In short
The grooming and sexual abuse allegations against 41-year-old corrections officer Roger Huber in Lockport, New York, and the disappearance of his alleged co-victim/witness Cheryl Rucci before she could testify; includes later intimidation, indictment, plea, sentencing, and ongoing uncertainty about Cheryl’s fate.
Guest backgrounds
No podcast “guests” are interviewed in this episode. The hosts reference sources including: Investigator Joe Taylor (sheriff’s office investigator at the time), Cheryl Rucci (former live-in partner and alleged assault participant), Cheryl’s daughter (key account of the night of Cheryl’s disappearance), Emily and Megan (minors in the special education program), and a witness “Amy” who reported seeing a woman bound/possibly kidnapped in a teal car area.
Key claims
Roger sexually abused minors (including Megan and Emily) and allegedly began contact before Megan turned 17; Cheryl later confessed to a 1999 assault and agreed to testify; Cheryl vanished after being sought for grand jury testimony; Roger intimidated witnesses (near-miss driving) and denied everything; he pled guilty to attempted rape and child endangerment.
Notable examples
Motel New Year’s Eve exposure incident; boat/tubing with alcohol and minors; Emily’s journal; Cheryl’s missing-person timeline (shoes/purse left, no struggle); Amy’s “go, go, go” sighting near woods; Roger’s 2005–2006 case (21-count indictment, plea, 16 months–4 years).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOHost Introduction and Warning
0:43 to 1:00
Ashley and Britt introduce themselves and give a warning to listeners.
“And the story I have for you today is true to the title.”
The Story Begins: Emily's Journal
1:00 to 3:09
The story revolves around Emily, a special education student, and her troubling observations.
“Our story begins on January 6th, 2005 in Lockport, New York, which is this small city about 40 minutes outside of Buffalo.”
Investigating Roger Huber
3:09 to 4:32
An administrator seeks to investigate Roger Huber after concerning reports from Emily.
“Roger was apparently not a very common name in the area at that time.”
The Age of Consent Issues
4:32 to 5:13
Discussion about the legal implications of Roger's relationship with Megan.
“I mean, not even if she's a special needs student?”
The Complexity of Roger's Relationships
5:13 to 7:51
Investigator Taylor delves into Roger's relationships and the manipulation involved.
“So, Investigator Taylor decides to go directly to Roger with the allegations instead.”
Roger's Aggression and Victimization
7:51 to 9:09
Discussion on Roger's aggressive actions towards both Emily and Megan.
“And the way that he would use one victim to prey on the next, I think, is part of the process as well.”
Cheryl Rucci's Role and Confession
9:09 to 11:12
Cheryl's experiences with Roger and her eventual confession to authorities.
“And he told of a time in December that Roger had sexual contact with Megan at a gym in front of her 12-year-old cousin and in the presence of a 2-year-old.”
Cheryl's Disappearance
11:12 to 13:09
Cheryl goes missing before she can testify against Roger, raising concerns.
“Did she realize that she was doing that when she was talking to them?”
Investigation Aftermath and Conclusions
13:09 to 14:01
The aftermath of Cheryl's disappearance and the law enforcement's response.
“So it might be, but the DA's office won't release anything related to Cheryl's case to us.”
Cheryl's Mysterious Disappearance
14:01 to 16:41
Learn about the troubling circumstances surrounding Cheryl's disappearance and its investigation.
“And to them, the circumstances are deeply concerning.”
Show all 21 chapters
Roger's Indictment and Legal Troubles
16:41 to 19:46
Explore the legal case against Roger, including the charges and his plea.
“And you said indicted on 21, but only 20 stick.”
Roger's Manipulation and Witness Intimidation
19:46 to 22:02
Discuss Roger's attempts to intimidate witnesses after his indictment.
“And at his sentencing, which happens on June 5th, 2006, the judge tells him, I think you are a threat.”
Cheryl's Family's Perspective
22:02 to 24:05
Understand Cheryl's family's beliefs about her disappearance and their concerns.
“And every day over the past year without word from her, they only became more and more convinced that she didn't leave on her own.”
Search Efforts and Investigative Failures
24:05 to 27:12
Examine the efforts made to locate Cheryl and the shortcomings of the investigation.
“And interestingly, I don't know if you remember, so they brought canines in to like track her scent when she first went missing.”
New Witness Account Emerges
27:12 to 28:00
Hear about a new witness account that sheds light on the night Cheryl went missing.
“He said they followed up on more than 200 leads.”
Introduction to Amy's Witness Account
28:00 to 29:00
Learn about a key witness named Amy and her account from the night Cheryl disappeared.
“And there is this one tip in particular that I think is a shining example of that.”
Amy's Encounter with Danger
29:45 to 36:25
Explore the chilling details of Amy's encounter with a mysterious woman and a hulking figure.
“On the night Cheryl disappeared, around 10, maybe 10.15 at night, Amy was driving to work, taking this rural road near the woods off State Route 78.”
Investigative Follow-Ups and Findings
36:25 to 42:00
Delve into the aftermath of Amy's sighting and the subsequent investigation into Cheryl's case.
“Don't tempt me with a good time in the shovel, but I would.”
Roger Hueber's Ongoing Influence
42:00 to 45:35
Explore the troubling reality of Roger Hueber's continued presence around children despite his past.
“And this is why I titled this episode as a warning.”
The Complicated Legacy of Cheryl Rucci
45:35 to 45:55
Understand the complexities of Cheryl Rucci's life and her family's struggle for answers.
