Energy addition, not energy transition? What does it mean for the future of our energy system, and the climate? | Special episode recorded at ADIPEC, the world’s largest energy event

8 Nov 2025 · 45 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

A special ADIPEC episode arguing “energy addition” (adding renewables and low-carbon tech alongside oil/gas/coal) rather than rapid “energy transition” replacement; transition succeeds when new power is economically viable. It also links the shift in conference focus to AI/digitalization, workforce uncertainty, and continued decarbonization via methane and flaring cuts.

Guests (backgrounds)

Carol Nackley, long-time energy executive; advisory firm Crystal Energy; Secretary General of the Arab Energy Club. John Gilley, CEO of Kent (energy services; oil & gas, hydrogen, renewables; expanded via SNC-Lavalin acquisition). Sascha Sisiu, sales manager Middle East & Africa at Erzen (German industrial equipment: compression/blowers; gas processing). Clay Siegel, senior fellow at CSIS (energy security, geo-economics). Bjorn Otto Sverdrup, chair of Oil and Gas Climate Initiative executive committee; head of Oil and Gas Decarbonisation Charter secretariat.

Key claims

Policy is decelerating net-zero rhetoric, but oil/gas won’t disappear soon; “complementarity, not substitution.” Solar/wind scale when cheaper, regardless of policy. AI is real but not as disruptive as past oil tech revolutions; workforce impacts unclear. Methane and flaring reductions remain business-rooted.

Notable examples

U.S. shale “substitution” analogy; solar/wind cost advantage; hydrogen and nuclear “out of fashion” at ADIPEC; EV adoption potentially removing 10–15 million bpd oil demand; methane tracking/flaring as “energy loss”; U.S. LNG export capacity and potential gas glut; China exporting clean-tech as an alternative model.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Political Landscape of Energy

0:00 to 0:50

Learn about the politicization of energy and the need for a diverse energy approach.

“In the United States we seem to have quite a bit of politicization of energy.”

The Political Landscape of Energy

0:55 to 1:44

Learn about the politicization of energy and the need for a diverse energy approach.

“It brought together the entire energy ecosystem to address a dual imperative, strengthening today's energy systems and scaling intelligence solutions that advance global progress.”

Energy Addition vs. Transition

2:12 to 6:05

Explore the concept of energy addition instead of a complete transition.

“To write off our conference, I spoke to a range of people about that idea.”

AI's Role in the Energy Sector

6:05 to 7:36

Discussion on the implications of AI in the energy industry and workforce.

“We've heard much less about that here this week.”

Decarbonization Trends and Future Outlook

7:36 to 10:24

Insights into the shifting narrative around decarbonization in the energy industry.

“Not to continue producing in the same way we have been producing.”

The Evolution of Kent and Energy Transition

10:24 to 13:50

John Gilley discusses the evolution of Kent and the importance of energy transition.

“Yeah, I do think that's very interesting.”

Climate Change: The Greatest Challenge

13:50 to 14:00

A debate on climate change as the greatest challenge of our time and its implications.

The Debate on Climate Change as the Greatest Challenge

14:00 to 17:19

Explore the contrasting perspectives on climate change as the most significant challenge and the need for a balanced approach to hydrocarbons.

“You called climate change the greatest challenge of our times.”

Economic Viability of Energy Transition

17:20 to 20:16

Discuss the economic factors driving the energy transition, including the competitiveness of renewable sources like solar and wind.

“Okay, he has canceled certain projects that he was allowed to do, but wind will continue in the US because it's cheaper to provide electricity.”

AI's Role in Energy Efficiency and Data Centers

20:17 to 22:54

Investigate how AI can enhance energy efficiency in data centers and its implications for future energy systems.

“even though they're in conventional oil, have an element of energy transition in them.”
Show all 20 chapters

Insights from the ADIPEC Conference

22:55 to 28:01

Hear perspectives on the energy transition from industry experts and the evolving mandates of companies in response to climate challenges.

“There is also enormous potential for AI to help solve these challenges and can have a really positive contribution as well.”

Insights on Oil and Gas Industry Dynamics

28:01 to 29:38

Explore the evolving views on the long-term future of oil and gas and its market trends.

“So it's a whole basket full of things that comes into play, yes.”

Energy Addition vs. Energy Transition

29:39 to 31:29

Discuss the validity of the concept of energy addition in the context of current energy demands.

“Someone else I spoke to was Clay Siegel, who's a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, which is a Washington-based think tank.”

Energy Security in a Changing Landscape

31:30 to 33:44

Understand how the ongoing dependence on oil and gas impacts global energy security.

“Another one thinks that those are terrible and that it's only this way to go.”

Climate Change and Industry Response

33:45 to 36:37

Analyze how the oil and gas industry is adapting to climate change while maintaining production.

“Are you saying that we're just going to have to accept increased global warming because we don't have any alternative to getting away from oil, I guess?”

The Role of China in Global Energy

36:38 to 40:04

Examine China's emerging role as a leader in renewable technologies and its implications for global energy.

“Maybe I wouldn't necessarily look at the United States as a petro state per se, because I believe that generally that implies a little bit of national control over the industry.”

Commitment to Decarbonization in Oil and Gas

40:05 to 42:00

Learn about recent efforts and commitments from the oil and gas industry towards decarbonization.

“The one that I would keep an eye on for the coming year or so is on the topic of United States permitting reform.”

Decarbonization Momentum and Challenges

42:00 to 43:42

Explore the ongoing momentum in decarbonization despite challenges and backlash.

“So despite a lot of talk about the energy transition faltering, faltering, the momentum for decarbonisation faltering, you would say it's as strong as ever?”

