E582 | Alex Bakir, Norrsken Evolve: Resilience, Climate, and Building Europe’s Future

18 Sep 2025 · 53 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

EUVC Podcast Episode Notes: E582 | Alex Bakir, Norrsken Evolve: Resilience, Climate, and Building Europe’s Future

Episode Overview In this episode, co-hosts Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva welcome Alex Bakir, General Partner at Norrsken Evolve, a newly established €57 million pre-seed fund. The discussion revolves around Bakir's journey, the challenges in fundraising, and the innovative approach of Norrsken Evolve in supporting resilient and sustainable startups in Europe.

Key Themes

  • Background of Alex Bakir
  • Early life influenced by Iraqi-English heritage.
  • Education in climate science at Cambridge and work at the World Bank and Climate Change Capital.
  • Experiences from the clean-tech crash of 2008 shaped his current perspectives.
  • Fundraising Journey
  • The arduous process of raising the fund took 18 months, illustrating the difficulties faced by emerging managers in the current climate.
  • The narrative shifted from climate buzzwords to a focus on realism and industry needs, emphasizing resilience.
  • Fund Structure and Strategy
  • Norrsken Evolve's unique approach includes:
  • Investing in 80 companies with initial ticket sizes of €250K.
  • No board seats taken, emphasizing an automated approach to follow-ons.
  • A sprint model for collaboration that fosters in-person engagement among founders.
  • Investment Focus
  • Targeting sectors related to a carbon-free economy, future infrastructure, and health technology.
  • Emphasis on "mission-driven" founders who have experience and an evident purpose.

Episode Breakdown 01:38 - Alex’s Path

  • Discusses his upbringing, education in climate science, and early career experiences at the World Bank and Climate Change Capital.

04:30 - Lessons from the Cleantech Crash (2008)

  • The impact of macroeconomic factors on investment viability and the importance of modeling recession effects.

07:19 - Why This Time is Different

  • Current considerations include energy security, supply chain challenges, and a shift towards realism in industrial strategy.

10:31 - Fundraising Challenges

  • Transition from a target of €40M to €57M and the difficulties encountered in the fundraising process.

12:36 - Mistakes & Pivots

  • Discussion of previous naivety in pursuing a global strategy versus a Europe-first resilience approach.

15:50 - LP Profiling

  • Importance of local anchors and validation in gaining institutional backing.

19:00 - The Trough of Despair

  • Reflecting on the challenges of fundraising in a competitive environment.

22:11 - The "Funky" Model

  • Overview of the fund's strategy: 80 small bets, automated follow-ons, and no board seats.

26:06 - Sprint Model

  • Description of the six-week in-person collaboration model focused on founder engagement.

31:22 - Investment Focus

  • Emphasis on the carbon-free economy, infrastructure innovations, and the future of Europe.

40:57 - Founder Fit

  • Ideal founder characteristics: experienced, mission-driven individuals.

Key Takeaways

  • Resilience Over Buzzwords: The shift away from vague climate language to concrete discussions about resilience is critical for attracting investment.
  • Innovative Fund Structure: Norrsken Evolve’s structure challenges traditional VC norms, focusing on a high volume of small investments and automated follow-on strategies.
  • Founder-Centric Approach: The emphasis on interpersonal relationships and founder collaboration is seen as essential for the success of the startups.
  • Long-Term Perspective: Bakir's insights reveal that despite challenges, there is a belief in the long-term importance of climate tech and resilience in Europe.

Conclusion Alex Bakir's insights provide a nuanced understanding of the current European venture landscape, particularly in the realms of sustainability and resilience. His experiences highlight the importance of adaptability, realism, and focus on founder engagement in shaping the future of venture capital in Europe.

For more insights and updates on European VC, follow the EUVC podcast at [eu.vc](https://eu.vc).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00What if building the world's largest constellation of space cameras was the easy part? Creating the world's largest constellation at the time of space cameras, we could just call it what it is, was way easier, actually, than getting this done. For 18 months, Alex Bakir fought to close Norskin Evolve's$57 million fund. There were moments when even he wasn't sure. It took us 18 months to get to that moment, where even earlier this year, I was like, I don't know if we'll get this done. But behind the struggle was a deliberate choice to abandon climate buzzwords for something more real. So you need to talk about things in more meaningful ways than that.

0:33So we very quickly developed like a dual narrative of talking about what's going on in Europe, where all our resources come from, the fact industry needs to change. The result? A fund structure that breaks every traditional VC rule. So 80 companies is a lot of that, right? 250k, cool. So we're not a material owner on the cap table. No board seats, no gut decisions, just one automated rule for follow-ons. So that becomes our follow-on strategy, right? We're not really thinking about it. It's very automated. Because in a world where Europe needs rebuilding, relationships still matter most. Emotional bonds get forged in reality, and we have found that we give the most value if we're with you for some weeks.

1:10Discover the contrarian playbook that turned 18 months of uncertainty into Europe's most oversubscribed emerging manager story, and why 80 small bets might beat traditional venture wisdom. Join us for the full conversation on the EUVC podcast.

1:27Before we start the show, a quick note. If you're building or running a fund, you know it takes the right partners. At EUVC, we only work with sponsors we truly believe should be part of your tech stack. Please do take a moment to hear about them. And if you do, reach out, mention EUVC. It's the best way you can support what we do. Thank you so much. First up, Ace Alternatives. Every fund manager needs clean operations behind the scenes. From fund admin to tax and compliance, Ace handles it all across VC, PE, private debt, and real assets. They're trusted by some of the best investors in the world.

2:01and if you want peace of mind and a scale ready back office, Ace should be part of your stack. Finding deals and managing your portfolio is at the heart of running a fund. Synaptic helps you discover startups before others do and Portfolio IQ keeps your portfolio data sharp and ready for LPs. Together, they're essential tools for modern fund managers. When it comes to legal, you need a team that truly knows venture. Hainspoon supports LPs, TP, startups and scale-ups across the full fund lifecycle. Smart managers make Hainspoon part of their stack. we have two at EUVC. Tech BBQ. Oh my god, who doesn't love barbecue?

