Will AI Screw IP Holders, Content Getting Better or Worse, and The Future of Journalism with Ishan Sinha, Partner at Point72 Ventures

20 Mar 2025 · 58 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Consumer VC Podcast Episode Notes

Episode Title Will AI Screw IP Holders, Content Getting Better or Worse, and The Future of Journalism with Ishan Sinha, Partner at Point72 Ventures

Episode Description In this episode, Mike Gelb interviews Ishan Sinha from Point72 Ventures about the evolving role of AI in consumer startups, the challenges posed by AI-driven media, and future monetization strategies for creators. The discussion covers intellectual property implications, consumer AI trends, and venture capital investment strategies, alongside insights from past market cycles.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Introduction to Point72 Ventures
  2. Background: Point72 Ventures is the venture arm of Point72 Asset Management, a hedge fund founded by Steve Cohen in 2014.
  3. Initial Focus: Started with public market investing before venturing into early-stage consumer investments.
  1. Transition from Public Market to Venture Capital
  2. Core Similarity: Evaluating businesses and determining their potential.
  3. Major Differences:
  4. Lack of quantitative data for early-stage startups.
  5. Importance of qualitative assessments and personal relationships with founders.
  1. The Role of AI in Consumer Startups
  2. Current Landscape: Rising significance of AI applications across various consumer sectors.
  3. Key Questions:
  4. Are VCs underestimating consumer AI?
  5. How can AI benefit artists and creators?
  1. AI Challenges in Media and Content Creation
  2. Intellectual Property (IP): Discussion on how AI impacts IP holders, particularly in the context of music and journalism.
  3. Historical Context: Comparison of current AI challenges with past disruptions in the music industry (e.g., Napster and Spotify).
  1. Future of Journalism
  2. Monetization Strategies: How AI might reshape the ways journalism generates revenue.
  3. Potential Solutions: Licensing agreements and partnerships between AI companies and traditional media outlets.
  1. Consumer Trends and Market Sentiment
  2. Current Trends: Discussions on how consumer behavior is shifting towards AI-driven solutions and the growing power of platforms like TikTok for customer acquisition.
  3. Investor Sentiment: Changing views on consumer investment attractiveness following recent market shifts.
  1. Venture Capital Insights
  2. Investment Strategies:
  3. Importance of conviction in market opportunities.
  4. The challenge of competitive deal-making in the venture space.
  5. Lessons from Previous Cycles: Emphasis on focusing on great founders and sustainable business models regardless of market trends.
  1. Lightning Round
  2. Consumer Trend to Watch: Rise of AI agents capable of automating mundane tasks.
  3. Personal Growth in Venture: Shift from trend-chasing to focusing on solid fundamentals and founder capabilities.

---

Key Takeaways

  • The landscape for consumer investments is evolving rapidly, particularly with the advent of AI technologies.
  • Historical disruptions in media, especially in music, provide valuable lessons for navigating today’s issues surrounding AI and IP.
  • Founders and investors must remain adaptive, focusing on consumer demand and sustainable business models amidst changing market dynamics.
  • The importance of personal relationships and qualitative assessments in venture capital cannot be overstated.

---

Final Thoughts Ishan Sinha emphasizes the need for venture capitalists to shift their focus from trends to foundational business practices, underscoring the inevitability of consumer demand and the importance of building meaningful relationships with founders. As AI continues to reshape various industries, navigating IP rights and creating effective monetization strategies will be crucial for the future of journalism and media.

For more insights and updates, visit [Consumer VC](http://www.theconsumervc.com) or follow Mike Gelb on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/MikeGelb).

---

This document serves as a concise synthesis of the podcast episode, highlighting critical discussions and insights relevant to venture capital, consumer behavior, and the impact of AI on various sectors.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00What do you think is the biggest consumer trend to watch out this year? You're seeing people like scale to millions of dollars of revenue quickly, figuring out what the TikTok does. We kind of have gone through a couple of paradigm shifts in consumer technology. Like in the early 2000s, it was the internet, right? Like all of a sudden, all the stuff here that are not flying is now on your computer. And now all of a sudden, the companies like Spotify or whatever that have really disrupted their respective industries are where there's consumer demand. Consumer demand that you honestly cannot ignore.

0:29Consumers really want to just stream music for$10 a month. That is going to happen. Our guest today is Ishan Sinha, who is a partner on the investment team at Point72 Ventures, where he co-leads their consumer investment practice. Point72 Asset Management is an American hedge fund. It was founded in 2014 by Steve Cohen. Point72 Ventures is their venture capital arm. We discuss what types of consumer AI applications Ishan thinks will succeed versus ones that won't succeed. the challenges of AI media content and copyright, and we also talk a little bit about the music industry. Hello, I'm your host, Mike Gelb, and welcome to The Consumer VC, where we discuss the intersection of venture capital and consumer innovation.

1:13If you're enjoying the show, please subscribe on whichever channel you're listening on, whether that's YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, that would be amazing. And if you're loving the show and want the full experience, check out the newsletter at theconsiderobc.com. I share fundraising updates weekly, and you'll be the first to receive new episodes straight to your inbox. All content episodes are for informational and entertainment purposes only and is not investment advice. Without further ado, here's Eshaan. So let's start from the very beginning of your career with Point72. I mean, Point72, why did it make sense in your mind for Point72 to even launch a venture fund in the beginning?

1:54Yeah, yeah. So I joined Point72 in 2016. And I actually joined on the public market side, which is what Point72 is known for, right? It's a large asset manager. The bulk of what they do is publicly traded investing, which is a combination of both fundamental long-short equity, like going long and shorting stocks based off of fundamental deep research, and a systematic quantitative strategy, right? quants and algorithmic trading and all that. So I was working on the fundamental side. I was researching stocks all day. It was an awesome job. You kind of just did research and read and learned about different industries all day.

