In short
EUVC Podcast Episode Notes
Episode Overview
- Title: E669 | Harrison Rose, GoodFit: How AI Is Rewriting B2B Go-To-Market
- Co-Hosts: Andreas Munk Holm, David Cruz e Silva
- Guest: Harrison Rose, Co-founder and CEO of GoodFit
- Description: Discusses the transformation in B2B SaaS go-to-market strategies due to AI, challenges faced with traditional methods, and insights into building GoodFit.
---
Key Topics Covered
- Introduction to GoodFit
- Purpose: A data platform for go-to-market (GTM) teams that maps markets and scores accounts to optimize sales efforts.
- Functionality: Helps companies identify potential customers and suggests effective go-to-market strategies.
- Background of Harrison Rose
- Early Days with Paddle: Co-founded Paddle at a young age, learned the importance of data-driven decisions in sales.
- Transition to GoodFit: Recognized the need for an efficient GTM strategy at Paddle, which led to the creation of GoodFit.
- Evolution of Go-To-Market Strategies
- Current Landscape: Traditional methods of hiring more sales development representatives (SDRs) and mass emailing are ineffective.
- Shift Needed: Focus on data-driven insights rather than just automation of outreach.
- Target Market for GoodFit
- Focus on B2B Tech: Primarily serves B2B tech companies that are more familiar with the nuances of effective GTM strategies.
- Willingness to Invest: Target customers tend to have higher ACVs and are thus more willing to invest in sophisticated GTM tools.
- Founder's Perspective on Second-Time Entrepreneurship
- Experience Comparison: Rose discusses the advantages of being a second-time founder, including credibility and a network of connections.
- Ability to Attract Customers: GoodFit had interested customers lined up even before its official launch, contrasting the challenges faced by Paddle.
- Investor Relations
- Choosing Investors: Emphasis on finding partners who align with the company's vision and can offer valuable insights rather than just capital.
- Bootstrapping vs. VC Funding: Initially bootstrapped GoodFit for four years before raising a $13M Series A to scale.
- Impact of AI on Go-To-Market
- Data and AI Integration: AI can significantly enhance decision-making by providing insights on market engagement strategies.
- Current Misuse of AI: Many companies focus on automating existing ineffective outreach rather than improving the quality of their strategies.
- Future Vision for GoodFit
- GTM Decision Hub: Aspiring to be the central system that informs companies about who to sell to, how, and why, while integrating with execution layers.
- Focus on Data Quality: Delivering high-quality, configurable datasets to empower GTM strategies.
- Personal Reflections on Founding Journey
- Identity and Leadership: Discusses how the identity intertwined with his role at Paddle and the need for personal exploration post-departure.
- Evolution as a Leader: Importance of adapting leadership style as companies grow from startup to larger organizations.
---
Key Takeaways
- Importance of Data: Effective GTM strategies require a data-centric approach to identify and engage potential customers successfully.
- AI's Role: While AI holds transformative potential, its misuse can lead to exacerbating existing problems rather than solving them.
- Founder Evolution: Experienced founders must adapt their leadership styles as their companies grow, focusing more on strategy and less on day-to-day operations.
- Networking and Credibility: The value of building a strong network and reputation in the industry cannot be understated, especially for second-time founders.
---
Conclusion Harrison Rose's insights provide a fresh perspective on the evolving landscape of B2B SaaS, emphasizing the crucial role of data and AI in shaping future go-to-market strategies. The episode highlights the significance of learning from past experiences and adapting to new challenges as a founder.
---
For More Information Visit [EUVC](https://eu.vc) for updates and more insights into the European VC scene.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Welcome back everyone to another episode of the EUvz podcast. Today I'm delighted to be joined by Harrison Rose, founder and CEO of GoodFit. Harrison previously co-founded Paddle, scaling it into one of the UK's fastest growing software companies, and now is building GoodFit, an AI driven go-to-market data platform that just raised$13 million, Series A led by Notion Capital. A former investor is of course Robin Capital, and I am a big friend of Robin, so I wanted to give a shout out here. Today we'll dive into how he's applying his GTM learnings to this new venture, what the rise of AI means for commercial strategies and what this all means for the European ecosystem.
0:37Before we start the show, a quick note. If you're building or running a fund, you know it takes the right partners. At EUVC, we only work with sponsors we truly believe should be part of your tech stack. Please do take a moment to hear about them. And if you do, reach out, mention EUVC. It's the best way you can support what we do. Thank you so much. First off, Ace Alternatives. Every fund manager needs clean operations behind the scenes. From fund admin to tax and compliance, ACE handles it all across VC, PE, private debt, and real assets. They're trusted by some of the best investors in the world.
1:11And if you want peace of mind and a scale ready back office, ACE should be part of your step. Finding deals and managing your portfolio is at the heart of running a fund. Synaptic helps you discover status before others do. And Portfolio IQ keeps your portfolio data sharp and ready for LPs. Together, they're essential tools for modern fund managers. When it comes to legal, you need a team that truly knows venture. Hanespoon supports LPs, GP, startups and scale-ups across the full fund life cycle. Smart managers make Hanespoon part of their stack. We have two at EUVC. Tech BBQ. Oh my god, who doesn't love BBQ?
1:45Europe's startup scene meets the loudest, friendliest family reunion ever at Tech BBQ. From Nordic founders to global VCs, this is where ideas catch fire and relationships get real. If you're building or backing in Europe, Tech Barbecue is where you want to show up. And hey, if you've got a big fun announcement coming up, want to hit the headlines or just want to tell you a story about, do reach out to us because we'd love to help and we've got some pillar partners to help you get in the right media places. They've held us land Bloomberg, CNPC, Financial Times, Forbes and many more for the EUVC Summit and we'd love to do the same for you.
