Understanding Your True LTV and Company Value | Prof. Daniel McCarthy

18 Aug 2026 · 1 h 4 min · 22 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

How to measure true customer lifetime value (CLV) and use it to assess company value, profitability path, and acquisition/retention strategy for D2C and subscription businesses.

Guest

Prof. Daniel McCarthy, founder of Theta; associate professor of marketing at the University of Maryland. Background includes a PhD in statistics (not typical marketing), prior buy-side experience, and co-founding Zodiac (predictive analytics SaaS). Theta has run paid engagements across 450+ companies (telecom, McDonald’s-like QSR, pharma, and many D2C brands) and often supports private equity diligence.

Key claims

  • 40–80% of D2C customers buy once and never return; “good customers are born, not made.”
  • CLV must be profit-based (contribution profit), include CAC and variable costs, and be discounted; “accumulated revenue per customer” is wrong.
  • CLV should diagnose whether there’s a durable path to profitability; if not, the CLV definition is incorrect.
  • Discounting often lowers both first-purchase profit and repeat CLV; it can also degrade future customer quality.
  • For non-subscription firms, churn is unobservable, requiring latent attrition models; subscription churn is easier to model but still needs cohort and seasonality handling.

Notable examples

  • “Golden cohort” effect: early cohorts repeat more; later cohorts often worsen.
  • A modeling misspecification example: ignoring a “honeymoon phase” broke predictions for a large gaming company.
  • CFO-facing reporting: cohort monetization/cost curves; NPS can be linked to monetization to make it CFO-relevant.
  • Out-of-home attribution challenge: use marketing mix modeling to capture carryover effects.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Understanding Customer Purchase Behavior

0:00 to 0:33

Learn about the high percentage of one-time buyers in D2C brands and the implications for profitability.

“For most D2C brands, 40 to 80 % of their customers are going to buy one time and they're never going to come back.”

Daniel's Background and Expertise

0:56 to 2:19

Discover Daniel's journey from academia to entrepreneurship and his focus on customer lifetime value.

“I'm delighted to be joined today online again from across the pond by Daniel McCarthy, founder of Theta and associate professor of marketing at the University of Maryland.”

The Foundation of Theta and Customer Value

2:19 to 4:34

Explore the founding of Theta, its focus on corporate valuation, and the analytics behind customer behavior.

“And, you know, probably a lot of people in the audience, you've heard about customer lifetime value.”

Engagement with Private Equity Firms

6:10 to 8:01

Learn how Theta assists private equity firms in evaluating consumer brands and understanding transaction data.

“What's like the typical questions that businesses are coming to you to answer when they're engaging with you guys?”

Metrics for Evaluating Business Health

8:01 to 10:00

Hear about the key metrics used to assess the health and growth potential of a business.

“And oftentimes, you know, for series A, series B, series C, you know, if you're growing really fast, it's enough of an indication of product market fit that, you know, you can kind of make it to the next round.”

Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Valuation

10:00 to 14:00

Understand the differences between bottom-up and top-down approaches in projecting customer lifetime value.

“I know in the deck you shared with myself that you approach like the value equation for, for consumers very much like bottom up rather than top down.”

Forecasting Customer Behavior

14:00 to 15:40

Learn how customer cohorts affect forecasting and acquisition strategies.

“Usually if they're like way off, it's because they're just not even attempting a bottoms up, you know, a bottoms up way of getting to the number.”

Understanding Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)

15:40 to 18:50

Discover the nuances of calculating CLV and its importance.

“And if acquisition is going to like jump like this, oftentimes that that's what ends up being quite unrealistic.”

Challenges in Predicting Customer Behavior

18:50 to 21:00

Explore the difficulties in predicting customer retention and behavior.

“They'll either not include CAC, they'll use revenue instead of profit, they won't discount.”

Segmenting Customers for Better Insights

21:00 to 22:40

Understand how to effectively segment customers for actionable insights.

“Yeah, turning that into actionable tactics, whether that's creative products, offer, even retention tactics makes a lot of sense.”
Show all 22 chapters

Leveraging Customer Insights for Marketing

22:40 to 24:40

Learn how to apply customer insights to improve marketing strategies.

“And the best segments are the ones that really have the most signal.”

The Impact of Discounting on Customer Value

24:40 to 28:06

Examine how discounting affects customer lifetime value and acquisition.

“I wanted to touch on that side of the equation, like AOV.”

The Impact of Discounting on Customer Quality

28:06 to 31:16

Understand how discounting can lead to lower quality customers and reduced profitability.

“So it just brings in a lower quality customer.”

Measuring Churn in Subscription Businesses

32:07 to 36:25

Learn how to measure churn effectively in subscription and non-subscription models.

“So it's definitely a question of when will subscription fatigue really hit?”

Complexity in Non-Subscription Customer Models

36:25 to 42:00

Explore the challenges and strategies in modeling customer behavior for non-subscription businesses.

“Cause the, I'd say that's the other setting that often has been getting more and more popular these days is it's not quite full subscription, but it's not full non-subscription either.”

Understanding CFO Metrics and Marketing Communication

42:00 to 45:55

Learn how to align marketing metrics with CFO expectations to enhance credibility and budgeting.

“they should be reporting into maybe the next board or leadership meeting to really tell that growth story through the lens of customer metrics rather than aggregate top-level metrics?”

Navigating Out-of-Home Marketing and Attribution Challenges

45:55 to 49:54

Explore strategies for justifying out-of-home marketing expenses and measuring their impact.

“So probably one that some of the listeners can maybe take away.”

AI's Influence on Data Insights and Consumer Behavior

49:54 to 54:27

Discover how AI is transforming data analysis and consumer purchasing decisions in today’s market.

“Can't really escape AI on a podcast nowadays.”

The Changing Landscape of Consumer Research and Decision-Making

54:27 to 56:08

Understand how AI is reshaping the decision-making process for consumers in various purchasing scenarios.

“I think that whole process is changing a lot right now.”

Consumer Behavior and AI Adoption

56:08 to 57:30

Explore how AI is influencing consumer purchasing behavior and paths to purchase.

“more educated consumer is making more considered purchases through AI.”

Macro Trends Impacting Consumer Brands

57:31 to 1:02:02

Discusses key macro trends affecting consumer brands and their strategies.

“I wanted to ask if you were to zoom out and look at say the consumer brands that you've worked on over the last 12 to 18 months, and this isn't in the notes I sent over, so sorry for putting you on the spot slightly.”

