The Future of Consumer Health with Nicolas McCoy

3 Jun 2026 · 1 h 11 min · 27 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

How consumer health is shifting from doctor-led care to consumer-led prevention and self-optimization, and what that means for food/beverage/supplement brands, M&A, and form factors like gummies and injections.

Guest backgrounds

Nicolas (Nick) McCoy studies what separates niche consumer brands that stay niche from those that hit mainstream. He is Managing Director of Whipstitch Capital, analyzing trends across food, beverage, supplements, and wellness.

Key claims

  • Consumers are “the CEO” of healthcare because information, AI, med spas, concierge/concerned doctors, peptides, and OTC options have multiplied; primary care focuses more on acute issues.
  • Better-for-you is growing faster than the store (about 7% faster vs 3–5% historically).
  • In M&A, headline multiples stay similar, but weaker companies see multiples fall faster in downturns; profitability and EBITDA matter more because brands are larger before being bought.
  • “Brand headroom” (online + channel performance) predicts sellability; flattening growth reduces deal value.
  • Low-income is a faster-growing segment for better-for-you; K-shaped spending is less pronounced in food.

Notable examples/data points

  • Med spas doubled since 2018; 10,000+.
  • Needle/GLP-1-adjacent demand: 30-gauge needles show ~850% YoY growth (subcutaneous insulin/peptides; gray market).
  • Walmart placement can hurt performance (example: “Flapjacks” protein muffins initially placed in nutrition supplement section vs Kroger breakfast).
  • Mass crossover metric: velocity ratio of MULO vs natural; above ~12 suggests better mass potential.
  • GLP-1 adoption: ~12% on FDA-regulated semaglutide; guest expects 30–40% stabilized use over 10 years, driving demand for protein and especially fiber.
  • Peptides: RFK Jr. awareness may increase consumer questions; compounded pharmacies could expand access; prices may drop.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Shifting Landscape of Consumer Health

0:00 to 0:57

Learn about the evolving perceptions and responsibilities in consumer healthcare.

“There's companies that are profitable and$200 million plus that unsuccessfully sell and processes all the time.”

The Rise of Biohacking and Consumer Agency

1:14 to 3:56

Explore how the biohacking movement empowers consumers to take control of their health.

“we talked a bit about how there's a biohacking functional...”

Trust in Healthcare Systems: US vs. Australia

3:56 to 6:28

Discuss the contrasting levels of trust in healthcare systems between the US and Australia.

“Whereas in the US, it's almost the complete opposite, right?”

Market Dynamics in Consumer Health

6:28 to 9:18

Understand current market dynamics affecting consumer health brands and M&A activity.

“What happens is during the kind of slower times in the capital cycle and slower times in the M &A market, you see as the attractiveness level goes down of companies, the multiples fall away faster.”

Evaluating Brand Value and Timing for Sale

9:18 to 12:22

Learn how to assess the right timing for selling a brand based on market conditions.

“you're a big strategic and, you know, you've got Cheerios in your portfolio, which is, you know, a billion plus brand that makes a lot of money, you've got a lot of room to grow and scale to get to profitability, right?”

Calculating Headroom in Brand Growth

12:22 to 14:00

Discover how to calculate headroom for brand growth in competitive markets.

“sold and you look at online, selling through Shopify themselves off the website, as well as other e-commerce retailers like Amazon, Thrive, etc.”

Understanding ACV and TDP in Retail

14:00 to 15:00

Learn how ACV (All Commodity Volume) and TDP (Total Distribution Points) affect product placement and sales in retail channels.

“TDP divided by ACV is your SKUs on shelf.”

Category Variability in Shelf Space

15:00 to 16:00

Discover how different food categories impact the number of SKUs on shelves and sales velocity.

“it out, but you can get to higher levels.”

Channel Valuation in Retail

16:00 to 17:50

Explore the value of various retail channels, particularly the differences between convenience and grocery stores.

“brand, you know, divide it in half or so and kind of get there.”

Crossing the Chasm from Natural to Mass

17:50 to 22:50

Understand the challenges brands face when transitioning from natural products to mass market distribution.

“And then I think, you know, another thing to think about too, is how deeply can you penetrate these retailers?”
Show all 27 chapters

Impact of Consumer Economy on Food and Beverage

22:50 to 24:30

Gain insights into how the current K-shaped economy affects consumer spending in the food and beverage sector.

“Because the big buyers are experts at selling in stores.”

Growth of Better-for-You Products

24:30 to 28:02

Learn about the growth trends in better-for-you products, particularly among lower-income consumers.

“I also wanted to talk to you a little bit about the current economy.”

Wearable Adoption Trends in 2025

28:02 to 28:59

Explore how snap households adopted wearables at an increasing rate due to health management.

“at the end of 25, Nielsen IQ did a consumer survey of snap households and wearables.”

Growth in Hypodermic Needle Usage

29:00 to 31:15

Discuss the significant growth in hypodermic needles usage and implications for consumer health.

“Metformin is almost free, so you can get prescriptions super cheap and stay on that cycle and to essentially be the agent of your healthcare again.”

Impact of RFK Jr. on Peptides Awareness

31:16 to 33:54

Examine the influence of RFK Jr.'s discussions on consumer awareness regarding peptides.

“credit card account, but a different website or something like that.”

Future of GLP-1s in Consumer Health

33:55 to 36:31

Analyze the potential future prevalence of GLP-1s and their impact on consumer health.

“I mean, there's gray markets out there for, you know, a lot of prescription drugs now.”

Opportunities in the Peptide Market

36:32 to 42:01

Discuss the development and opportunities in the peptide market and related consumer products.

“they've you know had to worry about muscle loss um retitrutide is is supposedly better at muscle preservation.”

The Normalization of Injections and Supplements

42:01 to 45:03

Learn how injections and gummies are becoming more accepted in consumer health.

“this health care diet is so fundamental right because you can sabotage your peptide work your workouts, everything that you're doing with a lousy diet.”

Challenges in Gummy Formulations

45:03 to 48:35

Discover the complexities involved in creating effective gummy supplements.

“because only 20 % is the active ingredient.”

Hormone Therapy Trends in Healthcare

48:35 to 50:48

Explore the growing trend of hormone therapy and its impact on health, particularly for women.

“What are your kind of, why do you, is, is anyone actually positioned for this or like, what are your kind of thoughts on this, on this trend as well?”

The Intersection of Hormones and Mental Health

50:48 to 53:12

Understand the relationship between hormone optimization and mental health improvements.

“I mean, you know, 10, 20 years ago, kids didn't talk about mental health in school.”

Market Trends and Economic Adjustments

53:12 to 56:00

Examine the current market conditions and how companies are adjusting to economic changes.

“And then also as well, you then also have a lot more trust, right?”

Market Dynamics in Consumer Health

56:00 to 1:01:40

Explore the evolving landscape of consumer health investments and buyer activity.

“And so now that opens up and you need more to put more there.”

Innovation and Evolving Consumer Trends

1:01:40 to 1:06:55

Discuss the role of innovation in consumer categories and changing consumer preferences.

“Because I just think it's interesting, mid 2010s, right?”

Personal and Professional Inspirations

1:06:55 to 1:10:01

Learn about the personal experiences that shaped the guest's passion for consumer health.

“What events in your life have inspired you personally and professionally?”

Consumer Preferences and Innovation in Health

1:10:01 to 1:10:40

Explore how consumer preferences evolve and influence health brand success.

“What's going to make consumers direct their spending some certain way versus another way?”

Reflections on the Shift from Tech to Consumer Health

1:10:41 to 1:11:25

Discuss the transition from tech to consumer health and its implications.