2:22Tear down this wall. It's more than just an ally. This is a union of values. Let's start acting. This show is not investment advice and the hosts of this episode may be invested in the funds and companies featured. Welcome to the pod. Thank you for having me, mate. Yeah, yeah, really excited. So Harrison, let's just level set with everyone that might not know GoodFit. Talk to them. What is GoodFit all about? yeah i mean good fit is a data platform for go-to-market teams basically so we help you map your market of all the qualified accounts so you can tell to out there we configure a bunch of insight against every single one of those companies in your market help you recognize which of them are those you should actually be spending your time dollars money effort on and then even scientists suggest which of the ever-evolving new exciting go-to-market strategies you should actually deploy in order to go and capture that demand and turn it into revenue tell us about paddle because you had an aha moment at paddle so let's just get that out of the way as well yeah so good fit was kind of born out of some of the the needs that we had at paddle i guess so i'm not sure it was an aha moment as such like we we started paddle i had a co-canical christian when we were like 17 18 and because of that we hadn't worked anywhere else we had no context on what good luck like what came before what was status quo like i've talked in the past about that being like a real blessing and a curse.
3:50Like the blessing is that you approach everything from first principles versus how things are usually done because you just have no reference point, quite frankly. The curse is you sometimes spend weeks and weeks trying to solve something that has actually just already been solved a hundred times before and you don't need to reinvent. So like it has pros and cons. But in the context of GoodFit, I was kind of the commercial leader, commercial co-founder at Puddle. But when we started, nobody knew who we were, never knew what we did. And we operated on a quite different business model, actually, to the market was expecting.
4:20It's called the Merch to Record business model. For those listeners that don't know, Paddle, we're like a revenue infrastructure company for other software businesses, like checkout, recurring billing, payments, things like this. But we basically had the ability to serve every software company in the world that had a checkout. So a pretty big market. I was like a one-person commercial team. So that first principles question I asked myself was like, where do I start? Like I could sell to any of these software companies. and so approaching things from first principles i kind of was like well let me get a list or let me map every software company out there that i could sell to let me gather as much information on them as i can in a systematic way so i can prioritize my time on those that are most likely to like most likely to yield results because i'm a one-person team right now because there was no way i could work kind of large portions of the market and those same principles applied to go to market today they're kind of the same principles on which we built GoodFit from, but we got more and more sophisticated around this go-to-market kind of data engine that we built a paddle to fuel our own go-to-market up until the point that we recognized that was a product in its own right and have started GoodFit.
5:23And I can tell that story as well. It wasn't necessarily an aha moment as much as we were just approaching like, how do we go to market in the most efficient way possible? And the starting point for that was data. And that was really the genesis for what eventually became GoodFit, if that makes sense. Yeah. Then tell me a bit about the customers that come and use GoodFit. What's the profile? Because I imagine that go-to-market is very much a startup problem and startup verb, so to say, or it's something that if you go to a normal company that's outside of the tech arena, they don't think of it as such.
6:00They think of themselves as salespeople and so on. So talk a bit about that, how it works. i mean we don't necessarily make the distinction like whether you're going to market we talk about go-to-market strategies a lot whether you're deploying like ads uh we'll talk about programmatic go-to-market a little bit later i think whether you've got a sales team that are cold calling like all of these things need to be fueled by data like you always need to ask who am i selling to like why and also how which is which of those strategies you're deploying and that's true whether you're like i don't know trying to find true in every industry that's selling quite frankly, whether you're trying to sell, I don't know, as an agency to go and do some web development or a classic B2B SaaS product.
6:39And that is the vision for GoodFit or the mission. We always want to answer who you should be selling to, why and how for any company out there. We do focus on B2B tech companies. That's largely just because they're a little bit farther down the education curve, which I think is what you're alluding to. They tend to have a little bit more robots thinking, even if they don't necessarily have the function. They're a little bit more educated on what are the jobs to be done to go to market effectively, if you like. But we serve companies in B2B tech, and it's tech more broadly. I kind of think of it as the same kind of market that investors would invest in even today, which is kind of broadening, I think.
7:14But it does tend to be companies that have some level of go-to-market that are already established. And we're really helping them turn that into a predictable machine, something that's optimized and working really, really efficiently and effectively, as opposed to helping folks go from zero to one. I think over time, it's something we'll do more and more with like clear and what the product and how the needs differ when that's your challenge, as opposed to how do I make this thing bigger, better, more effective. But it just tends to be the established kind of B2B tech companies with a sales marketing function that tend to come and buy GoodFit today.
7:47Tell me, Harrison, a bit about the, like you had the founding journey with Paddle and now you have it with GoodFit. what's different this time around because obviously first time you were testing a bunch now especially with a company that does go to market as as your product i imagine that go to market is something that was quite easily uh approached for you yeah i mean completely different like i can't emphasize enough that we started that business it's like effectively children not having done anything before and every single thing that we could have possibly done was new and like there's some really stark stories of that like i remember raising the series a and people asking like what what's your culture like and christian and i being like so what's culture like we didn't know what that is and like the journey we went on there and the culture that we eventually built was something i'm so proud of so i can't emphasize enough that the the experience is fundamentally different it's certainly a lot easier i'd say second time around again having having made some mistakes, albeit not easy, easier, but not easy.
8:51I'd say the market piece is something that's really interesting though. Like we had a queue of customers lined up ready to buy GoodFit before it even started. I can talk a little bit more specifically about that founding story in just a second, which is very different to Paddle. Like, as I said, when we started how known and knew that we were, we had no credibility. We'd not built a unicorn. We'd not already established ourselves as thought leaders in go-to-market and built a network of revenue leaders who wanted to replicate what it is that we've been doing. Like that experience Vince is very different and was certainly a lot harder because yeah, we weren't selling to our peers into a network that we'd established.
