In short
How brand value is created (and destroyed) through “craft, creativity, coherence, and commercial impact,” with a focus on luxury at LVMH; includes a major Pampers case study and guidance for CMOs on balancing short-term performance with long-term desire.
Guest
Mathilde Delhoume-Debros. Background: ~30 years at Procter & Gamble, including work on Pampers; later nearly 10 years as Global Brand Officer at LVMH. Current role: brand equity advisor across LVMH’s 75 independent maisons.
Key claims
- CMO influence should be judged by bottom-line impact that preserves long-term brand equity, not short-term jumps.
- Luxury value comes from desire (not replenishment), so marketing must build desirability over time.
- In luxury, sacrificing craft/coherence destroys value; “excellent” work leads to erosion if complacent.
- Creativity must be coherent with brand DNA; “one plus one equals two” collabs are buzz-driven, while “one plus one equals 10” collabs create superior value.
Notable examples
- Pampers repositioning: from “superior dryness” to “baby development” (sleep, movement, personality). Product unchanged; revenues tripled from ~$3B to ~$9B in three years.
- LVMH/Paris 2024 Olympics: “artisans of all victories,” framed as creative partnership and craft-centered ceremonies.
- Luxury vs FMCG: luxury can push culture further; FMCG needs more consumer noticeability and careful tradeoffs.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOFueling Your Brand's Success
0:03 to 0:31
Explores the analogy of airplane fuel and brand sustainability.
“Family time isn't just the big moments, it's weeknight dinners.”
Fueling Your Brand's Success
0:55 to 1:55
Explores the analogy of airplane fuel and brand sustainability.
“This is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs.”
Fueling Your Brand's Success
1:58 to 2:35
Explores the analogy of airplane fuel and brand sustainability.
“I always take the analogy of the airplane.”
Transforming Pampers: A Case Study
2:35 to 4:04
Mathilde Delhomme-Debreu shares the success story of Pampers.
“But if you have waited too long, you are going to crash.”
The Role of a CMO in Brand Equity
4:04 to 5:29
Discusses how CMOs influence brand equity and long-term value.
“I don't know if you remember the very first time we met.”
Creativity, Coherence, and Commercial Impact
5:29 to 7:58
Mathilde explains the interplay between creativity and brand coherence.
“Yeah, and I remember what I told you also.”
Desire as a Mechanism of Value
7:58 to 9:55
Discusses the importance of creating desire in luxury branding.
“How do you then tie the creativity, the coherence, and the craft to commercial impact?”
Luxury vs. Necessity: A Philosophical Debate
9:55 to 14:00
A discussion on the necessity of luxury goods in human life.
“being able to show that you grow the disability of your brand over time.”
Transforming Pampers: From Function to Emotional Connection
14:00 to 21:59
Learn how Pampers redefined its brand positioning to connect emotionally with parents.
“we bring to be a real actor in culture and being able to promote subcultures through luxury, which is also important.”
Transforming Pampers: From Function to Emotional Connection
22:03 to 22:30
Learn how Pampers redefined its brand positioning to connect emotionally with parents.
“It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once.”
Show all 25 chapters
Transforming Pampers: From Function to Emotional Connection
23:00 to 23:54
Learn how Pampers redefined its brand positioning to connect emotionally with parents.
“Botox, onabotulinum toxin A, prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they start.”
Balancing Desire and Brand Value in Luxury
24:00 to 28:00
Explore the complexities of maintaining brand value through desire and performance in the luxury market.
“And does desire at scale, is that a premise that extends beyond any one company?”
Artistic Vision at LVMH
28:00 to 29:00
Explore how LVMH balances brand DNA with artistic innovation.
“but I could say the same on Michael Ryder on Céline, or Nicolas Gésquerre on Vuitton, or even Pharrell Williams on Vuitton Home.”
The Balance of Visibility in Luxury Marketing
29:00 to 30:20
Learn about finding balance in luxury marketing between being heard and being elegant.
“Is there a decision within a portfolio like LVMH's that a brand like Tiffany will always supersede any individual artistic designer?”
Types of Luxury Brands
30:20 to 33:40
Discover the different categories of luxury brands and their marketing strategies.
“And in this category, you will put at Elvimage, the L 'Oropiana, the Berluti from competitions.”
The Role of Craftsmanship in Luxury
33:40 to 34:40
Understand the importance of craftsmanship in maintaining luxury brand value.
“What's Mathilde's theory for middle market and FMCG, would you say?”
LVMH and the Paris Olympic Games
34:40 to 38:40
Explore LVMH's partnership with the Paris Olympics and its cultural significance.
“You know, this one is a kind of all of envy.”
Value Creation vs. Destructive Forces
38:40 to 42:04
Identify factors that contribute to or detract from commercial value in branding.
“I think everyone had a little tear when we had Céline Dion at the top of the Eiffel Tower starting to think it's a Dior dress.”
Defining Creativity in FMCG and Luxury
42:04 to 43:42
Learn how creativity differs in fast-moving consumer goods versus luxury brands.
“the ability to uh to bring an idea an idea that could have been done before but the way you bring it to life makes people think about wow i've never heard since that before or help them to see things in a fresh way.”
