E418 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen, and Ben Prade

24 Feb 2025 · 1 h 1 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

EUVC Podcast Episode Notes

Podcast Title: EUVC Episode Title: E418 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen, and Ben Prade Co-Hosts: Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva Guests: Dan Bowyer and Mads Jensen from SuperSeed; Ben Prade, Partner at GP Bullhound

Episode Overview This episode dives into the recent developments within the European tech landscape, highlighting insights from industry experts. The discussion covers various topics, including funding trends, geopolitical impacts on investment, and emerging technologies like AI, quantum computing, and fusion energy.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Introduction to GP Bullhound
  2. Ben Prade shares insights about GP Bullhound, a growth investment firm with nearly $1 billion AUM that focuses on the tech industry.
  3. The firm has evolved from an advisory house to include investment, leveraging their extensive network and expertise.
  1. Investor Sentiments and Economic Landscape
  2. Mads discusses his experiences signing term sheets while traveling, stressing the importance of being active in investment despite personal distractions.
  3. The recent Munich Security Conference and J.D. Vance's controversial speech highlighted the shifting geopolitical landscape, urging Europe to reassess its defense responsibilities.
  1. Opportunities for European Tech
  2. The speakers emphasize the need for Europe to adopt a more autonomous approach in defense and technological advancements.
  3. The conversation shifts to the potential for European tech to fill gaps left by U.S. policy changes and the rise of Chinese investment.
  1. Trends in Fundraising
  2. Ben discusses the current fundraising climate, emphasizing a shift towards investing in defense technologies and how geopolitical factors influence LP (Limited Partner) interests.
  3. The importance of DPI (Distributions to Paid-In capital) is highlighted, noting that most funds are struggling with returns.
  1. Technological Innovations
  2. Exciting developments in AI, quantum computing, and fusion energy are noted as areas where Europe has significant potential:
  3. Quantum Computing: Discussion on Microsoft's Majorana One chip and its implications for future quantum applications.
  4. Fusion Energy: France's advancements in fusion technology, showcasing the potential for unlimited clean energy.
  1. Investment Strategies
  2. The crowding out of European VC by U.S. investors is a concern, with a notable shift in LP focus towards domestic opportunities due to recent valuation changes.
  3. Ben emphasizes that investing in deep tech necessitates different strategies, particularly for companies that require significant upfront capital before generating revenue.
  1. Future Outlook
  2. The conversation concludes with a reflection on the potential trajectories for European VC, including the viability of new sectors such as asteroid mining.
  3. The podcast underscores the need for more diverse funding strategies, particularly for ambitious projects with long-term horizons.

---

Key Takeaways

  • The European VC landscape is adapting to geopolitical changes and technological advancements.
  • Growth-stage investment remains crucial, with a focus on sectors like defense and AI.
  • There's optimism about Europe's ability to innovate across different technology sectors, provided there is adequate funding and strategic focus.
  • The conversation encourages a proactive approach to investment, urging stakeholders to build robust ecosystems that can withstand global market fluctuations.

---

Conclusion The episode provides valuable insights into the current state of European tech investments and the potential impacts of socio-political dynamics. The co-hosts and guests bring a wealth of knowledge, emphasizing the importance of strategic thinking as Europe navigates its own tech ecosystem.

For more information, follow the EUVC podcast at [eu.vc](https://eu.vc).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00So welcome to Upside, where we talk all things European venture, startups and investing. digging into the real stories behind the tech headlines. Today it's Mads and myself from SuperC joined by Ben Prade, a partner at the growth investment firm GP Bullhound. Now, GP looks like they've got nearly a billion AUM and by the looks of things have invested in every cool tech household name under the sun.

0:26Tear down this wall. It's more than just an ally. This is a union of values. Let's start acting. This show is not investment advice and the hosts of this episode may be invested in the funds and companies featured. Ben, welcome. Tell us a little bit about you and what you do. Yeah, hey guys. Well, great to be part of it. I've been listening to the podcast for the last few weeks and I really love what you guys are doing. You're the listener, you and my mum. so uh yeah so gp bullhound it may be a name that pops out to some of you in the kind of tech industry um so we've been around about 20 25 years we're an interesting beast actually because we are probably more predominantly known as an advisory house um we've been doing mna for tech founders across europe and the us for the last one as i say 20 25 years actually it's just around that the dot-com burst, that we kind of got started, actually.

1:27That's allowed us to build a big office network. You know, we're 12 offices. We're in Asia now as well. But I guess what's maybe a little bit less known is that we're building an investment business alongside that for the last 10, 15 years as well, really kind of using the best kind of knowledge and contacts and deal flow from the network to really invest in those companies. And a bit different to you guys, we're a little bit more of a growth stage investor, I would say. I know you guys like the early days. Hey, listen, that's what Europe needs, right? I mean, we need more GP bullhounds. I think, you know, no one's going to argue with that.

2:01We need more growth beyond the pre and the seeds. That's right, yeah. And again, I think our portfolios are probably a little bit more concentrated as well. So, you know, we're only investing in maybe 10 companies per fund, getting very hands-on with those companies. So, you know, we'll often find they'll have a great early stage VC like yourselves in there but then we're taking that baton on to really help internationalize them think about even bolt-on acquisitions you know going to the US which is such a core part of any European company strategy is really if you're going to go global you have to break the US right and we're a good partner for that with the two offices over there.

2:41Wonderful thanks so much for joining us. No no no problem and then myself so I was a kind of more traditional investment banker for many years hedge funds trading all that kind of jazz made the jump about kind of eight ten years ago into tech i sit on the ic so i get involved in the investments but really my day job is fundraising uh which has been a you know an interesting process we're gonna dig into that we're gonna dig into that because we want to we want to share because i think many of our listeners are founders and i really want to dig into what goes on behind behind behind the scenes which you're hopefully going to share all the dirty secrets.