“What works in 2016 would not work in 2026 necessarily.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00There's companies that are profitable and$200 million plus that unsuccessfully sell and processes all the time. You know, it's more of a show me and not a tell me at that point. I think the number of Americans that are suddenly comfortable with injecting themselves has gone up a lot. And I think it will continue to. It's like there's this virality, right, of society. Dick McCoy studies what separates niche consumer brands from the ones that break into the mainstream. As managing director of Whipstitch Capital, he analyzes the trends shaping food, beverage, supplements, and wellness. From creatine gummies to mass market health products, he's tracking where the next generation of consumer winners will come.

0:33The consumer now, the CEO of their healthcare, and they are taking charge of their healthcare. And that's kind of what you're seeing. Primary care physician is really more focused on acute things, which is what they're really trained for. My daughter goes to school and all the kids are talking about, you know, their neurodiversity and what prescriptions they're on. And, you know, it's almost like a cool thing. It's like people are coming out of the closet almost, you know?

0:57Nick, thanks so much for joining me here today. How are you? I'm good. I'm good. How are you? Good, thank you. Good, thank you. Really appreciate you jumping on. No, no. Thank you for having me. It's a pleasure. When we first connected a few weeks ago, we talked a bit about how there's a biohacking functional... When we first connected a few weeks ago, we talked about how there's the biohacking functional health movement that's going on. And I keep hearing more about it. Like also, you know, Maha as well has become very prominent. Tell me about your kind of your views on that and how you view that segment.

1:45Yeah, I think it's interesting. I think there's a big picture thing going on here, which is, you know, when I was a kid and, you know, even 10 years ago, the CEO of your healthcare was your doctor. You know, that we went from traditional insurance to managed care. Everybody had this primary physician that was doing referrals. And that person was basically in charge of your health at the end of the day. If you didn't have a referral, you couldn't get reimbursement. And so, you know, they kind of had a lot of power. And as, you know, as kind of the internet has expanded and AI has come and you know you've got things like peptides and things like you know and med spas suddenly everywhere I mean med spas have doubled since 2018 or over 10 ,000 now that doesn't even include like individual doctors that you know are you know non-insurance taking doctors that concierge docs and things like that so you have kind of all of these sources available and information available and it's really made the consumer now the CEO of their healthcare, not the primary care physician.

2:43The primary care physician is really more focused on acute things, which is what they're really trained for and not necessarily, you know, prevention, which is so big right now. So, you know, the consumer now kind of sits between the doctor and all of these other things, supplements, you know, better for you food, peptides, you know, all of that, right? You know, over-the-counter things, meditation, right? All of and they are taking charge of their healthcare. And that's kind of what you're seeing. And as far as like food and beverage and brands go, this is having dramatic impacts in terms of the growth, the uplift.

3:22Totally. A few months ago, I was talking with an Australian founder of a wellness company. And what I thought was a really interesting insight that they said was in Australia, there's such trust in your doctors in the healthcare system that consumers actually don't really need to know as much about biology or don't really kind of care to know much about their biology just because there's kind of so much trust in this system. Whereas in the US, it's almost the complete opposite, right? Where you actually now, you know, don't have as much trust in the health, the healthcare system, you're making your own choices when it comes to what's actually readily available to, to consumers, um, versus going through, uh, versus kind of going through your, your healthcare provider.

4:19Uh, so I, and then, uh, and then also as well, um, you actually, as a consumer want to be a lot more informed about, about your own health as you do, um, versus, you know, in this example of against Australia. And I thought that was actually really interesting too um that uh how much how much it actually can how much how different it can be not just for american consumers but in different countries too that is interesting yeah i mean i'd be curious kind of what they're and i don't know that much about that market other than it does seem like supplements that do really well there tend to do well here um it's it's kind of a good i mean per capita gdp is not too dissimilar so i guess maybe that that makes some sense but i don't know what their training is is like there and kind of you know what what is the health care paradigm, right?

5:06Is it just acute or is it acute in prevention or somewhere in between? Yeah, no, that's a fair point. That's a fair point. She was just saying how the American consumers are a lot more educated about these types of topics versus that she's found to be Australian consumer just because there was actually quite a bit of trust in the healthcare system where it seems like here in the States, there really is not nearly that trust or certainly that trust has gone down yeah yeah um yeah i believe it yeah and and as well as what you're describing is is also you know transitioned to better for you food and beverage and um is growing faster than the rest of the store um at the grocery store and as where you sit on the m &a level are you seeing multiples reflect that growth yet or is there still a lag between in consumer momentum and deal pricing?

6:07It's an interesting question. If we're just talking about multiples, the kind of headline, biggest headline type deals, the most attractive companies out there tend to trade for very similar multiples even during good times and bad. That, I would say, has stayed somewhat level. What happens is during the kind of slower times in the capital cycle and slower times in the M &A market, you see as the attractiveness level goes down of companies, the multiples fall away faster. And during the more active times, they don't fall away as fast. And I think right now we're moving from what was in 23 and 4 or so was really a really tough time.

6:55I mean, it was kind of a triple whammy on innovation and better for you and just slowing down at the capital cycle between interest rates and inflation and people migrating back to restaurants after COVID, which was causing unit volume declines in grocery stores. I mean, it was just a really hard time to be a brand. Now we're migrating back into a much more normalized growth environment with this tailwind of actually better for you growing at rates like 7 % faster than the store, which is above the average of kind of 3 % to 5 % we've seen over the last decade or two. If you can elaborate a little bit in terms of the hard times of 2023, 2024, and are you also sensing on the M &A side, for example, there was much profitability mattered a lot more, for example, than it did now?

7:44Or how did that actually translate? Yeah, I think profitability actually has continued to matter more over the last decade, continually. And part of the reason is, is because these companies are getting larger and larger before they get bought. You know, in 2010, companies that were 10 million in revenue were getting competitively bid on by strategics. You know, and now you have to be north of 100. Yeah, I mean, I remember, I remember there was a company called the Toon Foods, they made Uncle Sam cereal. And, you know, they got bought by a public company. So I can say the numbers, but it was about a$10 million revenue company and about a$10 million deal.

8:24Post bought them. And I think they had eight bankers go pitch the company to go sell it, which it was a really sought after deal in 2009 or 10 or whenever it was. And it just shows how different the market was back then compared to today. And that deal, what do you say? So that deal was definitely bought, not sold. They were not trying to sell, but they had so much attention and action. So a$10 million revenue company, a$10 million revenue branded product company at the time was kind of ripe for sale. Yeah. I mean, they ran sale process, just like a lot of other people do now. But you would not get the same result today.

9:09You know, there's companies that are profitable and$200 million plus that unsuccessfully sell and processes all the time. So, I mean, the thing is, if you're$10 million and you're not profitable and, you know, you're a big strategic and, you know, you've got Cheerios in your portfolio, which is, you know, a billion plus brand that makes a lot of money, you've got a lot of room to grow and scale to get to profitability, right? So you can run a model when it's$10 million that says it's profitable by 30 or 40 or 50. But if you're buying a brand at 200, you know, you don't have that much more scaling room.

9:38You kind of want to know what that EBITDA margin is going to be like on that brand. And it's more of a show me and not a tell me at that point. Can you give us a rough idea in your mind when a brand should be EBITDA positive? And I know that it obviously depends on different categories, right? Depends on a beverage company or food. But roughly in your mind, what does it actually matter? It's a great question. And it really depends so much. So beverage is really an interesting example because you kind of get to the size where 40, 50, 60 million, where you start to get more approaching profitability or maybe even slightly.

10:22And then to grow more, you have to think about moving your distribution to DSD. And when you go DSD, it means you're going to be spending more money in your distribution. Granted, you're going to be getting more sales because you've got somebody actively stocking the shelves and keeping the product looking good and doing it every day. not, you know, stealing space from your competitors and not, you know, letting them steal it from you. So it's, you know, it's a big, it's a plus, a net plus, but it is going to cost you in the short term in your margin. So you have this kind of like dip and then you get profitable again.