2:36Europe's startup scene meets the loudest, friendliest family reunion ever at Tech BBQ. From Nordic founders to global VCs, this is where ideas catch fire and relationships get real. If you're building or backing in Europe, Tech BBQ is where you want to show up. And hey, if you've got a big fun announcement coming up, want to hit the headlines or just want to tell you a story about, do reach out to us because we'd love to help and we've got some pillar partners to help you get in the right media places they've held us land bloomberg cnpc financial times forbes and many more for the euvc summit and we'd love to do the same for you

3:12tear down this wall it's more than just an ally this this is a union of values of values Let's start acting, acting, acting. This show is not investment advice, and the hosts of this episode may be invested in the funds and companies featured. Today, I am talking with Alex Bakir, general partner at Nuchen Evolve, the brand new 57 million euro pre-seed fund spot out of the legendary Norskin family of funds, I was about to say. Together with Johan Adby and Rebecca Lötmann-Röder, Alex is doubling down on impact-driven founders, building Europe's resilient and sustainable future. They have some backing from friends we all know, EIF, Sam & Mass, SmartCab, and operators like Tavit Henrikus and Sten Tamk Ivi, who we of course also know from Plural.

4:03The fund is already supporting startups tackling everything from climate resilience to bio and health tech. And this is very much an exciting episode for me. Tell me, Alex, how did you come to be? Oh, my God. Where do you want to start? I mean, we were just talking, where's my name come from? So start with day zero. I'm half Iraqi, half English, but was brought up in England. So when people want to talk about impact, which I really care about, for me, that meant, okay, so my dad's side of my family is trying to get out of Iraq right now. when I was a kid in the 1990s. And he's not here and he's dealing with that.

4:42So like this whole like the world is safe, the world is secure, like the post-World War II European construct is one that's like enduring. Major questions on all of that, you know? Like I think the world has a tendency of like surprising everybody. So that's sort of how I was like brought into the world. With all immigrant families, like education, right? How do you improve your lots in the universe? It's education. So my dad was really, really, really smart. I turned out being like somewhat smart and managed to eventually find my way to Cambridge University, where I studied like a lot of like climate science, actually.

5:18And I was like, wow, we are. That's not science, though, because it has science in it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I've read lots of papers that were hard to read. Let me put it that way. Beyond my mental capacity, for sure. And then this was like 2001. Right. and it was very very very very very clear that we were sort of screwed and we'd known this for a long time and this is 2001 and so i was like why are we not doing anything about this you know like young idealist like activist oriented i was like we got to work together we got to like hold hands and like fix this problem it's got to be an international level like i need to work on that and so i ended up finding my way into like the world bank as my first job right doing like big energy projects on a national scale.

6:03And I lasted less than a year in that job. It's super important. I think this stuff should happen. It was just a very bad fit for me, personally. And I was a little bit downhearted at what was happening. So I quit. I had one of those fancy two-year whatever-it-is things. And then there was this fund in London that got raised called Climate Change Capital in the mid-2000s. Billion dollars into climate stuff, 2005. So I was like that thing that looks like a thing that I should really get involved in right it's kind of what we're doing over here but maybe a little bit more like fast cutting edge commercially driven so I just bugged them for ages until they gave me a job so I wound up in London at this billion dollar fund I was very junior with some awesome people literally doing in my lifetime the first like wave of sort of like clean technology investment right so that was kind of how I arrived at yeah into my mid-20s let me put it that way tell me then navigating through that time because everyone like cleantech clearly took a took a hit and i'm sure that that has given you a bunch of learnings both like and maybe you can also contrast that or liken that to what some would say that we're going through right now yeah i mean cleantech died in 2008 right officially 2009 but it died in 2008 um that word anyway or however you describe stuff that would you know address problems in the energy system all that kind of stuff um the billion dollar fund ended up dying right eventually and that that can happen it turns out um but the the optimism in like the 2005 to 2008 period was insane like the stuff going on was insane the money being made was actually insane like the first kind of carbon credits are out there that kind of stuff So I had like the education of the up and the down of that.

7:56The learnings were that even the best investment thesis is probably going to get messed up by macro. The key learning actually from that period was no one had modeled what would happen in a recession to all this climate stuff. And you have things like energy prices, commodities prices, carbon credit prices. No one had modeled it. And when it hit, obviously, it was bad. And all these assets went to like nominal value, kind of on the pound because we were dominating GBP. And that was a real lesson. Like macro can and will turn against you. And I had this expensive apartment in like central London.

8:31I said, what am I doing here? Like, how do I? No jobs, right? All the finance jobs. Everyone's walking out their buildings with little boxes. So I kind of talked to a few people and I said, I need to hide for a couple of years because this economy is not good. So I applied a business school and actually went out to Stanford. That took me to California for about a decade, which, yeah, lots of learnings in that decade, too. But then, like, to answer your question, yeah, we're finally back in a world where everyone recognizes that there's loads of problems, right? Those problems are getting worse, by the way.

9:04And now everyone's talking about it's got to make economic sense, right? It's got to stand on its own two feet. Yeah, like, we've sort of known that since 2008. That's not like a new revelation in any way. It's like a very logical thing to think about. no one actually cares unless it's very real and material for them and solves like real problems at prices of that so like we're there and like that that said we did have a green premium and that said we did have maybe some investments that were more founded on regulation and yeah good good tailwinds and so on rather than buyers no matter what is going on in the world and whatever regulation requires like where yeah like very few of the people that lived through the 2008 2009 were around you know like it's almost like our our like in our collective memory is so short it's like what's happening now cool this looks good but anyone that was around at that time saw all that happen already right and so it's already very clear for me that anything reliant on like a green premium a carbon price that's just not a sensible thing to do right yes you need to make some stuff that hopefully is reducing emissions but like this just needs to make sense so like the whole like re-revelation of that like i really hope we remember it next time around you know because it's like yeah what makes you comfortable to double down on climate in the current market like why is it you're saying this is not 2008 again it is actually it is actually different and tell me this is why it's different yeah i mean the world is like super scary you know Right.

