In short
Podcast Notes: D2C Diaries - How Jack Rubin Scaled Purdy & Figg to 1 in 20 Homes with One Product
Episode Overview In this episode, hosts Olly Hudson and Loukas Hambi interview Jack Rubin, co-founder of Purdy & Figg, a direct-to-consumer (D2C) cleaning product brand that has achieved significant market penetration in the UK. Jack shares insights on maintaining focus, scaling brands effectively, and the importance of balancing creative and performance-led marketing.
Key Themes and Discussions
Introduction to Purdy & Figg
- Founding Story: The brand was developed from Jack's mother and her friend's passion for DIY cleaning products, eventually evolving into a scalable business model.
- Product Focus: Successful with just one product (CounterClean), which was meticulously developed over two years and now holds a patent.
Achievements
- Market Penetration: Currently, Purdy & Figg products are used in 1 in 20 households in the UK, with approximately 500,000 active members.
- Brand Recognition: The brand aims for a household penetration rate comparable to established brands like Nespresso.
Ruthless Focus vs. Early Diversification
- Single Product Strategy: Rubin emphasizes the benefits of focusing on one product, one market, and one channel initially, stressing that many brands fail by diversifying too early.
- Creative Volume: Purdy & Figg’s strategy included running 180 shoots per year, focusing on high-quality output before moving into diverse channels.
Shifting Towards Creative Diversity
- New Channels: Jack discusses transitioning towards more diverse marketing channels including TV, radio, and podcasts.
- Creative Operations: A structured approach to creative, treating it like a funnel that involved significant capacity building in production.
Customer Acquisition Insights
- Targeting Focus: Jack speaks to the importance of focusing on one channel (Meta, for example) before diversifying to effectively understand and leverage customer acquisition strategies.
- Consumer Insight: They conducted a detailed segmentation study of their customer base to refine their branding and marketing efforts.
Measurement and Marketing Strategy
- TV Campaigns: A case study of a house test for regional TV ads demonstrated that initial poor performance can lead to high long-term gains in customer acquisition.
- Incremental Growth: The effectiveness of brand advertising over time shows a significant increase in customer awareness and organic growth.
Company Structure and Scaling
- Team Structure: Rubin outlines a dual structure with dedicated brand and growth teams, including departments for retention, product management, performance, and creative.
- Leadership Evolution: Jack discusses the need for personal growth in leadership as the company scales, emphasizing trust, feedback, and candor in organizational culture.
Long-term Vision
- Patience in Growth: Jack articulates a vision for building a lasting brand over decades rather than aiming for quick returns.
- Future Plans: Although Jack acknowledges the need to eventually diversify markets and products, he emphasizes further developing their subscription model and optimizing their existing product in the UK first.
Family Dynamics
- Collaboration with Family: Jack discusses the benefits and challenges of working with family in business, emphasizing open communication and shared goals.
Key Takeaways
- Ruthless Focus: Prioritize narrowing efforts to maximize effectiveness and efficiency before expanding.
- Creative Strategy: Invest in creative in-house operations to increase the volume and quality of output.
- Long-term Thinking: Building a successful brand takes time; patience and strategic planning are crucial.
- Adaptation: Stay flexible and willing to adjust strategies based on customer insights and market feedback.
- Leadership Development: Continuous learning and adapting leadership styles are essential as a company grows.
Conclusion Jack Rubin’s journey with Purdy & Figg illustrates the importance of focused execution, robust creative strategies, and the willingness to adapt. His insights into marketing, brand building, and leadership provide valuable lessons for those in the D2C space.
For more information, you can find Jack on [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com) and [Twitter](https://twitter.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00We now have about one in 20 households in the UK using Purdy and FIG coming up to 6-7 % now and half a million active members.
0:12So yeah, welcome to another episode of DTC Diaries. We're joined by Jack Rubin today, co-founder at Purdy and Fig. I think the way I would describe you guys and yourself, sharp operational thinking, ruthless focus, and that fusion of brand and performance-led mentality. So welcome to the show. Thank you. Good to be here. Been chasing you down for a while. We got there. probably the hardest guest to to get on it's been a slog yeah tough man's pinned down but yeah very excited to have you here i think i echo what luke says i always use you as a reference point when talking to other brands around just amazing like operation and like simple how fast and like keeping things focused and simple can be because i know we've had a lot of conversations around that in the past so excited to dig into some of that throughout the focus yes yeah it's your pinned LinkedIn Twitter post as well, isn't it?
1:06Around the values of the business and one of them being around Ruthless Focus. So yeah, but I guess for people that don't know you or don't know the brand, just give us a quick synopsis, backstory, the brand up until this point and we'll get into some more tactical stuff after that. Sure, yeah. So I'm the CEO at Purdy and Fig and one of the co-founders. So we started six years ago now. um it all came out of my my mum called purdy and her great friend called charlotte fig who started making cleaning products in the kitchen at home and they were just making products they wanted to use but over time their friends would start to say oh can you make us some and they're like we'll do better than that we'll teach you how to make it so they start to run these workshops to teach their friends how to make cleaning products and my brother and i were both entrepreneurs and in kind of a dead end in terms of what we wanted to do next.
2:01And so we saw kind of the passion and interest from mum's friends. And I kind of saw early signs of product market fit in the concept she was working on. So we said to her, mum, can we launch this as a brand? You know, are you planning to do anything with it? And she was like, no, no, I'm just doing this as like a hobby, you know, and I'm going to keep doing it, but please go ahead. We can launch brand. So then in 2020, we started the business. We hired a PhD chemist as our first move, raised a bit of seed capital and spent two years developing our formula for counter clean, which has now got a patent.