2:37And honestly, I was the first associate that they hired on the venture team. At the time, it was like three folks in a basement in our old office. And it was really launched as like an experiment of like, hey, look, we have all these smart people at the firm, right, doing research in different categories. We do have a large firm that has ties to, in particular at the time, the financial services ecosystem. I think about where 0.72 sits, like we work with all the banks, we work with all the lenders, like we're close to that ecosystem. And so Steve, Steve Cohen, who started Point Simage, you had this idea of, well, can't we leverage the intellectual capital and kind of where we sit in the ecosystem to start making some startup investments?

3:28I think naturally we were seeing startups anyways. You have to remember this was kind of a different era in 2016 in New York City. It's not like there were tons of venture funds. And that was also, I joke about this, like in 2016, that was a time where like the idea of like a hedge fund doing some startup investments was somewhat novel. It's not really anymore. But, you know, we kind of saw an opportunity. Hey, couldn't we come in here and become like a real New York City venture fund? And we started doing fintech investing and then, you know, sort of expanded from there. And yeah, you know, one thing kind of led to another.

4:02The team just grew and grew and grew and started adding more verticals. And eventually we added a growth business. And yeah, now we're investing in a bunch of different spaces. I lead our consumer team. I do both early and growth stage on the consumer side. And yeah, honestly, it was kind of just, from my perspective, I just kind of lucked into this position. I was a hedge fund analyst. I think in 2016, I got bitten a little bit by the startup bug and kind of raised my hand. If you guys want to build a venture fund, I'll help you guys. I don't even know what that means, but I'll try my best to learn on the fly.

4:35And I don't know, like almost 10 years later, I'm still here. No, I mean, congrats. What was the biggest transition going from public market investing and working at a hedge fund and then going into venture, into early stage and growth stage investing? It's a really good question. A lot of people ask me this. I would say the core of it is that the two jobs are actually very similar. At the end of the day, you're looking at businesses and evaluating, is this a good business or not? On the public equity side, you kind of have the ability. If you don't think it's a good business, there's another thing you can do.

5:18But at the end of the day, you're doing the same thing. You're doing research on trying to evaluate if a company is good or not. I'd say the thing that I really had to adjust to, it's two things. Number one, I come from a little bit more of a quantitative background. I studied economics in college, and I was an investment banker before this. And so I was very comfortable making decisions off of data, off of like, you know, you build a model and, you know, the model spits out a number and you're like, oh, that's a good number. We should buy it. Right. And the reality is you can't really do that with startups, particularly like early stage startups.

5:49Maybe at the growth stage, you can do a little bit more of that. But I would actually like it sounds fluffier, but I would actually say when you don't have the crux of like data to invest off of, it's actually really hard. Right. It's actually really hard to be like, I think there's something special about this human being, which is ultimately like what most early stage investing boils down to. Right. Or it's really hard to think abstractly about markets. I always talk about like, you know, like you can try to quantify the TAM for Uber in like 2007 or whatever. But like, what are you doing? You know, what's the what's the actual like at the end of you kind of have to like invest off of something abstract and invest off of a person.

6:26And I would argue that's way harder than like crunching numbers and, you know, like all this data looks right. You know, this trend line is up to the right. That's the first thing. The second thing that I would say is like the biggest difference is the access piece of it. You know, when you're an edge fund analyst and you want to buy shares of a particular stock, like most cases, like if you have a view on it, like buying those shares isn't the hard part. Whereas in venture, like the hard part, I think is like, yeah, if you, if you love a deal, chances are everyone else loves the deal too. Right.

6:59And, uh, getting allocation is hard. And so like the interpersonal piece of it was an adjustment for me. I've grown to really, really, really love that. I mean, my, my favorite part of my day is spending time with founders, but, uh, but like that was a trend. I did not appreciate that going into this job, how, how important that was. It might be the most important thing. do you think yeah so i guess that that shift from being um from really from being quant from from really focused on the quant side to really not have enough data i actually have to focus on the on the qualitative side and really build that trust with people and and actually you're you're really betting on the jockey in a lot of ways especially in the early days that that and the horse because the horse is still kind of assembling it's still kind of growing uh into a horse and so So totally understand that adjustment.

7:49I have a question. Just in your view, we talked about allocation can become hard in terms of competitive when the deal is competitive. Do you find when the deal is very competitive that that actually translates into the company actually performing really well and maybe becoming quite a big company? Or do you think that it actually doesn't have a lot of – or actually being contrarian in that you actually looking at startups that maybe don't have – that maybe aren't in that – that it isn't actually as competitive to actually get in the rounds. That maybe is actually more enticing for you. So yeah, the short answer is like, I don't think there's a real pattern there.

8:43So long as you develop the conviction internally as an investor, that's what I kind of always coach my team on, right? I'll say this, like some of the best deals I've done in my career, like, you know, that I've been hit for almost a decade. And like, we have realized a couple of exits and seen these companies grow. Some of the best deals I've done were super contrarian to the point that like, there was no competing term sheet, right? Like, to the point that like, in investment committee meetings, I got asked, like, are you sure about this? Like, nobody else is looking at it, right? At the same time, for each one of those, like, certainly, we have companies where, you know, it was competitive for good reason, the founder was amazing, and they had to track record and you know, that company did well.

9:23But I would say there's sort of no correlation. I don't know if I would ever say like, you know, just because a company's competitive means it's good, or just because a company's competitive means it's bad, like, just because an allocation decision is competitive. But what I always coach my team on is, hey, if you've done the work and you believe that this market exists and this founder is awesome, I don't care what other venture funds are saying, let's do the deal. It almost is an irrelevant signal for me. What about price then? Let's say you love the company, but how do you also stay price disciplined for example really are i mean it's obviously easier in a scenario where you know you are a uh you can set the price right because you're the only term sheet there but in a competitive round it's tough i think it just comes down to like how much conviction do you have that this can be a big company and um are you okay paying up for it i think i was listening to a podcast i can't remember if it was this one but with uh with sarah topple from benchmark you said But if the only reason you don't want to do a deal is the price, pay the price.