10:41If I look, so I have a like I have a master's degree in international relations and economics as well. And like the world is really scary. You haven't seen like this kind of isolationism, nationalism, tariffs, non-trade barriers, supply chain stuff. None of like the fear of like globalized conflict is as high as it's been. Right. Since 1920. Everyone can see that. That has like super real effects on how companies are making decisions. Right. What supply chains make sense. Right. Where should your materials come from? How do we think about our cost basis? All that stuff. And the fact is, Europe has been sort of dependent on Russian gas and imported hydrocarbons since World War II and the discovery of the Gawa oil field in Saudi Arabia.

11:24That's like when I was doing international relations, we were building the pipelines across Europe being like, oh, yeah, this is good. No problem. Let's just ship all this gas over here. So our raw material supply stuff is not really within anyone's control, right? Or not within our control. Your business, if it's based here, has like zero ability to substitute out of that in a real way. And I think people, because of the general really scary nature of the economy and the relationship between all the nations around us, people are just taking that seriously. Like, cool, if we want to have a business that thrives in this environment, guess what?

11:59Europe doesn't have these like fossil based resources outside of like a few remaining North Sea gas fields. So if we want everything to work and the power to be on and the materials to flow and the industry to flourish, it makes sense that we shouldn't be using stuff that's based on that. Right. And so that automatically brings like this like next wave of development into a logical place where it's like, cool. So we need other ways to do that. And guess what? Most of those ways are going to be like low greenhouse gas emissions. So we're in like a realist world. I kind of love that. Right. We're not in this utopian place.

12:31things are very real it's about numbers about supply chains about materials it's about you know quote-unquote rebuilding europe so that for me we haven't been in this environment before this is super super different from 2050 and super super different from 2008 that being said you know we already talked about like our lessons learned tend to not stick around so let's see tell me alex because now you've been on the fundraising trail you've raised 57 million you actually got significantly above what you first planned. Congratulations on that, obviously. It's not what everyone is experiencing in climate right now.

13:08Traction is not the word that I hear from people most often. Tell me, what do you think kind of allowed you to get the catch-up effect or get the ball moving for the fundraise? Yeah, yeah, yeah. So let me start with, I've never done this before, right? It's not like I have anything to compare it to. So for me, that was just a normal thing. When I compare it to other people, other people's experiences, everyone's having a really hard time. And ours, I thought like, this is quite hard. Just as background, I worked at a space technology company called Planet Labs for like five years, where we built the world's largest constellation of Earth imaging spacecraft about this big with cameras in them, took pictures of everything.

13:45So putting, creating the world's largest constellation at the time of space cameras, we could just call it what it is, was way easier, actually, than getting this done. Just to put it into perspective, I was like, this feels hard, right? I feel like I've done hard things. This feels really hard. So I think we were really lucky in that we had no knowledge of what it should look like, number one. Number two, we had some really kind people that told us that we had like mud on our face. You know, like feedback is so important to everything we do. So just knowing how we're coming across when we talk to investors or LPs was really, really important.

14:22And we got some super solid feedback, like very, very early on. Like, this is not going to work, guys. Like, we like you, but here are a bunch of problems. So we had to go and reflect on, okay, what is going to work? What do we believe in? And like, what is going to work and what's going to fly? Just double click on that. What were the problems that you were going to market with, or at least preparing to go to market with that you were told, this is probably not the right narrative or the right strategy? What was it that you had wrong in the beginning, so to say? Yeah, yeah. Really good question.

14:53So number one, we naively thought we could run a global strategy with first-time people. Clearly not a thing. And you can be told that very early on. And so awesome. Let's not do that. And I understand why that's a very bad thing to try to do. Second thing was, I mean, it was already very clear to me when we started. And this was a long, difficult process, right? It's been like two years in the making. The headlines always feel nice. but like the reality of everything that's meaningful is like quite horrible and messy underneath right so it was really clear to us about 24 months ago that climate tech is a buzzy thing that people are going to put money to doesn't work right so you need to talk about things in more meaningful ways than that so we very quickly developed like a dual narrative of talking about what's going on in europe where all our resources come from the fact industry needs to change and the fact that probably has to be quote unquote climate tech, green tech to get you there for materials, energy, et cetera.

15:49So we started using this word resilience really early on, right? So I want to be super clear, we don't do weapons, we're impact oriented. That word became like suddenly more and more exciting for people and has ended up in very weird places, if I'm honest with you. But we were kind of in that world 24 months ago when we kind of reoriented how we were talking about ourselves, just based on some stuff I was reading from the European Commission on, like, you know, critical raw materials and what that means for everything we do. Right. So we were quite a long way ahead of that curve behind the scenes, even if this fund gets launched into like its moment.

16:22Right. So we were lucky on that for sure. And then if I'm like totally honest with you, we were very blunt about things we'd gotten wrong in the past, things that didn't really work very well and how we would do things differently. And then people believed us eventually. Right. And it took a long time for people to start believing us. And we were super lucky to be able to do stuff in the meantime, right? We were in motion all the time. And that eventually came together. But it was super, super hard. And you need some early backers. We were talking offline about like this moment where momentum shifts.

16:54It took us 18 months to get to that moment where even earlier this year, I was like, I don't know if we'll get this done, Johan and Rebecca. Like, I think we will, but I don't know. And then the momentum shifts. And then suddenly you go into like, everyone wants to be in. And so there's a very fine line, I think, having an N of one to talk about. Yeah. Tell me now, but everyone's just the same. All of a sudden it's like it pops and it works. Tell me at the same time as everyone also says, oh, man, it's a struggle. Would you just keep going, going, going? And in the end, you end up crossing the finish line.