“She was an imperfect victim who became an imperfect witness.”
Call for Information on Cheryl's Case
45:55 to 46:39
A heartfelt plea for anyone with information about Cheryl Rucci's disappearance to come forward.
“I mean, anything at all, please contact the Niagara County Sheriff's Office at 716-438-3393.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Ashley Flowers:Hi, Crime Junkies. It's Brit. If you're like me and you're ready to dive into even more cases, there's another podcast I think you're going to love. Park Predators. In Park Predators, host Delia D 'Ambra dives into the haunting crimes that happen in some of the most beautiful and unexpected places across the globe. Delia has helped host a couple of episodes of Crime Junkie in the past, and if you've listened to her before, you already know her investigative approach brings the facts of each case and their chilling details to life, making Park Predators the perfect mix of captivating and informative storytelling.
0:33Ashley Flowers:So once you're done with this episode of Crime Junkie, go check out Park Predators. New episodes drop every week. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
0:43Brit Prawat:Hi, Crime Junkies. I'm your host, Ashley Flowers. And I'm Britt. And the story I have for you today is true to the title. A warning for our viewers, especially the ones in New York, but a reminder for all crime junkies to be careful who you trust. So let's dive in.
1:33Brit Prawat:Our story begins on January 6th, 2005 in Lockport, New York, which is this small city about 40 minutes outside of Buffalo. There is this 16-year-old special education student who I'm going to call Emily. She has been working with a school administrator on ways to better express herself because she's going through a lot at home at the time. She's been dealing with a lot of trauma and her multiple disabilities make it really hard for her to like work through that and process things like all the things going on around her. So working with this person, this administrator and a psychologist, she begins to journal to try and get out the things that she's going through and feeling on paper.
2:13Brit Prawat:Maybe that would be an easier way for her to share information with them. And it is. She writes about her home life, about the books that she reads, and about one of her few friends named Megan. She's actually another female student in the high school special education program. But what Emily is writing about her is deeply concerning because Emily writes that 17-year-old Megan is in a relationship with someone named Roger, an adult man who works in law enforcement. And they have been doing things that apparently make Emily uncomfortable. And whatever it is was clearly intended to be kept secret because Roger specifically told Emily that this school administrator better not find out about him, which, as you can imagine, makes this administrator determined to find out not just about what's going on, but who exactly this Roger is.
3:08Brit Prawat:And she knows exactly who to ask because her husband is a deputy with the Niagara County Sheriff's Office, and he helps her connect the dots. Roger was apparently not a very common name in the area at that time. Law enforcement Roger is 41-year-old Roger Huber, who is employed by the same department, but he actually works as a correctional officer at the local jail. So she calls the jail superintendent and keeps it simple. Tell Roger Huber to leave my students alone. Now, at first, this administrator doesn't expect it to go any further than that. She assumes that the department will deal with it quietly.
3:50But someone at the jail takes it up the chain because pretty soon an investigator from the sheriff's office, this guy named Joe Taylor, contacts her and says that he is formally investigating the allegations against Roger. Thank God. And good, because realistically, I mean, she was a mandatory reporter. Like it should have been more official than that. And I actually checked with my sister-in-law, who's a vice principal, and she's like, absolutely, you're not supposed to like go investigate or see what's what.
4:17Brit Prawat:Report and that's, yeah.
4:19Ashley Flowers:Yeah.
4:19Brit Prawat:So at least when it gets told to them, it got up the chain. Now, here is where it gets tricky. The age of consent in New York is 17. So it's actually not illegal for Roger to be in a sexual relationship with 17-year-old high school student Megan.
4:38Ashley Flowers:I mean, not even if she's a special needs student? No, that is not a factor. It is only about age. So really, the investigation that ensues is just trying to determine if the relationship started before Megan was 17. Now, Joe Taylor tries to go right to the source with Megan. He reaches out to a woman that he describes as the mother figure of Megan's house. But that woman says that talking to Megan is probably going to be a waste of his time. Because according to her, Megan would never be honest about what is going on between her and Roger. She would protect him. Yeah, based on the little snippet we got from Emily's diary, I'm sure that he has made it very clear to Megan, because he made it clear to Emily, that people shouldn't know about their relationship.
5:22So, Investigator Taylor decides to go directly to Roger with the allegations instead. Now, when he asked the jail supervisor to send Roger over to the criminal bureau, it's casual. Like, Taylor doesn't have enough to charge him or arrest him or even Mirandize him. Like, this is just a chat. But he asked Roger how he knows Megan. And Roger says that, you know, he's known her for like six or seven years since back in 1998 when she would have been about 10 or 11 years old. And she's really close with the family now because she is friends with Roger's 13-year-old son. And she's over at his house almost every day babysitting his eight-year-old daughter.
6:04Ashley Flowers:Wait, is there a Mrs. Huber in the picture? Not technically then. So he had been married before, though. Like, that is who he had three of his four kids with. Then his fourth kid, the eight-year-old, he had with this long-term girlfriend who did live with him when this was all going down in 2005. Now, in the end, Roger denies ever having a sexual relationship with Megan and even agrees to take a voice stress test before investigator Taylor lets him go. Okay, but I want to know what his live-in girlfriend has to say about all this. Taylor does, too. But it has to be handled the right way. Because Taylor quickly learns how complicated things are.