2:44And it was a long slog to get there because it's a really complex bit of science to try and do what we were doing with essential oils and surfactants in a really concentrated form that you can add to water to create cleaning products at home. And so yeah, we launched CounterClean in the end of 2022. And then we've been lucky enough to go on a great journey since. We now have about one in 20 households in the UK using Purdy and Fade coming up to six, seven percent now, and half a million active members. So yeah, we're very lucky and fortunate. Yeah, you've got amazing family penetration on my side, for sure.
3:26I think every single household in my family probably has your product, including us, which is, yeah, I can, it's crazy that level of penetration though. Like when you put it like the sheer percentage of homes you've got into, I guess that's great to hear, but also maybe a bit scary when you're thinking about growth into the future. so Nespresso is at 18 % household penetration so that's always been kind of where I think we can get to in the UK as like a benchmark a great brand with pretty widespread appeal a bit overrated though Nespresso Nespresso but they just they did a great job of making home coffee decent.
4:17Remember when they first kind of, it must have been when we were a bit younger, but remember they first kind of popped off and everybody kind of, those little like espresso pods machines. Yeah, remember that whole ride. But that's interesting. You've still got a long way to go then, I guess, through that. If you make the right moves. Yeah. Yeah. I saw you spoke about, you were speaking to a seasoned operator, DTC founder, who had gone from your scale to multiple nine figures. one thing he said is to continue to scale, you need to be making ruthless big swings every year to become more efficient and retain efficiency.
4:53What was that big swing for you this year? Yeah, it's very true. So every single year, you're going to see your CPMs go up 10 % at least. And then you're going into the next, let's call it the next 10 % of your audience. So I say your cat's going up 20 % a year because you times those two things together, right? So you need to grow 20 % a year. You therefore need to take a swing every year that improves your efficiency by 40%. That's essentially how you have to think about growing a business. 40 % year on year improvement just to grow 20 % year on year. So yeah, you need to take big swings.
5:40So last year, our big swing was creative volume. We went really hard on that and built a team, a big team, before it was really a thing to do around creative volume and a process. That was really powerful. This year, it's really been top of funnel. So introducing TV, radio, podcasts, and YouTube awareness spend at a pretty serious level, but measuring it properly, testing it properly to help grow the pool of customers we can go after. Yeah, we've really honed in on the brand this year. It's all right. And then you, yeah, you've spoken a little bit about this, but what success have you seen there?
6:23I think you shared some interesting insights about how new customer acquisition over time was improving. What are some of the key learnings and takeaways from going through that process? And I guess what advice do you have for founders out there that are maybe looking to bring that into their marketing mix?
6:45I guess my main bit of advice for founders looking to scale new customer acquisition is around focus in terms of what channel they're using. So what I see a lot of early stage founders do is diversify too quickly across channels. what we found was just focusing on one one area and becoming really really good at it is much more powerful um actually we we diversify too early even as well ourselves and that was still we were we probably started diversifying at 20 million and that was still too early we weren't ready yet to really understand how new channels contribute and that's focusing on meta i'm assuming like everyone should be obsessing around that until it's like a system that can run Not necessarily meta, it depends on your business.
7:30So meta influences or search, I would say. Search shopping are kind of the three buckets, depending on whether you're demand capture, demand creation.
7:42Yeah.
7:46But yeah, become really good at one thing before spreading yourself too thin. Interesting. What did that process of becoming? you mentioned i want to dissect both the the creative team build because i think that's really interesting to talk about because um i i always use you guys as a reference so just just when people ask me like what's an example of a brand who are doing creative internally at volume incredibly well i always reference you guys because i think you're the sheer and you've kind of pivoted this more recently from what you said the other day but the sheer volume and quality and then the growth that came as a factor of that um that you guys are pumping out is crazy how did you how did that evolve over that period of that year like how did you build that out what was the kind of approach to that i think the big unlock with the with the creative ops was seeing it as a funnel um and every stage of the funnel needs needs to be addressed um on its own so um since you've got you've got asset creation at the start of the funnel which is you know ugc videos you're doing location shoots you're doing studio shoots etc etc it might be even AI now at the beginning of the funnel.
8:59Then you've got script writing, then you've got video editing, and then you've got upload into the account and testing as your kind of your main functions. And then it was just essentially adding process and volume into each area. So as we added more script writers, we added more shoots and more production people, and then we added more video editors and essentially just looked at where things were slowing down the process and just adding heads. So I got to a stage where we had six video editors, sorry, and lots of different script writers. And I think we did, last year we did 180 shoots. If you can imagine that.