17:29Tell me a bit about LP profiling, because I'd be very curious on this. I imagine that you very quickly know who is a match and who is not. But I'd be curious if there's any pre-filtering before you actually have a call that allows you to gauge this or any questions that you felt or any signs in the first calls or even the first responses to emails that told you this is going to be worthwhile or let me go to the next one. But yeah, yeah. I mean, there's no reason for NLP to pick up the phone and talk to us in the beginning, right? At all. So I always kind of describe it as you got to remember that you're the pizza guy bringing a pizza no one has ordered to the door of a wealthy person that has just sat down to have his steak with his family.

18:16And you're trying to sell your pizza. Yeah, it's just irrelevant. You know, it's just noise. There's no signal. It's just noise. So how do you become Signal? For us, actually getting some brand names on board early was super, super, super important. We felt like, well, we need the local people to care about this. And if we can't get the local people to care about this, why should anybody else care? Because at least the local people in our orbit know us a little bit. And that's hard because everyone's over allocated. There's no money in the market. So we were lucky to start getting some million dollar commitments that made sense.

18:51The big turning point was actually meeting Tabernacle and Stand Plural. and what they're doing in Estonia, right? We are going to be part of what they're doing in Estonia as well. And there was just a very good connection there early on because Johan has built a couple of companies, raised 100 million. I've been an operator in some interesting companies. There's just like a vibe there that works very well, right? You can tell you're talking to, what's the right word, a similar species that has similar points of view about what's going on with the early stage companies, what founders need, et cetera.

19:20And we really do have a lot of focus on what founders need, which we should talk about, right? We do in-person stuff with founders in our fund, a lot of it. So that worked. And then suddenly you are like, you know, 10 % there, right? Then we were like... Talk about, before we go on, talk a bit about what's happening in Estonia and what the guys are doing there. Just because it's not everyone that's tuned into it, of course. Oh my God, this is super awesome, basically. So Tavit and Sten and Scala, which is sort of their background family office, are building the world's largest kind of entrepreneurial technology center, right?

19:57It's kind of like a quadrant of a city type scale. It's called the greenhouse in English. I'm not going to say it in Estonian, but it has a nice name in Estonian. I'm not going to butcher it. They really want to have world-class support for early stage companies in and around that ecosystem. So they came to visit us. they spent time with us while we're working with companies. And they were like, this is interesting. Like, how do we get you there? And we're like, well, invest in the fund. And they're like, cool, are you going to come there? And we're like, actually, at like a very small fund size, we can't really support it.

20:28And then they sort of leaned in and they're like, okay, how do we work together to make sure you guys have presence here? And I'm super, super excited about that whole project and whole ecosystem. But it's a huge project, a huge multi-year project, massive commitment to really building kind of Estonian, the Estonian tech universe ultimately. Okay. So then tell me, then that helped you, you got the first 10 % of the fund close, so to say. And then we went into like the trough of despair, right? Where, you know, it's very, very hard to get over allocated high net worth individuals into emerging managers, building a funky fund.

21:03And we should talk about our fund construction. It looks not normal, which was a huge problem for a long time and then it became a huge asset because it doesn't look normal um this trough of despair is like you're talking to everyone and everyone has a reason for no right yeah not this not that not x not y it's like very similar to if you raise from vcs and you just get the response back like traction or whatever right like it's not the full story you know it's not the full story it's just a way to filter and move on so we're like okay we probably need to get an institution here given this landscape how do we get an institution and the closest one to us was the Swedish institution, Saminvest.

21:39So we really, really worked hard to get them excited about what we're doing. And good news is they were local so they could come down to like the Norskan house in Stockholm and actually see us live and like be in and around what we're doing with founders. We run this year, like a six week sprint that is like not a school, but it's working with our portfolio because we believe the best way to work with portfolio is other founders and operators are likely going to be your best guides, actually. We have a very, very healthy skepticism for any kind of school classroom based style thing. So we managed to turn them, right?

22:12And we managed to turn them really with the help of like Rebecca, the third partner who is a career VC. Like she is incredible at venture capital, like great track record, worked at like top firms kind of in this ecosystem. So we actually expanded our team and we brought Rebecca. And we spent a long time before we made that decision to add a third person to the team. And then with her rounding out our skill set, I'm like an operator. Johan is a serial founder. We have a career VC here that has done loads of early stage in these sectors. That allowed us, along with lots and lots of hard work and lots of invites and lots of come hang out with us, come and look at this, come to here, listen to this.

22:51That allowed Sam Invest to gain confidence in us. And so once we had that, suddenly you go from 10-ish to 20, right? And now we're talking. Now people are starting to take you seriously because there is someone doing like real DD on kind of what you're up to. You know, there's like this institutional stamp, which we did not think we would be able to get, if I'm totally honest with you, because we're so early and like classified as emerging managers, how do you get an institution on board? The advice we give to our founders is sort of, they need to kind of fall in love with you a little bit. And so you need to make the opportunities for that to happen while really listening to the things that they don't like.

23:28So that was really, really important. Then let's go to another thing you've mentioned a couple of times. You said it's a pretty funky structure or it's a pretty funky strategy and we definitely did some things differently. Let's talk about that and the importance of what I often say to emerging managers is being different where it matters, but really not like being as vanilla as you can on the things that don't matter. Mm hmm. Yeah, I'm interested in your point of view on how this plays out. I'm not sure we've talked about it. So of the fund, we want to invest in 80 companies, 8-0 is the target in three years.

24:04A lot of companies, that's fast. Our initial ticket size is 250 ,000 euros, standardized ticket size. We do flex on terms because every company is different, by the way. You know, there isn't like a single thing that should be working. And you really don't want to mess up the cap table journey and dilution journey of companies sort of on a roll in the early days. So 80 companies is a lot of them, right? 250K, cool. So we're not a material owner on the cap table. What does that mean? We're not taking board seats, right? Actually, we can't take board seats because the portfolio is too busy. So no board seats.