6:45So his girlfriend is 33-year-old Cheryl Rucci. And Cheryl, like Megan and Emily, had a learning disability that affected her mental development.
6:55Brit Prawat:So even at 33, her cousin, who we spoke to, put her mental age at about 16. And it seems like Roger manipulated her into being both victim and perpetrator. You see, Cheryl's mom and stepdad are corrections officers, and they worked in the same department as Roger when Cheryl was growing up. Her brother is even a corrections officer now, too. By the time Cheryl was 15 or 16, Roger was divorced, and Cheryl started babysitting Roger's kids, sometimes at Roger's house. You mean like Megan did? Yeah. So fast forward about 10 years to when Cheryl is 25. She's then living with Roger, having a baby with him, and being a full-time stay-at-home mom to his three other kids.
7:42Like, she has her baby in 1997. 1998 is when he meets Megan.
7:47Ashley Flowers:I mean, this feels like a cycle of grooming. But there are more than just Cheryl and Megan in it. And the way that he would use one victim to prey on the next, I think, is part of the process as well. So investigator Taylor ends up learning that while Emily may have just written in her journal about Megan, Roger has been sexually aggressive with her too. She says that over the summer, Roger played a pornographic movie in front of her and asked her to show him her breasts. And another time, Roger took her and some other minors out on a motorboat to go tubing. Cheryl was there, some other adults too, and there was alcohol on board.
8:30And at least one minor was drinking.
8:33Brit Prawat:But when they got out on the water, you know, basically stuck with no way to get away, Roger, Cheryl, and the other adults got naked in front of these minors. Roger also exposed himself another time to Emily. One New Year's Eve, he took her and Megan to a movie. And after, they all went to a motel. And when Megan went out to get a drink, that's when he exposed himself. And we know by that point, Roger had already had sexual contact with Megan because through his investigation, Taylor learns that sexual contact with her began in the spring or summer of 2004, when she possibly wasn't 17 yet. And he told of a time in December that Roger had sexual contact with Megan at a gym in front of her 12-year-old cousin and in the presence of a 2-year-old.
9:25Ashley Flowers:Which is like conditioning these other kids to think that this is all normal.
9:29Brit Prawat:That is exactly what I'm saying. It wasn't just a single person caught in Roger's web. But at the center of it with him was Cheryl Rucci. Except it seems like she was ready to break the cycle of abuse. By the time Investigator Taylor sits down with her, she says that she has just left Roger because he told her that he didn't love her anymore. And according to her cousin, Roger was really ugly to Cheryl during this time. So maybe that's why Cheryl is even willing to talk to Taylor. Maybe the fact that she's now fighting for custody of her own eight-year-old daughter, who would be in a house alone with Roger, is why she shares a bombshell that will do Roger in for good.
10:16Brit Prawat:Probably something that Roger thought she would have taken to her grave.
10:29Brit Prawat:Cheryl Rucci tells Investigator Taylor that in the summer of 1999, she and Roger sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl. Together, like a broken record, the story goes like this. Roger was close with the girl's family. He'd known her since she was a baby. She was in his orbit well before it happened. He made her family feel comfortable with him, made this child feel comfortable with him, before he and Cheryl abused her. Cheryl gives enough details and specifications that she essentially hands Roger over to them on a silver platter. But in doing so, she is basically signing herself up for the same fate.
11:12Ashley Flowers:Right. Did she realize that she was doing that when she was talking to them?
11:15Brit Prawat:I think she did. I mean, she didn't have a lawyer or anything when she talked to them. So I don't know how much she contemplated, like, or how much she could contemplate the repercussions that might come from this. But I think she was driven to confess out of fear. Her family felt that for her whole adult life, Roger had his thumb on her. They told us that while she worked on and off a little bit throughout her life, she never really had a steady job. She'd always been easily manipulated and controlled by Roger, both financially and emotionally. And her cousin, who we spoke to, said that they never saw any sign of physical abuse.
11:50Brit Prawat:But Cheryl was clearly afraid of the guy, and he had threatened to take their daughter away from her. And I think the fear of losing her daughter, of what would happen to her daughter, that could have been the big driver of why she was willing to confess, no matter what it meant for her. Now, of course, when investigator Taylor confronts Roger with this in a formal interview on March 15th, he denies all the allegations against him. Like, sure, yeah, he knows this girl, like he was at all these places, but like all of it's totally innocent, he says, like nothing to see here. But the thing is they don't need him to confess.
12:29They have enough by that point to arrest him on felony sex crime charges tied to the 1999 allegations that Cheryl told them about. But that means that what they will need is Cheryl to testify against him. So probably deciding that she was the lesser threat of the two, they offer her a plea deal if she will agree to testify against Roger, which her family said that she was planning to take so that she could be with her own daughter. Now, we don't know the exact details of the deal.
13:04Brit Prawat:Investigators wouldn't confirm anything to us other than the fact that there was a deal. Is it not documented somewhere? So it might be, but the DA's office won't release anything related to Cheryl's case to us. But here's what I know. So on August 9th, 2005, Cheryl was at this cookout at her apartment complex. And according to her family, some friends told her that Niagara County Sheriff's deputies had been there earlier looking for her. They were trying to serve her with a subpoena to testify before the grand jury. Apparently, Cheryl got upset. She started calling family, including her mom, but no one picked up.
13:43She left her mom a voicemail asking her to call back.
