In short
EUVC Podcast Episode Notes
Episode Information
- Title: E482 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen, and Lomax Ward
- Hosts: Andreas Munk Holm, David Cruz e Silva, Lomax Ward, Mads Jensen
- Release Date: June 2023
- Description: The episode discusses various current events in European tech, including geopolitical issues, startup strategies in the EU, and significant tech industry developments.
---
Key Topics Covered
- Tariffs, Trade Wars, and Their Impact on Startups
- Tariffs and Trade Deals: Discussion on the relevance of US-EU trade relationships, with emphasis on tariffs affecting European startups.
- Key Point: The US-EU trade relationship is valued at $1.5 trillion, making it a crucial economic bloc.
- Current Issues: Tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automotive sectors are concerning for hardware startups.
- EU Startup Strategy
- EU Startup and Scale-up Strategy: New initiatives to streamline the approach to startups and investing in the EU.
- Key Features:
- Scale-up Europe Fund: Aims to exceed €10 billion for startup funding.
- Blue Carpet Initiative: Focus on attracting talent, simplifying tax rules, and streamlining employee stock options.
- Lab2Unicorn Initiative: Connects universities with startups to accelerate research to market transitions.
- Regulatory Harmonization vs. Divergence
- Regulatory Differences: Discussion of the divergence between EU and US regulations, particularly impacting startups.
- Harmonization Importance: Emphasized the necessity for harmonizing regulations to facilitate smoother trade and startup growth.
- Talent, Tax, and the Fight for Founders
- Talent Acquisition: Discussion on the importance of attracting talent from outside the EU.
- Employee Stock Options: The current challenges with stock options in various EU countries and the push for reform.
- Munich as a Deep Tech Capital
- Emerging Hub: The potential of Munich as Europe's next deep tech capital, bolstered by significant investments from companies like TSMC and Apple.
- Big Tech Developments
- Emerging Technologies: Discussion on the growing influence of AI and hardware advancements from companies like NVIDIA and Anthropic.
- NVIDIA's Success: Record-breaking revenue and its competition with Microsoft.
- Anthropic’s New Models: Introduction of advanced AI models that promise significant improvements in coding and reasoning tasks.
- Market Dynamics and Startup Survival
- Economic Environment: The implications of macroeconomic trends on venture capital and startup dynamics, including interest rates and inflation.
- Disruption in Software Development: The rise of rapid development cycles (e.g., "vibe coding") and how that affects market strategies for startups.
- Noteworthy Highlights
- Deal of the Week: Brightflag's exit for $425 million, representing a significant achievement in the legal tech space.
---
Key Takeaways
- The episode covers a broad range of topics affecting European venture capital and startups, highlighting the intricate balance between geopolitical developments and market dynamics.
- The hosts emphasize the importance of regulatory harmonization to enhance the EU's competitiveness in the global market, especially in light of the rapid advancements in technology.
- There is a strong focus on the talent and funding landscape in Europe, with ongoing discussions about the need for improved frameworks to attract and retain talent.
- Big tech companies are driving innovation in AI, impacting both the startup ecosystem and established industry players.
---
Conclusion This episode of EUVC provides a nuanced look at the current challenges and opportunities within the European tech landscape. The discussions reflect on critical issues that could shape the future of startups and venture capital in Europe as they navigate complex macroeconomic variables and the ever-evolving technology sector.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Welcome to Upside, where we dig into the real stories that live behind the headlines affecting European venture. Today is Lomax, Mads and myself. Sadly, no Andrew. He is off on holiday with family. And there's been a lot of news. There's been a lot of news this week. And I don't even, I kind of don't even know where to start. And what we are going to talk about, and I don't want any groans from the backseat, is tariffs and EU and US and trade deals. This would have finally done. Tear down this wall. It's more than just an alliance. This is a union of values. Let's start acting. This show is not investment advice, and the hosts of this episode may be invested in the funds and companies featured.
0:51So we need to talk trade deals. We need to talk tariffs and how these things are going to pay back to Europe and how they're going to affect us. And I was reading this week about taco tariffs, as in, what is it? Trump. Trump always chickens out. It's been a great trade. Which he was sincerely offended by, which made me smile. And I know that they're at time of press. Now, this is the Friday. This podcast goes out on the Sunday, which is the beginning of June. Yeah, just the beginning of June. But there were federal judges that were trying to block some of the tariffs. But I read last night that they're not able to.
1:30And all tariffs are on the table. and there were always going to be tariffs targeted on steel, aluminium cars. They were going to stay in place regardless. But there may be some trouble afoot for tariffs and Trump's plans, although I'm sure he'll get the Supreme Court to do his bidding. There is a EU-US trade deal. The promise of tariffs has cajoled some activity, which we've always said is part of the plan. What does this mean for us as investors? What does this mean for startups, short, medium, long term? Lomax, I know you've got some more scene setting detail for us. And then maybe you could share your take.
2:09I've been trying to think about what this means for us as early stage investors and startups. I think that's the key thing here, because I think you can get a lot, a lot, get stuck a lot in the geopolitical weeds here. But stepping back just to set the scene, the US-EU trading relationship is the biggest trading relationship in the world. 1.5 trillion of exports and imports total, which is nearly three times or certainly more than twice the US-China trading relationship. So this is a big behemoth of a relationship. Funnily enough, one of the questions I was asking myself is, we're talking about trade deals now.
