E279 | EUVC | Acing LP Relationships with experts from Cavalry, Cherry, Isomer Capital, No Such Ventures & Bunch

13 Feb 2024 · 1 h 7 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

EUVC Podcast Episode Summary: E279 - Acing LP Relationships

Episode Overview Podcast Title: EUVC Episode Title: E279 | Acing LP Relationships with experts from Cavalry, Cherry, Isomer Capital, No Such Ventures & Bunch Hosts: Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva Date: [Insert Date] Listen: [Apple](https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/euvc/id1544598239) | [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/0WO5adjTSnzxCC3l2sRq1f)

Episode Description This roundtable discussion features a diverse panel of experts discussing the intricacies of managing Limited Partner (LP) relationships in the European Venture Capital landscape. Key topics covered include onboarding processes, LP expectations, trust-building, and the impact of digital tools on LP-VC interactions.

Key Speakers

  • Alexander Langholz-Baikousis, CFO, Cherry Ventures
  • Simon Lohmann, Head of Platform & IR, Cavalry Ventures
  • Chloe Dagnall, Principal, Isomer Capital
  • Sophie Heijenberg, Investor, No Such Ventures
  • Enrico Ohnemüller, Founder & CEO, Bunch

Key Takeaways

  1. Onboarding LPs
  2. Importance of streamlining onboarding to enhance the investor experience.
  3. Emphasis on digitization to move away from paper-based processes.
  4. Acknowledgment that every LP is different, requiring tailored onboarding experiences.
  5. Suggestions for using technology to improve efficiency and keep LPs updated throughout the onboarding journey.
  1. Managing LP Expectations
  2. VCs should understand their LPs' backgrounds and interests to tailor communications effectively.
  3. Transparency is key in building trust; regular updates and clear communication can alleviate stress during fundraising periods.
  4. Strategies to manage expectations regarding fund performance and investment risks, especially during market downturns.
  1. Investing Phase Dynamics
  2. LPs prioritize returns, hence the importance of regular updates on fund performance and portfolio status.
  3. Discussion about the need for quarterly updates and calls to ensure LPs feel informed and valued.
  4. Engaging LPs in portfolio discussions can enhance relationships and provide invaluable insights.
  1. Exiting Strategies
  2. Best practices include having open dialogues with LPs regarding exit strategies and aligning on expectations.
  3. Different LPs may have varying preferences regarding liquidity and timing of exits.
  4. Importance of utilizing LP networks to facilitate portfolio company exits.
  1. Technological Integration
  2. The role of technology platforms like Bunch to automate processes, manage LP relationships, and provide data-driven insights.
  3. Importance of maintaining accurate and accessible reporting for LPs, which can be facilitated through technology.

Discussion Themes

LP Onboarding Process

  • Key Challenges: Lengthy paperwork, lack of digital solutions, and the need for customization.
  • Strategies: Standardization of documents, utilizing CRM systems for tracking LP preferences, and implementing e-signatures for efficiency.

Understanding LP Expectations

  • Importance of proactive communication to prevent "bad surprises".
  • Segmenting LPs based on their investment size and preferences for tailored reporting.

Portfolio Management and Reporting

  • Emphasis on transparency in reporting portfolio performance.
  • Need to balance between providing sufficient detail and avoiding overwhelming LPs with unnecessary information.

Exit Considerations

  • The significance of aligning on exit strategies according to LP preferences.
  • Engaging LPs in discussions can lead to strategic advantages during exits.

Conclusion The episode emphasized that strong LP relationships are built on trust, transparency, and effective communication. The panelists offered valuable insights into the evolving landscape of LP management, the importance of digital tools, and the need for tailored approaches to meet diverse LP expectations.

For more insights and continuous updates on European VC, visit [eu.vc](http://eu.vc).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Welcome everyone to today's roundtable on Asing LP relationships. I am Andreas and I'll be your host for today's conversation. We are going to focus 100 % on the intricate dynamics between LPs and VCs. And we're going to really dive into how VCs can manage and nurture the relationships effectively, as well as dive into the expectations and preferences of LPs. And of course, try and hack the tech stack of our speakers. So to structure this conversation, I've decided that we will try and talk through the investor journey. And we have split it into three main stages, onboarding, investing, and exiting.

0:42So that is going to be the structure for today. But before we get started, let's just get some brief introductions to our esteemed panelists. So everyone, a two-liner about yourselves and your role and how that relates to the topic of LP management. and Alex, I'll ask you to go first. Awesome. Thanks for having me. Yeah, name's Alex, CFO and partner at Cherry Ventures. I do a variety of things, but lots of the time or day in, day out, I talk to our LPs and manage basically all relationships with existing LPs and prospective LPs. So happy to be here today. Yeah, thanks Andreas. Thanks for having me.

1:24I'm Simon. I'm with Cavalry Ventures, an early stage fund out of Berlin. We invest initially in pre-seed and seed stages. I'm with the firm since six and a half years now, started in the investment team, then built up the platform team, and now responsible for investor relations and fundraising activities since almost two years now. And we have like almost 300 LPs on our platform. So, yeah, I hope I can add value to this discussion today. And thanks for having me again. Hi, everyone. Chloe Dagnall, principal at Isma Capital, a VC fund of funds. So we are an LP in over 75 funds in Europe, clearly the ones that need to be managed.

2:05So happy to give everyone some tips today on how we like that to be. beautiful thank you chloe as you see we're trying to put together a panel here with diverse perspectives so an lp there in the form of chloe sophie tell us a bit about yourself and how you relate to the topic of lp management yeah sure um i'm sophie based in amsterdam working at no such ventures the seeds and series a vc investor across europe and we do operate as a vc but have a an angel or LP syndicate model. So LPs can invest with us on a per deal basis and opt in in specific deals that they prefer. We now have close to 200 people that invested with us.

2:46So also some community management and process management there and therefore really interested to have this conversation. We have two VC funds, one LP and one syndicate. Now Enrico, tell us about yourself and how you relate to this topic. Perfect. Great to be here. Enrico, one of the founders of Bunch, we are building the rails of private markets. As we say, we are trying to build one end-to-end platform where GPs can manage their LPs. I think that totally makes sense to discuss today. And I'm in charge of product operations and people at Bunch and very excited to share, but also learn a lot from you guys today.