Connecting with Professor Daniel McCarthy

1:02:03 to 1:03:59

Learn how to connect with Daniel McCarthy and explore his resources.

“And then if there's any resources or things you want me to link specifically in the description that people can go to to learn a bit more, we'll definitely get those added as well.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00For most D2C brands, 40 to 80 % of their customers are going to buy one time and they're never going to come back. Delighted to be joined from across the pond, Daniel McCarthy, founder of Theta, associate professor of marketing at the University of Maryland. Good customers are born and not made. Trying to do a whole bunch of magic to try to make the bad customers into good customers is not as good of a proposition. What CLV should be able to tell you is, does this company have a really good path to profitability or not? And if you're not able to get that from CLV, then your definition of CLV is not correct.

0:32We'll often see people talking about LTV, and it's wrong on so many levels. What are some of those key metrics they should be reporting into maybe the next board or leadership meeting? I think it's a very helpful exercise to ask.

0:52Welcome back to another episode of D2C Diaries. I'm delighted to be joined today online again from across the pond by Daniel McCarthy, founder of Theta and associate professor of marketing at the University of Maryland. Definitely the most qualified person we've had on the pod. So very excited to be to be talking today. Thanks for coming on, Daniel. Great to be here. Yeah, I think I first became aware of yourself and the work that you guys are doing at the 40th event that we attended in January in New York City. And you presented on that day around some of the topics we're going to dive into over the next sort of 45 minutes to an hour.

1:38I think we've probably recorded nearly 100 episodes of the podcast to date. And we've pretty much focused every single one of those on how to acquire customers. We've not probably given enough airtime to everything else that's involved in running a successful econ brand. So really excited to kind of dive into that. I guess it'd be great just to start, as with every guest, just with a little bit of a brief introduction about yourself, your work, some of the stuff you're doing at both the university and theatre currently. Yes, I kind of wear a couple of different caps. The first is, as an academic, I've been a professor for a number of years now, since 2017.

2:18And I've been focusing on this problem of how can we predict what customers will do in the future and how can that inform an understanding of how much businesses are worth? And, you know, probably a lot of people in the audience, you've heard about customer lifetime value. And, you know, a really big question is, you know, what do you finance people think about that? How can we kind of look at that through the lens of the CFO? And so my Ph.D. dissertation was actually all about that topic. I'd spent a handful of years on the buy side before coming back for a PhD. Even though I'm a marketer, formerly my PhD is in statistics, so not your typical marketer.

2:59The other thing that I've been doing in addition to kind of teaching about customer lifetime value and doing research on CLV and how it kind of rolls up into corporate valuation is as an entrepreneur. Yeah, so I've started a few businesses. Pete Fader was my advisor in all but name back when I was at Wharton getting my PhD. We co-founded a company called Zodiac back in, I think it was 2012. And yeah, predictive analytics software as a service firm. We primarily help marketers do tactical customer acquisition and retention. again doing the same thing that I was doing for my research really you know which is let's get those hyper accurate models for what the customers are going to do and we grew it we sold it to Nike in March of 2018 took some of the proceeds and started Theta we were able to work into our non-compete with Nike that we could use very similar or even the same models as long as we primarily just worked with private equity firms pursuing customer-based corporate valuation.

4:11So as long as we're not doing work for firms like Puma and Adidas and just kind of helping PE firms kind of kick the tires on the brands that they're potentially evaluating for acquisition, I think that was kind of far enough from what they were doing that they didn't perceive it to be a threat, which it really wasn't. So we've been doing that ever since. So yeah, now Theta's been around for quite a while. We've probably run the numbers as part of paid engagements on over 450 distinct companies and really kind of runs the gamut from largest telecom firms in the world, some of the biggest quick service restaurant firms in the world like McDonald's, pharmaceutical companies, and then obviously tons and tons of direct-to-consumer brands.

4:59And so, you know, certainly a direct hit for the sort of things that we'll be talking about here. So, yes, that's, you know, I kind of been living it both as an academic and as a practitioner, which hopefully should, you know, give a pretty kind of unique, differentiated kind of perspective on a lot of these issues.

5:16Daniel McCarthy:Yeah, super interesting. Quick one before we get back into the episode. Every business spends money to make money. Ads, software, flights, travel, the hundred unavoidable little things to keep the lights on. All that spending every month and none of it comes back to you. It just goes out the door. Incard is a financial platform built for digital businesses and it flips that on its head. They're giving 2 % cash back for your first year on ads, SaaS, travel and everyday business spend. And it's all uncapped. The same money you were spending anyway, except now a slice of it runs back in your account.

5:51Daniel McCarthy:You also get multi-currency accounts, corporate cards and Shopify, Meta, Stripe and Xero connected in one place. a true source of truth. But honestly, you're spending regardless, so you may as well earn on it. Sign up for free. Use the code SWU2K26. Link's in the description. Now back to the episode. I really want to dive into the sort of service and the value that you're providing to PE firms and businesses exploring acquisitions through Theta and how maybe that can encourage sort of different ways of thinking about customer base and tying that to acquisition and retention strategies beyond that.

6:35What's like the typical questions that businesses are coming to you to answer when they're engaging with you guys? Yeah, if we're working with a growth private equity firm and they're evaluating some consumer brand, usually they have their own internal way of thinking about valuation so there are some firms that kind of come to us to you know go all the way to valuation but a number of the firms they've got you know they're positive on the company and what they want to do is they want to make sure that there's not no skeletons in the closet that could be gleaned from the the transaction data. And so you typically at the early stages, there's not as much data, there's a lot more other firms.

7:21And so the rich data is typically not made available in the data room at that point. But when the circle gets smaller, and you're kind of closer to the final stages, then usually firms will spend more, PE firms will spend more on diligence, and the potential targets will we'll put a lot more data into the data room. And so, so we'll kind of come in, you know, on behalf of the firms, the PE firms and just help them understand like, what is this telling us? Is there anything that we need to worry about? And I say that that's kind of like the big thing that, that, that PE firms would come to us most often to do.

8:04Makes sense. And I know from reading some of the material that you shared previously, you tend to do that through the lens of like a growth report card when looking at the health and quality of a business for anyone who's like listening and isn't privy to some of the frameworks used within that process would you be able to walk through what some of those main metrics are and how you approach that yeah the big thing is really uh is the company creating value through growth or not and uh you know oftentimes it can be a little bit hard to parse it all out if you don't have access to the transaction data, because you can have companies that are growing really fast.