2:47Why has there never been a trade deal done in the past? I mean, surely this is such a big trading relationship. It would have made sense to have a trade deal in the past. And this has been attempted, 2013 to 2016, there was a big attempt called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, which fell over. Of course, it's back on the table now. Do you know why it fell over, Lomax? Do you know what happened with that? Yeah. I mean, our old friend, you know, regulation is one of them with the EU and the US having such a divergence in the way that they regulate things. Whereas the EU tends to have a precautionary principle of banning something until proven safe, where the US is more risk-based of permitting, less proven dangerous.
3:27So I think you had kind of a different regular, because don't forget, you know, trade, it's not just about tariffs. You know, the more you want to harmonize trade, you can create free trade, but you also want to make it really frictionless, have, you know, harmonization of standards. So similar regulatory frameworks, principles. And so the more you can kind of harmonize on that side, the easier it is to do trade. So these kind of deals, that kind of stuff is on the table. So there was a big disagreement there. And, you know, there's been a history of sort of subsidy wars. So where governments, you know, are giving subsidies to local champions and the Airbus Boeing example was a big kind of stumbling block there where each geography was popping up or supporting their local champion.
4:11So this, you know, a deal hasn't been done in the past, but that's no problem because, you know, the tariffs have been relatively low. This is now back on the table because tariffs are up. Now, why is this relevant for startups? I I think, look, in a way, we've talked about it before. Most startups sell software. Roughly 10 % of European startups are hardware. So for them, it is relevant because if we're talking about 50 % tariffs on European hardware, then, for example, in my portfolio, the new manufacturing startups that are selling goods into the US will really, really struggle off the back of that.
4:45So that's clearly a big thing and needs to be discussed and parked at the moment. there are only tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automotive. So we need to make sure that is kept low for new innovative products. But there is actually a really interesting one where I think this is very important. Something we actually haven't discussed on this pod before is going back to that harmonization of standards piece, which is, that is actually a much bigger deal than I think is made in the tech press. It's that, you know, in the context, take, for example, med devices. you know, you have to go through a whole regulatory regime in Europe, then you have to go through a whole other one in the US, right?
5:22So if they can actually, or any kind of product that requires a CE mark, like actually, if as part of any broader trade deal, you can get rid of tariffs or reduce them, et cetera. But, you know, historically, we haven't really had many. You can actually harmonize things between the two jurisdictions to remove friction to doing business, then that would be an amazing thing. I think there's still massive stumbling blocks in the way, for the reasons I've said in terms of the different way that we approach regulation in the two continents. But that's the kind of thing I'd love to see. Clearly, you know, these meetings are only just going in the diary now.
5:56So this is going to take a long, long time. But something should and ideally would be done. Why is this back on the table now? You know, we have the increased threat of China. We have the increased threat of Russia. The reminder that the EU-US trading bloc is massive and important. And so someone should do something about this. Lomax is obviously right. It's a massive and massively important trading relationship, yet one Trump has thrown into disarray alongside the rest of the global financial and business system. And even with all that chaos, the stock markets are now up 4 % since the quote unquote liberation day tariff announcements.
6:38And so you mentioned the taco trades earlier. I mean, the taco trades was what allowed us for a brief moment in time to buy NVIDIA stock at$95 a share. They're now close to$140. And that's just over a few weeks. So that's been an incredible trade and one that's made at least some of us very happy. What will happen longer term here? I think here's the thing. Whatever happens, it seems likely that there will be some residual tariffs. Trump's been talking about tariffs for 40 years. He's not necessarily consistent about many things, but this has seemed to be one of the bedrocks of his political, economical philosophy, if you can call something that comes from him that.
7:22And even a 10 % de minimis tariff would add between half a percent and a percentage points to US inflation. And so on top of that, you've got Congress. They're looking to add$3 to$4 trillion of federal deficits over the next 10 years in the kind of this big beautiful budget that one right so so and yes it just squeaked through it was on 250 to 214 votes in the house and now waits in the senate it's going to go through the process there and and it will come to some version that will go to to trump they're hoping to get it done before the july 4th recess so you know on one hand you You have at least some residual tariffs looming, no matter what happens with all these negotiations.
8:09And you have these fiscal deficits, and that's going to drive inflation. And so I think markets are looking at this and sort of saying, look, this is anything but prudence. We know Elon, again, say about him what you will, but he's kind of left government now saying that Doge was an important idea. But it's really hard to push through the savings that were needed. So the net net is US inflation is now down to 2.3%, but it's unlikely to come further down and interest rates will likely stay higher for longer. And so we talk about what does that macro really mean for us as startup land? Well, it means a ton of things because macro drives interest rates and interest rates drive M &A and financing.
8:53And that drives the money we have to invest in companies. It drives the exit environment and liquidity and DPI that are pushed back to investors. So this is not really helping anyone in business attack at the macro level. So what can be done is the question. The UK had, I don't know if you can call it negotiations. I mean, I think the UK folded fairly quickly, kind of this brave new world of global swarsparkling and global Britain and all that stuff. The UK basically went from a situation where we had 3 % to 5 % tariffs on US goods, and the US had an average 1.8 % tariff on UK goods. And we've now reduced tariffs on the US goods down to about 2.5%.
9:38And US has increased tariffs on UK goods up to about 10%. So what a fantastic trade deal that was. Win. Boom. It's really important that the EU doesn't fall into the same trap. And I think the good news is the EU is probably the most sophisticated trade negotiator in the world. You have mapped out exactly down to the constituency level what areas will be most heard in the Republican Party in the midterms if selective tariffs are slapped on specific U.S. goods. So very, very sophisticated machinery that's been put in place, kind of a little bit sort of the anti-Trump, the anti-chaos. and I think that the EU will probably be able to get to a good outcome because of that.