10:32If you have tons of conviction, and I couldn't agree with that, but if you have tons of conviction, you think this is going to be a Facebook-like outcome or whatever, one of those companies, pay the price. But I would say like in general, I think given our DNA and how much time we spend on deep fundamental research and kind of the culture of our firm, we try to be as price disciplined as possible. of all. Now, in consumer, consumers never, well, not never, but it seems like for the last few years, it's never, it hasn't been considered an attractive space to invest in, to spend time in. And, you know, I think that, you know, and, and, you know, maybe partly for good reason, in terms of everyone loves, you know, enterprise SaaS and, or, or, or B2B SaaS in, in some way, shape or fashion in terms of obviously the margin profiles and as well as the overall customer base might be a bit easier to manage.

11:31Consumers are a bit more fickle, for example, than businesses and maybe you have a lot more long-term contracts. But what do you think the pulse is right now when it comes to investing in consumer? And is it only, is your only focus in consumer AI, for example? So you're right. Like for the last couple years, it has not been the sexiest sector, I guess. And look, for good reason, right? There was a wave of consumer companies that came out in the last decade that really were able to take advantage of digital marketing. The cat game made sense. You could market on social media and Instagram, Facebook, hit the right customer.

12:24Over time, A, those markets got crowded. And B, because of Apple's IDFA rules and things that came out, suddenly that business model no longer really worked. And so I think that scared people off of consumer for a good reason, right? Like at the end of the day, unit economics end up being unsustainable. Like what are we really building here? I think that's starting to change, right? And I think investors are sort of realizing that. For one, there's new channels to go acquire customers, right? We're seeing that across our portfolio, you know, particularly our release age portfolio, which is like zero to one.

13:02And like, you're seeing like, you're seeing people like scale to millions of dollars of revenue quickly by figuring out like the TikTok algorithm, right? It's so good if you want to get your profile or even get your company in front of the right group of people. I don't know if you can scale to like$100 million business doing that. But like, you can prove product market fit pretty quickly. I think that's really interesting. I think investors are paying attention to that. And then I think the secondary thing, which you kind of touched on is AI, right? I think we kind of have gone through a couple of paradigm shifts in consumer technology.

13:36Like, you know, in the early 2000s, it was the internet, right? Like all of a sudden, all the stuff you're reading offline was now on your computer. Then in 2009, 2010, like that was when mobile powered by cloud became really ubiquitous. All of a sudden you had, you know, supercomputers in your phone and you could do a bunch of apps you could use. And now all of a sudden, a lot of people believe that we're in sort of like the next wave of this, right? where brand new experiences that consumers kind of hadn't even fathomed before are now available, right? Powered by AI. And I think a lot of people are really excited about that.

14:13I would say we've seen Wave, one of these companies, sort of come and go, right? There's some that have obviously stuck around. ChatGPT and OpenAI is obviously the big one that people think of. But I'm really excited for, you know, Wave 2 and the company sort of being built right now. And yeah, like I wouldn't say it's entirely powered by AI, but I would say there's a lot of excitement about making sure that people are investing in the next wave of sort of great AI companies. Totally. I mean, I'd love to love to talk, obviously, about this article that you put out about how AI media startups can help solve existential issues for the industry and artists.

14:47And when we think about industry and artists, we think about IP holders, right? And so what do you see as the most pressing challenges for AI startups that can actually address this space? And talk about also some of the problems that we're having right now when it comes to AI media startups and actually some of the actual publishers and the IP holders. yeah so so the genesis of like this article the reason why i decided i want to kind of start thinking about this and write something here was because um you know point 72 we we have access to a couple of different like interesting assets in the media entertainment space right so the most obvious one steve cohen who founded point 72 also happens to own the new york nets right and so uh We actually, oh, go ahead.

15:42No, that's great. We happen to collaborate pretty frequently with that team. And, you know, like that's kind of an interesting, like we just kind of get to learn about like the traditional sort of sports ecosystem that way. The other interesting asset that we have is we were the first institutional check into this company called Range Media Partners, which is a talent management company in L.A. they manage artists musicians actors athletes uh writers digital creators um you know obviously through that and they've started producing movies uh as well they produced them on legs earlier this year if you saw that um they they also produced um the new timothy shallon movie with about bob jalen forget the name of it um oh uh that's right that's right uh forget the name of it uh i probably should have watched it uh but anyways uh but uh so so through those two relationships like we've just been close to what i'll call like the traditional media ecosystem right like traditional sports and traditional hollywood and through that i've kind of gotten a pretty like front review of how they've reacted to ai right um and on the one hand i think i don't know optimists about technology probably like you and me look at all this AI stuff in the market and we're like, wait, this is so cool.

16:58This is enabling new customer experiences. On the other hand, in some of these meetings I'm sitting in, I'm hearing musicians say things like, well, this AI song I heard on X sounds a lot like my voice, right? And so like trying to straddle, like, I think I am a believer that this technology she's here to stay. There are amazing things that it's enabling. I mean, it's, you know, these AI music generators, like you're democratizing something that has been really hard to learn for a long time. I think there's only good in that, right? But there's also, I think, a responsibility that these companies have that has perhaps gone maybe underappreciated by Silicon Valley and by some of these founders.

17:39And that's not to say it's wrong or, you know, it's unfixable, but it's just something to be aware of, right? And what's interesting is like, if you look at history like this is not the first time we've kind of gone through some of these paradigm changes i mean you know music streaming was has a lot of parallels to this and they were able to figure out a way to compensate the rights holders um is it perfect no and i'm sure we'll get into that uh but you know like there's frameworks to work within and so all this to say like when you know the lawsuit came out uh earlier this year about or rather in 2024 about um you know some of the record labels being a little bit upset with, uh, with some of the AI music generators, it wasn't exactly a surprise to me.

18:22Um, I think it will get figured out in due time, but you know, I just think that's something that, that we as a firm are monitoring very closely. Yeah. I mean, I feel like, you know, cause I know that you wrote about this in your article about giving, about saying, of course there was, you know, music piracy happening in the late nineties, with of course the launch of Napster and of course, you know, I remember Kazaa and, you know, and, and, uh, and LimeWire and, uh, uh, yeah, a whole, a whole host of others, uh, where you can just, you know, uh, download music, uh, uh, music illegally. And then, and then obviously, you know, Apple, Apple launches iTunes and kind of gets all the record labels on board for that.