Defining Creativity in FMCG and Luxury
43:45 to 44:38
Learn how creativity differs in fast-moving consumer goods versus luxury brands.
“It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once.”
The Disease of Collaboration
44:38 to 45:37
Explore the complexities and impacts of brand collaborations in modern marketing.
“This is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.”
The Disease of Collaboration
45:43 to 51:42
Explore the complexities and impacts of brand collaborations in modern marketing.
“And I was like, oh my God, we've reached peak collaboration.”
A World of Kindness and Dictators
51:42 to 56:00
Reflect on the importance of kindness and the desire to eliminate oppressive leaders.
“And then to make sure that you cover the spectrum of beauty, because there is not, again, one definition of beauty.”
Reflections on Kindness and Connection
56:00 to 56:51
Explore a conversation highlighting kindness and human connections.
“So an end to dictators and down on dictators, up on kindness.”
Insights from VW's Strategic Decisions
56:51 to 58:36
Learn about the implications of Volkswagen's strategic missteps and value destruction.
“Last month, the Volkswagen Group, Europe's largest automaker, announced it's cutting up to half its global model lineup.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments, it's weeknight dinners. Sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9 % of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com. When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications, and more.
0:42Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a$75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. That's Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. Chronic migraine is 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more. Botox, onabotulinum toxin A, prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they start. It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month. It prevents on average 8 to 9 headache days a month versus 6 to 7 for placebo.
1:18Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection. Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, including ALS Lou Gehrig's disease, myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.
1:54Why wait? Ask your doctor, visit BotoxChronicMigraine.com, or call 1-800-44-BOTOX to learn more. I always take the analogy of the airplane. You know, you take fuel to take off and fly. You're at your cruising altitude. And then you take off the fuel. You take off feeding your brand. So you do what you call the shitty brand. And then the jet stream is going to carry you for three years. And it's going to give the illusion that your brand is still doing well. Yeah. Until the moment where it goes. And so either it crashes very fast or you need to put a crazy amount of fuel to get it back to the cruising altitude.
2:35But if you have waited too long, you are going to crash.
2:43Before she was the global brand officer at LVMH, Mathilde Delhomme-DeBros spent 30 years at Procter & Gamble. And in our conversation, she tells me a story that every CEO and CFO needs to hear. It's a story about when Pampers was positioned around functional superiority. It's superior dryness, and it was a$3 billion brand. But when she and the team at Proctor repositioned it based on the insight that for parents, a diaper isn't just about dryness, but about their baby's development, that a baby who sleeps undisturbed because of superior dryness grows better, and that changing your baby's diaper seven times a day is a moment of love, the brand's revenues tripled to$9 billion in only three years.
3:27The product didn't change, but the meaning around it did, and that in turn changed everything. In this episode, Mathilde and I talk about what her nearly 10 years as global brand officer and her current role as brand equity advisor across LVMH's 75 independent maison have taught her about desire as a mechanism of value creation, and why creativity without coherence and craft without culture both lead to value destruction, and also why in luxury, the moment you believe you've done an excellent job is the moment value starts to erode. I don't know if you remember the very first time we met. It's Cannes, where we are recording, four years ago, and it was that Friday morning, right?
4:14So the festival was pretty much over. And the day before, I had just, in my role at Forbes, put out that year's, I think it was the 2022 Forbes World's Most Influential CMOs list. And like five seconds into meeting, you said to me, and by the way, I agreed with you completely. But what you said to me is, Seth, at LVMH, we consider influence only based on impact on the bottom line. Do you remember? Mm-hmm. And one of the things I said to you at the time, agreeing with you completely, right, was how would I, editing that list, separate or define your impact or an individual CMO of a maison's impact as opposed to 127 years of brand equity as one easy example.
5:08So my question is, as somebody whose career has taken you from Proctor to LVMH, which is quite a spectrum if you want my personal opinion, how do you think about how the audience should think about identifying a CMO's influence on the bottom line? Did I say that in 2020? And you know you did. Yeah, and I remember what I told you also. I said, in fact, being on your ranking is a bad omen because usually the year after the brand collapsed. Well, not all. We have had a few. No, no, a few collapsed. And this is why I was talking about how do we make sure that the influence we have as CMO carries fruit tomorrow, but also in the long term.
6:00And perhaps I'm not talking about 150 years, but making sure that we are not sacrificing the brand DNA for a short-term jump that will damage the brand on the long term. So I think this is what CMO is here for. It's to promote excellence in craft, making sure that every day when he goes to the office, it's to make sure that it will be excellence in brand building craft. I'm not talking about the products. Usually it's not in the realm of the CMO, but I'm talking about brand building craft. and this one gets sacrificed this day, not at LVMH, it's still a reparamment, but in other companies, I see that kind of deteriorating.
6:54The second one is creativity. The CMO is here not always to be the creative because not all CMOs are born creative, but to be able to recognize creativity and nurture creativity. So I think that's the second impact that you can really observe on a CMO. And the third one, which this day can be a bit controversial, but it's coherence. Because lots of people think that creativity and coherence fight against each other. No, because in fact, it's a kind of coherent disruption. You need to encourage all the time, but to make sure that you build your brand on its DNA with creativity and you don't damage it.