3:30So with that out of the way, let's go right into discussing the LP investment journey and its key pain points. And as I said just before, we're starting with onboarding as the first of the three steps, onboarding, investing and exiting. And Enrico, you have, as you just said, by building out a bunch and thinking about the whole problem space, you've really dived into this problem area and how you might solve that. So I think it's natural for us to start with you. So give us the overview of the LP onboarding experience and the pain points that you've identified in that. There are probably a lot of answers to this question.

4:08What we've seen and what we've tried to empower our users to do, and we don't have any LPs, but we now have roughly 2 ,000 investors on the platform, is actually smoothing out the process of onboarding. And all of you know that for an LP, an investment into a fund is basically always starting from scratch and that's something that i think all of them don't uh don't experience on on their normal lives they can yeah do the next investment copy their id uh just copy a lot of information and don't feel that they have to start from scratch again that's that's one of the very very big point points everything moves into digital so the back the second big big learning from from our side was actually how much is still PDF paper driven.

4:57I know that some of us, Alex and Simon and me are based in Germany, so we are probably like the outliers and the worst case to push this forward. But private markets overall and some of you may already have seen subscription documents in the US they're still also extremely lengthy and extremely PDF driven. we are trying to make this digital especially for the LPs and then lastly I think our learning that came in the last especially last six months, every LP is different and what we are really focusing on at the moment is the long tail of LPs so I am very much looking forward to Chloe your experience and your view of it because I think you have a different expectation to a high net worth individual that that does like two or three fund investments that really wants to streamline their process.

5:55And on the same side, Alex also, for example, wants to streamline the onboarding of this founder or ex-founder and don't spend a lot of time on that. So I think our biggest learning here, every LP is different and you can treat a high net worth individual investing into a fund not the same way as you can treat Chloe or an IF or a KFW. So you have still flexibility and you will always have LPs that want actually to do everything from scratch again because they have teams that they're paying a lot of money to do that from scratch again and maybe negotiate some side letters at the same time. So three distinct topics.

6:37One, digitization and moving away from PDFs for the LP experience. Two, making it flexible enough to onboard Chloe as well as a high net worth individual at the same time. Lastly, not start from scratch. So making an investor and able to copy paste information that he's already provided in his last 10 investments or five or three investments or two investments into private markets. Maybe because we went right into the deep end there, right? In terms of this is the nitty gritty operations of onboarding an LP. And obviously everyone in our audience are going to be very familiar with this as well.

7:20But Alex, I'd maybe love to ask you to start us off from your perspective as a VC onboarding LPs, how do you kind of think about the journey when an LP comes in? How do you segment them? Do you know already, okay, this is a high net worth, so they have different expectations from an isomer? And then what are the pain points across those different categories that you work with? Good question. So maybe to start off simply by saying we know who every LP is even long before we actually race or we kind of formally launch a fundraise. So it's quite anybody who we work with during the fundways, we already know them for probably 12, 24 months before.

8:12And they have gotten a good feeling about us too. And that has certain implications about the onboarding too. Before Alex, we then jump into onboarding. Tell us about the rationale behind that, because that's obviously the fundraising part, which is somewhat before here, we're kind of saying, okay, you've got fundraising. We've done a ton on that on EOVC. Then we have LP management. And that's why we kind of jump off from the point assuming that, okay, the ticket is secured. Now what's happening? But Alex, just because you're saying what you're saying here, could you maybe expand a bit on the reflection there or why it is that you already know all of this beforehand?

8:51Yeah, because we also at the end of the day, we have a fundraising strategy. So and the strategy evolves around, you know, institutionalizing our LP base, which we have worked around for eight to 10 years now. Diversifying our LP base geographically by type of investors, all with one's, I think, main goal is to work with LPs very, very long term. like when we have conversations and that takes a few conversations and meetings really trying to figure out what's the kind of long-term vision for the LP are they looking to invest into the next five cherry funds or is it just you know try and test the waters on one and in the end of the day as a manager is it you know obviously subject to us performing very well there's huge benefit in keeping captive very long term.

9:48And also from an LP's perspective, you reap the benefits when you invest across vintages, you can invest through market cycles, et cetera. So that means also we have a very good understanding of who we are working with when we launch the fundraise. Now, that doesn't mean that we have KYC, these institutions or people, et cetera, But we know fairly well what their strategy is. And they know ours too, by the way. It's a two-way street, right? So they get to know us quite well also before they actually, you know, we're kind of in live fundraising and into the subscription process, etc. Then the second part, which you were about to embark on, in terms of onboarding, how do you?

10:36Look, if you zoom out, it's what am I concerned with, or we are concerned with is LP user experience, right? On the one hand, and on the other hand, it's that we adhere to any kind of internal rules we have set, but also regulatory frameworks in terms of who we work with, right? And in the end of the day, we work with other people's money. So it's a great responsibility, but it also is a responsibility towards, I think, the wider markets you work in, so that it's actually money that is also legitimate, right? So that all needs to come in together when you're onboarding and working with LPs. And that can sometimes be tough, right?

11:21You want to close the fund very fast and then you still have 50 LPs in onboarding and you just need to go through the process. Now, what can help with that is you work with software solutions and you just try to make that onerous process more digital and more efficient and reusable, right? So it comes in, you know, I think that takes up a lot of the things that obviously Enrico mentioned, and there's a few players in the market that have been trying this, but I think in the last 24 months have really done a big step forward in making this experience better and more efficient, and it's obviously about time because the alternative investment space has grown so much over the past decade.

12:09Maybe if I can quickly jump in there, what we've also seen is just to add on that is transparency, right? A lot of LPs don't, they feel like they're super, super confident already, but they also want to know what the next step is. And they would even prefer actually to know, let's say, when the next step would happen, right? And that's just a dynamic that we have seen playing out and sometimes increasing stress levels because obviously the funders, under pressure to close the fund or close the next vintage. And then the LP doesn't really know what the next step is. When is the closing? When is the capital call?

