say, I don't think it makes sense to get profitable and hoard cash at the expense of exploiting a first mover advantage and providing important momentum to your business that's going to attract customers, talent and capital down the road.
38:22But if there's a channel that has upside down unit economics that you're pouring money into only to show growth and in doing so shortening your runway and making you need to go to the market to raise more capital faster than you otherwise would, I would be very, very scared to do so. So many of the conversations that we're having with our founding teams is invest your capital in strategic places to create proof points, extend your runway where you can, but continue to execute against the strategy, which is not to remain a sub$10 million brand forever. but to set yourself up as a viable business that will be able to either attract more capital, grow and not need more capital, and down the road, be large and or acquirable.
39:21I appreciate that. That's great. Madeline, do you have anything else to add there or no? No, I mean, I would just say, you know, we all see how the capital market has tightened up quite a bit over the last year. And to Kiva's point, being in a position where you can have more runway, but continue to show why this is a compelling company and needs to exist. It's a balance. But I think that in the value we're trying to add to these businesses are constantly trying to help them think through that problem. How do you ever, because I know that obviously the majority, the overwhelming majority of successful exits will come from the strategics.
40:03And obviously strategics are a very important part when it comes to the overall ecosystem. Do you also maybe look at in terms of what, what strategics might find attractive to a company within a company or, or the growth that a company needs to be, needs to be in order to be interesting to a strategic? Yes. I mean, you know, I think we rely, our business relies on the companies that we invest in being accretive and interesting to these strategic buyers. So I think it's definitely top of mind for us and something that we think about a lot and we talk to these folks about pretty regularly. In this second fund, we brought on as a limited partner in the fund, Unilever Ventures, who we are working with closely both in talking through our investments and our pipeline, as well as kind of the trends that they're more broadly excited about as a great potential strategic buyer of the businesses that we are investing in.
41:14So I would say, you know, through things like that, through formal partnerships, but also in getting to know different folks across the board, we're always kind of trying to not only get a sense of what they're interested in, but sharing with them, hey, these are the themes and the trends that we're super excited about. and we think are going to continue to push things forward and be essential to the consumer landscape as it evolves over the next couple of years. Got it, got it. Yeah, no, and I appreciate how you think about it as well, whether it's through partnership, LP relationships, or just kind of getting a general sense in terms of what the strategic are thinking about, the overall trends or categories that they're kind of excited about, and then mapping that down as well into what also makes sense potentially.
42:05I know, Kiva, you're bullish on is the non-alc movement. I know that you're investors and surely it's been interesting as an interviewer I've had on investors that are bullish on non-alc. And then I've also had investors that aren't maybe bearish overall, but think that it's going to be just maybe a niche category, not maybe as mainstream as some others believe. They might think that people still want to have an escape, that maybe that's CBD or something else, but there might still be there. Why do you believe that non-alc beverages will be a big category? I think it comes from the combination of two things.
42:48One is, and by the way, these two things, I think are such massive staples and trends within our industry that I just don't see them going away. Number one is that our culture is built upon a collection of social interactions that have so much alcohol consumption built into them. The way that people come together, the social lubricant of our Western society is alcohol. If you go to a restaurant on a Friday night, a concert, a sporting event, wherever it may be, if you and a friend are looking to get together after work, what do you say? Let's get a drink. You don't say, let's walk around the block or let's sit in chairs and look at each other.
43:48You say, let's get a drink. That is something that may over time decline some, but I believe it's such a pivotal and massive part of our culture that it is going to stay for decades to come. The second is that people are trying to consume less alcohol. And they're doing that for a number of reasons. One is that they want to sleep better. two is that as they're upgrading many parts of their wellness regimen they're finding that the consumption of alcohol is offsetting a lot of their gains and three probably most holistically is they want to feel better and they've learned that alcohol has an impact on the way that they feel in a way that's being more popular to talk about.
44:43So the common misconception when people rebut the thesis that non-alcohol alternatives like non-alcohol beer, non-alcohol wine, non-alcohol spirits and cocktails will grow is that people actually want alcohol. And I don't disagree with them. I don't disagree that people want alcohol. If people didn't want alcohol, then thesis number one would be untrue. The truth is that people don't want alcohol all the time. You may want to have a glass of wine on Friday or Saturday with friends. You may want to have three, four, five, but that doesn't mean that when you meet a colleague or a business acquaintance on Tuesday or Wednesday, and you have an early flight or an early workout the next day, that you want to drink with them.
45:33But if getting together with that person counteracts with your ability to have a good night's sleep and a good early workout the next morning, or let's say your kids are waking you up at five in the morning anyway, and you just want to feel a little bit more rested to attack the day, being able to sit across from that person and have a non-alcoholic glass of wine or non-alcoholic beer and not throw off the dynamic or feel confident at a party where everybody else is drinking alcohol that you don't necessarily want to be pressured into, these are these moments where non-alcohol alternatives solve a really, really important problem for consumers.
46:15Our thesis is not that non-alcohol alternatives are going to become 50 % or even 10 % of the beer, wine, or spirits market. The thesis is simply that even if they contain half a percent, these markets are so big that there is so much room to build categories that continue to solve a really big problem that consumers are facing. It's interesting because so just thinking about you know myself so i stopped drinking really since like 2015 or so um i probably had like i've like i've been to bars since then and have had like a couple drinks but in terms of like the hey let's like get to get together i mean now for the past like few years i really haven't had much of anything if my wife tells me that like a glass of wine tastes really good then i'll just have a sip but um just to kind of taste um just to taste it but like i can't i won't order um anything at bars and the and the reason why is because i can't i actually just can't finish it anymore like i just can't um like finish like a pint of beer or anything like that even though like i like the taste it's also kind of ironic too because back in the day i like i like brew beer with my dad back in the day and like i love doing that and stuff like that but um um And so anyway, I just like I just can't really like I mean, I also maybe just have like a weak stomach, so I just can't do it.