8:44And oftentimes, you know, for series A, series B, series C, you know, if you're growing really fast, it's enough of an indication of product market fit that, you know, you can kind of make it to the next round. But, you know, a big question is, are those customers who are, you know, signing up for the first time, are they repeating? and are they kind of coming back over and over and over again or not? And if you're throwing enough marketing into customer acquisition, oftentimes you can kind of like create or kind of manufacture a lot of growth, but it won't stick. And you're kind of stuck on what I would often call the customer acquisition treadmill that you just have to like keep on throwing more and more and more money into acquisition just to kind of like keep growth up.

9:31And actually, the tricky part is if you're growing revenue quickly enough, you can give the illusion that you have more product market fit than you do, because oftentimes your overhead is not growing to the same extent. And so even if your repeats kind of bad, you still might be more profitable or less unprofitable over time because you're flexing the overhead. but actually you know if you kind of look at clv contribution profitability by cohort you know what you'd see is that there's not not a whole lot of durability there so yes i think done right if you're a pe investor and you're kind of looking at these numbers what clv should be able to tell you is does this company have a really good path to profitability or not and if you're not able to get that from clv then your definition of clv is not correct makes sense that it's interesting the point on on those businesses that may be playing more of an arbitrage play on on first order but then have like you say limited fixed costs i'm sure i'm assuming you've probably seen probably seeing more of that now with the rise of ai and how much more individual people are able to do and how that allows brands to keep that cost base down relative to maybe a few years ago and and it achieved these ridiculous sort of growth, growth numbers.

10:57I know in the deck you shared with myself that you approach like the value equation for, for consumers very much like bottom up rather than top down. So top down being more homogenous and bottom up being more like individual led. Would you be able to speak to that and like how you actually sort of quantify CLV? Yeah. The top down view is you say, you know, I can see this company has been growing well over the past four years. This is the historical growth rate. If I'm going to be conservative, let's cut it in two and assume they can kind of do that for the next few years. But there's nothing where you're kind of like looking at customer acquisition, looking at from the bottoms up in the sense of saying they've acquired this many customers thus far.

11:41This is my projection of what future acquisition will be. This is how many orders my existing customers will place. This is how many orders I would expect to get from the new customers. And I'm going to sum it all up across all the customers to get what my estimate of revenue will be. And so, you know, that's kind of what we mean by bottoms up. And it can be a really helpful way of kind of like vetting a revenue forecast, because I would say that's one of the other things that companies will often come to us to evaluate. If you look at these pitch decks and inevitably they always have that slide in there and it shows revenue going like this.

12:17And then the question is, well, what would it take if we were to kind of invert that? Like what sort of customer acquisition, retention and repeat purchase would we need to have to actually be able to get that? And then you can say, well, would I expect that? You know? And so it kind of like inverts the question. Yes. I don't know if you're familiar with Michael Malbison, but he's kind of all about this. He calls it expectations investing. And the idea is to say, the company is trading at a certain valuation right now. What would it take to be able to get that, to rationalize that valuation? And so I think that this could be a really useful way of grounding you.

13:03and oftentimes if you find that our projections just come in low relative to what management is saying it could be because there's this over optimistic view of acquisition or something else and uh and that might be kind of what would actually be driving the the difference of opinion makes sense i guess what you've just explained there and you do see it in every pitch deck certainly every pitch deck i've seen is that that's like radical optimism because you are painting that you've got to paint that picture i guess when you're trying to go through that process but and when you're coming with that maybe that more realistic maybe not pessimistic but realistic view like where are you what metrics are you usually finding are off maybe overstated or or just off most frequently what are the what are the assumptions that you're challenging the most I guess, in that process.

13:58If they actually give the cohort data, it becomes hard to get too far off. Usually if they're like way off, it's because they're just not even attempting a bottoms up, you know, a bottoms up way of getting to the number. So I maybe meant the other way, like maybe if you're the one doing that bottom up forecast and comparing it to more of the top down homogenous, maybe a little bit of a rougher approach or looser approach to forecasting, less scientific, less exact. Where do you find the differences to be the greatest when you bring that level of rigor to the process? Yeah, usually if you've got a bunch of existing customers and you've been operating for a few years, you've got a lot of cohorts.

14:44And so you usually get a pretty good sense of like, this is what customers do after they're acquired. and usually there's not a whole ton of variation across the cohorts. If anything, usually the cohorts get a little bit worse over time. The customers that you're acquiring today, they don't repeat quite as much as the early adopters because the early adopters, they were like really into you. They acquired back when you were young and probably the product wasn't what it is now. Golden cohort almost. Yeah, yeah. So usually, you know, if you say, all right, I'm going to assume, imagine we just assume retention, repeat purchase, basket size, it's all going to be the same as the recent cohorts.

15:30If anything, that might be over-optimistic. And so then the question becomes, if we kind of made that assumption, what is this saying about acquisition? And if acquisition is going to like jump like this, oftentimes that that's what ends up being quite unrealistic. Usually that's where you kind of hope. And they'll often have this in the pitch text as well. They got that obligatory slide and it's got the TAM and it's got the SAM and it's got the, you know, the current penetration and the penetration is like a speck of sand. And say, all right, you know, here we go. but you know i think if you were to kind of really be rigorous about that and kind of break down the market and say like this is the actual achievable market given what they're doing right now um what can we really expect you know there are some times where um the implied acquisition forecast like blows out yeah any sort of notion of sam um so yeah so that could be a tell that that something is, is not quite right.

16:35But you typically, you know, customer acquisition, when you look at the trajectory over time, you know, usually, you know, you see some regularity to it. And so even if we were to be fairly optimistic, there's not this, you know, humongous range that that you kind of expect above that or below that. So, yeah, so usually that's, you know, you can't, you can't deviate too much from what you would have expected given the historical data. I guess when you've got that data, that predictability makes sense. Within that equation of CLTV, I guess just give a quick run through, I guess, of like your approach to defining and measuring that just for the listeners who maybe aren't familiar with that.

17:21Yeah, it's a big question. We'll often see, you know, people talking about LTV and you actually ask them for the formula that they're using. And oftentimes it's as simple as like realized cumulative revenue per customer. You know, just they were born some time ago, revenue up until today. That's it. And it's wrong on so many levels. First is CLV should be a profit measure. And it should be specifically should be a contribution profit measure. You've got how much you spent to acquire the customer. you know, we would call customer acquisition costs. You've got that stream of kind of contribution profits over time.