3:21So that'll be super cool. But Mads, listen, first up, how's your week been? You've been away. You've been fabulous-ing in the mountains. What's new with you? I've had a great week in the mountains. There's just nothing quite like the Alps. And we had terrific weather this year, lots of snow right before we came, and then a week of sunshine. But temperature's cold enough to keep the snow powdery. I really enjoyed that. In the meantime, we were able to do two term sheets this week. So got some investment done there. Just while you were shushing down the slopes, just, you know, signing a term sheet on your mobile phone.

3:54I just need to go away more. I bet the family loves that when you're out there doing term sheets when you should be with the kids. Yeah, yeah. And with four daughters. What are lifts for? Yeah, yeah. What are lifts for, right? There you go. If we can do a few deals going up the mountain, why not? What else has been on your mind? So you've had some other thoughts. Do share. Something that happened tail end of last week was the Munich Security Conference. And I think we recorded last week on a Thursday and it happened Friday and we published Sunday. So there was kind of a little bit of a debt zone that we didn't quite get to catch on the pod.

4:32And it was really interesting that there was this talk from J.D. Vance that was kind of left many in Europe a bit shell shocked. Actually, going back over the talk and listening to it, it's easy to get swept away by the media narrative about how horrible he was to Europeans. And I think clearly when you think about the U.S. policy right now, we're European-focused. But what's happening in Washington is very relevant to us because it influences kind of everything right now on a global basis. And I think there were some things he got wrong and probably also some things he got rights in the speech, J.D.

5:12Vance. And so firstly, maybe some of the context. So, you know, there are potential accords on the horizon with Russia, which is, you know, you could say it's maybe not the ideal situation from a European perspective that the U.S. sort of seems to have done a 180 in terms of, you know, who are really the allies and what are their objectives. And then there's also a potential trade accord with China. This is a little bit more speculative, but there is speculation that Trump really is trying to do a big trade deal with China that will sort of completely upend the global trade flows. And so on top of that, Trump has also said, look, we've got to cut the fence spending.

5:50We've sort of got to try and go for global disarmament, which in many ways is a laudable goal. If you think about some of the things maybe that the speech got right, I think there is this talk about freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is important. It's kind of not to conduct or condone terror or subversion of the state, but to discuss and find insights. And I think there is an argument that maybe the pendulum in Europe has swung a little bit too much in the wrong direction where we've become a little bit too cautious about really letting people speak even when we disagree with what they say.

6:27I think there's another element that was really interesting coming out of the talk, which is, okay, so let's say that the U.S., kind of new U.S. policy is no longer to be the sort of quote-unquote global policeman, but to pull back from some of those duties they've taken over in the past. Well, you know, we can either see that as a terrible loss in Europe, or we can see that as a bit of a wake-up call to take charge and be in charge of our own destiny. And if you think about Europe today, the European economy, even excluding the UK, but the EU economy is 10 times the size of the Russian economy.

7:05And so add UK to that, it will take a whole lot for us, I think, to match Russian level of military capability. And I think there is something about sort of saying, look, we're not expecting our, you know, the daddy that's the U.S., kind of our parent to come to our rescue. No, we've got to grow up, be in charge of our own destiny and make sure we have the capabilities we need to defend our sovereignty, our security, the safety of our citizens. And I think if we take that mindset, maybe something good could come out of this. Maybe we could be a little bit more forward-looking, a little bit less sort of looking in the rearview mirror, and a little bit more about, well, what will it take for us to be autonomous, not just from a defense perspective, but also technologically, and able to carry our own weight in the world?

7:55And so I hope that people will see it as a wake-up call and as an opportunity to step up as opposed to sort of – I think what we sometimes do is to sort of just feel hard done by and sort of slink away over into the corner and say, oh, aren't they terrible? So that was my perspective of that. There's a lot more we can go into around what has it been for European defense, what's happening with UK and AI, and we can unpack that as we go. Yeah, we're definitely going to go there. later across multiple topics. Ben, what's been keeping you up this week? What's been on your mind? Well, a little bit of that kind of stuff.

8:33I do agree with Mads. I think this is an opportunity for Europe. I wonder sometimes with these speeches that are made, how much strategy there is behind it and how much there's just looking for impact, looking for headlines. And we'll see if the US has a real strategy for Europe and some of its interactions on a global level, or whether it just changes week by week, tweet by tweet, you know, that's the only thing that bothers me. But if it comes to a good point for Europe and we take our destiny back in our own hands, I think that's great. I thought there was some really interesting points you guys made a couple of weeks ago about the US almost kind of wanting Europe to be beholden to them from a defense point of view to be able to kind of get this political power that it's had over the world and it'll be interesting as the u.s pulls back who will fill those voids you know i think there's clearly an opportunity for china to get more involved in fact i saw this week um i think there's a new tender out by the hong kong government to invest in vc funds across europe um you know and you would think well you know that's an interesting thing to do why are you doing that and i think there There is not, you know, perhaps there's a void there to be filled by Chinese money in certain locations, which will build goodwill.

9:50And in the long run, that's a shame for the US, right? Because I think it loses that soft power that it has across the world. And it does bring a lot of justice and a lot of good things. So we'll have to see how that develops in the long term. I think the US is a long term loser in that front. But other than that, you know, Europe, I think, is good. I think we spent a lot of time this week or last few weeks building deal flow in Germany. There are some fantastic companies there. I think that engineering spirit that they had from the last generation that built so many great engineering companies and manufacturing companies is there in the new generation to build technology companies.

10:29We see that same determination. And, you know, I think it's a great opportunity. It's a great time for Europe to, as you say, stand on its own two feet and prove what it can do. well Trump is definitely doing that the Trump administration is definitely making everybody globally much more concerned about their own defense security their own their own standing in the world is this is the JD Vance rhetoric and the Trump admin is it changing your investment criteria is it changing the way that you view deals are you looking at more defense for example well for us um i think clearly the amount of money coming into defense you can't ignore and we can get on to this when we talk about fundraising if you're raising a fund and you're telling people you're going to invest in defense you are more likely to raise a fund right now which means more money i think most people would assume that if you put AI on your pitch deck or whatever, AI on your startup or VC pitch deck, you're going to fundraise.