10:22But there will be volatility and it can be painful short term. Of course, the alternative is just to accept that the bully bullies and slaps more tariffs on us and we reduce our tariffs. But I'm not sure that's in our interest either. I think the takeaway here is basically for me, there's the direct impact of tariffs and the indirect impact. The direct impact is, you know, do I have a tariff on my product as a startup? You know, would, if there is a trade deal, you know, if there's harmonization of data standards, will that make doing business across, you know, across quarters easier, et cetera.
10:56And there's the indirect one, which is the one that Mads, you just so eloquently covered, which is like, well, you know, if tariffs indirectly push inflation, affects interest rates, affects, you know, rotation of assets of capital into equity, into high risk assets away from it, if it rotates money out of it or into it, depending on which way interest rates are going, that all affects the capital that we have and the founders have. So there's sort of this direct and indirect impact, both incredibly important. Well, public markets have kind of rescued private recently, haven't they? So the fact that our investors and their investors have been able to balance the books a bit more after the recent downturns meant that privates have stayed up.
11:36So venture capital has stayed a little bit more buoyant, in which case they wouldn't have done had public markets carried on the trajectory downwards. I think you should just go there for a second because there is a seemingly complete schism in financial markets. You have bond yields that have gone up and up, especially US bond yields, right? You now have treasury kind of 4.6, you know, within striking distance of 5%, which is a lot. They hit 2007 levels, didn't they, Mads? They kind of like back, we kind of went all the way back to the crazy times, 2007, I think. And at the same time, you have stock markets back to near record levels, kind of completely having wiped out the tariffs crash.
12:22And so how can that be? How can bond markets fret and worry and sort of be not quite panicking yet, but certainly not in a good place and stock markets be so seemingly, you know, not only benign, but actually very positive, very optimistic. And I think it's really down to how the two constituents, they look at the world. If you're a bond trader, you get paid not to lose money. And you look at this looming federal deficit, you look at increasing inflation or at least the risks thereof. And you say, gosh, there's just so much risk in the economy right now. I get paid not to lose money. I'm going to be really cautious about how I deploy.
12:58But on the other hand, if you're an equity investor, and that's very much the camp we're in, you look at the world we're in today. You say, gosh, we have all this chaos, confusion, all these threats. But we have AI, the biggest economic transition and transformation in our history, in our lifetime. And so the potential of that is so great that it can outweigh the world's leading economy seemingly on the trajectory to sabotaging itself. And I think it's just really interesting to see how that's unfolding. You know, we talked about NVIDIA is now neck and neck with Microsoft, again, vying for the role as the most valuable company in the world.
13:44The AI economy is here and there will likely be a reset at some point because of the precariousness of the U.S. fiscal position. But medium to long term, the markets are clearly telling us that there is so much potential. Very similar to the pattern we saw in 1990-2000. How much of this is being amplified by people perceiving Trump to be quite reckless and very kind of anti-regulation and will push the barriers for them? How much of this kind of bifurcation is a Trump amplifier effect, do you think? I think there was certainly some of that earlier in the year, right? Even post the election, there was kind of the whole run up to the inauguration.
14:30and people were just very, very excited about a kind of, frankly, more benign environment in which to do business. I think some of that has gone away today. There's just too much chaos. Businesses can't plan. Everybody knows that. But even so, even with all the chaos, even with the fiscal recklessness, even with global trade wars, stock markets are still saying, wow, the price here is incredible. There's just no way we can be out of this market. So I think it's interesting to observe. And of course, we see that from our vantage point, kind of early stage investing, the companies we're in, the potential is a nearly limitless.
15:10I think a lot of this is both fundamental and there's a huge amount of sentiment that's driving global markets at the moment. For example, in the beginning of the year said, well, you know, it's going to take one earnings missed by NVIDIA to reset things and cool things off. And what have we seen yesterday? I mean, NVIDIA smashed it out of the park again. So actually - Even without China, right? That was with all the China concerns. You know, you can talk about bubbles and.com and all this kind of thing, but there are still some pretty compelling fundamentals on the ground. And Mads, bless him, gets incredibly excited about what's going on in AI, as we all should.
15:50And, you know, there is reason to that. You know, it's not just, it's what we're seeing on the ground day to day and what we're seeing with these companies and their numbers, it's real. Clearly, the multiples are high and lots of people want to cram into these companies, but these are pretty compelling growth rates, right? Well, the EU seems to have woken up. I don't know how much has been charged by... Has it? Has it? Well, let me finish and then shoot me in the face. So we've got some plans afoot. We don't know what was in the oven pre-threat of tariffs. Obviously, commerce and trade has always been on the table, but it feels like there's a bit more of an accelerating force to be debated.
16:35And by all means, shoot me in the face. So the European Commission has unveiled the EU startup and scale-up strategy, which is a streamlining of member states approach to startups and investing. There is a scale-up Europe fund, which is a blended investment vehicle expected to exceed 10 billion euros. and we could talk about where that fits in context. There is to come some regulatory simplification. There is a blue carpet initiative, which is all about attracting talent, simplifying tax rules and streamlining employee stock options. There's a Lab2Unicorn initiative, which is looking to accelerate the transition from research to market by connecting universities.
17:13And there is better infrastructure access in this directive, whatever that means. So I have a whole bunch of challenges with how the EU is presenting this. Will it move the needle? How can the UK and other non-European countries engage? What does all this really mean? But Mads, do you want to give us some more of the inside scoop as to what's happening with this latest EU kind of strategy thinking? Yes. So the EU has put forward, or the Commission specifically, has put forward a strategy document, 21 pages, not terribly long. It's got the usual four pillars, kind of reduce regulatory burdens and admin, more money, better access to talent and better access to infrastructure and customers.
