In short
EUVC Podcast Episode Summary: E368 | Announcing Rerail with Anthony Danon
Episode Overview In this highly anticipated episode of the EUVC podcast, co-hosts Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva welcome Anthony Danon to discuss the launch of his new angel fund, Rerail, which will focus on early-stage investments in fintech and fintech-powered sectors. With a fund size of $20 million, Rerail aims to transform the future of finance through strategic investments. The episode explores Anthony's journey and insights into the evolving landscape of venture capital in Europe.
Key Themes and Discussions
- Introduction to Rerail
- Fund Size: Rerail has a target fund size of $20 million, with the ability to increase to $25 million.
- Investment Thesis: Anthony emphasizes a broad interpretation of fintech with his "FinTech is everything" thesis.
- Investment Focus:
- Pre-seed and Seed Investments: Targeting early-stage companies with checks ranging from $200K to $500K.
- Core Areas of Interest:
- Fintech: Companies innovating within all financial sub-verticals.
- Fintech-Powered Sectors: Startups leveraging fintech to disrupt industries like climate tech, healthcare, and logistics.
- Not-Yet Fintech: Companies that may not be fintech now but can utilize fintech as a strategic advantage.
- Anthony Danon's Background
- Early Career: Anthony began his career in consulting and transitioned into fintech operations before moving to venture capital in 2014.
- Network Building: He emphasizes building relationships with founders and operators as crucial for success in VC.
- Cocoa Launch: Anthony co-founded Cocoa, a previous micro fund focusing on angel investing.
- Investment Strategy
- Collaborative Approach: Rerail aims to collaborate with various stakeholders rather than compete with them, leveraging Anthony's extensive network.
- Global Expansion Plans: While focusing on Europe, Rerail plans to expand opportunistically into global markets.
- Ownership Sensitivity: The fund model allows for flexibility in ownership stakes, focusing on collaborative investments rather than strict ownership percentages.
- The "FinTech is Everything" Thesis
- Core Fintech: Innovations in traditional financial services, including capital markets, payments, and asset management.
- Fintech-Powered: Highlighting financial services as a horizontal enabler across various sectors.
- Software in Regulated Markets: Emphasizing the intersection of software and financial services.
- Challenges in the Current Market
- Valuation Concerns: Anthony discusses the challenges of investing in high-valuation rounds while maintaining a disciplined approach to valuation.
- Co-investment Dynamics: The importance of being proactive in co-investing strategies and developing conviction early on.
- Future Ambitions
- Scaling Plans: Anthony envisions Rerail evolving into a larger fund over time without necessarily sacrificing its collaborative approach.
- Long-term Vision: The potential for Rerail to grow into a significant player in the European VC space while maintaining a strong focus on fintech.
Conclusion This episode of EUVC, featuring Anthony Danon, provides valuable insights into the emerging trends in European venture capital, particularly within the fintech sector. With the launch of Rerail, Anthony positions himself as a forward-thinking investor who prioritizes collaboration, innovation, and the transformative potential of fintech in various industries.
Call to Action
- Listen to the Full Episode: For deeper insights and discussions, listen to the full episode on the EUVC platform.
- Follow Anthony Danon: Connect with Anthony on LinkedIn to stay updated on his journey and Rerail's developments.
- Engage with EUVC: Follow EUVC for the latest insights and trends in the European VC landscape.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:28Welcome back, everyone, to another episode of the European VC podcast. Anthony is going to be one of the real trailblazers of European venture. So please bring this to you. Go and enjoy it. Here's a few words from our beloved sponsor. Enter the world's largest and most dynamic space for startups, investors and corporate innovators at Expand Northstar. There you'll find 70 ,000 plus international visitors, 1 ,800 plus startups, 1 ,200 plus investors, 450 plus global speakers and infinite opportunities to connect, collaborate and co-create the future. Mark your calendars. 13th to the 16th October 2024 at Dubai Harbour, where dreams meet scale.
1:10Expand Northstar is not just an event. It's an all-in-one opportunity offering a massive value with a single free pass. Expand Northstar provides the ideal ecosystem to turn your ambitions into reality. Back to reality, man! Secure your free pass now and join us in Dubai. Dream big, scale bigger.
1:32Tear down this wall. It's more than just an ally. This is a union of values. United and determined we can serve as a model for other regions of the world. The nature of a problem requires a European response. Europe is a story of new beginnings. New beginnings. Let's start acting. This show is not investment advice and the hosts of this episode may be invested in the funds and companies featured. Anthony, welcome to the European VC podcast once again, but this time not as a host. So excited to be here. Thank you for having me. It's an honor. Yeah. And to everyone in the audience, I am sure you can imagine how excited I am to finally be having this unveiling podcast with you, Anthony, where we can talk about Rerail, which is the fund that you've just embarked on building.
2:32But before we open and really talk about what Rerail really is, I'd love for you to just tell us a bit about your journey and how you've come to found Rerail as the founding star here. And I think fair to say, let's just assume that we have many listeners that don't know you yet. So start from the bottom. Okay, so originally I'm Greek. I was born and raised in Athens. I have a lot of family all over though. I ended up in the UK for my studies in Cambridge, and then I stayed in London after. So I've been in London for the majority of my career and having been brainwashed to do consulting or investment banking, because that's what you would do by majoring in econ back in 2012, 13 time.