18:07Obviously, the contribution profit should be all the revenue that you get, but then you got to subtract out all of the variable costs. And so if you're selling a product, all the labor, the materials, the shipping, the payment processing, all of the expected returns, all that stuff, because all that's going to scale directly with revenue. and got to be able to project that out suitably far into the future, but not too far. And then you really want to discount that to account for the fact that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar, you know, five years from now. So yes, accumulated revenue is just not going to cut it.

18:46But, you know, I would say people will make every mistake. Yeah. They'll either not include CAC, they'll use revenue instead of profit, they won't discount. Sometimes people will use a finite horizon. You know, they'll say like the first three months or the first six months or something like that. Oftentimes they'll get the costs wrong. So they'll know that it's supposed to be contribution profit, but instead they'll use gross profit. And they're actually potentially quite different from each other. Or they'll know that they should do contribution profit, but they won't include all of the variable costs.

19:27So, yeah, so there's, you know, there's a lot of nuance to it. And obviously the tricky part is, especially for the customers that you've acquired relatively recently, if you want to, you know, to get like a two-year LTV, you need to have an accurate prediction model. And that's really where Theta and where Zodiac had come in was that prediction problem is tough, especially because for most D2C brands, 40 to 80 % of their customers are going to buy one time and they're never going to come back. And then you have this really dedicated 5 % of the cohort. That's amazing. They just love it. They keep coming back.

20:08They buy over and over and over again. And when you have such extreme, what we call heterogeneity, which is just kind of variation across the customers, it becomes really hard, actually, to predict what those customers will do. So I would say maybe that's kind of the final thing that I'll see people get wrong is they'll kind of get the LTV to CAC. But you're kind of averaging all of the bad customers in that tiny sliver of the good customers. And I think what could be the most actionable and the most diagnostic and the most useful to the investors is to get individual level estimates of value.

20:45And what you might often find is that there are these systematic differences and what makes those best customers the best. You can actually figure out what they are and why it is that they're so different from everyone else. And that can lead to a whole bunch of profit enhancing things that the firm could do to acquire more like the best and acquire fewer of the worst. Yeah, turning that into actionable tactics, whether that's creative products, offer, even retention tactics makes a lot of sense. How segmented would you say is optimal for that level of analysis? Obviously, going to an individual customer level is extreme.

21:26But when we're looking at like cohorting out the different relative values of various customer cohorts, I think I saw an example in your, again, the material you shared with me previously that of a brand where 2 % of their customers made up, was it north of 80 % of their total value or total revenue or something to that ilk. you can just by hearing those numbers you can see the value in doing that analysis and then turning that into action but how deep how how in depth are you would you would you see brands going into that process what do you what you what's your advice there yeah you don't want to slice the baloney too thin so to speak so um but i would say if yeah if you've got the individual level estimates very good models can get you that and then you can do whatever cohorting you want And the tricky part is if you knew what the very best segments should be, then you can just kind of pre-segment the data that way.

22:27But typically the problem is you don't know, you know, you know, what you typically have is you got the transaction log data on the one side and you got the CRM data on the other side. And then the question is, all right, so what is this going to tell me? And so if you can get those estimates of what each and every customer is worth, you can effectively run this big regression where you try to explain variation in those values as a function of all of the other stuff. And the best segments are the ones that really have the most signal. Well, it's kind of a combination, I'd say. The best way to segment, it's a function of the strength of the signal.

23:05Like, does it really do a good job of discriminating between the best and the worst? and then the second thing is obviously can you actually do something differently because of it you know so acquisition channels maybe there might be a little bit less signal but you know you can allocate more to facebook and less from google you know so it's a very actionable channel uh the same could be said for um you know like product of first purchase or potentially like um the customers who make their first purchase online versus in a store you know so yeah yeah Yeah, that's stuff that you can really work with.

23:41I've actually got an example of some analysis. I remember I did a couple of years ago for a brand that I was working closely on where we layered CLV across postcode data in the UK and found that we've really over-indexed into ethnic minority postcodes. postcodes. But then when we, when we analyzed the creative, we were putting into market the relative diversity. It was so, it was, we had, we weren't indexing towards that at all. So it was a, maybe not, not quite as granular, but an example of how that then turned into a tactic of like intentionally recruiting individuals that would better resonate with those demographics.

24:24Yeah, exactly right. Same would go for product. You know, if you find that, the highest value customers, they all like a certain product. Put it in the creative, you know, put it in the advertising. It just kind of makes sense. Put it on the website. 100%. You mentioned first products there. I wanted to touch on that side of the equation, like AOV. I always say this to clients. I think the ability to create meaningful changes in LTV post first purchase is significantly less impactful often than focusing more on AOV or what people buy at the point of first transaction. How true do you think that is, and how do you see that play out generally across the businesses that you see and work across?

25:14I would say, yeah, the general point that, you know, good customers are born and not made. I think that kind of rings true to me. We often find that if you had a model that allowed different customers to just have different inherent levels of goodness, it doesn't really change very much. But the different people will have different levels of love for the brand. That model can work really, really well. um so yeah to put it differently you know if you spent a lot of your attention on acquiring the right customers and doing it in the right way that can often be a lot better than trying to take a whole get a whole bunch of customers in the door who potentially could be pretty crappy and somehow you know try to like do a whole bunch of magic to try to make the bad customers in the good customers you know that just uh often is not not as good of a proposition yeah it makes sense i think that's like where's the point of leverage there and where's better to spend your time and i think it the data often points towards it being on that um better tactics to bring in better customers on a higher value product because they like they they turn into higher value customers long term on the other interestingly like the force that we often see certainly over the last two years it's almost like working against that is discounting versus full price.

26:45I feel like when I was pulling some analysis across all of our clients and discount rate at the start of this year, and even if you just drag it back over two years, it's like a constant force of a runaway train of just discount rate increasing over time at an aggregate level. How have you seen that play out into some of these models? Do you find that it decays, usually just continues to decay value of customers over time post first purchase. Absolutely. Yeah. So that's kind of one of the other. So there's what I call the taxonomy of CLV. I've got a whole lecture in my class. It's just about like, I call it the taxonomy because, you know, you've got like the golden definition of CLV and you've got like all the other stuff that's like relevant, useful, but it's just not quite the same.

27:36And one of them is what we call net CAC and then net CLV or, you know, kind of repeat CLV. And the reason that's important is because if you acquire a customer on a discount, mechanically, it's going to lower their CLV because the first purchase is less profitable. Like right there, even if they were identical after acquisition, just the fact that they came in on the discount means you're going to make less money from them. all those being equal and so a question could be um what if we kind of strip that out you know so we kind of just look at everything that happens after that point and say is there a profitability after that first purchase different and what you often find is that um those discount those customers that came in on discount they're bad for two reasons the first is you're getting less profit on the first purchase and oftentimes we find is their net clv you know that the value after after that first purchase is also lower.