9:43So it's just, it's like, you know, multiple shoots a week, every single week. so um yeah just a really simple funnel really that you just have to attack individually you spoke about script writers there specifically are you isolating creative strategy and script writing or do you see that role which traditionally i guess more in an agency setting the creative strategist would be building the creative strategy but then also doing more executional things like concepting scripting how are you approaching that uh yeah we we've merged them um so our script writers are script creative strategists as well i remember you talking about how you onboard script writers into the business you just get them writing a ridiculous amount of scripts like you're hiring from big agency weren't you yeah yeah we took the approach of getting really creative people from big agencies who are used to doing big brand assets they have the creative mind and we did a whole bunch of creative tests um in the interview stage which uh you speak to us drachis now uh you know they still they still talk about their interviews um you know me sitting there and asking them how many uses can you get out of a brick in 60 seconds and then you basically plot their answers on a graph of of usefulness and how rare the answers are and you basically get a sense of how creative they are those kind of tests um so we we pick people out of agencies but they were used to working on literally like one part of one project for a year or 18 months so that the way they thought about creative strategy was just just slow and different so baptism of fire like the way to deal with that was to get them to to i said you can you can write about one angle and one persona and you need to write you know x many scripts a week 30 a week or something and that and you could only do that one angle so it was just forcing them into this very narrow tight brief and they had to think of every single way of writing that script first and getting used to doing that and then do it for the next angle and so on and it was just a great way of training them I love that and I remember Ollie mentioned that to me and that was probably end of last year and we kind of had this at times you know some people come into the business and they they're able to just produce volume and produce at speed but then a lot of the time it's not the case and i think we went through an evolution of how we onboarded our creative strategist where we were too slow and i think it's a great learning where we made that flip as well to like from day one rather than oh you know we're going to introduce you to the concept of this and you know watching videos to literally just execution volume speed you've got x amount of time to do this amount of scripts because i again with creatives as a quote did this documentary years ago about this artist and he said you know you never p you never finish a piece of art artists don't finish a piece of art they just decide to stop and i think it's the same with this so you need to almost create uh the boundaries of where they can work within and get them used to the behaviors of working at speed and scale so yeah those constraints are really really powerful as well um constraints in general are powerful always um uh but yeah it's i remember reading a um an article about a photography competition and i think i did i tell you about this but i think yeah i mean i was done study wasn't it yeah so they they got they got two groups and one group they were like you need to spend three months trying to get one photo that's amazing and you know it was just just try what that one photo the other group they said um you take as many photos as you possibly can as a way of a way of um entering this photography competition and you know in almost every case the group that were taking loads and loads and loads of photos produced not only the best photo but like the top five photos versus the group trying to perfect and it was just that iteration and learning of producing so many and seeing what worked, what lighting worked, the angles.
13:51And these were professional photographers even. So they already had the knowledge and information. That really stuck with me, that study. Feedback loop is shortening that feedback loop, right? And I imagine that's the same with those people who are coming from big agency. They've had the feedback loop stretch over like 18 months. So to come into a setting where you get data day one when you make an artist. They love it as well. Must be so refreshing. They really enjoy that part of it, I find. Yeah, 100%. Yeah, the quantity creates the quality. And I guess we've almost gone through another iteration of that with Andromeda and recent updates to Andromeda and how creative similarity now impacts reach, cost fatigue is changing.
14:28How are you thinking about volume differently now versus last year? I'm a bit slow on this now because I'm not as tight to, you know, creative, that level of tactical creative. I know that we're slowing down volume a bit in order to focus more on quality, more because diversity is so important. And so it's just being a bit more intentional about how we create those diverse assets. So fewer, slightly fewer, still a lot, but slightly fewer, more diverse assets. um so that's just one small change we made recently but i think i think uh obviously the the pursuit of more diversity from a brand perspective often comes from a from a slowdown in reach and in like a an inability to still grow we did a podcast the other day and with happy the happy stack guys and you mentioned during that episode how your audience demographic has shifted over the last sort of eight 12 to 18 months or maybe even a short time frame yeah through some of this other off channel activation um it'd be good to hear a bit about that i know you've mentioned that it's gone from like exclusively for like 40 plus house women basically and now you've really got strong penetration in that 30 to 40 demographic yeah do you where do you think that's been driven by is that off a meta um some of this top of funnel activity a bit of a combination of the two so i think it started with our branding changes um so we did a rebrand in September 24, which just brought the brand, made the brand a bit more modern.
16:10Still got the same idea. It was subtle in some ways, but like... It was subtle. It was like a subtle elevation, I guess you'd probably call it. Yeah, exactly. We didn't want to mess with the boat too much. But yeah, and we wanted to keep our existing audience. But we did a huge segmentation study into our customer base that was incredibly detailed, looking at all the characteristics. why they were buying and the different segments of the cleaning market and how we our customer base matched to the wider demographic of the country and we just found some really interesting insights about who our customer was and we then created a bit of a bullseye of that customer called Victoria and from there we did our rebrand and the reason we chose Victoria's group was that they had the biggest halo effect.
17:04Not only did they make up about 25 % of the country, but they had the biggest halo effect on the other groups. So if we got Victoria, then we would also get 10 % of nurturing controllers. You won't know what that means, but they're kind of these different terms or 10 % of sustainability people and whatever else. So we kind of stacked up the town from there. And then we just ruthlessly kind of went after that core audience with our rebrand and top of funnel channels. So we moved into doing radio last year as a first test. And then we tested TV this year at quite decent volume. And then we've gone into podcasts and YouTube awareness quite heavily as well.
17:49So that's brought a whole load of additional people in market for us. So you can see our awareness and consideration data has jumped significantly. and then we use that to calculate what you call an in-market audience which is essentially how many people are aware of you and are considering to buy you that you haven't already converted and we track that because we know how that links to our customer base so if we drive that up we're able to drive our customer base up like a leading indicator on future conversions yeah we know we know what percentage of that audience we've historically converted yeah and so it's just about keeping those ratios relatively stable over time um and it's allowed us to yeah push into a wider group yeah i think on the brand piece it's it's really interesting because i was actually having a chat with a with a founder the other day and the way that i think different brands look at purdy and fig in the market is is almost this idea of you know they look at purdium fig as a lifestyle brand versus a brand that's heavy problem and solution us versus them which is which is an interesting uh insight i'd love to know like how you view i don't think they used to by the way i think that's been something that happened in the last eight 12 months or so exactly that's what i want to almost tap into because i think it's it's interesting how you use positioning um through your branding you know i've heard you talk about with the the most expensive cleaning product but the cheapest candle things like this how are you how are you thinking about that what i guess that what was that journey like over the last nine to twelve months as you say to to get to the point where brands view you in that way um it requires quite a lot of investment um so it's like put your money where your mouth is basically um so you need to elevate the creative you need to elevate the design you need to invest in the packaging and then you need to invest in channels that aren't dr because dr will never create lifestyle dr will convert really efficiently and really well but ultimately we've seen the data on our awareness and consideration um it it does some but not a lot of considerate in fact dr can negatively affect consideration um we've seen that in some of our studies so like essentially piss people off with advertising right yeah too much frequency high frequency and and message offers and wrong messages so you've got to basically change your mindset but i mean i'm a dr guy from from my background but i had to i i'm yeah i accepted the first principles thinking that you can only convert someone if they are in market and considering to buy you.