17:58So sort of the usual four suspects and not too dissimilar from, for example, the UK AI policy that we saw unveiled last year. There's some really good initiatives in there. The 28th regime, which we've talked about at some length, kind of this idea of creating a new way for European startups to incorporate. So instead of having to incorporate every single member state, they can incorporate once using 28th regime rules and then operate across the union. There's also this idea of a European business wallet, which is a digital business identity. I think it's a great idea. We just see how arcade the process of engaging with governments are in various countries, kind of digitizing all of that, making it simple, having a simple digital identity, I think is great.
18:43There is the European Innovation Act with regulatory sandboxes, which is something we've experimented a lot with in the UK. We had that around the kind of the whole fintech boom and all this way to have a faster path of access to a regulated market so you can experiment as a startup. So there's an idea to kind of scale that up in various guises across the EU. I think that's great. I kind of channeling our inner Jerry Maguire's, right? I mean, show me the money. There is this idea, you know, we need more growth capital. We need to be able to do what our friends, the Yanks, are doing with kind of big growth funds that can put billions into cool things.
19:22And the timeline that's being talked about right now around the European Innovation Investment Pact and some of the other vehicles that are being discussed are 2026. So I still have a sense of the approach some administrations take when they look at this stuff is they get the right people in the room and they announce it and the money's there. We've just seen Trump come back from the Middle East and having a slew of amazing announcements around how both the U.S. would invest in the Middle Eastern region, but also Middle Eastern money investing back into the U.S. I don't know. I don't understand why we're not taking a little bit more of an aggressive approach here and moving faster because frankly, 2026 is light years away.
20:04I thought it was two years out. I read that some of these initiatives weren't penned until 27. Yeah. Well, so there you have it, right? So you're sort of talking about just getting rules into place in 2026 and then money will flow after that. It almost doesn't matter. It's too long. It's too far away. Like get the right people in the room we know where the money is right it's the opportunity is here and we know it is you know show the data talk about the case and let's get let's get the money into the system so we can start getting to work. Well Max you're a bit more of a cynic on this topic aren't you?
20:37Well I have if there are a couple of green shoots in this in this report the match didn't that maybe it worth pulling out so they're not there's the 10 billion whatever these numbers are so small I just like as you know as a reminder OpenAI raised 40 billion in its last round right so So the EU announcing 10 billion of also not even its own money, like other people's money, private money. It's a glint in the milkman's eye. However, a couple of things that were interesting to me. One is Mads did touch on, which is the talent, what they're planning to do around talent is to try and make it easier for non-EU founders to come to Europe and build companies and to also hire people for their startups from outside the EU.
21:19I think that's clearly great. You know, the U.S. is built on the back of immigration, both like literally and also startup industry is. And so we could take a leaf out of that book. You know, clearly the Silicon me is like, well, you know, the Kikles, the AFD, the Chegas, the Vox, the Farage, you know, Bratelli, whoever they may be in whichever country are going to kind of really try and shout down those initiatives. But, you know, let's see. I think it's great that they're trying to open the taps on talent. The second one actually was in the detail, which is around employee stock options. It was great to see the EU recognizing that there is a major issue with the way that employee stock options work in the EU.
22:05So as a reminder, this is the key way to really incentivize your talent and your company. And we've seen thousands, maybe even millions of engineers in the US become millionaires. You know, the top engineers at NVIDIA all have tens of millions of dollars worth of stock options now, right? And so, you know, stock options has been a way to attract talent out of traditional industries into startups. And we know in Europe, we have major problems around the fact that each country has different regimes. But more importantly, they have very onerous tax consequences. For example, in some countries, including Portugal, for example, you can get taxed.
22:43when you get given the option on grants, which is just totally crazy, right? So you're just receiving an option or getting any cash. And then there was like the, do you get taxed on exercise? Well, that can happen in some countries. Are you getting taxed as income or capital? Obviously at different rates. So in the US, it's much more favorable. In the EU, it's not. They recognize that it's great. They're going to do something about it. The cynic in me is like, well, actually tax is a national competence within the European Union, which means you're going to need to get every single country to basically align, which is not easy.
23:15But I think it's great that they're tackling that. And I think that's absolutely key. It's really, it's actually not talked about enough. Can I just say on this, this 28th regime stuff, which sounds like a kind of Robert Harrison novel that, you know, Andreas Plinger, bless him, has been working on. I'm amazed how much, this is actually great to watch a kind of founder, GP, really actually, he's been working on this for the last like 10, 12 months. He's already got the EU to make announcements like this. He's got members of the European Parliament pushing this stuff through. So this is the push to create a legal entity that is a single standard legal entity that can be used by startups to make it easier to raise money and do business, etc.
23:58That is making progress. And that's legal rather than tax. So that is actually a competence of the EU. So that would be great to get it done. Again, the cynic in me is like, did you already know, guys, that there is a concept of a single legal entity? It's called the Societas Europa. Have you heard of that thing? Yeah? Never. That's existed since the beginning of the EU. There are only, well, apparently there are 3 ,000 registered, probably about 2 ,500 of those are zombies. So you've only actually got a few hundred. That is, to be fair, for more public companies. But my point is, this concept has existed for, you know, larger corporations and hardly anyone's used it.
24:35So let's see what the kind of new little brother, little sister, the adoption that it gets. But I think it's a great initiative and I'm really hats off, Andreas, on that. But as I said, I'm excited about the potential changes to the employee stock options because that is such a needle mover for hiring and incentivizing talent in companies. I want to talk about big tech. I want to talk about some of the big announcements. There's been, over the last few weeks, we've had Google's I.O., we've had Microsoft's Build. There have been other large announcements from Anthropic. And I love the VO3 videos have blown my mind.