19:06and it's because i think that the record labels thought we hit we can't live our lives just in lawsuits this is what the this is what consumers want and it also just made the the record labels look you know terrible you know i remember i remember metallica just all as well i remember metallica doing some of the lawsuits against her fans and you know it just it just made it just was a really you know crappy era i would say for kind of all all kind of parties involved um and at the same time and but the record labels i think needed to accept we need to participate in digital right we need to participate in this world in um in in digital music not just you know physical music with cds and you know records and tapes but predominantly cds but we need to we need to actually participate in a new digital era um what is how are we actually going to do it where we obviously protect our ip um i'd imagine you know and then of course you know spotify comes along and you know really really almost has like an alternative to this existential threat which is you know piracy but i don't i don't know for example if spotify was the first thing the first thing that kind of gets pitched to the record labels, they might, you know, go, I don't know if they go, Oh yeah, no, we're not going to do that.

20:31Why would we do that? Cause our business model is so good. I mean, if you think about the record labels business model, it was unbelievable. I mean, you know, you, you promote one song, you hope that that song is a hit, and then you have a bundle of 10 to 15 songs or, or however many songs are on a CD. And then the only way the, the consumer can actually list that song apart from the radio is to actually purchase that music. to purchase a full-length album and pay$20. And even with iTunes, with paying$1 for a single, that still is a huge disruption to the kind of bundled album previous business model that the record labels had.

21:12And now you're introducing$10 a month,$15 a month to actually then have the entire catalog of everything being able, having the ability to stream the stream songs. So it was almost like a compromise in some ways, right? In that we have this existential threat and piracy. Here's the compromise in the Spotify's and the Rhapsody's and the iTunes and stuff like that in order to participate in this digital world because we have this consumer pull and there's no escaping this consumer pull for it. And I do wonder what that looks like when it comes to other sectors. Because I think it's really, really hard.

21:58I think it's really hard. Something that I've been thinking about, and certainly your article was what triggered it, was you mentioned how ChatGPT right now is facing a lawsuit with New York Times, right? And they're using not just New York Times articles, but other publishers as well, articles that they're using for, and you search it and you don't know that it's from New York Times. You don't actually ever need to click to the website to New York Times or what have you, or to other publishers. And I remember going to a marketing conference back in, I think, 2017, 2018, and Rand Fishkin, who is like a CEO, I'm sorry, CEO, SEO and SEM legend, really understands Google really well.

22:58And he's talking about how his biggest worry with SEO and SEM is that click-through rates are down. And that Google actually is emphasizing you wanting to stay on the platform than getting off the platform. Which in some ways, yes, you maybe know who the article is from. But if you're not clicking to the article itself, right, then that does diminish what you actually created. it no different to um what you know chat gpt is going to so kind of this is a problem that was happening before even ai ai was introduced right and i don't know there has to be some type of compromise that happens but i'm not even too sure what that compromise you know quite looks like in a lot of ways um uh you know because ai or not ai this these types of things were happening um um previously i think that's right um wow so much there that that i think is is very critical sorry that was a long rant no no i i love that i i'm really with this so so so you're right that like if i can distill it down to one thing i would say it's like the inevitability of consumer demand like if you read that article i i talk a lot about like the supply side the demand side of the consumer yeah it's consumer companies right like i feel like a lot of these ai companies right now and I keep on bringing up the music companies, but that's just sort of the easiest example.

24:24I call them supply side companies, right? Where like you can go in there and you can create supply of more music. I think if you kind of look at history, like the companies that have, the companies like Spotify or whatever that have really disrupted their respective industries are where there's consumer demand. Consumer demand that you honestly cannot ignore, which is why I call it like the inevitability of consumer demand. Because if consumers really want to just stray music for$10 a month, that is going to happen, right? Like regardless of what the record labels want to do, regardless of all your interests and your incentives.

24:56Well, it may not happen, right? It may not happen, but what's the alternative? The alternative is piracy, right? So that's the alternative. So we're going to introduce$10 a month. That's kind of like the compromise per se with giving the consumers what they want, but at the same time still protecting IP. A hundred percent. 100 % IP 100 % no that's right and like I'll give you a tactical example sort of in our portfolio um it has a lot of parallels to Spotify and a lot of the ideas that you're talking about um we had this company in our portfolio called Global Comics right with an x um they are put very simply Spotify but for comics it sounds like a very small market but if you actually look at it like the uh you know there are 500 million comic book readers worldwide uh right now it's largely physical but like you and i both know that's not really you know how like you and i both know like this is going to get kindle-fied at some point right um if if you want to read this stuff digitally uh you have to download uh dc comics app and marvel comics app and a and a japanese manga app and on the japanese side the translations are all pirated right i'm a i'm a huge uh manga fan and so like you know if you want to read stuff in real time like when it comes out you You can either wait a couple of weeks for the official translation or there's like an ecosystem of people online that pirate stuff or pirate stuff and translate it for you.

26:20Like there's a lot of like shaky stuff happening in this industry, right? There's a lot of parallels to – I know you can imagine when people are downloading PDFs and sharing them and if you really want to find it, you can find it online, right? You can imagine the publishers are really upset about this, right? For every PDF that gets shared of a Spider-Man comic, that's revenue that's lost, right? in Japan or in Korea for everything that gets illegally translated to the US and read on some user-hosted website, that's eyeballs that aren't coming to your website that you're not monetizing via ads, right?