Upcoming COP30 and Energy Day Preparation

43:42 to 44:30

Learn about the upcoming Energy Day at COP30 and discussions on industry decarbonization.

“Right, and I know you're going from here very soon to COP30 in Berlin, Brazil, and we're going to be talking to you again then.”

Show Closing and Future Insights

44:30 to 45:14

Wrap up the discussion with thanks and a preview of future episodes on COP30.

“about the COP30 climate talks that start on Monday.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00In the United States we seem to have quite a bit of politicization of energy. One side, one kind of tribe has an affinity for these types of energy supplies. Another one thinks that those are terrible and that it's only this way to go. But I'm telling you, we really need all of the above. The transition will happen when it's economically viable. No greater example of that is solar or even onshore and offshore wind. When they become viable, it just happens. It doesn't really matter about policy. The energy transition for it to succeed, we need all the fuels on board. not to continue producing in the same way we have been producing lots of technologies out there to reduce the industry's impact on the environment.

0:39But really, I think and I'm a strong believer that the energy transition is about complementarity and substitution. It's too early for substitution.

0:50This episode of The Energy Gang is brought to you by ADAPEC, the world's largest energy event. ADAPEC 2025 took place in Abu Dhabi from 3rd to 6th November under the theme Energy, Intelligence, Impact. It brought together the entire energy ecosystem to address a dual imperative, strengthening today's energy systems and scaling intelligence solutions that advance global progress. More than 205 ,000 attendees and 2 ,250 exhibiting companies gathered to exchange ideas, forge partnerships and mobilize investment, showcasing solutions that deliver energy to more people more affordably and with lower carbon intensity.

1:26Across 380 sessions, over 1 ,800 expert speakers explored how the convergence of energy, AI, investment in emerging economies is reshaping markets and driving opportunities worldwide. Following this year's success, Adipec returns to Abu Dhabi from the 2nd to the 5th of November 2026. Discover more at adipec.com.

1:51Hello and welcome to The Energy Gang, a discussion show from Wood Mackenzie about the fast-changing world of energy. I'm Ed Crooks and all week we've been at ADPEC, the world's largest energy conference which is held in Abu Dhabi. It is a vast event, more than 200 ,000 people attend and it's also a place where you can see many of the most influential people who are shaping the world of energy. Now one of the big themes here has been the idea of energy addition as opposed to energy transition. What it refers to is the thought that newer sources of energy, in particular renewables and also other low-carbon technologies such as green hydrogen, are being added to the world's established energy sources, meaning oil, gas and coal, rather than replacing them.

2:30To write off our conference, I spoke to a range of people about that idea. Did they think that was the right way to describe the way the global energy system is changing? And if it is true, what are its implications? First of all, I spoke to Carol Nackley. She's had a long career in energy and now has an advisory firm called Crystal Energy. She's also Secretary General of the Arab Energy Club. I asked her first for her impressions on this year's ADIPEC as the conference drew to a close. I'm not new to ADIPEC, so I don't like to comment only on this year's ADIPEC. I like to take a look at all the previous ADIPEC sessions that I attended over the years and easily that goes over 10 years.

3:04And it's amazing. So each year you do find a main theme. So we cover all themes related to energy, but there is always one theme that dominates the discussions. and this year in particular AI, digital technologies. And it's not just in the discussions that dominated the pros and cons, the challenges, the impact. It's also you see it everywhere. So when you cross the halls, you can easily see the whole event has been more digitalized than all the previous years. And I mean, I learned a lot about AI, how it's being implemented in organization, the energy sector. And the only question that I kept on coming to my mind is mainly about the workforce, because I know the energy industry, especially oil and gas, you will always seek improvements in efficiencies, optimizing costs, and this is where AI is helping a lot.

3:52But I have to say that I did not leave with a convincing answer about the outlook when it comes to the workforce, because nobody really knows. So you have some organizations, they don't mention letting people go. They said it's against their culture. What they are doing, they are upgrading the skills. So they are having this kind of nice flow between humans and the machines and the software. But other people warn of job losses, but not quite convincingly. And the interesting thing, nobody knows how far AI can go with its impact on the industry. We also talked about AI and the increase in demand for electricity.

4:32but I did not hear about improvements in efficiency when it comes to the demand. So there are lots of unknowns with AI and I don't think AI is going to leave Adipak anytime soon. Because I was wondering how real you think a lot of this is. I mean, I've been speaking to some people here who said, yes, there's all this talk about AI, but it's kind of, it's fashion, it's the current trend, it happens to be what everyone wants to talk about at the moment, but a lot of it is cosmetic, a lot of it is kind of showy stuff and things that could be done in principle and might be interesting but are not actually really changing the way people do business and the way the energy industry operates.

5:10Do you think there's something in that or do you think there is a real change here? Look, that's how I'm going to put it. So far, and I'm not an engineer or a specialist in IT or AI, But I don't think, and I'm not convinced, that AI is as disruptive as a technology as, for example, what we saw as a share evolution. Even if you take horizontal drilling alone back in the 60s and before that, you know, they made deep water drilling possible. They opened up Alaska. They opened up the North Sea. They opened up offshore Brazil, for example. And then we had the hydraulic fracking added to horizontal drilling.

5:47And that's when we saw a serious disruption. I mean, look at market dynamics today, largely dictated by what happened in the U.S. with the share revolution. I don't see that happening with AI, at least not in the coming few years. So it is changing the way organizations are doing business, but it's not really rewriting, reinventing the structure of oil and gas markets or energy markets in general. That's really very interesting. I mean, again, talking about sort of changing fashions, it feels like two years ago, if you'd been at this event or many other energy conferences, all the talk would have been about decarbonization, emissions reduction, the energy transition to a low-carbon energy system.