13:46Brit Prawat:But when her mom eventually gets that message and tries, she can't get a hold of Cheryl. So her family starts looking for her. They start calling around. And by the next night, August 10th, they report her missing because no one can find her. And to them, the circumstances are deeply concerning. Like we're talking about a witness in a sex abuse case against a corrections officer who just disappeared before she could testify against him. But her family told us that authorities did not view the circumstances in the same light they did. They all met at Cheryl's apartment to look for her that night.
14:23family and law enforcement. And there were no signs of a struggle. Nothing was a mess. And even though they took some investigative steps you would expect for a missing persons case, like taking items from her place for testing, they ran, you know, canines trying to track her scent, a family member said that they were told that Cheryl probably just ran away to avoid testifying. More than that, an investigator apparently told Cheryl's sister that Cheryl was just a crackhead whore. And if they give him 10 days, he'll find her body in Niagara Falls.
14:55Brit Prawat:What? Well, 10 days come and go. And guess what? No Cheryl. So now she's not only missing, she will eventually get listed as a fugitive.
15:11Ashley Flowers:And does this department know about Roger's case? Like the details, the fact that she's the witness? Britt, it is being handled by the same department.
15:19Brit Prawat:And this is the same department, I'd like to remind you, that Roger worked for.
15:24Ashley Flowers:Yeah. And, okay, do they not believe in, like, a conflict of interest in New York?
15:28Brit Prawat:I don't know how this is flying. It's kind of unbelievable. Yeah. Now, I do need to say that while the family says that law enforcement seemed to have a one-track mind and write Cheryl off as a fugitive in the wind, the current investigator told us that all possibilities, including foul play, were explored from the jump. Either way, Cheryl's disappearance doesn't actually stop the case against Roger from moving forward. Investigator Taylor is allowed to read Cheryl's written statement to the jurors. And by the time it gets to that, they have built out a bigger picture of what Roger had been doing.
16:08All the stuff with Megan, Emily, the boat, the alcohol, the motel, that was all going to be part of their case now too. And Emily, the student whose journal started this whole thing, she was expected to be a witness in the case. So even without Cheryl there in the flesh, on September 1st, the grand jury who was presented the case against Roger indicts him on 21 counts. I'm not going to read every single one because it's a lot, I'll give you like the highlights from the 20 that actually stick. So there are multiple counts of rape, sodomy, sexual abuse tied to that 1999 allegation involving that 14-year-old girl.
16:47Brit Prawat:They also charge him with endangering the welfare of children, unlawfully dealing with a child for allegedly giving alcohol to a minor, criminal contempt for allegedly violating an order of protection, and a firearm charge connected to his job as a peace officer.
17:03Ashley Flowers:And you said indicted on 21, but only 20 stick. I gotta know about the one that didn't stick. There was a charge related to the New Year's Eve incident with Emily and Megan in that motel room. It turns out the motel was in a different county, so that got dropped. Now, Roger pleads not guilty to all 20 counts. Roger makes bail. He walks out. But does he go home and sit on his hands and stay out of trouble while he waits for his day in court? No. Of course not. No, he does not.
17:33Brit Prawat:He starts trying to intimidate witnesses or at least one witness. Three different times over the course of a few weeks in December, Emily saw Roger drive his green truck behind her while she was walking near his street. And he would like swerve right at her, getting close enough that she could almost reach out and touch his vehicle. And there was like no question that this was him. I mean, for one, this man has a vanity plate that says Huber. But like also at least one of the times Megan was in the passenger seat of the car when it came close to her. And Emily wrote in her journal that one time Megan approached her and threatened her to try and get her to change her testimony.
Read the full transcript
18:16Ashley Flowers:I mean it feels like he's using Megan like he used Cheryl.
18:19Brit Prawat:He's got her so wound up in his crosshairs that I think she sees Emily as the enemy. or at the very least, she is willing to do Rogers' bidding, no matter how she sees Emily. These incidents end up getting reported to authorities, and prosecutors use this to get Rogers' bail revoked. And while he's sitting in prison, the case that his defense team was building really starts falling apart because they had a witness who I guess was there for the 1999 incident and originally gave the defense a signed statement saying that what Cheryl described never happened. But before we get to trial, that witness flips.
19:02Brit Prawat:And she was going to testify that everything did happen exactly like Cheryl said it did. Why the change of heart right before trial? Well, apparently, Roger's estranged daughter. So this would have been his daughter with his ex-wife, not the daughter he shares with Cheryl. She knew about this 1999 incident as well. And she told the witness that you shouldn't lie. Like, you've got to tell them what happened. And based on that, she decided to tell the truth. And Roger sees the writing on the wall after this. So this is when he decided to take a plea. He pleads guilty to second-degree attempted rape and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child.
19:46And at his sentencing, which happens on June 5th, 2006, the judge tells him, I think you are a threat. I think you are a predator.
19:55Brit Prawat:I think you prey on young girls. I think you have an inability almost to avoid that. And then the judge gives him the maximum sentence, which is 16 months to four years in state prison. In a pre-sentence interview, Roger had described what he did this way. He said, quote, I have three beautiful naked women in front of me and took advantage of an opportunity. And let's be very, very clear. One of those women was a 13-year-old kid. Now, the prosecutor points out something else that I think is important. She speaks to Cheryl's role in all of this. And she said that Cheryl was someone who was very controlled by Roger.