10:51Whereas in food, you're going direct at that point, which takes out the distributor and actually gives you more of that, you know, retail on the shelf dollar. It means you're actually getting, instead of maybe 50 cents of the dollar on retail, you're getting maybe 60, you know, or a little bit more. So, So, but it's tough. I mean, there are food companies that are$10 million and they're profitable. And then it also depends on how fast you're growing. And I've seen food companies that are over 100 million and growing at 30 % or 40 % a year and not. And that's okay because they're spending the money economically.

11:27You can't capitalize marketing investment. Right. That's fair to say. how when do you think how do you kind of judge if if it's all right and i guess you never maybe never quite know um until you know in hindsight but when do you kind of if you were to analyze a brand for example how do you think about is this the right time to sell for example um like is are you going to drive the most amount or is this the most amount of like attention you're going to get at this point in time and the highest price that will be paid for your company? Yeah, it's a great question. So when we look at brands, we look at what is kind of the brand headroom.

12:17And by brand headroom, we mean if you look at where the brand is proven that it can be sold and you look at online, selling through Shopify themselves off the website, as well as other e-commerce retailers like Amazon, Thrive, etc. In-store, looking at conventional, natural, drug, mass, club, all of the channels. And food service too, right? There's branded food service. And where are they kind of proven and how big can they get in that channel? Looking at other analog brands, as well as kind of their own performance trends. You come up with a number. And if a brand is at$100 million and it's got a$300 million headroom, well, if you're going to sell to a strategic, you can probably run that brand up to 200, 225, and you've still got this kind of growth, right?

13:05When you get up to 300, and you're bumping against the top of that headroom, and you flatten out, it gets really hard to sell somebody that you're going to get to five or 600 million, right? So you want to have that growth momentum on your side, and you don't want to lose it because you compromise a lot of value as soon as you flatten out. So there's kind of a sweet spot that happens there. Now, you can always go into new categories. You can always go into expanding by whatever, adding a protein version of whatever you're doing. But you have to prove those things out for them to really count in headroom.

13:37Well, can you tell me a little bit about how you actually calculate the calculus behind headroom? And then I'd love to talk about single category versus platinum too. But let's start with in terms of the calculus on the headroom side yeah yeah so the mechanics if if you're looking at you know a category like spins mulo which is you know drug um club mass and in conventional grocery um you know there's there's acv which is you know all commodity volume or basically what percent of the channel on a volume weighted basis are you and so if a brand is at let's say 20 right now and they have an average of three SKUs on shelf, which would be three, you know, 20 % ACV would be three SKUs times that, or 60 TDP.

14:22TDP divided by ACV is your SKUs on shelf. And then they have a velocity, which is expressed as dollars per TDP. And that's basically, you know, how much velocity per each TDP are you running? And so the first thing to do is look at how far can you go in ACV. And you can look at other analog brands. Like if you're in, you know, if you're in the chip aisle, it's pretty hard to get more than 50 % ACV is an independent brand. If you're in Frozen, I look at brands like Kodiak that got well north of 70 % when they were independent. You start getting to the point where every little bit that you add is averaging down your velocity because you're kind of maxing it out, but you can get to higher levels.

15:03So you kind of look at the category and you look at analog brands, and then you look at how big a brand block can you get or essentially how many SKUs on shelf in each store. And some categories like baby food is like probably 30 or 40. But if you're in cottage cheese, it's probably going to be four or five, right? So it varies by category. And you can look at that with the analog brands and then how much velocity looking at it. So if you look at frozen, frozen meals could be 150 or$200 ,000 of TDP and and you're going to be perfectly fine on shelf. And there's a lot of brands that sit there. But if you're in frozen pizza, it's probably going to be north of 500.

15:43Obviously makes sense. It's dollars per inch. Pizza is a bigger box. So you have to sell more to keep the retailer happy, right? So it's, so, and then it's basically just, you know, mapping all that out and you get to a store, you know, volume sale. So you get to some number like 100 or 200 million, and then you just back into what does that mean in wholesale dollars to the brand, you know, divide it in half or so and kind of get there. and you just do that across the channels and that's that's kind of how we do it add it all up and you know you have to factor in things like costco which you know are not reported in spins um but are easy to do the brand knows how much they sell per skew per store per week and you know if you a thousand skew per store per week it's about 25 million a year wholesale because costco is a very uniform margin is are there any retailers that you have to kind of discount um or or uh like you mentioned for example costco for example is not in spin are there is there any is there any or even like do like dcc sales for example is there anything how do you think about the different um different sales channels and based on price um you mean will they be successful or not in a retailer yes no no not not so much in a retailer but when you think about what the value is um if they're trying to be sold and what the value is in terms of all the sales channels.

17:03Are there any sales channels that might actually be more valuable versus ones that are less valuable? Sure. So for beverage, convenience is very valuable. Convenience has a higher potential for beverage sales than conventional grocery on average. If you look at dollars per TDP of larger brands in convenience, they're two to two and a half times what they are in conventional grocery. Uh, food is more like, you know, 1.3 times or so, and it's very limited what actually sells in food very well in convenience. Um, so if you're a beverage, it's pretty valuable. If you're in food, there's not a lot of expectation that you're going to necessarily get big there and only certain categories can.

17:48Um, but for the ones that do it's, it's great incremental growth. And then I think, you know, another thing to think about too, is how deeply can you penetrate these retailers? And I think Walmart is one of the best examples. there are brands that do really well in 600 walmarts and then when they go to 1200 or 2000 it just falls right off and then there's other brands that can go to 4000 walmarts and maintain you know velocities that aren't that dissimilar to how they do in a thousand why why is that the case in in walmart um i think it's because the i think the demographics um and the um planogram or the lack of uniform planogram in these stores.

18:28A lot of these stores weren't built as food stores originally, and they were kind of converted. So that means that they may not have certain sections or so sometimes a brand will get placed in an area where it wouldn't necessarily be in the rest of Walmarts. One example that comes to mind, and I always talk about things that are much older because I want to be careful about information, but about seven or eight years ago, there was a brand out there which is still out there called flapjacks and they have these little mighty muffins that's like basically like protein powder and you put water in it migrate it it's great product um well when they went into walmart at first they in in a lot of the walmarts they got placed in the nutrition supplement section but when you went to kroger they were in breakfast which is kind of where they belong wow yeah but but the walmart walmart breakfast set is not it's not uniform like a kroger breakfast set they have a cereal set and they've got in a different now they got you know at least at the time you know the breakfast bar set and so this was kind of most closely resembling nutritional supplements so they put it there and of course it didn't sell as well you know until you know yeah so i think that's part of it too um and and you know i think there's i think there's legitimately a price point you know issue with walmart and walmart is doing a really good job at expanding and better for and and you know bringing in more consumers that are, are, you know, buying more premium goods.

19:53Um, but I do think that there's, there's a number of Walmarts where there's more price sensitivity than others. Yeah. Now we talk about a lot of the show about what types of products can actually cross that chasm and go from natural to mass, which is a product. I'm sure you see this all the time where a product could sell really well in natural, for example, but then not be able to kind of cross sarcasm. And it is a great business in natural, right? But it's never going to be a massive business because it's not a mass retail. How do you kind of analyze that from your seed? It's a great question.

20:31So one thing we look at, and this is kind of geeky, we look at the ratio of velocity of MULO to natural and spins. And generally speaking, if that number is above 12, MULO is 12 times the velocity of natural, then it's a brand that is going to do better in mass over the long term. And if it's less, if you get down to brands in that kind of 6, 7, 8 range, it's sometimes hard for those brands to break 15 or 20 % ACV in conventional grocery. Okay, wow. So there's a specific data point that you kind of rely on in order to figure it out. And it's category dependent. That's not totally, totally uniform, and it's definitely something to compare across brands within a category.