7:43So I think those three things are really important. If I go every morning to the office or when I had the luck to be the global brand office of LVMH, I had in mind craft, creativity, and coherence was my motto, which I like to see in all CMOs. How do you then tie the creativity, the coherence, and the craft to commercial impact? I'll add a fourth C, which is commercial impact. And obviously luxury is rooted in brand. It has always been. It will always be. Has the luxury category figured something out about brand that you think others are perhaps missing? Perhaps the balancing short-term, long-term.
8:36Yeah, as you were saying. And there was a speech last year. I don't remember who said that. The person asked the audience, who is going to buy an expensive smartphone in the next two weeks? Only a few people raised their hands. And then he asked, who is going to buy one in the next two years? basically the entire auditorium raises them. So I think this is what I mean is that we are not a toothpaste. We are not a laundry detergent or diaper which need replenishment every month. This is something which is about desire. So you need to create the desire. So the impact is the ability to create desire.
9:22Of course, you need an exceptional product at the beginning to create. But then once you have this exceptional product, the role of the CMO and its commercial impact is to create the desirability. It may not happen tomorrow or in the next two weeks. Perhaps it will happen over the next year. There's something called Christmas. And this is something that we need to keep in mind. So not commercial impact, short term. Yeah, long term equity, long term value. And then desirability. being able to show that you grow the disability of your brand over time. Last year, when I had my Forbes podcast, The CEO's Guide to Marketing, I was sitting with AC Eggleston Bracey, who at the time was the global CMO at Unilever.
10:12Desire at scale. Desire at scale. And it was really interesting to me that AC was as focused, Unilever was as focused on creating desire for FMCG as you are and your colleagues are creating desire for Dior and Louis Vuitton. As somebody who comes from Procter, did you think about desire back then, right, when you were selling diapers and not speedies? No, but I talked to Essie Comex before she launched a desire at scale so i i think i know where the idea is coming from hello i see so uh so no and frankly if today i was back in fmcg yeah i would have a completely different approach tell us about that because if you if you sell a diaper just on functional superiority it's going to be very difficult to justify the premium you ask versus just a private label.
11:18Of course, a few hours of dryness more or sometimes not even noticeable by the consumer. So I think what you need to do is to provide this product superiority, but to elevate it to an emotional need that you fulfill that makes full sense and justifies the price premium. I mean, Proctor's always done that, right? Yes and no. Maybe not everywhere. Not everywhere. And some brands are better than others at P &G at leveraging this emotional need or this emotional insight. But it's very rooted in functional superiority, and sometimes it stops there. And in FSTG, lots of people stop there. And you get the who when you get to the emotional need.
12:05You know, you're reminding me of something that Scott Galloway, who is also a slightly better known than me, Vox Media personality, a little bit more successful. I'm coming for you, Scott. said about, I think it was like three or four years ago. And Mr. Arnault had in that moment in time just become the world's wealthiest human being. And Scott, I think it was a post that I saw posted that, you know, worth noting, I'm paraphrasing, worth noting that the world's wealthiest person makes something nobody needs. And I was like, you're missing the point entirely because everybody needs identity, expression, the communication of status.
12:51Luxury to me, yes, a diaper has an efficacy in a moment that arguably a Dior bag does not. I don't need a Dior bag to carry my keys, but I absolutely, some of us, need it to share with the world our taste, our identity and our status. And I'm wondering, you know, if you got to choose between, you know, Scott's perspective, nobody needs luxury. And mine, which is, I think you're missing the point of luxury. Where do you fall? Of course, I think I'm on your side. Scott is arriving. Be ready. I'm on your side. I think the motto of LVMH is savoir faire rêver. the art of crafting dreams so and you know humanity needs to dream yeah if you don't dream you die okay and i think what the luxury is bringing indeed you don't need physically the bag but you need beauty in this world you need to craft those dreams and to be part of the beauty we bring to be a real actor in culture and being able to promote subcultures through luxury, which is also important.
14:14So for me, it's as essential as an FMCG. But one is you need, when you have a toothache, you need to go to the dentist. Okay, it's a chore. But there are things that are not chore in human life that luxury is taken care of. And this being said, I go back to Pampers. You know, when Pampers was just about superior dryness, it was a$3 billion brand. With Jim, at the time I was working for Jim Stengel and Gianni Cesarani, and we moved Pampers from superior dryness to caring for your baby development. Development? Baby development. And I was called together with Gianni at the time by the chairman of P &G.
15:05And he said, Mathilde, what have you been smoking? It must be good because baby development and a diaper. And I said, well, probably because you don't change your baby enough. Because when you change your baby seven times a day, it's a moment of exchange of love and you build the development. I have to. I loved changing my kids' diapers. You see? Because it was just that moment there on the table, eye to eye. And I didn't actually like the act of changing the diaper, but I liked the moment of changing the diaper. I loved it. And then I was saying when a baby sleeps well, it develops better. And so diapers that keeps him dry overnight.
15:44So a higher order need. It sleeps well. When a baby moves freely because he has a stretchy diaper, it develops better. When a baby pulls on his diaper by himself, it develops his personality. So I'm sorry, but a diaper is a huge enabler of baby development. And then I remember at the time they all stopped and said, hmm, it makes sense. And it makes so much sense that three years after Pempers had moved from$3 billion to$9 billion. In three years, the business tripled. In three years. Because of the positioning and frame. Yeah, and every single line. You know, there were things that were in the cupboard that R &D, because there was genius R &D people, but it was not about superior dryness.