9:23And a problem that we really knew, like Paddle like GoodFit came out of a personal need. So we started this because Christian was trying to sell software himself and realizing that he was spending as much time on the infrastructure to sell the software as he was building the software, which was kind of the idea behind Paddle. It was born out of and it's the same for GoodFit, albeit we were much better positioned to take advantage of that experience, that network, that credibility second time around for sure. Tell me a bit about selecting investors. I was chatting with Ichazo from Notion before coming on here.
9:54I said, do you want to join? And then she said, no, no, Harrison will do great alone. I'll let him take the spotlight on this one. So tell me a bit about picking investors this second time around versus the first one. What would you say are the crucial things to pay attention to yeah so it was very different so at paddle we were we raised money from the day zero before we began like krish and i were kind of playing with some ideas of what would become paddle whilst i was at school he'd actually left already and we raised for an angel investor and then went on that path thereafter i think by the time i stepped back from full time we'd raised 300 million dollars it was your classic vc counterpart journey so with good fit i actually joined a little bit into it having begun so my old vk of revops at paddle actually left paddle and started good fit a little bit before i joined and we could talk about that if you want but we were bootstrapped as i said we had a queue of customers lined up ready to buy good fit before we began notion in particular actually had paid particular attention to to the unique way in which we're using data and go to market and we're encouraging us to educate the rest of their portfolio on it And that eventually became him encouraging Alex to maybe leave Padawan and go turn this into a product.
11:04Very happy for him. I hired him straight out of uni, but on an amazing, amazing story of his own. Was devastated. I lost my right hand and VP of Red Ops in the business. But have eventually joined him along the way. I was telling him, I'm like, it's not normal that you have a queue of people lined up ready to give you tens of thousands of dollars before you've even begun. Like, it's incredibly abnormal, in fact. but because of that luxury and because he was a one-person scene for quite a while as he was kind of working out what the product looked like very clear on the problems he wanted to solve but not necessarily sure on what the solution looked like good fit was bootstrapped for for four years and then our first round of funding we've just closed and announced in the last month month or two led by notion obviously i've got a great relationship with them since they led the series b at paddle back in 2017 but yeah we actually bootstrapped good fit for a number of years before having just raised.
11:49And again, much more optionality in terms of investors we could choose second time round, having had some experience under your belt. But I always wanted to pick Notion there because generally, I think they were the investor that understood this problem, showed the most interest in it from the earliest days, were powering most of their portfolio in terms of go to market. And my relationships with the partners there are so, so strong. and if you can establish that trust with someone and feel like you can go and be fully authentic with them you're going to run your business much more effectively quite frankly like in the early days of paddle i had a lot of imposter syndrome like as a young founder but being able to do the second time around with someone that i trust and believes in me like i don't know it just really elevates that that experience i'd say talk about the decision to also because yes you got notion but you also got a group of solo GPs, all friends of mine, actually.
12:46Common Magic, Adrena. Who do we have more? I saw another name. Gideon. So, yeah, Gideon from Adrena, Sarah from Common Magic. We've got Robin from Robin Capital. We've also got an Ovia in Wraith. We've got Salaka as well. So a few different folks, yeah. Tell me about their decision to put together the syndicate, so to say, behind the round as such. Because you could have, I'm sure, picked anyone. on yeah we didn't even speak to to an investor who's quite interested in doing that whole thing so like i think it's a couple of things right like notion they were the lead but i think we're quite willing to do the whole thing and then different questions come up right like again to walks then do you want this person to own such a large portion of the cap table and is this is this healthy in terms of running the business like if you have an investor that's talking to you like that like already that's a great sign this is a great investor because they're thinking about with business not just their own ownership like awesome already what a great sign and was no surprise to me and two and like it was a pretty chunky round as i said we really wanted to this this step change would be structure vc back is quite a big one for us so we did want to raise a reasonable amount of money to facilitate that change because because it really does require quite a lot but i think i was also conscious of like echo chamber like i've known notion for a long time they've known me for a long time they know how i like to go to market i have been a go-to market advisor for motion for a number of years like i think there's a bit of danger of just per chamber really that's good governance yeah it is good governance too exactly and network and experience and just different perspectives right it was like that that was the main the main thing and each person it sounds like you know them that we've brought in is a phenomenal operator advisor like pet persons having in your corner.
14:30So that's kind of how we got there. Then tell me about that decision to me to do a 12 million year round. Like, and I think there's two decisions. There's the first one, which is bootstrap for four years. That's not what everyone chooses to do. So let's talk a bit about that and what that enabled you to do when you think it's a good fit and when you'd say, well, maybe do take money early. And then after that, let's talk about the decision to do a chunky round, as you called it. Yeah. so the the boost reposition as i said there was a few things right alex actually started before me right so he left paddle his story is amazing he joined us somewhere to like manually research and gather data for the sales scene that paddle won a hackathon in like three weeks and it's like i can turn this into something completely systematic and promising engineering heavy as opposed to human heavy immediately after that he kind of came became a right hand in the business and we built this go-to-market data engine together which would become a good fit he left a little bit worth of ARR in less than 12 months.
