Perplexity CEO on why the browser is AI's killer app

17 Jul 2025 · 50 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Decoder Podcast Episode Summary

Episode Title

Perplexity CEO on why the browser is AI's killer app

Host

Alex Heath, Deputy Editor at The Verge

Guest

Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity

Episode Overview

In this episode, Alex Heath steps in for Nilay Patel, who is on parental leave, to discuss the future of web browsing and AI with Aravind Srinivas, the CEO of Perplexity. The conversation revolves around Perplexity's new AI web browser, Comet, and its implications for the future of internet usage and AI.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. The Role of Browsers in AI Development
  2. Concept of AI Agents:
  3. Aravind defines AI agents as tools that can perform tasks on behalf of users by integrating with various applications seamlessly, requiring context and permissions.
  4. The browser is seen as the optimal environment for developing these agents due to its established structure and user familiarity.
  • Comet as an AI Browser:
  • Perplexity's Comet browser aims to enhance user experience by allowing AI to interact with web pages effectively.
  • The goal is to make the browser an agent capable of executing tasks without compromising user privacy.
  1. Building the Comet Browser
  2. Technical Foundation:
  3. Comet is based on Chromium, which allows easy data import and retains the familiar interface for users transitioning from Chrome.
  4. The browser supports a sidebar AI assistant that can provide contextually relevant assistance while browsing.
  • User Experience and Onboarding:
  • Aravind acknowledges that there is a learning curve associated with understanding and utilizing Comet’s capabilities effectively.
  • Plans are in place to provide educational resources to ease this transition for users.
  1. Use Cases and Applications
  2. Current Usage Examples:
  3. Users are employing Comet for various tasks such as creating Facebook ads, handling customer service inquiries, and conducting market research.
  4. The most common use is invoking the AI assistant for assistance with tasks related to the currently viewed webpage, significantly enhancing productivity.
  • Impact on Browsing Behavior:
  • The introduction of AI may shift the way people engage with content on the internet, focusing less on passive browsing and more on interactive tasks facilitated by AI.
  1. Challenges and Market Dynamics
  2. Competitive Landscape:
  3. The conversation touches on the competitive nature of the browser market and the potential for Perplexity to gain traction if Chrome were to be spun off due to regulatory actions.
  4. Aravind discusses the implications of Meta’s hiring spree for AI talent and the potential impacts on Perplexity’s growth and innovation.
  1. Future Aspirations for Perplexity
  2. Business Model and Profitability:
  3. Aravind outlines strategies for monetization based on usage, suggesting that users may pay for specific tasks rather than a flat subscription.
  4. The goal is to reach profitability before considering an IPO, which Aravind envisions could occur around 2028 or 2029.
  • Long-Term Vision:
  • The aspiration is for Perplexity to become an indispensable tool for users, integrating deeply into their workflows and managing tasks more effectively than traditional browsers or chatbots.
  1. Comparative Technologies
  2. MCP (Model Context Protocol):
  3. Aravind contrasts his approach with MCP, suggesting that while both aim to enhance agent capabilities, his browser-based method might offer superior security and privacy.
  4. He is cautious yet optimistic about integrating MCP where beneficial, but believes the browser's capabilities are currently more advantageous.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Browsers as AI Enablers: The discussion emphasizes the browser as a pivotal platform for AI developments, particularly in creating user-friendly agents.
  • Comet’s Unique Position: Perplexity aims to differentiate Comet by integrating AI seamlessly into the browsing experience, making it not just a tool for navigation but a productivity enhancer.
  • Market and Regulatory Context: The episode highlights the competitive and regulatory landscape affecting browser market dynamics, suggesting potential opportunities for Perplexity amid larger players.
  • Importance of User Education: As AI tools become more complex, educating users on their capabilities will be crucial for adoption and success.

---

Closing Remarks The episode ends with Aravind expressing his long-term vision for Perplexity and the transformative potential of AI in web browsing. It encapsulates a forward-thinking approach to technology and user experience, signaling significant shifts in how we may interact with the internet in the future.

---

Credits

  • Production: The Verge, part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.
  • Producers: Kate Cox and Nick Statt.
  • Editor: Ursa Wright.
  • Theme Music: Breakmaster Cylinder.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28Support for this show comes from The Home Depot. Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com.

1:11Having a smart home is a cool idea, but kind of a daunting prospect. You have to figure out which devices to buy, how to connect them all together. It's all just a lot. But for two weeks on The Vergecast, we're trying to simplify all of it. We're going to spend some time answering all of your questions about the smart home, and then we're going to go room by room through a real house, my real house, and try to figure out how to make it smart and how to make all of that smart make sense. All of that and much more on The Vergecast, wherever you get podcasts. This special series is presented by The Home Depot.

1:46Welcome to Decoder. I'm Alex Heath, Deputy Editor at The Verge and author of the Command Line newsletter. I'm hosting our Thursday episodes while Nilay is out on parental leave. Today, we're talking about how AI is changing the way we use the web. If you're like me, you're probably already using apps like ChatGPT to search for things. But lately, I've become very interested in the future of the web browser itself. That brings me to my guest today. Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas is betting that the browser is where more useful AI will get built. He just released Comet, an AI web browser for the Mac and Windows that's still in an invite-only beta.