3:15Thankfully, I did a small stint in consulting, which I disliked, which got me into exploring something different. And that ended up being my first actual, basically, job was being an operator in a fintech company. Little did I know it was fintech or that it was an operator in a startup, but actually was me applying a lot of my econometrics knowledge and getting a bit more technical into a company doing credit analytics and wanting to branch out into invoice financing. So that was about around 2013 time. And it was great because it got me into tech. It got me into fintech early and I got to see a bit from the inside how it is to be an operator.
3:54Although quite soon after, two years later or so, I switched to the dark side, as I say. So I've been in VC since June 2014. So almost 10 years, almost about the time you're starting to see if you're any good at it, as I say, and been in venture since. So the majority of my career venture, I've been focused in Europe. but initially I was doing both US and Europe. And now I'm branching back to being a bit more global, but we'll talk about that. I've been in different firms and funds over time, always with a skew to early stage. And the more time I spend, the earlier I went, right? I realized I love the zero to one, supporting founders from like how the sausage is made, you know, the ideation side of the way to kind of product market fits.
4:39And also I've always had a skew to what I've called fintech is everything, which sounds like a very self-serving motto. And I'm sure we will unpack later, but it is really a very, I guess, wide definition of fintech or people think about fintech. And I also very quickly realized at the time that although most people around me doing fintech were trying to get alpha from being like traditional domain experts, I was basically spending most of my time building relationships with the founders and operators I was meeting. And the idea was like, these are the people that would get me smart. And so, you know, by now, hopefully that's percolated to being some of the deeper networks of fintech founders and operators in Europe.
5:20And so although I say I focus on fintech is everything, I'm very bottom up. I'm very founder driven. I'm very network driven. First years in venture, I was junior, but we worked on deals like Carta, CurrencyCloud, Betterment, you know, and it was dead times and I was learning from it. It was where also I led one of my first deals in Trulayer, Francesco and Luca, who have now become very good friends as well. And then from Anthemis, my first four years, I went to Speed Invest my next three years, which was also a really great school. And I led different other deals, some of which some people will know, like Wayflyer and revenue based financing or Primer in payments.
5:57And while I was within a speed investment, thinking about like, you know, road to GP was when I kind of ended up realizing, whoa, I'm super young still. Do I really not want to be in venture? I was 27 back then. That's four years ago. So what I ended up doing is I thought, let me take a step back, spend a year validating whether I want to be in venture, go back to operating. So, you know, 2014 to 18 was Anthemist, 18 to 21 was Speedinvest. I hired my replacement at Speedinvest, who's now a partner there and was really great Olga. And then I spent a year exploring. That exploration ended up being where I ended up coming with the insight or at least for me seeing the opportunity of being an angel fund.
6:42And so I was basically spending time with founders and operators. and instead of joining any, I started coinvesting alongside them as an angel. Small personal checks. It was also 2021. So everyone was irrationally spending their savings. So was I. But it was, I guess, in some respects, what was energizing me the most. And it was the first time I was seeing like the unique relationship of trust I could build with founders from the get-go, from just not being the lead VC they pitched for term sheets. And also that all the VCs that have grown up with who are now leading some of the top firms and are good friends that were starting to collaborate quite intensely, which is obvious in theory, but because I wasn't competing with them anymore, you know, I could leverage that.
7:29And I was in this unique position and I started thinking about building my Fintech Angel Fund. But actually I spent a second winter long down in Barcelona with a few VC friends because it was the only city that was open. And that was when I started chatting a lot with Carmen, which many of you will know, who is a very good friend. And we decided to partner up together and launch Cocoa, right? And that was around three years ago. It was early days micro funds for European standards. And there was an opportunity to build an angel fund that's backed by founders, that's generalist in nature. Although at the time, you know, majority of the deal flow was fintech.
8:09And I had that skew, where basically, it could become the in-house VC to The founders, as we say, help them hack the system and then collaborate with the rest of the investors. So we did that three years ago. We launched Kukua One and we've had an amazing time both deploying Kukua One and also supporting the portfolio. And we have another eight years or so supporting them as well, which is a privilege to do so. Now, the more time I spent, the more I was seeing two things. One is my right to win. And, you know, the reason why I was top of mind and a lot of the value that I was bringing to founders besides the in-house VC, which I think is very valuable and I still am doing, was the network of fintech founders and operators I was bringing to the table.
8:54And on the other hand, I was seeing that fintech's definition was finally becoming very horizontal, right? I was meeting vertical software companies or vertical AI companies where fintech was just a revenue model. I was meeting climate companies where they were using the analytics to offer some sort of or finance to actually stimulate that. I was looking at health care companies that were using insurance to monetize or were solving their FinOps problems within that specific industry. So although the markets, let's say headlines or the news headlines were all about fintechs doom and gloom, I was actually seeing a very interesting industry, which I think we've just scratched the surface, becoming a strategic advantage of almost any business.
9:38And I wanted to go a bit more global as well. And so I decided to launch a solo GP fund or angel fund that's dedicated precisely to that. And that is Rerail. And so Rerail is the start of a series of funds. So Rerail One, which I'm launching more officially now, is a 20 to 25 million dollar angel fund backed predominantly by founders and operators, but also some institutions essentially investing collaborative checks at pre-seed and seed 200 to 500k checks with a skew to fintech is everything, which we can unpack in a second on what we're doing. that means if you want, with Europe as the core focus, but opportunistically global.
