In short
EUVC Podcast Episode Summary
Episode Title
E319 | EUVC Awards
Guests
- Marc-Olivier Luecke, General Partner at Atlantic Labs
- Christian Siewek, Co-founder and MD at Vimcar
Description: In this episode of the European VC Podcast, the hosts engage in a detailed discussion about the exit of Vimcar, which was nominated as a finalist for the Exit of the Year category at the European VC Awards. The conversation covers the journey of Vimcar from pre-seed investment to its exit in January 2023 to Battery Ventures, highlighting key aspects of venture capital and startup dynamics.
Key Topics Discussed
Overview of Atlantic Labs
- Atlantic Labs is a €110M fund with €300M under management, based in Berlin.
- Focus areas include Climate & Energy, AI & Data, and European Deep Tech.
- Notable investments include Choco, Zenjob, Wandelbots, Again, and Vimcar.
The Journey of Vimcar
- Founding Story: Christian and his co-founders identified an opportunity in accessing vehicle data and initially focused on creating a digital logbook for freelancers to save taxes.
- Investment Thesis: Marc-Olivier outlines the criteria for investing in Vimcar: emerging technology, scalable business model, and strong founding team.
- Challenges: Discussed early challenges including the need for acceptance from tax authorities and competition from OEMs.
Fundraising Milestones
- Pre-seed (2013-2014): Initial investment and development of the product.
- Series A (2016): A €4 million round that allowed for scaling and a pivot to a subscription model.
- Series B (2018): A €12 million round that facilitated further expansion and the introduction of additional products, positioning for international growth.
Reflections on VC and Founder Dynamics
- Discussion on the importance of investor alignment and the role of trust between founders and investors.
- Emphasis on the balance between aggressive growth and sustainable business practices.
The Tech Reset and Strategic Decisions
- The impact of the tech reset in 2022 led to strategic shifts within Vimcar, including a focus on efficiency and profitability rather than aggressive cash burning for growth.
- Reflections on how to manage expectations and growth strategies during challenging market conditions.
The Acquisition Process
- In January 2023, Vimcar was acquired by Battery Ventures in an all-cash deal.
- Discussion on the timing and strategic alignment leading up to the acquisition.
- Insights on the decision to engage in a structured process versus exclusivity with Battery Ventures.
Post-Exit Reflections
- Christian discusses the quick integration between Vimcar and Battery Ventures, highlighting the importance of shared visions and values.
- Marc reflects on the fund's lifecycle and the implications of having successful exits for both founders and investors.
The Role of Wealth
- Both guests reflect on the personal impact of financial success and how it changes perspectives on work, ambition, and life goals.
- Emphasis on the importance of maintaining a balanced lifestyle and focusing on long-term fulfillment over immediate wealth.
Key Takeaways
- The importance of a clear investment thesis when entering into partnerships.
- The need for adaptability in response to market changes and conditions.
- Understanding investor-founder dynamics is critical for long-term success.
- Wealth can provide freedom and options, but true satisfaction comes from purpose and community engagement.
Final Thoughts The episode encapsulates the journey of Vimcar from inception to exit, emphasizing the complexities of venture capital and the importance of strategic alignment between founders and investors. The discussions provide valuable insights for entrepreneurs and investors navigating the European VC landscape.
---
For more details and to listen to the full episode, visit [EUVC](https://eu.vc).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Welcome back everyone to another episode of the European VC podcast. Today I am joined by Mark Olivia, Lücke, and Christian Siwek. Christian is the founder of Vimcar, German's leading fleet software designed for small to medium-sized businesses. And Mark, of course, is the founder and GP of Atlantic Labs. And right now, Atlantic Labs is a big fund. It's a 110 million euro fund with 300 million under management based in Berlin, Germany. They're focusing on pre-seed, but occasionally do see. And they're investing all across Europe. It's a journalist fund and they're focused, but they are currently mostly focused on climate and energy, AI and data and European deep tech.
0:42They've done incredibly investments, some of them being Choco, SunJob, Vandalbox again, and of course, Vimcar, which we're going to dive super deep into today because Vimcar is the or the Vimcar exit, which happened in January 2023, is one of the finalists in the European VC awards category of the exit of the year. So, of course, huge, massive congratulations to both Christian and Mark Olivia on that. But also, this is going to be a conversation where we talk all about the thesis of investing in Vimcar, then the journey of building it up all the way from Pre-C to Series B and to a final exit to Battery Ventures.
1:28So, you know, a company journey that we don't normally talk too much about on the European VC podcast, but also, of course, littered with a tons of reflections from the VC perspective and the dynamic between the founder and the VCs and the rounds that happened in between the pre-seed round in 2013, 2014, and the final exit in 2023. Also, before we get into it, I just want to give a massive shout out to our sponsor and very good friends at Tactic. They are sponsoring the exit of the year category at the EUVC awards. And we just have to say there are not many partners that we have that we are as happy about as Anobab and his team at Tactic.
2:12We think definitely that they are the best forecasting and planning software for venture funds. So massive thanks to them for helping us build the awards and everything we're doing here at EUVC and supporting us in our content efforts. but also definitely a very warm recommendation that you go and check that out. I have not really advised anyone to do so without them coming back and saying, yeah, that's interesting. We will definitely look deeper.
2:53United and determined, We can serve as a model for other regions of the world. The nature of a problem requires a European response. Europe is a story of new beginnings. Let's start acting. This show is not investment advice and the hosts of this episode may be invested in the funds and companies featured. Mark Christian, welcome to the European VC podcast. Really great to be here. This is the first time we're doing an episode that's diving into an exit with the founder and the investors. I'm super excited about this for that reason. But what is more, this is also an interview that we're doing because you guys are the finalists in our exit of the year category.
3:43So first of all, massive congratulations on the success. It has been quite the ride with Vimcar, and we're going to talk through that in this episode. But also congratulations, of course, for being recognized as one of the most meaningful exits in the ecosystem this year. Congratulations, Christian. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. And notice the humility from Mark. You'll see that throughout the conversation. So super thankful for that. Maybe let's start this conversation where everything started, of course, which is the initial investment memo and thesis and why Mark and the team decided to invest. And Christian, of course, started to or decided to found the company.