15:27It's like a one-person team. It was the good times, don't get me wrong, on COVID. He also churned most of it as a one-person team, not really knowing what he was doing. But it was really clear there was real problem market fit, as I'd describe it, in what it is he was doing. And he probably just needed a little bit of help and experience to come in and turn that into a business, which is when I joined him. But as I said, that gives you the luxury to be able to bootstrap. We were selling data at the time, like candy. People were just desperate to get what it is that we were offering. And when you're selling high-value contracts with a relatively small team it gives you the luxury to be able to bootstrap and then when i joined him being completely candid with you there were a few things in my mind like one one was just like curiosity like i'd never run a profitable company before and i wondered what that would look like turns out really hard uh that's what i say as hard as running a company valued at 1.4 billion dollars i think just despite much smaller scale and the other was I mean I'd just been on a 10-year journey like I'm really conscious of the commitment you're making to VCs when you sign on the dotted line for VC money that you're about to go and try and return their fund and build another 100 million dollar business I wasn't sure we were necessarily ready for that or we were committed to that and then over time as we were working together as we saw the market explode around us as go to market has fundamentally evolved and changed in the past couple of years we just became so excited about what we could do that it made sense we got some acquisition offers that we were very easily turned down.
16:54And all of this became real obvious to us that we should turn this into something big. And Notion was the obvious choice to do so given the relationship that we have there as the leader at least. It would be helpful that you talk a bit to the audience about the decision to raise capital from VCs, because I think it's something that there's quite a few too many founders, and honestly, also VCs and angel investors that are not mindful enough about. I think a good investor is very mindful of what it takes to go on the journey and also a good founder. And the good investor would also make sure that the founders understand, but I see it too often not being the case that these conversations are being had.
17:33So talk about that decision and where you see me, because I imagine you talk to a bunch of other founders out there that are struggling on the journey or trying to figure out their route, and then they look at you as a bit of an inspiration having gone for years without. Yeah, I think you need to be really, really clear on outcomes, right? We were bootstrapped for a while because we weren't sure on what outcome we wanted to shoot for and it gave us optionality, right? We could continue to run the business profitably. We could raise some debt, for example, to get a bit of an injection of capsule into the business and keep 100 % ownership between Alex and I.
18:09Or we could go VC back knowing that you're basically committing to build a colossal business over probably a longer period of time. And we weren't sure which path was right for the business in terms of fit, because not every business is actually VC backable in terms of its potential outcome. We should also acknowledge that. I think increasingly we were sure that we were, but I wanted to get into business and ensure that was the case in the early days. And two, you need to align with your investors and what outcome is the issue. Some angels are happy for you not to build a massive business and deliver a relatively quick return at whatever multiple.
18:38An institutional VC investor probably doesn't care about that type of outcome, right? And so I think it's all about determining what do you want for your business in terms of size, scale, time horizons, even, and then thinking about what options that allows for you and then executing on that, right? In our case, given the way in which we saw AI transform and go to market, we were like, this category has never seen and potentially will never see in my lifetime quite as much change and disruption as we're seeing right now. And we have the opportunity to fundamentally change the way in which every single B2B product in the world is bought and sold moving forward.
19:18Like that feels like a pretty fucking chunky problem that's exciting for us to go and solve. What's the only way to really able to do that? The only option really becomes to raise your seat, right? but I think it's being really honest with yourself and your investors about what outcome are you shooting for in what time horizon and who makes sense as a result, quite frankly. And then let's talk about this AI disruption of go-to-market because I completely agree with you that this is one of the places where we can definitely see a huge explosion in opportunity. So talk about that disruption, what you're seeing, maybe also talk a bit to where you're seeing people getting it wrong.
19:53It seems like everyone's thinking that now you can automate a lot of your outreach and AI is going to make it all work. And then you realize once you get into the nitty gritty, it's actually not that easy. This is what we were observing ourselves over the past few years, right? Like where good fits on up 10, 20, 30 customers paying us high tens of thousands a year and making sales seems more efficient, more productive. Like suddenly the things that we can actually deliver for these companies, like the opportunities were exploding, right? Like where data historically could be used to supply the sales team with a less qualified accounts to go and work.
20:28Now every single element and every single decision to go to market can start to be influenced by the combination of data and AI. And I think it's how those things interplayed, which is really, really critical to deliver the great outcomes, maybe start to jump ahead to some of the issues that I think some people are having. I think the biggest thing that I'm seeing is our usage of AI in go-to-market is incredibly narrow right now. People are using AI actually just to automate a lot, as opposed to necessarily do things better, which I think is the biggest distinction that we're going to see over time.
21:04So right now, AI is kind of effectively, I think, being used at least by good folks to get richer data sets than they've ever before to inform the gen AI that they're using to produce a message or produce a landing page or an ad or whatever, or enrich accounts better than ever before to get better insight before you go and do an activity. But I think where we'll see AI really start to impact go to market most profoundly is that AI will start to inform how companies are going to market better than ever. And this links to a little bit of the vision that I have for GoodFit. I want to take every account in your market, analyze every single one of those accounts versus your historic performance.
21:43Secondly, both of those things better than ever before as a result of data and AI and start to do things like recommend for every single account in your entire market, the expected value or spend you could afford on every single one of those 10 ,000 accounts in your term, what channels are most efficient to contact them with, if it's ads, how much, is it email, is it call call, is it events, and what combination of those things do we think is most effective, most efficient in order to get that company to engage based on how they've performed in the past. Like if I asked a human that on a single company right now, it's a really, really hard thing for them to be able to work out.
22:15Right. If I'm like, here's a company, what is the most efficient and effective way to get in front of them? What is a unique combination of touch points that's going to deliver the best results for the lowest cost? Some of them are looking like, obviously, I can't work that out. Right. But suddenly, when you can do that across all 50 ,000 companies in your addressable market, the quality and the effectiveness and the efficiency of what we're going to be able to deliver is much improved. But also, as you start to feed that data, which is required to deliver that level of insight, analysis and insight into like the, what I call the execution layer, then the next set of tools are actually delivering the touch points, delivering the ads, delivering the message, whatever it may be.