25:08AI mode. I know it's not in Europe yet, but that as a potential chat GPT challenge, I think is really, really cool. Anthropics, Opus and Sonic models could vibe coding actually work. Then I saw also that in the UAE, the government is offering free access to chat GPT Pro to all citizens. And then that made me think, should Europe be doing something like this? Should AI learning, be a compulsory at school. But there's been a plethora of big tech, very impressive announcements. I'm not quite sure where to start. Mads, what would you focus on first? Where would you pick this up? I think we have to focus on the bellwether, which is NVIDIA.
25:49We touched briefly on some of the impressive results before. I mean, they delivered 44 billion of revenue in the quarter just ended up 12 % on last quarter. I mean, that's a$160 billion company that's growing as fast as a$100 million company. It's just unbelievable. They're neck and neck with Microsoft now for the most valuable company of the world. And that was a super strong quarter, even with China export controls that they said cost$2 to$3 billion in the last quarter. And even when they said that they thought the impact could be as much as$8 billion in the next quarter, the market is still super excited.
26:29And we've talked about at a macro level, kind of the longer term story about AI. The shorter term story is, if we go back six to 12 months, many people were questioning whether NVIDIA could keep growing. Is there enough workload out there to justify all the processor spend? And what's happened is that AI processing is exploding. Now, Google at Google I.O. revealed that they're processing nearly 500 trillion tokens a month. Now, what is that? Does that mean much? Well, I'll tell you, it's 50 times up on a year ago. So it's a 50-fold increase in the volume transaction of a volume that Google is processing.
Read the full transcript
27:09We don't have similar figures for NVIDIA because they don't process their own transactions. They sell the kit for others to do that. But Google is processing a lot on their own TPUs. And in some sense, they're a sign of what's happening everywhere across the industry and what's getting people so excited about continued NVIDIA sales. Reasoning is a big driver. Agentic workloads are big drivers. For anybody who has not been playing around with the reasoning models yet, I mean, they are just so powerful. That, I think, takes us directly to maybe the second thing here, which is when we talk about reasoning models, it's hard not to talk about Anthropik and the release of the Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 models that just came out.
27:50Why two models? Well, Sonnet is the everyday workout horse, whereas Opus is sort of the multi-hour agent that can take on giant code bases and research tasks. Opus 4 is said to be the first model that can fix code bases better than human reviewers. And one test at Rakuten saw the model take on a code base and operate autonomously for seven hours with no context drift, just fixing code and fixing issues. So it's just, it's incredible, right? You'd sort of, you take an AI, you unleash it there for a full day of work and it just goes off and does this thing. Yeah, you should see the, people should look at the benchmarking.
28:34I was having a quick look at the benchmarks and the task solving and the previous set were in the 40s and these benchmarks are in the 70s and 80s. It's quite incredible. Yeah. So Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, I mean, he's sort of come out and said, look, it's going to replace a whole lot of work that's being done today because these models are becoming so powerful so quickly. A couple of other interesting tidbits. So it's crossed Anthropic's own safety checks from ASL 2 to ASL 3, meaning that it's at a level now, Opus 4 specifically, where it's so sophisticated that they sort of feel, well, we need to provide next level guardrails and checks around the model to make sure it's not used for nefarious purposes.
29:21It's by far the most expensive model out there today. Sonnet 4, and that's the cheaper model, kind of the everyday workhorse. It's nearly as good as coding. for assist at the price. So kind of you have your super duper agentic, send me off for hours at a time, Opus model, and then you have kind of the more day-to-day and model you can use for everything. Very powerful. Now, there's still text-first models. I mean, they are okay, they are multimodal, but Google and OpenAI still win when it comes to processing images and kind of some of the multimodal work. When it comes to text only, it's really tricky to beat the anthropic, they're very, very strong.
29:58Can you tell your reflections on that before we circle back to Europe again? What was the blackmail thing, Mads? Was it somebody was threatening to not use an anthropic model and then the model tried to blackmail the code? Yeah. A safety engineer was threatening to shut it down and it had then gone through his email and found some signs of some affair he was having and said, should I email, talk about - Email your wife. Yeah, sues the over-in accounting or whatever it was before you think about shutting me down. So yes, I mean, to some extent, there's a little bit of tongue in cheek around some of the stuff, but the models are just becoming really, really good at combining different things.
30:45And this is back to reasoning, which has been a sea change in the last 12 months. The thing that makes me fizz the most is how all this will affect the application layer and obviously what's going to happen for startups in Europe and the investing world in Europe. I mean, not going to take it in a massive direction, but it's an observation, which is, so this is like, it's staggering. What Mads has just talked us through and what we're reading and seeing with the advances in AI at the big tech level, what does this mean? for yeah for the application level but what's going for what's for us on the ground the decisions that we make as investors early stage at the seed stage for founders and decision for entrepreneurs and founders like starting and or growing new businesses where suddenly they're seeing you know the amount of i i don't know i'm not you guys but the amount of companies i've seen in the last 12 months that are building something that has just had their lunch completely eaten by one of the big tech companies.
31:43Like, how does this, it's an evolving, almost day-to-day landscape that I don't remember a period of investments quite so fluid as this in terms of what I'm seeing, you know, which we've obviously seen these companies grow incredibly fast out of nowhere, but you know, the risk that they could become obsolete very, very quickly. The shifting sands are, for me, staggering at the moment. And I'd love to hear what you guys are kind of seeing and doing on that. But it's just an observation. If it is, it's, think about normally big tech is not so dynamic. Like normally you're kind of the big, the incumbents are kind of slow and releases take ages and whatever.