2:24I've been using it, and it's pretty interesting. Arvin's not alone here. OpenAI is also working on its own web browser, and then there are other AI-native web browsers out there like Dia from the browser company. Then there's Google, which may be forced to spin off Chrome if the U.S. Department of Justice prevails in its big antitrust case. If that happens, it could provide an opening for startups like Perplexity to win market share and fundamentally change how more people interact with the web. In this conversation, Aravind and I also discussed the future of Perplexity, the AI talent wars, and why he thinks people will eventually pay thousands of dollars for a single AI prompt.

3:07I hope you enjoy this conversation as much as I did. Here we go.

3:26Aravind, before we get into Comet and how it works, I actually want to go back to our last conversation in April for my newsletter command line. We were talking about why you were doing this. And you told me at the time that the reason we're doing the browser is, quote, it might be the best way to build agents. And that idea has stuck with me since then. And I think it's been validated by others and some other recent launches. But before we get into things, can you just expand on that idea why you think the browser is actually the route to an AI agent? Sure. What is an AI agent? Let's start from there.

4:06A rough description of what people want out of an AI agent is something that can actually go and do stuff for you. It's very vague, obviously, just like how an AI chatbot is vague by definition. People just want it to do, like respond to anything. The same thing is true for agents. It should be able to carry out any workflow end to end from instruction to actually completion of the task. Okay. Then you boil that down to what does it actually need to do it? It needs context, right? It needs to pull in context from your third-party apps. It needs to go and take actions on those third-party apps on your behalf.

4:44So you need logged in versions of your third-party apps. You need to access your data from those third-party apps, but do it in a way where it doesn't actually constantly ask you to auth again and again. It doesn't actually need your permission to do a lot of the things. At the same time, you can take over it and complete the things when it's not able to do it because no AI agent is foolproof. especially when we are at a time when reasoning models are still far from perfection, right? So you want this one interface that the agent and the human can both operate in in the same manner, where logins are actually seamless, client-side data is easy to use, and controlling it is pretty natural.

5:26Nothing is going to truly be damaging if something doesn't work. You can still take over from the agent and complete it when you feel like it's not able to do it. What is that environment in which this can be done in the most straightforward way without creating virtual servers with all your logins and having users worry about privacy and stuff like that? It's the browser. Everything can live on the client side. Everything can stay secure. It only accesses information that it needs to complete the task. In the literal same way you access those websites yourself, that way you get to understand what the agent is doing.

6:00It's not like a black box. You get full transparency and visibility, and you can just stop the agent when you feel like it's going off the rails and just complete the task yourself. And you can also have the agent ask for your permission to do anything. So that level of control, transparency, trust in an environment that we're used to for multiple decades, which is the browser, such a familiar front end to introduce a new concept of AI is going and doing things for you, makes perfect sense for us to reimagine the browser. How did you go about building Comet? When I first opened it, it felt familiar.

6:35It felt like Chrome. In my understanding, it's built on Chromium, the open source kind of substrate of Chrome that Google maintains. And that allows you to have a lot of easy data importing. I was struck when I first opened it that it only took one click to basically bring all my context from Chrome over to Comet, even my extensions. So why decide to go that route, build it on Chromium versus doing something fully from scratch? First of all, Chromium is a great contribution to the world, right? Most of the things they did on reimagining tabs as processes, the way they've gone about security, encryption, and just the performance, the core backend performance of Chromium as an engine.

7:16rendering engines that they have, is all really good. There's no need to reinvent that. And at the same time, it's an open source project, so it's easy to hire developers for perplexity. They can come work on the Comet browser, especially if it's something that has open standards. And we want to continue contributing to Chromium ourselves, so we don't want to just consume Chromium and build a product out of it, but we actually want to give back to the ecosystem. So that's natural. And the second thing is like, it's the dominant browser right now, like Chrome. And almost if you actually include Edge, which is also a Chromium fork, DuckDuckGo, Brave, they're all like Chromium forks.

7:56Only Safari is based on WebKit. So it's actually the dominant browser. And there's no need to like reinvent the wheel here. In terms of UI, we felt like it would be better to retain the most familiar UI people already are used to, which honestly is the Chrome UI. Safari is a slightly different UI, and some people like it, some people do not. And it's still a much smaller share of the market. And imports need to work. Otherwise, you're going to be like, oh, this is not working. Oh, that thing has all my personal context. I'm missing out on it. I don't want to go through the friction of logging into all the apps again.

8:32I think that that was very important for us for the onboarding step, which is not only onboarding you as a human, but also onboarding the AI. because the moment you're already logged into all the third-party apps that you are logged in on Chrome in the exact same security standards, the agent gets access to that on your client and can immediately show you the magic of the product. And the agent is seeing it, but you perplexity are not. You're not using all of the Chrome data I instantly bring over to train on me or anything like that. No, the agent only sees it when you ask a prompt relevant. For example, based on what I've ordered on Amazon in the last month, recommend me some new supplements or like go and order the magnesium supplement that I've already ordered frequently on Amazon.

9:17The agent only sees that for that one singular prompt and doesn't actually store your entire Amazon history on our servers. And you can always like ensure that like your prompts get deleted from our servers. So even the prompts we can choose not to look at, even for like, you know, let's say fine tuning purposes. Let's say we want to make our agents good at an aggregate. Oh, users have done Amazon shopping queries. Let's go and make it better on that. We don't even need to look at that if you choose to not retain your prompt. So that's the level of privacy and security we want to offer. At the same time, the frontier intelligence is all on the server side.