10:24And there's a ton to unpack, Anthony. Maybe just before we go further, let me ask you a status question. What's the status of the fund? Are you deploying out of it already? Are you fully raised? Are you still open? Yes. So I'm privileged to have raised above $20 million, which is the target. And I did the first close back in end of July. So I've started deploying from that already. The hard cap is$25. And so I'll do a final close soon on that. Everyone talks about how tough the market is. But Anthony, I have to say, I tip my hat to you every single time we talk. You blow me away every single time.
11:05And I really hope that everyone listening it already feels that way. But otherwise, I think we should just continue into the conversation about your thesis around fintech being everything, because I think that's where we should start. Then we should go into strategy afterwards, because there's a ton to unpack there. I think you're one of the really important upcoming thinkers on micro VC and strategies that can be successfully deployed there in Europe. But let's start with the fintech is everything thesis. Tell us why do you see FinTech being everything and exactly how do you approach it? Awesome.
11:42Thank you. Obviously, very self-serving, Meldo. I mean, I didn't coin the kind of FinTech is eating the world. I think it was Angela at A16, maybe a bit too early, but it's done a lot of good to the industry as well. Again, I think for perspective, the way I view the world and I operate because I focus a lot on early stages. I focus on talent and people first. So if you ask me and whether I'll be looking out for companies to put them in some sort of thesis, I won't, right? A lot of my modus operandi is like meeting and building relationships with some of the best fintech founders and operators out there.
12:18And so I just wanted to clarify that. But if I were to define, let's say, the wide spectrum of types of opportunities that I would be looking into, I usually kind of slice them into three buckets. So one is what I call core fintech, where is what most people think about when they think about fintech, right? It's like traditional financial services innovation. And there I'm looking at any sub vertical of financial services, right? So from capital markets and trading to wealth and asset management, insurance, payments, retail and business banking, although it feels saturated at times and that we've seen so much activity, and I've heard so many people say like, but there's so much that's been done, is there anything left?
12:59If you really think about it, the average experience of services out there is actually almost negative NPS, if not low NPS. And the technology behind is still predominantly legacy tech. We've had a lot of like lipstick on a pig moments, as I said, rather than actual innovation. Also, it tends to be concentrated within specific subverticals right now with the kind of tech macro change, for example, we've had a rise of the CFO stack companies and business banking, right? Before that, we had like consumer banking revolution. You know, we haven't seen too much actual innovation in asset management.
13:37We haven't seen too much in capital markets, which is actually where fintech started. Now, when you layer to that technological shifts like AI or Web3, or even like infrastructure upgrades, like real-time payments and fraud as a derivative to that. There's so much opportunity there. So that's the first bucket. And I'll look at a lot of that. The second bucket is what I call fintech powered. And it's the idea that financial services is a horizontal. It's the support function of any market. And so I'll look at either natural intersections with markets, let's say logistics and trade finance, right?
14:14Health and insurance, climate and financing, where financial services can be an enabler, a component of that business. And the other side of that specific category is where fintech can be a business model, a revenue model, a strategic advantage. So an example is vertical software. If you think about it, the largest vertical SaaS companies out there, some of which are companies like Shopify, Service Titan, Toast, they don't look fintech up front. But if you look under the hood, majority of the revenues comes from monetizing either payments, lending, revenue cycle management, not SaaS. And so for those companies, fintech is not the core element, but actually can be the core revenue stream.
14:58So that second category of like, let's say fintech powered, the idea is that Rerail, which is not necessarily a lead VC, but rather the coinvest brings, let's say, that fintech network and know-how to enable those companies to capitalize on those opportunities. And then the third bucket is software that sells with a skew to regulated markets where let's say one of the customer base can be fintech or financial services right where the idea is the element of what they're doing per se might not be something that i have a particular expertise on but that one of the type of customers they're selling to is very much one that i have a very deep network with so i can both understand very well those customers and also help with distribution so when i say FinTech is everything.
15:44I think it's becoming, in some respects, a strategic advantage, a distribution, a component of a business for almost any company. And I want Rerail to be, you know, the go-to angel fund, the pipes that, you know, I guess, collaborative value adds in terms of network and know-how. And what is very interesting is that there are not too many sectors that are as nuanced as financial services. And so having, let's say, a specialist coinvest that brings that on board makes a ton of sense. That's at least the thesis in my hypothesis. I love Anthony, because one thing that you've said it shortly before here, but you've also talked about it in past podcasts, is the approach of going for, how should we put it, not a domain expert play, but rather a network expert play.
16:42You still have, obviously, the domain expertise, but what you're saying is not, I am the smartest guy within fintech. I can tell you exactly how to build your infrastructure, XYZ, all that stuff. But rather, you know enough about fintech to be obviously one of the leading specialists, but your real edge is your network. Yeah, absolutely. And if you think about it, what I do, well, I guess what I do really think is if you compare me with other fintech investors, I'm probably the least expert in a traditional sense. But that actually plays really well to founders. What I say is like, look, I speak the same language as you, but I will not even come close to pretend I know better than you or even know the sector as close to as you do.