24:38Follow-ons. So in our experiences, I've been in sort of VC twice. I also had a stint at a place called the Omidyar Network, which is the family office of Pierre Omidyar, which is my first job out of business school in California. It's where I met the space technology company, Planet Labs, which I joined and it goes on to IPO ultimately. So like following decisions, we have some experience of collectively. And we were like, cool, how do you even do that effectively with a large portfolio? And our conclusion was like, you can't. Right. And we'd been operating for a little while. So we had an existing portfolio.

25:10So we just sort of looked at it and said, what rule would have maximized return on follow-on allocation? And it turns out 50 % increase in last post money to new pre with a real VC leading it would have maximized return. So that becomes our follow-on strategy, right? We're not really thinking about it. It's very automated. We're very transparent. So loads of companies, no governance role, automated follow-on, right? That just raised so many questions. Was that superior to you having just done a bigger ticket in the first round? Great point. So no. And in the kind of experimental things we've been doing before that, our ticket size was 100 or 125.

25:52So we doubled it to increase return. But then you hit this point is like, well, do we want to be a big owner with that? Like we actually shouldn't be. so we're kind of balancing between how much do we own what brawl do we want to have and what makes sense for this company the nice thing about 250k is you actually join you're very collaborative actually it turns out like there's a lot of people in that world that want to work together before and you can you can get into much more interesting things actually with that with that level so it's been an advantage for sure but i wouldn't have necessarily known that right without actually actively trying and seeing what's going on with like one million raises three million raises what ticket sizes make sense.

Read the full transcript

26:30I get it 100%. And here it's another dynamic than return profile slash, you know, it's another dynamic than how do you maximize for returns that drives your strategy, which I think is important to note. And that is a good answer to not wanting to do a bigger ticket in the first round when you actually just have as a follow on strategy a rule and not that you double down on select companies that you pick. So that was very interesting to hear. It's also aligned with, I think, what the best investors say that unless you have a really good reason to be able to say you can pick in the follow on, then you're probably better off just making a bigger ticket in the first place.

27:15Yeah, I wish I talked to you two years ago. It would be really helpful to know that back then. We've sort of learned this along the way. Yeah. Well, it's just garbage that I know from others. So then tell me a bit more about this sprint model and the importance of having almost an accelerator type model. Yeah. So I'm going to start with, we don't believe in schools. Founders are really sophisticated. If you want to find out information, look at YouTube. It's awesome. You can always find anything you want. Y Combinator is great. So this is not a sit down classroom style thing. right that being said we work with companies so when we choose to invest we give we invest it's like here's 250k and then we're like now tell us what's actually going on because we know from our own experience that behind the curtain is probably a bit of a mess right and i'm being nice that all the things you're promising are probably not really there that's cool we're on your cap table we're on your side so let's have a real conversation about what the problems are like i don't want any of the sales stuff.

28:16So we do that immediately. And we start thinking about, okay, here are the problems, right? And then we want to bring them to come and work with us. And we want to bring them to come and work with us for some quite selfish reasons, I'm going to be totally honest, but and some quite like important reasons for that, right? Let's start with the selfish reasons. We're not a big owner on your cap table. You know, we need to we want to develop a relationship with you, right? We want you to really like us, and we want to work together with us, and come to us with all the bad stuff, right? And the good stuff, hopefully.

28:47And you can't substitute for that with video, unfortunately. Emotional bonds get forged in reality, right? And we have found that we give the most value if we're with you for some weeks, right? This year, it's six weeks in Stockholm. It's a tough sell. I'm not going to lie, right? Founders are like, why? I'm like, I need to be heads down. I need to be execution-oriented. So with us, it's like, cool. here's what we're going to work on together. Right. And by the way, if you come work with us, we have a very good network here driven by the houses, you know, the brand in general, us personally. And if you are thinking about building your pilot plant, guess what?

29:26Right. Semvision just built their pilot plant. Why don't you come over here, be with us? We'll talk with them. We'll go see it. Right. So it's really tailoring what they need with what we have around us and like being really, really diligent about that. And then, yeah, we also do like some sessions. I just did a class. I just did a session on like interpersonal dynamics, the number one Stanford Business School class I took 15 years ago, which is all about how should you be talking to each other? So stuff like that only really works if we're together. And then the hidden thing for the founders is that founders are smart.

30:00They really know what they're doing. Right. They've really thought through all of the things about their business. It's really helpful to be talking with and like right next to other people doing it differently or trying something else. So that dynamic is super powerful, super, super strong and creates just like loads and loads of information sharing immediately. There's no time loop, right? There's no I'm going to go and reach out or talk to this person that's there. And you know if this is working or not because they're going to tell you. And so this like network of alignment is super important.

30:28And we really focus on that. Right. If you come work with us, the point is like we're all helping each other from day zero. Right. There's like very basic things that need to happen and you need to buy into that ethos. And that accelerates everything. Tell me a bit about your view so far. Have you lost deals because of this dynamic? Have you seen several founders that, ah, there's no reason to even go there because they're going to say, well, I don't need that shit. Yeah. So to be totally honest, yes. Right. But the common point of losing a deal is actually a founder has taken a very big check from a VC that maybe has historically played elsewhere.

31:09And then they want to take like 95 % of that round. And that's really why deals get lost. A very big check from someone with a bigger fund kind of shows up and takes it. That's number one reason. Number two reason, you get into YC. Just the network effects of that. we are not able to at this point in our short existence able to compete with right so you lose that losing because you don't want to actually come here in the last few years like maybe one or two right but the point is we're probably not going to want to invest unless you actually want to work with us too so there's like probably an earlier stage filter for some of that and also if like you really don't value any of this then it's probably not going to be valuable so we're probably the wrong investor.