6:26We've heard much less about that here this week. Absolutely. Yes. Again, does that reflect a real change in the industry, or is that just a kind of a change in the prevailing discourse? I don't think it's just a change in the industry. I think the industry is mirroring what is happening in the global environment. If you look at policy shifts, for example, the geopolitical changes that we are seeing, and not just in the U.S., but everywhere. I mean, 2024 was the biggest election year in human history, so we had changes everywhere. And with those changes, we also saw fundamental changes in policies.

7:03We saw policy shifts moving away from the rapid push towards decarbonization, achieving net zero to I don't like the word abandonment or a U-turn. Not a U-turn, but definitely a deceleration. Definitely like trying to rebalance the argument. For me, it was a bit too polarized, but we're not ditching the net zero. So now when you think about the future of the energy industry, when you think about the future in the light of everything you've been hearing here this week, what are you expecting now? What I always believed in, that the energy transition for it to succeed, we need all the fuels on board.

7:41Not to continue producing in the same way we have been producing. We mentioned AI earlier. Lots of technologies out there to reduce industry's impact on the environment. But really I think, and I'm a strong believer, that the energy transition is about complementarity, not substitution. It's too early for substitution. So when you look at the global energy industry, primarily oil and gas companies, private or nationally owned companies, I don't see them abandoning their net zero targets, right? I see them recalibrating their portfolio, especially the private companies. But when you look at the Aramco's of this world in Adnong, they did not abandon their efforts to reduce their carbon emissions because they are taking a much longer-term perspective than this immediate short-term debate.

8:26They want to be the last to leave a shrinking market, whether it would be maybe in 80 years or 50 years, I don't know. But there is not about just the one which has the lowest cost of production. It is also about the organization and the country that has the lowest carbon footprint, the lowest carbon intensity. Blend those two in addition to your resources, and they have massive reserves here in this region. They will be the last to leave a shrinking market when that happens. Yeah, I think that's really interesting, and I think that is a very compelling argument. So, question, what might we be talking about a year from now then?

9:01Come back to ADAPEC 2026. What do you think the hot topic will be then? Well, it will definitely, oil and gas will always remain key topic. One thing actually we should have mentioned is, for example, hydrogen was not a big thing this year. Although last year or the previous years, it was almost like AI today. I don't think, yeah, I don't think it's going to come back anytime soon, hydrogen. Maybe we'll have to wait a bit longer. Well, we do have to wait and see. I actually chaired a panel on hydrogen, talking about hydrogen and derivatives. I heard some pretty interesting things there from people operating in the industry saying that, as you say, it's out of fashion now, but there is actually a lot of progress being made.

9:40Costs are being driven down. Perhaps some of the hopes for hydrogen being a huge part of the global energy system have faded. But low carbon hydrogen having a key role in some sectors, in some countries, that's definitely not gone away as an idea. I still think there could be much more progress. Yes, it has not been abandoned. But definitely the excitement, I mean, last few years, in almost every session, everybody became hydrogen experts. You don't have that this year. And I don't think it's going to come back anytime soon next year. But we will continue to see definitely technology playing an important role, including carbon capture and storage.

10:16And this is an area which was there, especially in this region, because what's happening in this region also influenced the ADPEC agenda. Gas, the push for gas in this region. gas is going to continue to be a big theme, as well as renewable and maybe, maybe nuclear, because I can see like a stronger interest across the region to think about power, security, and increase in demand for electricity. We'll see. Yeah, I do think that's very interesting. The UAE, where we are at the moment, they've had their nuclear program, which has been a big success, it seems. I've just come from the United States, where there's talk about this massive push, $80 billion plus push into new nuclear construction being backed by the US government.

10:58And SMRs coming up. A lot of interesting technologies there. Is it the next hydrogen story? I don't know. I think it could be, but maybe some of those technologies. I think it's certainly not going to be room for all of those different ideas. There's a lot of different SMR designs that have been proposed. They're definitely not all going to make it. But as you say, some of them may reach commerciality. We'll have to see about that. But that's a very interesting thought, as you say. Maybe next year everything's going to be about nuclear. So I will see you here next year. And I'm just about to say it would be great to talk to you again next year and to see how things are going then.

11:33But thanks very much for joining us here. Thank you for having me with you. Very luckily. Thanks a lot. I next spoke to John Gilley, who's chief executive of the energy services company, Kent, which is dealing with a lot of these issues in a very practical way. It works on projects in oil and gas and hydrogen and renewables. I asked him first to talk about what he thought were the most important messages for the industry coming out of AdiPec. I've been coming to AdiPec for 15 years, at least 15, 16 years. And the narrative changes as how, you know, people talk about it and how it's actually put across.

12:05You know, so it used to be a pure oil and gas conference where you were talking about technologies. How can we drill for oil? How can we extract gas more efficiently? So on and so forth. to a point where you start talking then about energy transition. Certainly over the last couple of years, energy transition, how can we progress into energy transition, especially on the back of the COP that was held in Dubai recently where Sultan got that fantastic agreement. That narrative does seem to have shifted or deprioritized slightly and is replaced with AI, digital. How can we secure the data? How can we be more efficient?

12:41The fact of the matter is energy transition is continuing. Yeah, that is really interesting. And I want to get into a lot of those issues later on in the interview. Just before we do that, though, I am interested in hearing a bit about your recent history. You became CEO in 2020. And then the following year, Kent became a much larger company with the acquisition of the SNC level in oil and gas division. And you changed the name of the company from Kentek, which had been back to Kent. What did that mean for you? To be honest, frankly speaking, it was a crossroads for me because at the time I'm a complete energy transition geek or freak or addict, whatever you want to call it.