11:34But we've got a new game in town, the defense game, right? That's right. And these things come and go. You know, quantum's another one. But sure as hell, if you're going to say, you're going to raise a fund in marketplaces, you're not going to raise that fund, right? Even if that might be the best strategy out there from an investor point of view. so for sure these massive themes that the link to geopolitics is having an impact on the ground in what we're all investing in and what we're looking at i've not seen this i mean maybe i've had my head in the sand but i've not seen at a government level so much potential impact for our industry as in vc startups almost at the lowest end you know obviously we're a stage before you in the investment sphere, investing at pre-seed and seed rather than the growth piece.

12:24But I've never experienced in my career the macro really, really, almost immediately affecting AI defense, almost coming full stack down the stream to create different strategies. I think it's an exciting time to be alive. But Ben, you've been out on the fundraising tip. You've been out speaking to LPs to invest in your latest fund, which I think you just closed 300 million. 300 million, yeah, which is another 300 million client. So tell us a little bit about what your impression of the response from LPs, what they're looking at, how the industry, how the ecosystem is feeling from your perspective.

13:05Yeah. Yeah, sure. Well, I guess it's important to go back a few years to think about what's happened, I guess, over the last 10 years or so. There was obviously a great time for VC kind of post 2012 all the way through to 2022. you know you had a whole food chain operating early stage funds growth stage funds late stage funds and importantly an IPO market that was functioning this was allowing companies to make good investments and then get their cash back out and send that cash back to LPs that drove good returns. This is one thing that we talk about quite a lot which is founders especially I don't think they fully appreciate that whole stack that full recycling if our investors investors investors aren't taking returns they're not able to recycle in the next generation of VC funds and startups so that is incredibly important sorry to interrupt you but I think is that's an incredibly important part of our ecosystem that basically stopped right that's right yeah so I think a few it stopped for a few reasons clearly it got overheated um you know COVID came along I mean it poured you know rocket fuel onto the whole system you know people sat at home certain types of technology companies just went through the roof we also had you know zero interest rates at that time free cash into the system everything got overblown and then we saw you know the big blow up in the markets once inflation went up interest rates went up everyone the markets hit a full stop and came flying down and then in our industry you know private market valuations of our companies tend to mirror the listed market valuations quite quickly these days.

14:43It's not even that big a lag. So you had this horrible moment in 2022, 2023, where we were all reducing the valuations of the companies that we were holding in our funds. So all these funds that were looking super, super good on paper, suddenly were looking a lot more realistic in terms of valuations. That coincided with this big ramp up of people coming into the industry. So new funds being launched on the back of this, you know, this great run that we'd had in the late 2010s, the amount of funds out there just grew massively. And of course, it was fine that the money was coming into the system from new investors who were getting sucked into VC who potentially maybe shouldn't have been there.

15:23But there was so much news around that. Now, of course, you've got a situation where a lot of new funds raised their first fund, you know, 2020, 2021, 22, invested at the top of the market and you know now those valuations are looking pretty toppy they don't have the track record they're coming back to market now and it's like well you know can you give me another billion dollars please but you know the money from the last fund has done absolutely nothing and it sure as hell isn't coming back to anyone in cash terms anytime soon so as the IPO market has just died it means that the cash isn't flooding back into the system and you know we have this concept of DPI, which for people that don't know, that's kind of distributions to paid in capital.

16:10So that's the amount of money you're getting back from a fund compared to how much you've invested in it. And let's be honest, most funds are delivering almost zero DPI back. So a lot of money is stuck in the system. It's not coming back to LPs. A lot of LPs just don't need VC in their portfolio. You know, it's not like we're often an afterthought. I don't know if you found this i mean at our stage it feels like we're we're so the rlps tend to do publics they'll have you know some property they'll do their philanthropic philanthropic stuff and then vcs or it almost feels like the afterthought it's like one to two percent of aum i don't know if that's that's possibly not the space you play in i imagine no it is i mean we had investors all the way from entrepreneurs all the way through to institutions um i think you know what what has happened also for the institution investors a lot of that cash was coming from the US you know it was the biggest investor in VC and some of that was coming into Europe now since the revaluation in tech you know the leading light in technology has been the AI boom in the US you know the magnificent seven and then off the back of that the private companies in the AI space in the US have been doing very well also so now that big pool of capital in the US is not really looking beyond the US borders, which has been another problem for Europe, is that US investors, it's very hard, let's be honest, for a European fund to go to the US and attract investment when they've got such a big technology ecosystem over there.

17:44And that has sucked some of the fuel out of European VC. Where are most of your LPs? Are they global? Are they Europe? Has that affected you at all? Well, actually, we do have investors from the US, but in our last fund, very little new investment from the US. So what we found is, so we're kind of lucky because we've just raised a fund post the revaluation. So a lot of funds are still going out there now. Our fund, we had to kind of raise this fund in the new paradigm, if you like. And what we found is, you mentioned it, is government money. That was very interesting for us. So what has filled the gap from what used to be maybe US pension fund money is government money.

18:34And I think a lot of governments across the world have seen the potential for technology to allow them to have a domestic economic policy, to create jobs, to attract people to their region. And the way they're accessing that is through VC funds. So I think there's a good opportunity for European funds to work with foreign governments, both in Europe and across the world. I mean, we got a lot of investment from Southeast Asia. And these are great countries with good sovereign wealth and with a policy driven element to what they're doing. And so going to these nations, we're a big organization. We can do M &A, we can do reports, we can do research, we can work with their local companies.

19:18so I think to your point about government getting more more involved I think VCs these days to attract funding have to do more than just say give me some money and I'll give you some money back in four years time they need to work very closely with the LPs in terms of knowledge sharing ecosystem building to to gate that money to bring that money in and I think that's a key development that we'll see. Of course, it does throw up the questions of does government money change the strategy of the underlying VCs? Is there an issue around those VCs maybe changing what they were doing before to attract government money?