20:44And once you accept that, you start to understand marketing theory a bit better and you then have to change your mindset and commit to a new way of thinking. So I think I wouldn't recommend doing it too early because if you start making those investments before you can afford it, it can become problematic. We've seen the examples of brand-centric D2C companies blow a load of money and not do very well. I think you need to get the balance right between the two and introduce it, you know, in an affordable way when you've got the cash to do so. And so you don't think it's possible to be viewed as a lifestyle brand unless you are looking at those bigger brand activations, TV ads, you know, more brand focused campaigns.
21:35You can, you can amongst a small group of people, yeah. And, but it still requires investment, you know, making good creative is not cheap at all. Like a good piece of video creative is going to set you back 30, 40 ,000 pounds. That's the truth. And I'd love to know like how you're approaching that balance of brand and elevation, especially now where, you know, with the introduction of VO3, now Sora 2, how are you thinking about AI within your creative mix and how that could potentially, I guess, impact that elevation of the type of creative that you're producing. So we're using it definitely for the hiring creative.
22:19It's really helping us push into concepts that would used to cost maybe a couple hundred thousand to make and we can make them 50 ,000. So it's supplementing real production and a lot of great thinking on the creative direction side with some AI for the imagination and for the ability to just capture those particularly odd shots. So we're doing an amazing Christmas campaign at the moment about our Christmas scent, Frankincense and Myrrh. And the whole concept is Santa Claus comes down the chimney and he forgets to deliver presents because he spots a bottle of Purdy and Fig on the kitchen counter and just starts cleaning all night.
22:59So it's whenever I'm still Christmas. But to actually do that, we had to use quite a lot of AI to like get the reindeers and have them coming down. Cause that's like, that would be really expensive to do in real life. So it made that video possible. It still costs us a lot of money to make, but probably a third or a quarter as much as it would have. And are you using it at all for more of your DR focused creative? Or is it more just for the more elevated? I think we're using it to help with script writing and concept writing. And I think we're using it to swap out hooks and B-roll and that kind of thing.
23:39But we're not using it to like create full ads because we just haven't found it to be effective at doing that yet. Yeah, agreed. I think we're definitely a way off that. It's definitely, we're doing a lot of the similar stuff there, like hook variations, B-roll, but still haven't found it to be anywhere near as close in terms of outperforming real creative. I want to come back to that, um, that, that shift in brand perception. Cause I think it's really interesting. Um, cause I would also say that it's the, the, the brands become like almost like more aspiration and luxury over a period of time.
24:18I've followed the journey for like the whole path of growth. And it feels like when I've seen the TV ad and I hear the, the radio and podcast as I heard one this morning, actually on my football podcast. Why is it always on the football world? someone's buying that athletic podcast athletic podcast is quite like um it's like it's like paid for journalism so i think it is quite like an aspirational audience maybe that's fine maybe they're hoping in your buyers like listening in the background whilst the partner's like yes exactly football chat you know it's new market potentially yeah um got me um but but the the delivery of that um radio format the presentation of that tv ad is super elevated it's like you're trying to make the routine of cleaning like sexy almost and like and i think that's a really interesting like thing people are trying to do across the across those more boring routine categories now how did you start from purely brand work to build that concept or did you pull learnings from say a meta from a messaging perspective um i guess did you start ground up from from research or did you yeah use some of the data you've got you had previously yeah Yeah.
25:29So with brand work, we've gone really hard on the vision. So from the beginning, when we started, the idea was transform cleaning from a chore to a joy. That's always been the brand's vision. So the insight there was that my mum and Charlotte had basically had to use cleaning products their whole lives and they never liked a single product they used for 30, 40 years. And so the real concept behind the brand is how can we change the experience of the products so that you just enjoy cleaning a little bit more. There was a famous quote by Shirley Conran, who recently passed away, which was, we'd all rather lie on the sofa than clean under it.
26:08So no one, you know, it's a thing you kind of just have to do. But if you're going to have to do it, you may as well have a product that you actually enjoy and like using. And we were always tackling that experience with lovely packaging, amazing scents and simplicity. So in the cleaning aisle, it was, you know, 15 products for different surfaces and we created one simple product that can do everything. So it's demystifying it a bit, making it, and then decluttering your home as well. So all the elements of it were just about enjoying the product a bit more. And so we just wanted to take that idea and get it into brand advertising.
26:47Because I think it's a powerful idea and I think it's a different idea in terms of the cleaning category itself. It's obsessed with data and stats. kill 99.9 % or if you look at your recent fairy ad you know this now is 12x times concentrated or it's um you know you get an extra 20 % in the bottle it's it's very kind of functional and um and that all comes out of basically post-world war ii mad men style advertising agencies that realized if they told women um that they were using um certain products in that had certain properties it made them feel like they were looking after their home properly which elevated their status um and so it's all come out of basically uh um yeah advertising theory this this this way cleaning products are sold um and if you don't know if you've ever noticed but it's it's very male so yeah the way clean was advertised arm and hammer Mr.