47:39But it is also interesting because the idea of like non-alc for me never would register like it never would like thinking about getting like a non-alc beer or a non-alc wine. I've tried non-alc beer and I actually like it. I actually think like it tastes good, but I don't know why. I haven't ever like wanting to like go back for more or, um, or actually like, or maybe engage in it in a normal level. I mean, I, um, I really just have like water or like flavored water in some capacity. I've finally started to get interested in like sparkling water. That's how boring I am. I'm always interested to see how consumers will, will respond if they, if they want that, that similar taste profile that maybe you can get in a glass of wine by, by having not, uh, not out of replacement.
48:26And I've seen it kind of go both ways in that some consumers love it and get it. And then others are like, well, why? I don't really understand it. So I do think that it's quite like an interesting trend. And I'm really kind of curious in terms of how it all plays out. I think the two insights into what you said are, one, a lot of people assume that this is a solve for non-drinkers, for people who have given up drinking or people who can't drink. I actually think it's a bigger solve for people who drink some and want to drink a little bit less. So that's insight number one. Insight number two is that the consumer world is incredibly fragmented.
49:07If there's one thing that Madeline and I can try to shout from the rooftops here, it's that one person loving or hating a product is so non-indicative of whether a brand will succeed or whether a movement or category will succeed. And it is actually the fragmentation of taste preferences and consumer preferences in general that allow this industry to flourish. It's what allows indie brands to go solve problems that big, large, established, well-resourced CPG conglomerates can't solve. So that fragmentation, I think, is the magic of this industry. It's something that I think we should just be celebrating more.
49:50The differences between us and how these brands can solve our problems and how when we solve our problems, we can share those solutions with friends. That, to me, is the most special part of the industry that we work in. Yeah, that's a really great point. Really great point. And on that note, I think that's a great place to stop right here, just in terms of celebrating the fragmentation and also the opportunity within consumer brands. Kiva and Madeline, thank you both so much for your time. Thanks for having us, Mike. It's always a pleasure. Thank you. And there you have it. It was a pleasure having Kiva and Madeline on.
50:26Thank you both so much for coming on the show. And congratulations again for raising your second fund at$34 million. That's just fantastic news. Gabriel, thank you for joining me today. How are you? Yeah, really great. Thanks for having me, Mike. No, I really appreciate it. So when someone wants to invest, whether they've started their own fund, they're emerging manager and they have LPs, or whether they're an angel investor, how do they typically get started? What should they be thinking about? Yeah, that's a great question. So yeah, our platform makes it easy for people to pull funds together and invest in early stage startups.
51:02There's a number of reasons someone would use SPVs or want to create a venture capital fund. so you know for angels i would say you know the most important part is you know diversifying your portfolio so instead of you know putting 10k checks into you know a single company you can diversify by putting your eggs in various different baskets using an spv so that's it's a predominantly popular use case to kind of diversify your angel investing as you know it's highly risky asset class. So instead of being concentrated in one single asset, it allows you to invest in multiple. So that's a use case there.
51:46Cool. So how does Vobin kind of make it easy? And what do you need to think about on the admin side in order to actually set up whether you're angel investing, whether they're setting up like an SVV or a fund? Yeah. So fundraising is a pretty difficult task, whether you're a founder, angel, or a venture capitalist. So with our product, we have all the ancillary services incorporated into the platform using a digital platform. So, you know, we handle the legal documents to create a separate legal entity. We have a banking partner that is incorporated into the dashboard. We'll onboard the investors.
52:24You'll have real-time information of how your fundraising process is going. And then we'll handle any administrative aspects such as reporting, any taxes, and ultimately the distribution at an exit scenario. So, you know, if a company goes IPO, if a company gets acquired, you know, how does that capital flow back to the investors? So, you know, we handle all of that. So our clients can focus on, you know, finding great opportunities, networking, building relationships, and building those investor relationships, which takes a lot of time and effort, as anyone who's been fundraising will know. Again, if you're enjoying the show, I highly recommend subscribing to my newsletter at theconsumervc.com where you'll receive all new episodes straight to your inbox and a weekly recap of all the consumer deals that are happening.
53:12Thanks again for listening.
From the publisher
We have two amazing investors on the show today who just came off raising their second fund at $34 million fund. We have Kiva Dickinson, our first non-named Mike second time guest, and Madeline Kaplan from Selva Ventures. Selva Ventures is an early-stage venture capital firm dedicated to partnering with consumer brands that promote healthier living. We discuss how fund 2 is different to fund 1, the difference between and clean and clinically backed beauty and personal care brands, do they value one dollar of online revenue more than a dollar earned in retail and much more.
The Consumer VC represents the opinions and beliefs of Michael Gelb and does not reflect the opinions and beliefs of Manufactured Networks, Inc.
**Sponsor***
This issue is brought to you by Vauban from Carta. Vauban from Carta is the easiest way to launch & run your venture investing. They offer SPVs, and fund vehicles for GPs at all stages of the journey - from your first syndicate to operating a multi-million dollar venture fund. Their end-to-end platform automates your back-office and manual workflows so you can focus on what matters: finding the next unicorn & building investor relationships.
Click Here to Get Started - https://structurer.vauban.io/