21:19And you can see very clearly which brand kind of resonates more in the mass market with consumers. This is an interesting question. Miro, what does it stand for? Miro, multi-unit, oh my God, I can't remember. Multi-unit something outlet. I just can't remember. Unit, okay, cool. No, I appreciate that. Very, very cool. Yeah, because that's the number I have, you know, a lot of investors that kind of come on this show. And that's number one, kind of almost number one thing when it comes to ones that invest in food and Bev and, and CPG about, can you actually cross that chasm and go from natural to actually be successful in this?

22:02Because it really makes sense from a VC perspective to get involved if you cannot do that. And a lot of the times you're kind of making investments that a company, their traction has only been a natural. So you don't truly know. So I do think that's quite interesting. And I think in food and beverage particularly, it's probably more meaningful. But when you look at supplements, which are really under-index in conventional retail, they're just so heavily D2C. And then you've got mass stores that sell supplements really well, like Target and Walmart and things like that. And then natural, of course.

22:37And if you look at clean beauty and clean personal care, you know there's there there's a lot of that that may not you know get beyond 12 or 15 acv and in mulo um and you know some of those brands are really valuable they can be 100 million plus because they've got big d2c sales they're selling in the beauty stores you know what i mean because they can actually be profitable on d2c and actually be profitable on the channels where food and bed you yeah in mass but but well they don't actually maybe need to rely on mass as much right like like the beauty and then also you know uh supplements for example because they can actually have a very profitable d2c business whereas food and bev needs to rely on mass because you can't really have a profitable or it's very hard very hard to have a profitable d2c business but do but having the success in retail um you know if you're doing well in target walmart and a few other select you know conventional uh areas maybe you know maybe some club and natural and some of the beauty channel as well as that DTC adds a tremendous amount of value.

23:44Because the big buyers are experts at selling in stores. They want to see that. That's what it is. If you have a brand that hasn't yet gone into mass and wants to sell, do strategists look at that as saying, hey, there's an opportunity here because we can buy it and then of course we can do a mass or do they want to see typically some type of proof point that it could work in mass? I think the proof point is always going to add more value. But again, brand specifically, there are times where they just love the brand. We sold a brand called Ukora four or five years ago, and they were all D2C at the time.

24:24And it was a successful process, and it was fine. But that's not every brand. Fair point, fair point. I also wanted to talk to you a little bit about the current economy. and from a consumer lens, we hear the term all the time, K-shaped economy, for example. What does this mean in context of food and beverage and how broad is the growth of Better for You? Sure. So the K-shaped economy actually refers to, if you look over time at how much do the top 20 % of America spend in total, and I like to look at spending and not how much wealth do they have because, again, our whole business drives off of spending.

25:02And the top 20 % of America today A spends about 57 % of dollars and the bottom 80 spends 43. And that number literally, it looks like a K. It's like this. Over time, 20 % has gone up and 80 % has gone down. But what's interesting, if you look at food, the top 24 % or the top 26 % spends 24 % and the bottom 74 % spends 76. So it's actually just about uniform. Every customer that walks through that Walmart door is an equal opportunity customer at the end of the day. Some reasons for that, well, wealthier people eat out more, right? So that's one of the equalizers. And right now, we are seeing low income is actually the fastest growing area and better for you.

25:52And it actually was earlier this decade too, when staff benefits were really high in 2021 early into 22 as well. Wow. Unfortunately, you cut out there for a little bit. Okay. Do you mind just repeat that? We'll edit everything out. I'm really happy to ask the question again if that's helpful. Yeah, yeah, sure. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, or I can just start the answer again if you want. Go for it. Yeah, yeah, that'd be great. Okay. Okay, when we're talking about the K-shaped economy, we're actually thinking about a graph that looks like a K. And this is basically how much money are households spending. If you track it over time, the top 20 % of households are basically increasing.

26:37And today, they're spending about 57 % of total consumer expenditures. And the bottom 80 % are about 43%. And over time, it looks like this. But when we look at food, actually, the top 24 % of households spend 24 % and the bottom 74 % of households spend 76%. So it's very, very equal comparatively to the rest of the economy. People eat about the same amount of calories and wealthier people eat out more, but basically every customer that comes into that Walmart is an equal opportunity customer, which is really interesting when you think about hiring to make sure that you understand to reach every customer that comes in that door because each one can give you exactly as much bottom line profit because retailers make the same margin pretty much in everything they sell so does this mean that maybe you shouldn't segment like in terms of like consumers because almost anybody can be a consumer like a lately a consumer product since um because of this or or how do you think in terms of like the insight yeah yeah i mean low income right now is the fastest growing area of better for you.

27:51I mean, it's growing from a smaller base, but it is growing a couple points faster than higher income in terms of better for you growth. Interestingly, at the end of 25, Nielsen IQ did a consumer survey of snap households and wearables. And what they found was snap households actually were adopting wearables in December of 25 at four times the rate of the general population. And in the beginning of 25, it was more like half the rate. So over the year 2025, and part of this is probably because of Obamacare benefits going away and things like that, that adoption rate just spiked. When you also think about it, wearables are durable goods.

28:38And so there is a second sales cycle that happens. People get an Oura Ring version one, it wears out or they decide to buy another one, they pass it off to somebody else. The stated intent of why were they adopting a wearable? Number one was managing chronic health conditions. So if you want to save money and go into the doctor, you can get a wearable, you can get a continuous glucose monitor, you can start monitoring it yourself. Metformin is almost free, so you can get prescriptions super cheap and stay on that cycle and to essentially be the agent of your healthcare again. Wow. Yeah. It's as someone who's wearing an order ring.

29:17Yeah, totally, totally. That's really interesting. I wanted to also talk about hypodermic needles. I know that you mentioned this last time when we talked about how if you look at Amazon data, you're seeing 850 % year-over-year growth in these needles, and it's not just GLP-1 alone. What's the signal that you're actually tracking with this? And what does this tell you about where consumer health is headed? Yeah, this is a great question. So that number actually came from essentially a data scrape that Nielsen IQ did. And we looked at 30 gauge needles, which are basically the small ones that they use for insulin injections and also basically anything that you're going to inject subcutaneously.

30:11So that could be testosterone, which can be done two ways. It can be done into a muscle. It can be done subcutaneously. All of the peptides, which includes GLP-1s, of course, being the biggest one. So yeah, I mean, I think that is more people who are either buying GLP-1s in larger sizes to save money and then basically using, you know, essentially multiple needles or more than they're going to give you when you get your GLP-1 male prescription from Lilly. They kind of give you, you know, kind of one per vial or maybe a little bit more. And so you have to go buy, you know, and supplement. Or it's people who are going to the gray market to save even more money and, you know, acquiring it themselves or through compound pharmacies and things.

Read the full transcript

30:55And, you know, and then they're buying all the needles. And it's also all the peptides. The peptide market, well, there's not great data. We did look at trying to pull data, and what we found is the websites for these peptide companies seems to change, interestingly. So you kind of get these weird data charts where they kind of show growth for a year, and then it goes down, but it kind of is replaced by another line, which is the same probably credit card account, but a different website or something like that. We couldn't really figure it out. Clearly, there's growth, but we don't have great data behind it.

31:27but I can just tell you anecdotally, the number of peptide sites, the number of peptide manufacturers in China that show up on this one website, I can't remember the name of it right now, that literally you can send your vials to test what's in it for free. And then they basically will post it with the manufacturer, what it was, endotoxins, purity, how many milligrams are actually in the vial, all of that. So anybody buying from any of these vendors in China or whatever can go online and look at the history of the tests of the vendor and figure out if they trust them or not wow that's really it's better than the ebay it's better than ebay feedback that's that's really interesting how will what happened two weeks ago with rfk jr bringing you know i know it's not uh bringing 12 12 peptides um off off the category two lists and how will or they're not off the category two list.