26:56And so they're very upset about this. Their reaction has been for each of them to launch their own app, which is like a bad customer experience. So the founder of Global Comics, Chris Carter, he is actually a reformed pirate. it he is one of the guys that like used to uh used to um like translate stuff and put it on his own website he had 100 million viewers on his website at one point uh 100 million maus and uh you can imagine uh the publishers weren't thrilled about that asked them to stop doing it so we decided to found the business legally now this is a really good example of like the customer demand is unbelievable like like it just brought the for ten dollars a month can you just get access to everything in a legal way 100 right uh customers love that the company is doing really well but you can imagine like it's taking a lot of convincing to get the publishers on board they're like you know well why would i do that i can just why can't i charge ten dollars for my own app or you know why can't i just do this my own lot i don't want you guys i don't want there to be an intermediary between me and my consumers and it's making me really appreciate like you know 10 15 years ago when daniel x from spotify went to the record levels that must have been really hard like arguably harder than just building the technology it must have been really hard to just get these like legacy institutions to agree to give you their ip that's their whole business right you're transforming the whole business and so the only reason that happened was because of your point around um piracy was such a big deal it was it was yeah what's the alternative right what's the alternative what's the alternative and and and you know the inevitability of consumer consumers really want this stuff and they wanted a price that makes sense to them and so it's I'm getting such an appreciation for how working with the IP ecosystem is hard, right?

28:44But on the flip side of that, once you are Spotify and you get access to all the record labels content, and once you are a global comics and you become the only place where people can read certain things they really want to read legally, that's a real moat, right? That's not something that can be disruptive. I think a lot, and maybe this is a separate tangent, I think a lot about over the holidays, I was playing around with Cursor and I was able to build my own little app in Cursor. And I was like, damn, anyone can kind of build anything now, right? But you know what? IP can actually serve as a moat, right?

29:23Not everyone can go get Warner Music Group to give you access to their assets. And so I've been thinking a lot about those ideas. But yeah, it's hard. It's hard to navigate this ecosystem. It takes a special kind of founder. AI does play in this a lot, and I'm happy to go into that a little bit. But yeah, it's a hard endeavor, and I've gotten a great appreciation for what these entrepreneurs went through, Netflix and Spotify and whatever, like 10, 15 years ago. Well, so do you think IP is a moat, or do you think that distribution is a moat? Because, you know, when you're able to distribute about it, like thinking about, you know, ChatGPT and, you know, they have, you know, however many, you know, 100 million or however many, I know that they're the quickest company to move past 100 million.

30:07I don't know what their user base is now. But you have all these users and everything like that. And, you know, Spotify as well could, I'm sure, make that pitch to record labels that we've kind of, that we have a really great grasp on demand or that we have a lot of demand ourselves. how do you think about that that tension between between who has the actual power here when it comes to the distributors or the actual ip holders so it's really interesting right um i think this is all changing in real time like i'm a very like classically trained like hedge fund investor right it's like you think a lot about moats and things like that uh the reality is again i was playing around with cursor over the holidays like i can kind of build whatever i wanted i'm slightly exaggerating that point but like i can see a future where anyone can kind of build whatever they want.

30:53Right. And so like, I don't even know what the concept of a moat is anymore. Right. The only real moats I think are going to exist in the future are really like customer love. It sounds so fluffy, but customer love, the community around your product, and probably some degree of proprietary IP that people can only access through you. Right. I think historically distribution has been such a moat. And I think it's so incredibly important, but I don't know this distribution look like in five years when there's 3 million copycats of every app out there, right? I don't know. And Matt, maybe that's not the world, the way the world is moving in, but I can kind of see a reality where that's the case.

31:30And so I don't know, there's a short history to your question. If you look at history, right? Like you look at Spotify, you know, I attended their investor day in, in, in 20, I think it was 2018 when they, when they did their direct listing, like at the time right like this was such a big debate in that stock where spotify uh gets all their content from from now it's changing but at the time largely three record levels right um three they had three main suppliers um and there was such a big debate on okay well who really controls this dynamic is if the label is it the distributor which is spotify um obviously the people that were very long spotify or were arguing that spot i was gonna do that i was gonna control uh control these negotiations do you know for every 10 dollars you spend on spotify labels get a portion of it spotify gets a portion of it um i think what history has shown is actually the ip holders sold a little bit more power in this their gross margin hasn't materially changed the last couple years they're still paying seven to eight dollars of of that 10 out to the labels and you know like that hasn't really changed.

Read the full transcript

32:44Now, there's so much interesting stuff to talk about here. You look at what's happening with music and AI right now, right? Like anyone can generate anything that they want. That's kind of, I mean, I've been thinking about this for a while. That's kind of in Spotify's interest, right? Like if you can dilute the power of these labels, if more people are generating more songs outside of this, this like label, outside of this ecosystem, system uh that kind of reduces your the the supplier concentration right so a bunch of things i think are changing yeah i mean i think i i think as well this is why you know spotify got into podcasting too right yeah and why they had to double down on podcasting because as well for them podcasting i'm sure is a great business in that absolutely you don't have to pay you don't pay any of your margin to the record labels or to podcasters you have to pay them to anybody no no podcasters have to there's no royalty for uh uh for podcasting um so that's why do you think that do you think that there should be a royalty for podcasting it's a good question um like i guess like i don't necessarily see how it's different for music right like at the end of the day the argument for like you know the the sort of business model of record labels was hey they used to cost a lot of money to go buy a guitar rent a studio get a microphone whatever right like record your song and hire a band and like i'm not gonna say that's not expensive anymore but uh but theoretically it's certainly it's certainly come down in price for sure certainly come down right and so like i don't see why record labels are or sorry why podcasts are are different because like you know there's still expenses to the microphone in front of your your faced right now, the tooling you need, perhaps getting the right guests on board.

34:36And so I can see why those business models have parallels and are similar. I can see why there might need to be an entity in the middle of the podcaster and a Spotify that handles the financing of it and gets royalties paid out. But I guess I get why Spotify is doing what that is exactly what you said, right? It's, it's, uh, they're, they're trying very hard not to pay 80 cents on the dollar. Yeah, no, for sure. I, I don't, I don't know if podcasters really should get royalty. Cause I'm thinking that, you know, I think part of the difference is I'm thinking about, you know, how podcasters make money and how, you know, musicians, um, or, you know, record labels and everything like that makes money.