12:48So I think transparency is also something that we've seen and asked for both sides on top of the three that Alex just mentioned. And I think it's something that would reduce a lot of the stress or pressure around times of fundraise in both sides. I'm also a founder, so I know how this feels when raising, right? Simon, I'd love to call on you because you've got, as you said, more than 300 LPs. So what Alex just said, time is off the issue here, especially if you have 300 LPs to manage and onboard. So tell me a bit about how do you make sure that this process is streamlined for yourself and as painless as possible for DLPs?

13:38So first of all, I think you have to hire a great team that is supporting me a lot. So we have an in-house legal counsel, we have a finance team, we have a good tax advisory and so on. but no jokes aside like next to the team you need like clear processes and repetitive processes I would say so for example at Cavalry we divide our LP base into like the long tail which is then actually collectively investing via feeder fund and then we have the bigger LPs let's say people or institutional investors that invest more than a million they invest by our main fund so we have a difference here which is which is helpful in terms of the process and then um i think it's just helpful if you do it uh like all all time the same way um so we have a clear process um what we like to do is to do an onboarding process with each new lp and so we send out a survey survey doing the onboarding ask them about their expertise and their knowledge and their network in specific industries and also ask for their interest.

14:54For example, are these LPs interesting in co-investments? If so, in which type of co-investments, which industries, what is the typical ticket size? Do you want to engage as a sparing partner with the portfolio and so on? And then we actually implement all of this into our CRM system and we tech it so actually all the people at Cavalry internally can search for these types of things because it's super relevant in the collaboration in the future with the existing LPs. For example, now we have an SPV at our fund here and I have to check which of our LP is actually interesting in investing into a company like this and then I send all the information and the memo to just these LPs and not to everyone and so on.

15:46So I think it's super important to try to automate processes and use software as well. That's super helpful, especially when you want to scale and when you have to manage 300 LPs, right? Because it's not done manual. It's not possible anymore, right? Yeah, and I think that there's a big learning there for everyone listening in, right? Clearly, there's the basic stuff that you need, the KYC, AML, and all that stuff, which you're required to get. And then there's ensuring that you create a good setup for value add along the way or whatever you might call that. The extra thing is that LPs might invest in your fund for.

16:26And this is just as important to manage as a VC as the other part almost. um sofia co-investing could not be a more uh bang on subject for you because everyone that invests you chooses to co-invest basically could you tell us a bit about how you manage to run a syndicate of your size and make that a fluent process and how what alex and simon just said is different when you run a syndicate model yeah interesting and i think a lot of things are actually very alike. The onboarding for us is a bit different as we normally, so RLPs are also mainly high net worth individuals and a few smaller family funds.

17:05So we tend to get in touch with people who might be interested to go invest in the future, right? And then they become part of our community. And then we already try to do something similar as Simon just mentioned to kind of map their backgrounds and their investor preferences, right? Because some people only invest in specific sectors or specific business models or whatever. So it's very important for us to map that and capture that in the CRM system as well so that we engage the right people for the right deal and also maybe engage them already pre-term sheets to hear their view as an expert, which can be very useful.

17:42And yeah, kind of nurturing that community through events or sending gifts or hosting small dinners or whatever is very important for us to keep the relationship ongoing and at your top of mind whenever a new opportunity arises. And then at the point that we have an opportunity coming in, then the pressure is a bit higher, right? Because then you need to onboard new investors, get them through KYC and stuff. And there my biggest learning is that simplicity is key. So it should be very repetitive every time again. So the set of documents should be the same. People should get familiarized with how we do things so that there is no surprise involved.

18:20and you see that there are a lot of small things that can already make a difference. So having e-signing in place, for example, or sending all documents at once instead of four different documents, stuff like that is already improving your NPS with them all the time. And very much agree with what has been said about keeping them updated because sometimes you forget how deep you are into the process and that other people are waiting for you to send them the next action. So there's a lot of automation and standardization involved for us as well. Chloe, you're the LP here. Tell us, I won't ask you to weigh on, don't be the judge here.

19:01But I'd love to ask you from what you've heard here, what to you as an LP is the most important thing? And what are you seeing typically being difficult for managers to get done in a timely manner or to prioritize sufficiently for a player like you? You know, one thing that strikes me, so Simon made the point of, you know, going out, surveying your LPs, asking them what they're interested in. LPs change their mind all the time with what they're interested in. right and uh like we're guilty of it here you know you set out you have a thesis but obviously like as as all investors do your thesis changes over time and what you're interested in might change over time so I think that even though it's great to like have these automations in place that really help you be more efficient and get things to people's inboxes quicker that is definitely important I would definitely say that you know having those regular in person or you know phone call email touch points with individuals is also great because it just allows you to stay on top of course when you have like 250 300 lps like simon's talking about or maybe you have a whole syndicate it's you know you need that automation in place but definitely for some of your larger more strategic lps then i would recommend you know having regular catch-ups so you can really understand well what are they leaning into at the moment what are their priorities and maybe where can you help them?

20:28But what I would say from our standpoint is, you know, once we're at this investing point and once you're at that point in the journey, you know, the most important thing for your LPs, most of them will be the returns that you can create. So, you know, also being an LP and getting out the way and allowing you guys to do your thing and hunt for the best deals without, you know, spending too much time distracting you, asking for updates, asking for data asking for all these ancillary and additional things it's really really important that as an LP you learn when to step in and when you think that your value add is important versus actually you know when you're creating more work and I think that's where a lot of these automations can also really help right because you could offload managers time I always you know talk to our VCs that we invest with about being able to leverage as much of their time towards their investment and their investment portfolio and away from these kind of admin-based tasks.

21:26And certainly software and automations, it is kind of one way to do that. Alex, we just heard from Chloe, who is a very institutional investor, how they think about things and what they're kind of being mindful of. You said you're very much working on institutionalizing your LP base. I'd love to understand what do you see as the steps that for you in terms of managing the relationship here during the onboarding process with a very large institutional investor? What is it that's absolutely key for you? What are you seeing that, okay, if we want to play this game, if it's the big U.S. endowments, then we need to really nail X, Y, and Z.