4:31I actually want to let you guys decide where should we start? Should we start with the founding story or the investment story? I'll let you decide. Mark, how about you go first and then I'll hop in. I was wondering, does it make sense to share already very early on what Wilmka is doing? Maybe start with the investment hypothesis and then we'll figure out along the way. Yeah, also because the investment hypothesis is much shorter, right? Yes. We didn't give it so much. Usually we always look for three things, right? So it's emerging, changing technology, which is creating new market opportunities.
5:08is you know a straightforward scalable business model and and good founders and in this case there's this whole space emerging around access to car data and what you could do with it right because there's much more information on the on the board computers and also a standardized access to it and and the vincar team had had this very straightforward idea on how to save taxes and i let christian talk about a little bit more which we really like because it was very straightforward a bit of a no-brainer for users to save several thousand euros a year. And we liked that. And we also thought that the team had a healthy ambition level, but also very humble, hardworking, diligent.
5:49And we're just convinced that they would execute well. And so, yeah, we want to give them a chance. Christian, maybe it's the perfect time to segue over to you so you can then tell us your journey founding the company. Yeah, yeah. I think that, I mean, as you hear, Atlantic is pretty pre-seed, so very early. That's why basically our journeys, they did not really start altogether, but very soon after Andreas Lukas and myself, so we were co-founding the company, we started out like Atlantic was joining in. And we actually started not solving a problem, but seeing a technology that we liked, basically accessing vehicle data.
6:43But I was even going back two years before when Andreas and Mastarik worked at university on a project with Audi. And they were thinking about how to build services, connect the service for the future. We thought that's too limited to a brand, that it's too complicated with all the technology there. and then there was kind of a device that you could put in OBD, onboard diagnostics, into a car, and data was like magically coming out. And we thought like there has to be something. Obviously, this is not the approach you should phone a company on because it's essential to find a problem that you want to solve and where people are basically valuing that solution and are willing to pay for that.
7:24and that's why we had like a first idea of kind of a Fitbit for vehicles, so to say, and to put it like very simply, which I think Atlantic was still open to invest in, but then we really very quickly also realized where to go for something more specific, a point solution. We actually started out with a point solution that Mark was also mentioning and basically enabling freelancers with business vehicles to save a ton of taxes per year by writing a logbook that kind of automatically writes itself or is at least 10x easier to maintain than the handwritten one. And that's kind of how we started out.
8:14And that was in 2013 that you started. And then in 2014, you launched this first iteration of it. Maybe, Mark, just because you stated the highlights of why you invested. The founding team was there. You saw the opportunity. You thought it made sense. There's an inflection point in terms of technology happening. But could you be more specific exactly? why was it that you at this pre-seed stage was right to say, let's go with Christian and Andreas on this? Well, I mean, we always invest pre-seed stage, try to get in as early as possible and ideally engage with the founders even before they start with your company or have finalized the idea.
9:07And in this case, it was actually my partner, Christoph Mayer, who led the investment at the time. And it was also the time when I joined him at Atlantic end of 2013. and Christoph at the time was already a well-known business angel in the European ecosystem but before that he had founded a company himself called Gate 5 which he then sold to Nokia and then helped to develop into what is today here sort of a navigation and mapping company so he knew the space very well and he engaged very early on because he felt there's an opportunity there to get into the car with this wedge you know, a very specific solution but also might be opportunities to use the car data for other things afterwards and you know we had a bunch of ideas uh that you interacted on also over years christian right and thinking about insurance and other things lots of things to do with with the data in there but of course you also had to be um you know you had to convince users to actually stick this dongle into the car so it had to be a convincing use case to scale it and you had to stay a bit clear of what OEMs were doing themselves because they're also quite possessive of the data in the car.
10:15We thought it was a perfect combination of very specific use case, sort of out of the death zone of the OEMs and the potential to expand it later. And I know, Christine, that the whole issue with the OEMs was also one that you had in mind, of course, and MN were trying to gauge. I'd love to ask you, how did you kind of come to feel comfortable with this risk? How did you explore it? Yeah, it's a very good question. So that was probably our number one point that we always disagreed in any funding round with investors coming in and really disagreed from the heart that we didn't really thought that our point solution, of the the the the solution we're going for and also what we're going for later on which we're going to talk about in a minute that that was kind of being ever covered by an oem due to multi-brand restrictions so there's always something done for your own brand and then also the accessibility piece we didn't really believe in that so the data points we needed were really kept and also So we had a backup technology in mind, which is just GPS-based, which you can never really stop us from gathering.
11:40But also up until today, so we're 10 years in, nothing has changed. And not even like accessibility, like open accessibility to all those connected vehicles is really given. It's going to get much better, but still we gather still today I would say 98%, 99 % of people are with the devices that we're using from the very beginning. And 10 years ago, I was like, oh, in five years, everything's going to be connected and different. And scarily, nothing has changed much. And I think that says, says speaks, speaks tons, tons about our car industry. Am I right in saying that, that like all the stuff that Elon with Tesla said, well, they do not know how to innovate.
12:30Even when they put the capability in there, they don't know, they don't really get to, because of the structure and the system that we have in place in the industry. Innovation is, real innovation is just not happening. There's some truth to it. But I guess connecting vehicles or making vehicle data accessible for other providers that want to build solutions, maybe that also wasn't particularly a priority as, for example, autonomous driving was more of a stadium in the last year. So that's my positive interpretation of if I had to choose a focus, then I probably ought to go for autonomous driving rather than making a data game and building the OS for vehicles and so on.
13:23So I'm being less critical or more diplomatic. Yeah, as well, I think you're also in a position where we need to be more diplomatic than me. So if we then say, if we go from when you launched the point solution with the logbook, basically the digitized logbook, could you take us through the rest of your, the next stage of your journey? So we launched the point solution and actually believed the underlying technology is very powerful. That was the big piece of development, basically getting the data out of the cars, creating trips out of them and so on. So there was quite some effort there. Okay, that's kind of the base, the fundament of everything that's coming after.
14:12That's why we also invested a year, which is like in hindsight, I'm still thinking about like, It doesn't need a year to launch, but there were some circumstances such as it had to be accepted by tax authorities. We launched with Android and iOS simultaneously, which 10 years ago was probably a bit more bothersome than it's probably today. And so quite a few things. And then we thought it's a niche and let's see what the first month brings and then take it from there. but then this niche basically and and acceptance by the market was like yeah it was way better than we expected and we just continued with that point solution not thinking about of course think about bigger things but just executing just on that piece and i guess after two years after after launch we had around like two million in in in recurring revenue uh which i guess was also fundamentals like the the business we were building um knowing today i think it's quite hard to build to go over that that first million or first two million uh so i guess in hindsight we did the right thing just focusing on that one thing a bit really well and then expand from there mark i'd love to ask you uh as the investor on the sidelines first of all let's talk about what what did you actually do for the company with the company in that period but also what were you thinking in this period?