35:16Um, a lot of the money that record labels make, um, or, or some of the money that, that record, that that record label might make is of course on the actual royalty on on music itself and i mean because those royalties now are um uh are really crippled compared to what they were previously getting in the cd area era they've now actually had resort of course like 360 deals all these things to like yeah so like get their get their money from other ways uh pretty much have like a percentage of sales from the artists for everything that they do uh doesn't happen all the time but it certainly was something that was you know is is fairly controversial uh but in the podcasting side you know the one thing you can do in a podcast that you can't do in music is actually display like an ad for it right or you can actually do or you actually can do so you're actually there's a ways to within the content itself there's actually ways to actually make money within the content itself that you're actually listening to right so and then of course sell that to um sell that to potential sponsors.

36:16And then also, and you can't really do that in music, right? So I do think it's interesting because I think that if there was royalties within podcasts, that could change as well some of the dynamics for podcasting. Meaning, would you sign exclusive deals with Spotify to stay on Spotify? Well, maybe you actually want then your podcast to be distributed as big as possible and have the largest distribution network as possible because then it's more royalty that you're getting. Now, that royalty probably is still pretty small in terms of what you're getting from a listener perspective. But that's why I don't think – well, maybe one of the reasons why an artist will never go exclusive to a specific platform in terms of, hey, we're going to – we're only going to be a Spotify artist, for example.

37:02I don't think that's why an artist would ever do that. And also where an artist makes the majority of their money is in touring. So you want the widest spread as possible, the wide accessibility in order for someone to find out about you and to obviously go see you on tour. So but it is interesting. Like it is interesting. Why about, you know, royalties and podcasting and if that even makes sense. Yeah, I think the economics of like you're right, like podcast. I mean, podcast ad, you know, that's better than me. But podcast ad economics are supposed to be quite good, right? Like people actually listen to those ads and there's like decent decent monetization on the back of that.

37:35But you're right. That is offset by the fact that there aren't sync licensing opportunities with podcasts. If you're a musician, you're right. You're right. That's a fair point. That's a fair point. it's interesting it's a very interesting thing about yeah yeah um how how also do you think around i i think i think this is in the article about how you know you talked about i'm just thinking as well on on publishers on on the publishing side and maybe going back to chat gpt and google right and and and google kind of wants you to remain on the platform and not to actually click the links and as well as uh chat gpt there are no links you just you're just giving the information and you're not actually too sure where that where that source is from but it's but but it's in their data set and the data set might include you know the new york times for example right but how what do you think is the right way or theories to kind of have this compromise that we experience in music i i kind of call it a compromise or or the worst the worst of it which is piracy right what's what's a way to kind of combat that when it comes to actually publishing itself and in this new ai world yeah i mean look i think i think there are a bunch of approaches in the market right i think um i think there are there are uh projects out there like nightshade which are explicitly trying to like block uh block the scraping of written work for for ai models right like i don't know if that's the best way to approach it either only because like again like people are going to figure out ways around it i do think the licensing opportunity like i think i think opening a student a lot of the right things on that right like i think they're going in their um striking deals and trying to compensate the writers and and these outlets um to get access to the platforms i think i'm starting to see this now more in chat gpc when i said they are starting to link to uh external references and like i think the more they build that in there you know i think perplexu is already doing that as well like i think that's good like giving credit and being like hey if you want to read more click here um but it's a really hard it's a really hard problem to solve yeah i mean do you do you think like so in the music industry of course you have like a high concentration where i think it's now there's been a lot of consolidation but i think there's now three or four um emi i think is still independent if i'm not mistaken but um uh but so you have the big four right now and but of course you have like a very you know kind of high concentration of of uh of of of music artists and of course there's a ton as well of independent artists and then on the publishing side you have you know ASCAP, BMI and and CSAC and all those taking care of the publishing rates do you think that maybe that maybe there should be some sort of like publishing organizations that actually represents a lot of these groups in terms of like in and actually you know the new york times and you know washington post but also just you know uh really just like publishers in general in terms of in terms of and in terms of actually to then have even more power um versus a um versus a you know so some of these ai platforms to actually consolidate that do you think that something like that could be in the works totally right like like i don't have any knowledge if it's in the works um but but like i do think that's a big part of the power dynamic in the music industry right like again it's changing as like more artists go independent and the growth of uh of like merlin and some of these like more independent uh independent outlets but like historically the music industry has really been run by three record levels sony warner and universal and there is a when there are few suppliers right like there's a lot of collective bargaining power that they have and uh and i mean And I think the lawsuit against Suno and UDO was through the RIA, which is representing all three of them, right?

41:39And so, like, I don't know. I think that's a very powerful statement that we'll get a company to sort of act on it. And, you know, like, I don't think such a sort of agreement exists amongst, like, written publishers, like, written publications. But I definitely think it would help them negotiate and leverage, right? Totally. Also, when you're switching gears a little bit as well, you also mentioned in your article how you feel like when you're looking at new AI concepts, it maybe just doesn't – it's not really solving a problem, right? It's just like a fun thing to kind of do and exercise, but it's not really quite solving a problem.

42:21Maybe you're creating a cool image or maybe it's a short video, but it's not really solving a problem. You know, there's this, I'm just, here's what you think about this. The, you know, one of, you know, and I think that quite a few people, including, you know, Chris Dixon kind of talks about this a lot with Clay, about Clay Christensen's disruption theory and point to kind of the next big thing will look like a toy. do you think that this will be the case in ai the next thing that the next thing big thing will actually look like a toy and something that right now you actually don't think is a immediate solving a problem or is an immediate need that could one day become in it or or do you think or or do you know or do you not think so um i try not to be like as black and white on that stuff i I think, look, my preference as an investor is definitely to start with demand, right?

43:23With like, do people want this? It's like the fundamental first thing I ask. And I think maybe perhaps my risk profile as an investor is I don't love investments where I have to hope that one day collective behavior changes and people want it. That's just the first thing I ask. You're totally right. That like, you know, companies like, I don't know, I remember in 2011 or 2012, when I was in college, like Snapchat came out, it felt like a toy. And I didn't know that it was going to be this like massive generational company, you know, a decade later. But I get it. I totally get that thesis, right?