27:48Bang Mystically like you know it's all men helping women essentially with their their task which was like the advertising idea at the time and we just wanted to completely buck against all of that and do something very different it's really interesting because like that stats like leverage of stats it's like do you think that has like a life cycle because obviously it worked for a period of time and then it almost like becomes normalised in like an expected baseline A bit like how you've, like, sustainability was, like, a core marketing angle early 2000s. Like, you could build a brand on solely the idea of being, like, eco-friendly.
28:27Or natural, yeah. And, like, that's just not, you can't, it's like a secondary tertiary USP, you know. I guess that could be, you could kind of see that similar, I guess. Like, it should just be expected that it kills 99 % of germs in your house, right? It's cleaning, cleaning products. So, interesting to see how you've kind of latched onto that. um yeah i think it does go it advertising definitely goes in cycles but the context and culture changes yeah so i think people now want to connect much more to their products we've seen the kind of move into lifestyle across loads of categories and that just hasn't really properly happened in cleaning yet so it was always going to happen eventually and we're just i think at the forefront of that that change um and that's contributed directly to that shift in in age do you think that's contributed directly to that shift in age demographic of your customer base as you've managed to successfully execute on that kind of aspirational sort of i think i think that's right yeah i think that's right yeah i think just sticking to our our vision and getting that out there has really helped makes sense i want to touch on measurement of those because you ran a really extensive detailed house test on tv yeah and tv is very intimidating for brands partly for investment but partly from a from when you've lived and breathed direct response the idea that you can't get feedback in a day is terrifying right um it's also terrible from a cash flow perspective so when you run a tv ad you have to buy the media something like eight weeks before you need to reserve the slot 12 weeks before then you need to pay all up front eight weeks before so if you're spending like let's just say notionally half a million quid or a million quid on a TV ad.
30:07It's a million quid eight weeks before it goes live. Almost no payback straight away. Most payback comes after six months, let's say. So you're basically a million quid down for like nine months. Just sat there staring at your house dashboard. Like, please, please, show up, show up. So brutal from a cash flow. You need to have the money to do it. Yeah, makes sense. Sorry. So yeah, how did you approach measurement of that? And then I guess it'd be great to hear how that's then played out from like an impact perspective? So we ran TV regionally to understand essentially how the areas that we ran the TV ad performed over time against the areas that didn't, because we knew there wouldn't be a direct response payback from the TV activity.
30:51So we set up a house test where we just took the region where the TV ads were running and we didn't run any other tests in the whole period. We ran the TV ad and then we did a post-treatment window, which is essentially how long you keep measuring the latent effect for we did that for the longest i think house have ever done it we did it for six months yeah um so essentially keeping all variables the same for six months in a region and just seeing how many customers came in in that region over six months versus the region we didn't run the tv in did you homogenize the regions like was did you use any like post codes or was it just a city um we yeah we use postcodes postcodes homogenized yeah makes sense So what we found, which was really interesting.
31:34So first, while the TV ads were live, which was about a month, we saw some customers come in, but it was pretty horrendous, right? You're talking like below 0.1 returns. Were you nervous? Not really, because I expected it. I expected it. And our brand director was like reassuring me that, you know, it was absolutely fine. So yeah, 0.1 return, really, really poor. you're kind of thinking, this is not great. As we kept running the post-treatment window, though, we found that more customers were coming in every week that we got further out from the activity than while the activity was live. So let's say we got about 500 customers a week during the activity from it.
32:18In the two weeks after activity, it was 700 customers a week. In the seventh and eighth week it was 900 customers a week in the ninth and tenth week it probably stayed the same and then it kind of leveled out I can't remember the exact number but and it just kept going at that level for the whole six months so the overall ICAC was just coming down and down and down and down eventually we switched off because the test starts to lose significance as you get too far away from the event but we did some modeling and basically figured out that over like a year or two based on some pretty conservative assumptions about how that changes over time that incremental customer again uh it's like the by far the most efficient activity we run um so it's it's pretty pretty crazy but it costs and it's and it's nerve-wracking and the cash flow is hard but the payback is i think pretty substantial and across those three channels tv right did you do the same across podcast and radio yeah we've done the same across all three hierarchy of the three tv well podcast is actually like is acting more as a DR channel for us even though we run the brand ad so that's been really interesting and then yeah TV's better than radio but radio's still still strong and then YouTube we're running at the moment with a house to compare to TV and so far it's very similar makes sense but like YouTube and connected TV stuff pretty bullish on YouTube in general I just think there's so much inventory to be had there that it's like, if you can get it to work.
33:56Yeah, and CPMs are amazing. It's got so much upside. It's just brands don't give it enough time and like stick with it and really focus on creative. That's super interesting. So I guess you just use that, just double down from there. Like just... Yeah, I mean, it's just like working out how much to invest in terms of both cashflow and also percentage of marketing mix and just do it being sensible, but also trying to invest in the future because there's obviously a P &L hit. And you need to factor that into the way you run your business. So yeah, just trying to keep it going. What's really interesting is if you keep doing it, so we've been doing it a year now, and what happens every time you run the activity, you're essentially, the way you see it actually come through in your data is your baseline organic.