22:07The real big LPs, pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, you know, on the one hand, they know that you're not Blackstone or BlackRock, that kind of institution. But at the same time, they have, I think, certain expectations when it comes to what you need to have in place, as in to safeguard the money, to apply certain rules, governance, procedures, all of that. That's not so easy to be done when you're a small firm. And I think that's the crucial part. It comes into play into the onboarding, because for them, before even investing, if they have made that decision commercially, there will be some things around governance, et cetera, that are kind of minimum requirements that you need to have.

23:00You would be, I think that needs to be prepared well in advance of the onboarding and is then reviewed during kind of the due diligence after the commercial decision, right? And that goes from having policies around lots of things, how you work internally with your employees, what cybersecurity policies you have in place, all these kinds of things that maybe are not so visible to the outside. And sometimes I would say individual LPs don't even get to see, but certainly the big ones do. And yeah, I think that's definitely something to keep in mind if you want to have big institutions invest with you.

23:47When did you start the process of getting yourself to a point where you can actually take these people in? Was that a thought from Fund One? Were you born with that or did that come as you? I mean, look, we always had institutional LPs and entrepreneurial LPs. That's what we call them. Bits of similar content. We actually have both. So it's part, you know, if you look at our investment firm here, everybody in the investment team has operator entrepreneur experience. And the first money we ever raised at Cherry was from entrepreneurs. So the first 30 million. And then we added institutional investors.

24:30So we have both. And I would say, you know, with the institutions that we started with, they helped us get there. It's obviously not just you just switch the you just switch around and then you do completely different institutions. So to some extent, yeah, obviously we have been doing that since the get go. But if I compare us now having raised close to a billion, a billion in commitments to versus where we started on an institutional basis, 2016, of course, it's much more. And it's been a journey. It's not just, you know, it's been, I think, work around the journey. And it's also, I would say, importantly, in that timeframe, the market has also changed, right?

25:16There is more regulation. And just that simply also increases, I think, the thresholds. And also importantly, if you think about these big institutions, think of a pension fund. we have one very large Canadian pension fund their regulations to safeguard the money of their clients obviously has also increased and you know I think these institutions have over the past 10-20 years increased their allocation into the private investment world so naturally this also had to evolve I think it's fair to say also just 6 months ago or so maybe a bit less. We had the Securities and Exchanges Commission coming out with new rules for the US, which very much comes to Europe by the big US LPs.

26:11And I see both Alex and Simon smiling here because I'm sure you've been impacted by it or at least are looking to be. I can just tell you we manage all of our US money, almost everything. And one third of our funds is usually from the US by a US feeder that we manage from here. So we even have a degree of regulation that we have in the US. Enrico, I'd love to ask you because what we've just heard here is there's a very big difference between the large investors and the small investors. And you also said it in the beginning that Bunchy is very much made for capturing the long tail of investors, meaning the small ticket investors.

26:54I'd love to ask you a bit about how do you make sure that you have a platform that caters to both sides or how do you cut the cake there, so to say? Because that's definitely what we have experienced at EVVC when we do our LP in syndicates. It's definitely a difference between what's expected for an LP syndicate to work and to have good paperwork and good process versus an angel investment. 100%. I think we're trying to give the GP the flexibility to decide on an LP basis or LP group basis while trying to automate as much as possible in the area of the LPs where you can automate. So, yes, automate the long tail and give the flexibility for the big ones.

27:41And what we are actually seeing there is really more about, let's say, the process that comes after the investing. I don't know if I overstepped my boundaries of the process of the call now, but as Alex already mentioned, right, there are very big compliance efforts or requests from these large institutions on special reporting, special policies, cybersecurity, and all of these LP governance topics that come after. we try to let you know, right? We are not only an onboarding tool. We are trying to create workflows on a GP per GP basis or investor per investor basis. And if this large Canadian LP wants a specific report on a quarterly basis, and for that, three, four different KPIs have been, or metrics have to be calculated or have to be requested from different points, different portfolio companies, whatever.

28:44These are the workflows that you can build on our platform and that we try to help you be compliant to, let's say, your site letters or also your LPA, which is, let's say, the first level from day one or from the first day of the closing. So if I look at this, I mean, there is a lot still to do. And at one point, there might even be APIs to the EIF or APIs to the Canadian Endowment Fund to onboard completely technical. And I think this will move in this direction. But now it's really enabling the flexibility for the big ones and making sure that you run a compliant system from day one, which is not think about side letter once the first reporting is there.

29:33but think about the side letter before you close the fund. Or don't even think about the side letter because you have a technology thinking about the side letter for you. And I think that the complexity that Enrico just unveiled a bit of here goes to show why you want to be in bed with the right partners when you're setting up your fund. So very cool, Enrico, for you to share a bit of light on that. Now, I'd love to get us into the second part, second act of this, which is investing. And that is, of course, the phase where LPs actually engage with their investments and monitor their progression.

30:09And I was thinking, Chloe, maybe we should start with you as the LP here and tell us a bit about how you work together with your VCs to really make sure that you're on top of what's going on and also share with us what your main concerns and priorities are for you when you've committed your capital during the investment phase. maybe I pick up on one thing that you said there Andreas which was like keeping on top of what's going on and I think that's a really important part for LPs right we're not in the thick of it day to day we don't see everything that our GPs see and quite often when you are so in the thick of it you kind of lose track of what's most important and the way that I always think about it is your LPs should never be badly surprised I think no one minds a great surprise right that's always that's always a solid uh if a company's doing really well there's a big up round a big exit something like that that happens really fast I think that's always really exciting but ultimately if something is going wrong often these things happen a little bit slower and there's often a chain of events that lead up to maybe a write-off or or a down round or something like that and ultimately keeping your LPs in the flow with that kind of information is really really important and so kind of no bad surprises is one way that you can look at it like obviously if you've got a long tail like you Simon of 250 LPs you can't spend your whole life reading around them all and telling them what's going on so things like quarterly update calls are a great way to keep people in the loop but you know if you have a few more major LPs maybe your LPAC use that as a way to to make sure that they are up to date and in the loop with with everything that's going on.