20:42And these were his fantasies, not hers. Cheryl didn't introduce this to their relationship. He did. Roger seems to disagree with that because later at a parole board interview in 2007, he tries to put a lot of what happened on Cheryl, saying she invited the girls over. He didn't know how old they were. Like, one girl told me she was 18. Cheryl told me that too.
21:05Ashley Flowers:I mean, I believe this zero percent. You are a man in your 40s. You don't need to check a birthday when you see a 13-year-old girl. Right. They're like they're in middle school. Come on. And listen, one parole commissioner calls him out on this like absolute bullshit. She basically says, like, how convenient is it that now it's all Cheryl? Like the girls were friends of hers. She brought them home. And you're just this like innocent victim who didn't know like how old they were or like who they were. And like, oh, like, again, how convenient that Cheryl has been missing for more than a year now by this point and isn't around to defend herself.
21:40And that's when Roger pushes his narrative here by saying, well, she's on the run, I guess. And that is an insulting insinuation to Cheryl's family.
21:48Brit Prawat:Because from their point of view, Cheryl wasn't just a missing person. She was supposed to testify in a sex abuse case against someone who worked for the very same department that is now investigating where she went. And every day over the past year without word from her, they only became more and more convinced that she didn't leave on her own. they think something bad happened to her. And to them, the evidence was there from the beginning. Cheryl's daughter said that her mom used to walk her to school, take her to the park and the movies. One time she even got a job at her school so that they could walk home together.
22:26Brit Prawat:She told us that Cheryl was loving and kind. She was family-oriented. And that she doesn't think she would ever have just walked away from her. More than that, though, like Cheryl didn't have a cell phone or credit cards or a driver's license? And like, sure, like she could have taken the bus or something, but how is she going to get by? They told us that the first night when they reported her missing and they went with police to check her apartment, Cheryl's shoes were by the door, exactly where she always left them. Her purse was still there. The whole place was clean besides a couple of beers.
22:59And yes, they took those, checked those, no DNA on those. It looks like she just stepped out with just the clothes on her back and was going to come right back. And based on the last reported sighting of her, that might actually have been the case. And more than all of that, the thing that they say is Cheryl was chatty. Like she would call her family every day, multiple times a day, especially when she wasn't working or didn't have her daughter and she got bored. Like they would call her Nancy nine times. Like she wouldn't go long, like even a day without calling. Now, from law enforcement's point of view, Cheryl's last confirmed sighting is at about 9 p.m.
23:40on August 9th. This is like the same day she was at that cookout, heard about the sheriff's looking for her. And they say that at 9 p.m., some neighbors reported seeing her around the apartment complex. And some people said she might have even been barefoot in taking out the trash at the time, which makes sense with her shoes being inside the apartment.
23:59Brit Prawat:But if she walked out without her shoes, it doesn't seem like she would have gone far, right? And interestingly, I don't know if you remember, so they brought canines in to like track her scent when she first went missing. Well, according to family members and some early reporting on this case, the trail that got picked up seemed to go from Cheryl's apartment to a nearby skating rink. And investigators do get reports from witnesses who saw a car in the area that night. But they got like multiple descriptions of what that car looked like. Even though it doesn't seem like anyone saw Cheryl get into that car, like that is what makes the most sense to me.
24:36Like with the canine scent ending there.
24:39Ashley Flowers:Yeah, and if she gets in the car, then she probably went off with someone she knows.
24:44Brit Prawat:Presumably. I mean, that's what I would think. But it would seem like that couldn't have been Roger because we find out he always had an alibi. He was supposedly with his and Cheryl's daughter at the movies that night. Like he had her that night. That's why Cheryl was alone at her apartment when she went missing. But here's the thing. So for years, right, we've thought he had an alibi. We actually spoke to their daughter for this episode. We talked to her about the night her mom went missing. And she dropped this huge bombshell. She said, yes, they were supposed to go to the movies. But that movie night got canceled.
25:23Roger ended up dropping her and her brother off at their grandma's, like Roger's mom's house.
25:29Brit Prawat:Which means there was a stretch of time where from her point of view, Roger was on his own. Or at least she doesn't know where he was. But would Cheryl have actually gotten into a car with Roger? I don't know. I mean, but like who's saying that she got in the car willingly? I guess why else would she have been at the skating rink? Well, that I don't have an explanation for because, I mean, it's not like it shares a parking lot with her apartment complex or anything. Like, it's like across this like major road. So I agree. Like, if she went that way. It's like intentional. Yeah.
26:03Ashley Flowers:For a reason. And the thing is, like, if you remember, we know she called her mom when she heard that someone was looking to serve her with a subpoena. But the huge unanswered question I have is like, who else might she have called when her mom didn't pick up? the current investigator wouldn't even confirm for us whether they even pulled Cheryl's phone records much less like what they showed if they did okay but if you're gonna call someone to meet you or pick you up like why not just have them come to your apartment like why meet at the skating rink I don't know none of it makes sense and maybe it's because like that didn't happen maybe the scent that tractor was old or maybe it didn't track to like the skate rink at all because we tried to verify this detail with the current investigator, and all he would say is that dogs were used in that initial window when Cheryl was reported missing.
26:53But he couldn't say that the trail was ever concretely verified. Again, I don't know the difference between couldn't and wouldn't tell us. Right. So I don't know. Maybe the skate rink is just this red herring. He did tell us, though, that over time, more resources were put into locating Cheryl, not as a fugitive, but as a missing person. He said they followed up on more than 200 leads. And according to an article in the Lockport Union Sun and Journal, they did land searches. They did sonar searches in a nearby lake. They sent out cadaver dogs at one point, but they never found any sign of Cheryl.