43:57I think from my perspective, I think companies, I mean, look, we come from like a sort of, we operate within a hedge fund where we think a lot about for all of our investments, we really critically think about and often do like model out the future, right? even for early stage companies. And a lot of that boils down to like, can we really articulate customer demand here? Do we think there's a path to sort of sustainable unit economics? You know, is there all the boring stuff? Is there a path to like significant free cashflow generation? Like how so? What do we have to believe? And I think that often starts with, do we believe people are going to use this product and why is that going to sustain?

44:36And I think that informs like the sort of toy comment, right? Where like, I think for me, I'm kind of always looking for businesses where there's clear and articulated customer demand. And, you know, like we always start with that. How, in terms of customer demand, how, what are some maybe metrics or things that you focus on that actually validate if there is customer demand? I would say all the usual, like no big secrets here, right? From like a consumer perspective. I mean, we're obviously looking at like the, the, the sort of top line metrics, right? Like, is this thing growing? Like, can I, can I see that there's some degree of, you know, people are using it or telling their friends about it?

45:22I want to see reasonable CAC, right? Like, do you have to spend tons of money to get people to open your app and use it and pay for your product? And then obviously the most important thing, retention, right? Like, do people love this? How often, like engagement, how often are they opening up the app? how much are you retaining your paid customers? If there's a free tier, how much are you retaining them? How does that look relative to Benchmark Suite? How much time are people spending within the app? I think those are all... I wish I could say there was some formula that we put all the stuff into a model and spits out a yes, invest button and click invest.

46:00But yeah, we kind of look at all these things and try to approximate. We're honestly trying to answer the question of do people like this? And do we think they will continue to like this in the future? If you don't mind, I would love to do a lightning round with you if that's all right. Sure. All right, cool. So what do you think is the biggest consumer trend to watch out this year? AI agents. I think this is the year where consumer-facing AI agents are, in my opinion, going to get really good and are going to start doing tasks for you. I have a lot of questions around the defensibility of a lot of these companies.

46:34But as a consumer, I'm really excited for people to start taking away some of my mundane tasks. When in terms of tasks, if you might give an example in terms of what tasks you think some of these agents will be able to do. So, okay. So we've spent a bunch of time in the last year in the travel space, right? And I would say a lot of the sort of consumer-facing travel companies, which are all really cool, were ultimately discovery-focused. right it was like hey like you know here's a cup type in like the approximate like i want to go on a beach vacation and this is my budget and here's like 10 options and here's pictures and videos of it i think that's really cool i think ultimately why we couldn't get there on one of them was they didn't actually lead to anything like turns out the friction point wasn't really in discovery and daydreaming it was it was actually like all right i want to go to uh kenya which is a run on where i went on my honeymoon like that's a really hard trip to to sort of plan out like you know You got to book flights, you got to get visas, you got to book the safari, you got to get the car from this airport to that airport.

47:38Can someone just do that for me? I don't want to pay an actual travel agent, whatever, hundreds of dollars. Can an AI agent actually do that for me? I actually met one recently that I would say got like 80 % of it. It was really cool. I think things like that where you're not even expecting it. I spent time with, again, the tech wasn't there yet last year, but I spent time with someone, sorry, an agent. I keep saying someone. It's probably H-40. With an agent that was automating a lot of home care tasks, right? Like you're currently dealing with a broken microwave. Like what if I could just, I don't know, text an agent, can you just deal with this, right?

48:24And they would interface with the person to come into my apartment and fix that up. I think the tech is finally getting there this year. And I think, I don't know, I think because the tech is getting there and is getting less abstracted, more like consumer-facing, consumer DNA founders can start to pick up some of this technology and actually build something great for the consumer versus like what often feels like science projects. And so long way to say, I think this is a year where like a lot of these companies are going to come to market. And I think it's going to be a net positive for the consumer.

48:55That's awesome. That's awesome. Thanks so much for giving us that use case. Um, within, within venture, what's the biggest thing you've changed your mind about? Um, wow. That's a really good question. I would say, okay, the biggest thing I think I've changed my mind about is, um, now that I've been investing in venture for sort of, you know, call it eight or so year eight, nine years. Um, I've kind of lived through like, and granted, that's not a very long career relative to a lot of people in venture. but I've kind of lived through like a couple of different sort of market cycles right like when I joined in 2016 you know that was when that was at the tail end of like a lot of the DC companies raising a bunch of money then that kind of stopped being hot and then and then fintech became a big thing and b2b software became a big thing and then that kind of tailed off and then crotchet became a big thing and then that tailed off and then AI became a big thing and you could argue it's starting to sort of tail off right now, perhaps not as dramatic, but you know, you could argue like the fervor slightly dying down.

49:59And so like, I think the biggest thing I, I used to, when I was younger, try to play into those trends a little bit, like, Hey, you know, we should be looking at crypto right now. And I would say that around like 2019, 2020. And I think, I think the only thing that you can really do is like, just think a little bit ahead, invest in great founders and make sure that the business model is sustainable, that I can live through these like the troughs or like capitalism quite as easy to access. And I think that's all you can do. It sounds so simple. Bet on good founders that are solving real problems that think about capital efficiency.

50:35It sounds so obvious, but I don't know. I guess I didn't really appreciate that as much when I was a little bit younger. And so that's all you can do. Ignore the market cycles and just bet on good people. Love that. Love that. What do you, so this is based on, I believe it's based on Sarah Tavill's kind of framework in terms of all the different kind of five elements a venture investor needs to do and do and do and, you know, be great at or at least focus on. Sourcing companies, taking the right companies, getting internal approval to invest in a company, negotiating a term sheet, and then advising or working with portfolio companies.

51:18What do you think you're best at of the five? And what do you think you have most to learn? So it was sourcing companies. Sourcing, picking, getting internal approval to invest in the company. And then negotiating a term sheet and then advising and working with the portfolio companies. So, okay. So I would say what I'm best at, and I'll almost take this one out, is getting internal approval. Only because I have such a good team around me. I have so much support. I have so many people that like kind of just have faith in me that like I can, I can invest in a manga comic book company and people are like, we trust you.