31:53I think, you know, obviously LP's priority number one is returns. That is always going to be the case. You know, you're focused on it time and time again. But giving everyone a holistic view of what that looks like, right, especially early on in your fund, how the fund is performing is not really representative of where it may end up. So giving some kind of colour to what those numbers mean in your reports through a quarterly call through things like that is is really important I think also keeping um keeping your LPs up to date with any other changes that are going on right are you launching new strategies is there a change in the partnership is there just a change in the team more generally I don't it's great if your LPs can find that out before the rest of the market essentially so even just something like a quick email communication before you do a post on LinkedIn about some big news.

Read the full transcript

32:49It's a really nice way to say, hey, you guys matter a little bit more than everyone else. And so you get some time with this information to ask any questions before others do. So I think that's a really, really important part of LP management is actually just making sure that, you know, as a partner in the fund, as a limited partner in the fund, you have some sort of advantageous seat as to what is going on. Yeah, absolutely. Let me pick up on the no surprises there and having 300 investors. Simon. Yeah, perfect. I actually wanted to add on this one because, Chloe, what you said is absolutely right.

33:28So, for example, at Cavalry, we do an LP segmentation. So we segment our LPs into groups. For example, individual investor, mid-market investor, and then the enterprise investors, the institutional investors, the big investors. And they get different level of transparency and information from us. We have like a quarterly newsletter that we send out to every LP. There we have more updates in the quarterly report. We have some qualitative update, you know, in the team or biggest, you know, with new customers of relevant portfolio companies and so on. So some updates. But then we also do an IR quarterly call with all the mid-market and the bigger LPs where we actually give a little bit our opinion on asset level, how good are there actually capitalized, what is the runway and so on.

34:20Do we have to do a down round? Do we have to make changes in the valuations or not? How safe are we with the investment and the returns? So a little bit more of context and background information. We also like to add actually our opinion on the market. So sometimes we have a strong opinion on macro environment and so on. And sometimes there's just some emergency communication to all LPs. For example, we had last year this Silicon Valley Bank situation where it's super important that you are transparent, that you are quick and that you are communicating with your LPs because they want to understand what is the exposure in our portfolio and so on.

35:03And that's super important. so that's why we actually have these processes in place and also try to segment it because otherwise it's not manageable with the 300 LPs, right? But what we also do, of course, we don't not only do this onboarding and then ask things in the survey, we also close to our LPs and like to communicate with them and work closely with them. So, for example, what we do a lot is we reach out to LPs after we did this onboarding and we know where do they actually have experiences and where do they have a good network when we see something in our current deal flow. We like to reach out to the LPs and then try to engage them in our deal processes.

35:50So for example, as an sparrings partner in general, but maybe also as a potential customer, we ask for feedback on this kind of product. Is there really a need in the market? And so on. So we really try to be close to our LPs and build up a real operational working relationship, because in this way you get higher engagement and they also have a level, like a more natural level of transparency, which gives a lot of trust. And trust in the end is the most important factor, I would say, when you do investment decision next to returns and everything, of course. but trust is very important and if you do this and you really work with them then the probability is higher that they will keep investing in your future fund generations and that's what we try to do and try to be really close and engage with our LPs and lots of interesting things there that were said and you know we of course we've developed our I would say investor relations apparatus over some time and And one thing that's definitely true, I can say, better make sure your LPs know also the bad news before they are in the news.

37:04You know, you want to stay on top of things. And that's sometimes not so easy, right? I mean, you'll have events in the portfolio that are not so much in the public. But if you have invested in a B2C company that all your piece are using privately or whatsoever, it will be in the news and they will know about it. And then you need to know what's in the news is not necessarily even true. And it's like it's made for the public. It's not even has a sufficient level of detail. So I think that's definitely key for anybody who starts to do this. Very, very important. and then other than that I think what's interesting is also if you look at the stage of the fund in the lifetime you start out with a fund it's obviously very different what you can report to LPs then versus a fund that's in year eight yeah but that's also how we treat it right so very early in the fund lifetime we talked to LPs about portfolio construction are we on track to with regards to portfolio construction, what we actually promised.

38:13So investments per year, the themes that we are looking at, why are you investing in these teams? What's so interesting about them? And that doesn't mean that you have to, in the end, to be factored. In our funds, they're investing into a blind pool, but obviously we have laid out a strategy, et cetera. And you can be opportunistic also, and you have to be as a VC. If you aren't over 10 years, then I think I'm not sure you can generate alpha. sustainably but um you need to like I think provide background why certain themes are now interesting maybe they weren't interested they were weren't interesting in a low interest data environment how does that change etc so portfolio construction themes that we think about um how do we think the year shapes up that's I think an important in the early days of the fund lifetime and yes it's nice to communicate follow-ons because it's early validation you know that there are up rounds in the portfolio but of course it I think Chloe said in smart LPs they know that it takes years for a fund to settle in the kind of in the quarter there and you know I think most of these think this is six to seven years um so what even in the second part of the fund lifetime now think of a fund and you know as opposed to that think of a fund that's in year eight portfolio is ideally quite segmented you know who the drivers are you have some dpi and i think then you can do you can provide a lot of value add if you have a pretty good idea what this means in the portfolio as in where do you think what an exit timeline is we never promise exits because in the end you know we can't there's many things that need to happen for an But we can provide visibility on where do we think a fair valuation is, where does this might end up.

40:02They do a lot of work around that. So that's very different work than we do in the early days of the fund. You just made me think of something we have to come back to, which is, of course, fair valuation and how you communicate that throughout the fund's lifetime. That said, though, I will just ask Sophie to come in here before we go there to a big subject that will overshadow for a while, I think. Sophie, tell us a bit about, because you run that syndicate model as we spoke about, how do you facilitate that your investors are best possibly, how should I put that, best possibly acquainted with what's coming in and what's happening across the portfolio?