22:52Like, Gen.ai can do much, much better stuff fed with really great data, right? And I think this is where some of the disconnect is today. Like people are jumping straight to execution layer and AI to just automate stuff. But they're feeding their gen AI, creating the message or the ad or whatever, just a bunch of really crap stuff, basically. And thus the results are you're just automating more bad stuff as opposed to doing anything differently or anything better. And everyone's like, this isn't working. And they say, well, you're actually just doing more bad. So no shit. And I think this is the trap that most people fall into.
23:28Tell me, Harrison, because now we're a bit in the weeds of what GoodFit really is and what GoodFit really does. Like you described here, the go-to-market motion all the way from the beginning of getting the data, scoping out who you target, getting the data to be able to target them well, all the way to in the end, actually approaching and getting them through a sales funnel and closing. What do you do on this part? What is GoodFit doing right now and where are you working towards being able to handle this? So today we're at the start of every go-to-market action that you take. Eventually I want to be at the end and then the circle around the whole thing, right?
24:05So every single go-to-market strategy, motion, campaign, whatever, starts with who the hell am I selling to? Why? And then eventually how, which is also somewhere we're going to start to improve. The start is like, who am I selling to and why? Whether you're running a cold call campaign, an ad, a direct mail campaign, inviting them to a breakfast, that's a go-to-market strategy. And we're here to answer that question for every single company. And the way that you do so is that way back to the first principles of Paddle is like, what is actually my qualified list of accounts that I can sell to?
24:36And against every single one of those, I need a huge amount of insight configured to me, unique to me, that really helps me understand which companies are great or not. And that really does need to be configured to you in order to be useful. and then with that you can start deploying go to market much more effectively analyzing your performance much more effectively like the starting point is always the quality of your data so we're here to map that market enrich it with insight configured to you analyze what great customers look like and then today we feed that into your as we call it execution layer of choice but once we've worked out this is a tier one customer versus a tier two we feed your tier one customers into your outreach your code calling tool your abm platform or whatever and that's where you'd execute.
25:17Maybe your tier three, you'd run what we call programmatic go-to-market app, which is a much more automated means of go-to-market with less humans in the loop because your expected return from those accounts is lesser than the tier one. So they require a different approach, right? So we're starting to inform who you're selling to, why and how, but the actual execution is taking place elsewhere. Now today, huge amounts of dollars have gone into this execution layer, like a new sales martech tool seems to emerge like every week, which is why there's a greater emphasis, I think, for revenue leaders on telling them how, like which of these things to actually use or what combination of them.
25:50But then there's also nothing at the end of this process to be like, we have observability into every single one of these channels, touchpoints, customers that you've been selling to. We know their sales cycle, their ACB, on what channel they responded, how long it took. And then taking that to inform that next set of activities. Like there's not really anything close in the loop super well right now. So the vision is to become kind of this decision hub, this mission control for go to market, determining who you're selling to, how and why, as opposed to actually doing the execution, like sending the email or the tool to run the cold call.
26:22I think there's plenty of that in this space. There are very few people informing what goes into those tools and why, and then what next based on how it performed. So that's kind of what we're doing. And today we've been winning based on the data, just to be clear, we supply the best, most configurable datasets in the world to feed some of these systems. They increasingly will be advisory on like what to do with the data in order to drive the best go to market and this is where ai really transforming some of our capabilities if that makes sense all right this is hugely interesting tell me why do you like is it purely because there's so much competition in the execution space that you don't want to touch that and you just think the opportunity in itself on the on the data side is so big that for you having an api that that integrates into salesforce or whatever people use is sufficient it's really interesting i want to never say never to be honest with you uh i think there's a chance that we could do it at some point in time because if you're deciding which companies why and how if you start owning now you could probably potentially do a pretty good job of that too right so maybe one day i think honestly my view is that the execution is going to become increasingly commoditized like i i don't think it's super complex to build a product that can send along email or run a bunch of cold calls.
27:37I think that's increasingly not very defensible, to be honest with you. So that's just an investment thing of just like, does it make sense for us to build this thing when we could just integrate with it, to be fair? The other is that I have, and VCs don't always agree with me on this. I'm like, I have a feeling that the way you stand out in a go-to-market motion or the way you're successful is that what is the unique recipe of that execution layer that you're going to deploy that helps you stand out to a prospect, which gets them to engage with you. And I think that could just continue to proliferate the different options that we have there.
28:12And no tool is ever going to be able to encompass all of them very well. And we don't need to. If our data is fed into them and we get the data fed back, we just need to continue to inform what goes in and make that process really easy. And that's easier and easier with NDP. You get integrations, all this type of stuff. So maybe we'll get there, especially if we see that become a really common recipe but I'm not sure. Yeah. Tell me Harrison how you think about pricing so to say and batching of customers because I imagine there's a there's a point where this is valuable like enough per client per potential like me so I'm a creator I love a billion subscribers like it would it be something that I would ever use or do you need to have you need to justify a x dollar amount spent on research per client?
28:57And for that reason, you need to be looking at this type of... Yeah, that's a great question. So two things need to be true. Like one, the market probably needs to be big enough for this to be complex. Like if you're only selling to like 50 companies, like you can probably manually work out what's the best way to get in front of them and do a bunch of research into them, right? It's probably less than a thousand. You maybe should just do this manually. When it starts to get above a thousand, I think it's really hard to do this stuff without making it a product. The other probably is ACV as well.