32:24Like the dynamism we're seeing up here. I mean, you know, we're seeing even more dynamism at the lower level, which is what you would expect. But it's, it's, it's, it feels a very, everything feels in a way like both very robust because you're seeing things like very impressive and fast and big numbers, but everything's very fragile at the same time. It'll take some time, I think, to layer down into the application layer is my take. The other thing that really intrigues me is what this means for tech founders, what this means for founders building product, because you can vibe code, you can spin up products on a weekend you could spin up features on a weekend so this this velocity and cadence of of product release which therefore will mean we'll need how do we then think about going to market raising capital owning market share so this opens up this whole spectrum of what's going to happen to what was taking months to years to build viable product to go to market to solve x is now taking days and weeks and will this mean more niche products will this mean that we we won't get so many monopolistic behemoths will we still will one big monopolistic beast roll up all of these kind of smaller vibe coded launch things this is what's going on in my head so what's happening with technical founders what's happening on the product side what's happening with how we're solving problems also what's going to come in house is sass dead are all these sass products It's going to be brought in-house because non-technical teams within organizations can spin up their own environments and build their own things.
34:02So I have no answers to any of your questions, Lomax. Interestingly, we talked earlier last year that Klarna laid off a bunch of people to start using more and more AI in its business. It's now sort of halted. It's rolled back that policy, right? So even that is kind of changing, right? We're in Jevons paradox territory, aren't we? could we hire more people to do more because jevon's paradox is in play i mean i i genuinely don't know it's gonna be a fascinating a fascinating thing i want to ask you guys is this so we have a we had a guy involved in our investments a few years ago who always used to ask the question every bloody time you know why doesn't go why couldn't google just build this and it was all there was a standard vc question isn't that what i know but this was on our internal investment committee so obviously you know we'd slightly got a quite we we at least got past that point right but but we had this discussion every single time now i sometimes i look at what these companies are rolling out and i'm like well actually sometimes i'm i'm sort of the incumbent risk is is is more of a worry to me than it ever was i don't know how you guys think about this particularly in your software world i'm you know obviously investing in slightly funkier hardware companies and biotech companies but how do you think about that at the moment I think you follow the money.
35:19I mean, just look at what they're doing. You know, in the three most sophisticated AI companies in the world, it's, you know, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. Okay, so OpenAI, they just bought Windsurf for$3 billion. If it was that easy to make software, why would they spend$3 billion on Windsurf? Google has just bought WIS for$33 billion. If it was that easy to make software, why would they spend$33 billion? You could hire a lot of Google engineers. I know they're expensive. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, and that was like a third of the cash on that balance sheet. I mean, it was like a better company almost deal kind of thing.
35:53So it turns out that, you know, Vitecoding is amazing at making prototypes, but if you got to do something that's industry grade, you know, you don't want to release a Vitecoder app with all the security bucks and issues into the world. Yeah. And yes, the tools keep getting better and better, but every time we have new tools, we have new problems. I just saw the other day that Google is now saying that cracking the Bitcoin algorithm is a lot closer. than everybody thinks because of quantum. You know, that's going to create a whole new slew of problems. I mean, think about having to rewire, you know, cracking Shor's algorithm, right?
36:26Having to rewire the whole world of cryptography. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So there's... I would have no problem if Bitcoin died. I would have no problem if Trump's meme coin just suddenly got cracked tomorrow and all the wallets were emptied. I would have no problem with that personally. Well, sort of, you know, put that to one side. I just think there will keep being technical problems that we need to solve. Yeah, there will be. I don't think that's going to go away. But I think the point where you're absolutely both right is the level and rate of disruption is just incredible. So you really have to stay on top of your game all the time.
37:02You have to be super nimble, both move fast and think strategically, which is, I mean, I think it's part of what makes it so exciting. I agree. It feels like we're going to be leaning much more into the commercial and go-to-market aspect. I don't know if you both agree with that, but it feels like founders are going to have to really think about owning market now with these levels of disruption. So that I think is very, very interesting for us as investors. I was just saying going back to Europe for a minute, because, you know, we're sitting here talking about, you know, EU startup acts and kind of our various regulatory initiatives.
37:35It's clear that the large US firms are firing on all cylinders. Jesus wept. I mean, it's just, I mean, it's just unbelievable. We've never seen anything like it. I just talked about this frigging EU report, like 10 billion, whatever. It's like, seriously, it's just a joke. It is a little bit, right? At the same time, China - Fair off not saying anything. China is performing extremely well. China now has four open source, state of the art, frontier level AI models. Okay, so where does that come from? And this is with export controls. This is with all the restrictions that have been put up. So the Chinese are absolutely hammering it on AI.
38:21And so it's clear that historically in Europe, we've been a little quicker to regulate, not always as quick to innovate. I think Mistral had a good running for it. And they did some nice innovation last year. They've just been sort of overtaken by the Chinese. So we've got to wake up. I think it's clear that GDPR has caused issues for Europe and not just for startups. I don't know if you saw the German army, kind of the Germans, they're talking about remobilizing and kind of becoming more serious about this stuff. They say they're not able to find their reservists because GDPR prevented them from keeping contact details from former soldiers.