34:45So your baseline organic coming from brand search. Direct referral traffic. Direct referral, that kind of thing. it kind of just jumps up and then it just stays there and then it jumps up again and it stays there and what i've been looking at is like if we kept running this for you know another two or three years at the same jump up rates in organic baseline in year kind of three and four of our financial plan we could be getting like half of the customers we're acquiring now for free um which which would transform our pnl i mean we would be insanely profitable if that started happening so um yes it costs and it's an investment but if you actually plan over a five-year period of how it can how it can change your business it's pretty substantial very cool really cool yeah i mean i'd love to touch on go back to people because i know you've scaled how many people do you have in house now 70 odd um so we've got our own factory which makes it uh so a bit more complicated um because we run a we run a mixing and bottling line factory um but we've got about 60 people in london 30 in our factory and then probably 20 international cool and what roughly does that in in terms of your operate the operations and marketing what What does that team look like right now?
36:12In the marketing side? Yeah. So we essentially have a brand team and a growth team. And I've got a leader in each that sit on my leadership team and exec group and report into me. And in our growth team, we have retention, which includes, which is basically email and SMS. then we have product um a product team which is um like more of a typical structure of a product team you'd find a um genuine product company like a twitter or revolute or something in terms of product managers and scrum teams doing working in groups with designers ux people uh product managers um and within that team they're split into acquisition and retention in their work and then you've got performance team as well um looking after acquisition um you know on all the key channels so that's growth and then you've got performance creative sitting under performance in our in our business and on the brand team we have all of our creative production um in the brand team we have a creative director design our design team and then also um influences and brand management.
37:27So yeah, that's how we split that. And what would you say, what would you say you've had to unlearn as a founder to, to I guess, let the company scale to a point that's beyond your direct control? It's so much learning. So I think the only way you can kind of continue to lead your company as it grows through this, this stage is by, being very intentional about learning as much as you can about how to run a company of this of this size and learning about leadership learning about management organizational design these things they're not easy so I've had you know so many coaches over the last two or three years that I pay a lot of money to so I can ask questions about leadership and management and structure to all the time.
Read the full transcript
38:24And then I've got a chairman who has been a CEO for 40 years that I speak to every single week for multiple hours a week. And that's really been the way I've managed that process. I'd say the big, the big learning is leadership and management. Because when you get to this, you know, this number of people, you can't control everything. As you say, you need to have a really trusted group of people that run the business for you. Um, and you need to motivate them in the right way, lead them in the right way, set the strategy in the right way, um, for them to go and be successful. So that's very different to when I was running Facebook ads and doing managing creatives and, you know, basically doing every job in the business, running customer service um but it's an enjoyable change i mean if you were doing that stuff forever it would get pretty dull because it's not intellectually particularly intellectually stimulating to do forever um it's really good to know how to do but you want that change in in experience and learning so i've really enjoyed it yeah no one thing that stands out about yourself is and you're very intentional in terms of leadership management and also by the sounds of things hiring as well and just how you approach that which I think is more on the rare side with with d2c operators or founders and I think that's really interesting I would love to know what maybe over the last 12 to 18 months what are some of the biggest areas that you feel like you've evolved that's made you into the leader that you are today?
40:06Maybe, you know, some of the learnings that you've taken from some of the mentors that you have or some of the ways that you have just really got to the point that you are right now. And obviously it's a continuous journey, right? Evolution, but what do you think has made you that today? I don't think I'm all that, to be honest. So I wouldn't be able to say there's, I've still got so much to learn about leadership and management.
40:34so yeah i i hate to kind of wax lyrical about it well not not in the sense of we're at the end point now but you know you will have over the last 12 months grown as a leader yeah like you know like are you know are there are there specific things that you've i mean i think i think um integrity and honesty and trust i think are the big things in leadership so being fair being honest treating people properly candor giving people proper feedback proper expectations clear objectives those are the things that people both need and respond to and build trust over time because you say what you're going to do and you do it and you treat people properly.
41:27I think those are the principles I try and implement day to day. And then you've also got to trust your people to do great work and not tell them how to do things and let them make mistakes. So it's kind of, yeah, those have been my main lessons. Nice. Yeah, that's great. I love that you mentioned candor there. That's something we've been really bullish on this year. and it's one of our company values now. We brought it in around the start of the year and seen like a massive impact and thriving candor, not even, you know, just downwards, but upwards as well and side to side and everywhere within the business.
42:06And that almost the, something that really stuck with me was the idea of like being kind, not nice. And nice is telling people what you want them to hear. Kind is giving feedback with, you know, productivity, honesty, empathy. Feedback is so powerful. honestly. So the big thing I'd recommend founders do if you're at an earlier stage is implement processes now that seem ridiculous, but it gets you into the habit of doing it. So for instance, OKRs, you don't need OKRs when you're a team of five, you don't. But actually just doing OKRs, having mid-year reviews, having quarterly updates for the objectives, having your feedback sessions going through that process giving those forums for feedback and objective setting although it feels ridiculous that size because like you know what do we need to align we're a small team we just know what we're doing it actually is a really powerful thing to do and I did it really early and I remember me and my brother debating it because he he's like I'm not doing that um and I was like yeah I but I think it paid off to be honest 100 % yeah it's it's in it comes down to values as well like the sooner you can implement values and behaviors into a business the better because it's much harder to do at a later point I think that's super interesting because we as an agency when we were even when we just saw we implemented OKRs and I always like we do quite a bit of like agency mentoring through various forms for other agency owners and it's always like when you see other agencies it's like you get this context of like what do you like when you compare them to yourselves like what what's allowed us to maybe get beyond certain revenue bottlenecks and growth trajectories that maybe others get like stuck out and a lot of it for me comes down to those areas that you'd class as being a little bit more like boring like business operations like hr reviews the the setting the okr frameworks a lot of the back-end biz ops that that people just don't think about this they spend all of the time like just on like marketing or just on sales or just on um service delivery and we implemented okrs when we were probably about 10 to 12 people and oh yeah it's a huge block of a company it's like not not putting in proper structure and process around performance um for sure sorry i want to talk a bit about forward looking because um again from speaking from previous conversations you you break growth levers for dc runs into like three sections right what are those three areas always think about channels products and markets as the three ways you can grow yeah so you we've touched a bit on channels with some of this diversification well you've got sales channels and marketing channels i guess so yeah so i mean sales channels in terms of you know are Are you DTC?