Read the full transcript
29:29Like again, if you're winning customers at five bucks, right, like you just know you need to be able to capture them as cheaply as possible. That's the goal. It's not like, how can I do it as efficiently as possible? The efficiency is just as cheap as possible because you're doing a 10 bucks a month subscription, right? Whereas if your ACV range, what ACV starts at like 10 grand, but then maybe you can go all the way up to 100 grand, say, you need to start to be a little bit more sophisticated on the different ways in which you're going to capture the demand of the difference of that spectrum and what are the different options you have available to do so to go and do so really effectively and so there's certainly those two two vectors in there and where do and where do you see that good fit fitting best honestly it's any company that has a market in the thousands which honestly is most companies to be fair it's quite rare the someone's addressable market is less than that unless they're like exclusively selling to like tier one banks in the UK or something.
30:26Yeah, exactly. And then we can make a single go-to-market strategy more effective, just to be clear. And this is the world we came from, right? Like if you've got in the most basic scenario, you've got a bunch of sales reps emailing manually and cold calling manually, you could let them work out themselves who they should email or cold call. Or some of the case studies we have on site is whoever with personia that's like a billion dollar company growing like an absolute weed i think we reduced our sales cycle by 60 because rather than letting the reps work out who they were going to email our call call it's like why don't we analyze who we've been having success with in the past who we closed quickly at high acv and then put those ones in the names of the reps to go and work a really basic use case it works right and then as people's go-to-market strategy becomes more and more complex both in terms of the breadth of customers they're serving and the options that the channel options they have available to them, it becomes increasingly hard to answer the question of who should be sold to why and how, and then our value increases every time.
31:22But it's also valuable in the most basic of going to market strategies, to be honest with you. Let me ask you a question. You're building out of London. This is a Europe versus US question. I had the founder of Daytona on the podcast. I think it was him. He said, for us, because we're selling to fast growing tech companies, it was a natural move to go to Silicon Valley because everyone was there. And once I had one customer, they met the other guys at the cafe and then they said, ah, we're using Daytona now. It's really powerful, blah, blah, blah. And then they get a virality that they didn't feel they got when they were in Europe.
31:59And you're selling to a similar type of customer base. He also said, well, in Silicon Valley, I would put up a billboard, physical billboard, and I would have a long list of customers the day after because all my customers are driving down that road. It's super interesting. I mean, I love those random stories. I've invested in a company that just like point of sale for small shops, like amongst like a Taylor S, for example, and they target her shop like to take their car payments. And now like the go to market experiment we ran was we started sponsoring just like every local football team, like kids football team that we could.
32:33And it was like, because most of their dads and moms were small business owners. So like Like the very best place we can be seen is on the shirt of their kids, right? Exactly, it was a thousand bucks, right? And so I love those stories. I love that creativity. And this is kind of what I mean about how someone executes is often a unique recipe, I think. But whatever, let's map the market of every local kids who will be who go and sponsor. I don't know. I think it's a great question. I think there's two, if you don't mind, I'll evolve the question a little bit too, because when we were starting Paddle, like the thing that really irked me, I eventually moved to the US and launched our US office at Paddle.
33:06Actually in the middle of COVID, had moved in January 2020. It was like a complete disaster, but we got there eventually. That must have been awesome. Oh my God, yeah. It was always the wrong time to move to the US because I was too involved in operations in the UK. And then, no, no, I really did pick the wrong time eventually. But one thing we got was just like, oh, Europeans can't sell the commercial talents in the US. You need to go to the US. That really used to irk me because I don't think there is a gap in talent pool, actually. I think there used to potentially be a senior leadership level, But I think that's narrowed in the past five years or so.
33:39Things that we do see are there's definitely a different willingness. So 50 % of our revenue at GoodFit already comes out of the US. And again, to be honest, I do think we'll have US operations at some point in the future. I think the biggest difference we see between the markets is, it's like virality. Like we didn't spend a single dollar ourselves in marketing at GoodFit for four years when we were bootstrapped. And pretty much our exclusive driver of revenue was referral of just like a revenue to buy something they tell another revenue leader is good and they buy it right like so i think you can still get that in smaller markets again the how far that's going to get among that exponential club looks like might look different but some density of people in region like i appreciate sf might be a little bit better but i still think you can get there and the biggest difference we see is willingness to spend naturally on sales and marketing in each region like funnel metrics acv all of this stuff is better and more efficient for us in the us and the uk So I'm not sure that better US salespeople are better at selling, but I think they'll probably get a bias.
34:37And their willingness to spend to grow is probably better. And that might gravitate people towards that market. But I think that's probably something that will also change. Are the majority of your customers VC backed? I'd probably say yes by number. I mean, we have plenty of boot shop companies or quite old companies as well. oh, we just did a six-figure deal. The company is actually 15 years old and never raised the dollar. As I said, like the problems of who should we sell to and why exists across such a broad range of people, but depending on their own sophistication and curiosity, they might come in.
35:11We've sold to like PE firms before. Like they actually need to map their market of software companies. They could go and invest in, right? It's actually the same process, same problem. Our market can be very big. We're try to focus for now. But yeah, I'd say the majority are probably VC bad, yeah. Yeah, which of course also affects willingness to burn money. Oh yeah, or take bets, right? Okay, now let me shift to a more personal side if that's all right with you. I'd love to ask you about the decision to leave Paddle. And I think there's two sides. There's one personal, like why do you do it? But there's also the more, and that's why I asked about the personal willingness to go into personal stuff, because there's also this, when is it a fit for me to stay with a company in terms of has the company outgrown my skillset and both what I love to do, but maybe also what I'm good at.
36:02Yeah, I find it fascinating. Also, I'm very much heartlessly very authentic. Like if anything, I overshare rather than understand. So go as hard as you want, Andreas. I'm not bothered. You'll probably be bleeping stuff out of the recording as opposed to the other way around. But on the decision to step back, I'd like to talk about how founders need to evolve and grow in order to survive a 10-year tenure. and grow from 0 to 100. Like I think there's actually some pretty common reasons as to why people can't do it. I'm very proud to have gone that far as did Christian and I can talk about how I think we just about managed.