9:56This is one of the main reasons why Apple is struggling to ship all Apple intelligence, be it on iOS or macOS or whatever, right? Because I think there's generally like an expectation that everything needs to live on the client side. That's not necessary to be private. You can still be pretty secure and private with frontier intelligence on the server. So that's the architecture we brought in on Comet. We're talking now a couple of weeks or so after Comet came out. And it's still invite only. Or I think it's also restricted to your premium tier, your 200 a month tier. But you've been tweeting a lot of examples of how people have been using it.

10:33They've been using it to make Facebook ads, do FedEx customer support chat, run their smart home accessories, make Facebook marketplace listings, schedule calendar meetings. There's been a lot of stuff that you've shown. I'm curious. Unsubscribing from spam emails, which is a favorite use case of a lot of people. So maybe that's the one. But I was going to say, what has been the main use case you've seen so far that people are finding with Comet? Actually, while these are the more glamorous use cases, I would say the boring dominant one is always like invoking the sidecar and having it do stuff for you on the web page you're on.

11:13Not necessarily just simple summarization, but more complex questions. It's like, let's say I'm watching Alex Hill's podcast with Zuckerberg or something. And I want to know specifically what he said about a topic. And I want to take that and send it as a message to my teammates on Slack. I think that's the thing. You can just invoke the assistant on the site and do it instantly. It's connected to your Gmail, your calendar. It's also able to pull the transcript from the YouTube video. It has fine-grained access. And it's immediately able to retrieve the relevant snippet. I can even ask it to play it from that exact time step instead of like going through the entire transcript and like, you know, control a thing, like whatever I want.

11:53That is the level of advantage you have. Like it almost feels like you should never watch a YouTube video standalone anymore unless you have a lot of time on your hands. And it's fantastic, right? And people use it for LinkedIn. Like honestly, searching over LinkedIn is very hard. They don't have a working search engine basically. So the agent figures out all these shortcuts, like how we figure out using these filters, people search or connection search, and it's able to give recruiting power that was never possible before. I would say it's better than using LinkedIn Premium. Yeah, and I'm glad you brought up the sidebar because for people who haven't tried it or seen it, that is the main way Comet diverts from Chrome is that you've got this AI assistant orchestration layer that sits on the side of a webpage that you can use to interact with the webpage and also just go off and do things.

12:40that interface suggests that you see the web as being less about actually browsing. I mean, you just said no one really has time to watch a YouTube video. Is the browsing part of the browser becoming less meaningful in the world of AI? I think people are still going to watch YouTube videos for fun or exploration, but not when I'm actually like landing at a video, like, I mean, you do a lot of intellectual stuff, so it's not always fun to watch the entire thing. But I like watching specific things in the video. And also, by the way, when I'm in the middle of work, I can't be watching the Verge podcast, right?

13:21But I still don't want to wait till the entire weekend to fully watch it. I want to instantly know what Zuckerberg might have said in your video about their cluster or something. And then in the weekend, I can go back and watch the entire thing. I'm going to have a lot more time on my hands. So it's not actually going to like stop the regular browsing. I actually think people are going to like scroll through social platforms or like watch Netflix or YouTube even more, I would say, because they have more time on their hands. The AI is going to do a lot of their work. It's just that they would choose to spend it on entertainment more than like intellectual work, intellectual browsing.

13:59Or if people derive entertainment from intellectual stuff, like intellectual entertainment, I think that's fine too. reading books. All these things are fine. Reading blog posts that you otherwise wouldn't get time to read when you're in the middle of work. I think these are the kind of ways in which we want the browser to evolve where people launch a bunch of comment assistant jobs, like tasks that would take a few minutes to complete on the background and they're chilling and scrolling through X or whatever the social they like. We need to take a quick break. We'll be right back.

14:41Support for this show comes from LinkedIn. Imagine if any of the movies that included the line, I need the right person for the job, settled for, I'll just take about anyone. How many heists would have failed? How many deals would have fallen through? How many secret spy missions would have ended in disaster? So why would you accept just anyone when hiring for your business? When you need the right person for the job, you can turn to LinkedIn Jobs. And now LinkedIn Jobs is stepping things up with their new AI assistant. So you can feel confident you're finding top talent that you can't find anywhere else.

15:15With LinkedIn Jobs AI assistant, you can skip the confusing steps and recruiting jargon. It filters through applicants based on criteria you've set for your role and surfaces only the best matches so you're not stuck sorting through a mountain of resumes. Hire right the first time. Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash partner. Then promote it to use LinkedIn Jobs' new AI assistant, making it easier and faster to find top candidates. That's linkedin.com slash partner to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply. Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough.

15:59So why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com.

16:35Support for this show comes from Rocket Money. There are very few easy things about managing your money. How many subscriptions is too many subscriptions? How do I create an easy and effective budget? How do I keep track of all my accounts? Should I just hoard all my cash and bury it in the backyard? With so many ways to mismanage your money, sometimes it feels like the easiest thing to do is just ignore it. But that's where Rocket Money comes in. It tracks your spending, your accounts, and your subscriptions all in one place and makes managing your money actually easier than pretending it doesn't exist.

17:10Try Rocket Money for free at rocketmoney.com slash Vox.

17:20We're back with Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas. Your tagline for Comet is enabling people to, quote, browse at the speed of thought. I find that there's actually a very steep learning curve to understanding what it can do. By the way, Alex, I want to make one point. There was some article either from Word or somewhere else that Google was trying to use Gemini to predict maximal engagement time on a YouTube video and show the ad around that timestamp. Perplexity on the Comet browser, I mean, was using AI to exactly save your time to get you the exact timestamp you want in a fine-grained basis and not waste your time.