40:44or how do you think about that? Do you think that everyone should know what's happening across the portfolio or do you only report on a company by company basis and all the things? And after that, Enrico, I'll go to you and ask you about the whole tech setup for both a fund to allow for all this type of reporting and communication during the investing phase and then contrarily on the same thing for syndicates. Sophie, you go first. I think it's very similar. actually to what was shared before. So we do very detailed reporting on a company level, both financially and qualitatively to talk about management, market trends, et cetera.

41:25We do report on a company per company level. So if you invested in five companies with us, you will receive five detailed quarterly reports. And of course, we are open in LP conversations about how the whole portfolio is doing as a whole, right? But in the end, a lot of people are not that interested in that because if they chose to invest with us in four deals, they don't really, yeah, are concerned with the other five or six or how much other deals we have been doing. So it's very individually focused, and we should also approach it from that angle because we are not structured as a fund. So it's a bit of a less, it's a bit of a diversification play, right?

42:01So we should keep spending attention on companies that might not be in the top 10 % highest performers, make sure that they also can still realize a decent return or at least have a decent trajectory ahead of them. So I think that makes it a bit different. But in terms of reporting requirements, I think it's very similar. So I like what Simon was saying about the SME mid-market and enterprise customer kind of thinking, because that's also true for us. You see that a lot of people are just reading an exact sum of a report and that's fine for them. And some people just want to know all the details.

42:35So they want to know every number and what's behind that. And we have to find a balance in reporting to have an approach that works for everyone. But I normally really like it to get our feedback and get their expertise. Also, what the others were saying, if we're working on an M &A deal, it's very nice to spar with some experienced M &A investors or dealmakers or entrepreneurs who have been there just to get their take. So in general, it's also a nice interaction moment, again, to get our view on things. And I really like to overshare in that sense, because I very much agree with what Chloe was saying.

43:13You just want to make sure that everyone's up to date and it always helps to get our perspective. Sophie, you said something there, which I found a bit interesting, because you said we share, of course, on a deal by deal basis. Because if you're a massing company, you actually don't care about Y and C necessarily. But at the same time, both as a syndicate lead and also as a VC, you are interested in sharing firm developments and you're interested in also kind of, yes, you committed to this fund, but I'd like to tell you that my fund one and two are already in the green. um so so how do you think about that both from your perspective and and also chloe alex and simon how do you think about the strategic communication through this period because one thing that you're reporting what's happening on the on the fund level because you need to but then there's also the marketing speech towards your lps in this period yeah no i very much agree and it's it's also a natural process right so some people only started investing with us like in the past year and they haven't been part of previous deals.

44:22So it's always good to share with them when we made what decision there and how those companies are progressing. Also for them to get a feel for the opportunities that are still coming up. So we do, of course, look at it and also calculate for ourselves what the portfolio performance is as if it was a fund. Because I think it's still a strong tracker to see how we do. but in the end that's also by the way how we sometimes can report to LP so we can show their performance as if it is a fund with I don't know five investments or ten investments or how many they've done but you see that because they specifically choose to be involved with specific deals they also like to to get that deal by deal yeah attention there and reporting because it's kind of their their driver yeah obviously there's the two parts to it and yeah Alex, Simon, Chloe, any reflections on the marketing side of communication to LPs during the investing period?

45:23How do you do that strategically, optimize it for positioning towards your LPs? Look, I think a lot of the things, you know, I agree with a lot of things. Of course, you can be strategic to some extent, but then also, you know, it's, we're pretty clear, for example, when you start investing, you know, the fund is launched. We already know when we want to raise the next fund, always subject to market developments. But it's more like tracking towards that rather than kind of trying to be opportunistic. I mean, I'm talking about next fundraising timeline. You know, of course, there's a few things that you could potentially do to strategize.

46:10You know, I think you want to show a nice performance before you actually go out. But at the end of the day, it's little marks on a quarterly by quarterly basis. What was very strategic going back to the market downturn started at the end of 2022? if I'd say what was the most strategic thing that we did we proactively adjusted our valuations without waiting for any corrections so we did that up front yeah and I think you you also wanted to talk about fair values we were in for many years in the market where you could just lose use the last price because there was always a new price you know and and I think sometimes then you you have to come up with a new price because the one's old but then we were in a scenario where you could anticipate that the new price is not going to be the old price so and that's tricky right so how do you stretch how do you also when you think strategic because i would say that's strategic you can wait for prices to happen and you're like look that's the price that was paid now i'm marking it down or up and and then i think many people had to mark down then but that's also a lot of piecemeal kind of a piecemeal approach right then you may end up marking down and marking down and we said look we want to find a way where our portfolio now shows the most adequate value that most adequately reflects the current market environment now that's hard to do yeah but you can get there you can in an iterative approach manage that and i think that was strategic if i come back to that question that was the most strategic thing we've done in the last three four years and i think maybe to jump in on that it's strategically building trust there with your lps right which goes back to that point what we were saying earlier you know trust is the most important thing here i don't think especially existing lps really do not want to feel like they're being sold to when it comes to the next fund, right?

48:19The best way to get your existing LPs to re-up is to have this trusting relationship whereby they feel that they know the truthful vision of activity of what is going on inside your portfolio. And so if you're trying to be too strategic and trying to sell too much to your LP base, I don't think that's going to end up well for anyone. So I think, you know, taking that proactive approach And, you know, giving that honest overview of what is going on is ultimately the thing that is going to lead to better trust, stronger partnerships, and therefore most likely make your LPs want to re-help with you.

48:57Maybe to add on this, because we did the same as Alex just described, and it's super tough because in private markets and especially in early stage venture investing, you don't have actually like, I would say, standard market valuation methods. So it's really interesting what people actually did. So I reached out to a lot of our LPs, like the bigger ones that are invested in several GPs, you know, that are maybe invested in the same assets. So our co-investors and ask them, what is the valuation in your books and in their books, actually, you know. And we also reached out, of course, directly to our co-investors because there is not like a real method how to do it.

49:41Some people then actually adjust the valuation by the company in 25 % steps. Some others really like to or try to calculate something. And it's really interesting. And you have to find your own way. But what is very important, as Chloe and Alex mentioned, is that you're communicating with your LPs and that you let them know. And also what is important now after this happened in the down market or when the market turned, We now have a new process in place where we sit down with all the managing partners and myself together in the room once a quarter. And we go through the portfolio, all of the funds, asset by asset, and ask ourselves, do we have to adjust the valuation or not?