15:44Well, I mean, you can only do so much as an investor with any company, really. I mean, I think our philosophies, what I hear from founders mainly is that they need money and they need good people. And it's good also to have sometimes a trusted investor who is in a position to ask tough questions if possible, but we couldn't do much more than that, right? They went their own journey. but it did take a time for you to develop traction and then in order to be in a position to raise the Series A as well took a bit of time and we did have to we brought in some other investors after us so end of 2014 we did a small seat round with some good co-investors and business agents also from the industry which was important also because we didn't have so much money ourselves at the time yet.
16:42And then we went out to raise the CSA together and closed that then three years later. If I remember correctly, it was a 14 million euro fund that the investment came out of. Am I correct, Mark? So our first fund was 23 million. So it was Atlantic Internet at the time. So first micro fund we set up before then, you know, in 2016, we set up Atlantic Labs. So yeah, we're still still quite cash constrained and reliant on bringing other good investors in with us. Which is not entirely the case now. You're bigger as our audience will also have heard in our introduction. Christian, I would love to ask you, thinking back now and you're, I'm sure, also pondering next move, what am I going to do?
17:29Also supporting other entrepreneurs in their early stages, what have been your reflections on this early period and what you got from investors versus what you would like to see given to founders? That is a very good question. First of all, I think you can't get it all from one investor. and each and every investor has its specifics that are particularly useful, like beyond, of course, the monetary, the financing piece. That should be a given. What I found was particularly impressive for Atlantic was that Atlantic and then especially, of course, Christophe, who is gnawing for his ambition in thinking big, whereas there are these three guys that are working on some digital logbook with probably limited market size just want to get it right and getting started and then there's someone pushing you to think about what if what if we'd raise 50 million what would you do next year and in the end And I think that was really important too.
18:45I think we didn't fully follow through what was asked or recommended, but of course it was also kind of a provocation, which really started thought experiments in our head, like, hey, yes, how can we think it bigger and so on? And without that, we would have never built a company eventually that we did over time and potentially would have kind of sticked to that niche. So here was really the motivation, the confidence that you can build something bigger and so on. At the same time, I think it's really great that you didn't need to raise $50 million, but you built a business so cash efficient, right?
19:28And I think that's one of the for us also great success story that you managed to do that. It's the hindsight look. No, but I actually think that's one of the conversations we had in the judging panel when talking through the different finalists that we have vying for the award. Vimcar is a very good example of what you can do if you build, not in just dumping cash on a company and scaling rapidly. So maybe I do think it is worthwhile and it's probably well to connect this to them going to your Series A round and kind of talk through the rest of the journey. But it is exactly that which you guys are a great example of that you can build in a more organic, healthy, quotation marks, healthy way than the blitz scaling.
20:25yeah yeah absolutely i i i um i in preparation i had a look at our series b deck which says we invested a million to go to a million arr we invested four million to go to five million arr and then dot dot dot yeah so kind of like it's a ratio yeah so it's kind of the efficiency um piece that we did like that we also also wanted to stretch uh for the more conservative think is around our business. What do you, now that we're on this efficiency topic, maybe we could reflect a bit on, first of all, obviously you made decisions that allowed you to build like that, but there are also obvious consequences for the magnitude of the outcome.
21:14Okay, you may have been bigger if you had scaled differently. Fair enough. but at the same time you also were much less diluted both of you which i would love to just maybe you know reflect a bit on with you like what does this make you think about the vc model about like yeah which route do we push founders you mark which route do we want to take companies which profile of companies do we like and like from an investor perspective and you christian from the founder perspective, there could be differences. Last exactly. No, I mean, I suggested Wimka as an exit of the year because, you know, it's a deal, an all-cash deal, which really flushed cash back into the ecosystem for these season LPs.
22:07And I think that's very important because we have too few of those. I think we can agree, right? There's too much money going in, but not coming back. also if you look at you know some of those unicorn exits that we all strive for and I think this affects a lot of mentality and the dynamics of the CF system they are of course very rare and few in between you have to get lucky right to get them but even if they materialize it may not even be a cash deal but more often than not it's a four share deal because that's the only way that you can pay for these acquisitions and in fact at the same time as the Wimka exit we had another exit in the food delivery business a uniform exit and and that was an old idea so you can debate which is better but eventually money has to has to flow back into the ecosystem and the second reason is that it's very cash efficient right so there's i think about 17 million flowing into vim car which wasn't even spent by the time of the exit right there's still a good portion left of a balance sheet and and still gross level was returned more than eight times across the capital and so i think this is the sort of cash on cash returns that that we need to show to our in the ecosystem so and at the same time it was also great timing right it was a really terrible market environment end of 2022 nested had crashed public markets were down and the market environment was very bad and so i think i think it's a great template that you are able to check these sort of businesses and i think for us as an investor, of course, you know, we had a very small micro fund at the time, which thankfully this investment returned for us.
23:45Very grateful for that. Of course, if you're a larger fund, this may not work in the same way, but you still need these sort of exits as part of it. And we try to balance our portfolio, right, between doing some very binary bets, which may or may not produce outlier unicorn returns, but we also want to back businesses where there's very clear business model and the path of scaling in an efficient manner. And I think it's a balance of the two which works for us. Yeah. And Christian Nankin, in contrast to Mark, you do not have a portfolio of companies that you found. Too bad, huh? So I'd love to ask you about your perspective on the same situation basically yeah i i think it's a bit also and of course in in hindsight but like we really loved uh yes ambition and growth but keeping it controlled as you see with the the metrics if you metric that i i i shared and that was kind of keeping me sane so to say and And make sure also it's not getting too binary, especially if you go longer and longer with a company where essentially like 99 % of your theoretical wealth is exposed to that one opportunity, right?
25:08I don't think you ever did secondaries, did you? No, never. So you're really all in. You're getting a bit nervous at some point, obviously. but that also probably helped us to be conscious of cost. At the same time, we were also pushed to be ambitious, which then turned out to be a good balance. And then if I'm looking at it now, I think VCs and founders, they can have very different incentives. and keeping it very low dilution and more compact. So probably if I wanted to optimize for a certain financial outcome, I don't even believe that at least two cases necessarily the best one. So a B2B SaaS building it 100%, owning it 100%, building it to 5 million over a couple of years is probably also a very good option.