16:27It was about stretchy sides. It was about a wetness indicator. So it was not for dryness, but it was completely relevant for baby development. How did you communicate development? You didn't talk about development, right? You don't talk about that. But I remember we did an ad which worked very well at the time. we say, your baby grows half a millimeter per night while sleeping. This is why it better have an undisturbed sleep. But we didn't say, but we said it. And same thing, you know, moving is part of life. It's part of growing up and same thing. So we put the insight where it was important.
17:12Did pampers ever get into adult diapers? I have no idea why this has occurred to me. It has been a long time I've left P &G, but there was adult incontinence diapers also. Under the Pampers portfolio? Because Pampers was for babies. Yes. Yeah, babies first. Not for diapers. And at the time, what was a rule is we don't say that the parents are going to sleep better. We say it's a baby at the center. Right, because your concern is the baby. Yeah. Of course, all moms say, I sleep so much better. But we say, not our issue. Yeah, yeah. So that's it. So you see, we move from a functional need to a desire that every parent has to see their baby develop happy and healthy.
17:56And this was a shift. Functional desire. A need, a desire. Except in luxury, very often we don't have a functional needs per se, so we build on desire. But I would say we have craft. We have such an amazing craft. Bernard Hanou always say, we don't do luxury. We do product of exceptional quality. And I think this is what we have. We have products of exceptional quality. Well, I mean, to charge what you charge, you have to have products of exceptional quality and you have to have brands of exceptional quality. No one will buy... Actually, here's a question. Not every image, just generally. Acme Luxury Company.
18:45What fails faster? A brilliant brand, luxury brand, with a shitty product? No pun on diapers. Or a shitty brand with a brilliant product? Luxury. Acme Luxury Company. The second one will fail more often. you know it's a bad brand with a great product because uh but if the brand builds you know because on the capitalize on this great product to build the brand it will work if they just stay at product level it will not work yeah but the other one will collapse uh it will take time to collapse i always take the analogy of the airplane you know it takes you It takes fuel to take off and fly. You're at your cruising altitude.
19:37And then you take off the fuel. You take off feeding your brand. So you do what you call the shitty brand. And then the jet stream is going to carry you for three years. And it's going to give the illusion that your brand is still doing well. Until the moment where it goes. And so either it crashes very fast. or you need to put a crazy amount of fuel to get it back to the cruising altitude. But if you have waited too long, you are going to crash. And of course, I created a false binary and it's very hard to build a brilliant brand on a shitty product. But I do think about it in the context and I think my question comes from a world in a time when so many CEOs, outside of luxury in particular, are questioning, and CFOs are questioning the value of brand, are so myopically focused on, as you were talking about, the balance between short and long this quarter's numbers, to the detriment of the long term.
20:44Yeah, and now what I try to reconcilia this paradox is to say even performance should build brands. 100 % we should stop opposing one versus the other we should synergize and brand should perform we want a brand advertising that doesn't perform it's just when is it going to really have a visible impact that a brand should perform and a performance should brand no excuse and my friend from Meta knows that when they are doing the catalog yes and Nicola knows very well that I'm fighting against this catalog where you have seven bags, seven necklaces, with the same for Bulgari, Cartier, Tiffany, and the cheap brand of not even luxury.
21:42I think this one is the worst you can do because it's performance that is not branded. Yeah, yeah. So even performance should be well-branded to communicate the assets of your brand.
22:00This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9 % of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com. When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications, and more.
22:41Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a$75 sponsored job credit at indeed.com slash podcast. That's indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. Chronic migraine is 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more. Botox, onabotulinum toxin A, prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they start. It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month. It prevents on average eight to nine headache days a month versus six to seven for placebo.
23:17Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. Allerge your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection. Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, including ALS Lou Gehrig's disease, myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.
23:53Why wait? Ask your doctor, visit BotoxChronicMigraine.com, or call 1-800-44-BOTOX to learn more.
24:05you had mentioned in passing and answering one of my earlier questions that i think you said this that if you went back to png after or to fmcg even after your time here at lvmh you would look at the world differently and i want to i want to ask you kind of a follow-up question to a bit of our conversation on desire and it's it's pretty consistent with what we're talking about, but do you think that the marketplace, the commercial marketplace writ large, defines desire too narrowly, right? And does desire at scale, is that a premise that extends beyond any one company? That's a good one. Never thought about it that way, but yes, I think you're right.
24:51It's, in fact, for advertising media money reason, it's really deployed and activated short term by the commercial context. So there is lots of pressure which is put on the CMO to go for that, not only from their CFO, but by the media world. And I think this is where our agencies have a role to play, have the role to play as a voice of wisdom to be the intermediary between the media supplier and the media buyer also we are to make sure that we keep this balance. Because if you go direct, you have the fear of missing out. What I'm not doing, I should be doing. And you always need the kind of the strategic thinking that helps you put things in perspective?