19:57And we'll see how that plays out. Some governments will require the VC to put a certain amount of money back into their ecosystem. And that can start to influence the investor as to where they're putting that money. We've managed to avoid that so far work more in terms of softer connections in terms of building and making opening offices or working within those ecosystems but I think it's an important development for VC so if you're a new VC right now going out to raise a fund you know you need to think a I need to really focus on a particular sector be very sector focused whether it's AI or whether it's defense I need to have some deep expertise in that particular sector maybe people in my team from academia etc and I need to go out and show LPs how I can work with them to educate them around that sector and that's how you're building a longer term LP base I think right now.

20:56On the quickly on the M &A IPO piece is your sense that 25 is going to open up more of all it feels like that anecdotally but I think you're closer to the to the fire than we are is that are you sensing that that's happening we're sensing it's happening it's not coming as quickly as everyone i have to admit you know um even clarnut for instance we we know we're investors in clarnut from a couple of our funds it's a fantastic company um they've been talking about the ipo it's maybe looking like april may now that they may may ipo i think that'll be a huge bellwether for what happens next but even they've taken their time.

21:36So whether 2025 is the big dawn or not, I suspect maybe it may be 26, 27 really. Okay. Okay. Yeah. I mean, it feels like AI specifically has accelerated the recovery, has accelerated LPs being back in the black. It feels like we've got this accelerating force with kind of this slight liquidity push being then unevenly distributed because of geopolitical tensions. And I'm also hearing anecdotally, a lot of Italian government money going into VC funds and being released with a very specific focus on Italian startups and a little bit going on in Spain. It just feels like this nationalist populist push, especially from the government level, is now creating a few more engines and fires in local economies.

22:28I don't think it's a bad thing but um i'd love to see how this all comes to pass now mads have you got any before we move on to like the crystal balling and opportunities in european venture have you got any any reflections on what ben has been saying or any thoughts about our experience of the fundraising environment in europe i think ben charted the path perfectly it's what we've all seen and lived through. You had a bubble in 2021, 22. The bubble burst and has been deflating. The recovery from that bubble has taken longer than people wanted or were hoping for. I think there has been a lot of focus on public markets.

23:11It's kind of, I think maybe for the first time you've been able to play this new tech wave of AI through public markets, which many people have been doing. But that said, AI is clearly a subsector within the venture capital ecosystem and startups where things are happening and a lot is happening and valuations are relatively high, dollars are flowing, investments are being made, and capital is being raised. And so maybe the truth is we're just never going to go back. Things are never going to go back to the way they were. It's a constant evolution and the markets will keep changing. And I think, you know, the insight is if you have, if you're building good companies, you'll always be able to raise capital.

23:56There's always money for good businesses. And that's been the experience even in 2023, which was not a great year. So yeah, things are tougher, but it's not impossible. And I think when people work hard and build good companies, I think there is always a way. Well, let's have a chat about the future and how Europe and LPs and VCs and startups and that connective tissue, how we think that's going to progress over the next two, five, ten years. But first, just for a little bit of background context about the European ecosystem. So last year, Germany, France and the UK, the VCs there invested around$25 billion.

24:35Across all of Europe, that was about$45 billion compared to the States, which was$200 billion. So still a fair track behind. Now over the past decade European VC has yielded a net IRR, so internal rate return of 20.8 % beating the US at 18.2 % so European funds have outperformed on an IRR basis. European VC has consistently outperformed public markets delivering a net annual return of 23 % over the last 10 years and the share of global VC has gone up from 5 % 20 years ago to 20 % in 2023. So there's a lot to be positive about in the European ecosystem. But Ben, if you were crystal balling and looking to the future, and I love your optimism because you've always struck me as this kind of super positive, optimistic guy in our industry.

25:27What do you see? Where are the opportunities? Where are you investing? Where are you playing? And how do you perceive the world? Yeah, I think for us, we do invest across Europe. You mentioned Italy, you mentioned Spain. You know, Spain is a very interesting region for us. We do a lot of investment in Spain. We have a lot of investment into our fund from Spain, from the stakeholders in government all the way through. I think we are seeing academia being more present in technology than it was. Maybe that's one of the real benefits of the last few years. I think if you look at the companies in the 2010s that were taking off, it was more kind of gaming, it was social media, it was e-commerce.

26:13It's not the dream of tech. now you're seeing AI, you're seeing quantum, you're seeing some really deep tech coming through. And I think that's really a positive thing for Europe because we do have fantastic universities and institutions. Some of the leaders in all types of technology and science are based here. That's a strategic advantage for us. And as the government's become more conscious of that and building funding around those institutions, I think it's a huge opportunity for us, not just Cambridge and Oxford, but across Europe. So we're seeing incredible AI companies come up, for instance, in Spain, where you wouldn't have thought that.

26:54And these are congregations of different types of people from different countries, using Spain as a base, and building fantastic companies. You know, the culture around work in Europe probably has to adapt a little bit, you know, they have to work hard they have to be in the office they have to be working seven days a week so that is coming in Europe you know it's improving compared to the US but you know with this government money coming into the ecosystem we all know the wonderful job the European Investment Fund has done but has always been a little bit more of a silent investor into funds letting funds do their thing but as these governments get more involved one of the huge benefits is for our portfolio companies, the connections we have with governments is really, really powerful because we can start bringing our portfolio companies to governments, maybe think about how is that government going to build its own AI infrastructure?

27:47Maybe our portfolio company can be a customer to the government. And that becomes a really powerful thing for Europe to start accessing if it can support its own technology companies through contracts, through government help connections across the world that's a real interesting thing so as all of this political goodwill and pushing and shoving starts to starts to come to a strategy i think that's a huge opportunity for europe i think people often don't fully appreciate how much the private markets and vc and startups and and the tech industry has been supported by the us government i think europe gets a bad rep where it's kind of kind of put down often by by the amount of government money that goes in but there's a huge amount of government money that goes in from the us into effectively into private markets and into supporting the the tech industry i think we it's worth just i say that quite a lot so if i'm repeating myself i apologize if that's boring but i think it's really important to see this this isn't a european thing government money this is a global thing.