26:12But there's no better than the other, but apparently the 5 million hubs and all by the founder is not an attractive case at all. Yeah. Mark, you said something here around secondaries that might be cool to just bring in and ask Christian reflections on not taking secondaries. Did you, was the opportunity just not there or did you not explore it at all? It was all about business, business, business and pushing through. I think the the um when when you also have these times right where you are very bullish about your business and then you're a bit scared at times and then growth might be dropping and just like okay if the next funding round might not be the number one option then what is it and then you start really reflecting about should I have time secondary should I do it is it good for the business that I'm 100 % exposed and also acting out of maybe a very defensive and risk of us and so on.
27:21So I think at some point we should have asked for it, but it was never like we want it and you don't get it. This type of situation that really never happened. I think we haven't really gone through an in-depth discussion. Mark, do you recall the same?
27:42instead i remember that one of the angels wanted out right at the beginning i mean because it took a bit of time to get to the series a and and um investors were a bit were getting a bit itchy some of them and and then one of the angels won this money back i remember so that happens and maybe this is the perfect segue to then go into talking about the series a that then took a bit of time It was a 4 million euro round by UVC and Koperian. Maybe whoever, Christian, maybe you will talk us through that journey and both racing it. Let's start with racing it and there Mark can pitch in. And then afterwards, we also talk a bit about lessons that you make.
28:21I think from Atlantics, in my perspective, it took like two years to race the round. In my perspective, it took like 12 months, still a long time. But we've been like, if you're working with Atlantic, you're basically being constantly exposed to any sorts of potential follow on investors, which makes a ton of sense, because I think there's this company business VC fit is very important. and you never know who and also sometimes it's individuals in thumbs that are more attracted to certain things and so on and you you need that fit otherwise um you have a problem after raising the run so this this alignment understanding of the approach of the speed that we're going on the focus and so on it took a while and then also like looking at okay these guys they do something with based on vehicle data but also i'm seeing a digital logbook which is very specific niche and yes it's growing nicely but like what is it in the future and it was not necessarily also a topic i really don't sure it's probably also um it took a bit longer as i wouldn't consider ourselves as the as the fundraising monsters at least on the first meters i guess we followed up very nicely afterwards always so um once once vcs were really looking a bit a bit further yeah but then it took like about a year to uh yeah get that round uh together of course not in that intensity but really having all the conversations and talking to many vcs who would be potentially It's my view.
30:07I mean, it always takes long. And I mean, we did have to bridge in between to make it happen. So I think one lesson learned for us as a pre-sit fund, right? You always need to keep a bit in reserve and also have friendly co-investors because fundraising always takes longer than you think. But I also really want to double down on the point that Christian said, right, on the founder investor match. and you asked earlier how we help our founders and fundraising is clearly one of the things which is super important but when you invest so early and we spend a lot of time but over the years i i strongly feel that you know it's it's not about maximizing the valuation or of the brand of the solo investor but really trying to understand who's the right partner to lead the deal one both understands the space and clicks with the founders so that they can work well together over the next many years that they're together.
31:00And I think that's very important. And so I felt that Andreas from UVCU, who went and left the deal, and we introduced them, was a very good match because he would get it in the automotive industry based in Neonic, and would be able to be a good partner of them, as was Acton Capital later on, being super helpful to the team in many different ways. During this period, you went into a second category of products. Yeah, that's a new segment. And you also changed to subscription only model. Maybe talk through those decisions. Yeah, starting out, we already had a subscription model, but then also a one-off price, which kind of helped us also to basically fund our business, to fund its operations and customer acquisitions and so on, obviously.
31:50And then basically shortly like a month after raising CSA or getting the cash, we basically switched fully to subscription only, which I think was a really smart decision. So from that point on, this was all about annual recurring revenue and all the dynamics behind it, be it expansion, churn, and so on. And yeah, we also moved into a new category, which came very naturally where we realized that our product that we were addressing freelancer segment with was also used by smaller companies that were doing the exact solving the exact same problem but with a pool of vehicles and multiple drivers and so on so we built a product to basically also both that self-service for small fleets and quickly realized that there are many more things to solve there and then really expanded the product for that segment for smes this is where we are still today and what i'm talking about is um so what we do is fleet fleet management where trip logging is one piece but there's also geo tracking there's also all the administrative piece driver license checks cost control damage management whatnot and so a bit like um maybe like a something like a personio for for vehicles so the way people need to be kind of administered in a company also be including some more additional operational pieces and that's kind of what our Series A investment went into and then also of course in parallel there's always like how can we grow faster not only by product but also by building out the GTM motions and so on.
33:46And you just executed really well, right? I think you never had this hyper ambitious pitch to just convince on vision. But I do think you convince all your investors by just really doing a good job and delivering what you promised. Convincing on optionality. And then if we go on, because then now we're getting to the end of 2018, which is two years after your Series A, which was end 2016, team and you then raise your Series B and that's 12 million by Acton Capital. Maybe I should kick it to you and say, okay, so now we've heard what happened from A to B, then the raise of a base of Series B compared to your earlier capital intakes.
34:31What did you think of our Series B? No, I mean, I was, so we already had three investments together with Acton and really appreciate how that is super helpful to engage with their founders. So I was very happy to have them on board. I think the intro came parallel from us and from Andreas, both based in Munich, and I thought that was very helpful. And clearly, it gave you, put you finally in a position where you didn't need to think about the next race anymore, but you'd be signing through to break even. You wanted, and it's all about, you know, which path you wanted to go. I think there was, you know, there was a decisive moment.
35:08But of course, there's been a bit of strategic questions coming up again. Do you want to internationalize? Do you want to open up new categories? And now that you have the money, what do you do with it? And Christian, now you have the money, what did you do with it? Maybe the talk first heard a bit about that. So the Series A came with some trouble in that it did take a full year. you had to find the partner and firm where there was a great mix or a great match. How was the Series B from a dynamics perspective there? Yeah, it was definitely smoother, I guess, for mainly two reasons. One is that being engaged in so many conversations and knowing so many VCs already, I think it also helps for next rounds because in many cases also it's not a fit because you're still a bit too small at that moment, but you might be very much relevant later on.