17:29And the other thing that I think is quite interesting and important here is that because I do pre-seed and seed, coming with a prepared mind and a focused value add helps. But I do remain slightly naive so that I'm open and plastic to changing my ideologies to what could be possible, right? So if it's a category that I found traditionally very challenging to crack, but I meet an obsessed founder with a unique insight and the right tailwinds for that market, I'll be prepared to kind of gain conviction and back those. I've seen too many times domain experts either constrain the type of opportunities they're going after by just saying, oh, I'm only looking at these types of companies.
18:10And in reality, early stage is all about capturing the best talent, if I am to kind of boil it down to like first principles and like oversimplify, or others that are just like too smart to capture like the groundbreaking opportunities that are like shaking the markets. So my hope is that my approach and what I think has fared well to me up until now is to be network driven, to leverage the insights of founders and operators, many of which are my LPs, some of which are my advisors, and match that with some of the prepared mind I have from like meeting and having looked at FinTech for the past 10 years or so.
18:45Yeah, and I think that just to add another point to it, from the LP perspective, at least this is how I think about it is so important to remember that you only have so much time and attention as a micro VC, especially as a solo GP. so it's very very hard to say you know do a really good network play at the same time as you also want to be a domain expertise i always or the domain expert i always say this you know you need there are trade-offs all the time and it's just so extenuated when you're a solo gp that you need to i love that you make this conscious pick and say i need to understand enough to have a prepared mind and be considered one of the go-to guys in this sector, but I'm not trying to be the one who comes up with a thesis that I'm then finding a founder that's building within, like believing that there's already people working in these things in the ecosystem.
19:46My role is to find the best ones. I also think it plays incredibly well with, and now we venture a bit into the strategy space, with your approach of of knowing and working with founders before they even start building things. So that you are when you are the lead ticket and we'll talk about this, it's oftentimes in a in a previous round because it's actually you helping put together the angel round. Maybe you can talk a bit about that. I think it's I think this is really where you can see the difference between what I think is just an outlier emerging manager and micro VC versus most others. Like I appreciate that.
20:25And let's see, like proofs in the pudding. So I got to execute on that. But if I look at some of the learnings also within, while I was operating and co-investing with Carmen at Cocoa, right, as well. But how I've applied some of those learnings and evolved that here as well, is that if you think about it, I think there's two things to it. Well, there's three sides to it that are an advantage for me, right? One is the network of Indic founders and operators, right? That is a magnet for many things, for talent, for YVCs. I want to be close to me because I can leverage that. And the second is that I'm collaborative, right?
20:59And I've been collaborative for the past four years at the minimum, but not collaborative in the sense of like waiting to be brought into deals, collaborative in the sense of like, I want to meet founders super early, but I'm a co-invest alongside Rounds so I can work with anyone. I think that positioning compounds. And then the third thing is what you mentioned previously, which is because my focus is the very early stages. And because I have like this skew of fintech is everything, I can justify spending disproportionate amounts of time meeting and knowing some of the best founders and operators out there, even if they're not building.
21:34Right. And yes, of course, I need to be disciplined because I can't just like spend time with just operators smooching, if you know what I mean. But I think it is some of my superpower is meeting some of those people super early, at least as early as others, many times earlier than others. And I think it's more of an art than science. But for specific types of companies where the founders specifically want to already started building something, but don't want to usually raise a proper VC round because they want the flexibility and they don't want to raise a round yet. but they have some friends and family they want to bring on board.
22:13You know, oftentimes it might make sense for them to do an angel round or a friends and family round. And I think the beauty of Rerail and some of those other angel funds is that in those rounds that tend to be sub 8 % dilution, you know, I can come in and be part of them because I don't need that much ownership. And so going back to leading co-investing, the strategy of Rerail, you know, is to do 200 to 500K checks at pre-seed and seed, which is like a collaborative checks alongside other venture investors as a core. But it will also very much practically look out for some of those opportunities where the founders are just getting started.
22:51And it makes a lot of sense to do a friends and family round before a VC round where I might be the largest check, right? Leads, for lack of a better word, right? Yeah, but I think you need to be cautious on which ones you're doing those because I'm not a proponent that says any company should be starting with a very small check round. I'm just saying specific types of companies, specific types of founders, it might make a lot of sense. And then there's another peculiarity or not peculiarity necessarily, but you've started as a European focused guy, so to say, but now you're moving a bit more globally with the investment focus.
23:31Could you tell us a bit about why you've made that decision? Yeah. So don't get me wrong. I'm a huge believer in European tech and actually think that financial services on average compared to other industries is one of the least winner takes all dynamics types of markets. It obviously depends on the business model and type of company. But if you really think about it, only on payments, there's three humongous companies, Stripe, Checkout, Adyen, two of which are European, whose business is very similar. And they're above 10, often much beyond billion each. And so I firmly believe there's enough opportunity in Europe.
24:16At the same time, I've started observing because when I started in venture initially, I was doing both US and Europe, but that was back in 2014. So I started some relationships back then, which I've maintained a lot. And a lot of those relationships, whether it's venture investors, some of the top names in the US, operators, they have me as the go-to guy on like European fintech collaborative. And so there's a tendency to start being brought into deals where there's sense for me to be in opportunistically. So even when I was deploying with Cocoa, I was pinged about a deal that was a B2B cross-border payments where one of the corridors was Europe.