18:06So often people ask, why would Google not do this and that? The incentives are completely different here. Yeah, and I want to get into that and have a lot of business model questions about Comet because it is also very compute-intensive for you and expensive to run, which you've talked about. But to my point about the learning curve and making it approachable, how do you do that? Because when I first opened it, it's kind of like, I don't know what I can do with this thing. I mean, I go to your X account and I see all the things you're sharing. But I do think there's going to be a learning curve that the people building these products don't necessarily appreciate.

18:43No, no, I appreciate that. And it's been the thing for me, myself as a user, is that even though it's fun to build all these agent use cases, it takes a while to stop doing things the usual way and start using the AIs more, which includes even basic things like what reply you type onto an email thread. Even though Google has these automatic suggested replies, I don't actually usually like it. And it doesn't often pull context from outside Gmail to help me do that. Or Slack, checking on unread Slack messages, I usually just go open Slack as a tab and try to scroll through those 50 or 100 channels I'm on, clicking each of those channels, reading all the messages that are unread.

19:28It takes time to actually train myself to use Comet. So what we plan to do is actually publish a lot of the early use cases on an educational material and have it be widely accessible. I think it's going to go through the same trajectory that chatbots had. I think the beginning when ChatGPT was launched, I'm sure not a lot of people knew how to use it. What are all the ways in which you could take advantage of it? In fact, I still don't think people really, it's not really a widespread thing. There are some people who really know how to use these AI tools very well. And most people have at least used it once or twice a week.

20:04And they don't actually use it in their day-to-day workflows. The browser is going to go through a similar trajectory. On the other hand, the one use case that's been very natural, very intuitive, that you don't even have to teach people how to use this as a sidecar. It's just picked up so much that I feel like it'll be so intuitive. It'll almost be like, without the sidecar, why am I using the browser anymore? That's how it's going to feel. It does quickly make the traditional chatbot perplexity chat GPT interface feel a little arcane when you have the sidebar with the web page. Exactly. A lot of people are using ChatGPT for, like, you're on an email and you want to know how to respond.

20:44So you copy-paste a bunch of context. You go there, you ask it to do something, and then you copy-paste it back. You edit it finally in your Gmail box, or you do it in your Google Sheets or Google Docs. All this is going to, like, the comment is going to feel much more intuitive. You have it right there on the side, and you can do your edits, or you're using it to draft a tweet or Elon Musk posts something and you want to post a funny response to that, you can literally ask Comet, hey, draft me a funny reply tweet to that and it'll automatically have it ready for you. You literally have to click the post button.

21:19All that stuff is going to definitely reduce the amount of times you literally open another tab and keep asking the AI. And firing up jobs right from your current website to go pull up relevant contacts for you and having it just come back and push notify you when it's ready, that's feeling like another level of delegation. Where is Comet struggling based on the early data you've seen? Definitely not perfect yet for long horizon tasks, like something that might take 15 minutes or something. I'll give you some examples. I want a list of engineers who have studied at Stanford and also worked at Anthropic.

22:01And they don't have to be currently working at Anthropic, but they must have worked at Anthropic at least once. I want you to give me an exhaust list of people like that, forward it over to Google Sheets with their LinkedIn URLs. And I want you to go to ZoomInfo and try to get me their email so that I can reach out to them. I also want you to bulk draft a personalized cold email to each of them to reach out to for a coffee chat. I don't think you can do this today. It can do parts of it. So you still have to be the orchestrator stitching them together. I'm pretty sure six months to a year from now, it can do the entire thing.

22:39I'm betting on progress in reasoning models to get us there. Just like how in 2022, we bet on models like GPT-4 and Cloud 3.5 Sonnet to arrive to make the hallucination problem perplexity basically non-existent when you have a good index and a good model. I'm betting on the fact that in the right environment of a browser with access to all these tabs and tools, a sufficiently good reasoning model, like slightly better, maybe GPT-5, maybe like Cloud 4.5, I don't know, could get us right over the edge where all these things are like suddenly possible. And then like a recruiter's work worth one week is just like one prompt, right?

23:22Sourcing and reach outs. And then you got to do state tracking. Okay, it's not just about doing this one task, but you want it to keep following up, keep a track of their responses. If maybe some people respond, go and update the Google Sheets, mark the statuses like responded or like in progress, and follow up with those candidates, sync with my Google Calendar, and then resolve conflicts and schedule a chat, and then push me a brief ahead of the meeting. Some of these things should be proactive. It doesn't even have to be a prompt. That's the extent to which we have an ambition to make the browser into something that feels more like an OS, where these are processes that are running all the time.

24:06It's not going to be easy to do all this today, but in general, we have been successful at identifying the sweet spots where things that are currently on the edge of working and we nail those use cases, get the early adopters to love the product and then ride the wave of progress in reasoning models. That's been the strategy. And I'm not sure if it's just the reasoning models or it's just the products early or I haven't figured out how to use it correctly. My experience so far - It's not like I'm saying everything will work out of the box with a new model. Yeah. You really have to know how to harness the capabilities and have the right evals and version control the prompts and do any post-training of auxiliary models, which is basically our expertise.

24:50We are very good at these things. I would say that based on, and I'll caveat that I haven't spent weeks yet with it, but based on my early experience with it, I would describe it as a little brittle or unpredictable in terms of the success rate. I asked it to book a very, or take me to the booking page for a very specific flight that I wanted, and it did it. And it took me to the page where, and it filled in some stuff, whereas the normal perplexity or chat GPT interface would just take me to the webpage. It actually took me a little bit further. It didn't book it, but it took me further. But then I asked it, like, create a list of everyone who follows me on X that works at Meta.