36:11I think that was also the case, if I recall correctly. And then it's the pure seeing how things that are being told are actually being executed. I think where we weren't as great is like drawing the multi-billion picture. I think we're really great on delivering on what we were saying we would deliver. And that made it actually pretty easy because I guess no later than the B round, if it's like a bit of a conservative one, I mean, we're not talking about an 80 million B round or something and just moonshot stuff, but also it was much more about financial metrics, also looking at like how much are these guys burning really?
37:00And is other unit economics, do they really make sense? Is there a proven GTM motion already? And then also, as Mark said, it was about internationalization. So that was one piece that we raised for was also going international to have that next level of growth trajectory in the next years. I'm just wondering here, because you spoke about it quite a few times and here it becomes super obvious that this is not, as you said, biggest ambitions in the world, moonshot idea. What did that mean in terms of then the investors that were interested and those that there was a match with and wasn't? Did either of you kind of get any surprises there?
Read the full transcript
37:50we understood very quickly where there were vibes with an investor and where we are aligned on so could potentially aligned on certain things and we're not so if you had conversations around what is it in 10 years um how can we build that into a 10 billion company and so on i think it's an interesting thought experiment but if that is if your conversation was only around that then this is not really how we work so i don't think it's way less ambitious but the way we work was more like okay there are 50 50 million vehicles commercial vehicles in europe we have like 50 60 000 now still a lot more air are than many of our peers that have like kind of started companies around the same time and there's a green field out there so whenever we're approaching customers it's a green field situation and we need to get our head around how can we basically get more market share on what is already there and it's no rocket signs that there is a need and it's rather a question of when are they adopting products and solutions and not if and even only with the products we had we're like okay we can turn this into a 100, 200, 300 million AR business at some point just following through.
39:16So we didn't need that magic around hypothetical things that were like really unproven and yeah, very fun future. Yeah, it's important. I think it's important what you say, Christ, right? It's not a small opportunity. Otherwise, Battery Ventures wouldn't be doing this buy and build case in that space right now, right? It's just the question of sequencing and framing and how you pitch to investors. And with Acton Capital, there was definitely exactly that fit, right? So it was like, yeah, we look identically on the opportunity, more or less. And we are going to talk more about battery ventures and what they're doing here.
39:56So I think that's going to be part of the conversation around the actual exit and timing and deliberations. So let's get into that. But it's obviously a very interesting point. Maybe let's say so just to rechart it, right? Then in 2018, you did this Series B. In the end of 2018, you did this USP,$12 million by action capital. That allowed you to consider additional products, fully take the free products to their full capacity. And then you had enough capital to also really scale and both focus on GTM and get that completely correct, but also internationalize to the UK and drive further growth.
40:36Let's maybe just ask you about what then happened in 2022 where, you know, this is of course the tech reset. April 2022 is where I typically date it. Tech reset. What would you say, Christian? What happened here? Yeah, so of course it would be very convenient to blame everything on the tech reset. no I think what happened after 18 we got a really great in 19 we had a really amazing growth here so really yeah almost 90 % which for us was good and then 2020 came where we weren't like really affected like COVID kicking in but it wasn't like all companies were running away and we didn't close any we had a few hot months and 2020 i think was a bummer for for for everyone um into a certain degree and then we kind of had like okay now we want to like re-accelerate since there's brexit we also want to go to the uk that makes sense and kind of had a few big bets in parallel which was uk which was a massive investment in outbound because we We were a business that was 95 % inbound driven, which is super cool.
42:08But also, it's not really in your hands to grow beyond a certain stage. So you need that outbound or outreach components at some point. And then, yeah, we really invested a lot. 2020 came with, of course, some external circumstances. And we kind of realized in particular 21 that throwing money in the growth channels does not necessarily or unfortunately does not result one by one into additional growth. So like a few percentage points, we were growing faster, were like super, super expensive. and that made us really end of 2021 think like okay is this really how we want to operate is that does that really make make sense and then beginning of 2022 we took like the strategic decision also with with investors to like hey let's turn that let's increase again optionality let's turn that into a cash positive business we knew that that it would only take us a few basically a few months to do so by being a bit more cautious on the on the on the marketing side and on the hiring side and that's kind of how we started out into 2022 but not having any scenarios for end of 2022 beginning of 2023 in mind right but just working on on on that piece and interestingly we increased growth again by spending less so there was I still can't get my head around that but that happens probably if you don't want it too badly Mark, what reflections do you have and similarly for you Christian reflections on this there's something up why pushing for more sales does not work.
44:20It almost does the opposite. What are reflections there in terms of, is that just a trade of the business, meaning the sector and the product that you're selling and so on? Or do you see that this was company specific? We made some wrong calls. we hired maybe not the right people we made up we we we sunk our own boat um or or or was it external factors i let christian answer it very diplomatic i think the answer in the end is is yes and yes right so yeah it's it's really both i think there are markets that and probably the fleet management one is such a market where it and in particular if you're looking at smes and smaller where you need an openness to adopt and it may take some more time and you just need to sit there and work through it over a few more years but also i think we made there a couple of of things on the product side and on the GTM side.
45:32Probably we could have simply done a better, bring in maybe more experienced people as well or whatever. I'm not sure that's always the solution, but probably also something company specific for sure. I mean, we were all first-time and still first-time founders. So how can we get it right? A hundred percent. or even 80%. So definitely also. But that's the question then to an expert like Mark and also the rest of the, obviously the board and investors, like reflections from your side on both like this decision and that it didn't pan out and kind of what did you take, what have you taken with you onto other companies?
46:21Yeah, I mean, of course, I think everyone is a little bit disappointed that you're not growing more quickly at this stage. right and weren't able to do that but on the other hand everybody's also happy that you didn't waste much money trying to internationalize it costs at all costs and and and then not making it right which would be the other way and because we're thinking both about geographic expansion a product expansion switched you know a fleet and other options as well but and i think when we talk about the exit we get to it it's also okay to build a business which is very good in in a certain space and doesn't have ambition to grow by itself organically for global domination, right, but can be part of something bigger.
47:04And I think this is a template we'll see much more. And I think it's a healthy realization that you don't need to invest tremendous amount of money to grow that business on its own necessarily. Yeah, because you could have done it more cash effectively. and for that reason less dilution and then the outcome would actually, from a pure venture perspective, also have been better. Yeah. So let's maybe go directly into the exit and the strategy and the timing and deliberations made in connection to this. Or maybe, yeah, so you, of course, and go to 2024, you realize that it does make sense to have this SaaS company, which Frimcar was, grow capital efficiently.