25:50You just used the word balance, and I want to ask two questions that are about balance. The first is, I think fashion labels in particular are a great metaphor for the premise of this show, which is that every decision a company makes either contributes to value creation or value destruction, not just the ones people consider marketing. And we've been talking about product, a designer has so much influence over desirability in any given moment, in any given season, in any given tenure. How does that balance work within a luxury company or is the job of the marketer to express the vision of the designer?
26:45I think there are different types of fashion labels. Fashion labels where you have an artistic director that really has their hands on what is going to be created. And you have brands without artistic director, where you are just a CEO, a CMO, a studio, and they express a brand. So that's something. I'm talking about the artistic director. If you talk about the first one, which is brand with the artistic director, you have to be realistic because the role of the CMO is really indeed to put forward, to put in full light what the artistic director is doing. Because he's the artist. I think the artistic director carries a huge responsibility, which is to understand the DNA of the brand and put it in the future.
27:32so that's really where you have the uh the balancing act dna and future because if you stay dna only you become very dusty if you are future only you lose the roots of your brain yeah and i i think this is what uh the jonathan anderson and dior is doing wonderfully well understanding the roots of christian dior and putting it into the future so this is one example but I could say the same on Michael Ryder on Céline, or Nicolas Gésquerre on Vuitton, or even Pharrell Williams on Vuitton Home. So they are people that dive into the DNA of the brand, but not to replicate it, to stretch it into the future.
28:19And I've seen other artistic directors, usually not at LVMH, kind of ignoring the DNA of the brand. and it becomes their own ego and their own creation. And usually you look at the brands that are in trouble, it's because of that. Or some others that are just applying the DNA, flat, flat-footed, and this goes nowhere either. So this is where, you know, they are really artists that have a vision. And I think that the beauty of LVMH is to kind of give the freedom of speech to this artist to express their vision of the brand. Is there a decision within a portfolio like LVMH's that a brand like Tiffany will always supersede any individual artistic designer?
29:16And obviously there are collaborations with the Elsa Peretti's. Yeah, and there are artistic directors that have been at Tiffany also. So, no. You know, and you know, every maison is completely independent. So they do it their way. Yeah, actually, I want to come back to that in a minute. Which is really amazing at LVMH. You know, it's not a conglomerate. Right. It's really 75 independent maisons with their own DNA and their own teams that are accountable for the results. Yeah. I want to ask you kind of a follow-up question about balance. And there's a tension that I think every brand in any category faces, which is finding the balance between shouting and being heard but not seen and speaking quietly and being not heard.
30:17right the balance between you know broadcast and narrow cast between standing out and standing apart and i'm wondering and it feels particularly true in in luxury right because there's a requirement of elegance um how as somebody who has marketed pampers and speedies how how do you think what's your advice to the audience on how to find that balance because in my observation you got a lot of people shouting and saying nothing today first you need to avoid that you don't shout in luxury if you start shouting you are not luxury yeah uh then it's not one size fits all i always say that for me there are three categories of luxury brand.
Read the full transcript
31:10There is what I call the craft masters. And in this category, you will put at Elvimage, the L 'Oropiana, the Berluti from competitions. This is where I will put Hermès or Van Cleef. And these brands, they really rely intensely on the quality of their craft. You know, L 'Oropiana is a master of fibers. They help you to touch the exceptional in life. So this is what they are about. They'd help me more if they lowered their prices, but that wouldn't be luxury. No, you would not have the finest cashmere in the world. You would not have the best linen in the world. So this is really, when I talk master of fibers, it's just amazing what they are able to do.
31:55And not only through nature, but also through technology, because that's the beauty of L 'Europiana. It's the best natural fiber, but there is an amazing technology behind it. They don't shout. Why? Because they are about craft, the mastery of the craft with a very well-identified mindset of their target audience, and you should not shout at it. And if you are not visible to the world, c 'est pas grave, as long as you are visible to the target audience that matters. So that's one thing. Then you have what I call the zeitgeisters, where culture and being at the age of culture all the time is really important.
32:40It's not about trends, it's about being a trendsetter. And again, on this one, you need to be visible, you need to be heard, but your creativity and your ability to have the pulse on culture, it is what is going to give you this visibility. So where the first one, it was more craft and superior resonance with your consumer. This one, the zeitgeist, there is a creativity and the culture that is going to give you this visibility. And in the middle, what I call is a timeless icons. They do everything very well with a voice heard, with a right balance, you know, always elegance, always voice. And here you'll find a Dior, for example, but this is also where you'll find Chanel, where you'll find Cartier, where you'll find Tiffany.
33:30They are here. And according to where you belong, that's my own theory. It's not an LVMH theory, it's a Mathilde's theory. What's Mathilde's theory for middle market and FMCG, would you say? How does that play outside of the category? For FMCG, I never really made the exercise to see if it would work. Because building an FMCG neat brand, for example, on the zeitgeist, on the culture, would not probably be enough. The craft probably and the timeless icon, you would find it. So craft and a superior understanding of the consumer and something which is more well-rounded. And you will have all the leaders of FMCG in those kind of timeless icon.