39:05so they can't contact people that were previously in the army because they don't know where they are. It's bonkers. There we go. Totally bonkers. It is bonkers. AI Act, we've seen that there are talks about watering it down, postponing, delaying. I think there is a realization that we need to shift gears, but I come back to what I said before. It's the sense of urgency. It's us talking about stuff we should do in 26 or 27. Folks, it's happening right now. so we really need to get our speedos on and get cracking. I think like, you know, just I was thinking, you know, like sometimes you can take for granted that the US primacy in various, you know, technology, biotechnology, et cetera.
39:49But actually like that stuff, they think about this stuff. They think about, you know, the way that we talk about Europe, like there's a really good piece by Eric Schmidt that he put out in Time Magazine this week about biotech, basically saying, look, you know, We used to produce 40 % of the world's semis. It's now down to 10%, 15%. We've lost primacy in that area, right? You've got a video on the chip, fabulous kind of chip company, but they've lost primacy and now they're trying to do something about it. The article in his case was around biotech and how the US is at risk of losing its top position there to China, right?
40:25They have to constantly fight internally in the US to maintain the position they have. And so it's not just something that happens. You take it for granted. It needs work and these initiatives. And I find that the EU sort of does stuff, but probably focusing on the wrong things and not being as optimistic or as expansive about it. So that was just an interesting thing that I read this week. I mean, I guess, what can you say if you're trying to be optimistic about the EU? I mean, TSMC have just announced that they're building the big chip design facility in Munich. So that's great. As you look at the numbers, Europe is obviously woefully similar to those numbers about US, you know, semiconductor manufacturing.
41:07Europe was probably, it was around 40 % in 1990 of global chip manufacturing is now down to like 5, 10%, right? But actually chip design, you know, obviously we've got arm holdings in Europe, like chip design, Europe is not so bad at. It's more like 15, 20 % of global market. And actually it's great to see a facility like this. And quoting our friend Hansel from Zoolander, right? isn't Munich so hot right now, just generally. You know, like Apple have put, you know, a big 2 billion research facility there. You know, the Munich Security Conference now is like absolute like central part of the global calendar.
41:42You know, we're seeing, you know, quantum systems recently raise money. You know, there's a really big, I think there's lots going on in Munich at the moment, which makes it very, very interesting place. So it was good to, it was good to see that if I had to pick out some kind of macro, like important tech infrastructure news that was probably it well let's see how it unfolds the other um thing that caught my eye this week i'm sure it caught yours was the the johnny ive sam altman loving so it's not really what's the video oh i i i struggled through the video um there was lots of there was lots of windy walks down san francisco streets if you haven't seen it Yeah, I've been trying to understand how it all fits together, what the strategic play is here.
42:28And it feels like actually getting to know Sam Altman a little bit through his writing and watching him on YouTube is that there probably isn't much of a strategic play. It's a bit more of an experimentation. But they've got together. So OpenAI has bought IO, which is a team of 55 or so people out of Love From, which is Johnny Ive of Apple fame and iPhone and MacBook Pro fame. His design studio for$6.5 billion in pure stock. So no cash, pure stock. So it's quite an unusual thing. It's not the whole of Love From. It's just the team within, the product team within. and they're being very cagey about what hardware they're building.
43:13So could it be a pendant or a humane style pin or is it going to be a phone? Although Sam Altman is very keen to get us away from screens and handsets. Is this going to be a natural next step evolution for foundational teams? Is this really just an experiment? Well, there are lots of speculation about form factors and use cases and what exactly this device is going to be. I'm not good at anything to that, but I do think there is a sign that Sam Altman, he's thinking beyond the models themselves. If we think sort of models to applications, which we've talked about a lot, to hardware with built-in applications, then I think it's potentially a bet that the form factor or the form factors that we've seen, we had the form factor of the 90s and the 90s, which was the PC, and that was the Microsoft era.
44:02and then we've had the form factor of the last 15 years, which was the phone. So that was sort of the Apple and to some extent Google era and that they could make way for the next form factor. And I think Sam, he wants to take Apple head on and he wants to build a trillion dollar company. And I think this is part of that strategy. So you're saying he might not know exactly what the device is or should be or whether it's a real thing yet or an experiment. But I certainly think that the idea here is to dethrone Apple as a trillion dollar company. Well, seeing Tim Cook as an accountant running Apple has been extremely distressing with Apple Vision Pro nonsense and more and more derivative models of iPhone.
44:48It's like maybe they're creating their own space in the market. Lomax, what do you reckon? I think it's, I don't have a lot to add on, on, as Perlman said, on the form factor discussion. But what I would, it has made me reflect this. So it's an interesting tie-up and I'm interested to see what they come out with. I'm sure it'll be both beautifully designed and highly functional. It has sort of made me think because I've been quite blinkered, I'd have to say, in terms of assuming that the form factor would be the glass to the, you know, potential contact lens kind of going down. I was maybe very one channel on that aspect, thinking we go from the meta Ray-Ban glasses, you know, actually Google have just announced these Android glass devices, you know, sort of rebooting the Google Glass from 10 years ago.