25:26And it gave me one person. And I know for a fact, there's many more than that. Or for example, I said, find my last interview with the CEO of Perplexity. And it said it couldn't, but then it showed a source link to the interview. So the answer said it couldn't, but the source didn't. I see some brittleness in the product. And I know it's early, but I'm just wondering, like, is all of that just bugs? or is that anything inherent in the models or the way you've architected it? I can take a look at it. You can share the link with me. But I would say majority of the advertised use cases that we ourselves advertise are things that are expected to work.

Read the full transcript

26:07Now, will it always like 100 % of the time work in a deterministic way? No. Are we going to get there in like a matter of months? I think so. You kind of have to be timing yourself where you're not exactly waiting for the moment where everything works reliably. You want to be a little early. You want to be a little edgy. I think there are some people who just love feeling the being part of the ride to like, you know, maybe there are more majority of the users are going to wait until everything works stable. So that's why we think the sidecar is already a value add for those kind of people where, OK, they don't have to use the agents that much.

26:44They can use a sidecar. They can use Gmail. They can use calendar connectors. They can use like all this LinkedIn search features, YouTube, or just basic stuff like searching over your own history. These are things that already work well. And this is already a massive value add over Chrome. And once they, like several minutes worth long horizon tasks start working reliably, that's going to make it feel more than just a browser. That's when you make it feel like an OS, like you want everything in that one container. and you'll feel like the rest of the computer doesn't even matter. We started this conversation talking about how you think the browser gives you this context to be able to create an actually useful agent.

27:23And there's this other technical path that the industry is looking at and getting excited about, which is MCP, Model Context Protocol. And at a high level, it's just this orchestration layer that lets an LLM talk to Airtable, Google Docs, whatever, and do things on your behalf in the same way that Comet is doing that in the sidebar. You're going at this problem through the browser and through the logged in state of the browser that you talked about and that shortcut. While a lot of people, Anthropic and others, OpenAI are looking at MCP as maybe the way that agents actually get built at scale.

27:56I'm curious what you think of those two paths and are you just very bearish on MCP or do you think MCP is for other kinds of companies? I'm not like extremely bearish on MCP. I just wanted to mature more. And I don't want to wait. I want to ship agents right now. I feel like AI as a community, as an industry, has just been talking about agents for like last two years and no one has actually shipped anything that worked. And I got tired of that. And like, we felt like the browser is a great way to do that today. MCP is going to definitely play a contributing factor to agents, like to the field, like in the next five years.

28:38There's still a lot of security issues they need to figure out there. Having your authentication tokens communicated from your client to an MCP server or from a remote MCP server to another client, all these things are pretty risky today. Way more risky than just having your persistent logins on your client on the browser. Same issues exist with the operator, which tried to create server-side versions of all your apps. This is OpenAI's computer use tool operator. Exactly. I think there's going to be some good MCP connectors that we'll definitely integrate with, like Linear or Notion. I guess GitHub has an MCP connector.

29:18So whenever it makes sense to use those over an agent that just opens these tabs and scrolls through them and clicks on things, we're going to use that. But it's always going to be bottlenecked by how well these servers are maintained and how you kind of like orchestrate these agents to use the protocol in the right way. It doesn't solve the search problem on those servers, by the way. You still have to go and figure out what data to retrieve. You define it as the orchestration layer. It's not the orchestration layer. It's just a protocol for communicating between servers and the client. or one server, another server.

29:59But it's still not solving the problem of the reasoning and knowing what information to extract and knowing what actions to take and all that chaining together different steps, trying things when things don't work. Whereas the browser is basically something that's been designed for humans to actually operate in. And extracting the DOM and knowing what actions to take seems to be something that these models, the reasoning models seem to be pretty good at. So we're going to do a hybrid approach and see what works best. At the end, it has to be fast, it has to be reliable, and it has to be cheap.

30:34So if MCP lets us do that better than the browsing agent, then we'll do that, right? Like there's no dogmatic vision here. At The Verge, we care a lot about the way our website looks and feels, the art of it, the visual experience. And with all this agent talk, and it collapsing into browsers. I'm curious what you think happens to the web and to websites that devote a lot to making their sites actually interesting to browse. Does the web just become a series of databases that agents are crawling through MCP or whatever and this entire economy of the web goes away? No. I actually think if you have a brand, people are going to be interested in knowing what that brand thinks.

31:22and it might go to you, the individual, or it might go to Verge, or it might go to both. Doesn't matter, right? So even within Verge, I might not be interested in articles written by some other people. I might be interested in specific people who have like their content or something. So I think the brand will play an even bigger role in a world where like both AIs and humans are surfing the web. And so I don't think it's going to go away. Maybe the traffic for you might not even come organically. it might come through social media. Like let's say you publish a new article. Some people might come click on it through Instagram or X or LinkedIn.

31:59Doesn't matter, right? And whether it'll be possible for a new platform to build traffic from scratch by just doing the good old SEO tricks, I'm actually bearish on that. It's going to be difficult to create your own presence by displaying the old playbook. You got to build your brand through a different manner. in this time period. And the existing ones who are lucky enough to already have a big brand presence, they have to maintain the brand also with a different playbook, not just doing SEO or traditional search engine growth tactics. We need to take another quick break. We'll be right back.