27:31In 2011, the sheriff finally said that investigators believed that Cheryl was a victim of foul play and that she didn't leave on her own.
27:41Brit Prawat:Investigators even searched Roger's old home once it was foreclosed on. They didn't find anything. But even with this change of heart, I cannot help but believe that the early assumptions that they made did like irreparable damage to Cheryl's case. Stuff that's going to be so hard to come back from because there are some tips and leads that like once they're passed up on, you don't really get a second chance. And there is this one tip in particular that I think is a shining example of that. This witness story that has never been reported on before. Now, the current investigator told us that her account is noted in the original case file, but we spoke to her directly.
28:25Now, this witness is a local woman who I'm going to call Amy. And on the night that Cheryl disappeared, again, this is August 9th, 2005, she saw something that she has never been able to forget.
28:58Ashley Flowers:live shopping app in the country. It's a totally interactive experience where you hang out live with sellers and a community that shares your exact vibe. Plus, you'll score incredible deals on name brand makeup, clothes, and jewelry, completely skipping the retail sticker shock. Scrolling Whatnot is honestly the most fun I've had shopping in a while. There are categories and sellers for just about everything. I was even able to snag some neato squishies that are tough to find but so easy to snatch up for a great price on Whatnot. Download Whatnot today and get$20 off and free shipping on your first purchase.
29:29Ashley Flowers:Search Whatnot, W-H-A-T-N-O-T, in the App Store. Sign up and start finding the best deals on the products you love with$20 off and free shipping on your first purchase.
29:45On the night Cheryl disappeared, around 10, maybe 10.15 at night, Amy was driving to work,
29:52Brit Prawat:taking this rural road near the woods off State Route 78. And she spots this, like, teal four-door car that's pulled over to the side of the road with its lights on. So Amy pulled up behind it. She thought that maybe the car broke down. Someone might need help. Again, not a lot of traffic on this road. And when she gets out, she can see that there is a woman inside the car. She's young-looking, tan with dark hair. And she seemed like she was trying to talk to Amy. She was, like, talking fast, like she was anxious or scared. But there was also like music blaring from the stereo inside the car. And the woman inside wasn't rolling down the window so that Amy could hear her better.
30:30So while Amy is trying to like make sense of this, something catches her eye on the side of the road.
30:36Brit Prawat:And it's like this huge, incredible Hulk-like figure walking out of the brush back toward the car. Back toward where she was standing. And that's when Amy could finally read the woman's lips. She was saying, go, go, go. So Amy runs back to her car and speeds off just enough to get out of Dodge. And she uses her car's, like, emergency system to call for help before she decides to circle back. She knew that the woman shouldn't be left alone. Like, every fiber of her being was telling her that that woman was in danger. Because, like, it finally hit her why the woman might not have been rolling down the window.
31:18Brit Prawat:because Amy realized that the entire time she was there by the car, she never once saw the woman's hand. So she's thinking like, oh my God, maybe she was like bound in some way, which is just all the more concerning. Now, when Amy gets back to the spot, the car is still there, but now the lights are off and the woman is gone. So is the man that came walking out of the brush. And Amy looks up and down this road, but nobody is walking in either direction, which just gives her the eeriest sense that both of them disappeared into the woods. Now, Amy has enough self-preservation sense about her to know that she can't just go into the woods to find them.
32:01Brit Prawat:Authorities have to. Except, authorities don't show up. What? At least not for as long as she waited out there. Now, we don't know exactly where Amy's emergency call was routed to. I don't know who got it. I don't know what was entered into the system in real time. Now, the current investigator told us that Amy's sighting was noted in the case file, which we don't have access to because when we requested it, our request was denied. But he said that the call was followed up on and he wouldn't say how. Cool. But like as far as Amy's concerned, right, like she thought no one came out. So a couple of days later, when she is at home, she sees Cheryl's photo on the news.
32:45And she recognizes Cheryl as the woman she saw in the car. So obviously, Amy calls up the police right away because she wants to make sure someone knows about what she witnessed, right? Because she doesn't know.
32:58Brit Prawat:Like, she didn't talk to anyone. But their response is mind-boggling. Amy says that the detective outright told her that Cheryl wasn't worth looking for. Which is what they had basically told her family. Amy claims that the detective said that Cheryl got into this mess herself and now she's trying to get out of it.
33:17Ashley Flowers:What does that even mean?
33:20Brit Prawat:That doesn't even feel to me like, oh, like she ran away. This feels like she deserves whatever's coming to her.
33:26Ashley Flowers:Yeah, and it's coming from somebody who's employed by the same law enforcement office where Roger was employed. Listen, I don't know who told her that, but this idea that people had Roger's back or had reason to cover for him.
33:44Brit Prawat:Dude, I can't even tell you how deep it goes. Like, for legal reasons, literally, it's something that we're still digging into. But let me just tell you, like, real quick, side story here, two interesting tidbits that we stumbled upon. Because Cheryl's cousin told us that a woman who knew Cheryl commented publicly in a Facebook group that she was sexually assaulted in Roger's home after being served alcohol. In the comments, the woman said that she was underage at the time and the man that she accused was and still is a member of the Niagara County Sheriff's Office. We reviewed the screenshots of those comments taken before they were deleted.