13:17I can't get enough of it on the data side of it, on the engineering side of it. And I did think for a while that maybe I should leave this industry. Maybe I should go and do something purely in renewables or something completely, completely different. And it was at that time that we went from a company of 2 ,500 people to the new company of 10 ,000 people overnight. So we had a complete reset of culture. We couldn't have said to those 7 ,500 people come in and bow down in front of the Kent Tech Culture. We rebranded as Kent. I think that was 2021. And during that work, we asked everybody, we interviewed or had workshops with over a third of the population of the company to ask them, what type of company do you want to work for?

13:58What should that company's purpose be? and so where I squared it away with my own kind of moral line was I prefer to be in the industry doing something about it than being outside of the industry you know driving my Range Rover and saying that these companies are destroying the planet so that's what I chose and funnily enough from the 3 ,000 or three and a half thousand employees that was the theme you know we want to be known as a company that are courageously tackling the greatest challenge of our time and the greatest challenge of our time is climate change So let's talk a little bit more then about the energy transition and climate change.

14:34You called climate change the greatest challenge of our times. There's a debate about that, right? Not everyone would agree with that. You'll find people who will say, yes, it's a challenge, but there's a lot of other challenges in the world, in particular, I guess, challenges around relieving poverty, global development, raising living standards and so on. And then on the other hand, you will also find people who will say, well, okay, if you think that, if you believe that climate change is the greatest challenge of our time. That means we just have to get off hydrocarbons as quickly as we possibly can.

15:04Even if, as we say, the hydrocarbons produced in the Gulf region that are relatively low emissions and low cost, you still need to move quickly away from those because of the urgency of the issue. How do you sort of square that circle? So, following off, getting off them as quickly as we can is probably not the right statement. getting off them in a controlled manner over decades is the way to go because the problem is is that what nobody needs is price spikes so we have to continue to invest in producing hydrocarbons responsibly we're in the regions of the world where we where we ought to and then at the same time we're in parallel invest in these newer technologies to make sure that those can also come to bear specifically sustainable aviation fuel and the pure renewables type projects.

15:58It's something that if you rush into will cause massive economic problems and we've seen that in past years with spikes in Europe and the gas cost almost crippled the UK at one point. So you can't have that. It has to be very well planned, very well documented as to how we will actually do this. It of course becomes extremely difficult because of the short... In countries where you have political systems that actually turn over every four years, it becomes almost impossible, you know, because every four years, those political parties are looking for re-election. So drives that they're trying to do in implementing policies can be reversed or can be dampened down.

16:36And we've seen that. We've seen that for decades, for decades, you know. And so your point is then that if you want public buy-in to the energy transition, if you want public support for decarbonisation over time, you have to do that in a way that people aren't acceptable that's affordable crucially and that doesn't hurt living standards. I kind of change my view on this as time goes by. In the end of the day the transition will happen when it's economically viable. No greater example of that is solar or even onshore and offshore wind. When they become viable it just happens. It doesn't really matter about policy.

17:17Trump cancelling wind projects and and deprioritizing that. Okay, he has canceled certain projects that he was allowed to do, but wind will continue in the US because it's cheaper to provide electricity. When you compare it to what the US utility customers are paying for electricity because of failed nuclear projects to the actual cost of a kilowatt hour from solar or wind, it's a fraction. So there's no policy that will stop that because business people will just look to make their margin. And how do you see the outlook for some of those low-carbon sectors then? Because as you say, there are cases where the case for low-carbon energy is just economically very, very compelling without any subsidy or anything, and wind and solar would fall into that category.

18:00When you think about some of the things you've been talking about, though, think about offshore wind, think about sustainable aviation fuel, those are relatively higher cost. Where the policy support isn't there, those sectors are really challenged. so what's your expectation of how that's going to play out do you think the policy support will be there to enable those sectors to continue to grow or is that a risk do you think that'll be withdrawn and they'll face severe problems i really would see that sustainability aviation fuel is a fuel for the future it's just a no-brainer when you think about actually let's say the decarbonization of transportation i think the well the demand for oil at the moment is about 100 or 102 million barrels a day depending on the week and what's happening around the world 40 million miles of that is in personal transportation private transportation that transportation whether people like to admit it or not is being electrified as we speak with certain countries you know i can't remember what china is at but it's about 50 or 60 percent overall evs now proliferation is up around eight percent there's an inflection point on that curve that when you pass it it could hit 25 percent within three years.

19:07You know, there's this adoption curve that you have, but nobody's really tested it on something such as large as a car, normally on an iPhone. And the inflection point on the iPhone, I think, was around 7%. So for a car, it might be bigger. Once that happens, that will take 10 to 15 million barrels of demand off the page, which is monumental, you know. And that will have, I think, the type of effects that nobody can understand just yet. You know, we saw the effects from Russia's invasion of Ukraine, what it had on gas, you know, and this type of effect is just unprecedented. And it will be a different world, you know, and so we will start to decarbonise massively.

19:43For the first time last year, oil was 30 % of the world's energy supply, with renewables being roughly a third. Largely the new capacity, the increased capacity on the renewables, has been met by wind and solar. You know, so energy transition is happening. Oil and gas will be around for decades to come, and we should continue to produce it as responsibly as we possibly can. Many of our projects with ADNOC is about actually reduction of flaring, taking out of carbon within the process before it ever gets burnt. So lots of the projects are actually, I would have said maybe 7 or 8 out of 10 of our projects, even though they're in conventional oil, have an element of energy transition in them.