45:44I sort of assumed we had this sort of fusion. I've still got mine in my drawer here. I've got my original Google Glass in my bottom drawer. I basically assumed that we would have this fusion of AR, so not all mixed reality, should I say, mixed reality and AI, and you would have kind of one device and it would be glasses and you'd walk down the street and you could talk to it and it could give you the kind of questions that you now, when you talk to your laptop and open our, whichever model gives you the answer. So I sort of, I'd kind of been on that track. You know, obviously we had Humane and this Rabbit R1 device, but that both both slunked right but it's very interesting to see how can i go in this direction and and so we'll see um i you know i still i hope it's not a pendant i still think there's a i still think mixed reality is a category is is going to be a big thing but actually that you know now i'm looking at this like there is a world in which it could be bypassed and the you know device is something different so that's a very kind of made me made me think and otherwise i think it's a the video was a bit nauseating great to see as an Englishman great to see a Brit who's you know obviously done amazing things since leaving these shores and at the same time as Steve Hilton now who's um another Brit who's now running for um governor of California right so you know the Brits in California are you know doing doing wonderful things I I sincerely hope it's not a pendant I don't I'm not with you on the glasses front I think anything that is between human interaction i can't see being more than a a utility i don't see it being the next form factor although that was my point that was my point dan i said i still think mixed reality will be a big category but i'm not saying it's going it may not be that the thing as ubiquitous as the iphone you know for example and it may be another another form factor what's happening with you fine gentlemen this week i i have lunch with ekaterina zarieva who's the startup research and innovation commissioner from the eu she's coming coming to the uk uh next week so i'll be out for lunch with her which i which will be interesting what's um what's happening with you lomax what's uh what's on your agenda well look the weather out here in lisbon is stunning at the moment um the builder has now done our office the the painting is being finished we're in yeah we're in The meeting rooms are done.
48:10We haven't got showers yet, but I've been surfing quick 40-minute sessions and my lunch breaks twice this week. So this is a great place to come and work. So you guys, please come. Please come. It's looking awesome. And last night, we actually hosted a dinner for founders who have exited their company for more than 100 million in Lisbon, of which there are actually quite a few. So we had a really, really nice private dinner. So it was a really, really interesting discussion. And one thing I've noticed about Lisbon, actually, it's a bit of a hub for exited founders, because, you know, which makes sense.
48:44You exit your company, come and live in a nice place, you know, so there's more and more people coming here, which is interesting. And can I do my deal of the week? Do it. Go for it. So this is actually a massive one, I think. You know, we talk about unicorns and whatever, but an Irish company called Bright Flag has sold for 425 million, which is an amazing exit. They only raised 35 million. So the cap table probably was relatively clean, raised Series B. Seed round in, I think, 2016, backed by our friends at Frontline. So a huge, you know, congrats to them. And it's an all-cash deal. And yeah, it's not the$33 billion Ways acquisition, whatever.
49:23But, you know, as we talked about before, the European ecosystem is that much more immature than the U.S. And these kind of half a billion dollar exits are really, really big things. And, you know, Ireland, as an app for the Irish tech ecosystem, it's a massive exit. So that money will flow back into funds, into founders, et cetera, et cetera. So all really, really good stuff. And it's legal tech as well. I mean, that's quite a tough space to play into. You know, as always, like boring stuff is good. This is not like legal tech in the sense of like Harvey AI. This is kind of relatively boring kind of software to in-house legal departments for practice matter management, et cetera.
50:02I love boring. Bring on the boring. Boring is great. It attracts fewer entrepreneurs and less competition and that kind of thing. So it's often overlooked. But it's not part of this sort of very hypey, you know, let's replace lawyers with LLMs kind of game, which is potentially a thing. But I'm sure we'll see some blowups there because it's probably too much optimism. But this is a very like, there's 27 million ARR business. You know, this is like, from what I could tell, this is a, you know, serious, credible SaaS company that has had a big exit. So congrats to those guys. That's my deal of the week.
50:33And welcome to the frontline team. Mads, what are you out about this week with the girls? What else is on your agenda? Next week, we've got the big private Marcus Jamboree is taking place in Berlin. It's super venture and super return time. So the whole European world of private equity and venture capital are heading to Berlin. And while they do that, we are heading up to Cambridge. bridge so instead of spending time talking to all the other investors we're going to host 30 amazing startup teams there and uh you'll run a great one day accelerator on monday which i very much look forward to that's cool so actually everyone on this fall that we're all we're all protesting with our feet and not going super towards the whole in whole industry everyone in my whatsapp which is all going to berlin we all know that it's a great place to catch up with people and it's not the best place to raise money, quite frankly.
51:30And so, interesting. Yeah, I'm working. I think it's the real work. Well, I'm coming out of Lisbon, sort of. Peace. Gents. Yes. What a gift. What a pleasure. I'll catch you next week. See you then. Bye-bye. Bye. Bye. Tear down this wall. It's more than just an alliance. This is a union of values. Let's start acting. Acting. Acting, acting, acting, acting.
From the publisher
In this episode,
, Lomax, and
reunite to talk about the stories behind the headlines - Trump’s tariffs, EU’s sluggish startup strategy, the Anthropic surge, and why Europe’s hardware design hopes might rest on Munich.
From missiles interrupting pool time in Tel Aviv to Nvidia’s record-breaking quarter, the crew tackles everything from macro trade wars to micro founder incentives—plus a healthy dose of sarcasm, realpolitik, and startup survival.
Here’s what’s covered:
- 04:30 Tariffs, trade wars & what it means for European startups
- 08:15 Harmonization vs. regulation: Why EU/US divergence matters
- 10:55 Tariffs & inflation: Why macro still rules the game
- 13:10 The public/private schism and bond market dismay
- 21:45 The EU startup plan: blue carpets, unicorn labs & old ideas
- 26:00 Talent, tax & the fight for Europe's future founders
- 29:30 Why Munich might be Europe’s next deep tech capital
- 31:00 Big tech flexes: Google, Anthropic, and the return of hardware
- 35:00 Vibe coding & SaaS disruption: The new normal?
- 41:00 AI agents, Nvidia blowouts, and the pace of change
- 45:20 Deal of the Week: Brightflag exits for $425M
- 57:00 Why the crew skipped SuperVenture to actually build stuff