34:22We also reached out to the man accused and the current sheriff and the deputy sheriff for their responses to those allegations. And we have not heard back. We also heard from Cheryl's family that Cheryl had turned over some tapes to the sheriff's office right before she went missing. Now, I'm being like vague about like what's on him, whatever, whatever. Because I have questions. Still digging. But the current investigator said that he is familiar with the claim that those tapes exist, but he hasn't seen documentation of their verified existence in the missing person case file available to him.
35:00So if these tapes are real, we don't know where they are now, whether they were logged somewhere else, returned, lost, destroyed, or never actually turned over in the first place. And obviously we reached out to Roger about the tapes and all this, but we have not heard back from him. And speaking of Roger, this man is hard to miss. Like, homeboy is scary looking. So to bring it back to Amy and her story, when she eventually saw Roger, she did think that the bald, stocky, muscular, Hulk-like figure that she saw walking out of the brush that night was him.
35:37Brit Prawat:Now, police blowing Amy off wasn't even the end of the saga. About two and a half weeks after that initial incident, Amy was driving past the same area where the car was. And she noticed this foul odor coming from the woods near where the car had been. And she told us that she drove that route all the time. She had never smelled anything like that before. So she doesn't think it was like a dead deer or random animal or something. But the thing is, Amy didn't report it that time. She had already called investigators and got dismissed. So she was afraid of being labeled as like a nuisance caller.
36:16Brit Prawat:But she did say that later she spent years trying to get cadaver dog teams like back to that location where she saw the car. That's kind of hard to do as one individual with no law enforcement connections.
36:29Ashley Flowers:Okay, girl, what are we waiting for?
36:30Brit Prawat:Don't tempt me with a good time in the shovel, but I would. But I don't want to get in the way because I actually have some kind of good news. The current investigator who took this case over in 2023 has been doing some legwork on this. He wouldn't tell us much about what he's doing. But when we got court records from Rogers' prosecution, I'm talking like hundreds of pages, transcripts, motions, orders, indictments, in it was a receipt showing that materials from the original case file were checked out and then returned to the DA's office custody in July of 2025. So we're talking just a year ago.
37:06And this included like Cheryl's own written statement to investigators, a statement from another witness, a letter, materials from a case that had been closed for nearly 20 years, got pulled a year ago and reviewed by someone. Now, I don't know exactly what, who had those files or what they were doing with them or whatever. But what the current investigator would say to us is that at some point in the last couple of years, he did put in a request for a trained search and rescue organization to come and search this area in question. Now, we spoke to the founder of Western New York Missing and Unidentified Persons, an advocacy organization that helped push for the search, which finally happened in November of 2024.
37:49and they told us that the team searched. They didn't find anything, but caveat, they felt like they had more work to do. She said that the team wasn't able to cover everything that they wanted to that day and they haven't been able to get back out there with law enforcement since.
38:07Ashley Flowers:Even if nothing is there now though, that doesn't mean there was like never anything there.
38:13Brit Prawat:This is exactly my point about the lost time. Like it is, it's terrible. Like, I don't know what has been lost that we can't get back.
38:21Ashley Flowers:Wait, if police actually followed up on it like they said they did, like, wouldn't they have gotten a plate number or something on that car, like, to know whose it was? So I don't know what they did, right? Like, they won't tell us. But Amy said that she actually recorded at least a partial plate number that night. I mean, she knew something was up. She was there with the car. She gave that to police. The only thing we know is that the registered car didn't apparently match the description of like this teal four-door car. Now, my next question, okay, what car did it match? The current investigator wouldn't get into any specifics about the partial plate itself, who it came back to, what other kind of vehicle it could have been registered to.
39:04But what I think is so interesting, Britt, remember how witnesses reported seeing a car like near the skating rink the night that Cheryl disappeared? So the current investigator told us that one of the multiple vehicle descriptions, remember, there was different ones, but one of them was a teal or blue car. Now, I don't know who that teal or blue car could belong to. But when we talked to Amy, she said that the teal car that she saw looked like a Chevy Caprice style sedan. And so obviously, like when we talked to Cheryl's daughter, we asked her like whether like Roger or anyone around him owned a car like that back then.
39:42And she said the one thing that came to her mind was that Roger had this like dark sea green like Chevy Camaro. But like a Chevy Camaro is a two-door sports car. He also had that like pickup truck or like a trailblazer or whatever. A Caprice is a larger four-door sedan. It doesn't look like either of those.
39:59Brit Prawat:So I don't know if it was a car completely unrelated to him, something he might have had access to. That car is a big mystery. Now, Roger was released from prison on January 15, 2010. Four days later, he registered as a sex offender. But he almost immediately violated his registration requirements when he moved in with his new wife, Megan, and their baby without telling anyone. Megan, the former high school student, Megan. That's the Megan. Obviously not in high school anymore by that point. But failure to do that got him five years of probation that began in 2012. When he was back in court for failing to update his address as a registered sex offender, the judge said something during the sentencing that really stuck with me.
40:50Brit Prawat:He said, quote, Everything that I know about you, Mr. Huber, is you're a good father. Although, you know, having a criminal past is never a good role model example. But let's again, those those years hopefully are behind you. Sounds like you're a good father. I'm not going to remove you from from your family. I'm not going to place you in jail. End quote.
41:12Ashley Flowers:I'm going to go out on a limb here and just say that I think it's more than just not being a good role model here. So I do just have to say the judge, the first judge who called him a predator was like, I don't think you like have the ability to even stop. That was a woman. The judge who called him. Wait, let me guess. This one's a man. Was a man. The one who calls him a good father. So like make your own call about that. Roger got discharged from all supervision on February 25th, 2015.