34:21The zeitgeister, they need lots of money behind it before it becomes something which is more mainstream in FMCG, whereas you can bet on this one in luxury. If I understand it correctly, you were pretty seminal in bringing LVMH and the Paris Olympic Games together. It's not me. Not you. You know, this one is a kind of all of envy. I always say I have three all. of my all of fame, the thing I've done I'm so proud of. Then my all of shame, the thing I've done, I'm so ashamed that I learned so much about it. And then all of envy, the one I look every day, I wish I would have done it. And, you know, Paris 2024 was really the work of Antoine Arnault, Hélène Frey, Christine Drillon, all the quote-unquote LVMH image, the LVMH brand image, really willingness.
35:21And I think they have done it masterfully in full cooperation with the Comité Olympic. So this one... Which is not an easy thing to get the full cooperation of the IOC. But my question is... But I wish I would have done it. Would... Does the company's relationship but the games continue or it's just the Paris games? Joker.
35:50Because the Olympics are a mass property. And a big cultural property. It's the biggest cultural event on the planet. Which is to say that a lot of inefficiency in reach there because actually as I hear myself say it that's not true. Right? Because everybody aspires most everybody aspires to luxury and obviously there are entry points within luxury. But for me, it was a really interesting deal because it didn't at first, I got it and I got the French piece, obviously. I'm a former Olympic sponsor. I was a sponsor of the Alberville Games back in 100 years ago in 94, right? 92? Yeah. Yeah. Early 90s.
36:34Yeah, Barcelona was 92 and then Alberville was 94 or maybe, no, both 92. It was the last time the Olympics were together. But I digress. Was there any conversation, like, are the Olympics too big for luxury? Because I think it's really instructive to people in that, to borrow the late kib again, to borrow the phrase balance. There's a really interesting balance in that. I don't know if Olympics are too big for luxury, but in the case here, I think there was a perfect alignment of the planet, which is the values. You know? the values about excellence in craft yeah this is lvmh this is what every athlete is pursuing then creativity slash innovation you look at sports it's uh both creative in the way they play and there is lots of innovation going on and uh entrepreneurship and uh they are all kind of betting on the victories and going with that.
37:38And then the fourth value of LVMH is engagement. And an athlete and his team or her team is very high on engagement. So there was a confluence of values. Then Antoine and Hélène, with the help of the agency, found this big idea about artisans of all victory, which I think was the perfect way to say this. With artisans victories. And it was a journey to victory, but with the craft at the center, which was also a beautiful one. And then I would say the approach, which is it's not going to be sponsorship. It's not going to be product placement. It's going to be creative partnership and making every ceremony a stage for beauty, the art of crafting dreams again.
38:30So there was such a synergy, alignment, that there is a moment where you cannot say no. It becomes obvious. And it became also obvious for people who saw it, you know. I think everyone had a little tear when we had Céline Dion at the top of the Eiffel Tower starting to think it's a Dior dress. She was the queen for one night and probably forever because of that moment. And it was a moment in Dior. and everything, you know, all the ceremonies were crafted with the Chaumet medals and the Louis Vuitton tray presenting the medal. And it was just creative partnership at every stage, which was great.
39:14But you need to have this magic moment where everything aligns. Which is indeed often magic and hard to fabricate. You can't fabricate it, but you can plan for it. But what we've been talking about so far is all the ingredients that add value, that lead to value creation. What, from your perspective, is the antithesis? What have you seen be a destructive force for commercial value, whether, you know, across the span of your career, whether within your career as an observer of the craft and commerce? And again, sacrificing on craft. You know, I always go back to my four C's. craft, creativity, customer, culture.
40:01So sacrificing on craft, doing something which is not perfect. You know, at LVMH, when you do something really good, you get a pas mal. Really good is not really good enough. Exactly. It's never good enough. And as soon as you say, I've done an excellent job, you are being complacent because, you know, the sky is the limit. So, you deteriorate as soon as you sacrifice some craft. Would you say the same is true for FMCG? No. Yeah. No, there are shortcuts. So, that are in fact appropriate, right? Yes. Yes. This is what allows a balance between the price and the superiority you bring. So, there is a moment where you need to cut a corner, but you do that on purpose because it gives you still the superiority.
40:56that is justified. Whereas here, there is nothing like superiority. It just needs to be exceptional, best, and no point of comparison. It's not better than. You know, I was raised at P &G with better than, dot, dot, dot, who? Yeah. Not, no, I don't have a better bag than. No, no, a better jewel. No. You just have a perfect craft, a perfect mastery of the leather, of the fashion, of the stones. So this is, as soon as you sacrifice craft, it's bad. It's killing in luxury. And in FMCG, you need to decide where you put the line. Okay. Consumer noticeability is a big one. As soon as you lower the craft and it becomes consumer noticeable, you shoot yourself in the foot.
41:51Just know that. Then creativity. creativity is a no-brainer in luxury no creativity no luxury creativity uh makes you win in fmcg it makes you win what's your definition of creativity in that context
42:12the ability to uh to bring an idea an idea that could have been done before but the way you bring it to life makes people think about wow i've never heard since that before or help them to see things in a fresh way. On papers, I told you, either you say there is no leak overnight or you say your baby is going to sleep better, therefore it will grow better. That's a new way to look at dryness. Whereas in luxury, it's going to be the creativity of a new artistic realization of a new expression of this artistry that makes you go, wow, I want it. Perhaps I cannot afford it tomorrow, but the day after tomorrow I can.