24:54And, you know, they're like, oh, Anthony can open any doors for you to set up like initially the business there. Or a European founder in the US or a SaaS like FinTech that wanted to go global from B0 and think about Europe from the early days. And so the idea is that, you know, I want to over time capture the global opportunity, but I'll start slowly but surely getting there. So initially, you know, Europe is the core for Rerail, but I'll spend a bit more proactive time globally because I want to opportunistically capture some of those deals that I initially have a right to win or be part of, but then proactively spend relationships.
25:34So time to build relationships so that I can over time fund two, fund three, become more and more global. So that's the idea. You have had the, how should I put this? the fortunate success or you've been good enough to get some of the absolute leading LP elite to back you. I won't mention any names because I don't know how much you share. But suffice to say, they're names that we all know. I would love to ask you, because this is a topic that I meet from many emerging managers in Europe, that they're thinking about how should they cut their geo spread? Should they do stuff outside of Europe? Should it just be an opportunistic thing they don't talk about, but they know that they have the right in their LPA?
26:24How have you thought about it? So obviously I can hear that there's this long-term strategy behind it that you want to be more and more global, but how has the LPs that you've spoken to on a global scale kind of diligence you when you're thinking, when they're looking at you, small fund, but you're still going to do global stuff? Yeah, I think it's a good question. Obviously, saying that you want to do opportunistically global in itself adds a hurdle, right? It's a bit like, you know, can you prove you can do that because you haven't done this for the past five, six, seven years, for example, right?
26:59I think I was in a privileged position where, and I think that perspective matters for other emerging managers, where I was pitching a strategy that I've proven I can execute on within Cocoa, slightly different setup, but very similar in terms of check size, number of portfolio, etc. And I was also pitching a, let's say, USP or specific point of view, which is all of what I've done for my career. So quite good, let's say, GP market fit. And so how I think about it is like you have certain degrees of freedom of things that you can stretch a bit, which are not like as obvious, which an LP is like happy to take some risk with.
27:39But even that, I think it needs to be rational. And so taking a step back, what I don't want to sacrifice for sure, or risk, let's say, is not being focused. So my number one focus for fund one is day to day on what I know well, which is Europe. Once I feel that that actually works really well, I will proactively spend time forward to unlock some of the rest and that being the US. So just to answer your question directly, I would say you need to think about how many degrees of freedom you have, right? If I were to say I'm a generalist fund that wants to do everything and lead, like good luck, right?
Read the full transcript
28:25Here I'm saying I'm a collaborative fund, which by design is all about networks and the compounding effect of that. I have a specific point of view to the world that makes me increasingly top of mind for a very specific value add, which is a bit more scalable. I've been doing this strategy and have proven that with a previous fund. And I want to increasingly test the waters to see if I could stretch this to start doing global. Not with the first fund is testing, but being opportunistic. opportunistic. With the second fund, it's taking the learnings to see whether I can intentionally say, I'll do 20 % of my fund into XGEO, right?
29:03Hopefully that paints a picture. Yeah, for sure. And I will come back to the topic of the empire of re-rail and where you're headed and what you're building. But before we go there, I want to ask another somewhat clarifying question, or at least a bit more delving into your thinking. Because you all the time have this discussion around co-invest strategies versus lead strategies, ownership percentages. Are you allowed to, like Carmen has spearheaded a lot in the ecosystem. I don't care about ownership. That model versus the, no, I'm never going to go below 5 % and price matters a lot and so on.
29:41So could you maybe talk to us a bit about how you think about these, how should I put it, the dichotomies of venture and where there's oftentimes principled stances, but in fact, you know, all models can work. That's how I find it. You just have to pick one and then the individual components need to be complementary to each other. I think that, by the way, that's where I would start from. It's funny because everyone preaches their own strategy, right? So I would say many strategies can work as long as you have a fund model that supports that strategy, right? I think that's how I would say this.
30:18You know, The more concentrated you are and the more your value add is illustrated, the more you can argue, I want to be very ownership sensitive, which means you have some sort of failure rate. But, you know, you have a win rate based on your value add. And it's about striking, you know, one or two really great deals. And because you will be concentrated, you will have the requisite ownership so that by exit, the$1,$5,$10,$20 billion outcome plus will actually be many times fund returner. The more you're, let's say, doing like spring price strategy or like very high volumes, it's about making sure you have access and scale access and then scale your operations to be systematic on decision making so that you can be capturing and almost indexing the market.
31:09So these I see as two extremes. First principles in venture, ownership always matters if you think about it, if you do the math. The other flip of the coin is that it's a parallel game and you want to be in the top outliers, which increasingly seem to be fewer and fewer, concentrating more and more investors, making it more and more competitive. right so the idea that we started with Kokoa and now I'm evolving a bit with Rerail is like can you be somewhere in the middle where you're still picky you're still relatively concentrated for the model but you have a fund size that means that yes ownership matters but from a user experience to the founder this ownership is not usually a barrier it's not the typical conversation they have with an investor of like, oh, I need 10 % or 15%.
32:03That ensures that your relationship with the founder is aligned and allows to build that unique relationship of trust from the get-go that hopefully, if you have also the right value out, ensures a really high win rate. So if I talk like fund language, that's, I think, the model. Here and in Kukua, ownership matters, but just like Kukua was very small. So that ownership that would make the fund mass work was so small that we don't care about ownership versus other investors is what we were saying, right? So I think that's the important nuance here. And Rural is somewhere in between that. It's small enough where the ownership that I require is relatively low, where it can co-exist with many other investors, and where it usually is not an impediment to the founder at all right which hopefully will allow me to optimize for access and if i do my job well be in some of these you know huge future success stories and thank you for the clarification and this is why i always love having you on the podcast and and and i i'm always sorry when we do our super angel podcast that we don't have anthony talking more because i think you're you're so thoughtful in how you lay things out so so i think we need to do more educational stuff with you because you're a masterclass in your own right.