50:27And then we discuss this. because I think it's really important to have a process in place and not just always keep the last money valuation in the report, as Alex mentioned, right? And one other strategic thing, of course, would be something like when you do a new fundraising, maybe you don't have so much DPI yet or something like this, like different instruments like secondaries, partial exits, and so on. Maybe you want to show more DPI to make it easier to raise your future funds and stuff like this. But I think this is really a tough decision. And I wouldn't do that because you have different LPs in your different funds.

51:10Right. And I think you always should increase the interest or align the interest of all the LPs. And you shouldn't sell any assets where you have a lot of upside potential and stuff like this. But this is, of course, another instrument to think strategically about fundraising and expectation management that maybe make your life easier. But I think you should always think this decision through. And it's not that easy to actually do. And there's a lot of discussion that we also have internally when to sell and stuff like this. So when you're in like year eight or so in your fund lifecycle, it's not about the follow-on rounds and new investments anymore, as Alex said, but it's more about when you sell actually and when you distribute the money to the LPs.

51:58Absolutely. We're going to get much more to distribution here in a second. And Enrico, I'd love to ask you because we had just a conversation now, but we also had a conversation a couple of weeks back on the UBC where we did a panel on portfolio management and data-driven decision making and so on. And there, one of the big topics that ended up coming up was exactly how do you measure performance of a fund before you start having real markups and so on? Because that's typically the situation that you raise fund two and three on the back of. So I'd love to ask you, Enrico, how do you, with Bunch, make sure that your investors can, in the easiest possible way, give good guidance on where the portfolio stands and the fund stands, other than just the very, how should I say it, boring statistics?

53:02things uh it was super super good question and super good discussion i think simply like first simple answer right the you guys are looking looking a bit at everybody else they're they're there for for good reasons so um at the moment we are not giving anyone advice how to value a company but what we are trying to do is actually giving them the perfect data set to take decisions So what we actually have seen, and I'm also the founder and I'm also reporting. So we've seen that obviously founders sometimes are good in reporting and diligent reporting and some founders aren't. That's the first level of flexibility that, yeah, we've seen now more and more come up.

53:46And the second way that we've seen it all, and that's probably more relevant for Chloe, is that for funder funds or investors into funds, they're extracting information out of the reports from the underlying funds and that's something that we are currently working on very very holistically where we actually extract this information as data-driven as possible so you always get pdfs but they're very similar we have a good standard of of ill power and west europe reporting that most fund reports on and therefore give you a more data-driven yeah database to work and take decisions on rather than look through pdf reportings and then it sounds super super super trivial but but also for those investors and and some of the lps it's it's really what we call global cap tables because some investors don't actually know what the underlying assets what their ownership in the underlying asset is because obviously if you want to invest into three four five ten fifteen gps they sometimes tend to invest into the same assets and sometimes they also report different valuations a bit to to to simon's point so i think two years ago when we started the company we were like okay every single startup that we have on the platform or that is invested through our platform should be one startup and has one valuation has one reporting and and maybe at one point this is actually also the founder directly being access but we learned quite quickly that this valuation yeah level between funds is super, super huge.

55:20And some funds take this decision very early and some funds follow on. I think in the end, most funds took the decision to change a couple of the valuations. But in the end, to summarize, we are a data provider and we are currently extracting data mostly out of reports for funder funds and investors into funds. And then secondly, we are currently thinking about how can you make this portfolio reporting a more holistic, more standardized approach? Because in the end, that's the only thing that we can do, right? We can only provide Alex or Simon or Chloe or Sophie with the information. We are not, that's why we're in private markets.

56:02We are not the ones taking the, giving the feedback and doing the price adjustment at the moment. Even though they have found it super interesting that Chloe said, okay, we do quarterly earnings calls. So one's been in public markets and things that are so similar are super, super interesting because obviously the liquidity, the tradability is something that shows potential but also risks through private markets. But to summarize, we provide the data. We are already quite powerful when it comes to data that we know best, which is actually portfolio reporting or fund reporting. And we are getting better to understand what is operational reporting, what are operational KPIs and what is maybe even a market standard on certain sectors.

56:50But that's something that we are currently learning, that we're getting better at. In the end, the decision is with the GP. And now to the final segment of our roundtable today, and it's going to be a short one. And it's very, very, I would say, I was about to say fitting because what I had written in my script here was that it's an often overlooked but crucial part of the LP investment journey. And here we are making it an overlooked part of the journey by only dedicating a couple of minutes to it. But Chloe, I'd love to ask you to go first here and tell us what you see as the best practice as an LP.

57:29Yeah, I think best practice as an LP really differs upon what the exit scenario is, right? So you have a few different things that can happen. Either a portfolio company exits kind of early in the journey. it's a trade sale as an LP you don't really have much influence on what happens there if there is an IPO maybe there is more influence as an LP because sometimes your GPs will ask you okay well when do you want to sell when when do you want us to sell the shares and that can vary from LP base to LP base right maybe you have a super small LP base to all want to hold in that case do that I think it's again this communication point right really understanding what are your LPs positions and what works for them sometimes you can distribute the shares in specie and you know that way you can do different things that for different LPs but really it's this asking your LPs what they want which can be a really important part of that journey secondly you know you can get to the end of your fund and maybe there hasn't been much liquidity and as Simon mentioned you You know, maybe there's an opportunity to sell some things in secondaries or maybe there's an opportunity to do a continuation fund.

58:43Again, I would just say, talk to your LPs about it. Like they're there, they're around the table, they are limited partners. They will have an opinion on it. Discuss the possibilities, the outcomes, the eventualities. Make sure everyone understands that it's on the same page. And I think, you know, that's a really, really important standing starting point is just really, you know, having those conversations with your partners to get a view on where your LP stand and what's important for them. Sometimes it will be really important for people to access liquidity. And so, you know, they'd rather sell quickly and at a lower price.