32:46Support for the show comes from Rippling. If you're a business owner, here's the truth. SaaS promised to make work easier, but now the average company is buried by hundreds of apps that silo your teams, slow you down, and simply don't work together. That's not SaaS. That's SAD. Software as a disservice. That's why you need Rippling. Rippling is the unified platform for global HR, payroll, IT, and finance. They've helped millions replace their mess of cobbled-together tools with one system designed to give leaders clarity, speed, and control. By uniting your employees, teams, and departments in one system, Rippling removes the bottlenecks, busywork, and silos your software created.

33:29Automated, perfectly in sync, and seriously simple to use, Rippling gives your company one source of truth for your people, their data, and everything they touch. With Rippling, you can run your entire HR, IT, and finance operations as one. Or pick and choose the products that best fill the gaps in your software stack. And right now you can get six months free when you go to rippling.com slash decoder. Learn more at r-i-p-p-l-i-n-g dot com slash decoder. That's rippling.com slash decoder for six months free. Terms and conditions apply.

34:09Ever feel like your work tools are working against you? Too many apps, endless emails, and scattered chats can slow everything down. Zoom brings it all together. Meetings, chat, docs, and AI Companion seamlessly on one platform. With everything connected, your workday flows, collaboration feels easier, and progress actually happens. Take back your workday at zoom.com slash podcast and zoom ahead.

34:40If you're tired of database limitations and architectures that break when you scale, Then it's time to think outside rows and columns. MongoDB is the database built for developers, by developers. It's ACID compliant, enterprise ready, and fluent in AI. That's why so many of the Fortune 500 trust MongoDB with their most critical workloads. Ready to think outside rows and columns? Start building faster at mongodb.com slash build.

35:16We're back.

35:20On Comet as a business, it's very compute intensive and it's still invite only. I imagine you wish you could just throw the gates open and let anyone use it, but it would melt your servers or your AWS bills, right? So how do you scale this thing? Not only do you scale it from the product sense and it becoming a thing that normal people can easily use and understand that curve of learning it that we talked about, but also just the business of it. you're not profitable, you're venture-backed, you have to make money one day, you have to be profitable. How do you scale something like this that is actually even more compute-intensive than a chatbot?

35:55I think if the reliability of these agents gets good enough, you could imagine people paying usage-based pricing. You might not be part of the max subscription tier of like$200 a month or anything, but there's like one task you really desperately want to get done, and you don't want to spend like three hours doing that. As long as the agent actually completes and you're like satisfied with the response rate, the success rate, you'll be okay with trusting the agent to like paying an advance fee of like$20. And for like, you know, for the recruiting task I described, like give me all the Stanford alumni who worked at Anthropic.

36:33I think that is a very interesting way of thinking about it, which is otherwise going to cost you a lot more time, or you have to like hire like a sourcing consultant or you have to hire a full-time sourcer whose only job is that if you value your time you're going to pay for it maybe like let me give you another example like you want to put an ad on meta right instagram and you kind of want to like look at ads done by similar brands pull that study that or like look at the adwords pricing of like you know 100 different keywords and figure out how to price your thing competitively like these are tasks that could definitely save you the hours and hours and maybe even give you an arbitrage over what you could do yourself because AI is able to do a lot more.

37:15At scale, if it helps you to make a few million bucks, does it not make sense to spend like$2 ,000 for that prompt? It does, right? I think we're going to be able to monetize in many more interesting ways than chatbots for the browser. It's still early, but the signs of life are already there in terms of what kind of use cases people have. And if you map reduce your cognitive labor in bulk to an AI that goes and does it reliably, it almost becomes like your personal AWS cluster with natural language described tasks. And I think we have to execute on it. But if we do execute on it and if the reasoning models are continuing to work well, you could imagine something that feels more like Claude Code for life.

38:05And Claude Code is a product that people are paying thousand bucks a month also, because even though it's expensive, it helps you maybe get a promotion faster because you're getting more work done and your salary goes up and it feels like the ROI is there. Are you betting so much on the browser for the next chapter of perplexity because the traditional chatbot race has just been completely won by ChatGPT? Like is perplexity as it exists today going away and the future of it is just comment? I wouldn't say that I'm betting on it because the chatbot race is over. Let me decouple the two things. The chatbot race does seem like it's over in the sense that it's very unlikely that people think of another product for day-to-day chat.

38:53From the beginning, we never competed on that market. We were always competing on search. We were trying to reimagine search. in the conversational style. Yes, every chatbot has search integrations. Some people like that. Some people still like a more search-like interface that we have. So we never wanted to go after that market and we're not competing there either. Google is trying to catch up and Grok's trying to catch up, Meta's trying to catch up. But I feel like all that is like wasted labor in my opinion at this point. The way I would phrase it is the browser is bigger than chat. It's a more sticky product.

39:29and it's the only way to build agents. It's the only way to build end-to-end workflows. It's the only way to build a true personalization, memory, and context. And so it's a bigger price, in my opinion, than trying to nail the chat game, especially in a market that's so fragmented. It's a much harder problem to crack too, both in terms of intelligence, how you package it, how you context engineer it, how you deal with all the shortcomings at the current moment, as well as like end user facing UX, which could be the front end, the back end, the security, privacy, and all the other bugs that you get to deal with when working with a much more multifaceted product like the browser.