33:24I'd love to then ask you about the Coinvest strategy specifically. How do you execute on that to perfection yourself? It's something that is obviously a model that's played by many, but I think it's one that you've executed incredibly well and also obviously prominently featured in all the founder references that you have. Thank you. It means a lot. Well, we'll see if I ended up picking well, right? Truth's in the pudding, but input energy matters as well. So I think there's two things that really matter that some coin investors don't do or some people don't think when they think about coin investing in the context of like an angel fund, let's say, versus just being an angel investor.
34:08one is I think you need to be developing your own conviction but there is a balance there and we can unpack that and the other one is I think you need to be acting fast and almost with the muscle of a lead VC not in terms of the competitiveness you have but in terms of like seeing founders very early acting very fast make like building conviction fast and deciding like whether that's something you want to do, right? On the first one, I'll start by saying, and it's a balance, right? That if you end up trying to proxy all the top big VC funds, on average, you'll probably do well, but you'll be getting probably lower ownership.
34:51But also it's a theoretical thing, right? That you can always do that. I think also what gets lost to people is that each fund optimizes for their model, which is what we just talked about previously. If I was a multi-stage fund that I was priding myself on being like the first one that did Facebook or the first one that did like a social network, my vested interest is in any pre-seed company that would come through. I would, if they're a good team, like I would probably do it, a 5 million round, because if I manage a 1 billion or 600 million fund, like it's optimizing for false positives, right?
35:28So I can't be seen to lose the next meta or Facebook if I was the next meta of Facebook, just as an example, not only about specific funds. And so if I was the coinvest fund that were to just like proxy coinvest with this fund, I'd probably not do very well. Because a lot of them are like call options, a precedence, especially industries like social networks. But just as an example, that everyone is essentially solving for their own strategy. So I'm not saying I'm smarter from some of the top VC guys. So my conviction is better. I'm just saying for my model, my mental maps, my conviction, I leverage all inputs, including who the lead VC is.
36:05Because one thing that you need to remember is that as a Coinvest VC, there's so much you can do. The lead VC is very influential to the founders. If it's a harmful lead VC, then that will actually can play a role in how the founders actually do. but it's about developing your own conviction. So it's quite a unique position because you can leverage diligence, information from all these investors, other micro funds, the leads that are looking at it, but it's about developing your own conviction. So I think that's number one. The number two, and how I would unpack this, is again, the easiest thing to do is to go relax and wait for VCs to bring you in.
36:45Oh, you know, like X fund will bring me into their deals because I have this fintech value add and know how. Maybe I'll never rely on that, right? I will rely on using my network to be there as early as possible, hopefully earlier sometimes than other funds, because I think the hardest bit of being a co-investor is being brought in at the last minute. You'll never get what you want in terms of check size. There will be very limited amount left. So all this ownership talk we talked about is not going to be there, right? Whereas if you're early and you make your decision early, not whether you'll invest whether you have high conviction on this team you can put a lot of your energy in helping out those founders while they're raising and that puts in a very different position to when you're brought in at the last minute as like almost like a charity it's oh yeah i'll bring you in anthony into this round it's the opposite it's like anthony was there from the beginning and was helping me in the round and i really want him in and you have leverage suddenly so i think the two is what really matters and what makes a difference or at least has made a difference on executing, let's say, as a co-investor.
37:49Could you expand a bit on your decision to do 50 % pre-seed and 50 % seed? Obviously, you can always move a bit up and down there, but why both pre-seed and seed? My skew is to do round number one, so do very early stage. So I will not have an excuse to say something's too early for me. And I love the zero to one phase. sometimes inch rounds even before pre-seed but I've modeled my fund as if it's 50 % seed 50 % pre-seed just simply to be conservative on the valuation ranges so the lines are very blurred and so I've just assumed that 50 % of let's say the checks I do will have valuations that are on the higher end of typical seed type of rounds and half of them are going to be smaller and so I'm I'm not saying I want to do 50 % seed.
38:44Actually, seed is going to be the exception to the rule. I'm just saying because a lot of these momentum deals might end up being a bit higher valuation. I wanted to model my funds on a conservative basis. I actually think it was an important question and answer, even though you're not targeting 50 % pre-seed and 50 % seed as such. But I think it's because of the audience being emerging managers and existing GPs, it's such a thoughtful way to say that I basically have in terms of in my portfolio model and the percentages I can get in the price I'm paying, it's going to fall in these two different buckets and thus they should be considered differently.
39:24Then I want to ask you finally, the reserve ratio that you have, it's 20%. Some would say that, some would say don't have any. This would say you should have at least 40%. You're flying it on 20. Tell us why. Look, it's a learning ratio, reserve ratio. Let's see. It's flexible. I think number one, I start from the principle that the smaller a fund you are, the more difficult to make a case for a reserve. And the larger the fund you are, reserve is everything. And allocating your funds to your biggest successes is everything, right? To make the fund economics work. And so the easiest thing to do is to say, look, I'll be a microphone, I'll have zero reserve, I'll just do one time checks.