47:53And then you end up with an acquisition by battery inside. Let's maybe just talk about how did that come to fruition and what did that do to both the founder mentality and master mentality and the conversations that were being had. Well, I just think as you alluded to, there was a little bit of a question already in the board around the time. And, you know, I was more on the outside with our partner Jens on the board. And then I got involved in the exit conversations. But around whether this business should be standalone in the long term, if there's really a competitive edge as a standalone business for forever, or if we shouldn't combine, right, in order to manage to get this global expansion in order to make it something bigger.
48:40So that conversation happened quite early. and you know Christian I think you and Andreas you engaged quite early also speaking with advisors and other strategic partners and players in the space to figure out what could be possible options for you. It all started out with like having the optionality and having like the financial structure in place that allows you to basically think about it more thoroughly and not like run for the next series, for a series C necessarily. I guess we agreed at some point that it probably doesn't make sense to raise another round if we're not seeing the proof for stronger organic growth.
49:23I think that was kind of the – which is not an easy call to make, right? So, of course, if you have Atlantic on board, But then there's the ambition and the growth voice. That's very important to say, like, why? Why? I don't get it. Why? And then you're kind of leveling that out with other perspectives as well. And then you at some point agree on there was very quickly a certain openness to alternatives, right? And if you think about alternatives, I guess, from a VC standpoint, just operating the business and being happy about profits for the next 10 years is not sure that's a desired outcome, but you quickly end up thinking, okay, is an exit, is that an option?
50:13Like, what is a good exit? Are we ready for that? And you start having these kind of conversations, which happened poorly. beginning to mid of the year and of course then also especially in dress and myself we kind of familiarize ourselves a lot and and for that purpose spoke then with a few i mean a advisors investment banks i mean you you get these documents very quickly where they propose you hey this is what you can do with your business and so on yeah i'd love to ask you about yeah go ahead more? No, I just want to point out that you engaged really early with battery. I think like 18 months before the close actually happened and when there's nothing concrete yet.
50:58And it felt to me like you were actually helping them to a degree, you know, at least understand the space better, but also formulate their thesis on, you know, what a buy and build strategy could look like in the space. I think that was very important. And also the other way around, I guess. Yeah. If we go to Battery after, I would just love to ask about the experience of shopping for M &A Advisory on both sides. Like, well, any, maybe first chart the experience and then also talk about learnings and what would you say to others that are in this position? Like, be hesitant to do X or be very aware of Y.
51:38A couple of days ago, I had a conversation with a friend that is currently thinking about an exit and thinking about timing. And then my number one advice was don't think about it alone, but reach out to a few maybe trusted M &A advisors or banks for just do some sparing around it. And of course, it will quickly turn into a pitch situation. But you get a sense really quickly with whom there is a vibe, who has done similar deals also in a certain space, who's really interested in your case, and who is just currently being not too busy and so on. I think you maybe don't want to share too many details yet yet about the business but i think it's always a good exercise to just casually talk early and just for yeah clearing up your mind also regarding what you want and if you start talking about specific scenarios very early you also realize very quickly whether you really want it or whether it feels odd and to talk about it and here was a bit unusual that in the end we decided then not to mandate an advisor, then not to run a competitive process, which normally would always recommend most founders to try to run a structured process and be as competitive as possible.
53:09Yeah, and I think that's the next topic, right? Maybe, Mark, before we go to it, in terms of engaging with M &A advisors, any recommendations from your own experiences there? Well, I mean, the normal recommendation would be to, yes an advisor helps because founders normally have no experience in doing an MA transaction it's the first time and maybe the only time they do it so it's good to have somebody who's got a lot of experience there and ideally your investors have experience but you know they may not have a time to to really dedicate on an operational basis you know every day so so I think it's good to have an advisor it's good to have the right one who doesn't over promise and is able to but you get this competitive dynamic going and frame the target in a way that the strategic benefit and synergies are clear to the buyer.
54:03So I think that's the main thing an advisor is doing and then getting this dynamic right. Then the truth is also in my experience, you know, nearly always the buyer ends up being a party where it's already some sort of relationship to its in the business so if it's a strategic buyer company that there's already some working relationship on them and they understand how it could fit well together or if it's a private equity buyer like in this case that it sort of fits into a thesis and they know how they can make more out of it and it's you know much more often than it just being a you know we look at the numbers we like it and and we buy it because at a minimum then you won't have the synergies which justify premium price.
54:46And it was reflected on the other day because, you know, your co-founder Andreas, he was part of a CEO coaching group we set up where there were six CEOs sort of doing peer coaching. We're not involved, but we helped set it up. And out of these six, four had their exits already, and two are on their way, hopefully. And these four exits, three were done without an advisor, exclusively to a strategic buyer, which clicked with the founders and the business liked it. And the fourth one was done with an advisor who was very helpful, but it was still with the, went to the strategic require, which had originally triggered the whole process and where there's a close relationship.
55:26So I think having the right advisor can make a huge difference in the outcome in terms of particular the price which is being paid, but you still need the strategic link and you should start establishing it as early as possible, also outside of the process. Yeah, incredibly interesting. But then let's go to the, well, special situation that's not so special if we think about the peer group that you just spoke about, Mark. But let's talk about then engaging directly with battery in 2021, taking that decision, how you manage through that process, why, you know, and maybe the learnings that you made when looking back.
56:08I'm always thinking in terms of learning and whether there's anything like that's really applicable to other because it seems like this process is so individual. But like one, I think, important learning that Mark already mentioned, very few things come totally as a surprise. So there's always kind of a connection that has been somehow established before. in in our case it wasn't for a very long time it wasn't a strong a strong connection but in in summer 2022 we kind of exchanged with battery quite a few times around how we see the market so whether like a roll-up game makes it made sense and why and and then also more specifically whether vim car could be like the platform or core to something bigger and by that is and and so on and we had really similar perspectives on that also on that that pure organic growth where you just throw money at it it's probably not the smartest way to generate value for everyone involved but but also at the same time of course the vim car team including investors they were like probably lost when it comes to n and a roll-up so there was not like much operational experience and in in in doing in doing that and that's kind of how it clicked and we continued to exchange and then um one of our competitors basically um went into a structured process which kind of triggered a really a sudden momentum within very few weeks so we were approached by many pe's at that time some are having a bit more serious interest wanted to really like meet up some just to learn vimka as probably reference as they've been in the other process and so on so you you learn that quite quickly if something is going on and then we also learned of course what was going on i mean it's a small it's a small industry or the players like the relevant players there are not many and then also of course m &a and advisors and banks there unfortunately they're talking a lot so you learn quite a quite a few quite a few things and then there was all of a sudden this momentum where we are also thinking like maybe it really makes sense that and of course that was mainly driven by battery, maybe it makes sense if we buy both companies in parallel and throw them together and basically form the nucleus of future European fleet management and really grow from there organically and then plus also roll up and that's basically what happened so and that was basically the reason because the perspective was so clear and what could happen that we kind of jumped opportunistically jumped in there saying like hey if we believe the price is right and we get kind of a quick process as well then let's do it and And those were probably the most horrible six weeks of my business life, maybe my life.