45:08Are you in wholesale? Yeah, makes sense. Are you in retail? Those three. So looking forward, say, we're obviously coming up to Q4, so maybe playbooks may be set for then. But looking into next year, how are you thinking about evolving the business in pursuit of further growth into next year? So we've never tapped any of the levers. So we're now six years in, and we're still one product, really, one market, one channel. some serious focus and restraints as well like yeah major restraint and a lot of people have been telling me for a long time we're going to run out of time um we need to expand this we need to expand that my view is that your tam is there's no thick ceiling on your tam your tam is dependent on your work.
45:56So if we expand markets and channels, especially markets, we will, our time in the UK will be limited by the distraction of being able to grow in other markets. So for that reason, I've always, I've always wanted to hold it off for as long as possible. And to be honest, that's still my view now. So even at our penetration, I think we should spend another two or three years focusing on improving our subscription model, improving our product for CounterClean and improving our marketing in the UK. I think we've got so much longer to go on that. So it's a really boring answer, but I'm not planning really to tap on any of the major growth leaves, even at this stage for the foreseeable.
46:49Makes sense. Can't argue with it if it's worked. I guess it depends on the vertical as well in terms of like when you make that shift to more diversification or skew diversification. Because I guess with where you are in cleaning, the TAM is likely quite big, right? Well, I think only because we've... Because you've probably generated significant... Yeah, I think the TAM isn't that big. I mean, the cleaning, surface cleaning market in the UK is like 300 million pounds. Do you feel like there's a concept of like rising tyres lift all boats must help you a little bit as you've obviously getting probably more competitors into the space.
47:33Have you felt an effect of any of their work in like growing the category as a whole? Not really, to be honest. We've not seen a huge amount of direct competition. I think that's partly because we've built a really good moat around what we're doing it's pretty hard to i think copy the exact set of things we do um for purdy and fig makes sense but yeah i mean look obviously there are some businesses that need to expand you know product channels markets faster than we've done um my general view though is that most businesses do it way too early and they could they could wait many years before doing it um and that by doing it, they overcomplicate their businesses.
48:20They lose focus on what matters. The business becomes inefficient, things conflict. So just to give an example, I mean, if you're running multiple markets with a small team or multiple channels, you just have internal conflicts around what to prioritize. I mean, your team can only create so much creative for each market or a channel like wholesale or grocery may conflict with your DTC channel and your marketing team have to create completely different materials for those two channels. And they might cannibalize each other. So you just create all this internal conflict and difficult decision-making.
48:58Whereas when you're simple and focused, it's so clear to everyone. This is what we're focusing on, UK creative, UK influencers. How do we get better at that? There's no competing resource or no competing focus area. um and that's i think really powerful so yeah my advice to people would be to be if they're thinking oh i'd really like to go to market to wait a year and then see what happens and then when that year goes see if you can wait another year yeah keep doing that well it's clearly working so um no i i completely agree i think like when you distill strategy down to its core Like part of that is just prioritisation and the simpler that becomes, the easier the strategy is.
49:45Yeah, definitely. And what, because I know what, I was listening to you talk in another podcast and you mentioned, you know, ideally you wouldn't ever sell the business because your goal is to build it into an empire. I mean, what does that look like? Because empire building often requires some level of expansion, vertical play, taking away from focus. So what does that look like? No, no, yeah. Eventually we will do all of it. Yeah. No doubt about it. But I think great consumer brands are built over a decade or two decades. You know, we've got this idea, you know, partly from the DTC, the first DTC wave, that you can build a billion dollar brand in three or four years.
50:27So yeah, you can if you raise 150 million quid and you never make any money. But if you want to build a lasting brand that's genuinely got operational modes, that really knows how to do a small set of things really well, I believe you stay focused. And then you build in those channels, markets and products one at a time at the right time, slowly and confidently. and that means it will take probably 20 years to build a multi-billion dollar brand but that's okay like if i was to sell purley and fig i just want to start another brand and i like this brand um so i'm in no rush um and so that's kind of my approach with with the whole exit question yeah student in the game just love love the game playing the game um which makes a lot of sense yeah i mean we we will one day i i think probably sell um and there will be opportunities for our team to to make money from there we've got an esop scheme our whole team is part of so they will be able to you know cash out shares along the way and we will one day sell but I don't run the business like that.