51:58Right. And so like, I would say like, if I get to conviction on something, I feel pretty good that, you know, like I, I, I have the right people around me to, to put me in the position to succeed there. I think, so I'll take that one out almost. I would say, I think where I am really good, where we don't want to done a retroactive it it's in picking like i'm a hedge fund analyst by dna i'm a stock picker by dna and you know we've done retros there are very few deals that i've missed like in terms of like companies that like i've met where i've been like i don't know about that um let's not go further and that doesn't make any sense now like do we win all those no um and then do we see every great deal certainly no um but i did like as i've gone through like my list of like oh i met that founder for the first time and then that turned out to be this$10 billion company and I totally didn't see that in the first minute.

52:49That almost never happens. So I think I have a good eye for that. I think the upside of that is we don't see everything. I do think my team is based in New York City. I do think there's an advantage to being in the Bay Area. I'm in the Bay right now. But we definitely are not seeing everything. I would say on the sourcing side, we are good but we're not great right um i would say that's that's the part where uh where i'd like to improve the most for for companies that you don't win what do you think tends to be the reason why you don't win the deal almost always it's uh it's brand right like 0.72 i would say has a good brand but i would say we have a really good brand in new york um we have a really good brand if people know the hedge fund, you know, they know of Steve Cohen, they know of the med story, but often like founders want to work with, you know, the, the tier one Silicon Valley firm.

53:49And I get why there's great signaling to that. It, you know, it does certainly help in recruiting to be able to say that you had XYZ great, you know, storied Silicon Valley firm. I think we're still a relatively young firm, right. On the venture side. And so we haven't built the same brand as a couple of these others, but that's almost always the reason why we lose deals and hey, that's a part of the game. Totally. My final question for you is, what's one book that's inspired you personally and one book that's inspired you professionally? One book that's inspired me professionally is a book I actually read it a couple years ago and I'm rereading it now called The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis.

54:37It's written by an MIT professor, Andrew Lowe. And it's basically about the efficient markets hypothesis and how it's almost like just accepted as truth, right? Like stocks traded a value that takes into account all information available, but then how can that also be true? How can it also be true that stocks are mispriced? Right? How can those two ideas both be true? Things are efficient and there's value to be captured, right? And he creates a really cool framework using ecology and psychology to sort of explain the gap behind it. It's a fascinating book that certainly informed my way of thinking, particularly as I transitioned from the hedge fund side where you think so much about the efficient markets hypothesis to the venture world where frankly nothing is efficient and so like like it was it was a very cool read um in terms of like a book that has uh that's really sort of affecting me uh personally that i just love uh another book that i recently reread this summer i was uh i was on vacation uh in uh in sardinia with my wife in the mediterranean uh and i reread the count of monte cristo a movie just came out uh on it uh which i also recently watched it was awesome uh but the kind of monte cristo one of my favorite books i ever read the ultimate like adventure story the ultimate like revenge story um and like i don't want to spoil it but i feel like the ending is uh is great for people that are uh you know maybe insane and too committed to the work the ending is kind of just like you know chill out a little bit um if i can spoil it without spoiling it um and i i love that book and so it was very fun to like read it while we were like on vacation for that week in the mediterranean like oh i recognize that name um we'd highly recommend a reread of it yeah i so i never read kind of monica which certainly was a mistake but i i saw that i know there's one in that came out um last year but there was one that came out like 20 years ago right there was one that came out 20 years ago which is great and i love that one oh my gosh like that was like that was like one of my favorite movies growing up uh which in hindsight should have also read the book but uh you'll love the new one the new one uh came out and uh it's in french like i i don't speak french okay um but it got like uh you can look this up it got like an 11 minute standing ovation at the can film festival because it was just that good uh so i watched it and it was amazing it was like it i think it's like just came out of theaters like i'll say a couple weeks ago so i would highly recommend it yeah 2002 that was the one version i was that i was uh that that i must have watched um awesome awesome i will i will definitely have to check out the the french one that just came out um ishan this was awesome thank you so much for coming on the show thank you so much for spending time with me i really appreciate it of course thank you uh stay safe in la man hope the family's good and uh yeah hopefully all's good i appreciate you having me

From the publisher

#consumervc #venturecapital #aicontentcreation Join host Mike Gelb on The Consumer VC as he talks with Ishan Sinha, Partner at Point72 Ventures.In this episode, Ishan shares insights into the evolving role of AI in consumer startups, the challenges of AI-driven media, and the future of monetization for creators. He discusses the impact of AI on intellectual property, whether VCs are still underestimating consumer AI, and how AI-powered businesses can scale effectively. Ishan also breaks down venture capital trends, investment strategies, and lessons from past market cycles. For an insightful conversation at the intersection of AI, venture capital, and consumer innovation, check out the full episode!📩 Get Exclusive Insights & Deals 👉 [Insert Newsletter Link] 00:00 Introduction & Podcast Overview 00:45 Why Did Point72 Start a VC Fund? 03:10 From Public Market Investing to Venture Capital 06:05 Are VCs Underestimating Consumer AI? 09:50 AI in Media & Content Creation 12:30 AI vs. The Music Industry 16:20 Lessons from Napster to Spotify 19:15 How AI Can Benefit Artists & Creators 22:40 The Future of AI in Publishing & Journalism 25:30 How AI is Reshaping Consumer Tech 28:45 Investing in AI Startups: What VCs Look For 32:05 The Role of AI in Business Models & Monetization 35:00 Will the Next Big AI Innovation Look Like a Toy? 38:15 Lightning Round: Biggest Consumer Trends, Myths About VC & More 41:30 Final Takeaways & Where to Follow Ishan Sinha................Subscribe to Our Newsletter:https://www.theconsumervc.com/Subscribe on Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/4Hjm74Z...Subscribe on Apple Podcasts:https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...Follow on Twitter: / mikegelb Follow on Instagram: / mikegelb Follow on TikTok: / consumervc

More from Consumer VC

All 83 episodes
Will AI Screw IP Holders, Content Getting Better or Worse, and The Future of Journalism with Ishan Sinha, Partner at Point72 VenturesConsumer VC · 58 min
Listen in VO