28:40So it just brings in a lower quality customer. So I'd say that that is something that we found to be true more often than not. Makes sense. Such a tough drug to get off as well once you've kind of, as a brand, have wedded yourself to discounting and the pursuit of greater volume of sales over time, and not as much focus on that quality. Certainly from what we see across clients who come to us and we run that analysis. Yeah, I mean, you play devil's advocate. Like if one were to only offer that discount to new customers, then one could consider that to be customer acquisition cost. And in truth, then it would be because it's only going to the new customers.

29:28It's not going to anyone else. And so one could imagine, you know, if you didn't spend up a whole bunch of money on some big glitzy advertising marketing campaign, but instead, you know, just offers like a new customer promo, maybe it could end up being that that's more effective. But, you know, the proof's in the pudding. Like, you know, question is, does it actually play out that way? And, you know, usually when these companies are offering the promos, they're offering it to everybody. and so oftentimes then you've got all the stuff that's happening with the new customers but then you're kind of taking all those existing customers who might have purchased at full price anyways but you know if you kind of dangle free money in their face you know they're going to take it and uh and then they'll get used to it so um yeah so it can kind of also have some negative repercussions for the value of those uh those existing customers too I hadn't thought of like the way you explain that around like waiting that discount into the CAC equation is really interesting.

30:31It makes a lot of sense. I definitely agree on the repeat point is just like pulling full value future demand forward at a discounted rate is I feel like people see that a lot. if a customer's been with you for two years they're pretty set in their ways it can be kind of hard to like change what they want you know if they've been kind of getting the same stuff but you know if you give them like free money anyone will take free money so so that can be the one thing uh that kind of gets them to to do something to kind of take you up on the offer but the problem is that's kind of what you don't want them to take you up on you know because they're going to probably not buy any more than they did, but you're going to make less profit when they do buy.

Read the full transcript

31:15Daniel McCarthy:Quick one before we get back into the episode. Every business spends money to make money. Ads, software, flights, travel, the hundred unavoidable little things to keep the lights on. All that spending every month and none of it comes back to you. It just goes out the door. Incard is a financial platform built for digital businesses and it flips that on its head. They're giving 2 % cash back for your first year on ads, SaaS, travel and everyday business spend. And it's all uncapped. The same money you were spending anyway, except now a slice of it runs back in your account. You also get multi-currency accounts, corporate cards and Shopify, Meta, Stripe and Xero connected in one place.

31:55Daniel McCarthy:A true source of truth. But honestly, you're spending regardless, so you may as well earn on it. Sign up for free. Use the code SWU2K26. Link's in the description. Now back to the episode. I wanted to just quickly touch on, I guess, subscription specifically, subscription businesses and churn and your approach to measurement of churn because I know that's something that you also see as often being flawed in people's approaches, I feel like everybody we come across is trying to launch a supplement subscription business in consumer at the moment. So it's definitely a question of when will subscription fatigue really hit?

32:39I feel like they're about to roll out a law in the UK around making cancellation far easier and more mandatory. So we're interested to see how that plays out into the US as well. But how are you approaching measuring true churn, whether it's subscription or not? then where do you see people getting that wrong as well? Yeah, I mean, that's kind of alluded to the biggest distinction, which is subscription versus non-subscription. Non-subscription customers still churn, but you can't see it. They don't tear up a contract or something like that. And so it's actually ironically at Theta, so subscription, it can be more like shooting fish in a barrel.

33:23It's just easier to do. You can specify a richer model for churn. But, you know, we'll often find that we add more value for non-subscription firms because it's just trickier, you know, because you need to kind of deal with this non-observability. You will say that you kind of need to sort out how often customers repeat and whether they're churning from the same purchase data. Whereas for a subscription firm, you can sort out like retention just off of the retention data. And then you can sort out the, you know, how much they tend to buy, how well they monetize while they're alive from, you know, what people do while they're still with you.

34:07And so it just becomes a much more separable, easy to model process. So usually, you know, if you're within one of these firms, there's a whole bunch of best practices. Subscription firms got to model by cohort. You got to separate out, you know, the seasonal cohorts versus, you know, the cohorts that are happening when you're not in a heavy promotional period. you really want to do the modeling again at the individual level and there it really matters because you'll have a lot of customers that drop out early and then you'll have some that stay for a very long time and so if you assume that they all kind of share the same retention rate you're going to horribly underestimate the value of the cohort so so that's incredibly important to do But, you know, I would say to their credit, if you're at a reasonably large subscription firm, typically they'll have at least a decent, half decent model for customer retention.

35:11You get to the smaller firms and they often just don't. So, you know, you really want to make sure you're kind of doing that right. Now, non-subscription, it's like the wild, wild west. You know, we'll work with like the biggest companies in the world. And it's amazing. Some of them, it's like they have nothing. So, yeah, so there it really becomes helpful to have basically what we would call a latent attrition model. It's just a model that allows for repeat purchase. And at some point the customer goes kaput, but you have to infer it from the data. You know, it's just not something that's observable.

35:48And thankfully, there are some time tested models to do that. they do better than you know than models that don't allow for that but at the same time you know we found again over the course of the engagements that we've done that there are a handful of enhancements that you really need to have to be able to to do the modeling well in that setting so yes we've got this model that we call clv ultra and and that's what we think to be like the very best model for both kind of repeat purchase and retention modeling, uh, in, in a, in both a non-subscription setting and in hybrid settings. Cause the, I'd say that's the other setting that often has been getting more and more popular these days is it's not quite full subscription, but it's not full non-subscription either.

36:37You know, they kind of, it's some mix of the two. Um, and this model tends to be really good for those kinds of mixed subscription, non-subscription type settings. What's some of the complexity? Just speak to it at a higher level. What brings so much complexity to modeling that for non-subscription businesses? Why is it such a gap that you see? Is it just difficult to generate the data or general lack of understanding of how to build and run that model? What would you say are the common issues or bottlenecks? uh yeah the first issue is you can't observe churn and so churn's happening but uh but we need to infer it and so that's kind of level one um level two is there are a lot of these kind of systematic dynamics that just we tend to see over and over and over again there's a kind of dynamics as a function of the customer life cycle so oftentimes what we find is that there's like a this honeymoon phase, you acquire a customer and over the first, it could be between the first month or the first, you know, three months that they tend to, um, to purchase more frequently than you would think.