41:47Brit Prawat:But that's not five years. It's your right. Math is mathing. He just got done early. And just in time, because in August of 2015, he ended up getting arrested for driving under the influence of drugs, which would have been a probation violation. If he had still been on it. Right, but he wasn't. And so he is still out. And this is why I titled this episode as a warning. Because while one judge was just hoping Roger's past was behind him, he was a convicted predator. And I think it takes more than hope and a prayer to protect kids. And Roger seems to be around plenty of kids still. He is still married to Megan.
42:31Brit Prawat:They now have three kids. And because of her Facebook, we have a pretty good idea of the image that they put out to the world. Posted on Megan's page are photos of Roger at backyard pool parties at Disney World with his family. It's the curated image of a family man, and it's an image that Roger seems like he wants to protect. Our reporter Malika Dhaliwal found a state police report from October 2025 where Roger called 911 to report suspicious activity because people were talking about him in a public Facebook group, specifically about him being a registered sex offender and the crimes that he was convicted of.
43:13So they were speaking the truth. Yes. He told police that he thought the comments were threatening, but the responding officer like looked at the comments and was like, yeah, no. And Roger had to admit that like nobody threatened him directly. No one had done anything to him or to his property. the officer basically told him, like, listen, Facebook is a public forum. And it's like if your community wants to talk about who's living in their community, like people have the freedom of speech just like they would in any other public place. And I can't say if this next thing was Roger or not. But when Malika posted on a local Lockport Facebook group asking if anyone who knew Cheryl wanted just to talk to us, within 24 hours, that post was reported multiple times and got removed.
43:56But it's hard to hide from your past forever. And we heard something really interesting. So in our reporting, we were trying to get in touch with the original prosecutor on Roger's, like, sexual abuse case. But interestingly, her office said that she couldn't speak because of a pending matter related to the criminal case against Roger. What criminal case?
44:21Brit Prawat:Exactly my question. We have been trying to find out. But knowing that that case stuff was being pulled in 2025, knowing we've got a judge saying there is a pending criminal case in 2026, I think something seems to be brewing in Niagara County. Cheryl Rucci is still missing. Her daughter now has children of her own, three boys that Cheryl never got to meet. And her daughter told us that growing up without her mom has been confusing and painful, especially because she believes that she knows who is responsible and has had to watch that person go on living their life. And Cheryl's mom has spent 20 years waiting for answers and trying to keep Cheryl's memory alive.
45:07Brit Prawat:But at times it can feel like her legacy is always going to be tied to Roger. And Cheryl's cousin acknowledges that Cheryl may have been involved in some bad things. She is far from a perfect victim. But she says that her daughter should never have had to grow up without her mother. And maybe that's the truth about Cheryl. She was a complicated person, living a very complicated life inside a world that Roger Huber controlled. I'll say it again. She was an imperfect victim who became an imperfect witness. She was a woman who decided to testify against the most powerful person in her life, knowing what it might cost her.
45:44Brit Prawat:and then she disappeared before she could have her day in court. She deserves to be found. Her family deserves answers. So if anyone out there knows anything about the disappearance of Cheryl Rucci, I mean, anything at all, please contact the Niagara County Sheriff's Office at 716-438-3393. You can also submit a tip anonymously to their website. Investigator Ed Finley, he's the current lead on the case, told us that even information that seems small, like a rumor that's been passed around, even if you think they know it, they might not. Like, it can matter if it gives investigators something to follow.
46:39Brit Prawat:you can find all the source material for this episode on our website
46:44Ashley Flowers:crimejunkiepodcast.com and you can follow us on instagram at crimejunkie podcast
46:48Brit Prawat:we'll be back next week with a brand new episode
46:57Thank you.
47:27Brit Prawat:Crime Junkie is an Audio Chuck production. I think Chuck would approve.
From the publisher
In August 2005, a woman disappeared just days before she was supposed to testify against her boyfriend, a corrections officer accused of sexually abusing minors. For years, her family says she was treated like a fugitive instead of a missing person. But when we looked deeper, we found a witness who has never spoken publicly before — and a sighting from the night she vanished that could change the way this case has been understood for more than twenty years.
- If you know anything about the disappearance of Sheryl Rucci, please contact the Niagara County Sheriff's Office at 716-438-3393. If you’d prefer to remain anonymous, you can submit a tip on their website.
Source materials for this episode cannot be listed here due to character limitations. For a full list of sources, please visit: https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/warning-roger-hueber/
Did you know you can listen to this episode ad-free? Join the Fan Club! Visit https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/fanclub/ to view the current membership options and policies.
Don’t miss out on all things Crime Junkie!
- Instagram: @crimejunkiepodcast | @audiochuck
- Twitter: @CrimeJunkiePod | @audiochuck
- TikTok: @crimejunkiepodcast
- Facebook: /CrimeJunkiePodcast | /audiochuckllc
Crime Junkie is hosted by Ashley Flowers and Brit Prawat.
- Instagram: @ashleyflowers | @britprawat
- Twitter: @Ash_Flowers | @britprawat
- TikTok: @ashleyflowerscrimejunkie
- Facebook: /AshleyFlowers.AF
Text Ashley at 317-733-7485 to talk all things true crime, get behind the scenes updates, and more!
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.