28:52Yeah. Now, well, let's move into quantum. So I think there are, we're going to talk a little bit about fusion later. So AI, quantum and fusion, I think are really exciting. And there are some movements across all three. Now on the quantum side, there was news this week from Microsoft after 20 years of research. It's hailed as a new paradigm in quantum. And we're going to get into each of our cynicism about this in a second. But the Majorana One chip, which is the world's first quantum processor powered by a topological core architecture, meaning that quantum is more reliable and scalable. The qubits are.

29:26So Satya is saying that this new state of matter is pivotal for achieving more stable qubits. It's become a bit of a PR sesh from Microsoft this week. Mads, do you want to kick off on the quantum tip? Yeah, I thought it was really interesting. I mean, look, you have all the usual naysayers and it's easy to be skeptical, of course. You know, does it work? Is it a genuine breakthrough? or is it just another Theranos? There's always plenty of that. But for a moment, let's just assume that this does work. And maybe the context around why quantum is useful. There's a lot of stuff you can do with quantum computing that you can't do with traditional computing around encryption, which we all know can be used to potentially crack the RSA algorithm, which means we're going to have to think about different ways to encrypt things.

30:18But also in things like finance, you can optimize portfolios because you can simulate trillions of options in parallel. You can use it to optimize supply chains. You can use it in AI because quantum linear algebra. So basically, traditional, the AI models we build today, kind of the model that we're all super excited about right now, we can call that traditional AI, is basically built on linear algebra. That's how we make these big neural nets. But quantum linear algebra, which is what we can do when we have quantum computing, will enable us to train vastly bigger models in a fraction of the time.

30:59So it's sort of a whole new scope of what we can do with AI models. So there's so many cool applications of this once we get it to work. And we'll talk a little bit about some of the timescales in a minute. Now, the challenge is that the quantum states, these new bits, these qubits, They're not like traditional bits that are just zero or one. They're these qubits that can be zero or one, or they can have these super positions where they can be everything in between. And that means that they're very finicky. And that means that even if you can create a qubit, it might not reliably tell you what you want to know.

Read the full transcript

31:36It might not be a reliable store of information. And so today, for every time you have a qubit, you need another 1 ,000 or 2 ,000 or 5 ,000 qubits to error correct that one qubit. So when you hear we've created a 1 ,000 qubit computer, that's really maybe only one logical error corrected qubit. So we need hundreds or thousands of error corrected qubits to do meaningful computations. And so what's special around this Majorana 1 is that it's a completely new approach to designing the qubits. So you have this built-in error correction because it's topological, meaning that it's created in a way where rather than having one part of the system contain all the information, you have two different particles, and then you look at the relationship between them, and that's more reliable from a physics-based perspective.

32:32And therefore, instead of needing thousands of qubits for error correction, you may only need 10 or 20 or 30. So that means you're bringing the scale of where we get to meaningful quantum computing much, much closer, potentially, if it works. And so that's what's making it so exciting. When are we going to get this to a commercially useful state? Commercially useful quantum computers will have at least 100 logical qubits. And that could arrive already by the end of this decade. So kind of 27 at the near end to 2030 at the far end. Cryptography breaking quantum computers are probably still 10 years away.

33:14And if we're looking at some of the scales of what we need for scientific breakthroughs in material sciences and pharma, we're probably still around 15 years away. So it's still a little bit further out into the future, but the potential of what we'll be able to do here is so vast that it's very exciting. Ben, do you do quantum now? Yeah, we do. Yeah, I was fortunate enough to have a brilliant young man on my team who's a PhD in quantum computing from Cambridge. He feeds me the soundbites that I use for my fundraising chats, basically. That's great. So I'm learning slowly from him. But it is, yeah, we have an investment in a company from Australia, QControl, that does software for quantum computers.

34:04And to Matt's point, you know, it's not that far in the future. there are applications around quantum in our everyday lives already. I mean, MRI uses quantum technology effectively to check the behavior of atoms around magnetic fields. One of our acute control, you know, there's interesting work around quantum sensing. So this is using quantum sensors to track potentially, you know, where you are in the world as alternatives to QPS, et cetera. So I think quantum has all sorts of implications also in the AI field. So we talk about tensor networks, which is another very complex mathematical theorem.

34:48But those tensor networks are now being used in AI around language models. So I think it's a fantastically exciting time. We will invest in this space. Again, it comes down to expectation versus reality. and in terms of the fund length. If you have a 10-year fund, you just have to be careful of timing it so the companies that you're investing in are going to have the impact within the lifecycle of your fund. And what do you think about the Microsoft press release? Well, I'm reliably informed that if you dig into the press release, some of the reviewers or the referees within Nature magazine were a little bit skeptical.

35:28I don't think that the theory is problematic in any way, but there is this element where, you know, the big companies, if they're missing a bit of PR for that week, perhaps they can throw out something extremely technical and, you know, keep everyone happy that they got lots of likes on online, et cetera, et cetera. a little bit you know like the big announcements around ai you know i sometimes just feel that these big and that who's checking in four five six years time what they said in an article or a big announcement a few years ago really came true you know i think sometimes the value of these things is in the announcement to make you know a politician look super good or a company look really clever you know where's the evidence no one's going back to check these things so i I mean, maybe that's me being a little, yeah, a little bit harsh.

36:18You know, I think it's fantastic and people should push the barriers. So, yeah. We are. We are. I mean, it's great. I think you made this point earlier, Ben. Europe is great. We have the R &D. We have the technicians. We have the engineers. So AI, quantum, fusion, all of these technologies that we're talking about are happening in Europe, which I think is something that we must always shout to the rooftops about. Now, staying with AI, Grok 3 is out. So ultra-fast development, trained on Colossus, 100 ,000 GPUs. It only took three months to train, which is much faster than GPT-4 and Sonic 3.5. But what does this all mean, Mads?