43:08Astoration is useful. Desire, okay? So the creativity that creates desire. So that's the second one. And culture is that you need to have your finger on the pulse of culture and decide how you push the cursor. And in luxury, you can push the cursor quite high, okay? from being more in line with culture to be ahead of culture. In FMCG, it's risky.
43:42This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9 % of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com. When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications, and more.
44:24Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a$75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. That's Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs. Chronic migraine is 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more. Botox, onabotulinum toxin A, prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they start. It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month. It prevents on average 8 to 9 headache days a month versus 6 to 7 for placebo.
45:00Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection causing serious symptoms. Allerge your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection. Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, including ALS Lou Gehrig's disease, myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.
45:36Why wait? Ask your doctor, visit BotoxChronicMigraine.com, or call 1-800-44-BOTOX to learn more.
45:46so let's stick to this because you've talked the this being fingers on the pulse of culture and i want to use culture because a lot of brands are trying to get involved have been involved yeah with culture in partnership with in collaboration with other brands right and um of course the olympics are a brand so that's an example but you've talked about uh the disease of collaboration which is the the premise if i understand it right that that brand to brand collabs are just running everywhere everywhere what's what's your take because it seems there was a point it's like seven or eight years ago i think where there was some it was a crocs collab with somebody else.
46:37And I was like, oh my God, we've reached peak collaboration. We've jumped the shark. It's over. I've actually come to reconsider fairly shortly after that. I reconsidered it because I just think in today's world, other people's money, other people's attention, other people's audiences, other people's equities. It's like how it's so essential in a world of limited resources to borrow and collaborate with. Now, obviously that doesn't excuse the terrible collaboration, but tell me what's your perspective on it. I think the collaboration is fine as soon as one plus one is superior to two. Yeah. Okay.
47:16Because if it is just two brands collaborating to do one plus one equal two, it becomes so visibly marketing that there is no creativity. There is just commercial. Let's try to make some more money by creating a buzz around the alliance. between those two brands. But when you get one plus one equal 10, because there is a coherence of values, a coherence of creativity, then it becomes interesting and it is worth doing. And so creativity and culture respond to each other. And then you have the detrimental collaboration. The ones that damage, usually the most prestigious brand, It serves the little one, but damages the big one.
48:09I was just having drinks the other night with Sophie Bambuk, who is the CMO at AP, and talking about the collab they did with Swatch. And at first I didn't understand it. But now I understand it more and it makes sense to me from an AP perspective, which is teaching people to appreciate the mechanics. Which was an interesting take. They didn't make a watch. They made a pocket watch. But it is a fine art. But I want to go back to something you said, which is sometimes it is just about commerce, right? And if it drives commerce in the short term and isn't detrimental in the long term, it's not, you know, not brand accretive.
48:56It's not either detrimental nor beneficial in the long term. But, yeah, it kind of worked right now. What's your take on it? Would you do it? Me, no. But I know that it's okay to do it. Yeah. But for me, it's not, you know, the beauty of the craft as I describe it. Okay. But sometimes you have to do it. but I prefer when you manage to elevate both brand and particularly your brand through collaboration. Before we get to the last question of the show, I want to ask you a question in advance and it goes back to something you said earlier, which is, you know, better than dot, dot, dot. At P &G, if I understand it correctly, they've long been famous And maybe this is less so today than it was 20, 30, 40 years ago, 60 perhaps, for inventing products that cannibalized products, right?
49:55And I believe that kind of the internal conversation was it's better to cannibalize ourselves than to be cannibalized by the competition. sticking a pin in that as somebody who served as a center of excellence and image and content for 75 individual Maison who sometimes compete with each other if for the attention of the same user you know am I going to buy a Dior bag or a Vuitton bag in building the portfolio that Mr. Arnaud has has he embraced some of that same thing which I might as well cannibalize or just own the market writ large? As I told you, every maison is independent. That's right.
50:40But the beauty of those 75 maisons is through the DNA. In fact, they are not competing with each other. But aren't they? At the end, it's a share of money people can buy. Right. So, indeed. But the reason why you'd buy a Giro bag versus a Louis Vuitton bag will have to go about what the brand stands for and what the brands represent. And when the DNA is well articulated and the products bring to life the DNA, you know when you need the Dior and when you need the Vuitton. So that's what is really interesting. Portfolio is not a word we use very often at LVMH, but implicitly the complementarity of the DNA of our brands leads to this kind of portfolio mapping that covers it all.
51:39Complementary as opposed to cannibalistic. Yes, exactly. And then to make sure that you cover the spectrum of beauty, because there is not, again, one definition of beauty. What can be beautiful for you, I could find it ugly and vice versa. and through this complementarity of the DNA and of what the brand stands for, it allows to grow. This is a digression, but there was something you just said that reminded me of the work that Loewe did a couple of years ago when Charlie Smith was the CMO that was, I thought, so breathtakingly refreshing for luxury, which is they had a certain irreverence and a sense of humor.