31:54There's a nice self-selection dynamic that happens when we talk to companies. Yeah. And there's, of course, a strong overlap with the people that get a big check and the people that honestly do not need this type of thing. Yeah. If you've built a billion dollar company before, chances are you're pretty clear on what needs to happen. Chances are your network is pretty strong and you've already done the work on this before you've gone to like talk to anybody. Let me go back to, now I want to ask about your investment strategy and what you focus on. And I want to bring it back to kind of where you started also, which was when we spoke about what is climate tech, what is resilience, and what is it not?

32:37Where do you focus? Where do you think the opportunities are? Where do you think that climate tech 2021 was? And you probably don't want to be today. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, I think we're still seeing some of the fallout. There's going to be chapters, right? There's like the North Vault chapter. There's the discreditation of the carbon market chapter. So I'm sure we're going to see some more. But what we care about, we are hardware software agnostic, by the way. It turns out that a lot of founders are very interested in building hardware that has AI-enabled stuff around it. So that's great. We love that as long as it's solving like a real problem, right?

33:11You need to be very clear on, great, we are doing underwater submarines because we want to make constellations of stuff and there's a real market for it. And we've already tested that to some extent and we know who's going to buy it and how much they would pay. So we really like hardware, but we will do software. We are very focused. I mean, I don't know if there's a better word for it, but like stuff that takes greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere or stops them being emitted. But also it's just a real business. Materials is a great example. We're seeing a lot of interest this year around graphite or graphene, all those types of materials, because you need it in supply chains.

33:46Do you see any macro risk or how do we evaluate the macro risk of carbon capture, carbon low emission type things being right now? The macro risk right now is all around closing. It's like realist, internal, looking at ourselves, supporting ourselves. I don't think that trend is really going to go away into ever changing the U.S. administration and what is happening in Ukraine and Russia actually plays out. So there is five years in time. Who knows what's happening? But if you look at cycles over time, they're not that quick. We're in a closing phase. So we're probably going to be in this closing phase for a while.

34:26So these kind of early signals we see are likely going to persist throughout the 10-year lifetime of our fund. Things might change in between. So I actually view the risk as not doing this as much more important. If you assume this is going away, I think that's much more risky than assuming it's going to stay, just because historically, this takes multiple years to roll through the system. we would never do anything because there's like a carbon price makes it profitable right there's this has to be well we're doing this thing but way better and it happens to be good for ghg emissions and much better if this is strategically important to industry in europe right like our populations are kind of getting older we're getting sicker we will look by the way at like healthcare stuff as well.

35:11We have done some bio and we will look at like security stuff too, because all this needs to work together. But the core of it is it needs to like not be messing up the climate as it scales and like impact, however you define it should be like very clear. Like it shouldn't be like a three-day discussion. It should be like, oh yeah, cool. If you do this, then great. We're not using this diesel powered thing and it's way more efficient for these reasons. So we believe you can do it. So that's like the core of it, right? It is very much what we've been doing, I think. I think it's just getting a lot more clarity on the types of companies that will be successful today.

35:46I have this nagging question or thought in my mind, which is none of us knows kind of where everything goes, but I'd be curious to understand how you think about where we stand today with the European landscape. Where will we go? because it's clear where the US ecosystem has gone and it'll probably stay there for a while. I feel like we are still having quite some persistence in Europe, actually more than I would have thought and maybe that I also think will remain. But I'd be curious where you see us. Are you seeing the smartest thought leaders, the smartest companies and the most important decision makers behind the scenes moving towards a less of a climate oriented approach?

36:44Or do you see them doing lip service to what's going on in the US, but actually they think this is here to stay and we got to double down? Yeah, no one cares about it. If there's a bucket that says climate, no, right? Turns out that bucket, a lot of stuff in it is just really important. right and makes economic sense for a lot of people where these technologies exist so it's just like i don't know vc i've sort of been in and around climate since 2001 right the problems don't go away right the problems with the grid aren't different like the problems with your feedstock being dependent on stuff coming out of going through like the straits of hormones it's not gone away right these just they get worse and worse and worse we have this like tendency to like I don't know that the ESG trend I'm a realist at heart I think the world is going to kill us right that's kind of my very my basic point of view on life on this planet and I think we would probably kill ourselves or if we don't the AI as well but so there's like there has to be very real material reasons why a thing is going to be valuable in the economy and I do 100 % believe that those a lot of those things not everything a lot of those things need to be dependent on different types of inputs, different types of processes.

38:00And then like the climate sucks, I've studied it, like this doesn't also go away, you're going to get more and more shocks, like insert this month's flood, like hurricane drought, right? I'm a big believer in chaos theory in a concept called self organized criticality, which is natural systems with inputs move to a place where they're on the edge of chaos. And chaos is like, have you read that read or watch the three body problem, right? It's bad. And like natural systems have a tendency to get right there. And then something big happens. So you're going to see these frequency of events going where people are looking for new solutions, frankly, right?

38:36Like the wildfires in LA, how many companies are now like caring about that and how many startups have popped up to like cut deal with that in various ways. So these problems have only ever got worse. And so our vocabulary we use for it, I don't care that much about. Call it climate tech. Call it like purple parrots. I don't really care. Let's point at the things going wrong and technology that can fix it while building massively scalable business at the same time. Have you seen the philanthropy bucket to this type of thing drain out completely or is it the same still yeah i mean like i think philanthropists or family offices right or the people thinking about doing good as well as making money or maybe not even making money they're like us now so like what do you care about what's on your mind but safety security like peace scared like we're scared of what's going on around us in europe We're not in a happy place.

39:37So should climate be the top of your Maslowian hierarchy of things you care about right now? Probably not, right? Probably not. And that's why you're seeing resilience has really been pulled over to this defense world, right? And we don't do weapons, but there's plenty of stuff that makes a ton of sense in terms of security, materials, monitoring, being aware of what's going on around us. All that stuff makes a ton of sense and is not weaponry. How do you lean on the resilience and climate discussion? How do you detach the two or split the two? Do you at all, do you kind of use resilience as a way for you to also be able to do stuff that maybe doesn't have much impact on climate, but it has a lot of impact on resilience?