40:10Do you think that's why OpenAI is going to be releasing a browser? Because they agree with that? I don't know if they are. I've read the same leaks that you have and it was very interesting. It came two hours after we launched. but uh i would say uh you you also made another point about perplexity being ignored and comet being the next thing i don't i don't see it that way because you cannot build a browser without a search a lot of people praise the comet browser because it doesn't feel like another browser because you know why one of the main reasons is of course we have the sidecar and we have the agent and all that, but the search, default search is perplexity.

40:51And we made it in a way where even if you're having an intent to navigate it, it'll understand that. It'll give you like four or five links if it feels like it's a navigational query. It'll give you images pretty quickly. It'll give you like a very short answer also. So you can combine informational queries or navigational queries, agent queries in like one single search box. That is only doable if you actually are working on the search problem, which we've been working on since the last two and a half years, right? So I don't see it as two separate things. Basically, you cannot build a product like Chrome without building Google.

41:25Similarly, you cannot build a product like Comet without building perplexity. So is there a Comet standalone mobile app and a standalone perplexity app? Yeah, there will be standalone apps for both. Some people are going to use the standalone Comet app, just like how they use Chrome or Safari, and it's okay. they probably won't do that because it's going to have an ai that you can talk to on every web page including in voice mode actually but you still want to just navigate and get to a website quickly like i just want to like go and browse verge without actually having any question in my mind that's fine and i could go to perplexity and have the all the other things the app has like discover feeds and spaces and like just just like quick fast answers without the web interface that's fine to.

42:12And we're going to support like a packaged version of the Browser Comet within the Perplexity app, just like how the Google app still supports navigation like Chrome. So by the way, both the Google app and the Chrome app are WebKit apps on iOS. Similarly, both the Google app and the Chrome app are Chromium apps on Android. We'll have to follow the same trajectory. Speaking of competition, I'm curious what you think of Dia, what the browser company has done. They released it around the same time as you. They're moving in this direction as well. Obviously, they're a smaller startup, but they got a lot of buzz with Arc, their original browser, and now seem to be betting on the same idea that you have with Comet.

42:53I'm curious if you've gotten to try it or how you think it will stack up against Comet. I haven't tried it myself. I've seen what other people have said. I think they have some interesting ideas on the visuals on the front end. If I were them, I would have just tried it in the same browser they had instead of going and trying to build distribution on a new one. But yeah, it's interesting. We're definitely going to study every product out there. And our focus, though, more goes on to Chrome. It is the big brother. And the way I think about it is even if I take 1 % of the Chrome users, set their default as Comet, that's a massive, massive win for us and a massive loss for them too, by the way, because any ad revenue lost is massive, like at that scale.

43:41Is word of mouth the main way you're going to grow Comet, or are you looking for distribution partnerships beyond that? In the beginning, we're going to do more word of mouth growth. It's very powerful. It's worked out well for us in the past with perplexity itself. And we're going to try to follow the same trajectory here. And luckily we have an installed base of perplexity already of like, you know, 30 to 40 million people. So even if we get a good chunk of those people to try out Comet and convert some of those people who tried it into setting it as default, it'll already be a massive victory without relying on any distribution partnerships.

44:16And then we're obviously going to try seeing how to convert that progress into a partnership like Google has with a bunch of people. I just want to caveat by saying it's going to be extremely hard. We've spoken about this in the past where Google makes sure every Android phone has Google Chrome as the default browser. And you cannot change that. You lose a lot of money if you change that. Microsoft makes sure every Windows laptop is coming with Edge as the default browser. Again, you cannot change that. You will lose a lot of money if you change that. Now, the next step is, okay, let them be the default browser.

44:52At least, can you have your app as part of the Android or Windows build? You still cannot change that easily, especially on Windows. It's basically pretty impossible to convince like large OEMs to change that. So they have all these agreements that are like several years locked in and you work with companies that plan for like the device that they're shipping two years in advance. That's their mode. And in some sense, it's not even the product. It's not even exactly in the distribution world. It's more in these legalities of how they crafted these agreements, which is That's why I'm like, like, you know, happy that the DOJ is at least looking into Google.

45:31And we've made a list of recommendations on that. And I hope some something happens there. Yeah, they may have forced a spinoff of Chrome, which would be really interesting and reset things. You know, there's a lot of people that think Apple should buy you. And Eddie Q, one of their top execs, actually has some pretty nice things to say about you on the stand when he was there during the Google trial and said that you guys had talked about working together. Obviously, you can't talk about something that hasn't been announced yet, especially with Apple. But what do you make of that and Apple? I mean, I'm firstly honored by Eddie mentioning us in the trial as a product that he likes.

46:05And he's heard from his circles that people like it. I would love to work with Apple on integrations with Safari or Siri or Apple Intelligence. It's the one product that almost everybody loves using. Or it's a status symbol. Like everybody wants to graduate using an Apple device. So I'm pretty sure that we share a lot of design aesthetics in terms of how we do things and how they do things. At the same time, my goal is to make Perplexity as big as possible. It's definitely possible that this browser is so platform agnostic that it can benefit Android and iOS ecosystems, Windows and Mac ecosystems.

46:46And we can be pretty big on our own, just like Google was. Of course, Google owns Android, but you could imagine they would have been pretty successful if they just had the best search engine and the best browser, and they didn't actually own the platform either. I and others also reported that Mark Zuckerberg approached you about potentially joining Meta and working on his reboot of their AI efforts. What was Zuck's pitch? I'm curious. Tell me. Zuck is awesome. He's doing a lot of awesome things. And I think Meta has such a sticky product. It's fantastic. And we look at that as an example of it's possible to build a large business without having any platform yourself.