59:43Also having like a second child that was born like basically the week before D &D started, which I do not recommend. And then it was like, just go through, explore, have a check-in every week. Where do we stand? And every, of course, trusting battery, which probably also took some convincing to investors, to our investors that it was the right thing to do that we believe that we could trust Battery and looking at it now I think we did a great and also like Battery was really a great really an amazing partner that always delivered on promises and also allowed for that smooth process because during the day you can like be pragmatic or you need to be pragmatic if you want to assess a business that you're buying for a nine-digit amount, then you better look closely, but you only have five to six weeks.
1:00:44So I think it was also a bit of a gamble from there. Mark, trusting battery. You did not have the direct and very close contact as, of course, the founders did with battery. So what were the hurdles? What were the things that allowed you to feel comfortable with giving exclusivity to battery and trusting the founders in running this? Well, the founders we trust anyway. So that was not an issue. But not our experience. That's true. But running an exclusive process, that was quite unusual, I'd say, and also controversial, to be honest, as a decision. right because you know normally you don't end up with a maximized valuation if you only have one bidder and there's also a risk but if they change their mind you're left with nothing right but on the other hand we were concerned that if we started a process with an advisor and reaching out to potential new bidders it would just take a lot more time right until you prepare other materials set up process and these people get around to it we'd lose a lot of time and we might potentially both lose this opportunity where battery has several targets in mind and how to combine them and keeping them on track but also it was a very fragile market environment right you said right the tech down earlier in the year and you know the VC market outlook was very bleak we weren't sure we would be able to raise an external growth front again if we wanted to in this environment so we're all very laser focused on trying to get this transaction over the line before the year end and holidays, and who knows what would happen afterwards.
1:02:27You might have a bank blow up, as an example. Two months later, right? And that's what happened. So, I mean, we're really happy to have gone that route because we felt it was the quickest route. It was mainly about timing. That was the important thing. And we also saw the benefits to battery that it really helps them because they wanted to paralyze the acquisition of Arboros and Limcar. And knowing that they had exclusivity on Wimka allowed them to run in this other process, which was a structured competitive process in parallel and sync the timing so that they can't close both transactions at the same time, otherwise it wouldn't have worked.
1:03:05So there's a real benefit for them there. And we also made them pay for it, right? So we said, if you want to be exclusive, you have to sharpen up your offer, and then we're all in, and you have to close it by the end, at least got to sign it and then close the end of January. And I think with time, like from a company perspective, with time, you can manage risk, right? So if you set yourself like a six-week deadline, then what could possibly happen? Like after two or three weeks, you know, right? You have like much better visibility on how things are really going. and like worst case you're you're you're wasting five six weeks i mean that's that that's bad and that hurts a lot but also i think if if things had gone really really bad then you know after two or three weeks you see like are like how engaged are external lawyers for example how engaged are external auditors and you see when someone is going really all in and wants to make it happen if you feel like you're really transparently about potential issues.
1:04:14So I always had the feeling that I was in control or we were in control of that. Just to sum it up, right? It was an all-cash deal, closed in January 2023. It was in parallel with the other acquisition. It was a great outcome for all parties, as you say yourself. It was a fund returner for Atlantic. the employees and founders of course got a payday and battery or hopefully quite happy about the acquisition today. Could you talk a bit about that the post exit situation that you're in now Christian? So I think the two management teams they didn't hesitate long so we are like already in January I mean we didn't close until end of January January and February were sitting together already knowing that Berlin would be our common new headquarters.
1:05:12And we decided on the future leadership team and basically operated in parallel, but started to move everything together, including like working very quickly on like, I think we set up a business case in like two weeks for that year. I had to go like really quickly and that kind of made us work together really, really early. So yeah, first, I think end of, or mid of February 1st board meeting with everyone. So we kind of operated as one, at least on a leadership level, as one company very, very quickly. and yeah so i heard that is that this is not not not common but like who am i uh to know and and to tell but to tell but it felt really really quick and uh but that that was i think possible because like everyone like avrios vimka and battery were so well aligned on what was happening with with the business and the outlook of the business that it was like very natural working together very quickly and rather seeing the companies as different products rather than different business models or teams.
1:06:34Of course, it takes time until today. It takes time to get the Wimka and the various piece out of people's heads. And then maybe let me shift to the VC side, Mark, and ask you about, But maybe you'd share a bit about where the fund is today. Like this was an investment in 2014 to begin with. Now it's 2024. The exit happened in 2023. We don't talk too often on the podcast, nor is it something we see too often, like the end of life cycle for funds. But, you know, very quick math, likely VC funds are 10 years life cycles. So it's pretty easy to say, well, okay, if this was done in 2014, that means that you're looking at a fund here that's about done.
1:07:24Could you tell us a bit about where the fund is, what you still have left and how you're managing it now? Yeah. And I mean, the timing obviously also played a little bit in the whole discussion around the exit, right? both our time in front of life cycle coming to the end and for our founders as well we'll be doing it 10 years and these considerations also also enter the discussion also for our core investors it was the same i mean a little bit of a special case because this first fund 2013 still under the label of atlantic internet was really micro fund single lp single gp a bit of a different different situation and the portfolios you know we had a number of excel this was a great one and we still we still have some legacy companies which are managing and given that is only one LP in where it's an easy discussion on you know how we want to manage the remaining companies.
1:08:17Generally if you invest pre-seed, it does take longer than 10 years to create a primary exit for our portfolio. Of course we all know that right and so you have to be able you know to of course early on trigger some conversations these strategic conversations i mentioned but also very grateful that there's a secondary ecosystem emerging in europe now where you know as this portfolio deals happening and then there's buyers ready ready to buy you out and for this fund as i said it's not so much for an issue but as in 2016 when we set up our first proper multi-lp fund of atlantic labs and as that is coming to the end of the life cycle i'm sure we're going to start engaging these conversations much more to manage that proactively.