51:45I run it like, what's the best way to run the business? And if someone comes along one day and offers insane money that makes everyone very rich, we'll consider it. Yeah. I feel like one of your biggest superpowers, just from speaking to you today is, is patience, which is something that, as you said, indeed, see, especially, you know, since COVID and how it's created this idea that we need quick fixes, we need to be scaling quickly um would you agree yeah no i i mean i'm impatient in many ways i mean i think i'm bloody nightmare to work with i think you need a nice balance of the two right you need to be patient in like the macro and like impatient in the mic yeah yeah exactly pace i feel like one of the biggest jobs of a ceo is to inject pace into a business but then have restraint and patience on a longer term time horizon which i think you display i think that's right yeah and um most of the value you'll accrue in a business will come in the last few years so and if you look at any of the great entrepreneurs or investors like warren buffett i think had like a billion dollars when he was 60 yeah and then he's you know one of the richest men in the world now and well i think it might be when he was 70 i can't quite remember but he's made basically all of his money in the last like 15 years do you follow him and charlie munger quite closely yeah is that their proponents of taking very very few very large bets yeah concentrated bets which i think is like a very and even when you look at the investing environment today in comparison to that it's like the complete anti thesis of like how to to to generate upside in investing yeah it's to let your winners ride basically exactly like go big on one company and hold it for 30 years which I guess is a back into some of the way you you think about 30 no yeah a bit long yeah but yeah interesting to definitely think in decades I mean one of my big reflections as a founder that I didn't realize when I started Purdy and Fig having despite having a business before that you're signing up for at least a decade at least a decade of your life and probably two it's that it's that quote from Bill Gates you underestimate you overestimate what you can do in a year and underestimate what you could do in 10.
54:06Yeah. Yeah. But, but really when you're starting a company, think about, do you want to spend the next decade or more, maybe two decades working on this thing? Because that's what it is. I mean, I will think long and hard about starting another company and what it is, because it is a serious, serious thing to do. And, you know, when I was, yeah, I didn't really realise that, to be honest, when I started. It was kind of like, oh, yeah, yeah, I'll just do this. And I was thinking in kind of one or two or three-year chunks. But now being close, you know, getting up to our first decade, it feels like we are.
54:46I'm really realising that it's a long, old journey. Yeah. Exciting. Very exciting. I would love, we don't have much time left, but I really wanted to touch on family and working with family. because I think I've worked with family members. It's gone well and not so well in some cases. Same. Yeah, same as Ollie. How have you found, how has that evolved the dynamic of your family? Because obviously your brother is your co-founder and so your mum is also co-founder of Face of the Brand. How does that work with the three of you? Yeah, I mean, working with family is great. it's such fun because you you love each other you know each other so well and i think genuinely you make great decisions so my family we always brought up with the value of debate and discussion so around the dinner table it was like politics and you know whatever else and we brought that to the business so it's like that's now so embedded in our culture at petting fig so when new people come in they're quite shocked because um you know we'll be talking about an idea or you know they'll put forward a proposal and the approach of perlian figures like pick it apart debate it for like an hour and a half two hours and a lot of challenge to get to the right answer and people find it quite shocking because it's there used to be an environment where it's like oh no no yeah that's just your thing go ahead and we're not doing it to control it's just all of us finding the best answer always been a big part of our culture um so yeah that all came from the family dynamic, basically, and that trust that you get in family just to be able to discuss things and, and know that you're truth seeking getting to the right answer for everyone.
56:32So I loved that whole side of it. As the business grows, it gets complicated, right? Because people want different things. So, you know, I wanted to continue building a company, a bigger company, I enjoyed that. But a lot of founders don't like, you know, that stage of a company. And my mum, especially um you know she's 70 i think oh god she'll kill me 68 or 69 maybe so um you know she can't work for more than you know so long um so we it was all about finding the right thing for everyone and coming to that with a lot of empathy and a lot of love around let's let's all just make sure it works for everyone along the journey.
57:18And if you do that and you put each other first the whole way, I think it works. It doesn't work if you start butting heads, being selfish, thinking you're getting hard done by or in any kind of building any resentment or not communicating. That's when I think things go pear-shaped with family. So yeah, for us, it's worked great, but you've got to bring the right mindset to it, I think. yeah I love that yeah put leaving the ego at the door almost um and debate is good debate is healthy well ego can be there but it's like let's all talk about that so it's like let's all talk about where our ego is at and how we're feeling about our ego and you know how it's all going to work rather than just like pretending it's not there and you know lots of resentment and difficult things so there's nothing wrong with ego like ego is a part of human beings you can't stop ego we've all got it but you can talk about it and then address solutions so everyone feels respected yeah transparency then speaking yeah speaking what you feel yeah yeah pretty much well jack thank you so much for for joining us today it's been an absolute pleasure yeah massive massive pleasure as always thank you thank you for coming on where can people find you um so my linkedin is is relatively active now um so just jack rubin on linkedin um and then i'm on twitter which is more dc stuff so if you want um i occasionally tweet about what i'm learning in the business i think i'm jack rubin one on twitter maybe the soap guy oh yeah yeah we'll put you in the We'll put you in the description anyway.
58:59So it's fine. See you later. Well, thank you for coming on. Thank you. Bye.
From the publisher
Purdy & Figg has quietly become one of the most impressive DTC brands in the UK. 1 in 20 households now use the product. But what’s more impressive is how they've done it:
One product. One market. One channel. For six years.
In this episode, Jack breaks down how he's stayed this focused and why most brands burn growth by diversifying too early.
We get into how Purdy & Figg became the blueprint for creative volume, running 180 shoots a year and scaling a performance team in-house before it was trendy. Now, he's pivoting again, this time toward creative *diversity*, building campaigns that stretch across YouTube, TV, podcasts and radio.
He talks honestly about the real impact of brand spend, the cash flow pain of TV, and why DR alone will never build a lifestyle brand. There's deep insight here on CAC, media mix, testing frameworks, org structure and how to lead a DTC company without losing your grip on creative.
This conversation lays out exactly how to scale performance and brand, without sacrificing either.
🚨🚀 If you're a brand spending £100K/month, we'll run your ads. Apply for your free audit here: https://eu1.hubs.ly/H0nQwsq0