37:57And then they kind of settle into this baseline. And, um, you know, we just find that time and time again, before we actually had a model that didn't allow for that. And, uh, then we started doing work for one of the largest gaming companies, and it just did not work. And you can kind of see, because I'd say the one thing that you always want to do is be empirical about your data. And you may have your beliefs about how customers behave, but the way you can test it is just hold out the last six months of your data, train your model on everything else, predict the last six months, and then see how good your predictions were along a handful of different dimensions.

38:36And that will tell you, is my model good or not? And we just found there were systematic issues when we did not allow for a honeymoon period. So, yeah, so you want the data to tell you the length of that period. You want basically you want to account for all those those dynamics that happen as a function of the life cycle. The third thing is calendar time effects. And there's really kind of two of them. There's the ones that are seasonal. People buy more Christmas time. they buy less during some other time of the year, spring season. You want the data to tell you that. And that will kind of hit all of the cohorts within those certain calendar periods and they will recur year after year.

39:21But then the other calendar time effect is what we call the non-seasonal calendar time effect. And that's the stuff that kind of hits the one time, but does not tend to recur year after year and so probably biggest example of that covid hopefully hit one time hopefully it'll come back yeah but boy it hit all those cohorts you know so yeah so you really you need to account for all that and you know there's kind of that that baseline point that i made before that all your customers are really different so you want to allow for those differences to exist too so it's kind of like there's just a lot of stuff there that you have very complex yeah you got to deal with all of it uh or your predictions will be bad makes sense that honeymoon phase is definitely see that it always blows my mind how many people like will repeat on month zero from like when looking at brand's data especially somewhere they're up into like the double digits percentage wise for for repeat rate in the first month of after acquisition even if they're selling loads of products where they just can't physically need more.

40:31So you can see that kind of abnormal behavior in some of that data. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, and to your point, so let's say that in the first month people buy a lot more. Then what ends up happening if you're doing a cohort model and you don't allow for a honeymoon is you see you got these customers that were born two months ago and their first month was amazing. And you're like, wow, these cohorts are just getting better and better over time. And it's like, actually, no, they're not getting better. They're staying the same. They're just in the honeymoon phase and they're going to, you know, they're going to kind of settle down to baseline just like all the other cohorts did too.

41:06So, yeah, that's just kind of model misspecification. Yeah, it makes sense. We've talked through a lot of financial metrics. A lot of this language may be new for some of the listeners, may not for those that are more senior stakeholders or in those rooms more frequently. I know you speak to that disconnect between like marketing and finance language. If we're looking at, if we're giving, for those listening today, like what do you believe that if they're in a marketing role and they're wanting to improve their like rigor of reporting and their ability to drive tactics off the back of some of these metrics?

41:52What do you think they should be looking at from a dashboard perspective every week? What are some of those metrics they should be reporting into maybe the next board or leadership meeting to really tell that growth story through the lens of customer metrics rather than aggregate top-level metrics? Yeah, I think it's a very helpful exercise to ask, what would the CFO care about? And would the CFO agree with this? And so the discount rate thing, use the weighted average cost of capital. That's what the CFO does. But I can't count how many times I'll just see undiscounted figures. And immediately you lose credibility with the CFO because they're like, well, my investors are demanding a certain rate of return of my firm and you're not accounting for that, you know, in your equation.

42:49So, yes, that'd be one. But, yeah, I think that the perceptual metrics, CFOs, they struggle with perceptual metrics like net promoter score or the open rate on the emails. Or, you know, we had this much engagement with our last social media post. It's like, okay, it's nice, but like, where's the money? You know, I want to see the money. And if it's not trans, if you can't translate it credibly to revenue, then it's like the CFO can't get all that excited about it. So I think it's, when it's done right, everyone feels a little bit uncomfortable. that the marketer needs to kind of like elevate up to kind of cohort monetization and cohort, you know, cohort costs and cohort revenue.

43:41And, you know, the CFO, they're not going to be quite used to that, but at least we're saying this is how much we spent on customer acquisition. This is how our cohorts are monetizing. This is how much revenue we got off these cohorts. And that suddenly it's something that, you know, they think in that, in those terms and, you know, net promoter score, it could be very helpful if you can then establish like a data driven relationship between NPS and monetization. And then it's like, okay, now I got it. You know, you've got the low NPS segment, the high NPS segment, and they monetize like this.

44:19I can get behind that. And oftentimes, you know, if you look to, you know, I've spent a ton of time. If you go to my LinkedIn, I'm always talking about kind of company disclosure. And we'll have all these examples of public companies that are reporting on this stuff. And the CFO will have in the investor day presentation, you know, cohort curves. and I love it every time I see it. But the fact that they're disclosing that and like communicating that to external stakeholders is such a good sign. I mean, it's like an invitation to the marketing department to be a part of the conversation because they're really the ones who can own that and kind of like manage that better than most of the other people in the C-suite could.

45:03So stick to that, you know? That's like, that's where you're gonna get their attention. and you know the other thing i would say about the getting the cfo on board why that can be valuable again they're the ones that control the purse strings you know so if you can kind of get them excited and seeing that you're a demand generator and not a cost center you're going to be more likely to get budget you know i think you can make a more credible case to the cfo that you know some investment that you want to make is actually going to to pay off over the long term I really like that approach as well, like taking some of the, I really like the idea of that approach.

45:41And the NPS was super interesting. Maybe quite easy to connect together as well with connecting NPS to customer profile and therefore LTV versus some of the more like front-end metrics. So probably one that some of the listeners can maybe take away. One follow-up question to that is. obviously it's somewhat easy to articulate how like I guess more direct response like meta some of these lower funnel channels I guess if you want to use that term translate into customer metrics compared to maybe some of those like bigger swing campaigns those things that are harder to predict the value of. Say we're testing, say marketing teams wanting to go to explore out of home, they've never done it before.

46:38Is there a way that you'd recommend people handling some of those conversations or thinking about or lens to think about that through? For my own benefit as well, it's just, it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on that. Yeah, it becomes tougher. I have a whole lecture on customer acquisition costs where we go into this in my class. And And it's really, you know, I'd say it's tougher because the trackability is often not as good. Yeah. And the potential effect might happen over a longer span of time. So if you're right at the bottom of the funnel, you either click on the ad and buy or you don't.