40:06But my tendency is to be slightly more concentrated and have at least a specialist view to the world. So like picking and concentrating. And so the idea of putting 20%, which might end up becoming 30 or 10 % is twofold. One is have the flexibility baked in, I think feeling like you don't have any allocated, where you never know, there might be pay to play, there might be different dynamics, It just makes you feel a bit more risk averse when you do the upfront check, which I think can be an impediment in itself. And the second thing that is a hypothesis is that, well, firstly, I won't have a reserve to keep doing follow on as an expectation like other funds do.
40:48But it will be some money that I might end up reserving for like very few that I have a really high conviction on and where there's really illustrated tailwinds in the market, right, or market pull. And so the idea is that although the easiest thing to say is that statistically speaking, it's very tough to tell when the next fall on company is going to be, if it's going to be your success story or not. and in 2020 and 21 even more so when these happened three months later a really high uplift what i'm saying now is that given some of my specialist view and some of my proximity with the founders plus the fact that the markets now have a bit more breathing room and the following rounds happen slightly more rationally i want to examine very like each and every case and i might end up leaning in or one or two or three of the companies anthony given your network with to some of the very, very best VCs means you're also going to be doing deals that are highly priced because they're incredibly competitive.
41:51So I think asking you the following question makes a lot of sense, which is how do you deal with outliers? What's the process? How do you think through when this opportunity looks like the right one, but it just breaks my model completely what's the process that you uh that you uh go about to make sure or make the decision whether you want to participate or not and it's an interesting debate right because i think like you can have this debate with different micro funds and each or even fund manager and each one will have their own you know point of view and each one is probably right for in some respects um and also there's the like saying of like valuation is a mental trap i think it's peter Fenton or someone like, and then there is, or Bill Gurley maybe, and then there's the other side of the things like, you know, price really matters, right?
42:41The way I tend to like to exercise venture is price matters until it doesn't. So, I mean, obviously it's easy to say in theory and different to execute in practice. So in theory, I like to be disciplined on average, right? Like I have a model to abide to, I'm doing precedency for a reason, you know, you're paying for a specific risk level, you know, to be able to get, you know, 50, 60, 70x a deal on your successes or beyond that requires a center and entry point that makes sense. And that will percolate on the fund model, right? So if you think about it as such, it makes sense to be disciplined.
43:20And also you're running a fund. You're not an angel. You don't care about deal by deal economics. You care about returning a fund. And so ownership given check size and a number of portfolio companies, all of this works really nice harmoniously together in certain ranges of valuations and discipline. And by the way, I think there are ways on staying disciplined on certain deals that are very high profile, like those angel rounds, for example. These are very high profile people that are not going out and doing VC rounds where the valuations are very much still low because they're not optimizing for valuation yet, right?
43:51Or there might be a category that for some reason is not sexy, but there's a unique insight and the founders are great, But because of that, it doesn't become a 20, 25 million valuation preceded seed round, which is a very high valuation, right? So I think that's one side of the story. And that's important. I've seen people be too religious on that at the same time. Like I optimize for my model constantly. Well, you might end up missing on loads of outliers. And especially when we're in the business of outliers, right? Yeah, so I guess, Anthony, that you would agree on the statement that you're disciplined, but price won't keep you out of a round if you really think it's the right company to be betting on.
44:33yeah exactly and i do i do just to round this off thing that each like what i do have is i have my own mental model to know you know when i get as i say obsessed about a founder and a team and their unique insights and in a market that's conducive to that hopefully where i'm willing to stretch and going back to uh when you asked about like best practices as a co-investor you know meeting those founders very early gives you, let's say, you know, usually the right data points and the right amount of information you need to get to that place, right? The bigger question is like, how do you avoid almost like abusing this principle and starting to think that everyone's great?
45:17And I think like, that's really difficult to describe, right? It's the like, you know, seeing greatness, seeing exceptional. But I, you know, I've done it two, three times, I think I've done it two, three times in Cocoa and I've not regretted it at all in terms of like early data points on execution, follow on fundraisers from these companies. And then the last thing I'll say is like for those types of companies where you do, you know, you do make the exception, having met them really early means hopefully you've added enough value to try to do the largest check you can within your model so that it's still a coin vest.
45:51but it actually like gets you as much ownership as you can, even if it's going to be definitely subpar to even your model so that you're just saying that, look, I'm obsessed about this team. This is a one in a thousand opportunities. I think it's an outlier. I'm not rational in doing this from a deal dynamics perspective because I'm obsessed. But what I've managed to do is in a very competitive round, I've managed to maximize the check size I could do, even if this is suboptimal from an ownership perspective. I love the point you made with having seen exceptional. And I think that's really one of the problems in the LP landscape as well, which is causing a lot of downstream effects with subpar fund managers and so on.
46:33because every single VC almost are, they're playing at the National League. They're great and they will sweep you off your feet. But if you then stack them up against the really great VCs, that's where you realize, okay, there is a difference between National League and the global championships. And I think that that's one of the big problems that we have on the LP side as well, that many have not seen true exceptional VCs. And for that reason, they bag the subpar. But that one is on me, not on you, Anthony. Now, let me return, now that we're towards the end of this podcast, let's return to the question of the empire of WeRail.