20:21But nobody really understands or talks about it. And what about AI then? That, as you say, has been another big theme of the conversation here at IPEG. yeah that's something you do a lot of work in but you have a data center business yeah uh how has the ai revolution been changing what you do massively and we've been investing millions millions in it for the last number of years and we look at it in different ways you know so we've looked at the actual data center side of things which is the company that we acquired subtle as consulting and so that's just purely figuring out how to design and build data centers globally so subtle was a relatively regional company and that's what we figured that we have at camp we've got this wonderful global reach platform that we can buy regional companies plug them into our platform and then grow them from from there so that's one side of we're also interested in the power side to supply energy to the data center so where that can be let's say gas turbines or where they're not really interested in the whole rhetoric about nuclear supplying power to data centers i think is nonsense but other things like wind or you know let's say isolated energy supplies like offshore wind that we can bring ashore and power data center.

21:30So we're interested in making that connection somehow into data centers. On the AI side of things, we've got this as kind of two different sides. One is a sales side where we've launched our own product called Innova AI, which is a Kent product. We won the award last year for best AI solution. And that was launched last year at Adypec. It's in the AI hall as well. You can see AI is becoming a much bigger theme. And then outside of that, we've retained consultants to guide us on our roadmap towards how we integrate AI into our business, either to sell it to our clients or to make us more efficient so we can pass on the savings to our clients.

22:07And we have to hardwire the logic of that and theme it towards our purpose, which is tackling the great challenge of our time. We're continually looking, how can we use this software, this gift from whomever to actually accelerate us working more efficiently, producing hydrocarbons more efficiently and more responsibly, but also increasing the energy systems of the future, which the world is... At some point, it's an existential threat for our company. That's why we're investing. That's why our purpose says we want to give the world the energy that it so badly needs. The world's addicted to energy.

22:46We're all addicted to energy. So there's all sorts of different things that we can do in terms of helping the world to get the energy that it requires. Yeah, that's a really great point. And that's actually a theme that my colleague on this podcast, Amy Myers-Jaffe, often picks up on, which is that people talk about AI and energy and people talk about data centers and rising electricity demand and all of that in terms of problems that are being created by AI. There is also enormous potential for AI to help solve these challenges and can have a really positive contribution as well. Huge. I mean, it's outside of our remiss, so I'm not talking about Kent, but it's maybe something that we could look at in the future, especially as soon as we've kind of dipped our toes into data centres, and I think we'll be very large in data centres.

23:29And we're building mega data centres in this region, in Saudi and in Abu Dhabi, and we're looking at going into our regions then with the help of the companies that we've acquired. But if you think about energy usage and efficiently using that, So behind the meter type energy generations in houses, you know, having AI systems figure out which houses are good energy batteries in terms of heat or cooling, that it can draw on that energy at different times and running more intelligent networks. You know, the actual need for or the demand will drop dramatically. At the same time, we're electrifying vehicles.

24:05We get, you know, demand side generation. It will transform. It will transform. And I'm sure there are companies doing that. I would love for us to actually get into that side of things. You know, when you talk about passive houses, you know, reducing all of the demand on that side of things, as well as everything that Kent and our clients are doing on the other side and meeting somewhere in the middle. I'd love to do that. But we can't do everything. We can't do everything. Yeah, we're busy with what we have. Yeah, but it certainly is a very exciting time, isn't it? Fascinating. The possibilities are amazing.

24:39and it's going to be, as you say, fascinating to follow how it develops and how this industry changes in the years to come. For now, though, John Glead, thanks very much indeed. Great talking to you. My pleasure. Thanks for joining us. Cheers. Another executive we spoke to was Sascha Sisiu, who's the sales manager for the Middle East and Africa for Erzen, which is a German manufacturer of industrial equipment. I asked him what he'd learned at the conference. Do you think carbon reduction and addressing climate change has been de-emphasised here this year? No, I would say the opposite actually.

25:10And to be honest, I think the most drive that actually comes from companies. So they have their own mandate, whether it's Oman, UAE or other GCC countries or even African countries. So they have their own mandate to push that decarbonisation forward. And which is good for us because we have innovative products that actually fit into this gap. That's still on. Yes. Right. And so obviously there's been a lot of a debate about the energy transition and what's happening to that and is there an energy transition and so on. But you're saying that as you see it and certainly from your customers, that interest in reducing emissions is still stronger than ever?

Read the full transcript

25:52As strong as ever? Yeah, definitely. I would say it's stronger than ever because companies, as I said, they have their own mandate and they're pushing really forward whether this is flare gas recovery, whether it's let's say tail gas, flare gas, boil off gas recovery, all these kind of applications what the customer is looking for fits into our portfolio whether it's with compression or whether it's with the blowers that we have. So definitely it's I would say it's an uptrend actually it's a must now. So how do you think this is going to affect your strategy and your decision making as company in terms of what you've learned here and what you're hearing from customers and potential future customers what does it mean for you?

26:34Yeah I mean how it impacts us it impacts us extremely because the request is there to have a product that actually provides that so particular on the compression side so what we have done now in Ersen in our factory in Germany is we developed one of the biggest hydrogen compressors that is specifically tailored it's a bespoke solution so that will contribute definitely into the hydrogen market and green energy and also reduction of co2 it will be released probably in a month's time and it's a real step forward so you see there's a direct impact is there right that is really fascinating and i do think it's one of the things i've been really struck by while i've been here is that there is sort of the debate over energy and what happens in political circles and so on And that kind of swings around very rapidly.