36:38But in terms of the decision to set back, it's not the one that you'd commonly find, I don't think. Most people, like you ask a founder and get, I really hate platitudes, but like the platitude you ask the founder of like, oh, also like to run your business like eight years in, it's just like, oh yeah, it's way, way worse. I'd love zero to one. I love the scrappy. I loved working out what the problem was. I actually really hated that period. There's no resource. There's no money. You're worried the business is going to die every single night until you find 10 logos. And the thing that I enjoyed the most was actually having a really set of excellent senior leaders that I could align around problems, go and see them do amazing, amazing stuff and help them be the best they can be, give them resources and the clarity and the case setting in order to go be successful.
37:20That's the stage I actually really love. So like series BC was like gold for me. so the reason to step back wasn't that i wasn't enjoying it anymore or i don't think it wasn't because i was doing a good job then maybe others would differ it was my choice to step back like the board wanted me to stay they offered me like a year off a lot all sorts of stuff it was that it was really personal to this and i'm not sure if it's useful to the audience but it's like when you've been running a business from 17 18 years old through to whatever it was to 28 29 like your whole identity friendships like how you spend your time like who you are become so intertwined with this thing that i was like i think i'd like to experience life not as harrison at paddle.com like it became who i was like holy like we did the series b with notion actually i remember going out for dinner and then martin krishnan i like oh what do you do outside of paddle and they're like well nothing like we lived we even lived together like we we don't we don't do anything else which is different second time around which we can talk about but yeah it was it was mainly that i was just like i really think it's important for me to experience life outside of the context of wearing these clothes and push myself and challenge myself like who will i as an entrepreneur if i'm not running this this big company like can i do it again would i like to i don't know like it was that curiosity that i think led me to to take a step back christian eventually followed which is kind of interesting too like a year later it might just be like saving the same so being in the same environment for a decade or so i think you start to get curious about what others look like whether the grass is green or it's a different question but yeah yeah well that very true now let's uh before we go to the what life is like now so to say let's stick on the learning so to say what you've seen that other founders maybe get wrong on this journey from zero to 100 i think the thing that I used to say to the company, and I think is so applicable to the founders too, is that like, various times, Paddle was like the fastest growing software company in the UK.
39:18This was the time when like 300 to 400 % growth was quite good, like maybe less so these days. But like, I used to say to the business, I'm like, if the company is growing at 300 % year on year, like every single one of us, every single thing, every single process needs to grow at the same rate. Otherwise, we're either going to stop growing at that rate or you're going to get left behind like ultimately and like that's okay like you've done a great job getting us here eventually you're going to cap out thank you so much i hope you're really proud of what you've done here you can go do it somewhere else now like that's totally cool but like that's absolutely true of the founders too and i think christian i really had to lead by example there because we literally had never done anything before so unless we were learning at a slightly faster rate than the company we were going to get fired and they're bringing some people with some actual experience some adults to come and come and run the business right that evolution is profound in the founders because the role you have to play at different stages along that journey are very very different and i think that's also why people don't don't last the the 10 years or 20 years whatever because either they're not equipped to to do it because that's totally normal like in the same way your vp sales from 0 to 5 probably isn't going to be your vp sales from 100 to 150 like it's not even a criticism it just is what it is and and two did the role changes right i i don't know what i'd be like now like above 100 million revenue maybe i wouldn't be enjoying it but i was enjoying it when i left in terms of the role it was more curiosity and just wanting to push myself to to experience life in a different way that that led me to leave but yeah that's kind of how i think about it it's true not doubtless too tell me also about this um the the motion so to say or the the feeling of being in a company that small versus one that's quite large you go from from basically managing or leading a group of of bandits that that you're buddies with to then all of a sudden running a big cooperation of like you got to think about how you phrase things you got to all of a sudden think about culture in a different way different like think about that
41:27yeah exactly like i think about it in a few phases like to try and make it as digestible as possible like when you start you're like basically trying to drive a change in the world at least your business is doing anything somewhat exciting right you need to like gather a bunch of disciples who believe in the change in the world who want to just be there with you alongside you making this change happen right it's very like emotional and like intense and like emotive i guess and then as you get to like i don't know 30 40 employees like not everyone's gonna feel like that anymore and like where you could be in a line as a peer at earlier stages like no matter what anyone says at like 30 40 people people want to be let like they want to be told where we're headed why what the pace should look like and then as you say they start paying attention to your behavior like how you look when you turn up to work what meetings you attend what meetings you don't attend and like i think for a while i tried to hide behind it's really cool that people can just like turn up here at power and i really know who's the leader and i'm like fitting in and so that's not what people want or need quite frankly and and then there's another stage where you enable people stop joining the company to work for you and they work for the leaders you've hired you need to turn them into like cultural champions and leaders in their own right and like you go through this real set of phases but even like ego suffers right at some point in time like no one's joining the company to work for you like it's like you've hired this incredible we've got like a president and CEO and our paddle is on the IPO train at service now.
42:52Like the guy's phenomenal. Like I'd want to work for him too, right? Like that's how it goes. But yeah, that's how I think about it. Now, before we close, I want to ask you a bit about the new life that you live. You don't wear the paddle clothes anymore. You don't live in the same apartment as the guys anymore. Like, is there something here that's called life balance that you've also realized there's a life outside that should be lived? or is it just that you've shifted the clothes and now you wear good fit clothes? Yeah, I'm wearing clothes. That's the positive. No way. I think I find this fascinating and I don't think it's talked about very often.