40:26Yeah, we definitely will look at like health tech, right? We'll definitely look at like cyber, but it has to be real mean solving meaningful problems, right? That we really care about for our way of life. Let me put it that way. And so we will do stuff, but, you know, 20, 30 percent. We have a history of actually investing in like bio and health. We have quite a few portfolio companies that we still care about that. You know, there's a lot of us. We're all quite sick on average. You know, we are all aging at the same rate, but collectively getting older. So that has loads of repercussions. What happens in Tokyo when everyone has so much dementia happening in the population, they can't even know where to go and get their money from the bank, which is real problems happening in some Western societies today.

41:12So we care about all of that, honestly. And that is resilience as well. Tell me a bit about founders. Do you see founders still attracted to the climate nomenclature or climate mission, or is it more the resilience mission? Where do you see it? Do you see it as it's still important to them that they're aligned with you? Some people say, we're seeing that we're winning rounds that maybe couldn't before because we are European, because that aligns with the founders. You can talk a bit about that. Yeah, I mean, like founders are like unique species of things, right? Like very, very strange people that I love to bits, but very, very strange.

41:51What they care about most is like who they're working with, right? Right. So they have the thing they care about. They're building like they like us because they talk to us. We're like, yes, we share a lot of similarities. Now we think about the world. We'd love to work with you. Right. Or your experiences make a lot of sense to me. Wow. You built a space technology company or your hands built one of the largest vertical social networks. Right. That is the thing that resonates. We do want founders actually care about the future of the planet. We think that gives you very real benefits, not only just like the story, but like your own resilience.

42:23like why are you getting up today when the world is absolutely horrible and you're just getting bad news after bad news right like what's the point of you being here what's your bigger mission like what's your why and so we find that like founders that know that tend to be building in more meaningful areas and we really really like that like we really look for it actually which means they're often a little bit older we're not we're not really with like 18 year old vibe coding ai folks it's normally people that have had a round of the world and maybe been hit in the face and seen something that is really just wrong and know how to fix it or have a theory about going how to fix it.

42:57So founders, they're so smart, they follow the money, right? So if they need to put a different thing on the top of their slide, then they will, right? If they need to reframe what they're talking about, they'll do that quicker than we can. So everyone is constantly looking for like this edge about what makes them more appealing. And for us, it just comes down to, are you solving a real problem that aligns with our thesis. Are you incredible? Can we help you? Do you like us? Do you like us enough that you're willing to come hang out with us for a little bit and be in our network? And do you like us enough that you want to talk to other founders like you in the future?

43:31We really care about this kind of network of people. So that's when we win. And it's less about us, honestly. It's more about us and the other human. And do they like us and care about what we're saying. Alex, why did you go to pre-seed instead of seed? I have an issue with names, right? Like, I don't know. Let me put it like this. Why did you go to super early, super small ticket, high volume investing instead of slightly bigger tickets, slightly more progressed and more ownership and more concentration. Look, Rebecca showed us some papers that had been analyzing like 20 years of like returns.

44:15And it was pretty clear that the bigger portfolios actually did better, in our opinion, right? Like plus 50, maybe 200. So like, okay, that's awesome. So if we want a big portfolio, what can we actually achieve here? Like, how do we get to that? Right? And if this was our fund for and I had like returned to you like multiple X's, then maybe people would believe that we could deploy more well, right? But we're emerging managers. So how do we get to that place with founders that care and convince other people to give us enough money to do it? That's like the optimization. We also have a history of doing small tickets, right?

44:53So because of that, there is history. And like, if you've done it before, then you're automatically more credible. It's not hypothetical. It's like, okay, yes, they have deployed that way. We do see what the returns look like. So it's more like, who are we? Who are we trying to get money off? What do we want to achieve? And then what do we want to go for? And we started out with a 40 million fund, right? That was the goal, 40 million. And then, wow, we get to maybe we should go for a 50 million fund. And then to go back to the beginning, that momentum thing happens, which is so intangible. And suddenly you get oversubscribed.

45:25And it's the weirdest feeling in the world. It's like finding product market fit at your startup, the wind's now behind you, right? And it just goes, and you don't really know why. But it turns out you found like the right combination of those things that attract money, which is really scarce right now to want to take a risk on you. With this model, why do you put that in some people's view, unnecessary constraint that they need to want to buy into doing that stupid six-week program with you? like emotions right at its core um we want to be uh connected with the people we're working with and we want that to be a two-way street because we know that over many years things are awful and things are great but unless we have that from the start like we are not gonna have enough relationship strength frankly like for you to really tell us what's going on and for us to really be able to help.

46:22So it's just the humans, it turns out in the world of AI, are still really important. Let me ask you one other question. Now I've spent 46 minutes on this podcast asking you a bunch of questions that are super annoying about climate and narrative and all this stuff. Where are people like I and LPs and other people getting things wrong and asking the wrong questions? How would you wish that we could reset the narrative? My point of view is there's no wrong question. If you have a question that's given me data about how you're thinking. So like all questions are awesome because I'm getting data about what you care about.

46:59Honestly, feedback is so essential to everything we do. What's super clear, right, is the level of risk taking is not really there in this world. If I compare it to raising at a company level, wow, there's way more risk takers that will go at the company level than they will at the fund level. And I don't necessarily know why that is. like for a fund like house and the check size is bigger i don't know right i don't think so so why is there like such a different like risk assessment like they're both going to take 10 years one's actually more diversified right and has like more chances of like trying to like make a lot of bets or making bets that might counteract each other so that risk thing is something i haven't figured out yet why is this so much more risk averse over here is it because the money's closer to institutions and like people are not incentivized to take risk um is it because people been burnt?