32:26It's for, it's, it's for a review, right? That's happening in a few months to hopefully have them removed or maybe have them removed off category two. How will that disrupt peptides in, in your view? I think, I think one of the things that, um, RFK has done, um, without, you know, probably even somewhat indirectly here is just his vocal presence and his number of hits in the news is raising awareness around health across America. Just somebody out there saying Maha on a weekly basis, this news around these peptides, he was on a podcast with Joe Rogan, I think it was about a month, month and a half ago.

33:11He mentioned that in that podcast. There's been discussion about this in other summits and things like that that has been involved in, and it's kind of spreading the word around peptides. So just spreading the word is raising consumer awareness. So consumers, when they're going to their med spa or their doctor, are asking questions about them. Now, doctors couldn't prescribe, traditional doctors couldn't prescribe peptides when they're on category two. The fact that they're now available at compounded pharmacies is going to be able to change that. The ones that are on that list, the doctor has to be comfortable with it.

33:45It seems like med spa doctors probably are more comfortable with it. Um, you know, and concierge doctors are more comfortable. And I think it also just means that you're going to see probably prices start to drop on those peptides too. Yeah. I'm, I'm also curious if doctors are able to prescribe peptides, if what the consumer then market will become, like, will there still be a, there will be still a consumer market for peptides, but I'm just, I'm just kind of curious how much, you know, um, what the demand will be like for, what the demand will be like kind of D to C to consumer if you also have the prescription from your doctorate?

34:24Right. Yeah, it's a great question. I mean, there's gray markets out there for, you know, a lot of prescription drugs now. You know, generally things that are older and, you know, less dangerous. So, you know, people get this stuff anyway right now. Totally. Well, speaking of peptides, what do you see as the future of GLP-1s and their impact on the consumer? Yeah, this is really interesting. And this is something that I know a number of thought leaders in the data companies we spend a lot of time talking about. Right now we're at 12 % officially on GLP-1s. So that's 12 % on people who are on FDA-regulated semiglutide, which is GLP-1, terzepatide, which is GLP plus GIP, some people call it GLP-2.

35:14And that's 12%. So there's some number, we don't know what it is. I mean, I've seen kind of one to 2%, and personally, I believe it could be higher, of people who are on those drugs plus redditrutide, which is kind of the next one that's coming down the pipe here through gray market or other compound pharmacy or other sources. There's a cycle where these people lose weight. I think about half of them are on for weight loss and about half are on for diabetes, metabolic, things like that. either way there's a cycle of losing weight where people eat restricted calories and then there's basically a stabilization that happens you know it's like if you take the same dose you know you might start at 200 and you're just going to kind of tick down and then as you approach like maybe like some number like 160 it's different for everybody right you kind of level off and then the only way to keep losing is to increase the dose or obviously whatever build more muscle and cut calories but you know if you're if you're on if you're on a glp you're probably going to be you know increasing dose and so you reach an equilibrium and so then you know you're going to be on this kind of stabilized level so i think 10 years from now you know what 30 40 percent of america could be even more could be on stabilized glp for metabolic you know and or weight management issues and so what does that mean well people are more conscious of protein just because they've they've you know had to worry about muscle loss um retitrutide is is supposedly better at muscle preservation.

36:44But there's this concept of people getting skinny fat, where they've lost 30 pounds, but 12 has been muscle and 18 has been fat. And so they just don't have the figure or whatever in some ways that they did. Fiber is really important. Fiber is not sexy, like protein. I imagine if I was in high school right now and I was walking around around school, I'd be flaunting my 42-gram protein drink, but I certainly wouldn't be flaunting a 20-gram fiber drink. I mean, it's just not sexy. But it is really sexy if you're on a GLP-1 because it keeps you regular, and you don't want to get up and be bound up every day.

37:26So if there's an increase, right? Right now we're at 12%. If that goes to 30 % to 40 % of people that are on GLP-1s. Do you think, because right now, for example, Blue Veneer Expo West, you see a lot of brands and protein is a huge call out, right? And they will think that we're a kind of peak protein. Do you think then that we are in kind of peak protein or think it's just kind of just getting started this whole wave because of the GLP-1s, if there is an increase that goes from 12 to 30%, if that happens? Yeah, it's an interesting question. um i don't i don't think we're at peak protein um i i do think that it is going to continue to increase and but you know we may be at peak protein growth um i think that it really depends on how much this group um and our society in general adopts weight training because i think that you know, that piece of wellness definitely gets people to be more conscious of it.

38:31And, you know, lean muscle mass is really, and strength is really correlated with longevity. So, you know, I think that that is something people pay attention to on GLP ones, definitely. But if that 30 or 40 % and even the, you know, in the remainder is, you know, doing more weight training, then I think we're going to see continued protein growth. Got it. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. That makes a lot of sense. Um, and how are you, how are you thinking just peptides in general, maybe, maybe we'll take GLP ones and put them over here and just other peptides, right? How do you think about, um, what do you think that, that there's going to be the opera?

39:11What do you think are the opportunities for strategics and where, and where do you see those going? I know we talked a little bit about RFK and having these 12 peptides off, but how do you see the peptide market developing? Yeah, it's a great question. So there's, right now, you know, peptides are basically chains of amino acids just strung together, you know, kind of like letters and words. And, you know, if you get the right combination, it forms basically a word or a message, you know, to activate something in the body. And there's, you know, there's hundreds of them out there. There's thousands in the body.

39:49So the potential for, you know, thousands of peptides to be in the market, it's almost infinite, right? the potential of this. In some ways, it could be a good piece of the future of medicine, right? I mean, there's plenty of peptides in medicine now. The question is, how do people make money on it, on that side, when it's very difficult to patent something, which is literally a protein that, or I guess if it's less than 40, technically, it's not a protein, right? Something that's just out there, right? You have to have something innovative, essentially, to patent, or you have to, just like in GLPs, be given essentially a special, you know, mechanism to patent.

40:29So I don't know how much that's going to be on the drug side or how much of that is going to be available on, you know, the company side. But if I look at like the copper peptide right now, it's interesting, you know, GHK-CU, that is approved topically and it's in, you know, lots of serums and other, you know, creams and things like that. And it's, you know, very effective for, you know, kind of skin rejuvenation and, you know, of skin health and sold that way. And it's obviously something that's contributing to efficacy in personal care, and that's driving growth in brands. You know, most of the peptides are not bioavailable, you know, through the mouth, like in the stomach.

41:06So, you know, I think that probably is more personal care. I mean, some are, but, you know, many are not. Then the question is, well, you've got all these peptides and somebody's got to figure that out. And so you've got things like hims and hers and, you know, function, which is, you know, obviously doing all these blood tests, which are having you, you know, figuring out what's wrong with me. So, you know, maybe the peptides are something that are going to help me because there's something that came up in my function test, you know, and I'm doing something else and that's going to support it.

41:35And so I think in the kind of the service business around them, I think there's going to be a lot of opportunity. And, you know, there already is, obviously, hims, hers is a public company. um and then you know obviously med spas right again in that service side um so i think i think it's a little bit of like you know we're gonna see but as far as like kind of food and beverage and all of that i think it's basically a tailwind because everything that you're doing around all of this health care diet is so fundamental right because you can sabotage your peptide work your workouts, everything that you're doing with a lousy diet.

42:11And you can figure that out real quick because you just don't feel well, especially as you get older. Yeah, that's, that's very, very, that's very, that's really well said. That's really well said. Yeah, I think, do you, I mean, obviously, I know we, the Amazon stats when it comes to needles, but do you think, you know, injections, needles, do you think that's just going to be something that's going to be every day come in that people are not going to have a fuss about in terms of form factor? I think the number of Americans that are suddenly comfortable with injecting themselves has gone up a lot, and I think it will continue to.

42:48I think there'll always be people that elect not to. There's more and more oral versions of GLPs coming out in the pipeline. I think there will be people that will avoid it. But yeah, I think especially as people talk and And people hear from their friends, oh, well, I took whatever, BPC-157 after my knee surgery. And instead of taking 12 months to be able to be fully healed, I was healed in whatever, five or six. It's like there's this virality of society, just like with brands. Brands hit this inflection point where they suddenly don't have to spend as much marketing money to grow. And they just seem to grow.