27:26And what is sort of fashionable one year is not fashionable the next year and so on. But behind that, the industry is changing at a much slower pace. And there is a steady process of evolution. Yes. And that continues whatever the noise is in the debate around that. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, there are certain topics, they don't go away. And there will be more emphasized on it. It's also about sustainability. So now, you know, if you look into the company profiles, it's a key factor about sustainability. How do you source? Where do you source? What are the transportation ways? What is the cost of production?

28:06So it's a whole basket full of things that comes into play, yes. Because in terms of your customer base, you're serving the oil and gas industry, certainly, and other industries as well. Yeah, I mean, the portfolio consists basically out of compression for air, for modified versions of this, and for gas processing. And then to keep it simple, there's basically two products, which is compression and which are the blowers. And the application for this goes from, let's say, steel plants, DIY steel plants, cement factories. One of our biggest units is basically wastewater technology. So I don't think there's any wastewater site that doesn't have our product.

28:48And then recently more and more comes up with the oil and gas and petrochemical. Yeah, that's very interesting and I wonder if there's also sort of a shift in views about the long-term future of oil and gas that perhaps, you know, two or three years ago all the debate would have been about, oh we have to get off fossil fuels very quickly, there's no long-term future for oil and gas and now people have moved away from that idea. You know, that is a debate. And practically speaking, what I see on the ground, on the market, is oil and gas is by far not that. It's actually there's an uptrend. And again, I see it by the RFQs that are received from oil and gas companies from Nigeria up to Qatar.

29:30So I would say it's unbroken, actually. It grows, you know, it's not sinking. Well, thanks very much indeed. Enjoy the rest of your conference. You're welcome. Sasha Sisio, thanks very much for joining us. Thank you. Thank you. Someone else I spoke to was Clay Siegel, who's a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, which is a Washington-based think tank. And I asked him about this concept of energy addition as opposed to transition. Well, I think that there's a lot of validity to that concept and that lens for looking at what's going on in the world today. You know, we really do need all of the above when it comes to meeting future demand.

30:06Oil demand is expected to remain high for at least a decade, maybe even longer. And although it's mostly focused in the developing world, it's still going to be formidable, especially given the relative hiatus that we've had in exploring for new resource. I mean, at the end of the day, it's a depleting resource. And so you constantly have to infill, backfill the resources that are being depleted. Likewise, we'll have strong demand for natural gas, not just as a bridge, which is kind of the, you know, the label du jour. But natural gas is here to stay. It's like a fundamental pillar of world energy supply.

30:46And likewise, we also need the newer and cleaner technologies to be a part of the mix. So these things are in addition to, not instead of. And it's the same way I think about, like, anybody who's ever been part of a software migration at work. You know, naturally, the powers that be don't turn off the old system and then evaluate whether or not the new one is going to be adequate. Those things are done in parallel. And they're checked multiple times before eventually, at the end of the process, deprecating something that has already been proven to have a reliable substitute. But in the meantime, I think that we need all the above.

31:20And that's all the more reason, Ed, why it's concerning right now that in the United States, we seem to have quite a bit of politicization of energy. You know, one side, one kind of tribe has an affinity for these types of energy supplies. Another one thinks that those are terrible and that it's only this way to go. But I'm telling you, we really need all of the above. Right. So what are the implications of that then for energy security? So that's your specialist area. Now, it's what you study, think about all the time. If you're right in saying that the world is going to remain dependent on oil and gas for decades to come, and oil and gas demand are probably going to keep growing even for years, maybe decades to come.

31:59What does that mean for energy security? I think that at the root, energy security is really just about the challenges involved in connecting supply with demand. And we can look at oil and gas together, but they also have quite a bit of differentiation. And so what's really interesting to me this week, with all of the soundings taking place here at Atapak, is the focus on the United States having real geo-economic leverage in negotiations with other countries, in the formation and maintenance of alliances, and in promoting its own economic and national security interests. So we have a huge pipeline, that's lowercase p, pipeline, of liquefaction projects, which are export projects, coming on stream in North America and the United States at a pretty robust clip.

32:52And a lot of the discussion this week has been around, could we potentially even be facing a glut of too much gas export capacity relative to demand and market for U.S. gas? I think that in the short term, there's definitely a role for United States gas to play in having backed out Russia from the European continent and cementing that new reality about having substitute supplies come to Europe from the United States, and increasingly so. And that's going to magnify that geoeconomic leverage that any administration in Washington brings to the table. So what about climate change then? I mean, obviously, one of the reasons people have been pushing for rapid movement away from hydrocarbons has been because of the greenhouse gas emissions implications, rising temperatures posing a growing threat to communities all around the world.

33:50Are you saying that we're just going to have to accept increased global warming because we don't have any alternative to getting away from oil, I guess? We were always going to have to accept that some processes are taking place regardless of what policies and similar measures are undertaken. But, look, the requirement to abate greenhouse gas emissions and to be good stewards of the environment, I believe, and I live in the oil patch in Texas, is embraced by industry. And we see, for example, even when you have what is typically thought of as a more favorable or amenable group of people, politicians that come to power, you still see specific issues like methane tracking and methane emissions controls strongly embraced by industry.

34:35You see things like carbon capture, where big investments are still taking place, notwithstanding a little bit of a shifting of the regulatory environment and some added costs for those projects. So the industry is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, I think, in a material way. It might not be enough to placate every interest group and every perspective that's out there, but I still think that it can make a big difference and move the needle. And what about China then? When you look at what's happening in China, there's very rapid change in the car industry in particular. EV is now rising to about half of all the new cars sold in China.