1:09:04I promised you, no, I did not. But I told you, I forewarned you that I tend to spend all the time we have. And I have another 10 minutes on my clock before we have to round it up. And for that reason, I'd love to ask you if you'd be ready for going into a bit of reflexive introspection on what wealth does for a person when it enters your life. I think it's more to you, Christian. I cannot talk about wealth, but I mean, we are the business of delayed gratification, right? I mean, it just takes a very long time. And so it's incredibly satisfying and important that you also get to the end of a journey sometimes.
1:09:50There's this intermediate success that you share as a VC with founders. and obviously you know external validation like having around is nice and other milestones it's nice and but as a preceded investor you're very much aligned with founders that you know we don't pay ourselves a high salary and we're very much waiting for that big payday to come it eventually or maybe not because you know it's it's all incredibly uh risky and it does take a long it does take a long time but I think the great thing to see if you have an exit like this is also that you know then the relationship with the founders also changes because they can become angel investors themselves and I'm super happy to see that then founders of exit then they co-invest with us and help back and mentor young founders in our portfolio and we've done one co-investment with with you guys and your co-founder and you know this is the sort of thing that i want to see more so that things come back into the ecosystem of money and advice not just by having vcs but also the founders yeah and then from from my perspectives yeah so definitely it changes something but i was surprised how little so so i mean i mean it makes you of course personally it makes you a bit less scared of things a bit more relaxed so to say and I think it's always good to come from a place where you're a bit more relaxed and you can think more clearly and so on and and I guess that's that is really something I think is the biggest change that I'm not able to kind of think more clearly also about what I want what I like what I would like to do in the next years and so on and my my decision was for example to stay with the business because I see so much potential I see the current role and I'm I'm in as something I can really learn a lot and I know that I'm doing it from not from a place of desperation but from a place of curiosity and doing only things from a place of curiosity is a core position to yeah to be in yeah so that's really what i'm probably taking the most of course like the first weeks and months it's it's all a bit weird after after after after a transaction but um unfortunately you you get used to to anything very very quickly so um yeah it does not guarantee any satisfaction or happiness or whatever you'd be looking for at all.
1:12:42But it's more like baseline contentment and being in a comfortable headspace more often. I think what's helping and what's really cool. And I'm really thankful for. I'd love to ask both of you the motivation. How much money has been a motivation in life in general? Like, but not necessarily. therapy. So for me, money is a huge motivator, but it's not about getting rich as fuck and driving a Lamborghini, but it's about ensuring, as you say, contentment or a safe place, but also a secure future for my family and children. I'd love to ask for you to just reflect a bit on what money means to you and what it meant in the beginning.
1:13:31For me, money was never a goal in order to have to spend it but but very much a a measure of whether something is working i was always interested in investing and and you know seeing how how you could turn something small and something big and that motivates me a lot but our ethos also this firm is really and we don't want to be too rich or to have too much money paying us a lot because we want to stay hungry and we'll stay you know grounded in the same level as young founders who want to build something new. So, you know, also personally me and Christoph, we reinvest all of the money we have into the fund, into the startups, because we want to keep that mentality of building for our future.
1:14:15Does your wife agree with that decision? It's a different question.
1:14:25But I can totally relate to what you said, Andreas. So if that is your definition of whether you're motivated by money, then I would say yes, then I'm also to that degree. But probably it was a bit more so 10 years ago than it is now. And I think you only find out how much that motivates you once you are at that point, because you have some weird conception in your head what it does to you. and actually like ideally you're not hanging around with like other friends or like you're doing something differently but maybe you can balance a few things better. So if you have like a balanced lifestyle of having some hobbies and sports and I have the opportunity at one point to take maybe a year or two off to spend more time with the family and so on.
1:15:25Like those are the things that really matter. And yes, they're fueled by money. But if you have no clue what you're doing all day long, then it doesn't really help. I think you're absolutely right there that as long as you're in a position where you continue doing what you've always done, even when you don't have to. I think the important part is that you get the privilege of, we always talk about setting boundaries when we talk about being able to do a high-performing job, but at the same time also having a family that you're there for as a parent and a husband or wife. And that's where maybe money allows you to be a bit more clearer and the boundaries clear.
1:16:09And I think that that, Margie, you're also nodding here. And I think that that's really what we all strive for, right? And I do think that money is incredibly important there in terms of giving you that freedom. Guys, thank you so much for joining in this conversation, both about the exit and the investment and the journey, but also in the end, a bit about wealth and what it does to you and how it motivates us. You are both amazing and incredible people really doing something for the ecosystem now. Christian also giving back as an angel investor. Thanks so much. are incredibly fortunate to have you with us both in the ecosystem and on the podcast and congratulations on both the exit and on being a finalist in the category of exit of the year cool thanks so much andres was a was a pleasure thanks for having us Bis dann.
1:17:27Acting, acting, acting, acting, acting, acting.
From the publisher
Atlantic Labs is a 110M EUR fund with 300M under management, based in Berlin, Germany. They focus on pre-seed rounds but occasionally go for seed rounds. They focus mostly on Climate & Energy, AI & Data, and European Deep Tech. Some of the most notable investments from their portfolio are: Choco, Zenjob, Wandelbots, Again, and of course Vimcar.
We’re going to dive deep into the exit of Vimcar that happened in January 2023, together with Marc and Christian and make sure to touch on things like:
- the thesis of Atlantic Labs and why they invested in Vimcar
- the challenges of building a company like Vimcar
- the journey of going from pre-seed to Series B and exit to Battery Ventures
- … and more that we invite you to discover below.
Chapters:
00:23 Overview of Atlantic Labs
00:49 Vimcar's Journey and Exit
04:13 Investment Thesis and Founding Story
05:24 Early Challenges and Solutions
08:19 Series A Fundraising Journey
13:48 Series B and Expansion
21:38 Reflections on VC and Founder Dynamics
37:22 Investor Alignment and Ambitions
40:10 Series B Funding and Expansion
40:37 Challenges During the Tech Reset
43:07 Strategic Decisions in 2022
44:02 Reflections on Growth and Sales Strategies
51:14 Engaging with M&A Advisors
55:53 The Acquisition Process and Challenges
01:04:44 Post-Exit Integration and Leadership