37:00What's the output of all this speed? We sort of talked about it a week or two ago, you know, talking about that it was just about to drop. And it's a super impressive model. It's very, very fast. It's quickly hit the top of the benchmarks, top of the chatbot arena. All the benchmarks are super impressive. The development speed has been very impressive. And it's interesting to see how this rivalry between Elon Musk and Sam Altman, kind of X versus open AI, that's leading to this hyper-competitive atmosphere. As a working tool, I'd say the news analysis is really hard to beat because it's sifting basically straight from the X feed or the Twitter feed.

37:47When it comes to doing work, kind of the file and the project work, it's not quite there yet. It's not bad, but some of the other models like Anthropics, Cloud, and OpenAI, such as GPT, are still better. And, you know, I'm a huge proponent of Anthropics. I think that's a wonderful company. I can't wait to see what comes out of that shop next, then it's not going to be far now. On the open AI side, we know that chat GPT or GPT 4.5 could be out as early as next week. And GPT-5 may be released as early as May. So the Grok 3 is a great contribution in record time. And a friend of mine said the other day that it's freaking annoying with Elon Musk, knowing that he is as distracted as he is by all the shenanigans he is running around and spends time on that his companies are still executing so well and that he's been able to build these organizations he's not writing the the code he's not shooting rockets i mean he's got teams of incredibly impressive people doing this stuff it's not like he's a he's he's the he's the only one in the firm that can do these things exactly but who's built these teams who's attracted this talent right this is the thing that's a bit annoying uh because you you kind of look at you I admire him for his business prowess.

39:08I think some of the stuff he says politically is sometimes completely misguided, and you want there to be some justice and balance. But, yeah, anyway, that's a conversation for another day. That's on Grok 3. While we're at it, quick shout-out to Evo 2 that was also out this week. So Evo 2 is a massive biological foundation model. It's got 40 billion parameters, so it's smaller than the big LLMs, like a GPT 3.5 or GPT 4. It's been trained and data sourced from over 128 ,000 genomes across all domains of life. So plants, animals, bacteria, and more. And it's a foundational model that gives us predictive powers on DNA.

39:55So we can think a little bit about it like a biological GPT or biological chat GPT. It can help answer questions like how a mutation affects a gene's function, and therefore it's useful in things like cancer research. So it's just so fascinating. It's just been released. Where's Evo2 from? So it's an open source piece of work that's come out of collaboration between the ARC Institute, Stanford, and NVIDIA. It's been released completely as open source, which is so exciting. So it's just come out. We need to see more to understand how good and how strong it really is in production. But it's just, you know, what a wonderful thing that these organizations have gifted the world.

40:39I think we talk about how AI is going to bring us closer to solving, you know, curing cancer and doing some of these things. It's exactly these types of, you know, technological milestones that bring us closer to that, to those types of breakthroughs. Yeah. I mean, we're super future focused today. I mean, the latest AI, the quantum, the fusion, This all feels like the kind of dialogue that is, oh, yeah, that's 10 years away. That's 10 years away. It feels like there has been some some steps forwards. I mean, we're going to talk about fusion next. Now, France is continuing to nail their tech PR.

41:13They're so bloody good at it. Macron is like really nailed this whole tech. The French tech PR engine is back in. We're talking star stuff. We're talking unlimited energy from fusion. The CEA's West Tokamak reactor has produced 22 minutes of continuous fusion. That's what goes on inside the sun. It's a new record. I think China was 17 minutes. Mads, you'll have to correct me there. There's lots to unpack between like AI is going to be very energy intensive. Can fusion come online soon enough to create some of our energy requirements? This is very exciting. It's a new record. But Mads, tell us a little bit what's happening on the fusion side.

41:54Yeah, it feels like in all the doom and gloom, it actually feels like some of all these things, as you're saying, are coming together. And fusion energy is important because a single gram of hydrogen isotopes, they can yield the equivalent of 11 tons of coal. And so it's the dream of unlimited clean energy that we potentially have in our hands here. Now, fusion has been super elusive. For decades, it was said that the only really reliable piece of R &D or kind of assault that's come out of all the R &D has been this number 40, which is that it was said that fusion was always 40 years away. That was sort of the iron rule of fusion research.

42:36Now, the difficulty is not in fusing two hydrogen atoms. The difficulty is in making the process sufficiently stable that you can reach these temperatures you need. So kind of 100 to 150 million Celsius. And then keeping this high energy plasma continuously stable without damaging the reactor. It kind of works in the sun. It's pretty far away. But how do we do that on Earth? And so in January, a team of Chinese researchers, they managed, as you say, to get to 17 minutes of continuous output. But this week, a French team managed to get to 22 minutes, just a month later. So boom, take that for European tech.

43:19What a wonderful thing. Now, the question, of course, is what will it take to go commercial? We're not there yet. There are a couple of things you need to do. You need to achieve continuous net energy gain. So you need to, it takes a lot of energy to kind of put the magnets in place that hold this burning plasma kind of there so it doesn't burn a great big hole in the reactor. And of course, you need to get more energy out of the reactor than you put in. Otherwise, it's a bit pointless. So we need to get to continuous net energy gain for an extended period of time and kind of scaling this continuous operation from minutes to days, weeks, months, years.

43:56And we need to develop the materials that are durable enough to withstand the temperatures. And so we also need to address some of the fuel cycle challenges and make sure we have enough deuterium and tritium to be able to run the reactors. So the timelines are short term in the next kind of five years, we're expecting to do continuous experimental milestones to refine the reactor design and bring some of these gain cycles from 22 minutes and often get it further up. Medium term is probably next decade, building and testing demo reactors and then seeing the sustained energy gain there. And then longer term, and we're talking probably 2040s onwards, commercial rollout.

44:38And so, look, it's easy again to be cynical, you know, 15, 20 years away. But if we think about it, you know, for a second, what if we only have 15 to 20 years until we're at a place where we have limitless, limitless clean energy? Wouldn't that be a pretty remarkable thing? So just think it's worth kind of stopping and reflecting on some of these milestones here. No, I totally agree. And also, if this kind of 40-year milestone has been halved or more, I mean, I think, let's hope that's right. I love that it's all happening in Europe, as you say. It feels like there have been some real inroads.