47:17You know, like oftentimes that's just a much quicker cycle. And the tracking can be really good because, you know, you can track the clicks, you know, so the attribution is better. But if you have out of home, you got people going by the billboard, you know, they look up and they see it. And, oh, yeah, that's an interesting, I might, I might check them out some point down the road. But, you know, the company won't know, like you, Ali, saw that billboard. You know, they just won't be able to attribute exposure in the same way. And if it's more upper funnel, which, you know, like a digital brand building campaign would also be, then the effect might take longer.

47:57And that kind of degrades your ability to do attribution. So those make it trickier. I'm not sure there's like a silver bullet answer to it, but I'd say, you know, one thing that can be potentially better than nothing is some sort of model that explains variation in purchasing or conversions as a function of your spending on out of home. you know so something more like a marketing mix model yeah like a good one uh that's properly calibrated and saturated you know so that way you can say i've got these other things i'm doing i've got this thing too i can allow for you know carryover effects that might spend today might affect you know this outcome measure of interest x number of months from now and let me let the day to tell me the strength of that relationship.

48:51You know, that oftentimes might be the best that one can do. Makes sense. I guess that's the, that's the conversation to have, I guess is like the rigor and bringing, bringing it to the CFO with that level of like intention and from both an execution and, but also like a best approach to measurement. It's probably going to get their sign off rather than a, let me chuck 50 grand at this and see what happens at least then you'll know yeah it's like after it's done you know did did it pay off or not and that can help also then it could be a learning experience you know that if you're not betting the farm you kind of run a few tests but you have a very clear measurement framework for success versus not you can kind of pre-declare it to the CFO.

49:41And then based on how that goes, then that can help inform whether you scale it more or pull it back. But at least then it's all laid out in advance in principle. So I think they would appreciate that. I just wanted to flip into, we were chatting just before we started actually about Codex very briefly and your use and enjoyment and value that you're getting out of that as a tool and I just wanted to spend the last 10 minutes before a quick couple of closing questions on AI. Can't really escape AI on a podcast nowadays. It has to be in there somewhere I feel. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on how investors

50:26and general maybe public markets as well is looking at AI's impact on valuation, impact on um company structure as well if you if you're exposed to that um and just yeah your general thoughts on how how that should be viewed within today's like landscape i mean there's a lot of different ways one can slice that but certainly a couple of them could be you know are you a part of the i'll call it like the data or action layer or not and um you know just to kind of give one example of that i don't know if you're you know if you're like a competitive athlete but um i'm kind of amateur but decent yeah i'm definitely not i'd love to say yes but um but yeah definitely not yes i'm like you know decent with running um and i've used strava and um strava one of the big things that they've launched recently was this uh mcp connection to clod it's all yeah chat gpt they have like an indirect connection through the apple health app so that way you can see the workouts you can't get all the detailed granular data but at least you can see you know you can see some level of detail um and now i find that i'm constantly saying so how was my workout you You know, it will tell me like, well, the evolution of your heart rate, you know, from the first half to the second half.

52:01And here's like the seven year trend, you know, the story arc of your running career. You know, it tends to take you like 40 weeks to get to peak. You know, I'm like, wow, there's no way I could have ever known that stuff before. But suddenly it's like enriched all that data in this really powerful way. And I'm like, there's no way I'm going to turn from Strava, you know. So locked in. yeah so it's basically part of the data layer and um honestly i think of theta as part of the data layer too that it's giving you all these good metrics and suddenly it's like ai has allowed us to to understand what it all means for us and what we can do with it in a way that didn't used to be possible before you know that just makes it all that data it's not like i didn't have the data.

52:48I could do an export into a CSV file and I could start trying to like run it through an statistical software. I'm like, you know, I have a day job and I've got a baby and, you know, I just have a lot of other demands on my time. I can't do that. You know? So now I'm just like talking at my phone and I can get all that. And so, so I think there is like a generalizable lesson there that if you're either able to take advantage of it, people look to you as, I want access to this data and now I can, you know, glean a lot more insight from it. That's a winning position to be in or, you know, for action as well.

53:25Yes. I use superhuman. I know they've got this MCP connection as well. So you can kind of very easily, you know, interact, you know, through interact with the LLM through superhuman. You know, that makes it that much more useful to continue using superhuman. Um, so yeah, I think that that, that, that's really helpful. I think there's like a whole separate other set of companies where it's just like a crappy version of Anthropic, you know, or, or open AI. It just, you go in there and you can kind of summarize my email or help me draft this, but it's using some crappy model. Yeah. It's just not good.

54:10And that's just, you know what i call it those the wrapper companies um i don't see that as being uh nearly as as useful so um so i think figuring out where on that spectrum are you you know i think that that can be a useful exercise um i say the other big thing is um when prospects are deciding who they want to buy from. I think that whole process is changing a lot right now. Most of my major purchases, I do a lot of me search. Like, you know, I feel like maybe it's a terrible way to go about it because I'm like really different from the typical consumer. But most of my major purchases, I'm doing the research through ChatGPT.

54:59And, you know, whether it's my coffee machine, the heavy bag, treadmill, anything that's above a certain dollar amount and i'm always doing that research and what you might find is that the answers that surface within the llms can be potentially quite different from the answers that you would have surfaced had you done at google search so yeah most brands they don't even know you know they don't even know where they are on the on the share of voice within llms And so step number one, figure out where you are. Hopefully there's something you can do about it, but step number one, at least know where you are.

55:40Yeah, the inputs and what drives rankings is very interesting. You can use things like Triple Whale, I have a good tool for measurement of LLM visibility for those watching who maybe want to do that for a consumer brand quite quickly. Yeah, reviews, sites, and Reddit, Quora, things like that are having a much greater impact than obviously on Google where they aren't factored in for rankings. Do you feel like what you've explained is super interesting because you and I also think it's like yourself and maybe that like higher income, more educated consumer is making more considered purchases through AI.

56:23um i'm not sure that the average customer is doing is on that journey currently um will that happen it's hard to say but i think we're definitely seeing that like um fragmentation of of like paths to purchase across more and more channels like when i'm looking when you're like zooming out you've got that as an example you've got things like app loving that have become more meaningful. You've got obviously meta Instagram, TikTok. There's just, I feel like there's just more and more routes to attention than there was maybe like three to four years ago for consumer brands. She's interesting. Yeah.