52:27You know, how do you pronounce Luayve, which, by the way, I was not pronouncing correctly until the campaign. And they kind of approached the selling of, I mean, how old is the brand? I mean, it's a Spanish brand. Well, is it over 100 years, 70 years, something like that? I would interrupt you by DNA. And I'm wondering, like, did that dissonance, Was that an internal conversation anywhere? No, they're an independent maison. Yeah, and it also fits well with what Loewe stands for. But again, Loewe, I would put more in the zeitgeist. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Pulse on culture, but with a profound respect for craft.
53:12Yes. Jonathan Anderson was the artistic director at the time. At the time, yeah. And craft was also at the center. Of course. So you could have the funny communication about how to pronounce Loewe. You know, the spelling contest was just fantastic. But you could have also the Tsuna Fujita collaboration. You know, those Japanese ceramists and going in Japan to find those ceramists and understanding their craft and putting it in their leather marketery, you know, which is just gorgeous. and having the full activation plan around this one. It was given the Grand Prix of Luxury in 2024, the Sunan-Fujita collaboration for Louisville.
53:59So it's really interesting because this brand did it very well. They did. But respecting, again, the DNA of the brand, doing collaboration very subtle, you know, like the Sunan-Fujita collaboration. Here is my last question for you, which is the last question I ask everyone, which is if you were given all the power in the world to create anything tomorrow and destroy something tomorrow. You don't have to answer it through a business lens. It could be a personal lens, a humanistic lens, any lens you want. What would you create tomorrow and what would you destroy tomorrow? Oh, that's a tough one.
54:36Could I destroy all the dictators? You could. I would be supportive. I would destroy the dictators who are ignorant of freedom, mankind, and human beings. So, yeah, destroying dictators that are overruling the freedom of every individual. So this is what I would destroy. what would I create? Is there a tool for kindness? I think this word, I'm perhaps completely utopic, but I think there is a word in French which is bienveillance, which is approach the world with kindness. This is what I would do, is that trying to be able to, what I would create is something that removes your bias, your preconceived idea to approach every human being which is in front of you with a positive attitude about saying, this is another human being like me, not richer, not poorer, not more intelligent, not dumber, and being able to consider to have a human being to human being conversation without bias.
56:02I've been living in for the last four months in Woodstock, New York famous for the music festival even though it didn't take place in Woodstock and I was getting I was getting these pants in fact tailored for this trip and the tailor in Woodstock has a sign by her cash register that says be kinder than necessary I like that Yeah. Kindness is a necessary tool. Yeah. Yeah. With a chance for everyone. Yeah. There's no bias. So an end to dictators and down on dictators, up on kindness. No argument here. Mathilde, thank you so much. Such a pleasure to see you again. Likewise. I've been missing you.
56:51To wrap up this episode, consider this. Last month, the Volkswagen Group, Europe's largest automaker, announced it's cutting up to half its global model lineup. reducing equipment options by up to 75%, shrinking production capacity, and potentially eliminating up to 100 ,000 jobs worldwide. First half 2026 operating margins fell to 3.8%. Sales were down across nearly every brand in the portfolio in China, which has been the company's growth engine for over a decade, collapsed by nearly 26%. No doubt every decision that led here was in its moment rational. Expand the brand portfolio to capture more segments.
57:30Launch more models to compete in more categories. Build more factories to meet projected demand. Invest heavily in China because the growth was extraordinary. CEO Oliver Bloom acknowledged that VW's own brands have been cannibalizing each other, what he diplomatically called substitutions in some segments. Each individual decision made sense. The accumulation of them is what destroyed value, because complexity compounds just as powerfully and surely as meaning does, except in the wrong direction. What makes the VW story instructive for every enterprise, not just automakers, is that value destruction is almost never a single catastrophic decision.
58:07It's a series of reasonable ones that nobody ever examined as a portfolio. So the question worth considering isn't whether any one decision is wrong. I mean, that's worth considering too. But the real consideration is whether anyone is watching what all these decisions add up to and whether the enterprise, every enterprise, has the discipline or the courage to stop adding before the weight of what it's built becomes the thing that tears it down. Today's episode was produced by Art Chung, Jim Mackle, Manolo Moreno, Brandon McFarlane, and Ashley Futterman from the Vox Media Podcast Network and the Wisdomist Company.
58:46For a limited time, you can get a Big Mac meal for just$8. That's a burger, fries, and a drink. They don't call it an extra-value meal for nothing. Get a Big Mac meal only at McDonald's. Price and participation may vary. Promotion pricing may be lower than meal pricing.
From the publisher
LVMH’s Mathilde Delhoume-Debreu spent 30 years at Procter & Gamble before becoming the Global Brand Officer across the luxury behemoth’s 75 independent Maisons, which means she's navigated a spectrum of value creation across categories and has come to deeply understand what separates brands that drive value enduringly from those that don’t.
In this episode, she and Seth dig into how repositioning Pampers from functional superiority to a higher-order insight about baby development (without changing the product at all) tripled brand revenues in only three years; why creativity without coherence and craft without culture are two of the most reliable paths to value destruction; what LVMH's model of 75 independent Maisons teaches any enterprise about the difference between cannibalization and complementarity; and why the balance between the short and long term isn't a strategic preference but what determines whether a company survives its own success.
Create or Destroy: Reimagining Marketing with Seth Matlins is produced by The Wisdomous Company and the Vox Media Podcast Network.
Follow the podcast on Instagram / TikTok: @createordestroypod
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