43:25And that's kind of when they hit this critical mass of virality where people are like, hey, I love this new whatever, cracker, potato chip, whatever it might be. right and all of a sudden you see brands kind of take off when they hit this critical mass and i think you could see that too yeah that's yeah i i think it's a fascinating consumer behavior that's maybe becoming more more normalized just injections becoming a lot more uh more normalized where you know i mean even if some supplements how gummies have become more normalized when it comes to you know supplements um especially you know grooms and the apples also create and um another other brands but what's interesting about that is that gummies yeah easier right a lot easier to take than maybe um mixing a powder and doing um mix it powder water and then and then consuming that but needles it's you know quite quite quite different so i it's just it's just interesting to see how some of these are becoming more normalized, some that are easier to do like gummies and then some that are a little bit more harder to do like injections.

44:31Yeah, yeah. And I think when I'm talking about injections being more accepted, it's definitely subcutaneous leading the way. I think people still would prefer not to go into muscle. I think subcutaneous are small little needles. It's kind of quick, painless, easy. Yeah. But gummies are interesting, definitely. I think four out of five people would definitely eat a gummy over taking a shot. No, for sure, for sure. Nine out of 10. Speaking of gummies, I remember that you've said that gummies are also a pretty tough form factor because only 20 % is the active ingredient. You have to have quite a bit of sugar as well in the gummy itself.

45:11Do you think that gummies are going to become a lot more normalized? I mean, obviously, we just saw the Gruen's transaction. and like I've said, like Create, for example, just raise$20 million. But do you see gummies kind of spreading across multiple categories or do you think that it's still going to be too hard because of the amount of sugar that you have to put into it? Yeah, it's a great question. So, you know, at the end of the day, so first of all, I have a family that is in the gummy formulation business. So I've learned a bit just in discussions. And it is definitely kind of humbling to hear how difficult it is.

45:53You get different batches of pectin, and that can screw up the consistency of your gummies just because of one ingredient. And so the 20 % isn't a hard, fast rule. I mean, one thing I think that really helps create is they're at 30. When you look at it, they've got basically a gram and a half of creatine in every five grams of gummy, which is 30%, which is pretty good. But I think, again, we're dealing with grams. So if the active ingredient is 300 milligrams and it's still at the 20 % level, well, that's only a gram and a half, right? So that means 1.2 grams of sugar, that's five calories. That's pretty de minimis, right?

46:33So creatine is something that people are taking traditionally five grams. And now for brain health, I've heard numbers like 10. And I've actually got one friend the other day that told me they take 20 every day. And I was like, wow, yeah, that's quite a bit. But obviously, they're blowing the doors off at Create and they're selling big bins of them. And so it works really well when you can get 30 % and make it easy on people. So I think it's always going to be an easy form factor. It's easier to eat gummies than take a pill. There's a lot of people that don't want to take medication. They don't want to take pills.

47:12Beverages have done extremely well over time and gotten a lot of growth because you can get active ingredient into beverages and that is their supplement, essentially. Yeah. No, that makes a lot of sense. Yeah. And I imagine your friend that's probably taking 20 grams of creatine is probably not in gummy form, I would think, just because of the eye sugar there. I mean, think about this, just to highlight the point. How much money would America spend on caffeine if they took caffeine pills versus buying beverages, right? But we don't do that. We want the beverages, right? Right. That's a very, very fair...

47:53I did meet somebody who said, if I want caffeine, I just pop a pill. I just pop a pill, and he's the only person still I've ever met that that's i was gonna say i don't know the data but i bet it's less than one in a hundred and it always will be right exactly exactly um i actually recently though had a caffeine spray company come on the podcast so you oh interesting yeah yeah yeah that's interesting so that's i thought that was an interesting four factor um tell us a little bit about testosterone therapy as well adoption what's really interesting is women is driving this trend um which is seems counterintuitive to a lot of people.

48:34What does that, what does that unlock? What are your kind of, why do you, is, is anyone actually positioned for this or like, what are your kind of thoughts on this, on this trend as well? Yeah. So, so I think hormones are really interesting because I think it's one of the kind of core fundamental, you know, again, consumer is agent of healthcare things. You know, there, there can be a lot of things that bother you in life and it's real easy to go and you find a pill or whatever it might be for it and kind of tamp it down, that can be cured with just optimizing hormones. If you're really deficient in testosterone, you're going to be more tired, you're going to be less focused.

49:16Once you kind of get yourself regulated, it can cure a lot of those ills. What's interesting about, I think women's health is an area that has got a lot of growth in it. And specifically on hormones, what's interesting is all of the testosterone clinical trials have been done with men. There's never been one done for women, and there probably never will be because we're using bioidentical hormones now. And so there's no financial incentive to do one, right? And it also means that doctors are less comfortable and have been less comfortable prescribing them. There was also a really unfortunate study done with progestin, I think it was in the late 90s, where a bunch of rats got breast cancer.

50:01And that stopped a lot of women from taking hormone therapy for a very long time until that study got debunked. I mean, I can't remember exactly the type of rats, and I'm definitely not a rat expert, but when you do these studies, there's multiple kinds of rats. And there's rats that you use that can tell you if there's a high likelihood of getting cancer or not. And then there's other rats you use to figure out what kind of cancer they're going to get, because they'll get cancer almost 90 % of the time that you run any study with them at a high level. And I don't remember what kind of rats, but I had understood at one point it was not necessarily the optimal selection.

50:35And progestin is not, it's a synthetic. And we're using bioidentical now, which are believed to be much more benign, much less risky. And so now we're kind of coming out of that. And I also think hormones are kind of like mental health. I mean, I think people didn't want to talk about them, right? I mean, you know, 10, 20 years ago, kids didn't talk about mental health in school. It would, you know, if you were the kid that had to go to the nurse's office, right? Yeah. There's some shame, right? And I think there was, you know, I think there is a little bit of that with hormones too. And, you know, now it's like my daughter goes to school and all the kids are talking about, you know, their neurodiversity and what prescriptions they on.

51:09And, you know, it's almost like a cool thing, you know? And, and, you know, I think, I think we're seeing that more with hormones and, you know, even with guys, guys don't like to talk about anything, right? I mean, women are much better, I think, at communicating with each other about vulnerabilities. But I go to the gym now. Guys are always talking about it now. It's like people are coming out of the closet almost. Totally, totally. Are there any subcategories within mental health that you think there's any white space that you don't think is touched yet? It's a great question. I think, again, with the hormones and the mental health, when we think about supplements and food and beverage, again, I think these are the things that are creating those tailwinds.

51:56So if somebody is on testosterone and they have more energy and more agency and they're going to have the ability to build more lean muscle mass just by doing the things that they're doing every day, walking up and down stairs and things like that, they are going to be starting to think about different things in their diet. um they may be more inclined to start weight training um you know when they start seeing that that result um you know they may be buying more dhea and things like that to take with their testosterone especially if they're doing something like in clomiphene and that's their building blocks to build it you know um you know for men women obviously not um so so i think mental health is you know it's a little bit of the same way it's you know you're you're doing something already here to kind of, you know, maybe it's a prescription, maybe it's, you know, hormones, maybe it's, you know, meditation or whatever it is, and you're adopting your diet because, you know, if it's just not going to work if all you eat is sugar and, you know, your sugar is going like this all day, right?

52:54That's wrecking havoc on your nervous system. Atone your whole body. Totally. That makes 100 % sense. Yeah. So I think this is the rising tide, right? The more people are kind of regulating, I think it's more of a rising tide on innovative and better for you. Totally. Yeah, absolutely. And then also as well, you then also have a lot more trust, right? With the regulation comes a lot more trust too. Yeah. How, in terms of your inbound mix, is it founders? Do you find that a founder is selling because they want to or because they have to? I think right now it's more they want to. Yeah. A couple of years ago, late 22 into 23 was a really tough time, I think.