59:19Maybe your fund already has great DPI, in which case, you know, they're willing to ride it for a little bit longer to get that upside. Maybe one point is that you can also involve your LPs when it comes about exit in your portfolio. For example, if you have corporates or bigger family businesses as LPs in your LP base, they can actually also be the buyers of your portfolio companies. Sometimes you even have a lot of potential inside your portfolio. If you have like a late stage or more mature former portfolio companies that you already exited or that went public or so, they can be buyers with newer portfolio companies, stuff like this.

1:00:02So I would always try to help the portfolio companies when it comes to exits and try to leverage your LP base as well. I know it sounds repetitive, but the outcomes is important. We had one larger M &A trade at the end of 2020. We did keep LPs updated in our quarterly calls, but only to a certain extent that we're actually able to, right? And I think it's also around managing expectations. If I had said back then early on, yeah, I'll think it sells for$1 billion. dollars every LP goes crazy and they're like oh great let me tell my clients in front of funds and stuff money's coming right and then but there's so many things that need to happen right there was an antitrust uh case that first needed to be solved that takes a few months so we just try to manage expectations also until it's really done now with an IPO again it's very different also right so and we we also had that and i was asked you know i think they weren't even a pre marketing and in my prior career i've done a lot of ipos so i also know a lot of things that can happen in an ipo it's just amazing that you get asked a lot of questions so okay so when is it happening i heard the pricing is in four weeks so do we get the money in five weeks that's so far away from the reality i mean the sophisticated lps no but um maybe some are newer to the business or they just you know if this happens you know late in a fun lifetime which ipos usually just takes some time it's not a phenomenon that you see all the time and we just try to manage expectations because and if you've seen in a down market um there's so many things even if the ipo shows priced let's say it's done you know Roadshow worked well it's priced you're still in a lockup yeah you'll be six months in a lockup at a minimum we have seen shares not we luckily in the portfolio but others also have seen shares trade down 95 in the lockup period so if you had told LPs five for five years how great this is and it will return the fund multiple times and then you You actually lose the value, 95 % of it in the lockup period.

1:02:23It's tough. So we kind of, whenever we mentioned something, you know, for example, price range was set. They went out to the roadshow. We let LPs know that. They can read it online, but, you know, they also got it from us. Pricing was done. What happens next? You know, okay, lockup period is done. How do we, and then it's more around how do we think about the company in general? world what's the sell down strategy like do we want to sell everything in the bargain the block trade or uh do we want to do there's lots of things you can do you do we want to sell down our stake in a dribble down over three months or you know what's our plan are we long-term holders because we we've been with the business since day one we know you know we know the founders we know the business or is it actually we're quite far away from the business so we want to sell short to medium term because we're not in the end we're not stock traders right people invest with us because we're vcs and not stock traders i think that also got a bit diluted during the boom years with some of the u.s funds and at the end of the day it's around that why do we want to sell within the next three months what's our strategy is it we wait for the next we basically when we did that sale we basically said here's our macro calendar those are the events that could potentially impact the stock we've spoke to a few people this is the next quarterly reporting date this is our sell window we don't announce it but that was my answer when they asked and then we just pulled the trigger yeah we did it before some very unfortunate events happened in early 2022 which was in the thing in the end the right thing to do but i think it's more around that how do you think about the process and how do you what's your thinking around it and not just saying oh you know seems like a a good day for the stock let's sell maybe sex sequering a bit on this I think overall what we've also seen is education right transparency I mentioned earlier and we discussed this but education on on this element across the board helps tremendously we all we all wanna wanna make private markets grow as they have been growing or even more and and it needs education for more people to participate or more people to understand what is the IPO process and that there is a bit of uncertainty even though that it might be an IPO.

1:04:46I mean, we also saw Figma and Adobe. I think that's also something that probably everybody was already spending the money on Figma, which is an amazing company. I think everybody works probably even with it. And then in the end, they cannot do the deal. And I think they still had a billion of just a cover-up fee if the deal didn't happen. But overall, what I want to say is education is key and a lot of things can go wrong. And if you are hyped up and already spent your money before the DPI actually has been returned, then you might run into two issues. Rico, I think you segued us perfectly into the ending where I can say, let's close on the line of a lot can go wrong.

1:05:42Everyone, thank you so much for tuning in to today's roundtable on ACNLP management. I hope you enjoyed it. Simon, Sophie, Chloe, Alex, and Rico, thank you so much for joining us here today. I hope you had some fun as well. Thank you. Thank you.

1:06:02Tear down this wall. It's more than just an alliance. This is a union of values. United and determined, we can serve as a model for other regions of the world. The nature of a problem requires a European response. Europe is a story of new beginnings. New beginnings. Let's start acting. Thank you.

From the publisher
965 joined us for yesterday's roundtable on acing LP relationships - in case you missed it, listen here or rewatch on eu.vc 👀

Whether you're navigating the complexities of LP expectations, leveraging digital tools for onboarding, or aiming to strengthen trust and transparency, this roundtable covers it all. Watch it here or add it to your episodes on Apple or Spotify.Our esteemed speakers:
What You Will Learn:
  • Key strategies for VCs to effectively manage and nurture relationships with LPs.
  • Insights into the expectations and preferences of LPs in their partnerships with VCs.
  • The importance of transparency, communication, and alignment of interests in LP-VC relations.
  • Innovative tools and services that can facilitate stronger LP-VC connections.
  • Real-world experiences and lessons from leading professionals in the field.



This roundtable is brought to you in collaboration with bunch.capital 💖 Being the operating system for private markets, bunch goes beyond the ordinary, reshaping the investment experience by digitising every aspect of the investment process from onboarding to reporting & compliance. They focus on elevating the quality of GP-LP relationships and are trusted by over 1,500 customers who have invested more than €950 million through the platform. Join us if you are interested in exploring how cutting-edge technologies can transform your LP experience. Check them out on bunch.capital 💖

More from EUVC

All 626 episodes
E279 | EUVC | Acing LP Relationships with experts from Cavalry, Cherry, Isomer Capital, No Such Ventures & BunchEUVC · 1 h 7 min
Listen in VO