35:14A lot of very successful companies there now starting to export to the world as well. Obviously, huge production of solar panels, wind turbines and so on. Batteries for battery storage. Again, huge sales in China also being exported to the world. People talk about that as sort of an alternative model of energy. People talk about China as the electrostate in comparison to the United States then, which is the world's largest petrostate. And I wonder if you see a realistic prospect that that sort of alternative Chinese model, if you like, is going to become increasingly attractive to other countries around the world in order to decrease their reliance on oil and gas.

35:55Well, in my understanding, it already has to an important extent. And China is providing another paradigm, another model about how to deploy and employ a similar kind of geoeconomic leverage. and the United States in a way has kind of walked away from the challenge and ceded that ground, in my opinion, to Beijing, which is a leader on kind of the international stage in terms of exporting a lot of those newer technologies that can benefit the so-called addition that we were just talking about, referencing what has been called the transition. So China has an important role to play there and a lot of its trading partners are embracing its kind of unique capability to contribute in that regard.

36:38Maybe I wouldn't necessarily look at the United States as a petro state per se, because I believe that generally that implies a little bit of national control over the industry. The attribute that makes the United States such an important contributor and its ability to have grown over the last decade in contributing to global oil supply and gas supply is the innovation of free markets. And so the private industry in the United States is what made the shale revolution possible. It's what provided the impetus to lift the longstanding ban on exports. That's enabled things like 4.5 million barrels per day of oil exported to all corners of the world and increasingly flows of natural gas.

37:17So it's a really important paradigm model that has benefited a lot of partners around the world. Right. And as you're saying about China, even though China is kind of an alternative model and it's proving highly successful in technologies that the U.S. has been much less successful in, and in fact, under the Trump administration, has been withdrawing support from. Despite that success that China is showing, that's still not going to be enough to make a difference in the sense of turning the world away from oil and gas and kind of accelerating that transition towards a completely low-carbon energy system globally.

37:58I think the thing to keep an eye on right now in that context is how this short-term kerfuffle is resolved. And we have the two largest economies in the world in kind of a trade stalemate right now. And there are really important energy implications therein. Just as an example, we've seen the struggle over the two sides with sort of warring or competing export license requirements. And that's affected everything from United States exports of ethane to China. And that's really important for the petrochemical industry. And others as well. We've talked about rare earths quite a bit this week. So understanding how these two economic superpowers resolve this short-term difference is going to pave the way to that medium-term future where both of these guys are contributing to energy security and energy security challenges for the rest of the world.

38:52So that's really interesting then. So what do you think the implications of that are for the future of energy policy in the U.S.? I mean, there's still a lot of lingering debate here at ADIPEC about the state of the energy trilemma and rebalancing of those priorities between sustainability, affordability, and security. From my perspective, talking to folks in the Trump administration, you know, in this White House, there is no trilemma. There is no dilemma. There is no lemma of any sort. I mean, these guys are laser focused on affordability. And energy security is a means to the end of affordability.

39:27And that's what these guys are focused on. The National Energy Dominance Council is quite involved in efforts in that regard, for example, to speed projects through to completion and delivering the goods. And I think you'll see more of that focus from these guys over the next three years. And do you think they're going to be able to show results for that, given that at the same time they're trying to increase affordability, drive the cost of energy down? There are a lot of other pressures driving the cost of energy up, including increased demand for AI, including tariffs being one thing, increasing costs in the supply chain and so on.

40:03How likely do you think they are to succeed? I think that there's a good chance that measures like what the Dominance Council are working on can, at the asset and the project level, lift some roadblocks, cut some red tape, and bring some more energy to the marketplace. The one that I would keep an eye on for the coming year or so is on the topic of United States permitting reform. And I would not be surprised to see a real legislative initiative on Capitol Hill come together, coalesce bipartisan support to bring energy projects onto market. That's what I'm watching for the new year. Yeah, 100%.

40:42I do think that, as you say, that's a really important issue, and that's going to be a great subject to watch. And I certainly think, as you say, over the coming year, it's going to be something we're going to be following very closely on the energy gang, and perhaps we should talk again then as things evolve there, because I think it would be really interesting to talk to you about that as it shapes up. But for now, though, Clay Siegel, thanks very much indeed. Great talking to you. Thanks, guys. Finally, I spoke with someone whose job it is to reconcile continuing demand for oil and gas with meeting climate objectives.

41:10He's Bjorn Otto Sverdrup, who's the chair of the executive committee of the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative and also head of the secretariat for the Oil and Gas Decarbonisation Charter. I asked him what he'd been working on. These are busy days, right? But I think the most important thing for us, at the start of the event, we brought together 35 out of the 55 companies who have joined the Oil and Gas Decarbonisation Charter. These were the 35 CEOs and we met. And the main point was basically to ensure that we're sustaining the momentum on particularly reducing methane emissions and flaring towards 2030.

41:54And I was thrilled to see the commitment made and also the strong emphasis on further progress. So despite a lot of talk about the energy transition faltering, faltering, the momentum for decarbonisation faltering, you would say it's as strong as ever? True. I think the business environment for businesses where to survive and thrive in has changed quite a lot over the last years. So geopolitical uncertainty, the rule book is changing with tariffs, etc. There's a bit of a backlash, both from the investors, ESG, regulatory political backlash on sustainability. But despite that, I think the message from the CEOs, and these are the biggest companies in this industry, was very clear.