45:16I mean, 22 minutes doesn't sound long, but I think in fusion terms, that is pretty bloody long. So let's keep on going, Europe. Now, Ben, you obviously invest in AI and quantum. What are you doing in energy? Are you doing fusion? Are you doing nuclear? Are you looking at other energy plays? Not really. I think we're interested in AI companies. We're looking at an AI company that works in compression right now. So compressing language models up to 80 % to 90%, allowing them to be more efficient. So coming at it possibly from the other angle, which is using less energy in the process. But I wouldn't say we're investors specifically in that sector.

45:59So my kind of knowledge probably ends at Chernobyl being my favorite TV show. Yeah, not a great outcome there. But that wasn't Europe. Let's not call that Europe. I want to quickly talk about some some data that Peter Walker from Carter released this week and I think anecdotally we all felt this but he goes into he he was looking at round sizes for startups over the last five years and he's come up with these two competing theories around VC-backed startups so I think it's really interesting and I'm going to throw and some new b new vc buzzword bingo see if you can pick it up and it this these theories feel to me a bit jevons paradoxy so theory one here we go ai is making everything about building a company cheaper yeah startups need less cash than ever before and this is likely to continue so this is very much leaning into sam altman's solo unicorn founder theory which i think is is a really interesting thought experiment theory two so ai is lowering the barrier thereby increasing competition therefore making the cash advantage actually more important as startup scale i.e you can start for less but ultimately winning a category is going to cost you more than ever so what does the data say so he took a snapshot of median round sizes over the last five years across most stages rounds are smaller than they were five years ago adjusted for inflation the major outliers being the very very early stages of pre and seed therefore is seed the new a could it be that companies are raising larger seed rounds in the explicit attempt to not need another fundraise and somebody then coined the the term venture light or seed strapping or to be a seed strap startup our larger funds now playing at seed where their fund economics demand companies raise significant amounts of cash or the numbers no longer make sense so mads we kind of we've always had a sense of this especially as with us pre-seed and seed where do you want to take this topic?

48:07I think it's interesting to see how some of the data plays out and also some of the anecdotes. And, you know, there's so much speculation. I saw one of the founders, I think it was from Gamma, interviewed recently. And Gamma, that's a wonderful, just beautiful product and a beautiful tool they've built. And the headline of the story, I think, was in the New York Times was that exactly as you're saying here, you know, with AI, we can build companies much more efficiently and we can scale revenue and therefore we don't need to raise so much money or build so big teams. And the takeaway from the story was, yes, that's kind of what they've done, but they're on their way out to raise more money so they can build bigger teams.

48:44And I think at the end of the day, the loss of economics will always apply. If you've got two teams that are equally good with the same type of technology and one has got more resource and more money, they can acquire more customers and they're going to win the market at the end of the day. And so I think at the end of the day, there will always be a market for capital and investment because it's not just building the product. It's also making the product better. It's also distribution. It's also all the other things that go around creating a big successful company. And if you have more resource, you've got better chances of doing that.

49:20The caveat is when you're very early and you're still figuring out how to get the product market fit, too much resource can distract you. You don't want to become too bloated or get too big too soon. You want to make sure you're very judicious around how you raise and how you spend. kind of always, but certainly very, very early on. But then I think once you're a product market fit, more money is going to put you in a better position. And we've seen this in the LLM space, right? All the big frontier model companies are raising a lot of money because being first to market and having the resource and being able to hire the best people still matters.

49:53So I think to some extent, I think I love Peter Walker's analysis. I think it's really good. He's always has got great data and great analysis of it. And I think his takeaway was along the lines of, look, there is just still a lot that's happening here. Watch the space. It's still a little bit murky. We don't know exactly what's going to happen. Ben, you're later than us. You're from the growth perspective. But have you got any thoughts on these two theories? Yeah, I mean, I think it is interesting. I think, again, though, there is a different type of company that we're looking at these days compared to five, seven years ago.

50:31I think SaaS companies were very much in the limelight back then. And a good SaaS company would develop its product over time. It would improve its product over time. And you would see that its revenue would grow more steadily as the product improved and it get out there and sold its product. It was a more gradual impact on revenue. now if we're looking at deep tech companies a lot of the work happens very early on perhaps even before the company goes to the customer if they're creating a piece of technology so for us as a growth investor waiting till a company like that gets to 10 20 million in revenue it may be too late because they become too visible you know once you have an amazing piece of technology that is being monetized everybody's on it so for sure does that mean you'll come downstream yes i think we will have to shift your yeah we have to take a view of the value of the technology and have some way of equating that to what we used to call revenue at a certain point and say there's so much inherent value there we can come in as perhaps as a growth investor you know we really need to see some revenue so it's not as we're not coming into the seed stage and a lot of these technology companies or deep tech companies will have maybe had some kind of product in the market before and now they've created a new product that they're raising for and so sometimes you can use that previous revenue as a justification that this is an ongoing company that can make money so that helps but I think the other point to this is that the revaluation of of course, in 2022 that we talked about earlier, did change some of the aspects of the way these companies grow.

52:20There was the growth at all costs mantra out there in the past, which was burn cash, get users and think about profitability in the future. I think investors are much more focused now on can you reach profitability very quickly? Is it in your own hands? And I wonder maybe whether that has changed the round size that we're looking at and that perhaps founders are a little bit more pragmatic about you know proving profitability before I think we my sense is we're moving slightly out of that black swan memo get to profitability stretch stretch your timelines I have no data to back this up but my sense is that we're now moving not to the crazies, grow at all costs, crush the world, cash be damned.

53:15But I think there is an argument for some startups to start putting their foot back down on the gas and kind of get into from growth and put it all into the marketing and the sales column again. But we'll see. Awesome. So I want to highlight a quick deal of the week before we close off this pod. So I was looking at Carmen Plus this week, which is a Dutch US startup that builds autonomous spacecraft that can travel to asteroids and then mine them for materials. They've raised 20 million dollars and they're looking to do their first launch in 2027, which is around the corner. Now, the reason it caught my eye was because when Elon was doing starting SpaceX and Starlink and I thought, oh, this is whatever, you know, five, 10 years ago.