43:35But like when I was running paddle throughout the whole time I was there through to when I left and bearing in mind I left and like, yeah, I've got close to 100 million in revenue. It felt like we were either going to fail so dramatically that I'd never be able to work anywhere again and I'd be f***ed, basically. It was unemployable, probably am, but for other reasons. And that was one outcome. The other was, we're going to be so successful beyond our wildest dreams that nothing else ever matters anyway, right? and like that extremism of perception of potential outcomes drives a a desperation to win quite frankly like and succeed because you don't have any other choice to diverging although i think it's unhealthy and like i think you can only even operate like that well this is where i think it's interesting in terms of responsibilities and things like the way i'd lead a paddle was like i'd be first first in through the door in the morning lost out like i'd never even expect to have other people like i value output of their work but like despite that that's still how i try and lead and i'd want to work the hardest and better and whatever then as i i i've evolved into good fit like i don't have that luxury like i can't i can't be first in the building and last out because i have i'm married now like we're planning a family like that isn't how you're going to be able to lead i think i probably was having to work harder and longer first time around because i had to work out what the f**k i was doing a lot of the time right and that that takes quite long time and so i'm learning a ton but you understand what i mean some of these lessons are learned the thing that i'm having to learn second time around as a ceo is like how do i lead this time in a completely different set of circumstances and environment like one thing i really pride myself on you probably got this from both the chasso and i it's like our intensity and setting the pace and like i really think i drive momentum forward in like conversations like i want people to feel it when i walk in the room like if i can't be in the in the room like all day every day that's harder so how do i do that in this environment so i'm learning a ton i want to learn from people that have done that with responsibilities because ultimately i don't have any to be honest with you and so yeah that's a learning for me second time around i'd say no and everything does change with uh family and so on and like yeah it's a new life balance for everyone uh to figure out well i'm sure you'll absolutely nail it because you've done great so far uh and it's been an absolute joy to have you on the podcast any uh parting words you want to give to the audience uh no thank you so much for having me and for listening in yeah hopefully it inspired you along the way or if you've got any questions for free to reach out on linkedin or carisnick.io like i always want to try and give back some of the advice that i thought would be helpful to me along the journey particularly because i get really sick of reading the same advice over and over again on like classic LinkedIn posts or blog posts.
46:27So if there's anything weird, gnarly, or you think it's being left unsaid that you'd like some advice on, that's probably where I enjoy things the most. Yeah, feel free to reach out and hopefully this was useful. You're awesome, buddy. Thank you so much for coming on. Thank you. Cheers. Before we start the show, a quick note. If you're building or running a fund, you know it takes the right partners. At EVC, we only work with sponsors we truly believe should be part of your tech stack. Please do take a moment to hear about them. And if you do, reach out, mention your VC. It's the best way you can support what we do.
46:58Thank you so much. First off, Ace Alternatives. Every fund manager needs clean operations behind the scenes. From fund admin to tax and compliance, Ace handles it all across VC, PE, private debt and real assets. They're trusted by some of the best investors in the world. And if you want peace of mind and a scale ready back office, Ace should be part of your stack. Finding deals and managing your portfolio is at the heart of running a fund. Synaptic helps you discover status before others do and PortfolioIQ keeps your portfolio data sharp and ready for LPs. Together they're essential tools for modern fund managers.
47:33When it comes to legal you need a team that truly knows venture. Hainspoon supports LPs, TP, startups and scale-ups across the full fund life cycle. Smart managers make Hainspoon part of their stack. We have two at EUVC. Tech barbecue. Oh my god who doesn't love barbecue? Europe's startup scene meets the loudest friendliest family reunion ever at Tech BBQ. From Nordic founders to global VCs, this is where ideas catch fire and relationships get real. If you're building or backing in Europe, Tech BBQ is where you want to show up. And hey, if you've got a big fun announcement coming up, want to hit the headlines or just want to tell you a story about, do reach out to us because we'd love to help.
48:10And we've got some pillar partners to help you get in the right media places. They've held us land Bloomberg CNBC, Financial Times, Forbes, and many more for the EUVC Summit. And we'd love to do the same for you.
From the publisher
If you’re in B2B SaaS, you probably feel it already: the old way of “just hire more SDRs and send more emails” is broken.
Everyone has the same tooling. Everyone is running the same sequences. Everyone is “personalising at scale” with the same prompts. Yet pipeline quality is down, efficiency is under scrutiny, and suddenly… go-to-market (GTM) design has become a first-class strategic problem.
Few people are better positioned to talk about this shift than Harrison Rose.
Harrison co-founded Paddle, helped turn it into one of the UK’s fastest-growing software companies, and has now raised a $13M Series A (led by Notion Capital, with participation from Robin Capital, Inovia, Salicap, Common Magic, Andrena and more) to build GoodFit – an AI-driven GTM data platform.
Here’s what’s covered:
00:47 | What GoodFit actually does — mapping your entire market and scoring every account
01:32 | Paddle origins → the first-principles GTM problem that later became GoodFit
03:31 | From internal tool to standalone company — recognizing the “product inside Paddle”
04:18 | Who buys GoodFit — why B2B tech is the first adopter (and why the market is much bigger)
06:28 | Second-time founder advantage — credibility, networks, and selling before the product exists
08:29 | Choosing investors — why Notion, avoiding echo chambers, and constructing a syndicate
13:24 | Bootstrapping for four years — optionality, profitability curiosity, and knowing when VC is the right path
18:34 | AI’s real impact on go-to-market — why most teams are just automating bad outreach
22:25 | The GoodFit vision — deciding who to sell to, why, and how (and leaving execution to others)
35:34 | Leaving Paddle — identity, founder evolution, and learning to lead differently the second time around
46:40 | Giving back — why Harrison opens his inbox for “weird, gnarly, unsaid” founder questions