47:50I don't know exactly. But that is super clear. I do have, if we should say one thing, I think one, there's a lack of bias. You're not leaning into people's bias that they're really good at picking, which is something that is great as a founder that you can lean into. And then there's also another one which is actual and true, which is you do have a capped upside on your fund. Probably things should be very magical if you go beyond 7x, especially since you have a strategy with small tickets and limited follow-on, it's unlikely it's going to be 100x. That scenario can almost not be modeled out. Whereas with a company, that's kind of why you do it.

48:34And thus, you have a different view on risk when you're looking at the two. And then I think that with the founders, when you're investing direct, you're, of course, also looking at, how should I put this? You're looking at very, very different things. Whereas when you as an LP look at funds, you look at very, very similar things. And you're trying to decide between things that look a lot alike, and that will have very similar return profiles on the average. So for that reason, what you're really looking for is the one that will not bottom amount. And those are there. And that's why I think emerging managers, it's so hard to be an emerging manager because it's where there is the inherent biggest risk that my million or whatever that I wish would give me 3X only gives me 0X or 0.5X or something like that.

49:27And it's a very real risk in emerging manager land. And that's why I think it's so hard. Yeah. Yeah. And like just hearing that, I'm super thankful, I think. Which is why I think that more emerging managers should deploy a strategy like yours because it is the one where you have the biggest chance of leveling out the problems of the emerging manager because you have a very diversified portfolio. Yeah. No, like honestly, it's beyond my expectations, right? Where we've gotten to. And because it's an NF1, this is normal. So hopefully we'll get the chance to do another one. and then we'll have like another end that i can be like oh wow that was weird back then right but i was super thankful for where we are and like to be honest we just really care about these companies succeeding right and i think founders that want to build something really meaningful sense that from us and and feel like there's something to gain from from working with us yeah alex i think you guys were in the market already when you got the norskin team on board to want to give them, give you their brand and name and trust.

50:34But congratulations on closing oversubscribed 57 million instead of 40. That is incredible. Not a lot managed to do anything similar to that. So congratulations, my friend. And thank you for joining me today. Thank you. Thank you for having me and the hard work has just started, right? Yeah, that is very true. Before we start the show, a quick note. If you're building or running a fund, you know, it takes the right partners. At EVC, we only work with sponsors. we truly believe should be part of your tech stack. Please do take a moment to hear about them. And if you do, reach out, mention your VC.

51:07It's the best way you can support what we do. Thank you so much. First up, Ace Alternatives. Every fund manager needs clean operations behind the scenes. From fund admin to tax and compliance, Ace handles it all across VC, PE, private debt, and real assets. They're trusted by some of the best investors in the world. And if you want peace of mind and a scale-ready back office, Ace should be part of your stack. Finding deals and managing your portfolio is at the heart of running a fund. Synaptic helps you discover startups before others do. And Portfolio IQ keeps your portfolio data sharp and ready for LPs.

51:41Together, they're essential tools for modern fund managers. When it comes to legal, you need a team that truly knows venture. Hainspoon supports LPs, GPs, startups, and scale-ups across the full fund lifecycle. Smart managers make Hainspoon part of their stack. We have two at EUVC. Tech Barbecue. Oh my god, who doesn't love barbecue? Europe's startup scene meets the loudest, friendliest family reunion ever at Tech Barbecue. From Nordic founders to global VCs, this is where ideas catch fire and relationships get real. If you're building or backing in Europe, Tech Barbecue is where you want to show up.

52:14And hey, if you've got a big fun announcement coming up, want to hit the headlines or just want to tell your story about, do reach out to us because we'd love to help. And we've got some pillar partners to help you get in the right media places. They've held us land, Bloomberg, CNBC, Financial Times, Forbes, and many more for the EUVC Summit. And we'd love to do the same for you.

From the publisher

Welcome back to another episode of the EUVC Podcast, where we gather Europe’s venture family to share the stories, insights, and lessons that drive our ecosystem forward.

Today we welcome Alex Bakir, General Partner at Norrsken Evolve, the new €57M pre-seed fund spun out of the legendary Norrsken family of funds. Together with Johan Attby and Rebecka Löthman Rydå, Alex is doubling down on impact-driven founders building Europe’s resilient and sustainable future—with backing from EIF, Saminvest, SmartCap, and operators like Taavet Hinrikus and Sten Tamkivi of Plural.

We dive into Alex’s journey - with family roots in Iraq and England to Cambridge, the World Bank, Climate Change Capital, and Planet Labs; his lessons from the clean-tech crash of 2008; why resilience is now the lens for Europe’s industrial strategy; and how Norrsken Evolve is rethinking fund construction with 80 portfolio companies, automated follow-ons, and a sprint model for founder collaboration.

Here’s what’s covered:

  • 01:38 Alex’s path: Iraqi–English upbringing, Cambridge climate science, World Bank, first-wave cleantech VC

  • 04:30 Lessons from the cleantech crash (’08): macro can kill even great theses

  • 07:19 Why this time is different: realism, supply chains, energy security

  • 10:31 Fundraising the hard way: €40M → €57M; satellites vs. raising a fund

  • 12:36 Mistakes & pivots: from naive global to Europe-first resilience

  • 15:50 LP profiling: local anchors + institutional validation (Saminvest, EIF)

  • 19:00 The trough of despair & team completion with Rebecka Löthman Rydå

  • 22:11 The “funky” model: 80 companies, €250K tickets, no boards, automated follow-ons

  • 26:06 Sprint model: six-week in-person collaboration (not a school)

  • 31:22 Investment focus: The carbon-free economy, the infrastructure of tomorrow, future of Europe

  • 40:57 Founder fit: mission-driven, experienced builders with scars and purpose

More from EUVC

All 626 episodes
E582 | Alex Bakir, Norrsken Evolve: Resilience, Climate, and Building Europe’s FutureEUVC · 53 min
Listen in VO