57:01That is kind of like the open question. You know, two years from now, what is like the typical Joe consumer doing? Yeah. You know, um, say am I the canary in the coal mine or, or not? I think adoption is going to go up a lot. it's just going to get smarter and smarter. So if I had to make a bet, I bet that a lot more people will be doing it that way. But yeah, that's kind of an open question. I agree for sure. That segues nicely onto my final question. I wanted to ask if you were to zoom out and look at say the consumer brands that you've worked on over the last 12 to 18 months, and this isn't in the notes I sent over, so sorry for putting you on the spot slightly.

57:43Mentioned discount rate as something that I've seen as like an aggregate thing that's just increasing and maybe decaying value over time. Is there any like real macro trends when you look at consumer metrics across consumer brands that you think businesses need to be cognizant of or aware of? Or is that just not something you can, that may not be something you can pass out? I'm just interested to hear your thoughts. Yeah, the macro trends. Well, certainly cross-cohort dynamics are big and you always want to be mindful of them. And that's kind of the whole question. Are the cohorts we're acquiring today, are they the same, better or worse than the cohorts that we acquired a year ago?

58:31And, you know, they can get better for some businesses. They can get worse for other businesses. So you want to make sure you know for your specific business. in terms of the macro trends you know i think um you know certainly there's the ai factor you know that uh that can be a source of cross-cohort variation um and i think the gravitational pull that it exerts is going to be a function of where where you stand relative to your competitors within your category and uh and then you know as you were saying a moment ago the degree to which we see adoption of AI as being a way to do market research.

59:13You know, so more adoption, it's going to pull more. Less adoption, it'll still be a factor, but it won't pull quite as hard. So I definitely see that as being, you know, one factor. You know, for direct-to-consumer businesses, I do feel everyone always loves to talk about the hot thing, the jour. And, you know, if you're like a shoe brand, you're a shoe brand, you know, like people are still going to be buying shoes. They might change the way they do the research. You know, are there kind of other macro factors that might influence the success or failure of a brand like that? But I would again say that potentially the big B brands have more to lose through AI share of voice.

1:00:02Because oftentimes we found that people who are asking in LLM and they say, hey, I've got this issue with my ankle. I've got weird arch support. What are the best shoe brands for me? It's going to surface brands that might not have otherwise shown up as much. so um so incumbent brands could stand to gain a little bit more um yeah you know trend towards privacy yeah i think that that's something that we had seen with apple's att um you know that's for yeah less targeted marketing um yeah so certainly not in europe for years americans don't like privacy the macro trend uh that's still playing out it's still playing out right now um so yes to the extent that continues to manifest you know i think that um less targeted marketing you know it could be harder for them to have precision so that's all else equal going to be you know something of a negative for for d2c brands uh so yeah that would just be something to expect um beyond that you know i guess it's the whole thing of the supply chain and uh the fragility of it and yeah i think that that's kind of an open question but um you know in general the closer you are to your you know to where your products are being manufactured you know i think that that lowers the risk that there's going to be some major disruption that suddenly leaves you you know high and dry with your supply chain um but you know i'm not sure i would call that a macro trend you know it's just like a potential black swan type of risk you know that uh seems more possible now than it did you know five years ago definitely i feel like we're in um that expecting volatility just as i can that is normal rather than it being like a freak event like we are in an era of just like macro shock after macro shock on a short time scale it's not how you plan for that but yeah well yeah thank you thank you very much for i found that super super interesting i i definitely learned a lot i'm sure um many of the viewers did who have stuck around to the end i really appreciate you you're walking through through that uh today i'd love just to end with a view of like where can people find yourself where can people learn more about the work you've done.

1:02:35And then if there's any resources or things you want me to link specifically in the description that people can go to to learn a bit more, we'll definitely get those added as well. Yeah, my big social media platform is LinkedIn. So, you know, so if you search for Daniel McCarthy UMD, you'll find me there. I'm regularly posting about kind of all the sort of stuff that we talked about. So if this is interesting, I think definitely let's connect. and in terms of other resources yeah i'll follow up on that but uh i would say the whole idea of kind of linking customer behavior to corporate valuation you know we've got this harvard business review article that's a really nice introduction to that so you know certainly i'll be posting that too but uh yeah theta's theta's my firm uh theta clv.com uh check us out and uh i think if there's anything else i think um you know you know certainly i teach this class on customer lifetime valuation and uh more and more i'm doing executive education at university of maryland as well so yes if you find this stuff to be interesting um you know certainly you know professor dan you know can uh i have a spike in uho uk cohort next year yeah we're very uk heavy so people might be popping across the pond to let me know perfect well yeah i'll be sure to drop all the links in the description again thank you very much for your time really appreciate it um yeah thanks everyone for stuck around like and subscribe if you're here till the end and we'll catch you on the next episode

From the publisher

🚨🚀 If you're a brand spending £100K/month, we'll run your ads. Apply for your growth roadmap: https://www.soarwithus.co/d2c-diaries-get-in-touch?utm_campaign=191661253-D2C+Diaries&utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=podcast&utm_term=d2c_diaries&utm_content=ep_85

Daniel McCarthy is the founder of Theta and an associate professor of marketing at the University of Maryland. Private equity firms bring him in to dig through the transaction data before they buy a DTC brand, and he's done it on over 450 companies, from McDonald's to some of the biggest names in ecommerce. He breaks down the "growth report card" that shows whether a brand's growth is real or just manufactured by spend, why discounting a customer's first order drags down what they're worth long after, and why most brands have no idea where they stand when someone asks ChatGPT which brand to buy.

Harvard Business Review article:
How to Value a Company by Analyzing Its Customers: https://hbr.org/2020/01/how-to-value-a-company-by-analyzing-its-customers

This podcast is proudly sponsored by Incard.

If you're spending serious money on daily business expenses and getting nothing back on it right now, this dedicated offer gets you 2% Cashback for year 1 on Ads, SaaS, Travel and other everyday business expenses. Uncapped.

Sign up for free and use the code SWU2K26 to unlock your cashback: https://www.incard.com/?fpr=soarwithus

Follow Daniel McCarthy: https://www.linkedin.com/in/danielmcc/
Follow Olly: https://linktr.ee/ollyhudson
Follow Joe: https://linktr.ee/joe_marston
Follow Loukas: https://shorturl.at/TRI8B / https://x.com/LoukasHambi
Follow Liam: https://www.linkedin.com/in/liam-dean-a11a43152/
Follow D2C Diaries: https://www.tiktok.com/@d2c.diaries / https://www.instagram.com/d2c_diaries/

More from D2C Diaries

All 51 episodes
Understanding Your True LTV and Company ValueD2C Diaries · 1 h 4 min
Listen in VO