47:26Were you shocked by the numbers that Zuck is paying for top AI research, these nine-figure compensation offers? I think a lot of them are actually tied to Meta's stock needing to increase for those numbers to be paid. So it's actually pretty contingent on the business and not just, you know, guaranteed payouts, but still huge numbers. Yeah, huge. And definitely I was surprised by the magnitude of the numbers. Seems like it's needed at this point for them. But at the same time, like Elon and XAI were shown, like, you know, you don't need to spend that much to train models competitive with OpenAI and Anthropic.

48:06So I don't know if money alone solves every problem here. You do need to have a team that works well together, has a proper mission alignment and milestones. In some sense, failure is not an option for them. The amount of investment is so big. And I feel like the way Zuck probably thinks is, you know, I'm going to get all the people, I'm going to get all the compute, and I'm going to get all the, like, you know, milestones set up for you guys. But now it's all on you to execute. And if you fail, like, it's going to look pretty bad on me. So you better not fail. That's probably the deal. What are the second order effects to the AI talent market, you think, after this, after Zuck's hiring spree?

48:48I mean, it's definitely going to feel like a transfer market now, right? Like with NBA or something. Yeah. There's going to be a few individual stars who are having so much leverage. One thing I've noticed is anthropic researchers are not the ones getting poached. Mostly. He has poached some, but not as many. Yeah, so it does feel like that's something labs need to work on, which is truly like aligning people on one mission, that like money alone is not the motivator for them. And as a company, your company is doing well, like, you know, the stock is going up and you feel dopamine from working there every day and you're encountering new kind of challenges.

49:29You feel a lot of growth. You're learning new things. And you're getting richer too along the way. like why would you want to go and just because you have some guaranteed payments do you think strongly about getting perplexity or profitability to be able to control your own destiny so to speak definitely it's inevitable we want to do it before the ipo and we think we can ipo in 2028 or 9. i would like to ipo by the way just to be clear i don't want to stay private forever like Some of the companies have chosen to do so. Even though it gives you advantages in M &As and decision-making power, I do think the publicity and the marketing you get from an IPO and the fact that people can finally invest in a search alternative to Google is a pretty massive opportunity for us to IPO.

50:16But I don't think it makes sense to IPO before hitting like a billion dollars in revenue and some profitability along the way. So that's definitely something we want to get to in the next four years or three years. But I don't want to like stunt our own growth and not be aggressive in trying new things today. Makes sense. Yeah. You launched Perplexity. It's crazy that it's already been just over three years now. And it was right around when ChatGPT first launched. And it's wild to think about everything we've talked about and that all this has happened in like barely three years. So maybe this is an impossible question, but I want to leave you with this question.

50:53If you look out three years from now, you just talked about the IPO, which is interesting. But what does perplexity look like three years from now? I hope it becomes the one tool you think of when you want to actually get anything done. And it has a lot of deep connection to you because it synchronizes with all your context and proactively things on your behalf and truly makes your life a lot easier. All right. We'll leave it there. Arvind, thanks. Thank you.

51:30Thanks to Aravind for taking the time to speak with me and thank you for tuning in. If you'd like to let us know what you thought about this episode or what else you'd like us to cover, drop us a line. You can email us at decoder at theverge.com. We're also on TikTok and Instagram via at decoder pod. If you like decoder, please share it with your friends and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. And if you haven't already, don't forget to subscribe to The Verge, which gets you access to my newsletter command line and a bunch of other great stuff. Decoder is a production of The Verge and is part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.

52:03Our producers are Kate Cox and Nick Stat. Our editor is Ursa Wright. The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. See you next time.

52:17Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com.

53:18C service in the U.S. with over 1 ,500 corporate guides. Don't wait. Protect your privacy. Build your brand and get your complete business identity in just 10 clicks and 10 minutes. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com slash paidvox and start building something amazing. Get more with Northwest Registered Agent at northwestregisteredagent.com slash paidvox.

From the publisher

This is Alex Heath, deputy editor at The Verge. Nilay’s out on parental leave for the next few months, so I’ll be stepping in to host our Thursday episodes while he’s out. My guest today is Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, who is betting that the browser is where more useful AI will get built. 

Perplexity just released Comet, an AI web browser for the Mac and Windows that’s still in an invite-only beta. I’ve been using it, and it’s very interesting. In this conversation, Aravind and I also discussed the future of Perplexity, the AI talent wars, and why he thinks people will eventually pay thousands of dollars for a single AI prompt.

Read the full transcript here on The Verge.

Links: 

Perplexity just launched an AI web browser | Verge

Perplexity wants to buy Chrome if Google has to sell it | Verge

The Dia browser is a big bet on the. web and AI | Verge

Perplexity’s CEO on fighting Google & the AI browser war | Command Line

Perplexity launches a $200 monthly subscription plan | Verge

Meta says it’s winning the talent war with OpenAI | Verge

Meta is trying to win the AI race with money | Verge

Meta held talks to buy Perplexity and others | Command Line

Inside Mark Zuckerberg’s AI hiring spree | Command Line

Perplexity is ready to take on Google | Command Line

Credits:

Decoder is a production of The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.

Our producers are Kate Cox and Nick Statt. Our editor is Ursa Wright. 

The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Decoder with Nilay Patel

All 152 episodes
Perplexity CEO on why the browser is AI's killer appDecoder with Nilay Patel · 50 min
Listen in VO