54:01Oh, this is this is mining rights. so my assumption was all of this push into space was we're running out of stuff on earth guys and girls we need to go and get some more stuff from somewhere it's on asteroids it's on other planets so my assumption it was all you know that that push from him was all mining rights and so seeing Carmen Plus just reminded me of that conversation in my head now I don't know if anyone has any perspectives on this but maybe Ben do you have any any thoughts on a on an asteroid mining startup top I guess would you invest I think we would look at it for sure um it does sound a long way down the line gosh um I think when we do invest in space we've got some fantastic space companies in our portfolio they're much more in the uh current space economy where there's revenues coming in and there's there's natural use cases I think it sounds wonderful I think it sounds like the plot to a Hollywood movie uh perhaps there might have even been a couple of 90s Hollywood with movies but i think bruce willis is under version four yeah i was gonna say which one where was bruce willis it was with them who was steve tyler's live tyler live tyler wasn't it yeah yeah yes i'm up for that i'm up for whatever it was called version two starring elon musk and and actually he's if he goes to mars and danbo yeah yeah i'm in i mean i'll polish off my acting my acting chops mads yeah would you would you invest would we invest in a in a in a space asteroid mining company?

55:23Maybe we'd look at it. Yeah, I think yes, yes and no. And I think this sort of goes to the heart of a challenge. It's something I think we need to think about as an industry. Because I think historically, some of this stuff is stuff that would have been funded by government research labs, right? NASA has been putting lots of money into, you know, taking mankind to boldly go where no one has gone before and all that stuff for decades. And that's wonderful. I think there's so much more you can do in a commercial setting, because it's just We just know once there is a profit incentive, everybody becomes more focused on efficiency.

55:57And it's just a better way to build and do. At the same time, if you look at the type of capital that's required very early on, to Ben's point, Ben, he's a growth type investor and they really need to see some revenue. And guess what? When you're building satellites to go mine asteroids, there probably ain't going to be much revenue the first few years. And we sit at our end. And for us to write a check into a round like this, well, the check's as big as half our fund, right? And this is the seed check. So what is the type of fund we need that can fund these types of probably worthwhile endeavors that could yield great and profitable returns at some point in the future where the fund is big enough but can invest early enough?

56:43And can you make all the fund economics work? And I think we've seen some of it in the States where Andreessen have had their American dynamism and have been pushing sort of that notion. I don't know if we quite have that type of investment firm in Europe yet. Should we? Should we have one? Absolutely. I think it's exactly what we should have. And I think one is not enough. I think we need to build a whole industry of venture investors. It won't be seed investing like what we know today. There's not half a million or a million or two million bucks to write some software and get to market within a couple of months and then boom, off you go.

57:23It's much longer horizons. There's much more risk. The payoffs could be incredible. You look at what Elon Musk has done with SpaceX. Wow. Right? That took a lot of capital up front but has built an incredible business. And the seed investors in that company have done very well. Wouldn't it be great if we could build another five or ten SpaceX-type companies in Europe? We've got the Cornish space port. We've got our UK space port down in Cornwall. We've got our broken 747 that was supposed to lob satellites off that kind of arc takeoff to lob satellites into space. We can rev that up, I'm sure.

58:01I'd like to think we can get beyond Monty Python at some point, right? Yeah, for sure. But I think on this point, it is still governments that decide the winners in this space. It's still the government money which chooses which company which strategy. Because they're the first lost piece, really. They're the ones taking the risk. They have created Elon the ability. They've given him the ability to fund a lot of the space. That's the thing. People don't realize. I think those NASA contracts that went to SpaceX at the outset is what built SpaceX. So there's still a huge influence there from government money.

58:38Let's completely agree. Let's take the flip side of the argument is if you're the US government and you're looking back over the last couple of years and you say, OK, we took a risk 15 years ago. We backed SpaceX. We procured some launches, some launch capacity. Today, that means we have instead of having a monopoly with Boeing, we have another vendor. and when the astronauts were stranded on the ISS recently and Boeing couldn't fly them back, well, SpaceX could. And so I just think it's so important that you create that competitive dynamic. I think kind of saying that the government gave it to him, I don't, it's not fair.

59:21I mean, you could like or dislike the man's politics, but nobody can argue that what SpaceX has accomplished is incredible. The fact that you have incumbents like Boeing that have not only not been able to do the same, but have performed, cannot even create a reusable launch vehicle, let alone a shuttle to ferry these poor astronauts back, I think just goes to show how difficult the endeavor is. Listen, they gave it a good go. They nearly got there. And I think Boeing have super screwed the pooch. I mean, they're in such the doghouse at the moment. Absolutely. So, yeah, I just want more. I want us to back more great founders to go and do great things.

1:00:06I think that's how we create successful societies. Do it. Let's do it. Ben, what's happening for you this week? What's on your agenda this week? I'm actually heading to Doha for Web Summit a couple of days down there. Lots of great companies. Obviously, lots of potential investors from that region as well. having said that, it's not easy for funds to raise in the Middle East as well the Middle East is very inwardly focused right now on building their own ecosystems but yeah, really looking forward to that that'll be the main thing for me And Mads, you're off travelling as well, aren't you? That's right, I'll be in the Far East I'm talking at a conference there on AI and how AI is transforming and continues to transform the investing landscape.

1:00:56Well, it's great because as soon as you go away, we sign more term sheets, so that's fine. I just have to stay away. That's it. Just go away and we'll be absolutely fine. Gents, what a gift. What a pleasure. Thank you so much for your time. Catch you next time. See you next time. Bye.

1:01:25Acting, acting, acting, acting, acting, acting.

From the publisher
Welcome to a new episode of the EUVC podcast, where our good friends Dan Bowyer and Mads Jensen from SuperSeed have a discussion with Ben Prade, Partner at GP Bullhound, to cover recent news and movements in the European tech landscape. 💬

More from EUVC

All 626 episodes
E418 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen, and Ben PradeEUVC · 1 h 1 min
Listen in VO