47:19And these are my words, but I think it's clear to anyone listening in that you're a man with great ambition. And you're building WeRail as a micro VC right now as a solo GP as well. What's the ambition? Are you going to be the next 500 million euro fund in Europe? Or are you going to stay small? Are you going to stay just Anthony? What's your plans? Thank you for the question. So I don't know what I don't know, right? What I do know is a couple of things. And this is not a getaway answer. I'll try to answer this as well as possible. So what I do know is firstly, starting the way I'm starting gives me much more degrees of freedom on evolving over time, right?
47:58If I decided to do something larger and leading, I could do that in principle, although that's not my preference. I'll talk about that. And so what I really love about the current structure is that by being small, I can be collaborative. By being collaborative in this compounding position between the founders and the VCs, that gives like a compounding access loop. And also the last thing that I think is interesting is that because I'm not a lead fintech fund, but a coinvest, I can capture all these opportunities that are not typical fintech companies, right? Like if you're doing a verticalized thing in healthcare, you don't want a fintech lead VC.
48:38But if you realize that majority of your revenue or some of like your proposition involves fintech, getting re-rail might make a lot of sense for you because of that. So I'm, let's say, attacking a larger TAM, bringing a specific value add in a compounding position. So the current baseline assumption is that I want to grow that in a firm type of capacity, right? So I'm not wedded to being a solo GP, so I'd probably build a small team over time. We shall see. But I don't have a tendency to want to build a big fund. So maybe the 20, 25 million fund might become 30, 35, 40. But that allows me to do rinse, repeat, high impact funds that are focused on doing that specific strategy.
49:29over time, slightly larger reserve as I prove my capacity to keep investing into some of those founders and slightly more concentrated. But that is the number one hypothesis of how I want to grow this. Now, if things change, and I end up like wanting to lead rounds and stuff like that, the structure would need to change. But the current baseline, and even like my, my way of working and what I think I'm really great at is very much optimized to that collaborative sense of venture. So that's how I see like seeing like real real two will look very much like real one, but up, you know, trimmed around the model and slightly more global real three, I think will be the inflection Paul.
50:09So we'll see. I'm so happy I asked the question because I always like, I'm gonna so enjoy following you on the sidelines over the next, the next decade or two. So Anthony, Anthony, I have no more questions to you. Do you have anything that you feel that we should have talked about that we haven't yet? No, I think this has been an amazing discussion. I really, really enjoyed, you know, talking. I would also encourage, you know, any founder that's looking to build any business that might utilize fintech in the future. You know, don't hesitate to contact me. It doesn't need something to be something like very fintech specific up front.
50:51So, you know, excited to be investing with this and can't wait to grow this for the years to come. Anthony, you're my favorite Greek. Thanks so much for joining us on the podcast. You've been amazing as always. Thank you for having me. As we say in Greece. Here's a few words from our beloved sponsor. Enter the world's largest and most dynamic space for startups, investors and corporate innovators at Expand Northstar. There you'll find 70 ,000 plus international visitors, 1 ,800 plus startups, 1 ,200 plus investors, 450 plus global speakers, and infinite opportunities to connect, collaborate, and co-create the future.
51:31Mark your calendars. 13th to the 16th October 2024 at Dubai Harbor, where dreams meet scale. Expand Northstar is not just an event. It's an all-in-one opportunity offering a massive value with a single free pass. Expand Northstar provides the ideal ecosystem to turn your ambitions into reality. Back to reality, man. Secure your free pass now and join us in Dubai. Dream big, scale bigger.
52:01Tear down this wall. It's more than just an alliance. This is a union of values. United and determined we can serve as a model for other regions of the world. The nature of a problem requires a European response. Europe is a story of new beginnings. Let's start acting.
From the publisher
But now he鈥檚 built Rerail to pursue his powerful "FinTech is everything" thesis, placing $200-500K checks into early-stage companies that are transforming the future of finance and beyond. And my god are we excited for this.
He focuses on pre-seed and seed investments in three core areas:
- Fintech: Backing companies driving innovation across all finance sub-verticals, tapping into the potential of AI and cutting-edge technologies.
- Fintech-powered sectors: From climate tech to healthcare and logistics, Anthony looks for startups leveraging fintech to disrupt and enhance industries far beyond traditional finance.
- Not-yet Fintech: Seeking companies that may not be fintech today but have the potential to use fintech as a strategic advantage, whether in their revenue model, customer base, or business approach.
Go to eu.vc for our core learnings and the full video interview 馃憖
Chapters:
02:07 Welcoming Anthony Dannon
02:33 Anthony's Journey to Founding Rerail
03:06 Early Career and Transition to VC
04:16 Building a Network in FinTech
07:34 Launching Cocoa and the Angel Fund
11:05 The FinTech is Everything Thesis
20:29 Collaborative Investment Strategy
23:28 Global Expansion and LP Support
26:44 Proving the Strategy
27:27 Degrees of Freedom in Fund Management
27:51 Focus on Europe First
28:19 Collaborative Fund Approach
30:18 Ownership Sensitivity in Venture Capital
33:24 Co-Investment Strategies
37:50 Balancing Pre-Seed and Seed Investments
39:24 Reserve Ratios and Fund Economics
41:51 Handling High-Valuation Outliers
47:10 Future Ambitions for Rerail