42:46We are staying the course on this. And the main thing is that I think particularly methane and flaring that we really need to achieve by the next couple of years is solidly rooted in the business case. it goes hand in glove with efficient operations and also I think quite a lot of companies talk about this seeing this as part of a being a responsible operator and then of course we also bring companies from both the global north and south east and west and it was interesting to see in some countries energy starved countries the recognition is that they have no energy to lose and And then methane emissions or flaring is energy loss, and we need to address that.

43:34So combined, I mean, the rationale, the business case is as solid as ever, and there is a green light, get going. Right, and I know you're going from here very soon to COP30 in Berlin, Brazil, and we're going to be talking to you again then. What's going to be your focus in Brazil? No, so we feel we are very grateful. We feel privileged because we have been selected by the COP presidency to be a partner, to organize our Energy Day. And we will be at the opening of the Energy Day this next Friday in Bel-Am, in the Blue Zone. We will address the challenges related to how can we speed up the decarbonization of oil and gas industry.

44:17And then we will also launch a progress report from the efforts done over the last month. So we're excited about that. Definitely look forward to hearing more. Thanks very much indeed. Thank you. We're going to be talking to Bjorn Otto again next week about the COP30 climate talks that start on Monday. Obviously, the movement for climate action is facing some challenging times at the moment. But as we've been hearing in this show, the pressure to address global warming and cut greenhouse gas emissions has not gone away, even if some of the responses to it are quite different from what they were a couple of years ago.

44:47So do come back and follow the Energy Gang next week when we'll be bringing you all the latest news and insights from COP30. That's all from us for now, though. Many thanks to Bjorn-Otto Sverdrup, Clay Siegel, Sasha Sissiu, John Gilley and Carol Nackley. Thanks to our producers, Dan Cottrell and Toby Begins-Gilchrist. And above all, many thanks to all of you for listening. We really value your feedback, so please do keep it coming. And we'll be back soon with all the latest news and insight on the future of energy and COP30. Until then, goodbye.

From the publisher

As world leaders, businesses and NGOs start their journeys to Brazil for the COP30 climate talks, more than 200,000 people attended ADIPEC in Abu Dhabi, the world’s biggest energy event. Energy Gang was there to bring you the highlights from the week’s discussions.

 

One of the key talking points was the theme of energy addition, rather than transition. In other words, the idea that new renewables and other low-carbon sources are adding to global energy supplies, rather than replacing fossil fuels. With forecasts showing an acceleration in power demand growth driven by AI, and the continuing need for increased energy supply to raise living standards in low and middle-income countries, calls for a rapid transition away from oil, gas and coal seem to many to be unrealistic.

 

At ADIPEC, the conversation centred around the vision of new low-carbon supplies stacking on top of hydrocarbons, to reduce costs, increase access and cut emissions intensity. But there was confidence in the prospect of robust global demand for oil and gas, in particular, for decades to come.

 

To debate that vision and assess what it means for the world, host Ed Crooks is joined by energy executives and analysts who have been part of the conversation.

 

Dr Carole Nakhle is the founder and CEO of Crystol Energy, an independent advisory firm. She was first up to discuss whether decarbonisation targets are being pushed further into the future, and how they can be met if clean energy is complementing fossil fuels rather than replacing them. “Complementarity beats substitution,” Carole says. What does that mean for energy security, access and emissions?

 

Next, Ed spoke with John Gilley, CEO of Kent, which designs and engineers assets for the energy industry, including both oil and gas and low-carbon technologies. John isn’t worried about a slowdown in clean energy deployment. When energy is cheaper, it gets used, he says, and solar and wind keep winning on cost. He believes climate change is the greatest challenge of our times, and his purpose at Kent is to support ways to tackle it, while meeting the world’s demand for energy. John and Ed talk it all through.


Sascha Sissiou is sales director for the Middle East and Africa at Aerzen, a German manufacturer of equipment for oil and gas and other industries. Sascha argues that, far from the momentum towards decarbonisation slowing, it is actually speeding up, as reflected in demand from Aerzen’s customers. Demand for flare-gas recovery and other emissions reduction technologies has grown, and Aerzen is rolling out new large compressors for the hydrogen industry. Sustainability standards now influence sourcing, logistics and manufacturing across industries from wastewater to petrochemicals.

 

Next, Clay Seigle, senior fellow at the thinktank CSIS, talks about the implications of sustained oil demand for energy security. On climate, he highlights the importance of industry-led investments in methane controls and carbon capture. Looking ahead, permitting reform could emerge as the next big US energy story; Clay explains why.

 

Finally, as the Energy Gang prepares to switch focus to COP30, Ed sat down with Bjorn Otto Sverdrup, who’s the head of the secretariat for the Oil & Gas Decarbonization Charter. They bring together more than 50 leading oil and gas companies from around the world to work together to cut their emissions. Bjorn says the industry’s top CEOs are staying the course on near-term decarbonisation goals with high impact - cutting methane and eliminating routine flaring by 2030 – because they make operational and reputational sense. There will be more to come on this issue at COP30.

 

We will be bringing you all the big stories and exclusive commentary and analysis on COP30 from our energy expert friends, as well as some new voices. So don’t forget to follow the show wherever you get your podcasts, to keep up with all our coverage of the climate talks over the next two weeks.

 

This episode was recorded live at ADIPEC 2025, the world’s largest energy event, held in Abu Dhabi from 3–6 November. With more than 205,000 attendees and 1,800 speakers, this year’s theme - Energy Intelligence Impact - sparked vital conversations about the future of energy.

 

Learn more about the event at adipec.com

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

More from Energy Gang

All 60 episodes
Energy addition, not energy transition? What does it mean for the future of our energy system, and the climate?Energy Gang · 45 min
Listen in VO