53:46And there was definitely a slowdown in the capital cycle. And there was a kind of lack of liquidity, again, because when interest rates go up, that means that all the people that fund the venture and private equity funds, suddenly they have a choice of higher rate bonds. and if last year bonds were 4 % and this year they're 8%, you're going to allocate a little bit more in that direction. Inflation was hard of a consumer. We had this hit of a reduction in unit volume in grocery stores. That was a headwind everybody was facing. So big strategics were kind of, their stocks went down and that meant they were less aggressive in M &A.

54:30All of that just was like a perfect storm. So what you're saying is we're back. We're back. Yeah, yeah. I mean, we're not frothy. I mean, we don't have whatever, 20 IPOs and SPACs like we did in 2021. But we are seeing IPOs now again, which, by the way, really before 21, we didn't see in this industry. There's very few. I mean, we had Annie's and Pets. Yeah, I mean, there was a couple, but there weren't that many. Yeah, right. Right. We haven't seen a lot of them. Fresh Pet. Lee. Skibata. Yeah, we're certainly, yeah, certainly a lot of appetite on that side. I mean, a couple of companies I know that are kind of Europe.

55:15Yeah. To IPO.

55:21Obviously, we had this jolt, you know, in 2018, 2024, that was really tough times. What's the, has we, have strategic stuff like that just kind of adjusted toward this new norm? And that's why there's been a lot more activity because interest rates are still high, right? I mean, they've gone down a little bit, but they're still high. Is it just more so that we've kind of adjusted this new normal and kind of from the ZERB era? Yeah, yeah, I think so. I think the change in interest rates is the more shocking thing. And, you know, once you kind of establish a new normal, you know, even if you hold your, even if you're an insurance company and you're holding your portfolio allocations the same, well, your bonds are making money and you haven't invested in private equity in a couple of years and you start getting money back out of funds.

56:11And so now that opens up and you need more to put more there. Also, I mean, interest rates are high, but we do have some inflation right now. And I think we always have to think about interest rates relative to inflation because inflation actually is, you know, it's increasing revenue as well, right? It means you have more, a greater ability to take price, you know, so, you know, out of necessity, but, you know, there was a few years in low inflation times back in, you know, the 2010s where it was extremely difficult to take price. That's a good point. It's a very good point. How, which buyer profile you find that that's most active right now?

56:52I know that we've kind of, you know, the big ones are, you know, the strategics maybe, but do you find that PE, for example, is a lot more active or family offices? And has there been a shift within the past 12 months? Yeah, interesting question. I think there's been a shift over, you know, let's say the last 12 years, really 12 plus years. You know, I think the number of large strategics has not grown nearly as fast as the number of innovative ready-for-sale companies.

57:23And by the way, on average, they do about a deal a year, big strategics do. So PE has really kind of filled that gap. IPOs have filled it a little bit. I kind of put family offices into that PE bucket. And yeah, I think PE is definitely growing more. It's interesting. One thing that we track is we look at spins and we look at in spins, how many companies are over$100 million and are not co-ops or farms or family farms that are just never going to sell, like actually companies that will be saleable brands. And how much is that number going up? And we started tracking it a couple of years ago and their numbers were like in the 50s.

58:05And now we're up to 89. And yeah, more than half, and that's retail sales. So that doesn't necessarily mean company sales. More than half of those companies have some kind of an institutional investor and you know about three quarters of them are you know between 100 and 500 million so kind of right in that sweet spot of you know acquirable you know the index better for you you know north of two you know two times um and they're growing at you know three or four times the you know the average yeah you know the average of other companies so it is it is a group that is appealing and growing in size so we are you know we are going to see more transaction volume or we're going to see more strategics, one or the other.

58:48That's really interesting. Well, I mean, speaking of strategics,

58:59so Fernando Fernandez, who is the CEO of Unilever, last year said he's allocating 1.5 billion euros to every year for acquisitions. grooms was this year obviously are there any brands that you think will be their target for next year it's it's a great question um and uh i i don't know specifically i think grooms is really interesting because i think the most interesting thing about that deal was the time from inception to sale and a billion dollar type tag on the deal. To my knowledge, I've not seen that in food and beverage before. It was the fastest ever. Tia to a billion. In tech or whatever, I'm sure that's happened, but that's new food.

1:00:05It just shows how it's matured now i remember about 12 or 13 years ago um there was a company called rickland orchards i don't know if you remember it but they had greek yogurt bars uh and they went from inception to sale in i believe it was 20 months and but they only sold for a number like i think it was 55 or 6 million it was a public deal so you can look it up um not speaking out of turn here but at the time that was you know that was his headline grabbing is Gruen's today. So it just kind of shows you how the market is evolving and maturing into such a much bigger... Everything is much bigger now.

1:00:46It's hitting a much bigger consumer base. And so we have this much more spending power behind the potential of these brands as they just become more and more mainstream, as health becomes more and more mainstream. Do you think because of the Gruen's transaction and other M &A transactions over the years, you know poppy for example and kind of uh others that are tough uh roads do you think that there's going to be a lot more capital that kind of goes into consumer just overall as a category food and bed beauty personal care vms i i do think we're going to continue to attract capital yeah i mean i think the more that we see large headline deals the more that we see ipos then capital comes and chases it.

1:01:28I mean, capital is really dominated by, you know, is really driven by fear and greed. And, you know, I think of the two, greed can be the more powerful emotion. Yeah, that's very fair. Because I just think it's interesting, mid 2010s, right? You had a lot of tech going into CPG and kind of these categories and many of those deals didn't pan out. And I do wonder if we might get a point of with all these headlines and all these news and all these transactions that the tech money might actually come back or, or additive, it might come back, you know? Yeah. Or just more funds that are, you know, or yeah.

1:02:07Um, more multi-billion dollar, multi-strategy funds, increasing their consumer allocation. Totally. Is there a category that I know we talked a little bit about protein and fiber, but is there a category that looks hot from the outside right now that you'd actually pass on or you actually don't think is that attractive? Yeah, it's interesting. I get asked the category question a lot. And what is so fascinating to me is when you look at founders, founders have a unique eye on a consumer that you or I or the senior executives at all these large CPGs don't have. And they see this this need from a unique viewpoint.

1:02:52And then they craft their brand, you know, and drive all that passion behind growing it and satisfy it. And it, you know, I mean, for years and years and years, like Frozen was considered, you know, in 2011, 12, 13, or whatever, nobody would want to go into Frozen, right? I mean, it's like, it costs so much, the margins aren't great, whatever. And there was a tremendous amount of innovation in Frozen, right, over the 10 years that followed that. So there's a category that people would have said, you know, this is an expensive category, you know, to operate in, the margins aren't that high or whatever, you know, why would you ever go into it?

1:03:24Yet there was a lot of success, right? So I don't think there's necessarily a bad category, you know, outside of, you know, what are things that are just directly combating, you know, or directly pushing into the headwinds or combating the tailwinds of, you know, what's going on in consumer. But I mean, even like candy, I mean, there's companies in candy that are just doing fantastically right now. They've got, you know, prebiotic fibers in them, they've got less sugar, they've got, you know, they're capitalizing on like kind of that sour and sweet combination, right? I mean, like these kind of complex flavors are things that really resonate with GLP users.

1:04:03Things that are beyond just simple, salty and sweet, those are under indexing. But when you put those with, you know, sweet and salty, or, you know, sour and sweet, you know you put those together that's where you start to see them over indexing so it's interesting do you do you think for example like one that i think is kind of a hot debate in cbg circles is protein for not not necessarily saying that you know protein is um but is there a limit to protein in terms of category right like protein marinara sauce protein popcorn is there a limit to where protein actually sits, can it actually fluctuate throughout the aisle?

1:04:47Yeah, I don't know. I'm curious if you have any thoughts. It's a really good question. I think if protein can be formulated into something in a way that it is additive or not detractive of what you're buying. So if it's going into whatever, marinara sauce, and the marinara sauce still eats like any other marinara sauce, then no, right? I mean, there's going to be somebody that's going to want to buy it. I think type of protein is something people are, quality protein and type of protein are things people are going to look at more and more. But I don't think there's necessarily a limit on where it can go.

1:05:32I do think that the intensity of protein demand, meaning like what percent protein by calorie, is something that is going to level a little bit as more people go on maintenance mode in GLPs versus this intense, I'm eating 1 ,000 calories a day and I've got to get 100 grams of protein, so that's 40 % by calorie. So I'm going and drinking beverages that are 160 calories and 40 grams of protein and nothing else. Or these super high protein servings to try to get that. Because it's really difficult if you're on a GLP-1 and losing that kind of weight. Totally. It makes a lot of sense. It drops to 20 % by calorie when the 1 ,000 calories goes to two and you're in maintenance mode, you know?

1:06:25Yeah, definitely. And I think that opens up where it can go. It means that, you know, there are areas where you can't put protein because, you know, at that level, right, and have it be good. I mean, I can't imagine you could, you know, put protein in marinara sauce at 40 % by calorie, you know, and have it work. I don't know. I don't know what the numbers are in the, but you know what I'm saying? Like, I think it actually opens it up so it actually could go to more categories at 20%. yeah that's a fair you're saying yeah yeah that's yeah so protein can even go to go into more categories in terms of what what it currently is yeah like it's drying on baked goods right like I've seen protein cookies and when people try to put too much protein in they get really dry right so 40 % may not work but 20 might right right right and still obviously have the taste have it tasting great which because you know obviously taste is king um yes if um let me see uh

1:07:33uh okay i think that actually all right final question yeah this is great um what's what's one book i actually forgot the footage i think on the uh on the uh question but what's what's one book that's inspired you personally and one book that's inspired you professionally? So I actually changed that. Oh, I see. What events in your life? Okay. Let me ask yours. Let me ask your way. What events in your life have inspired you personally and professionally? It's a really good question. And there's lots of things, but I'll tell you a couple of quick stories. So one was, when I went to college, I was in a dorm that had a lot of athletes in it.

1:08:23And I was 17 years old, and I was pretty underdeveloped. I was kind of that tall, skinny kid that didn't fill out in high school. And I've got all these guys that are whatever, playing football and baseball. And we had weights in there and stuff. And so immediately, I was like very motivated to, you know, start lifting weights and, you know, fill out and try to figure that out. And, and I did, it was, you know, it was a lot of work. I, I actually, you know, started mail-oating supplements at the time, because that's what you did. And it, it really started to focus me more on nutrition and food and, and things like that.

1:09:01And, you know, I think that kind of seeded some passion around wellness, you know, early on. and you know as as kind of times went on I you know I worked in technology for a while and I really didn't like it I loved you know I really loved the uncertainty of consumer brands and the puzzle of like figuring out you know is there's a brand work and so kind of the early 2000s there was there was like the dot-com meltdown and that was kind of that was kind of the point where I was starting to really lose you know the luster of working in tech it wasn't as interesting and and I you know started doing consumer deals in 2020 you know 2003 that's when I went to my first Expo East.

1:09:37You know, over that decade, my mom got sick with Alzheimer's and died. And, you know, I think that also kind of was really tough and depressing. And it also, it kind of made me think more broadly about wellness. You know, I mean, I got her into like a phase three, you know, trial. And, you know, so I learned all about that. And of course, you know, unfortunately it didn't work because nobody's really developed a great cure for Alzheimer's. And then I had two kids, you know, around that same time around 2010 and you know obviously you want to kind of like do the best for your kids and you know figure out how to get them to you know learn and love the best foods and so i think kind of all of that has has really you know slowly and over time more and more kind of you know broadly opened my eyes around you know the breadth of this whole you know consumer kind of health and innovation movement um and i just honestly just love this puzzle of what is going to make a brand resonate with consumers?

1:10:30What's going to make consumers direct their spending some certain way versus another way? Because it's a very dynamic question. Consumers change every day. What works in 2016 would not work in 2026 necessarily. Yeah, I know. I also really appreciate the vulnerability in you sharing your story. But yes, I completely agree with you in terms of what do consumers think about today and how that will change as it does. So that's, yeah. And also, I'm so glad you made the change to consumer from tech. I think it's definitely a lot more interesting. That's so much more interesting. I do think it's very interesting.

1:11:18I agree. I agree. It is. Well, Nick, thank you so much for your time. This was loads of fun. Thank you so much. yeah thank you thanks for including me here this is great really appreciate what you do

From the publisher

The future of consumer health is being built right now.

Consumers are becoming the CEOs of their own healthcare. From GLP-1s and peptides to protein, wearables, functional foods, and preventative wellness, entire industries are being reshaped by changing consumer behavior.

In this episode, Mike sits down with Nicolas McCoy, Managing Director of Whipstitch Capital, to unpack the biggest trends driving consumer health, food & beverage, supplements, wellness, and M&A. Nick spends his time analyzing what separates niche brands from the companies that break into the mainstream and get acquired.

They discuss why better-for-you products continue to outperform, how GLP-1 adoption is changing consumer spending habits, the rise of peptides and hormone optimization, why protein isn't slowing down anytime soon, and what strategic buyers are looking for in today's market.

Nick also shares his framework for evaluating brand headroom, explains why profitability matters more than ever in consumer M&A, and breaks down how founders should think about timing an exit.

You'll learn:

✅ Why consumers are becoming the CEOs of their own healthcare
✅ How GLP-1s are changing food, supplements, and wellness
✅ Why better-for-you products continue to outperform the market
✅ The future of peptides, hormones, and preventative health
✅ How investors evaluate brand headroom and acquisition potential
✅ Why some brands successfully cross from natural to mass retail
✅ The growing role of wearables in consumer health
✅ Why protein is still growing and where it goes next
✅ How strategic buyers think about acquisitions today
✅ What founders should know before trying to sell their company


If you're a founder, investor, operator, or simply curious about where consumer health is headed over the next decade, this episode is packed with data, trends, and practical insights.


Timestamps

00:00 Intro
01:11 Consumers becoming the CEOs of their healthcare
06:07 The state of consumer M&A today
09:48 Why profitability matters more than ever
12:09 How to know when to sell your company
13:51 Understanding brand headroom
17:11 Which retail channels create the most value
20:00 Crossing from natural to mass retail
24:30 The K-shaped consumer economy explained
27:45 Why lower-income consumers are adopting health trends faster
29:13 The surprising growth of injectable health products
32:40 RFK Jr., MAHA, and peptide awareness
34:42 The future impact of GLP-1 adoption
37:26 Protein's next phase of growth
39:24 The future of peptides and personalized health
42:17 Why injections are becoming more mainstream
44:31 The rise of gummies as a supplement format
48:19 Women's hormone health opportunities
51:31 Mental health, wellness, and consumer behavior
53:23 Are founders selling because they want to or have to?
54:36 Is the consumer market back?
57:06 The growing role of private equity in CPG
59:23 The evolution of billion-dollar consumer exits
01:01:17 Why more capital is flowing into consumer brands
01:02:13 Categories Nick is watching closely
01:07:51 Personal experiences that shaped Nick's career
01:11:15 Closing thoughts


📬 Subscribe to Consumer VC for more conversations with the founders, investors, and operators shaping the future of consumer 👉 https://www.theconsumervc.com/

Follow Mike Gelb:
Twitter/X: @mikegelb
Instagram: @consumervc
TikTok: @consumervc

More from Consumer VC

All 83 episodes
The Future of Consumer Health with Nicolas McCoyConsumer VC · 1 h 11 min
Listen in VO